Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AGORA ATHENIAN
RESULTS OF EXCAVATIONS BY STUDIES AT ATHENS
OF CLASSICAL
VOLUMEXXVI
THE
GREEK
BY
COINS
JOHN H. KROLL
with contributionsby ALAN S. WALKER
THE AMERICAN
SCHOOL
OF CLASSICAL
STUDIES
AT ATHENS
PRINCETON,
Data Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Pliiciation Kroll,John H., 1938The Greek Coins / byJohn H. Kroll; with contributionsby Alan S. Walker. cm. - (AthenianAgora; v. 26) p. referencesand index. Includesbibliographical ISBN 0-87661-226-5 1. Coins, Greek-Greece-Athens. 2. Coins, Greek. 3. Agora (Athens, Greece) 4. Athens (Greece)-Antiquities. Alan S. II. Title. III. Series I. Walker, DF287.A23A5 vol. 26 93-33146 [CJ459.A8] CIP 737.4938'5-dc20
To
THE MEMORY OF
MARGARET THOMPSON
PREFACE
VolumesII and IX, MargaretThompson'sCoinsfrom the FOLLOWING UPON TheAthenian Agora, Period Roman the (1954), and George Miles' TheIslamicCoins(1962), the present through Venetian Athenian Results Excavations series. volumebringsto a conclusionthe publicationof coins in The of Agora, Publicationof the Greek coins was initiallyentrustedto Josephine P. Shear; but after writing three articlesin the 1930's she was unableto makefurtherheadway,and the projectlapsedfor preparatory severaldecades. With the resumptionof large-scaleexcavationsin the Agora in 1970, responsibility for the Greek material was reassignedto me, excavationnumismatistfrom 1970 through 1973. I in turn enlisted the assistanceof my two successorsat the Agora, FredKleiner and Alan Walker. Our first task was to establish a reliable frameworkfor the chronology of Athenian bronze coinage, to which all but 13 percent of the Agora Greek coins belong. My initial papers focused on Athenian bronze coinage of the Roman period and of the 4th and early 3rd centuriesB.C. Kleiner, who elected not to participate in the final publication, devoted a series of articles to the bronze coinage of the 2nd and early st centuriesB.C. Walkerspecializedin the Athenian imperialbronze coins from the Agora, making them the subject of his 1980 Ph.D. dissertation.For this project he went through the entire inventoryof over 3,400 Athenian imperialbronzes to verify or correct the to identifications that had been made at the time of discovery, obtain weights,and to look for "runs" or groups of coins that had been found together but had not been recorded in the list of Agora deposits,which had been compiledprimarilyfor the studyof ceramicmaterial.In 1981 I was able to devote eleven months to reexaminingthe remaining 13,000 Greek coins in the same way. Tedious and time-consumingas this was, it provedhighlyinformativeand has been more thanjustifiedby the accuracyand controlmade possible.Insteadof workingfrom the old inventorycardsthat go back to the year of discovery of each coin (as MargaretThompson was obliged to do in the preparation of Agora our catalogue has been compiled directlyfrom the coins. In the summer of 1990 we II), added the severaldozen Greek coins unearthedsince 1981. Alan Walker'scontributionsto this volume are substantial.He wrote the catalogue of Athenian imperial coins in Chapter III and the core of the numismaticand chronologicalcommentary in the introductory in part of that chapter.He suggestedmany helpfulimprovements draftsof the other and he is responsiblefor identifyingmany of the difficultnon-Atheniancoins that earlier chapters, Agora numismatistshad found intractable;these include nearly all coins cataloguedin ChapterIV bearing excavationinventorynumberssuffixedwith the letter "a". A number of persons and institutionshave generouslyassistedthis project.We wish particularly to thank the former and present Directors of the Agora Excavations,Homer A. Thompson and T. Leslie Shear,Jr., for their encouragementand interest.We have been fortunatein being able to drawon the expertiseof many other colleaguesand friendsat the Agora and elsewhere,among them Virginia R. Grace, G. Roger Edwards, Susan I. Rotroff, John McK. Camp, Rhys F Townsend, Kevin Clinton,Judith Binder, Ursula Knigge, ChristianHabicht, Orestes Zervos, and Theodore Buttrey deserve special acknowledgment.Basil C. Demetriades was always eager to discuss the problemspresented by Athenian bronzes and did us the invaluableservice of making availablehis
1 "The Coins of Athens," Hesperia 1933, pp. 231-278; 1936, 2, pp. 123-150; and "AthenianImperial Coinage," 5, 1936, pp. 285-332. Hesperia
viii
PREFACE
electronic scale for weighing. Members of the permanent Agora staff, secretariesMargo Camp Alice Paterakis and OlympiaTheophanopoulou,and photographer andJan Diamant, conservators Craig Mauzy, cheerfullysaw to the coordination,production, and photography of the hundreds of castsorderedfor illustration. CathyCollins,GretaHam, and TraceyRockettprovidedstillfurther assistancewith the casts and the assemblyof the plates. Richard Anderson, architectof the Agora Excavations,prepared the two site plans, of which one is entirely new, that appear on Plates 35 and 36. We would also like to thank our many numismaticcolleagues who took time from their visits to the Agora to go through our unidentifiedmaterial. Finally,the volume owes a great deal to the staff members of the American School PublicationsOffice. Their devoted and thoughtful editing,checking,and productionhave made this a much better book. For the resourcesthat enabled me to develop and begin writing up my part of the material,I am indebted to fellowshipsgranted by the National Endowment for the Humanities in 1981, by the American Council of Learned Societies and the Institutefor Advanced Study in 1985/1986, and by the University Research Institute of the Universityof Texas at Austin on both occasions. Over the years the UniversityResearchInstitutehelped defray many lesser expenditures,and the hospitalityof the Institutefor Advanced Study made it possible in more recent summersto return and workin its pleasantenvironmentin Princeton. Austin,Texas August 20, 1993
TABLEOF CONTENTS
PREFACE ..................................................... VI
LIST OF PLATES................................................................. ............................................... AND BIBLIOGRAPHY ABBREVIATIONS SELECTED OF CONSPECTUS COINS.....x...................................... . INTRODUCTION. ....1... .......... ............ ....... ...... . ...... . ... . ............ . ..... .......
X Xi xvii 1
I. ATENIANSILVERCOS ...............................................................
24 113
166
(withAlan Walker)
............................................................ IV NON-ATHENIANCOINS
APPENDICES
...
................ ..
291
. 292
297
I. PeriodI Chronology.................
...........................................
........
320
322 324
II. Structure of the Period II Coinage ...................................... . .. ............................. III. Late Period II and Period III Varieties.....
IV PeriodIV AE 1 Varieties........................................................ V PeriodIV Fractions.............................................. ........... VI. Three EarlyPeriodIVA Deposits ................ ......................... VII. HypotheticalDevelopment of the Athenian Bronze DenominationalSystems and Comparisonwith the Roman System ....................................... VIII. Athenian ImperialDenominations............................................. IX. Totals of Athenian ImperialDies ...............................................
CONCORDANCES
..................
. o.... ........................
LIST OF PLATES
1. Athenian Silver,6th and 5th CenturiesB.C. (1-12d) 2. Athenian Silver,5th and 4th CenturiesB.C. (12e-18) 3. Athenian Silver,4th to 2nd CenturyB.c.;Bronze (19-37) 4. Athenian Bronze,4th CenturyB.C. (38d-46c) 5. Athenian Bronze, 4th and 3rd CenturiesB.C. (46d-54f) 6. Athenian Bronze, 3rd CenturyB.C. (55a-67b) 7. Athenian Bronze, 3rd CenturyB.C. (67c-75f) 8. Athenian Bronze, 2nd CenturyB.C. (76a-86d) 9. Athenian Bronze, 2nd and Early 1st CenturiesB.C. (87a-99e) 10. Athenian Bronze, 2nd and Early 1st CenturiesB.C. (99f-114a) 11. Athenian Bronze, 1st CenturyB.C. (115a-126e) 12. Athenian Bronze, 1st CenturyB.c. (127a-138g) 13. Athenian Bronze, 1st CenturyB.C. (139a-148) 14. Athenian Bronze, 1st CenturyB.C. (149a-156d) 15. Athenian Bronze, 1st CenturyB.C. and 2nd CenturyafterChrist(157a-167c) 16. Athenian Bronze, 2nd Centuryafter Christ(169a-197e) 17. Athenian Bronze, 2nd CenturyafterChrist(198-247a) 18. Athenian Bronze, 2nd CenturyafterChrist(248a-278a) 19. Athenian Bronze, 2nd and 3rd Centuriesafter Christ(279a-307a) 20. Athenian Bronze, 3rd CenturyafterChrist(308-36 la) 21. Athenian Bronze, 3rd CenturyafterChrist(362-401b) 22. Athenian Bronze, 3rd CenturyafterChrist.Italy,Sicily,Thrace (401c-449) 23. Thrace, Macedonia (452a-504b) 24. Macedonia, Thessaly,Epeiros(505-57 la) 25. Epeirosto Phokis,Boiotia, Euboia (572-624) 26. Euboia, Salamis,Megarid (625-657) 27. Aigina, Corinth (658a-717) 28. Peloponnesos(718-812b) 29. Crete, Cyclades,Pontosto Aiolis (817-898) 30. Aiolis, Ionia, Karia (900-966) 31. Lydia toJudea, PersianEmpire,Egypt to Numidia (969a-1035) 32. Modern Imitations.Coin Blanks 33. Coin Blanksand Rejects 34. Coins from the Libraryof PantainosNorth Stoa 35. Plan of the AthenianAgora, ca. 100 B.C.,with Sectionsof ExcavationIndicated 36. Plan of the AthenianAgora, 2nd CenturyafterChrist
xii
and and in the Carradice= I. Carradice,ed., Coinage Administration Athenian Persian (BARInternationalSeries 343), Empires Oxford 1987 Le sacr6 d'leusis Cavaignac= E. Cavaignac,"Lesmonnaies d'tleusis," RN, ser. 4, 12, 1908, pp. 311-333 (= idem, trisor 404, Versailles1908) jusqu'en dans Tournai 1957 des Cerfauxand Tondriau= L. CerfauxandJ. Tondriau,Leculte souverains la ciilisaionsgrco-romaines, Clinton 1989a = K. Clinton, "The EleusinianMysteries: Roman Initiatesand Benefactors,Second Century B.C. to A.D. 267," ANRW2.18.2, 1989, pp. 1499-1539 Contributionto the Renaissanceof Eleusis,"in Greek Clinton 1989b = K. Clinton, "Hadrian's Renaissance, 56-68 pp. = K. Clinton, The Sacred the Elesinian Mystries (Transactionsof the American Clinton, Sacred of Officials Officials PhilosophicalSociety,ser. 2, 64, 3), Philadelphia1973 A in Relion III, i, Cambridge 1940 Cook, Zeus= A. B. Cook, Zeus, Study Ancient = SNG,The Royal Collection of Coins and Medals, Danish National Museum, Copenhagen 1942-1979 Cop Conductedthe School ClasicalStudies VI Results Corinth = K. A. Edwards,Corinth, VI, atAtzens, Coins by American of ofExcavations Mass. 1933 1896-1929, Cambridge, the and Republic: Economy, Crawford, CMRR= M. H. Crawford, Coinage Moneyunder Roman Italyand theMediterranean 1985 Berkeley/LosAngeles London 1974 Republican Coinage, Crawford,RRC= M. H. Crawford,Roman = The Coinage theRoman World theLateRepublic in CRWLR (BARInternationalSeries 326), A. M. Burnett and M. H. of Crawford,eds., Oxford 1987 A. DilosXXVII = P.Bruneau,C. Vatin,V Bezerrade Meneses, G. Donnay,E. Lkvy, Bovon, G. Siebert,V R. Grace, M. de des de E. (xploration archiologique Sawatianou-Petropoulakou, LydingWill, and T. Hackens,L'Etlot laMaison ComMdienes Dlos XXVII), Paris 1970 EABC = J. H. Kroll, "A Chronology of Early Athenian Bronze Coinage ca. 350-250 B.C.," in Essays Thompson, pp. 139-154 = and Carson Knneth Jekins, M. Price, A. Burnett, and R. Bland, eds., of EssaysCarson-Jenins Essaysin Honour Robert London 1993 = C. PresentedStanley to in Robinson Essays Greek Coinage Robinson, M. Kraay and G. K.Jenkins, eds., Oxford 1968 Essays 0. = Greek and Numismatics Archaeology: Essaysin Honorof Margaret EssaysThompson Thompson, M0rkholm and N. M. Wetteren 1979 Waggoner,eds., des du FdDIII, ii = M. G. Colin, Inscriptions Trisor Athnins (Fbuis deDelphes ii), Paris 1909-1913 III, = W. S. Ferguson,Hellnistic London 1911 Athens, Ferguson Fox 1890 = H. B. Earle Fox, "Note sur quelquesmonnaiesattiques,"RN, ser.3, 8, 1908, pp. 58-64 avant Basel 1978 au en monitaire Grace II siecle et Giovannini= A. Giovannini,Rome la circulation Jesus-Christ, Grace 1985 = V R. Grace, "The Middle Stoa Dated by AmphoraStamps,"Hesperia 1985, pp. 1-54 54, Grandjean = C. Grandjean, "Le monnayage d'argent et de bronze d'Hermione (Argolide),"RN, ser. 6, 32, 1990, pp. 28-55 British MuseumClassical in Renaissance theRoman Greek Reaissance= The Greek from the Tenth Colloquium Fmpire:Papers (Universityof London Institute for Classical Studies, Bulletin Supplement 55), S. Walker and A. Cameron, eds., London 1989 Griffith= G. T. Griffith,TheMercenariestheHelnistic World, Cambridge 1935 of der Die Grunauer= S. Grunauer-von (AMUGS Berlin 1978 Hoerschelmnann, Mnzpr4gung Lakedaimonier 7), Habicht 1976 = C. Habicht, "ZurGeschichteAthens in der Zeit MithradatesVI," Chiron 1976, pp. 127-142 6, des der Habicht 1991 = C. Habicht, "Zu den Miinzmagistraten Silberpragung Neuen Stils,"Chiron 1991, pp. 1-23 21, = in Athens helnistischer (Hypomnemata G6ttingen 1982 Studien C. Habicht, Studien Geschichte zur Zeit 73), Habicht, v. = C. im Geschichte Athens 3. Jahrhundert Chr (Vestigia 30), Habicht, Untersuchungen Habicht, Untersuchungen zurpolitischen Munich 1979 Hackens, T 1969. "La circulationmontaire dans la Beotie hellenistique: Tr6sorsde Thebes 1935 et 1965," BCH 93, 1969, pp. 701-729 in Coins Civic and Politics theRoman East,A.D. 180-275, Berkeley/LosAngeles/London 1987 Harl = K. W. Harl, Civic Head 1881 = B. V Head, "On the ChronologicalSequence of the Coins of Boiotia,"NC, ser. 3, 1, 1881, pp. 177-275 HN2 = B. V Head, Historia Numrwn,2nd ed., Oxford 1911 = M. Hoff, 'The EarlyHistoryof the Roman Agora at Athens,"in Greek Hoff 1989 Renaissance, 1-8 pp. = R.J. Hopper, "Observations the Wappenmizen," Essays in on Robinson, 16-39 pp. Hopper London 1985 Countermarks, Imperial Howgego = C.J. Howgego, Greek
Xlll
= Coins theHunteianCollection in Hunter G. Macdonald, Catalogue Greek I-III, Glasgow 1899-1905 of IG I3 = Inscriptiones Attica Ficlidisanno 3rd antriores, ed., fasc. 1, ed. D. Lewis, Berlin 1981 Atticae IG II2 = Inscriptiones Filidis anno II-II, Editio minor, ed.J. Kirchner,Berlin 1913-1940 posteriores, IG V = Inscriptiones ed. Laconiae, Messeniae, Arcadiae, E Hiller von Gaertringen,Berlin 1923 et Berlin 1892 IG VII = Inscriptiones ed. Megaridis Boeotiae, W. Dittenberger, IG IX.ii = Inscriptiones ed. Thessaliae, 0. Kern, Berlin 1908 Coin M. IGCH= AnInventoty Greek Hoards, Thompson, 0. M0rkholm,and C. M. Kraay,eds., New York 1973 of Kleiner 1973 = F S. Kleiner, "The 1926 PiraeusHoard and Athenian Bronze Coinage ca. 86 B.C.," AeXt 28, 1973, A' [1975], pp. 169-186 Kleiner 1975 = E S. Kleiner, "The EarliestAthenian New Style Bronze Coins: Some Evidence from the Athenian 44, Agora,"Hesperia 1975, pp. 302-330 Kleiner 1976 = F S. Kleiner,"The Agora Excavationsand Athenian BronzeCoinage, 200-86 B.C.," Hesperia 1976, 45, pp. 1-40 Kleiner,AM 20 = F S. Kleiner,"Some UnpublishedAthenian Bronze Coins,"ANSMV20, 1975, pp. 1-5 von in r5mischen Klose = D. A. 0. Klose, DieMiinpragung Smyrna der Kaiserzeit (AMUGS10), Berlin 1987 ACGC= C. M. Kraay,Archaic Classical and Greek Coins, Kraay, Berkeley/LosAngeles 1976 = C. M. Kraay,Coins Athens (MinervaNumismaticHandbook 2), Newcastle upon Tyne 1968 ofAncient Kraay,Athens Kroll 1972 =J. H. Kroll, "Two Hoards of First-CenturyB.C. Athenian Bronze Coins," AeXt 27, 1972, A' [1973], pp. 86-120 Kroll 1973 = J. H. Kroll, "The Eleusis Hoard of Athenian Imperial Coins and Some Deposits from the Athenian 42, Agora,"Hesperia 1973, pp. 312-333 Kroll 1976 =J. H. Kroll, "Aristophanes' Inov)p& XaXxta:A Reply,"GRBS17, 1976, pp. 329-341 Kroll 1977 =J. H. Kroll, "Some Athenian Armor Tokens,"Hesperia 1977, pp. 141-146 46, Kroll 1981a = J. H. Kroll, "Evidence for Identifyingthe Denominations of Hellenistic Athenian Bronze Coinage" (lecture,San Francisco1981), abstractin AJA86, 1982, p. 273 to Kroll 1981b =J. H. Kroll, "FromWappenmuinzen Gorgoneiato Owls,"AVNSMN 1981, pp. 1-32 26, Kroll 1982 = J. H. Kroll, "Nailing Down the Archaeological Chronology of Early Hellenistic Athens" (ecture, Philadelphia 1982), abstractin AJA87, 1983, pp. 241-242 Lacroix = L. Lacroix, Lesreproductions de statues lesmonnaies sur La et archatiue classique grecques: statuaire (Biblioth6quede la Facultede Philosophieet Lettresde l'Universitede Liege, fasc. CXVI), Liege 1949 Berlin 1952 Leigle =J. Leigle, DerZeusdesPhidias, LIMC= Lexicon Classicae Zurich/Munich 1981-1990 I-V, Mythologiae Iconographicum new LS1 = H. G. Liddell, R. Scott, H. S.Jones, A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th ed., Oxford 1940 1969 = H. B. Mattingly,Review ofM. Thompson, TheAgrinion Hoard, NC, ser.6, 1969, pp. 325-333 Mattingly 1979 = H. B. Mattingly,"L.JuliusCaesar,Governorof Macedonia," Chiron 1979, pp. 147-167 9, Mattingly 150, Mattingly 1990 = H. B. Mattingly,"The Beginningof the New Style SilverCoinage,"NJVC 1990, pp. 67-78 Mavrogordato 1916 = J. Mavrogordato,"AChronologicalArrangementof the Coins of Chios, Part III," NC, ser. 4, 16, 1916, pp. 281-355 ser. Mavrogordato1917 =J. Mavrogordato,"-, PartIV,"JNC, 4, 17, 1917, pp. 206-256 Mavrogordato1918 =J. Mavrogordato,"-, PartV" NC, ser.4, 18, 1918, pp. 1-79 Collection Greek McCkan= S. W. Grose, Catalogue theMcClean FitwilliamMuseum, Coins, of of Cambridge 1923-1929 Meshorer = Y Meshorer,Ancient Dix JewishCoins, Hills, NJ. 1982 Millar 1969 = F. Millar,"P.HerenniusDexippus: The GreekWorldand the Third-CenturyInvasions," JRS 59, 1969, pp. 12-29 Milne 1923 =J. G. Milne, "The AutonomousCoinage of Smyrna,"section I, NJVC, 5, 3, 1923, pp. 1-30 ser. Milne 1927 =J. G. Milne, "-," section II, NC, ser.5, 7, 1927, pp. 1-107 Milne 1928 =J. G. Milne, "-," section III,NC, ser.5, 8, 1928, pp. 131-171 Milne 1933 =J. G. Milne, Ashmolean Museum Oxford 1933 Catalogue Coins, ofAlexandrian K. II = T. V Buttrey, T. Erim, T. D. Groves,and R. R. Holloway,TheCoins Morgantina (MorgantinaStudiesII), Princeton 1989 M0rkholm 1984 = O. Morkholm,"The Chronologyof the New Style Coinage of Athens,"ANSMN29, 1984, pp. 29-42 Hellenistic theAccession to M0rkholm,EHC= 0. M0rkholm,Early Coinagefrom ofAlexander thePeace (336-188 B.C.), ofApamea P. Griersonand U. Westermark, eds., Cambridge 1991 and Princeton 1961 Mysteries, Mylonas = G. E. Mylonas, Eleusis theEleusinian
xiv
Ancient Coins Lost Art: NCP = F W. Imhoof-Blumerand P. Gardner, Illustrating MasterpiecesGreek A Nwnismatic Commentary of new onPausanias, enlargeded. with introduction,commentary,and notes by A. N. Oikonomides,Chicago 1964 Newell = E. T. Newell, TheCoinages London 1927 Poliorcetes, ofDemetrius = Siler Coinage NewStyle M. Thompson, TheNew Style ofAthens (NumimaicStudies New York1961 10), = Ancient Coins Greco-Roman ]Vckle World: W. The]ickleNumimatic Papers, Heckel and R. Sullivan,eds., Waterloo, ofthe Papers Ontario 1984 Nicolet-Pierreand Kroll = H. Nicolet-PierreandJ. H. Kroll, 'Athenian TetradrachmCoinage of the Third Century ser. B.C.,"AmericanJournal ofNumismatics, 2, 2, 1990, pp. 1-35 NNM = Numismatic andMonographs Notes Coin Noe = S. P.Noe, A BibliographyGreek Hoards, ed., New York 1937 2nd of Oeconomides-Caramessini1976 = M. Oeconomides-Caramessini,"The 1973 Peiraeus Hoard of Athenian Bronze Coins,"AAA9, 1976, pp. 220-223
Oikonomidou = M. Karamesini-Oikonomidou, H NotilaOaTxOX7tCa -Ti NIxonoXiCos, Athens 1975
Olynthus = D. M. Robinson, Excavations Olynthus, TheCoins III at at Found Olynthus 1928, Baltimore 1931 in III, VI = D. M. Robinson,Excavations Olynthus, TheCoins at in Found Olynthus 1931, Baltimore 1933 at VI, Olyntus IX = D. M. Robinson and P. A. Clement, Excavations Olynthus, 77heChalcidic andtheExcavation at Mint Coins IX, Olynthus Found 1928-1934, Baltimore 1938 in XIV at and Found 1934 and1938, Baltimore in XIV, Olynthus = D. M. Robinson,Excavations Olynthus, Terracottas, Lamps, Coins 1952 Osborne = M.J. Osborne, "Kallias,Phaidrosand the Revoltof Athens in 287 B.C.," ZPE 35, 1979, pp. 181-194 = in W. ofNany M. Waggoner, E. Metcalf,ed., New York 1991 WaggonerMnemata: Papers Memory Papers = O. Picard, "Monnaies,"in L'Antre II Picard,Antre Corycien (BCH Supplement9), Paris 1984, pp. 281-306 = de etd'histoire et Eubeenne: Atude numismatique Picard, Chalcis O. Picard, Chalcis la Confedration (IVe-Ier sicle), Paris 1979 = B. Pick, "Die 'Promachos'des Pheidiasund die KerameikosLampen,"AM 56, 1931, pp. 59-74 Pick 1931 the Supplement 7), Cambridge,Mass. PnyxI = G. R. Davidson and D. B. Thompson, SmallObjectsfrom PnyxI (Hesperia 1943 Price 1964 = M. J. Price, "The New-Style Coinage of Athens: Some Evidence from the Bronze Issues," JVC,ser. 7, 27-36 4,1964, pp. Price 1967 = M.J. Price, "Coins from Some Deposits in the South Stoa at Corinth,"Hesperia 1967, pp. 348-388 36, Price 1989 = M.J. Price, "The Larissa, 1968 Hoard (IGCH237)," in Kraay-Merkholm Essays,G. Le Rider, K. Jenkins, N. Waggoner,and U. Westermark, eds., Louvain-la-Neuve1989, pp. 233-243 at Price 1991 = M.J. Price, "Circulation Babylonin 323 B.C.," in Papers Waggoner, 63-72 pp. Price 1993 = M.J. Price, "Morefrom Memphis and the Syria 1989 Hoard,"in EssaysCarson-Jenkins, 31-35 pp. = Price, CRWLR M.J. Price, "SouthernGreece,"in CRWLR, 95-103 pp. and Cities: Architecture Ancient onthe Coins Greece, andPalestine, Rome Priceand Trell = M.J. Price and B. L. Trell, Coins Their of London 1977 Berne Berne, 1979, of ofthe CongressNumismatics, September T. Hackensand R. Weiller, Proceedings = Proceedings 9thInternational eds., Louvain-la-Neuve,1982 mv Tou Kp&irouC IIToXIOatlov, Athens 1904-1908 IIroXelatcOv =J. N. Svoronos,Ta NoVloE4axa Raubitschek1946 = A. E. Raubitschek."Octavia'sDeificationat Athens,"TAPA 1946, pp. 146-150 77, RE= A. E von Pauly,Realencyclopadieclassischen der revisedby G. Wissowa,Stuttgart Neue Altertumswissenschaft,Bearbeitung, 1894-1972 Athenaion Politeia,Oxford 1981 Rhodes = P.J. Rhodes, A Commentarythe on Aristotelian RIC = Roman London 1923Coinage, Imperial Robinson and Price 1967 = E. S. G. Robinson and M. J. Price, "AnEmergencyCoinage of Timotheus,"NC, ser. 7, 7, 1967, pp. 1-6 London 1932 Coinage Thessaly, of Rogers = E. Rogers, TheCopper Rotroff 1983 = S. I. Rotroff,"Three Cistern Systemson the Kolonos Agoraios,"Hesperia 1983, pp. 257-297 52, Rotroff 1984 = S. I. Rotroff,"Spool Saltcellarsin the AthenianAgora,"Hesperia 1984, pp. 343-354 53, Paris Roussel = P. Roussel,Dilos,colonie athenienne, 1916 to Provincial RPC I = A. Burnett, M. Amandry,and P P. Ripolls, Roman I, Coinage, FromtheDeathof Caesar theDeath London/Paris 1992 Vitellius, of
XV
M7 = T. V Buttrey,A. Johnston, K. M. MacKenzie, and M. L. Bates, Greek, and Sardis Roman, IslamicCoins fromSardis (Archaeological Explorationof SardisMonograph 7), Cambridge,Mass./London 1981 Its and the Seltman = C. T. Seltman,Athens, History Coinage before PesianInvasion, Cambridge 1924 Shear 1936 =J. P. Shear, "Analytical Table of Coins,"Hesperia 1936, pp. 123-150 5, and Shear,Kallias= T. L. Shear,Jr.,Kallias Sphettos theRevolt Athns in 286 B.C. (Hesperia of of Supplement 17), Princeton 1978 Shelov = D. B. Shelov, Coinage Bosphorus VI-II Centuries (BARInternationalSeries 46), Oxford 1978 B.C. ofthe SNG= Syloge Graecorum Nummorum Starr = C. G. Starr,Athenian 480-449 B.C., Oxford 1970 Coinage Stroud 1974 = R. S. Stroud, "AnAthenian Law on SilverCoinage,"Hesperia 1974, pp. 157-188 43, Sutherland,Olcay, and Merrington = C. H. V Sutherland,N. Olcay, and K. E. Merrington, The Cistophori Augustus of (RoyalNumismatic Society Special Publications5), London 1970 Sv. =J. N. Svoronos, Lesmonnaies d'Athnes, completed by B. Pick, Munich 1923-1926. Reprintedwith translatedtext as Corpus the Coins Athens, Ancient of of Chicago 1975 7, 1904, pp. 107-142 Svoronos 1907 = I. N. Svoronos, <IIepypYacpLx6g Tou NoiLaoparlx6uMouaoeou ano 1 xarxacX6yoC npoaxTrt&cxav EeTxtc3pplou 1906 cXpt 31 Auyo6aoou 1907o, JIAN 10, 1907, pp. 177-262
Svoronos 1900 = I. N. Svoronos, <<IIept ov e:LLTrlpEov T)ov (xpXCal)v>>, II, JAN 3, 1900, pp. 319-343 part Svoronos 1904 = I. N. Svoronos, <NoLatoaTRxx6v pooalxxi>,,JIAN e6priac EXAuotvog: Noltalaxra A90Tv6vXaXx&
Avtly6vou B' tou A6Aoavoq>,JIAN 11, 1908, pp. 230-232 Svoronos 1911 = I. N. Svoronos, leIIeypcpapLx6q Tou NotLaaTLx6u Mouaetou anxo1 xaxcaX6yoq npoaxr?c&Tcov 31 Eetrctpplou 1908 .eXpL Auyou'aTou1909>, JIAN 13, 1911, pp. 37-112 Svoronos 1927 =J. N. Svoronos,"La monnaie d'or attique,"JIAN 21, 1927, pp. 147-169 II Tbnos = R. Etienne and L. Artemis-Gyselen,"L'atelier monetairede T6nos,"in R. Etienne, Tbnos lesCyclades milieu et du duIVCsiecle du av.J-.C. dumilieu IIIe sicle ap.J.-C.(Tnows Athens/Paris 1990, pp. 225-252 I), in Thompson, H. A., 1958 = H. A. Thompson, "Activities the AthenianAgora: 1957," Hesperia 1958, pp. 145-160 27, Thompson 1942 = M. Thompson, "Coinsfor the Eleusinia,"Hesperia 1942, pp. 213-229 11, ANSAN 7, 1957, pp. 1-11 Thompson 1957 = M. Thompson, "AHoard of Athenian Fractions," = Robinson M. Thompson, "The Mints of Lysimachos," Essays in Thompson, Essays Robinson, 163-182 pp. in Touratsoglou 1988 = I. Touratsoglou,Die Miinsttte vonThessaloniki derrimischen Kaiserzeit (AMUGS12), Berlin/New York 1988 = Touratsoglou,CRWLR I. Touratsoglou,"Macedonia,"in CRWLR, 53-78 pp. = Traiti E. Babelon, Traitdesmonnaiesgrecques etromaine, Paris 1907-1932 Von Aulock = SNGSammlungAulock, v. Berlin 1957-1968 Walker 1978 = A. S. Walker,"FourAE Coin Hoards in the Collection of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens,"Hesperia 1978, pp. 40-48 47, Walker1980 = A. S. Walker,"AChronologicalStudy of the GreekImperialCoinage of Athens Based on the Collection of the Agora Excavationsat Athens," 1980 Universityof Pennsylvania, Ph.D. Dissertation,Ann Arbor 1980 Walker 1982 = A. S. Walker,"Some Plated Coins from the Agora,"in Procedings Berne, 131-136 pp. Warren 1983 =J. A. W. Warren,"The AutonomousBronze Coinage of Sicyon (Part 1),"NC 143, 1983, pp. 23-56 Warren 1984 =J. A. W Warren,"- (Part2),"NJC144, 1984, pp. 1-24 Warren 1985 =J. A. W. Warren,"- (Part3),"NC 145, 1985, pp. 45-66 WSM = E. T. Newell, The Coinage the Western SelucidMints I III of Studies New fromSebucus to Antiochus (Numismatic 4), York 1941
Svoronos 1908 = I. N. Svoronos, vE6prlia ex T'c Ko: a At8o6. A6aot XVa,xxv VOaLOTiccV T OLt Botorxol un6
PERIODICALS AA = ArchiiologischerAnziger AAA= ApXaLOXoytxi Av&Xexrae A9Ov6v = Amican Journal AJA ofArchaeology AJAH= American Journal Ancient of History AJP = Ameican Journal Philology of
XVi
AM = Mitteungen deutscen des Abteilung Instits, Athenische archiiologischen = American Museum ANSMN Notes Numimatic Socie.t de BCH = Bulletin correspondance hellhnique at School Athens BSA= Annual theBritish of Hoards CH = Coin = AeXtc ApXXLOXOYLX6V AXt'clo ApXacokoylx/ EPApX = EnprAcplk Studies Roman Byzantine and GRBS= Greek, JHS = Journal HelenicStudies of = internatonal numismatique L4ANJournal d'archiologie und Numismatik Geldgschichte JNG = Jahrbuchfiir Studies JRS = Joural ofRoman Chronicle NC = NAumimatic Zeitschift NZ = Numismati,che de RBN= Reue beige NuismatiqueetdeS'illographie REG= Reu desiudesgrecques RN = Raue numismatique for SAN= Journal theSocie_ Ancient Numimartics of Rundschau SNR= Schwieische numismatische = TAPA Transactionsthe Association of American Philological undEpigraphik Papyrologie ZPE = Zeitschitfifir are The followingabbreviations used in this volume: AE = bronze AR = silver AV = gold bill. = billon cmk. = countermark cuir.= cuirassed diad. = diademed dr. = draped EL = electrum ex. = exergue 1.= left laur.= laureate obv. = obverse r. = right rad. = radiate rev.= reverse stg. = standing
CONSPECTUS OF COINS
CONSPECTUS OF COINS
Occasional discrepancies between regional totals and the numbers of coins listed beneath by city or ruler and by century ar followed by a +. The + indicates an uncertain number of additional coins that have been catalogued in brackets as being not
Centuries
B.C.
Centurie
6th ITALY-SICILY (15) CisalpineCelts (1) Brundisium(1) Kroton (1) Rhegion (1) Akragas(1) Gela (1) Mamertinoi(2) Syracuse(4) Siculo-Punic(3) CRIMEA and THRACE (134) (5) Pantikapaion Olbia (1) IstrianonLimen (2) Abdera (1) Apollonia Pontica(1) Byzantion(1) Deultum (1) Maroneia(6) Mesembria(3) Pautalia(1) Perinthos(2) Philippopolis(1) AugustaTraiana(1)
5th
4th
3rd
2nd
1st
1st
2nd
1 1 1 1
1 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 1
1
1 3
Coela (1) Sestos (2) Imbros (3) Lemnos:Hephaistia (7+) Myrina (54+) Samothrace(4) Thasos (3) Kings Lysimachos(5) RhoimetalkesI (1) MACEDONIA (304) Akanthos(1) Amphipolis(2) Aphytis (1) Bottiaia (1) Dion (1) Olynthos (1) Ouranopolis(2)2 Pella (1) Philippoi(4)1 Skione (1) Thessalonike(8) Kings Philip II (6) Alexanderm (26) Philip m (2) Anonymous (10) Kassandros(18+) Demetrios Poliorketes (23) Antigonos Gonatas (184+) Philip V (4) ?Perseus(1) Macedonian League (3)3 THESSALY (72) Ainianes (3) Atrax (1) 3 4+ 41+ 3 2AR &2 1AR
3 13 4
2 1
Centur
6th Gomphoi (1) Gyrton(4) Halos (1)1 Krannon (2) Lamia (2) Larissa(5)5 LarissaKremaste (1) Magnetes(7) Orthe (1) Phalanna(4) Pharsalos(5) ThessalianLeague (33) Peparethos(2)1 NORTHWEST GREECE (61) Dyrrhacion (6)6 Skodra(1) Nikopolis(11) EpeiroteLeague (3) Korkyra(16) Leukas(2) Medon (1) Thyrreion(1) AitolianLeague (20) CENTRAL GREECE (475) LokrianLeague (46) PhokianLeague (24) Delphi (3) Boiotian League (175) Orchomenos(1)
5th
4th 1 4 2 2
3rd
2nd
1st
1st
2nd
6 1 4 5 26 1 2 3
4 3 4 1 2 1 1 4 22 2 22 3 33+ 128 8+ 12 20 4 4 1
Tanagra(9) Thebes (9) Thespiai (14) EuboianLeague (36) Chalkis(112) Eretria(4) Histiaia(37) Karystos(5) ATHENS (14,360+) Athenian (13,749+) Eleusinian(611) SALAMIS-AIGINA(456) Salamis(99) Megara (333) Pagai (1) Aigina (23) PELOPONNESOS (354) Corinth(137) Phlious(6) Sikyon(75) Aigion (3) Boura(1) Patrai(1) Pellene(6) Tenea (1) Achaian League (9) 3AR 2AR
10AR
59AR
2AR &2750+
2284
13
14 IAR 6 2 57 16
3 19 39 11 4 2 4 1 1 44 2 1? 2 8
Centuri
6th Mothone (1)1 Thouria (2)1 Lakedaimon(18)1 Kythera(1)1 Argos(13) Epidauros(10) Hermione (6) Kleonai (3) Methana (1) Troizen (2)1 ArkadianLeague (3) Heraia (2) Kleitor (1) Mantineia(3) Megalopolis(1)1 Orchomenos(1) Pheneos (2)1 Tegea (10) CRETE and ISLANDS (67) Aptera (1) Arsinoe (1) Knossos (2) Roman provinceof Crete (1) Andros(1) Delos (17) Keos League (8) Karthaia(4) Koressia(3) oulis (3) Kythnos(2) Melo (2) Paros(1) Siphnos (1)
5th
4th
3rd
2nd
1st
1st
2nd
14
3 9 5 2
8 1 1
3 2 1 3 1 7
1
1 1 1
11
16 8 4 3 3 2
2 1
1 "AR"
3 3 4
1 EL
1 9 2
2 1
31 1 1 2 3 3 12 1 1 1 2
Centuri
6th Metropolis(1) Miletos (5) Phokaia (1) Smyrna (11) Teos (1) Chios (22) Samos (6) Knidos (4) Myasa (1) Mydnos (1) Kos (4) Rhodes (14)
5th
4th
3rd
2nd
1st
1
1st
2nd
4 1 3 5 1 1 1
1 2
2AR&5
4 2AR &4 1
1
Hermokapelia(1) Sardis(3) Tripolis(2) Akmoneia(1) Apamcia (1) Laodikia (1) Synnada (2) LycianLeague (3) Patara(1) Attaleia(1) Nrge (1) Side (5) Sillyon(1) PisidianAntioch (1) Selge (1)
2
3
1
1
4 1 1 1
Seleukiaon the Kalykadnos(1) Soloi-Pompeiopolis(2) Syedra(1) Tarsos(1) King Amyntas (1) SYRIA-PERSIA(18) Kings Seleukos II (1) Antiochos II (1)1 Seleukos IV (1)1 Alexander I Balas (1)1 Antiochos VII (1) Antioch on the Orontes (3) Judea (9) PersianEmpire (1) EGYPT-NUMIDIA (52) Kings Ptolemy II (3+) Ptolemy 1m(5+) Ptolemy IV (1+) Ptolemy VI & VII (3) Ptolemy VI (2) Ptolemy VIII (3) Ptolemy IX (2)2 Ptolemy XI (4) Ptolemy XII (1) Kleopatra VII (1) Alexandria(11)1 Cyrene (1) Ptolemaic Cyrenaica(1) Roman province of Cyrenaica and Crete (2)2 KingJuba I (1) 1AV
1 1 1 1 7 1
3+ 5+ 1+ 3 1AR &1 3 4
7 1 1
1AR
Centuri
5th
4th
3rd
2nd
1st
1st
2nd
3 1 3 11 67 8
3 469+ 3 2699+
5 85 9 85 22AR
&24
3 65 3 2349 35AR
&245
1 Agra 1I,nos. 1-550, to which are added the 98 Roman coins to A.D. 267 from the 1950 through 1990 excavations.The Roman coins are overwh includea few pieces from mints in Greece, Asia Minor,Spain, and Lyons, and a small proportionof the coins from t althoughthe totalsofthe 1stcentury B.C. from such imperialmints as those at Antioch, Milan, Lyons, and Asia Minor. 2 NN-2014, an extremelywornJanus/Prow as (33 mm., 18.24 g.) that was excavatedbefore 1949 but inexplicablyomitted from Agora II. 3 To Agora add a denarius of L Farsuleius Mensor (E-2432 = GRC,fig. 26) and a plated Venus/Aeneas denarius ofJulius Caesar (K-1646), both e II, bronzes (both found before 1949) of the 90's or 80's B.C.: 00-527, a heavily worn Janus/Prow as (26 mm., 7.44 g); and 00-27, a Herakles/Prow q threefurther"FleetPraefect"bronzesofAntony (asAgora no. 13: Capito, RC I, 1470),for a currentAgora total offive (K-1587, 00-1249, IIO-879, E-62 I,
IN'I'RODUCTION
CATALOGUED HEREIN are the 16,557+ identifiableGreek coins produced by the Agora
excavationsbetween 1931 and 1990. The total includesmore than a thousandextremelyworn coins that, while not identifiableby actual variety,can neverthelessbe attributedto certain large Athenian series;but it excludeswell overfourthousandother damagedor totallyworn pieces that by size and fabric can be identifiedonly as 4th-centuryor Hellenistic "Greek",if these pieces happen to be availablefor reexaminationat all, since many had been weeded out from storage and were discardedin the late 1940's. As can be readily calculatedfrom the catalogue summarypresented on pages xvii-xxvi, all but one-tenth of 1 percent of the identifiablecoins are bronze. Eighty-seven percent are Athenian. Because of the dominance of the Athenianbronze,one of our majorgoals is to presenta reliable surveyof this coinage insofaras the limitationsof excavationspecimensallow.The limitationsmust be stressed,for a conventionalstudy of the coinage would rely far more heavilyon museum-quality specimensfrom outside the excavationsthan on the coins that we are publishinghere. Fortunately, the bronze coinage of Athens has alreadybeen well illustratedin the folio plates of . N. Svoronos' d'Athnes. 1923 Lesmonnaies with Despite its obsolete organizationand chronology,thisworkillustrates first-rateexamplesfrom Europeancollectionsvirtuallyall the Athenian bronze varieties,and in the case of the Athenianimperialbronzeof the 2nd and 3rdcenturiesafterChrist,a veryhigh percentage of the obverse and reversedies. Since this workwas reprintedin 1975 in a new, convenientformat and is now widely available,we have not hesitated to refer to it constantly.So fully do Svoronos' that many readerswill want to keep an open copy of plates complement our text and illustrations Svoronosclose at hand. In comparison with museum or hoard specimens, it is in the area of absolute metrology that the Agora specimens are most deficient.Most are worn to some degree;almost ll were found in a at heavilycorrodedstate;and this wear and corrosion,togetherwith the heavy chemical or electrolytic cleaningused to removethe corrosionfor identification,are responsiblefor an inevitableloss of some originalsurfacemetal and weight. As can be calculatedfromTablesIII and IV (pp. 324-327 below), which compare the averageweightsof Agora and nonexcavationhoard specimensof certainbronze issues, the weight loss of the Agora excavationcoins is generallyin the area of 8 to 14 percent for largerbronze coins with diametersof ca. 18-20 mm., althoughthere are some issuesin which thereis less or no detectable differential.The differentialdeclines as diametersbecome smaller.We have neverthelessrecorded the weights and weight averagesof the better-preserved Agora bronze coins for their value as relative since even approximateweights can be more informativethan indicators, linear measurementsof diameterfor comparingindividualissues and sometimesfor distinguishing denominationalrelationships. The frequentlywide variationin weightbetween coins of a given issue arises from the fact that the blankswere cast or cut with much less individual attention than was expended on the blanksof precious-metalcoinages.1But this phenomenon has been observedalso in Roman bronze coinage, which is knownto have been struckat so many pieces to a given weight of
1 For the coin blanks of the 1st century B.C. and the 3rd century after Christ excavated from mints in the Agora, see Appendix B with Plates 32 and 33. All these blankswere cut from forged bronze rods, the Ist-centuryB.C. blanks by chopping,the later ones by sawing.In neithercase was much care takento cut the rods into strictlyuniformsegments.
INTRODUCTION
metal, so that the averageweight of all bronzecoins from a given issue or batch shouldrepresentthe standardto which that batch or issuewas struck.2In some Athenianbronze coinages,a fixedweight standardwas demonstrablyadheredto from one issue to the next; other Athenian bronze coinages were minted in issuesor batchesthat become progressively lighterovertime to increaseprofitability.3 This volume differsfrom most previouspublicationsof excavationcoins in the attentionpaid A to archaeologicalcontexts and in the more than minimal number of illustrations. good pictorial recordof the Athenian bronzesis obviouslynecessaryif this volume is to serve as a useful reference for that coinage. But in addition, we believe that excavationcoins should not be treateddifferently than other archaeologicalmaterial: they should be recordedvisually as well as described;and if this means the illustation of a large numberof mediocre,worn, or damaged specimens,such is the than pieces selectivelypurchasedfor which reflectsmore faithfully realityof excavationnumismatics, modern collectionsthe true characterof the lower-valuecurrencyin actual circulationin antiquity. In this connection, it is salutaryto emphasizethat the coins chosen for our plates are the very finest specimensthat the Agora excavationshave to offer.We decided to illustrateplastercastsratherthan direct photographsafter experimentsconvinced us that in most cases casts produced more legible and evenlylit images.A good samplingof the finestAgora Greekcoins in directphotographywill be Coins the in Athenian and found in FredKleiner's 1975 Agora PictureBook, Greek Roman Agora. In my study of the Agora Greek coins, I was surprisedto discoverhow few, relativelyspeaking, come from chronologicallysignificantcontexts.A majorityof the coins were recoveredfrom late or "mixed"fills,having apparentlybeen redepositedin earth that had been dug up and reusedin later contexts, buildingoperations.4A numberof other coins have potentiallyinformativestratigraphical but at the presenttime these contextsare too vaguelydated or have been too little studiedto deserve mention in our catalogue.This leavesthe coinsfromthe Agoradeposits:the dumpsor accumulations of earthand debristhat have been excavatedfromwells,cisterns,buildingfills,buildingdestructions, more or less closedcontextualentities.Most of these depositshavebeen carefullystudied, and similar, many repeatedly,and severalhave been as instrumentalin the reconstructionof the chronologyof Atticbronzecoinage as they havebeen for the chronologyofpottery,stampedamphorahandles,and other kinds of artifacts.The Agora depositswith importantgroups of Greek coins are listed at the end of this book (pp. 297-318) and are cited when relevantin our discussionsand catalogue.Among the deposits are a few hoards, or groups of coins that were intentionallyassembled and secreted together,as opposed to the randomlylost, and perhapsoccasionallydiscarded,coins that found their way into most normal filling deposits. When relevant, the relativewear of a coin in a deposit or hoard group may be indicatedon a scale ofw(ear)l-6, from unworn (wl) to extremelyworn (w6).
2
the the maderoughly samesizein the hopethattheywouldturnout roughly Blanks werepresumably verycarefully. thus on theendof a batchdepending howthemetalwaslasting; towards or sameweightandthesizereduced increased About standard." fromthemintwouldbe thesameas itsweight of themeanweight a batchof coinage Augustan straight much and Roman 2nd Coins, ed., London1960,p. 122, wrote,"Brass copperare struck coinage,HaroldMattingly, foreachpiece,butat so not morecarelessly weight adjusted [than goldor silver]-a marco, apezo--i.e., noton a carefully
many to the pound."
so as was issueof coinage described theRomans struck manyto thepoundandthis by RRC, 592: "An Crawford, p.
3 Compare IV 88-96 (Table p. 324 below),115-126 and 149-153 (Table [pp.326-327 below]and varieties III, weight 137-140, 143, and 144 (TableIV [p. 326 below]and p. 90). Forthe progressive 82, 88) with varieties pp. see or varieties series, p. 75, under99, andp. 79, under108. of reduction otherAthenian see 4 Butat leasta fewGreek to coinscontinued be usedaslateasEarly times; under142 fora Ist-century Byzantine
B.C.
coin in a 6th-centurySlavicInvasionhoard.
INTRODUCTION
The formatof the catalogueentriesshouldbe self-evident.Coins are listedby varieties(numbers in boldface). The variety numbers of silver,gold, electrum, and billon coins are italicized, and the type of metal is specified.All other coins are bronze. (Wheneverpossible,coins too poorly preserved to be assigned to a single variety are assigned to a group of varieties that are cited together in brackets,for example, [14 47] on page 43.) If a variety is representedby only a single coin, the bold variety number will function also as the individual coin reference. In cases where a variety is representedby many specimens,the total numberof coins is followedby the range of diametersin millimetersand by the averageweight in gramsof the best-preserved specimens(the numberof coins weighed given in parentheses);listed below are the specimens chosen for illustrationor for some special contextual or other reason. Each individually catalogued coin is listed with its Agora inventory number; diameter in millimeters;die position, if numismaticallyrelevant; -weightin grams; and furtherbibliographical, or other annotation,if needed. Referencesto Agora depositsare enclosedin parentheses. contextual, Illustratedcoins are markedwith an asterisk.Die alignmentsare indicatedby arrows,or, for worn coins whose die axes can be identified by angle but not top or bottom orientation,just by I, \, etc. Weights followed by + are of heavily damaged coins that have lost a considerableamount of their originalweight. In additionto the abbreviations given on p. xvi, the followingcataloguingconventionsshouldbe noted. In the recordingof legendsand types,bracketsenclose restoredlettersor partsof a designthat are no longer visible on the coin. Obliteratedvariablelegends that cannot be restoredare recorded as [----]. In legends, a dash (-) indicatesa horizontalbreak between letters, a verticalbar (|) indicates the beginning of a new horizontalline of the text. A horizontal line above two or three lettersindicatesthat they are conjoined in a single ligature. Forthe rubricsAE 1, AE 2, etc., employedin ChapterII to distinguishthe severalmodularunits of Athenian bronze coinage to the end of the 1st century B.C.,see page 38 below. Such rubrics, long used for the sizes of late Roman Imperialbronze denominations,were firstapplied to Athenian bronze coins by Fred Kleiner, whose system had to be modified to encompass the much greater range of Athenian materialcataloguedhere (see note 117 below,p. 68). The Agora coins are listed in the excavators'notebooksand are storedin the Stoa of Attalosby inventorynumbers,which are prefixedwith the Greekletter or lettersthat designatethe excavation section. Forreaderswho might wish to identifythe approximatearea in which a coin was found, we havebeen able to includea new plan of the Agorawith sectionboundariesindicated(Plate35). Coins inventoriedunder the rubricsKTA or NSR were not recoveredin the course of excavation: some were pickedup in or near the Agora;othersare donationsof unspecifiedprovenience.Althoughthey do not properlybelong in a publication of excavationfinds, we include a few because they have become part of the Agora numismaticcollection.
I ATHENIANSILVERCOINS
and abundant silver coinages of the ancient world from the middle of the 6th to the middle of the 1st century B.C. At four peak periods of coining (the first two decades of the 5th century, the 450's through 415, the second half of the 4th century,and the first decade of the 1st century was prodigious; and to judge from hoards and B.C.) the output of Athenian silver tetradrachms the widespread imitation of these tetradrachmsin all periods, the internationaldemand for this coinage remainedstrongalmostto the very end. This is not of course the place to attemptanything like a comprehensive account of this vast coinage, whose detailed history depends in any case on hoards and the study of specimens in the great public collections that hoards have supplied.1 But the incomplete sampling of Athenian silver from the Agora excavations at least calls for a selective survey,if only to provide a frameworkfor a fuller analysisof Athenian bronze coinage in ChapterII. The Agora's 129 Athenian silverpieces and imitationsthereof representless than 1 percent of the the nearly 14,000 Athenian coins excavated. Predictably, overwhelmingmajorityof the silver findsare of the smaller,more easilylost denominationsof a drachmor its fractions,and this explains why roughlyhalf of the pieces date from the 5th century,when Atheniancurrencywas exclusivelyof silver.Thereafter,the findsprogressively decline centuryby centuryto a mere three silverNew Style pieces of the 2nd centuryB.C.in a trendthat reflectsthe increasingimportanceof the supplementary bronze currency.Once a bronzecoinage was introducedin the 4th century,bronze began to replace and lesseneddependencyon silverin general. the smallersilverdenominationsin petty transactions the end of the 4th centuryat the latest,Athens no longer botheredto strikeany silvercoin lower By than the triobol;and in the laterHellenisticcurrencythe hemiobol and the obol came themselvesto be minted in bronze.2 and drachmsis striking.There are five to The proportionof unofficial,imitativetetradrachms bronze.At least one tetradrachm in silverand twenty-twoof silver-plated seven of these counterfeits in the formercategory(AppendixA, coin a) is modern, and one or two other silverpieces could also be recent,althougheven if they shouldbe so, the proportionof ancientfalseto genuine tetradrachms and drachmsremainsimpressively high for so few total pieces found. tetradrachmsI 6a-m are a specialcase; As explainedbelow (pp. 9-10), the thirteensilver-plated from a single disturbed hoard, they had intentionallybeen buried together. It is clear, coming however,that most of and possiblyall the remainingsubaeratepieces were gotten rid of after they had been detected as false.At leasthalf of them had been testedor defacedwith a chiselcut. Of these 9a, 160, and 16phad been removedfromcirculation,that is, frommortaluse, by being dedicatedto a god and deposited in a sanctuary.The unlucky owners of most of the other plated pieces, even those withoutvisibletest cuts, had presumablyjustthrownthem away as worthless.It is conceivable that some of the ancient owl imitationsof full silver may also have been intentional discards;for
1 The best surveysof Athenian silver are by Kraay,Athens (in more detail but extending only through the 4th and 9-12. For a tabularsummary of estimated levels of Athenian silver-coinproduction century)ACGC,pp. 55-77, pls. Athens 1980. over time, see the diagraminsertedat p. 56 of C. E. Conophagus,LeLaurium antique, 2 83-84 below. Pp. 38, 48-49, 68,
B LESSED with her own naturaldepositsof silverore, Athens minted one of the most influential
if they cannot pass autopsy as bona fide Athenian emissionstoday,they would doubtlesshave been of Athenian suspectin antiquityand, accordingto Buttrey's persuasiveinterpretation the 375/4 B.C. law on silver coinage, could have been refused by anyone demanding payment in certified legal tender.3The high survivalrate of imitationsis surelyan effectof theirworthlessness; as a forceful and reminder of how common bad money must have been in the ancient marketplace,the discovery of so many in the soil of the Agora enables us to appreciatebetter the legislation of 375/4 that and proceduresof the public certifierof currency,the boxL.a-cT)<, spelled out the responsibilities in protectingthe state coinage againstforgeriesof all kinds.4 SIXTH AND 1F I'HCENTURIES B.C. Athenian numismaticsbegins with the anepigraphicWappenmiinzen(Heraldic coins), a uniface coinage with changing obverse types. The Agora has yielded eight pieces: an obol with amphora obverse,a drachmwith horse'shindquarters obverse,threedrachmsand two obols with the common strutted-wheel obverse,and, from near the end of the series,a fine didrachmwith bull'shead obverse The Athenian origin of these and the rest of the Wappenmiinzensilver (which altogether (1-5). involved fourteen obverse types in the didrachm sequence) is no longer doubted, not least, as Hopper has emphasized,because of the importanceof the Agora finds in strengtheningthe record of Attic provenience.5Scholarshipnow connects this coinage with the Peisistratid tyranny,placing it between Peisistratos'return to power in 546 and the adoption of the static Athena head/Owl types, probably in the teens of the 6th century under Hippias.6 Unfortunatelyfor chronological purposes,only the wheel drachm 3a comes from an Archaiccontext, and it was found embedded in a floor of the early 5th century.The remainingAgora Wappenmiinzenand the excavation's late two 6th-centuryowl pieces (an obol [6] from the earliestphase of the owl coinage [SeltmanGroup H] and a tetradrachm[7] from the succeedingphase [GroupL]) were recoveredeither frommuch later or from mixed contexts. Missing from the Agora catalogue are any specimensfrom the huge owl issues of the first two decades of the 5th century7and from the followingearly "wreathed" silver,so called from the olive leaves added to the brow of Athena's helmet, of the 470's and 460's (StarrPeriodsI-V).8 The ten
3 T. V Buttrey,"The Athenian CurrencyLaw of 375/4 B.C.," in EssaysThompson, 33-45; and, especially,idem pp. 71-94. Editioprinceps, 1981, pp. translation,and extended commentary: Stroud 1974, pp. 157-188. Recent discussion and bibliographyby T. R. Martin, "SilverCoins and Public Slaves in the Athenian Law of 375/4 B.C.," in Papers Waggoner, 21-48. pp. 4 The problem, of course, was by no means limited to Athens. Commenting on the frequency of Roman plated coins in excavations,Burnett (CRW,p. 100) estimatesthat "approximately half of all denarii found on a site tend one to be plated." 5 Hopper,p. 25. On the Wappenmiinzen,see furtherKraay,ACGC, 56-60; Kroll 1981b, pp. 1-32. pp. 6 Kraay,ACGC,pp. 58, 61; Kroll 198lb, pp. 20-32; J. H. Kroll and N. Waggoner,"Dating the EarliestCoinage of Athens, Corinth, and Aegina," AJA88, 1984 (pp. 325-340), pp. 326-333. For the earlier chronology espoused by H. A. Cahn, "Datingthe EarlyCoinagesof Athens,"in Kleine Schiften Basel zurMiinzknde undArchiologie, 1975, pp. 81-97 (whobegins both the Wappenmiinzenand the owl silverin the early6th century),see Krolland Waggoner,op.cit.,p. 330, note 34. A laterchronology(starting WappenmiinzenunderKleisthenes,the owls after480) proposedby M. Vickers, the "Early Greek Coinage: A Reassessment,"NC 145, 1985 (pp. 144), pp. 22-33, is rebutted byJ. H. Kagan ("The Decadrachm Hoard: Chronology and Consequences,"in Carradice [pp. 21-28], p. 22) and, especially,M. C. Root ("Evidencefrom Persepolisfor the Dating of Persianand ArchaicGreekCoinage,"NC 148, 1988 [pp. 1-12], pp. 8-12). 7 M. Price and N. Greek Silver The Waggoner,Archaic Coinage, 'syut" Hoard,Dorchester/London 1975, pp. 56-61, GroupsIV-VI (= Seltman GroupsM+G, C+F, and E). Cf. Kraay,ACGC, 10:181-186. pl. 8 Starr,pp. 8-63, pls. I-XXI. Cf. Kraay,ACGC, 11:187-190. pl.
Agora tetradrachmsof 5th-centurydesign are all of the later "standardized" type, with generally hard, mechanical Athena heads; heavy, spread helmet ornaments;large lettering; and owls' tails simplifiedinto a single prong. Chester Starrplaced the inaugurationof this style at ca. 449 through associationwith the Athenian "CoinageDecree", which epigraphistsgenerallydated to this time.9 But new hoard evidence from Lycia shows that the preceding style (StarrPeriod V) began in the 460's, about a decade earlierthan Starrhad assumed,l0so that the shiftto the conventionaized style and the massstrikingthatthe shiftimplieswill have occurredin the 450's, probablyupon the removal of the Athenian League treasuryfrom Delos to Athens in 454.11 The archaeologicalcontext of the tetradrachm8b reinforcessuch upward compressionof Starr'schronology.The enlarged helmet palmetteand reverseletteringput 8b at a slightlyadvancedstage of the standardizedstyle that Starr Warhad begun or in its very earliestyears."12 to attributed the time "eitherbeforethe Peloponnesian But the coin was excavatedfrom a fill containingpottery that comes down only to the middle of the 5th century.Accordingly,8b should probablydate no later than the 440's, and the stylistically earlier 8a, with neat, compact palmette and letters, can be dated, with Starr,pl. XXII, nos. 1-3, to the 450's, within the initialphase of the standardizedcoinage. most of which, as 8c is a fine example of the typical,more developedstandardized tetradrachms, were probablymintedbeforethe income fromAthens'alliesand the Laurionmines Starrremarks,13 went into decline ca.415-413. 8e,on the otherhand, with coarseprofileand largeeye slightlyopened at the inner corner,sharesthese featureswith the emergencygold statersand fractionsof 407/614 and the platedbronze owls struckin the followingyear (seebelow)and so shouldfall towardsthe end of the standardizedcoinage late in the century.15 Since the popularityof such 5th-centuryowls throughoutthe EasternMediterraneanresultedin their becoming the most imitatedof all ancient coinages,16and since copying has again flourished in modern times to supplythe insatiablefancyof collectors,it shouldnot come as too greata surprise of that severalAgora tetradrachms 5th-centurytype are not of bona fide Athenian origin. In the 4th
9 Starr,pp. 64-75. But the date of the decree (R. Meiggs and D. Lewis, A Selection Greek to Historical of Insc?iptions 111-117, no. 45) is stillfarfromsettled;see Kraay,ACGC, 70-71 and theEndoftheFyI/ Cenury B.C., Oxford 1969, pp. pp. the relevantpapers by D. M. Lewis,H. Mattingly,and M.J. Price in Carradice,pp. 43-72. 10 in S. Fried,"The DecadrachmHoard: An Introduction," Carradice,pp. 5-6, for the latestAthenian tetradrachms (PeriodVA) in the great 1984 Lycianfind. Kagan (note 6 above,p. 5) dates the find 465/462 B.C. 11 As R. T. Williams(Phoenix 1972, pp. 411-412) and H. Nicolet (Revue Philologie, 3, 48, 1974, pp. 132-134) de ser. 26, had alreadyanticipatedin their reviewsof Starr. 12 Starr,p. 72, with referenceto his pl. XXII:4' and 5', the latterbeing a virtualduplicateof our lOb. 13 Starr,p. 73. 14 Sv. 21.1-22. Kraay,ACGC,pp. 68-69, pl. 11:202, 203. E. S. G. Robinson, "Some Problems in the Later Fifth ofAthens,"ANSMN9, 1960 (pp. 1-15), pp. 9-13, pls. 1:9-12, II:1-4. W.E. Thompson, "The Functions CenturyCoinage ser. of the EmergencyCoinages of the PeloponnesianWar," Mnenoyne, 4, 19, 1966 (pp. 337-343), pp. 341-343. 15 In a fundamentalpaper, "The Tell El-Mashkuta Hoard of AthenianTetradrachms," ser. 6, 7, 1947 (pp. 115JC, owls: the die E. S. G. Robinson noted anotherdistinctionbetween the earlierand later standardized 121),pp. 117-118, fixed in of the former are loose, while the die positions of the latter are normally (althoughnot invariably) positions a 9 or 8 o'clockalignment.It is unclearwhen the shiftto the fixedpositiontook place, but, as Robinsonobserved,the 8-9 and o'clockalignmentoccurson both officialand imitativeAthenianstrikings was continuedin the 4th- and 3rd-century The 12 o'clock alignment of the New Style silver begins late in the 3rd century in the drachms with symbols owls. (see below). 16 To Kraay, ACGC,pp. 73-77, pl. 12, and the bibliographyon Athenian imitations assembled by Stroud 1974, pp. 169-171, add 0. Morkholm, "ACoin of ArtaxerxesIII," NC, ser. 7, 14, 1974, pp. 1-8; T. V Buttrey,"Pharonic in Imitationsof AthenianTetradrachms," Proceedings pp. 137-140; idem 1981, pp. 76-78; iden,"SeldomWhat They Berne, in of the Athenian Tetradrachm," JicklePapers, 292-294; H. Nicolet-Pierre,"L'oiseaud'Athena, Seem-The Case pp. in sur a classique d'Egypteen Bactriane:Quelquesremarques l'usaged'un type monetairel'aepoque classique," Iconographie Paris1986, pp. 365-376; and M.J. Price,"New Owls for the Pharaoh,"Minerva etidentt rgionals (BCHSupplement14), 1, 1990, pp. 39-40; idem1991, pp. 67-68; idem1993, pp. 31-35.
were struck,especiallyin Egypt, many centuryB.C. vast numbersof imitativeolder owl tetradrachms of them with an ungainly,enlarged eye of Athena.17 8f has an enlarged eye and may indeed be Egyptian,although the inner corner of the eye is more closed than one normallyfinds on the usual Egyptian imitations.That 8f is non-Athenianin any case is certain from its helmet palmette with only three branchesinstead of the canonicalfive. The pinched featuresand compressedethnic give is was 8g away as a more obviousimitation,if indeed the tetradrachm ancient at all; the tetradrachm found with 8a but in a modern context, and it is conceivablethat both could be remnantsof a 19thor early 20th-centurycollection or touristshop that stood above the present excavatedarea. Some
such provenience surely accounts for the tetradrachm in Appendix A, coin a (P1. 32), an indubitable modern forgery. Because of its light weight and the linear, inorganic absence of modeling at the corner of Athena's mouth, 8h is suspect, as are the drachms i Omand, possibly, JOj. There are finally the silver-plated or formerly silver-plated bronze imitations. These are of course
ancient;and the best preserved,the cut tetradrachm9a, which had been deposited in a small, open
shrine around 420 B.C., can only have been a private forgery, as the comparatively flat relief and deviant style of the reverse independently imply. One presumes that the bronze cores of a plated
drachm (11) and of two other plated tetradrachms c)were similar5th-centuryB.C. counterfeits, (9b, although each is so disfiguredthat the possibilitycannot be ruled out that one or more could be remnantsfrom the official bronze issue that was struckin 406/5 in the pressingfinal years of the PeloponnesianWar. Were it not for Aristophanes'referencesto this emergency bronze of 406/5, one would not hesitate to condemn all subaerate Athenian owls as ancient counterfeits. But in a well-known passage in the Frogs(lines 725-726) Aristophaneslaments that in 405 the city was using a very in recently struckbronze currency(ra 7ov7pa XcaXxla) place of its fine old silver and "new"(i.e., 407/6) gold. In the Ekklesiazousai (lines 815-822) he recalls the awkwardconsequences when the bronze was demonetizedin favorof the reestablished silvercoinage. Since no wholly bronze coins of have generallyassumedthat the appropriate5th-centurydate are knownfromAthens, numismatists 406/5 bronze was a silver-platedbronze coinage. This solution, first proposed by Barclay Head in 1911,18was immeasurablystrengthenedsome years later when Svoronos reported on a hoard discoveredin 1902 in the Peiraeus,which contained "thousands"of subaeratetetradrachmsand drachmsin a style (notablywith the opened inner corner of Athena's eye) identical to the style of the 407/6 gold.19 The very magnitude of this particularplated coinage argues against its being a forger'sstock:20the mere hundredor so drachmsthat can be tracedback to the Peiraeushoard show that they were minted from a minimum of five pairs of dies and that these pairs were employed in tandem, since there is no obverse or reverse sharingbetween them.21 Two tetradrachmsfrom the hoard22document a sixth pair of dies. To date, the Peiraeus 1902 hoard is the only known proveniencefor this coinage, and in this respect the absence of any sure examples from the Agora is to be regretted. Still, the identificationof this plated bronze of correctfin desile style with the
17 Sv. 19.1 and most of the large-eyetetradrachms Sv.,pls. 16 and 17 are apparentlyEgyptian;cf. E. S. G. Robinson, of "CoinsfromAl-Mina (1936),"JC, ser.5, 17, 1937 (pp. 182-196), pl. IX:5-8; and idne(note 15 above,p. 6), pl. V:12-14, with Buttrey'sobservations(workscited in note 16 above,p. 6). 18 HN 2,p. 373. 19 Svoronos 1927, pp. 157-158, quoted and discussedin Kroll 1976, pp. 331-333, where it is furtherexplained that the Peiraeus 1902 hoard is the misnamed "Eleusis1902" hoard of IGCH46. 20 As AdalbertoGiovanninisupposedin "'Athenian Currencyin the Late Fifthand EarlyFourthCenturyB.C.," GRBS 1975 (pp. 185-195), p. 189. 16, 21 Kroll (1976, p. 333, note 18)listsfourpairsof dies for the plated drachms(e.g.,Sv. 15.19-26). To these must now be added a fifthpair froma specimenin the unpublishedlot of Peiraeus1902 drachmsat the AmericanNumismaticSociety. 22 Sv. 15.12, 13; for their hoard provenience, see M. Oeconomides-Caramessini,"Note on the Piraeus Hoard of 1902 of Athenian Plated Coins," CH 7, 1985, pp. 40-41 (withmention of additionaldrachmlots).
ATHENIAN SILVERCOINS
bronze issue of 406/5 remains compelling,if only because alternativeidentificationshave so little to recommendthem (pp. 25-26 below).
FOURTH CENTURY B.C. In surveysof Atheniancoinage, it is sometimesallegedthat this wartimetoken money with its highly inflationary potentialcontinuedin use for a decade afterthe defeat of Athens in 404/3 and was not recalleduntil Konon enrichedAthenswith Persiansubventionsin 393.23More likely,the bronzewas graduallywithdrawnand replacedwith such old silveras was on hand, if not rightafterthe war then at leastwith the reestablishment ordereddemocraticgovernmentin 403/2.24 When Athensbegan of a to strike silvercoinage again is a separatequestion, and here there may very well be a connection with the arrivalof Persianmoney in 393, for a few of the earliestremodeledtetradrachms, which on Athena's new profile eye is especially large, show up in three Sicilian hoards of the 380's.25 But the level of minting was modest and remained so to the middle of the century.Writing in 355/4, Xenophon complainedthat the Laurionmines were then being workedat far below their potential and that explorationfor new depositshad been only recently,and inadequately, The undertaken.26 relative paucity of extant Athenian tetradrachmsfrom the first half of the 4th century tends to confirm this testimony. Others shared Xenophon's interest in developing the Laurion silver industry,and under the financialadministration Euboulos,355-342, miningactivityincreaseddramatically the number of as of mining leases purchasedfrom the state rose from 17 in 367/6 to a record 62+ in 342/1.27 The effect on the coinage was predictable.In the second half of the 4th century,Athenian silver was again being struckin massive quantities,and again in a monotonously standardized,mechanical style. This has come to be known as the pi style, after the i-shaped configurationof the obverse helmet ornament,28and is typifiedby most of the 4th-centurypieces excavatedfrom the Agora. The majorityof these, namely,the tetradrachms15b-g,the drachm(withirregularly shapedflan) 17, and at least the triobols 19e-h and the diobol 20b (all again with irregularflans), belong to the later, fully mechanicalphase of the coinage (Bingen'sPi III-V), which spanned the last three decades of
23
25
1976, pp. 338-341. IGCH 2117 (Leontinoi 1957), 2119 (Contessa 1888), and 2121 (Manfria 1948). The obverse style of this earliest profile-eyeAthenian silver is quite distinctive;e.g., Sv. 19.2, 5, 13, 14. Despite the number in an Egyptian hoard (Sv. 26.7-9, 13-19), coins of this style are Athenian in origin; cf. the correspondingfractional silver from the small lamp hoardfromAgios IoannisRentisin Attica,ApAeXAc18 (1963),B' 1 [1965], p. 50, pl. 56 (IGCH89, where the date should be correctedto ca. 375-350, the time of the lamp). R.J. Hopper,"The Attic SilverMines in the FourthCenturyB.C.,"BSA48, 1953 (pp. 200-254), p. 216; cf. pp. 250251. Furtherevidence of Euboulos'developmentof the Attic silverindustrycomes from a fragmentarynomotheticlaw of 354/3 that deals with both the mines and the Athenian mint (1975 Agora inscriptioninv. no. 7495, publicationin See des JHS 83, 1963 (pp. 47-67), p. 64; P.Gauthier,Uncommtaire preparation). also G. Cawkwell,"Eubulus," historique Poroi deXbenphn,Geneva/Paris 1976, pp. 223-231; J. Ober, Fortress Attica,Leiden 1985, p. 29. On the 4th-century miningleases in general,see M. K. Langdon, "PoletaiRecords,"in G. V Lalonde,M. K. Langdon,and M. B. Walbank, Agora XIX), Princeton 1991, pp. 60-62, 76-137. (The Inscriptions Athenian 28 Bingen 1973, pp. 11-16, is the standardtreatment.Idem1975, pp. 161-170, adds little. The pi style was originally discussedand dubbed the "bracketstyle"by MargaretThompson (1957, p. 6). Cf. M0rkholm,EHC,p. 86.
26 Proi 4.28. 27
24 Kroll
FOURTHCENTURY B.C.
the century.29The more refined tetradrachm15a and the subaerate 16a-m are obviously earlier and appear to belong near the beginning of the formation of the pi style, that is, in the 340's, if Athens' earliestregularbronze coinage, the pi-styleDouble-bodiedowls (41-43), began to be struck in the 330's, as proposedbelow. The most interesting4th-centurypieces from the Agora excavationsare the plated imitations. 160 and p, each heavilygashed with a chisel cut on the reverse,were separatelyfound in frontof the Metroon-OldBouleuterionwheretheyhad doubtlessbeen depositedin accordancewith the currency law of 375/4. The law specifiedthat if the dokimastes determinedthat any coin of Atheniantype had a bronzeor lead core or that its silverwas debased,it was to be mutilatedand removedfromcirculation by being cut across,dedicatedto the Mother of the Gods, and turned over to the Council.30 The thirteen nicely preservedsubaeratetetradrachms16a-m clearlyhad a differenthistory.All are uncirculated,were struckfrom the same pair of dies, and were recoveredfrom the same pockets of Classical fill beneath the Temple of Ares close to the center of the Agora square. As Walker has explained, they must be the remnant of a much larger "treasure" identical pieces that had of been intentionally buried in the third quarter of the 4th century, the date of the accompanying context pottery;much later,in the time of Augustus,the deposit was disturbedand largelyremoved during the laying of foundationsfor the Temple of Ares.31 One suspects that the primary burial was a true "forger'shoard": a lot of freshly minted imitations that the forger or his agent had deposited for retrievalor had to abandon to escape detection. It has been argued that the center of the Agora was too exposed for such clandestineactivityand that the coins must ratherhave been buried under officialauspices.32 But althoughfree of buildings,this area was by day throngedwith vendorsat theirbooths;in this busymilieu, it ought not to have been people, includingvery probably too hard to find or dig a pit for a bag or more of "hot"coins without creating undue suspicion.33
to in tetradrachms struck Egyptby Sabakes and According Bingen(1973,p. 18),the pseudo-Athenian satrapal in Mazakes 333-332 B.C. Nicolet-Pierre, monnaies deux derniers avantla conquete "Les des (H. satrapes d'Egypte
ante d'Alexandre,"in EssaysThompson, 221-230, pls. 25 and 26) providea terminus quemfor the second and perhaps pp. the start of the third phase of the pi-style coinage. M. J. Price (1991, p. 71; 1993, p. 33) notes that the genuine and in many Easternimitationsof Athenian tetradrachms the 1973 Babylonhoard of 323 B.C. (CH 1, 1975, no. 38, with CH
29
of as oftenon 3, 1977,no. 22)andin the 1989Syrian hoard, probably 333B.C., attain styles lateasPiV Careless striking, flans(cf.Sv.,pl. 30),is typical the later, of massive phases. elongated pi 30 Stroud1974,p. 158, lines 10-13: i&v 6nt[6X)aXxov] 18 4 6no6X3up38ov f xl(38Xov, itaxoTxto xo[...6..][
xal
atco tep6v
xTf
the of dulyrecognized relevance 160andp withtheirrevealing findspots. 31 Walker withinthe templefoundations. the Temple On 1982,pp. 131-136, pl. 22, with a plan of the findspots
of Ares,Agora XIV, pp. 162-165.
32
In ; [T]&v MvrTp6b p3oXojv. his commentary(pp. 171-178) Stroud Oe?y xct[ x[altapaX]X&xco T^oxr
Walker1982,pp. 133-134, whereit is further that were as proposed theseplatedtetradrachms struck officially
an emergencymeasureafter Chaironeiain 338 in anticipationof an attackon Athens by Philip and that the Athenians publicly disposed of them in a kind of votive burialin the Agora when the attackfailed to materialize.Cf. M0rkholm,
of coins Fourre EHC,p. 86. Butneitherthe lightweightnorthe die positions the coinsareproofof statemanufacture.
couldbe made only in sanctuaries, whichthe Agorawas not. Earlier mentions theseplatedtetradrachms in of are T. L. Shear, "TheCampaign 1933," of 4, Hesperia 1935(pp.310-339),p. 339, andJ.P.Shear1936,p. 123. 33 In Sokrates' booksweresoldin the Orchestra, the centerof the as III, day, Agorawas called(Agora pp. 162-163; XI1 that in not Agora p. 171),so it ispossible thecoinswereconcealed an areathatwasfrequented vendors by (although
by bankers and money-changers,whose Tp&dxtle were located furtherto the northwestnear the Stoa of the Herms [Stroud 1974, p. 167]).
with bronze cores are usually lighter than prototypesin silver;and in well-made forgeriescorrect die positions are to be expected. A finalweaknessis the suggestionthat the burialhad "thecharacterof a dedication"; dedicatoryburials but
10
Or was the 4th-centuryfill containing the coins actuallybroughtfrom elsewhereby the Augustan buildersof the Temple of Ares? Although contextuallydated to ca. 350-325, the burial probably occurred rather early in this quartercentury,since the tetradrachmsbelong to an incipient phase of the pi style. The pi-style coinage continued down to Athens' capitulationto Demetrios Poliorketesin 294. The notorious statersthat the tyrant Lacharesstruckfrom Akropolisgold to pay his mercenaries from 296 through Demetrios' siege are typical late pi style;34and the large Thorikos hoard of surelydates also to the time of the siege, when predominantlyfreshlycoined, pi-styletetradrachms Demetrios dispatched troops to lay waste the countrysideof Attica.35This policy of destruction seriouslycrippled the silver industryof Attica and, coupled with Athens' capture, put an end to mintingfor about a decade. THIRD CENTURY B.C. The next phase of Athenian silver, Bingen's syle a quidridigiti,36is represented in three Agora tetradrachms(of which one is subaerate)and two drachms (22a-24b). The diagnostic helmet ornamentconsistsof four openly spacedbranches;Athena heads are generallymore finely featured; and the ethnic is decorativelyrendered with curved alphas and small thetas. Such quadridigite tetradrachmsfirst appear in early 3rd-centuryhoards and seem to have begun soon after Athens' expulsion of Demetrios Poliorketes'garrison from the Mouseion in 287 or 286.37 The impurity of their silver relative to the exceptionallyfine Laurion silver of the earlier,pi-style owls tends to confirm that the quadridigiteowls were in large part struckfrom the silverthat Athens receivedto assist her ongoing struggle against Demetrios, 200 talents in 286/5 from Lysimachos,Ptolemy I, and Antipatros,a nephew of Kassandros,and 50 talents in 282 from Ptolemy II.38 Hoards of the 3rd century imply that this coinage was substantial,although whether productionwas short-lived and intensive or whether it continued into the 270's or even as late as the ill-fatedChremonidean is War,which Athens waged againstAntigonosGonatasfrom 268 to 261 B.C.,39 uncertain. Attributableto this war in any case is the special coinage of Attic pentobols, whose handsome design(Athenain Corinthianhelmet/Owl standingobliquelywith wings half raised)and anomalous denominationradicallydepart from the traditionalowl silver.The pentobols were struckin three issues,a majorissuewith an uprightamphorato the rightof the owl (Sv.24.4-8) and two otherswith aplustre(Sv.24.1) or anothersymbol(dagger?,Sv. 24.2) in place of the amphora.The two pentobols fromthe Agora (28a, b)are heavilyworn, as was the specimenreportedfromthe Thebes 1935 hoard of the second half of the 3rd century. The condition of the Thebes specimen points to emission
34 Sv. 21.1-22. Attributionand date: Svoronos 1927, pp. 159-168; Newell, p. 133, note 4; Nicolet-Pierreand Kroll, p. 2, note 3. 35 Bingen 1973, pp. 18-21; 1975, p. 167. IGCH 134. pp. (pp. 181-197) and Habicht (Untersuchungen,45-62) place the revoltagainstDemetrios one year earlier than does Shear (Kalias,pp. 63-73). 38 Shear,Kallias, 26-27, 80-81, with the silveranalysespublishedby Nicolet-Pierreand Kroll,pp. 32-35, tablesIV pp. and V
36 Bingen1973,pp. 14-15. Nicolet-Pierre Kroll,pp. 3-5, pls. 1-3, nos. 1-28. Morkholm, and EHC,pp. 86-87, 148.
37 Osborne
Einzelschriften Wiesbaden1972, pp. 93-203; Habicht, ersuchungen, 95-112; E W.Walbankin CambridgeAncient pp. 20), and 2nd Histo0y, ed., VII, i, E W.Walbank,A. E. Astin,M. W.Fredriksen, R. M. Ogilvie, eds., Cambridge/London/New York/New Rochelle/Melbourne/Sydney 1984, pp. 236-239.
11
That the pentobolspertainto ajoint Athenian-Ptolemaicenterprise in the firsthalf of the century.40 which were struckon followsfrom their direct metrologicalrelationshipto Ptolemaictetradrachms, a standard of 14.25 g.,41 exactly five-sixthsof tetradrachmsof Attic weight (17 g.), and from the turn and liftedwings are borrowedfrom the eagles on novel pose of their owls, whose three-quarters Ptolemaiccoinage (e.g. 1004, 1005, 1009). The pentobolsare to be understoodas Egyptian-weight drachms and presuppose a historicalcontext involving direct Egyptian participationin Athenian affairsfor a period of at least three years.These can only be the opening years of the Chremonidean War,when PtolemyII sent troopsto Atticato defendagainsta Macedonianblockade.These soldiers broughttheir own Egyptianmoney with them, as finds of Ptolemaic coins from three of their Attic fortsattest;42 the Athenians,too, must have contributedto the war effortand did so, one sees, in but this one Attic denominationthat was directlycompatiblewith Ptolemaicsilver. Tetrobolswith two-owl reverses(29a-c) make up the second exceptional silvercoinage of 3rdcenturyAthens. Like the pentobols, the tetrobolswere probablystruckfor militaryuse; by the early Hellenistic period the tetrobol was proverbiallyregardedas a soldier'sdaily wage.43As shown by the contrastingearly(29a, b = Sv. 23.43-45) and later(29c = Sv. 24.18-24) stylesof the Agora pieces, the Atheniansminted this tetrobolsilveron at leasttwo separateoccasionsin the 3rd century.But it is not possibleto say when or even whetherthese occasionsnecessarily belong in times of war,since the stationedin the borderfortsof Attica had to be paid even duringpeacetime.44 troops A more seriousproblemin Atheniancoinage of the 3rd centuryis posed by the "heterogeneous" variedgroup of tetradrachms that occur in hoards of about 260-220 silver,a sizable and stylistically B.C. along with the pi-style and quadridigit6 tetradrachms which they are generallymodeled.45 on The one Agora specimen (30), with a quadridigite-like Athena but an oddly fashionedowl, is fairly typical, but there are easily more than a half-dozenother differentobverse and reversestyles.The eclectic, frequently derivative or uncouth, and highly diverse die cutting leaves little doubt that at least some of the heterogeneous material consists of unofficial imitations. But does it all? In an analysis of the several heterogeneous subgroups,Helene Nicolet-Pierreand I pointed out the difficultiesof defending any one subgroupas being officiallyAthenian and were inclined to regard the tetradrachms bloc imitationscounterfeited fill a demandforAtheniansilverat a time when en as to Athens was no longer coining.46But extensive die linkingwithin the subgroupsallows at most for only a few centers of production, which, according to the hoards, ought to have been located in Centralor Northern Greece.And since it is impossibleto identifyany non-Atheniansource,there is
40 Nicolet-Pierre and Kroll,p. 30, no. 19. In his publication the hoardrecord of (IGCH 193),TonyHackens (1969, followed pl. 24 in attributing pentobols the period255-229 B.C. the to Sv., pp. 702-707) 41 See E. S. G. Robinson, "TheCoin Standards Ptolemy in M. Rostovtzeff, Social Economic of The and I," History of the Hellenistic III, Oxford1941,pp. 1635-1639.The 14.25-g("Phoenician") World was standard introduced in the late reignof the firstPtolemy. 42 The coins AE and 1 AR of I 9 II (33 Ptolemy andII fromthe forton the Koroni peninsula; AE of Ptolemy froma fortat CapeZoster;and 49 AE, 1 AR, and 2 AV of Ptolemy and II at an encampment Heliopolis) listedin I at are J. R. McCredie, Military (Hesperia Fortfied Camps Attica of Supplement Princeton1966,pp. 9-10, 30, 47. On the 11), of in Hellenistic finds,seeJ.H. Kroll,"Numismatic chronology thebronze (to Appendix" V R. Grace,"Revisions Early AM Chronology"), 89, 1974(pp. 194-203),p. 201.
43
45 Nicolet-Pierreand
44 Cf.
12
ATHENIAN SILVERCOINS
stilla very good possibilitythat many of the heterogeneoustetradrachms may be bona fide Athenian emissions.Some pieces introducenew features,like scrollson the helmet visor of Athena, owls (ason 30) with unfeatheredheads and smallisheyes,and diagonallyorientedethnics(cf.also 30), that imply that they were stampedwith wide, cylindricalpunch dies insteadof the smaller,squarepunchesthat producedthe incuse squaresofthe older owl coinage.It is not easy to understandwhy copyistswould have indulged in such innovations,much less why these featureswould have been incorporatedin the drachms and tetradrachmswith symbols that Athens introducedafter 229, if the featureshad originatedin imitations.Stylisticheterogeneitycould have been the resultof sporadic minting and uncertaintyon the part of die engraversabout how closelyto copy old models. Some heterogeneous dies could be old quadridigitedies broughtout of retirement.The Agora provenienceof 30 points to Athenian manufacturebut cannot prove it; for the Agora has produced more than its share of imitative5th- and 4th-centuryowls (pp. 6-7, 9 above),and there is no way of ascertainingwhether are 30 is a 3rd-centurycounterpartor whether it and relatedheterogeneoustetradrachms genuine Athenian issuesof roughlythe third quarterof the century.47 Accordingly,it is unclear to what extent Athens may have coined between Antigonos Gonatas' captureofAthens at the end of the ChremonideanWarin 261 and the evacuationof the Macedonian garrisonsfrom Attica in 229, although minting must have been light, on any interpretation.The Athenian-Eleusinian varieties62 and 63 (see pp. 35-36 below) are the only bronze issues that can be attributedto this period. In silver we are left, possibly,with one or two of the later issues of tetrobolsand howevermuch of the occasionalheterogeneouscoinage as may be trulyAthenian. In ChristianHabicht explainsthat the diminishedlevel an exhaustivereviewof the earlierscholarship, of Athenian coin productionbetween 261 and 229 can no longer be attributedto terms imposed on the city by Antigonos Gonatas.48The Antigonid Pan-head tetradrachmswith an Eleusis-ring to symbol,formerlybelievedto have been mintedby Gonatasin Athens, have now been reattributed circulatedin Athens his mint in Pella.49Although silver and bronze coins of Gonatas commonly after261 (seepp. 36, 51-52 below),this was the very time that Macedonian soldierswere occupying the Peiraeusand the other forts of Attica, including until 255 the fortresson the Mouseion; and it would be surprisingindeed if their Macedonianmoney did not pass into more general circulation. to Gonatasis said to have returnedeleutheria Athens in 255; yet this seems to have had no apparent effect on coin production. Nor is there really any reason to suppose that even between 261 and 255 Athens could not have coined if she wanted and was able. "Nowhere in mainland Greece south of Macedonia," argues Thomas R. Martin,50"does one find a single place whose coinage can reasonablybe thoughtto have come to an end in the fourthcenturyas a resultof suppression by a Macedonian king";and on Martin'sshowing,this conclusion applies equally to the 3rd century.
heterogeneousdrachms (Sv. 23.13-16) and hemidrachms(Sv. 21.51, 52) belong. But the owl's head and the diagonal ethnic relate the coin also to Nicolet-Pierreand Kroll, coin C5, and the coins of Group C are also good candidates for being genuinely Athenian, providingthe dates of the KrUedinand Phyattoshoards are lowered into the last third of the 3rd century;paceNicolet-Pierreand Kroll, pp. 20-21, 25, 26. It is doubtful that metallurgicalanalyses of the heterogeneoussilverwill be able to settlethe questionof originsince the Atheniansapparentlydepended on nondomestic silverfrom the time of the quadridigitecoinage down throughthe EarlyPeriodof the New Style coinage. 48 Habicht, Shdin, pp. 40-41. 49 Gonatasand the SilverCoinageof Macedoniacirca280-270 B.C.,"AVSMtf26, 1981 R. W.Mathisen,"Antigonus (pp. 79-124), p. 112, note 12. Cf. Boehringer,p. 100. 50 T. R. Princeton 1985, p. 183. in and Greece, Martin, Sovereignty Coinage Classical
47 Nicolet-Pierreand I (p. 17) assigned 30 to Group F, which happens to be the one group to which the few known
13
Suspensionof minting, he explains,was normallythe resultof financialhardshipand the abundant international supply of Macedonian money that eliminated much of the need for locally struck Both factors are found at Athens after 261, only here it is the degree of the suspension currency.51 that remainsin doubt. Whateverthe truth of the heterogeneoussilver,Athens initiateda new series of owl coins after the departureof the Macedonian garrisonsin 229. The Agora drachm31 is a fine example of this the of new silver "with symbols"(Sv. 23.20-42). Unfortunately, two most prominentcharacteristics this coinage, the helmet ornament in the form of an aplustreof three or four gracefullycurving tendrilsand the control symbol added to the left of the owl, were mostly struckoff flan. But lesser modificationsof the traditionalOld Style designs are clear enough: a delicate pendent earringhas replaced the large disk earring of the Archaic and ClassicalAthena heads; the visor of Athena's helmet terminates in a volute; and the head of the owl is now unfringedand has a long, narrow beak conjoinedto the outlinesof the brow.Fifteento 17 differentissuesof this silverwith symbolsare on record, 10 to 12 issuesfrom drachmsand 5 from tetradrachms.52 There were probablymore, for few of these slight emissions are documented by more than one or two specimens. Beginning at some point in the 220's (on the evidence of the Corinth 1938 hoard of ca. 215 B.C.[IGCH 187] with four freshdrachmsfrom three issues),these emissionswill have continuedinto the 2nd century.
SECOND AND FIRST CENTURIES B.C. A shorterseries of transitionaltetradrachms"withmonograms"followed and carriedthe evolution from the Old to the New Style severalstepsfurther.Five issues(fromeleven coins, all from the 1968 Larissa-Sitichoro hoard of ca. 165 B.C.) known,one identifiedby a monogram, the other fourby a are letter or monogram and symbol.53But it is the fabric and owls of the coins that bring them to the thinnerand broaderuntilin the two later very thresholdof the New Style: flansbecame progressively emissionsthe spreadNew Stylefabricwas achieved,while in everyparticular, down to the reduction of eyes to small, sunken dots and the exposure of the leading edge of the left wing, the owls of all five emissionshave assumedthe full-bodiedschema of New Style owls.A sixth silverissue introduced the horizontal amphora beneath the owl and the olive-wreathborder on the reverse.54Although stillone step shortof the full New Styledesignwith the head of Athena Parthenoson the obverse,this issue inauguratesthe New Style coinage, which in antiquitywas called after its wreathed reverse roO to stephanephoric coinage (e.g., SpaXal Tx ocpav)vcp6pou,xrepaXtia oaxepravtcp6pa), distinguish it from the Old Style glaukophoric silver.55 According to the most recent discussionsof the relevant hoards,the additionof the wreathbelongsafterthe conclusionof the Third MacedonianWarin 168 or Athens' acquisition of Delos in 167/6, with the final shift to the New Style Athena Parthenos obverse occurring ca. 165 and the first 78 emissions of the coinage following one another in an
51 Ibid., p. 246.
H. Nicolet-Pierre,"De l'ancienau nouveaustyleath6nien:une continuite?," Studia in Paulo S. Naster Oblata, Scheers, Louvain 1982, I(pp. 105-112), p. 110 and pp. 106-107, pl. XV:2-5. Cf. Morkholm,EHC, pp. 148-149. ed., 53 Nicolet-Pierre (note 52 above),pp. 107-108, pls. XV, XVI, nos. 6-11. Price 1989, p. 238, pl. LV,nos. 222-237. 54 New Style, 440-441, pl. 150, no. 1350. H. Nicolet-Pierre,Bulletin la Socitf Franfaise Numismatique 1983, de de pp. 38, pp. 293-295. A second specimen has been purchasedby the BritishMuseum;Price 1989, p. 238. 55 L. de Paris Robert, tudes numismatiquegrecques, 1951, pp. 105-135.
52
14
ATHENIAN SILVERCOINS
unbrokenannual sequence down to the issue signed by King Mithradatesand his Athenian agent Aristionin 87/6.56 Although the earlier New Style issues were struckin greater volume than the late Old Style emissionswith symbolsand monogramsthat led up to them, large-scalemintingdid not begin until the 140's (issue nos. 21-27, of 144-137 B.C.,were each struckfrom as many as 14 to 21 known obverse dies), and it is to this mature phase of the coinage that the three Agora specimens 32-34 belong.The coinage reachedits apogee in the 90'sB.C.(25 to 47 attestedobversedies in some yearsof that decade).Followingthe King Mithradates/Aristion issueof 87/6 and Sulla'scaptureof Athensin the springof that year,productionstopped,startedup again, and then plummetedafterthe piratical devastationof Delos in 69.57 From that time down to the termination of the coinage in the late 40's the minting of silverwas kept alive by small issuesfrequentlyinvolvingbut a single obversedie. data recorded on the reversesof the coins, Margaret Thanks to the wealth of administrative monumental 1961 corpusof the coinage, and the intense chronologicaldiscussionthat Thompson's her workhas provoked,Athens' New Style silveris the most fully documented of all ancient Greek coinages.Each of its approximately112 issuesis identifiedby an emissionsymbol and is signedwith mint officials.58 the names or monogramsof the two supervising Beginningwith the 12th issue, the the month of mintingis recordedby a letteron the reverseamphora.Between 136/5 and 88/7 B.C., name of a short-termthird magistrate,who might serve for as little as a month, is added below item is a two- or three-letterabbreviation that of the two annual magistrates.A final adminstrative located beneath the amphoraand thought to pertainperhapsto sourcesof bullion.59 Recent discussionhas emphasized the emergence of the New Style coinage as the dominant internationalsilvercoinage of late HellenisticGreece.60In large part this was achieved by default: afterthe defeat of Macedon in the firsthalf of the 2nd centuryand the defeatof the AchaianLeague in 146 B.C., Athens and the ThessalianLeaguewere the only Greekstatesstillmintingin silverto any considerabledegree. But it was also advancedthroughpolicy,as seen from the decree passed by the that required"allthe Hellenes"to accept the Attic Delphic Amphictionyin or aroundthe 120'sB.C. Athens at tetradrachm (presumably the expense of all silverof non-Atticweightstill in circulation).61
En-Nu'man "TheMa'Aret Hoard, 1990;idem, 1989,pp. 238-239; Mattingly Price,CRWLR, 95, 100;idem pp. in in Carson-nkins 69-86),pp.84-95. Cf. P.Grierson M0rkholm, 1980," Essays EHC,p. 170.PriceandMattingly (pp. the CRWLR, 63) p. by (1984,pp. 38-42; anddefended Touratsoglou, by argued Morkholm dispute higherchronology that ca. thatbeginsthe New Stylecoinagebetween 185and 180and assumes the firsttwentyor so issueswerestruck becameannual. f. M0rkholm, whenproduction over EHC, finally spanuntilca. 145B.C., intermittently a 35-40-year and wereproduced designed silvercoinages bronzeand moreconservative since 170. Unfortunately, Athens' quite p. withmonograms silver and of New Stylesilver thepreceding the of independently one another, chronology theearliest B.C. cannotbe decidedby an appealto the bronzeof the early2nd century The "NewStyle"typeof owl,whichfirst in in the bronzecoinagefor the firsttime already the 190's occurs in appears silverin the issueswith monograms, thata contemporary it so happens 81 in the Owl-on-thunderbolt datingof the silver variety (seep. 50 below).And But New Stylechronology wouldfitwiththe M0rkholm withmonograms the 190's to quitenicely. the argument early of citedat thebeginning thearticles marshaled and in is fromthebronze decisive, in lightof theevidence coinage hardly 160's. is to withmonograms morelikely dateas lateas the 170's-early thisnote,the silver 59 New SyIe, 613-622. pp. issuesmintedto financeSulla's 60 Crawford, CMRR, 127; Price, CRWLR, 96-98. The pseudo-Athenian pp. p. the after Mithradates 86 bestdemonstrate how influential New Stylecoinagehad become;see just campaign against NewSkle, 425-439. pp. 61 FdD III,ii, no. 139,lines 1-6.
57 See pp. 80-81 below. 58 Fullprosopography Habicht1991. in 56
15
of was an influentialmember of the amphictionyand stood to profit,but the establishment a uniform servedwider economic interests,so that the active encouragementof Roman authoritiesin currency Greece has been suspected.62 There has been speculation also that the coinage was minted almost entirely from older coinagesprocuredthroughexchange,especiallyon Delos.63Doubtlessmuch recoinagewas involved, particularlyin Thompson's "Early"and "Late"New Style Periods,the analyzed tetradrachmsof which show relativelyhigh levels of copper impurities.64 the seriousnessof the second Laurion But slaverevolt, ca. 100-98 B.C.,65provesthat the Attic mining industryhad not only been reestablished but must have been operating at a substantiallevel, while analyses of 39 tetradrachmsof the "Middle"Period (135/4-100/99 B.c.) give consistentlythe same minimal copper percentagesthat characterizedLaurion silver of the 6th through 4th centuries B.C.66 Although the revolt had no effect on the volume of coins produced, there is a clear correlationbetween the date of the revolt and a sudden reduction in the fineness of the silver beginning with the Demetrios-Agathippos issue of 99/8 B.C.For severaldecades to that point, the coinage seems to have been manufactured predominantly from domestic silver. After 99, other silver had to be procured. Apart from the impact of the revolt,the veins at Laurionwere givingout, and by the time of Strabo(9.1.23) even the resmeltingof old slag had been discontinued. There will be more to say below (pp. 81-82, 85-87) about the post-Mithradaticphase of the coinage, since this is the one period in which Athens' bronze and silver coinages were routinely administeredtogether. It is, in fact, the fundamentalmodificationof the bronze coinage after the Battle of Philippi in 42/1 B.C.that enables us to place the formal end of the New Style silver in that year. Since 69, minting had been limping along in intermittentemissionsof insubstantialand often token size. In the 40's much of this silver was doubtless requisitionedand recoined to pay Roman armiesof the civil war,but the deliberateterminationof mintingwas more likelythe resultof competitive pressurefrom the Roman denarius, which was beginning to circulate in quantity in Greece and must have become especially common at Athens when the victorious Marc Antony wintered there with his army after Philippi. Of approximatelysimilar weight, the Attic drachm But (4.2 g.) and the Roman denarius (3.86 g.) were almost, if not actually,interchangeable.67 the denariuswas 9 percent lighter and would have been forcingthe drachm out of circulation,Since it had become unrealisticfor the Athenians to maintain their traditionalsilver currency in the face of an ever increasing supply of the lighter Roman coin, the decision was taken to abandon the drachmfor the denariusand (asarguedfurtherin ChapterII, pp. 89-91) to readjustthe local bronze
in London 1988, p. 129: "[Tlhere Price, CRWLR, 97; I. Carradice and M.J. Price, Coinage theRomanWorld, p. is every reason to believe that the Romans adopted [the New Style coinage] as the official coinage of the province of Achaea." 63 Price, CRWLR, 97; Carradice and Price, loc. cit. (note 62 above); for the probable recoining in the 160's of p. silverdeposited on Delos, see Giovannini,pp. 51-62. 64 New Syle, pp. 624-625. 65 See note 108 below,p. 66. 66 New Syle, pp. 624-625. Silver of the 6th-4th centuries: C. M. Kraay, The CompositionGreek Silver Coins, of Analysis Oxford 1962, pp. 16, 34; Nicolet-Pierreand Kroll, pp. 32-34. Activation, byNeutron 67 Inscriptions Roman Imperialdate fromthe GreekEast of commonlyreferto denariias Attic drachmai(cf.L. Robert, "Monnaiesdans les inscriptions grecques,"RN, ser.6, 4, 1962 [pp. 7-24], pp. 12-13) in a Hellenizingusage that is found as early as Polybios(F.W. Walbank,A Historical on I, CommentaryPolybius Oxford 1959, p. 176). Hultsch (s.v denarius,RE V, col. 209) affirmsparity between the denarius and the Attic drachm. But none of this, of course, should be taken as proofof exact equivalencein the thirdquarterof the 1stcenturyB.C., when both coinageswere in circulationtogether.
62
16
ATHENIAN SILVERCOINS
coinage accordingly.Thus the year of Philippimarksboth the end of Athens' silver coinage and the quasi-Romanizationof the city's currency,which for the next 250 years was to be dominated by the denarius.
CATALOGUE
ca. 550-520 OBOL Bulbous amphora. *1 S-4035 0.4968 GRC,fig. 8 Incuse square divided diagonally. Seltman, p. 157, pl. IV:x
B.C.
DRACHMS Horse's hindquartersr. *2 IIA-5 3.76 Similar. Seltman, p. 158, pl. IV:., ; Sv. 1.26-28
GRC, 8 fig.
Seltman, p. 158, pi. IV:, e; Sv. 1.58, 59 GRC,fig. 8; (fromfloor packing of Archaic building southeast of the Tholos; with sherds of late 6th and early 5th centuries B.C.) Similar.
*b I-903 *c BE-115
OBOLS
Similar.
DIDRACHM-STATER
Seltman, nos. 69-71, 81; Sv. 1.35-37 Hopper, p. 27, no. 3: "Reverse[die] isolated. It could be from the same obverse as S[eltman no.] 81a, but the corroded surface makes judgement difficult." Similar.
The weightsrecordedhere for , 3a, 4a, and 5 correctthe slighdydifferentfiguresgiven for these coinsin Hopper, p. 25, note 1.
8
CATALOGUE
ca. 510's-500 B.C.
OBOL
17
0.47
TETRADRACHM
Similar.
AeE Owl stg. r., facing; behind, olive spray. 16.97 (3rd-centuryB.C. context: Cistern L 17:7) ca. 450's-404 B.C.
*7
4-344
TETRADRACHMS
AeE Owl stg. r., facing; Head of Athena r., wearing Sv., pls. 11-17.24, passim Attic helmet ornamented with behind, olive spray and crescent. palmette and olive leaves, / 16.50 (foundwith 8g in modern fill) GRC,fig. 9 (fromfill containing pottery of first half to mid-5th cen4 16.33 / \
tury B.C.)71
GRC,fig. 9 Like the coin's pitted surface,its light weight is apparentlya result of corrosion and cleaning (cf. 33, 34). see imitation, Egyptian(?); pp. 6-7 above imitation;found with 8a possibly imitation, as the low weight and the parallel, inorganic lips of Athena suggest;(fromwell filling of early 3rd century B.C.:F 11:2)
/ \
-
*a
Br-895
11.81
about half of the silver plating remaining on the bronze core; test cut
on obverse; (sanctuary context of 420's B.C.)72
Since a number of the owls on Group H tetradrachms(Seltman, pl. XIII) stand to the left, Seltman (p. 192) classifiedall obols with left-facingowls in this group. Whether this classificationis correct in every case is impossible to decide from the small scale of the coins (cf. the owl-left obols Sv. 2.54-58, 7.58-60, none of which, at least, can postdate 480). Neverthelessthe attributionof our Agora obol to Group H is supportedby the owl's stockyproportions and squat posture. The obverse is essentiallyeffaced. For discussionsof the Group H chronology,see the workscited at the beginning of note 6 above, p. 5. 70 P. Bicknell("The Dates of the ArchaicOwls of Athens Belongingto Seltman'sGroupsH and L," L'antiquite classique 38, 1969, pp. 175-180) and Kroll (1981b, pp. 25-30) both date Group L after Hippias' expulsionin 510. 71 Section Omega pottery lot 479 (fromcrushedbedrockfill along side wall of Greek house), including a lamp and saltcellarbut no stampedware, which, accordingto Agora XII, p. 22, began "justbefore the middle of the 5th century." The lot contained also a later lid fragment,probablyof the 3rd centuryB.C. 72 From layer 11 of the CrossroadsEnclosure east of the Royal Stoa (DepositJ 5:2), with pottery of ca. 430-420 B.C. This layerwas sealed below the greatvotive depositof layer 10, which, on the evidence of ostraka,dates shortlyafter 417 B.C.(T L. Shear,Jr.,"The Athenian Agora: Excavationsof 1972," Hesperia 1973 [pp. 359-407], pp. 364-367). 42,
69
18 NN-1789 0-126 \
N
ATHENIAN SILVERCOINS 13.00 12.31 bronze core only slight traces of silver;badly battered,with two test cuts on reverse
DRACHMS Similar.
10 *a 8-624 *b II-510 *c Br-238 *d I-328 *e E-1703 *f T-1805 *g AA-185 *h n-445 *i IIII-531 *j Br-230 k KK-461 I NN-1445 *m 4-138
\ \ -+ / \ -
4.14
GRC,fig. 9
+\ / \
test cut on obverse and reverse large eye; ancient imitation? worn extremelyworn probable imitation;modern?
DRACHM PLATED COUNTERFEIT AE *11 NN-2120 -+ 2.23 broken and heavily blisteredbut attributableto the 5th century since the reverselacks the crescent of 4th- and 3rd-centurydrachms;no silver remains
TRIOBOLS
Similar.
A A 3 8 or e E Owl stg., facing; on either side, olive branch with two pairs of leaves. 3-e 3-e 3-e
3-e GRC,fig. 9 3-e (deposited,with 13c, in 420's B.C.in filling of altar);T. L. Shear,Jr., "The Athenian Agora: Excavationsof 1980-1982," 53 Hesperia (pp. 1-57), 1984, p. 31, pi. 8:b; some wear e-E e-E e-E
*h *i *j k I m
4444444-
3-0
worn
The discoveryof this subaeratecounterfeitin a sanctuaryimpliesthat it was dedicatedthere as a privateofferingand/or to remove it from circulation,like the counterfeitcoins mentioned in 4th-centuryAkropolisinventoriesand the plated imitationslike 160andp that upon detectionwere cut and depositedin the Metroon;p. 9 above.
CATALOGUE
DIOBOL OR TRIHEMIOBOL73
19
Similar.
[AeE] Two owls stg. 1. and r., facing; [between them, olive spray of two leaves]. 1.18
Sv. 10.31-37
*12A
T-1498
11
OBOLS
Similar. 13 *a AA-461 *b KTA-115 *c BE-337 *d NN-1297 *e r-642 *f K-1054 ,g AA-23 *h OA-220 i E-189 j E-562 k E-2175 I Z-2617 m H'-2627a n II-592 o NN-2135 p E-1018 q Q E-6253
HEMIOBOLS
0.62 V 0.61 /, 0.54 0.55 t- 0.62 0.56 t- 0.57 4, 0.63 0.58 broken 0.57 0.64 broken t- 0.60 0.55 0.57 t 0.51
(same context as 12g);Shear 1984 (under 12g above), p. 31, pl. 8:c GRC,fig. 9
Similar.
As with some of the worn, hence unillustratedobols 13i-q, the obverses of these hemiobols are too poorly preservedfor certain attributionto the 5th century.One or more could be 4th centuryin date. ca. 390-295 TETRADRACHMS Similar,but with eye of Athena rendered in full profile. 15 *a
73
AOE Owl stg. r., facing; behind, olive spray and crescent.
o-389
+-
16.73
BMCAttica, xxv, identifiesthis variety as a diobol, not unreasonablysince the same two-owl reversewas used p. for the diobols of the 407/6 gold (Sv. 15.7, 8). Nevertheless,the weightsof 0.90-1.06 g. of the seven specimensillustrated in Svoronosimply that the denominationwas the 12 obol trihnmiobolon, was struckat another time in the second which half of the 5th centurywith the reversetype of owl with spreadwings (Sv. 11.35-42: 0.96-1.10 g.).
16
\ 13.22 a H-1465 *b H-1466 11.17 4- 11.55 c H-1725 4- 13.72 *d H-1935 Walker 1982, pi. 22:2 *e H-1936 13.96 Walker 1982, pi. 22:3 H-1937 11.60 f * H-1938 13.84 Walker 1982, pi. 22:4 *h H-1962 13.59 Walker 1982, pi. 22:5 *i H-2024 10.64 GRC,fig. 11 4- 10.77 J H-2134 4- 14.10 k H-2164 *l H-2165 Walker 1982, pl. 22:6 12.17 4m H-2166 9.15 heavily corroded and broken 16a-tnare all from the same pair of dies and come fromfill of the thirdquarterof the 4th centuryB.C., beneath the Temple of Ares (above,pp. 9-10). The silverplatingis well preservedon all specimensbut 16m. - 11.74 about half of the silver veneer preservedon the obverse;much less *n B-560 on the reverse;(context of the last quarterof the 4th century B.C.) / 12.55 *o E-2420 GRC,fig. 11; Stroud 1974, pl. 25:f / 13.56 GRC,fig. 11; Stroud 1974, pl. 25:f *p E-1365 16o and p (bronzeonly), having identicaldeep cuts on their reversesand found in front of the Metroon, had been officiallymutilatedand deposited in the Metroon in keeping with the nomothetic law of 375/4: see p. 9 above.
DRACHM
Similar.
*18
PLATED COUNTERFEIT AE DRACHM / 2.90 a third to half of the silver plating remains;incuse-squarepunch 00-1134 mark over the ear of Athena on obv.
TRIOBOLS
Similar.
A E E or variant. Owl stg., facing; on either side, olive branch with five or more leaves. E-O (N 18:3) E-e Kleiner 1975, pi. 75, no. 165 (H-K 12-14) e-3
Sv. 21.43-50
19
21
E-E
19a and b can be assigned to the first half of the 4th century.The more crudely rendered owls of 19c-h are characteristicof the pi-style triobols of ca. 350-295. Compare the many pi-style triobols in the Peiraeus 1956 hoard (IGCH 127);Thompson 1957, pl. 1-3:3-66. DIOBOLS Similar. A E or variant. Double-bodied owl, facing; in each upper corner, olive spray.
e
Sv. 21.54-62
/ \
O-E
TRITARTEMORIA
Similar.
A E O or variant. Three crescents,horns inwards, arrangedin circle. 0-3 E-O ca. 286-280 B.C.orlater
Sv. 17.44-48
21
*a H'-3850 b H-1148
0.40
t 0.49
TETRADRACHMS Similar,but with quadridigitetype of helmet ornament. / 16.28 22 *a A-419 *b A-322 / 15.96
AOE Owl stg. r., facing; behind, olive spray and crescent. Nicolet-Pierreand Kroll, p. 4, pl. 2, no. 20
*23
II-556
14.10
The silver envelope is intact, except for a small patch on the rim and a small area on the reverse.
24
*a b
25
a b
S-6430 K-1730
/
/
16.84 14.06
22
PLATEDAE COUNmEu
ATHENIAN SILVERCOINS
OF 5TH-3RD-CENTURY B.C. TETRADRACHM, 9, 16, OR 23 AS
*26
BA-437
% 8.43
no silver preserved;disfiguredby deep chisel cuts and corrosion.The large size of the owl precludes attributionto any pre-480 owl series.
27
PLATED Couvmir-uF' OF 5TH-3RD-CENTURY B.C.DRACHM, 11, 18, OR 24 AE AS - 2.76 AE only; blisteredand mostly effaced I-895
268-262 B.C.
PENTOBOLS
A E 8 or variant. Owl stg. r., three-quarters facing, lifting wings; [at r. amphora or other symbol].
Sv. 24.1-9
28 *a 00-246 *b IIn-872
/ /
2.26 2.60
2.48
Sv. 23.43-45; 24.18-24 r., facing. issue of first half of the 3rd century (Sv. 23.43-45) same GRC,fig. 9; later 3rd-centuryissue; possible illegible symbol below owls, cf. Sv. 24.18
AOE Owl stg. r., facing; behind, olive spray and crescent. 15.82 Nicolet-Pierreand Kroll, p. 17, pl. 6, F23
cf Sv. 23.11
ca. 220's-190'sB.C.
DRACHM
Sv. 23.25-42
CATALOGUE
ca. 165-42 B.C. 134/3 B.C.(Morkholm 1984) DRACHM,
23
Head of Athena Parthenosr., wearing elaborately ornamented Attic helmet; border of dots.
*32
H'-3347
t 3.61
A-OE Owl stg. r. on amphora, facing; in field: TI-MAINIKIAPXE and anchor (at 1.);on amphora, H; all in olive wreath. GRC,fig. 12
*33
r-1456
12.68
Similar,except in field: HPAKAEIAHIEEYKIAEZI and symbol of [T]IMAI[P] Tyche voting (at r.);letter on amphora illegible. worn and battered
Similar.
*34
H-421
14.02
Similar,except in field: AQ-EIl eEOEIXAPIIAEE[O]]A and symbol of Tyche holding staff (at r.);on amphora, e; below, EO. GRC,fig. 12
25
being no coins that can be associatedwith it, merely as an abstractvalue. Therein would seem to lie the point of Eupolis'and Aristophanes' comic allusions.One could no more buy or sell something for a kollybos in 5th-centuryAthens than one could buy or sell something for a nonexistent U.S. half-centtoday.8 The earliest reference then to an existing bronze coinage at Athens is Aristophanes'mention at Frogs 725-726 of the 7Tov)p&XcaXxLca in 406/5, although this coinage is almost certainly struck to be identified in the silver-plateddrachms and tetradrachmsof the kind found in the Peiraeus 1902 hoard (pp. 7-8 above). To a considerabledegree this identificationrests on the absence of a more plausiblealternative.Forinstance,the discoveryof a bronze coin of Salamisin a Kerameikos grave reported to be of the early 4th century allows that the bronze coins of this Athenian island might go back as earlyas the end of the 5th century(seeunder 640-642). But even if so precociousa chronology were correct, one still could not connect the Salaminian coinage with the bronze of and the later joke about the demonitization of the bronze 406/5, since the passage in the Frogs 815-822 both make it clear that the Athenians themselveshad voted to currency in Ekklesiazousai strikeit. Earlyin this century,EarleFox made a case for associatingthe highly irregularAthenian pieces of varieties 35 and 36 with the 406/5 bronze.9 The two varieties representtwo denominations: 36, designed with a single pellet on the reverse and the reverse type of a 5th-century silver trihemiobol, represents the unit; 35, with a triobol reverse and two pellets, its double. Apart from a few Wappenmiinzentetradrachms,l0these happen to be the only Athenian coins that ever bore marksof value. They are also the only Athenian issues until the Roman Imperial era having obverse Athena heads that face to the left and (except on the late 4th/early 3rd-centuryvarieties 50 and 52) ethnics spelled with an eta. On both denominationsthe reverseowl stands on a kernel of wheat. Fox argued that all such departuresfrom normal Athenian practice were intended "to distinguishthese two coins from any others ... and everythingseems to point to the conclusion that if money of necessity really was issued, it must be recognized in these most exceptional little pieces." It can be objected that the AOHethnics ought not to date until after 403/2, when the Athenians formally adopted the Ionic alphabet for official use in place of the Attic alphabet; but Ionic spellingis found in a numberofpre-403/2 Athenianinscriptions, and so this argumentagainst Fox'sattributionis perhapsnot decisiveof itself.1 Noting that six out of the seven Atheniancoins recoveredin the excavationsof Olynthosbelong to variety 35, Robinson and Price more recently equated the Owl-on-wheat-kernelpieces with the coins known to have been minted by the Athenian commander Timotheos during his siege of Oikonomika Olynthosin the late 360's.12Accordingto the pseudo-Aristotelian 2.23.1, Timotheos ran
Cf. M. N. Tod, "EpigraphicalNotes on Greek Coinage I: KOAATBOE," JC, ser. 6, 5, 1945 (pp. 108-116), pp. 111-112, comparingthe kollybosof Eupolisand Aristophanesto the proverbialEnglish "mite".The only concrete evidence for the value of a kollyboscoin comes from a late Hellenistic inscriptionfrom Adania in Messenia, IG V i, 1532, in the improvedtext of Tod, BSA28, 1927-1928, pp. 153-157, where the kollybos (representedby the symbol almost certainly its half (Tod, "Epigraphical K) is a fraction of the chalkous, Notes," pp. 113-114). But the term was presumablyappliedto other minusculevaluesat other times and places.Reinach'sequationof the kollyboswith the Attic obol ([note 6 above, p. 24], pp. 156-158) rests on the sequence of small weights in Theophrastus, de Lapidibus 46, and can be passed over now that D. E. Eichholz (TheophrastusLapidibus, de Oxford 1965, p. 119) bracketsthe kollybos weight denominationin this passage as a late and unreliableinterpolation.See p. 37 below. 9 H. B. Earle Fox, "Some Athenian Problems," JC, ser.4, 5, 1905 (pp. 1-9), pp. 2-5. 10 Kroll 1981b,p. 13, pl. 2:17. 11 Pre-403/2 use of Ionic letters: L. Threatte, TheGrammar I, ofAttic Inscrptions Berlin/New York 1980, pp. 27-38. 12 Robinson and Price 1967, pp. 1-6.
8
26
out of cash and issuedbronze coins, which he promisedto redeem later in silverin order to provide his troops with ration money. The irregularnature of his coinage and the fact that it was struck far fromAthens admirablyaccount for all anomaliesof varieties35 and 36. But in developingtheir attribution,Robinson and Price were unawareof the nine Owl-on-wheat-kernel provenience-based pieces thatwere found in Athens, eight in the Agora and one fromthe Pnyx excavations,and of three otherspecimensthatwerepurchasedin Thebes.13Mightthese twelvepieces fromAthensand Boiotia outweighthe six excavatedat Olynthos and give new substanceto Fox'sold attributionto 406/5? They cannot. It is much easier to explain the Agora, Pnyx, and Thebes examplesof 35 and 36 as the remnants of a north Aegean military "scrip"that was perhaps never redeemed in full and traveledhome with the troops and rowers left holding it than it is to imagine how specimens of the 406/5 bronze could have reached Olynthos in such numbers as to dominate overwhelmingly the finds of lost Athenian coins at the site, especiallywhen the 406/5 bronze was unlikelyto have retained any monetary value outside Attica. Second, although 36 borrows its reverse type from 5th-centuryAthenian silver (trihemiobolswere not struck after the 400's), other typological and bronze are more at home in the 4th century. This is stylisticdetails of the Owl-on-wheat-kernel obviouslyso for the AeH ethnic, but it appliesequallyto Athena'sprofileeye on obversesand to the heavy foliage of the olive sprayson either side of the owl of 35.14 There is finallythe grain of wheat on which the owls are perched. As Robinson and Price plausiblysuggest, the symbol refersto the purpose of the coinage as militarygrain money (acrt7patov).15In the 4th century,foot soldiersand a rowersnormallyreceivedtwo obols per diem for rations,16 sum very much in line with the valuesof tariffedat 1: and 3 obols in accordancewith theirreverse these coins, whetherthey were respectively typesor whether,as theirmarksof value imply,merelyat 1 and 2 obols.17Inasmuchas Robinsonand bronze to Timotheos has so much to recommend Price's attributionof the Owl-on-wheat-kernel it, only one extant bronze coinage remainsthat can be identifiedwith the xovpa&XaXxIaof 406/5, bronze representedin the Peiraeus1902 hoard. namely,the silver-plated This disguisedbronze coinage from the end of the PeloponnesianWar and the bronze military strikingsof Timotheos (which must have become quite well known at Athens, as the Agora finds attest)were both short-termexpediencies,issued in place of silverat times of financial crisis. Both were relatively high-value fiduciary coinages and could hardly have inspired confidence in the concept of a bronze currency among a populace whose attachmentto a coinage of exceptionally pure, local silverwas a matterof long-standingnationalpride. Fora while in the 4th century,Athens struckfractions in silver as small as the quarterand eighth of an obol (Sv. 17.53-56, 22.23). But the need for a more convenientpetty currencyin bronze must neverthelesshave been recognized,
and one of reportedin EABC,p. 147, note 19, the three pieces from Thebes are in privateAthenian collections, listed in Pnyx p. 16, no. 12, is verifiable.The numberof specimenswith Macedonianproveniences the three examples I, has also grown. One piece in one of the same privatecollectionsis fromAmphipolis,and two othersare said to have been found in Macedonia. 14 The fine British Museum specimen of 35 (Robinsonand Price 1967, fig. 1 = Sv. 22.93) has four pairs of leaves and a terminal berry or leaf on each of its olive branches. Fifth-centurysilver triobols (12) were designed with only two pairs of leaves plus a terminal berry,and the gold triobolsof 407/6 (Sv. 15.4-6) have two or three pairs and the terminal,whereasolive brancheswith four or more pairsof leaves are common on triobolsof the 4th century(19). 15 Robinson and Price 1967, 5, note 2. p. 16 Demosthenes 4.28, and, in general, Griffith,pp. 268-272, 296. 17 Possibly,the discrepancybetween the marks of value and the denominationaltypes is to be understood as the differencebetween values of 1 and 2 obols at time of issue and implied or guaranteedredemption values that were that greaterby a third. Such inflated "face"values would of course have made the coins more palatable to an army was very angry,we are told by pseudo-Aristotle 2.23.1), at being forced to accept them. (Oikonomika
13 As
PERIOD I
27
in particularly the furtherreachesof Attica;for it was there,with the coinage struckby the Athenian cleruchyon Salamis, that the regularproductionand use of small-denominationbronze currency in Attica apparentlybegan (see under 640-642). Before the middle of the 4th century a second Attic bronze coinage appeared,the Eleusiniancoinagewith Triptolemos/Piglettypes and the legend EAEYEI (38). This was minted in Athens and employedthe same modularunit (designatedherein as AE 3) as the Salaminiancoins;the denominationwas in all probabilitythe quarter-obol(pp. 34-36 below). Then, probably in the early to mid-330's, Athens finally issued bronze coins in her own name, at first by merely adding her AeE ethnic to the Eleusinian Triptolemos/Piglet coins (39) but quicklysubstitutingAthena/Owl types once the citizenrywas finallyreconciledto an explicitly Athenianbronzecoinage. Fromthatpoint down towardthe middlepartof the 3rdcentury,emissions, predominatelyof the AE 3 denomination,were minted at variedintervalsin both the Athenian and the Eleusinianseries.l8
PERIOD I (includingthe Eleusiniancoinage) Mid-4th-Mid-3rd CenturiesB.C. Fundamental to the chronology of the first period of regular bronze coinage in Attica (Table I, between the Eleusinianand Athenian series.Both seriesmust pp. 320-321) are the interconnections be treatedtogether and call for some prefatoryremarksabout the anomalousEleusinianmaterial. The 4th- and 3rd-century bronzeinscribedEAEYEI alwaysbeen one of the more problematic has coinages of ancient Greece. Assuming that the legend was an ethnic, Barclay Head conjectured that "Eleusiswas the only Attic deme which was allowed by Athens (perhaps on account of its sacred character)to coin bronze money for the requirementsof the Eleusinian Festivals."19 But other scholars,skepticalthat a politicalsubdivisionof Athenscould have exercisedthe prerogativeof mintingcoins, have arguedeitherthat the coinagewas producedby a brieflyindependentEleusinian state20or that, as an Eleusinianfestivalcoinage, it was actuallyminted under the centralauthorityof Athens.21The first view can be rejectedat once. There were never more than two short intervals duringwhich the deme center of Eleusiswas divorcedfrom Athens, in 403-401, when Eleusiswas establishedas a semiautonomouspolity for dissidentAthenianoligarchs,and in 287-285/4, when it was held by a garrisonof DemetriosPoliorketes;22 the variedbronze coinage with the Eleusinian yet legend was struckover more than a century.
18 Salamis continued strike the secondhalfof the 4th to in
(640-642) is too vague to merit discussionin this chapter.
19
Svoronos,quoted in Traiti II.iii, p. 140; Picard,Antre, 293. p. 21 So Babelon (rait II.iii, pp. 138-142) and Thompson (1942, pp. 213-219). See also J. H. Kroll, "Athenian Bronze Coinage and the Propagationof the EleusinianMysteries"(ecture, Chicago 1991), abstractin AJA96, 1992, pp. 355-356. 22 In 287 (accordingto Habicht, Untrhucen, pp. 45-60, and Osborne, pp. 181-194, againstShear,Kalias,pp. 63the 73, favoring286 B.C.) Athenianswon their freedomby expellingDemetrios'troopsfrom the Mouseion but had yet to control of the other forts in Attica. For the subsequentrecoveryof Eleusisin 285/4, see Shear,Kallias, 83-86, gain pp. and P. Gauthier,"Lareunificationd'Athenesin 281," REG92, 1979 (pp. 348-399), p. 372.
HN2,p.391. 20 So Le Cavaignac,pp. 331-332 (= idem, trsorsacrld'Aksisjusqu'en 404, pp. 79-80); Ferguson,p. 145, note 4; I. N.
28
The interpretation this as an Athenianfestivalcoinage, on the other hand, is scarcelybeyond of as it is by both the iconography and the minting history of the coins. The question, supported iconography pertains not to the deme of Eleusis but to the mythology (Triptolemos)and ritual (the paraphernalia initiates'sacrificial piglet and theirdistinctivestaffof bound myrtleboughs)of the In GreaterMysteries.23 a later PeriodI issue with an obversehead of Demeter (61), the reversesof after the coins depict the Eleusinianofferingvessel,theplemochoe, which the last day of the Mysteries, the Plemochoai, is named, and the ring (herein called the "Eleusisring")that was used to clasp togetherthe boughs of the initiates'mysticstaff.24 The second argument for the festival hypothesis comes from the recurrence of issues with Eleusinian types through the whole of the Hellenistic bronze coinage. After the adoption of Athena/Owl bronze coins signed AGE,such special Eleusinianissues were often struckin parallel with them and continuedto bear the traditionalEAEYEI legend. The late 4th-centurycoin mistakenly struckwith an EleusinianTriptolemosobverseand a Two-owl,AeE reverse(p. 32 below)provesthat these Eleusiniancoins were struckin the same centralmint as Athens' AeE bronze.After the middle is of the 3rd century,however,the EAEYEI legend vanishes,and AGE henceforthused on all occasional issues with Eleusiniandesigns. Such issues are especiallyprominent in the last quarter of the 3rd (116 and 117).25 Altogether,these recurringEleusinian century (72-75) and in the later 80's B.C. issues constitute what must have been a recognized if sporadic traditionwithin Athenian bronze coinage as a whole, and they are virtuallyinexplicableunlessthere was some direct associationwith the celebrationof the Mysteries. By the 4th century,control of the festival and the sanctuaryof Demeter and Kore had long passed into the hands of the Athenian state at large,26so that even if no proof existed in the form of the above-mentionedhybrid Triptolemos/Two-owlcoin, it would still follow that the EAEYEI legend coinage must have been struckby the polis of Athens.This means, of course, that the EAEYEI but cannot be expanded as an "ethnic"of the demesmen of Eleusis, that is, 'EXeuaL(vtlov), must be understoodas referringin one way or another to the festival.MargaretThompson realizedthis in her paper espousing the festival interpretationof the coinage, but she thought that the legend But named the Eleusinia,the agonisticfestivalheld at Eleusis.27 this festivaldid not begin to rankin importancewith the Greater Mysteries;and since the iconographyof the coins refers exclusively to the Mysteries,the legend must surely refer to the Mysteriesas well. EAEYEI apparentlyserved
Graz 1987. On the piglet For Triptolemos,see G. Schwarz, Ikonographie Trpolemos: und enerAgrar- Mystriengothit, R. sacrifice to Demeter, see K. Clinton, "Sacrificeat the Eleusinian Mysteries,"in Eariy Grk Cut Practice, Hagg, N. Marinatos, and G. C. Nordquist, eds., Acta InstitutiAtheniensisRegni Sueciae, Stockholm 1988, pp. 69-79; and but the Burkert, 256-264. In modern scholarship, mysticstaffofmyrtle is usuallycalled a bakdos, this is probablynot pp. lumiereet le faisceau:Images du ritueleleusinien," 103. C. BErard the correctterm; see Clinton, Sacred ("La p. Officials, Mor 48, 1985, pp. 17-19, note 1) argues that the ancient name wasb5pdy,a. et du Recherches docments CntreThomas I owe these last and other referenceson Eleusinianmatters to ProfessorClinton, who kindly read an earlier draft of this chapterand suggesteda number of improvements. For the correct identification,see 24 The plemochoe is the vessel that numismatistshave often termed a kernos. 544-549. The "Eleusisring"is the clasp thatJ. D. Beazley ("Bakchos-rings," F Brommer,"Plemochoe,"AA 1989, pp. while cautioning that the initiates'staff on which ser. VNC, 6, 1, 1941, pp. 1-7) provisionallytermed a "bakchos-ring", bakchos. it was used may not have been called a varieties127-129, 146, 150, 154, 155, 25 See also the 2nd-centuryvarieties86 and 106 and the other post-86 B.C. last emissionsmay have been special festivalissues;see p. 84 below. althoughit is uncertainhow many of these 26 Clinton, Saed Ofifals, p. 8. 27 4AP 100, 1979, pp. 1-12; Thompson 1942. On the festival: K. Clinton, "The Eleusiniaand the Eleusinians," GRBS16, 1975, pp. 269-279. R. M. Simms, "The Eleusiniain the Sixth to FourthCenturiesB.C.,"
23
PERIOD I
29
as an accompanyinglabel to underscorethe force of the images on the coins, to indicatethe purpose of the coinage, and, initially,to disassociatethe bronze from Athenian money proper. It may be scil. "Eleusinian(money),"on the model of other plausiblyexpanded 'EXeucua(vlcx6v, v6atLaVa), coin legends in the neuter singular,or simply 'EXeuol(voq),"of Eleusis."28 adjectival The associationof certain Greekcoinageswith majorfestivalsis well documentedin the Roman Imperial era, when coins were frequentlystruckwith types and legends advertisinglocal games.29 But the associationcan be tracedback as earlyas the 5th- and 4th-centuryB.C. silvercoinage of Elis, which most commentatorshave connected in one way or another with the quadrennialOlympic festival.30 Althoughsuch Greekfestivalcoinageswill have servedas souvenirsand helped to advertise the festivals,one assumes that most were struckto provide money for the festival trade, which in the case of EleusinianMysteriesmust have been considerable.Unlike most Panhellenicfestivals,the Mysterieswere celebratedannually,and probablyno other event in the Athenian calendarattracted a greaternumber of visitorsto Attica. Philostratos' remark(Life ofApollonios 4.17) that the Mysteries were "the most crowded(ToXuav9p7x6ToXaa) of Greekfestivals"appliesto Imperialtimes. But even in the 4th century B.C.the great internationalpopularityof the festival must have been growing: between ca. 368 and 347 a revised code of regulationsgoverning the publicizing and conduct of the Mysterieswas promulgatedto encourageincreasedforeignparticipation.31 Each year every new initiate and his or her sponsorlived at Eleusisduring the last four days of the festival,purchasingtheirlodging,food, drink,and amenitiesfromlocal vendors,innkeepers,and, one imagines,a whole agora of Athenianand itinerantmerchantsmakingthe festivalrounds.32 Such festivalbusinessrequiredmoney,in particular small-change the kindsuitablefor dailyprovisions. And the tiny fractionsof Athenian silver,the bronzepieces of Salamis,and any other miscellaneous given ecth petty currenciesavailablein Attica in the second quarterof the century,it is not hard to image the Athenians turned to supplyingthis trade with a convenient bronze coinage of their own why manufacture. The coins are only one of the commercialimportance of the EleusinianMysteries. insication The 2nd-centuryB.C. decree IG II2 101333informs that Eleusiswas one of the three sites in Attica where the Athenians maintained an official set of standardweights and measures. The two other sets were housed inside the Tholos in the Agora and at the Peiraeusand were, as at Eleusis,in the keeping of a public slave. Notably, the slave in charge of the standardsat Eleusis was responsible to officials of the Mysteries: the hierophant and "the men appointed each year for the festival"
28
"Eleusinian" were commonly used with referenceto the sanctuaryand cult of Demeter and Kore, as distinctfrom the surroundingdeme; cf. the officialtitle of the overseersof the sanctuary, who were simplycalled the Cta-tccrat 'EXCuatvL 'EXeuawv6sv(IGI3 391, line 15;II2 1544, line 1; 1672, line 3, etc.). Forthe adjective (IGIS 386, line 2) or the EktaxaT&la omitted from LSJ,see, e.g., Strabo8.6.22; IG II2 1666, lines B.69, 75, 81, and 1672, lines 53, 54, 309. 'EXeuaLvLax6q, 29 SeeJ. P. Callu, Lapolitique monitaire empereurs des de romains 238 d 311 (BibliothMque 6coles fran9aisesd'AthMnes des et de Rome 214), Paris 1969, pp. 26-27; A.Johnston in Sardis M7, pp. 12-14; Harl, pp. 19, 28, 63-70. 30 Summaryin Kraay,ACGC, 103-105. Fora probablebronzefestivalcoinage of HellenisticThespiai, see 606 and pp. 607. 31 K. Clinton, "ALaw in the City Eleusinionconcerningthe Mysteries," 49, Hesperia 1980, pp. 258-288, esp. 273-275, 281. 32 On Greekfestivalsas "fairs" and the economic significance the festivalmarket,see L. Ziehen, RE XVIII, col. 582, of s.v.Panegyris;M. Wtrrle, Stadt FestimKaiserzeitihen und Klinaien, Munich 1988, pp. 209-215. 33 Translationin M. M. Austin, TheHellenistic tothe WorldfiomAlexander Roma Conquest, Cambridge 1981, pp. 191-193, no. 111.
of Fortheseand otherforms coinlegends,see Kraay,ACGC, 5-7. In antiquity, today, as "Eleusis" and pp.
30
(icl xTv =cav5yuptv,lines 48-49). It was clearlyappreciatedthat efficientand well-regulated buying and sellingat the festivalmarketcontributedto the successof the festival. The chronology of the Eleusinianand Athenian varietiesis best discussedby subgroups,here and in Table I (pp. 320-321 below)indicatedby roman numerals. on 38: Trptokmos/Piglet mystic staffEAEYZI (i.a) Variet The initial Eleusinianseries is distinguishedby large, heavy flans (15-18 mm., 3-4 g.) and the use of reversesymbols or letters to differentiate fifteen emissions.34 its These fifteen emissionslead of AeE issues(39 and 40), themselvesthe immediateforerunners the first down to the Piglet-on-staff, Athenian Double-bodied owl bronze (41) probablyof the early or mid-330's. Hence, if the fifteen Eleusinianemissionswere minted on a more or less annualbasis,the serieswill have begun sometime decree and reform program for attractingmore in the 350's. A connection with the 368-347 B.C. foreignvisitorsto the festivalis likely. The characterof the changing symbols and letters sets these issues apart from all other 4thcentury Athenian coinage. Being predominately "private"rather than public in character,the symbols (such as ivy branch, grapevine,boukranion,fly, shell, dolphin, and astragal)are evidently the marksof the individualsor boards of officialswho oversawproduction of the separate issues. The officials may have been among those chosen for the administrationof the festival, like the or 7tot&Txrit 'EXeuaov60ev; if the moneyersbore a liturgicalexpense, clansmen of the Eumolpidai and Kerykeswith their close ties to the Mysteriesmight have participated.35 on 39 staf, (i.b) Varieies and40: Tiptolemos/Piglet mystic AeE varieties (with reduced diametersand The changed ethnic of these concluding Piglet-on-staff on the main emission(39: A8Eabovepiglet)by a weightof 13-15 mm. and ca.2.5 g.)is accompanied issues,the symbolsof the EAEYZI change in the characterof the reversesymbol.Unlike the "private" of Eleusiniandevices. the "religious-public" repertory symbol here, the plemochoe, is drawn from to for the festivalcoinage apparentlyhad been transferred a differentadministrative Responsibility authority.If we could be sure that this minor reform in the organizationof the coinage belonged we financialreformsconcerningAthenianfestivalsin the mid-330's,36 would gain a with Lykourgos' valuablefixed point for the earlyPeriodI chronology.But an earlierdate for the reformis possible.37 These first regular A9E strikingsin bronze led quickly to the next step in the development of the coinage, viz., the replacementof Eleusiniantypes with traditionalAthenian owl types, as the Athenians seem to have overcome in stages their hesitancy to place their name and types on a base-metalcoinage. headandivyleaf(Sv.103.2, (2)ivybranch 103.1), boukranion 103.4, In theexergue: pig's 5), (Sv. (3) (Sv. 3), (1) shell (Sv. (7) (Sv. (6) (Sv. ring 7), (4)scallop (Sv.103.6, (5)Eleusis inwreath 103.18), fly(orbee?) 103.9), astragal 103.10), cluster Numismatic head(American (Trait, (10) Society), vinewithleafandgrape (9) (Sv. (8)dolphin 103.14), ram's
34
pl. 109:17),(11) letter A (Cavaignac,nos. 49 and 54). In right field: (12) plemochoe (?) (Traii, pl. 193:15)and (13-15) the series.The M and N emissionshave 14-16 mm. diametersand fall at or near the end.
The and M letters (Sv. e p. (1942, 218,note18) by 103.11). listcompiled Thompson pl. 103.15), (BMC.Atca,20:4) N(Sv. of themat thebeginning of The 1 omits theastragal. uniformly 17-18mm.flans emissions and2 locate large only 35Assuggested, iteras, Kevin Clinton. per by 36 F. Mitchel, Athens: ofose Taf W. ClasiStdes II:Lctures inMemoy UnisityofCincinati 338-322," "Lykourgan 1973 Sempe Norman (pp.163-214), 197-198. II, pp. that of the date varieties 37 The 4th-century of thepresent (1942,pp. 220-221) the precludes theory Thompson 3rd of was in ethnic caused theMacedonian (p. occupation Eleusis theearly century 27above). by changed
PERIOD I
31
41-43: Athena Attichelmet/Double-bodied in owl (ii) Varieties With 979 recorded Agora specimens, this first fully fledged "Athenian" bronze coinage is one of the most prolific from any period. Apart from the rare bronze tritartemoria(37), it is the only Athenian bronze until the late 3rd centurymodeled on contemporarysilvercoinage: obverseheads reproducethe pi-styleAthena heads of the later 4th-centurysilver,reverses,the type of 4th-century diobols (in the fringedstyle characteristic the owls on later 4th-centurysilver).38 of Productionbegan in a relativelyslight emission (41) with the double-bodied owl standing on a horizontalEleusinianstaffthat is carriedover from the Piglet-on-staff emissions.After the second Double-bodiedowl variety(42), which lacksa symboland has reduceddiametersof normally 12-14 mm., the coinage entered a final voluminousphase in the varietymarkedby an Eleusisring under the feet of the owl (43). In this last phase, diametersshrinkeven further;hurriedstrikingis evident from many pieces stamped from poorly centered dies (cf. 43g); an towardsthe eseries,the end of when diameters frequentlyreach a minimal 10-11 mm., the die cutters ceased to adhere to the pi-style model and produced Athena heads either in a softer, naturalisticrendering (43e-g, with Sv. 22.42) or with perfunctorycrudeness(43h and i). The small owls of these latest pieces generally have stubby,compactbodies, and in two instancesthe ethnic is freelyspelledwith an eta (431and m). Since this was a huge coinage, with weights and diameters that underwent a considerable for The earliestprobable reduction,the Double-bodiedowlswereclearlystruck a protracted period.39 date for the inaugurationof the pi-style silver,around or soon after 350 (pp. 8-9 above), provides the terminus quem; inception of the succeeding Two-owl bronze, 44 47, after 322 or 317 the post the terminus ante,unless, as the naturalisticAthena heads and different size modules of provides the two coinages suggest, there was some overlapbetween the minting of the latest Double-bodied owls and the earliestTwo-owl coins (44), which also have the Eleusisring as a type adjunct. Since in either case a substantialpart of the Double-bodied owl bronze can be attributedto the 320's, the problem is whether it could have begun as late as the mid-330's under the administrationof Lykourgos,or whether a somewhatlonger period of mintingis called for.At present, a startingdate after 338 seems preferable,but furtherevidenceis needed. AlthoughDouble-bodiedowls firstoccur in archaeologicaldepositsroughlydated to the last half or last thirdof the 4th century,40 tells us this even less about the date than do the above considerations, which locate the bulkof the coinage in the 330's and 320's. The stylisticrange of the massivevarietyof Double-bodied owl over Eleusisring makes it clear that this could not possiblybe an emissionofa single year and that the Eleusisring was thereforea static adjunct part of the reversetype. So, too, must be the mystic staff under the owl on the first variety (41). The displayof these Eleusiniandevices suggests,of course, that this firstAthena/Owl bronze coinage was minted, like the Triptolemos/Piglet coinage it replaced, in conjunctionwith the celebrationof the EleusinianMysteries.AdjunctEleusiniansymbolscontinue to appear on the next two Athena/Owl issues, Two owls over Eleusisring (44) and Two owls over plemochoe (45),
These stylisticreplicationsshould not be taken as evidence that the Double-bodied owl bronze was produced in the same mint as the silver.Despite considerablevariationin die alignments,the majorityof the Double-bodied owl bronzes have alignments in the 12 or 6 o'clock positions, while very few have the 8 or 9 o'clock alignments typical of all Athenian silver coins from the late 5th through most of the 3rd century B.C. Like most of the later bronze and silver coinages of Athens, the Double-bodied owl bronze and the silvercoinage contemporarywith it must have been struckindependentlyof one another. 39 Caley,pp. 45-47, noted the exceptionalvariabilityin the bronze alloy of the five Double-bodied owls he analyzed and contended that the seriesmust have been protracted. 40 See pp. 29&-301 below,nos. 2, 3, and 5 and the Agora Deposit S 19:3.
38
32
and then disappear(46: Two owls, no symbol)about the time thatthe EleusinianTriptolemos/Piglet coinage is revived(48 and 49). The implicationseems to be that before this revival,all the PeriodI bronze coinage may have been issued as Eleusinianfestivalmoney. 44-49: Athena Attichelmet/ owlsin olive in Two and in wheat wreath, Triptolemos/Piglet wreath, (iii) Varieties
EAEY
The four varieties of the wreathed Two-owl coinage (44: Eleusis-ring symbol, AGE;45: plemochoe symbol,Ae; 46: no symbol,Ae; and the rare47: no symbol,AGH) representa renovation of the bronze coinage after the crudely minted late Double-bodied owl strikings.Size and weight harkback to the latest Piglet-on-staffbronze(39 and 40) in the 13-15 mm., ca. 2.5 g. range, which remainsstandardfor the rest of PeriodI. The typeswere redesignedand more notablyand lastingly were emancipatedfrom stylisticdependencyon contemporarysilver.As in the latestDouble-bodied owls, obverse Athena heads, often in richly ornamented helmets (cf. 44a and Sv. 24.49), are now renderedwithout a trace of mechanical,pi-style rigidity.The Two-owl reversetype is not entirely new, since two standingowls had been the device of 5th-centurysilverdiobols or quarter-drachms (12A)and gold diobols(Sv.15.7, 8). But the olivewreathencirclingthe reverseis new,and it remained a fixtureof the bronze coinage well into the 3rd century. The third and largestTwo-owlvariety(46) is the last Athenian issue that was struckbefore the destruction the Kerameikos of BuildingZ-3 betweenca.320-317 and the startof the Owl-leftissue50 in 307 (seebelow).46 appearsquite clearlythen to belong to the 317-307 oligarchythat Kassandros installedunder Demetrios of Phaleron.It is likelythat one or both of the two relatedissues,44 and 45, were minted duringthis same regimeor underthe 322-317 oligarchythatAntipatrosestablished under Phokion. A specialproblemis raisedby the two coins listedundervariety47, which are essentiallyvariants of variety 46 but bolder in design (apartfrom their large Athena heads, note the full-bodiedolive leaves on the better-preserved46a). As the AeH spelling of their ethnic is characteristicof the following Owl-left variety,the two coins appear to belong to a limited emission struckjust before the change to the Owl-left types. Eleusiniancoinagewas revivedin the courseof the Two-owlseriesabout As noted, the traditional the time that the Two-owl coins ceased to be markedwith Eleusiniansymbols. The synchronism 48 between the two new Eleusinianvarietieswith legends in EAEY, and 49, and the Two-owl AO varieties45 and 46 is impliedthrough(a)the curtailedlegendsin both groups;(b)coordinateweights and diameters (Table I, pp. 320-321 below); (c) the surroundingwheat wreath of the Eleusinian reverses,which parallelsthe reverseolive wreath on the owl coins; and (d) the find of twelve Two above (48), corrodedtogether in a lump owls over plemochoe (45) and four Wreathedpiglets, EAEY at the bottom of the Dipylon well in the Kerameikos(Purse A, p. 299 below). For proof we have only to turn to the hybrid coin illustratedby Svoronos (Sv. 103.40, now in the British Museum) obverse(Triptolemos with a Wreathed-piglet (45) chariot)and a Two-owls-over-plemochoe mounting reverse, a piece we owe to "a workmanat the Athens mint, [who] confusing his dies, struck the flan of the intended Eleusiniancoin with the punch of a contemporaryAthenian issue."41 and in 50 helmet/Owl He/A, in olivewreath, heavy Triptoleleft, (iv) Varieties and 51: Athena Corinthian in wheat EAEYEI wreath, mos/Piglet The averageweight of the Owl-leftpieces is some 50 percentgreaterthan that of the preceding and followingAthenianvarieties.Thisjump in weight, however,is not accompaniedby a significant
a doesnot appear typeof Triptolemosmounting chariot Thompson 1942, p. 214 (cf.p. 224).The variantobverse varieties.On the precedingPiglet-on-mystic-staff until the Wreathed-piglet obverses,Triptolemosis alwaysseated.
41
PERIOD I
33
increasein diameter.Since the new designformatof Corinthianhelmet and a singleowl was retained throughvarieties52-54, which returnedto the ca. 2.5 g. weight of the old Two-owlbronze,it appears that the heavinessof the Owl-leftbronze was intended to enhance acceptabilityand does not signal a change in denomination or value. The Wreathed-pigletcoinage issued contemporaneously(51) points to the same conclusion.42 Despite theiraugmentedweight of 3-4 g. (whichessentiallyrestored them to the standardof the originalEleusinianemissionof variety38), these heavyWreathedpiglets employ the same types and fundamentalmodule as all earlierand later Wreathed-pigletvarieties and undoubtedlyrepresentedthe same value as they. The heaviness of the Owl-left coinage is matched by the exceptional quality of its alloy,43die engraving(cf. Sv. 22.85 and 86), and striking, makingit altogetherone of the most carefullyprepared bronze coinages ever minted at Athens. The coinage, furthermore,was of some magnitude. The 24 best-preservedspecimens of the 251 found in the Agora were stamped from a minimum of 18 obverse dies, and through them one can trace a progressionfrom the large, ornate Athena heads that mustbelong at the beginningof the series(50a-c) to the smaller,plainerones at the end (50h-k). In Athenian coinage the backwardsorientation of the reverse type (owl facing left coupled with retrogradeethnic) is unique. Yet it is repeated on every die of this exceptionally large and well-manufacturedseries (whose obverse Athena heads do face correctly to the right) and must have been a deliberate and officiallysanctioned essentialof the design. Unable to suggest a more plausible explanation, I earlier interpretedthe reversedowl and ethnic as the political expression of a revisionistoligarchic government symbolizing"a reversedAthens, a traditionallydemocratic Athens that had been literally'turnedaround"' (EABC, 146).I accordinglyassociatedthe coinage p. with the two oligarchiesin power between 322 and 307 B.C. But two more recent items of evidence indicate that this dating was too early.The first comes from the excavationin 1978 of Kerameikos at BuildingZ-3, destroyedafter ca. 320-317 B.C.; the time of its destruction,Owl left was not yet in data from the Kerameikos,the coinage was circulation,although, accordingto other stratigraphical known to have commenced by 304 (see pp. 298-299 below). The other evidence is the recognition that the succeedingOwl-right,A-eH,issue (52) is closelytied to issue 53 in the 280's and cannot date to the restoreddemocracyof 307-ca. 300, as previouslysuggested(EABC,p. 147). The downdating of 52 has the effect of bringing down the date of Owl left as far as it will go, but the inception of Owl left cannot come down later than 304, so this varietymust thereforenow be attributedto the democraticgovernmentrestoredto power by Demetrios Poliorketesin 307.44 On this chronology the reversed owl and ethnic will have to remain unexplained, unless they were precautions to ensure that these larger,heavier coins would not be used or mistakenfor cores of plated drachms. But the augmented weight, the modernized spelling of the ethnic, and the novel treatmentof the conventionalAthenian types (the Corinthian-helmet obversecopies the canonicalAthena heads on
42 Three archaeologicalcontexts confirm that the heavy Athenian and Eleusinianvarietieswere struckin tandem. See the KerameikosBuilding Z destructiondeposit (p. 298 below, no. 2), from which both varietieswere absent, and the second Dipylon well purse (p. 299 below, no. 4) and the Agora Deposit F 11:2, both of whose latest pieces are Owl-left and heavy Wreathedpiglets. 43 Caley (p. 32) observedthat the 12.49 and 12.76 percentagesof tin in the alloy of two analyzedOwl-leftcoins (Caley, table V, nos. 1 and 2) are "higherthan ... in any other series." 44 As proposed in Kroll 1982, pp. 241-242; cf Rotroff 1984, pp. 344-345. FourOwl-leftpieces were excavatedfrom the constructionfillof the SquarePeristyle the Agora(cf.EABC, 146-147, listingthe in pp. only one fromuncontaminated fill), but since this building is now known to date from the early years of the 3rd century,the context no longer has any directbearing on the chronologyof the coins; see Deposit O-R 7-10.
34
the gold staters of Alexander and hence carries pro-Macedonianconnotations)give Owl left the characterof a "reform" coinage, in keepingwith the radicalcharacterof the 307 democracy. in helmet/Owl in and in 52-55: Athena Corinthian (v) Varieties right, wreath, lightT?ptolemos/Pigletwheat EAEYEI wreath, Normalcy in weight and design returnedin the three relatedvarieties,52: Owl right, A-eH, in olive wreath;53: Owl right,A-e, in wheatwreath;and 54: Owl right,A-G,in olive wreath.Of these, the second and most plentifulcan be associatedwith a historicaloccasion. Since the conventional olive-wreathborder on the reverse is replaced by a wheat wreath borrowed from the Eleuisinian coins, it is likelythat the resultingcompositeAthenian owl encircledby Eleusinian Wreathed-piglet crownwas createdto symbolizethe unificationof EleusiswithAthens.The type is most appropriately when the Athenians,who in 287 or 286 expelled the Macedonian placed at or soon after 284 B.C., from the Mouseion, succeeded in liberatingEleusis from Macedonian occupation. The garrison reunificationwith Eleusiswas celebratedin special games that year at Eleusisin honor of Demeter and Kore.45 A unique specimen of 53 in Berlin (Sv. 22.80; note the two wheat ears above the head of the owl) has an A-0 ethnic carried over from variety 52 and implies, as do strong general similarities in obverseand reversestyle,46that the two varietieswere contiguous.52, a small emission,probably began thereforesoon after the expulsion of the garrisonon the Mouseion; with the liberationof Eleusis, it was modified into variety 53.47 On the other hand, the last variety of the Owl right in wreath (54) must fall in the 270's, if the next type change, back to a reverseof two owls, is rightly located around 270 B.C. in By size,weight, and representation the AgorahoardDepositA 18:8of the 260's,the Eleusinian in a variety (55) that was contemporarywith 53 or 54, or both. All Wreathedpiglets concluded nineteen Wreathed piglets in the A 18:8 hoard (see 55c and p. 302 below) are of this late, light variety and had been subjected to the same moderate amount of wear (w3-4) as the Owl-right, A-e, pieces. owls wreath 56: helmet/Two in olive in (vi) Vaiety Athena Corinthian Two findsplace this uncommonvarietynear the beginningof the ChremonideanWar(268-261 B.C.).A specimen in uncirculatedcondition (E. Vanderpool,J. R. McCredie, and A. Steinberg, "Koroni:A PtolemaicCamp on the East Coast of Attica,"Hesperia 1962 [pp. 26-61], pl. 17:56 31, = EABC,pl. 16:1)was excavatedfrom the Koroni fort brieflyoccupied by Ptolemaic troops early The other find is the AgoraA 18:8hoard,which was closed probablyaroundthe end of in the war.48 the war and which has as one of its least-wornpieces an example of the presentvariety(56d). e in helmet/Owl 57-60: Athena Corinthian right, E withsymbol (vii) Varieties concludes with three pieces of this series: [57-60]a, The criticalA 18:8 hoard (p. 302 below) whose symbolcannot be read, and 57b and c, both from the issuewith the symbolof a smallwreath. On this slight hoard evidence, the wreath-symbolissue may, despite its light weight, belong earlier
45 IG II2 pp. 657, lines 43-44, with Shear,Kallias, 84-86. 6 Obverses continue the relativelyplain type of Athena heads of the later, smaller Owl-left dies (e.g, 50h-k), but the owls of all three Owl-right varieties are more erect and more conventionallyproportionedthan the distinctively owls of the Owl-leftemission. large-headed,"birdlike" 47 The bronzethusmore or lessparallels DemetriosPoliorketes' the silvercoinage,whichceasedalso to be struckduring of Athens from 294 to 287 or 286. See p. 10 above. militaryoccupation 48 See p. 11 above.
PERIOD I
35
in the series than the issues with wheat-ear symbol (58), cornucopia symbol (59), and Eleusis-ring symbol (60). Since these issues stand apart from the preceding coinage with respect to their unwreathed reverses,three-letter, triangularethnic, and use of emissionsymbols,I once thought (EABC, 144, pp. that the series began after a considerablehiatus in minting;I dated the series (and hence the 149) burial of the A 18:8 hoard) after 255 B.C.,when Antigonos Gonatas, having captured Athens in 261, relaxed his control through a formal grant of eleuteia.49But more substantiveconsiderations now arguefor a datingbefore261. Forone, the variantthree-letterethnic of 56g can be regardedas a transitionalstep towardsthe changed reversesof the Owl-right-with-symbol coinage and suggests that the latter probably followed variety 56 without interruption. There is secondly the strong probabilitythat the A 18:8 hoard was closed aroundthe end of the ChremonideanWar.The hoard contained no regal strikingslater than those of Demetrios Poliorketes(502b, 505) and Lysimachos (462), while included with its 104 coins were four lead tokensrespectivelydepicting a bow, a shield, a cuirass,and possiblya helmet.50The absenceof any bronzeofAntigonos Gonatas,which began to circulatein quantity at Athens after the 260's, is notable. And the lead armor tokens, apparently issuedto civiliansfor the drawingof weapons and armorfrompublic stores,imply that the owner of the hoard was involved with the military defense of Athens.5 If, like many hoards, A 18:8 owed its concealment to a pending catastrophe,one is hard put to suggest a more suitable emergency than Athens' capitulationto Antigonos Gonatas in 261. Third and more concretely,a specimen of the wreath-symbolissue (57g) was excavatedfrom the top of the lower fill of the south chamber of the "Cave"cistern on the Kolonos Agoraios (Deposit H 6:9), a fill that on evidence of pottery was dumped in the 260's upon completion of the adjacent Hellenistic "Arsenal".52 Although the high position of the coin in the fill leaves open the possibilitythat the coin could be intrusive,a pre-261 B.C.chronology for the series of Owl right with symbol is neverthelessto be preferredin the absence of real evidence to the contrary. 62 (viii) Varieties and 63: Two pigletsleft/Upright mysticstaf A-E, in olivewreath,and Pigletright, EAE-YEI AOE?/ Upright staff mystic Absentfromthe A 18:8hoard,thesevarietieswith changedEleusiniantypescomprisea post-261 B.C. coinage that was issuedwithjoint Athenian and Eleusinianlegends. Startingwith the PeriodII varieties72-75 of the last quarterof the 3rd century,all coins with Eleusiniantypes were routinely is signed AGE,so that it is clear that the presentUpright-mystic-staffbronze to be dated either very in PeriodII or before 229, when PeriodII begins. early The chief variety,62, has besides the A-Einitialsof Athens and Eleusis53 composite reverseof a Athenian olive branch encirclingthe Eleusinianstaff. Two variant pieces underscorethe unusual character of this coinage, the one in Paris (Traiti, 193:28) having a normal upright staff, A-E, pl. reverse,but an obverseof a singlepiglet rightover EAEY[, probablystruck(in error?)from a left-over
X, Agora nos. L 27b (two tokens),L 168, and L 227; with Krol 1977, p. 144. The defensive nature of the armor pictured on the tokens is underscoredby the token that pictures a bow, the 51 basicweapon for defendingfromcity walls.The alphablazon on the shieldtokenleavesno doubt that the equipmentwas Athenian and publiclyissued;KroU 1977, pp. 142-143. 52 Rotroff between the latestpotteryin the fill with that from 1983, pp. 258-276, 283-294, arguingfromthe similarity the ChremonideanWarfort at Koroni;R. L. Pounder,"AHellenisticArsenalin Athens,"Hesperia 1983, pp. 233-256, 52, esp. 244 and 255. 53 As Babelon (Trait,II.iii, p. 138) correctlyinterpretedthe letters.
49 Eusebius,ed. A. Schone, Berlin 1866-1875, II, p. 120.
50
36
Wreathed-pigletreverse die.54 The other is the variant of Two piglets left/Upright staff in the NumismaticCollectionof Athens (Sv. 103.41 = Trait,pl. 193:26),which bearsthe ethnic AeE above the two piglets on the obversebut no visibleletterson the reverse. At 1.49 and 1.75 g. and 12 mm., the two extantsingle-pigletcoins of variety63 are smallerthan the two-pigletpieces of 62 (2-2.5 g., 13-14 mm.) and fallunderthe AE 4 modularrubric,as opposed of to the AE 3 classification the doubledpiglets. Hence the single-pigletpieces should representthe denominationalunit to the two-piglets'double.55Although this might connect both varieties single more closely with PeriodII than with the pre-261 bronze,which, except for the Double-bodiedowl obverseof the unique bronze,was limited to the AE 3 double-unit(see below), the Wreathed-piglet coin in Pariswith Uprightmysticstaffsuggestschronologicalproximityto the pre-261 bronzeall the same and encourages dating of this entire group of Athenian-Eleusinianpieces with the upright staff to before rather than after the start of Period II. Thus, between 261 and 229 B.C., monetary in productionin Athenswas apparentlylimitedto these few strikings bronzethatperpetuatedthe old and very tenacioustraditionof Eleusinianfestivalmoney and to howevermuch of the heterogeneous silver(pp. 11-13 above)as happened to be of genuine Athenian mintage. Bronze Antigonid At this time most of the new currencyin Athenswas Macedonian.The occasionaldedicationsof in tetrachma Antgoneia the sanctuaryof Asklepiosfrom 256/5 to 249/8 B.C. and again in 215 B.C.56 hint at the influx of Macedonian silverfrom the garrisonsthat Antigonos Gonatasmaintainedafter 261 in and around Athens, but the king'sbronze was at least as influential.From the 160 pieces of Gonataswith Pan erectingtrophyrecoveredin the Agora (507) and the sizableissue of Athenian coins (69) struckover this regalbronze,it is clearthat this bronzecirculatedin the city in tremendous Much of it had probablybeen consignedto Antigonos'garrisonsbeforepassinginto general quantity. circulation,but its sheer bulkis reminiscentof the greatquantityof Antigonidbronze that had found with local types there (see under 509 and 595). its way to Boiotia and was subsequentlyoverstruck Citing the 1,000 talentsof bronze coin promisedto the Rhodiansby PtolemyIII in 224 B.C.(Polybios 5.89.1) and the 200 talents of coined bronze given by Ptolemy V to the Achaian League in 185 (Polybios22.9.3, 24.6.3), Svoronosproposedthat the Macedonian bronze in Boiotia arrivedin the form of a royal benefaction.57It is possible that a benefaction lay behind the mass circulationof Antigonid bronze in Athens as well. Such a gift, for example, could very well have accompanied Gonatas'grant of freedom to the Atheniansin 255. But ultimatelythe circumstanceof the arrivalof the coins is less importantthan their impact. Weighing 5-6 g. and measuring 19-21 mm. in diameter, they gave the Athenians a new and largerbronze denomination,whose usefulnessmust have been recognizedimmediatelyThese coins bronzes and reduced any lessened the Athenians'dependence on their own smaller-denomination of pre-261 bronze in circulation. More lastingly,once the new need for replenishingthe supply denominationbegan to be struckwith Atheniantypes in the 220's, it servedas the dominantunit of Athens' bronze currency until 86 B.C.It is one of the ironies of Athenian monetary conservatism
bronzeof the 4th and earlier3rd centurieswere identical Evidentlythe anviland punch dies used for the Eleulsinian in shape and size and easilyconfused.See also the coin publishedby Fox 1890, pl. 3, no. 16 (nowin the BritishMuseum), with the reversetype of Wreathedpig, EAEYabove (cf. 48), on both faces. 55 relationship. Thompson (1942, p. 222) righty assumeda "unit"/"half-unit" 56 Habicht, Studen, 35-36, note 105, p. 41. pp. 57 Svoronos 1908, pp. 230-232. 54
PERIOD I
37
that it took the coinage of an occupyingforeignpower to introduceand popularizethis influential AE 2 denomination. Denominational Values In a preliminarydiscussion based on the Agora A 18:8 hoard, I assumed that all Athenian PeriodI bronze was struckin a single denominationalunit and that this unit was the one-eighth obol chalkous,inasmuchas inscribedAthenianaccountsof 329/8 and 328/7 recordsumsof money down to the last chalkousand imply that an Athenian one-chalkouscoin was in circulationat that time.58 The fuller coverage of the Period I bronze in the present study,however,reveals that the coinage breaksdown into two modulargroupings,which in keepingwith the more extensivemodularsystem of the later Athenian bronze can be labeled AE 3 (coins normally of 13-15 mm. in diameter and 2-4 g. in weight) and AE 4 (ca. 10-13 mm. and 1-2 g.). In Period I the smallermodule is representedonly in the extremelyrare Piglet/Upright mystic staff 63 (12 mm., 1.50-1.75 g.) and the Double-bodied owls, which may begin at a borderline 13-15 mm. and 2.14 g level (41) but quicklydecline to become the diminutivepieces of the copious final variety 43 (1014 mm. and 1.85 g.). As the smallestbronze coins circulatingat the time of the inscriptions,such Double-bodiedowls makevery plausiblecandidatesfor the one-chalkousfractions of the inscriptions,even though the reversetype of the Double-bodied owl suggeststhat the coins ought to represent a double unit. But perhaps they do; for if the chalkouswas divided into two Or kollyboi,the coins may have been known as dikollyboi.59 perhapsthe Double-bodied owls were as dichalkia,but their excessivereductionmade it impossiblefor them to retain originallydesigned their original value. Whatever the circumstances,one has only to glance at Plate 4 to appreciate the conspicuoussmallnessof most of the Double-bodiedowls and how readilythey musthave passed as fractionsof the PeriodI coins minted before and afterthem. Except for Piglet/Upright mysticstaff63, all these other PeriodI coins are indeed heavierand, despite some decline and fluctuationin standard,appear to representa single monetary unit. The earlier Piglet-on-staffissues (38) introducethis AE 3 unit with relativelylarge flans of 15-18 mm. and 3-4 g. But late in the course of the Eleusiniancoinage, flans were reduced and by the end, in the Piglet-on-staff, AEEvariety39, had fallento 13-15 mm. and an averageweight of about 2.5 g. This remained the standardthrough the wreathedTwo-owl/early Wreathed-pigcoinage (11 49), and, allowing for some gradual slippage in weight, for the rest of Period I generally.Exceptions, it is true, are to be found in Owl left (50) and the accompanyingheavy Wreathedpiglets (51), whose weights were elevated to 3.5-4 g. and whose diameters sometimes reach 16 or 17 mm. But here we evidentlyhave to do with a short-livedreformor full restorationof standardratherthan a change of value. For the change in diameter is marginal,the heavy Eleusinianpieces bear the same types as the lighter Wreathed piglets that preceded and followed them, and the format of Corinthian helmet/Owl in wreath introducedin the Owl-leftcoinage was retainedin subsequentemissions,the
are EABC,p. 143, note 7. The inscriptions IG II2 1672 and 1673. The chalkousnotationalso occursin the undatable 4th-centuryabacusIG II2 2777. The earliestmention of the chalkous,Demosthenes21.91 (349/8 B.C.), informsonly that Demosthenes' audience was familiarwith the term and the slightvalue of the chalkous.It hardlyrequiresus to believe that the Attic bronze coins of the time, namely the AE 3 Eleusinianand Salaminianpieces of varieties38 and 640, were chalkiaratherthan dichalkia. 59 For the equation of 2 is kollyboi = 1 chalkous,see note 8 above, p. 25. The value-term Btx6XXupos attested,but the context (Aristophanes, Aiolosikon, frag. 3 [Koch]) belongs too early in the 4th century to be relevant to any coins of PeriodI.
58
38
sizes and weights of which had nevertheless returned to the normal ca. 13-15 mm., ca. 2.30-2.50 g.
range (52-54).
The doubled device of some of these AE 3 varieties strongly connotes that this was a double unit. One phase of AE 3 strikings (14 47) employed a two-owl reverse, later revived in variety 56. And in the late Athenian-Eleusinian variety 62 we meet with an obverse of two piglets, an odd and inexplicable type unless we are to understand that the piglet was doubled for denominational
emphasis,to distinguishthese coins especiallyfrom the smaller,lighterone-piglet coins (63) minted with them. Nor was the two-owlreversediscontinuedwith the PeriodI coinage. When the AE 3 unit at resumedca.229 B.C. the startof PeriodII, a reverseof two standingowlswas again adopted(65), as it was for the huge Period III AE 3 coinage that was struckover much of the second half of the 2nd century (99). Hence the AE 3 unit may be plausiblyequated with the dichalkon, or, as the denomination was alternativelyknown with reference to its value as the quarter of the obol, the tetartemorion. fit It is reassuringto see how logicallythese two PeriodI identifications the expanded denominationalstructureof Athens'laterHellenisticbronze.Fromthe later 3rd throughthe mid-1stcentury B.C. (Periods II-IVA), the coinage involvedfive modularunits (cf. Table VI, p. 329 below): AE 1: 8-10 g. ca. 20-22 mm. 5-7 g. ca. 16-20 mm. AE 2: AE 3: ca. 13-15 mm. 2-4 g. ca. 10-13 mm. AE 4: 1-2 g. under 1 g. AE 5: ca. 7-10 mm. Of these, the AE 4 unit was minted in the greatestquantitythroughout,preciselyas one would expect if it were the basic chalkous.It was followedin popularityby its AE 3 double (as suggested by its commonly doubled reverseowls)and by the new AE 2, which fromits position one step up the or denominationalladder can be readily equated with the tetrachalkon, hemiobol.60 The minimal AE 5 unit played a far more limited role, as it did not appear until the last third of the 2nd century and did not outlast the end of PeriodIII in 86 B.C. 68 below). The scale of values identifiesthis (p. as the half-chalkousor kollybos,the smallestGreek monetary unit for which there happens to be Coins of exceptionallylarge and heavy AE 1 size made a brief any epigraphicaldocumentation.61 see pp. 48-49 below)but were soon devaluedand not struckagain appearanceafter229 (64, 66, 68; until after 86 B.C.,when they replaced the AE 2 hemiobols as Athens' standardlarge bronze unit in the revampedcoinage of PeriodIV The identificationof these denominationscan thus be inferred from internal, mutually supporting Athenian evidence. But the resultingmodular-valuesystem of an eighth-obol chalkousof 1-2 g. (10-13 mm.), its 2-4 g. (13-15 mm.) double, and its 5-7 g. (16-20 mm.) quadruplehas been independentlydeduced or proposed also for a number of non-Athenianbronze coinages,62
PaceKroll 1981a, p. 273, where the AE 2 unit was erroneouslyequatedwith the obol. 61 Note 8 above, p. 25. 62 and G. Milne, Kobphon Its Coinge,JM 96, New York 1941, pp. 55-73. Warren 1983, pp. 33, 36, 51; idem J. idem1985, pp. 46-47. W. Weiser,"EinSchatzfundpampylisch-pisidischerBronzemiinzen,"S?R 61, 1982, 1984, p. 22; Zeit," ZPE 66, 1986, pp. 212-213. Picard, pp. 31-34; idm, "Ein Fund von rhodischemKleingeld aus hellenistischer de 281-301. 0. Picard, "L'administration l'ateliermonatairea Thasos au W sicle," RN, ser. 6, 29, 1987 Antre, pp. 33, (pp. 7-14), p. 8, pl. I.J. D. Mac Isaac, "PhliasianBronze Coinage," AJrSMN 1988 (pp. 45-54), p. 52. Grandjean, 28-55. Price (1967, p. 367) classifiesthe bronzecoins from the South Stoa wells at Corinth into three modularsizes, pp. c. A-C (= our AE 2-4); in Price'sunpublished 1967 CambridgeUniversitydissertation,Greek Brone Coinuge 450-150 and and Value, now in BMCAlexander, 39-40, the three modules are identifiedwith Circulation, pp. B.C., Its Introduction,
60
PERIOD I: CATALOGUE
39
which suggests that the system was a conventional one that was recognized and widely adopted throughoutmuch of 4th-centuryand HellenisticGreece.
CATALOGUE
363-359 Head of Athena 1., wearing Attic helmet. 35 7 coins *a e-737 *b NN-1006
*c EE-4
B.C. (Region Olntos) of
A H Owl facing, stg. on kernel of wheat; on either side, pellet and olive branch.
Sv. 22.93-96
d e f g
11 11 10 11
\ -
Sv. 22.97, 98
36
NN-2061
*37
r-137
Sv. 22.50, 51
Rare and imitative of Athenian silver, this is the most perplexing of all early Athenian bronze varieties. Reversesbear the distinctivetype of silverthree-quarter obols (tritartemoria, 21); and although the reversedies were specially engravedfor these larger-diameter versionsin bronze, the two specimens illustratedin Svoronos (Sv. 22.50 and 51, Athens and Berlin, both with 12 mm. diameters)were stamped from tiny obverse dies that appearto have been takenoverfromthe productionof silverfractionsof the obol. The largerobversedies of other examples, such as the one (9 mm.) illustratedin the Credit Bank catalogue63and one of the two unpublished pieces in the British Museum (both 10 mm.), were probably engraved exclusivelyfor the bronze. The variety was struckfrom at least three or four obversedies. It is conceivable that these pieces were actuallybronze tritartemoria, issued in state payments in lieu of silver a momentary fiscal crisis. Or perhaps they were distributedas voucher tokens, to be later exchanged during the hemiobol, the tetartemorion/dichalkon, the chalkous,as they are by the other scholarscited in this note. See also and A. E. Jackson, "The Bronze Coinage of Gortyn,"NC, ser. 7, 11, 1971 (pp. 37-51), pp. 50-51, with similarbut more provisionalidentifications.At Klazomenai, a chalkous (of AE 4 size: 1.3 g., 11 mm.) is so identified by the letter X on the reverse:E Imhoof-Blumer, "GriechischeMiinzen,"JVC, 3, 15, 1895 (pp. 269-289), p. 283, pl. 10:21. ser. 63 A. Bank Numismatic Athens 1978, no. 358. Collection, Walker,TheCredit
40
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1ST CENTURIES B.C. One of the BritishMuseum obversesstylisticallyapproximatesthe Athena heads on for silver tritartemoria.64 some of the later Double-bodiedowl bronzes(431,m), which suggestsa date as late as the 320's. But one stylistic comparison is a slender reed and leaves open the possibilitythat the variety may date from some other time in the century.The barelylegibleAgora examplewas foundwith a Double-bodiedowl bronze(r-138: variety41) in a fill below a Roman floor.
PERIOD I B.C. or ca. 350's-early mid-330's Sv. 103.1-15 EAEYEIabove. Piglet stg. r. Triptolemos,holding wheat on mystic staff;symbol or letter ears in r. hand, seated 1. in below or in field r. winged chariot drawn by two snakes. 15-18 Av. 3.20 (43) 77 coins 38 Pig'shead and ivy leaf, below (Sv. 103.2, 3) 18 - 2.85 a IIA-144 17 - broken b II-877 18 - blistered c AA-50 (L 19:2) Ivy branchwith leaves,below (Sv. 103.1) 17 . 3.01 *d E-1463 16 - 3.50 e A-1 17 - 3.29 f A-9 NN-2004 18 - 3.43 g Boukranion,below (Sv. 103.4, 5) )n 18 - 3.12 *h E-3100 Thompsc 1942, pl. I:l 16 - broken *i IIe-146 15 -- 3.42 j 00-461 Kleiner 1 18 X 3.49 k EA-250 1975,p. 317, no. 251 (P-R 6-12) below (Sv. 103.6, 7) Scallop shell, 16 - 2.78 1 II-28 Ram's head r., below (AmericanNumismaticSociety) 17 -+ 3.77 m H'-3181 Dolphin, below (Sv. 103.14) 17 \ 3.87 *n E-6448 Astragal,below (Sv. 103.10) 16 - 2.97 o H'-3273 - - broken p AA-973 A, below (Cavaignac,nos. 49 and 54) 16 v 3.14 *q H'-2901 e, in field r. (Sv. 103.15) 14 , 2.43 *r Q-515 15 , 2.91 s BA-207 Among the fifty-eightremainingspecimenswith illegiblesymbol or letter,four have Triptolemosseated r. (as Sv. 103.16) and one has piglet 1.(as Sv. 103.14). 64 Cf. the bronze symbolon with a three-obol mark (ou46oXovo Politeia XaXxouv ve'ca tOU y?: Aristotle,Ahenaion 68.2). No such tokens are extant, but for a series of lead dikastictokens that are stamped with the triobol device and that may have been substitutedfor bronze triobol tokens after the Anaion Potia was written, see Rhodes, p. 731, ConsfitutionAtns, London 1893 and 1912, frontispiece,and with the lead tokens illustratedinJ. E. Sandys,Aristotle's of Fox 1890, pl. III:15.
PERIOD I: CATALOGUE
ca. early-mid330's
B.C.
41
Similar. 39 *a *b *c *d *e 24 coins BB-226 I-969 Z-275 II-10 A-208 13-15 14 +15 4 15 +14 t 13 \ Av. 2.51 (16) 2.58 2.62 2.19 3.30 2.74
Sv. 103.33-37
unpublished
An unpublishedbut better-preserved example from the Dipylon Road excavationsin the Kerameikosgives the full ethnic and shows that the reverseis unwreathed.
ca. early mid-330's-322/317 B.C. or Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet. 41 16 coins *a B'-830 *b A-267 *c PP-821 13-15 13 / 15 13 +Av. 2.14 1.93 2.75 2.81
e 3 or variant. Double-bodied
owl stg. on mystic staff;in each upper corner, olive spray.
Sv. 22.43
e-3
Similar. 42 *a *b *c *d *e *f 73 coins S-3088 BF'-875 II-507 ET-233 A-214 4-183 11-15 Av. 1.75 (37) 14 t 1.35 13 t 1.41 15 t 1.85 12 \ 1.12 13 t 1.73 12 \ 1.62
Sv. 22.44-46
e-3
e-E
e-3 e-3
reverse type struckon both sides (cf. Sv. 22.52)
Similar. 43 *a *b *c *d 169 coins A-207 NN-328 ET-97 K-401 10-14 12 / 11 t 13 -+ 10 \ Av. 1.85 (65) 1.77 1.71 2.20 2.21
Sv. 22.35-42
E-e
42
*e *f *g
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1ST CENTURIES B.C. S-6016 K-1428 00-1032 14 11 12 10 12 10 12 10 10 1.90 - 0.81 4 1.17 1.26 \ 1.62 -+ 0.89 / 1.92 t 1.21 / 1.44
4-
e-E GRC,fig. 13 - same obverse die as 43h O-E trimmed flan e-H e-H Kleiner 1975, p. 304, pl. 75, no. 8 (H-K 12-14)
*h *i *j *k *1
Ie-12
Similar,except presence of mystic staff or Eleusis ring below owl uncertain. l-owlvariety. 721 coins of uncertainDouble-bodied [41-43] *a fl-262 12 - 1.85 11 t 1.96 *b A-270 *c NN-2122 13 t 1.56 *d HH-27 11 - 2.26 14 trimmed flan *e AA-991 1.63 *f IIne-124 same 13 - 1.09 N 1.85 same 12 *g S-3732 h e-274 Kleiner 1975, p. 304, pl. 75, no. I (H-K 12-14) 12 2.02 [41-43]a-c are illustratedfor their good pi-style obverses, e-g since their flans had been clipped down, d presumablybefore striking; is nearlytypeless.Most of these coins belong to variety43. Similar.
ca. 322/317-307 B.C. Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet. 44 *a *b *c *d *e *f g 49 coins o-150 8-787 H'-2245 K-772 T-920 A-417 rr-37 13-15 14 13 4 13 \ 14 t 14 413 14 \ Av.2.70 (13) 2.86 2.71 3.19 2.00 2.45 2.73 3.31 A?E below. Two owls stg. 1. and r., facing; between them, Eleusis ring; all in olive wreath. Sv. 24.42-50
Similar.
AO between. Two owls stg. 1. and r., facing; plemochoe below; all in olive wreath.
Sv. 24.34-39
45 *a *b *c *d *e *f
13-15 14 \ 13 t 14 14 13 14 t
GRC,fig. 13
43 Sv. 24.51-57
AO between. Two owls stg. 1. and r., facing; all in olive wreath.
0 Kleiner 1975, p. 321, pl. 75, no. 298 (misclassified) (M-N 15:1)
AO OA 5 -S specimens from the A 18:8 hoard illustratedin EABC, pl. 17:2, 6-9 The small Athena heads and chunkierfabric of 46h-k set them apart from the normal examples of variety 46. One or more might be Attic-helmetvariantsof the 3rd-centuryvariety 56 (Corinthianhelmet/Two owls, A over e), although, as we see from the otherwise normal 46g, the vertical arrangementof the ethnic is not necessarilyindicativeof later issue. 3.25 2.28 Similar. AOH below. Two owls stg. 1. and r., facing; all in olive wreath. unpublished
13 14 13
t ? t
2.78
47
2 coins *a E-5061
*b IIII-1000
14 t 3.06
15
-+
2.57
(A 17:3)
Two owls in olive wreath;details illegible. 368 coins of uncertainAttic helmet/Two-owls variety. [44-47] Similar. Triptolemos1., holding wheat ears in r. hand, seated in or mounting winged chariot drawn by two snakes. 48 13-15 Av. 2.55 (16) 28 coins Triptolemosseated *a fQ-183 14 -+ 2.36 EAEYabove. Piglet stg. r. on slim mystic staff;all in wheat wreath. Sv. 103.22, 25
*b K-1770
*c BB-892 *d MM-83 *e E-2406
15
2.50
2.87 3.28
44
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1ST CENTURIES B.C. Similar. Similar,except EAEYbelow. Sv. 103.26, 28
50 *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k 1,m
251 coins K-1616 B'-1024 II-690 K-1702 r-149 ME-238 A-410 NN-2040 IIH-825 Z-2995 H'-2247
Head of Athena r., wear ing Corinthianhelmet with three ke crests and, on visor, snal ornament. 14-16 Av. 3.52 (86) 14 . 4.02
Sv. 22.85-88
15 4 3.83
14 15 15 14 15 15 14 14 15 4, 3.46 4- 3.05 4. 4.01 +- 4.71 3.79 / - 3.36 t 4.31 4 4.12 / 3.43 (B 13:1)
Kleiner 1975, p. 305, pl. 75, no. 49 (H-K 12-14) Kleiner 1975, no. 43 (H-K 12-14); GRC,fig. 13
2 EE specimens from the A 18:8 hoard illustratedin EABC, pl. 17:10, 11 Triptolemosseated 1. in chariot, as on 38 and 39. EAEYEIbelow. Piglet stg. r. on slim mystic staff;all in wheat wreath. Sv. 103.17-21
51
*c II-85
*d *e *f *g EA-171 B-374 ME-249 BB-286
15-17 15 t 17 t 15 f 15 / 15 \ 15 / 15 /
Av. 3.73 (33) 4.24 4.22 4.04 3.65 3.26 5.68 4.03
287-284 B.C. A-e H Owl stg. r., facing all in olive Sv. 22.81-83 Head of Athena r., wearing wreath. Corinthian helmet. 13-15 Av.2.40 (18) 15 t 2.23 15 -+ 2.51 14 . 2.80 Kleiner 1975, p. 305, pi. 75, no. 54 (H-K 12-14)
52
PERIOD I: CATALOGUE *d rr-97 *e AA-507 f-h 14 t 13 \ 2.24 1.94 3 ES specimens in the A 18:8 hoard illustratedin EABC, pl. 17:13-15
45
284-270's B.c.
Similar. 53 *a *b *c *d *e 201 coins I-193 N-850 ME-20 A-244 0-403 12-15 14 4 14 \ 13 t 12 t Av. 2.37 (87) 2.78 1.84 2.75 2.42 2.73 2.75 2.12
Sv. 22.64-70
*f
g
r-381
5E-70a
12 4 12 4
12 t
EABC,p. 150, pl. 17:16 (1 of 15 specimens from the A 18:8 hoard); see also EABC,pl. 17:21, 22, 25, 27, 30 *h A-400 15 -+ 2.66 e-A (as Sv. 22.64); GRC,fig. 13 Aberrantdie cutting accountsfor the retrogradeethnics of 53h and the unillustrated rr-420 and ME-327.
Similar. 54 38 coins Owl r. (36 coins) *a NN-2099 *b E--44d *c AA-55 *d NN-1845 *e D-349 Owl 1.(2 coins) *f NN-1719 g 00-332 12-14 Av.2.34 (17) 13 4 13 t 2.22 2.10
A-e (or e-A) Owl stg. r. (or 1.),facing; all in olive wreath.
A-e A-9 EABC,p. 151, pl. 17:33 (1 of 6 specimens from the A 18:8 hoard);see also EABC,pl. 17:31, 32 A-e e-A; Kleiner 1976, p. 17, no. 86 (misclassified) (A-B 19-20:1) e-A A-e A-e
EAEYEIbelow. Piglet in wheat Triptolemos1., seated in or wreath, as on 51. mounting chariot, as on 48 and 49. 11-14 Av.2.26 (46) Lightvariey
Sv. 103.23, 27
t t
EABC,p. 151, pl. 17:47 (1 of 19 specimens from the A 18:8 hoard); see also EABC,pl. 17:46, 48, 51
2.06 2.47
46 *f *g Z-2986 S-2930
UNCIASIFIED Piglet stg r. in wheat wreath; legend illegible. [48, 49, 51, 55] 356 coins of uncertainWreathed-piglet type. Similar.
ca. 270 B.C. A Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthianhelmet. 56 *a *b *c *d *e *f 10 coins 8-785 AA-11 NN-1072 --26 NN-788 AA-271 13-15 13 t 13 t 14 t 13 t 14 t 14 t Av.2.35(8) 2.07 2.81 3.27 2.51 3.27 1.81
Sv. 24.58, 59
*g ME-270
13 k/ 2.31
EABC,p. 151, pl. 17:37 (A 18:8) e only between owls. The alpha was probablypositioned above and between their heads. 8 only between owls, as 56e A e E Kleiner 1975, p. 305, no. 83 (misclassified) (H-K 12-14)
ca. 270-261 B.C. A Similar. 57 *a *b *c *d *e g 24 coins NN-781 E-27 5-28a IIA-8 r-325 A-998 13-15 Av.2.13(14)
Sv. 22.76, 77
13 t 14 t
14 13 t 14 t 13 -
2.39
2.17 ' 2.56
GRC,fig. 13; Kleiner, MN 20, pi. 1:7 EABC,p. 151, pl. 17:38 (A 18:8) EABC,p. 151, pl. 17:39 (A 18:8)
14 t
2.15
2.37 2.41 1.56 Rotroff 1983, p. 291, pl. 57, no. 68 (H 6:9)
*f r-981
Similar. 58 *a *b *c *d *e 25 coins fl-375 III-322 r-654 NN-1979 H-2186 13-15 13 \ 13 \ 14 t 15 -+ 13 t Av.2.27 (16) 2.44 2.85 1.97 3.14 2.79
Sv. 22.78, 79
PERIOD I: CATALOGUE Similar. 59 *a *b *c *d *e 19 coins BA-56 00-815 A-686 II-629 OE-42 12-14 Av. 2.35 (11) 13 t 2.46 13 -+ 2.55 14 -+ 2.22 13 +- 3.02 13 t 2.04 Similar. *60 IIO-698 16 \ Similar. 2.90 Similar,except symbol at r. illegible. Similar,except in field r., cornucopia. Sv. 22.73, 74
47
Sv. 22.75
variety. [57-60] 146 coins of uncertainowl-r.-with-symbol 14 a _E-28b EABC,p. 151, pl. 17:40 (A 18:8) 14 - worn and cut to triangularshape *b AA-50 UNCLASSIFIED Similar. Owl r.; details illegible.
[52-54, 57-60] 580+ coins of uncertain3rd-centuryCorinthianhelmet/Owl-r. variety. The total excludesan estimatedseveralhundredcoins that in the 1930'swere identifiedand enteredin the field notebooks as "3rdcenturyB.C. Owl r."but which were subsequentlydiscardedas being insufficiently legible. 3rdcentury undated B.C., Head of Demeter r., wearing wheat wreath. 61 T-206 15 t [EAEYEI]above. Plemochoe resting on Eleusis ring; all in wheat wreath. too worn for illustration Sv. 103.29-32
3.22 Evidently an isolated emission of limited mintage. Published specimens have diameters of 13-15 mm.; Cavaignacgives two weights: 3.12 g. and 3.34 g. By diameterand weight, the issue might seem to fall between the heavy and light Wreathed-piglet,EAEYEIvarieties51 and 55, to which it is related through its five-letter ethnic and wreathed reverse.Alternatively, since the em on could (like51) have been struckwith "reformed" diameterand weight, a position afterthe light Wreathedpigletsis also possibleand would better suit the changed Elellsiniantypes. 261-229 B.C. Two superimposedpiglets stg. 1. A-E on either side of upright mystic staff;all in olive wreath. Sv. 103.42-46
62
TI hompson 1942, pl. I:4; Kleiner 1975, p. 316, pl. 75, no. 233 (C t-R 10-11:1)
48
13 - 2.47
14
-+
1.65+
When publishingthis very worn coin, MargaretThompson read A8E on the obverseand EAEon the reverse. While the suggestionsof obverseletterscould resultfromrandompittingsin the surface,the suggestions,especially of the theta, are undeniable (see Thompson'spl. 1:5).The obverse AeE is paralleledon Sv. 103.41, a variant of 62 in the Numismatic Collection of Athens. A second specimen of the present variety (at the American Numismatic Society,Inv. 1944.100.26047, 12 mm., 1.75 g.), being even more worn, confirmsonly the reading of the downwardsEAEon the reverse.Both specimens are overstrikes, seen from the broken relief of their as staffs. uprightmystic
for the evacuation of his garrisonsfrom the forts of Attica. Raising the agreed-uponprice of 150 talents, the city purchasedits freedom later in the year65and slowly began to recover a measure of her past brillianceas one of the more influentialand prosperousstatesof old Greece. As in many other areas of Athenian public life, the liberationof 229 had a profound impact on the coinage. with The traditionalowl silverwas soon refurbishedin a new series of drachmsand tetradrachms emission symbols and gradually shed its old-fashionedappearance to evolve in the 2nd century into the ornate, wide-flan New Style coinage. Yet the modernizationof the bronze coinage was, if anything, swifter,more dramatic, and more expressiveof the forward-looking spirit of the new a medium for a more varied nationalisticiconography and age, as the bronze began to serve as was for the firsttime issued in severalcomplementarydenominations. The establishedAE 3 unit of PeriodI, althoughcontinuedin three modest Period II emissions (65,67, and 77; see Table II, pp. 322-323 below),wasjoined and eclipsedby more substantialand frequent strikingsin the largerAE 2 and smallerAE 4 modules, the former taken over from the bronzesofAntigonos Gonatas(507). As explained(p. 38 above),the three basic Pan-erecting-trophy denominationsare to be recognizedas the chalkous(AE4), the dichalkon/tetartemorion (AE3), and the hemiobol (AE 2). A fourthmodularunitwas employedonly in the earlierphase of PeriodII. This is the much larger (20-22 mm.) and heavier (8-10 g.) AE 1, which would logically representthe bronze obol were it not that the unit was introducedin variety64 with the traditionaltypesof the Atheniansilvertriobol: Athena head in Attic helmet/Upright facing owl between two pendent olive branches. Ordinarily one might be skepticalwhether these triobol types were intended to retain their denominational meaning when transferredto a bronze coin, but in the present instance the case for transferred denominationalsignificanceis unusuallystrong.
65
PERIODII
49
In all Athenian coinage no reversetype was more closely associatedwith a common monetary value than the erect, frontal owl framed by olive sprays and a triangularlyarranged ethnic. The type was created for Athens' first triobols in the second half of the 5th century (12). Through the reversewas one of the more pi-style silverof the later 4th century,the triobolwith its characteristic And althoughwe do not know if any triobols heavilyminted denominationsbelow the tetradrachm. were struck with the quadridigitedrachms and tetradrachmsin the early 3rd century, Svoronos illustratestwo silvertriobolswith the unmistakableobverse style of certain heterogeneousdrachms The heterogeneoustriobolswere probablystruckby and tetradrachmsfrom later in the century.66 but whether they were or not, they bring the associationof reversetype and value into the Athens; 240's or 230's, after which triobols vanish from the pre-New Style silver,their types having been to transferred the heavy new AE 1 bronze.There is consequentlyeverygood reason to inferthat the AE 1 bronzes with triobol types were intended to replace triobols in silver.67In this connection it must be significantthat the types were employed on bronze coins only when the AE 1 module was introduced. Once the value of the AE 1 pieces had become familiar,denominational types were discontinuedin favor of more contemporarydesigns depicting a head of Zeus or Artemis on obverses and the statue of Athena Polias on reverses(66, 68). Significance,too, must be attached to the circumstancethat all these AE 1 coins were eventuallycounterstampedwith the device of a plemochoe on both sides, doubtlessto devaluethem to the level of the Demeter/Plemochoe AE 2 pieces (72-74) in a tacit recognition that the highly overvaluedbronze triobols had outlived their usefulnessas a substitutefor silver.The strikingof triobols in silver returned in the 2nd century with the advent of the stephanephoriccoinage. Close stylisticsimilaritiesbetween the silverdrachmswith symbols(p. 13 above), the firstAE 1 triobol variety 64, and the contemporaryAE 3 Two-owl variety 65 (note especiallywhat seems to be an aplustrehelmet ornament on 65a) affirm that th two bronze varieties date within the last the three decades of the 3rd century. But because the AE 1 triobols were almost certainly issued to replacesilvertriobolsalreadyin circulation,theirinceptionmay reasonablybe attributedto 229 and relatedto the 150 talentsof silverthat the Atheniansthen raisedto purchaseteir freedomfrom the Macedonian garrisonsin the Peiraeusand the other fortsof Attica. Aratosand the Achaian League gave Athens 20 talents toward this end,68 and it is usually assumed that another substantialgift was solicitedfrom Ptolemy Euergetes.Athens obtainedloans of perhapsas much as 20 talentsfrom the cities of Boiotia and relied heavily on contributionsfrom her wealthier citizens and friends.69 It now appearsthat another sourcewas tapped by withdrawinga quantityof silverfrom circulation, all triobolscertainlybut possiblysome silverin largerdenominationsas well, through an exchange with the bronze triobols, more or less as Athens had done with the plated bronze drachms and tetradrachms 406/5 B.C. of (pp. 7-8 above). Period II thus begins with the AE 1 triobolsin 229. The end of the period is archaeologically fixed by the great constructionfill of the Middle Stoa in the Agora (Deposit H-K 12-14). The 189
66 Sv. 21.51, 52 (see note 47 above,p. 12). Sv.24.28 = BMCAttica, V:15, is another 3rd-century B.C.silvertriobolbut pl. with an Athena head that has its closest parallelsin the tetrobols 29a, b. The tremendous scale of triobol strikingin the later4th centurycan be appreciatedfromthe 64 triobolsin the 89-piece Peiraeus1956 hoard, IGCH 127 (Thompson 1957). 67 The inscribed bronze TPI2BOAO struckby Samothrace (Hunter p. 388, no. 1, pi. 26:7: 10.4 I, g., 24 mm.) is of AE 1 size but belongs probablyto the 1st centuryB.C., judge from the broken-baralpha of the ethnic. to 68 Plutarch,Aratus 34. 69 Habicht, Studien, 79-81, for full documentationand discussion. pp.
50
identifiablecoins excavatedfrom the fill give a nearly complete run of Athenian bronze from the middle of the 4th centurydown to the closing of the fill ca. 183 B.C.70and include specimensfrom all but threeof the PeriodI coinages.71Observingin his publicationof the coins in the Middle Stoa fill thatlaterbronzevarietiesdo not show up in Agora depositsuntilafterthe middle of the 2nd century, Kleinerdeduced that the mintingof bronzewas suspendedbetween ca. 183 and ca. 140 B.C.72There at can be no doubt that mintingwas interrupted the end of PeriodII, presumablybecause continued productionwas judged unnecessary;but since the Period III strikingsprobablybegan in the 160's (pp. 67-68 below), the lacuna will have lasted for only about two decades. The PeriodII bronze is unusuallyrich in featuresthat tie particularemissionsto episodes in the The politicalhistoryofAthens duringthe late 3rdand early2ndcenturiesB.C. chronologypresentedin considerations: fromthe followinginterlocking Table H (pp. 322-323 below)has been reconstructed an abruptmodificationin 1. As in the owls of the late 3rd-early2nd-centuryB.C. silver,therewas the formofthe owlson the Period I bronze.Except in the AE 4 variety81, Owl on thunderbolt,all the with symbols(p. 13 Period II owls have heads designedlike those on the drachmsand tetradrachms to the brow,eyes are heads have little or no feathering,beaksare long and frequently joined above): The exceptionalowl headsof the Owl-on-thunderbolt pieces, with small,dot-shaped relatively large. eyes sunkendeeply below an enlarged,bulbousforehead,are, on the other hand, identicalto the owl heads of the New Style silver and the final, spread-flanOld Style tetradrachmswith monograms AE (p. 13 above). The Owl-on-thunderbolt 4 should thus belong relativelylate in Period II, surely to the early 2nd centuryratherthan to the late 3rd, as shouldthe AE 2 StandingZeus issues(78-80) with which the pieces depictingan owl on Zeus'sthunderboltwere presumablyminted. 2. That the AE 2 Standing Zeus coinage belongs after the turn of the century follows from a previouslyunremarkeddetail of its earliest obverse dies. Throughout most of the coinage, the Athena on the obversewears a Corinthianhelmet. The firstissue, however,began with an Athena in an Attic helmet ornamented with a wing (see 78a, b and Sv. 80.1-3), which at once brings to mind the winged helmet worn by the goddess Roma on the early denarius coinage of Rome.73 CertainArchaicelectrumof Kyzikosand Prieneand laterbronze or silverissuesofKamarina, Velia, and Metapontion also depict Athena in a winged helmet.74 But the very rarity and remoteness
The date is derivedfrom the abundantwine-jarhandlesin the deposit;see Grace 1985, pp. 1-54, with Grace and s "Les M. Savvatianou-Petropoulakou, timbresamphoriquesgrecs,"Dfl XXVII, pp. 289-291, 317-319. Over 1,200(84 of the Middle Stoa stampedhandlesbelong to the well-datedRhodian and Knidian series,whose chronologies percent) in the early2nd centuryare anchoredto 188 B.C. throughthe hypothesisthat the introductionof secondarystampson the on Rhodian handles and the simultaneousappearanceof namedphewuaroi the Knidian follow upon Rhodes' takeover of the Carian coast in that year. In light of the ancillarychronologicalevidence assembledby Grace, the hypothesis seems inescapable.The latest stamped handles in the Middle Stoa fill come down to about five years after the start of the Rhodian secondarystampsand the Knidianphowchoi and so date the closingof the depositto around 183 (Grace op. 1985, pp. 8-9, 14-15; Grace and Savvatianou-Petropoulakou, cit.,p. 291, stating "183 or 182 B.C."). 71 Kleiner 1975, pp. 304-307: depositsI and I. The threePeriodII coinagesthat are missingfromthe depositare the AE 1 triobolvariety64, the AE 2 Zeus/Amphora variety76, and the rareAE 3 Owl left with amphora 77. 72 Kleiner 1975, pp. 329-330; 1976, p. 36. 73 Crawford,RRC,nos. 44/5, 45/1, 46/1, etc. 74 LLMC II, s.v.Athena Ailee, p. 964 and pl. 711, nos. 64 (Kyzikos) and K.Jenkins, U. and 65 (?Priene). Westermark TheCinageof Kamina, London 1980, pp. 220-224, pls. 35, 36, nos. 198-205 (AE, 420-405 B.c); SNC, Itay 1560, 1561, 1575-1577, 1583, 1584 (Veliasilver,4th-3rd centuriesB.c.);and 1241 (Metapontionsilver,"HannibalicPeriod, c. 212-07 B.C.").The last coin probablyowes its winged helmetto the denarius.The winged helmet on the denariusand its relation to the winged helmet of Perseuson the coinage of King Philip V of Macedon is discussedby Boehringer,
70
II PERIOD
51
of such comparanda make it highly probable that the helmet wing on the Athenian bronze is a must have been reachingAthens,if borrowingfrom the denarii,which, firststruckin 212 or 21 1 B.C., Not only did Athens only in sample numbers,during the Second Macedonian War (200-197 B.C.). herself with Rome, Pergamon, and Rhodes in the spring of 200 at the beginning of the war, ally but for its duration a detachment of Roman soldiers was stationed in Athens to defend against Macedonian attack, while the Peiraeusserved as the base of operationsfor the Roman fleet.75In these circumstances,the borrowingof the helmet wing will date afterthe springof 200 and should, indeed, be understood as a complimentaryreference to Rome, the new champion of Athenian independence. 3. A winged helmet (on which the wing is more pointed and closer to the Roman prototype) is worn also by Athena of the AE 3 variety77, Owl left with amphora, and places this rare variety, too, after the spring of 200. The variety must fall between that date and the start of the Owl-onthunderboltAE 4 (and the Standing Zeus AE 2 of 78-80); for, as seen from the better-preserved examples of the Owl-left emission in Svoronos (Sv. 22.89-92), the owls have heads of Old Style design with large eyes. This Owl-leftAE 3 is linkedto the AE 2 variety76, Zeus/Amphora, through the olive-wreathborder on the reversesof both issues, a feature that occurs nowhere else in the PeriodII bronze. Since the reversetype of a large Panathenaicamphoraon the AE 2 coins suggests that they were probably struckin conjunctionwith a celebrationof the Greater Panathenaia,the accompanying Owl-left AE 3 with its winged helmet and adjunct Panathenaicamphora may be dated to 198 B.C., when the festivalwas held for the firsttime afterthe alliancewith Rome. 4. Followingafter a short interval,the Athena in winged helmet/Standing Zeus AE 2 (and the start of the Owl-on-thunderboltAE 4) can plausiblybe associatedwith Flamininus'victory over Philip V in 197 at the conclusionof the Second MacedonianWar and his policy,announced a year later at the Isthmian Games, of guaranteeingfreedom for all Greeks.The policy,it is true, brought no special benefits to the Athenians, who were already free, but enthusiasmfor Flamininusmust have run high, if only for his defeat of the hated Philip. The acclamationshe received elsewhere as Savior and Liberatorreplicatedthe cult titles of Zeus Soter-Eleutheriosat Athens and Plataia and point to an association of Flamininuswith this cult, as Walbanknoticed.76 Given the Roma helmet on its firstobversesand the very limited time in the early 2nd centuryavailablefor this issue, it is reasonableto suppose that the Standing Zeus on the reverse of the coins actually depicts the Athenian statue of Zeus Soter-Eleutherios, discussedbelow. as This in turn leaves the final type change of the AE 2 unit to the FulminatingZeus reversein that is, about midwaybetween 196 and ca. 183. variety82 to fall around 190 B.C., 5. Athens' long and important series of AE 2 issues began with the overstrikingof the Panerecting-trophyAE 2 of Antigonos Gonatas (507) by variety 69, whose reverse of Owl threequartersright, wings raised, with amphora, was copied from the pentobol silver struckduring the ChremonideanWar (28, see pp. 10-11 above). Intended to remove the Macedonian bronze from circulation,the overstriking was, as Habichtpointed out, unlikelyto havebeen enactedbeforeAthens
that on is pp. 116-124.ButM0rkholm (EHC, 136)cautions speculation thismatter futileuntiltherelevant of p. coinage
Philipis more securelydated. Even so, it is unthinkablethat the Athenianswould haveborrowedthe winged helmet from the coinage of Philip. 75 For documentation, mostly in Livy, and a vivid narrativeof the Roman presence at Athens during the Second Macedonian War,see Ferguson,pp. 270-279, esp. 278-279. 76 F. W. Walbank,A Historical on CommentaryPolybius Oxford 1967, pp. 613-614, concludingthat "Flamininusthus II, appropriatedthe identificationwith Zeus favoredby PhilipV"
52
brokefree of Macedoniancontrolin 229 B.C.77The overstriking apparentlybelongsin fact a number of yearsafter229. Workingbackfromthe AE 2 issuesof the early2nd century,the AE 2 issues73-75 with the EleusinianDemeter/Plemochoe typestaketheirplace roughlyin the last one or two decades of the 3rd century,leaving the two Owl three-quarters right issues 69 and 70 and the overstriking over Gonatasto date in the 210's or later220's. Becauseof the historicalassociationsof the reverseof the Owl three-quartersright with amphora with the ChremonideanWar pentobols, which were
struck to pass as Ptolemaic drachms and may have actually been called 8paXiat IToXeci-xal, it LCL follows that the type was revived for the overstriking more for its pro-Egyptian than for its anti-
Macedonian implications.Accordingly,the overstriking should date to or just after 224/3 B.C., the close politicaland culturalties to the Egyptiancourt and year in which the Atheniansreestablished honored Ptolemy Euergetesas the eponymoushero of a new Athenian tribe.78 6. Each of the laterAE 2 coinagesof PeriodII was accompaniedby its own small-denomination variety:the FulminatingZeusAE 2 by the Cicada/AmphoraAE 4 (see under85), the StandingZeus AE AE 2 by the Owl-on-thunderbolt 4 (p. 50 above),the Zeus/Amphora AE 2 by the Owl-left-withamphora AE 3 (p. 51 above), and the Demeter/Plemochoe AE 2 by the Plemochoe/Eleusis-ring AE 4. It followsthat the earliestAE 2 coinage, Owl three-quarters right,was probablyaccompanied by the earliestAE 4 variety,Owl on rudder(71). An issue of the drachmswith symbols (Sv. 23.41, 42; see p. 13 above) also has its owl perched on a rudder,which doubled on the drachms as an emissionsymbol. But we should probablyinterpretthe rudderof both coinages as the metaphorical and the rudderof government(xupepv7i<a), owl as the helmsman(xup1?pevsT), the whole device as an eloquent, if modest, emblem of Athenian autonomy. 7. Mention has already been made of the relatively short-lived AE 1 triobols that were inaugurated in 229 B.C.with triobol types (64). The series passed through two type changes (66: Zeus head/Athena Polias, and 68: Artemis head/Athena Polias)before all the AE 1 pieces were counterstamped on both sides with a plemochoe device to devalue them to equivalence with the Demeter/Plemochoe AE 2 hemiobols. Dating with the latter,the Plemochoe/Plemochoe
counterstamping occurred between ca. 220 and ca. 200, so that the bronze triobols must have
the city to repay the sizable debts it contractedin that year.Not that this highly overvaluedbronze would have necessarilyretainedits face value for a decade or more; over time its value in relation to silvermay very well have declined. Even if the coins were ultimatelypassingas bronze obols, their continuationwould probablyhave beenjustified.The Athena PoliasAE 1 with the Artemisobverse was produced for a long enough time for its reversesto pass from a phase of fine die engraving and a dotted border to a stylistically cursoryphase without the border (cf. Sv. 25. 10).79The variety, on for all one can tell, may have been issued after the AE 2 overstriking Gonatas. On the other
(EABC, 144,note9) thattheoverstriking Studien, 42, 148,note 137,correcting earlier p. Habicht, my suggestion pp. Macedon towards strict deathin 239. Stressing Athens' havebeenprecipitated Antigonos' policyof neutrality by might to of between229 and PhilipV's invasion Atticain the fallof 201, Habicht(Studien, 146-150)proposed connect pp. in that with the overstriking the damnatio memoriae the Athenians passedagainstKingPhilipand all his ancestors 201 II the wouldcompress firstsevenAE 2 issuesof Period so late a datefor the overstriking or a yearor two later.But shortspaceof onlyfouror fiveyearsandcannotbe accepted. withinan impossibly 78 The honors for andtheevidence the 224/3 datearereviewed Habicht, Studien, 105-112,and,in connection pp. by Alexandrine bowlsimitating with the suddenvogue in Athensfor moldmade XXII, Agora by prototypes, Rotroff, pp. 11-13. 79 H. Kroll,"TheAncient to and in inAthenan Architecture, Sculpture, TopographyPresented Polias," Studies ImageofAthena J. Princeton 1982(pp.65-76),p. 71, note27, withpl. 11. A. Homer Thompson 20), Supplement (Hesperia
77
PERIODII
53
hand, the Zeus/Athena Polias variety 66 (fine style, dotted reverse border)was accompanied by the AE 3 variety 67 (also with a dotted border on the reverse)and presumablyantedatesthe Owl three-quarters right AE 2 and Owl-on-rudderAE 4. Iconographical Symbolism Conspicuousin this review of types is the fresh and sometimespoliticallychargediconography that sets the Period II bronze apart from the monotony of all preceding Athenian coinage. Even otherwise conventional owl or Athena-head types were given an original, topical twist, as when the ChremonideanWar owl with lifted wings and amphorawas revivedfor the overstriking the of Macedonian bronze of Antigonos Gonatas (69), the owl of the firstAE 4 reversewas made to grasp the rudder of state (71), or Athena's helmet was embellishedwith a wing alluding to the goddess Roma, as it was during andjust afterthe Second MacedonianWar (77, 78). A more explicit expressionof Athenian independence and nationalismis found on the AE 1 obversespicturingthe statue of the chief tutelarydeity of the city,Athena Polias or, as the goddess was also known, Athena Archegetis(Founder).80 The coins of varieties 66 and 68 afford the only extant visual documentationin any medium for this statue, but the identificationwith the ancient olive-wood xoanon that was housed in the Erechtheionand dressedeach Panathenaiain a newly woven peplos seems certain from the inscribed inventoriesof the gold ornaments of the image, which included a phiale in one of the goddess' hands and a gold owl supportedat shoulderlevel, preciselyas the coins show.81The image on the coins, too, wears a Corinthianhelmet, presumably the removable "sacredhelmet" on the Akropolismentioned by Aristophanes.82 One suspectsthat the venerable Polias image was conceived on the coins as a kind of response to the archaistic statue of Athena brandishinga thunderboltthat Antigonos Gonatas placed on the reversesof his drachms and tetradrachms.This Athena is identifiedas the statue of Athena Alkis, or Alkidamos, that stood in the Macedonian capital of Pella.83The reverse of a fighting archaisticAthena had earlierappearedon satrapaltetradrachms PtolemyI and on statersof Demetrios Poliorketes of and so had a long association with Macedonian royalty.84 was very probably this association that It inspiredthe Atheniansto place the image of their own nationalAthena cult on the reversesof their coins soon after the Macedonian occupationof Attica ended in 229. Two Athenian emblems, the Panathenaicamphora and the cicada, make their earliestappearances as coin types in the Period II bronze. The cicada first occurs on the Cicada/Amphora AE 4
Ibid.,p. 69. Ibid., 65-72. Implicitlyrejectingthe epigraphicaltestimonia,Ira S. Mark("The Ancient Image and Naiskosof pp. Athena Polias: The Ritual Setting on a Late Fifth-CenturyAcropolis Relief" [lecture, San Antonio 1986], abstract in AJA 91, 1987, pp. 287-288) alternativelyidentified the Polias with the xoanon depicted on the relief, 0. Walter, der im in Vienna 1923, no. 76. But even if we could be sure that the Beschreibung Reliefs Kinen AkropolimuseumAthen, xoanon on the relief held a phiale and an owl, the owl would be positioned at the goddess' waist, not her shoulder as the inscriptionsrequire. Nor does the xoanon wear the golden gorgoneion that was part of the Polias ensemble since before 480 B.c.(Plutarch, Themistokles with the inscribedinventories),although a gorgoneion is to be found 10, on the breast of the Athena who sits below the xoanon on the relief. The very presence of this Athena implies that the xoanon was an image of another deity altogether,as Waltersays. 82 J. H. Kroll, "'The Sacred Helmet' of Lysistrata 748-55 and the Image of Athena Polias"(lecture,Cincinnati 1983), abstractin AJA88, 1984, p. 250. 83 Brett 1950, pp. 55-72, pl. XII:14, 15. Lacroix,pp. 119-121, pl. VIII:8-10; Boehringer,p. 99, pls. 25, 26:18-26; LIMCII, s.v.Athena Promachos,p. 973, pls. 722, 723, no. 164. On the circulationof Gonatas'silverat Athens after261, see pp. 12, 36 above. 84 Brett 1950, pl. XI. Lacroix, pp. 116-121, pl. VII:5, 6; LIMC II, s.v. Athena Promachos, p. 973, pls. 722, 723, nos. 158, 159, 162.
81
80
54
and (85) around 190 B.C. goes on to become one of the more populardesignsof the bronzecoinagein the later 2nd and earlier 1st centuriesB.C.(cf. 100, 108, 113, 131). From Thucydides (1.6.3) and line Aristophanes (Knights, 1331)we know that the Atheniansof old used to fastentheirhair withgold broochesin the form of a cicada, and the scholiaon the Kightsexplainwhy: born, like the Athenians, from the earth, cicadas symbolizedAthenian autochthony.85 The Hellenisticrevivalof this ancient and the elevation of the cicada to a quasi-officialstatuswithin the repertoryof Athenian symbol state emblems are a prime expressionof what has been called in the context of other antiquarian revivalsof 2nd-centuryB.C. Athens "the outbreakof sentimentalnationalismwhich accompanied the Roman conquest of Greece."86The use of the Panathenaicamphora as a reverse type in the Zeus/Amphora AE 2 (76) seems to have been suggestedby the Eleusinianvessel on the reverses of the precedingDemeter/Plemochoe emissions(72-74). In contrast to these new Athenian types, the Demeter/Plemochoe AE 2 and Plemochoe/ AE Eleusis-ring-in-wheat-wreath 4 (72-75) draw on the establisheddesigns and symbols of the earlier Eleusinian coinage. But in Period II the bronze with Eleusinian types, no longer bearing the EAEYEI legend, is fully incorporatedinto the mainstreamof the regularbronze coinage and (as shown by the AE 2 overstriking) interruptsthe sequence of issues with Athenian devices, instead of being struckin tandem, as earlier.The abruptshift from Athenian to Eleusiniantypes in the last to quarterof the 3rd centuryis awkward explain,unlessit arosefroman expansionin the importance and size of the Eleusinianfestivalsabout a decade or so after 229.87 The major innovationof the PeriodII iconographyis the recognitionextended to deities other than Athena and Demeter. By priority and frequencyZeus is the principal newcomer. Portrayed soon after 229 on the obverse of the first oftthe two AE varietieswith the Athena Poias reverse (66), the Zeus probably represents, as the historical context suggests, Zeus Soter-Eleutherios.88 The Artemis whose head is substitutedfor the head of Zeus on the next, and last, AE 1 variety (68) may accordinglybe recognized as Artemis Soteira or, if the reference is to the liberation of Mounychia from the Macedonian garrison, Artemis Mounychia.89After this single appearance, Artemis disappearsfrom the coinage until after Athens gained control of Delos in 167/6. When she is met again in variety 104 (PeriodIII), the referenceis doubtlessto her Delian cult. Zeus, on the other hand, becomes ever more entrenchedas PeriodII progresses.Reintroduced AE 2 Zeus head/Amphora variety76, thegod was t ansferredto the reversesof issues78-80, on theAgodZ there depicted in the form of an Early Classicalstatue of a nude standing Zeus holding a lowered
D. M.Jones and N. G. Wilson in choli in Aristophanem, Equies,W.J. W Koster,ed., Groningen/Amsterdam I, ii, 268. 1969, p. 86 J..K. Davies,AdianinPAftiedFarilis, 600-300 B.C., Oxford 1971, p. 11. 87 Compare the program for increasing internationalparticipationat the Mysteries in the second quarter of the 4th century (pp. 29, 30 above), when the Eleusiniancoinage originated.An Athenian decree of the late 3rd century (B. Helly, Gonnoi Amsterdam 1973, pp. 120-127, no. 109) deals with the internationalannouncementsof the three I, major Athenian festivals (the Eleusinia, the Panathenaia, and the Mysteries)showing that Athens was at this time with which the Mysterieswere being passinglegislationto restoreher festivalsto theirformerbrilliance.The seriousness in 201 of two young Akarnanians who viewed the rites without conducted at this time is underscoredby the execution of Attica shortlythereafter(Livy31.14.6; Polybios 16.35.5). being initiated,executionsthat led to PhilipV's invasion A third "Eleusinian" issue, so rare that no specimen has turned up in the Agora, should probablyalso belong to Period II rather than III, the only chronologicalalternative.This is the AE 4 (11 mm.) Sv. 103.47-49: Triptolemos seated left in winged chariot A8E in a triangulararrangementarounda plemochoe, wheat ear at right. 88 See below.Forthe Athenian cult of Zeus Soter-Eleutherios, AgoraII, nos. 24-36, pp. 25-28. see 89 The shrine of ArtemisSoteirawas locatedjust outside the Dipylon;see IG 1121343, 4631, 4695, and B. D. Meritt, discussionin "Researches "GreekInscriptions," 10, Hesperia 1941 (pp. 31-64), pp. 62-63, no. 28, with W. S. Ferguson's in Athenian and Delian Documents I," RKo7, 1907 (pp. 213-240), pp. 213-214, and J. H. Oliver's in "Greekand Latin Inscriptions," 10, Hesperia 1941 (pp. 237-261), p. 243, no. 42. ForArtemisMounychia,see K. Werniche,RE II, von cols. 1393-1394; W.Judeich, Topographe Atn, 2nd ed., Munich 1931, p. 452.
85
PERIODII
55
thunderboltat his right side, his left arm extending straightout from the shoulder in a gesture of This statuewas then replacedon the remainingAE 2 reverses(82-84) by another,which authority.90 representsthe god in the more conventionalLate Archaic-EarlyClassicalschema of a stridingZeus brandishingthe thunderboltin his upraisedright hand; an eagle is added at his feet. Both statue types recur in the later bronze coinage. The final PeriodII AE 2 format of Athena wearing Corinthian helmet/Fulminating Zeus was revived in the second half of the 2nd century B.C. for the last eight AE 2 issues of Period Im (90-97); and the striding,FulminatingZeus reverse (althoughhere with the eagle on the wrist of the god's extended left arm) was again revivedat the startof the AE seriesthatbegan afterthe BattleofPhilippi in 42/1 B.C.(137). Historically, however, the Standing Zeus was the more importantstatue. Chosen firstfor representationon the PeriodII reverses, it reappears as a reverse type shortly after the Battle of Actium (148) and, a full three hundred years later, on a single reverse die of the huge Period VI Athenian imperial coinage of the 260's after Christ.91 A third statue of Zeus on Athenian coins is not strictlyrelevantto our understandingof these two statues but has neverthelessled scholarsto identify one or the other of them as Zeus Polieus. This third statue is known from one reversedie in the PeriodVB imperialcoinage of Hadrianicor Antonine date (175) and from one reversedie in the PeriodVI imperialcoinage a little more than a centurylater (357). It is of a Zeus standingbeforea low,gabled altarornamentedwith a boukranion, his left hand extended down over the altar in the ritualact of sprinkling,92 right hand (likethat his of the StandingZeus on the PeriodII and IV reverses) hangingat his side, holding a thunderboltat a tilt.3 Portrayedon the Hadrianic-Antoninereverse at a relativelylarge scale and with 45-degree what must be a considerablefidelityto the style of the original,the SacrificingZeus is a handsome figure and since the middle of the 19th century has been customarilyassociatedwith one of the two statuesthat Pausanias(1.24.2)saw in the sanctuaryof Zeus Polieuson the Akropolis:"theone by
90 That the statueis EarlyClassicalis clear fom is to the Eay ClassicalApollo fom the west pediment of easimilarity the Temple of Zeus at Olympia, who also liftsone arm straightout in a commandinggesturewhile carryinghis attribute and weapon down at his side in his other hand; see Boardman, Greek figs. Scupture, 19, 21:3. Although both arms are broken below the shoulders, the copy of an Early Classical Zeus assigned to the Nymphaeum of Herodes Atticus at Olympia (Bol,pp. 187-190, pls. 59-61, no. 48; R. Bol and P.Herz, "ZumKultbilddes Zeus Panhellenios.Moglichkeiten der Identifikationund Rezeption," in Greek Renaissance 89-95, pl. 28], p. 89) seems to have been posed more or [pp. less like the West Pediment Apollo. Closer to the Athenian Standing Zeus with perpendicularleft arm is the statue of a nude Zeus at Olympia depicted on Elian coins from the time of Hadrian (Liegle, pp. 110-111, p. 4:6), but the left leg of this statue is more bent, and there is an eagle perchedon the god's left wrist. 91 The die is known from two unpublishedcoins, one at the AmericanNumismaticSociety,the other in the Evelpides Collection, Athens. 92 Publicationsdescribe,and sometimesillustrate with a restoreddrawing,the Zeus as holding a phiale;cf. BMCAtia, p. 104, no. 755, and the drawingsand citationscollected in Cook, us, pp. 572-573, figs.399, 400. But as Cook'sown excellentdrawing(Zeus, 402) of the BritishMuseum specimen(BMCIAtica, xviii:5;Sv.92.6) shows,the god'shand is fig. pl. empty and is turned palm down with the thumb below the fingers. All examples of this imperial Period VB reverse are from the same die, and an unpublished,relativelyunworn specimen at the AmericanNumismaticSociety confirms the detailsof the down-turnedhand and the presenceof a boukranionon the altar.When this reversetype was copied on a die of the PeriodVI coinage (357 = Sv.92.7 = Cook, Zeus, 573, fig.403), an eagle was added on Zeus'sleft wrist.Like p. a numberof PeriodVI variationsof PeriodV dies, the eagle mustbe attributed the whim of the PeriodVI copyist,who to apparentlymisunderstoodthe gestureof the god's left hand. 93 Because the pose of the Standing Zeus with perpendiculararm is similar to that of the SacrificingZeus in all general respects except for the elevation and action of the left arm, it was once suggested that the two reverse types representthe original and a modified version of the same cult statue, whose left arm was readjustedor replaced in a putative renovationor copy of the image between ca. 30 B.C.and the 2nd century after Christ. SeeJ. H. Kroll, "The Standing Zeus on Athenian Coins and the Cult of Zeus Eleutheriosin the Athenian Agora" (lecture,Boston 1989), abstractin AJA94, 1990, p. 336. But this suggestion,unlikelyenough in its own right,is disprovenby the reappearanceof the StandingZeus with straightarm and without altaron the PeriodVI reverse(note 92 above).
56
Leocharesand the one called Polieus." the formeris the only Athenianstatueof the god for which As we have the name of a sculptor,commentatorsequated it with the SacrificingZeus of the imperial coinage, while leaving the FulminatingZeus (or the StandingZeus with perpendiculararm) to be identifiedwith the presumablyolder cult image of Zeus Polieus.94Since the Polieus cult is known almostexclusivelyfor its curiousand primitiverite of bull sacrifice,the Bouphonia,a sourceof much it learnedinterestin antiquityas today,95 has been suggestedthat the altarin frontof the Zeus on the coins may be the very altar at which this ritual took place96 and that the same altar is imperial depicted by itself on another imperial Period V reverse(203).97 Like the altar on the Sacrificing Zeus coins, the last altar is depicted with an ornamentalboukranion,although its top is flat, not gabled, and it supportsa second boukranionand two flankingsacrificialvessels. Since there is an olive tree at either side, the altarwas located on the Akropolis. If the altar before the SacrificingZeus and this Akropolisaltar are the same, the Sacrificing Zeus would have to be one of the statuesconnectedwith Zeus Polieus.So the reasoninggoes. But it all may be fantasy.Georg Lippold rightlydisputed the simplisticconnection with the 4th-century B.C. sculptorLeochareson the groundsthat the SacrificingZeus on the coins is not consonantwith of the characteristics Leochares'art.98The Severe or Early Classicalpose of the SacrificingZeus, with shouldersback, both feet flat on the ground,99implies that the image antedated Leochares by more than a century.The altar between olive trees should be the great altar of Athena on the Akropolis,not an altar of Zeus. Apart from the Athena symbolismof the olive trees, Greek altars of skullsof sacrificedvictims,regardless the divinity were commonlyornamentedwith the sculptured Althoughthe SacrificingZeus must have been located next to an altar,the depiction worshipped.l00 of the altar need not imply a specificcultic traditionlike the Bouphonia.Thus, while an equationof SacrificingZeus with a statue in the shrine of Zeus Polieus is not impossible,neither is there any compellingreason to recommendit. There is thereforeeven lessreasonto extend the Polieusequationto the Standingor Fulminating To Zeus statueson the coins of the 1stand 2nd centuriesB.C. judge from the silence of literaryand the cult of Zeus Polieusseems neverto havebeen incorporatedinto the political epigraphicalsources, ideology of the Athenianstate;and, for this reasonalone, the god would be strangelyout of place on the Hellenistic coinage. A much strongercase can be made for identifyingone of the Zeuses on the the Hellenistic coins with the image of the Athenian political cult of Zeus par excellence, cult of a pedestalin front As Zeus Soter-Eleutherios. has long been appreciated,this image, which stood on of the Stoa of Zeus in the Agora, must have been an Early Classical statue.101In Roman times
di in "Giove are Polieo Atene," discussions byO.Jahn, NuoveMorie dell'nsiato CorrispondenaArchaeologica major 19 and 54; Cook,Zeus, cit. GCiechische loc. Kultmythologie, Leipzig1871-1889,pp. 2, 1865,pp. 1-24, pl. 1;J. Overbeck, 94 The
95 Testimonia Pausanias to deAbstinant 29-31)andbibliography 1940on the Polieus 1.24.4andPorphry, 2.10, (esp. the Bouphonia: of cult in Cook,Zeus, 574-605. Recentdiscussions Burkert, 136-142;E. Simon,Festivals of pp. pp. The Parthenon G. of Periean Madison1983,pp. 8-12. Topography the sanctuary: P Stevens, Setig ofthe (Hesperia Attica, Corner theParthenon,"Hesperia of "TheNortheast 15, 1946(pp. 1-26), 1940,pp.79-86;idem, 3), Supplement Princeton pp. 12-15. 96 Overbeck, cit.(note94 above); loc. BMCAttca, 104. p. 97 Sv.,pl. 87, caption nos.42, 43: "autel Zeus." de to BMCAttica,111,no. 816,justcallsit an altar. p. 98 RE XII, col. 1996, s.v.Leochares. Greek Warrior Boardman, S ture, 38, 67. the 99 Compare Choiseul-Gouffier figs. (A): Apolloandthe RiaceBronze 100E M. Fraser and dozensof square round Oxford1977,pls.42, 43, 64-91) illustrates Monumnts, (Rhodian Fineary one For see withboukrania. a largerectangular to Dionysos, Cook,Zeus, 579, fig.404. altars p. sculptured 101ThussinceH. A. Thompson's Side on 6, (Hespea 1937[pp.1-226],p. 54, "Buildings theWest oftheAgora" epochal restored the before Stoaof Zeushasbeenhypotheticaly on fig.34 = Camp,p. 106,fig.79),thestatue theround pedestal
and and 92 summarizeJahnOverbeck. Fullbibliography (NCP, (note above, 55).Imhoof-Blumer Gardner pp.137-138) p. inLacroix, 75,note2. p.
PERIODII
57
the cult of Zeus Eleutheriostook on a new political-religious significanceas a medium for expressing era Athens' devotion to Rome: in the earlyJulio-Claudian an annex for an imperialcult was added at the rear of the Stoa of Zeus, and there is evidence that the emperorsDomitian, Trajan,Hadrian, and Antoninus Pius were all formally identified or very closely associatedwith Zeus Eleutherios, a record apparentlyunmatchedby any other Athenian deity. 02 The argumentfor identifyingthe StandingZeus with the cult image of Zeus Eleutherioscomes fromthe date of the AE 2 issue78, on whichthe statuetypewas introduced.The issuewas strucksoon after 198 B.C. six issuesbefore ca. 183 B.C. but (pp. 50-51 above).The limitspoint to the 190'sand a close associationwith the defeatof Philipin 197 and Flamininus' liberationdeclarationof 196, associationsreinforcedby the winged helmet of Roma worn by Athena on the earliestobversesof the issue. In 196the ThessaliansmemorializedtheirliberationfromMacedon by establishing Larissaa cultof at Zeus Eleutheriosand a quadrennialfestival,the Eleutheria.103 the Macedonian cities of Abdera, At Ainos, Maroneia, Petres,and Thessalonike,cults of Zeus Eleutherioswere founded conjointlywith cultsof Roma afterthe finaldefeatof Perseusin 168.104 The evidenceis circumstantial consistent: but at Athens no Zeus was more appropriate the historicalcontext of issue 78 than Zeus Eleutherios. to the StandingZeus is Soter-Eleutherios, how are we to understandthe FulminatingZeus If, then, that replaces the Standing Zeus in variety82? The change to the conventionalfulminatingimage need not have had any significancebeyond a decision to representZeus in a guise that was more universal,easily recognizable,and suitablefor a standardizedcoin type. Accordingly,the Standing Zeus would indeed reproducethe actual cult statuein the Agora, while the fulminatingimage (with added eagle, which is unlikelyto have been part of a Late Archaic-EarlyClassicalstatuebut which makesfor a more satisfactory coin design)givesa genericZeuswho nevertheless symbolizedthe same ideals. Or could it be that the StandingZeus was later thought to be too closely associated political with Flamininusand Rome? Livy (35.31 and 50) reportsthe growthof stronganti-Romansentiment at Athens in 192, about the time that the change from the Standing to the FulminatingZeus took place. In either case, Zeus figureson the bronze of HellenisticAthens in one dominantaspect, as the Eventhe small-denomination reversesthatpicture tutelarydeity of nationalfreedomand sovereignty. an owl perched on a thunderbolt(varieties67 and 81 of Period II and 99 and 100 of Period III) are to be recognized as little metaphorsfor an Athens restingon the liberatingmight of Zeus. In this vein it is probably correct to interpretthe routine pairing of Athena and Zeus on the opposite sides of the main AE 2 bronze of PeriodsII and III as the pairingof two functionallycomplementarydeities, one the religiousembodimentof the polis, the other essentiallya personification
as an EarlyClassical Zeus of the striding, XIV,p. 101. Whetherthe cult of Zeus Soterfulminating type;cf. Agora Eleutherios foundedto commemorate was deliverance fromthe Persians, severalancientcommentators as believed as III, pp. 26-27, nos. 26-28), or whether, impliedby the Archaicstructure below the Stoa of Zeus (H. A. (Agora XIV, Thompson, cit.,figs.72, 126;Agora p. 96),it goesbackin someformto pre-Persian op. times,a cultimagedating after480 B.C. is calledfor;anyearlier statue wouldhavebeencarried or destroyed 480. off in 102 H A. Thompson,"The Annexto the Stoa of Zeus in the Athenian 35, Agora,"Hesperia 1966, pp. 171-187; of XIV Agora pp. 102-103. Identifications Domitian:IG II2 1996;Trajan:A. E. Raubitschek, "Hadrian the Son as of ZeusEleutherios," 49, 1945,pp. 128-133;andAntoninus Pius:IGII23396.Hadrian's association thecultis with AJA indicated the statueof himthatwasdedicated to the statueof ZeusEleutherios the Agora(Pausanias next in by 1.3.2). Athens'valuedstatusas a freecity underthe Empire came to play so largea rolein explains whyZeusEleutherios cult. imperial 103See O. Kern,IG IX.ii, p. xx, and the epigraphical citations listedby E Stahlin,RE XII, i, cols.856-857, 864, in Fehrle Ausfiihrliches der s.v.Larisa; und Lexicon GriechischenR6mischen VI, Mythologie W.H. Roscher, Leipzig/Berlin, ed., 1924-1937,col. 621, s.v.Zeus(Beinamen); and L. Robert,"Bulletin REG J. epigraphique," 77, 1964,pp. 176-182, no. 227.
104 R. Mellor, 6EA PQMA, The Worship the Goddess Romain the Greek World of (Hypomnemata Gottingen 1975, 42), pp. 107-108.
58
of freedom. Although the pairing went back to the Zeus/Athena Polias emission 66, shortly after after the Athens' deliverancefrom Macedon in 229, enthusiasmfor Rome's guarantee of eleuthria the Second MacedonianWarregularized pairingof Athena and Zeus on the coinage, untilthe disasZeusthen revoltagainstRome in 88-86 B.C. trousoutcome ofAthens' involvementin the Mithradatic disappearedfrom the coinage for more than a generation.In 42/1 B.C.Athens revivedthe Fulminating Zeusreversefor a singleAE 1 emission(137), althoughpartialy,it seems, to signalthe devaluation of the AE 1 to the equivalentof the AE 2 of PeriodsII and III (pp. 85-86, 90 below).BeforeActium, Athens strucktwo issues (144 and 145) with PtolemaicZeus-head obversesin honor of Kleopatra. But the themes of salvation and eleueria returned in the reappearanceof the Standing Zeus on of minted soon afterActium, to commemorateOctavian's"liberation" Athens. an issue (148, q.v.) Neither the standing nor the fulminatingstatue appears among the many famous Athenian statuesdepicted on the city'sHadrianic-Antonine coinage,which representedinsteadthe Sacrificing Zeus (175, p. 55 above) and the enthroned statue of Zeus Olympios that Hadrian commissioned for the Olympeion(263). In Athens'finalcoinage of the mid-3rdcenturyafterChrist,the Sacrificing Zeus and enthronedZeus reversesare repeated(357 and 356, with note 66 below,p. 124).They are joined by a third Zeus type, the Standing Zeus with perpendicularlyextended left arm (note 92 above, p. 55), which returnsto the firststatue of the god depicted on Athenian coins, probablythe statuestillprominentlydisplayedin frontof the Stoa of Zeus.
CATALOGUE
229-ca. 224/3 B.C. AE1 Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet. 21-23 Av.9.16(7) E Owl stg., facing; on either side, olive branch.
A
Sv. 24.25-27, 104.5-7
64
10 coins
All counterstampedwith plemochoe in relief on obverse and plemochoe in incuse circle on reverse, as Sv. 104.5-7.
*a K-1647 *b e-375
*c *d *e f g h II-489 T-1844 A-356 A-1466 AA-80 EA-296
A
Sv. 24.29-31
65
12-14 Av.2.32 (4) 7 coins *a NN-1586 14 $ 2.87 13 - 2.22 *b Z-2856 14 t 2.19 *c E-5380
GRC, 13 fig.
Kleiner 1976, p. 13, no. 50 (H 12:1)
PERIOD II: CATALOGUE *d N-298 *e B'-1018 f e-314 g T-1867 14 12 13 f broken broken broken Kleiner 1975, p. 305, no. 84 (H-K 12-14)
59
4 1.99
The varietyis associatedwith 64 throughthe distinctivestyle of their reverseowls. AE1 A e-E Statue of Athena Polias stg. r., holding an owl in 1. hand and phiale in r.; border of dots.
Sv. 25.1-4
66 *a *b *c *d e f
counterstampedwith a plemochoe on both sides Kleiner 1975, p. 306, no. 88 (H-K 12-14) counterstamped,as 66d it specimensmay have been Owing to theirpoor preservation, is uncertainhow many of the other unillustrated restruckwith the Plemochoe/Plemochoe counterstamps. AE3 A Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 12-15 Av. 2.39 (20)
19-22 Av. 9.43 (14) 20 / 10.00 9.16 20 \ 21 10.28 20 \ 10.68 22 9.72 9.71 21-
67 A
20 coins
Sv. 23.46 2.36 3.13 2.65 2.98 obv. die A obv. die A obv. die B obv. die B; Kleiner 1975, p. 321, pl. 75, no. 296 (misclassified) (M-N 15:1)
13 t 2.28 e-534 f T-1863 14 - 2.41 13 t 2.14 g T-1196 h ME-315 12 t 2.14 A ? E, border of dots on reverse. *i 1III-191 12 / 2.32 13 t 1.96 *j Z-2750 *k EA-115 14 t 2.17 *1 II11-835 13 t 2.25 A-O, border of dots on reverse. *m Z-1398 13 t 1.63 *n HH-222 12 t 1.74 13 t 2.17 *o S-4433 13 f 2.54 *p IIi-242 q NN-1243 14 t 2.75 r Z-2812 14 t 1.63
Kleiner 1975, p. 321, no. 309 (M-N 15:1) Kleiner 1975, p. 306, no. 96 (H-K 12-14)
Sv.
obv. die B; Kleiner,MIV20, p. 1, pl. I:1 obv. die B; Kleiner 1976, p. 14, no. 64 (H 12:1) A [0] E
Sv.
obv. die B; Kleiner,MN 20, p. 1, pl. 1:2 obv. die C; Kleiner,MN 20, p. 1, pl. 1:3 obv. die C obv. die D obv. die D; Kleiner 1976, p. 17, no. 105 (A-B 19-20:1) obv. die D; Kleiner 1976, p. 14, no. 65 (H 12:1)
60 s t
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-IST CENTURIES B.C. EE-37 12 t 2.42 ET-198 15 t 2.47 Despite the changing reverseformat, this was not a protractedcoinage. Specimens were minted from only a few obverse dies and are rare; a piece in Berlin (Sv. 23.46) is the only published one not from the Agora excavations.In first calling attention to this coinage, Kleiner (MN 20, pp. 1-5) recognized that it belonged to the later 3rd centuryand that the dotted borderof its laterreversesrelatedit to the AE 1 varieties66 and 68. In to fact, Zeus'sthunderboltbelow the owl restrictsthe relationship the earlierof these AE 1 coinages.Inexplicably, an exceptionallyhigh proportion of the Agora pieces are well enough preservedfor illustration.The Mddle Stoa constructiondeposit gives the earliestrecordedcontext (for67h).
AE1 A Sv. 25.5-10, O-E Statue of Athena Polias r., Head of Artemis r., with quiver as on 66. at shoulder;border of dots. 104.3, 4 68 20 coins 20-22 Av.8.59 (13) *a f-562 20 4 10.40 *b T-177 7.10 20\ 9.05 *c Z-2403 21 overstruck,probablyon Zeus/Athena Polias (66) Kleiner 1975, p. 306, pl. 75, no. 89 (H-K 12-14) 7.37 *d e-637 / 22 7.68 *e T-1509 20 8.46 f II-615 22counterstampedwith a plemochoe on both sides, as Sv. 104.3, 4 overstruckon Zeus/Athena Polias (66) 9.61 22 g B-556 21 - 10.31 h AA-63 (L 19:2, lower cistern fill) There is an especially good but unpublishedexample of an overstrikeover variety 66 in the Numismatic Collection of Athens (Inv. 1905/6 NB' 3). Some of the Artemis/Athena Polias coins, including Sv. 25.10, can be identified as probable overstrikes their thin, wide fabric. But the majority of the Agora specimens by are too badly preservedto permit any judgment whether they are overstrikesor whether they underwent the as Plemochoe/Plemochoe counterstamping, 68f. 68h has the earliestcontext, shortlyafter 200 B.C. [Head of Zeus or Artemis r.] of uncertainAthena Poliasvariety. [66 or 68] 2 coins Plemochoe in relief. 21 r-1222 Similar.
Sv. 104.1, 2
AE2 A Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet. 69 *a b *c *d *e 113 coins MM-430 e-296 Z-2711 H'-3648 A-416 18-22 Av.5.28 (56)
Sv. 24.10-17
20 4 5.54 4.77 21
21 t 5.99 20 4 5.43 19 \ 5.80
overstruckon Antigonos Gonatas (507) similar;BA of undertypevisible on reverse overstrike overstrike overstrike
61
*f HO-312
*g *h i j k MM-378 A-347 T-1157 K-1294 ME-261
22 t 6.30
20 19 18 19 21 5.03 \ 5.80 . 3.45 t 6.23 t 4.90
A
GRC, 13 fig.
Kleiner 1975, p. 310, pl. 75, no. 171 (H-K 12-14) overstruckon Antigonos Gonatas; Kleiner 1975, p. 306, pl. 75, no. 86 (H-K 12-14) Most and possibly all specimens of this coinage are overstruckon Athena-head/Pan-erecting-trophy 2 AE of Antigonos Gonatas (507). Even when identifiabletraces of the undertype are lacking, the coins frequently have the telltalethinnessand slightlyconcavefabricof overstrikes. and k and 70c are three of six pieces of Owl 69j r. three-quarters from the Middle Stoa constructionfill of ca. 183 B.C., the earliestdependablydated deposit for this coinage.
Similar. 70
*a
Sv. 24.33
4 coins
E-8
17-20 Av.5.39(4)
19
19 17 20 -
Similar.
Similar,but uncertainvessel at r.
[69, 70] 17 coins of uncertainowl-three-quarters-r. variety. AE 4 A Head of Athena r., wearing e-E Owl stg. r., facing, Sv. 23.50-52 Corinthian helmet. on rudder. 71 88 coins 10-13 Av. 1.94 (32) *a NN-1658 12 4 1.94 Kleiner 1976, p. 6, pl. 3, no. 56 *b T-51 12 t 1.62 Kleiner 1976, p. 6, pl. 3, no. 55; GRC,fig. 13 *c E-1610 13 i 2.12 *d T-89 12 t 1.44 Kleiner 1976, p. 6, pl. 3, no. 54 *e 00-1152 12 / 2.16 *f K-1322 10 . 1.53 10 J. 1.42 *g 0-86 h K-1610 11 / 1.43 Kleiner 1975, p. 312, pl. 75, no. 199 (H-K 12-14) i T-1375 11 A 1.73 Kleiner 1975, p. 321, pl. 75, no. 311 (M-N 15:1) 11 / fragment Kleiner 1975, p. 316, no. 234 (corrected)(P-R 6-12) j SA-270 7 lh is one of two specimensfrom the Middle Stoa fill. Forthe position of the varietyin the PeriodII sequence, see p. 52 above (paceKleiner 1975, p. 325; 1976, p. 6). AE2
A-e
Head of Demeter r., wearing wheat wreath;border of dots. 72 PP'-174 22 8.27 E Plemochoe with wheat ear passed through each handle; at r., Eleusis ring. overstruckon ? Sv. 104.8, 9
62
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-IST CENTURIES B.C. Similar. Similar,but at r., aplustre. Sv. 104.14-19
73 *a *b *c *d e
Kleiner 1975, p. 321, pl. 75, no. 302 (M-N 15:1) All or most overstruckon Owl three-quarters (69 or 70). The helmet of the undertype is especiallyclear r. on 73a and b. Similar. Similar,but at r., owl. overstruckon Owl three-quarters (69, 70) r. overstruckon ? (M 21:1) Similar,but symbol at r. illegible. Sv. 104.10-13
Z-1506 T-1668
18-23 20 \ 20 / 22 4 23 $ 21 \
74
[72-74] 32 coins of uncertainDemeter/Plemochoe variety. Eight of these coins come from 2nd-centuryB.C. deposits: Kleiner 1975, p. 306, nos. 90, 91 (H-K 12-14), p. 321, nos. 303-305, and p. 324, no. 345 (M-N 15:1);and Kleiner 1976, p. 13, nos. 54, 55 (H 12:1). The true sequence of the three issues(Eleusis-ring symbol,aplustresymbol, and owl symbol)is not recoverable. AE 4
e
Plemochoe with wheat ear A E Eleusisring; all in Sv. 104.21-23 wheat wreath. passed through each handle. 10-13 Av. 1.70 (31) 13 t 1.66 12 t 2.00 12 t 1.65 12 t 1.89 Kleiner 1975, p. 306, pl. 75, no. 93 (H-K 12-14) 12 / 2.04 12 t 1.84 Kleiner 1975, p. 310, pi. 75, no. 174 (H-K 12-14) 12 - 1.35
198 B.c.
75 *a *b *c *d *e *f g
AE2
A-e
76 *a *b Sv. 25.15-21 E Amphora; at lower 1., owl; Head of Zeus r., bound with all in olive wreath. fillet. 19-22 Av.5.49 (7) 16 coins overstruckon Demeter/Plemochoe (72-74) 20 t 7.58 8-384 6.85 overstruckon Antigonos Gonatas (507) r-354 20 overstruckon ? r-670 21 t 3.53 on overstruck Demeter/Plemochoe (72-74) SA-486 20 -5.65 overstruckon Demeter/Plemochoe (72-74) A-9 20 . broken r. -+ broken overstruckon Owl three-quarters (69, 70) III-594 - broken overstruckon Demeter/Plemochoe (72-74); Kleiner 1976, p. 14, Z-2769 no. 63 (H 12:1) are similaroverstrikes. All other unillustrated specimens
*c
*d *e f g
PERIOD II: CATALOGUE AE3 A Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet with wing. 77 2 coins *a 00-1089 *b T-1227 13-14 Av. 2.75 (2) 14 t 2.39 13 t 3.06
63
Sv. 22.89-92
For the dating of this rare issue and the foregoingAE 2 varietyit accompanies,see p. 51 above.
ca. 196-190 B.C. AE2 A-e E Zeus, nude, stg. r., holding thunderboltin lowered r. hand, extending 1. arm; at r., owl.
Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet with wing or Corinthian helmet.
78 7 coins 17-20 Av.5.56(4) Attic helmet with wing (3) *a T-1508 20 f 4.92 overstruckon ? b 2-359 20 / 5.31 (N 20:6) Corinthianhelmet; obverseborder of dots (4) *c Z-2781 19 / 6.26 overstruckon ?
Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 79 *a *b *c *d *e *f g h 58 coins r-1284 8-240 HH-217 T-636 B'-861 E-861 T-186 X-101 16-20 19 19 4 18 t 19 , 20 t 20 17 t 20 t Av.5.00 (27) 4.79 4.95 5.23 5.08 5.29 4.40 4.35
overstruckon ? Kleiner 1975, p. 306, pl. 75, no. 99 (H-K 12-14) overstruckon ? halved (K 18:2) overstruckon ? (N 18:3)
Sv. 81.7, 8
Similar.
[78-80] 30 coins of uncertainStandingZeus variety. a K-1327 17 - 5.10 Kleiner 1975, p. 310, pl. 75, no. 176 (H-K 12-14)
64
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-IST CENTURIES B.C. AE4 Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet. A-e E Owl stg r., facing, on thunderbolt. Sv. 23.47-49; Kleiner 1976, pl. 3:52, 53 (Type7)
81 *a *b *c *d *e
*f rr-8 *g Ie-327
h
flan clipped before striking Kleiner 1975, p. 312, pl. 75, no. 198 (H-I 14:1) AE On the absolutechronologyof the StandingZeus AE 2 and the Owl-on-thunderbolt 4 struckwith it, see 50-51,57 above. Three StandingZeus pieces (78b, 79g, and 79h) are the latestcoins in cisternfillsofjust after pp. 200 B.C.Two of these fills (N 20:6 and K 18:2)are so dated by their lateststampedRhodian amphorahandles. K-1466
10-14 Av. 1.63 (55) 1.40 12 t 1.39 14 4 1.90 11 4 1.42 10 t 2.01 2.03 11 14 4 1.98 12 t 1.45
13 t
AE 2 Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet; border of dots. 82 *a *b *c *d *e f g 41 coins E-803 8-237 NN-1372 NN-50 KK-67 ME-230 EA-212 Av.6.19 (37) 6.83 7.00 5.97 7.58 19 t 8.81 17 o 5.79 19 t 6.33 17-20 19 t 18 t 18 t 19 t 19 t 19 t 4.97 4.78 Ae E Zeus, nude, stridingr., hurling thunderboltin raised r. hand, extending 1. arm; at r., star and eagle. Sv. 81.17, 18; Kleiner 1976, pl. 1:4-5 (Type 2a)
h EA-214 iT-1195
Kleiner 1975, p. 306, pl. 76, no. 103 (H-K 12-14) Kleiner 1975, p. 317, pl. 76, no. 254 (SquarePeristylefloor hoard; see under O-R 7-10) Kleiner 1975, p. 317, pl. 76, no. 256 (same hoard) Kleiner 1975, p. 319, pl. 76, no. 261 (M-N 15:1)
e
Similar. A-E Zeus hurling thunderboltr., at 1., wheat ear; at r., eagle. Sv. 81.28, 29; Kleiner 1976, pl. 1:6-8 (7ype2b)
83
overstruckon ?
65
e
Similar.
-A
Sv. -; Kleiner 1976, pl. 1:9-11 (eype2c)
84 *b *c *d *e
42 coins
*a flA-13
KTA-105 1-312 EA-65 AA-276
18 t 4.57
18 19 18 18 19 t / t t 6.33
7.59
6.81 6.53
t 5.58
g h i
Kleiner 1975, p. 307, pl. 76, no. 106 (H-K 12-14) Kleiner 1975, p. 307, pi. 76, no. 109 (H-K 12-14) 18 t 5.91 Kleiner 1975, p. 316, pl. 76, no. 241 (P-R 6-12) 18 /" 7.68 Kleiner 1975, p. 324, pl. 76, no. 347 (M-N 15:1) The present dating of ca. 190-183 B.C.of the FulminatingZeus issues 82-84 (p. 51 above)replacesKleiner's broader ca. 200/196-180 B.C.(Kleiner 1975, pp. 327-328; 1976, pp. 36, 38). The three are the latest AE 2 varietiesin the Middle Stoa constructionfill (H-K 12-14) of ca. 183 B.C. (Kleiner 1975, pp. 312-313, table I). ME-14 EA-15 T-1645
e-148
19 t 5.76
AE 4 Cicada. A-9 E Amphora with transverse palm branch. Sv. 107.55-58; Kleiner 1976, pl. 3:59-61 (Type9)
85 *a *c
*b S-598
13 ,
.
1.86
1.93 Kleiner 1976, p. 6, pl. 3, no. 60
Z-2644bis 13
Kleiner1976,no. 61
12 t
A
1.30
1.16
1.70
11 t 2.01 11 A broken
Kleiner1975,p. 307, pl. 76, no. 110 (H-K 12-14) Kleiner1975,p. 316, pl. 76, no. 247 (P-R 6-12)
The star symbol of the heavy (i.e., early) 85a duplicates the emission symbol of the initial Fulminating Zeus AE 2 variety 82 and confirms that the Cicada/Amphora AE 4, the most prolific of all Athenian AE 4 bronze, was struck in tandem with the Fulminating Zeus issues 82-84, as Kleiner (1975, p. 328; 1976, pp. 34, 38) had independently deduced from the Middle Stoa construction fill. What Kleiner did not recognize is that after a long interruptionthe Cicada/Amphora AE 4 was revived towards the end of the 2nd century in Period III. The later Cicada/Amphora coins employ a different A-E form of the ethnic and are generally struckon smaller,lighter flans, with diametersof 9-11 mm. and weights that frequentlyfall below 1.0 g.105Fifty-eightsuch pieces, either with the later ethnic or with 9 mm. diameters and thereforeof legible, the ethnics on specimens in Agora deposits down to ca. 130 B.C. are regularlyAE (DepositsH-K 12-14, P-R6-12, M-N 15:1 [Kleiner 1975, pp. 304-324], H 12:1,and A-B 19-20:1 [Kleiner 1976, pp. 12-19]). But at
105 When
66
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1 ST CENTURIES B.C. unmistakablePcriod III date, are cataloguedbelow under variety 108. All other Cicada/Amphora specimens, including more than 300 on which no ethnic is preserved,are counted here, even though perhaps over half of those with illegibleethnicsmay have actuallybeen struckin PeriodIII. All, or nearlyall, the 107 coins selected here for weighing,however,do belong to the early2nd-centuryphase of the coinage.
PERIOD III
ca. 160's-87/6 B.C.
Period III effectivelycoincides with the prosperousera framed by Athens' acquisitionof Delos in 167/6 and her disastrousparticipationin the rebellion of MithradratesVI against Rome eighty years later.The bronze coinage is very much a continuationof that of Period II but is best treated separately,as the chronology relies on entirely differentcategories of evidence, and most of the varietiescan no longer be associatedwith particularissuesof the main, AE 2 smaller-denomination unit (see Table III below,pp. 324-325). Two of the later AE 2 issues are absolutely datable: the Fulminating Zeus emission with the symbol of the two pilei of the Dioskouroi (94) must be contemporaneouswith the two-pilei stephanephoricsilver issue of 99/8 B.C.,while the concluding Fulminating Zeus issue with the symbolof the Pontic starbetween crescents(97) belongs,with the New Style star-between-crescents silverand gold, to 87/6. In that fatefulyear,Athens, irrevocablycommitted to Mithradates'cause, was besieged and taken by Sulla. fix Over a dozen hoards of the late 2nd and early Ist centuriesB.C. the relativechronology of most of the AE 2 issuesand some of the smallervarieties.The hoardsare staggeredin four groups: 1. The Tambouria (Peiraeus) 1938 hoard106was buried soon after its last AE 2 issue of FulminatingZeus with eagle and pileus (90), probably early in the last third or last quarter of the 2nd century. the were both interredshortlyafter99/8 B.C., 2. The Attica 1949 and the Athens 1955 hoards107 date of their latest FulminatingZeus variety,94 (two pilei). There is a very good chance that the burial of one or both of these hoards was connected with the second revolt of the Laurion slaves, in apparentlystill unsuppressed 98/7.108
least a quarterof the sixty-fourCicada/Amphorasin Deposit B 20:9 of the firstdecade of the 1stcenturyhave the later form of the ethnic, althoughthis is not noted in Kleiner 1976, p. 21, nos. 17-80. That the light Cicada/Amphorasbegan with fourpieces that give an averageweight to circulateafterca. 130 is seen too fromthe Tambouriahoardof ca. 130 B.C., which produced nineteen pieces with an average of only 1.15 g. Attica 1951 hoard, of 1.87 g., and from the 87 B.C. (Kleiner1976, A46-E20 [ethnicsnot analyzed],p. 27). All eight of the Cicada/Amphorapieces in the smallDelos hoard 11, IGCH 324 published by E. Fosterand T. Hackens, "Decco Metal Detector Survey on Delos," Archaeometry 1969, 170,pl. II, have the Period III arrangementof the ethnic and, except for one coin at 1.40 g., weigh between 0.70 p. and 0.85 g. The six remainingbronzes (av. 0.55 g.) in this small deposit are of the late Period III AE 5 variety 110: Apollo/Owl on Amphora. 106 IGCH 249. Kleiner 1976, pp. 22-27, 32: Hoard A. 107 IGCH 269 and 276. Kleiner 1976, pp. 22-27, 32: Hoards B and C. 108 Associationwith the slaveuprisingwas suggestedfor the firsthoardby Price(1964, p. 35) and recognizedas possible by Kleiner(1976, p. 38, note 63), who pointed out, however,that the provenienceof the hoard is unknown.In fact we do not have a sure location for the discoveryof either hoard. The revolt customarilyhas been placed in 104-102 B.C., in Studies Classical Phiology 83, 1979 [pp. 213-235], pp. 232-234) but Stephen Tracy ('Athens in 100 B.C.," Harvard for 100-98. In the processionto Delphi for the festivalof the Pythaisin 98/7, the Atheniancavalrywas plausiblyargues representedby a token five horsemen (as comparedwith the 122 cavalrymenin the precedingPythaisof 106/5). Tracy
PERIOD HI
67
3. The earlierphase of Sulla'soperationsin Attica is responsiblefor eight hoards that end with the antepenultimateand penultimateFulminatingZeus emissions,those with the symbolsof mystic staffand thyrsos(95 and 96).109Two of the hoards,PortoRaphti 1967110and Keratea 1954, come from EasternAttica and were presumablysecretedwhen Sulla'sforcesarrivedduringthe summerof 87. One assumes that all or most of the other hoards come likewise from the Attic countryside. None have a preciseprovenience,except perhapsfor Plakaca. 1942, but it may have been purchased ratherthan found in the Plakadistrictof Athens. Fulmi4. The final three hoards, all concluding with the Mithradaticstar-between-crescents nating Zeus issue (97), belong to the Sullan sack in the spring of 86. Two of thesel11 were found in the Peiraeus,which Sulla capturedand put to the torch after the fall of Athens in early March. Possible indications of burning on the coins of the third hoard112suggest that it too is from the Peiraeusratherthan from Athens, which was sparedfrom fire.113 Several Agora deposits, dated primarily by their stamped Rhodian and Knidian amphora handles, supplementthe hoards.The most useful are M-N 15:1, consistingof three fills connected with the construction of the South Stoa II around 140 B.C.,and the later drain deposits H 12:1 and A-B 19-20:1. The coins from nearly all these hoard and deposit contexts are tabulatedand article of 1976, "The Agora Excavationsand Athenian analyzed in Kleiner'sfundamentalHesperia Bronze Coinage, 200-86 B.C." Even after a number of his observationsare emended, the overall chronologyof the coinage in this period remainsessentiallyas Kleiner established. The AE 2 seriesbegins with two issuesof exceptionaldesign: Demeter/Piglet (86), presumably an Eleusinianfestivalissue, and the unusuallylight and handsomeApollo/Owl with lyre (87), which was accompaniedby the equallyfine Apollo/Amphora AE 4 (101) and, probably, Apollo/Lyre AE 3 in the Agora).Kleiner assignedboth AE 2 varietiesto the 140'son the (Sv. 106.8-11, unrepresented groundsthat neither was representedin the materialconnected with the constructionof the Stoa of But Attalos,ca. 150 B.c.114 thisnegativeevidenceis not decisive.No exampleof the Demeter or Apollo AE 2 appearedin the South Stoa II constructiondepositsof ca. 140 B.C. either,althoughboth issues were surelyin circulationby that time and in fact couldverywell go backto the 160's.The acquisition for of Delos providesa terminus quemof 166 B.C. the Apollonian striking;and it is doubtfulthat post
explainsthat the main body of the cavalrywas probablyneeded at home to protect the countrysideagainstmarauding Athenaios 4.272 E-F) recounts that the slaves. The slave revolt was serious and of some duration;Poseidonios(apud slavesseized the fortressat Sounion and ravagedAttica "fora long time." 109 Keratea 1954 (IGCH277; Kleiner 1976, pp. 22-28, 32: Hoard D) and the following,all of which are reviewedand summarizedin Kleiner 1976, pp. 30-32: Attica 1906 (IGCH280), Attica 1927 (IGCH281), Pnyx (not the originalplace of burial) 1937 (IGCH274), Attica 1937 (IGCH282), Plaka ca. 1942 (IGCH275), Porto Raphti 1967 (IGCH279), and and Athens 1969 (M. Caramessini-Oeconomides E S. Kleiner,"ANew Hoard of AthenianBronze Coins,"AAA7, 1974, 149-156 = CH 1, 1975, no. 95). The Attica ca. 1951 hoard (IGCH 283), published in Kleiner 1976, pp. 23-27 pp. as Hoard E, consistsonly of smallerdenominationsand may be pre-Sullan,althoughnot any earlierthan the last quarter of the 2nd century. Another useful tabulationand discussionof several of these hoards will be found in Price 1964, pp. 27-30. 110The penultimate FulminatingZeus variety with thyrsos symbol is not present in the Porto Raphti find, but the 15-coin total is so small that there is no reason to doubt that the hoard belongs with the others of 87 B.C. 111 Peiraeus1926 (IGCH316: Kleiner 1973; Kleiner 1976, pp. 31-32) and Peiraeus 1973 (Oeconomides-Caramessini 1976, pp. 220-223 = CH 3, 1977, no. 73). The coins of the latter were excavatedfrom the floor of a large Hellenistic buildingin a layer of burning and debris. 112Walker1978, pp. 44-45, the Cigar Box Hoard (=CH3, 1977, no. 75): "The coins ... seem to have been burntand are quite similarto the coins in the 1973 hoard from the Piraeus." 113Appian, Mithradates Plutarch,Sulla13. 41; 114 Kleiner 1976, pp. 36-38. See Deposit P-R 6-12 (p. 316 below).
68
Demeter/Piglet could be appreciablyearlier,as the seven specimens in the great Peiraeus 1926 hoard appearedless worn (w4-6) than the ten specimensof Apollo/Owl with lyre (allw6).115 Around the middle of the centurythere is a returnto AE 2 issuessigned with emission symbols and to the PeriodII pairingof Athena and Zeus, at firstin two issues(88 and 89) with the traditional rolesof the two gods reversed:obversesbear the head of Zeus, reversesan archaistic representational statue of Athena hurlingthe thunderbolt.The Athena is the same Macedonian Athena Alkidamos thatAntigonosGonatasand PhilipV had placedon the reversesof theirsilvercoins.16 Her depiction on these Athenian reversesought to be some kind of referenceto the defeat and dissolutionof the kingdomof Macedon in 168 at the conclusionof the Third MacedonianWaror perhapsthe defeatof Andriskosand creationof the Roman provinceof Macedonia in 148-146. After ca. 140 the familiar Athena in Corinthianhelmet/FulminatingZeus formatwas revivedand persistedthroughthe long series of eight AE 2 emissions (90-97) that culminatedin the Mithradaticstar-between-crescents strikingof 87/6. Below the AE 2 unit, which we take to be the hemiobol (see p. 38 above), were minted the AE 3 dichalkon/quarter-obol,now struckin the prolificvariety 99, Two owls on thunderbolt,on a scale unequalledsince PeriodI; the basic AE 4 chalkous(101-109); and, makingits firstand only appearanceat Athens in PeriodIII, the small AE 5 module of coins that weigh well under a gram or (110-1 14). This last fractionshouldrepresentthe half-chalkous sixteenthof an obol (p. 38 above). Denominationally, only variety100, Cicada/Owl on thunderbolt,presentsa problem.Accordingto these coins, which were minted with AE 3 diametersbut with generally heavier weights Kleiner, than other Period III AE 3 pieces (cf. Table III, pp. 324-325 below), representa unit in between the Two-owls-on-thunderbolt 3 (99) and the largeAE 2 module.117 so, the Cicada/Owl pieces AE If would probably have to be identifiedas trichalkia.It is arguable,however,that the coins are late AE 3 dichalkiaof restoredweight. The notable iconographicalvariety of the Period III AE 4 and 5 coinage is due in the first instance to the addition of Delian Apollo (and Artemis)to the chief national cults of Athens. From the middle of the 2nd to the middle of the lest century B.C., Apollo dominates the obverses of the smallerdenominations,and his attributes lyre,tripod,and quiverexpandthe repertoryof available of reversetypes. Varietyresults,too, from the frequencyof type changes in these denominationsand the convention, begun in Period II, of honoring a pair of deities on a single coin. Thus on various Period III fractions, a head of Apollo is paired with a reverse owl (110), Panathenaic amphora (101, 105), and Eleusinianplemochoe (103), as well as with his own attributes(111: lyre; 112: tripod). Zeus is paired with a plemochoe (102), and so forth. The only types that depart from these now routine gods and symbolsare the heads, evidently,ofKore in variety 106 and of Nike in variety 107. Svoronos attributed a majority of the Period III and IV AE 3-5 varieties to the Athenian cleruchs on Delos, since many of these smallerbronzes were recoveredin the French excavations on the islandin the early 1900's(seeTable III, pp. 324-325 below)and as often as not had typesthat
Kleiner 1973, p. 171. See note 83 above, p. 53. Forthe PhilipV coins, Brett 1950, pl. 12:17;Boehringer, 104, pl. 7:6-9. p. 117 Kleiner 1973, pp. 180-181; 1976, pp. 9-10, 34-35. Kleiner'smodular nomenclaturecompared to that used in the presentwork is Kleiner AE 1 = here AE 2 Kleiner AE 2 = here AE 3 Cicada/Owl on thunderbolt(100) Kleiner AE 3 = here other AE 3 and all AE 4 varieties Kleiner AE 4 = here AE 5.
116 115
PERIOD III
69
he consideredmore "Delian"than Attic.118 But the Athenian proveniencesthat emerged from the excavationshave discreditedsuch attribution,119 least for all but a few exceptional issues. at Agora One of the exceptions is the Artemis/Plemochoe AE 4 (104), which, although probably minted at Athens, seems to have been consignedfor circulationon Delos.120Forgenuine Athenian cleruchy emissions, however,we must turn to the AE 2 and AE 3 coinage struckon Delos by the Roman legate Gaius ValeriusTriariusin 69 B.C.(see under 830) and to the bronzes struckby or for the Athenian cleruchson Salamis(640-642) and the northernAegean islandsof Lemnos, Imbros,and Skyros(159-161, 454-456). The concluding star-between-crescents FulminatingZeus AE 2 of the First MithradaticWar (97) is historicallythe most intriguingemission of PeriodIII. The bulk of the issue must have been minted earlyin the archonyear 87/6, beforethe Roman siege began in earnest and Sulla effectively cut Athens and the Peiraeusoff from one another.121 The coins circulatedin the Peiraeusas well as in Athens, and there is no reasonto thinkthat a subsidiary mint was set up in the Peiraeusonce the two cities were isolated. As is clear from the 201 Agora specimens and the correspondinglylarge numbers from the hoards of 86 B.C.,122 issue was minted in profusion. Its hurried production the is evidentfrom the many examplesthatwere carelesslystruckor seeminglystruckfromworn dies.123 Or were the latterreallystampedwith insufficient forceto drivethe metal into the deepestrecessesof the dies? Such weak strikingis probablyresponsiblein part for the numerousstar-between-crescents that look "worn",even though they were removedfrom circulation pieces from the hoardsof 86 B.C.
118 Sv., pls. 106, 107; and, earlier,<<NotlaaTc rv ev AiXcp AeO7vaclov ta xX7)po6xov>,JIAN 3, 1900, pp. 50-54; cf. idem of 1907, p. 194;and idem 1911, pp. 58, 76, 78,83; whence Roussel,pp. 47-48. The attribution coins to the Athenians on Delos was originallyproposedby U. Koehler,"Die Minze der KleruchenaufDelos," AM 6, 1881, pp. 238-243. 119 Dulos XXVII, p. 390, note 1. Kleiner 1976, pp. 6-7. M. Thompson, "Some Athenian 'Cleruchy'Money,"Hesperia 10, 1941, pp. 199-236, corrected Svoronos' more fanciful attributionsof Athenian bronze to cleruchs on Skiathos, Peparethos,etc. (Sv.,pl. 25). 120 There are fiveAE 5 varietiesattestedfromDelos (Delos XXVII, table,p. 409) but not fromthe Agora: (1)Sv. 106.3841-Apollo/Quiver (25 from Delos); (2) Sv. 106.45, 46-Plemochoe/Quiver (4 from Delos); (3) Sv. 106.82, 83Artemis/Plemochoe (3 from Delos); (4) Sv. 107.24, 25-Apollo/Wheat ear (1 from Delos); and (5) DelosXXVII, F58, 59-Athena/Lyre (2 from Delos). The first (to judge from the quantity on Delos) and third (to judge from the similarityto 104) may be further exceptional issues consigned to Delos, but the find evidence from the two excavationsis too insubstantialfor a final decision. Comparedwith the Delos excavations(see Table III), the Agora has producedrelativelyfew identifiableAE 5 pieces overall, perhaps because of less favorablesoil conditions or the continuous occupation of the site rather than because of any actual pattern of AE 5 circulation.It is interesting,however,that finds of the largerAE 2 and 3 coins on Delos are minimal, suggestingthat these larger-modulebronzes did not comprise an importantpart of the currency of Athenian Delos. For all the silver hoards that were buried on Delos at the time of the Mithradaticuprisingin 88 B.C. Hackens, "Tr6sorhellenistiquetrouve a Delos en 1964," BCH 89, 1965 [pp. 503-534], pp. 515-516), there (T. is not a single hoard of contemporaryAE 2 and 3 bronze to match the severalfrom 87/6 B.C. Attica. Three Athenian varieties in Svoronos' Delos plates are unrepresentedboth among the Agora and the Delos excavationfinds: Sv. 106.8-11 (Apollo/LyreAE 3), 106.31, 32 (Athena/LyreAE 3), and 107.46-49 (= BMCAttica, 89, p. no. 632, Kore or Apollo/Owl-with-palm-branch-on-thunderbolt 1, of PeriodIV fabric). AE 121 See 30-38 and Plutarch, Sulla 13 for this and other details of the siege. The star-betweenAppian, Mithradates crescentssilver(NewStle, nos. 1143-1146) was struckin months 1 (June-July),2, and 6 (November-December)of 87/6, i.e., both near the beginning of the siege and when it was fairlywell advanced. 122 235 pieces (or one-third of the FulminatingZeus coins) in the Peiraeus 1926 hoard; 152 pieces (or 95 percent of FulminatingZeus coins) in the Peiraeus 1973 hoard. See note 111 above, p. 67. 123 Kleiner 1973, p. 180, note 26. See also the double-struck 97e below,and Kleiner 1976, pl. 2:33, from the Peiraeus 1926 hoard.
70
less than a year after minting.124 Their softer,leaded alloy may also account for some actual wear from brief circulation.125 Unlike earlier FulminatingZeus bronzes, whose alloy contained about 1 percent or less of lead, the star-between-crescents coins were minted from a heavilyleaded bronze a lead content of 12-13 percent and thus are about 1-1.5 grams or 15-20 percent heavier with than coins of the earlier issues (see Table III, pp. 324-325 below). There seems to have been no shortageof availablebronze;otherwise,the amount of this metal would have been reduced in each batch of alloy as the extra lead was added. But, by weight, the actual bronze content was kept as before,apparentlyso that no one could accuse the coins of being debased. It has been suggestedthat the purpose of the added lead and weight was to raise the value of the coins in response to the inflationarypressuresof the Roman blockade.126 But this is unlikely if the coins were mostly struck before the siege had become critical. Moreover, such a putative revaluationwithout an accompanyingchange of type or diameter to reflect it would have unfairly discriminatedagainst the earlier,lighter FulminatingZeus bronzes alreadyin circulation.A more plausibleexplanationis that the leading was intended to make the bronze softer so that the coins could be stamped out more quickly,that is, with fewer blows of the hammer, and to prolong the lives of the dies.127In addition, the extra weight would have encouraged acceptance of the coins, which was a matter of some urgency in view of their politicallycharged Pontic symbol and their importancein financingthe resistanceagainstSulla.128 The relativelygood condition of most of the star-between-crescents specimens found in the is another idiosyncracy.As a group these are the least-wornHellenistic Athenian bronzes Agora on from the excavations(the severalexamplesselectedfor illustration Plate 9 are in this regardfairly few could have circulatedafter 86. It appears that in making terms with Sulla, the typical).Very Athenians placed the names of Mithradatesand his Athenian agent, the tyrant Aristion, under a To silver damnatio memoriae.129judge fromthe paucityof extantspecimens,the star-between-crescents signedby King Mithradatesand Aristionwas probablyrecalled.30 One assumesthat the associated bronze coins had to be turned in as well, probablyto be exchanged for newly minted bronze of differentdesign (p. 82 below). But whether or not the Mithradatic bronze could have been exchanged during a limited period, it was evidently demonitizedby means of a statuteforbiddingsellersof goods and services from accepting it. 97h and possibly 153e (undertype),for example, were cut with an X to void them as legal tender, and the numerous, unworn specimens from the Agora had surely been thrown away as so much trash. Some of the coins were eventuallypicked up and reintroduced into circulation but not until later in the century or in the Imperial period, when the intense emotional climate of the First Mithradatic War had long subsided. On the other hand, it is clear that FulminatingZeus coins from the pre-Mithradaticissues continued to circulatewithout interruption. A number, like 94f and possibly 95a, were countermarkedwith a cicada stamp, clearly after Sulla's capture of Athens, inasmuch as such countermarkedcoins do not appear in
On the worn appearanceof many specimensin the Peiraeus1926 hoard, Kleiner 1973, p. 180. So Oeconomides-Caramessini1976, p. 223; Walker1978, p. 44. Kleiner 1973, pp. 181-182. 127 For the technicaladvantagesof strikingfrom a leaded alloy,see Caley,pp. 138-139. 128 Price (1964, p. 35) emphasizesthe value of these bronze coins as a propagandamedium. 129 Habicht 1976, pp. 127-135, accepted in principle by Ernst Badian ("Rome, Athens, and Mithradates,"AJAH 1, 1976 [pp. 105-128], p. 125, note 41). 130 Mattingly 1979, p. 164; M0rkholm 1984, p. 33.
125 126 124
71
the Sullan hoards.131Some AE 2 pieces dating before 86 B.C.were overstruckin the second half of the 1st century B.C.(see 143f, with 137e and 138h), while others still circulatingin the late 1st century B.C. or in the 1st century after Christ were occasionally chopped in half to make up for a scarcity of half-unit coins (see 79f, 89d, 94g, [82-84, 90-94]a, b and pp. 92-93 below). CATALOGUE
Die alignmentsin PeriodIII (andIV) are fixed at 12 o'clockand are not recorded.Occasionaldeviationsare aligned just off the verticalat 11 or 1 o'clock. ca. 160's-150's B.C. AE2 Head of Demeter r., wearing wheat wreath. 86 *a *b *c *d e 18 coins EA-173 4-132 K-39 K-981 Z-2738 17-19 19 18 19 18 17 Av.6.15 (5) 5.27 5.48 6.41 6.15 blistered AGE above. Piglet stg. r. Sv. 103.50-56; Kleiner 1976, pl. 2:40-42 (Type4)
Kleiner 1976, p. 5, pl. 2, no. 40 Kleiner 1976, p. 14, no. 84 (H 21:1) A-E
17-19 18 18 19 18
ca. 140's B.C.132 Head of Zeus r., bound with taenia; border of dots. A-E O ArchaisticAthena striding r., hurling thunderboltin raised r. hand, holding shield on extended 1. arm; at 1., helmet; at r., horse's head. Sv. 22.53, 54; Kleiner 1976, 2.38, 39 (7ype3)
88 *a
10 coins T-661
131 On the cicada countermark,attested on FulminatingZeus coins of the two-pilei, mystic-staff,and thyrsosissues see the fifteen coins collected and discussed in Kleiner 1973, pp. 182-183, and Kleiner 1976, p. 10. The (94-96), countermarkis not found on star-between-crescents pieces. 132 Kleiner 1976, p. 38, table IV
72 *b E-278 *c T-1194 19 19
A-@
Similar. Similar,except E and at 1., wheat ear; at r., snake. Sv. 22.55; Kleiner 1976, pl. 2:34-37 (ype 3)
89
17-20 17 20 17 19
Similar.
[88, 89] 68 coins of uncertainZeus/FulminatingAthena variety. Kleiner 1975, p. 312, no. 200 (H-I 14:1) a K-1458 obv. cmk.: star in incuse circle b S-3535 The above arrangementof the two Zeus/FulminatingAthena issues is based on weights. The discoveryof 88c in the South Stoa II constructionfill places it beforeca. 140 B.C. [88, 89]a comes also from a deposit dated ca.
140 B.C.
countermarkof [88, 89]b appearson Sv. 22.55 and seven out of twelve FulminatingAthena The star-in-circle pieces in the Attica 1906 hoard (Price 1964, pp. 28-29; Kleiner 1976, pp. 10, 20). Occurring on no other Athenian variety,the countermarkwas added before the change back to the FulminatingZeus types in variety 90, but its purpose is unclear.
ca. 130' B.C.133
Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthianhelmet; border of dots. 90 4 coins *a B'-1009 *b NN-1304 17-18 Av.5.13 (4) 6.10 18 5.03 18
O A-E Zeus, nude, stridingr., hurling thunderbolt;at 1., pileus; at r., eagle.
Similar.
91 *a *b *c *d e
16-19 18 18 17 18 17
37-38.
PERIOD III: CATALOGUE Similar. Similar,except at 1., amphora; at r., cornucopia and eagle. 3.72 Sv. 81.20, 21; Kleiner 1976, p. 4 2f) (7Tpe
73
*92
A-287
18
Closely related to 91, variety 92 was the firstFulminatingZeus issue struckafter the burialof the Tambouria in 1938 hoard (Kleiner 1976, pp. 22, 25, 32-33). The issuewas slight,as meagerrepresentation the Sullanhoards confirms(Kleiner 1976, p. 25).
Similar,except uncertainvessel at 1. 11 coins of uncertainFulminatingZeus with cornucopia-and-vessel [91, 92] variety. Similar.
e
Similar. Similar,except A-E and at 1., amphora;at r., eagle. Sv. 81.25-27; Kleiner 1976, 2g) pl. 1:18-20 (Type
93
17-19 18 18 17
99/8 B.C.
Similar.
94
*c r-522
*d K-1264 *e T'-699 *f T-167 g ET-163
16-19 16 17 16 19 17 17 20
The date of the issue (the next fixed point in the AE 2 chronologyafterthe Agora depositsdated ca. 140 B.C.for varieties88 and 89) is that of the Demetrios-Agathippos New Style silver,which also employsthe two caps of the Dioskouroifor its issue symbol.1'35 Since the place of the two-pileibronzesin the Sullan hoards suggeststhat the issuefell within a decade or so of 100 B.C., exceptionalassociationof the bronzewith the silverfollowsnaturally the (Price 1964, p. 35; Kleiner 1976, pp. 37-38). In Period III the only other instance of a shared symbol is in the star-between-crescents gold, silver,and bronzeof 87/6. But the design of the two-pileibronze is itselfexceptional: to accommodate both caps on the reverse,the designerdispensedwith the eagle that had regularlystood before Zeus and adopted a linear arrangementof the ethnic, the canonical A-OE of the New Style silver. It is hard to see why the traditionalFulminatingZeus reversewould have been so altered,unlessthe intent was to assimilate the bronze to the silver.Another feature common to the issues in both metals is their remarkablevolume. As Kleinernotes from the forty-sevenobversedies of the silverand the numberof bronzepieces in hoardsof the early 1stcenturyB.C.(Kleiner 1976, p. 33, note 45; p. 37, note 60), the two-pileiemissionswere manufactured greater in than any other New Style silveror (exceptingthe starbetweencrescents)FulminatingZeus bronze series. quantity
135 New Style, nos. 879-928, as dated in Boehringer,p. 202; Mattingly 1979, p. 162; and M0rkholm 1984, p. 32.
74
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-IST CENTURIES B.C. mid-90's-arly80'sB.C. Similar. Similar,except mystic staff. A-e E and at 1., Sv. 81.49-52; Kleiner 1976, 2t) pl. 2:24-26 (Type
95
96
Forthe hoardsthat fix the position of varieties95 and 96, see p. 67 above.
87/6 B.C.
Similar.
97
*a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h i j
201 coins 17-21 Av. 7.27 (62) Kleiner 1976, p. 4, pl. 2, no. 30 18 IT-151 6.24 7.16 19 M-107 GRC,fig. 14 18 8.55 X-42 7.33 18 E-2450 double-struck 9.31 18 H-17 7.95 18 K-1317 7.49 17 AA-191 X chisel markedon obv. 17 8.46 T-420 Kleiner 1976, p. 4, pl. 2, no. 32 19 8.22 NN-20 broken (U 13:2a)Plate 34:3 PP'-1006 20 nos. 1143-1146) and gold (Sv.71.1-4) silver(NewSyek, Although this is the bronze counterpartof the 87/6 B.C. issuessignedby King Mithradatesand Aristion,its date is independentlyconfirmedby the contextualevidence of the Sullan bronze hoards and by the circumstancesthat the earliestAgora deposits in which specimensappear contained debris from the Sullan destructionof 86 (Price 1964, pp. 32-34). Since the star-between-crescents bronzes became worthlessafter Sulla'sconquest and were discarded,it is not surprisingthat a remarkabletotal of thirteen was found in the cistern Deposit N 20:4 of the mid- to late 80's. For a possible specimen that may ca. have been demonitizedlike 97h but with an XI on both sides, see 153e (overstruck 20 B.C.). UNCLASSIFIED
[82-4, 90-97 420 coins of uncertainFulminatingZeus variety.Of these, 3 were halved,most likelyin the 1stcentury afterChrist(pp. 92-93 below).
*a NN-957 17 halved
18 17 17
PERIOD Ill: CATALOGUE AE3 ca. 130' B.C.136 Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet; border of dots. 98 28 coins *a Br-465 *b ft-357 *c r-1611a 12-15 Av. 2.61 (12) 13 2.58 14 3.22 12 2.65 A 8-E Amphora with transverse palm branch.
75
Coins of this variety are occasionally present in hoards of the early 1st century B.C. (Kleiner 1976, p. 32, table III) but in much smallernumbersand in a more worn condition than pieces from the clearlylatervarieties 99 and 100.
ca. 130-90 Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet; border of dots. 99 *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h *i *j *k *1 *m *n *o *p 635 coins K-1262a E-4073 E-474 OA-259 r-140 H-998 00-1069 II-491 8-991 IIE-424 NN-1220 BB-494 ZZ-34 r-1630 II-420 II-616 12-18 17 17 16 15 15 14 14 14 14 13 13 12 12 12 12 12
B.C.137
AGE below. Two owls stg. r. and 1., facing, on thunderbolt; all within olive wreath.
Av. 2.84 (147) 5.35 4.96 3.46 3.75 3.65 2.58 trimmed flan 2.74 2.58 4.08 2.62 Kleiner 1976, p. 8, pl. 4, no. 89; GRC,fig. 14 2.64 2.33 2.72 1.94 1.85 overstruckon Owl-on-thunderboltAE 4 (81) broken or halved
In the long course of production, coins of this variety underwent a substantialdiminution that is reflected not only in the wide range of flan weights and sizes but also by the progressivereduction of the diameter of the dies. Ultimately,the mint was overstriking variety on AE 4 chalkoi of the early 2nd century (see 99o). the To make them commensuratewith the later coins, flans of the earlier,larger 99f and Kleiner 1976, pl. 4:87, were cut down, apparentlyin these cases after striking,since the trimmingrespectsthe reversetype. Kleiner'sdating of ca. 130-90 B.C.followsfrom the abundanceand condition (w2-6) of specimensin hoardsof the early 1stcenturyB.C.and the presenceof three examplesin the Agora drainDeposit A-B 19-20:1 of the third quarterof the 2nd century(Kleiner 1976, p. 18, nos. 115-117; pp. 27, 32, 35-38; Kleiner 1973, pp. 176-177). As proposedbelow, however,the coinage may have ended by the 90's B.C.with the change to variety 100.
136 Kleiner
137
Ibid.
76
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1ST CENTURIES B.C. A Cicada. O-E Owl stg. r., facing, on thunderbolt.
100
*a *b *c *d *e *f
73 coins 12-16 Av.2.85(18) 2.00 Z-2198bis 14 T-517 2.35 12 3.66 AP-31 12 E-548 2.65 12 8-114 2.75 12 13 2.39 II1-624 The 182 hoard specimensweighedby Kleiner(1973, p. 181, tableI) gave an averageof 3.48 g and suggestedto him that these Cicada/Owl-on-thunderboltcoins representa larger denominationalunit than the Two-owlson-thunderbolt99, even though both varietieshave diametersof the same size (Kleiner 1973, p. 180; Kleiner 1976, p. 10). The averageof 2.85 g. taken from the 18 best Agora specimens, however,agrees with the average weight of the Two-owl coinage (2.69 g. fromhoard pieces, 2.84 g from Agora pieces; see Table III[pp. 324-325 below]).It is noteworthy, too, that in the Athens 1955 and the Keratea 1954 hoards the Cicada/Owl pieces were somewhat less worn than the accompanyingTwo-owl strikings(Kleiner 1976, p. 27). We deduce that the two varietiesmay very well representan earlierand laterversion of the same AE 3 unit. If so, the later Cicada/Owl with full restoredAE 3 weight. Two pieces occur in coins will have been struck,around or shortlyafter 100 B.C., the drainDeposit B 20:9 (early1stcenturybut no coins laterthan 87 B.C.;Kleiner 1976, pp. 19-21, nos. 107, 108). AE4
166-150's B.C.
101
19 coins 12-14 Av. 1.64 (15) 1.44 *a Z-610bis 13 13 2.02 *b S-5469 Kleiner 1976, p. 34, note 50, pl. 4, no. 99 12 2.10 *c A--169 14 1.72 *d r-208 Kleiner 1975, p. 322, pl. 75, no. 324 (M-N 15:1) 12 2.07 *e T-1377 The later variety 105 has similartypes but a differentarrangementof the ethnic and omits the palm branch behind the amphora;the coins tend to be smallerand are much cruderin style.The fine obversesof the present varietyrelateit to the AE 2 Apollo/Owl with lyre (87) and perhapsto the rareAE 3 Apollo/Lyre (Sv. 106.8-10), which has yet to show up in the Agora or Delos excavations. 10e (previouslymisclassifiedwith variety 105) comes from the ca. 140 B.C.destructiondeposit of South Stoa I.
ca. 140' B.C.138
Head of Zeus r.; border of dots. 102 *a *b *c *d 8 coins 0-177 K-1284 00-468 K-520 10-13 Av.1.63(8) 11 1.27 13 2.16 2.23 12 1.55 13
A-@ E Plemochoe.
77
1.98 IIII-274 12 10 K-360 1.51 11 1.31 Z-2743 Kleiner 1976, p. 14, no. 91 (H 12:1) The context of 102g gives a terminus quem ca. 140 B.C. ante of This, the only AE 3-5 variety in the pre-86 B.C. with an obverse head of Zeus, was likely minted with the Zeus/Fulminating Athena AE 2 (88, 89) of coinage the 140's.
Head of Apollo r., laur.; border of dots. 103 21 coins *a NN-1656 *b NN-1120 10-13 Av. 1.58 (10) 1.89 12 11 1.54
e
A-E Plemochoe; all within wheat wreath. Sv. 106.48-51; Kleiner 1976, pl. 3:77-79 (Type13)
Kleiner 1976, p. 7, pi. 3, no. 77 = p. 18, no. 114 (A-B 19-20:1); GRC,fig. 14
11 *c 1.67 A-422 *d K-1759 10 1.66 e Z-2723 12 broken Kleiner 1976, p. 14, no. 90 (H 12:1) *f NN-1556 12 A-OE 1.62 12 1.69 *g 00-1222 cavity punched in obv. Dating is from the contexts of 103e (ca. 140 B.C.)and 103b (also of the third quarterof the 2nd century).The archaizingApollo head with falling twistsof hair is distinctive,as is the crowded,wreathedreverse. 103g, found with three imperial (Period VB) fractions,circulatedas late as the 2nd or 3rd centuries after Christ, when the punched cavitywas added; see p. 94 below.
ca. 140-90 B.C.
2 coins *a IIn-290a 12 1.50 *b IIII-939 10 1.25 In contrastto these two Agora pieces, the varietyhas been found in quantityon Delos; see Table III, pp. 324325 below. Sv. 106.78-81 and the four specimens illustratedby Kleiner (1976, pl. 4) are all from the Delos excavations,which recoveredsixty of these Artemis/Plemochoe coins from the House of the Comedians alone (DelosXXVII, p. 321, pl. 65, F178-F237). There can be little doubt that the variety was minted for use on the island. Weightsshow that the variety is later than the Apollo/Plemochoe, of which only one specimen has been recordedfrom Delos (NumismaticCollectionof Athens 1906/7 x4' 225). Head of Apollo or Artemis, r.
Plemochoe in wreath; ethnic illegible. [103, 104] 52 coins of uncertainApollo/Plemochoe or Artemis/Plemochoevariety. A-e E Amphora.
Head of Apollo r.
105
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1ST CENTURIES B.C. 2.13 1.60 1.32 1.85 1.86
[101 or 105] 12 coins of uncertainApollo/Amphora variety. Head of Kore(?) r. AOE above. Piglet stg. r. Sv. 103.57-64; Kleiner 1976, pl. 3:67-72 (Type11)
106 *a *b *c *d *e *f *g
9-12 12 11 11 11 11 10 9
Av. 1.45 (42) 1.35 1.38 1.60 1.45 1.66 1.38 1.20
Although the relativelycrude obverseheads of this and the foregoing105 are virtuallyidentical(Kleiner 1976, the p. 7), it is not certainwhether the heads are all of a laureateApollo or whether,as more reasonably, heads of 106 with the piglet reverserepresentKore wearing a crown of wheat. Influencedby the piglet, Kleiner (1976) mistookthe heads of both varietiesas heads of"Demeter?" and connected 106 with the Demeter/Piglet AE 2 of the second quarterof the 2nd century(86). But both AE 4 varietiesmustbelong furtheralong in the centurywhen the size and weight of the chalkous had declined, and the head on the present variety looks too youthful for Demeter. ForKore on a later issue, see 117. With the shrinkageof the AE 4 flans there was a correspondingreduction in the sizes of the dies; compare the Apollo heads of variety 101 with the smallerheads of 105 and the still smaller Kore(?)/Pigletcoins. Any firm contextualevidencethat could fix the positionof these and the otherlight AE 4 varieties107-109 in the half centurybefore 87 B.c. is lacking.139 ASv. 106.33-35 A-E Quiver and bow. Head of Nike r., wing at shoulder. Av. 1.34 (21) 9-12 107 33 coins 11 *a N-899 1.20 same obv. die as 107a 11 1.90 *b T-242 same obv. die as 107a 11 *c NN-474 2.37 1.45 *d II-702 12 0.95 11 *e K-1211 1.63 *f NN-1732 10 of The identification the head as a head of Nike (underBMC,nos. 610, 611) is probablycorrect.The alternative is Eros,suggestedperhapsby the unboundhair of the die of 107a-c, the pudgy face on the die of Sv. 106.34, 35, and the reversequiverand bow.The reverseattributes, however,ought to belong to Apollo and Artemis;and Eros is not at home in the traditionalstate iconographyof Athens,whereasNike was closely associatedwith Athena. Kore(?)/Pigcoin (Kleiner 1976, pl. 3:72)belongsto the seven-pieceNumismaticCollectionofAthens lot IK. 127 published by Kleiner (1976, p. 28) as part of a possible hoard, even though one of the coins (F7) dates after 86 B.C. (variety127) and would have to have been an intrusion.If the remainingsix coins do happen to come from a hoard, however,they suggest that Kore(?)/Pigdates closer to 102 (Zeus/Plemochoe) and 103 (Apollo/Plemochoe) than, say, very late in the 2nd century.
139 A
Cicada. 108 *a *b *c *d *e *f 59 coins A-321 BA-78 BB-706 NN-200 K-1028 AA-266 9-11 10 9 9 9 9 9 Av. 1.13 (20) 0.70 1.00 1.23 0.75 0.97 0.66
79 Sv. 107.60-69
This is a revival of the Period II Cicada/Amphora AE 4 (85) but with reduced size and weight, an altered form of the ethnic, and a generally clumsier style. The total of 672 Cicada/Amphora pieces listed under 85 doubtlessinclude many pieces that belong to this late 2nd-centuryissue;see pp. 65-66 above.
Sv. 107.70-73
AE5 ca. 130-90 B.C. Head of Apollo r., laur. A-e E Owl stg. r. on horizontal amphora. Sv. 106.52-64; Kleiner 1976, pl. 3:73-76 (Type12)
110 *a *b *c *d
7-10 10 10 7 8
Kleiner's dating of ca. 150-140 B.C. (Kleiner 1976, pp. 36, 38) was based on the misattributionof Z-2852, an 11 mm. illegiblecoin fromDeposit H 12:1,to thisvariety(Kleiner1976, p. 15, no. 92). It is clearfromthe small Delos hoard IGCH 324 (note 105 above, p. 66) that the varietybelongs to the middle or later phase of PeriodIII. On the other hand, no specimens of the following 111-114 have been recoveredfrom a chronologicallyuseful context.
Head of Apollo r.; border of dots. 111 6 coins *a X-33 *b I-2114 *c 00-263 *d r-326 7-10 10 8 7 9 Av.0.43 (6) 0.49 0.58 0.59 0.26 (N 19:1) broken?
A O-E Lyre.
Sv. 106.23-26
80
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1ST CENTURIES B.C. Similar. -E Tripod. Sv. 106.21, 22
112 *a *b *c d
6-10 7 7 6 9
Similar. 113 4 coins 8-9 *a E-1299 8 *b KK-419bis 8 Av. 0.56 (3) 0.39 0.58
-E Cicada.
Sv. 107.42-45
A
Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 114 *a b 2 coins Z-1716bis Z-1528 8 8 0.27 0.41 A-E
.E
A-O
E Tripod. Sv. 106.44
or
PERIOD IV
86-10's B.C.
In the wake of Sulla's capture of Athens in the spring of 86, the characterof the bronze coinage was abruptlytransformed.Abandoning the FulminatingZeus AE 2 of the defeated government, Athensbegan to mint a largerand heavierAE 1 coin thatwas destinedto serveas the city'sprincipal bronze unit until the advent of Athens' Greekimperialcoinage in the 2nd century after Christ. The new AE 1 coinage was struck in five series (Table IV, pp. 326-327 below). In the first New Style silver:the AE 1 issuesbear (PeriodIVA)the bronze is closelytied to the post-Mithradatic Head of Athena Parthenos/Owl standingon the same types as the silverdrachmsand tetradrachms, amphorain surroundingolive wreath, and frequentlyemploy the same emission symbols.Like the New Style silver,this bronze was probablycalled "stephanephoric" money; and when the minting of the silver was discontinued in the late 40's these stephanephoric, or heavy Owl-on-amphora
bronzes, were discontinued with it. From that point down to the end of the Athens' Hellenistic
coinage in the Augustan era, Athens struckin bronze alone. In the second series (Period IVB), which is connectedwith MarcAntony'scontrolof Greece afterthe Battleof Philippi,the eponymous olive wreath disappearsfrom the reversesof the coins, a variety of changing reverse types replace the static Owl-on-amphoradevice, and the size and weight of the AE 1 unit were allowed to fall. The three remaining series (Period IVC-E) are early Augustan. Reverses are again wreathed but changing types persist except in the last two last issues, 157 and 158, the light Owl-on-amphora revivethe old AE 1 reversewith which the post-Mithradatic issuesof PeriodIVE, which nostalgically bronze began. bronze will be found in my publicationof two sizable The basic study of this post-Mithradatic Augustanhoards, the 483-piece Chaidarihoard of ca. 1929 and the 230-piece 1932 Agia Varvara
PERIOD IV
81
hoard,140each of which contained a nearly complete run of the AE 1 issues from the mid-80's B.C. throughthe final Augustanstrikings. Three smallerbronze hoards141 and a few Agora deposits provide supplementaryfind information; but by and large, the Period IV absolute chronology depends on the associationof exceptional coin types with events in the historicalrecord and, for a few of the initial PeriodIVA heavy Owl-on-amphoraissues,on synchronisms with the contemposilver. rary Period IVA:86-42 B.C. The chronologyof the post-Mithradatic tetradrachmand drachmcoinage, to which the firstor heavy Owl-on-amphoraAE 1 emissionsare tied, is stillvery much under discussion.The sequence of the first eleven or twelve silver issues is relativelysecure,142and on the absolute chronology endorsedby M0rkholm, the firsteight of these issueswould have been struckin a more or less annual sequencebeginningin 86/5 immediatelyafterSulla'sconquestand continuinginto the early 70's.143 The seventh or eighth emission, Sotades-Themistokles,is, however, the last issue in two hoards discoveredon Delos, and after the next emission, Eumelos-Theoxenides,there is an immediate, drastic falling off in the volume of coins minted.144For the remaining twenty-fiveknown issues, outputwas normallylimitedto just one or two obversetetradrachmor drachmdies a year.Since the piraticaldevastationof Delos in 69 providesa sound historicalexplanationboth for the burialof the two Delos hoards and for the sudden and permanent loss of Athens' ability to maintain minting
140Kroll 1972: IGCH 341 and 342. Contraryto the notes in IGCH, it is clear that the Chaidari and Agia Varvara hoards are separate finds (Kroll 1972, pp. 86-88), although both do come from the same region of Attica (near the Sacred Way between Athens and Daphni) and were almost certainly buried at the same time. The date has to be estimated from the moderate to slight wear of the latest coins (of Periods IVD and E) and should lie within the last decade B.C. less probably,the first decade of our era. A connection with the obscure revolt of Athens in ca. A.D.13 or, (for which, see Bowersock,Augustus, 105-108) cannot be ruled out, but the wear of the coins implies an earlier pp. emergency.A raid of brigands?Crawford(CMRR, 251) makesprominentmention of both hoardsbut followingIGCH p. below); AkropolisNorth Slope 1936 (IGCH340), 40 coins, buried ca. 30 B.c.;and Attica 1927 (IGCH343), 44 coins, buried,like the Chaidariand Agia Varvarafinds,aroundthe end of the 1stcenturyB.C. Attica 1927 may be a parcelfrom the Chaidarifind. 142 Now see afterSotades-Themistokles (like and Mattingly 1979, pp. 161-165, table B, placing Eumelos-Theoxenides Morkholm 1984, pp. 32-33) following Boehringer,pp. 24-27, 202-203, in insertingthe strange Kointos-Charmostra issue as the first issue after Mithradates-Aristion. is Only the inclusion of Kointos-Charmostra open to serious doubt; despite its Sullan date, MargaretThompson's argumentsfor excluding it from the Athenian sequence should not be minimized (NewSyle, pp. 464-467, nos. 1427 and 1428). 143 Merkholm 1984, pp. 33, 42, citing Habicht 1976, pp. 137-142, who connects the symbol of Harmodios and of Mentor-Moschion, the third (or, subtractingKointos-Charmostra,second) issue after MithradatesAristogeiton Aristion, with the honors lavished on Sulla upon his return to Athens in 84. But in the absence of supportinghoard ofa evidence,the associationcan onlybe conjectural.The overstriking Demeas-Kallikratides tetradrachm (approximately the twelfthissue after Mithradates-Aristion) the Roman quaestorAesillasno longer presentsany difficultiesfor New by Style chronology in any period. In a paper presented in London at the 10th InternationalNumismatic Congress in 1986, Robert Bauslaughwas able to confirm the suspicionsof ChristophBoehringer("Hellenistischer Miinzschatzaus Trapezunt 1970," SNR 1975 [pp. 37-64], p. 62) and M0rkholm(1984, pp. 35-38) that minting of Aesillastetradrachms continued into the 60's. Until Bauslaugh'sforthcoming corpus of Aesillas is in print, see his "Two Unpublished Overstrikes:New Style Athens and Aesillasthe Quaestor," ANSMN32, 1987, pp. 11-21. 144 The hoards are Delos EO and A (IGCH 297 and 347): New Syle, pp. 513-515, 533-537, pls. 197-201. For contractionin output, see NewSyle, pp. 653-654; Mattingly 1979, p. 165, table B.
misdates them to 42 B.C. 141 Kroll 1972, pp. 87-88, table I: Delos 1910 (IGCH322), 16 coins, buried possiblyin 69 B.C. (TableVI, p. 329 below)
82
at anything approachingprecedinglevels,145 very strongcase exists for pulling down the date of a all eight or nine of the earlierpost-Mithradatic issues into the 70's B.. This leaves a gap of about five years between the Mithradates-Aristion issue of 87/6 and the recommencementof the silver coinage around80 B.C. Mattinglyhad alreadypostulateda gap of two yearsby allowingthe silverto with Sulla's resettlementof Athenian affairsin 84/3,146 but two years should probablybe begin regardedas a minimum. in Howeverlong the interval,an interruption the strikingof the silveris only to be expectedafter the exhaustingsiege, pillaging,and confiscationsof 86 and the temporaryloss of Delos for the two thn yearsthereafte. It is within this inteval tat the earliestOwl-on-amphorabronze (115: no symbol) its surelybelongs. Introducedat a time of crisisand economic reconstruction, silvertypes and heavy AE 1 module suggest that, like the AE 1 hemidrachmsof 229 (64), it was originallyintended as a partialreplacementfor silver.Once the strikingof silverwas resumed,additionalOwl-on-amphora AE 1 emissions,now bearingemission symbols,were minted from time to time along with it. Nine issueshave symbols.Two date with the pre-69 silver: 1 18 (poppy and wheat-earssymbol) and 119 (mysticstaff) share symbolsrespectivelywith the Lysandros-Oinophilos the Sotadesand Themistoklessilverof the 70's.Two or three issues(124: caduceus;125: thyrsos;and probably121: The rest (120: plemochoe; 122: two tripod)parallelemissionsin the later silverof the 60's-40's B.C. wheat ears; 123: flower;and 126: two pilei) stand alone and probablybelong to years from which no silverdrachmsor tetradrachms extant,if any were struckat all. Fromthe wear of the Chaidari are and Agia Varvarahoard specimens,it is clear that 126 was the last issue in the seriesand that 124 and 125 are late. But we lack any furtherphysicalcriteriathat can be broughtto bear on the internal chronology:too few of the coins are well enough preservedfor stylisticcomparison,and throughout the seriesthe AE I weightswere uniformlymaintainedat an averageof about 10-1 1 g. (seeTable IV [pp. 326-327 below], column of hoard specimens). In addition to these regularemissions,the AE 1 unit was struckin two exceptional issueswith Eleusiniantypes, 116: VeiledDemeter head/Triptolemosin chariot,and 117: Kore head/Iakchos. in Both were struckearinly Period A and imply an exceptionallavishnessin the celebrationof the EleusinianMysteriesat this time. Plutarch,Sulla26, has usuallybeen understoodto indicate that with this Sullawas initiatedat the Mysteriesupon his returnto Athensin 84 B.C. Althoughdifficulties interpretationhave been recentlypointed out,147the traditionalview of a Sullan initiationhas the advantageof providingan explanationfor at least one of these issues. The Period IVA fractionalunits able V, p. 328 below) continue the AE 2, AE 3, and AE 4 modules of the pre-Mithradatic coinage but are readilydistingished by their thick, chunkyfabric; leaded alloy (givingthem a blackcolor when cleaned);and, except in some earliervarieties,ethnics are inscribedin one line: A-eE. These characteristics typical of the AE 1 coinage as well, but they have a special relevancefor the four fractionalvarieties129-132 and the PeriodIVB fraction 145, to all of which had been previouslymisattributed the pre-Mithradatic coinage, althoughnone occur
As David M. Lewis ("The Chronology of the Athenian New Style Coinage," NJC, ser. 7, 2, 1962 (pp. 275-300], out for the burial of the Delos hoards and Crawford(CMRR, 196) urges for the collapse in the p. pp. 282-283) points For volume of mintingw the abandonmentof Delos as a center of commerce following the sack of 69, see Hoff 1989, 69 p. 7. A thirdhoard that may date firom is the smallDelos 1910 hoardof bronze coins (note 141 above,p. 81) analyzed in Table VI, p. 329 below. 1' Mattingly 1969, p. 328; idem,"Some Third Magistratesin the Athenian New Style Coinage,"JHS 91, 1971 (PP.85-93), p. 82.
145
PERIOD IV
83
in hoardsof the late 2nd and early 1stcenturiesB.C.that give a good representation the PeriodIII of AE 2-4 varieties.148 The three contexts tabulatedin Table VI (p. 329 below) are essential for isolating the earlier Period IVA fractional issues of the mid-80's to mid-70's: Demeter-head/Triptolemos-in-chariot AE 2 (127 and 128), Apolo-head/Cicada AE 3 (131), Apollo- (orAthena-)head/Wheat-earsAE 4 n (132-136). The poppy symbol on some Demeter/Triptolemos AE 2 pieces (128) links them to the AE 1 variety 118 and the Lysandros-Oinophilos drachmsand tetradrachms, which employ the device of the poppy between wheat rs as their emission symbol in the early 70's, and suggests eat that the earlier,heavierDemeter/TriptolemosAE 2 withoutsymbol(127) probablybelongs near the start of the IVA bronze in the mid-80's. The AE 4 varieties 133 and 134 with a reverse type of a poppy and wheat ears are possiblyalso to be dated with the Lysandros-Oinophilos silverand large bronze.But the device, althoughnew in the post-Mithradatic like the two wheat ears of coinage,was, the other AE 4 varieties (132, 135, and 136), a conventionalEleusinianone (see 150) and need not as a coin type be a magistrate's badge writ large,especiallysince virtuallyall the old, speculative associationsof exceptionalPeriodIV reversetypeswith symbolson the New Style silverhave proved to be mistaken.149 The retention of the AE 2, AE 3, and AE 4 modules suggestssome level of continuitybetween the pre-Mithradaticand the Period IVA bronze. The chalkous,quarter-obol,and half-obol values that we have assignedto the pre-Mithradatic 4, AE 3, and AE 2 modules are likely to apply to AE these same modules in Period IVA, with the result that the new Period IVA AE 1 denomination would be valued as an obol. One might thus expect that the large AE 1 coins of post-MithradaticAthens were known as obols. Martin Price, however, has made the useful conjecture t that ey may actually have been known as drachms,150 there are two reasonsfor thinkingthat this conjectureis correct.The first, and of course,is the denominationalconnotationsof the stephanephoricsilverdrachm(andtetradrachm) types: their transferto the AE 1 unit would be most meaningfulif this bronze unit was itselfintended to representa drachm.The second argumentderivesfromthe Hadrianicor earlyAntoninepropertytax inscriptionIG II2 2776,151which recordssums in the denariusand four local, obviouslybronze, subdivisonsof the denarius(the drachm, the hemdrachm, obol, and hemiobol) and shows that by the second quarter of the 2nd century after Christ the four denominationshad been retariffedto one-sixth of their originalvalues in silverto become I, 2 , and 1 of the denariusrespectively.
(Apollo/Cicada), 130 (Athena/Artemis),and 145 (Zeus/Eagle)were thus misdatedby Kleiner 1976, pp. 34-35, 38 (table I); varieties 129 (Dolphin on trident/Plemochoe) and 132 (Apollo/Two wheat ears in wreath) by Kroll (1972, p. 87, note to table I). 149 For such now discreditedassociationsin Svoronos' plates, see Sv., pls. 56 (Apollo Delios reverse of 143 with the Delios symbol of the pre-86 silver of Sokrates-Dionysodo), (gorgoneionobverse of 139 with the symbol of 66 Apollo the pre-86 silver of Niketes-Dionysios),72 (sphinxreverseof 153 with the symbol of the pre-69 silver of Diophantosobverseof 129 with the symbolof the pre-86 silverof Xenokles-Harmoxenos), and 78 Aischines),77 (dolphin-on-trident reverse of 147 with the symbol of the pre-42 silver of Philokrates-Kalliphon). (Nike Thus, even though it is at least chronologicallypossible,the connection suggestedon Sv., pl. 73 between the reverseof the AE 2 130 (Artemisrunning tetradrachms(NewStyle,no. 1227) (Artemis [or right, with torch) and the symbol of the post-69 Leukios-Antikrates Kore?] running left and Demeter holding a torch right)is not likely to be any more substantialthan any of these other former type-symbolassociations,quite apartfrom the questionof whether the devices reallymatch. 150 Price, CRWLR, 97. p. 151 See S. G. Miller, "ARoman Monument in the Athenian Agora," Hesperia 41, 1972, pp. 50-95, with addendum, pp. 475476. The inscriptionis dated between ca. A.D. 130 and 140 or slightly later (ibid.,pp. 66, 86-87), although a date as early as A.D. 110-116 has also been proposed(cf ibid.,pp. 475-476). See pp. 118-119 below. 148Varieties131
84
thatthe Roman-era bronzehemidrachm drachm, and calleda "light" drachm, exeToOU 8p(aX5i),
in IG II2 1368, another inscriptionof the 2nd century after Christ, represented the traditional silver values of the hemiobol and obol and that at some point the bronze coins that would have ordinarilyrepresentedthe hemiobol and obol were renamed hemidrachmand drachm. When did this renaming occur? Presumablyafter the Period III coinage, which ended in the Sullan siege, but before the start of Athens' imperial bronze coinage in the 2nd century of our era, inasmuch as the latter coinage was structuredaround the reduced AE 1 denomination inherited from the Period IV bronze. There being no other occasion within this span to which the renaming can be plausiblyattributed,one concludes that the renamingprobablytook place with the creation of the stephanephoricAE 1 coinage after the captureand plunderingof Athens in 86. Silver would have been in short supply, and it is not hard to imagine why the Athenians would have resortedto the issue of highly overvaluedbronze drachms as an emergency measure. Conceivably,these initial AE 1 drachmswere originallytariffedat face value to be the equivalents of silver drachms; but such excessive overvaluationcould not have been sustained for long. One suspectsthat the value of the AE 1 drachmsdeclined until they were finally stabilizedat the level of an obol by the time the Athenians recommenced the strikingof a silver coinage. In this way they would have become obols in all but name. It followsthat the AE 2 unit would have been termed a hemidrachm.This is independentlysuggestedby the Eleusiniantypes with which it was normally struck,throughthe Augustanphase of PeriodIV;for in the New Style silverthe hemidrachm,whose reverse owl stands within a wheat wreath on a mystic staff, was the one denomination designed Whetheror not the reverseof the AE 3 Apollo head/Cicada variety with an Eleusinianemphasis.152 AE (131) was taken over from the pre-Mithradatic 3 Cicada/Owl-on-thunderbolt(100), arguablya it follows that in Period IV the AE 3 unit was probablyknown as a quarter-drachm. quarter-obol, The AE 4 eighth, the smallestfraction of Period IV, could have still been called the chalkous, as it had been for centuries. In additionto these IVAissues,bronzesofpre-86 mintageprobablycontinuedin use to providea substantialpart of the fractionalcurrencyafter 86. Although their value remained unaltered,we assume that they, too, would have had to have been renamed, the familiarold AE 2 Fulminating Zeus hemiobols,for example,becoming officiallyrecognizedas bronze hemidrachms. No surveyof the PeriodIVA bronze would be complete without mention of the bronze coinage minted at Delos in the name of Athens by Gaius ValeriusTriarius,the Roman legate who restored the island city after the piraticalattack in 69 B.C. (see 830 and Sv. 106.66-76). Triariusstruckin two modules, AE 2 and AE 3, and the similarityof these in size and weight to the common AE 2 bronze underscoresonce again that whateverchanges may and AE 3 issues of Athens' pre-86 B.C. have occurredin denominationalnomenclature,the old module-valuesystem of the pre-86 bronze coinage appearsto have survivedthe FirstMithradaticWar intact. Period IVB:42/1-32 B.C. The six AE 1 issues of the next, or unwreathed,phase of the post-Mithradaticcoinage have a historicalinterestthat few otherAthenianbronzeseriescan rival.Their relativechronology,as seen in Table IV (pp. 326-327 below), is fixed primarilyby the descendingweights and the increasing amount of lead in the alloys of the issues. The Dionysos types of the fourth and sixth issues (140:
AE 1 pieces cannot be identifiedas bronze hemidrachms,as Kroll 198la, p. 273 once proposed.
152 The distinctivenessof the New Style hemidrachmreversesproves that the Period IVA heavy Owl-on-amphora
Since the denariuswas by weight the effectiveequivalentof an Attic silver drachm, it is apparent
PERIOD IV
85
YoungDionysos/Athena advancing,and 144: Zeus/Bearded Dionysos head) place these two issues afterthe summerof 39, when Marc Antony,arrivingfrom Italy with his new wife Octavia, declared that he was to be addressedas "The New Dionysos"and took up residence in Athens throughthe winters of 39/8 and 38/7. Together with the associatedfractionalvarieties 141 (YoungDionysos head/Kantharos)and 142 (BeardedDionysos/Bust of Athena),these are the firstand, until the time of Hadrian,the only Atheniancoins with typesdepictingDionysos.In view of the extravagant lengths to which the Athenianswent in honoringAntonyas Dionysos,153includinga ritualmarriagebetween Antony-Dionysosand Athena and the celebrationof a new festival, the PanathenaicAntoneia of the 'Avr6vtor ?e6q N?os AL6vuaoo,154 initialDionysos issuescan be attributedto 39/8 or 38/7 B.C.with a high degree of probability. Accordingly,the first unwreathedAE 1 issue (137: Athena will have been struckno later than 42/1 or 41/0. Parthenos/FulminatingZeus) On the other hand, this firstunwreathedissue assuredlyfallsafterthe end-dateof the New Style of silver,since the new featuresof the bronze (the substitution changingreversetypes for the familiar from Owl-on-amphoradevice, rapidlyfallingweights, and, above all, the omission of the stephanos the reverses)signalthat the era of Athens' stephanephoriccurrencyhad passed. Prosopographically, we know that silvertetradrachmsand drachmswere being struckas late as the mid-40's,155 that so the pivotal change from the wreathedsilverand bronze to the exclusiveproductionof unwreathed bronze is to be placed sometimebetween ca.45 and 41 B.C.In historicalterms, the change occurred either when Greece was under the control of Brutus,from late 44 to the Battle of Philippi(October 42), or shortly after the battle, when Antony led a large army into Greece and made Athens his winter headquarters.l56 A case for Brutuscan be developedfromthe assumptionthat the FulminatingZeus reverseofthe firstunwreathedissue was chosen to symbolizethe freedomespousedby the Republicancause after the murderofJulius Caesar.Revivedfromthe PeriodII and III AE 2 coinage, the type acknowledged Zeus as protector and symbol of eleuteria (pp. 57-58 above) and would have been an appropriate choice after Brutusarrivedin Athens in August of 44 and was effusivelyhonored as Liberatorwith bronze statuesof himselfand Cassiuserectednext to the Tyrannicides the Agora.157 in During a stay of several months he began to organize the Republicanresistanceagainst the Caesareans158 and soon received the allegiance of the other cities of Greece, which expected that he would free them from Roman rule.159 The theme of Freedomdominatedthe gold and silvercoinage stiuck by Brutus and Cassius in 43 and 42, and among their types was the tripod of Apollo, patron of libertas.160 The Pythian tripod also happens to be the reversetype of the second unwreathedAthenian AE 1
153 On Antony-Dionysosat Athens,see Dio 47.39.2; Seneca, Suasoriae Athenaios4.148 1.6-7; Sokratesof Rhodes, apud Raubitschek1946, pp. 146-150; Cerfauxand Tondriau,pp. 300-301. B-C; Zonaras, 10.23; 154 IG II2 1034, lines 22-23. The alternate restorationof the name of the festivalas the Antonian Panathenaia(by Raubitschek1946, p. 148) has not met with approval:Cerfauxand Tondriau,p. 301 and C. Pelekidis,Histoire l'cphlbie de Paris 1962, p. 255. attique, 155 The evidence comes from the three issues signed by Diokles of Kephisia and the subsequentissue of Diokles of Melite (JNew nos. 1249, 1250, 1259-1262, 1269-1271), all ofwhich postdate51/0, when the KephisianDioklesheld Syle, the priestshipof Asklepiosand Hygeia. See Mattingly 1969, p. 328; Kroll 1972, pp. 93-94; M0rkholm 1984, pp. 35, 42. 156 Plutarch,Antony 23.2. 157 Plutarch,Brutus Dio 24; international 47.19.4; A. E. Raubitschek,"The BrutusStatuein Athens,"Ati delterzo congresso di epgrafia e Rome 1959, pp. 15-21. greca latine, 158 A. E. Raubitschek,"Brutusin Athens,"Phoenix 11, 1957, pp. 1-11. 159 Dio 47.21.1. 160 Crawford,RRC,nos. 498-500, with p. 741.
86
issue (138), and so it can be argued that the first two Period IVB issues date from the two archon yearsprecedingPhilippi,44/3 and 43/2. Nevertheless,the case for Antony is much stronger,in the first instance because it allows the full IVB series to belong uninterruptedly a single regime. There is, moreover,no difficultyin to 23.3) mentions that associatingthe second, unwreathedtripod issue with Antony. Plutarch(Antony beforeAntony left Athens for Asia Minor in the springof 41 "he made measurementsof the Temple of Pythian Apollo with the intention of completing it; for he had promised this to the Senate Althoughthis was the temple at Delphi (it had been burnedby maraudingThracians (atyxXTdiov)." be an allusion to Antony's the Pythnantripodo the second IVB e ion could ian of 85/4),d project.If Antony upon arrivalin Athens in 42 confirmedthe city'sstatusas a "freeand allied city (as he must have, to judge from his unexpectedlyconciliatorytreatnent of Athens),the Fulminating Zeus reverseof the first unwreathedissue would have been just as timely n emblem of eleutria in if that year as before Philippi,162 indeed the type was exclusivelytopical. But we will see (pp. 90-91) that the type may have been chosen also forits denominational significance:to denote devaluationof the AE 1 unit to equivalencewith the pre-Mithradatic FulminatingZeus AE 2. The situationafterPhilippipresents,finally,the more plausiblehistoricaland monetarycontext for the Athenian decision to abandonthe mintingofsilver.The explicitchange in the appearanceof the bronze coinage demonstratesthat howeverslightand erraticthe minting of the stephanephoric silvermay have been since the 60's, its terminationwas a deliberatelegislativeact. The silverdid not plentiful just die out from a lack of resources.Competitionfrom the lighterand now overwhelmingly Roman denariusleft the Athenianslittle choice but to forsakethought of furtherproduction.From hoards,Michael Crawfordremarksthat "it is the period afterthe death ofJulius Caesar which sees the spreadfor the firsttime over most all of the whole of the Greek east of issues of the mainstream coinage of Rome."163The spread was greatly augmented by the denarius issues of Brutus and Cassiusin 43-42 B.C.,14 up to that time the most extensive denariuscoinage minted in the East, and after Philippiby the almost continuousstreamof denarii issued by Antony in Asia Minor and probablyat some bases in Greece.165 The terminationof the New Style silverwas thus a responseto the tidalwave of Roman military silver that flooded Greece during the Second Roman Civil War. The response clearly cannot be to attributed Brutus'residencein Athensin 44, beforehe had begun to assemblean army or to strike th a coinage, nor wiin te next year and a half when the early civil war denariiwere only beginning to circulate.After Philippi, however,this silverwas circulatingmore widely; and Antony stationed his army for severalmonths at Athens, seeming to have alreadydecided upon making Athens his and military, long-termheadquarters consequentlyone of the chiefcentersof Roman administrative, of Antony and his forces in the winter of 42/1 must and naval power in the East.166 The presence
C. B. R. Pelling, Pbitarch, ofAntony, Ljfe Cambridge 1988, p. 176, correctingR. Flaceliereand E. Chambry,Pltarque Paris 1977, p. 216, who arguedin favorof the temple of PythianApollo at Athens. Vies XIII: Dbtrios-Antoine (Bude), 162 Compare the head of Eleutheriaon coins of Pella and Thessalonikecommemoratingthe free status awardedto these cities by Antony and Octavian after Philippi(RPCI, 1545 and 1551, with pp. 296, 297). 163 Crawford,CMRR, 252. So, too, Price, CRWLR, 99: "Itis only with M. Antoniusthat [the denarius]appearsto p. p. have enjoyedwidespreaduse." 164 Crawford,RRC,nos. 498-508. 165 Ibid.,nos. 516, 517, 520-522, 527-529, etc. Minting of Antonian denarii in Greece, see RPC I, p. 245. For the bronze coinage struckfor Antony in Greece, see note 180 below,p. 89. 166 Antony'sother center was Ephesos, but he seems to have favoredAthens. In the fall of 40, Antony returnedto Athens to meet with his wife Fulviaand other adherentsbeforecontinuingon to Brundisium(Appian,Bela Civiia5.76). Returninga year later with Octavia, he remained for two winterswhile preparingwar against the Parthians.After a
161
PERIOD IV
87
have injected denariiinto the Athenian economy as never before and caused the Atheniansto bring the era of their stephanephoriccoinage to a formal close.167 The terms of the resulting legislation are beyond recovery.However much they might have statusto the denarius,the latterby this time was probablybecoming the accordeda preferred,dejure basic silver coin in Athens regardless,as the heavier silver of true Attic weight was being driven into savings or the melting pot. The legislationwould surely have addressedthe characterof the new unwreathedbronze, which now, necessarilyvalued in relation to the denarius,was retariffed downwards.The evidence and nature of this devaluationwill be discussedpresently,but it can be noted here that the progressively fallingweightsof the PeriodIVB AE 1 emissionsare responsiblefor the reducedweights of the fractionalvarietiesof the period (Tabley p. 328): the reducedAE 2 141 (Dionysos/Kantharos),the reducedAE 4 142 (BeardedDionysos/Athena bust),the last emissionof the Hellenisticcoinage struckin this familiarsmallmodule, and the reducedAE 2 145 (Zeus/Eagle on thunderbolt). The Ptolemaic types of this last variety date it and with it the related Zeus/Bearded Dionysos AE 1 variety 144 to the time of Antony'sliaison with Kleopatra and thus almost certainlyto their stay of severalmonths in Athens in the summerof 32. IVC-E:31-1 O's TheAugustan Issues Periods B.C. of Athens'Hellenisticcoinage concludesin the earlyAugustanera in threedistinctseriesof reduced AE 1 emissions. Except for the last, they continue the Period IVB convention of changing reverse types,but reversesare now again enclosedin a wreath.Unlike PeriodIVB issues 137, 138, and 143, whose Athena heads scrupulouslyreplicatedthe obverseheads of the discontinuedstephanephoric silver and bronze, the Augustan emissions were normally designed with Athena heads that were either very free or very crude adaptationsof the New Style prototype. The first re-wreathed AE 1 series (Period IVC) consists of three small issues of aberrant appearance and considerablyrestored weight of 8-9 g. Reverses all suggest a connection with Octavian: the Demeter or Kore reverse of 146 with his initiation at Eleusis within weeks after Actium (earlySeptemberof 31), the Nike reverseof 147 with Actium itself, and the StandingZeus The three issues may be dated (Eleutherios)reverse of 148 with Octavian'srole as "Liberator". to late 31 B.C. and the years soon following.168 accordingly Afteran interval,mintingresumedon an unprecedentedscalein the secondAugustancoinage of four homogeneousissues(PeriodIVD). Obversesare typifiedby a helmet with flattenedcrownand a single,bushytail of the centralcrestfallingbehind (asopposedto the two linear tailsthat trailbehind
few years, when Octavia came with troops from Italy for continuing the war, she brought them to Athens (Plutarch, Antony 53.1-3). In the summer of 32, when assemblinghis forces to defeat Octavian, Antony again took up residence at Athens, this time in the company of Kleopatra(Antony 57.1-2). 167 Antony may or may not have had a hand in the decision,but if he did it need not have been coercive.Writingabout liked to be addressedas Antony's first residence in Athens in 42/1, Plutarch(Antony 23.2) tells how he "particularly and Philathenaios gave to the city very many gifts,"which, according to Appian (BellaCivlia 5.7) included the islands of Aigina, Ikos, Skiathos, and Peparethos.Antony naturallyreplaced the democraticgovernment that had supported Brutusand Cassiuswith an oligarchy(seeJ. Kirchner'scommentaryto IG II2 1043, and P. Graindor, Atnes sousAuguste, Cairo 1927, p. 95); but the logical time for this change in governmentwas 42/1, not Antony'sreturn from Italy three years later. 168 Correctingthe chronologyin Kroll 1972, from p. 99, where I assumedan unbrokenchain of annualAE 1 strikings the startof the unwreathedAE 1 in 41 B.C. and, not recognizingthe propersequence of the IVE coinage, placed both the PeriodIVC and the PeriodIVE seriesbeforeActium.
88
on regularNew Style obverses)and reversesby a new,triangular dispositionof the ethnic. Alphasare formed with brokenbars, althoughbowed bars are sometimesfound in the first emission normally in (149, Athena advancing,owl)and straightcrossbars the laterones (151: Athena advancing,snake; 152: Owl on prow,wheat ear; and 153: Sphinx).As an Athenian coin type, the concludingsphinx device is inexplicableunless understoodas the sphinx of Augustus'signet.169 Augustancistophoroi, also which Sutherlandassignsto 27-26 B.C.,170and aureilater minted at Pergamonin 19-18 B.C.171 employedthe sphinx as a reversetype. Since Augustusreplacedthe sphinx with a signet portraying Alexander the Great (Pliny,Natural 37.10), the final appearance of the sphinx on Roman History for a terminus or adquem the sphinx issue at Athens and an approximate ante coins of 19-18 B.C. gives dating in the mid-20'sto early teens for the four issuesof PeriodIVD overall.The second reference the to Augustusin this seriesis the prow,presumably prowofActium, that supportsthe owl of Athens on variety 152. maintainedaverageweightof around7.5 g., and The fourIVD issueswere struckwith a carefully in tremendousnumbers.The total of 1,409 Agora specimensmakes these, if not the most massive issuesin Athenianbronzecoinage,then certainlythe most prolificin a largemodule. With them were struckhalf-unitemissions(150, 154-156), mostly with Eleusiniantypes, and, at the beginning of Period IVD, three bronze cleruchy emissionsfor the Athenian islands of Lemnos (159A), Skyros (160), and Imbros (161). Intended for overseasuse by these cleruchies,the coins were minted in Athens and verifythat in the post-Actiansettlementof Greece, Athens was confirmedin possession of her traditionalNorthern Aegean cleruchyislands. The concluding reduced AE 1 series (Period IVE) revives the old stephanephoric types of Parthenoshead/Owl on amphora for two issues (157: snake symbol, and 158: cicada symbol) but at low average weights of 6.4 and 6.2 g. and generally in a bizarre, third-ratestyle that on many obverse and reverse dies borders on the grotesque. Although less so than in the preceding series, strikingwas again heavy, producingfrom both emissions a total of 475 Agora pieces. The breakbetween the second and thirdAugustanseriescould not have lasted more than a few years,as there is no detectabledifferencein wear of coins from both seriesin the Chaidariand Agia Varvara the hoards.Thus if the second series ends around 19 B.C., two light Owl-on-amphoraissuesbelong somewherein the later teens. Thereafter,Athens struckno new coinage for more than a century. A notable aspect of these Augustanissues is their thoroughly"autonomous"character.In an exhaustivesurveyof civic coinages minted under Augustus,Andrew Burnett has deduced that the customof placing the emperor's portraiton obversesbegan to spreadrapidlythroughoutthe Empire very earlyin the principateand that it was most likelypromotedas a matterof Roman governmental policy.172Yet Athens coined without the portrait;and while thi was certainlyexceptional, so, too, did a few other cities under Augustus: Chios, Rhodes, Tyre, and (allowingfor one special portrait issue,776) Sparta.Since all these citieswere,likeAthens, "freecities"underthe Empire,theirability to continue to mint with local, civic obversesis probablyto be understood as a privilege of their favoredpoliticalstatus.l73 Athena had always belonged on the obverse of Athenian money, but without changing the traditionalcharacterof the coinage, honors to Augustuscould be displayedon reverses,and were:
Baden-Baden 1962. 37.4. H. U. Instinsky, Siegel Kaisers Augustus, des Die 50; Suetonius,Augustus Pliny,Natural History Sutherland,Olcay,and Merrington,pp. 85-99, 104, pls. 17-19; RPC I, 2204, 2207, 2210. to the Mint of Pergamon,"RN, ser. 6, 15, 1973 171 C. H. V Sutherland,'AugustanAurei and Denarii Attributable (pp. 129-151), pp. 131-132, pl. 14, nos. 1-11.
169
170
173 Ibid.
PERIOD IV
89
the Nike of 147 and the prow beneath the owl of 152 both allude to Actium, the statue of Zeus on 148 refersto Octavian's"liberation" Athens,and the sphinxof 153 is Augustus'own signature. of Fallingat the end of the Period IVD coinage, the sphinx issue might have been struckas a gesture of reconciliation after 22/1, when on a journey to the East Augustus became angered with the Athenians, slighted them by wintering on Aigina, and deprived them of the territoriesof Aigina and Eretria and the business of selling Athenian citizenship.l74But cordial relations were soon reached, and in the fall of 19 Augustusvisited Athens on his way back to Rome and participated in the Eleusinian Mysteries for a second time.175Probablythe sphinx issue is to be dated to or in anticipationof this last visit. It is interestingin any event that after this one explicitlyAugustan issue, a reaction set in, and for the followinglight Owl-on-amphoraissues the Athenians adopted traditionalist types that looked backwardto the coinage and politicalorder of a vanished era. Denominational Change As the civil wars of the thirdquarterof the 1stcenturyB.C.bound the cities of Greece ever more tightly to Rome,176the traditionalmonetary systems of many Greek states began to succumb to Roman influence. An underlyingfactor,mainly attributableto the presence of successiveRoman armies in Greece, was the emergence of the denarius as the standardsilver coin of Hellas. With the triumph of the denarius there appeared in severalplaces bronze coinages that were modeled on the uniquely Roman monetary system of 16 asses (bronze units usually of roughly AE 1 size) to the denarius.Among the earliestsuch Roman coinages of Greece are the duoviralasses,semises, quadrantes,and sextantesbegun by Corinth upon its foundation as a Roman colony in 44 or 43 B.C. (670-704) and the related asses and semises struckby the Latin colony of Dyme in 40 B.C.177 In the early 30's, Roman officialsof the joint province of Crete and Cyrene introduceda bronze And in the 30's, coinage of sestertii, asses, semises, and quadrantesfor use in their territory.178 Roman denominations, including the sestertius,make their first appearance in the recognizably coinage of Sparta,179 perhapsunder the influenceof Antony'sso-calledFleet Prefectbronze, much of which was issued from two of Antony'sbases in Greece, possibly Corinth and the Peiraeus,in
38-37 and 36/5 B.C.180
At Athens the decision to suspendthe minting of stephanephoricsilveris a contemporaryand related phenomenon. The decision dates to or right after the winter of 42/1 B.C. and must have formalizedthe replacementof the drachmby the denariusin the economic life of the city.But there are several indicationsthat the shift in the basic silverunit at Athens was accompanied by a more
174 Dio 54.7, and Plutarch,Moralia207 E-F, with G. W. Bowersock, "Augustus Aegina," Classical on n.s. Quarterly,
14, 1964, pp. 120-121; idem, Augustus, 106. M. C. Hoff, "CivilDisobedienceand Unrest in AugustanAthens,"Hesperia p. 58, 1989 (pp. 267-276), pp. 267-269; idem1989, pp. 4-5. 175R. Bernhardt, "Athen,Augustus und die eleusinischeMysterien,"AM 90, 1975, pp. 233-237; Clinton 1989a, pp. 1507-1509. See also the discussionsby Bowersockand Hoffcited in the precedingnote. 176 E.J. Owens, "IncreasingRoman Domination of Greece in the Years48-27 B.C.," Latomus 1976, pp. 718-729. 35, 177 M. Amandry, "Le monnayage de Dyme (Colonia Dumaeorum) en Achaie. Corpus," RN 23, 1981, pp. 45-67, especially56-57, pls. 13-16; RPC I, 1283, 1284. 178 RPCI, pp. 217-221, 226-227. 179 with RPC of RPC I, AmericanJournal ser. ofNumismatics, 2, 5, 1993, forthcoming. 180 M. Amandry,"Lemonnayageen bronzede Bibulus,Atratinuset Capito. Une tentativede romanisationen Orient," parts I-III, SVR 65, 1986, pp. 73-85, pls. 10-17; 66, 1987, pp. 101-112, pls. 15-25; 69, 1990, pp. 65-96. Dating and Amandry's mint attributionsto Corinth (Atratinus)and the Peiraeus (Capito) are discussed in part III, pp. 78-83. Summaryin RPC I, pp. 284-286. Forthe five Capito specimensfrom the Agora excavations,see note 3 above, p. xxvi.
90
fundamentalreform in the structureof the bronze currency.The indications and what seems at are presentto be their most plausibleinterpretation as follows(see Table VII, p. 330 below): 1. According to the discussionon pages 83-84, the AE 1 unit, the chief bronze denomination of Period IV, was institutedin 86 B.C.as a bronze drachm, although after a sharp fall in value it was tariffedat only one-sixth of a drachm of silver for nearly all of Period IVA and thus served as the equivalentof the traditionalobol. It was accompaniedby an AE 2 half-piece,an AE 3 quarter, and an AE 4 eighth. 2. Among indications of change after Period IVA, the most tantalizingare two reverse types that could have been revived for their denominationalsinificance: the FulminatingZeus reverse of the first unwreathedAE 1 issue (137) of 42/1 B.C. and the Two-owls-on-thunderbolt reverseof the half-unitof the AugustanPeriodTVD reducedAE 1. Both reverseshark variety 156, apparently back to the two most commonplace coinages of Period III, the FulminatingZeus AE 2 hemiobol AE and the Two-owls-on-thunderbolt 3 quarter-obol(99). Together they suggest that with the discontinuanceof the stephanephoricsilver and bronze in 42/1, the AE 1 module, formerly a bronze drachm (= old obol), was halved in value and was intended to circulateas the equivalentof the pre-86 B.C. FulminatingZeus pieces. The PeriodIVAhalf-unit,or hemidrachm(= old hemiobol), was accordinglyreduced to a quarter. 3. A substantialAE 1 devaluationin 42/1 B.C. is also implied by the gradual reductionin the size and weight of the AE I unit over the course of PeriodIVB (see Table IV, pp. 326-327 below). Beginning(in variety 137) with an averageweight of about 9 g. and diametersof about 19-20 mm. (about 1-2 g. and 1 mm. less than the preceding Owl-on-amphorabronzes),the unwreathedIVB flanswere allowed to shrinkuntil in the ightestissue (143, with an averageweight ofjust under 6 g. the and diametersmeasuringnormally 17-20 mm.) they approximated weight and size of the pre-86 AE 2 FulminatingZeus coins and were in some cases actually overstruckon them (cf. 143f with 137e and 138h). In subsequentseries, the reduced AE 1 unit was partialy restoredat ca. 8-9 g. (Period IVC), then stabilizedaround 7.5 g. (Period IVD), before plummeting to 6.0-6.5 g. in the concludingAugustanissues (PeriodIVE). 4. Two furthersuggestionsof the cheapened value of the bronze coiage after 41 are (a) the more intensive strikingof the (reduced)AE 1 unit throughoutPeriodsIVB, D, and E and (b) the neglect of the minimalAE 4 unit, which was last struckin a single emission (142) of PeriodIVB. 5. Considerationof the Greek imperialcoinage of HadrianicAthens (PeriodV) suggestsquite independentlythat the value of the AE 1 module was indeed halved at some point in its history. PeriodIV coinage, which had remainedin use, the In essence a continuationof the Ist-centuryB.C. Hadrianicbronzewas mintedin fourmodularunits: a new,largeunit (169-185), which we may here
call 'AE O";the familiar reduced AE 1 unit (186-197), clearly inherited from the Period IV coinage;
and two smallerunits (198-212, 162-168 + 213-247). On the naturalassumptionthat these four modular units correspond to the four denominationsemployed in IG II2 2776, the 2nd-century oblgatio praediorum inscriptionreferredto above (p. 83 above),the large AE 0 unit will be the bronze drachm(worth6 denarius),the old reducedAE 1 unit the bronzehemidrachm(4 denarius),and the two smallerimperialmodules the obol and hemiobol (1 and 1 denarius).The intriguingequation the is of course the second, for it greatlystrengthens deductionin item 2 above that in 42/1 the AE 1 and bronzedrachm(= old obol)was probablyretariffed renamedto become the bronzehemidrachm (= old hemiobol). the 6. If this informationhas been interpretedcorrectly, effectof the devaluationwas to bringthe highly overvaluedbronze AE 1 drachm more into line with the Roman monetary practice at the time when the Athenians formallyforsooktheir stephanephoricsilverfor the denarius.Nominally
PERIOD IV
91
worth one-sixth of a drachm (or denarius)of silver,the AE 1 unit was reduced to a more modest coin of which there were 12 to the denarius.It is possiblethat over the four decades of PeriodIVA the value of the originalAE 1 drachmcould have continuedto decline to, say,7,8, or more per silver drachm, so that the devaluationof 42/1 B.C. may not have been quite so drasticas a full 50-percent reduction of name value.181But whatever the actual circumstances,the shift to a bronze system of 12 AE 1 units per denarius seems unmistakablyto have been intended to bring the Athenian bronze system into a closer approximationof the Roman silver:bronze ratio. In this connection it should be pointed out that, with the exception of the very lightest issues, the reduced Athenian AE 1 unit of PeriodsIVB-D had a size and weight range that is remarkablysimilarto that of the Yet contemporaryduoviralassesof Corinth.182 while the Atheniansallowedtheir bronze coinage to be adjusted in the direction of Roman usage, they stopped short of adopting the Roman system In in toto. PeriodIVB the AE 1 drachmswere renamedhemidrachmai, assaria, were tariffednot not and 16 to the denarius but, in keeping with the Greek obol-drachmdivisions, at a more favorable 12 AE 1 units to the denarius. The AE 1 devaluationhere envisaged would thus have been a kind of compromisebetween the Roman and the Greeksystems.183 Period IVAftermath Likethe other chronologicalperiods,"PeriodIV" definesthe temporallimitsof the manufacture of the coins; but if one were to apply it to the time span of their primary circulationand use, the period would have to be extended to cover entirely the Julio-Claudianand Flavian eras. For the vast numbers of the Period IV AE 1 and reduced AE 1 pieces that were minted between 86 and the teens B.C. remained the essentialbronze currencyof Athens until the 2nd century after Christ, when Athens supplementedthem with her earlierimperialissues (PeriodV). The prolonged circulation of the Period IV coins, worn frequently to near illegibility, is documented in a number of Agora deposits of the 1st and early 2nd centuries after Christ184 but nowhere so abundantlynor with such chronologicalprecisionas in the floor packing of a room in the northern outer stoa of the Libraryof Pantainosat the southeastcorner of the Agora square
bronze are tallied separatelyand involved an exchange differentialof 25 percent between money in the two metals, with the resultthat it took 7 1 obols in bronze to equal a drachm of silver.The phenomenon must have been common, although the exchange factor presumablyfluctuatedover time and from place to place. For all one can tell, the AE 1 drachm of Athens may already in 86 B.C. have been tariffiedat more than 6 per silver drachm. Could it then, when halved to a hemidrachm,have been tariffedat 16 to the denariusand have servedas the exact equivalentof a Roman as? Were it not for the Hadrianicbronze values mentioned under item 5 above, it would be worth exploringthis possibility. But the Hadrianicevidence supportsa ratio of 12 AE 1 pieces to the denarius,not 16, and it is doubtfulthat any putative of retariffing Athens' bronze would have allowedits value to rise from 16 to the extremelyfavorable12. 182The Corinthianasses commenced in 44 or 43 B.C. with an averageweight of 9.2 g. and diametersof 22 mm.; these declined until stabilized under Augustus at an average of around 7 g. and 20 mm. (Amandry,pp. 82-83, table 12). RPC I, p. 246, notes the similarityof Athens' reduced AE 1 module not only to the light asses of Corinth but to the presumedlight asses of a number of other Greekcities duringtheJulio-Claudianperiod. 183 Since the hemiobol was the Greekdenominationthat most closelyapproximatedthe silvervalue of an as/assarion, it is likely that the inscribed HMIOBEAIN bronzes of Aigion (see 731 and under 731-733) were also created to pass as equivalents or near equivalents of assaria. They are roughly the same size as the duoviral asses of Corinth and reducedAE 1 pieces of Athens. Forgood discussionsof the variedbronzedenominationalsystemsof Roman Greece, see Howgego, pp. 52-60 and RPC I, pp. 31-35. 184 Deposits D 1:1;D 4:1, layerII; F 1 :1;K 9-10:1; O 17:1;P 6:2 and Q6:2. These are summarizedas deposits 1-6 in Kroll 1973, pp. 324-326.
181In the accounts a of 2nd-century Thebanhipparch, VII 2426 (especially B.c. IG lines 17-18),sumsin silverand
92
(DepositU 13:2a).Dating with the stoa and librarybetween A.D.98 and 102 and yielding 51 coins, the earth packing gives a reliable sampling of the petty currency of early TrajanicAthens.185A on coins from the packingis illustrated Plate 34: apartfrom the worn denarius selectionof the latest of Titus (A.D. P1.34:34), all are extremelyworn pieces of PeriodIV or earliermintage. 79, The 1st century of our era thus stands as a low point in the numismatichistory of classical Athens. Yet the prolonged use of old, wretchedlyworn bronze coins is only one of several signs of the economic malaise that beset the city between the reigns of Augustus and Hadrian. From the stagnation of the Athenian terracotta-lampindustry to the minimal level of public building activity,which was restrictedto the repairand remodelingof existingmonuments,there can be no Insofaras the striking of mistakingwhat Shear has termed "thestarkrealityof Atheniandecline."186 coin in the cities of Greece had come to depend on the initiativeand largess of members of the the local elite, who undertookthe responsiblityof minting as a public benefaction,187 absence of any new bronze coinage inJulio-Claudianand FlavianAthens may be regardedas a symptom of decline in individualwealth and enterprise.Other factors,of course, could have contributed.Since the issuing of civic coinages under the Empire was apparentlysubject to imperial permission,l88 it is conceivable, for instance, that Athens might have encounteredresistancehad she insisted on resumingan autonomouscoinage or wantedto strikewhile retainingher existingbronzesystemwith ratio.The relevanceof such externalcontrol,however,is its exceptionallyfavorablebronze:denarius dubiousin the case of Athensin view of her privilegedstatusas a legally "freeand alliedcity."As very mentioned above (p. 88), free cities seem to have been exemptedfrom the constraintsthat ordinary subjectcities experiencedin the productionof coinage, as in many other mattersof self-government. Moreover,the long suspensionof civic mintingat this time is widely paralleledat many other places 189 in Greece and elsewhere. At Athens, as doubtlessat other cities, economic stagnationand public apathywere probablycause enough. Another monetary phenomenon of the 1st century after Christ was a markedincrease in the practice of cutting coins in two to compensatefor a shortageof half-unitfractions.The practiceof halvingwas certainlynot new: the half ofa large,late 5th-centurybronzecoin of Akragas(421)is the earliestattestationat Athens; two worn, halved Athenian imperial coins of the 2nd century after Christ(248fand [248-283]a) show that it continuedas late as the 3rd centuryof our era. But most of the evidencefor halvingcomes fromAE 1 pieces in circulationduringthe long suspensionof minting between Augustusand Hadrian. In the Period IV catalogueit will be seen that almost every AE 1
44, descriptionof the floor packingof the room (room 7) in the 1973-1974 excavationreport,Hesperia 1975, 343-345, note 23, two lots of coins are distinguished:35 coins from the earth fill and 16 more that "werefound pp. in the same area of the room but imbeddedin the top of the next lowerlayer."Since both lots appearto belong to a single deposition, they are listed together under U 13:2a in the list of deposits at the end of this volume (pp. 317-318). For FromCity-Stateto Provincial and Town,"Hespeia50, 1981 the architecture date of the library:T. L. Shear,Jr.,"Athens: 187-191. (pp. 356-377), pp. 370-371; Camp, pp. 186 Shear (note 185 above), p. 368, concluding a valuable surveyof Athenian public works in the 1st century after VII, Christ.JudithPerlzweig(Agora pp. 13-14) discussesthe slumpin EarlyImperialAthenianlamp productionas one of of numerousmanifestations general economic depression. 187 Howgego, pp. 85-87, 90-91; Harl, pp. 25-32; RPCI, pp. 3-4, 16. 188 RPC I, pp. 2-3, 19, 21, supersedingall earlierdiscussionson this fundamentalquestion. 189The only mints in Greece that produced anything more than the most minor coinages during the first century afterChristwere Corinth,Patrai,the ThessalianKoinon at Larissa,and Thessalonike.Among other mints,Spartahad a considerableAugustancoinage, a smallerone under Claudius,and then nothing until the 2nd century;Nikopolisstruck under Augustusand in a very smallNeronic emissionand then breaksuntil Hadrian. Cf. RPC I, p. 21.
185 In the
PERIOD IV
93
issue is representedby one or more halvedpieces. But the aggregateis modest, consistingof only 64 PeriodIV AE 1 coins, and so it (just under 2 percent)out of a total of 3,590 classifiedand unclassified is clearthat the halvingwas done unofficially. A few halvedAE 2 coins of PeriodsII and II1191 190 were also cut in Imperialtimeswhen theymusthavebeen circulating equivalentsof reducedAE 1 pieces; as any earlierthan this, the abundanceof fractionalissueswould have made halving unneccessary. Distributedover the PeriodIV coinage in proportionto the relativesize of each issue, the AE 1 halving apparentlybegan about the time that the Period IV minting was completed (a specimen of 158 [PeriodIVE] from Deposit E 15:3 had been halved alreadyby late Augustantimes) and, as we learn from six halved non-Atheniancoins fromthe Agora with the portraitof Nero, was certainly being practicedaroundA.D. 68. The halvingof these Neronian pieces, five duoviralassesof Corinth (691c, 694c-f), and an as of Sikyon (729),192 all but one from the last years of Nero's life, ought to be some kind of response to the damnatio The response was mmia of the dead emperor.193 uniquelyAthenian. None of the Neronian duoviralassesfound at Corinth,or anywhereelse outside the Athenian Agora, are halved. But these (and the relatedNeronian as of Sikyon)were, apparently because they were so similiarin size and weight to reduced AE 1 coins of Athens that they would have ordinarilypassedat Athensas equivalentsof the Atheniancoins and could be halvedin keeping with Athenian practice.The purpose of the halving,therefore,was no, it seems, solely to obliterate the memory Nero, whose image was only rarelydefacedon coins at this time anyway.194At various of in places in the empire,coins with Nero's effigywere countermarked 68/9 to ensurethat they would retain their value despite his condemnation.195 Some owners of Neronian coins at Athens, fearing that the coins would no longer be acceptedand havingno recourseto officialcountermarking, could have chosen to render them less conspicuousand harderto recognizeby cutting. The fundamentalcontinuitybetween the PeriodIV reducedAE 1 coinage and the new imperial issues that Athens finallydid strikein the 2nd century after Christhas been mentioned above. The firstimperialcoinage (PeriodVA)was restrictedto a fractionaldenomination,which filled the need earliersuppliedby halving and was clearlyintended to circulatewith the worn AE 1 currency.The
90 Forthe of see worncointhatwascutacross a chisel preparation with in technique halving, [149,151]a,anextremely
for being bent and snapped in two. The infrequencyof halvingat Athens contrastswith the huge quantitiesof cut coins producedwhen halvingwas performedin the Westfollowingcertaindrasticreductionsof the Roman bronze standard; see R. R. Holloway, "Numismaic Notes from Morgantina II: Half Coins of Hieron II in the Monetary System of Roman Sicily,"ANSAMN 1960, pp. 53-73; T. V Buttrey,"Halved Coins, the Augustan Reform, and Horace, Odes 9, 1.3," AJA 76, 1972, pp. 31-48; idem,in Sardis M7, p. 128; Morgantina pp. 147-148, 152, 153. To the bibliography I, on halving referencedin the foregoing, add M. Thompson, "A Ptolemaic Bronze Hoard from Corinth,"Hesperia 20, 1951 (pp. 355-367), p. 355 and pl. 101, no. 32 (halfofa large Egyptianbronze of the 2nd century B.C.). 191 79f, 89d, 94g, and the unclassified[82-84, 90-97]a, b. 192 Apartfromthese and the other halvedAgorabronzesmentionedabove,the excavationshaveyielded the six illegible halved coins listed under 1038 and at least two (thereare probablyothers)halved Roman coins not noted in Agora II: 00-1490, half of an almost totallyworn Augustansestertius,and E-6484, half of a sestertiusof M. Aurelius. 193 Out of the 48 duoviralassesof Corinthfrom the Agora (670-700), 22 are Neronian, but only these 5 were halved. So althoughdatableto orjust after68/9, even the cuttingof coins with Nero's imago Athenswas of limited application. at '94 On 694c Nero's image and name are intact, but this coin was not cut and though the middle. On damnatio the erasureof coins, see Harl (pp. 150-151, note 36), who pointsout that some allegedinstancesof intentionaldefacementof Neronian coins are the result of wear; Howgego (pp. 5-6, 210), who notes that at Thessalonikethe erasureof Nero's face and name is limited to a singleextant coin; and RPCI (p. 21), which liststwo effacedNeronian coins of Patrai(1263, 1278). 195 D. W. MacDowall, "Countermarks Early ImperialCorinth,"NC, ser. 7, 2, 1962 of (pp. 113-123), pp. 121-122; 6, with nos. 537, 543, 555-557, 619. Howgego, p.
94
adventof the full-blownimperialcoinage (PeriodVB) introducedthe large imperialunit, the 'AE 0" drachm,but retainedthe old reducedAE 1 module as the second unit on the denominationalscale. Fora while this freshcoinage could at most have only supplementedthe vast quantityof worn AE 1 withdrawn money stillin circulation.Whether,then, the bulkof the worn coinagewas systematically and melted down for restriking whetherall of it was allowedto remainin circulationindefinitelyis or unclear.But a fair quantitywas still in use as late as the middle of the 3rd century,to judge from one extremelyworn PeriodIV piece hoardedat the time of the Herulianinvasionin A.D. 267196and fromfifteenothersthat were punched on one side with a shallowcavityto give them the appearance of worn 2nd-centuryAthenian imperials.l97
CATALOGUE
Die positions,as in PeriodIII, are verticallyaligned,with occasionaldeviationsat 1 or 11 o'clock.
PERIOD IVA
AE1
86-lat 80's B.C.
Head of Athena Parthenosr., wearing ornamented Attic helmet; border of dots. 115 *a *b *c *d *e *f *g 60 coins AA-299 0-94 S-1090 0-102 K-1630 A-223 00-1486 19-23 Av. 10.46 (31) 10.79 20 (D 4:1) 13.11 21 9.94 20 22 12.50 19 10.40 9.09 22 halved 20
The position of this varietywithout symbol at the beginning of the heavy Owl-on-amphoraseries is implied of by the contextsof TableVI (p. 329 below),the overstriking a specimenin the 70's (119e),and the circumstance silver was that the issue has no parallel in the silvercoinage and so should belong before any post-Mithradatic struck(Krol 1972, pp. 87, 93).
196 Deposit B 17:1. Many of the 46 totally worn AE 1-sizedpieces from the great Eleusis hoard of A.D. 267 (Svoro-
nos 1904, p. 139, no. 267; Kroll 1973, p. 333) probably dated from PeriodIt but they are no longer availablefor examination. 197 See 103g, 127f, 137h, 144e, 149, 153h, two coins noted under the unclassifiedheavy Owl-on-amphoraAE 1 (p. 98 below) and five under the unclassifiedPeriodIVA-E AE 1 (p. 110, below). On the punched flans of the PeriodV imperials,see pp. 113-114 below.
95
(?)84 B.C.
Head of Demeter r., wearing wheat wreath and veil; 1 border of dots.
116
B'-693
19
A-eE Triptolemos1., holding wheat ears in r. hand, scepter in 1., mounting winged chariot drawn by two snakes;all in olive wreath. nearly illegible condition
A Ae-E or O-E Iakchos stg. r., holding a torch tied with fillet;99 at r., plemochoe; all in wheat wreath.
Sv. 104.24-28
Head of Kore198 wealring r., wheat wreath;border oif dots. 117 *a b 2 coins
Sv. 25.11, 12
A e-E (E 14:3; see Table VI, p. 329 below) [?]-E heavily blistered Both rarevarietiesbelong earlyin PeriodIVA. 116 revivesthe venerable4th- and early 3rd-centuryEleusinian type of Triptolemos 1. in chariot and goes with the early AE 2 variety 127, which has the same types. The discovery of 117a in Deposit E 14:3 implies that the Kore/Iakchos issue must be more or less contemporary. Being the first emissions with exclusivelyEleusinianiconography since the middle of the 2nd century (see 86 and 106), they seem to mark a revival of the old tradition of an Eleusinianfestival coinage. Associationwith the probableinitiationof Sulla in Septemberof 84 is likelyfor at least one of the emissions.As one sees from 117a and Sv. 25.11, 12, 117 was struckfrom a minimumof three pairs of dies. r-1084 AA-254 21 23 9.07 9.53
early70's B.C.
A-EE Owl stg. r., facing, on horizontal amphora;at r., poppy head between two wheat ears; all in olive wreath.
(E 14:3) A-e E The poppy-and-wheat-ears silver,the fourthor fifthissueafter symbolis sharedwith the Lysandros-Oinophilos Mithradates-Aristion Stk, (JVew nos. 1179-1186; Boehringer, 302; Mattingly 1979, p. 165;cf. M0rkholm1984, p. p. 32).
GRC,fig. 15
Except for Sv. 104.24 (variety116 but from a variantobversedie), Demeter is on the PeriodIV bronze with a coveredhead. consistentlyrepresented 199 On the of iconography(boots,shortgarment,and torch)of Iakchos,the youthfulpersonification the greatprocession to Eleusis, see LLMC pp. 612-614, pl. 419; Mylonas, pp. 207, 211, 212, 238, 252-254, with pls. 81, 84, 85, 88; V K. Clinton, "EleusinianIconographyand Cult: Iakchosand Eubouleus"(lecture,Baltimore 1989), abstractin AJA93, 1989, pp. 279-280. Foran Eleusiniantorchtied with a fillet,see A. D. Trendall,"Medeaat Eleusison a VoluteKraterby the Darius Painter,"Record theArtMuseum, Princeton University 1984, figs. 2, 9:b. On coins Iakchos is found also of 43, as the symbol of the 2nd-century Phanokles-Apollonios silver (NewSyle, nos. 697, 709, and 685, where the figure is misidentifiedas Artemis)and on the Athenian imperialvariety 188.
96
Similar. 119
*a *b *c *d *e f
33coins 18-23 Av. 10.11 (16) 9.61 20 00-1127 I-799 20 11.28 NN-1165 20 11.80 B'-1011 18 10.10 7.05 E-2033 22 overstruckon variety 115 20 AA-520 halved and extremelyworn The mystic-staff (Mw Style, tetradrachms nos. 1222symbol connects the varietyto the Sotades-Themistokles the seventh or eighth issue in the post-Mithradatessilver sequence as revised by Mattingly (1979, 1226X), pp. 164-165).
ca. 80's-42 B.C.
Similar. *120
KK-59 20 11.32 A plemochoe symbol occurs also on the silver of Mnaseas-Nestor,which Thompson (NewStle, pp. 369but 370, nos. 1147-1157) placed immediatelyafter Mithradates-Aristion which is now dated before the First MithradaticWar in 91/0 B.C. (Boehringer, 24-25, 202; followedby Merkholm 1984, p. 32, and, especially, pp. Mattingly1979, pp. 161-162). The bronzethereforecannotbe associatedwith the silver.Withonly two specimens in the 483-piece Chaidarihoard, this was one of the smallerAE 1 emissions. Similar. Similar,except at r., tripod. Sv. 72.17; 79.32, 33; Kroll 1972, pl. 35:6-10
121
*a
8 coins 18-22 Av.8.64 (5) 20 8.60 ET-32 There is no post-Mithradaticsilver issue with a simple tripod symbol, but the tripod here may be an abbreviationof the complex symbol on the Epigenes-Xenon tetradrachms:Apollo Lykeios leaning against a the nos. 1237-1240). Approximately fifthteenthor sixteenthissueafter column surmountedby a tripod(NewStyle, should belong in the mid- to late 60's. Mattingly (1979, pp. 166-167) Mithradates-Aristion, Epigenes-Xenon arguesfor 64/3. Similar. Similar,except at r., two wheat ears. Sv. 79.22-24; Kroll 1972, pl. 35:1-5
122
*a *b *c *d e
31 coins 20-22 10.28(12) 19 10.41 M-353 11.97 NN-565 20 9.21 BB-980 21 12.28 K-1687 22 halved 20 BB-63 Two wheat ears is also the symbol of the highly problematic Kointos-Charmostrasilver, which, despite Thompson'srejectionfrom the Athenian sequence,some rcholarshave dated to 86/5 as the firstAthenian silver issue after Mithradates-Aristion note 142 above, p. 81). However this may be, it is doubtful whether the (see silver and bronze could have anythingto do with each other.On the silverthe two ears of wheat are detached, vertical, and parallel;on the bronze they arejoined and usually rise in the form of V or Y (Kroll 1972, p. 91). Moreover,a date for the bronze as earlyas the 80's is ruledout by the facts that the issue was one of the largestin
97
the heavy Owl-on-amphora series and yet is missing from the early contexts of our Table VI (p. 329 below). Eitherthe issue has no parallelin the post-Sullansilveror its two wheat ears could be an abbreviationfor the Isis or symbol of Demeas-Kallikrates,the Demeter symbol of Menedemos-Timokrates, the Triptolemossymbol of since each of these divinities is depicted on the silver holding two ears of wheat (New Kallimachos-Epikrates, nos. 1232, 1233, 1241-1244, 1253, and 1254). Style, Similar. 19 11.50 Similar,except at r., flower.
*123
lA-76
Sv., pl. 70, associatesthis with the thirdor fourth silverissue afterMithradates-Aristion, Architimos-Demetri, whose symbol is Isis holding a lotus (JVew nos. 1173-1178). But the association is not really convincing, Styek, since the leafy floweror plant on the bronze (seeespeciallySv. 70.20) does not resembleIsis'lotus. It is more likely that the bronze lacks a counterpartin silver.The issue is rare; not one specimen is in the great Chaidari and Agia Varvarahoards. Similar. 124 *a *b *c *d 23 coins II-172 M-282 A-73 NN-1205 18-23 Av. 9.61 (12) 20 11.89 20 8.86 10.11 21 18 10.51
A winged caduceus is the symbol of the late Dionysios-Demostratos silverissue, known from a single drachm (NewStle, no. 1246). Similar. *125 r-498 20 9.72
The symbol is shared with the Architimos-Pammenes tetradrachms(NewSyle, nos. 1255-1258), one of the later New Style emissionspresent in the Hierapytnahoard (IGCH352) and so probablydatable to the 50's (see Mattingly 1969, p. 328).
Similar.
126 *a *b *c *d *e
halved (as also E-4569) this is the last issue in the heavy Owl-on-amphorabronze, as shown by the wear of specimens Apparently, in the Chaidariand Agia Varvarahoards.The issue is without a parallelin the extant post-Mithradatic silver. UNCIASSIFIED
Similar. Similar,except details illegible. 205 coins of uncertainheavy Owl-on-amphoravariety. [115, 118-126]
98
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1ST CENTURIES B.C. Nearly all these are extremelyworn from circulationcontinuing as late as the 2nd and 3rd centuries after Christ. Six (Z-27, Z-1182, 1-320, IIe-177, E4144, and T-990) are halved. And the obverses of two (e-426 and K-1518) were punched with a shallowcavity,for which see p. 94 above. AE2
) 84 B.c. A-e
Head of Demeter r., wearing veil; border of dots. E Triptolemos1., holding wheat ears in r. hand and scepter in 1., seated in winged chariot drawn by two snakes. Sv. 104.29, 30
127 *a *b *c *d e *f g
16-18 18 17 18 17 16 16 16
70's early B.C. Similar. Similar,except poppy head behind or in front of Triptolemos. Sv. 104.31-35
7 coins 15-17 Av.4.35(7) 128 Poppyhead behind Triptolemos 4.64 16 *a II-602 4.81 *b NN-1323 15 17 4.42 *c IIn-289 16 3.37 d ET'-727 head before Triptolemos Poppy 3.65 15 *e B'-928 16 5.51 *f KK-282 4.08 16 *g ET'-531 [127, 128] 30 coins of uncertainAE 2 Demeter/Triptolemostype. 16 blistered (N 20:4) a f-164 Of these two, clearly AE 2 emissions,the first (withoutsymbol) occurs in the Delos 1910 hoard (Table VI, p. 329 below) and appearsto go with the Demeter/TriptolemosAE 1 variety 116. The second (poppy symbol) emissionwas presumablyminted with the heavy Owl-on-amphoravariety 118.
70's-40's B.C.
Dolphin on trident;border of dots. 129 *a 14-17 Av.4.09 (15) 26 coins 4.21 E-3486bis 17
A-OE Plemochoe with wheat ear in each handle; all in wheat wreath.
Sv. 107.1-8
99
17 5.05 17 4.22 (F 11:1) 16 3.15 15 3.95 The trident and dolphin representPoseidon, whose head probablywould have been placed on the obverse were it not too easily confusedwith the head of Zeus. This is the only pre-imperialAthenian coin type that refers to Poseidon. The plemochoe on the reversefits the routine Period IV practice of designing the AE 2 half-unit with Eleusiniantypes. Poseidonmight have been chosen for the obversebecause of his connectionswith Eleusis; he was the ancestorof the Eumolpidaiand had a templejust outsidethe sanctuaryof Demeter and Kore.200 on If, the other hand, the exceptionalrecognitionof Poseidonis comparedwith the equallyunprecedentedappearance of Dionysos on varieties 140-142 and 144, which were struckto flatterMarc Antony during his residence in Athens in the 30's, it is possiblethat the presentissuebelongs to 62 B.C.,when Pompeythe GreatvisitedAthens on his triumphantreturn to Rome.201His visit could have coincided with the celebrationof the Mysteriesin late September. Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet; border of dots. A-eE Artemis, quiver at shoulder,running r., carrying flaming torch. Sv. 81.53-56; Kleiner 1976, pl. 4:110
130
Head of Apollo r., laur.;border of dots. 131 68 coins a IIe-447 *b KK-9bis *c IIII-173 *d K-587 200
201
-E or A-eE Cicada.
14-16 Av. 3.89 (35) 14 16 15 16 3.33 4.08 4.15 3.46 Kleiner 1976, p. 35, pl. 4:93 flan cut down before striking
Ae -E
Mylonas, pp. 167-168. Pompey was posthumouslyapotheosized as Neptune by his son Sextus, who called himself the son of Neptune and in 44-43 B.C. struck the remarkabledenarii with the portrait of Pompey-Neptuneaccompanied by the symbols of dolphin and trident (Crawford,RRC,nos. 483:1, 2, with p. 739, note 5). Granted that this was so much propaganda cultivatedby Sextus to enhance his position as praefectus et classis orae the maritimae, equation of Pompey with Poseidon is less likely to have originated with Sextus in the 40's than in the Greek East, where such ruler-god identifications had long been a fixture of political life. Historically,the equation rested on Pompey'snaval success over the pirates some twenty years earlier,and it would be surprisingif so obvious an associationcould have gone unnoticed during Pompey's tour of Greece in 62, especially by the poets who competed at Mytilene in glorifying Pompey's exploits (Plutarch,Pompey 42.2). For the divine honors offered to Pompey by the Greek cities, including Athens in 67 B.C.,see 27.5-6 and Cerfauxand Tondiau,pp. 284-285. A majorpart of the 50 talentsPompeycontributedfor Plutarch,Pompey the restorationof Athens went to the rebuildingof the Peiraeus(Plutarch,Pompey 42.11, with IG II2, 1035, line 47, and J. Day,An Economic under Roman New Domination, York 1942, pp. 145-149). History ofAthens
100
A-eE *e D-360 14 5.40 *f T-843 15 4.38 15 4.79 (E 14:3) *g r-1068 The first, and more common, form of the ethnic and the occurrence of three somewhat worn specimensin Deposit E 14:3 (TableVI, p. 329 below)show that the varietybelongs early in PeriodIVA.
AE 4
mid-80's-70s B.C.
[Head of Apollo r., laur., hair rolled;border of dots.] 132 rT-301 12 1.93
133
Head of Apollo r., laur., hair falling in archaizingcurls; border of dots. 10-11 Av. 1.87 (8) 11 (E 14:3) 1.64 10 1.71 10 1.79
134
Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet; border of dots. 10-12 Av. 1.69(3) 1.63 12 11 2.27
Similar.
Sv. 107.16, 17
[133, 134] 5 coins of uncertainAE 4 Poppy-between-wheat-ears variety. 11 *a OX-9 flan trimmed before striking 2.03
135 *a *b *c *d *e *f *g h-k
Head of Apollo r., laur., hair falling in archaizingcurls; border of dots. 10-11 Av. 1.70(22) 33 coins 1.33 B-358bis 11 11 1.91 BA-197 10 1.48 00-956 1.79 11 A-72bis 10 1.10 PP-647 2.06 KK-29bis 11 1.93 10 r-1059 (E 14:3) r-1054a and b, 1064, 1080 (E 14:3)
PERIOD IV: CATALOGUE Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet. 136 3 coins *a K-1592 *b NN-987 *c H'-3296bis 10 10 10 10 Av. 1.54(3) 1.62 1.55 1.46 Similar.
101
[132, 135, 136] 24 coins of uncertainTwo-wheat-ears variety. The datingof the AE 4 varietiesis based on the contextsof TableVI (p. 329 below)and the possibleassociation of 133 and 134 with 118 and 128.
PERIOD IVB
42/1-39 B.C.
Reduced AE 1 Head of Athena Parthenosr.; border of dots. 137 *b *c *d *e *f * g h A-O E Zeus stridingr., hurling thunderbolt,eagle perched on his extended 1. arm; at 1., wheat ear. Sv. 80.25-28; Krol 1972, pl. 36:6-10
45 coins
*a In-350
P-290 KK-359 BA-363 r-170 N-440 BB-602 PP-132
overstruckon AE 2 coin of pure, yellowish alloy flan trimmed hexagonallybefore striking halved (as also NN-1285) extremelyworn and punched on obv. with a shallow cavity (as also fA-84) Followingupon Antony'sarrivalin Athens afterPhilippi,this reformissuewill have been struckat the end of 42 or during 41 B.C. The arrangementof the ethnic and particularlythe omission of the eagle before Zeus's feet suggest that the revived type was copied from the early Ist-centuryFulminatingZeus variety 95 (mystic-staff symbol)or 96 (thyrsossymbol).The only modificationsare the change in emission symbol and the eagle added upon Zeus'soutstretchedleft wrist. Similar. A-OE Tripod; at 1., poppy; at r., thunderbolt. GRC,fig. 15 overstruckon heavy Owl-on-amphoraAE 1
18-22 Av. 7.65 (21) 21 8.21 20 7.93 19 8.68 19 7.05 19 4.80 19 5.45 18 4.85 20
GRC,fig. 15
138 *a *b *c *d *e *f *g h
139 coins IIo-142 II-473 KK-149 N-663 A-67 AA-81 K-584 f-313
17-22 Av. 7.47 (47) 20 7.26 20 7.64 19 8.44 20 10.26 18 8.56 17 5.92 19 17 3.46
halved (as also Z-2594, N-813, NN-1309, and NN-1546a) overstruckon unleaded AE 2 coin (as also X-49)
102
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1ST CENTURIES B.C. As suggested above (p. 86), the Pythian tripod on the reverseof these coins can be explained as an allusion to Antony'sproposedcompletionof the templeof PythianApollo. The poppy and thunderboltsymbolsfill out the design and the range of religiousreferences;Athena, Apollo, Demeter, and Zeus, the four principle deities in the numismaticiconographyof HellenisticAthens, are here uniquely representedon a single coin. The poppy and thunderbolt,however,may also be servingas magistrates' signatures. Gorgoneion. A-8E Athena advancing r., holding lowered spear in r. hand; aegis draped over extended 1. arm. Sv. 25.22-28; Kroll 1972, pl. 36:16-20
139
*a *b *c *d *e *e *f *g
79 coins 17-21 Av. 7.88 (30) 9.17 T-113 20 8.06 4-346 20 5.76 20 II1-46 7.75 20 AA-247 19 7.34 NN-524 flan cut down before striking 19 6.91 II8-321 same 9.93 21 AA-488 halved 21 S-3721 of 139f even afterpart of the flan had been crudelyremovedsuggeststhat it was overstruck The heavy weight on a heavy Owl-on-amphoracoin. Three other Agora pieces are definitelyoverstrikes, although the undertypes are unclear. Sv., pi. 25, connects this issue with the island of Skiathos,which Antony gave to Athens in 41. Some 4th- or bronze coins of Skiathosdid employ the gorgoneionas an obversetype (BMCTessaly, 11:19), pi. 3rd-centuryB.C. Athenian tetradrachms,didrachms, and obols,202 but so did a large and important series of 6th-centuryB.C. and it is more likely that these were the source of the present gorgoneion obverse (Kroll 1972, p. 98). The learned revival of historic coin designs occurs again in the Athenian coinage of the 2nd century after Christ (pp. 113-114 below).The reversetype is continuedin the next issue. 39-37 B.C. Head of youthfulDionysos r., wearing ivy wreath;border of dots. 17-21 Av.5.68(16) 5.49 19 6.09 18 17 7.25 17 5.42 5.95 17 halved 18 Similar. Sv. 25.29-32; Kroll 1972, pl. 37:1-5
140 *a *b *c *d *e f
Reduced AE 2 Similar. 12-15 Av. 2.60(16)203 15 3.23 13 2.92 A-e AE Kantharos. Sv. 25.33-35
141
Sv. 1.62-75; Seltman, Groups D and K; Kroll 1981b, pp. 10-15; H. Nicolet-Pierre, "Monnaies archalques a I: et d'Athenessous Pisistrate les Pisistratides Les tetradrachmes la gorgone,"RJ, ser.6, 25, 1983, pp. 15-33, pls. 2-5. AE 1 issue 140. Cf. 203 The averageis close to halfof the averageof the weighedAgora specimensof the contemporary note 211 below,p. 107.
202
103
A-E Bust of Athena Sv. 25.43-50 E Head of bearded Dionysos r., r., wearing Corinthianhelmet. wearing ivy wreath. 10-12 Av. 1.39(19) 52 coins 142 11 *a E-318 1.65 11 1.85 *b A-163 11 1.91 GRC,fig. 15 *c NN-679 flan cut down before striking *d rr-101 1.85 12 same 11 1.31 *e K-1254 A Two other specimenswere also struckon reusedflans that had been trimmedbefore striking. more notable featureis the broken-baralpha, makingits firstappearancein this issue. One specimen(Br-559) had been picked up and was being hoarded as a one-nummuscoin in the 6th century of our era; seeJ. H. Kroll, G. C. Miles, and S. G. Miller, "AnEarlyByzantine and a Late TurkishHoard from the Athenian Agora,"Hesperia 1973 42, (pp. 301-311), pp. 303, 308, no. 93. The Dionysos heads on this and the two precedingvarietieshonor Marc Antony,who declaredhimselfthe Neos Dionysos upon arrival in Athens in the summer or fall of 39. The symbolismis paralleled in two emissions of struckat Ephesosin the same year;these depict Octavia,Antonywearingthe ivy wreath cistophorictetradrachms The precipitousdrop in the of Dionysos, and, on the reverseof one emission, a standingimage of Dionysos.204 AE 1 emission (TableIXV 326-327 below) may reflect the Athenians' difficultiesin pp. weight of the Athenian raisingthe exorbitantdowry that Antony demandedfor his wedding to Athena. Dio (48.39) and Zonaras(10.23) 1.6) give the amount as one million drachms, Seneca (Suasoriae a thousand talents (six million drachms).The AE 4 issue, which pairs the head of Dionysos and the bust of Athena, may have been designed to commemorate the marriage of Antony to Athena, like the "wedding"aurei, with the head of Anthony on the obverse and the bust of Octavia on the reverse,struckin 39 and 38 to celebrateAntony's marriage to Octavia (Crawford, RRC, nos. 527 and 533/3a). Indeed, if Raubitschek(1946) is right in supposing that the Athenians honored Octavia as Athena Polias,the referencesmay extend to Octavia-Athenaas well as to Antony-Dionysos.However this may be, the three Dionysos varieties140-142 should date to Antony'sstay in Athens from 39 to 37 B.C.
ca. 36-33 B.C.
Reduced AE 1 Head of Athena Parthenosr., border of dots. A-e E Archaic image of Apollo Delios, holding the three Graces in his r. hand and a bow in his 1.;at 1., cicada. Sv. 80.8-14; Kroll 1972, pl. 37:11-15
143
*a *b *c *d *e *f *g
16-20 Av.5.33 (36) 19 4.38 18 5.94 17 4.98 17 5.85 18 5.84 4.85 overstruckon pre-87 B.C. 20 FulminatingZeus AE 2 18 halved (as are AA-171 and Z-1108) By weight this should be the last of the six PeriodIVB AE 1 issues,but other considerationssuggestthat 144 and the was actually the last, since it can hardly date before 32 B.C. was the issue to which belong, apparently, 81 coins N-1112 K-201 E-278 B-100 HH-26 00-1116 AA-285
204 BMCRR II, pp. 502-503, nos. 133-137; III, pl. cxiv:l-4; Sutherland,Olcay, and Merrington,pp. 86-88; RPC I, 2201, 2202.
104
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-IST CENTURIES B.C. chopped coin blanksthat were abandonedon the floor of the mint in the southeastcorner of the Agora square. could be squeezedinto the anxiousmonths Thus, althoughthe presentissuewith its nontopicaltypestheoretically between variety 144 and the Battleof Actium, it fits more comfortablyin the ample span between the Dionysos issues of 37-39 (140-142) and the Zeus/Dionysos and Zeus/Eagle issues of 32 (144 and 145). Confirmation of this arrangementmust await metallurgicalanalyses of several specimens to allow comparison of their lead content with that of 144. The Archaicstatueof Apollo Delios (L{MCII, p. 234, no. 390)was earlierused as the symbolof the 2nd-century of New Style silver emission of Sokrates-Dionysodo (NewSyle, nos. 611-628); Sokrateshad served as epimeletes in 117/6 (Habicht 1991, p. 9). But whethersuch a personalconnection lay behind the Apollo Delios type Delos of the present coins is debatable. None of the other changing types of the IVB bronze appear to have private associations;and the present reverse has the subsidiarysymbol of a cicada, which one would ordinarilytake for an emissionsymbol, even though such administrative symbolswouldbe redundantin a coinage with regularly changingtypes.The reverseis in any case the lastallusionto Delos in Atheniancoinage. By the 30's the islandhad lost its commercialimportanceand most of its formerpopulation,althougha settlementremainedon the island and the Athenianscontinued to manage it and the cult of Apollo as before;see Roussel,pp. 336-340.
32 B.C.
A-e
Head of Zeus, r., laur.;border of dots. 144 *a *b *c *d *e *f 152 coins MM-505 E-3957 00-1586 H-1718 AA-555 E-24 *g IIe-238 *h E-4136 15-20 17 17 17 17 17 15 17 18 Av.5.47(61) 5.71 5.86 6.98 4.46 5.17 4.07 E Head of bearded Dionysos r., Sv. 25.36-42; Kroll 1972, pl. 37:6-10 wearing ivy wreath.
halved reused, presumablyfor some industrialpurpose; obv. obliteratedby filed notches in a rosette pattern, as also ee-25 (Period IV Unclassified, p. 110 below). on examples,E-292 is halvedand BA-414, a totallyworn coin, is countermarked the Among the unillustrated The of the lattercoin precludesillustration. obversewith an owl in incuse circle(7 mm. diameter).The condition at 22.73 percent the highestknown issue is notable for the extremelyhigh lead content of its analyzedspecimen, Atheniancoin (TableIV,pp. 326-327 below).The percentageis largelyresponsiblefor the from any pre-imperial associationof the issuewith the choppedblanksexcavatedfromthe floor of the mint in the southeastcornerof the in Agora (25.5 percentlead;see AppendixB) and is approximated the contemporaryZeus/Eagle-on-thunderbolt fraction 145 (20.21 percent205). On this fourthAntonianemissionthe head of Dionysosis displacedfromthe obversein favorof a head of Zeus. But an explanationis immediatelyforthcomingfrom variety 145 with its standardPtolemaic Zeus/Eagle types. The Zeus obverse of the present issue is to be similarlyunderstoodas a reference to Egypt and so dates with 145 after Antony had thrown in his lot with Kleopatra. According to Plutarch(Antony 57.1-2), the Athenians had a great affectionfor Octavia and did not vote honors to Kleopatrauntil she and Antony arrivedin Athens in late spring of 32 and she bribed them with gifts. These circumstancesmake it doubtful that the Athenian issues could have been struckbefore late spring or summer of 32 and suggest why they refer to the kingdom of Egypt ratherthan to Kleopatra,the New Isis, directly.
205
PERIOD IV: CATALOGUE Reduced AE 2 Head of Zeus r.; border of dots. 145 14 coins *a D-98 *b AA-665 *c f2A-42 13-15 Av. 3.24 (13) 14 2.33 14 3.93 13 4.01 A-OE Eagle, wings spread, r. stg. three-quarters on thunderbolt. Sv. 22.59-61; Kleiner 1976, pl. 4:105-109
105
For the standardPtolemaic bronze pairing of Zeus head and eagle on thunderbolt,see 1005, 1006, 1009, 1010, 1013-1017; for the eagle reverseof Kleopatra'sown bronze, 1019. 145 is the only Athenian emission in any period with the device of an eagle. Citing the Antony head/Eagle bronze of Zakynthos(RPCI, 1290), I. Touratsoglou(in CRWLR, 57, 67, note 33; pl. 8:13) attributes Zeus/Eagle issue of Thessaloniketo Antony a pp. and Kleopatra.Another attribution(Aigion:Dionysos/Eagle) is proposedunder 733 (p. 233 below).
PERIOD IVC
Reduced AE 1 Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet; border of dots. 146 5 coins *a N-339 *b S-4129 19-20 Av. 7.82 (5) 19 7.70 19 7.79 AOE upwardsat 1. Demeter or Kore stg. r., carryinglit torch; at r., plemochoe; all in (?)wheatwreath. Sv. 25.13, 14; Kroll 1972, pl. 38:2-4
This, the last varietyin the AkropolisNorth Slope 1936 hoard (note 141 above,p. 81) and hence the firstafter the unwreathedPeriod IVB coinage, was irregularly designed (cf. Athena'sCorinthianhelmet and the position of the ethnic), poorly struck, and meager; known examples (includinga mere three from the great Chaidari hoard) were struckfrom one or possiblytwo obverse dies. It would seem to have been little more than a token emission, which, with the Eleusinianreverse, suggestsattributionto September of 31, when within a week or so after Actium, Octavian sailed to Athens to distributegrain to the Greek cities and to be initiated at Eleusis 68; (Plutarch,Antony Dio 51.4.1). Head of Athena Parthenosr.; border of dots. AGE downwardsat r., Nike advancing r., holding fillet in outstretchedhands; all in olive wreath with berries. Sv. 78.10, 80.15-17; Kroll 1972, pl. 37:16-20
147 *a *b *c *d *e
18-21 20 20 19 19 18
Stylisticallyand technicallythese are the crudestcoins ever minted in ancient Athens. As in variety 146, they are weaklyand often incompletelystamped;and, althoughAthena is at least given an appropriate New StyleAttic the rude, inept die cutting is without parallel. The issue was evidently hurried. As Octavian probably helmet,
106
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1ST CENTURIES B.C. visited Athens for a second time while crossingfrom Asia to Italy in 29,206 the issue may have been rushed into production for this occasion. The Nike in any case probablyrefers to Actium; and since she is posed as though crowningthe legend on the coins, the conceit impliesthat Actium was also a victory for the Athenians. Similar. A-GE Zeus stg. r., holding thunderboltin lowered r. hand, 1. arm extended; all in olive wreath. Sv. 80.22-24; Kroll 1972, pl. 38:1
*148
NN-676
20
8.16
Exceptionallyrare (but a single example in the Chaidarihoard),the issue neverthelessemployedtwo or three obverse dies (compareKroll 1972, pl. 38:1 with Sv. 80.22-24). Style and technique are noticeablybetter than in the preceding Demeter and Nike varieties,and the Parthenoshead and linear ethnic conform to standard New Style precedent. The importantStanding Zeus statue,which appearedfor the firsttime on Athenian coins in the early 190's, evidentlywith referenceto Flamininus,can be identifiedwith some probabilityas the statue of Zeus Eleutherios the by (see 78-80 and pp. 56-57 above).Accordingly, presentreverseought to referto a "liberation" Octavianin et the sense that he would have confirmedthe rightsof Athens as a cvitasfoederata libera. Augustuswas honored or Eleuterios are Eeutherios Zeus for in Lakoniaas Eao-xpxal ' EXeu0ptolo just such a confirmationof freedom.207 And at Athens an annex was added to the Stoa of Zeus Soter-Eleutherios found among his titles elsewhere.208 to house an imperialcult, surelyincludingAugustus.209
PERIOD IVD
mid-20s-19
B.C.
149
Reduced AE 1 A 3 E at upper I. Athena Head of Athena Parthenosr.; border of dots. advancing r., carryinglowered spear in r. hand, aegis draped over extended 1. arm; at lower r. owl; all in olive wreath. 17-21 Av.6.88 (101) 8.46 19 GRC,fig. 15 7.62 20 7.41 20
Bowersock,Agustus,pp. 120-121, with Dio 51.21.1. V Ehrenbergand A. H. M. Jones, Documents IllutrsatigtheReign of Augtus and Tibeius,Oxford 1955, no. 122b, T. in AnEconomic with the commentsofJ. A. O. Larsen, Rome, Frank,ed., IV,Baltimore 1938, p. 447. The ofAncient Survey liberatorof the Free Lakonians,was still receiving honors at same inscriptioninforms that Flamininus, the original the festival that celebrated the re-liberationof Augustus.For a surveyof coins that possibly commemorate Augustan to Cambridge 1946, pp. 338-347. Imperwm Auctoitas, grantsof freedomto other communities,see M. Grant,From 208 Eeutherios Mytilene: R. Cagnat etal., Inscriptiongraecae resromanaspertintes, ad Paris 1927, no. 62. ZeusEtrios at Oxford 1971, p. 144, note 1. at Carian Mys: BCH 11, 1887, p. 306, no. 1. In Egypt S. Weinstock, DivusJulius, 209 H. A. Thompson (note 102 above,p. 57), pp. 182-186, with a surveyofassociationsof Augustusand lateremperors with Zeus Eleutherios.On the associationsfurther,see below under 728 and 729 and B. Levy, "Nero'sLiberationof Achaea: Some NumismaticEvidence from Patrae,"in JMwckle pp. 167-185; RPC I, p. 47. Papers,
207
206
PERIOD IV: CATALOGUE *d *e *f *g *h *i j K-1603 S-5621 A-1109 I;-104 E-3392 PP-827 PP'-1032 18 19 19 20 19 18 20 4.95 6.46 6.82 5.65 5.99 6.40
107
halved (as are six others)210 cut down; heavily worn heavily worn; cavity punched on obv. (U 13:2a)Plate 34:4 In this PeriodIVD inauguralissue the letteringis neat and compact, the Athena heads are relativelysmall and rendered,and the strikingis superb.The undertypesof severaloverstruck attractively pieces cannot be identified. Reduced AE 2
A E Veiled head of Demeter r.; Poppy between two crossed Sv. 104.38-45 border of dots. wheat ears. 150 40 coins 13-16 Av. 3.26 (26)21l *a B-77 16 3.25 *b NN-816 15 4.73 GR fig. 15 !C, 14 *c N-824 2.48 14 *d NN-368 3.08 *e IIII-990 13 3.28 *f NN-1370 13 3.22 14 3.34 g r-1204 (E 15:3) The broken-baralpha, the style of the Demeter head, and the superiortechnique connect the variety with the AE 1 149.
Reduced AE 1 A Head of Athena Parthenosr.; border of dots. 151 *a *b *c *d *e *f g 135 coins A-1582 A-1145 neO-796 K-125 KTA-15 E-2249 e-768 18-21 19 20 20 19 20 19 20 Av.6.83 (49) 8.62 6.06 7.76 8.71 8.36 6.65 halved (as also E-3992)
With this emission, style and technique drop off abruptly.The Athena heads are coarse, squared, and (like the lettering)enlarged, to remain so throughthe succeeding 152 and 153. In addition to the precedingAthena advancing,owl, and the presentAthena advancing,snake,there is a rare variant (Kroll 1972, no. 568, pli.39:6) with Athena advancing,wheatear,thatprovidesa linkbetweenthe presentvarietyand the followingOwl-on-prow emission,which has a wheat-earsymbol also at the right.212 210 BB-1015, r-1157, A-190, NN-224, II-265, P-452. 211 The average is about half of the weight averageof Agora specimens of the accompanyingAE 1 variety 149. Cf. note 203 above, p. 102. 212 A more curiousvariantis the Athena advancing,snake,piece publishedas Sv.80.35. The obversewas struckfroma makeshiftdie engraved with nothing more than an AOE ligature, evidently at a time when production had outrun the supplyof serviceableAthena-headdies.
108
Similar. Similar,except symbol illegible. [149, 151] 151 coins of uncertainParthenos/Athenaadvancingvariety.Nearlyall areworn flat. Twelveare halved.213 Illustrated is 19 *a ST'-584 5.93 scored across by a chisel in preparationfor halving
A
Similar.
O E Owl stg. r. on prow;
at r., wheat ear; all in olive wreath. 152 501 coins *a 00-1248 *b E-260 *c MM-193
16-22 Av.6.84 (140) 5.77 20 19 4.14 overstruckon Sikyon variety 727 7.52 20 8.30 *d rr-181 20 19 3.64 overstruckon Sikyon, as 152b *e ZZ-129 *f KK-231 19 5.89 halved (as are seven other specimens)214 20 *g Z-2231 h PP'-1031 19 5.20 (U 13:2a)Plate 34:6 At least two other coins (HH-77 and T-56) were overstruckon the same Ist-century B.C. Sikyon variety p. (Apollo/Dove flying 1., AINEAE),as are BMCAttica, 92, nos. 669 and 670, and Sv. 80.41; see Warren 1984, from those of 151 and 153, the fact that some coins p. 20. Although the Athena heads are indistinguishable on of the presentvarietyalone were overstruck Sikyonprovesthat the threeAthenianvarietieswere struckseriatim.
A9
Similar. 153 *a *b *c *d
*?
overstruckon a coin that had been chisel markedon both sides with XI; possibly from the FulminatingZeus star-and-crescents variety;cf. 97h *1 KK-65 overstruck 19 9.07 f halved (as are eight others)215 19 g BB-52 shallow cavity punched on one side (as also on 11II-117) 18 I AA-540 6.48 h with unidentifiableundertypes.For the significanceof the sphinx reverse, A few of the coins are overstrikes see p. 88 above. Reduced AE 2
17-21 19 18 20 20 19
A
Triptolemos1. holding scepter in 1. hand, r. arm extended, mounting winged chariot drawn by two snakes;border of dots. 14-16 3.46 (17) 3.00 15 3.55 15 15 3.21 e E Crossed mystic staff and wheat ear; all in olive wreath. Sv. 104.46-50
154
A-1230, BB-605, rr-285, K-366, K-476, K-1415, N-833, 00-1105, 00-1215, IIE-167, E-736, ET'-417. r-432, r-484, rr-181, E-2499, 1-1537, A-164, E-465. A-99, Br'-l 11, Z-904, Z-1538, Z-2884, 0-672, AA-404, 00-1230.
PERIOD IV: CATALOGUE *d IIn-59 *e 00-551 f r-1038 3.84 3.16 3.70 (intrusivein E 14:3216) (as on 154a-c) but not invariably(cf. Sv. 104.46, 47) have curvedor brokencrossbars. Alphas frequently A-e 15 15 14
109
Nike advancingr., holding fillet Sv. 104.51-53 as on 154; border in extended r. hand and lowered chariot, of dots. stylis(?)in 1.;all in olive wreath. 155 8 coins 13-14 Av.3.14 (6) *a i-5688 14 3.80 *b Z-917 13 3.30 Since obverse and reverseare identifiableby their respectivelydotted and wreathedborders,we have in 155 the one Athenianvarietywhose ethnic is on the obverse(asopposedto thejoint Athens-Eleusis and its relations 63 with legends on both faces).Unique, too, is the arrangementof the letters.Lettering,characterof reversewreath, but particularlythe linear rendering of the figures relate both this variety and 154 to the AE 1 variety 151, Athena advancing,snake. A
m Triptolemosmounting
24 coins 14-20 Av.2.97(9) I-1483 20 3.74 16 nI-323 2.37 r-153 15 4.33 15 Hn-229 2.06 The unmistakableobverse style links this variety to the AE 1 issues 151-153. Except for the arrangement of the ethnic, the reverse type was adopted from the common 2nd-centuryAE 3 variety 99, doubtless with denominationalimplications(p. 90 above).The six examplesfromthe Chaidariand Agia Varvarahoardsgave an averageweight of 4.25 g. (Kroll 1972, p. 119).
Period IVE
ca. 15-10 B.C.
Reduced AE 1 Similar. A-eE Owl stg. r., facing, on horizontal amphora;at r. coiled snake;all in olive wreath. Sv. 79.36, 37; Kroll 1972, pl. 38:5-9
157 *a *b *c *d
216
16-20 17 16 17 18
Not only is 154f more worn than the other (earlyPeriod IVA) coins from this deposit, but the much later date of the variety is certified by the figural style, the wreathed border, and the occasionallybent crossbarsof the alphas of the reverse.With the exception of 129, reversesof the PeriodIVA intermediatefractions(127-131) are unwreathed. Bent crossbarsdo not appear until late PeriodIVB (142).
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-1ST CENTURIES B.C. 6.11 4.22 Similar,except at r., cicada. Sv. 79.38-42; Kroll 1972, pl. 38:10-14
Similar. 158 *a *b *c *d *e *f g 199 coins IIII-862 ET'-562 Q-460 AA-15 A-1241 H-83 PP'-1007 16-20 19 19 18 17 17 18 18 Av.5.53 (57) 6.63 6.27 6.02 4.88 5.14 3.24
halved (as are r-1150b [E 15:3], H-1887, and II-247) (U 13:2a)Plate 34:6
[157, 158] 160 coins of uncertainlight Owl-on-amphoravariety.One (Z-1196) bears an illegible countermark;three (BB-161, H-1439, and KK-12) are halved. a PP'-1008 17 (U 13:2a)Plate 34:7 5.22 The revivalof traditionalNew Style design in these two finalAugustanemissionsextends even to the obverses of the coins, which have the conventionaltwo tailsof the crestbehind the helmet. But the styleis atrocious.Except for the fine initial die pair or pairs of the issue with snake symbol (157a: Kroll 1972, pl. 38:7; Sv. 79.37, obv. die only), Athena heads are coarse, and the owls, economically rendered in heavy lines and punches, have a spookyappearance.Lettersare serifedwith dots, and many alphashave dots in place of crossbars.
PERIOD IVA-E UNCLASSI'IED [115-126, 137-140, 143, 144, 146-149, 151-153, 157, 158] Three (rr-258, Z-767, and Z-1077) 849+ coins of Period IV AE 1 size and fabric worn completely illegible.217 are halved. Five others (BB-177, E-441, AA-54, 11-741,and T-1064) received a punched cavity on one side, proof of circulationas late as the 3rd centuryafterChrist(p. 94 above).98-25 was reusedfor some industrial purpose;both sides were filed with notches in a rosette pattern, like the obv. of 144h. In addition, two of the totally worn pieces were countermarked: cmk.: A at 1. of amphora (D4:1) 19 5.14 *a AA-263 cmk.: AOE in incuse oval 6.73 19 *b AA-788 For illustrationsof 26 specimens (PP'-1009-1022, 1033-1037, 1073-1079) of Deposit U 13:2a of ca. A.D. 100, see Plate 34:8-33.
A-eE
Bust of Artemis r., quiver at shoulder;border of dots. 159 *a PP-692 *b IIn-384
217
[A]H-MNIStag stg. r.
14 20
2.16 2.86
The 849 total does not include an estimated one to several hundred illegiblyworn Period IV pieces that were discardedin the late 1940's as being too uninformativeto merit storage. Most of the discardedpieces are identified in the field notebooksas "Greek"or "New Style".
111
The second line of the legend is not visibleon the heavilyworn BritishMuseum specimen and is not recorded in the line drawingof the only other publishedspecimen, E. Beule, Lesmonnaies Paris 1858, p. 345. But d'AthInas, on an exceptionallythick and heavy specimen at the AmericanNumismatic Society (1944.100.25998 [Newell], 13 mm., 5.43 g.), there are tracesof the eta at the left of the stag and mu nu at the right.The chunkyfabricclearly identifiesthis as a PeriodIV issue,althoughwhetherit belongsearlyin the period or dateswith the followingthree varieties to early Period IVD there is at present no way of knowing. The types pertain to the cult of Artemis at Myrina, which minted coins with its own name and the head of the goddess and reverse bow and quiver der Musen zu Berlin, (J. Friedlanderand A. von Sallet, Konigich MiuzenI, Berlin 1888, p. 283, Beschreibung antiken nos. 12, 13;NC, ser. 1, 4, 1841, p. 8, fig. 3). Bow and quiverare used on other Myrinareverseswith AeE (456) and AOEIMY(see note 218 below).
ca. mid-20's B.C.
ATHENS-SKYROS
15-18 18 17 17 15
Similar. 161
A-e-E
INBPI Two pilei, wreathed, of the Kabeiroi. Kroll 1972, no. 11, pl. 40:12
16 coins 16-19 Av.5.13(11) 0-589 17 3.72 ne-156 17 5.04 AA-73 16 5.02 PP'-730 19 4.03 The Agora specimens of 159A-161 have nothing to add to the discussionof these three cleruchyemissions in Kroll 1972, pp. 101-104. The Chaidari and Agia Varvarahoards produced seven slightlyworn specimens (Kroll 1972, pp. 119-120; av. weight 6.19 g.), of which two Athens-Lemnospieces were countermarkedon the obversewith a small owl r. in incuse circle. The single, bushy tail of the helmet crest and the refinedengravingof all obverses,which appear to have been cut by the same die sinker,date the varietieswith the first emission of Period IVD (149: Athena advancing, Struckin Athens, therefore,not long afterAugustuspresumablyconfirmedAthens' continuedpossession owl).218 218 Further supportfor this dating (and the mintingof these issuesat Athens)comes from the curiousAthens-Lemnian Sv. Myrina overstrike, 80.44 = Kroll 1972, pp. 102-104, pl. 40:14, now in the BritishMuseum: obv.: Owl r. (identicalin to the Owl-on-prowowls of 152), rev.:A-eE above M-Y,bow and quiver;overstruck Sikyon, style on Apollo head/Dove, AINEAE, as are occasionalregularexamplesof 152, q.v.Kroll (1972) suggestedthat this late PeriodIVD overstrike was improvisedto appease the citizens of Myrina after the early IVD minting of 159A, whose Hephaistos-headreverse may have associatedthe issue too closely with Hephaistia, Myrina'srival city on Lemnos. But if 159 with its Artemis *a *b *c *d
112
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: 4TH-IST CENTURIES B.C. on of Skyros,Lemnos,and Imbros,the coinswere surelyintendedfor circulation these islands.Kroll(1972, p. 103) the legendsas coordinatedoubleethnics,curtailments for example, 'A0cvallxv xal Ar)jvltv, etc.; of, interpreted but the legends would be more meaningfulif they designatedthe demoi of the Athenian cleruchieswithout an understood conjunction. The correct expansionsshould probably translate"of the Athenian Lemnians,"and the like.
types of Myrina happened to have been struckas a coordinatefractionalissue of 159A, the circumstancesbehind the would be more complicated. overstrike
III
ATHENIANBRONZECOINS SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIESAFTER CHRIST
MONEY of Early Roman ImperialAthens remained unchanged from the time of Marc THE Antony and Augustus:the silvercurrencywas suppliedby the Roman denarius,while for more than a century the Athenians continued to make do with their old, increasinglyworn Period IV bronze.l Minting of a fresh bronze coinage did not resume until the revival of the city's fortunes in the first half of the 2nd century after Christ. Begun under Hadrian (A.D. 117-138), this new 2nd-centurybronze (PeriodV) evolved throughseveralphases and extended into the third quarter of the century under the Antonines. Then, after another century-longhiatus in minting, Athenian coinage came to an end in a brief but massivestriking(PeriodVI), which datesjust before the city
was overrun by the Herulian Goths in A.D. 267.2
These 2nd- and 3rd-centurycoinagesof Roman Athensperpetuatethe old Atheniantraditionof placing the head of the city goddesson obverses.This is certainlyunexceptionalfrom the standpoint of historical Athenian coin design, but it is a dramatic departurefrom the practice, which had become well establishedthroughoutthe Roman worldby this time, of reservingthe obversesof civic coins for the effigy and inscriptionof the reigning emperor.The coinages of Athens, Chios, and Termessos in Pisidia are, in fact, the only three Greek coinages of the Imperial era that consistently resisted this innovation. Yet if the Athenian imperialsare notably conservativein this one respect,they sharewith contemporarybronze coinagesfrom other Greekcities a propensityfor rich, iconographicalvariety that is entirely alien to the characterof Greek coinages of the past. As the obverseheads of Athena came to be renderedin a wide range of differingstyles,helmet types, and subsidiaryornament, the numerousreversetypesprovidea virtualpicturebook of much of the city's famouscult and mythologicalstatuaryin additionto monumentsand traditionalAtheniandevicesof other kinds.
CHRONOLOGY It is curious, however, that the coinage did not begin this way. The earliest issues (Period VA) are restrictedto a small fractionaldenomination,normally 14-15 mm. in diameter,designed with Athena/Owl types that copy the types of AthenianOld Style silver.The die cuttersnormallyspelled the ethnic AOH (163), althougha few of the earliestreversedies give the correctAGE (162). Fidelityto the prototypesis maintained in the severe head of Athena, her Attic helmet with tendril and leaf ornaments,the stockyowl facing rightwith olive sprig,and the verticallegend. The coins are struck on blanks that had been cast and then punched on one side with a shallow cavity,apparentlyfor 1 See 91-92 above,withPlate34. pp. 2 Svoronos of on for (1904,p. 110),placedthechronology theAthenian imperials a secure footing identifying the by
firsttime the separate2nd- and 3rd-century phasesof the coinage. In subsequentstudies,Kroll (1973) and Walker(1980) workedout the refinementsthat resultin the more detailed chronologypresentedbelow.
114
anchoring a rotaryplaning device that, when turned, smoothed and trimmed the cast planchet.3 The use of cast, punched blankscontinuedthroughthe successivePeriodVB and VC coinages. After the large initial issue (162 and 163), the Athena/Owl fractionsgraduallyevolved away from the Classicalmodel. Even as some of the original obverse dies were in use, new reversedies introduceddifferentarrangementsof the ethnic, droppedthe olive twig, and sometimesturned the owl to the left (164 and 165). Then, at the end of the series(166 and 167), these developmentsare joined by freer and more varied obverse dies that favoredbusts of Athena wearing a Corinthian fromthe obverseheads of the PeriodVB fractions.The VA helmet in stylesthat are indistinguishable owls give the impressionof being struckcontinuouslyand leading without a break into PeriodVB. Since most of the coins and dies belong to the initial, classicizingphase of Period VA, the coinage would seem to have been relativelycompact, lastingsurelyfor less than a decade. Historicalprobabilityvirtuallydemandsthat the elaborate,succeedingPeriodVB coinage begin under Hadrian, possiblyin connection with his firstimperialvisit to Athens in 124/5 or, better,his second and longest visit in 127/8-128/9. In either case the start of the VA owls should probably fall in the earlier 120's, a time that is reinforcedin general terms by the fact that VA owls first appear in reliable archaeologicalcontexts of the earlier 2nd century.4But it would probably be mistakento assume that Hadrian himself was directlyresponsiblefor the coinage. The financing and organizationof Greekcivic coinageswas normallya local concern, initiatedand maintainedby wealthycitizensas a publicbenefaction,so thatAthensis more likelyto have owed her PeriodVA and B (andeven C?)coinage to her other greatbenefactorin the 2nd century,the millionaireintellectual Herodes Atticus of Marathon, whose distinguishedpublic career began at Athens with the office in of agoranomos the early 120's, followed by his archonshipin 126/7.5 These dates independently the 120'sfor the beginning (VA)and initialelaboration(earlyVB) of the coinage. suggest The learned archaism of the VA owls is in keeping with the antiquariantastes of Hadrian, Herodes, and their contemporaries.But one has to wonder why this coinage was nonetheless so tentativeand limited. Restrictedto a small denomination,it could at best have only supplemented the heavilyworn Period IV pieces that were servingas the dominant bronze currency.Perhapsthe large initial striking(162 and 163) was produced for a festivaldonative. Or was it the Athenians' reluctance to strike a normal imperial coinage with the emperor'seffigy that was responsiblefor the unassumingcharacterof these pieces?6Whateverthe explanation,the VA owls set the precedent for a revivedAthenian coinage in the old Athena-headmanner,while the very inadequacy of the coinage will have given rise to the expansionof the coinage that followed. Period VB inauguratesthe developed imperial coinage with its many reverse types and four denominations, includinga largenew unitof 24-26 mm. thatquicklybecamethe majordenomination.
of and D. Brown,eds., New York1976(pp. 66-73), pp. 66-67. Foradditional bibliography a survey the use of the see in Imperial Athens, Amandry, 81-82. Greece, pp. omitting although technique 4 See 166aand to U D Deposits 4:1 and,especially, 13:2aand b. Krol (1973,p. 327)proposed datethe VAowls datedto this afterChriston the evidenceof DepositE 14:2,LevelII, whichwas ceramically to the late 1stcentury be below(pp. 305-306),the dateof thislevelshouldprobably extended in but as explained the list of deposits time; the startof the VA owlsmoreplausibly A.D. 111/2, the in Walker into the 2nd century. (1980,pp. 257-258)placed but Athenian dateof Hadrian's archonship, eventhisis too early. 5 P. Graindor, milliardaire Cairo 1930,pp. 55-57; W.Ameling,Herodes Atticus Hrode Un Attiuset safamille, antique, York Hildesheim/Zurich/New 1983,p. 1. II, 6 Thatis, there of the units here bronze, obverses whichwere Imperial mightbe a parallel withthesmallest of Roman See thanthe headof the emperor. rather withthe headof Athenaor someotherdeityor symbol normally designed cities. otherGreek of on the smalldenominations certain of RPCI, p. 41, notingthe omission the imperial portrait
3 For reconstructionof the instrumentand D. Crajfs, Strong and technique, see D. Sellwood, "Minting,"in Roman
CHRONOLOGY
115
The VB coinage is notable for the exceptionalqualityand elaboratenessof much of the die cutting, which resulted in some of the most magnificent coins ever struck at Athens (see Sv. 89.3 and or 94.2-6). Reverse legends are AeH, AeHNAIWN, an abbreviatedvariant. The wide range of and types of busts of Athena on the obverses indicates that the dies were cut by several styles artists or groups of artistsworkingover an extended period. The end of the VB coinage is markedby a slight reduction in the diametersof the coins and a simplificationof the obverse dies, which are linked to reversesthat sometimes have the typical VB legend AeHNAIWN, others that spell the ethnic with a bowed omega, AOHNAIQN.7 and These "transitional" obverse dies tend to dispensewith the ornate VB aegis and draperyand replace the full bust by a helmeted head with slight draperyaroundthe neck (cf. 175a and 182b). The succeeding PeriodVC coinage has ethnics regularlyin AeHNAIfTN, the types become and and more uniformstill: thereis usuallyjusta plain helmetedhead ofAthena, ratherblocky orrr simpler in shape, and a simplereverseof one figure.The laterVC coins are the most commonlyfound square of all Period V issues, both in the Agora and in hoards discoveredin Attica, and their numerous, nearly indistinguishableobverse dies and extensive die linking imply a sudden burst of minting activity at the end of Period V Period VB and C coins continued to be minted from cast flans with central cavities. Sawn flans without the cavities,however,were introducedfor late VB or VC fractionsand seem to have been experimentally used for a few of the largestpieces at the end ofVC,8 to speed up flan productionfor intensivecoining at that time. t apparently It is clear from severalhoardsburiedor lost at the time of th Herulianinvasionof Attica in A.D. the 267 that the PeriodVC imperialshad come to an end by the close of the 2nd century,if not already by the reign of Commodus (A.D. 177-192): the Severan sestertiiand many sestertiiof Commodus in these depositsare less worn than the accompanyingAthenianVB and VC pieces. The heavywear of the Athenian pieces is comparableto the sestertiistruckfrom Trajan through Marcus Aurelius (A.D. 161-180). As stated, the start of the Period VB coinage should coincide with the start of the Hadrianicrenaissanceof Athens in the 120's.9 The stylistic heterogeneity of the VB obverses suggests a coinage of some duration, struck very likely in severaldisjointedemissions,although it is doubtfulthat there were any lengthy gaps. The existence at the end of VB of a substantialtransitionalcoinage employing "new" obverse dies with occasional "old" AeHNAIWN reverses implies an overall continuity in minting at least to around the middle of the 2nd century,where the transitionalpieces seem to belong. A rough indication of date here comes from an Athenian lead token published in 1900.10 It is an official token of the Athenian Boule signed by an otherwiseunknownPammenes.On the obverseis a bust of Antoninus Pius (A.D. 138-161) with somewhat elderly looking features,and on the reverse is a
7 Characteristicexamples of obverse dies used with both types of reverselegend are 17la (= Sv. 82.29) and 175a (= Sv. 92.5, 6) paired with the VC reverse 264a (= Sv. 92.17, 18). This obverse links with other VC obverses,which are also transitional,throughother reverses,as Sv. 98.22 and 21 (280). 8 Sawing striations are visible on large VC pieces in the Eastern Attica Hoard (note 17 below, p. 117) and the collection of the AmericanNumismaticSociety. 9 On Hadrian and Athens, see D.J. Geagan, "RomanAthens: Some Aspects of Life and Culture,I, 86 B.C.-A.D. to 267," AJW 11.7.1, 1979 (pp. 371-437), pp. 389-399, 426-430 (bibliography); which now add A.J. Spawforthand S. Walker,"The World of the Panhellenion I: Athens and Eleusis,"JRS 75, 1985, pp. 78-104; D. Willers, Hadrians Athens durch Kunst Beiheft 16), 1990, pp. 7-12, Beitrge (Antke panhellenisches Programm, Archdologische Hadrian zuNeugestaltung 93-103; and the papers cited in notes 11, 60, and 61 below,pp. 116 and 124. 10 Svoronos 1900, 334, no. 180, p. pl. 19:22: Obv.: Bust of Antoninus Pius draped and cuirassedr.; at L.,BOT. Rev.: Draped bust of Athena r.; at 1., flAM-M. This Pammenes is a descendant of the well-knownfamily of the 1st New Style, 578; Habicht 1991, p. 15. centuryB.C. p.
116
bust of Athena similar to 182b (VB transitional)and 280a (VC). To judge from transitional-style the token, the transitionallate VB/early VC phase of the coinage had probablybeen completed alreadyby the end of Pius' reign in 161, which suggestsin turn that the VB coinage lasted beyond the end of Hadrian's rule in 138 into the 140's or I50's, leaving the mainstream VC issues to continue apparentlyinto the reign of MarcusAurelius.The exceptional scale and intensityof the concluding VC minting may suggest (on the model of the Period VI coinage, discussed below) emergencypreparationsfor defense against the invadingKostoboksin 170, if not coinage also for the repair of the damage at Eleusis they left behind.11 There is obviously much room here for futurechronologicalrefinement.For the present,the approximatechronologyof PeriodV appears as follows: PeriodVA earlier 120's PeriodVB mid/late 120'sto ca. 140's(or 150's) PeriodVC ca.(140's or) 150'sto ca. 175 The Lifeof Severus Augusta reports that Septimius Severus (A.D. 193-211) (3.7) in the Historia harboreda grudge against the people of Athens and upon becoming emperor revoked certain of This notice has been cited to explain an assumed cessation of minting at the start their privilegia. of his rule.12But since it now appears that the Period V coinage had run its course even before the joint reign of MarcusAureliusand Commodus in 177-180, Septimus'punishmentof Athens, if it had anything to do with coinage at all, at most could have deterred the resumptionof minting. The Athenians,in any case, again became accustomedto using old and ultimatelyextremelyworn bronzecoins, this time untilafterthe middleof the 3rdcenturywhen the immense PeriodVI coinage was put into production. The Period VI coinage was conceived fundamentallyas a revival of the Hadrianic-Antonine coinage: some new obverseand reversetypes and type variantswere created,but most types are the same. Many reversedies appearto have been copied, with variousdegreesof accuracy,directlyfrom VB and VC coins, some of which may have been worn and unclear in detail.13The reverselegend continuesto read A8HNAI9N on fractions,A9H.Most obverseand reversedies have a prominent or, the type (as opposed to PeriodV bordersthat were wreathed,dotted, or borderof dots surrounding omitted). The main, large-denominationcoin is slightly smaller,again, than its VC counterparts and is accompanied by only two smaller denominations,both of which are uncommon and may have been struck largely to legitimize the continuing circulationof worn Period V coins of like value. Finally,instead of being cast, the Period VI blanks were sawn from long, roughly cylindrical bars.14Rapid sawingproduceda number of coins of abnormalthicknessor thinnessand markedly divergentweights, even among coins struckfrom the same pair of dies. The blanks were heated before striking,and blobs of semimolten metal occasionallyadhered to a die to be transferredto the surfaceof the next coin struck(e.g., 284b, 299b, 318a, 343a, 350a). Strikingfaults are far more
"GreekConstruction 10, Rebuildingof Philon'sPorchand the Telesterionat Eleusis,"Boreas 1987, pp. 97-106; cf. idem, and Roman Rebuildingat Eleusis"(lecture,Cincinnati 1983),abstractin AJA88, 1984, pp. 262-263. 12 Kroll 1973, p. 323; Walker1980, pp. 251-252, 262-264. Cf. Hari, p. 24.
13 P. 126below.
"Roman 11On the Kostobok and damageat Eleusis,now see Clinton1989b,pp. 64-65; R. E Townsend, raid
Saw marksare visibleon 284g, 376a, Sv.84.30,85.41, and on many of the faulty,unusedblanksfrom the PeriodVI mint at the southwestcorner of the Agora;see Appendix B:IV and Plate 33.
14
CHRONOLOGY
117
common than in Period V, as are mistakesof die cutters,who turned out a few reverse dies with retrogradetypes (Sv.89.33, 34, 98.38-43) or with legends that are either retrogradeor abbreviated in some way due to miscalculationof space (see especially378). Rapid strikingwas facilitatedby the soft, cheapened bronze alloy,which contained an exceptionallyhigh admixtureof lead.15 Evidentlya hurried coinage, it was also of immense size and surprisingly compact. More than 800 obverse and reverse dies were used, as compared to slightly more than 700 for PeriodsVA, VB, and VC combined (TableIX, p. 332 below).While there were surelymany die engravers,they all seem to have been workingwithin a single tradition, without the often extreme differencesof style seen in Period VB. There is, accordingly,no evidence of stylisticdevelopment or of discrete stylisticsubgroupswithin the coinage. Nor is it possible to point to any type or variety as being either early or later in the coinage as a whole. Instead, the entire coinage is closely bound together by a complex matrix of die linkages,certain obverse dies being paired with as many as 15 to 20 reversedies, while a reversedie may be linkedwith up to 7 or 8 obversedies. This scrambleddie-box effect points to a single, compressedspace of miting that, despite the volume of dies and output, need not have lasted for more than a few years. That these are the years immediatelypreceding the catastrophicHerulian invasion of 267 is seen from the fresh condition of the many Period VI coins in hoards and other accumulations buried or lost at the time of the invasion. In addition to the two recordedHerulian-invasion finds from outside Athens, the 2,000-piece Eleusis 1902 hoard16and the 197-piece EasternAttica 1975 hoard,17a dozen hoards, dropped purses, and destructiondeposits connected with the disasterof 267 have been recoveredby excavatorsin the Agora.18While no two accumulationsare identical in composition, they collectivelygive a relativelycomplete picture of the money in circulationand savings at this time: mid-3rd-century"silver"antoniniani, mostly recent issues of Gallienus' sole reign (A.D. 260-268); some Roman sestertiiof the 2nd century and first half of the 3rd century; but primarilyAthenian imperialbronzesof PeriodsVB (extremely worn),VC (heavilyworn), and VI of (unwornand most plentiful).The representation virtuallyevery PeriodVI type in one or more of these recorded deposits confirms that the strikingof the coinage had been completed by the time of the barbarianattack,which happened to be responsiblealso for the destructionof the building in the southwestcorner of the Agora where the PeriodVI coinage had been struck(see Appendix B:IV).That the strikingprobablydid not commence beforeGallienusbecame sole emperorin 260 is suggestedby the comparableconditionof the PeriodVI bronzesand the antoninianiof Gallienusin the depositsof 267 and by the haste and intensityof the manufactureof the Athenian coins. Some of the Period VI pieces in the Herulian deposits have been damaged by corrosion and cleaning,especiallyby the redepositingof particlesof copperon the surfacesof the coins. The slightly dulled obverse relief on other hoard and deposit coins,19however,must be due to the wear of the obversedies;for the accompanyingreverses,havingbeen stampedfromdies thatwere changedmore
Analysesof four PeriodVI pieces (Caley,pp. 26-27, table IV,nos. 8-11) determinedthat lead made up 26.8 to 32.5 percent of their alloy. In contrast, the lead content of one PeriodVB specimen (ibid.,p. 43, table VII, no. 1) came to only 10.35 percent, and of a single VC piece (ibid., 26-27, table IV, no. 7) to 23.0 percent. pp. 16 Svoronos 1904; Kroll 1973, pp. 312-321, 329-333; Walker1980, pp. 146-147; Noe, no. 380. '7 A. Walker,"AHoard of Athenian ImperialBronzesof the Third CenturyA.D. from EasternAttica," CH 3, 1977, no. 95, pp. 40-48; Walker 1980, p. 147. Thirty-threecoins in this hoard are fresh antoniniani from the sole reign of Gallienus. 18 For a full list, see Walker 1980, pp. 46-47, 125-130. The most importantof these deposits are those listed below under B 17:1 and Q 19:3, pp. 303-304, 316. 19 Kroll 1973, pp. 315, 318.
15
118
frequently,are usually quite sharp. If allowance is made for the soft alloy and rapidityof striking, the Herulian deposit specimens seem not to have experienced any wear from circulation.Their condition is closely paralleledby specimensfrom the similarlylarge and hastilystruckFulminating Zeus issue of 87/6 B.C. (97) found in hoardsand debris from the Sullan sack of 86 B.C.20 As with the latterissue,we surelyhave to do here, too, with a crisiscoinage struckto help financethe resistanceof the city againstimminent attack. for In the 260's the new money was needed particularly the rebuilding,repair,and garrisoningof startedat the urging Athens' walls.A remarkof Zosimos (1.29.2-3) indicatesthat the refortification But of Valerianas early as 254, aftera seriousGermanicattempton Thessalonike.21 the workmust have continuedas long as time and money allowed.The wallsofEleusis were also strengthened,and the maintenance and provisioningof the garrison at Eleusis is now recognized to be the subject of a fragmentaryimperial letter from Gallienus,dated to 265.22 The emperor'spersonal interest in the military defense of Attica was surely a major reason for his visit to the city for a month in the fall of 264. Since the magnitude of the Period VI coinage requiresa period of production of a few years before its end in orjust before 267, it followsthat strikingprobablybegan in connection with this imperial visit.23Not that the emperor himself need have been personally involved with the organizationof a civic coinage. The first citizen of Athens at this time and the leading figure in the city's resistanceagainst the Herulii was the antiquarianand writer of history P. Herennius to If Dexippus.24 the PeriodVI coinage is to be attributed the initiativeof any one individual,thereis no better candidatethan this patrioticAthenianworthy. A few moderatelyworn PeriodVI coins from post-267 Agora contexts attest that these pieces continued in circulationfor a short time after the Herulian sack, until the increasinginflation of the 3rd centurydrovethem out of use.25
DENOMINATIONALVALUES Unlike the bronze coins of Hellenistic Athens, whose types and size both played a part in the identificationof denominations, the denominationsof Athens' imperial coins were distinguished by size alone. One denomination was struck in Period VA, four in VB, and three each in VC and VI, although in these last two phases the two smallermodules were minted in relativelyslight quantities.The distribution,averageweight, and normal range of diametersof the denominations are presented in Table VIII (p. 331 below), where each of the modules is identified with one of the four bronze denominationsattestedin the Hadrianicor earlyAntonine property-taxinscription IG II2 2776.26This crucialtext recordssums in denariiand four local Athenian subdivisionsof the
the the denarius: drachm of thedenarius), hemidrachm the obol(6), andthe hemiobol (h). (L), (g
The readycorrespondencebetween the fourunitsof value of this systemand the four modulesof the reasonenough contemporarybronze coinage is, in the absenceof any more plausibleinterpretation, the PeriodV moduleswith the drachm/obol units of the inscription. for identifying
20 Pp. 69-70 above. 21 On the literaryand archaeological XXIV pp. 1, 1 ;J.J. Wilkes, documentationfor Athens'ValerianWall,see Agora 187-192. in Greek "CivilDefence in Third-CenturyAchaia," RenJssane, pp. 22 D. Armstrong,"Gallienusin Athens, 264," ZPE 70, 1987 (pp. 235-258), pp. 246-251. 23 Ibid., 251, followingWalker1980, pp. 248-251. p. 24 For whom, see Millar 1969, pp. 12-29. 25 Walker1980, pp. 130-131, 133. 26 Pp. 83-84 above.
DENOMINATIONAL VALUES
119
A second Athenian inscription,IG II2 1368, of A.D. 175/627 refers to the bronze drachms as to "light"drachms,XexCoiU any Bp(aXVcal), avoid, apparently, confusionwith silverdrachms.Within the 2nd-century context of the inscription, silver drachms would have been denarii, which were x commonly known as 'Axrtxal pacXaltthroughoutthe Roman East.28But if bronze drachmswere first introduced into the Athenian monetary system in the 80's B.C.,as proposed in the preceding chapter,the term XentxoibSpacXji probablygoes back to that time as well, before the denariushad ousted the drachm as the standard silver coin of Athens.29 Indeed, the entire system evidenced by IG II2 2776 seems to have been created in stages during the 1st century B.C., remained intact throughoutthe 1stcentury of our era, and was simplytaken over by the PeriodV imperials. The key denominationhere is the second imperialunit, the bronze hemidrachmof 18-22 mm. and 5.40 g., which was the same size as the basiclate PeriodIV reducedAE 1 unit that stilldominated the circulatingbronze coinage at the time when the PeriodVB imperialsbegan. With the creation of the larger VB bronze drachm, the importance of the old AE 1 hemidrachm faded, however, and before the end of Period VB, minting of this denominationwas discontinued. Hemidrachms from Periods IV and VB remained in circulationas late as the mid-3rd century,as one sees from Deposits B 17:1A and Q 19:3 and from a number of worn Period IV pieces that were punched with cavitieson one side to make them appearlike worn imperials;30 it is possiblethat some of and the heavier hemidrachmseventuallypassed as drachms after the diameter of the latter had been reducedin PeriodVI. At any rate therecan be no mistakingthat the new drachmquicklybecame the main denomination of the Athenian imperialbronze alreadyin Period VB and that it underwent a progressivesize and weight reduction with each new phase of minting. Another, more abrupt reductionhad occurredearlierin the Athena/Owl hemiobolsafterthe largerimperialdenominations began to be struckin PeriodVB; for the type continuitybetween the largerAthena/Owl pieces of VA (162-167) and the smallerones of VB and C (226-231) makes it extremelydoubtful that the reductionin module could have involvedan accompanyingchange in denominationalvalue. Athens' idiosyncratic 2nd-century denominational system is not easily compatible with the conventional Roman system, in which the denarius is divided into 16 bronze asses. It has been observed that at certain times and places in the eastern part of the empire, local bronze assaria seem to have been tariffed at 18 to the denarius and that, if the bronze drachms, hemidrachms, obols, and hemiobols of Athens had to be readily convertibleinto assaria, an assarion tariffedat ofa denariuswould give them direct equivalenciesof 3, 1?, and l assariarespectively.31 This 2, neat although conjecturalreconciliationof the Athenian and the Roman systemshas not met with general acceptance,however;and it is more likelythat the Athenian and the Roman bronze systems functioned separately: at Athens the denariuswas divided into 6 bronze drachms, while Roman bronze coins would have been accepted at their own rate of exchange. It follows in any case that, within Athens, the Athenian imperialswere highly overvaluedin terms of the as/assarion,32which probablyexplainswhy they are so seldom found outsideAttica.33
27 A. J. Notopoulos, "Studiesin the ChronologyofAthens under the Empire,"Hesperia 1949 (pp. 1-57), pp. 29, 51. 18, 28 See note 67 above, p. 15. 29 See pp. 83-84, 90-91 above. 30 See note 197 above, p. 94. 31 Walker 1980, pp. 166-168; A. S. Walker,"16 or 18 Assaria,Drachmai and Denarii in Mid Second Century A.D. Numismatic Athens,"Israel 6-7, 1982-1983, pp. 142-174. Journal 32 Cf. 91 above. p. 33 Walker(1980, p. 149) mentions the few specimensfrom Boiotia, Corinth, Kenchreai,Isthmia, Olympia, Knossos, and Poitiers,but he notes (p. 170)that all but one or two are fromPeriodVI, as one might have predictedfromthe size of this final coinage, which may have been the largestsingle issue of coinage ever struckin Roman ImperialGreece.
120
of retained Althoughthe drachm/obol nomenclature the 2nd-centuryimperialswas presumably in PeriodVI, the same probablydid not applyto the value of the coins in Roman silver,which by the mid-3rd century had become extremelydebased. The Period VI drachmsare comparablein size to a number of contemporaryGallienan bronze issues from other mints in Greece; at Sparta and Nikopolis and for the Thessalian League such coins were produced with denominationalmarks, most commonly A for 4 assaria,34 showing that they were valued at a quarterof a denarius.One suspectsthat the value of the PeriodVI drachmshad risento a similarlevel of about 4 to the denarius, instead of 6 as earlier. ICONOGRAPHY the Numismatically, most unusualaspectof the Athenianimperialsis the omissionof the portraitand of the currentemperor.Such omissionis not altogetherwithoutparallelon contemporary inscription civic coinages, for other cities did strikeissues on which one finds the head of some figure (Roma, the Senate, the Boule, Demos, or a local god or hero) other than the emperor. But these issues, conventionallyknown as pseudo-autonomousissues, normally made up only a small part of the coinage of any city, which consisted for the most part of imperial portrait coins; and they are usually restricted to the smaller denominations.35Although they prove that it was not legally obligatoryfor a coin to bear the emperor'simage, they remain minor exceptions in a world that had come to accept and prefer (presumablywith strongencouragementfrom the Roman authorities36)the image as an expressionof respect and authorityon coinage in general. Even some of which originallystruckwithout the portraitin earlyJulio-Claudiantimes (p. 88 the ciitatesliberae, above),adopted it sooner or later: Rhodes for the firsttime under Nero, Spartaregularlybeginning with Claudius,Tyre under SeptimiusSeverus.Only Athens, Chios, and PisidianTermessos(which may have struckone smallJulio-Claudianissue, RPC I, 3514) held out to the end. All three cities were free, and this may be explanationenough for the exceptionalcoinagesof Chios and Termessos. But at Athens it is possible to go furtherand identify the attitudes that would have resisted any change in the autonomous characterof the city coinage: a proud historicalconsciousnessand a nostalgicconservatismthat ran more deeply here than anywhereelse in the Greekworld. The initial Athena/Owl hemiobols of Period VA, which imitate Athens' 5th-centuryB.C. owl silver,revealjust how sentimentalthe Athenianshad become about the cherishedtraditionsof their ancient coinage. As the intellectual center of the Greek world, the city had become, in fact, a hotbed of learned archaizingconceits.Under the subtitle Athens and the Re-creationof Antiquity," E. L. Bowie has written several amusing pages on the antiquariandreamworldinhabited by the wealthy intellectualsof 2nd-centuryAthens and their obsessiveinfatuationwith the past glories of Hellas.37Therein would seem to be the main impetus for continuing the head of Athena on the
Sparta (4, 6, and 8 assaria): Grunauer,pp. 94-96 (Valerianand Gallienus);Nikopolis (4 [see 563 below] and 8 assaria):Oikonomidou,pp. 33 and 188 (Gallienus,sole reign);ThessalianLeague (3 and 4 assaria):Rogers,pp. 53-57 (Valerianthrough Gallienusand Salonina).On the increasein the value of bronze and the mid-3rd-centurymonetary crisisin general, see Howgego, pp. 65-73; Harl, pp. 19-20; Burnett, CRW,pp. 111-114. 35 See GreekImperials," ANSMA 30, 1985, pp. 89-112; Burnett, A.Johnson, "The So-called 'Pseudo-Autonomous' nea del dimenticato storia Senato Roman,"Memorie 83-84; G. Forni, "IEPAe EEOC CTNKAHTOC,Un capitolo CRW,pp. di R della AccademiaNazionaleLincei VIII.v, 1953, pp. 49-168; and, especially,RPCI, pp. 15, 33, 41-42. 36 RPC I, pp. 37, 53. 37 E. L. Bowie, "Greeksand Their Past in the Second Sophistic,"PastandPresent 1970 (pp. 3-41; reprintedin 46, M. I. Finley,ed., London 1974 [pp. 166-209]), pp. 28-35. The name of Herodes Atticusrecurs Studies Ancient in Societ, throughoutBowie'sessay like a leitmotif.
34
ICONOGRAPHY
121
imperial coinage, even as the coinage was otherwisemodernized through contemporarytrends in style and type variation.On a symboliclevel, the traditionalAthena heads served as an affirmation of Athens' unique culturaland historicalpreeminence among all cities of antiquityand her claim, widely accepted by all educated Greeks and Romans, to have been the cradle of civilization.38 Given this recognition,there is somethingalmostinevitableabout the revivaland maintenanceof an ancient traditionof coinage in which Rome historically had no place.39As men of culture,Hadrian, the Antonine emperors,and Gallienuswould have appreciatedthis as much as any Greek. The obverseAthenas of PeriodsVB-VI wear either an Attic or, more commonly,a Corinthian helmet. Pick argued that these two general types respectivelyrepresentedAthena Parthenosand Athena Promachos,40 apartfrom the fact that the kind of helmet worn by the Promachosstatue but is unknown, the great number of variationsin helmet and bust/head designs imply that the die engraversborrowedfrom many sources,includingthe minor arts, often eclectically.41 Until a die study of the complex PeriodV coinage is completed, only a few generalitiesabout its varied obverse types and styles can be offered here. Beginning in VA, the head of Athena wears a simple Attic helmet in the fashion of 5th-centuryAthenian coins (P1. 15:162a-164a). In VB the representationchanges to a bust, usually with a Corinthian helmet and a small head so that considerableareas of the shoulder and chest, normally wearing an aegis, can be shown. On smallerdenominationsone can distinguishbetween a phase of finely designed busts (Pls. 16:186a190, 17:198-201) and a phase of more coarsely cut ones (Pls. 16:191a-197e, 17:202a-208a). On drachmsthe busts tend to be quite tall and elaborate (P1. 16:169a, 170, 174a, 181a, 182a, 183a185a), but there is one contemporarybust with a larger head wearing a Corinthian helmet with very slight drapery at the neck or shoulderline (P1. 16:172a; Sv. 82.1, 2). Later,or "transitional", VB drachm obverses,although simplified,continue the latter design with large (PI. 16:171a, 175a, 178a, 179a, 182c)or smallerheads (P1.16:182b).These simplifiedbustswith their negligibledrapery become in turn the primaryobversetypes of VC. While full bustscontinue in VC (P1.18:248a,253, 257a, 261a, 269a), they usually were avoided, as they were in Period VI, because of the greater demands in execution. Plate 19:280b-283d illustratesa run of typical mainstreamVC obversesat their most monotonous.42 Like the obverses, the many reversesof the developed coinage emphasize ancient Athenian traditions.The types are mostly of deities and heroes as they were depicted in celebratedAthenian statuesof the 5th and 4th centuriesB.C.The rosterof types createdfor the first developed coinage, early PeriodVB, is of interestfor its size alone:
and See C. Habicht,Hellenistic Athens HerPhilosophers MagieLecture1988),Princeton1989, pp. 20-21, (David decreeof ca. 120 B.c. (FdD ii, no. 69); Cicero(proFlacco Plutarch quotingan Amphictionic 345 HI, 62); (Moralia F), Athenaios PlinytheYounger (Lettrs 8.14.2); (15.691D);andSt.Augustine ofGod18.9). (Cit 39 Millar(1969,p. 21) notesanother and into the proofof Athenian pride: "Therise of provincial local families Romanaristocracy of courseone of the greatthemesof Imperial is Athensprovides of a different history. examples the over sometimes centuries, a prominent over of phenomenon, maintenance generations, in position the intellectual andpolitical of thecitybyfamilies life whosemembers couldeasily havesought Romanoffice, whodidnotchooseto but do so. Therewasa realsensein whichAthensremained capital, a provincial a not city."
40 38
41 Lacroix, 285-286;see note64 below, 124.The helmetof AthenaPolias pp. was,however, see p. Corinthian; p. 53 above.
42 Obverse types other than a head or bust of Athena occur on certain VB and C hemiobols: a bust of Theseus with a club over his shoulder (232-241); a bust of Asklepios(paired only with the Telesphorosreverse: 242); a bust of Demeter or Kore (243, 244); a young male bust wearinga wreath (245, 246); and a boukranion (247).
122
Athena Parthenos(169-171)43 VelletriAthena holding Nike (172)44 Athena running,pointing (Sv.85.4, cf. 310 [VI]) Athena facing olive tree (173) Contest of Athena and Poseidon,olive tree between them (174)45 Triptolemosin chariot(198) Triptolemosin chariotbetween Demeter and Kore (177) Demeter enthroned(186) Kore holding two torchesdownwards(187) Iakchosholding torch (188)46 Dionysos Eleuthereusenthronedbeforethymiaterionon a table (176)47
Apollo Patroos (191)48
Heraklesherm holding cornucopia(Sv.95.6, 7)49 Theseus leading the Marathonianbull to King Aigeus (Sv.95.23, 24) Theseus drivingthe Marathonianbull (180) Theseus raisingrock at Troizen(181)50 Theseus and Minotaur "boxing"(Sv.96.30-36) Theseus strikingat Minotaur(189, 200, 201) Theseus (or Herakles)holding phiale (199) Themistoklescarryingtrophyon ship (182, 183)51
43 Lacroix,pp. 266-281, especiallypp. 277-278, pls. 23, 24, has the best discussionof the numismaticevidencefor this statue (LMC II, p. 1031, pls. 729-730:220, 221). The Parthenoscontinued as the most common type in PeriodsVC (248-250) and, frequentlywith variantdetailsintroducedby the die engravers,VI (284-294). 44 Forthe statue type, L/MC II, p. 1033,pl. 733:247. 45 and NCP, pp. 130-131,pl. Z (relatedrepresentations brief discussion). 46 The hemidrachm reverses, 186, 187, and 188, employed with shared obverse dies, were designed together as an Eleusinianset. Collectively,they may representPraxiteles'group of Demeter, Kore, and Iakchos that was seen by Pausanias(1.2.4) near the Pompeion in the Kerameikos(NCP, p. 140, no. 5b). See I. N. Svoronos, I<parLetXous: type is of K6pr}xac IaxXO<ev AO9vcalS>, ApXEpl1911,pp. 39-52. The common Triptolemos-in-chariot A7nLTrlp, course a throwbackto the Eleusinianbronze coinage of the 4th and 3rd centuriesB.C.(3840, 48, 49, 51, 55). 47 It has been universallyassumed that this is the chryselephantinestatue of Dionysos sculptured, according to Pausanias(1.20.3),by the 5th-centurysculptorAlkamenes.The temple that housed the image, however,was not erected beforethe middle of the 4th century(J. Travlos,PictoialDictionary Anient Athns, New York/Washington1971, p. 537). of The statue is pictured without the table and incense burner on the New Style silver of Diokles-Diodoros(New Style, nos. 1269, 1270). p. 390, pl. 142, 48 The statue XIV, pp. 136-139, II, pl. 69. by Euphranor:LLMC p. 145, pls. 184, 185:39;Agora 49 Forthis statue in stone, see LMCIV,p. 783, 524:1163-1166. pl. type 50 180 and 181 ought to depict statuegroups that Pausaniassaw on the Akropolis(1.27.8-10), although for the bull dedication, see H. A. Shapiro, "The MarathonianBull on the Athenian Akropolis,"AJA 92, 1988, pp. 373-382. A third Akropolisgroup, Theseus fighting the Minotaur (Pausanias 1.24.1), must be representedby one of the several differentreversetypes depictingthis event. 51 Pausanias (1.36.1) mentionsa trophyof Themistokles'victoryon Salamisand goes on to say that a snakeappeared among the ships during the battle. In NCP (p. 153) it is implied that this Salamis trophy might be the Themistokles monument of the coins, since some VB dies show a snake on the ram of the ship. But the monument is much too elaboratefor a battle trophyand would have requireda long, rectangularbase, whereas the probable remains of the base (P. W. Wallace, "Psyttaleiaand the Trophies trophy on Salamis show that it rested on a ca. 1.80-meter-square of Salamis,"AJA73, 1969 [pp.293-303], pp. 301-303). The coins probablydepict anothermonument to Themistokles, not necessarilyone of those recorded in extant literatureand listed by G. M. A. Richter, ThePortraits theGreeks,st of ed., London 1965, pp. 97-98. On the other hand, the trophy on Salamis may be representedin the trophy-on-prow symbol of the silver issue of Themisto-Theopompos (NewStle, pp. 221-225, pls. 62, 63, nos. 596-610, 117/6 B.C. [Morkholm1984]). For the 5th-centuryB.C.statueof Themistoklesat Magnesia, see 926.
ICONOGRAPHY
123
Miltiadeswith captive Persianand trophy(190)52 Agonistic table with prizes (184, 192-194)53 Owl in olive tree, with or without amphora(195, 196, 211) Owl on amphora(197) Round altar on base next to olive tree (202)54 Rectangularaltarbetween olive trees (203)55 Akropolisviewed from the north and west (Sv.98.19-20, cf. 280 [VC])56 Boukranion(185). Five furthertypes were introducedlater in the transitional phase of PeriodVB: Zeus sacrificingat altar(175)57 Demeter and Kore standing(178) HeraklesFarnese(179)58 Goddess (Demeter?)seated on rock (204)59 Nike (207). Veryfew of these VB typesare knownfrommore than one or two reversedies. The concentration of early VB types concerning the Eleusiniandeities and Theseus is notable and should possiblybe
Two Athenian monumentsof Miltiadesare known. One was the monument at Marathonmentioned by Pausanias (1.32.4) as being separatefrombut near the famousMarathontrophyof white marble(forwhich, see E. Vanderpool,"A Monument to the Battle of Marathon,"Hesperia 1966, 93-106). The other was a statue group of Miltiades and 35, a Persianin the Theater of Dionysos; scholia to Ailios Aristides(W.Dindorf, Arstides Leipzig 1829, pp. 535-536) III, explain that the statues of Themistoklesand Miltiadesin the theater were each paired with a Persianprisoner.Since it is unlikely that the coins would give a conflation of two widely separatedmonuments, the monument on the coins mustbe the more importantone at Marathon,as the trophyindicates.The statuein the theaterwas probablya copy of it. Since the armed general with Persianis positioned at the left of most reversesbut in mirror image at the right on a variant die (Sv. 97.32), Richter ([note 51 above, p. 122], pp. 96, 98) naively thought that the coins show two statue groups,thereforethe groups of Miltiadesand Themistoklesin the theater. 53 The prize table was a popular reversetype in the coinages of other Greek cities duringthe 2nd and 3rd centuries after Christ; L. Anson, Numismata I, graeca London 1911, nos. 328-330, 690-740, 750-773, 779, 781, 943-947 gives a useful compendium. The standardAthenian VB type (184) is continued in Period VC (281, 282 = Sv. 58-61) and Period VI (386-400 = Sv. 91.1-45), when, however,the dies of some tables are inscribedwith the name of an Attic festival: AAPIANEIA (396), EAEVCINEIA (397, 398), OAVMnlIA (399), nANAOHNEA (400), and nlANEAAHNIA On all these Period V and VI tables, the standardthree prizes are wreath, model owl, and model (Sv. 91.43, 44). bust of Athena in Corinthian helmet. On the VB hemiobols 192 = Sv. 91.46, 47, the Athena bust is replaced by a marbleVarvakion Athena standingAthena with shieldat her side, apparentlya model Parthenos,like the ca. 1-meter-tall (LIMCII, pl. 729:220). 54 The caption to Sv. 87.38-40 identifiesthis scene as the "fountain"and olive tree of the Erechtheion(Pausanias 1.26.5 and 27.2). The cylindricaldrum certainlylookslike a wellheadsince it restson a wide base, and thejuxtaposition with the olive tree is suggestive,but can the threetonguesrisingfromthe cylinderon Sv.87.40 be interpretedas spraysor jets of water? It is highly doubtful,as such tongues were commonly employed on coins to representflames on an altar (e.g., the cylindricalflaming altar before Athena on 337 and before the temple of Divine Julius on Crawford,RRC, no. 540). The base of the round altar here possiblywas enlargedto give a clear orientationto the coin type. 55 See p. 56 above. 56 Showing the steps of the PanathenaicWay;the Cave of Pan, occasionallywith what seems to be a statueof the god within it (P.J. Riss, "A Colossal Athenian Pan," ActaArchaeologica 1974 [pp. 124-133], pp. 130-131); the gabled 45, fa9adeof the Propylaia; statueof Athena Promachos(note 64 below,p. 124),usuallyon a base; and the nonperipteral the Erechtheion with east porch. On the earliest dies (Sv. 98.19, 20) the east end of the Akropolisis surmountedby an owl. Compare 280 = Sv. 98.21-29 (VC)and the less dependablePeriodVI reversedies (375, Sv. 98.30-36), including one that was cut retrograde(Sv. 98.37-43). Discussion and bibliography:NCP, pp. 128-129; Pick 1931, pp. 63-70; Lacroix,pp. 281-286; Price and Trell,pp. 75-78. 57 See pp. 55-56 above. 58 Forthe IV, prototype:LUMC pp. 762-764, pl. 493, nos. 681-726. 59 NCP, p. 152, for the total uncertainty surroundingthe identificationof this type.
52
124
understood in light of Hadrian's initiation and patronage at Eleusis60and his massive building program at Athens that made him a second founder of Athens and a New Theseus.61 Beyond documenting monuments to these heroes, the reversesdepicting Miltiades and Themistoklesunderscorethe importanceof Marathonand Salamisin the civic consciousnessof Roman Athens.The theatricalcharacterof both monumentgroupssuggeststhat the sculptural prototypesmay have been Hellenisticor even Roman in date. In Period VC, the repertoryof major reverse types62was enriched with the introductionof additionaldesigns: Athena fighting(253) Athena of the ParthenonEast Pediment(254-256)63 Athena standing,shield on left arm and holding spear in right hand (257)64 Athena in chariot(210, 260) Athena and Marsyas(262)65 Zeus Olympios (263)66
Hadrian and Eleusis: Clinton 1989a, pp. 1516-1525, 1537-1538; and Clinton 1989b. Renaissance 10-16), pp. 10-11. See A. Adams, "The Arch of Hadrianat Athens,"in Greek (pp. 62 Severalminor obol and hemiobol have not been included,since it is uncertainwhether they are VB or VC. types 63 This Athena rushing to the right is similarto the Athena on the Madrid Puteal (LIMCII,pl. 749:373), which is widely believed to representthe missing figureson the ParthenonEast Pediment. NCP, pp. 129-130 notes a general similarityas well to the Athena of the West Pediment, insofar as she is known from the Carrey drawing (LIMCII, pl. 731:234). But the West PedimentAthena moves to the left, and there is no reason why a PeriodV die cutter,having chosen a model, would have reversedits orientation. 64 The identityof thisfigurehas occasionedmuch debate,chieflybecauseit is one of the most common of all Athenian imperialreverse types (althoughit does not appear until after Period VB) and thus might be thought to representan importantmonument.It has been consideredPheidias'colossalAthena Promachosand equatedwith the Athena Medici pl. (NCP,p. 128; caption to Sv., 86; and in other workscited by Lacroix,p. 284, note 2). But whether its relationto the Athena Medici is maintained (P. Chamoux, "Le type de la Minerve Ingres,"BCH 58-59, 1944-1945, pp. 227-229) Kunst Beiheft 15, 1988, or rejected (E. B. Harrison, "Lemniaand Lemnos: Sidelightson a Pheidian Athena," Antike the identificationwith the Promachosis impossible.On the reversesdepicting the Akropolis(280: see pp. 101-107), note 56 above,p. 123),the colossalstatuefacingwest towardsthe Propylaiais shownwith rightarm extended, holdinga Nike, and, on the earlier and best die or dies (Sv. 98.19, 20), with the left arm holding a spear and shield that rest on the ground. Colossalsize, positionbetween the Erechtheionand Propylaia,and orientationmake it clear that, despite in the close similarities schema, this is not the Parthenos.As Lacroix(pp. 283-286, with pls. 24, 25) correctlyconcluded in a judicious and fully documented discussion,the Promachosand Parthenoswere apparentlyvery similarin general reversesdo not give enough detailto establishhow the form, and the miniaturerenderingsof the formeron the Akropolis two images may have differed.It is by no means certain,for example,that the Promachoswore a Corinthianhelmet, as Pick (1931) proposed. In light of the Period V coins showing the Akropolis,one is obliged to reject all other reverse Athenas that have been claimed as the Promachos,such as 172, 298-300, the Veletri Athena (note 44 above, p. 122); the Period VI 297= Sv. 83.24-28 (Pick);and the PeriodVI 301 = Sv. 84.1-7 (Price and Trell, p. 76, fig. 132). The very similarityof the Parthenosand the Promachosmay explainwhy the latterseems not to appearindependentlyon the coinage. 65 The statuegroupby Myron on the Akropolis; Lacroix,pp. 252-254; H. A. Weis,"The 'Marsyas' Myron: Old of see that the reversedposition of Problemsand New Evidence,"AJA83, 1979, pp. 214-219, where it is not appreciated error. Athena and Marsyason a PeriodVI reverseis an engraver's 66 As Pheidias'statueat statuein Hadrian'scompleted Olympieion Olympia,but this shouldbe the chryselephantine that would have been copied from it (Lacroix,p. 266). It is uncertainwhether the Seated Zeus reverse in Period VI a (one die: 356) was intended to replicatethe VC reverse,for it is not a seriouscopy at all: Zeus is seated to the righton that this was the Zeus on the stool rather than on a throne and holds an eagle instead of a Nike. Svoronos thought Tou ParthenonEast Pediment(<<DGECd HIap0ev6Svo,>,JL4N 1912 (pp. 193-339), p. 273), but as the MadridPuteal 14, suggests(note 63 above), the ParthenonZeus held a thunderboltat his side. The Period VI Zeus appears in fact to
61
60
ICONOGRAPHY
125
Demeter standing(266)67 Eirene holding Ploutos (267)68 EarlyClassicalnude Apollo holding branch and bow (269)69 Nude Apollo sightingalong arrow(270)70 Young Heraklessacrificing(272) Theseus subduingfallen Minotaur(276) Asklepios(277). Kephisodotos' statue of Eirene and Ploutos may have been introducedbecause of its topical relevance to the peace and prosperity of the Antonine regime. In this connection it could be significantthat the Eirene and Ploutos was one of the three Period VC types not repeated in the PeriodVI coinage.71Might it have been judged too inappropriate the troubled260's? for to achieve the greatest possible richness in iconographical variety, the Period VI Designed coinage involved more than a dozen differentkinds of obverseAthena heads and busts, including one wearinga Roman maskedcavalryhelmet (401a) and a left-facingbust with a shield and spearat the shoulder(314a, 322a), and at least forty-sevendifferentbasic reversetypes, of which twenty-one are entirelynew: Fifteen entirelynew Athena types (296, 297, 301-304,72 305, 306, 308, 309, 311, 316, Sv.85.41,42 [runningleft], Sv.87.6, 7 [droppingballotin urn]) 317,334-338,348,349, Zeus standingwith perpendicularleft arm (unpublished)73 Hermes (358,359) Apollo Lykeios(363, 364)74 Artemiswith torches(370) Theater of Dionysos (376) Owl, olive tree, amphora,and palm (377-385).
have been copied from a silver coin of Alexander the Great, which might have been thought by the Period VI die cutter to show the Zeus of Olympia and thus of the Olympieion. 67 The caption to Sv. 92.22, 23 identifiesthe divinity as Hera, but the image is clearly the same Demeter shown next to Kore on 178. 68 The statue by Kephisodotos;see Lacroix,pp. 295-297. 69 Assumed by some to be the statue of Apollo Alexikakosby Kalamis (Pausanias 1.3.4); LIMC II, p. 217, pl. 206, no. 281. 70 The Vienna of specimen(althoughnot the illustration it in Sv. [Sv.95.10]) showsthe shaftthat the deity holds up for in his left hand; and from the Berlinspecimen(althoughthis again is not clearfrom the photographpublished inspection by Svoronos, Sv. 95.12) one sees that the god's right hand hanging at his side holds a doubly curved bow in a nearly vertical position. Accordingly,on the ticketsin the Vienna and Berlin trays the figure is correctlyclassifiedas Apollo (ratherthan Theseus [so BMC,p. 105, no. 759] or Hermes [soNCP,p. 149, whence Sv.,pl. 95]). Foran identicallyposed figurewithout preservedattributes,see the statuein EarlyClassicalstyle known as "Stephanos'Athlete"and the similar nude male in the so-called Orestes and ElektraGroup (B. S. Ridgway,TheSevere in Greek Syle Princeton 1970, Sculture, pp. 135-137, figs. 174, 175). On the evidence of the coins, the Stephanosfigureshouldprobablybe identifiedas Apollo. 71 The otherswere the standingDemeter (266) and Apollo (270). A few of the more complicatedPeriodVB typesalso do not reappearin PeriodVI: 177, 178, 190, and Sv. 95.23, 24. 72 N. Eschbach (Statuen des aufpanatenischn Preisamphoren 4. Jhs. v. Chr.,Mainz am Rhein 1986, p. 124) compares a statueknown from a Panathenaicamphoraof 336/5 (ibid., 109-110, 113, pl. 28:1, no. 63) with 301 = Sv. 84.1-7, pp. although on the latter,Athena wears an Attic, not a Corinthian,helmet and holds a spear rather than a stylis in her left hand. 73 See note 91 above, p. 55, and pp. 56-58, where the image is identifiedas the cult statueof Zeus Soter-Eleutherios. On the PeriodVI die, thereis no altarbeforethe image;cf. earlierrepresentations the statueon coins (78-80 and 148). of 74 LMC II, p. 217, pl. 206, no. 281. The statue is also depicted on the New Style silver of Epigenes-Xenon (New Style, 383, pl. 139, nos. 1237-1240; see under 121 above,p. 96). p.
126
Besides these new types, the Period VI penchant for diversityled to the creation of a great number of type variants,such as the otherwiseidenticalagonistic-tablereversesthat are separately inscribedwith the namesof Athens'fivemajorathleticfestivals(note53 above,p. 123),and seemingly endless versions of Athena Parthenos,including one holding an owl instead of a Nike (293) and another with an owl rather than a snake at her feet (292). On a Period VI die (357) an eagle was gratuitouslyadded to the wrist of the sacrificingleft arm of the Standing Zeus, although, as confirmedby the representationon the VB die (175), the wrist of the statue must have been bare. What all this means of course is that the Period VI die engraverswere not above "improving" on the statue types they reproduced,sometimes because they were copying from other coins and did not know the prototypes at first hand, at other times because variety or speed in execution could be more importantto them than representational accuracy. Fidelityto sculpturalprototypes can regularlybe expected only in the more deliberateand conscientiousdie cutting of PeriodsVB and C. In the followingcatalogue,the varietiesare arrangedwithin each period and denominationby reversesubjects,beginningwith Athena, followedby other gods and goddesses,heroesand historical figures, and finally miscellaneoustypes. Reversesare presented whenever possible with the most common varietyfirst, followedby all variantsrepresentedin the Agora collection. No attempthas been made to give a variety number to every known variant or to legend variantsthat are unique to single dies. Owing to the heavily worn condition of most Period VB and C drachms from the fine condition of the many PeriodVI drachmsthat were hoarded excavationsand the contrastingly or lost during the Herulian invasion of 267, the 2nd-centuryvarieties could not be illustratedso fully as the 3rd-centuryones. Die positions are loose in all phases of the coinage and are not recorded.
CATALOGUE
PERIOD VA
162
Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet; helmet bowl ornamented with two or three upright olive leaves and, usually,a curved tendril ending in a blossom;border of dots. 13-16 Av.2.38 (10) 14 2.02 14 2.50
AIE Owl stg. r.; to 1., olive twig with two leaves and berry;border of dots.
Sv. 88.24, 25
CATALOGUE Similar. 163 *a *b *c *d *e *f 200 coins BB-18 E-2122 KTA-51 AA-256 S-5021 OA-125 13-16 Av. 2.25 (78) 15 2.33 1.89 15 14 2.01 15 2.43 14 2.83 14 2.57 Similar,except AOH. Sv. 88.23, 26
127
Sv. 88.27
Sv. 88.28
Similar head of Athena or bust of Athena wearing Corinthian helmet and aegis; border of dots. 166 *a 12 coins Br'-281 14-16 Av. 3.22 (11) 16 2.99
rev. at 1. inscribeddownwards,flA, ITA or TTA (?);found with 5 illegible pre-imperialcoins in a floor layer of the earlier 2nd century after Christ
*b 00-270
15
1.75
Similar head or bust of Athena r. 167 16 coins *a 8-499 *b AA-178 *c NN-1334 14-17 Av. 3.01 (15) 15 2.78 14 3.22 15 3.08
Sv. 88.31-34
Ale-H or A-OlH Triptolemos seated 1., in winged chariot drawn by two serpents;border of dots.
Sv. 94.7-12
168
4 coins
128
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST PERIOD VB
ca. 120's-140s orlater Christ after DRACHMS Bust of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet; some busts fully draped ("elaborate") and armored with aegis, other busts with little or ("transitional") no drapery at the shoulder line; either wreathed or no border. 169 *a 6 coins T-18 24-26 25 Av. 7.66 (4) 10.32 AeH-NA-IWN Athena Parthenosstg. 1., holding Nike in outstretchedr. hand and resting 1. hand on shield to r.; between Athena and shield, coiled snake and spear; at 1., boukranion;border of dots. Sv. 82.1-4
Sv.-
Similar,but transitionalbust with slight drapery;border of dots. 171 *a 3 coins H'-2817 24-25 24 Av.6.72 (3) 5.46
AeH-NA-IWN Athena Parthenosstg. 1., as last; to 1., coiled snake; border of dots.
Sv. 82.29-31
Similar. [169-171] 11 coins. Bust of Athena r., of elaborate or transitionaltype; wreathed or dotted border.
Sv. 83.29-32; AOH-NAI-WNor AeHNAI-WN NCP, Z:xxii Athena, wearing Corinthian helmet, aegis, and long dress, stg. r.; holding spear with point downwardsin upraisedr. hand and Nike in outstretched1.;border of dots.
172 *a
8 coins 00-1506
24-25 25
Sv. 87.15-17 AeH-NAIWN Athena stg. 1., holding transversespear with r. hand and resting 1. on hip; at r., oval shield and snake; at 1., snake and olive tree with owl perching in branches;border of dots.
173
P-185
25
9.54
CATALOGUE Similar,but wreathed border. AlelH or Ale-H or AeHN-AI At center, olive tree, with owl in branches and snake entwined around trunk;at 1., Poseidon, half nude, stridingr., brandishingtrident in upraised r. hand; at r., Athena moving 1., extending r. hand toward tree and holding spear and shield with 1.;border of dots.
174 *a
2 coins IIII-575
24-25 24
7.90(1) 7.90 AEHNAI-UJ-NZeus stg., nude, to r., holding thunderboltat side with r. hand and sacrificing with 1. hand turned downwards over low altar at r.; border of dots. Sv. 92.5, 6; NCP, BB:iii
175
2 coins *a II-243
23-24 24
4.85(1) 4.85 AeHNA or AeHNAI-WN Bearded Dionysos, wearing crown of ivy leaves and elaborate robes, seated r. on high-backedthrone; resting r. hand on knee and holding long thyrsoswith 1.;at r., low table bearing burning thymiaterion; border of dots.
176 *a
3 coins r-404
22-25 25
Av.4.80(2) 5.19 AeHNAIWN At center, Triptolemosstg. 1., holding long torch, in chariot drawn by two snakes to 1.;at 1., Demeter stg. r., holding long torch with 1. hand and wheat ears with r.; at r., Kore stg. 1., holding torch with r. hand; border of dots.
Elaboratebust of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet, necklace of pendants, and cuirasswith aegis; no border.
177
2 coins
24-25
Av.8.57 (2)
178 *a
2 coins IIII-473
Ae-H-NAI At r., Demeter stg. Sv. 94.16, 17 1., holding scepter and wheat ears; at 1., Kore stg. r., holding long torch; border of dots.
24 24
(B 17:lb)
130
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. AeHNAI-WN Herakles,nude and bearded, stg. r., holding r. hand at side and leaning 1. on club propped on rock;lion skin draped around 1. arm; border of dots. Sv. 95.1, 2
179
5 coins *a K-1398
A9H Theseus stg. r., raising the rock at Troizen;border of dots. GRC,fig. 20 A-OH, elH-A, AIH-e, Ale-H, or AeHN-AIWN Themistokles, in militarydress and holding trophywith 1. hand and wreath with upraisedr., stg. 1. on galley sailing 1.;on prow, owl stg. 1.;on ram, snake to 1.;border of dots.
181 *a
8 coins 00-826
22-24 22
Av.5.88(5) 8.34
182
22-25 23 23 25
GRC,fig. 20
Sv. 97.20-25
183 *a
5 coins Z-526
24-26 25
Elaborateor transitional bust r. [182, 183] 15 coins. Elaborateor transitionalbust of Athena r.; wreathed or dotted border.
AGHNAI-WNFour-leggedtable with amphora below; at r., palm branch;on table from 1. to r., wreath, helmeted head of Athena r., and owl stg. .; border of dots.
Sv. 88.55-57
184 *a
4 coins Z-2416
23-25 24
Av.6.78(3) 7.19
CATALOGUE Elaboratebust of Athena r.; wreathed or no border. 185 *a 8 coins S-3612 23-26 25 Av. 7.40(4) 8.03 AEH-NAI-WN Boukranionwith fillet hanging from each horn; border of dots. Sv. 99.1-3
131
UNCLASSIFIED Elaborate or transitional bust of Athena r. [169-185] 97 coins. Illegible reverse type.
HEMIDRACHMS
(a)Fine-stleobverses Bust of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet and aegis; border of dots. Sv. 93.36-42; AeH-NAIWN, A-EHN-AIWN, or AeHNAI-WN NCP, BB:xxii AEHN-AIWN, Demeter seated 1., holding wheat ears in extended r. hand and long scepter with 1.;at 1., usually,snake to 1.;border of dots.
186
Similar busts of Athena r., some with Attic helmets; border of dots. 187 24 coins *a A-666 *b T-285 19-21 Av. 5.05 (13) 19 6.52 20 4.79
AOH-NAI-WNor AOHNAI-WN Kore stg. r., holding two torches downwardto r.; border of dots.
Similar.
AOHNAI-WNIakchos,wearing short tunic and boots and holding long torch, stg. r.; border of dots.
188
Bust of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet and aegis; border of dots. 189 *a 2 coins III-359 19-20 5.43 (1) 19 5.43
A-eH Theseus, nude and with Sv. 96.17; club in his upraised r. hand, DD:iv JVCP, striding1.;before him at 1., Minotaur falling 1.;border of dots.
132
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Bust of Athena r., wearing Corinthianhelmet and aegis; wreathed border. Ale-H Miltiades,in military dress, stg. r.; holding with both hands Persiancaptive stg. r. with hands bound behind back; at r., trophy; border of dots. Sv. 97.32-35, NCP, EE:vii, viii
*190
T-405
22
Bust of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet and aegis; border of dots. 191 *a 2 coins E-92 18-19 Av.6.49 (2) 18 6.70
Similar.
AIH-9 Apollo Patroosstg. ., wearing long robe, holding lyre with 1. hand and phiale in extended r.; border of dots.
Sv. 93.4
A-Hj8 Four-leggedtable with amphora below; on table at 1., owl stg. 1., and at r., statue of Athena Parthenosfacing; border of dots.
Sv. 91.46, 47
192
3 coins
18-19 Av.6.51 (3) Similar. Similar,but both owl and statue of Athena stg. 1.; border of dots. heavily corroded
Sv. -
193
fLA-53
20
2.79
Similar.
Ale-HFour-leggedtable with
amphora below; on table, owl stg. r. and wreath;at 1., palm branch;border of dots.
Sv. 91.48
194
2 coins *a rr-38
20 20
Ale-H Olive tree with owl perching 1. in branches;at r., large amphora;border of dots.
Sv. 90.33
195 *a
6 coins 8-949
18-19 5.00 (6) 19 6.06 Similar. A8-H Similar,but owl perching r.; border of dots. Sv. 90.34
196 *a
9 coins T-216
133
Sv. 90.35-38, 40
197 *a *b *c *d *e
PERIODS VB and C
OBOLS
issues:VB (a)Earlier Helmeted bust of Athena 1., with shouldersbare; border of dots. *198 T-103 19 4.45 AeHN-AI-WN Theseus or Herakles stg. 1., holding phiale in r. hand and club with 1.;border of dots. Sv. 95.13-15; DD:i JVCP, AOHNA-IWNTriptolemos, holding long staff, stg. in chariot drawn by two snakes 1.;border of dots.
Sv. -
Similar.
199
16-18 Av.5.14 (5) 16 6.27 18 4.20 Similar. AeHNAI-WN Theseus striding1., Sv. 96.28 nude but for cloak wrapped around 1. arm, and holding club in upraisedr. hand; border of dots. 2.70 AOHNA-IWNTheseus striding1., Sv. 96.19 as last; at 1., Minotaur falling 1.; border of dots.
*200
I11-663
16
*201
IIe-470
Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet; border of dots. 16 5.87 Bust of Athena r. or 1., wearing Corinthian helmet and aegis; border of dots. 15-16 Av.409(4) 15 4.13
A-O-H Flaming cylindrical altar on wide base; at r., olive tree; border of dots.
202 *a
6 coins IIII-273
134
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar,bust r. No legend. Rectangularaltar topped by boukranionbetween two situlae;at 1. and r., olive tree. Altar face ornamented by wreath enclosing boukranion; border of dots. Sv. 87.42, 43
203 *a
4 coins 00-269
Issues:VBorC (b)Later Head or bust of Athena r., wearing Corinthianhelmet and sometimes aegis; border of dots. 204 25 coins *a 4-75 *b Q-418 16-18 Av. 3.12 (15) 16 4.59 16 3.79 Similar. 17-18 2.99 (2) 3.43 18 Similar. AleHINAIIfN Similar to last.
Sv.-
AleHJNAIIWNDemeter (?) seated r., on rock, leaning 1. arm on low column and resting r. in lap; border of dots.
205 *a
3 coins r-421
A-e-H-NAI, A-eHN-AI, or AeHN-AI Triptolemosstg. 1. in chariot drawn by two snakes to 1.;border of dots.
206
16-18 Av. 3.04 (15) 18 5.03 17 3.18 Similar. AOH-NAIor AOHN-AINike stg. 1., holding wreath in upraised r. hand; border of dots. Sv. 96.44
207 *a
2 coins T-926
17-18 Av. 2.85 (2) 18 3.48 Similar. AeHN-AI Theseus striding1., draperyover 1. arm and shoulder,club in upraised r. hand; border of dots. Sv. 96.26, 27
208 *a
7 coins AE-14
15-18 Av.3.18(7) 15 2.30 Similar. AOHN-AlfIN or AeHNA-I2N Theseus striding1., as last; border of dots. Sv. 96.20, 21
209 *a
2 coins Z-1975
CATALOGUE Similar. AOH-NAI-fN or AOH-NAIQ-N Athena, wearing armor and hurling spear,stg. r. in biga galloping r.; border of dots. Sv. 88.10-13
135
210 *a
13 coins 00-1228
16-18 Av.3.40(7) 18 5.20 Similar. AOHN-AIWN,AOH-N-AI, AGH-NAI,AG-H-NA-I, AOH-N-A, or A-eH Olive tree with owl perching 1. in branches;border of dots. Sv. 89.19
211 *a *b *c *d *e
16-19 Av.3.15(24) 17 4.13 16 4.12 16 3.90 17 3.00 19 3.69 Similar. AOH-N-AIor AGH-NA-I Large amphora with long scepter at r. and palm branch at 1.;wreathed or dotted border. Sv. 90.41,43
212 *a
7 coins T-1018
HEMIOBOLS
213
2 coins
Bust of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet and aegis; wreathed or dotted border. 11-12 Av.2.08(2) Similar;border of dots.
AOHN-AIWNor AEHNA-IWN Nike stg. 1., holding wreath in upraisedr. hand; border of dots.
Sv. 96.47
214 *a
9 coins T-866
12-14 Av. 2.20 (8) 12 2.19 Similar. AOH or A-OIH Nike as last, sometimes to r.; border of dots. Sv. 96.46, 48, 49
215 *a
16 coins n-289
11-13 Av.2.12(7) 11 1.21 Bust of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet; border of dots. AO-HNAIAsklepiosstg. 1., draped with r. shoulder bare, holding 1. hand at waist, resting r. on short staff entwined with snake;border of dots. Sv. 98.11, 12; EE:iv JVCP,
216 *a
6 coins P-1050
136
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Bust of Athena r. or 1., wearing Corinthianhelmet; border of dots. 11-12 Av. 1.36 (24) 11 1.39 11 1.52 Similar,bust r. A-9lH Similar figure of Asklepiosstg. 1.;border of dots. Sv. 98.13, 14
217
A-elH Drapedfigureof
Telesphorosstg., facing, wearing conical hat; border of dots.
Sv. 98.15
218
AA-755
219
9 coins *a NN-210
11-12 Av. 1.53(9) 2.13 12 Similar bust 1. or r., sometimes with Attic helmet; wreathed or dotted border. AeH, AeJH, A1eH, or A-eIH Prow of galley r., or 1., often with owl stg. r. on ram; border of dots. Sv. 97.37-39, 41-44
220
11-13 Av. 1.32 (33) 1.32 12 1.41 13 11 1.61 Bust of Athena r., wearing Corinthianhelmet; border of dots. 11-13 Av. 1.74 (26) 2.00 12 13 Similar. A-eIH Snake emerging 1., from basket with upraised lid; border of dots. Sv. 94.32-35
221
Sv. 93.21, 22
222
7 coins *a AA-387
11-12 Av.2.42 (7) 12 2.44 Similar,but bust sometimes 1. A-EIH or AE-H Tripod;border of dots. Sv. 93.23, 29, 30
223
11-12 Av. 1.25 (18) 1.36 12 1.15 12 Similar bust 1. or r.; border of dots. 11-12 Av. 1.30(4) 0.95 11 1.41 11
Sv. 89.24
224
226 *a *b *c *d *e *f *g
Similar bust r. or 1.; border of dots. 11-13 Av. 1.54 (72) 1.46 12 1.10 12 1.63 12 1.66 13 11 1.38 11 1.38 12
Similar.
AlelH or A-e Owl stg. r.; to r., olive branch; border of dots.
Sv. 88.36, 37
227
A-ElH Owl as last; wreathed border. chisel markson obv.: II- (?)
Sv. 88.41
229 *a *b *c d
Bust of Athena r.; wreathed A-ElH, Ae-H, or Ale-H Owl or dotted border. stg. 1.;border of dots. 10-13 Av. 1.45 (71) 11 1.29 1.40 13 1.81 12 GR( fig. 21 13 2.25 C,
Sv. 88.47-51, 53
Similar;wreathed border. 230 *a 16 coins IIII-282 10-12 Av. 1.49 (15) 10 1.34
Sv. 88.52
Sv. 88.43, 44
138
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Bust of Theseus r., head bare, with club over 1. shoulder; border of dots. AeH Piglet walking r.; wreathed or dotted border. Sv. 94.15
232 *a
10 coins ST'-704
Sv. 92.24-26
Similar. 234 12 coins *a rT-99 *b Z-1965 *c H-416 10-12 Av. 1.45 (5) 1.38 12 11 1.87 1.66 10
Sv. 90.45-47 AOH Amphora on conical foot; at r., palm branch;border of dots.
GRC,fig. 21
Similar.
A-e9H or Ae-H Three wheat ears emerging from rounded, handlelessvase or basket;border of dots.
Sv. 94.36
235
9 coins
236
HII-493
Similar. 1.63 11
Sv. -
Similar,but bust sometimes 1. 237 17 coins *a KK-114 *b IIII-152 *c E-3801 9-11 9 10 10 Av.0.97 (7) 1.16 0.75 1.03
Sv. 96.37-40
Sv. 94.50-52
Sv. 94.53, 54
CATALOGUE Similar. 240 39 coins *a Z-438 *b H'-3379 *c IIII-118 9-13 12 10 11 Av. 1.37 (25) 1.91 1.42 1.24 AIe-H Boukranion;border of dots. Sv. 99.39-42
139
Sv. 92.33, 34
242
6 coins
Draped bust of Asklepios1., snake emerging 1. from drapery;border of dots. 10-11 Av. 1.42 (3) Draped bust of Demeter or Kore r., wearing necklace; border of dots. 11 1.44
Sv. 98.16, 18
Sv. 94.14
243
EA-203
Sv. 94.49
245
N-723
Male bust r., wearing wreath with leaves above forehead; border of dots. 10 1.04
Ale-HBoukranion;border of
dots.
Sv. 99.43, 44
Sv. 99.45-47
UNCLASSIFIED Bust of Athena or other deity. [213-246] 277 coins. Details uncertain or illegible.
140
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST PERIOD VC
Christ (140'sor)150s-ca. 175 after DRACHMS Head or simple bust of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet or, rarely,Attic helmet; border of dots. 21-25 Av.6.75(70) 8.38 22 6.86 24 23 8.29 8.48 23 GRC,fig. 2 7.11 23 halved 23 AeH-N-AlQN or, very rarely, Ae-HN-AIAN Athena Parthenosstg. ., as 171; border of dots. Sv. 82.32-35
248 *a *b *c *d *e *f
Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthianhelmet; border of dots. 249 A-833 22 6.15
AOHN-AIN .Athena Parthenos as last, but with boukranion replacing snake at 1.;border of dots.
Sv. -
Similar.
AeH-NA-IQN, AeH-N-AIQN, or Ae-HN-AIQN Athena Parthenosstg. 1., as 248, but with phiale in place of Nike; border of dots.
Sv. 87.13
250
13 coins
22-23
Av.6.83 (13)
AOH-N-AIQNAthena stg. 1., holding Nike in r. hand and leaning 1. on upright spear held aslant;as 172, but type reversed;border of dots.
Sv. 83.37
251
K-1821
23
6.46
Similar.
Legend illegible.Athena as last, but with spear held vertically; at r., upright shield leaning on base of spear; at 1., snake coiled to 1.;border of dots
Sv.-
252
4 coins
22-23
Av.6.77(4)
CATALOGUE Similar. Sv. 84.36; NCP, AOHNA-IQNAthena stridingr., AA:xvi to strikewith spear preparing held in upraised r. hand, and holding round shield with 1.;at r., owl stg. r.; at 1., olive tree entwined with snake;border of dots. 8.64 AOHN-AI-f-N Athena striding r., looking 1.;1. arm slipped through strap of round shield, 1. hand holding spear; r. arm extended to 1.;at r., snake to r.; at 1., owl stg. r.; border of dots. Sv. 85.8-10
141
*253
IIn-63
23
254 *a
6 coins B-370
21-23 23
Av.6.50(6) 8.20 AeH-NAI-QN Similar to 254, but at r., owl stg. r. and, at 1., olive tree entwined by snake; border of dots. Sv. 85.32-35; NCP, Z:viii
Similar.
255 *a
14 coins r-1452
21-24 23
Av.6.56(14) 10.55 Sv. 85.12-18 AeHN-A-IQN, AeH-N-A-IQN, AOH-N-AIQN,AEH-NA-IQN, AEHNA-I-QN, or AeHN-AI-QN Similar to 255, but with only snake at r.; border of dots.
Similar.
256 *a
34 coins IIE-47
21-24 22
Av.6.40 (32) 7.02 AOHN-A-IQN,AeH-N-AIQN, AOH-N-A-IQN,AOH-NA-I-QN, AeHN-A-I-QN, or AeHN-AI-QN Athena stg. 1., holding spear with r. hand and round shield with 1.; border of dots. Sv. 86.1-4
Similar.
257 *a
21-24 23
Av. 6.63 (44) 4.36 AOHN-AIQNor AeHNA-IQN Athena stg. 1., with olive tree, as 173; border of dots. Sv. 87.18-20; NCP, Z:xviii
Similar.
258 *a
17 coins ft-19
21-23 23
Av.6.16(14) 7.98 AOH-NAIQNSimilar,but with snake entwined around tree; border of dots. Sv. 87.21
142
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. AOH-NAID-NAthena, holding shield and hurling spear with r. hand, in biga galloping r.; below horses at r., giant emerging from earth preparingto throw boulder with both hands; border of dots. Sv. 88.8, 9
260 *a
13 coins E-3396
22-25 23
Similar.
261 *a
4 coins NN-66
22-24 24
Similar.
A9HNAIJONor AEHNA-I-fN Athena stg., facing, arms at sides and looking r.; at r., Marsyas,nude, advancing towardAthena with r. arm raised;border of dots.
262 *a
4 coins II1-277
22-24 23
Similar.
AeHN-AI2N Zeus seated on throne to 1., holding Nike in r. hand, long scepter in I.; border of dots. GRC,fig. 20
263 *a
3 coins A-56
22-23 23
Similar.
AOHNA-I.N Bearded Dionysos seated r., behind low table. As 176; border of dots. (B 17:lb) AOHNA-I-DNAs 264, but no table; border of dots.
264 *a
2 coins IIII-510
23 23
Sv. 92.19
Similar.
AOHN-AinN Demeter stg., facing, head turned to r., holding long scepter in upraised 1. hand and wheat ears in lowered r.; border of dots. 7.55
Sv. 92.22, 23
*266
Q-58
23
CATALOGUE Similar. AGHN-AIfN Eirene, draped, stg., facing, holding long scepter in r. hand and turning head to look at infant Ploutos held on 1. arm; Ploutos raises r. hand towardsEirene'sface and holds cornucopia in 1.;border of dots. Sv. 92.38-44; NCP, DD:ix, x
143
267 *a
8 coins IIII-871
22-24 24
Similar.
AOH-NA-IQNApollo Patroos, wearing long chiton, stg. 1., holding lyre with 1. hand and phiale in outstretchedr.; border of dots.
268 *a
7 coins Z-1581
22-25 24
Similar.
AOHNA-I-QNApollo, nude, stg. r., holding bow in 1. hand and branch in r.; border of dots.
Sv. 93.8, 9
269 *a
11 coins 00-619
23-24 24
Similar.
A9HNAI-fN Apollo, nude, stg. Sv. 95.10-12; with head turned to r., NCP, DD:xxii, xxiii frontally, down arrow which is held sighting up in 1. hand; r. arm at side holding bow; border of dots.
*270
IIII-229
23
4.30
Similar.
Sv. 94.20, 21, 23, 24 A-9H-NA-IfN, AEH-NA-IQN, AEH-NAIfN, A-EH-N-AI2N, Ae-HNA-IlN, or AEHN-A-I-lN Triptolemos,holding torch and wheat ears, stg. 1. in chariot drawn by two snakes to 1.;border of dots.
271 *a
26 coins E-4313
21-24 23
Av.6.71(19) 7.68
Similar.
AeH-N-AIQN Herakles,nude, stg. 1., holding phiale in outstretchedr. hand and club, resting on ground, in 1.;border of dots.
272 *a
2 coins r-1482
24 24
144
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. A9H-NAIl|N Theseus driving Marathonianbull, as 180; border of dots. Sv. 95.21, 22
273
2 coins *a AA-605
23 23
Similar.
274
2 coins
23
5.53 (1)
Similar.
A9-HNA-I-flN Theseus
attackingfalling Minotaur,as 189; border of dots.
Sv. 96.15, 16
275 *a
3 coins Qf-329
23-24 24
Similar.
AOHNA-IQNor AeHNAI-RN Theseus leaning r., holding club with r. hand and, with 1. hand, clutching horn of Minotaur,who falls to r.; border of dots.
Sv. 96.1-7
276 *a
11 coins KK-300
22-24 24
Similar.
A9HN-AIQN Asklepiosstg., facing, head to 1., wearing himation, with 1. hand at waist and leaning r. on staff entwined with snake;border of dots.
Sv. 98.1, 2
277
4 coins *a IIA-77
23-24 23
Similar.
or AeHNA-IQN AeHN-AID-N
Themistokleson galley to r., as 183, but owl stg. 1. on prow and no snake on ram; border of dots.
Sv. 97.15, 19
278 *a
7 coins E-1171
22-23 22
CATALOGUE Similar. Sv. 98.21-29; AOHN-AIQNor AOH-NAIQN View of Akropolisseen from NCP, Z:iii-vi north and west. On r., steps of Panathenaicway lead up to Propylaia;at center, colossal statue of Athena Promachosstg. r. and holding Nike in outstretched r. hand, sometimeswith owl stg. r. below; to 1., Erechtheion.Halfway up Akropolisrock, to 1. of stairs, niche with curved lintel representing Cave of Pan; within niche, minuscule statue of Pan; border of dots. Av.5.93 (9) 8.76 5.79 6.13
145
280
21-24 22 21 22
(B 17:lb)
Similar.
Sv. 88.58-60
281
21-24 24 23
Av.6.96 (17) 6.81 8.05 AO-HNAIQNSimilar to 281, but on table, owl stg. I., bust of Athena r. and wreath;border of dots. Sv. 88.61
Similar.
282
4 coins
22-23
Sv. 99.7-9, 23 AeH-NA-IQN, AeHN-A-IQN, or AeHNA-IQN AeHN-AIQN, Boukranionwith fillet hanging from each horn, as 185; border of dots.
283 *a *b *c *d
21-24 22 22 21 23
146
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST PERIOD VI
284 *a *b *c d e *f *g h
133 coins AA-1091 AA-1029 AA-1006 AA-1070 AA-1097 B-328 III-491 r-279
Head or bust of Athena r., t AOHN-A-I2N Athena Sv. 82.5-24, 26-28; Parthenosstg. 1., holding Nike in NCP, Y:xviii 1., wearing Corinthian, rarely outstretchedr. hand and spear with Attic, or composite heir net, often highly varied in st tyle. 1., which rests on a shield, shown in profile,with base on the ground She occasionallywears a necklace. If a head, trui ncation line; similar to 169-171 and 248; is either bare or with sli border of dots. ight drapery;if a bust, it may be heavily draped or armo,red with aegis; border of doits. 19-23 Av.5.15 (108) 5.43 20 (Q 19:3) 5.96 23 (Q 19:3) 3.67 21 (Q 19:3) 4.35 21 (Q 19:3)H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:b 6.61 21 (Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:c 4.55 22 (F 10:2) 3.78 21 (B 17:lb) 22 8.25 GRC,fig. 4
Similar.
AOHN-AIQN,AeHN-A-1-QN,
Sv. 82.25
or AeHNA-IQN AeH-N-A-IQN
Athena Parthenosas 284; border of dots. 285 *a 10 coins AA-1019 19-23 Av.6.23 (8) 7.07 21 (Q 19:3)
Similar.
AeH-N-AIQN Athena Parthenosas last, but at 1., snake coiled to 1., as 171; border of dots.
Sv. 83.8
286
13 coins
20-23
Av.5.32 (13)
Ae-H-NAIQN As 286.
(Q 19:3) (Q 19:3)
AOH-NAIQNAs 286.
Sv. 83.12
CATALOGUE Similar. 289 *a 14 coins AA-1104 20-22 20 Av.4.91 (10) 4.55 AO-HNAIQNor Ae-H-N-AIQN As 286. Sv. 82.36, 38; 83.1-3
147
(Q 19:3)
Similar.
290
4 coins
20-21
Av.4.36 (4)
291
4 coins
Ae-H-NAfN As 286.
Sv. 82.37, 41
Similar.
AO-H-NAIfN or AOH-N-AIQN Sv. 82.42 Similar to 286 but, at 1., in place of snake, owl stg. 1.;border of dots.
292
2 coins
20-21
Av.5.12 (2)
Similar.
A-eH-NAIQN Athena stg. I., similarto 284, but, in place of Nike, holding owl r. in r. hand; at 1., snake coiled to 1.;border of dots. (Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pL 44:d
Sv. 83.38, 40
*293
AA-1098
21
6.32
Similar.
294
3 coins
AOH-NAIfN or AEH-N-AIQN Athena stg. 1., similar to 284, but seen so that shield is facing and not in profile;shield emblazoned with gorgoneion;border of dots.
21-23
Av.5.76(3)
Similar.
295
3 coins
AE-H-NA-I Athena stg. 1., holding Nike in outstretched r. hand and raising 1. to grasp upright spear; at r., between Athena's legs and spear butt, shield seen in profile;at 1., snake coiled to 1.;border of dots.
Sv. 83.22, 23
21-23
Av.6.71(3)
148
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. AEH-NAIQN or A8HN-AIQN Sv. 84.24, 25 Athena stg. r., raising r. hand to grasp upright spear and resting 1. on profile shield with base on ground before her to r.; between shield and Athena's legs, sometimes snake to r.; border of dots.
296
3 coins
20-21
Av.4.76 (3) Ae-H-NAIQN or Ae-HNAIf2N Sv. 83.24-28; Athena stg. 1., holding Nike in NCP, Z:xxiii outstretchedr. hand; she passes her 1. arm through strap of shield at shoulder and holds spear with 1. hand; wreathed or dotted border.
Similar.
297 *a
7 coins ZZ-95
20-22 21
Av.5.07 (7) 5.76 AOHNAI-fN or AeHNA-I-QN Athena stg. r., holding Nike and spear,as 172; border of dots. Sv. 83.33, 34
Similar.
298
4 coins *a 1-509
20-21 20
Similar.
Sv. 83.35, 36
299
(Q 19:3) GRC,fig. 22
Sv. 83.39, 41, 42; AeH-NA-IQN, AeH-N-AIQN, Ae-HNAIQN, Ae-H-NAIfN, or NCP, AA:iii A-e-HNAI Athena stg. 1., holding owl in outstretchedr. hand and graspingdownwardpointing spear in upraised 1.; sometimes with coiled snake to 1.; similar to 299; border of dots.
300 *a
5 coins E-357
or A8HNAI-QN AeHNAI-f-N
Athena stg. r., holding owl r. or 1. in r. hand and transversespear with point downwardin 1.; between spear point and legs of Athena, usually snake coiled to r.; border of dots.
301
21-22 21 22
GRC,fig. 22
CATALOGUE Similar. AOHN-AIQNAthena stg. r. with owl in r. hand, as 301, 1. hand not visible; at 1., column on base supportingflat plinth, upon which stands owl facing; border of dots. Sv. 84.9-14
149
302 *a
3 coins EA-231
20-21 21
Av.4.82(3) 5.04
Similar.
303
AA-1083
20
7.07
AeHNAI-Q-N Athena stg. r., as 301; in addition to spear, she carrieslarge, round shield over 1. shoulder;border of dots. (Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:e
Similar.
AOH-N-AIQNAs 303, but Athena's r. arm extended straightout, not bent upwards at elbow, and she holds Nike in place of owl; border of dots.
Sv. 84.18-21
304
0-375
fragmentary
Similar.
AOHN-AI-QNor AeHNA-I2N Athena stg. r., holding round shield with 1. hand and butt of spear with downward-pointing upraisedr.; at r., snake coiled to r.; border of dots.
305 *a
4 coins NN-841
20-22 22
Similar.
AOHN-A-IQNor AEHN-AI-QN Athena advancing r., brandishing aegis before her with 1. hand and holding spear with r.; border of dots.
306 *a
3 coins AA-1085
20-22 21
(Q 19:3)
AEHNA-IfN Athena attacking to r., as 253; border of dots. (Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:f
Sv. 84.37-40
150
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. AOHN-A-IQNAthena stg. r., holding shield with 1. hand and preparingto hurl spear with upraisedr.; border of dots. Sv. 84.29, 30; NCP, AA:xv
308
2 coins *a r-368
20-22 21
Similar.
AOHNAI-QNAthena advancing Sv. 85.1-3 r., holding round shield with 1. hand and transversespear,point upwards,with 1.;at r., snake coiled to r.; Athena wears either Attic or Corinthianhelmet; border of dots.
309
3 coins
20-22
Av. 5.11(3)
Similar.
AeHN-A-IQN Athena running to r., round shield over 1. shoulder; she points r. with 1. hand and holds transversespear,point upwards,in r.; at r., snake coiled to r.; border of dots. GRC,fig. 22
310 a
3 coins 111-469
21-22 22
Av.5.59(2) 4.49
Similar.
Sv. 85.38-40; AOHNA-IQNor AeHNAI-fQN Athena advancing r., head NCP, AA:x turned back, holding round shield with 1. hand and pointing r. with r.; at r., snake coiled to r.; border of dots. (Q 19:3)
311
9 coins *a AA-1004
20-22 22
Av.4.75(9) 6.96
Similar.
AeHNA-fI-N, A9HN-AI-QN, AeHN-A-IQN, AeH-NA-I-QN, AOH-N-AIQN,or AeH-N-A-I2N Athena advancing r., head turned back; similar to 254-256 but without snake, owl, or tree; border of dots.
Sv. 85.24-31
312
20 coins *a K-1633
20-22 22
Sv. 85.21 variant; A9HN-AI-Q-N As last, but with snake to r., as 256; border of dots. NCP, Z:ix (Q 19:3)
CATALOGUE Similar. Sv. 85.19, 20, 22, AeH-NA-I-QN, Ae-HNA-I-QN, or A-e-HNAIQN As last, but at 1. 23; NCP, Z:x of Athena, snake coiled to 1.; border of dots.
151
314
4 coins *a AA-1033
20-21 20
Av.6.00(4) 5.88
(Q 19:3)
AOH-NAI-Q-NSimilar,but at 1. of Athena, olive tree entwined by snake; as 255 but no owl; border of dots. Sv. 85.36, 37
Similar.
*315
S-6401
20
5.59
Similar.
AOHN-A-I-QNAthena stg. r., head to 1., holding Nike with r. hand outstretchedto 1., and spear and round shield with 1.; at 1., snake coiled to 1.;border of dots.
Sv.-
*316
S-3220
21
5.16
Similar.
*317
AOH-N-AIQNAthena stg. 1., holding Nike in outstretched r. hand, round shield over 1. shoulder and spear in 1. hand; at 1., snake coiled to 1.; border of dots.
Sv. -
ST-353
21
5.58
20-24 22 21 22
(Q 19:3)
Sv.-
320
10 coins
AOHNA-I-QNAs last.
AOHN-AI-QNAs last.
Sv. 86.13, 19
321 *a
7 coins AA-1057
20-22 20
(Q 19:3)
152
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. AeH-NA-I-fQNAs last.
Sv.-
322
3 coins *a AA-1022
20-21 21
(Q 19:3)
AGH-N-AIQNAs last.
Sv.-
Similar.
AOHN-AI-QNAthena with spear and shield, as 257 but, to r., snake coiled to r.; border of dots. (Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:a AeHN-AI-Q-N As last.
Sv. 86.21, 23
324 a
11 coins AA-1023
20-23 21
Sv. 86.20, 39
AGHNAIQ-NAs last.
Sv. 86.22, 38
AeHNAI-n-N As last.
Sv. -
(Q 19:3)
AEHNA-I-QNAs last. Sv. 86.26, 27
AeHNA-I-Q-N As last.
Sv. -
AOHN-A-IlN As last.
Sv.-
331
4 coins *a IIA-164
AeHN-A-I-fN As last.
Sv. 86.37
AeH-NA-I-fN As last,
sometimeswith owl at 1. GRC,fig. 22 AeH-N-AI-IfN As 324.
332 a
7 coins Z-1408
21-24 21
Av.5.95(6) 4.49
333
10 coins
Sv. 86.32
CATALOGUE Similar. AE-HNAI-fN or Ae-HNA-I-.N Sv. 86.40 Athena stg. r., head 1., holding phiale 1. in outstretchedr. hand, and round shield and spear in 1.;at 1., snake coiled to 1.;border of dots. (Q 19:3)
153
334 *a
3 coins AA-1101
20-22 20
Similar. 335
Sv.
00-1196
21
4.87
Similar.
AOHNAISimilar to last, but at 1., low altar and no snake; border of dots. 5.26 (F 10:2)
Sv. 86.41, 42
*336
B-318
22
Similar.
Sv. 87.8, 11 AeHNAI-f2N Athena stg. 1., holding phiale in outstretched r. hand; 1. arm goes through strap of round shield at 1. shoulder,and she holds transversespear,point upwards,with 1. hand; at 1., low flaming altar;at r., snake coiled to 1.;border of dots. 4.80 (Q 19:3)
*337
AA-1109
20
Similar.
AeHNAI-fN As last, but in place of snake, owl facing; border of dots. 4.72 (Q 19:3)
Sv. 87.9, 10
338
AA-1007
20
Similar.
AeHNA-IfN Athena stg. 1., as 250, but in place of snake, low altar;border of dots.
Sv. 87.14
339
3 coins
20-22
Av.4.84 (3)
Similar.
AOHNA-IQNAthena stg. 1., with 1. hand on hip and right holding upward-pointingspear; at r., below, round shield; similar to 173; border of dots.
340 *a
2 coins IIII-1036
21-22 22
154
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. AOHN-AI2N Athena stg. 1., with olive tree to 1.;similar to 258, but without snake between Athena and tree; border of dots. Sv. 87.27, 29, 30
341 *a
5 coins AA-1122
20-21 20
Av.5.86(4) 5.75
(Q 19:3)
A8-H-NAIQ As last.
Sv 87.23
Similar.
343
6 coins *a AA-11
20-21 21
(Q 19:3)
Similar.
AeHN-AIQN Similar to 341, but with snake entwined around tree; border of dots. 3.32
Sv. 87.31, 32
344
5-428
20
Similar.
As AQH-NAIS2N 345 but, in place of snake, owl stg. I.; border of dots.
Sv. 87.26
346
4 coins
20-21
Av.5.42 (4)
Similar.
A-eHNAIMN Athena stg. 1., holding round shield and spear with 1. hand, and extending r. towardsolive tree at I.; border of dots.
Sv. 87.12
347
III-1055
21
4.96
CATALOGUE Similar. Sv. 88.1-7; Ae-H-N-AIQN, Ae-H-NAIQN, Athena seated 1. NCP, AA:xx or AeH-N-AInN on backlessthrone, holding Nike in outstretchedr. hand, transverse spear in 1.;she rests 1. elbow on an upright shield seen in profile; border of dots. Av.5.50 (8) 6.29 (Q 19:3) A-eH-NAIfN Similar to 348, but Athena holds phiale in place of Nike; at 1., olive tree entwined with snake;border of dots. (Q 19:3) GRC,fig. 22 AOHNAIfiN or AOH-NAIfN Athena seated 1., on backless throne, holding phiale in outstretchedr. hand, raising 1. to grasp upright spear; at 1., olive tree entwined by snake; at r., leaning against back of throne, upright shield seen in profile;border of dots. (Q 19:3) AO-HNAIf2N,AOHN-A-IM-N, AOHN-AIf-N, AeHNAI-fN, AEHNA-IRN, or AeHNIAIlIN Athena in biga galloping to r., as 260, but without giant emerging from ground; wreathed or dotted border. Sv. 88.14-18; JCP, AA:xxii Sv. 87.33, 36 Sv. 87.34, 35; NCP, AA:xxi
155
348 *a
9 coins AA-1102
20-22 21
Similar.
349 a
2 coins AA-1103
20-21 20
Av.5.90(2) 6.90
Similar.
350 *a
4 coins AA-1081
20-21 21
Av.4.90(4) 4.84
Similar.
351 *a b
20-22 21 20
(Q 19:3) GRC,fig. 22 AOHNAIIQNor AeHN-AIIN2 As 351, but biga to 1.;border of dots. (B 17:lb)
AeHNIAI|IN Similar to 351, but Athena in triga to r.; border of dots.
Similar.
Sv. 88.19, 20
352 *a
5 coins IIII-478
20-22 21
Similar.
353 *a
3 coins AA-1030
21-22 22
Av.5.88(3) 6.40
(Q 19:3)
156
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. AeHINAIlfN Similar to 351, but Athena in quadriga to r.; border of dots. Sv. 88.21
354 *a
5 coins 1-970
20-22 21
Similar.
Sv. 89.16-18; AOH (in ex.) Olive tree entwined with snake, owl JCP, Z:xvii r. in branches;at 1., perched Athena stg. r., 1. hand pointing to r., and r. holding spear and resting on profile shield; at r., Poseidon stg. 1., r. foot on rock, holding trident (head downwards?) in upraised1. hand and dolphin (?) in r.; border of dots.
355
Similar.
AOHNA-I-fN Zeus seated r. on stool, holding vertical scepter in upraisedr. hand and eagle, looking back with wreath in beak, in 1.;border of dots. (Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:g AOHNAI-f-N Zeus sacrificing r., over altar;as 175, but with eagle on 1. wrist;border of dots.
Sv. 92.3, 4
356 *a
3 coins AA-1009
20-22 21
Similar.
Sv. 92.7
*357
Z-415
20
5.98
Similar.
AOH-NAIfN (retrogradefrom lower r.) Hermes, nude but for cloak billowing over shoulders, striding1., wearing petasos and holding coin sack with outstretchedr. hand, caduceus with 1.;border of dots.
358 *a b
22-23 23 22
(Q 19:3) GRC,fig. 22 AeH-N-AIRN Hermes as 358, but stridingr. and r. hand empty (?);border of dots. Sv. 92.35-37
Similar.
359 *a
2 coins 1-593
20-21 20
CATALOGUE Similar. *360 IIIn-544 20 7.52 (B 17:lc) AeH-NAI-QN Apollo Patroos stg. 1., as 268; border of dots. Sv. 93.5-7; NCP, CC:xx
157
Similar.
361 *a
4 coins 1-1520
20-22 20
Av.6.30(3) 5.80
Similar.
AOHNA-I-Q-NSimilar to 361, but Apollo holds laurel branch before him with r. hand; border of dots. 5.66
*362
r-1258
21
Similar.
*363
M-193
21
4.82
AOHNAI-f-N Apollo Lykeios stg. r., holding bow with r. hand and placing 1. atop head; at r., tripod entwined with snake; border of dots. GRC,fig. 22
Sv. 93.28
Similar.
Sv. 93.27
*364
I-1036
21
4.64
Similar.
365 *a
8 coins Z-1979
21-22 21
Sv. 95.9
Similar.
367
21-23 21 21
158
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. Sv. 94.25, 26, 28, 29 AOHNA-I-NN,AeH-N-AIQN, or A-eHNA-If-N Triptolemosin chariot to 1., as 271; border of dots.
368
9 coins *a N-202
21-22 22
Av.5.44(6) 7.57
Similar.
AeH-N-A-IMN or A-eHNA-I-fN Similar to 368, but Triptolemos holds wheat ear in outstretchedr. hand, sheaf of wheat in I.; border of dots.
369
2 coins
20
Av. 3.84 (2) Ae-HN-AIQN or Ae-H-NAIQN Artemis walking 1., usually quiver over shoulder,holding two torches;border of dots. holed Sv. 94.44, 45; NCP, BB:xi
Similar.
370
2 coins *a Q- 154
21-22 22
4.59(1) 4.59
Similar.
AOHN-AI-Q-NTheseus r., raising rock at Troizen, as 181 and 274; border of dots. 5.52
Sv. 95.30-36
*371
1-888
20
Similar.
AeHNA-I-QN, AGHN-A-I-QN, ANA HN-A --NHN-HN-A-I, , or AeHN-AI-2 Theseus and fallen Minotaur,as 276; border of dots. (Q 19:3) (Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:h A-OH-N-AI-O-NTheseus, nude but for chlamys covering outstretched1. arm, striding r., preparingto swing club held in r. hand outstretched behind him; border of dots.
372
21-24 21 21
Similar.
373
4 coins
20-22
Av.4.57 (3) Ae-HNAIQ-N, AeHN-AIQN, or AeHN-A-IfN Themistokles on galley to r., as 279, but sometimes with owl on stern; border of dots. (Q 19:3) Sv. 97.27-31
Similar.
374
6 coins *a AA-1067
20-22 22
CATALOGUE Similar. A9HNA-IQN, AOHNAIQ-N,or AeHNAI-QN Akropolis,seen from north and west, as 280; border of dots. Av.5.76 (4) 7.42 3.56 5.67 Sv. 98.30-36
159
375
21-22 21 21 21
Similar.
AOHN-AIQNor AEHNA-IfN Theater of Dionysos, seen from south; above, at center, Parthenon;at 1., possibly the Chalkothekeor Propylaia;at r. of Parthenon,round temple of Roma and Augustus;border of dots.
376 *a
4 coins AA-1052
21-22 21
Av.4.38(3) 4.72
(Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:i; GRC,fig. 22 Sv. 90.1, 2, 5-8 AeHNAIQIN, AeHNAIIQN, AeHNAIIQN, AeHNA, or AOH (legendsin ex. only). From 1. to r., amphora, olive tree, and owl stg. r.; sometimes palm branch under legend in ex.; border of dots.
Similar.
377
GAIHN-AI-fN, HGAIN-A-I-2,
Sv. 90.19, 20
or HGAIN-A-I-Q-N, AGHIN,
AeHNIN-Q-I-A (legends begin in ex., often partiallyretrograde). As 377. 378 17 coins *a AA-1035 *b 1-302 19-22 Av.4.86 (17) 19 5.09 7.70 22 Similar. 379 K-1452 21 Similar. 4.23 (Q 19:3)
Sv. 90.15
AGHNAIQN,AOH-NAIIQN,or, in ex., AGH From 1. to r., amphora, olive tree, owl facing; palm branch sometimes in ex.; border of dots. (F 10:2)
380 *a
5 coins B-320
160
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. AGHNAIjIN or AeHIN-f-IAN (legend in ex. or beginning in ex. and then retrograde).From 1. to r., amphora, olive tree, owl stg. 1.; border of dots. Sv. 90.13
381
6 coins *a 5-734
20-22 20
AGHNAIfN, AeHNAIM-N, AeHN-AtNOi, or AeHINAiQN (legend sometimes finishingin ex.). From 1. to r., owl facing, olive tree, amphora;sometimes palm tree on r. or palm branch in ex.; border of dots.
382
20-22 21 21
Similar.
AeHNAIfN (in ex.). From 1. to r., owl stg. r., olive tree, amphora;border of dots. (Q 19:3)
Sv. -
383
AeHNAIIND (legend finishing in ex.). From 1. to r., owl stg. r., amphora, olive tree; border of dots. (Q 19:3) ASHNAIIflN (legend in ex.). From 1. to r., olive tree, amphora, owl facing, palm tree; border of dots.
Sv. 90.27
384
AA-297
21
5.24
Similar.
Sv. 90.29
385
PP-841
19
CATALOGUE Similar.
161
Sv. 91.2-7, 9-15, 19 AeHNAIQN, AeHNAIQ-N, AeHN-A-IQN, AeHN-A-IQ-N, AeHN-A-I-QN, AeH-N-AI-QN, AeH-N-AIINR, or AeH-N-A-IQN Four-leggedtable, sometimes seen in perspective,with amphora below; on table top, from 1. to r., wreath, head of Athena r., owl stg. 1.;border of dots.
386 *a b
(Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:1 AOHNAI-Q-N,AeHN-AI-f-N, or AeHNAI As 386, but with palm branch to r.; border of dots. (Q 19:3) GRC,fig. 22 Sv. 91.16-18, 20, 21
387
20-22 20 20
Similar.
Ae-H-N-AIQN or AeHNIAIQN Similar to 386, but no amphora below table; border of dots.
388
4 coins
20-21
Av.5.08(2) AeH-NAIQN or AeH-NAIINn Similar to 386, but with owl facing; border of dots. Sv. 91.8
Similar.
389
4 coins
20-22
Av.4.96(3) AeH Similar to 386, but on top of table, from 1. to r., owl stg. r., head of Athena r., wreath;border of dots. Sv. 91.29
Similar.
390
4 coins
20-21
Av.4.21(4) AeH-NAIQN As 390, but owl facing; border of dots. (Q 19:3) AOH-N-AIQNor AeH-N-A-I As 386, but on top of table, from 1. to r., owl stg. r., head of Athena 1., wreath;border of dots. (Q 19:3) (Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:k
Sv. Sv. -
Similar.
392
20-21 20 20
162
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST Similar. As AeHNjAIA2N 392, but legend beneath table and amphora, and palm to r.; border of dots. Sv. 91.30
393
Z-1214
23
6.01
Similar.
Sv. 91.31
*394
00-431
21
3.10
Similar.
AeHNAI-Q-N or Ae-HNAIQN Four-leggedtable seen in elevated perspectivewith amphora below; on top of table, from 1. to r., owl stg. 1. or r., bust of Athena r., prize crown; palm branch sometimes to r.; border of dots.
Sv. 91.27, 28
395
6 coins
21-22
Av.6.17(5)
Similar.
AeHN-AIfQ-NFour-legged table with amphora below; on table top, from 1. to r., bust of Athena r., owl facing, wreath; along front of table, in tiny letters, AAPIANEIA;palm branch in ex.; border of dots. 5.73
Sv. 91.33-38
396
T-174
20
Similar.
AeH-NAIMN Similar to 396, but Sv. on table top, from 1. to r., wreath, bust of Athena r., owl stg. 1.; along front of table, in tiny letters, border of dots. [EAEVCINEIA];
*397
S-3694
21
5.60
Sv. 91.42
Similar.
AeHNA-I-N Similar.On table top, from 1. to r., owl facing, bust of Athena 1., wreath; along front of table, in tiny letters, OAVMnIA;border of dots.
Sv. 91.39, 40
399
5 coins
21-22
Av.4.93(4)
CATALOGUE Similar. AOHNAIQ-NSimilar to 399, but along front of table, in tiny letters, nANAOHNEA; border of dots. 4.14 Similar,but details illegible. Sv. 91.41, 45
163
400
III-769
20
AOH-NA-IQNBoukranionwith fillets hanging from horns; rarely, star above skull;as 185 and 283; border of dots. 5.49 5.87 4.86 6.42
Sv. 99.24-37
401
T-598
20-23 21 21 21 22
402
7 coins
Similar. 20-22 Av. 5.46 (6) Similar. 20-22 Av. 5.79 (14) 7.69 20 7.19 21 6.17 21 Similar. 20-22 Av.5.55 (13) 6.66 21 Similar.
A6HN-AIQN As last.
Sv. 99.10-12
403 *a b c
(Q 19:3)
(Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:m (Q 19:3) H. A. Thompson 1958, pl. 44:n AOHN-AI-QNAs last. (Q 19:3) Sv. 99.15-18 AOHNA-IQN,AOHNA-I-QN, A-eHN-AI-QN, or A-OH-NAIQN As last. (Q 19:3) (Q 19:3) AOHN-AIQNBoukranion as above, but within ornamental frame; border of dots. Sv. 99.13, 14 Sv. 99.19-22
404 *a
14 coins AA-1062
405
20-22 20 21
Similar.
406
3 coins *a I-559
20-21 21
164
ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS: SECOND AND THIRD CENTURIES AFTER CHRIST UNCLASSIFIED Similar. Types illegible.
[284-406] 88 coins. OBOLS Head or bust of Athena r., border of dots. 407 H'-3647 fragmentary Similar. AeHNA-IQN or AeHN-AIQN Theseus attackingto 1., as 209; border of dots. Sv. 96.22-25, 29 Ae-H-N-AIMN (obscure) Triptolemosin chariot to 1., as 206; border of dots. Sv. 94.37
408 *a
15 coins NN-666
16-18 Av. 3.15 (14) 16 3.48 Similar. AQHN-AIf2NNike advancing r., Sv. 96.45 holding wreath in r. hand and palm branch over shoulder with 1.; border of dots.
409
15-18 Av. 2.89 (12) 16 3.59 17 4.44 Similar. Ae-HNjAI-QN Olive tree with owl perching r. in branches; border of dots. Sv. 89.20, 21
410
15-18 15 18 17
Av. 3.81 (3) 4.52 3.96 2.95 AOHNAIIN (legend in ex.). From 1. to r., owl facing, olive tree, amphora;border of dots.
Sv.-
Similar.
411
4 coins
16-17 Av.2.44(4)
HEMIOBOLS
Sv. 93.31
Sv. 97.40
413 *a
2 coins EI-3562
CHRONOLOGY Similar. 414 *a 5 coins Q2-139 13-14 Av. 1.59(4) 14 1.98 Similar. *415 E-4658 12 Similar. 416 5 coins *a 4-237 *b E-869 11-13 Av.1.41 (5) 11 1.10 13 1.43 Similar. [414-416] 2 coins. Type uncertain. 1.94 A-@ Owl stg. 1.;border of dots. Sv. 88.54 AOH-NAIQNAs last.
Sv.-
IV NON-ATHENIANCOINS
THE 2,197 identifiableforeigncoins cataloguedin thischapterspan nearlythe entirechronological range of ancient Greek numismatichistory.The earliestcoins, two Aiginetan silverstaters (658a and b) and a plated counterfeitof a Siphnian hemidrachm(846), go back to the 6th century B.C. The latest, dating after the collapse of civic minting in the Greek East in the 260's and 270's of our era, belong to the final issuesof the Roman provinceof Egypt under Diocletian (1029, 1030) and to the last known ruler of the Black Sea Kingdom of Bosphoros, King RheskouporisVI, a contemporaryof Constantinethe Great (853a and b). Geographicalrepresentationextends from Italy and Sicily in the west to the PersianEmpire in the east, and fromthe Crimeancoast of the BlackSea in the northto Egypt, Cyrene,and Numidia in the south. The range is impressive,but no more so than one would expect from excavationsin the heartof Athens,which possessedone of the majorportsof the EasternMediterraneanand whose made it a culturalmecca for visitorsfrom all over festivals,monuments,and educationalinstitutions the Greco-Romanworld. of most of the largerconcentrations coins come fromneighboringand nearbystates. Predictably, heads the list with over 300 pieces, chieflyfrom two prolificbronze varietiesof the late 4th Megara and earlier 3rd centuries B.C. (643, 644). Then follow three mints that are representedby more than 100 cataloguedpieces each: the Boiotian League, the city of Chalkis,and, particularlyafter refoundationas a Roman colony in 44 or 43 B.C., the city of Corinth. The only other foreign coinage that has been found in comparable quantity is the coinage of the Macedonian kings from Alexander III through Antigonos Gonatas. Many of the more than 250 Macedonian regal coins must have originallybeen used by Macedonian troops in the garrisonsimposed on the Athenians from 317 to 307 and again from 296 to 229. But it should be emphasized that about two-thirdsof the total come from a single coinage and reign, the Panbronze of Antigonos Gonatas (507, 508). Although it is possible that all coins of erecting-trophy this type were originallyconsigned to Attica for garrisonpay and dispersedonly secondarilyinto coins in the currencypool general circulation,the tremendousnumber of the Pan-erecting-trophy of 3rd-centuryAthens might equally result from an undocumenteddonative of bronze money by Gonatas to the Athenian people (p. 36 above).Nor can one insist that all the precious-metalcoins of Alexander and Philip III recoveredfrom the Agora, a gold stater (487) and ten silver drachms (488a-h, 496a, b), were necessarilysent to Athens in militarypayrolls;for such coins of Alexander served as one of the dominant internationaltrade currenciesof the Aegean world as late as the early 2nd centuryB.C., and some at least must have arrivedin commerce. It is notablein this connectionthat most of the otherforeigngold and silverfromthe excavations alsobelongsto coinagesthat enjoyedin theirday a similarstatusas preferredinternationalcurrencies for commerce and for militarypay. These include the severalsilver statersof Aigina (658a and b, 660, 661), an electrum staterof Kyzikos(866), a Persiangold daric (1003), three silver Lysimachi (461-463), a Rhodian didrachmand two or three pseudo-Rhodiandrachms(959-962), and fifteen Histiaian tetrobols(632a-o, of which eight had been deposited together in a hoard). If the loss of these pieces in the Agora is somehow a reflection of their wide distributionand popularity,the presence of plated forgeriesof silver coins can be attributedto their worthlessnessonce they were
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
167
detected and evidently thrown away.To thefourree Athenian coins mentioned previously(pp. 4, 7, the non-Atheniancatalogueadds a plated Celtic drachm(417), a plated drachmof Alexander 9-10), (488i), a plated hemidrachmof Siphnos(846), a platedstaterof Elis (747), which had been cut in half to expose and probablydemonitizeit, and a platedAiginetanstatercunninglyprovidedwith a bogus test cut during manufacture(659). Three hemidrachmsof Demetrios Poliorketes(502a and b, 503), whose presence suggests,perhaps, Macedonian militarypay, a Euboian League drachm (610), a Corinthian drachm (666), an Achaian League hemidrachm (745), a tetradrachmof Ptolemy VI (1011), and a denariusofJuba I (1035) complete the modest total of foreignnon-Roman silverfrom the excavations. The bronze coins struckby or in the name of Athens'severalcleruchiesmake up anothernotable group. As full-fledgedcitizens of Athens permanentlyresidingabroad in territorialcommunitiesof their own, Athenian cleruchsare sometimesidentifiedin writingsand inscriptionsas Atheniansbut at other times by a localized ethnic, as Lemnians,the people of Salamis,or the like.1Their coinages are similarly varied. In the 4th and early3rd centuriesB.C., Myrinaand Hephaistia,the two cleruchy cities on the island of Lemnos, each minted coins with AthenianAthena head/Owl types that were with a branch of Apollo and H4A accompanied by a local legend and an adjunct symbol, MYPI with the tongs of Hephaistos (455, 455A). But when Lemnos, after a century of independence, was returnedto Athens in 167/6 and the cleruchieswere reestablished,their coins bore the legend AOEbut used reverse types emblematic of the issuing city: Artemis' quiver and bow at Myrina (456) and a lighted race torch at Hephaistia(454). Still later,in the earlyAugustanperiod, Athens minted for the island a coinage with the types of Athena head/Hephaistos head and thejoint ethnic AOEIAHMNI (159A). SimilarAugustanissueswere struckfor the cleruchiesof Skyros(160: AE| CKY) and Imbros (161: AeEINBPI). Whether Augustan or earlier,the smaller Lemnian cleruchy coins with Artemis/Stag types (159: AEEIAHMNI) belong to the 1st centuryB.C. also transferto Athenianownershipin 167/6 B.C., Delos became the most importantof Athens' Upon overseaspossessions. Because of its proximityand closer ties to Athens, the island used Athenian money and did not have a coinage of its own. The one momentary exception is a special bronze emissionin two denominationsstruckby the Roman legate GaiusValeriusTriariusafterthe piratical devastationof the island in 69 B.C. (see 830); Triarius'name appears on obverses, but the ethnic is the AOEof the Athenian demos. Owing to its entirely "non-Athenian"character,the more common 4th-century bronze "of the people of Salamis,"inscribedEAAA(Ltvi.ov) (640-642), stands somewhat apart from foregoing cleruchycoinages.Archaeologicaldata indicatethat the Salaminianbronze began in the firsthalf of the century,apparentlyto fill a void in the small-denomination currencyon the islandand ultimately Attica in general. Its utility was diminishedwhen Athens' Eleusinianbronze entered throughout circulation,and afterAthens was coining bronze in her own name later in the century,the Salamis bronze was finallydiscontinued. of Turningto the smallerconcentrations foreigncoins, one suspectsthat the nine pieces fromthe northernBlackSea ports of Olbia, Pantikapaion, IstrianonLimen, and Phanagoria(430-434, 852) were broughtby sailorsaboardtransports engagedin the Euxinegrain tradeand that the majorityof the fifteen early Ptolemaic bronzes (1004-1006, 1009) came with the soldiers sent by Ptolemy II to guard Attica at the outbreakof the ChremonideanWar.The abundant finds of Ptolemy I and II coins at severalAttic fortswhere these troopswere stationedmakeit clearthat for a few yearsin the early 260's B.C., Athens was being suppliedwith Ptolemaicmoney as at no other time in her history
1 2nd andMother inAncient City A.J. Graham, Colony Greece, ed., Chicago 1983, pp. 167-168.
168
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
(note 42 above, p. 11).But beyond such limited conjecturesas these, diminishinghistoricalreturns set in quickly,and it becomes difficultto attach significanceto the rest of the mostly isolated and seemingly random finds from dozens of Greek mints. A few coins owe their interest to discovery in a chronologicallysignificantcontext. Good examples are the three-assariacoins of Chios, 948a and 949, whose contextsof the mid-3rdcenturyafterChriststrengthenthe recent downdatingof the importantseriesof Chiote imperialsas a whole. Mention shouldalso be made of the few bronzecoins from the excavationsthat are noteworthyfor their artisticmerit. The large medallionlikeimperial bronzes from Philippolis(447), Pergamon(878), and Mytilene (905) stand out for their showiness and exceptionalcondition. Less well preservedbut of considerabledocumentaryvalue for the later career,heroization,and portraitureof the ostracizedAthenian statesmanThemistoklesis the large and quite rare imperial bronze of Magnesia on the Maiandrosthat pictures the altar and bronze statueof Themistoklesthat stood in the city agora (926). The essential question for the bronze coins catalogued in this chapter is to what extent they could havebeen used as money in a foreigncity likeAthens.Producedas token or fiduciarycurrency, did they retain their value when transportedacross the borders of the state that issued them and at implicitlyguaranteedtheirredeemability a given amountof silver?Or,leavingtheirvalue behind, or intentionallydiscardedin the Agora on account of their very worthlessness?The were they lost large cast bronze of Olbia, 433, may have made a fine souveniror barteringtrinketin 4th-century Athens, but it is hard to imagine an Athenian shopkeeperaccepting it as a conventionalmeans of payment in a normal retail transaction.But this is a highly unusual coin, which ordinarilywould have to be taken to a moneychanger.When we turn to smaller,more conventional coins, there is reason to believe that at least in the 4th and 3rd centuriesB.C., foreign bronzes were generally negotiablein Athenian commerce.2 The best evidence comes from the Agora A 18:8 hoard, analyzed and dated to the 260's B.C. on pages 35 and 302. Apart from four Athenian lead military tokens and two small silver coins (a hemidrachmof Demetrios Poliorketesand a drachm of Lysimachos),the deposit contained 92 legible bronze coins, of which 45 are Athenian, 21 Eleusinian,and the remaining 30 percent from foreign mints: Megara (16), Phokis (4), Lokris(2), and the Carian mint of Demetrios Poliorketes, Aigina, Chalkis,and Larissa(1 coin each). Since the hoard'sowner clearlyregardedthese non-Attic bronze coins as worth holding on to, the presumptionis that he could have spent them about as freelyas he could have spent his local Athenian bronze money.And since all the non-Atticbronzes are essentiallysimilarin diameter and weight to the Athenian and Eleusinianpieces in the hoard, all AE 3 dichalkia,one expects that the non-Attic coins would have passed in Athens at the same it value. In supportof these suppositions shouldbe rememberedthat in the 4th centurythe Athenians to usingthe bronzecoins of Salamisand the Eleusinianfestivalsfor a generation became accustomed or more before the appearance of their Athena/Owl bronze and that for a while after the latter entered circulation, all three bronze currenciesremained in use together.3 In an already mixed monetary context such as this, one would not expect random AE 3 pieces from Megara, Chalkis, or other Greek states to meet with much discrimination,especiallysince their value was so slight: if each coin was worth no more than a quarterof an obol, it is unlikelyto have made much difference to anyone whether a given AE 3 piece happened to have been minted locally or outside Attica. This suggests in turn that it did not make much differenceto the state. For whether or not the
2
Acceptabilityof most foreignbronze coins found at Corinth is assumedin Price 1967, pp. 367-369. 3 See the late 4th-centurydestructiondeposit of KerameikosBuildingZ-3, p. 298 below.
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
169
Athenianseverpassed a law in the 4th or earlier3rd centurydiscriminating againstthe use of foreign bronze coins, there is certainlyno evidence for the effectivenessof such legislation. AE The higher-valuePan-erecting-trophy 2 hemiobols of Antigonos Gonatas provide further evidence of the actual use of non-Athenianbronze coins in 3rd-centuryB.C. Athens. Granted that these were introducedwhile Athenswas underMacedoniancontroland beforeAthens had begun to mint in this larger bronze denomination, the Macedonian bronze circulatedneverthelessin such volume that when the Athenians called it in after 224, they were able to restrikeover it a very substantialbronze coinage of their own (69). The duoviralbronze of Antonian andJulio-ClaudianCorinth (670-704) is another non-Attic currencythat calls for special consideration.The close size equivalencybetween the duoviralasses and the Athenian Period IV AE 1 pieces that constitutedAthens' main bronze currencyin these same periods surely accounts for the exceptional total of 48 Corinthianasses found in the Agora. Proof of their absorptioninto the pool of circulatingmoney comes from the five asses with heads of Nero that had been intentionallycut in half. This operation was performed on a number of local AE 1 coins circulatingin Julio-ClaudianAthens but is unattested among the duoviralasses recoveredin the excavationsat Corinthitself.4Even so, it is doubtfulwhether such Corinthianasses ever reached Athens in sufficientquantity to have had a perceptibleeffect on the city's currency. In numbersof Agora finds,no other non-AthenianGreekcoinage of the Roman period can begin to rival the duoviralbronze of Corinth. But when the Agora total of 63 duoviralasses and fractions is compared with the approximately4,000 Athenian Period IV coins from the excavations,it is clear that this Corinthian coinage could have made a barely marginaldifferenceat most. Indeed, for non-Attic Greek bronze coinages that did have a significantimpact on Athenian monetary circulation,one must go back to the late 4th- and early 3rd-centuryAE 3 coinage of Megara and to the Pan-erecting-trophy bronze of Antigonos Gonatas. After the Athenian restrikingof this Macedonian bronze in the 220's, therefore, the inflow of supplementaryoutside bronze currencieswas sharply reduced, either because the supply of Athenian bronze had become more abundantor, more probably,because a new attitudeor policy discouragedthe,use of non-Athenian bronze now that bronze coins were more commonly issued in larger denominations and were playing a larger role vis-a-vis silver in the monetary economy. The figures collected on page xxvi show that of the total 4th- and 3rd-centuryB.C. bronze coins excavated in the Agora, approximately20 percent are non-Attic. For later centuries (except for the 1st century after Christ when Athens did not strike coins), the percentage ranges from 7 to 2 percent if we count only Greek coins, or 12 to 2 percent if we include all Roman bronze with the Greek. Attic hoards give the same picture. In contrastto the sizable non-Attic component of the 3rd-centuryA 18:8 hoard, bronze hoards from the 2nd and 1st centuriesB.C. contain only the occasional strayforeignpiece. If allowanceis made for the exceptionalhoardingof Roman sestertii in the mid-3rd century after Christ, the evidence from the Herulian-invasion hoards of A.D. 267 is no different.The straynon-AthenianGreekcoins accountfor a mere 0.3 percentof the total coins in all these post-3rd-century hoards.5Whethersuch strayswere keepsakesor coins hastilymistaken B.C.
See above, pp. 92-93. 729, a Neronian as of Sikyon,was also halved at Athens. Only 15 of the 3,402 bronzecoins fromthe fourteenAttichoardsof the late 2nd and early 1stcenturiesB.C. surveyed on pp. 66 and 67 above are not Athenian. There is 1 non-Athenianpiece among the 713 coins of the Chaidari and Agia Varvarahoards of the end of the 1st century B.C.(pp. 80-81 above). Herulian-invasionhoards (p. 117 above) have producedjust 4 coins from other Greek cities: 1 of Thessalonikeand 1 of Argos in the ca. 972-piece Numismatic Collection of Athens lot of the Eleusis 1902 hoard, and 1 of Chios (949) and 1 of Lydian Tripolis (969b) in the Agora hoard Deposit B 17:1A. 5
4
170
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
as Athenian, one cannot attach any more significanceto them than to the occasional Canadian penny or dime that will usuallyturn up in a large accumulationof U.S. change today. at The Canadian-U.S. analogy probably illuminatesthe "circulation" Athens of most of the non-Atticcoins cataloguedbelow.As with any Canadiancoin in the U.S., the lower its value and the more similarits appearanceto local coins, the more likelythat a foreigncoin might informallypass No from hand to hand. But this is hardlythe same as officialacceptability. foreign coin could ever the advantageof legally enforcedcirculation6and could alwaysbe refused,in which case its enjoy owner would have to go to the money-changersand take the best exchange he was offered. After the restrikingof Macedonian bronze in the later 220's B.C., foreign bronze coins apparentlywere in disfavored normalretailtransactions. Nevertheless,since they were alwaysworth somethingat the money-changers'tables, the great bulk of those that have turned up in the Agora were, like the thousandsof local Athenian bronze coins from the excavations,most likelylost by accident. The coins are catalogued in the traditionalorder: by geographicalarea, then by cities of the area arrangedalphabeticallyand by rulers.Coin varietiesin the earlierpart of the catalogue,Italy which is to Thessaly, are chiefly referencedto entries in the fully illustratedCopenhagen Sylloge, From Museum Catalogue. of the British generally more useful than the correspondingearly volumes Illyricumonwards I cite the more complete BMC. References to these works are directly to the under consideration. Thus, for coin numbers of the city (BMC)or region (Copenhagen Sylloge) example,the referenceBMC 145-148 undervariety573 is to coin nos. 145-148 of Leukas,regionof to Akarnania,in the BMC volume Thessaly Aetolia 184). The dates assigned to the pre-imperial (p. are probablymore eclecticallyderivedthan they shouldbe. On the whole, the datingof the coinages with CopenhagenSylloge its practiceof assigningbroaddatesby centuriesis preferredto the absolute historicaldates favoredby the BMC,except when such precisehistoricaldating is warranted.
CATALOGUE
ITALY
CISALPINE CELTS
Female head r.
*417
PP'-1 153
15 \
2.80
A. Pautasso,Le PrAomane Monete del' Itaia SettentriVarese 1966, onale, xxvii ff. pls. remain. For subaerateGaulish coins No traces of silver plating such as this that have been found in North Italian hoards, see ibid., pp. 95-96. Lion 1.;above, traces of a few blunderedletters.
CATALOGUE BRUNDISIUM
171
Head of Poseidon r.
Cop723-729
*418
AA-126
20 +- 8.45
KROTON
B.C. 4thcentury Head of young Herakles r. 12 \ 1.29 [KPO] below Crab. Cop1823
*419
K-645a
RHEGION
PHrINQN at r. of Lyre.
Cop1980
SICILY
AKRAGAS
late5thcentury-406 B.C.
HEMILTrRON
*421
00-1142
intentionallyhalved (found with coin 00-1141, a specimen of Athens variety 59, of the 260's B.C.)
172
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
GELA
ca. 420-405B.C.
TRIAS Horned head of river god r.; behind, wheat grain. *422 2-82 18 4 3.93 FEAAEabove Bull walking 1.; in ex., three pellets. GRC,fig. 19
MAMERTINOI
423
I-280a
PENTOKION
424
H-1234
SYRACUSE
17
4 2.93+
426 a b
NN-2123 Z-2994
[EYPA] above Head of Athena 1., wearing Corinthianhelmet. 20 \ 6.65+ 17 / 4.85 (broken)
Hippocamp 1.
317-289 B.C.
[EMTEIPA]
Head of Artemis r. 427 --706 22 -+ 7.23+
173
Sardinianmint; GRC,fig. 19 found while demolishinga modern house in the Agora, Fora modern imitationof a Siculo-Punictetradrachm see Appendix A, coin b (p. 291 below).
TAURIC CHERSONESE
PANTIKAPAION
Shelov, no. 55
A-195a
22 f
3.95
Shelov, no. 75 nAN[TI] below Prow 1. obv. cmk.: head of Athena r. in Corinthian helmet
Formint attributionsand dating,see Morgantina pp. 113, 150-151, nos. 436, 437. II,
174
OLBIA
O-All-8
Eagle on dolphin 1. rev. in ex., inscribed n; GRC,fig. 19
Cop74
ISTRLANON LIMEN
IET.
434 *a b
PP'-1221 ET'-458a
13 12 -
1.30 1.71
THRACE
ABDERA
Cop374
435
N-1116
13 f
2.24+
(K 9-10:1)
PONTICA APOLLONIA
after400 B.C.
CATALOGUE
BYZANTION
175
r Y above
437 B'-620a Cow walking on dolphin 1. 17 \ 3.09+
Cop488
DEULTUM
A.D.
222-235: JuliaMamea COL-FLPA-CDEVL around Eagle on altar;on each side a standardwith a star in center; in ex., T. J. Jurukova,Die von Munzriigung Berlin 1973, Deultum, no. 173
IVLIAMA-MEAAVG Bust r.
*438
IIe-790
24 t
6.93
(A 14:2) GRC,fig. 24
MARONEIA
ca. 398-347 B.C. Horse prancing r. MAP-lNI-TQN Square containing vine and grapes. E. Schonert-Geiss, Die Miinprgung vonMaroneia, Berlin 1987, nos. 598-943
439 *a b
c
13 \ 15 t 11 t
440
r-964a
26 t
6.77+
SchOnert-Geiss [AIONY'OY- EQTHPOEMAPQNITQN]Dionysos (under 439 above), two spears and nos. 1354-1510 stg. 1., holding grapes. ob,v., two circularcmks.: one containing a head, one a rose(?) Similar,but at lower 1. monogram based on H. Schonert-Geiss (under 439 above), nos. 1511-1639
Similar. 441 *a b 18 \ 17 t
X-120 r-171
5.92 3.99+
176
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
MESEMBRIA
BMC 5-7
Cop660, 661
PAUTALIA
PERNTHOS
445
IIII-53a
23 t
5.42
Schonert-Geiss (under 445 above), nos. 899 (obv.)and 854 (rev. [Gordian Il])
*446
1-1590
30 /
17.80
CATALOGUE
PHILIPPOPOLIS
177
AVTO M AVPHAANTONEINOC CEB Bust 1., laur., cuir., dr. *447 S-3788 41 f 37.63
MHTPOnOAEQC (sic)Herakles stg. 1., hand resting on club, holding lion's skin. GRC,fig. 25
Cop784
0iAinnononAEQC NQI[K]OPOV
TRAIANA AUGUSTA
cf. BMC 8, 9
COELA
A.D.218-222: Elagabalus ANTO-NINVS PIVS Bust of Elagabalusr., laur., cuir., dr. *449 rr-5 17 t 2.54 AELMVNICOE-LA Prow r.; cornucopia above. BMC 4
SESTOS
4th-3rdcentury B.C.
Herm.
[E]-A Amphora.
Cop932, 933
450
NN-1036a 12 -+ 1.63
[EHE] at r. of Lyre.
Cop936, 937
178
IMBROS
276/261-167 B.C. Female head r. [IMBPOY]at 1. of Hermes Imbriamosstg. r., before thymiaterion,holding branch. Kleiner 1976, p. 20, no. 1 (B 20:9) Cop952-957
452 *a b *c
15 t 3.45 13 t 1.92 12 4 1.27 Between 166 and 86 B.C.the reestablished Atheniancleruchyon Imbrosstruckan AE 2 emissionwith a reverse that repeatsthe present reverseof ithyphallicHermes Imbriamosbefore thymiaterion,althoughwith the legend AeENAIfN; the obverse type, Athena head in Corinthianhelmet, was modeled on the obverseof the standard "Muinzen KleruchenaufImbros," der 2nd-centuryB.C.Athenian FulminatingZeus AE 2 (F.W. Imhoof-Blumer, AM 7, 1882, pp. 146-148; idem, Amsterdam1883, p. 49, no. 49). Monnaes grecs, The bronze here representedin three Agora specimensshould be earlierand presumablybelongs to the long period of Imbrian independence from Athens which began in 276 or 261 B.C. (Ferguson,p. 320, note 3). For an Augustan"cleruchy" issue with the compound legend AGE INBPI,see 161. NN-1126 9-994 ET-285
LEMNOS
Hephaistia 276/261-167 B.C. Male head r., diad. H-0IA-I Race torch between pilei of the Kabeiroi. (from drain deposit with coins to 86 B.C.) Cop979
15 18 18 16
/ t t
t 5.03
166-86B.C. Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 15 \ 2.88 12 / 2.79 14 \ 2.70 E Race torch bound with fillet. AE Cop(Atica) 102, BMCAttica 577
By size and arrangementof the ethnic, this last varietyis relatedto AthenianAE 3 varietiesof ca. 170-86 B.C. (PeriodIII).The race-torchreverseand the rude styleof the Athena head make it dear, however,that it shouldbe to attributed the Atheniancleruchyat HephaistiaafterLemnoswas retured to Athens in 167/6 (Polybios30.20). 456 is a parallelstrikingfrom Lemnos'second cleruchycity,Myrina.
CATALOGUE
179
It is probablethat at least a few of the coinslistedunder455A are from4th- or early3rd-century Hephaistia. B.C. For an early Augustanissue in the name of the Lemnian Atheniansbut with an Hephaistos-headreversetype, see 159A.
Myrina
386-276/261 B.C. Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 455 *a *b *c *d *e *f g h 41 coins ME-31 0-505 ET'-528 fl-432 NN-1790 T-1602 II9-697 X-107 12-16 14 t 15 t 14 -17 t 13 t 12 t 13 A 15 vAv. 2.19 (27) 3.16 2.82 2.16 2.47 1.82 1.71 2.26 very worn MYPI (usuallyupward at 1.) Owl stg., facing; usually at r., a branch. Cop988, 990
Similar,except legend and symbol illegible. 455A 28 coins 12-15 mm., of variety 455 or the parallelbut less common Hephaistia variety Cop973: Head of Athena in Corinthianhelmet/Owl, stg., facing,between tongs (on 1.)and HOAdownwards(at r.). *a Z-2854 14 \ 1.98 obv. cmk.: X in incuse circle b 0-657 14 t 1.91 same c E-91 14 - very worn (N21:4) d IIE-529 14 - 2.58 (B 13:1) Three specimensof 455 were excavatedat Olynthos,one definitelyfromthe floorof a house destroyedin 348,10 the other two in less clear stratigraphical which neverthelessrelate to the pre-348 occupation of circumstances, the city."1 The Athena/Owl coinage of Myrina (and Hephaistia,see 455A) thus began between the restoration of the Lemnian cleruchies in 386 and the middle of the 4th century.A considerablevariety in style implies a lengthy period of minting, lasting probablyuntil the loss of Lemnos to Athens in 314, or even later if some of the coins shouldhappen to belong to the restoredcleruchyof 307-276 or -261 (Ferguson, 49, 64, 320, note pp. 3). Since the larger 14-17 mm. pieces were probablyissued as dichalkia(see p. 38 above), the of countermarking 455Aa and b with an X might have servedto devalue each to a X(aXxou0). Forspecimensin published2nd-centuryB.C. deposits,see Kleiner 1975, p. 307, nos. 112, 113 (Myrina),p. 312, no. 195 (Myrinaor Hephaistia,not Athens as published); 319, no. 267 (Myrina); Kleiner 1976, p. 12, nos. 4, 5 p. (Myrinaor Hephaistia). 10 XIV p. 422, no. 1; from the floor of house B vi, room f. Olynthus 1 Olynthus p. 86, nos. 760, 761, respectivelyfrom Streetvi before house A vi 2, and from a house(?)in Section G, VI, Area 29, probablyat floor level. Nicholas Cahill informspe litteras the areas,levels, coins, and other materialfound that with these coins point to deposit at the time of the 348 destructionor during the habitationthat preceded it. Although also belonging to 348 destructiondebris, OlnthusIX, p. 240, no. 1 is not a coin of Myrina.
Similar.
180
NON-ATHENIAN COINS 166-86B.C. A Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. Quiver,upright, crossed by Q diagonal bow. E Sv. 106.27-29
456 *a *b *c *d
A-9E; same obv. die as 456c Size, format,and crudeobversestyleassociatethisvarietywith the Athena/Race torchAE 3 cleruchyemission of Hephaistia 454. Since the bow and quiver of Apollo or Artemis was, like Apollo's branch on 455 and the bow on Cop989, used from time to time as a symbol of Myrina (see under 159 and note 218 above, p. 111), the presentemissionis doubtlessfrom this second cleruchycity on Lemnos.
13-16 14 / 14 / 13 \ 13 \
SAMOHRACE
1st B.C.12 2nd-early cenury Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 457 a b
c
EAMO (457a, b) or EAM00P (457c) at 1. of great goddess seated 1. rev., downwardsat r., nYeOK same name illegible [EAMO] Forepartof ram r.
Cop993-1001
cf. Cop1002
THASOS
ca. 390-310
B.c.13
11 -+ 0.97 10 - 0.63
[eA]EION between Bow and club; rudder within bow. below bow, star within bow, A, and caduceus?
cf. Cop1052
12 O. Picard,"Thrace,"in CRWLR (pp. 79-92), p. 81. 13 0. Picard,"L'atelier monetairede Thasos,"RN,ser.6, 29, 1987, pp. 7-9, identifyingalso the denominationsof 459 and 460.
181
306-281 B.C. Lysimachos, AR DRACHM Head of young Herakles,r. BAEIAEQEIAYIIMAXOY Zeus seated 1., holding eagle and scepter;at 1., dolphin above lion's forepart;below throne, tripod or quiver(?). Thompson, EssaysRobinson, no. 36 (but with differentsymbol below throne)
*461
T-1598
16 /
3.41
AR DRACHM Head of deified Alexander r. BAEIAEflEI AYSIMAXOY Athena seated 1., holding Nike; at 1., lyre. Thompson, EssaysRobinson, no. 174
*462
_E-79
20 4 4.26
Ephesos mint, ca. 294-287 B.C.;EABC,p. 152, pl. 17, coin R:69 (A 18:8);GRC,fig. 16
AR TETRADRAcHM Similar. Similar,except at 1., k; on throne, BY; below, trident between dolphins. 13.85 cf. Cop1142, 1143
*463
AA-300
35 t
Head of Ares r., wearing Attic helmet. 464 a b ZZ-109 e-345 18 X 18 t 3.76 3.03
Cop1149-1157
Rhoimetakes 11 B.C.-A.D. 12 I,
4 4.39
14 H. Robinson 183-200), pp. 197-198: Seyrig,"Monnaieshellenistiquesde Byzance et de Calcedoine, in Essays (pp. "Les'emissions Byzance avec tridentorni et initiales." de
182
AKANTHOS
466
Z-461
Cop24
AMPHIPOLIS
ca. 31-27B.c.:
Octuian
Cop107
APHYTIS
ca. 187 B.C. Head of Zeus Ammon I *469 NN-1121 16 t 3.46 [AtY] above Two birds billing. Kleiner 1976, p. 15, no. 1 (A-B 19-20:1) Cop131, 132
BOTrrIAA
187-168/7
B.C.16
15 OlyntusIX, p. 216, no. 3; pp. 263-266: eight specimens. Note the seventy Olynthos specimens of the related smallerdenomination(Cop 23), Athena head/AKIANin square(Olynthus p. 263, and Olynthus p. 413, no. 2). 22, IX, XI, 16 Touratsoglou,CRWLR, 55, pl. 7:17. p.
CATALOGUE
DION
183
43 B.C. (orlater)
RPC I, 1503
ca. 400-348 B.C. Head of Apollo r., laur. *472 T-11 15 4 2.87 XAA-KIA-Ef2Naround Lyre. Cop246
OURANOPOLIS
4th-3rdcentury B.C. Star of eight rays. 473 a b rr-268 Br'-309 18 - blistered 16 - brokenedges [OYPANIAQ-nOAERE] Aphrodite Ourania seated 1. Cop455-457
PELLA
after168/7 B.C.17
nEAI[AHE]Cow feeding r.
Cop266-275
PHILIPPOI
? IAIlfll2Nat r. of
Tripod; above, branch; at 1., bunch of grapes.
BMC 13
*475 17
K-7
16 -4 5.45
Price, CRWLR,p. 100, and Mattingly 1990, p. 67. Touratsoglou (CRWLR,pp. 55, 63, pi. 10:2) prefers 187-168/7 B.C.
184
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
27B.C.-A.D. 68
Nike stg. 1. VIC-AVG 476 *a MM-150 b IIO-864 c II-650 20 t 2.75 18 4 2.99+ 17 4 3.01+
[E]KI-QDove r.
Cop322
THESSALONIKE
187-168/7 B.c.19 Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. eEEEAAOINIKHE Horse running r. below horse, caduceus (BMC 40) (E 14:3) rev. symbol illegible 168/7-146 B.C.20 Head ofJanus. 479 S-2981 18 -+ 4.22 Cop370 [e]EEEAA[O]JNIKHE] Two centaurs rearingback to back. BMC 40-42
478 a r-1099
b A-291
21 t blistered 20 f 5.69
37B.C.
*480
E-1325
[--------]
4 4.11
18 Oyntus IX, p. 227, no. 4; pp. 311-312; Olynt XIV, p. 419, no. 2: total offifty-eight specimensfrom Olynthos. 19 Touratsoglou,CRWR,Ip. 55, pl. 8:9. 20 Ibid.,pl.8:16.
CATALOGUE
A.D. 98-117: Trajan
185
[------- ]
eECCAAO[N IKEWN]
Nike striding1.; in field 1., crescent.
A.D.
[------
Nike [OEC]CAAO-[NIKEWN]
striding1., carrying Kabeiros image and palm.
A.D.
484
Z-1756a
in laurel OECICAAOINIKEJ2N
wreath.
KINGS OF MACEDONIA
485 a b
c
d e
above Young male head (ApoU r., lo?) [IAIllnnOY] taenia. Nude horseman r. wearing 19 - blistered below horse, NE(as McClean 3374) 17 \ broken same? 15 +- broken below horse, N-monogram 17 - 4.34 no details 15 - broken obv. head 1. (as Cop616); no details
Head of young Herakles r. s,
Cop581-612
0IAinl[nOY]
Club.
Cop618-620
486
$-215
12 -
broken
Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet decorated with snake. *487 ME-204 19 t 8.60
AAE-ANAPOY behind BMCAlexander 2598 Nike stg. 1., holding wreath and stylis;to 1., : and race torch. Sardis mint, ca. 323-319 B.C.; Kleiner 1975, p. 307, pl. 76, no. 114 Drachm Mints : 12-14); GRC,fig. 16; M. Thompson, Alexander's desandMiletus(Numismatic Studies New York 1983, no. 170, 16),
186 AR DRAcIm
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
488 *a
ET-250
16 t 18 t 17 t 16 t 20 / 19 t 16 t 18 ? 18 /
*b II-525 *c A-415
*f *g
h *i
rev at 1., t. BMCAkxander r. 3109: Kition mint, ca. 325-320 B.C.GRC, 16 fig. rev at 1., spearhead;below, star.BMCAexander v. 1761: "Kolophon" mint, ca. 323-319 B.C. rev at 1., 4; below, r. BMCAexander 1817: "Kolophon"mint, ca. r. 314 0-301 B.C. rev at 1.,ME; below [ivy leaf]. BMCAkxander v. 1560: "Abydos" mint, ca. 310-301 B.C. rev at 1., E; no symbol below. BMCAkxander v. 2771: WesternAsia inor(?)mint, ca. 323-280 B.C. v.at 1., crescent(?) details details LtedAE; no details
MacedonianBronze,ca. 336-323 B.C. Young male head r., diad. 489 a b c d e Symbolson rev.illegible 17 -+ 3.76 A-217 14 \ 3.44 B'-935 15 t 4.10 K-1505 NN-1686 17 . 3.59 16 \ 4.31 -440 AAEEANAPOYabove Horse prancing r. 338BMCAlxander 370
Head of young Heraklesr. 490 *a b c d Symbolson rev.illegible 18 t 4.90 K-1756 20 4 4.20 BE-298 17 4 5.23 BE-576 19 - 4.97 S-3a
491
H-292
Similar. 13 / 1.64
Similar.
BMCAexander 328
BMCAkxander 327
187
BAEI between Bow in case and club. Macedonian mint B A between Bow with quiver and club. symbol on rev. illegible;Macedonian mint BAEIAEfZ between Bow in case and club; below, race torch. WesternAsia Minor(?) mint
PhilipIII, 323-316B.C.
267 BMCAlexander
BMCAlexander 376-390
Similar.
BMCAlexander 2800
495
AP-34
19 +- 5.68
AR DRACHM Similar.
0IAinnOYbehind
Zeus seated 1., holding eagle and scepter. rev. at 1., torch; below, Ml. BMCAlexander Sardis mint, ca. 323P68:
319 B.C.
496 *a
00-1051
16 t 16 t
3.80 3.90
*b ME-136
rev. at 1., bee or rosebud;below TI. BMCAlexander 92A: Sardis P92, mint, ca. 323-319 B.C. Regal Anonymous Bronze
ca. 325-300 B.C.
*497
E-1946
BMCAlexander 419
The datingby K. Liampi("ZurChronologieder sogennanten'anonymen'makedonischenMunzen des spaten 4. Jhs. v. Chr.,"JVG 36, 1986, pp. 41-65) of this (ibid.,group 11.3)and all other varieties of the Macedonian Shield/Helmet Bronzewithouta royalmonogramon the shieldto the last quarterof the 4th centuryis confirmed by the thirteen Shield/Helmet pieces that were excavated, along with coins of Alexander III and a coin of Kassandros,in the Northwest Quarter of Olynthos, inhabited until 316 (Olynthus pp. 237, 394, nos. 2-4, IX, with pp. 329-330 and p. 297 below)and the twentyexamplesexcavatedat the Olynthianport at Mekyberna,also abandoned in 316 (Olynthus pp. 257, 397, nos. 3-5, with pp. 372-374). IX, Similar. Similar,except symbol or monogram on shield illegible. 9 coins, 16-17 mm., of uncertainMacedonian Shield/Helmet variety Tracesof a royalmonogramappearin the centerof the obverseon two of these coins (BB-666, T-346), but it is unclear whether the monogram is that of Demetrios (as 506), Pyrrhos,or Antigonos Gonatas. For the issues of these kings,see Liampi (aboveunder 497), p. 45, pl. 6:a-c.
498
188
COINS NON-ATHENILAN 316-297 B.C. Kassandros, Head of young Herakles r. Recumbent lion r.
[K]AEElA[NIAPOYI
Cop1 38-1141
499
XA-76
17
t 4.33
KAEEANLPOY BAE:IAEflE
Nude horseman crowning horse r.
Similar.
Cop1142-1153
500
17-21 Av.5.35 (12) 19 - 3.80 19 t 5.69 20 t 4.87 Head of Apollo r., laur.
cf. below horse'sbelly, A (?), Cop1147 between horse's legs, bunch of grapes(?),cf. Cop 1151 no details, as on all other specimens
*501
00-1343
17
AR
HEMIDRACHM
Nike on prow 1.
AHMHTPIOYI BAEIAMER
Poseidon, striding brandishing trident 1.;at 1., A; at r., S. Tarsos mint, ca. 298-295 B.C. GRC,fig, 16 EABC,p. 152, p1. 17, no. Q.68 (A 18:8)
Newell, no. 45
502
rr- 187
,..U.-78
14 13
1.59
(reweighed)
t 1.51
AR - HEEMIDRACHM
Head of Demetrios r., vvearing diadem and bull's horn *503 '11-330 12 +- 0.96+
Poseidon brandishing trident 1.;at r., ivy leaf. Ephesos mint, Ca.301-295 B.C.
504 *a *b c d
e
f g h
B A above Prow r. Newel, nos. 20, 34, Head of Demetrios r., 40, 170, 172-174 wearing Corinthianhelinet with horn. 300-295 B.c. 15-17 Av.2.87(13) 18 coins no details 16 3.94 A-283 same 16 t 2.55 11-6 same 16 t 2.27 NN-131 same 16 t 3.61 BB-20 below prow,M1.Newell, no. 20: Salamis mint broken r-781 same (A 17:3) 1111-1002 broken below prow,R. Newell, no. 34: Tarsosmint broken 00-338 broken EA-377 (O-R 7-10)
2.11
B A above Prow r.; at r., Newell, no. 167 double axe; below,R. Carian mint?, after 300 B.c.; EABC,p. 152, p1. 17, no. P:67 (A 18:8)
189
506
BA-EI Macedonian helmet; Newell, nos. 125uncertain symbol at 1. 131 / 3.81 NN-1688 17 Amphipolisor Pella mint, ca. 294-288 B.C.;Kleiner 1976, p. 16, no. 10 (A-B 19-20:1) For the attributionof this variety to Demetrios Poliorketes(as opposed to Demetrios II, cf. Cop1224-1229), see Newell, pp. 118-120, and Liampi (under497 above),p. 45. 277-239 Antigonos Gonatas, Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet.
B.C.
Cop1205-1211
507 *a *b *c d *e *f g h i j *k *1 *m *n
160 coins 00-305 NN-1585 N-529 InnI-260 r-1110 NN-2116 E-4386 ME-328 Z-1118 e-189 A-210a H-46 A-1 _-467
18-22 Av. 5.52 (99) 20 -* 5.39 21 +- 8.73 6.06 21 19 6.12 21 -+ 8.00 18 / 4.49 6.68 20 22 - 5.28 20 4.43 21 +- worn 19 1 6.22 19 4 5.29 18 - 5.25 19 6.57 Similar.
rev. at 1., 1 at 1., 0 (as also r-619 and r-1098) at 1., 0 or flower(?)(as also H'-2326) at 1., K over 4>(as also K-1307) thick, angularflan, as 507b rev. Pan, holding wreath in r., crowning trophy at 1., K (as also T-7) at 1., Macedonian helmet with two side plumes same, and at lower r., B at lower r., trident at lower 1., pedum; obv. cmk.: facing head of Hera obv. cmk.: facing head of Hera (as also 00-327) cmk.: head of Pan r. in circularincuse (as also rr-348) cmk.: wreath (as also K-1004) Similar. Pan crowning(?)trophy same Cop1212, 1213
508
The size distinction between the two denominationsof this Pan-erecting-trophy bronze is clearer from the than fromour illustrations. judge from the Athenian evidence To specimensillustratedin the Copenhagen Sylloge (p. 38 above), the common AE 2 variety 507 ought to representthe hemiobol, the rare AE 3 variety 508 the quarter-obol. The countermark a facinghead of Hera on threeAgora specimens(see 507k, 1)was added at Chalcis;Picard, of Chakis, 180-181, for other examplesand discussion.The identification the profilehead in the countermark of pp. of 507m (cf.McClean also 509c below)as Pan'sseems clear from the little horn above the brow. 3606, 3608; Head of young Herakles r. 509 *b c *, d e 19 coins B A above Nude horseman crowning horse r.; below, J1. Cop1214-1221
*a 0-6
HI-759 NN-1455 ET'-549 EA-161
rev. cmk.: head of Pan r. in incuse circle obv. cmk.: Boiotian helmet in incuse circle between front legs of horse, 4 These Herakles/Horsemancoins bear the same ANTI monogramas Gonatas'Athena/Pan bronze (507, 508) and have been variouslyascribedto Gonatas(Cop 2114-2121; Price 1967, p. 374, no. 28) or to AntigonosDoson, 229-220 B.C. (e.g., by Head 1881, pp. 261-263; Svoronos 1908, p. 230; Walker 1978, p. 43). The problem is bound up with the attributionof the AntigonidPoseidon/Apollo-prowtetradrachms, which I. L. Merkergave to
16-19 16 4 17 t 17 \ 19 +- 4
at r. of horse, crescent
190
NON-ATHENIAN COINS Doson ("TheSilverCoinage ofAntigonos Gonatasand AntigonosDoson,"ANSMN 1960, pp. 39-52, followed 9, by Boehringer[p. 99]), but which more recent studies(R. W. Mathisen, "PanHeads and Poseidon Heads: Two Third-CenturyMacedonian TetradrachmTypes," SAN 16, 1985, pp. 29-35; N. G. L. Hammond and F. W. in Walbank,A History Macedonia Oxford 1988, pp. 594-595, following C. T. H. R. Erhardt, Studies the III, of Doson[diss. State Universityof New Yorkat Buffalo 1975]) now reattribute Reigs of Dmetrus II andAntsgonus to the later years of Gonatas' long reign. This reattribution leaves Doson without any silver in his own name, but this is paralleledby the preceding monarch, Demetrios II, 239-229 B.C., who did not mint, at least in his own name, in either silveror bronze. ProfessorMathisen has compiled a record of severalhundredAntigonid bronzes and in correspondencehas kindlyexplained that there are good groundsfor assigningthe Herakles/Horsemanpieces to Gonatas. Some of these coins are markedwith a controlsymbolof Macedonianhelmetwith two largesideplumes,which occursalso on a numberof the Athena/Pan bronzes(cf.507h and Cop1205-1207) and all Gonatas'silverdrachms(Cop 1203). To this one may add that (eaving aside the rare,small-moduleAthena/Pans, 508, which may antedatethe start of the horseman series)the two bronze varietieshave differentsizes and weights, clearlyrepresenttwo different Unlike the AE 2 Athena/Pan pieces, the AE 3 denominations,and could verywell havebeen struckconcurrently. in Athens,nor like the Athena/Pan coins were they Herakles/Horsemanbronzedid not circulatevery commonly with Atheniantypes(see 69). But both circumstances called in duringthe 220's and overstruck may be explained and need not imply any chronologicaldistinction. by the smallersize and value of the Herakles/Horsemancoins Just as Athens massively recoined the larger Athena/Pan pieces, so thousands of the Antigonid Herawith local types in Boiotia;see 595. kles/Horseman bronzeswere overstruck
Head of Zeus r.
B [A]I0 Athena Alkidamos stridingr., brandishing thunderboltin raised r. hand, holding shield on extended 1. arm; at lower r., bird.
Cop1244-1246
*510
H-2190
19
-+
3.35 Cop1248-1251
broken
OlAinnoY BAEIAEtEI
Harpa r.; all in oak wreath.
Cop1261, 1262
lIAInnOY [BAEI]AE[nfE]t
Harpa 1.;all in oak wreath. in O-R 7-10) (intrusive 178-168 B.C. PhilipVorPerseus,
Cop1264
[Head of Perseusr.]
[----
1., Eagle stg three-quarters lifted, head to r. wings 514 BA-362 20 3.73 (Q6:2, see under P 6:2 and Q6:2)
Cop1254-1256 or 1271-1280
CATALOGUE
LEAGUE MACEDONIAN
191
3rdcentury Christ after AAEEANAPOY Head of Alexander wearing lion's skin r. 24 4 9.95 24 4 10.93 27 1 6.75 KOINONMAKEAONQN B NEQ Horseman r. Cop1372, 1373
515 *a b c
THESSALY
ANIANES
B.C. 4th-3rdcentury Head of Zeus 1., laur. 516 a b A-511 A-315 16 4. 1.18 15 \ 1.78 Warriorslinging r. [AINIANQN] Rogers, no. 137; Cop4, 5
B.C. ca. 168-1st century Head of Zeus r., laur. *517 'i-132 20 f 6.48 Similar. Rogers, nos. 143150; Cop22, 23
ATRAX
ATP-[Arl]-QN Horseman r.
GOMPHOI
519
K-294
192
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
GYRTON
4thcentury B.C. Head of Zeus 1. or r., laur. 520 a b c d fA-47 S-1841 AA-298 KK-523 19 18 21 18 /
t t
FYPT-f2NIQN Horse Rogers, nos. 232235; Cop59, 60 stepping r. Zeus head r. same Zeus head 1.; M monogram below horse (D 4:1) Zeus head 1.
HALOS
B.C. 4thcentury Head of nymph facing. cf. Rogers, nos. 238240, 242-245 and Cop 64, 65, all with Zeus-head obverses (4th-centuryB.C. context: in stone bedding of pebble floor of house) und A. Moustaka,Kulte Mythen Miinzen, Wirzburg 1983, aufthessalische no. 168. p. 135, pl. 2, [AAEf2N]Phrixos riding ram r.
KRANNON
*521
NN-2104a 15 % 4.75
B.C. 4thcentury Head of Poseidon r., laur. 522 B-504 19 / 3.69+ Bull charging r. MAFNIKPANN variant of Rogers, nos. 187-189 and Cop41, 42 [KPA]Thessalian horseman r. Rogers, nos. 179185; Cop39, 40
Thessalian horseman r.
*523
E-5010
15 t
2.46
LAMIA
B.C. 4thcentury Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthianhelmet. 524 1-1209 15 4 1.75 Philoktetes [AAMIEf2N] kneeling,shooting r. Rogers, no. 388; Cop84-86 [M]AAIE[fN] Philoktetesstg., shooting r. Rogers, no. 384; Cop87, 88
CATALOGUE
LARISSA
193
526
T-22
527
A-11
17 -
13 t 2.34 EABC,p. 152, pl. 17, coin S:70 (A18:8) 12 / broken The good condition (w2) of 529a in the A 18:8 hoard of the 260's suggeststhat the bronze coinage of Larissa might have continued into the 3rd century (so Kroll, EABC,p. 152), even though Larissa ceased to mint in silver around 320 B.C. (Martin [note 50 above, p. 12], p. 52). That this and the other Larissabronze varieties from the seventeenpieces (mostlyof varieties began well before the middle of the 4th centuryis clearnevertheless 528 and 529) from the Olynthos excavations(Olynthus p. 343; Olynthus IX, XIV, p. 424).
LARISSA KREMASTE
ca. 302-286B.C.
Head of nymph 1.
530
0-137
12 +- 1.68
MAGNETES
ca. 197-146B.C. Head of Zeus r., laur. *531 00-290 31 +- 6.56 Head of Zeus.1. or r., diad. 532 *a 1-487 b T-671 20 " 5.67 17 1 2.21 Rogers, nos. 348352; Cop161, 162 MAr-NH-TQ[N] Centaur r.; below, star. Rogers, no. 339; cf. Cop157-160
A.D.
534
0-44
[FA]IOYK BH [MAEIMEINOC] [APFrQMArNHTfN] Bust r., laur., dr. Argo with rowers r. " 23 5.38+
ORTHE
Trident in wreath.
[oP-el]
PHALANNA
Young male head r. 536 *a *b c d KK-267 0-323 Z-2268 ET'-450 20 20 19 19 t / / / 6.36 5.90 6.41 7.45
4AAANNAIDN Head of nymph r. rev., behind head, A; behind shoulder,Bo no rev. letters (Rogers,no. 452)
PHARSALOS
4thcentury B.C. Head of Athena facing I., three-quarters wearing helmet with three crests. 17 \ 2.74 Similar. e-A-P-n Horseman charging r. Rogers, nos. 494, 495
*537
E-4593
Similar.
538 a
AA-64
20 f
5.81
195
THssALAN LEAGUE
Head of Apollo r., laur. 540 *a *b c d e f g 21 coins NN-1992 00-14 1-168 E-3490 $-36 II-1276 K-1467 17-23 Av.5.80 (17) 19 \ 6.93 18 t 6.43 17 t 4.44 20 t 6.62 19 t 6.62 19 t 6.70 21 t 6.48
eEESAlAQN
Athena Itonia fighting r. rev. at r., lC(Rogers,no. 17)
Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 541 *a r-912 b H-651 c e-242 d e-352 e KTA-2 18 18 18 16 16
eEEEAIAQN
Horse stepping r.
t t t t t
A.D.
14-37: Tzberius
A.D.
81-96: Domitian Domitia and [AOMITIANEEBAETH] Bust r. Rogers, nos. 88, 89; Cop339
196
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
A.D. 117-138: Hadrian
[AAPIANON KAICAPA
eECCAAOI]
Bust r., laur. 544 H'-3439 21
4 4.38
NIKO-[MAXOY] Horse stepping r.; below, R. Rogers, no. 92; Cop341, 342
545
00-698
2.13
[-----
547
II-32a
[----548 1-321 24
eECCAA[QN]
Athena Itonia fighting r.
4 extremelyworn
OF ISLANDS THESSALY:PEPARETHOS
3rd-2ndcentury B.C. Head of young Dionysos r., wearing ivy wreath. 18 t 3.00
n-EIn-A
Kantharos.
*549
r-727
nE[nA]
Owl 1.
3.45
Fora coin of Peparethosin a 4th-centuryB.C. context, see p. 300 below.Forcoins of earlyAugustantimesstruck in the name of the Atheniancleruchsof the Thessalianisland of Skyros,see 160.
CATALOGUE ILLYRICUM
197
DYRRHACHION
2nd-lst century B.C. Head of Dodonian Zeus r. s AYP below Tripod; at 1. and r., magistrate'sname; all in olive
wreath.
BMC 158-169
551 *; a 1 b c d e f
17 . 18 t 18 f 17 18 .
(BMC 169) XAIPIAIAOY VIAQlTA(BMC 167, 168) [4I]AnQTA ] [nO]AAIl[f2NO' (BMC 165)
16 f
3.22
[---]lAPro[--
55 if comes froma context of the earlier1stcenturyB.C.: MartyrII, layer4 to east of terracottapipes."In this "r is layer,the latestAtheniancoin, of variety94 (99/8 B.C.), worn to the same slightdegree as the Dyrrhachioncoin.
SKODRA
168-1st century B.C. Head of Dodonian Zeus r. *552 00-320a 16 -+ 6.33 [IKOAPI-NQN] Illyriangalley. BMC 1
EPEIROS
NIKOPOLIS
[---]-
[-----]
Emperor charging on horsebackr.
4 3.37
A.D. 117-138: Hadrian
198
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
[AYrOYCTOC]
Head of Augustusr.
*555
E-155a
21 +- 3.01
A.D.
[NIKOnOAEWC] Galley 1.
A.D.
IEPAC] [NEKonOAEfQC|
Kybele riding lion r.
[------]
NEIKO]nOAEQ[C] [IEPAC
Oikonomidou, Caracalla,no. 21
NEI-KOnOAE?C IEPA[C]
TurretedNike, walking r., holding palm and wreath; at lower r., wreath.
*559
11-582
25 f
6.81
561
IIn-719a
posthumousAugustusissuesofNikopolis, see C. M. Kraays reviewof Oikonomidou,NC, ser. 7, 16, 1976, pp. 238-244; RPC I, p. 272.
21 On the
CATALOGUE
A.D.218-222: Elagabalus
199
562
BB-130
[-------]
[NEIKO]lOAEWC Galley r.
A.D. 260-268:
Salonina
NIKOnOAI] [IEPAC
Nike walking 1.;at 1., A.
5.55
EPEIROTELEAGUE
234-168 B.C. Head of Dione r., wearing stephanos and veil; behind, 3(. *564 E-887 22 +- 4.80 Bust of Artemis r.; bow and quiver at shoulder; at 1., K; at r., CE. 21 / 7.69 Head of young Herakles r. 566 T-28a 12 / 1.69 Franke(under 564), nos. 610-612 [An]EIIPQTAN Tripod; all in laurel wreath. P. Franke,Die Antiken von Miinzen Epirus, Wiesbaden 1961, no. 400 (this coin)
*565
0-475
AnEIIPQTAN
Club; all in wreath.
BMC 101-116
17 15 16 17
t t t
568
K-154
Bunch of grapes.
BMC 281
200
NON-ATHENIAN COINS 229-48 B.C. Head of Poseidon r., laur. Bull'shead; all in laurel wreath. BMC 449-468
569
III-440
17 t
570
EA-402
NIKAINQP
Forepartof galley r.
20 22 20 24 21 19 20 20
t 4. t t t
rev. above, kIl(IAQN (BMC 536, 537) same same same rev. above, [KOPKYIPAI2N]; below, illegible name (H 12:4) rev. same rev. same
BMC 619-621
AKARNANIA
LEUKAS
after167B.C.
AEYKAAII[N] and wheat ear above Club r.; below, AHMAPETOE; all in oak wreath.
BMC 145-148
573 *a b
IIO-358 BE-487
19 \
18 -
3.45
2.60
MEDON
ME upwardsbehind Owl r.
broken
CATALOGUE
THYRRHEION
201
BMC 10
AITOLIA
AITOLIANTLEAGUE
AITlAfnN
Kalydonian boar r.
BMC 27-33
[AITQlAfN]
Spearhead 1. no details same same; heavily worn
BMC 35-37
5.04
4.29 -
[A]IT|IA2N
Trophy;at lower 1., (.
BMC 39
Similar.
AITIAfQN
Spearhead and jawbone of boar; at 1., bunch of grapes.
BMC 43-62
579 *a b
19 BB-10 17 E-4742 c A-1272 17 d AA-982 16 e nIIn-942 20 f T-67a 16 16 g r-540 h-k H-144, NN-139,
4.29 \ 3.15 betwe< spearheadand jawbone, 41 or tICE en / broken KAEI(BMC 58) / broken ) (BMC 51) / 4.40 - 3.64 t 4.23 0-440, Q-354, all broken
/
22
Picard,Antre, 284-285, whose chronologyis followedalso for the other Aitolian League varieties. pp.
202
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
earl 2nd century B..?
Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 580 a *b c d 8-288 4-103 H'-3542 Z-2798a 18 18 17 20 \ \ +f 4.25 4.50 3.87 4.10
BMC 64-72
LOKRIS
LOKRIAN LEAGUE
BMC 57-68
_--72
BMC 71-76
BMC 51-56
Head of Athena r., weal Corinthianhelmet. 584 19 coins *a IIII-841 *b ZT'-506 c _-518 d ---77d 14-16 Av. 2.23 (14) 14 t 2.34
15 -+ 2.61
A-O Bunch of grapes. rev. at 1., greave (BMC 80) at r., ivy leaf (BMC 79) same EABC,p. 153, no. 72 (A 18:8)
196-146 B.C.
BMC 77-80
15 16 t
2.23 2.31
BMC 81-84
CATALOGUE b c NN-1396 II-537 17 18 4.35 4.62 [OnOYNTIQN]behind Hero stg. r., with sword and lance, feeding snake. Cop79
203
586
19 - 5.75 00-948 For the dating of varieties581-584, see Picard,Antre, 287-288, followingJacqueline Humphris'Lokrian pp. mint study currentlyin preparation.We thank Mmine. Humphrisfor her assistancein classifyingthe more worn Agora specimens. The two Lokriancoins from the Agora A 18:8 hoard of the 260's, 581c and 584d, are heavily and identically worn, suggestingthat the second coin was minted probablynot much after the startof the 3rd century.
PHOKIS
PHOKIAN LEAGUE
mid-4thcentury-346 B.c.
587 a b
E-207 NN-1843
Of2 in laurel wreath. BMC 94-96 small module: BMC 97-100 late4th-earlier centuy 3rd B.C.
BMC 94-100
0 or 0f' in olive wreath. BMC 66-77 Helmeted head of Athena, facing. 588 22 coins 12-15 Av. 1.70(14) (H-K 12-14)23 *a e-335 14 4 1.51 *b NN-1828 12 4 1.93 Kleiner 1976, p. 16, no. 12 (A-B 19-20:1) 14 t 1.30 c E-25a EABC,p. 153, pl. 17, no. 73 (A 18:8) d SS-25b 13 1.94 EABC,no. 74 (A 18:8) e EE-43a 12 t 1.50 EABC,pl. 17, no. 75 (A 18:8) f EE-43b 13 f 1.62 EABC,no. 76 (A 18:8) For the chronology of the two varietiessee Picard,Antre, 281-283. The Agora A 18:8 hoard of the 260's pp. produced four pieces of the facing Athena variety(588c-f) in a notablyworn (w4)condition. DELpHI
A.D.
117-138:Hadrian
AEA-0TN around Laurel wreath, within which BMC 24
*589
KTA-19
nYlelA.
mistakenlylisted as e-335 in Kleiner 1975, p. 308, no. 150, see 723A (Sikyon: -450). At the time Kleiner was preparinghis paper,6-335 and 6-450 had become transposed.
204
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
afterA.D. 141: defiedFaustinaI
eEA 0AY-CTEINA
Bust r. *590 NN-978 24 \
8.02
AEA4)TN below Temple of Apollo: side and front, with statue of Apollo shown within. GRC,fig. 23
BMC 33, 34
Similar.
AElA0[nN]
Bust of Apollo with long hair, r.
BMC 41
*591
II-447
20 f
6.00
BOIOTIA
BOIOTIN LEAGUE
Boiotian shield.
BOIQTQNat 1. of Ornamented trident; at r., dolphin. rev., symbol?;GRC,fig. 17 symbol? symbol? symbol? at lower r., ivy leaf (BMC 57, 58) at lower r., K
BMC 57-62
592 *a *b *c *d e f
12-14 13 t 13 t 12 t 14 / 13 t 14 -
288-244 B.C.25
d
e
rr-lo8
Ql-188
23 23 21 19
t t t
BMC 64, 65
18 t 4.43
datingmust be extended to account Picard,Antre, 289, who observesthat Head's (1881, p. 254) 338-315 B.C. p. for specimensin Boiotiantombsofthe secondquarterof the 3rdcentury(C. Vatin,P.Brunea, C. Rolley,and T. Hackens, V de de MMdon Phocide, Tombes helustiques,Objets metal-momies, Paris 1976, pp. 21, 127, coin M 79). 25 Head 1881, pp. 258-259. Relativewear of specimensin IGCH229 and 233 confirmthe priorityof Athena/Trophy (595). On the other hand, it is unlikelythat the trophy (593) to the FacingDemeter or Kore head/Poseidon overstrikes reverseof the formercould belong after the Aitoliansdefeatedthe Boiotiansin 246 and 244 B.C.
24 See
CATALOGUE Head of young Dionysos r. [BOIQ]T[QN]at r. of Apollo with bow seated 1. on cippus;behind on cippus, tripod;on side of cippus, trident r.; [at 1., wreath]. BMC 74
205
*594
S -82a
17 -+ 3.04
later (oreary2nd?)century B.C. 3rd BOIQTQNbehind Head of Demeter or Kore, Poseidon stg. 1., with trident, three-quartersfacing 1., resting r. foot on rock. wearing wheat wreath. 16-20 Av. 3.54 (52) tra, of undertypes;GRC,fig. 5 ces 20 4- 3.77 tra, of undertypes ces 20 4 3.98 18 \ 3.61 san ne BMC 81-89
595 *a *b *c *d e
daimaged(N 18:3) This entire coinage was overstruckon Herakles head/Horseman bronzes of Antigonos Gonatas (509). Assuming that the Antigonid coins date from the reign of Antigonos Doson, Svoronos (1908, pp. 230-232) thought they were given by the king as a gift to the Boiotians,who fought with him against Sparta in the late was a routine conversionof foreign into local money. Because of the presence 220's, and that the overstriking of the overstruck coins in two hoardsthat date from the second quarterof the 2nd century(IGCH229 and 233), around 168, while Crawford(CMRR,pp. 124, Hackens (1969, pp. 727-728) preferredto date the overstriking 316), noting the wear of the hoarded coins, inclines to an earlier date, "between the late third century and 168." Since the Macedonian undertypesalmostcertainlyantedateDoson, however,and since the Boiotian types used for the bronze first appear on drachms as early as the middle of the 3rd century (Picard, Chalcis, 162; p. idem, Antre, 289), a plausible case can be made that the Macedonian coins entered Boiotia during the reign p. of Antigonos Gonatas or Demetrios II (who occupied the countryafter 236) and that the overstriking took place the sharp anti-Macedonianreactionupon Demetrios'death in 229 (see Hammond and Walbank[above during under 509], pp. 326-329, 341). This reconstructionat least has the advantageof close parallelismwith Athens, where a similarlytremendousinfluxof Gonatas'bronzeaccompaniedMacedonianoccupationbut was eventually overstruckafter the occupation ended (pp. 36, 51-52 above).
16 1 2.89
18 -
196-146 B.C.
Boiotian shield.
BMC 105-107
596 a b
e-696 nI-600a
15 f 14 t
3.08 3.67
BMC 108-111
General confirmationof Head's 196-146 dating for 596 comes from the Agrinion hoard (IGCH271) with its freshBoiotianLeague drachms,which have an identicalNike-leftreverse.Whether597 is to be similarlydated is less clear.The coins are a revivalof 592 but with a plainer,squaredtridentand no issue symbol.
206
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
ORCHOKENOS
2nd-lst centryB.c.? Veiled head of Hera r.; scepter over shoulder. 12 A 1.59
E-PI[X-O]
Tripod; all in laurel wreath.
BMC 39, 40
598
NN-1906
TANAGRA
Christ Ist-2ndcentuyafter
TANAirPAIInN
in laurel wreath. 599 Z-3011 15 +- 2.95
BMC 50
Head ofJulio-Claudian
emperor(?)r.; border of dots.
T-AIN-A Bearded male, nude, stg., facing, holding spear in r. hand and sword on shield resting on ground in 1.
RPC I, 1322
*600
K-1469
12 t
1.16
207
[---------]
Cop240
THEBES
378-338 B.C.
315-288 B.C. Similar. 605 8 coins *a S-4323 *b A-268 c r-1055 11-14 13 +12 14 / Av. 1.88(7) 2.41 1.47 broken eHBAIQN between Thyrsos and club. BMC 201-206
(E 14:3)
THESPIAI
Head of Muse r., wearing modius and veil, laur. 606 8 coins *a E-6461 *b K-38 14-16 Av. 3.75 (8) 16 / 3.89 16 / 4.72 Same. 12 / 1.45 12 +- 1.64
EErnilEnN
Lyre; all in laurel wreath.
BMC 14-25
607 *a b
K-1282 S-4753
BMC 26 Same, except no wreath. (fromfill containing Athenian bronze to the 80's B.C.)
The above dating is that of A. Schachter,"ANote on the Reorganizationof the Thespian Museia,"JC, ser.7, 1, 1961, pp. 67-70. A specimen of 606 has been recoveredfrom a pre-146 B.C.well deposit at Corinth (Price 1967, p. 377, no. 62); another was overstruckin an emission of Sikyon, dated probably ca. 200 B.C.(Warren 1984, p. 2, no. 7.C.xiv).
A.D. 81-96: Domitian
608 a b
00-799 S-6323
Head of Domitian r., rad. Apollo seated r., holding lyre. 15 / 3.20 15 i 2.67 olbv.head may be laureate
[----
[eEZnl-EQN]
EUBOIA26
EUBOIAN LEAGUE
348-338 B.C.
UNIT
15 t
broken
Bull recumbent 1.
611
I-328
DOUBLE
21 t
6.92
*612
r-969
Bull stg. r. 613 a b 24 coins r-1063 NN-2103 12-15 Av. 1.85 (15) 13 t 1.74 14 t 2.18
rev. below, EY-BO (no symbol) (Picard, Chalis, no. 22) (E 14:3) same
26 For the chronologyfollowed below, see Picard, Chalis, especiallythe "Tableaudes monnayageseubeens (IVe-II
siecle),"facing p. 350. The denominationalnomenclatureis also Picard's.His "unit","doubleunit", and "quadruple unit"denote the chalkous,the dichalkon,and the hemiobol (note 62 above,p. 38). 27 With W. P. and New Wallace, TheEuboian League Its Coinage, York1956, p. 128, no. 3, pl. XIV:11.
CATALOGUE
c
209
d e f
g
12 12 13
t
t t
same
12 t 1.62 13 +- 1.95 13 14 13 13 12 12
h i
t 1.85
t t
rev. below, [E]-Y obv. above, club; rev. at r. EYBO downwards(Picard, Chalcis, no. 23) similar,with leaf on grape branch at 1. obv. above, sword;rev. at r., EYBO downward (Picard, Chalkis, no. 26). Kleiner 1975, p. 307, no. 123 (H-K 12-14) same obv. and rev. obv. above, sword;rev. at r., trophy(?)(BMC 22) rev. obv. at r., thymiaterion(?); below, EY-[BO] (BMC 28) rev. at 1., leaf on grape branch rev. at 1., star(?) rev. at r., EYB[ downwards
191-170 B.C.
614
16-18 18 / 17 ' 17 \
rev. in ex. at r., wheat ear (Picard, Chakis,no. 37); GRC,fig. 17 rev. symbol effaced same; Kleiner 1976, p. 20, no. 5 (B 20:9)
146B.C. before
EN E EY[BOI]
Wheat ear r.
BMC 4828
CHALKIS
Coins cataloguedwith Agora inventorynumbersin Picard, Chacisare referencedin italics. 338-308 B.C. UNTr Bust of Hera facing, XAA Picard, Chalcis, diadem with fi% ve nos. 12-22 wearing Eagle holding snake; at r., symbol. disks, resting on Ionic capital. ' 2.04 13 trophy symbol (Picard, Chakis, 48, pl. XI, no. 15) p. 13 f broken cornucopia (Picard, Chakis, 49, no. 17) p. 14 t broken star (Picard, Chalcis, 50, no. 19) p. 13 f 1.77 no symbol (Picard, Chakis, 51, no. 20) p. 13 4 2.04 same 13 / 1.58 same
Cf. Wallace (note 27 above, p. 208), pp. 130-131, pi. XV:21, which, like the BMC, also puts this rare variety at the end of the Euboian League coinage.
210 13 t 1.99 g BA-343 h H'-3301 14 / 1.43 Obv. below,collar in place of capital *i KTA-106 12 f 1.75 13 \ broken j IIe-644 k 5S-50 13 t 1.11
NON-ATHENIAN COINS same same no symbol (Picard, Cialcis,p. 53, pl. XI, no. 21) no symbol (Picard, Chalis, p. 53, no. 21) same; EABC,p. 153, pl. 17, coin U:73 (A 18:8) 290-273 B.C. Similar. Similar. 1.23 trophy symbol 245-196 B.C. Similar. Similar. Picard, Chacis, nos. 43-53 Picard, Calcis, p. 71, no.33f
617
NN-1887
13 t
618 UNrr 13 - 2.09 III-1056 bunch of grapes (Picard, Chakis, 79, no. 43) p. A-224 12 / 1.29 herm (Picard, Chakis, 80, pl. XVII, no. 44) p. 13 . 1.20 KK-331 herm (Picard, GCalcs, 80, no. 44) p. A-155 13 t 1.76 wreath (Picard, Chacis,p. 81, pl. XVII, no. 46) ZZ-135 13 / 1.13 rose (Picard, Chakis, 82, pl. XVII, no. 48) p. DoUBLE f r-873 18 . 3.83 0IAIZ-AAe (Picard, Chakis,p. 86, no. 53 [14-Z]) 17 / 3.80 0IAIE-AAe obv. cmk.: dolphin (Picard, Chakis, 87, no.53) *g 0-39 p. h-y 18 other Agora specimens of Picard emission no. 53, all listed in Picard, Chacis,p. 87 a *b c d e [616-618] 41 coins of Facing Hera/Eagle type that cannot be classifiedby emission. Of these, 6 are of the double, 16-18 mm. denomination. 170-46B.C. DOUBLE Head of Hera r. XAA Eagle holding snake; at r., symbol. star (Picard, Chalis, p. 100, no. 66) symbol? XAAKI-AEQN Eagle holding snake; no symbol. Picard, Chakis, p. 110, no. 81 Picard, Chakis, nos. 66-80
619 a b
620 a b
c
d e
15 17 \ 16 15 15 4.
CATALOGUE f *g h i Z-2239 AA-873a EA-21 T-833 16 16 16 15 3.95 2.91 3.39 1.37 1.63 obv. cmk.: bunch of grapes same
211
4 4.19
11 t 11 1
1stcentu(y Christ after Head of Poseidon r.; trident behind. 18 f 6.05 18 f 5.58 XAAKI-AEQN Baetyl within baldacino. Picard, Chalcis, XXII, no. 97 pl. Picard, Chalcis, p. 127, no. 97
621 *a b
KK-538 00-1481
Head of Zeus r.
*622
18 f 3.88 Obv. cmk.: owl stg.r., facing,over? or X, in incuse square.Picard(Chalcis, 128)notes that the countermark p. is known only from this specimen and suggestsbecause of the owl that it was added in Athens. 00-1330
A.D.
198-217: Caracalla XAAKI-AEQN Hera seated 1., bull at her feet. Picard, Chakis, p. 132, no. 101:[4-g]
[AV K MAP AV ANTQNINOC] Bust r., laur., dr. 623 *a b Q-347a E-3905 24 \ 25 t 10.25 9.07
Similar.
*624
AA-766a
27 /
ERETRIA
192-191 B.c. DoUBLE Bull recumbent r.; in ex. [MANTIAfPOZ] *625 BB-821 14 / 2.39 [EPETPIEQN]above Two bunches of grapes. Picard, Chacis, p. 185, pl. XXX:lalit
Attributableto this Eretrian emission by size. Cf. the larger 16+ mm. pieces of the Euboian League with same types, Picard, Chalcis, XXX:28. pl.
212
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
170-146B.C.
EPETPIEfN below Bull recumbent1.;above, name in two lines. obv., [AY]EANlaPOE obv. name illegible
soonafter146B.c.?
626 a b
N'-1343 NN-1953
17 t 17 t
3.50 3.02
UNIT
Head of bull, with fillets, E-PE below at 1. and r. of BMC, pp. 96, nos. 19-20 facing; [borderof dots]. Octopus; [all in border of dots]. (H 16:4) ET'-578 *627 12 +- 1.73 tablefacingp. 350) and suitsthe late, sketchy The post-146 B.C. datingis tentatively proposedby Picard(Chalcis, style of the coinage and its dotted obverse and reverseborders. Even so, the Agora context precludes a date much after the middle of the 2nd century.Note that the types are revivedfrom 5th-centuryB.C.Eretriansilver fractions(BMC,p. 122, nos. 33-39). HISTIAIA
338-late 3rdcentury B.C.29
[IETI]below Bull stg. r., before vine with two bunches of grapes.
Cop510, 511
17 4 3.53 19 4 4.37 16 4 3.40 Similar. IE-TI below Forepartof bull r. rev. above, two bunches of grapes same symbol? (foundwith 1007e, 247-222 B.C.) Similar,except bull walking r. rev. above, trophy same IETI above Protome of bull, with fillets, to three-quarters r.; at 1., bunch of grapes. BMC 7-9 BMC 10-20
629
13-16 Av. 1.84 (4) 13 t 1.81 13 \ 1.35+ 14 t 2.04 Similar. 14 \ 2.40 12 t 1.50 Similar.
630 a b
T-319 ET-125
BMC 29, 30
631 a b c
29
pp. Picard,Antre, 289-291; with referenceto Picard, Chalcis, 176-178 (startof bronze after 338). pp.
CATALOGUE
late3rd century 146 B.C. to AR TETROBOL
213
Similar.
BMC 34-131
632 *a *b *c *d *e *f *g *h
FromM 21:1 14 AA-72 AA-90 15 15 AA-91 14 AA-92 AA-93 15 14 AA-94 14 AA-95 AA-96 15
on stern, aplustre winged thunderbolt;cf. BMC 113, GRC,fig. 16 AE no rev. symbols visible on stern, star?;cf. BMC 123-126 star?,aplustre;below, trident (BMC 36, 37) rev. symbols off flan rev. below, Ef (BMC 131) on stern, aplustre;below, E (BMC 79, 80) aplustre;below, A?, cf. BMC 42; same obv. die as 632b obv.: gorgoneion cmk.; Kleiner 1975, p. 319, pl. 76, no. 268 (M-N 15:1) same obv.: cmk. same
same
14 14 12
Forthe late 3rd century-146 B.C. datingof thisprolifictetrobolcoinage, see W. P.Wallace,"The Meeting-Point of the Histiaian and Macedonian Tetrobols,"JVC, 7, 2, 1962, pp. 17-22, who isolates a small group of ser. emissionsof ca. 178-168 B.C. and explainsthat it belongsabout midway in the full series.Our 632a-h were found together in the uppermost fill of cistern M 21:1, known as the Komos Cistern. Shortly after excavationof the cisternin 1947 Professor Wallaceexaminedthe tetrobolsand reported(in a letterto VirginiaGrace at the Agora, dated September 7, 1949) that based on the issues representedand the respectivewear of the coins, the cistern hoardwas deposited"considerably after 170, say, 160-150 B.C." He noted that similarissuesin similarcondition are known from another hoard "believedto date very roughlyabout 150 B.C." The two latestbronze coins from the cistern date from the 180's, as does its latest stamped amphora handle (Rhodian, ca. 186 B.C.),and there is no reason to suspect that any of the pottery from the fill is later. Consequently,it appears that the "purse" of eight Histiaean tetrobolslost or secretedat the top of the fillingis a later intrusion. The gorgoneioncountermark 632k-n has been attributed Parionin Mysiaby W. Schwabacherin a review of to of L. Robert, Atudes numismatiquegrecque, 1951, Gnomon 1953, p. 242; cf. L. Robert, "Circulationdes de Paris 25, monnaies d'Histiee,"Hellenica 11-12, 1960 (pp. 63-69), pp. 63-64.
ITTI[A]-IE[2N] Tripod.
BMC 138
BMC 134-136
19 1 2.93
214
c
635
Z-475
15 t
broken
KARYSTOS
B.C. 2nd-Ist century Head of young Herakles r. 636 a b KK-82a Z-939a 17 - 3.62 17 t broken K A above Protome of bull with r.; fillets, three-quarters at r. Ap. BMC 19-21
[636 or BMC 15, 16]: 2 coins (K-326, NN-1004) with the types Herakles head (young or bearded)/Bull'sprotome r. three-quarters No details. Head of Poseidon r. 637 e-390 16 t 4.09 [KA] above Trident. 1.50 BMC 27 BMC 25 [K-AIP-YIT-I:|Q-IIN] Dolphin twined around trident. BMC 24
KAIPY Dolphin r.
Head of nymph Salamis r., wearing stephane. 640 a b 42 coins PP-631 AA-30 15-19 Av.2.99 (18) 19 - 3.57 18 - 3.25
CATALOGUE *c N'-1360 *d NN-2104 *e *f g h NN-1876 00-1045 f2-322 F-1432 r-1441a r-1441b 17 \ 16 15 15\ 17 18 17 15 2.28 2.98 2.84 3.20 -
215
(froma layer containing pottery of the 5th and early 4th centuries
B.C.)30
i j
broken (from a fill with "a few sherds of the late 5th century"B.C. [section f notebook]) broken (D 15:3) same same
Only eight of the forty-two-cointotal are entirelylegible. The rest are attributedto this variety solely by their large 17-19 mm. flans. Similar. downward at r. of Shield of Ajax; at 1., sword in device on sheath; [?triskeles shield]. BMC 7, 8; Cop458
'AA[A]
*641 1
-16
16 1
2.72 BMC 9
[640-642] 55 coins (13-16 mm.) of uncertain Female head/Shield type. Most have 15-16 mm. diameters, and of these the bulk doubtlessbelong to the common variety640. Clearly of some duration, the bronze coinage of Salamis was minted in several phases, the first and most substantialof which is representedby the common, largerpieces of variety 640, almost certainlydichalkia.In a later emission, the sword on the reverse is displaced to the left (641), on at least some pieces by a triskeles device on the shield (AmericanNumismatic Society). The slightly smaller coins of variety 642 with the Kore obverse representanother emission.There are finallyseveralsmall-flanvarieties(cf. BMC 9, 10, Cop547; Traitd, pl. 194:5),some with blazons(includinga gorgoneionand an eagle)on the shield: at 11-13 mm. and 1.50-2.00 g., these should be AE 4 chalkoi;their cruderstyle locates them at the end of the series. The two specimens of 640 excavatedat Olynthos3l inform that minting began earlier than 348. But by how much? The contextsof640d and g suggesta relativelyearlydate in the 4th century,as does the reportof another Salamis coin (18 mm.) that was excavated in the Kerameikosfrom a grave dated 400-395 B.C.,32 although it would be prematureto drawany firm chronologicalconclusionsuntil the potteryfromthis importantgravegroup has been published. The destructiondeposit of Building Z-3 in the Kerameikos(p. 298 below) shows that the Salamis bronze was still in use as late as the last decade of the 4th century,while the absence of any pieces in the sizableAgora A 18:8 hoard is a good indicationthat it had ceased to circulateby the 260's. Room 4B of house "N", Layer 11: "potterymostly of 5th century but note a fragment of a small coarse saucer with bpack] gpaze], probablyearly IV" (NN notebook,p. 7226). 31 Oylnthus no. 830 (pl. 20), found on the floor of the destroyedhouse A 11, room 1; and Olynthus no. 1722 VI, IX, position of the latter coin is unknown, but in correspondence (pl. 32:23) from house A vii, room 5. The stratigraphic Nicholas Cahill explainsthat the area was free of later occupation. The three coins reportedto be from a hoardfound at Aspropyrgos near Eleusis(IGCH99) compriseanotherfind of aroundthe middle of the 4th century.The date is impliedby two of the pieces, which are earlyEleusinian(38: ivy-branch symbol, 17 mm., w4; grapevinesymbol, 16 mm., w3); the thirdis Salamis, 18 mm., in fine (w2)condition. 32 Mentioned in ApAeXAX18, 1963, B', p. 50, note 6. Dr. Peter R. Frankekindly sent a photograph of the (18 mm.) coin and his notes on the find.
30
216
NON-ATHENIAN COINS The very existence of a Salaminiancoinage is curious.Since the island was a subjectterritoryof Athens and settled by Athenian cleruchs, some scholars have argued that the coinage must belong to a time of political independence from Athens.33In 31734 a successionistparty of Salaminians,probably cleruchs, betrayed the island to Kassandrosand apparentlygovernedit for a decade, but this episode belongs around the end, not the start of the coinage. More than a century ago Paul Monceaux suggestedthat Salamis may have broken away but from Athens for a time at the conclusion of the PeloponnesianWar,35 however convenient this hypothesis an early 4th-centuryorigin of the coinage, it, too, does not carry conviction. Apart might be for explaining fromthe unsoundnessof Monceaux'sepigraphicalargument,it is knownthat the islandwas stillsubjectto Athens under the Thirty Tyrantsin the springof 403 and that when Athens sent out new cleruchiesin 386 to Lemnos, Imbros, and Skyros,overseaspossessionsthat she had lost in 404, these cleruchieswere to be modeled on the one then existingon Salamis.36 Salamishad remainedAthenian. If the coinage cannot be attributedto an independent Salamis, it has to be understood in terms of the cleruchy status of the island. As explained under 455, the cleruchycities of Lemnian Myrina and Hephaistia also struckcoins before the middle of the 4th century.Although these cities were certainlymore distant from Athens than was Salamis,their constitutional positionwith respectto Athenswas the same, and so, one assumes, was their motivation for minting a bronze coinage: such a coinage was apparentlyneeded, and as none was being supplied by Athens, the cleruchy governmentswere left to produce it themselves. It may well be that the Athenians encouraged the Salaminianbronze, which they were able to use while continuing their policy of strikingexclusivelyin silver.
MEGARIS
MEGARA
Prow on which stands a 1., tripod. 643 *a *b *c d *e 160 coins 13-16 Av.2.43(54)
BMC 21-29
MEr (legibleon 35 coins) 15 t 2.42 S-3655 15 -+ 2.20 A-891 14 \ 2.76 ME-192 14 t 2.56 IIA-1 14 -+ 2.40 X-36
obv. above, trident 1. (BMC 22); GRC,fig. 17 same obv. same same
33 raiti pp. II, iii, pp. 142-143; Picard,Antre, 292-293. 34 and C. Horner, QZaestiones Saamae, Basel (dissertation)1901, pp. 11-12; Ferguson According to Picard,Antre, (p. 117, note 2) prefers304 B.C. 35 de P. Monceaux, "Inscriptions Salamine,"BCH 6, 1882 (pp. 521-539), pp. 522-523. Monceaux's argumentfor Salaminianindependence rested on IG II2 3093, an early 4th-centurychoregic monument from Salamis that names Athenaion a local archonin its datingformula.We know,however,fromAristotle, Polita 58.8 and 62.2 that 6 iv EacXoaiMvt he was directlyresponsiblefor organizingthe local Dionysia, and that he served was an Athenian official, that &pXov as the normaleponymousmagistrateof the island.Horner (note 34 above)adds that, as a privatededication,IG I12 3093 should not be expected to recordthe name of the archonin Athens after the name of the archon in Salamis. 36 Salamisunder the Thirty: DiodorusSiculus 14.32.4. Existingcleruchyin 386: G I2 30, line b 7 ( p. 165, line 34, from the North Slope of the Acropolis,I," Hesperia in the expandedtext with commentaryby R. S. Stroud,"Inscriptions the cleruchy on Salamis as a legal precedent in regulationsfor the new cleruchy on 40, 1971, pp. 162-173), citing Lemnos.
CATALOGUE MErA (egible on 20 coins) *f AP-25 15 N 2.38 *g NN-1054 16 / 1.90 *h NN-1754 15 K\ 2.17
217
Either ethnic i 00-1075 14 -+ 2.15 obv., prow r. EABC,p. 153, pl. 17, nos. W:78-85 (A 18:8) j-q 8 _ coins The above dating is deduced from the worn example from a 348-316 B.C.house at Olynthos37and the moderate to heavy wear of the eight pieces (643j-q) in the Agora A 18:8 hoard of the 260's (EABC,p. 154). For fifteen published specimens from Late Hellenistic deposits in the Agora, see Kleiner 1975, p. 308, pl. 76, nos. 141-143, and p. 312, no. 203 (allH-K 12-14); Kleiner 1976, p. 18, nos. 131-141 (A-B 19-20:1).
second 3rd B.C. quarter century MEFA above or below Prow 1. 644 127 coins 13-16 Av. 2.23 (44) EABC,p. 153, pl. 17, no. X:86 (A 18:8) MEFAabove (23 coins) *a -5-31 14 / 2.16 *b NN-1014 16 t 2.58 *c IO-488 14 / 1.85 *d r-301 13 / 2.42 MErA below (8 coins) 14 \ 2.51 M-209 r-456 14 \ 2.30 NN-1741 14 4 2.18 Eitherformat h AA-762 14 t i-o 7 E_ coins obv., prow r. EABC,pp. 153-154, pl. 17, nos. X:87-93 (A 18:8) 644i-o were among the freshestcoins in the A 18:8 hoard and could hardly have been minted before the 270's (EABC, 154). p. Twenty Agora pieces from deposits of the 2nd and early 1st century B.C.are listed in Kleiner 1975, p. 308, nos. 144-146; p. 311, nos. 186-188 (H-K 12-14); Kleiner 1976, p. 19, nos. 142-154 (A-B 19-20:1); and p. 21, no. 111 (B 20:9). 2.50 Tripod between two dolphins upward;border of dots. BMC 30-34
second 3rdcentury-early century 2nd B.C. half MEFA above Prow 1. 645A *a *b *c *d
e
37
BMC 35-39
4 broken
/ -
firn E 0. Waage (Greek BrownCoins a WeUll [JNM 70], New York, 1935, p. 17) has alreadynoted that atMegara this Prow/Obelisk-dolphins bronzewas minted in two denominations.The smaller('AE 4": here 11-12 mm., ca. 1.00 g.) should be the chalkous,the largerAE 3 denomination,representedby varieties643 and 644, as well as 645A, its double (seep. 38 above).Typologically derivedfromProw/Tripod-dolphins (644), the Prow/Obelisk bronzeought to followit at some point afterthe 260's B.C.burialof the A 18:8hoard.A pre-183 B.C.datingfor the followingApollo/Lyre AE 2 is providedby the context of 646b. Head of Apollo r. 646 6 coins *a A-229 *b K-1310 19-21 Av.5.46 (6) 21 i 5.01 19 - 5.27
MErAI[PEnN]
Lyre. obv.: illegible cmk. Kleiner 1975, p. 311, no. 185 (H-K 12-14)
B.C. 2nd-Ist century
BMC 11-14
Head of Apollo r., laur. 647 10 coins *a BB-51 *b AA-230 15-17 Av.3.76(7) 16 t 4.63 15 t 2.17 Similar. 15 t 2.66 15 t 4.66 Similar. 649 H'-3565 16 broken
MErAIPEfN Tripod.
BMC 16-18
BMC 19
[M-E] Lyre.
BMC 44-46
1stcenry B.c.-3rd c Head of Zeus r.; linear border. *650 II-680a 14 I broken
Bust of Athena r., wearing unpublished [ME]-rA-PE1.,above, and r. of Tripod;border Corinthianhelmet; of dots. border of dots. / 2.21 12 651 *a N-976 11 \ 0.85 *b II-957 Lunateepsilonsand the cursiveomega of650 place the latterand 651 in the Roman era. Althoughthe Athena bust of 651 is similar to some on Hadrianic-Antoninecoins of Athens (see 229-231), it is most unlikelythat
CATALOGUE
219
the coin was minted to commemoratea reconciliation betweenAthensand MegaraunderHadrian,as mentioned in T. L. Shear, "The Campaign of 1937," Hesperia 1938 (pp. 311-362), pp. 357-358. 7,
MEr[AP]EWN
Demeter stg. r., lighting large torch.
6.21
MErA-P[EWN]
Zeus seated r., with scepter [and Nike].
BMC 46
A[VT- -C]En-C[EOVHPO]C
n[EP]
Head r., laur. 654 E-6410 25 / 8.69
BMC 51, 52
[-------]
Bust ofJulia Domna r. *655 Br'-487 24
. 6.02
A.D. 202-212:
PAGAI
*657
S-3979
26 \
9.80
nAr-AIWN Gate with large central entrance and two smaller niches with statues at either side; on top, three statues. GRC,fig. 23
220
Sea turtle. 18 17 /
11.78 11.23
Similar.
*659
__-4
20
7.03
cf. Kraay,ACGC, Incuse square with "windmill sail"pattern of four triangular p. 44, pl. 6, no. 11539 segments. obv. cut with two chisel gashes before plating in order to deceive the receiver.No traces of the silver plating remain.
ca. 490-480 B.C.
AR STATER
Similar.
*660
PP-273
19 -
AR STATER
Sea turtle with T-shaped arrangementof pellets on shell. *661 KK-9 22 t 11.71 GRC,fig. 7
662
14 coins *a SZ-66 *b
*c
BMC 206-222 Incuse square divided into five A between Two dolphins compartments. upwards. 10-14 Av.1.58(8) rev., in lower 1. compartment,A (BMC 213, 214); FABC p. 154, 11 1 1.59 p . 16, no. Y:94 (A 18:8) s;ame rev. 12 4 1.27 1.50 12 t 14 A blistered
London 1975, pp. 6-70, "GroupII," with Hoard, and N. M. Waggoner, "A Greek Archaic Silver Hoard from the chronology of C. Arnold-Biucchi,L. Beer-Tobey, Selinus,"AIV5N 33, 1988 (pp. 1-36), p. 17. 39 Price and Waggoner,op.cit.,p. 71, "GroupIV". 40 Ibid., 73, "GroupVII". p.
CATALOGUE e f
221
ME-57 10 - chipped Kleiner 1975, p. 308, no. 147 (H-K 12-14) NN-1669 14 4 chipped Kleiner 1976, p. 19, no. 155 (A-B 19-20) Two examples from the Olynthos excavations41 imply a startingdate before 348 B.C. The context and good condition of 662a suggestthat the coinage extended throughthe firstquarteror third of the 3rd century.
A-[I]Ir-IIN-H
Archaic statue of Apollo stg. r., with branch and bow. (found in earth layer with 67i of the 220's B.C.)
A.D. 202-212:
CORINTHIA
CORITH
AR DRACHM ? below Pegasos flying 1. 13 t 1.55+ Head of Aphrodite 1., hair bound up. BMC 181, 182
*666
EE-22
late5th-3rdcentury B.C. ? below Pegasos flying 1. 11-14 Av. 1.60 (24) 13 / 1.81 11 - 1.16 12 / 1.58 13 \ 1.29 13 +- 1.59 Trident upward. BMC 423-471
667
rev. at r., running griffin (BMC 437); GRC,fig. 18 tripod (BMC 439) race torch (BMC 441) same same
41
222 ET'-510 IF-176 K-1586 1-894 J 00-1210 k A-81 *1 Z-1020 m T-1252 n E-795 *o Z-400 f g h *i 13 14 12 13 13 13 12 12 12 \ 1.65 blistered . 1.24 - 1.59 A 1.40 / 1.10+ x 1.72 1.69
NON-ATHENIAN COINS rev. at ., A (BMC 453) rev. [A] - pine cone (BMC 453) EY - Ares holding scepter (BMC 456) H - wreath (BMC 458-460) E - thunderbolt(Corinth p. 15) VI, ? -amphora amphora-? A? - ?; Kleiner 1975, p. 323, pl. 76, no. 333 (M-N 15:1) -A -? 131.58 flan cut down before striking Five publishedexamplesfrom context of ca. 100 B.C.:Kleiner 1976, p. 19, nos. 156-160 (A-B 19-20:1). Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthianhelmet. K beneath Pegasosflying r. BMC 476
14 / 2.35 14 +- 1.30+ [Head of bearded Heraklesr., wearing wreath.] 11 $ 1.15 ? beneath Forepartof Pegasos r. BMC 481, 482
669
A-892
Recent excavationdata at Corinthindicatethat the startof the Pegasos/Tridentbronze (667) may go back as 55, earlyas the later5th century;see 0. Zervos,"CoinsExcavatedat Corinth, 1978-1980," Hesperia 1986, pp. 184, 203; with Warren1983, p. 33, note 46, supplementedin Warren1984, pp. 23-24. Price (1967, pp. 365-367) puts the end of the pre-Romanbronze of Corinthbefore 200 B.C. As ROMAN COLONY Coinage Signed by Duoviri Coins cataloguedwith Agora inventorynumbersin Amandryare referencedin italics. L Aeficius C. Certus, Iulius,44 or43 B.C. As LAVSIVLIICORINT Head ofJulius Caesar r., laur. 670 a b 8-401 II-944 23 / 23 7.02 broken [L CE]RTOAEFICIOI[C IVLIOIIVIR] Bellerophon,strikingwith spear,on Pegasos flying r. Amandry,p. 121, no. Ia; RPC I, 1116
Amandry,no.Ia:d7-r19:3
43 P Tadius C. Jicephorus, or42 B.C. Chilo, Iulius As in CORINTHVM ex. Bellerophonrestraining h. Pegasos r. before a porcl *671 NN-465 24 / 7.10 IVLI P TADI CHILOIC NICEPIIIVIR Poseidon, with trident, seated r. on rock. no.II: d6-r7:1 Amandry, Amandry,p. 124, no. II; RPCI, 1117
223
OR C PVBLIANT
Vase with one handle 1. 672 *a b II-66 00-683 11 11
COIRINin wreath.
4 1.98
. 1.58
Amandry,no.IVb:d3-r5 Amandry,no.IVb:d4-r5:6
[CORINT]
Head of M. Antony 1. 673 BB-515 As 24 -- broken
[CORINT]
Head of Poseidon r.
674
II-304
SEMIS
22 4 5.74
[CORINT]
Head of Aphrodite r.
676 a b
E-6295 8-69
22 -+ broken 22 4 6.73
effaced inscriptions
[MA.ANT.]THEOPH[IL.]II.VIR.I[QVINQ]
*677 E-1685 Boukranion. 18 / 2.94
Amandry,p. 139,
no. VIIb;RPCI,
1130
224
NON-ATHENIAN COINS C. Srvilis C.f Primus, Antonius 2/1 M. Hiparchus, As [CAESARI CORINT] Head of Augustusr. C [C SERVILIO F PRIMO M ANTONIO HIPPARCHO IIVIR] Heads of Gaius and Lucius 1. and r. Amandry,pp. 145147, no. XIa, b; RPC I, 1136
B.C.
678 a b
KK-244 MM-104
20 -+ 5.39 20 - 5.57
As CAESAR[COR] C HEIOPOILLIONE ITERIC GER[MANIC]VS MVSSIOPRIISCOIIVIRin Head of Germanicusr. parsley wreath. 679 H'-3619 22 Amandry,p. 154, no. XIIIe; RPC I, 1139
6.38
[--------19 +- 5.61
[------------
680
r-1205
As
*681
E-1934 As
LABE-ONE IIVIRI IIVIR] [L FV]RIO [L ARR]IOPERE[GRINO in ex. [COR] Head of Augustus1., rad. Hexastyle temple, inscribed [GENT IVLI]. Amandry,pl. XXI, no.XVI.19:b-If3 21 t 6.61
[L ARRIO]PEREGRIN[O
683 a b
00-742 00-1187
[C]ORbelow Pegasosflying r.
CATALOGUE
SEMIS
225
16 \
2.32
A.D. P Vipsanius M. Proculus, 37/38 Agrippa, Bellius As (1) C CAESARAVGVS or P.VIPSANIOAGRIPPAIIVIRI COR below Pegasos flying r. Amandry, pp. 184-186, nos. XVII. 1-27; RPCI, 1172
AVG (2) CAIVS-CAESAR Head of Caligula. head 1.;obv. legend (1);Amandry,nos. XVII.3, 8, 11, or 22 19 t 5.91 head r.; obv. legend (2);Amandry,no.XVII.17:e-Ih3:2 21 - 7.49 head r.; obv. legend ? 22 \ 5.92 same 21 t 6.39
Similar.
687 *a b
c
[686 or 687] Two asses of uncertainCaligulahead/Pegasos variety. head r. 19 -4 6.10 a EA-453 head r.; Pegasos 1. b P-1609 20 +- 6.51
As AGRIPPINA-AVGVSTA Bust of Agrippina Minor r. Q FVL FLACCOIIVIRICOR Amandry,p. 204, no. XX.21; RPC I, Genius of Colony with phiale 1190 and cornucopia;in field, GEN COR. GRC,fig. 24; Amandry,pl. XXXIV, no.XX.21:h-b5
*688
AA-203
20 t
8.39
226 As
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
[M AC] CANDIDO IIVIRCOR Aphrodite in biga drawn 1. by tritons. Amandry,no.XX.73:2 effaced obv. and rev. legends
T7.Claudws C. Optatus, uitusPolyaeu, A.D. 57/58 or58/59 As NERO CLAV-CAES AVG Head of Nero r. OPTATO IIVIR Amandry,pp. 211(1) TI CL[AVDIO] COR or 213, no. XXI.1-18; (2) C IV[LIOPOLYAENO IIVIR] RPC I, 1201 COR Bellerophonwith shield leaning r., restrainingPegasos 1.
691 *a b
*c
21 \ 21 / 21 \
rev. legend (1);Amandry,pl. XXXVI, no.XX.5:a-a6:l rev. legend (1);Amandry,no.XXI.5:a-a6:2(L 19:2) rev. legend (2);Amandry,no. XXI.12-18
IIVIR nos. XXI.19-33; (2) C. IVLIO[POLYA]ENO in RPC I, 1202 ISTHIMIA parsley wreath; COR below. head 1.;rev. legend (1);Amandry,pl. XXXVII, no.XXI.22:g-a4: head r., legend ?; rev. legend (1); Amandry,nos. XXI. 19, 20, 23-26 head r., legend ?; rev. legend (2); Amandry,nos. XXI.29-31
L RutiiusPiso,P Memmius A.D. Cleaner, 66/67 As IMP NERO CAE-AVG Head of Nero r., rad. [L] R PISON[E IIVI]QVI COR Galley 1.;in field, ADVEIAVG. Amandry, pp. 217-219, nos. XXII. 1-28; RPC I, 1204
22 +- 7.19 20 -4 6.40
CATALOGUE As [NERO CAESARIMP] Head of Nero. (1) [L RVT PISONE IIVIRQVIN] Amandry, or pp. 219-221, nos. XXII.29-51; (2) [P MEM CLEANDROIIVIR RPC I, 1205 QUIN] Emperoron tribunal,orating to 1.;in field, AD-LOIAV-G. head r., laur.;rev. legend (1);Amandry,no.XXI.29:3 head r., laur. head 1.;rev. legend (2);Amandry,no.XXII.44:2 head 1. head r. head r.
227
694 a b
*c
118-224 rr-122
I-143a P-512a I-325a I-1257a
d e f
19 20 18 18 20 19
7.00
P Anaxilaus, Ventidiws A.D.67/68 Ti. Claudius Fronto, As [NERO CAE-SAR] Head of Nero 1., laur. Amandry, pp. 221-223, nos. XXIII. 1-12; RPC I, 1207 Amandry,pl. XL, no.XXIII.7;obv. cmk.: tripod in incuse square (Howego, no. 478) rev. legend effaced P VE FRONTONE IIVIRICOR Emperor stg. 1., with phiale, being crowned by Tyche.
695 *a b
AE-1 AP-49a As
20 \ 16 -
6.88 4.24
696
P-1555
19 \
P VE ]FRON-TONE[ IIVIR]I [COR] Emperor stg., facing, with phiale, on podium of tetrastyletemple.
6.21
[SENATV-P.Q.R.] Veiled bust of Senate r. 697 BB-1315 As [ROMAEET IMPERIO] Turretedbust of TycheRoma r. 698 T-229 19 3.66 19 6.37
Same.
228 As
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
[SENATV]-P.Q.R. Veiled bust of Senate r. 699 EA-215 As [NEPTVNOIAVG] Head of Poseidon r. 700 IIO-345a 19 ' 6.37 21
-?
6.56
14 , 2.35 16 +- 2.58
702
KK-209a
QUADRANS
Dolphin 1.
15 4 2.79
WithoutNames of Duoviri
Head of Aphrodite r.
Cop30
*705
42
H-1761
24
4 7.52
Although it should be a phiale, the object held in the goddess' right hand is large and globular,like the apple held by Aphroditeon other imperialreversesof Corinth;see 706 and 719. The die cuttermay have conflatedattributes.
CATALOGUE
A.D. 161-80: MarcusAurelius
229
BMC 607
Cop329
708
PP'-62
Cop325
BMC 623
IMP L AVR VERVS AVG Bust r., laur., dr. *710 Q-277 27 -+ 11.90
Cop344
[CLICOR] Athena stg. 1., with Nike and spear; at foot, owl and shield.
A.D.
193-211: Septimius Severus CLICOR Peirene seated 1. on rock, holding vase. BMC 656
L SEPT SEVRE [PT AVG] Bust r., laur. *713 A-44 25 +- 10.97
230
NON-ATHENIAN COINS L SEPT SEV PER[T A]VG IMP VIII Bust 1., laur.,with shield and spear. 18 A broken
[. .]C COR
Melikerteson dolphin r., under pine tree.
BMC 648-649
714
0-434
[----715 ET'-669a 16 \
]
broken
Bust of S. Severus r.
[CLICOR] Pegasoswalking 1.
McCkan6201
A.D.
198-217: Caracala
*716
P-1035
25
4 8.71
CL[I]C[OR] Building,from which rises taperingcolumn with statue on top; at 1. and r., equestrian statue. olbv.: obscure cmk.
*717
NN-702
24 N 5.35
BMC 673
CLI[C]OR
Aphrodite stg. r., with scepter and apple.
BMC 669
A.D.
209-212: Geta
*720
nI-3
23 t
7.37
CLICOR unpublished? Nike walking r., head 1., holding palm in 1., and in r. shield with gorgoneion(?) device. e The reverseis entirelydifferentfrom the other Nike reverses cribedand illustratedin Corinth pp. 39-40, pl. VI, nos. 223, VI, , 227.
CATALOGUE PHLIASIA
231
PHLIOUS
Bull butting 1. 721 *a H-1112 b K-1086 c e-272 d B'-910 e H'-3758 f OA-181 14 14 13 12 12 17/ \ \ 1 broken 1.16 1.82 1.11+ broken 2.66
All belong to "Issue 1 [ca. 400-350 B.C.]"of J. D. Mac Isaac, "PhliasianBronze Coinage,"ANSMJV 1988, 33, 45-54. Denominations are the chalkous (721a-e, Mac Isaac type A) and the dichalkon (721f, Mac Isaac pp. type B).
SIKYONIA
SIKYON
ca. 345/325 B.C. Head of Apollo r. 722 K-299 17 t 2.49 E in olive wreath. Warren 1983, Group 3
ca. 330-200 B.C. Dove flying r. or 1. 723 16 coins *a 0-15 *b ET'-468 *c NN-447 12-16 Av. 1.97 (8) 16 $ 2.81 14 \ 2.20 12 / 2.11 E or El in olive wreath. Warren 1983, Group 4
Kleiner 1975, p. 308, no. 150, but with wrong inventorynumber and provenience.See note 23 above, p. 203.
232
Warren 1983,
Group
6B;
or 1984,
724
13-16 16 15 / 14 -
Group 9 Av.2.24(8) 3.42 2.91 1.63 obv. below, AH (Warren1984, Group 9.8) dove 1.
ca. 196-160/150
B.C.
*725
Z-1180
ca. 160/150-146
B.C.
El in olive wreath.
[723, 725, 726] 39 coins of Dove flying l./E, El, or [?] in olive-wreathtype. A few of these pieces could belong to Warren1983, Group 5: lettersother than El in the reversewreath.The 39 coins include 2 from Deposit B 20:9 (Kleiner 1976, p. 21, nos. 112, 113). 1stcentury B.C. Head of Apollo r. 727 *a II-636 b 0-647 c BB-7a d AA-260 17 17 17 17 \ / f t 2.00 1.86 3.43 4.68 [El] Dove flying or alighting 1.; in field, name. Warren 1984, Group 12
dove flying;AINEA[E].Warren,Group 12.1; GRC,fig. 18 similar,but name not preserved dove alighting;name(?) same
of For the overstriking pieces signed by Aineas in late Ist-centuryB.C. Athens, see Warren 1984, p. 20, and under 152 (p. 108 above). Nero RPC I, 1241
A.D. 67-68:
*729
Z-1922a
[NE KAI ZEYC] EAEYOEPIOC [nOAY]AINOY.AA Man on horse 1.;in ex., [Cl]. Head of Nero r. 18 4 3.28 intentionallyhalved
RPCI, 1238
CATALOGUE
A.D. 209-212:
233
Geta
4.69
ACHAIA
AIGION
*731
r-2
22 4 5.28
[eEOE]IOE KAHTAIOE Zeus stridingr., throwing thunderbolt,eagle on extended 1. wrist. GRC,fig. 18 [eEOE]IOS KAHTAIO' 1. Eagle stg. three-quarters
BMC 4, 5
732
BB-945
BMC 6, 7
AlrlE[QN]
Head of Zeus r., laur. *733 NN-84a
(ast three HMI[OBE]AIN letters retrogradein ex.) Goat stg. r., nursing baby Zeus within a cave.
21 J 7.73 The Dionysos and eagle typesof 732 shouldreferto Antony and Kleopatra(seepp. 103-105 above)and date it and the other issues signed Theoxios-Kletaiosjust before Actium. The chronology of 733 and related Aigion varieties inscribed HMIOBEAIN more problematic.Al use lunate epsilons, as do Aigion's imperial portrait is issues, which begin under Antoninus Pius. Head (HN2, p. 413) assigned the coins with hemiobol inscriptions to the time of Hadrian and later,Price (CRWLR, 97) to the time of AntoninusPius. p. BouRA
*734
NN-705
[-------]
unpublished
234
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
PATRAI
FIat 1. of Athena, BMC 7-13 advancingr., with shield and lowered spear. MHTflOAWPOC MENEKAEOCnATPEWN; at r., owl rev., (BMC 8-1 1) KAAAICTPATOY [NIKOCTP]ATOC nATP[ELN]; at 1., palm (BMC 12, 13) RPat 1. of Dionysos stg. 1., with torch. rev., name (?) same Cop156, 157
[flATPE-QN] below Cista mystica of Dionysos. 736 a b H417a IIA-426 19 t 18 / 3.32 4.75
737
00-982
A.D.81-96: Domitian IMP CAES DOM[---] Head r., laur. 24 1 6.07 COL A A I [PATRENS] Priestwith two oxen plowing 1. BMC 27
738
E-683
I-------I
Bust of M. Aureliusr.
COL AA PATR Distyle temple containing statue of Athena with spear [and phiale]; at feet, owl.
739
r-376
20 /
4.83
A.D. 176-192: Commodus
[------740 EE-68
[COLAA P]ATR Zeus seated 1., with scepter and [Nike]; at feet, eagle.
Cop191
[--...---741 BB-1259
BMC 47
CATALOGUE M AVR ANTONINVS PIVS AVG PATR COLAA GERM Distyle temple containing statue of Hermes seated 1. Bust r., laur., dr. 18 \ 4.09 " 20 4.33 GRC,fig. 24
PELLENE
235 BMC 51
742 *a b
AA-977 H-941
BMC 10-12
d e f
A.D.
193-211: Septims Seveus [TE]N[EA]TfN Tyche stg. 1., with phiale and cornucopia.
I--------]
3.71
ACHAIA LEAGUE
befor251 B.C.
ARHElIRACH
X in laurel wreath.
*745
A-980
14 +- 2.58
191-146 B.C.43
Zeus stg 1., with Nike and scepter;border of d lots. 746 *a S-305
20 t
6.66
obv., AXAIQNover A(?); rev. at 1., upwards, EPMIONEfN; at r., downwards,MNHEI[E]. Hermione mint (Clerk,op.ci., p. 24, no. 47: "Epidauros")
According tJennifer Warren,whose study of the Achaian League bronze is in preparation.We thank her also for the mint attributionsof 746b and 746e.
43
236 b
c
22 t 18 t 20 /
d e f g h
Hermione mint? obv., [AXJAI[QN]. MEEEANIQN.Messene mint (Clerk, obv., AEXIAE; rev., AXAIfMN op.cit.,p. 31, no. 108; BMC 154) obv. at r., XAPMIA[AE];rev. AX[AtIN nArAIfN]. Pagai mint (Clerk,op.cit.,p. 23, no. 33; BMC 135) rev., [MErA]PfN. Megara mint (Clerk,op.cit., p. 23, nos. 33-37). Kleiner 1975, p. 317, no. 253 (P-R 6-12) details and mint unclear
same same
ELIS
ca. 363-323 B.C.44 PLATED COUNTERFEr AR STATER OF [F]-A Head of Hera r. 21 \ 3.61 BMC 95, 96 Eagle stg r., wings spread; in olive wreath. intentionallyhalved; no survivingtrace of silver plating 312-271 B.C. Head of Zeus 1., laur. 748 B-351 20 \ 5.49 [F-A] Eagle stg. 1., wings spread. BMC 115
*747
N-328
271-191 B.C. [Head of Zeus r.] F-A Eagle r., wings spread, seizing snake; at 1. [KAA]. BMC 141
749
H'-2755
20
6.51
Head of Zeus, laur. 750 *a ne-406 b T-23 c B'-849a 19 \ 4.99 19 % 5.13 18 t 5.48
BMC 148
44 C. T.
Coins Seltman, The nempk of Olmpia,Cambridge 1921, pp. 92-105, Group GH1, Series XXX.
CATALOGUE Head of Zeus r., laur. 752 a b ME-295 T-1650 20 18 6.08 3.39 [FAIAEIlN] in olive wreath. Kleiner 1975, p. 324, no. 353 (M-N 15:1) BMC 149-155
237
A.D.
117-138: Hadrian
753
II-1098
[--------
Same.
BMC 159
754
ET-52
19 4
Same.
*755
ET'-432a
16
, 3.75
[HAEI-WN] Youthfulnude Zeus stg. r., arms extended 1. and r. [holding thunderboltand eagle].
KEPHALLENIA
Kranion
756
NN-2062
BMC 18
757
r-1568
[K] in incusesquare.
BMC 26, 27
Same
758
D-242
<
in wreath.
BMC 18
238
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
ZAKYNTHOS
I-A|[.-.]
Tripod.
BMC 42-47
MFSSENIA
MESSENE
370-280 B.C.
Head of Demeter 1., wearing wheat wreath. 760 a b EA-391 NN-1122 16 / 15 3.85 broken
M-E Tripod.
BMC 4, 5
280-146 B.C. Head of Demeter r., wearing wheat wreath. 761 a b c NN-9 Z-147 NN-1863 ItEat 1. of Zeus stridingr., throwingthunderbolt;at r., tripod. BMC 21-36
20 4 6.81
21 , 21 t 6.35 5.78
Cop522
762 *a b
E-4256 BB-639
18 t 2.62 18 4 3.47
KYPARIssIA
[---------I
BMC 3
CATALOGUE
MrOTHONE
239
[--------]
[MOe]QN-[AIQN]
Athena stg 1., with spear.
THOURIA
BMC 2, 3
*765
E-6462
20 "
3.76
A.D.198-217: Caracalla ?
[--------]] .
[eOYPIANWN]
A-A 1. and r. of Athena stg. 1., with phiale and spear. pierced with 4 mm. hole
BMC 5, 6
LAKONIA
LAKEDAIMON
ca. 223-222 B.C. Two pilei of the Dioskouroi; border of dots. 767 BB-66 15 +- 1.74 A-A Club. Grunauer,p. 116, Group VII
caa 197-192
Head of Apollo r.
[AAKEAAI-MONIf2N]
Two pilei of the Dioskouroi; between them the monograms A (above)and ? (below).
768
BB-1300
16 t
2.50
240
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
ca. 48-40 B.C.
770 a b
E-825 BB-705
16 14 -
2.55 1.80
ca. 43-31 B.C. Jugate heads of the Dioskouroir. 771 a b c Z-412 E-2430 Z-1963 19 18 16 2.72 2.85 1.61+ [A-A] Two amphorasentwined by snakes;in field, [letters]; all in olive wreath. Grunauer, pp. 134-140, Group XV
35-31 B.C. [NOMOOYAAKEC] Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. *773 NN-143 27 / 15.47 A-A Dioskouroistg., facing, with spears;between them, A PICITAINA; all in wreath. Grunatier, pp. 155-156, Group XVIII
[rEPONTON]
Head of Apollo r., laur. 774 K-1562 25 \ 11.43
A-A I -i1 Artemis 1., leaning on spear;beside her, dog; all in wreath.
31-7 B.C.
Head of Zeus r.
775 a b
A-119 NN-404a
22 20
- 5.12 - 6.60
CATALOGUE
ca. 21 B.c.: Augusts
241
K[AIC]
Head of Augustusr. 776 *a b
c
Enli[EYP]YKAEOE IA-A
Eaglestg r.
17 17 / 18 4
AV KAIC[---] Bust of Hadrian r., rad., ~, with drapery on far shoulder; border of dots.
*777
II-2
14 -+ 2.70
unpublished AAK[--- -] AAthena r., wearing peplos stg. with archaisticoverfolds, holding shield in 1. and brandishingspear in upraised r.; border of dots. for the reverse type at Sparta, see Grunauer,p. 103, pl. 32:40 (Geta)
Pius A.D. 138-161: Antonnus [AYTOKPATQP-ANTNNEINOC Club between pilei of Head r., laur.] Dioskouroi,in wreath. - 3.58 19 Similar. Grunauer,p. 185, Group XL, Ser. 1
778
A-308a
779
KK-208'
19 A 2.95
after146B.C.
780
0-416
[K-Y]
Dove flying 1.
BMC 14, 15
ARGOLIS
ARGOS
BMC 98
242
NON-ATHENIAN COINS Archaic Athena fighting 1. Head of Hera r., wearing inscribed [APrE]. stephanos Kleiner 1975, p. 309, no. 151 (H-K 12-14) 17 \ 3.97 17 t 3.14
3rd-2nd cntby B.C.
783 a b c d
Wolf at bay.
BMC 125-130
types 1.;rev., above, [A] (BMC 125, 126) types r.; rev., above, X(BMC 128-130) same types r.; rev. above, APrEfi[N]; below, K (McClar 6865, 6866)
784 a b c
BMC 131-135 Head of Apollo r., laur. Tripod. 14 / 1.88+ rev., [E]Y-eMIM-[E], [B] and club (BMC 131, 132) 16 , 1.90 rev., A-[All[K-PA],club and B (BMC 133) no details 14 - 2.19 [Head of Hera r., wearing stephanos.] BMC 140-142
785
IIA-427
16 -
1.37+
Serus 193-211: Sepimus
A.D.
*786
Z-320
NEIMEIIA in parsleywreath.
198-217: Caracalla
-]ANTWNEINO[C] [----Head r.
*787
T-227
26
J. Sabatier, "Monnaiesimperiales grecques,"RBN, ser. 4, 3, 1960 (pp. 1-25), pp. 1011,pl. I:8l;ith .NCP,p. 38
7.44
jEPIDAROS
E in laurel wreath.
BMC 16-21
CATALOGUE Similar. 789 a b Z-2643 0-528 16 N 1.77 16 t 2.66 E Thymiaterionbetween two cupping vessels. BMC 23
243
Similar.
790 a b
c
ee-123
K-1536 00-476
15 t 15 14 -
after146B.C.
Cop 132
HERMIONE
Head of Demeter 1., wearing wheat wreath. 792 *a b E-5552 X-175 14 \ 12 2.30 fragment
Grandjean, Groups I, II
TRICHALKON
t in wheat wreath.
793
r-1197
15
3.42
third B.C. quarte4thcentury DICHALKON Head of Demeter r., wearing wheat wreath. 794 NN-2022 15 t 2.13+ EP between Two torches; all in wheat wreath. Grandjean, Group IV, emission 13
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
Same as 792.
Grandjean,p. 45 not rely on the evidence from Olynthos, the Group II Hermione coin Although Grandjean(op.cit., note 22) did excavatedat this site (ibid.,p. 38 = Olynthus p. 94, pl. xviii, no. 785 = Olynthus p. 352, b) in an area that lay III, IX, abandonedafter 348 B.C. p. 297 below)confirmsher datingof GroupsI and II before ca. 350. (see
A.D. 198-217: Caracalla
794A
Z-683
13
1.50
KLEONAI
796 a b
Z-1366 I-502a
KA/Ef2in parsleywreath.
BMC 9, 10
[--------]
t 2.50
METHANA
A.D.
Bust of S. Severus r.
[-------18
798
00-51
ME9ANA-IWN Artemis stg. I., holding bow and drawing arrowsfrom quiver.
BMC 18
4.38
TROIZEN
B.C. 4th-3rdcentury
[TPO] Trident.
799
r-1082
(E 14:3)
CATALOGUE
A.D. 180-192: Commodus
245
[ --------
BMC 20
ARKADIA
ARKADIAN LEAGUE
A Syrinx.
BMC 62-69
BMC 87, 88
HERAIA
BMC 23
BMC 24, 25
A specimenof 804 was excavatedat Olynthos;see Oynthus p. 82, pl. XVII, no. 729 = Oynths IX, p. 352, d. VI,
KLEFTOR
370 after
B.C.
805
4-193
BMC 12, 13
246
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
MANTINEIA
806 a b
II1-581 r-359
[MAN] Trident.
BMC 20-23
unpublished?
807
00-597a
9 t
0.49
MEGALOPOLIS
ca. 234-146B.c.
BMC 16
808
MM-366
23 t
5.59
ORCHOMENOS
370 after B.c. Artemis kneeling r., with bow. 20 / [EPXOMEN-IQN] Kallisto seated 1., pierced by arrow;child Arkasbehind. BMC 1, 2
809
Z-1103
4.83+
PHENEOS
after370 B.C.
810
IIII-1098
[E]-E Caduceus.
BMC 20
CATALOGUE
TEGEA
247
4th-3rdcentuy B.C. Head of Athena r., wearing TEFE or TE Owl stg. Attic helmet. 16 f 3.87 TEfrE;owl r. (as McClean 7020) 15 \x 1.79 TE; owl 1. (BMC 10) 14 -* 1.07 samte 13 -+ 2.26 TEr ; owl 1. 15 \ 2.55 legend effaced;owl 1. Similar. 813 I-148a 14 [TErEA] Warriorcharging r. BMC 8-10
BMC 12, 13
Head of Eileithyiaor Demeter r., [with torch over shoulder]. 814 T-1450
[TEFEA] Athena stg. r., [placing hair of Medusa in amphora held by child Sterope].
18 /
2.25
after146B.c.
815 a b
[TEFEATAN] Athena and Kepheus stg., face to face; between them, Sterope receiving hair of Medusa in amphora; [above and below, monograms].
BMC 20, 21
nI-315 ET'-576
22 f 21 -
broken 6.15
816
T-1059
[--
---- ]
CRETE
APTERA
ca. 250-67 B.C. Head of Artemis r., wearing stephanos. 16 t 2.91 [An]-T[A] at 1. and r. of handle of Race torch. cf. BMC 12, 13
*817
e-351
248
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
ARSINOE
BMC 6
KNossos
BMC 70
RPC I, 983
CRETE AS ROMANPROVINCE
j. N. Svoronos,
Nuismatiquede la Crte ancienne, Macon 1890, p. 354, no. 126
*820
X-211a
16 \
1.95
AEGEAN ISLANDS
ANDROS 4th-2ndcenry B.C. Head of young Dionysos r., wearing ivy wreath. 18 . 5.50 (C 9:2) 16 - 3.80
[AIN-IIA-P] Amphora.
BMC 3-5
821 a b
KK-27 IIII-667
CATALOGUE Head of bearded Dionysos r., Kantharos, AIN-[IIIA-[P] wearing ivy wreath. 15 t 3.30 er Klein( 1976, p. 19, no. 163 (A-B 19-20:1) Head of young Dionysos r., A-NIA-PI Thrysos. wearing ivy wreath. 16 t 3.07 17 t 2.66 obv. cmk.: bunch of grapes in incuse circle 17 f 3.23 17 t 3.65 16 t 3.00 16 1 1.05+ BMC 7
249
*822
NN-1835
BMC 14-19
823 *a b
c
d e f
824
r-1612a
Head of bearded Dionyrsos r., BMC 20-22 A-NIA-PI Tripod. wreath. wearing ivy 10 t 0.90 (context ["Layer2 of MJ'1 with Period III Athenian coins to third quarterof 2nd century B.C. [three variety 98: Athena/Amphora]; see 984) DELOS
167 before
B.C.
Sv. 105.75-78
Sv. 105.91-93
826
EA-83
fragment A-H Lyre. Kleiner 1976, p. 15, no. 93 (H 12:1) Similar. Sv. 105.35-41, 49-74 Sv. 105.32-34
Head of Apollo, laur. 828 Apollo head 1.(Sv. 105.35-41, 64-74) BB-903 12 t 0.80 NN-857 11 t 0.86 c Z-2767 10 t 1.41 *d II-447 9 t 0.99 head r. (Sv. 105.49-63) Apollo e Q-33 10 t 1.03 f E-1148 10 t 0.88 a b
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
Kleiner 1976, p. 15, no. 95 (corrected)(H 12:1) Kleiner 1975, p. 322, no. 325 (M-N 15:1)
Similar.
Sv. 105.30-31
The Delian Apollo/Lyre bronzewas minted in threedenominations.Accordingto the criteriaoutlinedabove, p. 38, the larger,AE 3 unit (827) should be the dichalkon,which leaves 828 and 829 to be identified as the AE 4 chalkousand the AE 5 half-chalkous respectivelySome of the smallerand lighterpieces listed under 828 in fact belong to 829. may
As ATHENmAN CLERUCH
ca. 69 B.C. TPIA below Head of Apollo r., with quiver at neck. *830 AA-1149 18 t 4.57 A-eE Owl stg. r., facing, on horizontalamphora. Sv. 106.66-71
This is the only coin of this variety with a recorded Athenian provenience. All other specimens whose place of discovery is known (namely,the nineteen pieces in the Numismatic Collection of Athens, including Sv. 106.66-71) come from Delos.45 The obverse inscription is the signature of the admiral Gaius Valerius Triarius,legate of Lucullusin the Aegean and Black Seas duringthe Second MithradaticWar.4 Using Delos as his base of operations,Triariuscould have minted the coinage to compensate sailors in his'fleet; but in view of the Athenian ethnic and types of the coins, it seems far more likely that the coinage was ordered to pay wall that Triariusconstructedaround the ruined city of Delos after the pirate the workmenon the fortification Athenodoros devastatedthe island in 69.47 The nineteen Numismatic Collection specimens have an average weight of 5.05 g. This AE 2 issue was accompanied by an AE 3 denomination with the first three letters of Triarius'name in a monogram (Sv. 106.73-75, 13-14 mm., av. [of the eight NumismaticCollection specimens] 3.10 g.): Obv. --A at 1.and r. of Bust of Artemisr.;borderof dots. Rev. A-OE Two wheat ears;borderof dots. All exampleswith a recordedprovenienceare also from Delos.48 On the mistakenattributionof other AOE bronze varietiesto Delos after its transferto Athenian control in 167/6 B.C.,see above pp. 68-69 and under 104. Svoronos 1907, pp. 194-214, nos. 66, 76, 124, 125, 164, 304-306, pl. IV:8-10. Idem1911, pp. 60-61, nos. 85, 105;pp. 83-92, nos. 9.8, 9.9, 11.3, 14.26, 16.20, 16.21. 46 T. R. S. Broughton, TheMagstrates theRomn ubc I, New York 1952, pp. 113, 120, 125, 134, 141; Roussel, of Repan note 1, and pp. 331-333. p. 48, 47 de los,3rd ed., Paris 1983, p. 198. P.BruneauandJ. Ducat, Guide 48 Svoronos 1907, pp. 194-214, nos. 67 (pl. IV:11),77, 165-166, 307; idem1911, p. 78, no. 7.18.
45
CATALOGUE
KEOS
251
FederalCoinage
Bearded head (Aristaios) r., laur. 831 a r-1481 *b NN-1612 C AA-436 d A-599a e $-368 f N'-1257 16 18 18 15 14 15
t 3.45 t 4.93 t t
2.15+ 2.27+ 1.30+ 3.52
BMC 1-9 KEIor KEIQN of dog Sirios 1., Forepart encircled by rays. KE- IQ N ethnic? Kleiner 1976, p. 19, no. 164 (A-B 19-20:1) ethnic? same same same
Similar.
BMC 12
Karthaia
Head of young Dionysos r., wearing ivy wreath. 833 *a b S-1427 E-595 19 \ 3.19 18 ., 5.95
BMC 42
BMC 44
834
II-51
16 t
4.88
*835 49 G.
rr-65
as Reger and M. Risser,"Coinageand Federationon HellenisticKeos,"in Landscape ArchaeologyLong-term History: Keos Northern in the Cycladic Islands, Davis, J. Cherry, and E. Mantzourani, edd., Los Angeles 1991 (pp. 305-315), J. pp. 307-308.
252
B.C. 4th-2ndcentury Bearded male head r. (Aristaios) 13 - broken K 0 P [H] between rays of Star. BMC 57, 58
836
8-373
Bee. [KOIPH]
obv. cmk.: head 1., in incuse circle
BMC 66
18 4 6.44
19 t 3.86
Ioulis
*838
BB-445
11 t
1.06
Head of Apollo r.
839
r-806a
13
1.29
Bee. [IOYAIC]
BMC 78-83
KYTHNOS
3rd-lst cenaryB.C.
BMC 5
Rose. K-[Y]
BMC 7
4 2.76
CATALOGUE
MELOS
253
lst-3rd century Christ after Bust of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 25 f 7.67 in MHIAI[W]N olive wreath. BMC 38
843
IIII-1007
A.D. 176-192
*844
NN-618
BMC 48
PAROS
845 a b
EA-25 N'-1315a
BMC 32-34
SIPHNOS
*846
A-663
Incuse square. BMC 3 Bronze clearlyvisible beneath the silver envelope. The coin appears to have been intentionallyflattened.
SYROS
Head of bearded Pan r. 847 a b c 00-1261 NN-57 e-414 16 t 2.72 16 / 3.18 15 +- 3.05
[EYPI] above Goat. goat stg. 1.;obv.: indistinctcircularcmk. goat stg. 1. goat walking r.
BMC 1-12
poros fragmentfrom cisternQ9-1 0:1, which was coveredover duringconstruction of the terrace of the Stoa of Attalos in the middle of the 2nd century B.C. The cistern may have gone out of use in the early 3rd centurywhen the SquarePeristyle built (p. 315 below),but because of 2nd-centuryB.C. was contamination, it is unclearwhether the contextual terminus quem the coin should be pushed back to ca. 300. ante for
254
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
TENOS
288-ca. 230
B.C.
Tenos p. 246, no. 1 (context of first third of 2nd century B.C.51) II,
Head of young Zeus Ammon r., laur. 849 a b E-336 T-4a 14 t 16 t 2.30 4.70
Kleiner 1975, p. 309, no. 152 (H-K 12-14); Tnos II, p. 246, no. 7 Tens II, p. 246, no. 1
to endof3rdcentury ca. 188 B.C. Head of Poseidon r., laur. [T]-HIN-I Trident, handle flanked by dolphins. TbwsII, pp. 239241, ser. 205-206
19 t 11 t
4.60+ 1.30
Head of young Zeus Ammon r., laur. Cmk.: bunch of grapes in incuse circle. 851 *a b KK-278a EA-46 22 / 20 6.07 5.03
TinosII, p. 246, no. 6 rev.: obs scurecmk. (owl?);Tenos p. 246, no. 3 II,
ASIATICBOSPHOROS
PHANAGORIA
4ANA[rOIPITfN]below
Stag recumbent1.
Cop5
Section T Shop Building,room 2. Out 51 Embeddedin layerc, the thirdfloorlayerbelow the finalfloor of ca. 150 B.C.; of a dozen identifiableAthenian coins from this layer,the latestis from the 180'sB.C.(85: Cicada/Amphora).
CATALOGUE
KINGS
255
V: Rheskouporis A.D.314-342
Bust of Rheskouporisr.
[-----
---]
[- ----]
Bust of Emperorr.
N. A. Frolova, The Coingeof theKingdom A.D. of Bosporous 242-341/342 (BAR InternationalSeries 166), Oxford 1983, pp. 209-210
853 a b
MM-27 E-1147a
19 4 6.29 18 - 6.42
PONTOS
AMIsos
ca. time ofMithradates Eupator, 120-63 Head of young Ares r., wearing helmet. 18 t 5.72
B.C.
BMC 40-50
854
IIn-877
Head of young Dionysos r., wearing ivy wreath. 855 *a b IIe-632 K-552 21 t 22 t 6.41 5.65+
AMIZOYbelow Cista mystica;behind it, thyrsoswith fillet and bell. rev. at 1.,hr (BMC 53, 54) no < details
BMC 53-56
BITHYNIA
BITHINANLEAGUE
856
r-1522
BMC 12-21
256
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
A.D.
253-260: Valrian andGalleus I OMH[POCNI]KAIEfN Homer seated 1. on cippus, raising r. hand, with 1. hand on seat. Von Aulock 7081
857
r-396
AVT OVAAEPIANOC CEBB rAAAIH[NOC] Busts, rad., facing one another. 29 t 11.07
A.D.
161-180: MarcusAureus
MHTP NEf NIKOMHI[AEQfN] Cop557 Eagle stg. r., wings spread, head turned 1., fighting snake rising at 1.
*858
P-1145
25 +- 7.43
A.D. 248-251:
Tran Decius
*859
AA-505
AVT KA TPAIN AEKIOC Aulock 850 NIKOMHAEQAIC NEQKOPQN Von Athena stg. 1., with shield on AV CEB 1. arm, holding phiale in r. Bust r., rad. 23 f 4.63 ob\v.:indistinctcircularcmk.
KINGS
Prousias 183-149 B.C. II, Head of ProusiasII r., diad. 861 IIe-251 18 t broken [BA I]AEf[E] nPO[YI OY] Heraklesstg. 1., holding club and lion's skin. BMC 3-7
Head of young Dionysos r., wearing ivy wreath. *862 r-1036 14 t 4.74
BMC 14
(E 14:3) GRC,fig. 19
CATALOGUE MYSIA
257
ADRAMYTEION
BMC 7-8
H. von Fritz, Die anA-IA Enl [CTPA KO]M0 NEIKOV AAPAMV]TH[NfN] tikn Munzen Mysiens, Zeus stg. 1., holding scepter in 1. hand; eagle on outstretchedr. Berlin 1913, p. 51, no. 152
ATARNEUS
BMC 1-4
KYzIKos
B.C. mid?)-5th century EL STATER Bull stg. 1., on tuna. Quadripartiteincuse square. H. von Fritz, "Die von Electronpragung Nomisma 7, Kyzikos," 1912, no. 88
*866
GRC,fig. 6 Besidesbeing paid into the Athenian treasuryas tributein the second half of the 5th century,52 great numbers of Kyzikene staters served Athenian private interests.In 403 B.C.the strongboxthat the orator Lysias kept in his bedroom contained 3 talentsof silvercoin, 4 silvercups, 100 gold darics,and 400 Kyzikenes(Lysias12.11).
Br-68
18 -
16.10
IGCH 47, a hoard of eighty Kyzikenes found in the Peiraeusin 1882, is now dated to the end of the 5th century (M. Laloux, "Circulationdes monnaies de Cyzique,"RBN 117, 1971 [pp. 31-69], p. 59).
52 See S. K. ANSM 16, 1970,pp. 13-22. W Eddy,"The Value of the Cyzicene Staterat Athens in the Fifth Century,"
258
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
4th century B.c.
BMC 136-143
Fourspecimensfrom Olynthos (O!ynthus p. 354, no. 56) confirm that this coinage began before the middle IX, of the century. PARUON(?)
A.D. 14-37: Tberius
868
E-1484
[TI AVG] Head of Tiberius r. 16 t 2.29 DRV-CA Head of Drusus r. 17 1 5.32 [TI AVGDRVSVS] CAESAR Jugate heads of Tiberius and Drusus r. 17 / 5.41
Similar.
RPC I, 1659
*869
PP'-1249
Similar.
*870
OA-15
Christ 1stcenry after BMC 86-95 Priest or priests plowing with oxen r. T 18 - 5.41 871 a ST'-415 Julio-Claudianhead r.; obv. cmk.: E in incuse square 17 - 3.71 b EA-399 Julio-Claudianhead r. same 16 - 3.64 c III-1088 same 15 t 2.31 d 0-999 head 1. 16 4 2.69 (e 00-363 head 1., Nerva(?) (BMC 94) 18 +- 4.24 f H-1777 In RPC I (pp. 309-310), 868-870 are tentativelyassigned to an uncertain Roman colony in Macedonia, possiblyPhilippoi. Head of uncertainemperor.
[---
-]
PERGAMON
872 *a b
T-1297 r-507
BMC 78-83 at OIAETAIPOY r. of Head of Athena r., wearing Coiled snake. Attic helmet. rev. at 1.,M.. Kleiner 1975, p. 323, pl. 76, no. 334 (M-N 15:1) 16 f 4.30 - details effaced 16
Berlin 1910;and E. V Hanse, Th 53 Johnston, Sardis Pergamon, M7, pp. 19, 74, followingH. von Fritz,DieMwzn von
CATALOGUE ca. coinage, 197-133 Municipal Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet.
B.C.54
259
nE[P]r[AMH]
Nike stg. r., crowning inscriptionwith wreath in r.; in 1., palm.
BMC 135-138
873
r-685
17
t 6.0
n-EPIr-AIMHNQN
Eagle stg 1., wings spread, on thunderbolt.
BMC 144-149
t 7.43
Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet ornamented with star. 875 B'-669 16 -
BMC 190-204
Bust of Athena 1., wearing aegis and Corinthian helmet. 876 00-533a 25 f 7.66
BMC 129-134
Period VespasianHadrian to of
[eEON CYNKAHTON]
Bust of Senate r. *877 EA-401 15
eEAN P-[fMHN]
Bust of Roma, turreted,r.; border of dots.
2.13
A.D.
176-192: Commodus
AVTOKAIM-AVPH KOMOAOC
Bust r., laur., cuir., dr. *878 OA-245 46 f 49.9
260
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
PERPERENE
[nEPnE-PHNIQN]
Bunch of grapes.
RPC I, 2350
879 a b
BB-1292 NN-1804
PrrANE
n I [T A] between points of
Pentagram.
BMC 7-1055
TROAS
ALEXANDRIA TROAS
881
1-1550
M AV ANTON[IN] PIVS AV Bust r., laur., dr. 24 4, 7.05 ANTONIN-VS PIVS AV Bust r., laur.
COLALEXI AVG
Horse grazing r.
*882
Z-416
24
4 7.36
COL A TROAD Eagle flying 1., carrying bull's head. BellingerA262; cf. BMC 98-101
*883
NN-1151
A.D.249-251: Trajan Decus [IMP] Q C M [TRAI]ANV DECIVS Bust r., laur., cuir., dr. 17 1 2.40 COL AVGVI TRO Horse grazing r. BellingerA396
884
P-1399
55 Fora
CATALOGUE
A.D.251-253: Volsian
261
AFINI IMP.C.VIBI OLVSSIANV Bust r., laur., dr. *885 IIO-792 22 4 5.01
TRO COL-AVG Eagle stg.; facing, head 1., holding bull's head. (A 14:2) GRC,fig. 24 Assos
A.D. 180-193: Commodus
BellingerA423
Bust of Commodus r.
[--------
[Eni CTPATIB KA]AV APICTOAA[M]; upwardsin 1. field, ACCIQN; Zeus stg. frontally,holding eagle in r. and scepter in 1.
F Imhoof-Blumer, "Griechische Miinzen aus dem Museum in Klagenfurt,"NZ 16, 1884, pp. 264-265, no. 83
886
B-441a
31
4 13.01
ILION
Flavian A.D. period, 79-96 [IAI]Bust of Athena 1., wearing aegis and Corinthian helmet. 20 t 5.06 Aineas walking r., carrying Anchises and leading Askanios. BellingerT129
887
00-385
NEANDRIA
*888
KTA-109
BMC 6
BMC 8-11
889
EA-99
17 -+ 5.57
SKEPSIS
890
T-212a
BMC 19, 20
262
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
TENEDOS
4thcentury orlater B.C. Female head r. 9 - 0.50 [T]-E Double axe. BMC 22-25
891
NN-163a
AIOLIS
AlGAI
Head of Athena r., wearing AIrAEf2NZeus stg. 1., Attic helmet ornamented holding scepter in 1.; with griffin. [eagle] in outstretchedr. 18 t 6.16 obv. cmk.: owl r. in incuse circle 16 t 4.26+
A.D. 222-235: SeveAu Alexander
BMC 12, 13
[-------
-]
Enl CT-PAEVT-VX-OV:
AIFrAE[N] Similar Zeus.
26 4 5.91
AUroKANE
4th-2nd century B.C.
Head of Zeus r.
894
r-1412
11
4 1.35
ELAIA
L. Forrer,The Weber Collection: Greek Coins London III, 1926-1929, p. 171, no. 5472
895
Z-1190
CATALOGUE
263
B.C. 4th-3rdcentury
896
BMC 16-20
897 a b
T-20 00-220
Vase with one handle. [KY] Forepartof horse r. obv. name and rev. monogram effaced 16 f 3.04 same 17 - 3.39
BMC 40-52
2ndcentury B.C. Bust of Artemis r., bow and quiver at shoulder. 16 f 4.33 KY above Vase with one handle; BMC 90-92
in field,A-nAIT-OYIP-II0-E.
*898
MM-26
2ndcentury Christ after Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 14 t 1.41 [KVM]Eagle stg. 1.
Cop118
899
AA-749a
*900
IIn-788
30
E AVP ACKAHnI-IAKOV r B KVMIAI-flNStatue of Ephesian Artemis with forepart of stag at either side.
15.64
(A 14:2)
LESBOS
Methymna
ca. 350/330-250/240 Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. Cmk.: bee.
B.C.
Kantharos. [M]-AI[e]-Y
BMC 19-23; P. R. Franke,in H.-G. Buchholz, Methymna, Mainz 1975, p. 170, no. 22
901
D-32
12 t
1.44
(M 18:10)
264
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
B.C. 2nd-lst century
Mytilene
M-YIT-I Lyre.
rev. at 1., T;at r., club
BMC 37-95
M-[Y]IT-[I]
Herm of Dionysos on prow; at 1., vine branch with grapes.
BMC 132-138
904
IIA-428
20 t
4.88
AVT KPAT K-MAP AVPH ANTfNEINOC Bust r., laur., cuir., dr.
BEnl CTPAnlEAAOV
*905
OA-290
47
4 50.49
IONIA
EPvmSOS
4th-3rd B.C. century E-0 Bee. 906 I-696 16 t 2.43 Stag kneeling 1., head turned back; above, astragal. BMC 63-67
[E]-< Bee.
4 0.73+
CATALOGUE
ca. 48-27
B.C.
265
Bust of Artemis r., bow and quiver at shoulder. 908 B'-927 19 t 3.77
[E-0] Long torch between two stags;above, below, and in field [magistrates' names].
BMC 182-184
909
Z-3005
16 f
3.93
[--------]
Bust of Antoninus Pius r. *910 00-473 23 t 5.05
911
IIII-156
E(<ECIQNStag stg. r.
BMC 248
A.D.
912
1-1603
I[]-----
A.D.
209-212: Geta
*913
S-3807
BMC 289
A.D.
248-251: Eruscilla AnHMH-IEPAIEEECIQN Sacred wagon drawn by two mules. cf. BMC 335 (GordianIII)
EPEN ETPOYCKIAAA CEB Bust r., crescent behind. *914 IIII-466 28 4 8.77
266
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
A.D. 253-255: Saloninus
ERYTHRAI 4th-3rd centuyB.C. [Head of young Herakles r.] 916 ME-212 14 1.35 cf. BMC 66-81 (ethnic above club) (pro )bablyfrom H-K 12-14, but not listed in Kleiner 1975, pp. 304-312) EPY above Club and bow in case; between and below, [--]AKAE[-- I - -]ME[- - ]. BMC 85-94 EPY below Club and bow in case.
917
H-1714
nlOAYK[PI]ITOEI
EPY. [nl]OAK[PI]lTOYI
[EYPI M]ENEKPAI[THE]
Cop739
ArAen2NOE.
KLAZOMENAI
4thcentury andlater B.C. Helmeted head of Athena facing r. three-quarters 12 t 1.35 Similar. 921 N-581a 16 f 3.56 above KAAZO[MElINIQN Ram recumbent r.; below, [--- - - ]. BMC 85, 86
] [----Ram walking r.
BMC 56-72
920
T-198a
BMC 73-80
CATALOGUE
MAGNESIA ON THE MAANDROS
267
BMC 44, 45
*924
II-30
19 t
10.57
[MArNHT] below Stag stg. r.; above, star. 925 H-133 18 f 3.13
BMC 47
Enl rP APICTO[KA]OV
MArNHTfN Statue of Themistoklesstg. 1., with phiale in extended r. hand and sword in sheath in 1.;at 1., burning altar and, on ground, slain bull. Above and below statue'sextended hand,
eEMICITOKAHIC.
cf. S. Schultz, Die M'inprigug vonMagnesia am Mdander der in romischen Kaiserzeit, Hildesheim/New York 1975, p. 61, pl. 7, no. 103 (AntoninusPius), and p. 85, pl. 19, no. 244 (Severus Alexander).
*926
NN-595
40 1
23.46
METROPOLIS
927
r-1251
MHTPOnlOAITf[N] Thunderbolt.
BMC 1, 2
268
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
MILETOS
370-350's B.C.56
*928
OA-217
13 -
B. Deppert-Lippitz, Die Minprgung Miets vonvirtenbis ersterJahruhndert v. Chr.,Aarau/ am Frankfurt Main/ Salzburg 1984, p. 150, nos. 265-269
2.05
GRC,fig. 19
mid-at 4th century B.C.57
929 a b c
19 t 18 t 18 t
4 3.57
PHOKAIA
B.C. 3rdcentury or ater Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet. 12 t 1.68 Forepartof griffinbetween pilei of Dioskouroibelow, nYe[i]E. Cop1036
931
K-975a
SMYRNA
932
NN-1836
Veiled head of Eurydike "I; [EYPYAIKEfN] at 1. of of LysimachoEr. s) Tripod. (daughter Kleiner 1976, p. 19, no. 165 (A-B 19-20:1) 14 \ 1.19
56 P. Kinns, "The Coinage of Miletus,"NJC146, 1986 (pp. 233-260), p. 250. 57 Cf. ibid.,p. 251.
CATALOGUE
ca. 280-190 B.C.
269
EMYPNAIQNand [magistrate's name] on either side of Tripod. EMYPN only, at r. [IMYP]NAIQN at r.; [- -]-[- -] at 1.
ca. 190-105B.c.
934
M-78a
6.15
ca. 75-50
B.C.
H'-2602
A.D.
88/89: Julia Tt
938
11-419
CMVPN-AIIQN Prow r.
ca. A.D.210-235
[C]MYPN-[AI]|QN Prow r.
270
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
A.D.
222-235: JuliaMamaea
En c r KAIOrE-NO[YC]
Amazon (Smyrna)stg. 1., with temple in r., bipennis and pelta in 1.
r [CMYP]NAIQN NEQKOPQN
*940
Z-984a
29
A.D.
*941
PP-797
24 t
6.69
CMVPNAIfN r NEfKO En Klose, p. 321, nos. LXXV36-50 C M AVP CE--CT-OV SimilarAmazon with temple, bipennis, and pelta. obv. cmk: 5 in incuse circle (Howgego, no. 813) TEOS 3rd-lst cntu,yB.C.
Griffinseated r.
942
E-1456
17 f
3.44
Cmos
3rd-2ndcentury B.c.58 [Sphinx seated r.] 19 at [Xl]0ol [M]ENEEE 1. and r. of Amphora. (N 18:3) XIOL at 1. of Amphora; at r., magistrate'sname; all in vine wreath. Mavrogordato1916, no. 67; BMC 8597 Mavrogordato 1916, no. 623; BMC 82-83
943
X-113a
4.07
Sphinx seated with forepaw raised over bunch of grapes. 944 Sphinx r. a H'-2939 b B'-770 *c rr-225 d NN- 1730 *e AA-51 f B'-962 g K-841 14 12 t ? 14 t 14 t 16 K, 12 T 13 2.21 1.61 2.85 1.40 1.98 1.71 1.65
AnEAAHE (BMC 86) MHTPOA[I|PO?] (BMC 94) rOPrIA[ (Mavrogordato1916, p. 321) (F 19:6) same rPYIiOS-? no details
same
58 Mavrogordato(1916, pp. 297-355) assigns these issues of his Period IX to 190-84 B.c. But it is clear from the context of 943 that this varietybegan before then.
CATALOGUE h i 00-945 IIII-239 $-29 Sphinx 1. gI-239 13 t 14 t 13 t 2.49 2.66 2.64 1.56 2.59 0.75
same same same
271
J
*k
4 1a t
1 rr-77 m NN-1937 n
AEfAEIIOE; two pilei of the Dioskouroi between XI and 0O (cf. BMC 89: sphinx r.) [Z]HNOAOPIO:] (sic)(cf. BMC 50: drachm) no details
1stcentury after century Christ B.C.-1st Sphinx seated 1.;border of dots. 945 T-106 16 f 1.95 [XIOE] at 1. of Amphora; at r., [magistrate's name]. Mavrogordato1917, nos. 83-87; BMC 103-106
946
r-1467
ASSARION
[XIQN]
Sphinx seated 1. 947 1-1055 17 t 3.42
later orearly centuyafter 2nd 3rd Christ 3 ASSARIA TPIA (in ex.) AC-CAP-IAJ X-IIj-N Amphora between two poppies; all in wreath. Sphinx seated r. or 1., forepaw raised over prow. 30 t 10.79 sphinx r. (A 14:2: ca. A.D. 250) 32 t 8.83(worn) sphinx 1.;inscriptionseffaced Mavrogordato1918, nos. 127a, 128
948 *a b
II-793 1-895
for (pp. 114-115) providesa chronologicalframework the later imperialbronze coinage of Chios by dating the issuessigned by the magistratesPreimos,Irenaios,and Chrysogonosto specificperiods in the 2nd and 3rd centuries after Christ on metrological grounds. Pending an inclusive re-studyof the entire coinage, it can be noted here that the comparativeweights of the unsignedvarietiescataloguedhere locate 946 and 947 respectivelybefore and around the time of the Hadrianic-earlyAntonineissueof Preimos,948 between the issue of Preimosand the essentiallySeveran issue of Irenaios(the context and condition of 948a imply a date as late in the Antonine or Severanperiod as possible), 949 around the time of Irenaios,and 950 aroundthe time of Chrysogonos(betweenA.D.222 and 238 [Klose]).
59 Klose
272
NON-ATHENIAN COINS firsthalf3rdcentury Christ after 3 ASSARIA TPIA (in ex.) ACCAP-IAI seated r., 1. forepaw Sphinx raised over prow. X I Q N around Apollo and Dionysos stg., facing, sacrificingat altar between them; in ex., star. Mavrogorgato1918, no. 134
*949
IIII-442
29
4 7.94
Kroll 1973, p. 319, no. 14 (B 17:la: A.D. 267). As shown by the fairlyfresh condition of the obverse, the effacement of the reverse is due to corrosion, not wear.
1 ASSARIA
950
E-6376
SAMOS
ca. 129-20
B.C.
951 *a b c d e Large module, as Cop1721 ET-55 20 t 7.77 Intermediatemodule, as BMC 201-208, Cop1722-1724 15 -+ 2.90 rev. above, A-monogram (cf. BMC 201) EA-392 15 t 4.02 0-429a 15 f 3.55 0-629 14 t 3.75 EA-488
A.D.
238-244: Tranquilna CAM-I!QN Tyche stg. 1., with rudder and cornucopia. BMC 311
4 6.15
CATALOGUE KARIA
273
KNDOS
B.C.60 4th-mid-3rdcentury
[KNI]above Prow r.
BMC 55-64
BMC 67-71
210-190 B.C.61
BMC 52-54
4.66
MYLASA
B.C. 2nd-lst century Double axe. MYAA|IEf2N 1. and r. of Trident. BMC 14-16
*956
r-121
9 f
1.40
MYNDOS
1. M-[YN]IAI-fN and r. of
verticalWinged thunderbolt.
OA-270a
15
4 4.20
in of J. H. Nordb0, "The Coinage of Cnidus after 394 B.C.," Procedings the10thInternational Congress of I. A. Carradice,ed., London 1986 (pp. 50-56), pp. 53-54, 56, pl. 5:8, 9, 11. 61 Ibid.,pp. 54-56, pl. 5:17.
nimumatics,
274
ca. 190-166B.C.62
1.95+
broken
KQIONabove BMC 103-110 Bow in case and club; below, magistrate'sname. Kleiner 1975, p. 311, no. 189 [Kf2ON]ITEAEtE0OP[OE];63 (corrected)(H-K 12-14) KOIONI[- --]; (foundwith other coins, the latest being Athenian Period II pieces of ca. 220's-190's B.C.and 991, Antiochos m, 223187 B.C.)
(c ? d
E-52 T-860
17 t 15 t
2.55+ 2.93
inscriptionseffaced same
It is possible that 958c, d, or both might come from the later variety,BMC 156-164, "166-88 B.C.," ethnic KOIQN.
RHODES
AR DIDRACH Head of Helios three-quarters facing, r. *959 E-551 18 t 6.02 POAION above Rose with bud at r.; at lower 1., EY and bunch of grapes. BMC 35
or ca. in minted central northern Imitations Greee, 175 B.C.65 AR DRACHM Similar.Cmk: dolphin in incuse rectangle. *960 IIn-130 15 -+ 2.42 [P]-O Rose with bud at r.; above, AHMOKAH[E]; at 1., dolphin. BMC 199, 200
62 The contexts of 958a and b are compatiblewith this standardcatalogue dating but suggest that the series might have begun somewhatearlier. 63 W. R. Paton and E. L. Hicks, TheInscriptionsCos,Oxford 1891, p. 309, no. 85. of 64 R. Ashton, "RhodianCoinage and the Colossus,"RN, ser.6, 30, 1988, pp. 78, 86: Series 2. 65 R. Ashton, "Pseudo-Rhodian e Drachmsand the Beginningof the Lycian Ceagu e,"JC 147, 197, pp. 16notes 15 and 18, which mentionsboth Agora specimensand attributestheir dolphin countermarkalso to mainland 17, Greece, "perhapsafterthe battle of Pydna in 168."
CATALOGUE B.C. 4th-2ndcentury AR DRACHM 962 00-1160 Similar. 14 - 1.61+ Similar. too damaged for classification
ca. 330'sate 3rd cntury B.C.66
275
P-O Rose with bud on r. Head of Rhodos r., wearing stephane. rev. at 1., H 11 t 1.21
BMC 74-117
11 t
11 4
1.42
1.10
9 t 1.16 9 t 1.05
ca. 200
B.C.
P-O Rose.
BMC 324-326
11 4 0.97
12 -
965 a b
BB-841 NN-1085
Head of Rhodos r., rad., P-O Rose with branch on each side; all in incuse square. wearing stephane. rev. above, (?)nOY[--] 13 f 1.69 Kleiner 1976, p. 21, no. 114 (B 20:9) 13 t 1.68
late 1st century B.C. orlater
BMC 327-333
4 2.26
BMC 411-413
LYDIA
HERMOKAPELIA
A.D.
117-138: time Hadrian of EPMOKAnH-AITQN Bust of Roma r., turreted; at r., *. BMC 11-12
M-141
17 $
2.83
276
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
SARDIS
after133 B.C.67
Head of Apollo r., laur. 968 a b c r-98 X-187 EA-394 15 . 2.39 15 - 2.36 15 t 3.41
BMC 10-21
TRIPOIS
late2ndorearly caturyafter Christ 3rd Bust of Serapis r., wearing modius. 969 *a b --426 III-464
TPlnO-AEITQN
18 4 3.49
18 4 2.62 Kroll 1973, p. 319, no. 15, where wrongly identified as from PhrygianHierapolis (B 17:1a)68
PHRYGIA
AKMONEIA
BMC 16
970
00-729a
15 t
3.20
APAMEIA
971
r-393
18 t
5.05
67 Sardis M7, pp. 42, 79-80. 68 The somewhat worn condition of the coin (w4/5) is comparableto that of the Severan and late Antonine coins hoard. in this Herulian-invasion
CATALOGUE
LAODIKEIA
277
after133 B.C.
972
K-779
[AAOAI]KEQNDouble cornucopia.
BMC 31-38
SYNNADA
Imperialperiod Head of city-goddessr., turreted. 973 *a H'-3811 b IIII-456 CVNNA-AEDN Athena stg. 1., with phiale in r. and spear in 1. BMC 13, 14
19 f
19
3.87
4 2.82
LYCIA
LYcIAN LEAGUE
ca. 100-mid-30'sB.c. Head of Apollo r., laur. [AYKIabove and initials of mint city on either side of] Crossed bow and quiver;all in incuse square. H. A. Troxell, The Coinage theLycian of League (mJM 162), New York 1982, p. 100 (unit)
974 a b
1-925 K-8
12 10 -
1.12 0.91
late30's-ear1y20's B.C.
[A-Y]Head of Artemis r., bow and quiver at shoulder. 975 00-546 18 \ 2.39
Masikytesmint
PATARA
168 B.c.-Imperial period Head of Apollo r., laur. 976 AA-123a 8 f 0.83 [IIATAPE2N]Head of Artemis 1., wearing stephane. BMC 5-8
278
A.D.116-117: Trajan (Parthics) [A K TPAIANOC]-nlA[PeiKOC] [ATTAAEWJN] Head r., laur. Head of Athena r., wearing Corinthian helmet. 18 $ 3.83 BMC 16
*977
E-5588
PERGE
BMC 15-20
2.08
SIDE
B.C. 3rd-2ndcentury Head of Athena r., weaz Corinthianhelmet. 979 Largermodule (BMC59-61) PP'-1024 15 \ 2.69 Smallermodule (BMC 71, 72) 'b T-1652 13 t 1.91 c E-65a 12 d NN-8777a 10 a (U 13:2) Kleiner 1975, p. 324, no. 354 (M-N 15:1) Pomegranate. BMC 59-61, 71, 72
3'
980
K-1551
BMC 65-68
SILLYON
*981
00-1499
CATALOGUE PISIDIA
279
ANTIOCH
2ndcentury Christ after ANTI[OCH] Bust of Hermes r., caduceus at shoulder. COLO-NIAE Lighted altar. A. Krzyzanowska, coloniales Monnaies de d'Antioche Pisidie,Warsaw 1970, p. 140, no. VI/6; p. 144, no. V/5
982
Z-1725
14 \
1.85
SELGE
B.C. 2nd-Ist century Head of bearded Herakles r., club at shoulder. 983 K-92 13 t 2.73 [E]-E Winged thunderbolt and bow terminatingat upper end in head of stag. BMC 47, 48
CILICIA
EEAEYKEQNTN nlPOE TOI BMC 11-14 KAAYKAAN2I Forepartof horse r.; above, ZH; below, AYHE.
*984
r-1612
20 t
4.25
SOLOI-POMPEIOPOLIS
985
E-2368
Head r., [wearinghelmet?]. [EOA]EfN(?) Bunch of grapes. 11 4, attributionof this coin to Soloi uncertain
cf. BMC 34
280
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
after 66B.C.
Head of Pompey r.
nOMnE-IOnOAIEfN Nike
walkingr., with wreath and palm; at r., AP. 0
AH
*986 II-64a 20 t 7.57
SYEDRA
BMC 8
TARsos
ca. 130-31 B.C.69
at [T]APEEQ[N] r. of
Pyramidalpyre of Sandon.
BMC 106-114
KINGS OF GALATIA 36-25 B.C. Amyntas, Bust of Artemis r., bow and quiver at shoulder. 989 H'-2742a 17 f 3.26 BAIAE-ArElI[AMY]NTOM Stag stg. r. BMC 14, 15; RPC I, 3503
SYRIA
SELEUCID KINGS
WSMand Cop assignall the followingto the mint of Antioch on the Orontes. Selukos 226-223 B.C. III, Head of Artemis r., quiver at shoulder. 990
69
WSM,no. 1032
E-1295
15 t
3.71
at D. H. Cox, "The Coins,"in Excavations GiUiiKuk(Tarsus H. Goldman, ed., Princeton 1950, pp. 54-61. I),
281
[BAZIA]EQEI [AN]TIOXOY
Elephant 1.
991
0-309
11 -
1.65
Selukos 187-175 B.C. IV, Bust of young Dionysos r., wearing ivy wreath, thrysos at shoulder;behind, ME. *992 E-468 20 f 6.09
BAZIAEfEIZEAEYKOY
Forepartof galley 1.; above, A1 .
serratededge
Alexander IBalas, 150-145 B.C. Head of Alexander r., wearing helmet. 993 00-256 9 t 5.82 [BAZIAEfEl AAEEANAPOY] Nike stg. 1., crowning second line of inscriptionwith wreath. BMC 51-54; Cop263-265
Antiochos 138-129 B.C. VII, Winged bust of Eros r. BAEIAE1EI ANTIOXOYI EYPrET[OY]Crown of Isis; below, nP; at r., H. cf. BMC 60, 61; Cop327
*994
NN-1964 18 f
5.09
47-40 B.C.
THEI ANTIOXE[f2N]I
MHTPOnOAE[QE]I KAIAYTONO[MOY]
Zeus seated 1., holding Nike and scepter;thunderboltabove; pilei of Dioskouroi 1. and r.; all in wreath. *995 AA-268 30 / 12.60 (D 4:1)
996
I-983a
[-------]
s c
BMC 289
A in wreath.
282
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
A.D. 252-254:
Volusian
BILL.TETRADRAcHM
[--997 H'-3726
- ]
BMC 658-663
JUDEA Alexander 103-76B.C. Imitation Jannaios, Anchor in circle. *998 PP-597 13 0.67 Star with eight rays, surrounded by diadem. illegible traces of inscriptions
4 HerodArchelaos, B.C.-A.D. 6
2.01+
ArPln[A] [BACIAEWC]
Umbrella with fringe. 1000 a b c d NN-1048 NN-661 00-173 rr-95 18 16 17 16 t 2.63 -
The 2 JewishWar,year = A.D. 67/8 ?m nr(l)nr Krater. 1002 *a b Q1-109 rr-191 17 16 t 1.84 1.65
Vine branch.
283
Oblong incuse.
I. Carradice,"The 'Regal' Coinage of the Persian Empire,"in Carradice, pp. 73-93, Type IIIb (early)
*1003
GRC,fig. 16 On daricsat Athens, see under866 and the Athens 1929 hoard (IGCH32) of severalhundreddarics,recovered near the Ilissosriver. 9-83 8.33
15 -
EGYPT
PrOLEMAIC KINGS
II, Ptolemy 285-246 B.C. Veiled head of Arsinoe II r. nTOAEMAIOYBAEIAEfI Eagle stg. 1. on thunderbolt, wings lifted; at r., AI. IIxoXcreatv, no. 351
*1004
NN-995
18
t 4.33
[nTOAEMAIOY] BAIAE[QRE] IIxoXepalEcv,
Eagle stg. 1. on thunderbolt, wings lifted; at 1., E above shield; between legs, [letter]. pl. XIII:18-24
1005
X-207
27 f
14.60
[nlTOAEMAIOY BAEIAEQE]
Eagle stg. 1.;at 1., trident. Berytos mint III, Ptolemy 247-222 B.C.
Bust of Ptolemy III, laur. and wearing aegis. 1007 *a BB-874 b Z-517a c E-9a d 0-78 e N-95a 20 23 20 20 19
t 5.24
t f t 7.15+ 4.59+ 4.59+ broken
284
NON-ATHENIAN COINS PtolmyIV,222-204 B.C. Veiled head of Arsinoe r. [nTOAEMAIOYBAEIAEQE] Double cornucopia. Cyprus mint IInoXcaljcov, no. 1160
1008
K-861
13 t
1.38
I-IV,3rduntuy B.C. UndassifiabPtolemy Head of Zeus Ammon r. [nTOAEMAIOYBAEIAEBQ] Eagle stg 1. on thunderbolt, wings lifted.
1009
All extremelyworn AA-82 29 0-583 28 t c N-1167 28 t d r-1224 27 t e 00-621 27 f 8-166 27 27 t g flA-94 h fl-152 26 t i 00-875 26 t - K-882 k NN-1888 20 t 1 nII-272a 21 a b
13.58+ 13.62+ 14.18+ 14.09+ 11.12+ 8.90+ 10.65+ 10.80+ 11.44+ 6.30+ 6.40+
(N 20:4)
fragment
V Ptolemy and VIII,jot coiageof 170-163 B.C. Head of Zeus Ammon r. nTOAEMAIOYBAEIAEQE Two eagles stg. 1. on thunderbolt;at 1., cornucopia. ntoXcEaklcv, no. 1426
1010 *a b c
t 8.34 t 8.91
t 6.80
Year 21 (160
Paphos mint
Head of Ptolemy VII r., diad. Cmk.: K in incuse square. 1012 r-1330 19 f 4.31
Syrian mint
CATALOGUE
PtolemyVIII, 145-116 B.C.
285
1013 a
NN-1972
22 f 17 t
6.05 4.01
nos. 1651, 1652 EYrEPr[ETOY] Eagle stg. 1., wings lifted, on thunderbolt,at 1., eE. no. larger module (IIrxoXeclaov, 1651); legend effaced. Cyrenaica
mint70
*b BB-561
Similar.
BAEI[AEQZ nT]OAEMAIOY
EYEPrETO Eagle stg. r., wings lifted, on thunderbolt.
*1014
NN-1581 33 t
19.86
b B-514
14 14
t 1.7 t 1.67
*b NN-1009 11 t 13 t c rr-26
Similar.
nTOAEMAIOY BADIAEQE
Eagle stg. 1. on thunderbolt; at 1., aplustre. Cyprus mint
*1017
H-1002
28 f
7.30
[nITOAEMAIOY BAEIAEQE]
Two eagles stg. 1. on thunderbolt;at 1., Isis crown on stand.
1018
70
NN-201
20 f
3.12
In the forthcomingcatalogue of coins from the Universityof PennsylvaniaMuseum excavationsof the Demeter sanctuaryat Cyrene, Theodore V Buttreyattributes1013, 1014, and 1015 to the Cyrenaica.See also 1032 below.
286
NON-ATHENIAN COINS VII, Klopatra 51-30 B.C. Bust of Kleopatra, diad. [KAEOnATPAEBAEIAIEZHE] Eagle stg. 1. on thunderbolt; at r., [M]. 187 v, IIno. no. 1872
1019
N-2a
20 f
7.81+
ALEXANDRIA
A.D. Domitian, 81-96 AVTOK KAI-EAP A[OMITIANOZEEB] Head r., laur. 19 t 4.05 Year 3 Hawk stg. r., wearing skhent;
at 1., !:.
1020
BB-1252
Trajn,A.D.96-117 Head of Trajan r., laur. 1021 E-4447a 13 f 1.79 Year 17 A.D. Hadrian, 117-138 Head of Hadrian r. Two pilei of Dioskouroi; below, LAE. Year 10. GRC,fig. 23 Nilus reclining1., with cornucopia and reed, 1. arm on elephant; in ex., LAUAEK. pierced. Year 12 Similar,but letters and details effaced. Year Antoninu IS Pius, A.D. 138-161 AVT K T AI[AAAP ANTWNINOC]EY Head r., laur. 34 t 20.90 Bust of Hermanubis r., wearing modius [date letters]. pierced with two holes. Year ? Griffinseated r.; above, LH. Year 8 Milne 1933, no. 1843 cf. Milne 1933, no. 1722; BMC 1135-1137 Milne 1933, nos. 1264-1269; BMC 786, 787 Milne 1933, no. 1172; BMC 909
[-----
*1022
A-1443
10
f 0.98
*1023
E-5882
33 t
20.10
1024
H-2151a
*1025
I-488a
1026
X-147a
[-------
CATALOGUE
Pius hrjan-Antoninus
287
Crown of Isis.
Milne 1933, nos. 1171, 52705272; BMC 560, 561, 891-901, 1211
1027
00-543
12 -
0.99+
BILL. TErRADRAcHM A K M AVP nPO-BOC CEB Bust r., laur., dr. *1028 I-1 21 t 6.86 Year 2 Elpis stg. 1., with flower; at l., B. L Milne 1933, no. 4528; BMC 2417
BILL. TETRADRACHM A K rOYA AIOKAHTIANOC CEB Bust r., laur., dr. *1029 E-2889 20 f 6.78 Years 2-6 Dikaiosyne stg. 1., with scales and cornucopia;in field, L-[?]. Milne 1933, nos. 4768-4773, 4935-4936
BnLL. TEnRDRACHM
CEB AIOKAHTIANOC Bust r., laur., cuir. *1030 00-705 19 t 5.68 Year 11
CYRENAICA
CYRENE
K Y P Triple silphiumplant.
BMC 198-200
"REGAL" COINAGE
ca. 140-96B.c. Head of Ptolemy I r. *1032 I-1115a 13 Head of Libya r. BMC, p. 89, nos. 95-104
1.17
288
NON-ATHENIAN COINS
ROMANPROVINCE CYRENAICA OF AND CRETE
ca. 67 B.C.
beneathchin, r.
*1034 r-1122 29 t 13.01
] Minted in Crete
NUMIDIA
Jubal, 60-46B.c.
AR DENARIUS REX IVBA Bust r., diad., scepter over shoulder. HMMLKT IOBAI in Neo-Punic characters. Octastyle temple approachedby steps. J. Mazard, Corpus Nwummorum Nwmndiae Paris Mauretanique, 1955, nos. 84-86; Cop523, 524
*1035
K-1477
18 f
3.30
UNCLASSIFIED UnattributableGreekImperialswith IdentifiableObverse Portraits 1036 a b c d e f g h i j k Augustus PP-62 Nero 0-600 T-1092 15 16 16
CATALOGUE IllegibleCoins with Countermarks 1037 The listing is by countermarks,which are stamped in an incuse circle unless otherwise noted. Nearly all the coins are totally worn.
4th century B.C.and Hllenistic
289
a b c d e f g h i
Cornucopia in incuse oval 14 E-3912 Dolphin on trident rev. type of beardlesshead 18 NN-502 r-1088 20 Dolphin on tridentin incuse square 15 KK-166 Lyre K-1568 15
Rosette or star H-1810 17 14 EA-15 Z-3004 13 18 BE-424 Bunch of grapes 15 j K-1497 k 00-1263 15 Crude wreath? 1 N-1120 20 X m B-606 15 Greek Imperials n Open left hand in incuse field of same shape IIII-230 22 The countermark,located in front of the obv. head, is considerably larger than the open-hand countermarksfound on earlier duoviral asses of Corinth (Amandry, 30-31, pl. I). pp. in incuse square Star(?) T-141a 21 obv. head ofJulio-Claudian emperor IN BE-501 20 R in incuse field of same shape P-1494 17 Halved Coins, Worn Illegible 1038 a b c d e f 16 17 19 21 24 25 By size and fabricthe firstthree could be Athenian (PeriodsIII and IV). 8-182 I-323 BZ-165 Z-1003 Z-1273 Z-1511
o p q
290
1039
130 badly preservednon-Atheniancoins have so far resistedidentification.These are kept together in the Agora records office for furtherstudy by staff and visiting numismaticspecialists.
APPENDIXA
THREE MODERN IMITATIONS
(Plate 32:a-c) As noted in ChapterI (p. 7 above),a few of the 5th-centuryB.C. Atheniandrachmsand tetradrachms fromthe Agora are suspect:if not ancientimitations,one or two conceivablycould be modern. Here we list three Greek coins from the Agora whose modern fabricationcannot be doubted. The source of the first, the Athenian tetradrachm,is uncertain,but one assumes that the coin either is a lost souvenir or derives from a house or tourist shop that stood above or near the place of discovery. The other two come from 19th- or early 20th-centuryhouses that were demolishedfor excavation. Whether any of the bona fide ancient coins from recent or disturbedcontexts in the excavations might be similarstraysfrom modern collections,antiquitiesshops,or the like, there is usuallyno way of knowing.But these three fakesmake it a clear possibility.
*a. "AR"forgeryof an Athenian tetradrachmof the second half of the 5th centuryB.C.Compare variety8 above. Head of Athena r., wearing Attic helmet. PP-192 24 -+ 10.14 g. AeE Owl stg. r., facing; behind, olive spray and crescent.
Betrayedby its mediocre style, light weight, pewterlikealloy, and dulled, cast relief, all of which are typical of cheap, modern imitations.Foundin mixed, late, althoughnot obviously"modern"fill. *b. AR forgeryof a Siculo-Punictetradrachmof the 4th centuryB.C. Compare Cop 978-982. (Sicily) Head of Persephone-Tanit; around, three dolphins. Z-1 22 /j 7.33g. Horse's head 1.;behind, palm tree; below, traces of Punic inscription.
The metal has a pitted, cast look, and the weight is less than half of what it should be. Found in the cellar of a modern house. *c. AR forgeryof a gold staterof PhilipII, King of Macedon, 359-336 B.C. et Compare G. Le Rider,Lemonnayage d'argent d'orde Philippe Paris 1977, pp. 71-198, pls. 53-82. II, Head of Apollo r., laur. IAIlnnlOY Chariot drawn by two galloping horses r. holed
AA-14
18
4.06 g.
Apartfrom the fact that these typeswere not ancientlystruckin silver,the surfaceof the metal, especiallyon the reverse, has the pitted texture of a modern cast. The coin, drilled for attachmentas an ornament, was found in 1937 during the demolition of modern houses.
APPENDIXB
UNSTRUCK BLANKSAND THE MINTS OF THE AGORA
(Plates32 and 33) I The large square btuilding known as "The Mint" at the southeast corner of the Agora square (P-Q 16) owes its identificationto the more than 160 coin blanksexcavatedfrom its floors.1The best-knownblanksare the ten that were found in 1953 with the remainderof the bronze rod from which they had been chopped (P1.32:d).Renewed excavationin 1959 recoveredeight similarblanks from the floor of another room (see P1.32:e). During the final explorationof the building in 1978, floor areasand refusepits dug throughthe floor yielded an additional 144 blanksand relatedpieces of scrapbronze. had Measuringabout 27 by 29 m., the structure the form of an open courtyardwith threeroofed rooms along the backwall. The room at the southwestcornerwas much the largest,takingup about a quarterof the entireplan. The remainsof two furnacesand some cement-linedwater basinsset in the floor show that most of the bronze-working activitytook place in this southwestroom. Beforethe excavationsof 1978, it was assumedthat thiswas the mint of Classicaland Hellenistic mentionedin severalepigraphicaland literarytexts of the 5th, 4th, and Athens, t6 &pyupoxoxniov, 2nd centuries B.c.,2 and that Athenian silver as well as bronze coins were minted here. It is now apparent,however,that the presentbuildingplayeda far more limitedrole in the historyof Athenian coinage. Analyses of furnishingsand debris excavatedfrom the buildingin 1978 failed to produce trace elementsof silver,much less any more conspicuousindicationsof silverworking.And although the latest pottery recoveredbeneath the floors placed the constructionof the building as early as "the years around 400 B.C.,"3 none of the excavatedbronze blanks appear to be earlier than the Period IVB coinage of 42/1-32 B.C.,by which time Athens had ceased to mint in silver.Further study of the coin blanks may require minor chronologicaladjustments,but at present the dating of the three main groupsof blanksfrom the mint restson the followingconsiderations: Group 1 (1953). Plate 32:d illustratesten of the eleven pieces that were found together "immediately beneath the latest ancient ground level"just northeast of the large southwest room in 1953 and prompted identificationof the building as a mint.4 Collectivelyinventoriedas B(ronze)
1 For the in 23, building: H. A. Thompson, "Excavations the Athenian Agora: 1953," Hesperia 1954 (pp. 31-67), in in "Activities 24, 45-48; idem,"Activities the Athenian Agora: 1954," Hesperia 1955 (pp. 50-71), p. 59; idemn, pp. the Athenian Agora: 1959," Hesperia 1960 (pp. 327-368), pp. 343-344. A. Frantz, The Church theHolyApostles 29, of Agora (TheAthenian XIV, pp. 78-79. Camp, pp. 128-130, figs. 107, 108. XX), Princeton 1971, p. 3, pls. 2:b, 28. Agora Guide4, 162-163, figs. 106, 107. pp. 2 To the testimonia collected in 32, III, Agora pp. 160-161, add B. D. Meritt, "GreekInscriptions,"Hesperia 1963 no. 29. (pp. 1-56), pp. 31-32, 3 Camp, p. 129. 4 Thompson 1954 (note 1 above), pp. 46-47, pl. 14:b (with the photograph reproducedin M. Lang, TheAthnian of XIV, pl. 33:c; ide3,fig. 78; Citzen[Excavations the Athenian Agora PictureBook 4], Princeton 1960, fig. 13;Agora 1955 (note 1 above),p. 59. GRC, 3);Thompson fig.
293
1046, they comprisea shortlength of bronzerod, eight usableblanksthat had been chopped from it, and two unusableblanksthat had been chopped off incompletely. Diameters are 12 to 14 mm. The eight complete blanks have thicknessesof 7 to 10 mm., with an average thicknessof 8 mm., and weights of 7.58 to 5.10 g., with an averageof 6.48 g.5 One of the two incomplete blanks was sent for chemical analysis to E. R. Caley and W. H. Deebel at The Ohio State University,who determinedthat its alloy was composed of 66.5 percent copper, 7 percent tin, and 26.7 percent lead.6 The lead:tinratio (a critical index for metallurgical comparison,accordingto Caley and Deebel) is 3.62:1. Since the lead percentageis extremelyhigh for any pre-imperialissue of Athens (see Tables III and IV, pp. 324-327 below), Caley and Deebel correctlyrecognized that the blanksmust belong to the Athenian bronze coinage of the 1st century B.C., that is, the coinage of PeriodsIVB-E. In fact, the only AE 1 issueof Athensthat even approaches this percentage is the Antonian Zeus/Dionysos issue 144, which dates a year before the Battle of Actium to 32 B.C. The one specimen of 144 (froma privatecollection)that has been metallurgically analyzedprovedto have a lead content of 22.73 percentand a 3.61:1 lead:tinratio7that is essentially identicalto the one obtainedfor the blank.Eighteenslightlyworn hoard specimensof 144 (TableIV) close to the 6.48-g. averageof the eight gave an averageweight of 6.33 g., which again is remarkably blanks. complete It would be helpful to analyze more PeriodIV coins for comparison.Towardsthis end several specimens of each Period IVB-D issue were selected in 1991 for nondestructiveanalysis.Until the resultsof this project are available,the blanksand rod fragmentfound in 1953 are to be connected with variety 144 and dated with it to 32 B.C. Group 2 (1959). The second group consistsof eight pieces that were found in 1959 "embedded in the ancient floor in one of the rooms of the SW block."8Six others are illustratedon Plate 32:e: B 1242 (5.33 g.), B 1243 (5.32 g.), B 1237 (7.70 g.), B 1238 (broken, 1.85 g.), B 1239 (end of rod, 6.94 g.), B 1244 (7.60 g.). There is no reason to disassociatethese chronologicallyfrom the pieces found in 1953. Diameters and weights are similar. The two blanks,B 1068a (7.02 g.)and b (6.58 g.),on Plate 32:e are also contemporary. Both were found in 1952 in the same area as the 1953 blanksbut at a higher level. The one blankfrom within the mint that may be slightly earlier,or, less likely,later, than the rest is B 1245, which is wider (diam. 15 mm.) and heavier (8.96 g.). Its relation to the other blanks and its place in the IVB or IVB-E coinage (it is too light for Period IVA)should become clear when it is analyzed for its lead content along with the coins mentioned above and with a numberof other blanks.In additionto the foregoing blanks excavatedwithin the mint, ten similarblanks randomly turned up in the 1950's in digging in the generalvicinity,mostly in Roman Imperialand later contexts. Group 3 (1978). The 1978 excavationsrecovered 144 blanks, rod ends, and pieces of bronze scrap. Most come from pits in the floor of the building and are in such a corroded condition that little of the originalmetal remains.Consistingalmost entirelyof corrosionproducts,they could not be cleaned. A full listing with weights will be published once samples have been analyzed. Here, however,it should be mentioned that three sizes are represented.In diameterand weight the larger pieces are similarto the better-preserved (reducedAE 1) Group 1 and 2 blanksfound in the 1950's.
Weightsof the eight: 7.58, 7.14, 6.78 (2), 6.50, 6.03, 5.93, 5.10. E. R. Caley and W. H. Deebel, "The Chemical Dating of Bronze Coin Blanks from the Athenian Agora," The Ohio 44, Journal Science 1955, pp. 44-46. Cf. Thompson 1954 (note 1 above, p. 292), p. 47, note 21. of 7 VNew Stle, p. 640. 8 Thompson 1960 (note 1 above, p. 292), p. 343.
6
294
The intermediateblanks are of reduced AE 2 size (ca.2.25-4.00 g.); a few smaller ones are AE 4 (1.50-2.00 g.). At the time of excavation,it was assumed from the sizes of the blanks that most of them belong to the 3rd and 2nd centuriesB.C.9 But a date in the AntonianPeriodIVB (42/1-32 B.C.) is just as suitable for the three denominationsand is to be preferredin light of the more closely studiedblanksfrom the earlierexcavations. Whateverpurposethe buildingservedbeforethe middle of the 1st centuryB.C., presentevidence suggests that it was probably not converted to use as a mint until after the Battle of Philippi in 42 B.C. Metallurgicalanalysesof more blanksshould clarifywhether minting continued here only to the end of Period IVB in 31 B.C.or whether some of the blanksbelong as late as the Augustan Period IVC-E coinage, in which case the buildingwill have functionedas a mint well into the last quarter of the 1st century B.C. A new mint was clearly establishedat some other location when coining resumed in the 2nd century after Christ (Period V), for in the course of that century the site of the structurein the southeast corner of the Agora was largely built over by the Southeast Temple and the Nymphaeum.10 II All or nearly all the blanks from the Period IV mint in the southeast corner of the Agora are unfinished. Very thick and having rough, faceted surfaces, they are stil chopped segments of a bronze rod. Before being struckbetween coin dies they had to be heated and hammered to give them the necessary smoothness and disk shape of the twenty-fivefinished coin blanks illustrated on Plate 32:f. Size, weight, and fabricindicatethat these finishedblanksdate too from PeriodIVB or B-E, and so they were very likelypreparedin the mint at the southeastcorner of the Agora. They were found, however,in 1933 in the opposite, southwestcorner of the Agora square, between the Tholos and the Middle Stoa, in a pocket of gravellyfill beside the Great Drain (Deposit H 12:4); discardedin the the latestcoins date the fill to the middleof the 3rd centuryafterChrist.Presumably second half of the 1st centuryB.C., the blankswere probablytransportedfrom their originalplace of depositionin old, redug earth. The sharp,unworn edges of the pieces make it clear that these are unstruckcoin blanksfrom a mint and not heavily circulatedPeriod IV coins like those picturedon Plate 34 that had lost their typesthroughwear.There are two sizes.The twenty-tworeducedAE 1 pieces11measure 16-18 mm. in diameter and weigh 5.44 to 8.55 g.; the mean weight is 6.95 g. The three smallerpieces12have 13-mm. diameters and weigh 2.7 to 2.9 g. Several specimenswill be analyzed for lead content to assistidentificationwith specificissuesof the PeriodIV coinage. III PeriodVB or C ofthe Hadrianic-Antonine The one Agora blankthat survivesfromthe manufacture is the stray B 1641 (P1.33:a; 22 mm., 8.51 g.). Associationwith the 2nd-centuryimperial coinage coinage is shown instantlyby the shallow cavity punched on one side.13The beveled edge of the blank is furtherproof that the blank had been manufacturedby casting.Found during excavation
9 Camp,p. 129;Guide4, 162. p. 10 W. B. Dinsmoor, "Anchoring Floating Two Hesperia 1982 (pp. 410-452), p. 411, fig. 1, and 51, Temples," Jr., The 432-433, forthe dateof the templein thefirsthalfof the 2ndcentury. Nymphaem is Antonine. pp. 11Theseblanksstill theiroriginal inventory numbers: coin Z-2076,2077, 3,2084,2086, 2088,2089,2091, carry 2093-2095,2101,2104,2105, 2109,2111,2113,2116,2118,2121,2131, 2140.
12 Z-2079, 2100, 2117. 13 Pp. 113-114, 115 above.
295
of the northernpart of the Stoa of Attalosin mixed fill, it had apparentlycirculatedas a coin, since it has been stamped with a countermarkof an open right hand in an incuse oval. This particular of countermarkhas not been found on otherAgora coins, althoughfor the countermark an open left see 1037n. hand,
IV
The Athenian mint of the 2nd centuryafterChristapparentlylay outsidethe excavatedarea. In the middle of the 3rd century,however,mintingreturnedto the south side of the Agora square,although this time in the venerable old building at the opposite, southwestcorner, the building labeled on Plate 36 the RectangularPeribolos.14 Originallybuilt in the 6th century B.C.as a governmentalor it was heavilydamagedby Sulla'sforcesin 86 B.C. was subsequentlyoccupied and religiousstructure, for most of the Roman period by various industrialestablishments.In the 1st and 2nd centuries 15 afterChrist,occupantsincludedpottersand marbleworkers. Remainsof bronzeworkinghave also been found and were assigned to a reuse of the site after the Herulians destroyedthe building in A.D.267.16 But this evidence will have to be reexamined since at least some of it datesjust before the destruction, ca. A.D.264-267, when the building served as the mint for Athens' last coinage, the PeriodVI imperials. In 1961 thirty-eightunstruckflans of sawn, Period VI type (Inv.B 1254) and four broken or misstruckPeriodVI coins (K-1641-1644) were found together in a pit in the floor of the building's southwestperistyle(DepositI 1:3;P1.33:b).Likethe four coins, most of the blanksare rejects.Six of the blankswere sawnfrom a bar at an angle and are not completelycircular. large air bubblein the A bar from which fifteen of the other blanks were sawn was responsiblefor the holes in them. The burial of this refuse in a pit implies that it had been swept together in a clean-up, possibly while the mint was still in operation. It is doubtful, of course, whether this building was ever formally called a mint since coins were never struckhere for more than a few years. As with the building in the southeastcorner of the Agora, we again have to do with a structure that was temporarily taken over for the manufactureof bronze coins long afterits use in other capacities.17
XIV pp. 62-65, identifying the building as the Heliaia. Camp (pp. 46-47, 108) calls it probably a See Agora lawcourt.Now R. S. Stroud("The Sanctuaryof Aiakosin the AthenianAgora" Pecture,New Orleans 1992], abstractin AJA97, 1993, pp. 308-309) identifiesit as the Aiakeion. 15 Guide,pp. 168 = Guide4, 180-181; Agora XI, p. 186. pp. 16 Guid2, p. 106: "The final destructioncame with the Herulian sack of AD.267 after which a colony of bronze workerssettled for a time among the ruins." 17 Unstruck coin blanks have been found at a number of other Greek sites: Eretria (G. F Hill, "AncientMethods of Coining," NC, ser. 5, 2, 1922, p. 11, pl. 1:6); Olynthos (Olynthus XIV, pp. 403-406, pl. 173:23-25); Halieis J. A. 'The Mint of Ancient Halieis" pecture,Washington,D.C. 1975], abstractin Summaries Papers Presentedthe at Dengate, ofthe 77thGeneralMeeting Archaeological the Institute December New York1975, p. 4);Argos (H. Consolaki 28-30, 1975, of ofAmerica, and T. Hackens, "Un atelier monetaire dans un temple argien?,"ttudes argiennes [BCH Supplement 4], Paris 1980, Chalkis(ibid.,p. 289, fig. 14 [silver]); TauricChersonesos(if these blanksare indeed Classical pp. 279-284, figs. 10-13); and not Byzantine, see ibid., p. 286, note 16); and Pella, where the Hellenistic mint has been recently excavated at the edge of the agora (publicationby Dr. Mando Oikonomidou,forthcoming).
14
DEPOSITS,INCLUDINGHOARDS
A. OUTSIDE THE AGORA Summarizedhere is the evidence from the Olynthos, Kerameikos,and Pnyx excavationsthat has a special
relevance for the chronology of Athenian and related bronze coinages in the 4th century B.C. The other
accumulationsof coins found outside the Agora and cited in this volume are the hoards listed under item 6 below.
1. OLYNTHOS At a colloquium on ancient Olynthos held in Boston in December 1989, the two principleparticipants confirmedthe conclusionsof the excavator, M. Robinson,thatthe excavated D. portionof the citywas destroyed and abandonedin 348 B.C. except for the NorthwestQuarter,whose housescontinuedto be inhabiteduntilthe in the of historicalreconstruction foundingof Kassandreia 316.1 SusanRotroffinferred correctness Robinson's from independent ceramic comparanda.2Nicholas Cahill, who has studied the excavationnotebooks and
wrote his doctoral dissertation (University of California at Berkeley 1991) on Olynthos, emphasized, as Robinson had earlier, that nearly all the Macedonian regal coins from the excavation that date after 348
B.C. were concentratedin the pre-316 B.C. Northwesthouses;the few,randomexceptionsare to be understood
as stray pieces that scavengersdropped while plunderingthe ruins for stone and other building material.3
The proposal of some of Robinson's critics to downdate the abandonment of all the Olynthos houses to 316 or later4 can no longer be regarded as tenable. Even so, one still has to be cautious in citing Olynthos for numismatic chronology. Every coin should be checked for its findspot and the coins found with it to ensure that it does come from a house destroyed
or abandoned in 348. In most cases the provenienceconcordancesat the back of Olynthus and XIV are IX sufficient for this kind of checking. More detailed information, including the level at which each coin was found, is recorded in the unpublishednotebooks. I am gratefulto Dr. Cahill for generouslyproviding such unpublished information for the catalogue notes on the coins of Lemnian Myrina (455) and Attic Salamis (640).
1 Onthus IX, pp. 368-370. 2 S. I. and Other
Boston 1989),abstract AJA94, 1990, in Rotroff,"Olynthos Deposits-The Pottery" (lecture, 315-316.Idem, 'Athenian Hellenistic a Towards Firmer Acten XIII.Internationalen des pp. Pottery: Chronology," Kongresses 3 The abstract Cahill's of "Social Spatial and at published paper, 94, Organization Olynthos,"AJA 1990,pp.314-315, does not includehis prefatory observations the coinsand on the destruction on On chronology. the latercoinsfrom theNorthwest see as after348 at thesite,seeW.Hoepfner Quarter, under497 above.On stonerobbing a major activity
D. Raymond, of eds., St. Louis 1953(pp. 180-186),pp. 184-185. M. Rose,"AReconsideration the CoinsFoundat Cincinnati1983),abstract AJA88, 1984,p. 258; idem, in "Coinsand the Historyof Olynthus" Olynthus" (lecture, Boston1989), in abstract AJA 1990,p. 315. J. Dengate, "TheAbandonment Olynthos 316:A Solution (lecture, of in 94, to theProblem Early of Hellenistic 350-260"(unpublished followed W.D. E. Coulson, Chronology, lecture), by "Chatby
and E.-L. Schwandner,HausundStadt klassischen im Munich 1986, p. 29, with note 67. Griechenland, 4 A. R. PresentedDavidMoore to Robinson G. E. Mylonas and Bellinger,"Notes on Coins from Olynthus,"in Studies II,
298
In the last quarterof the 4th century,the superstructure this largebuildingjustinside the SacredGate5 of and covered inter an unusuallylarge numberof coins scatteredon the floor.Among them was alia collapsed a tetradrachmof Alexander IH from the mint of Amphipolis6and datable, through the latest Amphipolis issues in the Demanhur hoard, to ca. 320-317 B.C.7 The remaining coins, summarizedhere through the Dr. generosityof the excavator, Ursula Knigge, are bronze: 1 Eleusis Athens Pigleton staff(38) 1 AeE Pigleton staff(39) 33 Double-bodied (41-43) owl 10Twoowls,no symbol (46) 4 Twoowls,details (44-47) illegible 4 Eleusis Wreathed piglet,shortethnicaboveor below(48, 49) Salamis 2 Nymph/Shield (640) 1 Twodolphins Megara (643) 1 Twodolphins Aigina (662) 1 Apollo/Musselshell [Aeolis-Lesbos], Grynion (Cop pl. 5:202-207). The destructionof the buildingoccurredbetweenthe ca.320-317 issueofthe Alexandertetradrachm and the circulationof Athens' Owl-leftbronze (50), which is absentfrom the deposit but which must have been in circulationby 304 B.C.(see item 3, next)and probablybegan in 307/6 (p. 33 above).Dr. Knigge has attributed the destructionto a naturalcatastrophe, But possiblyan earthquake.8 since thereis no contemporaryevidence elsewherein Athensfor such an event, a respectable was alternative case can be madet thate structure hastily demolishedto facilitatethe extensive307-304 B.C.renovationof the adjacentcity walls.9
LEVELS 3. KERAMEOSDIPYLON ROAD
During excavationsof the Dipylon gate in the 1960's,GottfriedGrubenrecovereda small but important sequence of bronze coins from the successive4th-centurylevels of the road that ran through the gate.l0 In advance of the final excavationreport,we are able, throughthe kindnessof Drs. Gruben, PeterFranke,and significantLevelsIII throughIV Judith Binder,to list the coins from the numismatically 1 Eleusis Athens Found RoadLevelIIIb on Pigleton staff(38) Salamis 1 Nymph/Shield (640) in Salamis 1 Nymph/Shield embedded RoadLevelIIIb (640) in Athens 1 Eleusis embedded RoadLevelIIIc Pigleton staff(38) in Salamis 1 Nymph/Shield embedded RoadLevelIV (640) owl Athens 3 Double-bodied (42, 43) 1 OwlI.(50) Road Level IX which gives the earliest datable context for the Athenian Owl-left variety, was laid of immediatelyafterthe rebuilding the Dipylon that tookplace betweenthe publicationof IG II2 463 in 307/6
5 U. n Fiiur Knigge, DerKerameikos Athen, ofBMCAlxander 129.
6 U. 1980(pp. 246-265),p. 265, note 13, withfig. 12. Variety 1978,"AA Tatigkeitsbericht Knigge,"Kerameikos: 7 BMCA.4xander, fromPhacous," ASMN 9, 1960 Hoard Ptolemaic ("An pp.52,86, 101, 102.Cf.G.K.Jenkins Early For hoardof ca.318 B.C., seriesca.318-316 B.C. the Demanhur [pp. 17-37], pp. 19, 27),who datesthisAmphipolis see IGCH1664.
8 Knigge (note 5 above),p. 93. 9 Forthe renovation,ibid.,pp. 55, 64. 10 G. AA Gruben, "Die Ausgrabenim Kerameikos," 1964 (pp. 384-419), pp. 409-410.
299
(cf. line 53) and Kassandros' siege of Athens in 304." Road Level IIIb goes back probably to around 350 and ought not in any case be later than ca. 325 (according toJudith Binder, who was assigned the pottery
from Gruben'sinvestigations). The Athenian bronze coin that was found in a joint of the Dipylon masonry and that originallyled Gruben to date the gate complex to the early 3rd century12has now been cleaned and found to be of the Double-bodiedowl varietyof the thirdquarterof the 4th century. 4. KERAMEIKOS WELL B-l DIPYLON Two corroded lumps of bronze coins from the bottom of this well in the courtyardof the Dipylon13 representtwo pursesthat were droppeddown the well earlyin its use. The coins, illustrated Karin Braun14 by and assignedfactorsof wear in EABC,pp. 140-142, are A Purse Athens 12Twoowlsoverplemochoe (45) 4 Eleusis Wreathed above(48) piglet,EAEY PurseB 1 AR triobol Athens (19) 1 Twoowlsoverplemochoe (45) 6 Twoowls,no symbol (46) 8 Owl1.(50) 2 Eleusis Wreathed below(51). piglet,EAEYII was apparentlyin use alreadyby the time that Kassandroswas besiegingAthens in 304. ChristianHabicht attributesthe lead curse tablet from the bottom of the well to the year of this siege.15 The tablet, which cursesKassandros,two of his generals,and Demetrios of Phaleron,could hardlyhave been buriedin a tomb outside the city walls before being dumped down the well16if the cursing was performed while the siege was in progress. The tablet would, rather,have been intentionallythrown into the well immediately after inscribing,like the lead defixiones deposited in wells and springsin Roman times.17Deposition in a well may have been exceptionalas earlyas the 4th centuryB.C.; with enemy forcesoccupyingthe cemeteryoutside but the Dipylon, it would have been impossibleto activate the curse by the preferredprocedure of burying it in a grave. The latest pottery from the bottom fill of the well has been independentlyestimatedto date from
around 300 B.C.or a little later.18 The well was constructed sometime after 307/6, since it was dug through the Dipylon Road Level IV and
The constructiondate of the Third Periodof the AssemblyPlace is disputed.The excavatorsoriginally believedit to be Hadrianic.19 Laterworkand reflectionled Homer Thompson to arguefor the thirdquarterof 1 G. Gruben, "DerDipylon-Brunnen LageundBefund. des AM B1: Datierung Dipylon," 85, 1970(pp. 114-128), 125-127.Cf. Knigge(note5 above, 298),pp. 70-72. pp. p. 12 Gruben1964 (note10 above, 298),pp. 409-410;Gruben1970(note11 above), 125. p. p. 13 Gruben1970(note 11above), 114-124. pp. 14 K. "DerDipylon-Brunnen Die Funde," 85, 1970(pp. 129-269),pp. 138-139,pl. 78. AM Braun, B1: 16 SoD. R.Jordan, "Two Inscribed Tablets Lead from Well theAthenian a in AM Kerameikos," 95, 1980,pp.225-239. 17 See D. R. froma Wellnearthe Southwestern Cornerof the Athenian Jordan,"Defixiones 54, Agora," Hesperia 1985(pp.205-255),pp. 207-210.W.S. Fox,"Submerged Tabellae Defixionum," 33, 1912,pp. 301-330.R. S. O. AJP
15 C. Habicht, Pausanias' Guide Ancient to Greece, Berkeley1985, pp. 81-82.
(note above),p. XXII, Agora p. 111,andRotroff1984,pp. 352-353,nos.9 and 12. 19 K. Kouroniotes H. A. Thompson, and "ThePnyxin Athens," Hesperia 1932(pp.90-217),pp. 181-189. 1,
Sulis:Roman Inscribed Tablets Trm Leadfirm Sard Spring Bath,Oxford 1988. and the at Tomlin, Tabelae of 18 Braun1970 (note 14 above), citedby Gruben 11 pp. 194, 196;J. Binder, 233; cf.
300
the 4th century B.C., in particular the 340's and 330's.20 Recently, Mogens H. Hansen writes that the original attribution to the time of Hadrian was right all along.21 The eight bronze coins excavated in 1931 from the fill22 fall into two tight chronological groups, one of approximately the third quarter of the 4th century B.C., the other of the Early Imperial period: (a) Athens Salamis Peparethos (b) Athens 1 Double-bodiedowl (4143) 4 Nymph/Shield (640) 1 Dionysos/Kantharos(Cop [Thessay]359, 360) 1 Parthenos/Owl on prow (152) 1 Parthenos/Sphinx(153).
The six 4th-century coins go with the great mass of material from the fill that dates from the third quarter of the 4th century and earlier. The two Augustan coins of the second group are the kind that remained in circulation throughout the 1st century into the 2nd century after Christ. They indicate either that the final construction of the Assembly Place was indeed Roman or, if the construction happened to be earlier, that its fill was heavily disturbed by some kind of Roman repair work. Others will want to discuss these two possibilities further. Here it needs only be observed that the fill, or at least the main 4th-century part of the fill, provides another important context before the last quarter or third of the century for coins ofSalamis. CITED 6. HOARDS IGCH 32 46 47 89 99 127 134 159 187 193 229 233 237 249 269 271 274 275 276 277 279 280 281 282 283 Athens (Ilissosriver)1929 Peiraeus(not "Eleusis") 1902 Peiraeus 1882 Agios Ioannis Rentis,Attica, 1962 Attica, 1951 Aspropyrgos, Peiraeus 1956 Thorikos 1969 Phyattosca. 1956 Corinth 1938 Thebes 1935 Kopais 1908 Thebes 1965 1968 Larissa-Sitichoro Tambouria,Peiraeus,1938 Attica 1949 Agrinion 1959 Attica (Pnyx) 1937 Athens (Plaka)ca. 1942 Athens 1955 Keratea,Attica, 1954 PortoRaphti, Attica, 1967 Attica 1906 Attica 1927 Attica 1937 Attica ca. 1951 p. 283 above pp. 7-8 above note 52 above, p. 257 note 25 above, p. 8 note 31 above, p. 215 note 66 above, p. 49 p. 10 above note 47 above, p. 12 p. 13 above pp. 10-11 above pp. 204-205 above pp. 204-205 above p. 13 above p. 66 above p. 66 above p. 205 above note 109 above,p. 67 note 109 above, p. 67 p. 66 above p. 67 above p. 67 above note 109 above, p. 67 note 109 above, p. 67 note 109 above,p. 67 note 109 above,p. 67
H. A. Thompson and R. L. Scranton, "Stoas and City Walls on the Pnyx," Hesperia 1943 (pp. 269-383), 12, in Presened Egn to and History Topogwpy pp. 298-299. H. A. Thompson, "The Pnyx in Models,"Studies AtticEigr Vanderpool Supplement 19), Princeton 1982 (pp. 133-147), pp. 144-145. (Hesperia 21 M. H. Hansen, TheAhenian The Eccsia, II, A Collction ofArtics 1983-89, Copenhagen 1989, p. 141; idem, Athenian in the ofDemosthes,Oxford/Cambridge,Mass. 1989, pp. 4, 128. Age Democracy 22 Kouroniotesand Thompson (note 19 above,p. 299), pp. 211-212, nos. 1-3, 5-9.
20
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS 297 316 322 324 340 341 342 343 347 352 1664 2117 2119 2121 CH 1, 1975 38 95 CH 3, 1977 22 73 75 95 Noe 380 Delos (ES) 1912 Peiraeus 1926 Delos 1910 Delos 1968 AkropolisNorth Slope 1936 Agia Varvara,Attica, 1932 Chaidari,Attica, 1929 Attica 1927 Delos (A) 1905 Hierapytna 1933? Demanhur 1905 Leontini 1957 Contessa 1888 Manfria 1948 Babylon 1973 Athens 1969 Babylon 1973 Peiraeus 1973 Attica before 1940 EasternAttica 1975 Eleusis 1902 note 144 above, p. 81 note 111 above, p. 67; p. 68 note 141 above,p. 81; Table VI, p. 329 below note 105 above,pp. 65-66 note 141 above, p. 81 pp. 80-81 above pp. 80-81 above note 141 above,p. 81 note 144 above, p. 81 p. 97 above p. 298 above note 25 above, p. 8 note 25 above, p. 8 note 25 above,p. 8 note 29 above, p. 9 note 109 above, p. 67 note 29 above,p. 9 note 111 above, p. 67 note 112 above,p. 67 p. 117 above p. 117 above
301
B. AGORA DEPOSITS These are the more importantAgora deposits for Greek numismaticchronology.Each deposit is identified by its letter and number coordinateson the Agora grid (Pls. 35 and 36) and the number assigned to the deposit within this grid square.Since most of the depositsare summarizedor discussedin other publications, the following notices rarely go beyond bibliographyand a listing of the coins. In the case of deposits that have been variouslydated, asterisksdenote the most current or informativecitation or citations. Boldface in varietynumbersare used to referencecoins that are not cataloguedindividually this volume. Coin numbers in roman type cite the coins that are individuallycatalogued. Factorsof wear (wl-6, see p. 2 above) are given when potentiallyuseful. Eight of the depositsare hoards,that is, groupsof coins that were intentionally collected before being buried or lost together.The remainingdeposits are accumulationsof discardedand randomlylost material. A 14:2 Cistern (middle fill) Walker1980, pp. 49, 123, no. 2.
Athens Deultum AlexandriaTroas Kyme Chios Roman 6 pre-imperial(PeriodIV and earlier) 1 PeriodVC imperial(279), w5 1J. Mamea, A.D. 222-235 (438),w2 1 Volusian,A.D.251-253 (885),wl 1 Tranquillina, A.D. 238-244 (900), w3 1 3-assaria(948a),w3 1 FaustinaII, sestertius,rev.illegible,w5 Well 2 Two owls (44-47) 1 Two owls, AOH (47b) 1 Demetrios Poliorketes (504f) into early 3rd century B.C.
ca. A.D. 250
A 17:3
Rotroff 1983, p. 262. Athens Macedon
302
A 18:8
See pp. 35, 168 above. Fullpublicationof coins, with coefficientsof relativewear,in EABC,pp. 139-142, 150-154, pl. 17. Thompson 1942, pp. 223-224, note 32. IGCH 157. Fourlead tokensfound with the coins:
AgoraX, p. 36, with Kroll 1977, pp. 141-146. Athens 1 Double-bodiedowl (41-43) 8 Two owls, no symbol(46, includingl-p) 3 Owl 1.(50, including1,m) 3 Owl r., AeH (52f-h) 15 Owl in wheat wreath(53, includingi-n)
6 Owlin olivewreath including b) (54, 19 Eleusis Wreathed c) piglet(55, including or Wreathed unwreathed 2 Eleusis piglet(38, 48, 49, 51, 55) 1 Twoowls(56d) 3 Owlwithsymbol (57b,c; [57-60]a) 5 Owlr.(52-54, 57-60) AR 1 Lysimachos drachm (462) 1 Poliorketes:AR hemidrachm 2 Demetrios (502b) 1 Poseidon/Prow (505) 1 Nymph/Horse (529a) 1. 2 Athena/Grapes (581c,584d) 4 Athena/OQ (588c-f) 1 Hera/Eagle (616k) 8 Twodolphins (643j-q) and 8 Tripod dolphins (644a,i-o) 1 Twodolphins (662a) 9
to 86 B.C. Fill in Great Drain A-B 19-20:1 Kleiner 1976, pp. 15-19, 32, observing that the deposit is essentiallyof the third quarter of the 2nd District IV but Agora X, XII, *XXII. R. S. Young,'An Industrial centuryB.C. with slight,latercontamination. of AncientAthens,"Hesperia 1951 (pp. 135-288), pp. 262-263. 20, owl 28 Double-bodied (41-43) Athens 18Twoowls(44-47)
11 Owl 1.(50)
1 Owlr.,AH (52) 12 Owlin wheatwreath (53) 1 Owlin olivewreath (54d) and Wreathed unwreathed 12Eleusis piglet(38, 48, 49, 51, 55) 2 Twoowls(56) 10 Owlwithsymbol (57-60) Polias 1 Zeus/Athena (66) 1 Owlon thunderbolt (67q) 4 Owlthree-quarters amphora r., (69) 2 Owlon rudder (71) 1 Owlon thunderbolt (81)
2 FulminatingZeus, eagle, wheat ear (83)
1 Cicada/Amphora (85) 1 Demeter/Piglet (86) 1 Apollo/Owlwithlyre(87) 2 Twoowlson thunderbolt (99) 1 Apollo/Plemochoe (103b)
HOARDS INCLUDING DEPOSITS, Macedon Zeus/Twobirds(469) 1 Aphytis: 1 Alexander Head/Horse(489d) m: Poliorketes:Head/Prow 1 2 Demetrios (504) 1 Helmet/Shield (506) 1 Athena/Qfl(588b) 2 Head/Shield(640-642) 11Twodolphins (643) and 13Tripod dolphins (644) 1 Twodolphins (662f) 5 Pegasos/Trident (667) 1 Doveflying/I:in olivewreath (723) 1 Demeter/Tripod (760b) 1 Bearded Dionysos/Kantharos (822) of 1 Bearded head/Forepart dog(83lb) 1 Eurydike/Tripod (932)
CimLein, lower dlhmped fill
303
Phokis Salamis Megara Aigina Corinth Sikyon Messene Andros Keos Smyrna
B 13:1
1 Owl1.(50c) 1 Owlthree-quarters amphora r., (69),unworn 1 Athena/Owl(455g) 1 Athena/Owl(455Ad) Three hoards from the "South House" destroyedby fire A.D. 267
Kroll 1973, pp. 318-320, with references to AgoraII for the Roman coins. Walker 1980, pp. 53-54, 126,
no. 12. H. A. Thompson, "The Excavationof the Athenian Agora, Twelfth Season: 1947," Hesperia 17, in 1948 (pp. 149-196), pp. 178, 192; idem, "Excavations the AthenianAgora: 1948," 18, 1949 (pp. 211-229), pp. 217-218.
Hoarda, a savings hoard that probably had been hidden in a wall or upper superstructure of the house in the 250's, before the striking of Athens Period VI imperials began. The coins were found together on the
floor of the "Room of the Two Marble Busts". 1 Parthenos/Athena Athens advancing (151),w6 4 Period imperials VB (169-185 [2], 195-196 [2]),w6 4 Period VB/C imperial fractions (204, 211),w5-6 4 Period imperials VC (248 [3], 256),w5 Chios 1 Sphinx/Apollo Dionysos and w2 (949), 1 Serapis/Isis w4/5 (Lydia) Tripolis (969b), Roman to Decius(A.D. 249-251),sestertii, 42 Trajan Trajan w2-623 ?1 Gallienus,antoninianus,A.D. 260-268, w2
If the hoard was secreted before ca. 260, this last coin could not belong. It would have to be a stray piece that had separately come to rest on the floor with the hoard coins at the time of the destruction of
the house. Hoard the contents of a purse that had been droppedon the floor of the kitchen. b, Athens VB 8 Period imperials (172, 178a,185, 186 [2], 195, 197, 167-185), w6 3 Period VB/C imperial fractions (204, 216, 213-247) 14 Period imperials VC (248 [2], 250, 254, 256 [2], 257 [2], 264a,267, 270, 280b, 283,248-283), w4-6 15 Period imperials VI (284 [3, including 284g],286, 318 [2], 328, 333 [2], 343, wl-2 352a,375,388,401,405),
23
Fourof these sestertiiare illustratedin GRC, 32: Maximinus,Philip I, Otacilia Severa, and TrajanDecius. fig.
304
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS Hoardc, another "dropped purse" on the house floor. I PeriodVB imperial(182) Athens 2 PeriodVC imperials(252, 256) 11 PeriodVI imperials(284 [2], 318 [2], 333, 352, 355, 360,386, 392,402)
B 20:9
to ca. 86 B.c.
Kleiner 1976, pp. 19-21, 32. AgoraX, p. 135. 1 EleusisPiglet on staff(38) Athens 3 Double-bodiedowl (41-43) 1 Owl 1.(50) 1 EleusisWreathedpiglet (55) 1 Owl on rudder(71) 1 Plemochoe/Eleusisring (75) 4 FulminatingZeus: 1 eagle, wheat ear (80) 1 eagle, cornucopia,plemochoe (91) 1 thyrsos(96) 1 mysticstaffor thyrsos(95 or 96) 2 Athena/Amphora (98) 23 Two owls on thunderbolt(99) 2 Cicada/Owl on thunderbolt(100) 64 Cicada/Amphora (85 and 108) 1 Femalehead/Hermes (452a) Imbros 1 Athena/Trophy (593a) Boiotian League 1 Veiledhead/Lyre (606) Thespiai 1 Femalehead/Bull butting(614c) Euboian League 1 Hera/Eagle flying,serpent(616-618) Chalkis 1 Tripodand dolphins(644) Megara 2 Dove flying1. /(?) in olive wreath(723, 725, or 726) Sikyon 1 Rhodos head/Rose (965b) Rhodes
C 9:2 Athens
Andros
Susan I. Rotroff (personal communication) states that most of the pottery dates from the third quarter of the 4th century.
Cistern D 4:1 (Group G) Price 1964, pp. 32- -33, deposit V *Kroll 1973, p. 325, no. 6. Walker 1980, pp. 62, 113, 115, no. 34.
HOARDS INCLUDING DEPOSITS, Antioch Roman LayerIII Athens Zeus(995) 1 Zeus/Seated A.D. 1 Tiberius, II, denarius, 27-37 (Agora no. 18),w2/3
305
time of Hadrian Dumpedfill 1 Eleusis Wreathed piglet(55) on 1 Parthenos/Owl prow(152),w6 1 Period reduced 1, wornillegible, IV AE countermarked A andamphora with P1. (p. 110above, 15 [115-158]a),w6 1 VAimperial, Athena/Owl(163),wl a small, completejug (Agora G 182). This last coin was found inside V, to mid-1st centuryafterChrist D 11:1 Well, iumped fill IV *V *VII. Kroll 1973, p. 324, no. 1. Walker1980, p. 63, no. 36, Agora Athens 1 Owlthree-quarters amphora r., (69) 1 Fulminating Zeus,plemochoe, cornucopia w5 (91), 1 Parthenos/Owl prow(152),w4 on 1 Parthenos/Sphinx (153),w6 2 Parthenos/Owl amphora, on cicada(158),w5 D 15:3 Cistern, dimped fill second into fourthquarterof 4th centuryB.C.
AgoraXII: "ca. 375-330 B.C.",P. E. Corbett, "Attic Pottery of the Later Fifth Century from the Athenian
18, Agora,"Hesperia 1949 (pp. 298-351), p. 343, no. 140. 3 Double-bodied no symbol Athens owl, (42) Salamis 3 Nymph/Shield (640h-j) According to the unpublishednotes of Susan I. Rotroff, most of the pottery belongs to the mid- and
third quarter of the 4th century, but one pot (P 5364) is later, probably of the last quarter.
D 17:5
Cistern
AgoraIV, *XXII. Young 1951 (under A-B 19-20:1 above), p. 182; D. B. Thompson, "Three Centuries of Hellenistic Terracottas: V The Mid-Second Century B.C., VI Late Second Century B.C. to 86 B.C.,"
34, Hesperia 1965 (pp. 34-71), p. 50 (PapposilenosCistern). fill Upper Athens 2 Cicada/Amphora (85) 1 Twodolphins Megara (643) Lower fill Histiaia 1 Maenad/Tripod (633)
D-E 8-9:1
Cistern system (dumped fill) into early 3rd century B.C. *XXII. P. E. Corbett, "Palmette Stamps from an Attic Black-Glaze Workshop," Hesperia24, AgoraXX, 1955 (pp. 172-186), p. 178, no. 2.
Athens
1 Eleusis Pigleton staff(38) 1 Double-bodied (41-43) owl 1 Twoowls,Eleusis (44) ring 1 Twoowls,no symbol (46) 1 Twoowls,variety? (44-47) 1 Wreathed above(48) piglet,EAEY 1 Wreathed EAEY below(49) piglet, Well
E 14:2
Kroll 1973, pp. 325-327, no. 7. Walker 1980, pp. 69, 113-115, no. 49. AgoraIV, V, dating Level II to the late Ist century after Christ. But unless the three early Period V Athenian imperial fractions from near the top of this fill filtered down from Level III, it is probable that Level II continued into the 2nd century.
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS to mid- 1st century after Christ 2 Gorgoneion/Athena (139) 1 Dionysos/Athena (140) 3 Zeus/Dionysos (144) 1 Parthenos/Nike(147) 4 Parthenos/Athenaadvancing(149, 151) 2 Parthenos/Owl on Prow (152) 1 Parthenos/Sphinx(153) 1 Parthenos/Owl on amphora,cicada (158) probably early 2nd century after Christ 1 Parthenos/Owl on amphora,caduceus(124) 1 Zeus/Dionysos (144) 1 Parthenos/Nike(147) 4 Parthenos/Athenaadvancing(149, 151) 2 PeriodIV AE 1 worn illegible 2 VA imperial:Athena/Owl (163), 1 unworn, 1 heavilycorroded 1 VA (or B) imperialfractionno longer availablefor study 3rd century after Christ 1 Parthenos/Owl on amphora,wheat ear (122) 1 Parthenos/Athenaadvancing(149, 151) 1 PeriodIV AE 1 worn illegible 1 Hadrian/Temple (856)
BithynianLeague
Drawshaft (m;ddle fill) E 14:3 early 70's B.C. Kroll 1973, p. 89, note 6. AgoraIV, *XXII. D. B. See Table VI, p. 329 below. Price 1964, pp. 32-33. Thompson, "Three Centuries of Hellenistic Terracottas: VII The Early First Century B.C., B. The Mask Cistern; VIII The Late First Century B.C.," Hesperia35, 1966 (pp. 252-267), pp. 252-259; Dlos XXVII, p. 391. 1 Owl three-quarters amphora(69) Athens r., 1 Demeter/Piglet (86) 1 Zeus/FulminatingAthena (89) 5 FulminatingZeus: 1 eagle, cornucopia(91) 1 two pilei (94) 2 starand crescents(97) 1 issue? 1 Two owls on thunderbolt(99) 1 Cicada/Owl on thunderbolt(100) 1 Apollo/Amphora (101 or 105) 5 Owl on amphora:3 no symbol (115) 1 poppy and wheat ears (118d) 1 issue? (115, 118-126) 1 Kore/Iakchos ( 17a) 2 Demeter/Triptolemos(127, 128) 3 Apollo/Cicada (131, includingg) 1 Apollo/Poppy and wheat ears (133a) 5 Apollo/Two wheat ears (135g-k) [1 Triptolemos/Mysticstaffand wheat ear (154f)24] 1 Athena/Horse (478a) Thessalonike
24 Worn and clearly intrusivecontaminationfrom the upper fill, as is also a fragment of Western Arretine ware
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS Macedon Thebes Euboian League Troizen Bithynia E 15:3 1 Antigonos Gonatas: Athena/Pan (507) 1 Herakles/Thyrsos-club(605c) I Bull/Grapes (613a) 1 Poseidon/Trident(799) 1 ProusiasII (862)
307
to near end of 1st century B.C. Cistern IV; *XXII, but coins not so late as there stated. The five Period IVD-E coins show little wear. Agora 1 Parthenos/Tripod(138) Athens 1 Demeter/Poppy between wheat ears (150g) 2 Parthenos/Owl on prow (152) 2 Parthenos/Owl on amphora,cicada (158), one cut in half
A.D. 267 Hoard at Innwer corner of late wall F 10:2 Kroll 1973, p. 317, note 23, hoard a. Walker 1980, p. 72, no. 58. Athens 13 PeriodVI imperials,wl-2 (284f, 290, 301,318, 336, 348, 375b, 378, 380a, 382,
G 6:2 (Group C)
to early second quarter of 2nd century B.C. AgoraIV; XII; XXII, pp. 101, 109. H. A. Thompson, "Two Centuries of Hellenistic Pottery" Hesperia 3, 1934(pp. 309-476), pp. 345-369; *Rotroff 1983, pp. 276-278. Athens 2 Owl r. in wreath (50-54) 1 Two piglets/Mystic staff(62f)
308
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS 1 Athena/Triobol owl (64f) 1 Owl three-quarters amphora(69) r.,
H 6:9
Cisle-
(lower fill)
260's B.C.
See p. 35 above. *Pounder(note 52 above, p. 35), pp. 243-244; Rotroff 1983, pp. 258-276, 283-294. IV Agora X, XII, XXII. 1 Owlwithwreath Athens (57g) H 12:1 Fill in Great Drain into thirdor fourthquarter
of 2nd century B.C.
Kleiner 1976,pp. 11-15,32. AgoraIV, XXII. H. A. Thompson 1940(underF 11:2above),pp. 119-121. X, 2 Pigleton staff(39) Athens 7 Double-bodied (41-43) owl
7 Two owls (44-47) 3 Owl 1.(50) 1 Owl r., AOH (52) 12 Owl in wheat wreath(53) 1 Owl with cornucopia(59) 8 Owl r. (52-54, 57-60) 1 Two owls (65b) 2 Owl on thunderbolt(67j and r) r.: 2 Owl three-quarters 1 amphora(69) 1 symbol? (69, 70) 3 Demeter/Plemochoe (72-74) 7 Plemochoe/Eleusisring (75) 1 Zeus/Amphora (76g) 3 StandingZeus: 1 owl (78) 1 prow (79) 1 symbol? (78-80) 3 Owl on thunderbolt(81) 10 FulminatingZeus, eagle: 1 star(82) 1 wheat ear (83) 3 cornucopia(84) 5 symbol? (82-84) 2 FulminatingZeus, illegible(82-84) 4 Cicada/Amphora (85) 1 Demeter/Piglet (86e) 1 Zeus/Plemochoe (102g) 1 Apollo/Plemochoe (103e) 2 Athena/Owl (455) 3 AntigonosGonatas:2 Athena/Pan (507) 1 Herakles/Horseman(509) 1 Shield/Trident (592) 1 Demeter/Poseidon (595) 1 Apollo/Lyre (828h) 1 Apollo/Prow (954) to A.D.267
H 12:4 Gravelly pocket beside Great Drain See p. 294 above, with Plate 32:f (the 25 unstruck coin blanks). Walker 1980, p. 78, no. 72. 1 Double-bodiedowl, Eleusisring (43) Athens 1 Owl on thunderbolt(81)
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS 1 Apollo/Owl with lyre (87) 1 Two owls on thunderbolt(99) 2 Parthenos/Owl on amphora,issue? (115, 118, etc.) 22 UnstruckPeriod V,reducedAE 1 blanks 3 UnstruckPeriodIV reducedAE 2 or 3 blanks 8+ PeriodVB-C imperials(177, 197, 204, 220, 226, 3+ unclassifiable) 3 PeriodVI imperials(297, 318-333, 409) AugustaTraiana Korkyra Megara Sikyon Troizen
309
1JuliaDomna/llegible(448)
1 Herakles/Forepart galley (57le) of 1 Two Dolphins (643) 1 Dove feeding/Tripod (724) 1 Commodus/Theseus (800)
H 16:3 (Group B) to ca. 240 B.C. Cisterns IV; Agora XII; XXI; *XXII, pp. 102, 108. H. A. Thompson 1934 (under G 6:2 above), pp. 330-345. V R. Grace, "Revisions EarlyHellenisticChronology"(witha "Numismatic in Appendix"byJ. H. Kroll),AM
89, 1974, pp. 196-197, 202-203.
Athens
1 Eleusis Wreathed piglet(48, 49, 51, 55), worn worn 1 Owlin wheatwreath (53),heavily
H 16:4 (Group D) Pithos third quarter2nd centuryB.C. IV; Agora XII; XXI; *XXII, pp. 102, 109-110. H. A. Thompson 1934 (underG 6:2 above),pp. 369-392; *Grace 1985, p. 37. Athens 1 Double-bodied (4143) owl 1 Owlwithcornucopia (59) 1 Cicada/Amphora (85)
Eretria H-I 14:1 1 Bull head/Octopus (627) to ca. 140 B.C. Fill near northwest corner of the Rectangular Peribolos Kleiner 1975, pp. 311-312, 329, deposit III. Athens 1 EleusisPiglet on staff(38) 3 Doubled-bodiedowl (41-43) 1 Two owls (44-47) 1 Owl with symbol (57-60) 1 Owl r. (52-54, 57-60) 1 Owl three-quarters amphora(69) r., 1 Owl on rudder(71) 2 Owl on thunderbolt(81, includingh) 1 Zeus/FulminatingAthena ([88-89]a) Thessalian League 1 Apollo/Athena Itonia (540g) 1 Two dolphins(643) Megara Middle Stoa binlding fill
H-K 12-14
See note 70 above, p. 50 and Kleiner 1975, pp. 304-313, 329, deposits I (constructionfill under floor of west end of the stoa)and II (fillbetween stoa and RectangularPeribolosto south).Kleiner 1976, pp. 29, 32. IV; Agora XII; XIV, pp. 66-68; *XXII. Dilos XXVII, pp. 317-319. *Grace 1985, pp. 11-54. S. I. Rotroff, "The Long-PetalBowl from the Pithos SettlingBasin,"Hesperia 1988, pp. 87-93. 57, Athens 1 AR triobol (19c) 4 Eleusis Pigleton staff(38) 14 Double-bodied (41-43, including and [41-43]h) owl 43m
310
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS 36 Two owls (44-47, including44f, 46a, 46f) 15 Owl 1.(50, includingf and g) 2 Owl r., AeH (52, includingc) 8 Owl in wheat wreath(53, includingc) 13 EleusisWreathedpiglet (48, 49, 51, 55) 3 Two owls (56, includingg) 9 Owl with symbol (57-60) 13 Owl r. (52-54, 57-60) 1 Two piglets/Mystic staff(62e) 1 Two owls (65f) 1 Zeus/Athena Polias(66e) 1 Owl on thunderbolt(67h) 1 Artemis/Athena Polias(68d) 6 Owl three-quarters 3 amphora(69, includingj, k) r.: 1 plemochoe (70c) 2 symbol? (69, 70) 1 Owl on rudder(71, includingh) 4 Demeter/Plemochoe (72-74) 3 Plemochoe/Eleusisring (75, includinge, g) 6 StandingZeus: 3 prow (79, includingb) 3 symbol? (78-80) 1 Owl on thunderbolt(81h) 12 FulminatingZeus, eagle: 4 star (82, includingf) 4 wheat ear (83, includingg) 4 cornucopia(84, includingf, g) 4 Cicada/Amphora (85, includingi) 2 Athena/Owl (455) 1 AV AlexanderIII (487) 1 Demetrios Poliorketes: Head/Prow (504) 2 AntigonosGonatas:Athena/Pan (507) 1 Athena/Horse (541c) 1 Athena/<lf (588a) 1 Shield/Trident (592) 2 Demeter/Poseidon (595) 1 Bull/Grapes (613g) 1 Hera/Eagle (616-618) 1 Nymph/Shield (640-642) 3 Two dolphins(643) 6 Tripod,dolphins(644) 1 Apollo/Lyre (646b) 1 Two dolphins(662e) 1 Prow/Ram's head (663a) 1 Bull/4 (721c) 1 Hera/Athena (782a) 1 Zeus/Grapes (848b) 1 Herakles/Club and bow in case (916) 1 Herakles/Bow case and club (958a)
A.D.
Myrina Macedon
I 1:3 Pit in southwest corner of the Rectangular Peribolos See p. 295 above and Plate 33:b. Walker 1980, pp. 83, 127-128, no. 85. 4 misstruck Athens PeriodVI imperials,of which 2 are fragments 38 unstruckblanksfor PeriodVI imperials
264-267
311
B.C.
See note 72 above, p. 17. 1 Plated tetradrachm Athens (9a) K 9-10:1 late 1st (or early 2nd?) century afterChrist Kroll 1973, p. 324, no. 2. Walker 1980, pp. 65, 118, no. 89. Agora VI, VII, X. H. A. Thompson, in "Excavations the AthenianAgora: 1952,"Hesperia 1953 (pp. 25-56), p. 42. With only a few exceptions, 22, the Athenian PeriodIV coins are heavilyworn (w5-6). Athens 1 Twoowls(44-47) 1 Owlin wheatwreath (53) 3 Fulminating Zeus:1 eagle,star(82) 1 starandcrescents (97) 1 uncertain symbol 2 Cicada/Amphora 108) (85, 1 Apollo/Cicada (131) 1 Parthenos/Fulminating (137) Zeus 1 Parthenos/Tripod (138) 2 Gorgoneion/Athena (139) 1 Parthenos/Apollo Delios(143) 2 Zeus/Dionysos (144) 2 Parthenos/Athena (149, 151) advancing 1 Parthenos/Owl prow(152) on 1 Parthenos/Owl amphora, on snake(157) 4 Parthenos/Illegible VC [1 Period imperial (279),intrusive] Abdera 1 Griffin/Apollo (435) Corinth 1 Nero/Bellerophon w3 (691b), 1 Ptolemy I-IV (1009c) Egypt
Roman 1 Augustus/Illegible,w6 [1 Valeninian I, intrusive] [1 ConstansII, intrusive]
K 18:2 Cistern into early 2nd centuryB.C. handles to ca. 200 B.C.:V R. Grace, "The CanaaniteJar,"in TheAegean theNear and Stamped amphora Studies Presented HettyGoldman, S. Weinberg;ed., Locust Valley,NY. 1956 (pp. 80-109), pp. 95, to S. East, 107-108. Athens 3 Double-bodied (41-43) owl 1 Twoowls,plemochoe (45) 1 Owlin wheatwreath (53) 2 Owlr.(42-54,57-60) 1 Artemis/Athena Polias (68) 1 Owlthree-quarters amphora r., (69) 1 Standing Zeus,prow(79g)
Myrina L 17:7 AgoraXII, XXII Athens 2 Athena/Owl (455) Cisteis 1 Archaicowl obol (7) 1 Owl r. (52-54, 57-60) second half 3rd century B.C.
Athens
1 Eleusis Pigleton staff(38c) 1 Double-bodied (41-43) owl 2 Twoowls(44-47) 2nd 1 Artemis/Athena Polias B.C.) (68h)(inlowerfill,of late3rd/early century 1 Standing Zeus,symbol? (78-80)
2 or 3 Owl on thunderbolt(81)
1st to 6th century after Christ M 17:1 (Group M) Well, use fills Kroll 1973, pp. 325-326, no. 8, gives a synopsis of the coins recorded from the lowest three levels, representing the mid-ist to late 2nd centuries after Christ. It would be pointless to list these coins again since most of them have disintegrated or were discarded as being insufficiently legible after preliminary, and usually very vague, identifications were made at time of excavation in 1937. The interesting coin is an Athenian imperial Period VB fraction with Theseus or Herakles sacrificing reverse (199) recovered from Level I of the 1st century after Christ, apparently with another Period VB fraction that is now unavailable for examination. Coming from a continuous-use accumulation, these two 2nd-century coins were doubtless intrusions from a higher level in the well. Walker 1980, pp. 88, 114, 119, 130, no. 95. AgoraV VII. M 18:10 late 3rd to first quarter of 2nd century B.C. XXII. D. B. Thompson, "Three Centuries of Hellenistic Terracottas, The Second Century B.C. *Agora Part I, The Early Second Century," Hesperia 1963 (pp. 301-317), p. 317; idem1965 (under D 17:5 above), 32, Well, homogeneous fill
p. 50.
to 180's B.C. fill M 21:1 Cistern, homogeneous See p. 213 above. AgoraIV V XII, *XXII. H. A. Thompson 1948 (under B 17:1 above), pp. 160-161; G. R. Edwards, "Panathenaics of Hellenistic and Roman Times," Hesperia26, 1957 (pp. 320-349), pp. 345346; D. B. Thompson, "Three Centuries of Hellenistic Terracottas, Part III, The Late Third Century B.C.," 32, 1963 (pp. 276-292), pp. 276-291 (Komos Cistern). Dilos XXVII, p. 391. Hesperia 3 Two owls (44-47) Athens
Histiaia Egypt
2 Owlr.(52-54,57-60) owl 1 Athena/Triobol (64g) 1 2 Demeter/Plemochoe:owl(74b) 1 symbol? (72-74) 2 Fulminating Zeus,eagle,symbol? (78-80) therelater) inserted fromthe topof thefill,apparently 8 AR tetrobols (hoard (632a-h) worn I-IV (1009a), 1 Ptolemy extremely
to ca. 140 B.C. fill South Stoa II constrluctin M-N 15 1 VII (South Stoa I destruction debris), and VIII Kleiner 1975, pp. 318-325, deposits VI (construction fill), (South Stoa I latest floor fills). Kleiner 1976, pp. 29, 32. AgoraXII; XIV p. 68; *XXII. D. B. Thompson 1963 (under M 18:10 above), p. 317. DJlosXXVII, p. 392. 2 EleusisPiglet on staff(38) Athens 1 Piglet on staff(39) 7 Double-bodiedowl (41-43)
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS 8 Owl in wheat wreath(53) 3 Owl r. (52-54) 2 EleusisWreathedPiglet (48, 49, 51, 55) 1 Two owls (56) 9 Owl with symbol (57-60) 2 Zeus/Athena Polias(66, includinga) 2 Owl on thunderbolt(67d, g) 1 Owl on rudder(7li) 4 Demeter/Plemochoe: 1 aplustre(73e) 3 symbol? (72-74) 3 Plemochoe/Eleusis ring (75) 1 Owl 1.with amphora(77b) 2 StandingZeus: 1 prow (79) 1 symbol? (78-80) 1 Owl on thunderbolt(81) 20 FulminatingZeus, eagle: 4 star(82, includingi) 3 wheat ear (83) 5 cornucopia(84, includingi) 8 symbol? (82-84) 2 Cicada/Amphora (85, includingf) 1 Zeus/FulminatingAthena (88c) 1 Apollo/Amphora (10 le) 1 Athena/Owl (455) 1 AR tetrobol(632k) 1 Hera/Eagle (616-618) 1 Nymph/Shield (640-642) 1 Obelisk,dolphins(645Ae) 1 Pegasus/Trident(667m) 1 Zeus/Wreath (752b) 1 Apollo/Lyre (828i) 1 Athena/Coiled snake (872a) 1 Athena/Pomegranate(979b)
313
Myrina Histiaia Chalkis Salamis Megara Corinth Elis Delos Pergamon Side N 18:3
Cistern fill into early 2nd century B.C. *XXII. D. B. Thompson, "Three Centuries of Hellenistic Terracottas, II C. The AgoraIV, X, XII, XII, Satyr Cistern," Hesperia31, 1962 (pp. 244-262), p. 246, note 10. Athens 1 AR Triobol (19b) 1 Piglet/Mystic staff(63) 1 StandingZeus, prow (79h) 1 Athena/Owl (455h) Myrina Boiotian League 1 Demeter/Poseidon (595e) Chios 1 Sphinx/Amphora, MENEE (943)
N 19:1 (Group F) Cistern Price 1964, pp. 32-33, deposit III. AgoraIV, V, VII, *XXII. D. B. Thompson 1965 (under D 17:5 above), pp. 66-68 (Kybele Cistern). Dilos XXVII, p. 391. to end of 1st century B.C. fill Upper Athens 1 FulminatingZeus, star and crescents(97) 1 Two owls on thunderbolt(99) 1 Apollo/Lyre (I lla) 1 Parthenos/Tripod(138) 1 Parthenos/ApolloDelios (143) 1 Parthenos/Nike (147)
314
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS 1 Parthenos/Athenaadvancing,snake (151) 1 Parthenos/Owl on prow (152) 1 Parthenos/Owl on amphora(157 or 158) Middlefill Athens Sullan destruction debris 1 Owl three-quarters amphora(69) r., 1 FulminatingZeus, two pilei (94) 2 FulminatingZeus, star and crescents(97) 1 Two owls on thunderbolt(99) 2 Cicada/Owl (100) 1 Apollo/Cicada (131) 1 Demeter/Torch (792b)
Hermione
soon after 86 B.C. N 20:4 Cistern See Table VI, p. 329 below. Price 1964, pp. 32-33, deposit I. Kleiner 1973, pp. 183-189. AgoraIV, V, *XXII. D. B. Thompson 1966 (under E 14:3 above), pp. 252-259. Dlos XXVII, p. 391. Athens 1 Two owls (44-47) 1 EleusisWreathedpiglet (48, 49,51, 55) 2 Zeus/FulminatingAthena (1 89; 1 88, 89) 16 FulminatingZeus: 1 two pilei (94) 13 starand crescents(97) 2 symbol? 2 Two owls on thunderbolt(99) 1 Cicada/Amphora (108) 1 Owl on amphora,no symbol (115) 1 Demeter/Triptolemos(127, 128) 1 PtolemyI-IV (1009h) Cistern Athens 1 Owl 1.(50) 1 StandingZeus, owl (78b) to early 2nd century B.C.
Egypt N 20:6
XXII. Agora
N 21:4
Cistern D. B. Thompson 1962 (under N 18:3 above), pp. 244-262 (Satyr Cistern). AgoraIV XII,*XXII. 1st century after Christ Uppr fill 1 FulminatingZeus, starand crescents(97) Athens 1 Head/Bee (1033),worn Cyrenaica Middlefill Athens first quarter 2nd century star(82), 1 FulminatingZeus, eagle, 1 FulminatingZeus, symbol? [1 Parthenos/Owl on prow (152), probablyfrom upper fill] 1 Hera/Eagle (618) last quarter 3rd century 2 Double-bodiedowl (41-43) 1 Two owls (44-47) 4 Owl 1.or r. (50,52-54,57-60) 1 Athena/Owl (455Ac)
B.C.
B.C.
Myrina or Hephaistia
Kroll 1973, p. 324, no. 3. Agora VII. All coins extremelyworn. V 2 Parthenos/Owl amphora on Athens (115, 118-126) Delios(143) 1 Parthenos/Apollo 1 Parthenos/Sphinx (153) 1 Parthenos/Illegible fill O-R 7-10 early 3rd centuryB.C. Square Peristyle bllHwAing it in the teens and 20's of the 4th century (Agora Earlierdiscussionsof the building placed XIYV 61; p. FacesAdversity," 50, EABC, 146-147; H. A. Thompson, "Athens Hesperia 1981 [pp. 343-355], p. 350), but pp. not Sparksand Talcottbelievedthat the constructionfillwas "probably sealedoveruntil or near the end of the XII, p. 396). Rotroffs reexaminationof the pottery and the subsequentidentificationof a century"(Agora coin fragment as belonging to an issue of Demetrios Poliorketes(Kroll 1982, pp. 241-242) have led to the currentdating to soon afterca. 300 (Rotroff1984, p. 348). Full publicationis forthcomingin R. F. Townsend, TheEastSideof the Remains the volume 27 in the Athenian series. beneath StoaofAttalos, Agora Agora: 8 Double-bodied (41-43) Athens owl 1 Twoowlsoverplemochoe (45) 2 Twoowls,no symbol (46) 4 Owl1.(50) Wreathed unwreathed or 2 Eleusis piglet(38, 48, 49, 51, 55) Zeus(78-80), intrusive] [1 Standing Macedon 1 Demetrios Poliorketes (504h) V (513),intrusive] [1 Philip In addition,an AthensTwo owls, no symbol(42) and EleusisPigleton staff(38) were found on the floorof the structurethat was demolishedto make way for the SquarePeristyle(EABC, 146, note 17). p. A third group of coins from the Square Peristyleis the hoard of six early 2nd-centuryAthenian bronzes found stuck together and embedded in the earthen floor of the building at grid P-Q 7-8. The coins are Kleiner 1975, p. 317, nos. 254-259 (depositV): 3 Fulminating Zeus, eagle and star(82, includingg and h) and 3 FulminatingZeus, eagle and wheat ear (83, includingh and i). P 6:2 and Q6:2 Refuse pits early 2nd centuryafterChrist Fills of debris from buildings demolished for constructionof the Early Hadrianic Northeast Basilica. *T. L. Shear,Jr.,"The AthenianAgora: Excavations 1971,"Hesperia 1973 (pp. 121-179), pp. 136-139, of 42, notes 39-42. Kroll 1973, p. 324, pl. 61, no. 5. Walker1980, pp. 94, 114, no. 109. Ah coins are exceedingly worn. 1 Zeus/Dionysos Athens (144) 4 Parthenos/Owl prow(151) on 2 Parthenos/Owl amphora, on cicada(158) Macedon 1 Philip or Perseus V (514) One 151 and both 158 were found stuck to the bottom of a discardedterracottasavingsbank (Kroll 1973, pl. 61). P 7:10 second quarter3rd century afterChrist Kroll 1973, p. 317, note 23, group b; but the absenceof any PeriodVI imperialsimpliesa date beforethe 260's. Walker1980, p. 95, no. 110. Athens VB 2 Period imperials (169-185, 172),w6 7 Period imperials VC (257, 262, 270, 278, 281 [2], 283), w4-5 Roman 1 Commodus, A.D. sestertius, 192(Agora no. 192),w5 II, Hoard or dropped purse
316 P 21:4
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS fill into early 2nd century B.C. Cistern, homogeneous XXII. Shear 1973 (under P 6:2 and Q6:2 above), pp. 154-156. *Agora 1 Artemis/Athena Polias(68) Athens 1 FulminatingZeus, eagle, star(82) 1 FulminatingZeus, eagle, wheat ear (83) 2-3 Cicada/Amphora (85) [1 Parthenos/Athenaadvancing(149 or 151), heavilyworn and intrusive] 1 AntigonosGonatas:Athena/Pan (507) Macedon 1 Theodosius or colleague,A.D.393-395, intrusive] [Roman
P-R 6-12 Stoa ofAttalos buiilding fill to ca. 157 B.C. Kleiner 1975, pp. 313-318, 329, deposit IV (this deposit and Q-R 10-1 1:1; see also under O-R 7-10 for the coins listed in Kleiner 1975 as deposit V). Kleiner 1976, pp. 29, 32. AgoraIV; XII; XYI pp. 104-107; *XXII: to 145 B.C.;D. B. Thompson 1963 (under M 18:10 above), p. 317. DdlosXXVII, pp. 391-392. *Grace 1985, pp. 14-15: ca. 157 B.C.Rotroff 1988 (under H-K 12-14 above), pp. 92-93. 2 EleusisPiglet on staff(38, includingk) Athens 6 Doubled-bodiedowl (41-43) 9 Two owls (44-47) 1 Owl 1.(50) 1 Two owls (51) 1 Owl in wheat wreath(53) 3 Owl with symbol(57-60) 1 Athena/Triobol owl (64h) 3 Owl three-quarters 1 amphora(69) r.: 2 symbol? (69, 70) 2 Owl on rudder(71, includingj) 1 Demeter/Plemochoe, aplustre(73a) 1 Plemochoe/Eleusisring (75) 5 Owl on thunderbolt(81) 1 FulminatingZeus, eagle: cornucopia(84) 3 FulminatingZeus, symbol? (82-84) 3 Cicada/Amphora (85) 1 Zeus/Achaia (746e) Achaian League Cistern Q 9-10:1 See note 50 above, p. 253, under 845a (Paros). Hoard from pit in floor of house destroyed A.D. 267 Q 19:3 H. A. Thompson 1958, pp. 155-157, pl. 44. Kroll 1973, p. 318. Walker 1980, pp. 101, 129, no. 126. For the house in its rebuilt, post-Herulian phase, see AgoraXXIY pp. 39-40, pls. 6, 26, 29 (Areopagus House B). 1 PeriodVB imperial(illegiblehemidrachm,cf. Sv. 96.30, 31) w5 Athens 130 Period VI imperials (284 [15, including a-e], 285 [2, including a], 286, 287 [4, includinga, b], 288 [3, includinga], 289a, 291 [4], 293a, 298, 299a, 300, 301, 303a, 305, 306a, 307a, 31 la, 312, 313a, 314 [2, includinga], 318 [8, includinga], 320, 321 [2, includinga], 322a, 324 [3, includinga], 327, 331, 332, 333 [2], 334a, 337a, 338, 341 [2, including a], 343a, 346a, 348a, 349a, 350a, 351 [2, including b], 352, 353 [2, includinga], 356a, 358b, 361, 365, 368, 369, 372 [4, includinga, b], 374 [3, includinga], 375a, 376a, 377 [2], 378 [2, includinga], 382 [3], 383a, 384, 386 [2, including b], 387a, 388, 389, 391, 392a, b, 398, 399, 401 [10, including a, b], 402, 403a-c, 404 [2, includinga], 405 [3, includinga, b]) wl-2 2 Gallienus,antoniniani,wl-2 Roman
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS Q-R 10-11:1 Fill snder floor of Brick Bildlng
XXII. In Kleiner 1975, pp. 313-318, 329, cf Kleiner 1976, pp. 29, 32, these BrickBuildingcoins Agora (Kleiner,nos. 220, 223, 233, 242, 245, 250) are listed togetherwith the coins from the more extensiveand slightlylater Deposit P-R 6-12, Stoa of Attalosbuildingfill.
Athens 1 Two owls (44-47)
1 Owlwithsymbol (57-60) 1 Twopiglets/Mystic (62b) staff 1 Fulminating Zeus,eaglecornucopia (84) 1 Fulminating Zeus,symbol? (82-84)
Macedon 1 Antigonos Gonatas: Herakles/Horseman(509)
S 19:3 Cistlei (upper layer) to ca. 330-320 B.C. D. B. Thompson, "Three Centuries of Hellenistic Terracottas,IA," Hesperia 1952 (pp. 116-164), 21, IV, pp. 120-164 (Coroplasts' Dump). Agora *XII.
Athens 1 EleusisPiglet on staff(38) 6 Double-bodiedowl (41-43)
U 13:2 Library of Pantpanos North Stoa, floor fills of Room 7 See note 185 above, p. 92, with Plate 34 (a selection of thirty-four coins from fill "a"). *T. L. Shear, Jr., "The Athenian Agora: Excavations of 1973-1974," Hesperia44, 1975 (pp. 331-374), pp. 343-346, note 23. Walker 1980, pp. 108, 118, no. 145. The date of the first (construction) fill is that of the library itself, which was dedicated between ca. 98 and 103. The Period VB fractions in the second fill date it no earlier than the reign of Hadrian. All Athenian Period III and IV coins are exceedingly worn (w6). a. Packing beneath original floor (Floor A) Athens 1 Two-bodiedowl, Eleusisring (43) ca. A.D. 100
1 Owlr.,AeH (52)
1 Owl three-quarters amphora(69) r., 3 FulminatingZeus (82-84, 90-97). Plate 34:1-3 = [82-84, 90-97]c, d; 97j 1 Two owls on thunderbolt(99) 1 Parthenos/Owl on amphora,wheat ears (122) 1 Parthenos/Tripod(138) 1 Gorgoneion/Athena (139) 2 Parthenos/Athenaadvancing,owl (149). Plate 34:4 = 149j 2 Parthenos/Owl on prow (152). Plate 34:5 = 152h 3 Parthenos/Owl on amphora,cicada or snake (157, 158). Plate 34:6, 7 = 158g, [157-158]a 26 PeriodIV AE 1 coins, worn illegible.Plate 34:8-33, with p. 110 above 1 Athena/Pomegranate(979a) 3 non-Athenianillegible 1 Titus: denarius,A.D. 79, w4. Plate 34:34 ca. A.D. 125-130 or later
1 Owl r. (52-54, 57-60) 1 Parthenos/Fulminating Zeus (137) 1 Parthenos/Tripod(138) 1 Zeus/Dionysos (144) 1 Parthenos/Owl on amphora,cicada (158) 8 PeriodIV AE 1 worn illegible
318
DEPOSITS, INCLUDING HOARDS 4 PeriodVB imperials:1 Athena/Owl (229, 230) 1 Owl on amphora(197) 1 Altar and olive tree (202) 1 Basketand snake (220) 1 Nero: denarius,A.D. 64-68 (BMCRE 90-93), w4 A.D. 100 (BMCRE 2 Trajan:1 sestertius, 730-733), w4 1 dupondius,rev.illegible,w5
Roman
TABLES
320
TABLEI
PERIOD I CHRONOLOGY
Athens legend Eleusislegend
38 Piglet on mystic staff, EAEYII (above) 15 emissions 15-18 mm., 3.20 g. 39 [& 40] Piglet on mystic staff, AOE (above)[or below,40]) 13-15 mm., 2.51 g.
(i)
ca.early/mid-330's through322/317 B.C.
A Double-bodiedowl, e E 41 on mysticstaff 13-15 mm., 2.14 g. 42 no symbol 11-15 mm., 1.75 g. 43 on Eleusisring 10-14 mm., 1.85 g.
(ii)
322/317-307 B.C.
44 Two owls over Eleusisring, A)E, in olive wreath 13-15 mm., 2.70 g. 45 Two owls over plemochoe, AO, in olive wreath 13-15 mm., 2.50 g
48 Piglet in wheat wreath, EAEY(above) 13-15 mm., 2.55 g. 49 Piglet in wheat wreath, EAEY(below) 13-15 mm., 2.40 g.
46 Two owls, no symbol, AG, in olive wreath 13-15 mm., 2.34 g. 47 Two owls, no symbol A9H, in olive wreath 14-15 mm., 2.81 (iv)
307-ca. 300 B.C.
321
Athens legend
Eleusislegend
(v)
287-284 B.C. 284-270's B.C.
52 Owl r., A/eH, in olive wreath 13-15 mm., 2.40 g. 53 Owl r., A/e, in wheat wreath 12-15 mm., 2.37 g. 54 Owl r., A/e, in olive wreath 12-14 mm., 2.34 g. 55 Piglet in wheat wreath, EAEYEI(below) Light:11-14 mm., 2.26 g.
(vi)
ca. 270 B.C.
A 56 Two owls, e in olive wreath 13-15 mm., 2.35 g. A Owl r., e E, with symbol 57 wreath 13-15 mm., 2.13 g. 58 wheat ear 13-15 mm., 2.27 g. 59 cornucopia 12-14 mm., 2.35 g. 60 Eleusisring 62 Two piglets 1./Upright mystic staff,A-E, in olive wreath 13-14 mm., 2.21 g. 63 Piglet r., (?)AeE/Upright mystic staff, EAE-YEI 12 mm., 1.50-1.75 g.
(vii)
260's B.C.
(Chronological position uncertain) 61 Demeter head/Plemochoe on Eleusisring, in wheat wreath, EAEYEI(above) 13-15 mm., 3.23 g.
322
TABLEII
STRUCTURE THE PERIODII COINAGE OF
AE
229 B.C. 64 Athena, Attic helmet/Triobol owl 66 Zeus/Athena Polias 68 Artemis/Athena Polias 224/3
B.C.
AE2
69 Athena, Attic helmet/Owl three-quarters r., over Antigonos Gonatas) amphora(struck 70 Athena, Attic helmet/Owl three-quarters plemochoe r., 72 Demeter/Plemochoe, Eleusisring (struckover ?) 73 Demeter/Plemochoe, aplustre(struckover 69, 70) 74 Demeter/Plemochoe, owl (struckover 69, 70)
198 B.C.
76 Zeus/Amphora with owl in olive wreath (struckover 69, 70, 72-74, and Antigonos Gonatas) 78 Athena, Winged, then Corinthianhelmet/Standing Zeus, owl (firstones struckover?) 79 Athena, Corinthianhelmet/Standing Zeus, prow (some struckover ?) 80 Athena, Corinthianhelmet/Standing Zeus, wheat ear 82 Athena, Corinthianhelmet/FulminatingZeus, eagle, star 83 Athena, Corinthianhelmet/FulminatingZeus, eagle, wheat ear 84 Athena, Corinthianhelmet/FulminatingZeus, eagle, cornucopia
196 B.C.
323
AE3 229 B.C. 65 Athena, Attic helmet/Two owls 67 Athena, Corinthianhelmet/Owl r. on thunderbolt
AE4
224/3 B.C.
198 B.C.
77 Athena, winged helmet/Owl 1. with amphora in olive wreath 81 Athena, Attic helmet/Owl r. on thunderbolt
196 B.C.
85 Cicada/Amphora
ca. 183
B.C.
324
TABLEIII
LATEPERIODII AND PERIODIIIVARIETIES
Number from Agora Number from DelosI Averageweight ofhoard speciens Averageweight ofAgora specimens Lead %3
Period III 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 Demeter/Piglet Apollo/Owl with lyre Zeus/FulminatingAthena, helmet, horse head Zeus/FulminatingAthena, wheat ear, snake FulminatingZeus, pileus, eagle FulminatingZeus, plemochoe cornucopia,eagle FulminatingZeus, amphora cornucopia,eagle FulminatingZeus, amphora eagle FulminatingZeus, two pilei FulminatingZeus, mysticstaff FulminatingZeus, thyrsos FulminatingZeus, star and crescents 1 18 24 10 23 4 25 1 18 69 10 9 201 2 -6.53 2 -4.52 5.70 (9) (12) 6.60 (29) 5.97 (83) 5.35 (12) 5.48 (34) 5.94 (8) 5.96 (37) 6.04 (184) (63) 6.58 (83) 7.65 (235) 6.15 (5) 4.54 (11) 6.53 (6) 5.36 (5) 5.13(4) 5.12 (22) 3.72 (1) 5.20 (13) 5.55 (26) 5.80 (8) 6.18 (6) 7.27 (62) 12.33 (3) 1.03 (2) 0.28 (1) 6.54 (1)
Svoronos 4 324 1911,pp.58, 78,87 (for 1907,pp. 196,208,andSvoronos frtom Figures Dos XXVH,p. 409,andIGCH (forAE and5 varieties);
2 from 316 I, 1976,pp.23-28),274(Pnyx pp.24-27),and324 (note105above, 249,269, 276, 277,283 (Kleiner 1975), Weights IGCH (Kleiner p. 66). 3 from pp. Analyses Caley, 26-53 andJw' Stk, pp.639-640. 4 Four 2 issues III. of with and for listed metrological metallurgical AE comparison AE2 issues Period
325
2.55(24)
2.69 (579) 3.49 (182)
AE4 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 Apollo/Amphora Zeus/Plemochoe Apollo/Plemochoe Artemis/Plemochoe Apollo/Amphora Kore(?)/Piglet Nike/Quiver Cicada/Amphora Cicada/Quiver 19 8 21 2 31 81 33 58+?6 3 1 104 145 2 7 100 9 AE5 110 111 112 113 114 Apollo/Owl on amphora Apollo/Lyre Apollo/Tripod Apollo/Cicada Athena/Tripod 54 6 5 4 2 163 32 14 30 1 0.55 (6) 0.88 (11) 0.43 (3) 0.59 (5) 0.56 (3) 0.34 (2) 1.07 (27) 1.97 (1) 1 1.64 (15) 1.63 (7) 1.58 (10) 1.37 (2) 1.72 (20) 1.45 (42) 1.34 (21) 1.13 (20) 1.17(1) 1.10 (1) 20.84 (1)
Tothetotalof fifty-eight should addeda substantial uncertain be but number specimens of listed under heavier the II Period Cicada/Amphora 85. variety Seepp.65-66.
326
TABLEIV
PERIOD IV AE 1 VARIETIES
Number from Agora Averageweight of Agora specimens Averageweight of hoard specimens1 Lead %2
Period IVA: 86-42 B.C. 115 Parthenos/Owl on amphora, no symbol 116 Demeter/Triptolemos 117 Kore/Iakchos 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 Parthenos/Owl on amphora poppy and wheat ears mysic staff plemochoe tripod two wheat ears flower caduceus thyrsos two pilei 60 1 2 18 33 1 8 31 1 23 1 25 9.07 (1) 9.72 (13) 10.11 (16) 11.32 (1) 8.64 (5) 9.61 (11) 11.50 (1) 9.61 (12) 9.72 (1) 9.40 (14) 10.78 (9) [13.30 (2)] 10.99 (13) 11.85 (11) 10.20 (16) [9.57 (2)] 10.31(17) 10.73 (26) 10.46 (31) 10.82 (46) 5.15 (1)
Period IVB: 42/1-32 B.C. Zeus 137 Parthenos/Fulminating 138 Parthenos/Tripod 139 Gorgoneion/Athena advancing 140 Young Dionysos/Athena advancing 143 Parthenos/ApolloDelios 144 Zeus/Bearded Dionysos head 45 139 79 29 81 152 7.65 (21) 7.47 (47) 7.88 (30) 5.68 (16) 5.33 (36) 5.47 (61) 9.24 (18) 8.67 (32) 8.54 (17) 6.31 (11) 5.84 (15) 6.33 (18) 22.73 (1) 9.93 (1) 15.31 (2) 18.82 (1)
1 ChaXdari Agia Varvarahoards, Kroll 1973, pp. 106-119. The number of hoard coins weighed (in parentheses)is the same as the total and numberof each varietypresentin the two hoards.Abnormalaverageweightsskewedby too small a sample are bracketed. 2 From Jew Styk,p. 640 and (forvariety 146) Caley,pp. 52-53, table IX, no. 10.
TABLEIV: PERIOD IV AE 1 VARIElT'IES Number from Agora Averageweight of Agora specimens Averageweight of hoard specimens Lead %
327
Period IVC: 31-early 20's B.C. 146 Athena, Corinthianhelmet/Demeter 147 Parthenos/Nike 148 Parthenos/StandingZeus 5 43 1 7.82 (5) 8.08 (17) 8.16 (1) 8.09 (3) 8.51 (14) 9.52 (1) 10.45 (1)
Period IVD: mid-20's-19 B.C. 149 151 152 153 Parthenos/ Athena advancing,owl Athena advancing,snake Owl on prow Sphinx 345 135 501 277 6.88 (101) 6.83 (49) 6.84 (140) 6.80(92) 7.80 (118) 7.53 (43) 7.48 (88) 7.57 (42) 17.49(4) 18.68 (1)
Period IVE: ca. later 10's B.C. 157 158 Parthenos/ Owl on amphora, snake Owl on amphora, cicada 116 199 5.55 (38) 5.53 (57) 6.42 (49) 6.20 (58) 17.72 (1)
328
TABLEV
PERIOD IV FRACTIONS
Normal range of diametersand averageweightsof Agora specimens AE2 Period IVA: 86-42 B.C. 127 Demeter/Triptolemos 128 similar,with poppy head 16-18/5.76 (7) 15-17/4.35 (7) 14-17/4.09 (15) 15-16/3.85 (6) 14-16/3.89 (35) 12/1.93 (1) 10-12/1.84 (12) 10-11/1.74(25) AE3 AE4
129 Dolphin on trident/Plemochoe 130 Athena/Artemis 131 Apollo/Cicada 132 Apollo/Two wheat ears in wreath 133-134 Apollo or Athena/ Poppyand two wheat ears 135-136 Apollo or Athena/ Two wheat ears Period IVB: 42/1-32 B.C. 141 YoungDionysos/Kantharos 142 BeardedDionysos/Athena bust 145 Zeus/Eagle on thunderbolt Period IVD: mid-20's to 19 B.C. 150 Demeter/Poppy and wheat ears
13-15/3.26 (26)
154 Triptolemos/Mysticstaffand wheat ear 14-15/3.46 (17) 155 Triptolemos/Nike 156 Parthenos/Two owls on thunderbolt 13-14/3.14(6) 15-19/2.97 (9)
329
TABLEVI
PERIODIVADEPOSITS THREEEARLY
Agora Deposit N 20:4 Before Period IV Various,includingnon-Athenian 97 FulminatingZeus, starbetween crescents
(87/6 B.C.)
11 13wl-2
15 2w2
1 w2
9 w2-3
3 w2-3 1 w2
118 Owl on amphora poppy and wheat ears (early70's B.C.) -illegible symbol AE2
127 Demeter/Triptolemos (?84 B.C.)
1 w2
1 w2 1 w? (damaged)
127 or 128 Same, but poppy head? [154 Triptolemos/Mysticstaffand wheat ear
AE3
131 Apollo/Cicada AE4 132 Apollo/Two wheat ears in wreath 133 Apollo/Poppy and wheat ears 135 Apollo/Two wheat ears 4 w2-3 wl 5wl-3 3w3-4
1 IGCH dateof burial be 69 B.c.(seenote 145above, 82). 322;Krol 1973,pp.87-88. The actual may p. IVD coin,is intrusive note216 above, 109)andhencelistedherein brackets. 154f,a wornPeriod (see p.
330
TABLEVII
OF BRONZE HYPOTHETICAL DEVELOPMENT THE ATHENIAN SYSTEMS DENOMINATIONAL
ANDCOMPARISON WITHTHEROMANSYSTEM
Modulel
Athens
before 86 B.C.
Athens
86-42
B.C.
Athens
after 42
B.C.
(PeriodIII) AEO
(PeriodIVA)
(PeriodIVB-IVE)
Roman2
AE1
AE Drachm
( ARdrachm)
AE2 Hemiobol
( 1 AR drachm)
AE3
Hemiobol3 (~ denarius) AE4 Chalkous (1 AR drachm) Half chalkous (? AR drachm) Chalkous? (' AR drachm) discontinued Half chalkous? (1 denarius?)
Sextans
(1 denarius)
AE5
1 See pp. 38, 90 and Tables HI-V and VIII. After 42 B.c., the AE 1 and 2 modules were reduced in size and weight to become the effective equivalentof the formerAE 2 and 3 modules. 2 Using the generalweight/size modulesof the Corinthianduoviralbronze,Amandry,pp.82-83, table 12. s The fourthdenominationof Athens' imperialcoinage began at AE 3 size but was soon reducedto AE 4 for eriodVB (see Table VII).
331
TABLEVIII
ATHENIAN IMPERIALDENOMINATIONS
(Normal range of diameters,averageweights, and numbersof Agora specimens) Period VA Drachm VB 24-26 mm. 7.37 g. (175) 18-22 mm. 5.40 g. (154) 16-18 mm. 4.28 g. (133) 14-16 mm. 2.43 g. (250) 16-18mm. 3.39 g. (18) 16-18 mm. 3.20 g. (36) 12-13 mm. 1.53 g. (16) VC 22-23 mm. 6.67 g. (709) VI 20-22 mm. 5.30 g. (1115)
Hemidrachm
Obol
Hemiobol
*It is impossibleto distinguishbetween VB and VC hemiobolswhen the obversedepicts some figureother than Athena. Nearly all the Athena-head hemiobols,however,appear to be VB, and this is probablythe case for the VB-VC hemiobols as a whole.
332
TABLEIX
TOTALS OF ATHENIAN IMPERIAL DIES
Based on specimensfrom the Agora and other public and privatecollections Number of obversedies Period VA VB VB VB-C VB-C VC VI VI VI hemiobols drachms hemidrachms obols hemiobols drachms drachms obols hemiobols 28+ 32+ 12+ 24+ 60+ 55+* ca. 280 15+ 6+ Number of reversedies 61 59 36 51 163 133 ca. 554 16 7
Total
ca. 512+
ca. 1080
CONCORDANCES
AA-984 AA-991 AA-995 AA-1001 AA-1002 AA-1003 AA-1004 AA-1006 AA-1007 AA-1009 AA-1012 AA-1013 AA-1016 AA-1018 AA-1019 AA-1022 AA-1023 AA-1028 AA-1029 AA-1030 AA-1032 AA-1033 AA-1034 AA-1035 AA-1049 AA-1050 AA-1052 AA-1056 AA-1057 AA-1059 AA-1062 AA-1063 AA-1067 AA-1069 AA-1070 AA-1072 AA-1079 AA-1081 AA-1083 AA-1085 AA-1087 AA-1089 AA-1091 AA-1092 AA-1096
595 [41-43] 648 392 401 405 311 284 338 356 403 401 383 318 285 322 324 327 284 353 307 314 358 378 313 287 376 351 321 375 404 405 374 386 284 372 392 350 303 306 299 403 284 387 403
336 AA-1097 AA-1098 AA-1099 AA-1101 AA-1102 AA-1103 AA- 1104 AA- 1109 AA-111 AA-1118 AA-1122 AA-1125 AA-1132 AA-1140 AA-1149 AP-25 AP-31 AP-34 AP-49a AP-50 AP-84 B-77 B-100 B-155 B-165 B-171 B-255a B-262 B-318 B-320 B-328 B-329 B-351 B-354 B-358bis B-370 B-374 284 293 372 334 348 349 289 337 343 288 341 391 287 211 830 643 100 495 695 572 48 150 143 632 154 199 557 129 336 380 284 375 748 345 135 254 51
CONCORDANCE OF CATALOGUEDAGORA COINS B'-729bis B'-770 B'-830 B'-849a B'-861 B'-910 B'-927 B'-928 B'-929 B'-935 B'-948 B'-962 B'-996 B'-1009 B'-1011 B'-1018 B'-1024 B'-1034 B'-1104 BB-7a BB-10 BB-15 BB-18 BB-20 BB-46 BB-51 BB-52 BB-63 BB-66 BB-130 BB-161 BB-177 BB-186 BB-226 BB-274 BB-285 110 944 41 750 79 721 908 128 206 489 130 944 126 90 119 65 50 616 153 727 579 66 163 504 781 647 153 122 767 562 [157,158] [115-126, etc.], p. 110 701 39 439 91 BB-638 BB-639 BB-655a BB-666 BB-705 BB-706 BB-821 BB-841 BB-874 BB-892 BB-903 BB-945 BB-980 BB-1015 BB-1203 BB-1219 BB-1221 BB-1231 BB-1252 BB-1259 BB-1262 BB-1263 BB-1280 BB-1292 BB-1300 BB-1315 Br-68 Br-230 Br-238 Br-279 Br-293 Br-465 Br-895 Br-921 Br-931 Br'- 11 Br'-281 616 762 543 498 770 108 625 965 1007 48 828 732 122 149 17 576 631 964 1020 741 485 667 87 879 768 697 866 10 10 439 812 98 9 574 675 153 166
B-441a
B-504 B-508 B-511 B-514 B-524 B-533 B-556 B-560 B-602bis B-606 B'-620a B'-646 B'-669 B'-693
886
522 8 70 1015 642 217 68 16 109 1037 437 923 875 116
BB-286
BB-310 BB-324 BB-352 BB-416 BB-445 BB-475 BB-494 BB-499 BB-515 BB-546 BB-561 BB-602 BB-605 BB-619
51
604 20 401 134 838 81 99 238 673 492 1013 137 [149, 151] 465
Br'-309
Br'-432 B'-474 Br'-486 Br'-487 Br'-875 BA-56 BA-72 BA-78 BA-107 BA-197 BA-207 BA-316 BA-343 BA-362
473
608 915 652 655 42 59 850 108 127 135 38 460 616 514
CONCORDANCE CATALOGUED OF AGORACOINS BA-363 BA-405 BA-414 BA-437 BA-438 BA-482 BA-522 BE-73 BE-115 BE-298 BE-325 BE-337 BE-424 BE-483 BE-487 BE-501 BE-541 BE-576 BZ-29 BZ-73 BZ-165 r-2
r-98
337
137 431 144 26 953 609 746 20 3 490 12 13 1037 226 573 1037 602 490 728 955 1038 731
968
r-421 r-432 r-456 r-483 r-484 r-489 r-498 r-507 r-522 r-540 r-619 r-637 r-642 r-654 r-670 r-685 r-727 r-781 r-806a r-873 r-912 r-963
r-964a
205 152 644 726 152 963 125 872 94 579 507 759 13 58 76 873 549 504 839 618 541 147
440
r-1224 r-1239 r-1251 r-1258 r-1284 r-1323 r-1330 r-1356 r-1390 r-1412 r-1432 r-1441a r-1441b r-1452 r-1456 r-1463 r-1467 r-1481 r-1481a r-1482 r-1522 r-1565
r-1568
1009 746 927 362 79 645B 1012 743 512 894 640 640 640 255 33 939 946 831 682 272 856 829
757
r-110 r-121 r-124 r-137 r-140 r-149 r-153 r-158 r-164 r-170
r-969 r-981 r-1036 r-1038 r-1043 r-1045 r-1054a r-1054b r-1055 r-1056
r-1584 r-1605 r-1608 r-161 la r-1612 r-1612a r-1617a r-1630 rr-4 rr-5
r-171
r-208 r-242 r-279 r-291 r-301 r-302 r-325
r-326
441
101 94 284 692 644 226 57
111
r-1059
r-1063 r-1064 r-1068 r-1080 r-1082 r-1084 r-1088
r-1098
135
613 133 131 135 799 117 1037
507
rr-8
rr-14 rr-18 rr-23 rr-26 Fr-37 rr-38 rr-44
rr-47
81
141 147 595 1016 44 194 645A
409
r-354 r-359 r-368 r-376 r-381 r-384 r-391 r-393 r-396 r-404
r-1099 r-1105 r-1110 r-1122 r-1150b r-1197 r-1204 r-1205 r-1208 r-1222
478 685 507 1034 158 793 150 680 46 [64,66, or 68]
rr-49 rr-65 rr-69 rr-77 rr-87 rr-94 rr-95 rr-97 rr-99 rr-101
338
rr-420 A-3
A-9
E-1299
A-26 A-31 A-67 A-94 A-137 A-155 A-163 A-165 A-169 A-195a A-207 A-208 A-217 A-222 A-234 A-244 A-257 A-267 A-268 A-270 A-287 A-293
A-308a
454 46 138
703 147 618
142 592
101
432 43 39
489
AA-96 AE-1 AE-6 AE-10 AE-14 E-24 E-65a E-91 E-155a E-189 E-242 E-260
E-318
AA-7a
AA-11
8 567 53 186 41 605 [41-43] 92 19 778 922 22 69 456 64 69 103 563 226 482 56
E-356 E-441 E-473 E-474 E-545 E-548 E-551 E-562 E-724 E-729 E-803 E-869 E-887 E-988a E-1053 E-1104 E-1148 E-1163 E-1206 E-1245 E-1295
46
99
4
100
959 13 14 105 631 416 564 457 112 14 828 431 29 553
990
E-1325 E-1365 E-1456 E-1463 E-1484 E-1494 E-1553a E-1610 E-1611 E-1685 E-1703 E-1787 E-1917 E-1946 E-2024 E-2122 E-2175 E-2249 E-2334 E-2368 E-2406 E-2410 E-2420 E-2430 E-2450 E-2458 E-2494 E-2499 EE-4 EE-22 EE-25 EE-30 EE-37 EE-40 EE-68 EE-78 EA-15 EA-182 EA-189 EA-203 EA-215 EA-223 EA-320 Z-1 Z-27 Z-147 Z-275 Z-320 Z-344 Z-393 Z-394
113 480 16
942
740 1033 1037 840 83 243 699 43 488 A Appendix [115,118-126] 761 39 786 803 377 43
CONCORDANCE OF CATALOGUEDAGORA COINS Z-400 Z-412 Z-415 Z-416 Z-438 Z-457 Z-461 Z-470 Z-475 Z-517a Z-526 Z-605 Z-610bis Z-653 Z-671 Z-680 Z-683 Z-699 Z-733 Z-767 Z-833 Z-902 Z-904 Z-917 Z-939a Z-984a Z-1003 Z-1020 Z-1077 Z-1103 Z-1108 Z-1113 Z-1118 Z-1147 Z-1180 Z-1182 Z-1190 Z-1196 Z-1214 Z-1273 Z-1366 Z-1398 Z-1408 Z-1506 Z-1511 Z-1528 Z-1538 Z-1581 Z-1687 Z-1695 667 771 357 882 240 832 466 701 635 1007 183 776 101 691 12 133 794A 226 241 [115-126, etc.], p. 110 29 797 153 155 636 940 1038 667 [115-126, etc.], p. 110 809 143 157 507 223 725 [115,118-126] 895 [157,158] 393 1038 796 67 332 73 1038 114 153 268 221 477 Z-1716bis Z-1725 Z-1756a Z-1895 Z-1922a Z-1963 Z-1965 Z-1973 Z-1975 Z-1979 Z-2032 Z-2096 Z-2099 Z-2126 Z-2135a Z-2145 Z-2198bis Z-2205 Z-2221 Z-2231 Z-2239 Z-2248 Z-2268 Z-2403 Z-2416 Z-2440 Z-2541 Z-2594 Z-2617 Z-2643 Z-2644bis Z-2661 Z-2711 Z-2716 Z-2723 Z-2738 Z-2743 Z-2750 Z-2759 Z-2767 Z-2769 Z-2781 Z-2785 Z-2798a Z-2804 Z-2812 Z-2835 Z-2837 Z-2852 Z-2854 Z-2856 Z-2869 114 982 484 140 729 771 234 199 209 365 907 571 800 1036 448 620 100 106 246 152 620 724 536 68 184 823 12 138 13 789 85 638 69 182 103 86 102 67 223 828 76 78 19 580 827 67 954 828 110 455A 65 3 Z-2884 Z-2944 Z-2964 Z-2986 Z-2994 Z-2995 Z-3004 Z-3005 Z-3011 Z-3303 ZZ-34 ZZ-35 ZZ-95 ZZ-109 ZZ-129 ZZ-135 H-8 H-17 H-46 H-83 H-133 H-144 H-163 H-292 H-416 H-417a H-421 H-941 H-1002 H-1112 H-1148 H-1234 H-1380 H-1439 H-1465 H-1466 H-1544 H-1568 H-1714 H-1718 H-1725 H-1757 H-1761 H-1777 H-1810 H-1887 H-1907 H-1935 H-1936 H-1937 H-1938 H-1962 153 602 620 55 426 50 1037 909 599 964 99 133 297 464 152 618 827 97 507 158 925 579 686 491 234 736 34 742 1017 721 21 424 632 [157,158] 16 16 691 538 917 144 16 619 705 871 1037 158 550 16 16 16 16 16
339
340 H-2024 H-2099 H-2134 H-2151a H-2164 H-2165 H-2166 H-2186 H-2190 H-2192 H'-2245 H'-2247 H'-2326 H'-2337 H'-2357 H'-2504 H'-2602 H'-2627a H'-2682 H'-2742a H'-2755 H'-2817 H'-2901 H'-2939 H'-3178a H'-3181 H'-3273 H'-3296bis H'-3298 H'-3301 H'-3347 H'-3379 H'-3439 H'-3542 H'-3562 H'-3565 H'-3600 H'-3619 H'-3647 H'-3648 H'-3678 H'-3726 H'-3758 H'-3811 H'-3850 H'-3859 HH-26 HH-27 HH-60 HH-77 HH-217 HH-222 16 75 16 1024 16 16 16 58 510 658 44 50 507 29 153 19 935 13 428 989 749 171 38 944 867 38 38 136 645 616 32 240 544 580 577 649 129 679 407 69 707 997 721 973 21 8 143 [41-43] 93 152 79 67
CONCORDANCE OF CATALOGUEDAGORA COINS HH-283 HH-322 8-24 8-69 8-94 8- 14 8-148 8-150 8-166 8-174 8-182 8-189 8-206 8-218 8-231 8-237 8-240 8-242 8-269 8-272 8-274 8-288 8-291 8-296 8-309 8-314 8-335 8-336 8-345 8-351 8-352 8-354 8-357 8-370a 8-373 8)-375 8-384 8-390 8-396 8-399 8-401 8-403 8-414 8-426 8-450 8)-462 8-499 8-505 8-534 8-624 8-637 8-657 613 614 819 676 51 100 84 44 1009 89 1038 507 45 35 73 82 79 541 46 721 [41-43] 580 958 69 991 65 588 849 464 817 541 667 300 456 836 64 76 637 45 613 670 53 847 [115,118-126] 723A 551 167 455 67 10 68 455A 8-672 153 596 85 35 151 56 44 85 542 195 99 452 871 509 [115-126, etc., p. 110 790 1028 165 783 457 616 694 540 532 84 [115,118-126] 611 532 1025 796 298 406 375 582 359 259 906 319 387 119 575 95 75 667 948 974 39 354 996 744 364
8-696
8-714 8-737 8-768 8-785 8-787 8-792bis 8-857 8-949 8-991 8-994 8-999
88-6
Ei8-25 88-123 I-i I-50 I-52 I-57 I-143a 1-168 1-227 1-312 I-320 I-328 I-487 I-488a I-502a I-509 '-559 I-560 I-567 '-593 I-650 I-696 1-768 1-796 I-799 I-812 1-846 I-855 1-894 1-895 I-925 I-969 I-970 I-983a I-1034 1-1036
CONCORDANCE OF CATALOGUEDAGORA COINS I-1043 1-1047 I-1055 I-1115a 1-1209 1-1235 I-1257a 1-1262 1-1324 I-1336 1-1344 1-1400 1-1420 1-1458 1-1483 1-1520 I-1537 1-1550 I-1590 1-1592 1-1603 I-1607 I-1635 I-1664 II-6 II-8 II-28 II-66 H1-243 II-247 H1-289 11-353a H-419 H-447 11-453 II-489 H-510 H-582 II-592 II-615 1-616 HI-629 II-644 H-650 K-7 K-8 K-38 K-39 K-83 K-92 K-125 K-138a 248 719 947 1032 524 631 694 265 412 [248-283] 5 358 301 105 156 361 152 881 446 880 912 164 585 154 504 832 38 672 175 158 89 865 938 591 112 64 10 559 13 68 99 59 229 476 475 974 606 86 788 983 151 628 K-154 K-176 K-201 K-269 K-290 K-294 K-299 K-326 K-360 K-366 K-367 K-401 K-433a K-476 K-520 K-552 K-584 K-587 K-645a K-772 K-779 K-801 K-830 K-841 K-861 K-882 K-898 K-907 K-937 K-939 K-975a K-981 K-1004 K-1022 K-1028 K-1036 K-1054 K-1073 K-1086 K-1176 K-1184 K-1190 K-1198 K-1211 K-1254 K-1255 K-1262a K-1264 K-1282 K-1284 K-1294 K-1298 568 459 143 67 49 519 722 [636] 102 [149, 151] 217 43 602 [149, 151] 102 855 138 131 419 44 972 999 782 944 1008 1009 12 629 620 12 931 86 507 634 108 140 13 451 721 1001 863 130 106 107 142 106 99 94 607 102 69 75 K-1301 K-1307 K-1310 K-1317 K-1320 K-1322 K-1327 K-1356 K-1387 K-1388 K-1398 K-1415 K-1422 K-1428 K-1452 K-1458 K-1466 K-1467 K-1469 K-1477 K-1482 K-1487 K-1496 K-1497 K-1505 K-1518 K-1536 K-1549 K-1551 K-1558 K-1562 K-1568 K-1586 K-1592 K-1603 K-1610 K-1616 K-1622 K-1630 K-1633 K-1647 K-1676 K-1687 K-1692 K-1702 K-1730 K-1756 K-1759 K-1770 K-1796 K-1821 KK-9
341 46 507 646 97 592 71 [78-80] 19 488 30 179 [149,151] 958 43 379 89 81 540 600 1035 382 141 620 1037 489 [115,118-126] 790 81 980 457 774 1037 667 136 149 71 50 [82-84,90-97] 115 312 64 1006 122 160 50 25 490 103 48 515 251 661
342 KK-9bis KK-12 KK-14 KK-27 KK-29bis KK-59 KK-65 131 [157, 158] 126 821 135 120 153
775 152 149 507 42 618 812 646 4 504 478 516 53 751 50 75 488 44 22 640 60 [115-126, etc.],
p. 110
AA-110
AA-126 AA-161
AA-167 AA-178 AA-185 AA-222 AA-247 AA-254 AA-256 AA-260 AA-263 AA-268 AA-271 AA-276 AA-278 AA-285 AA-295 AA-298 AA-299 AA-300 AA-328 AA-365 AA-387 AA-404 AA-488
KTA-115
KTA-117 KTA-120 KTA-121 KTA-123 KTA-130 A-1 A-9 A-11 A-20 A-44 A-56 A-72bis A-73 A-94
13
280 1010 988 518 632 38 38 527 [82-84,90-97] 713 263 135 124 89
995 56 84 160 143 43 520 115 463 75 160 222 153 139
AA-505 AA-540 M-36 M-78a M-94 M-107 M-129 M-140 M-141 M-191 M-193 M-208 M-209 M-282 M-353 M-430 MM-23 MM-26 MM-27 MM-36 MM-83 MM-104 MM-136 MM-139 MM-150 MM-172 MM-193 MM-346 MM-366 MM-378 MM-430 MM-446 MM-485 MM-500 MM-505 ME-14 ME-20 ME-31 ME-35 ME-53 ME-57 ME-58 ME-64 ME-67
ME-99
859
367 363 227 644 124 122 571 492 898 853 244 48 678 687 257 476 963 152 157 808
69
69 248 95 162 144 84 53 455 43 663 662 70 141 62 743 85 496 14 55 49 48 643
CONCORDANCE OF CATALOGUEDAGORA COINS ME-204 ME-212 ME-216 ME-230 ME-238 ME-249 ME-261 ME-270 ME-295 ME-304 ME-315 ME-316 ME-328 ME-327 ME-337 ME-366 N-2a N-95a N-96 N-166 N-202 N-230 N-298 N-316 N-328 N-339 N-340 N-372a N-429 N-44o N-529 N-581a N-583 N-620 N-663 N-722 N-723 N-805 N-813 N-824 N-833 N-850 N-899 N-963 N-976 N-1112 N-1113 N-1116 N-i 120 N-1138 N-1167 N'-1257 487 916 66 82 50 51 69 56 752 782 67 83 507 53 66 52 1019 1007 629 106 368 634 65 430 747 146 118 704 686 137 507 921 87 929 138 149 245 978 138 150 [149, 151] 53 107 842 651 143 934 435 1037 691 1009 831 N'-1290 N'-1315a N'-1321 N'-1342 N'-1343 N'-1360 NN-9 NN-20 NN-50 NN-57 NN-66 NN-84a NN-113 NN-128 NN-131 NN-139 NN-143 NN-163a NN-200 NN-201 NN-208 NN-210 NN-217 NN-224 NN-263 NN-279 NN-322 NN-328 NN-368 NN-404a NN-439 NN-447 NN-465 NN-474 NN-502 NN-524 NN-565 NN-569 NN-595 NN-618 NN-661 NN-666 NN-676 NN-679 NN-683 NN-689 NN-702 NN-705 NN-743 NN-781 NN-788 NN-816 281 845 20 220 626 640 761 97 82 847 261 733 966 689 504 579 773 891 108 1018 248 219 229 149 743 443 95 43 150 775 892 723 671 107 1037 139 122 160 926 844 1000 408 148 142 105 665 717 734 645A 57 56 150 NN-833 NN-841 NN-857 NN-881 NN-922 NN-934 NN-935 NN-957 NN-963 NN-968 NN-969 NN-978 NN-979 NN-987 NN-995 NN-1004 NN-1006 NN-1009 NN-1014 NN-1036a NN-1048 NN-1054 NN-1066 NN-1072 NN-1074 NN-1085 NN-1088 NN-1 106 NN-1113 NN-1 120 NN-1121 NN-1 122 NN-1 126 NN-1 151 NN-1 165 NN-1205 NN-1220 NN-1243 NN-1259 NN-1283 NN-1284 NN-1285 NN-1297 NN-1299 NN-1304 NN-1309 NN-1318 NN-1323 NN-1334 NN-1369 NN-1370 NN-1372
343 409 305 828 153 81 6 828 [82-84,90-97] 301 686 508 590 554 136 1004 [636] 35 1016 644 450 1000 643 153 56 12 965 614 593 933 103 469 760 452 883 119 124 99 67 70 410 85 137 13 110 90 138 157 128 167 593 150 82
344? NN-1 396 NN-1401 NN-1445 NN-1455 NN-1462 NN- 1484 NN- 1498 NN-1546a NN-1556 NN-1581 NN-1585 NN-1586 NN-1612 NN- 1625 NN-1633 NN-1 642 NN-1653 NN-1656 NN-1658 NN-1665 NN-1669 NN-1686 NN-1688 NN-1719 NN-1730 NN-1732 NN-1 741 NN-1746 NN-1754 NN-1786 NN-1788 NN-1789 NN-1790 NN-1804 NN-1828 NN-1835 NN-1836 NN-1843 NN-1845 NN-1863 NN-1871 NN-1876 NN-1887 NN-1 888 NN-1906 NN-1937 NN-1952 NN-1953 NN-1964 NN-1966 NN-1972 NN-1979 585 85 10 509 500 613 453 138 103 1014 507 65 831 35 157 539 743 103 71 933 662 489 506 54 944 107 644 74 643 1010 66 9 455 879 588 822 932 587 54 761 645B 640 617 1009 598 944 85 626 994 645A 1013 58
CONCORDANCE OF CATALOGUEDAGORA COINS NN-1990 NN-1992 NN-1994 NN-2004 NN-2013 NN-2015 NN-2022 NN-2024 NN-2035 NN-2040 NN-2046 NN-2053 NN-2056 NN-2062 NN-2068 NN-2071 NN-2099 NN-2103 NN-2104 NN-2104a NN-2116 NN-2120 NN-2122 NN-2123 NN-2135 NN-2160 NN-8777a NSR-76 613 540 819A 38 825 197 794 645B 62 50 493 109 616 756 442 46 54 613 640 521 507 11 [41-43] 426 13 433 979 105 958 109 587 88 226 144 969 344 489 152 507 584 690 85 227 738 427 467 381 667 299 82 770 515 318 490 659 1007 641 588 588 56 57 57 [57-60] 529 644 588 588 54 55 616 505 662 53 581 584 502 462 422 594 15 874 723 618 534 1007 71 115 115 9 530 102 783 351 1036 536 304 780 444 951 714 579 565 789 1009
E-3a
~~-9a ~~-25a
%.-25b ~-27 ..-28a
Et~-28b
&--30
%..-63
I.h.-77d
r-"%.-78
-52
134 ~-207 %-278 289 E-292 E-426 -428
0-1 0....-86a
0-137
E-44e0
-465 E-467 E-518 %-589 %-598 =-683 =-706 ~-729 =-734 E-795 -802 .-803 E-825
0-177 0-196 0-204 0-239 0-323 0-375 0-4126 0-428 0-4277 0-434 0-244 0-475 0-528
0-583
CONCORDANCE OF CATALOGUEDAGORA COINS 0-589 0-619 0-629 0-635 0-647 OA-15 OA-125 OA-181 OA-217 OA-219 OA-220 OA-245 OA-259 OA-270a OA-275 OA-290 OE-42 OE-43 00-14 00-35 00-50 00-51 00-97a 00-173 00-220 00-246 00-256 00-263 00-269 00-270 00-272 00-273 00-290 00-305 00-320a 00-327 00-332 00-338 00-363 00-385 00-412 00-431 00-447 00-453 00-454 00-461 00-468 00-473 00-476 00-510 00-528 00-533a 161 1036 951 170 727 870 163 721 928 283 13 878 99 957 110 905 59 45 540 182 718 798 823 1000 897 28 993 111 203 166 712 602 531 507 552 507 54 504 871 887 613 394 601 140 818 38 102 910 790 55 81 876 00-543 00-546 00-551 00-563 00-597a 00-618 00-619 00-621 00-673 00-683 00-698 00-705 00-726a 00-729a 00-742 00-750 00-771 00-799 00-814 00-815 00-826 00-848 00-865 00-875 00-934 00-945 00-948 00-956 00-982 00-986 00-1011 00-1013 00-1032 00-1039 00-1043 00-1045 00-1051 00-1054 00-1069 00-1075 00-1089 00-1105 00-1116 00-1121 00-1127 00-1134 00-1141 00-1142 00-1147 00-1149 00-1152 00-1160 1027 975 154 485 807 147 269 1009 571 672 545 1030 556 970 683 613 1036 608 15 59 181 724 769 1009 439 944 586 135 737 772 485 221 43 1016 633 640 496 929 99 643 77 [149, 151] 143 19 119 18 59, seep. 171 421 159A 19 71 962 00-1187 00-1196 00-1203 00-1210 00-1215 00-1222 00-1228 00-1230 00-1246 00-1248 00-1261 00-1263 00-1276 00-1286 00-1330 00-1343 00-1376 00-1379 00-1424 00-1479 00-1480 00-1481 00-1486 00-1499 00-1506 00-1586 OX-9 1-2 H-8 1-10 1-30 II-59 I-148a H-173 1-240 11-265 H-289 1-293 1-304 11-330 1-347 1-420 1-447 11-464 1-473 1-507 11-525 1-532 1-536 1-569 1-571 1-602 683 335 224 667 [149, 151] 103 210 153 492 152 847 1037 1036 1031 622 501 197 620 860 458 153 621 115 981 172 144 [133,134] 777 149 39 924 581 813 689 62 149 215 686 674 648 157 99 828 662 138 42 488 525 592 12 784 128
345
346
I-651 I-667 I-702 I-741 I-877 I-888 I-895 I-902 11-903 I-944 I-957 II-966 I-972 II-998 n-1098 H-1276 IA-1 HA-5 HA-8 HA-77 IIA-112 IA-144 IA-148 HA-164 HA-213
IIA-260
HA-384 IA-412 HA-426 IA-427 IIA-428 nII-3 1e-12 nII-30 IIe-32a II8-33 IIe-47 Ie-51 I18-59 nII-63 nII-64a IIn-84 II8-85 nI-100 nIe-105 II-1 15 ne-124 nII-130 nIe-139 IIe-142
38 828 331 692 558 628 211 736 785 904 720 43 93 547 96 256 834 154 253 986 456 51 620
429
II8-143 nI-146 nII-149 IIn-156 IIO-161 IIn-167 IIn-172 In-177 IIn-195a HI-221 nII-224 nII-229 18-238 II8-245 IIn-251 IIn-272a nI-287 II8-290a IIO-297 nI-312 nII-314 nIe-315 IIn-321 IIe-323 Ine-327 IIn-345a II8-350 IIn-357 II8-358
nII-396a
149
38
91
855 727
616 35 12 650 50 455 60 561 509 662 592 900
161 244 [149, 151] 124 [115,118-126] 583 639 694 156 144 248 861
1009
ne-649 In8-654
1ne-680a Ie-690 nII-697 II8-698 IIn-7 9a nII-759 IIn-765 II8-768 118-788 II8-790 IIn-792 11e-793 IIE-796 Ie-815 118-852 n11-864 IIn-878 nII-46 IIH-53a IIn-89 HII-102 Inn-117 nII-1 18 IIII-132 IHI-152 IIII-156 HH-172 Hn-173 InI-174 nII-175 IIIn-183 Inn-191 IHn-229 IIH-230 HHI-239 H11-242 II-260 Hn-273 nIII-274 nI-277
IIII-282
Ie-406 ne-408 Ine-424 IIe-426 11n447 IIO-470 II8-488 I8e-491 II8-493 IIn-512 ne-514 ne-516 nII-519 nI-529 IIE-537 nIe-551 nII-556 II8-574 II8-581 Ie-590 IIe-600a
105 104 551 69 94 815 139 156 81 700 137 595 573 608 750 529
99
596
283 131 918 118 664 67 270 1037 944 67 507 202 102 262 230 128 58 330 46
189
347 [82-84,90-97] 97 158 [157, 158] [115-126, etc.], p. 110 979 152 149 [115-126, etc.], p. 110 140 [115-126, etc.], p. 110 417 434 869 70 191 83 1015 143 746 603 992 833 [149, 151] 79 632 776 13 601 115 853 278 283 157 366 833 520 1036 681 119 724 823 111 746 1029 55 479 127
IIII-384
1111-385
111-473
1111478 1111-485 111-491 10 1111-5 1 1111-53 111-532 111-5533
1111-851
1111-852 1111-862 1111-871 1111-872 1111-876 H111-877 1111-888
111-918 1111-939
1111-942 1111-986
159 141 569 949 973 969 914 310 178 352 280 284 264 10 19 470 360 684 174 76 100 89 593 200 821 382 248 632 400 50 67 584 578 784 158 267 28 80 854 83 645B 104 579 377 150 47 504 843 340 347 618
PP,-1005 PP'-1006 PP'-1007 PP'-1008 PP'-10091022 PP'-1024 PP'-1031 PP'-1032 PP'-10331037 PP'-1047 PP' 10731079 PP'-i 153 PP'-1221 PP'-1249 E-8 E-92 J-118 E-147 E-278 E-305 E-457 E-468 E-595 E-736 E-861
E-944
E-949 E-1018 E-1036a
E-1090
-I 147a
E- 1171
8 8
149 385 708 72 1036 24 474 161 812 [82-84,90-97]
E-1i172 E-i205 E-1281 E-1427 E-1841 E- 1843a E-i934 E-2033 E-2057 E-2069 E-2114 E-2229 E-2889 E-2930 E-2981 E-3018
348 S-3019 S-3088 S-3100 S-3175 S-3220 S-3341 S-3392 S-3396 S-3422 S-3486bis S-3490 S-3535 S-3562 S-3566a S-3612 S-3615 S-3655 S-3694 S-3696 S-3721 S-3732 S-3750 S-3753 S-3788 S-3801 S-3806 S-3807 S-3899 S-3905 S-3912 S-3957 E-3976 S-3979 S-3992 S-4035 S-4051 S-4073 S-4129 S-4136 S-4144 S-4154 S-4224 E-4256 E-4259 S-4260 S-4308 S-4313 S-4323 S-4386 S-4433 S-4437 S-4447a
CONCORDANCE OF CATALOGUEDAGORA COINS 15 42 38 567 316 597 149 260 987 129 540 [88,89] 413 852 185 220 643 397 560 139 [41-43] 248 795 447 237 420 913 903 623 1037 144 211 657 151 1 229 99 146 144 [115, 118-126] 220 687 762 656 430 318 271 605 507 67 147 1021 S-4593 S-4635 S-4649 S-4658 S-4690 S-4700 S-4742 S-4753 S-4879 S-4885 S-5010 S-5021 S-5061 S-5367 S-5380 S-5469 S-5550 S-5552 S-5564 S-5588 S-5621 S-5669 S-5688 S-5882 S-6016 S-6096 S-6105 S-6253 S-6295 S-6322 S-6323 S-6376 S-6401 S-6405 S-6410 S-6430 S-6448 E-6461 S-6462 S-6467 S-6481 SA-10 SA-15 SA-21 SA-25 SA-46 EA-62 SA-65 EA-76 EA-83 SA-99 SA-103 537 188 8 415 634 653 579 607 211 551 523 163 47 280 65 101 850 792 841 977 149 823 155 1023 43 228 963 13 676 929 608 950 315 944 654 25 38 606 765 55 24 62 84 620 845 851 746 84 499 826 889 73 SA- 115 SA-133 SA- 161 SA-171 SA-173 SA-209 SA-211 SA-212 SA-214 SA-231 SA-250 SA-269 SA-270 SA-296 SA-373 SA-377 SA-385 SA-391 SA-392 SA-394 SA-399 EA-401 SA-402 SA-416 SA-453 SA-475 SA-486 SA-488 ST-32 ST-52 ST-55 ST-91a ST-97 ST- 125 ST-143 ST- 163 ST-186 ST-198 ST-209 ST-233 ST-250 ST-285 ST-353 ST-364 ST-380 ST'-415 ST'-417 ST'-432a ST'-450 ST'-451 ST'-458a ST'-468 67 746 509 51 86 83 83 82 82 302 38 85 71 64 45 504 513 760 951 968 871 877 570 571 687 743 76 951 121 754 951 481 43 630 91 94 197 67 45 42 488 452 317 1036 616 871 [149,151] 755 536 75 434 723
CONCORDANCE OF CATALOGUEDAGORA COINS ET'-502 ET'-506 VT'-5I0 VT'-511 VT'-528 ET'-531 ET'-539 ET'-549 ET'-562 ET'-576 VT'-578 ET'-579a ET'-584 ET'-586 VT'-590 ET'-599 ET'-625 VT'-638 ET'-669a ET'-683 ET'-699 EVT'-704 ET'-727 ET'-739 T-4 T-4a T-1 1 T-18 T-20 T-28a T-37a T-51 T-56 T-67a T-89 T-102 T-106 T-113 T-134 T-141a T-158a T-167 T-174 T-180 T-198a T-206 T-212a T-227 T-240 T-254 T-282 T-285 730 584 667 46 455 128 896 509 158 815 627 919 [149, 151] 45 112 743 12 788 715 8 94 232 128 687 667 849 472 628 897 566 837 71 152 579 71 1010 945 139 15 1037 428 94 396 632 920 61 890 787 105 668 930 187 T-286 T-319 T-346 T-352 T-405 T-420 T-517 T-545 T-598 T-636 T-651 T-660 T-661 T-671 T-716 T-727 T-833 T-843 T-856 T-857 T-860 T-866 T-920 T-926 T-947 T-954 T-990 T-1013 T-1015 T-1018 T-1023 T-1059 T-1064 T-1069 T-1092 T-1 157 T-1 189 T-1 194 T-1 195 T-1196 T-1205 T-1224 T- 1227 T-1252 T-1284 T-1297 T-1316 T- 1369 T-1375 T-1377 T-1402 206 630 498 488 190 97 100 182 401 79 571 538 88 532 711 127 620 131 453 609 958 214 44 207 706 783 [115,118-126] 281 46 212 864 816 [115-126, etc.], p. 110 75 1036 69 112 88 82 67 837 632 77 667 645A 872 848 485 71 101 40 T-1425 T-1450 T-1498 T-1503 T-1508 T-1509 T-1512 T-1598 T-1602 T-1604 T-1645 T-1650 T-1651 T-1652 T-1664 T-1668 T- 1702 T-1760 T-1774 T-1805 T-1809 T-1844 T-1863 T-1867 T-18 T-22 T-23 T-52 T-64 T-72 T-103 T-177 T-186 T-203 T-216 T-222 T-229 T-240 T-242 4-15 D-29 4-32 4)-36 D-75 (P-98 4D-103 4D-107 4-132 4-138 4-154 o-173 410 814 12A 488 78 68 610 461 455 46 84 752 66 979 83 73 828 85 67 10 456 64 67 65 169 526 750 186 15 763 198 68 79 759 196 823 698 658 107 693 533 944 901 540 204 145 580 802 86 10 370 455
3499
350 D-183 ,-193 D-215 $-237 4-242 (4-328 D-344 D-346 $-349 I,-358 o-360 (D-368 D-389 4-391 X-8a X-33 X-36 X-42 X-49 X-52 X-99 X-101 X-102 X-107 X-1 10 X-113a X-115 X-120 X-147a X-175 X-178 X-185 X-187 X-207 X-21 la X-220 $f-7 T-23 42 805 486 416 758 804 7 139 54 31 131 831 15 12 893 111 643 97 138 667 140 79 595 455 19 943 63 441 1026 792 735 766 968 1005 820 15 507 937
CONCORDANCE OF CATALOGUEDAGORA COINS W-32 I-44 W-73 '-79 'I-83 'I-104 W-132 IF -151 T-156 TI-176 T-193 'I-214 'L-237 'I-239 $-242 'I-280a '-302 I-316 '-321 I-323 W-325a '1-328 '1-330 fi-6 f-19 /-33 i-58 fi-101 Q2-109 -138 -139 f1-152 f1-157 f-164 ?1-183 /1-188 ?Z-206a f-242 118 454 83 662 1003 149 517 500 812 667 53 233 416 944 577 423 378 515 548 1038 694 10 503 43 258 828 266 62 1002 126 414 1009 87 [127, 128] 48 593 535 386 f-249 /-257 ?1-262 f-277 f2-313 Q-322 /1-329 ?l-347a /1-354 /'-357 f2-359 /1-375 f-418 f-431 /-432 f1-433 /1-434 f2-445 Q2-460 Q-471 /l-473 /1-504 /-512 f-515 0-562 0-564 f-600 QA-10 f2A-13 fA-41 f2A-42 fiA-47 f7A-53 /1A-59 flA-76 flA-84 flA-94 QtA-105 51 91 [41-43] 710 138 640 275 623 579 98 78 58 204 488 455 67 197 10 158 613 485 551 613 38 68 8 1036 118 84 127 145 520 193 93 123 137 1009 186
II II II n II II II I I I I HI II II IVA IVC II IVB IVB IVB IVB IVB IVA IVA IVA IV: Athens-Lemnos IVC
45-47 81.1-6 7,8 9-16 17, 18 19, 22-24 20, 21 25-27 28, 29 30, 31 32-39 40-44 45-48 49-52 53-56 82.1-4 5-24, 26-28 25 29-31 32-35 36, 38 37, 41 39, 40 42
156 78 80 79 82 91 92 93 83 90 94 96 97 95 130 169 284 285 171 248 289 291 287 292
IVD IVD IVD: AthensMyrina (see note 218 above, p. l1) IVD II II II II III III III II III III III III III IVA VB VI VI VB VC VI VI VI VI
352
289
287
15-19
20, 21 22, 23 24-28 29-32 33, 34 35, 36 37 38, 40 39, 41, 42 84.1-7 8 9-14
VI VI VI VI
VI
Period VI VI VI VI VI
VC
VI
299 251
293 300 301
VI VI VB VI VI VC VI
VI
VB VC VC
VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VB VB VI VC
342
346 341 343 344
VI
VI
350
349
cf. 301,302
302 303 304 296 305 cf. 305 308 306 253 307 cf. 307 309 p. 122 310 254
VI
VI VI
15-17,22,23
18-21
24,25
26
27,28
29, 30 31-35 36 37-40 41,42 85.1-3 4 5-7 8-10 11 12-18 19,20,22,23 21 24-31 32-35 36, 37 38-40
VI VI VI VI
VI
260
210 351 352 354
VC VI
VI VI VI VA
VC VI VI VI VB
VI
353
163 162 164 165 166
24, 25
27 28
256
314 313 312 255 315 311 p. 125
41,42
86.1-4 5, 31, 33-36
VC VB VC VI VI VI VC VI VI VI
VC
29, 30, 46
31-34 35, 39, 40 36, 37 38 41 42
167 226
227 414
VA VA VA VA VA
VB
VB
VI VB
228
Lakedaimon, Grunauer GruppeXIII
43, 44
231
cf. 229
257
332 318 321 325 324 326 320 328
VI
VI VI
6-12, 14-18
13, 19
20, 39
21,23 22 24,25,28,29 26,27 30 32 37 38 40 41, 42
VI VI VI VI VI
VI
45 47-51, 53 52 54 55-57
58-60 61 89.1-5 6-10 11-15 16-18 19 20, 21 22, 23 24
229 230
416 184 281 282 cf. 174 174
VB VB VB
VB VI
VB VC
VC VB VB VC VI VB VI VB VB
cf. 334
333 331 326 334 336
VI VI VI VI
VI
224
CONCORDANCE TO ATHENIAN BRONZE COINS ILLUSTRATED IN SVORONOS Sv. PI. and fig. 25 26-32 33, 34 35-40 90.1,2,5-8 3,4 9-12, 16, 18 13
14 15
Variety 262 204 377 cf. 377 380 381 cf. 379 379 382 378 384 385 195 196 197 212 234 388 386 389 387 cf. 395 395 390 393 394 396 399 400 398 p. 123,note53 192 194 263 356 175 357 176 cf. 176 cf. 264 264 265 266 233 358 245
Period
VB-C
VC
VI
Variety 241 359 267 268 191 360 269 361 362 222 223 364 363 412 188 186 187 177 168 243 232 178 cf. 178 cf. 271 271 206 368 369 221 235 407 cf. 206 370 213 244 238 239 179 365
p. 122
VB VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VB VB VB VB VB VB VB VC VB-C VI VI VI VI
VI
VI
VI VI
VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VB
VB
5-7 8,9 10-14 15-20 21, 22 23, 29,30 .24-26 27 28 31 32-35 36-42 43-47 94.1 2-6 7-12 14 15 16, 17 18 19 20,21,23,24 22, 38, 40, 41, 43 25, 26, 28, 29 27,30,31 32-35 36 37 39 42
44,45
VC
VI
VC VI VB VI VB VB VC VC VC
VI
VC VB-C VI
VB-C VB-C
10-12 13-15 16-20 21,22 23, 24 25, 28 26, 27,29 30-36 37-40
354
Sv. PI. and fig. 96.1-7 8-14 15, 16 17 18 19 20,21 22-25, 29 26, 27 28 30-36 37-40 41-43
VC VI VC
VB
I
I I I I I I I (see p. 32) I (see p. 36) I II? (see note 87 above,
VI
VB
VC
VI VB VB VB VB
48
55 49 61 39 Obv.: 58 57, Rev.:45 62 62
237
207
47-49
44 45
46, 48,49 47 97.1-14 15, 19 16-18
64, 66,
or 68 68 64
VC VC
VB
5-7
8, 9
183
374
72
74 73 75 116 127 128 150 154 155 87
VC VI
10-13
14-19 21-23 24-28 29, 30 31-35 38-45 46-50 51-53 106.1-7 8-11
p. 72,nos. 1, 2
37-39, 41-44 40 98.1,2 3-10 220 413 277 367 216 217 218 242 219
VB-C
VI
11, 12
13, 14 15 16, 18 17 19,20 21-29
VC VI VB-C
VB-C VB-C VB-C VB-C
p.67
101
12-16
18, 19 20 = Sv. 107.42-45 21,22 23-26
27-29
30
p. 123
280
VB VC
VI VI VI VB VB
31, 32
33-35 36-41 42, 43 107
30-36
37-43 44-46 99.1-3 4-6
375
cf. 375
376
185 cf. 185
44
45,46 48-51 52-64 66-75
114 103 110 830 104 129 102 132 cf. 133(?) 134
7-9, 23 10-12
13, 14 15-18 19-22
283
403 406 405
VC
VI VI VI VI VI VI VB-C VB-C VB-C
76-81
82-83 107.1-8 9-11 12-14
404
401 402 240 246
24-37
38 39-42 43,44
IVA
III IVA
15
16, 17
IVA
IVA
45-47
247
355
Period
18-21 22, 23
24, 25
INDEXES
I. GENERAL
are References topagenumbers
ACHAIAN LEAGUE: 36, 49, 235-236 Aesillas:81143 Agonistictables: 123. SeealsoIndex 11.3:Table, agonistic. Aiakeion: 29514 Akropolis: 53, 55, 56; view of 123, 12464. Seealso Index 11.3. AlexanderIII:coinage in Athens 34, 124-12566, 166,298. SeealsoIndex II.2. Alkamenes: 12247 Altars: 55-56, 123. SeealsoIndex 11.3. AmphictionicDecree: 14-15 Amphipolis: 2613.SeealsoIndex II. 1. Amphora: handles, stamped 2, 5070, 64, 67, 213; Panathenaic, on Athenian coins 51, 52, 53, 54, 68. Seealso Indexes 11.3,II.4. Antigonos Doson: 189-190, 205 Antigonos Gonatas: 10, 12-13, 35, 48, 51, 52, 53, 68, 189-190; coinage in Athens 36-37, 166, 169; coinage overstruck 51-52, 53, 61, 62, 205. SeealsoIndex 11.2. 10, 32 Antipatros: Antoniniani.SeeRoman coins. AntoninusPius: 57, 115, 233. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Antony, M.: 15, 80, 85-87, 89, 99, 102, 103, 104, 105, 113, 233. SeealsoKleopatra;Index III.3. Apollo: 67-68, 83, 122, 125. SeealsoIndex II.3. Aratos: 49 Ares, Temple of: 9, 20 Argos: 29517.SeealsoIndex II.1. Aristion: 14, 70, 74, 82 Aristophanes:7, 24, 25, 53, 54 Armor.SeeTokens or Symbola. Hellenistic: 35 "Arsenal," Artemis: 52, 54, 68, 83149,111. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Asklepios: 12142,125. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Athena: Alkis (Alkidamos) 68; Polias (Archegetis) 53, 49, 53, 54, 58; types and statues of on Athenian imperial coins 102, 113-114, 121-126; wearingwinged helmet 50-51. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Athens: as culturalcapital 120-121; decline of 92; as free and allied city 57102,86, 88, 106, 120;revoltof in A.D. 13 81140 Augustus-Octavian:58, 87-89, 105-106, 111-112; civic coinages under 88-89, 113. SeealsoEleusis;Index 11.3.
RING." "BAKCHOS SeeEleusisring. "Bakchos." Mystic staff. See for manufactureof coins: 104, 11614,292-295 Blanks, Boiotian League: 36, 166, 204-206 BrickBuilding: 317 Bouphonia: 56 Bronze coinage, Athenian: alloy of 3139,33, 70, 84, 104, 117, 293; denominations of 1-2, 26-27, 32, 36-39, 48-49, 52, 68, 80, 82-84, 90-91, 118-120, 168-169. 7-8, 25-26. SeealsoKollybos. emergency(of406/5 B.C.) Brutus:85-86
PUNCHED COIN ON BLANKS WORN AND COENs: 94, CAVrrIES,
113-114 Chalkis:29517.SeealsoIndex II.1. Chersonesos,Tauric: 29517 Chios: 88, 113, 120, 168. SeealsoIndex II. 1. Chremonidean War: 10-11, 12, 34, 35, 167. See also Antigonos Gonatas. Cicada: 53, 54, 68, 83, 104. SeealsoIndexes11.3,11.4. Claudius: 120 Cleruchies.SeeDelos; Imbros;Hephaistia;Lemnos; Myrina; Salamis;Skyros. Coinage Degree: 6 Commodus: 115, 116. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Corinth: 89, 91182'183,92189,93, 166, 169; well deposits at 3862,207. SeealsoIndex II. 1. Counterfeits.SeeSilvercoinage, imitationsof. Countermarking: 64-65, 68, 70-71, 93. See also Index II.5. Curse tablet: 299 Cut or intentionallydefaced coins: 4, 7, 9, 70, 167. See alsoHalving of coins. AT DARICS, ATHEN: 257, 282 Delos: Athenianacquisitionand loss of 13, 54, 66, 67, 82; coinage ofcleruchy 15, 68-69, 76, 77, 167; devastation and decline of 14, 81, 104; hoards from 301. Seealso Hoards;Triarius;Index II. 1. Delphi: 86, 101. SeealsoAmphictionicDecree; Index II. 1. Demeter: 28, 54, 67, 83, 87, 12142, 122, 123, 125. See alsoIndex 11.3. DemetriosII, of Macedon: 48, 189, 190, 205
358
INDEXES Haleis: 29517 Halving of coins: 71, 92-93, 236. SeealsoCut coins. Heliaia: 29514 Hephaistia, Lemnos: 111218,167, 178-179. SeealsoIndex II.1. Heraldes: 123, 125. SeealsoIndex 11.3. HerodesAtticus: 114 Herulianinvasion:94, 113, 115, 117, 295. Seealso Hoards, with Herulian invasion. Hippias: 5, 1770 Hoards: from the Agora 34, 35, 117, 168, 302, 303304, 315, 316; not from the Agora 300-301 (fulllist); connected with the Laurion slave revolt(?) 66, with Herulian invasion 94, 115, 117, 118, 126, 169, 27668, 303-304, 316, with piraticalattack on Delos 81, with Sulla'sinvasion67, 118, 1695. SeealsoPeiraeus. IAKCHOS: 95, 122. SeealsoIndex II.3. 82, Imbros:69, 88, 111-112, 167, 178. SeealsoIndex II. 1. Imitations.SeeSilvercoinage, imitationsof. KALAMIS: 12569 Kassandros:10, 32, 187, 216, 299. SeealsoIndex 11.2. Kephisodotos: 125 Kerameikos:BuildingZ-3 32, 33, 215, 298; Dipylon gate, road and well 32, 298-299; grave 215 Kernos: 2824.SeealsoPlemochoe. Klazomenai: 3962. SeealsoIndex II. 1. Kleopatra:58, 87, 104, 105, 233. SeealsoIndex 11.2. Knidos. SeeAmphora, handles;Index II. 1. Kollybos: 24-25, 38. SeealsoBronze coinage, denominations of. Konon: 8 Kore: 68, 82, 87, 95, 12142,122, 123. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Koronifort: 34. SeealsoPtolemaiccoinage. Kostoboks: 116 Kyzikos:electrumstatersof 50, 166, 257 LACHARES: 307 10, Larissa:57, 9287. SeealsoIndex II. 1. Laurion: mines at 6, 8, 10, 15; slave revolt at 15, 66. See alsoHoards, connected with Laurionslaverevolt(?). Lemnos: 69, 88, 111-112, 167, 178-180, 216. Seealso Index II. 1. Leochares:56 Libraryof Pantainos:91-92, 317-318 Lykourgos:30, 31 Lyre, on Athenian coins: 68, 69120.SeealsoIndexes 11.3, 1.4. Lysimachos:10, 35, 167, 168. SeealsoIndex 11.2.
Demetrios of Phaleron: 32, 299 Demetrios Poliorketes:10, 27, 33, 3447,35, 53, 167, 168, 307. SeealsoIndex 11.2. Denarius: in Athenian inscriptions83-84, 90, 118-119; in Greece 15-16, 50-51, 86-87, 89, 91, 113, 120. See alsoBronze coinage, denominationsof. Denominations.SeeBronze coinage. Dexippus, P.Herennius: 118 Dionysios Chalkous:24 Dionysos: 84-85, 99, 102-103, 104, 122. See also Index H1.3. Dipylon. SeeKerameikos. Dokimastes:5, 9 Dolphin on Trident, on Athenian coins: 98-99. Seealso Index Hn.3. Domitian: 115. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Dyme: 89 cOINS:87, 104, 105. Seealso InEAGLE,ON ATHENAN dexes 11.3,11.4. Eirene and Ploutos: 125 Electrum.SeeKyzikos. Eleusinia:28, 12353 Eleusis: Athenian control of 27, 25-29, 34; coinage of and Mysteries27-30, 31-32, 34, 35-36, 52, 54, 67-68, 82, 89, 95, 99, 105; coin types and denominational significance84, 88; damage by Kostobocks 116; garrisoned against Herulians 118; initiationof AugustusOctavian at 87, 89, 105, of Hadrian at 124, of Sulla at 82, 95; Macedonian occupationof 27, 34 Eleusisring: 28. SeealsoIndexes 11.3,11.4. Eleutheria,at Larissa:57 Elis: silvercoinage of 29. SeealsoIndex II. 1. Ephesos: 86166.Seealo Index II. 1. Erechtheion: 12354'56 Eretria:89, 29517.SeealsoIndex II. 1. Euboulos: 8 Euphranor:12248 91181 Exchangerate, bronze:silver:
OF: COINAGE 29-30, 66108. Seealso Eleusis. FESTIVALS,
Flamininus:2, 51, 57, 106207 bronze coins. See Fburr6e. Plated orfourrke GALLENus: 117,1118,121. SeealsoIndex II.3. Gold coinage, Athenian: 6, 7, 32, 66, 74 Gorgoneion,on Athenian coins: 102. Seeaso Index 11.3.
HADRIAN:57, 113, 114, 115, 116, 121, 124, 218-219,
I. GENERAL
MACEDONIAN IN COINAGE, ATHES: 36-37, 51-52, 166-
359
167, 169, 205. SeealsoAntigonos Gonatas. MacedonianWar: Second 51, 53, 58; Third 13, 68 Marathon trophy: 12352 MarcusAurelius: 115, 116, 166. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Megara: coinage of in Athens 166, 168, 169; reconciliation of with Athens 219. SeealsoIndex II.1. Metroon-Old Boleuterion:9, 1772,20 Middle Stoa: 49-50, 294, 309-310 Miltiades,monument: 123, 124 Mints, in Agora: 104, 292-294, 295 MithradatesVI: 14, 58, 66, 68, 70, 74, 81-82 Mouseion: garrisonat 12, 34 Mounychia:liberationof 54. SeealsoPeiraeus. Myrina, Lemnos: 111218, 167, 178, 179-180. See also Index II 1. Myron: 12465 Mysteries.SeeEleusis,coinage of. Mystic staff: 28. SeealsoIndexes 11.3,II.4. NERo:93, 106209,120. SeealsoIndex 11.3. New Style coinage. See Silver coinage, Athenian, New Style. Nikopolis: 92189,120. SeealsoIndex II.1. Nymphaeum: 294
OCTAVIA: 103, 104 85,
Pnyx: excavationcoins from 26, 299-300; hoard 67109 Pompeythe Great: 99. SeealsoIndex II.3. Poppy,on Athenian coins: 83, 98. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Poseidon: 99, 122. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Praxiteles: 12246 Prow,on Athenian coins: 88. SeealsoIndexes 11.3,II.4. Ptolemaiccoinage: Athenian coin types relatedto 11, 58, 87, 104, 105; in Attica 11, 52, 167 PtolemyI: 10, 1140,167 Ptolemy I: 10, 11, 167. SeealsoIndex II.2. PtolemyIII (Euergetes):36, 49, 52. SeealsoIndex 11.2. PtolemyV: 36
Revival of historicalAthenian coin types: 90, 102, 110, 113, 114, 120 Rhodes: 36, 51, 88, 120. See also Amphora, handles; Index II1. Roma, goddess: 50, 51, 53, 57, 120. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Roman coins: finds of in the Agora xxvi, 92, 115, 117, 301, 303, 307, 311, 315, 316, 317, 318; in Attica 115, 117. SeealsoDenarius. Rudder,on Athenian coins: 52, 53. SeealsoIndex II.4.
Octavian. SeeAugustus-Octavian. Olynthos: coins from 25-26, 39, 179, 18215,18418,187, 193, 215, 217, 221, 244, 245, 258, 26055;coin blanks from 29517;destructiondate of 297 PAMMENES: 115 cave of: 12356 Pan, Panathenaia: 51, 53, 12353;Antonian 85. SeealsoAmphora, Panathenaic. Panhellenia: 12353 Patrai:92189.SeealsoIndex II. 1. Peiraeus: 7, 48, 49, 51, 67, 69, 89, 99201;hoards from 300-301 (fulllist). SeealsoMounychia. 5 Peisistratos: Pella: 12, 53, 86162,29517.SeealsoIndex II. 1. Pergamon:51, 88. SeealsoIndex II. 1. Perseus:57. SeealsoIndex II.2. Philip II: forgeryof coin of 291. SeealsoIndex 11.2. PhilipV: 5074,51, 5277,5487, 57, 68. SeealsoIndex 11.2. Phokion: 32 Piglet,on Attic coins: 28, 35-36, 38, 67. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Plated or fourree bronze coins: 4, 7-8, 9-10, 1772, 49, 167-168 Plemochoe, on Atheniancoins: 28, 30, 52, 64-65, 68, 99.
Seealso Indexes 11.3, II.4.
SALAMIS: coinage of 25, 27, 29, 3758,69, 167, 168, 214216, 300. SeealsoThemistokles;Index II.1. SeptimiusSeverus: 116, 120. SeealsoIndex II.3. Sikyon,coinage of: 93, 108, 207. SeealsoIndex II.1. Silver coinage, Athenian: fineness of 10, 15; imitations of 4, 6-7, 9, 11-12, 291; law on 5, 9, 20; New Style 13-16, 23, 48, 49, 50, 66, 73, 74, 80, 81-82, 83, 84, 85-86, 89, 12574.SeealsoDenarius; Macedonian coinage; Plated orfourree bronze coins; Ptolemaic coinage; Wappenmunzen. Skiathos: 102 Skyros:69, 88, 111, 167. SeealsoIndex II. 1. South Stoa: 67, 76, 312-313 SoutheastTemple: 294 Sparta: 88, 89, 92189,120. SeealsoIndex II.1. Sphinx: 88 SquarePeristyle:25350,3344,315 Stephanephoric coinage. See Silver coinage, Athenian, New Style. Stephanos,sculptor: 12570 Stoa ofAttalos: 67, 25350,295, 316, 317 Stoa of Zeus: 56-58, 106 Sulla: 14, 60, 61, 66, 69, 70, 74, 80, 81, 84, 295. See alsoEleusis, initiation of Sulla at; Hoards, with Sulla's invasion. Symbola. SeeTokensor Symbola.
360
INDEXES Triptolemos:28, 32, 83, 122. SeealsoIndex 11.3. Tyre: 88, 120
VALERIAN: 118. Seealso Index 11.3. WAPPENMNZEN: 16, 25, 102 5,
TERMEssos PIsmA: 113, 120 IN Theater of Dionysos: 12352,125 Thebes: 26, 300. SeealsoIndex II.1. Themistokles: 122, 12352,124, 168 Theseus: 12142,122, 123-124 ThessalianLeague: 14, 57, 92189,120. SeealsoIndex II. 1. Thessalonike: 57, 86162, 92189, 105, 118. See also Index II. 1. Thucydides: 54 Thunderbolt,on Atheniancoins: 57. SeealsoIndexesII.3, II.4. Timotheos: 25-26 Tokensor Symbola: 24, 4064, 115-116; for armor 35, 39, 168, 302 Trajan:57. SeealsoLibraryof Pantainos;Index 11.3. Triarius,G. Valerius:69, 84, 167, 250 Tripod, on Athenian coins: 68, 85-86, 101-102. Seealso Indexes 11.3,II.4.
ZAKYNTHOS: SeealsoIndex II 1. 105. Zeus: Eleutherios54, 56-58, 106; head 51, 54, 87, 104, 105; Polieus 55-56; statue of, seated (Olympias) 124, standingor striding50-51, 54-58, 68, 106, 123, 125, 126. SeealsoIndex 11.3.
362 Gela 422 Gomphoi 519 Gyrton520 Halos 521 Hephaistia453, 454 Heraia 803, 804 Hermione 792-795 Hermokapelia967 Histiaia 628-635 Ilion 887 Illyrinm551, 552 Imbros 161, 452 lonia906-952 Ioulis 838-840 IstrianonLimen 434 Itay 417-420 Judea998-1002 Karia 953-966 Karthaia833-835 Karystos636-639 Keos 831-840 Kephallenia756-758 Klazomenai920-922 Kleitor 805 Kleonai 796, 797 Knidos 953-955 Knossos 819, 819A Koressia836, 837 Korkyra567-572 Kos 958 Kranion 756, 757 Krannon 522,523 Kroton 419 Kyme 896-900 Kyparissia763 Kythera780 Kythnos841, 842 Kyzikos866, 867 Lakedaimon767-779 Lakonia 767-780 Lamia 524,525 Laodikeia972 Larissa526-529 LarissaKremaste530 Lemnos 159, 159A, 453-456 Lesbos901-905 Leukas573
INDEXES Lokis581-586 974-976 Lycia 967-969 Lydia Macedonia 466-515, Appendix A:c Magnesiaon the Maiandros923-926 Magnetes531-534 Mamertinoi423, 424 Mantineia806, 807 Maroneia439-441 Medon 574 Megalopolis808 Megara 643-656 643-657 Megaris Melos 843, 844 Mesembria442, 443 Messene 760-762 760-766 Messenia Methana 798 Methymna901, 902 Metropolis927 Miletos 928-930 Mothone 764 Mylasa956 Myndos 957 Myrina(Lemnos)455, 455A, 456 Mysia863-880 Mytilene 903-905 Neandria888, 889 Nikaia 857 Nikomedia858860 Nikopolis553-563 1035 Nwumdia Olbia 433, 434 Olynthos 472 Orchomenos(Boiotia)598 809 Orchomenos(Arkadia) Orthe 535 Ouranopolis473 Pagai 657 977-981 Pamphylia 430-432 Pantikapaion 868-871 Parion(?) Paros845 Patara976 Patrai735-742 Pautalia444 Pella474 Pellene743
II. INDEXES TO THE CATALOGUE:1. GEOGRAPHICAL Peparethos549,550 Pergamon872-878 Perge978 Perinthos445, 446 Perperene879 PersianEmpire 1003 Phalanna536 Phanagoria852 Pharsalos537-539 Pheneos 810,811 Philippoi475, 476. Seealso868-870 Philippopolis447 Phlious 721 Phokaia931 Phokis 587-591 970-973 Phrygia Pisidia 982, 983 Pitane 880 Pontos 854, 855 Rhegion 420 Rhodes 959-966 Salamis 640-642 Same 758 Samos 951, 952 Samothrace457, 458 Sardis968 Sarmatia 433, 434 Seleukiaon the Kalykadnos984 Selge 983 Sestos 450, 451 421-429, Appendix A:b Sicily Side 979, 980 Sikyon 722-730 Sillyon981 Siphnos 846 Skepsis890 Skione 477 Skodra552 Skyros160 Smyrna932-941 985, 986 Soloi-Pompeiopolis 987 Syedra Synnada973 Syracuse425-427 990-997 Syria Syros847 Tanagra599-603 Tarsos988 Tauric Chersonese 430-432 Tegea 812-816 Tenea 744 Tenedos 891 Tenos 848-851 Teos 942 Thasos 459, 460 Thebes 604, 605 Thespiai 606-608 7hessay516-550 Thessalonike478-484 Thouria 765, 766 Thrace 435-465 Thyrrheion575 Tripolis969 881-891 Troas Troizen 799, 800 Zakynthos759
363
364
INDEXES
INDEX 11.2
KINGS AND RULERS
Thrace Lysimachos461-464 Rhoimetalkes465 Macedon PhilipII 485, 486, Appendix A:c AlexanderHI 487-495 PhilipIII 496 Anonymousregal coinage 497, 498 Kassandros499-501 Demetrios Poliorketes 502-506 Gonatas 507-509 Antigonos PhilipV 510-513 PhilipV or Perseus514 Bosphoros RheskouporisVI 853 Bithynia ProusiasII 861,862 Galata Amyntas989 Syria SeleukosIII 990 Antiochos 1I991
SeleukosIV 992 AlexanderI Balas 993 AntiochosVII 994 Judea AlexanderJannaios998 Herod Archelaos999 AgrippaI 1000 Egypt PtolemyII 1004-1006 PtolemyIII 1007 PtolemyIV 1008 UnclassifiablePtolemyI-IV 1009 PtolemyVI and VIII 1010 PtolemyVI 1011, 1012 PtolemyVIII 1013, 1014 PtolemyIX 1015 PtolemyXI 1016, 1017 PtolemyXII 1018 KleopatraVII 1019 Numidia Juba 11035
For Roman emperors, generals, and members of the imperial family,see the Index of Types (Index 11.3),under the followingnames (listedhere in chronologicalorder): Pompey Julius Caesar M. Antony Augustus Gaius and Lucius Germanicus Tiberius Drusus Caligula Nero AgrippinaMinor Julio-Claudianemperor Julia Titi Domitian Trajan Hadrian Aelius Caesar AntoninusPius FaustinaI MarcusAurelius FaustinaII Verus Commodus SeptimiusSeverus Julia Domna Geta Caracalla Plautilla Elagabalus SeverusAlexander Julia Mamea Maximinus Maximus Tranquillina TrajanDecius Etruscilla Volusian Gallienusand Valerian Gallienus Salonina Saloninus Probus Diocletian
365
INDEX II.3
TYPES
unless stated Headsareinprofile, othrwise. A in incuse square:Argos: 781 A or A: ArkadianLeague 801, 802 Achaia, seated: Achaian League 746 Achilles,bust: ThessalianLeague 545, 546 Aelius Caesar,head: Nikopolis556 Agonothesia,head: Thessalonike480 AgrippinaMinor,bust: Corinth 688, 689 Aineas, with Anchises and Askanios:Ilion 887 Aitolia, head wearing kausia:Aitolian League 576, 577 Ajax. SeeShield of. Akropolis:Athens 280, 375. SeealsoTheater of Dionysos. Aktia, seated with scepter and agonistic urn: Nikopolis 560 Aleos, head: Tegea 815 AlexanderI Balas,helmeted head: AlexanderI Balas993 Alexander III (the Great), head: Lysimachos462, 463, Macedonian League 515 Altar: Athens 202, 203, Antioch 982; with eagle between standards:Deultum 438. SeealsoAthena;Apollo, standing;Themistokles;Tyche;Zeus, standing. Amazon (Smyrna), standing, holding temple: Smyrna 940, 941 Amphora: Athens 76, 85, 98, 101, 105, 108, 184, 212, 234, Sestos 450, Korkyra 572, Andros 821, Chios 943-945, 947, 948. SeealsoTree, olive. Amphoras,two, with snakes:Lakedaimon771 Anchor: Apollonia Pontica436, AlexanderJannaios998 Antoninus Pius, head or bust: Crete 820, Lakedaimon 778, 779, Ephesos 910, Alexandria1025, 1026 Antony,M., head: Corinth 673 Anubis,standing: Perinthos445 Aphrodite head or bust: Skione 477, Corinth 666, 676, 690, 705, Kythera780, Knidos 953 seated: Ouranopolis 473; in biga drawn by tritons: Corinth 689 standing:Corinth 706, 719, Smyrna934 Aplustre:Korkyra570 Apollo head or bust: Athens 87, 101, 103, 105, 110-113, 131, 132, 135, Mamertinoi 423, Abdera 435, Apollonia Pontica 436, Olynthos 472, Philip II 485(?), Kassandros 501, Atrax 518, Thessalian League 540, Lokrian League 583, 586, Delphi 591, Megara 646-649, Sikyon 722, 727, Pellene 743, Zakynthos 759, Lakedaimon 768, 774, Argos 783, 784, Delos 825-830, Keos 832, Karthaia834, Koressia837, Ioulis 839, Kythnos 842, Adramyteion863, Atarneus865, Neandria 888,889, Miletos 929, Smyrna933,935, Knidos 954, Sardis968, LycianLeague 974, Patara976, Seleukiaon Kalykadnos984, AntiochosIII 991 seated: Boiotian League 594, Thespiai 608, SeleukosIII 990 standing:Athens 269,270,361,362, Tanagra601, Lakedaimon 779; archaic statue: Aigina 664; Delios statue: Athens 143; Lykeios: Athens 363, 364; Patroos,with lyre: Athens 191, 268, 360; with Dionysos at altar: Chios 949 sacrificing, SeealsoTemple. Ares, head in helmet: Lysimachos464, Amisos 854; or Athena head in helmet: Metropolis927 Aristaios,head, bearded: Keos 831, Koressia836 Arkas.SeeKallisto. Arrow.SeeBow. Arsinoe,veiled head: Ptolemaic 1004, 1008 Artemis with bow, standing: Methana 798; running: Dion 471, Megara 656, Methana 798, Crete 820; kneeling: Orchomenos 809 head or bust: Athens 68, 104, Athens-Lemnos159, Rhegion 420, Syracuse 427, Epeirote League 565, Knossos 819, Delos 826, Aptera 817, Phanagoria 852, Kyme 898, Ephesos 908, Lycian League 975, Patara976, Amyntas989, Seleukos HI 990, Cyrenaicaand Crete 1034 ridingbull: Amphipolis467, 468 standing,with wreathand scepter:Perge978; Ephesia statue:Kyme 900, Ephesos909; Lykophryene statue: Magnesia on the Maiandros925; Anaitis statue: Apameia 971; leaning on spear,with dog: Lakedaimon774 with torchor torches,standing:Sikyon730, Ephesos 915; walking:Athens 370; running: Athens 130, Megara 655 Asklepios head or bust: Athens 242, Messene 762, Epidauros 788-791, Pergamon874 standing: Athens, 216, 217, 277, 367, Pergamon 876, Rhodes 966, Akmoneia 970; statue flanked by centaurs:Pergamon878 Athena head or bust in Attic helmet: Athens 6-27, 2931, 35-37, 41-47, 64-65, 69, 70, 81, 99, 136,
366
INDEXES 162-168, 177, 183, 187-189, 216, 220, 248, 284-416, Akanthos 466, Orthe 535, Pharsalos 539, Medon 574, Thyrrheion575, Heraia 803, 804, Tegea 812, 813, Pergamon872, 873, 875, Phokaia 931, Magnesia on the Maiandros 924; with wing: Athens 77, 78; with griffin:Aigai 892. SeealsoAres, head. head or bust in Corinthian helmet: Athens 28, 50, 52-54, 56-60, 67, 71, 78-80, 82-84, 9098, 114, 130, 134, 142, 146, 166-176, 178188, 190-215, 217-231, 248-416, Syracuse 426, Hephaistia 454, Myrina 455, 455A, 456, Samothrace457,458, Thessalonike478, Alexander III 487, Antigonos Gonatas507, 508, Lamia 524, Thessalian League 541, Aitolian League 580, Lokrian League 581, 582, 584, 585, Boiotian League 593, Megara 651, Corinth 668, Lakedaimon769, 773, Mantineia 806, 807, Arsinoe 818, Melos 843, 844, Pergamon876, Ilion 887, Kyme 899, Methymna 901, 902, Klazomenai 922, Attaleia 977, Side 979, 980 helmeted facing head or bust: Pharsalos537, 538, Phokian League 588, Kranion 758, Klazomenai 920, 921 and Marsyas:Athens 262 Parthenoshead:Athens32-34, 115, 118-126, 137, 138, 143, 147-149, 151-153, 156-158, 159A161, Pella 474. SeealsoTable,agonistic. and Poseidonwith olive tree: Athens 174, 261,355 seated, with Nike or phiale: Athens 348-350, Lysimachos 462, 463 standing in chariot: Athens 210, 260, 351-354 facingolive tree: Athens 173, 258, 259, 341-347 with Nike: Athens 169-171, 248, 249, 284292, 294 (Athena Parthenos. See also Table, agonistic), 172, 251, 252, 295, 298 (Velletri type), 297, 304, 316, 317, Corinth 712, 718 with owl: Athens 293, 299-303 with owl and phiale: Athens66, 68 (AthenaPolias) with phiale: Athens 250, 334-339, Kyparissia 763, Mothone 764, Thouria 766, Nikomedia 859, Synnada 973 brandishingspear: Athens 308, Lakedaimon777 with spear and shield: Athens 257, 296, 305, 318-333, 340, Thouria 765 striding: Athens 254-256, 311-315 (Athena of Parthenon East Pediment); brandishing spear: Athens 253, 307, Mesembria 443, Thessalian League 540, 542, 544, 547, 548 (Athena Itonia), Peparethos550 (AthenaItonia),Argos 782; with lowered spear and aegis: Athens 139, 140, 149, 151, 306; with spear and shield: Athens 309, 310, Patrai735, Thouria 765, Kleonai 797 Athens88, 89, PhilipV 510 throwingthunderbolt (AthenaAlkidamos) SeealsoSterope. Augustus,head or bust: RhoimetalkesI 465, Amphipolis 467, Nikopolis555, Corinth 678, 681, 682, Lakedaimon 776, Ephesos909, uncertain1036 Axe, double: Tenedos 891, Mylasa 956
Baetylin baldacino: Chalkis621 Basket.SeeCista Mystica;Snake;Wheat ears. Bee: Koressia837, Ioulis 840, Ephesos 906, 907, Cyrenaica and Crete 1033 Bellerophon,on Pegasosand fighting Chimera: Corinth 676; riding or restrainingPegasos: Corinth 670, 671, 691 Birds,two, billing:Aphytis469 Boar,Kalydonian:Aitolian League 576. SeealsoJawbone of; Prow,in form of boar'shead. Boukranion,fillet hanging from each horn: Athens 185, 283, 401-406; without fillet: Athens 240, 246, 247, Corinth 677. SeealsoBull, head. Bow: Kranion 756 431 and arrow: Pantikapaion in case: Pantkapaion 430 in case with club: Alexander III 490-493, 495, Erythrai916, 917, Kos 958 and club: Thasos 459, 460, Thebes 604 and club and quiver:AlexanderHI 494 crossedwith quiver:Athens 107, 109, Myrina 456, LycianLeague 974 with stag-headterminal: Selge 983 SeealsoArtemis,with bow. Buildingwith column and statues: Corinth 716. Seealso Temple. Bull buttingor charging:Krannon523, EuboianLeague 614, Phlious 721, Magnesia on the Maiandros 923 forepart:Histiaia 629 head: Athens5, Korkyra569, PhokianLeague 587, Eretria627. SeealsoEagle, holding. protome: Euboian League 609, 610, Histiaia 631, Karystos636 recumbent:Euboian League 611, Eretria625, 626 standing on tuna or walking: Gela 422, Euboian League 612, 613, Histiaia628, 630, Kyzikos866 SeealsoArtemis, riding; Boukranion;Hera, seated; Themistoldes, statue, facing altar and slain bull; Theseus, driving.
I. INDEXES TO THE CATALOGUE:3. TYPES Caduceus (usuallywinged): Athens 241, 245, Tanagra 599, Pheneos 810, Knossos 819. SeealsoHermes. Caestus,hand in: Smyrna 935 Caligula,head: Corinth 686, 687 Caracalla, bust: Thessalian League 547(?), Nikopolis 558-561, Chalkis 623, 624, Corinth 716, Patrai 741, 742, Kyparissia 763, Thouria 766(?), Argos 787, Hermione 795, Pheneos 811, Adramyteion864, Alexandria Troas 881-883, Mytilene 905, Magnesia on the Maiandros926, uncertain 1036; mounted, spearingenemy: Mytilene 905 Cavalryman.SeeHorseman. Centaur: Magnetes 531; with lyre (Chiron):Nikomedia 862 Centaurs,back to back: Thessalonike479; with torches, flankingstatue: Pergamon878 Chariot. SeeAthena;Triptolemos. Chimera. Corinth 674. SeealsoBellerophon. Chiron. SeeCentaur. Chloris.SeeLeto. Cicada: Athens 85, 100, 108, 109, 113, 131 Cista Mystica: Patrai 736, 737, Amisos 855. See also Snake. City-goddess, bust, veiled and turreted: Thessalonike 484; head, turreted: Ephesos 907, Knidos 955, Synnada 973, Tarsos988 Club: Athens 237, Philip II 486, Epeirote League 566, Leukas573, Patrai737, Lakedaimon767, 770, 775, Sardis 968; between pilei of Dioskouroi: Lakedaimon 778; and thyrsos:Thebes 605. SeealsoBow; Herakles. Column supportingstatue: Corinth 716 Commodus, bust: Megara 652, 653(?), Corinth 712, Patrai740, Troizen800, Corinth 712, Pergamon878, Assos 886, Sillyon 981 Cornucopia: Skepsis 890; between pilei of Dioskouroi: Adramyteion863; double: Laodikeia972, PtolemyIV 1008. SeealsoGenius of Corinth;Tyche. Cow, walking on dolphin: Byzantion 437; feeding: Pella 474 Crab: Kroton 419, Akragas421 Crescents,three: Athens 21, 37 Crown, prize: Synedra 987; (hemhem)of Harpokrates: Alexandria 1021; of Isis: AntiochosVII 994, Ptolemy XII 1015, Alexandria1027 Cuppingvessels.SeeThymiaterion.
367
and Kore, standing:Athens 178. SeealsoTriptolemos between. seated: Athens 186, 204(?), 205(?) standing:Athens 266; lightingtorch: Megara 652 Demeter or Kore, bust: Athens 243, 244, Paros 845, Elaia895; head facing: BoiotianLeague595; standing, carryingtorch: Athens 146 Demetrios Poliorketes, head: D. Poliorketes 503, 504 Diana. SeeArtemis. Dikaiosyne,standingwith scalesand cornucopia:Alexandria 1029 Diocletian, bust: Alexandria1029, 1030 Dione, veiled head: EpeiroteLeague 564 Dionysos head, bearded: Athens 142, 144, Andros822, 824, Karthaia835(?) head (or bust), young: Athens 140, 141, Maroneia 440, 441, Peparethos549, Boiotian League 594, Aigion 732, Andros 821, 823, Karthaia 833, Ioulis838, Amisos855, Nikomedia862, Seleukos IV 992 (bust) with Apollo: Chios 949 sacrificing, with torch: Pheneos 811; before table with seated, thymiaterion(D. Eleutherios):Athens 176, 264, 265 standing,with torch: Patrai736; holding spearsand grapes: Maroneia 440, 441; herm of, on prow: Mytilene 904 Dioskouroi,jugate heads: Lakedaimon 771; standing: Lakedaimon773. SeealsoPilei. Dog (Sirios),forepartencircled by rays: Keos 831, 832, Karthaia834, Ioulis 839. SeealsoArtemis. Dolphin: Karystos 639, Corinth 702; entwined on trident: Athens 129, Karystos 637; and shell: Syracuse 425. See also Cow, walking on; Eagle, flying above; Melekertes; Youth,riding. two: Megara 643, Aigina 662, Arsinoe 818. Dolphins, Seealso Obelisk, between; Trident, between; Tripod, between. Domitian, head: Thespiai 608, Patrai738, Miletos 930, Alexandria1020 Domitian and Domitia, busts: ThessalianLeague 543 Dove: Skione 477, Sikyon 723-727, Kythera780 Drusus,head: Parion(?)869 Drususand Tiberius,headsjugate: Parion(?)870 Eagle flying: Siphnos 846; above dolphin: Olbia 433; holding bull'shead, AlexandriaTroas883 standing: Akragas 421, Philip V or Perseus 514, Aigion 732, Elis 747-749, Lakedaimon 772, 776, Kyme 896, 899, Ptolemy II, 1006; on
Demeter head: "Eleusis"61, Athens 72-74, 86, 116, 127, 128, 150, Messene 760, 761, Hermione 792, 794, 794A, Pheneos 810, Tegea 814 head facing: Hermione 793
368
INDEXES Tenos 848, 849, Perperene 879, Chios 946, SoloiPompeiopolis985, Herod Archelaos999; two clusters: Euboian League 611, Eretria625. SeealsoVine, with. Great Goddess,seated: Samothrace457 Griffin,forepart:Phokaia931; seated: Abdera435, Teos 942, Alexandria1026 H with curvedsides: Heraia 804 R-: Kleitor805 Hadrian,bustor head: ThessalianLeague544, Nikopolis 554, Delphi 589, Elis 753-755, Lakedaimon 777, BithynianLeague 856, Smyrna 937, Antioch on the Orontes996, Alexandria1022-1024, uncertain1036 Hand. SeeCaestus. Hands, clasped, holding poppy and grain ears: Corinth 697, 698 Harpa: PhilipV 512, 513, LarissaKremaste530 Harpokratescrown. SeeCrown. Hawk: Alexandria1020 Hekate, holding two torches:Aigina 665 Helios, head or bust: Corinth 701, Kleitor 805, Rhodes 964, 966; head facing: Rhodes 959-962 Helmet: Mesembria 442, Kranion 757; Macedonian: Macedonian Kings 497, 498, 506, Herod Archelaos 999 Hephaistos,head: Athens-Lemnos159A Hera bust, facing,on Ionic capital: Chalkis616-618 head: Chalkis619, 620, Elis 747, Argos 782, 785, Samos 951; veiled: Orchomenos598 seated, bull at feet: Chalkis623 Herakles head, bearded: Thasos 460, Corinth 669, Patrai 735, Lakedaimon770, Selge 983 head, young: Kroton 419, Thasos 459, Lysimachos 461, Philippoi 475, Philip II 486, AlexanderIII 488, 490-495, Philip III 496, Kassandros499, 500, Antigonos Gonatas509, PhilipV 511-512, EpeiroteLeague 566, Korkyra567, 571, Leukas 573, Thebes 604, 605, Karystos 636, Kleonai 796, Erythrai916-918 head, young, facing: Kos 958 slayingstag: Perinthos446 standing, with club and lion skin: Athens 179, 365 (HeraklesFarnese),Philippopolis447, Aitolian League 580, Nikomedia 861; with club and phiale: Athens 272, 366 Herakles or Theseus, standing, with club and phiale: Athens 199 Herakleitos,standing:Ephesos 910 Herm: Sestos 450. SeealsoDionysos, standing. Hermanubis,bust: Alexandria1025
thunderbolt:Athens 145, Pergamon874, Kings of Egypt 1004-1005, 1007, 1009, 1011-1014, 1016, 1017, 1019; holding bull's head, Alexandria Troas885; holding snake: Chalkis616-620, 622, Nikomedia858; holdingwreath:Antiochon the Orontes 997 SeealsoAltar;Zeus. Eagles, two, standing on thunderbolt: Kings of Egypt 1010, 1018 Eileithyia,head: Tegea 814 Eirene,holding Ploutos:Athens 267 bust: Philippopolis 447, Coela 449, Nikopolis Elagabalus, 562 Elephant:AntiochosHI 991 Eleusisring in wheat wreath:Athens 75 Elpis,standing:Alexandria1028 Eros,winged bust: AntiochosVII 994 Etruscilla,bust: Ephesos 914 veiled head: Smyrna Eurydike(daughterof Lysimachos), 932 FaustinaI, bust: Delphi 590, 591 FaustinaII, bust: Amphipolis468 Femaledeity,seated on throne: Athens-Syros160. Seealso Great Goddess. Female, head: Cisalpine Celts 417, Syracuse 425, Mesembria443, Imbros452, Kythnos841, Tenedos891, Autokane 894, Mytilene 903, Laodikeia972; veiled: Euboian League 614, Eretria 626. See also Nymph, head. Fir tree. SeeTree, fir. Gaius and Lucius,heads: Corinth 678 Galley: Skodra 552, Nikopolis 556, 562, Corinth 693; forepart of: Korkyra571, Seleukos IV 992. Seealso Prow. Gallienus,bust: Perinthos446, ThessalianLeague548(?), Smyrna941 Gallienusand ValerianI, busts:Nikaia 857 Gate with statuesand three arches:Pagai 657 Genius of Corinth: Corinth 688 Germanicus,head: Tanagra601, Corinth 679 Geta, bust: Megara 656, Corinth 720, Sikyon 730, Ephesos 913 Goat, standingor walking:Paros845, Syros847; nursing Zeus in cave: Aigion 733 Goats, two, kneeling: Bottiaia470, PhilipV 511 Gorgoneion:Athens 139, Olbia 433 Grapes,cluster:Athens 233, Korkyra567, 568, Lokrian League 581-585, Euboian League 612, 613, Histiaia 634, Karthaia 833, Ioulis 838, Kythnos 841,
I. INDEXES TO THE CATALOGUE:3. TYPES Hermes head or bust: Sestos 451, Euboian League 615, Antioch 982 seated: Corinth 711, Patrai 741; statue in temple, Patrai742 standing, before thymiaterion: Imbros 452; before tree and altar: Tanagra 603 strikingfallen Panoptes: Chalkis624 walking,with coin sack and caduceus: Athens 358,
369
359
Hero, feeding snake: LokrianLeague 586 Hippocamp: Syracuse426 Homer, seated: Nikaia 857 Horse forepart:Atarneus865, Kyme 897, Seleukiaon the Kalykadnos984; winged, ending in cornucopia: Skepsis890 grazing: Larissa528, 529, AlexandriaTroas 881, 882, 884, Neandria 889 head: Siculo-Punic429, Pharsalos539 hindquarters:Athens 2 running: Thessalonike478 standingbefore palm tree: Siculo-Punic428 stepping or prancing: Maroneia 439, AlexanderIII 489, Gyrton 520, Larissa 526, Magnetes 533, Thessalian League 541,545,546, Elis 750 Horseman: Philip II 485, Kassandros500, Atrax 518, Krannon 522, 523, Larissa527, Macedonian League 515, Sikyon 729; charging or on prancing horse: Pharsalos537, 538, Magnesia on the Maiandros923, 924; crowninghorse: Antigonos Gonatas 509. Seealso Men. Iakchos,standing,holding torch: Athens 117, 188 Incuse square: Athens 1-5, Aigina 658-662, Siphnos 846, Kyzikos866 Isis, standing: Tripolis (Lydia)969. Seealso Serapis and Isis. Isis crown. SeeCrown of Isis. IET: IstrianonLimen 434 Isthmos,standing,holding rudder: Corinth 685, 700 Janus, head: Thessalonike479 Jawbone of boar, and spearhead:Aitolian League 579 Juba I, bust:Juba I 1035 Julia Domna, bust: Augusta Traiana 448, Thessalonike 483, Nikopolis557, Megara 655 Julia Mamea, bust: Deultum 438, Smyrna 940 Julia Titi, bust: Smyrna 936 Julio-Claudianemperor,head: Tanagra 600(?), Parion(?) 871, uncertain 1036 Julius Caesar,head: Corinth 670
K in incuse square: Kranion 757 Kabeirosor Kabeiroi. SeeNike; Pilei;Torch. Kallisto,seated, with child Arkas:Orchomenos809 Kantharos: Athens 141, Peparethos549, Andros 822, Methymna901,902, Teos 942 Karneios, head: Cyrene 1031 Kepheus. SeeSterope,with Athena and Kepheus. King, Persian,running: PersianEmpire 1003 KleopatraVII, bust: KleopatraVII 1019 Kore (Persephone),head: Athens 106(?), 117, SiculoPunic 428, 429, Salamis 642, Kyzikos 867 (Soteira); standingor walking,with torches:Athens 187,213. See alsoDemeter, and Kore;Demeter or Kore. Krater:Judea 1002 Kybele, head: Smyrna 934; riding lion: Nikopolis 557; seated: Samothrace457, Smyrna 936 Lakedaimon,head: Lakedaimon772 Leto, standing,with child Chloris:Argos 787 Libya,head: Cyrenaica 1032 Lion, forepart: Knidos 955; recumbent: Kassandros 499; running: Lysimachos464; standing or walking: CisalpineCelts 417, Miletos 928-930. SeealsoKybele, riding. Lucius.SeeGaius and Lucius. LuciusVerus.SeeVerus. Lyre: Athens 111, Rhegion 420, Sestos 451, Olynthos 472, Thespiai606-608, Megara646,649, Delos 827829, Mytlene 903 Maenad, head: Histiaia 628-635 Male, bearded, nude, standing, with spear and shield: Tanagra 600; head or bust, young: Athens 245, 246, Hephaistia 453, Philip II 485, Alexander III 489, Phalanna 536, Aitolian League 578, 579, Karystos 639. SeealsoYouth. MarcusAurelius,bust or head: Tanagra 603, Pagai 657, Corinth 706-708, Patrai739, Nikomedia 858 Marsyas.SeeAthena, and Marsyas. Maximinus,bust: Magnetes 534 Maximus,bust: Syedra987 Medusa, hair of. SeeSterope. Melikertes,riding dolphin: Corinth 683, 707, 709, 714 Men on horseback:Sillyon 981 Miltiades,with Persiancaptive and trophy:Athens 190 Muse, veiled head with modius: Thespiai 606, 607 Mystic staff: Athens 62, 63; crossed with wheat ear: Athens 154. SeealsoPiglet. Nero head: Thessalonike481, Corinth 690-696, Sikyon 728, 729, uncertain 1036
370
INDEXES standing, on temple podium: Corinth 696; on tribunal orating: Corinth 694; being crowned by Tyche: Corinth 695 Peacock:Samos 951 Pegasos,flying: Corinth 666-668, 683-687, 701, 704; forepart: Corinth 669; walking: Corinth 715. Seealso Bellerophon. Peirene,seated: Corinth 713 Pentagram:Pitane 880 Persephone.SeeKore (Persephone). Perseus,head: PhilipV 513, PhilipV or Perseus514 0 framedby four globules: Phlious 721 Philoktetes,shooting: Lamia 524, 525 Phrixos,ridingram: Halos 521 Piglet, on mystic staff: "Eleusis"38, 48, 49, 51, 55, Athens 39, 40; standing: Athens 63, 86, 106, 232, 243 Piglets,two: Athens 62 Pilei of Dioskouroi or Kaberoi: Athens-Imbros 161, Lakedaimon767, 768, Alexandria1022. SeealsoCornucopia, between;Club, between;Torch,between. Plautilla,bust: Aigina 665, Corinth 717-719, Kleonai 797 Plemochoe: "Eleusis" Athens 72-75, 102-104, 129 61, Plow: Dion 471. SeealsoPriest. Pomegranate:Side 979 Pompey,head: Soloi-Pompeiopolis986 Poppy, between crossed wheat ears: Athens 133, 134, 150 Poseidon head or bust: Brundisium418, Pantikapaion432, Demetrios Poliorketes505, Krannon 522, Korkyra569, 572, Chalkis621, Karystos637, 638, Corinth 674, 675, 700, 704, Troizen 799, Tenos 850 seated: Corinth 671 standing:BoiotianLeague 595, Tenos 851 striding,brandishingtrident: Demetrios Poliorketes 502, 503 SeealsoAthena, and Poseidon. Priestor Priests,plowingwith oxen: Patrai738, Parion(?) 868-871 Prize crown. SeeCrown. Probus,bust: Alexandria1028 ProusiasH, head: Nikomedia861 Prow: Pantikapaion432, Coela 449, Demetrios Poliorketes 504, 505, Magnetes 532, Korkyra568, Megara 643-645, Aigina663, Corinth673, Smyrna938, 939, Knidos 953, 954; in form of boar's head: Nikopolis 555; often with owl on ram: Athens 220, 413. Seeaso Dionysos,standing,herm on; Galley. PtolemyI, head: PtolemyVI 1011, Cyrenaica 1032 PtolemyIII, bust: PtolemyIII 1007 PtolemyVII, head: PtolemyVI 1012 Pyreof Sandon: Tarsos988
Nike head: Athens 107 standing:Philippoi476, AlexanderIII 487, Boiotian League 596, Side 980; prow: Demetrios Poliorketes 502; on globe: Thessalonike481, Corinth 680 walking and/or crowning: Athens 147, 155, 207, 214,215, 409, Thessalonike482, Nikopolis559, 563, Corinth 720, Pergamon 873, SoloiPompeiopolis 986, Alexander I Balas 993; carrying globe: Nikopolis 561; carrying Kabeiros image: Thessalonike483 SeealsoAthena;Zeus. Nilus, reclining:Alexandria1023 Nymph, head: Lamia 525, Larissa 528, 529, Larissa Kremaste 530, Phalanna 536, Euboian League 609, 610, Salamis 640, 641; head facing: Gomphoi 519, Halos 521, Larissa526, 527; seated, on stern of ship: Histiaia632 Obelisk,between dolphins: Megara 645 Octavian. SeeAugustus. Octopus: Eretria627 Olive tree. SeeTree, olive. Owl Double-bodied,standing:Athens 20, 41-43 standing facing: Athens 12, 19, 35, 36, 64, 231, Myrinaand Hephaistia455, 455A standing sideways, head facing: Athens 6-11, 1318, 22-27, 30, 31, 50, 52-54, 57-60, 77, 87, 162-167, 226-230, 414-416, Peparethos550, Medon 574, Thyrrheion575, Lakedaimon769, Tegea 812; on amphora: Athens 32-34, 110, 115, 118-126, 157, 158, 197; Delos (cleruchy) 830; on palm branch: Pergamon875; on prow: Athens 152; on rudder: Athens 71; on thunderbolt: Athens 67, 81, 100. SeealsoTree, olive. standingthree-quarters facing: Athens 28, 69, 70 Owls, two, standing:Athens 12A, 29, 44-47, 56, 65; on thunderbolt:Athens 99, 156 Palm, branch:Judea 1001; tree: Delos 825; with horse: Siculo-Punic428 Pan erectingtrophy:AntigonosGonatas507, 508 head, bearded: Syros847 head, young: Bottiaia470, ArkadianLeague 801 seated: Megalopolis808 Panoptes.SeeHermes, striking.
II. INDEXES TO THE CATALOGUE:3. TYPES Quiver: Argos 785. SeealsoBow, and club. Race torch. SeeTorch. Ram, forepart:Samothrace458, Klazomenai921; head: Aigina663, Pellene743; recumbent:Klazomenai922; standing:Kranion 756; walking: Klazomenai920. See alsoPhrixos,riding. RheskouporisVI, bust: 853 Rhodos, head: Rhodes 963, 965 RhoimetalkesI, head: 465 River god, horned head: Gela 422 Roma, head in Corinthianhelmet: Cyrenaicaand Crete 1033; turreted bust: Corinth 698, Pergamon 877, Perperene979, Hermokapelia967 Rose: Kythnos 842, Rhodes 959-965 Rudder: Corinth 702, 703. SeealsoIsthmos;Owl; Tyche. Salonina, bust: Nikopolis563 Saloninus,bust: Ephesos 915 Sandon, SeePyre of. Satyr,young head: Pantikapaion430, 431 Senate, bust: Pergamon877, Hermokapelia967; veiled: Corinth 697, 699 SeptimiusSeverus,bust: Megara 654, Corinth713-715, Boura 734, Tenea 744, Mothone 764, Argos 786, Methana 798, Tegea 816, Ephesos 912(?) Serapis, bust: Smyrna 939, Tripolis 969, Alexandria 1030; and Isis,jugate heads: Perinthos445 Serpent, fish-tailed:Pautalia444 SeverusAlexander,bust: Aigai 893 Shell. SeeDolphin and. Shield, Macedonian: Macedonian Kings 497, 498,506; Boiotian: Boiotian League 592, 596, 597; of Ajax, with sheathed sword: Salamis640-642 Ship, Argo with rowers: Magnetes 534. SeealsoGalley; Prow;Themistokles. Silphiumplant: Cyrene 1031 Sirios.SeeDog. Slinger:Ainianes 516, 517 Smyrna. SeeAmazon. Snake, basket with: Athens 221; coiled: Athens 219, Epidauros 790, Pergamon 872; on staff: Messene 762. SeealsoAmphoras;Eagle, standing,holding;Hero, feeding;Tree, olive; Triptolemos. Soteira. SeeKore. Spearhead: Epeirote League 565, Aitolian League 577, SeealsoJawboneof boar. Sphinx, seated: Athens 153, Chios 943-950, Perge978 Square.SeeIncuse square;Vine. Staff,mystic. SeeMystic staff;Piglet. Stag, kneeling: Ephesos 906; recumbent: Phanagoria 852; standing: Athens-Lemnos 159, Knossos 819A,
371
Ephesos 911, 913, Magnesia on the Maiandros925, Lycian League 975, Amyntas 989, Cyrenaica and Crete 1034; walking: Ephesos 912. SeealsoHerakles, slaying;Torch,between. Standards,military: Philippoi 476. See also Altar, with eagle. Star with eight rays: Ouranopolis 473, Karthaia 835, Koressia836, Miletos 928, AlexanderJannaios998 Sterope, receiving hair of Medusa with Athena: Tegea 814; with Athena and Kepheus: Tegea 815 Sword, sheathed:Amisos 854. SeealsoShield. Syrinx:ArkadianLeague 801, 802 Table, agonistic, with amphora, owl, head of Athena or statuette of Athena Parthenos, and usually wreath and/or palm branch:Athens 184,192-194,281,282, 386-400 Telesphoros:Athens 218, 242 Temple distyle,with statueof Athena or Hermes: Patrai739, 742 hexastyle:Corinth 681, 682, Smyrna 937 octastyle:BithynianLeague 856,Juba I 1035 side and front,with statueof Apollo: Delphi 590 tetrastyle:Corinth 696, 699 SeealsoAmazon, holding. Theater of Dionysos: Athens 376 Themistokles,standingon galley: Athens 182, 183, 278, 279, 374; statue facing altar and slain bull: Magnesia on the Maiandros926 Theseus bust: Athens 232-241 attackingwith club: Athens 200, 208, 209, 373, 408 drivingbull: Athens 180, 273 and Minotaur:Athens 189, 201, 275, 276, 372 raisingrock: Athens 181, 274, 371, Troizen 800 SeealsoHeraklesor Theseus. Thunderbolt: Syracuse 427, Elis 751, Pergamon 874, Metropolis 927, Myndos 957, Selge 983. See also Athena;Owl; Owls; Zeus. Thymiaterion,between cupping vessels: Epidauros789. SeealsoDionysos, seated before; Hermes, standingbefore. Thyrsos:Andros823; and club: Thebes 605 Thyrsoi,crossed:Chios 950 Tiberius, head: Thessalian League 542, Tanagra 602, Corinth 680, Knossos 819A, Parion(?)868 Tiberiusand Drusus,heads: Parion(?)870 Torch Hermione 792, 794A, Elaia 895; between stags: Ephesos908
372
INDEXES Vase, with one handle: Corinth 672, Kyme 896-898; with palm: Corinth677. SeealsoAmphora;Kantharos; Krater;Peirene. Verus, bust: Pautalia 444, Corinth 709-711, Ephesos 911 Vine, branch: Judea 1002; with grapes: Histiaia 628; with grapesin square:Maroneia439 Volusian, bust: Alexandria Troas 885, Antioch on the Orontes 997 Wagon, drawnby mules: Ephesos 914 Warrior, charging:Mamertinoi424, Tegea 813; slinging: Ainianes516, 517; standing:Mamertinoi423 Wheat ear: Euboian League 615, Neandria 888 Wheat ears: Athens 132, 135, 136, 239, 247, Agrippa I 1000; in vase or basket,Athens 235. SeealsoPoppy. Wheel, with four spokes:Athens 3, IstrianonLimen 434, Mesembria442, Akanthos466 Wolf,head: Argos 781; at bay: Argos 783 Wreath,surrounding ANTIKAIin wreath: Thessalonike480 X : Achaian League 745 BAZIAElIj:|(IAinnlOY: PhilipV 512, 513
race torch,boundwith fillet:Hephaistia454, Aptera 817; between pilei ofKabeiroi: Hephaistia453 SeealsoArtemis;Demeter. Torches,two: Athens 238, 244, Hermione 794. Seealso Hekate. Trajan, charging on horseback: Nikopolis 553; head or bust: Thessalonike482, Nikopolis 553, Attaleia 977, Alexandria1021 Trajan Decius, bust: Nikomedia 859, 860, Alexandria Troas884 Tranquillina,bust: Kyme 900, Samos 952 Tree fir: Skepsis890 olive, with owl: Athens 211, 410 with owl and amphora: Athens 195, 196, 377385, 411 with owl, amphora, and entwiningsnake: Athens 224, 225 SeealsoAthena, standing;Athena, and Poseidon. Trident:Orthe 535, BoiotianLeague592, 597, Karystos 638, Corinth 667, 703, Troizen 799, Mantineia 806, 807, Mylasa 956; between dolphins: Byzantion 437, Tenos 850. See also Dolphin; Athena, and Poseidon; Poseidon. Tripod: Athens 112, 114, 138, 222, 223, 236, 412: 501, Dyrrachion551, EpeiPhilippoi475, Kassandros rote League 564, Orchomenos 598, Tanagra 602, Histiaia 633, Megara 647, 650, 651, Sikyon 724, Zakynthos759, Messene 760, Argos784, Andros824, Kyzikos 867, Smyrna 932, 933; between dolphins: Megara 644. SeealsoApollo, seated. Triptolemos,between Demeter and Kore: Athens 177; in or mountingsnake-drawn chariot: "Eleusis" 48, 38, 49, 51, 55, Athens 39, 40, 116, 127, 128, 154, 155, 168, 198, 206, 271,368,369,407 Trophy:Aitolian League 578, Boiotian League 593 Turtle:Aigina 658-661 Tyche bust, turreted:Corinth 698 standing, with cornucopia and rudder: Nikopolis 554, Boura 734, Hermione 795, Samos 952; and scepter: Nikopolis 558; and phiale: Corinth 705, Tenea 744; and phiale at altar:Megara654, Corinth 710, 717 SeealsoCity-goddess; Nero, standing,being crowned by. Umbrella:AgrippaI 1000
Valerian.SeeGallienusand Valerian.
II. INDEXES TO THE CATALOGUE:3. TYPES 531-533, Dyrrachion 551, Skodra552, Chalkis 622, Megara 650, Aigina 664, Aigion 731, 733, AchaianLeague745, Elis748-752, Thouria 765, Lakedaimon 775, ArkadianLeague 802, Megalopolis 808, Tenos 848, Pitane 880, Autokane 894, Mytilene 904, Erythrai919, Smyrna 938, Myndos 957, Akmoneia 970, Apameia 971, Antioch on the Orontes 995, Kings of Egypt 1005, 1006, 1009, 1010, 1013-1018; bearded,young: Tenos 849, 851 seated, with scepter and eagle: Athens 356, Lysimachos 461, Alexander III 488, Philip III 496; with scepter and Nike: Athens 263, Megara 653,
373
Patrai 740, Antioch on the Orontes 995; with scepteron rocks: Gomphoi 519 standing with arms extended: Elis 755 sacrificingat altar:Athens 175, 357 with scepter and eagle: Adramyteion864, Assos 886, Aigai 892,893 with scepter and Nike: Achaian League 746 with lowered thunderbolt,Athens 78-80, 148 striding,throwingthunderbolt:Athens 82-84, 9097, 137, Aigion 731, Elis 754, Messene 761 SeealsoGoat, nursingZeus in cave.
374
INDEXES
Index 11.4
TYPES SYMBOLS ANDADJUNCT Amphora:Athens 28, 69, 77, 92, 93, Corinth667, Chios 950 Anchor: Athens 32 Aplustre:Athens 73, Histiaia632, PtolemyXI 1017 Ares, holding scepter: Corinth 667 38, Astragal:"Eleusis" Ephesos 906 505 Axe, double: Demetrios Poliorketes Bee: PhilipIII 496 Bird: PhilipV 510 Boukranion:"Eleusis" Athens 169, 249, Thyrrheion 38, 575 Branch:Myrina 455, Philippoi475 Caduceus: Athens 124, Thasos 459, Thessalonike478, Samos 951, Herod Archelaos999 Cicada: Athens 143, 158 Club: Abdera 435, Euboian League 613, Histiaia 634, Argos 784, Mytilene 903 Cbrnucopia:Athens 59, 84, 91, 92, Coela 449, Chalkis 616, PtolemyIII 1007, PtolemyVI and VIII 1010 Crayfish:Apollonia Pontica436 Crescent: Thessalonike482, AlexanderIII 488, Antigonos Gonatas 509, Ephesos914 38, Dolphin: "Eleusis" Byzantion437, Lysimachos461, Boiotian League 592, 597, Rhodes 960, Ptolemy VI 1012 Eagle: Athens 82-84, 90-93 Elephant:Alexandria1023 61 Eleusisring: Athens 43, 44, 60, 72, "Eleusis" Flower:Athens 123, Antigonos Gonatas507(?) Galley: Corinth 690 Grapes,cluster:Philippoi475, Kassandros500, Aitolian League 579, Chalkis 618, Histiaia 631, Patrai 737, Chios 944, Rhodes 959; two clusters: Histiaia 628, 629. SeealsoVine branch. Greave:LokrianLeague 584 Griffin,running: Corinth 667 Helmet: Athens 88, Antigonos Gonatas507 Herm: Chalkis618 Horse'shead: Athens 88 Isis crownon stand: PtolemyXII 1018 38 Ivy branchwith leaves: "Eleusis" leafi "Eleusis" AlexanderIII 488, Demetrios Po38, Ivy liorketes503, LokrianLeague: 584, Boiotian League 592 Lion, forepart:Lysimachos461 Lyre:Athens 87, Mamertinoi423, Lysimachos462 Mystic staff:Athens 41, 95, 119 Octopus: Akragas421 Owl: Athens 74, 76, 78, 149 Palm: Patrai735 Pedum:AntigonosGonatas 507 38 Pig'shead: "Eleusis" of the Dioskouroi: Athens 94, 126, Phokaia Pilei, two, 931, Chios 944, Antioch on the Orontes 995 Pileus:Athens 90 Pine cone: Corinth 667 Plemochoe:Athens 39, 45, 70, 91, 116, 117, 120, 146 Poppies,two: Chios 948 Poppy:Athens 128, 138 Poppyhead, between two wheat ears: Athens 118 Prow:Athens 79, Argos 785, Chios 948, 949 Quiver: Lysimachos461 Race Torch. SeeTorch. 38 Ram's head: "Eleusis" Rose: Chalkis618 Rosebud:Philip III 496 Rudder:Athens 71, Thasos 459 Scepter: Samos 951 Shell: "Eleusis" Akragas421 38, Shield: PtolemyII 1005 Snake: Athens 89, 151, 157, Atarneus865 Spearhead: Mamertinoi 424, Lysimachos464, Alexander III 488 Staff.SeeMystic staff. Star:Athens82, 85,401, Thasos 459, AlexanderHI 488, Magnetes 531, Euboian League 612, 613, Chalkis 616, 619, Histiaia 632, Karthaia 833, Paros 845, Magnesia on the Maiandros 925, Miletos 929, 930, Chios 949; between crescents:Athens 97 Stars,two: Chios 947 Sword: Euboian League 613
II. INDEXES TO THE CATALOGUE:4. SYMBOLS AND ADJUNCT TYPES Thunderbolt:Athens 67, 81, 99, 100, 138, Histiaia632, Corinth 667, Arkadian League 802, Antioch on the Orontes 995 Thymiaterion:Euboian League 613(?) Thyrsos: Athens 96, 125: Patrai737; with fillet and bell: Amisos 855 Tongs: Hephaistia 455A Torch: Alexander III 487, 495, Philip III 496, Corinth 667 Trident: Antigonos Gonatas 507, Boiotian League 594, Histiaia 632, Megara 643, Argos 785, Ptolemy II 1006; between dolphins: Lysimachos463 Tripod: Athens 121, Lysimachos461, Boiotian League 594, Megara 643, Corinth 667, Messene 761 Triskeles:Salamis641(?)
375
Trophy: Euboian League 613(?), Chalkis616, 617, Histiaia 630 Tuna: Kyzikos866, 867 Tyche, holding staff:Athens 34; voting: Athens 33 Vine branch, with grape cluster: Mytilene 904. Seealso Grapes. Wheat ear: Athens 58, 80, 83, 89, 137, 152, Leukas 573, Euboian League 614, Neandria 889 Wheat ears, two: Athens 122 Wheat kernel: Athens 35, 36, Gela 422 Wreath:Athens 57, Nikopolis559, Chalkis618, Corinth 667, Thouria 765
376
INDEXES
PLATES
PLATE 1
_ 3a
3b
3c
4a
4b
i
* x.t
LO
8a
8b
Ud
I l~~~~~~-
8e
1Oa
lOb
lOc
lOd
1Oe
lOf
lOg
lOh
lOi
lOm
11
d 12d
PLATE 2
ATHENIAN
B.C.
2e
12f
12g
12h
12i
12j
12A
9
13a
13b 13b
_0 13c
d134 13d
13e
13f
13g
13h
14a14? 14b
14c
**^**^*?
1 ***~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
15a
15b
15c
15d
15e
15f
15g
16b
16d
16g
16h
16i
161
16n
16o
16p
17
18
PLATE 3
19a
19b
19c
19d
19e
19f
19g
19h
20a
t-
20b
21a
' t-*
22a
22b
* 0*
29a
23
24a
26
28a
28b
29b
29c
30
31
32
33
34
37
PLATE 4
ATHENIAN
B.C.
38d
38h
38i
38n
38q do - qb
38r
39a
39b
39c
39e
40
41a
41b
41c
42a
42b
42c
42d
42e
42f
43a
43b
43c
43d
3d
k3e
I.
43f
43g
43h
43i
I.
43j
43k
431
43m
*?
[41-43]a [41-43]b
44a
44b
44c
44d
44e
[41-43]c
[41-43]d
[41-43]e
[41-43]f
[41-43]g
44f
45a
45b
,45c
=_45d
_45e
5f wwe
46a
_ 46b
46c
PLATE 5
46d
46e
46f
6g
46h
46i
6j
46k
7a
47b
48a
8b
48c
48d
48e
48f
48g
49a
49b
49c
50a
50b
0c
O50d
50e
50f
50g
*
h50h
***** **
O5i 50j O5k 51a
5b
51c
51d
51e
1f
51g
52a
52b
52c
52d
52e
53a
3b
53c
53d
53e
53f
53h
54a
54b
54d
54e
54f
PLATE 6
55a *
55b @
55c
55d
55e
55f
55g
56a
56b
56 c
*/
*56e *56d
6f
56g
57a
*57b
57c
57d
7e
57 f
a 58. *58b
58c
58d
58e
59a
59b
59c
59d
59 e
60
[57-601b
62a
62b
62c
62d
63
64d
64e
65a
65b
65e
66d
i7b
PLATE 7
67c
I67d
67e
67i
67j
_67k
671
67m
67n
670
67p
68a
_ 68b
68c
mm_68d
69a
69c
69d
69e
-'
69f
69g
69h
70a
70b
_ 70c
71a
_ 71b
_71c
id
71e
7f
0e
73d -74a
73a
73b
-=
73c
74b
PLATE 8
ATHENIAN
B.C.
76a 6
7Y 6
76b
76c
76d
76e
77a
77b
78a
78c
79a
79b
79c
79d
79e
79f
Oa
81a
81b
81c
Ble
If
81g
82a
82b
_c
82cd
82e
83a
83b
_83c
83d
3e
85b
85c
85g
86a
PLATE 9
87a
87b
87c
87d
88a
88b
88c
-Y
89a
--
89b
89c
90a
90b
91a
Em_ 91b
91c
91d
92
93a
93b
93c
94a
94b
...
94c
_.
94d
94e
94f
95a
95b
95c
96a
96b
97a
97b
'
97c
97d
97e
7 97f
uur 97g
9 97h
[82-84, 90-97]a
98a
98c
99a
99b
99c
99d
99e
PLATE 10
99i
99j
99k
991
99m
99n __99
(99p
1OOa
1OOb -"lOOc
1OOd =1 lOOe
--
lOOf
Ola _
lOlb
_lOlc
_10ld
Ole
102a
? Ir
103a
103b
103c = 103d
_103f
103g
104a
04b
105a
105b
105c
105d
105e
105f
106a
*.' .
r 106e 06f " 07e 107f
.06b #
06c
106d
106g
**
108a 108bWO18c
108Od
08e*
08f
109a
109b109c
llOa
llOb
Oc lOd
.9.
ll @l@ 1alllld
e IC
hId
*i-112
3a
3b 113b
i4a
@ 0
ATHENIAN
B.C.
PLATE 11
.-
115a
_. 115b
_dk_ 115c
_m-^ 115d
115e
115f
115R
117a
118a
118b
118c
118d
118e
119a
119b
119c
119d
119e
120
121a
122a
122b
122c
122d
123
124a
124b
124c
O 124d
125
126a
126b
126c
126d
126e
PLATE 12
ATHENIAN
B.C.
I
___
127a
'
~127b
127c
127d
127f
128a
128b
128c
128e
I
gm128f 128g 129a _a, 129b 129c _ 129d 129e 130a 130b
131b
131c
131d
131e
131f
131g
133a
_ 133b
133c
134a
135b _135c
135d
135e
135f
135g
I3
L (
136b
136c
[133, 134]a
137a
137b
137c
]137d
137e
137f
137g
_m-- 138a
3"
138b
138c
138d
138e
138f
138g
ATHENIAN
B.C.
PLATE 13
139a
139b
139c
139d
139e
139g
140a
140b
140e
141a
141b
141c
141d
142a
142b
142c
142d
142e
143a
_.-
143b
143c
143d
143e
143f
- 143g
144a
144b
144c
144d
144e
144f
144g
'
144h
145a
145b
145c
146a
147a
147b
147e
PLATE 14
ATHENIAN
B.C.
150a
150b
150c
150d
150e
150f
151a
151b
_-151c
151d
_,p 151e
151f
[149/151]a
L52a
152b
t52d
152e
152f
152g
153a
153b
153c
153d
153e
153f
153g
154a
t54b
154c
154d
154e
155b
ATHENIAN
AFTER CHRIST
PLATE 15
157a
157b
157c
157d
157e
157f
158a
158b
158c
158d
158e
158f
159a
159b
159A
160a
\ I
II
160b
160c
160d
161a
161b
161c
161d
162a
162b
163a
163b
163c
163d
163e
163f
164a
166a
166b
167a
167b
1_
167c
PLATE 16
169a
171a
172a
175a
I74
176a
178a
179a
181a
182a
182b
182c
183a
184a
185a
186a
186b
188a
I
____ommp
194a
PAE1 17 PLATE
-qqmm"198
199a
199b
200
201
202a
203a
204a
204b
205a
206a
20Gb0
209a
210a
211a
2llb
2c 21C
21Ile
212a
214a
215a
216a
217a
217b
219a
220a
22Gb
220c
221a
221b
222a
223a
223b
224a
224b
226a
22Gb
226c
226d
226e
226f
226g
227a,
227b
228a
229a
29b
229c
230a
231a
232a
233a
234a
234b
234c
237a
237b
237c
238a
240a
24Gb
240c
ATHENIAN
AFTER CHRIST
248a
248b
248c
248d
248e
248f
253
W"~ 254a -
MOP'255a
256a
ME" 257a
258a
260a
_...s
261a
262a
263a
264a
_m"265a
266
i_
267a
268a
269a
270
271a
272a
!73a
275a
276a
277a
278a
ATHENIAN
AFTER CHRIST
PLATE 19
279a
280a
280b
280c
281a
281b
_C=_
283a
283b
-s.o
VOJJC
iO_
283d
,",
284a
284b
284c
l-
284f
284g
285aI
LqI
OQ9'7 / a
288a
289a
293
297a
298a
99a
299b
300a
301a
302a
305a
306a
307a
PLATE 20
ATHENIAN
AFTER CHRIST
308a
311a
312a
313a
314a
315
316
317
318a
318b
318c
319a
321a
322a
331a
334a
336
337
340a
341a
343a
__
345a
348a
350a
_ loon-
351a
352a
353a
354a
355a
357
358a
359a
360
361a
ATHENIAN _lAM&k
AFTER CHRIST
PLATE 21
"d
362
363
364
365a
367b
368a
370a
371
372a
372b
374a
375a
375c
376a
377a
377b
378a
378b
380a
381a
382a
382b
383a
383b
386a
387a
~"00'387b
392a
392b
394
397
401a
401b
PLATE 22 -.0pslooks-
ATHENIAN BRONZE, 3RD CENTURY AFTER CHRIST. ITALY, SICILY, THRACE PLATE22
dom.-401c
403a
404a
*.9VM
405a
~,403b
-m,406a
408a
409a
409b
410a
410b
410c
412
413a
414a
415
416a
416b
419
,34a
439a
441a
149
THRACE, MACEDONIA
PLATE 23
w454a
455a
455b
456b
456c
456d
468
469
472
t75
l eS
- 476a
480
487
488a
488b
488c
488d
488e
I S.
492a 488f 488g 488i 490a 1 493 496a
497
500c
501
502a.
502b
503
504a
504b
PLATE 24
MACEDONIA,
THESSALY, EPEIROS
505
. 507a
507b
507c
507e
507f
507k
5071
507m
507n
508a
508b
509a
509b
509c
509d
521
523
528
529a
531
532a
536a
536b
537 37
539 539
540a
540b
541a
546
be
549
551a
552
553
554
555 559
PLATE 25
572
573a
574
575
578
579a
580b
581a
584a
589
592c
594
595a
595b
595c
595d
597a
__ 600
601a
602a
602b
605a
605b
= 606a
606b
607a
,610
L612
613k -m
6131
613m
614a
614b
616a
616d
;18b
618g
620g
620j
620k 622
PLATE 26
W627
629a
632a
632b
632c
632d
632e
632h
332i
632j
632k
632o
633
634a
640c
WOd
Ii4Oe
640f
641
642
643a
643b
643c
643e
643g
643h
644a
644d
644e
644f
-644g
645Aa
645Ab
645Ac
645Ad 645Ba
645Bb
646b
647b
648b
650
6b51 4 60 a6 85 ~6
56 652
5 655
t\IGINA,
__ CORINTH
PLATE 27
658a
658b
659
660
661
662a
662b
662c
663a
664
665
666
667a
667c
667i
6671
6670
668a
671
672a
677
681
686a -----
686b ----
-,,.- ..
687a
..
688
--lW
iQ1a
vV .,,,
691c
692a
693a
709
710
711
713
716
717
PLATE 28
PELOPONNESOS
718
720
721a
723a
723b
723c
724a
724b
725
727a
729
731
733
734
735a
742a
743a
744
745
746a
747
750a
755
759a
762a
765
773
776a
777
782a
786
787
791
792a
795
811
812a
812b
PLATE 29
817
818
820
822
823a
827a
828d
830
831b
832a
833a
835
837a
838
855a
858
859
862
866
870
883
885
888
892a
893
898
PLATE 30
903a
913
915
923
924
I
926
928
936
940
941
944c
944e
944k
0
954 955 956 959 960 961 963b 966
PLATE 31
969a
973a
978
979b
992
994
998
999
1001
1002a
1003
1004
1007a
lOlOa
1011
1015a 013b
1016b
1017
022
1032
PLATE 32
MODERN
IMITATIONS.
COIN BLANKS
a Modern imitations
d. Chopped coin blanks and rod segment from the "Mint":Group 1 (B 1046)
1242
3 1243
B 1237 -'
B 1238
B 1239
"'B 1245
B 1244
B 1068a
B 1068b
PLATE 33
b. Period VI rejectsand sawn coin blanks from the Rectangular Peribolos (Deposit I 1:3): B 1254
PLATE 34
8. 99
@10
@1
12
14
15
16
17
*9
20
21
22
23
24
*5
31
32
33
34
Coins from the original floor packing of Room 7 (Deposit U 13:2a) ca. A.D. 100
.....
PLAN A
PLATE 35
c
2
400
A I B C DI E
F G IH
II
K L
N IO PIQ I R S T U VW I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
X Y
1 2 3 4
CORA
:!
EXC
AVATIO3M
3
'..
B
.'
.
/ ' i-
BH~ftr~Y~~ QR
//
ATHEI NS
4
5 6
//,I /r7
sP
*? *
..
!.
Hr
.
/1
-t St/'
.,
^
I
--t
5 6 7
1/'/ i
t
7
/ T
z4,
Y '\N
i L R OA
7 8 9 10
+200 /
"
H'
/
/
//
/'
//
Kt
J
......: '..-/-^ '.,'
j....-..
^'
\
/
IB /
/ 40T
8 9
E<E 1
/
i
11 12
i f
no
/
/
f' /
! /f
-i
AN /'
0i?
10 11 '12 13
.'
\ \ '
% BB
-'
H-'i
13
/,
K
' -"
./ 4/
iii
....
................--.
14 15
I+1u00u
A ]
F,OPA I
QS
-<I i,
?
AA X
I JOTo ST
'-7
/
/
(.
/ ROMAN AGORA
14 15 16
IIA
16 17
/ E
n//
\-NN NN /
'""N
~.x
i '
0
/'/
's ?2.~/ i
'i1
\^
17 18
OIj -
\HH"' AA-\ i
i!'\_
AP
19
20 21 22' 23 24 25
Ao \
n
'AP E_OAG S AP EE
'
\_:__ 1..-ikj
.,
,L
20 21 22 23 24 25
'^t 1
L
l
X,0~ 1-1
'?
o
i
,[ /:
-'N/
\J
,-
I _ I s
tr.?,t,
._
26 27 28
\20E
0I
26 27
I~~~~~~~~~~~
I/ / /
i/
ii /// -
\
80 t
A1E
)o
1C 0
)i 0
28
29 --
2020
\. o 40 \ 6
ii I
I
0
' \
2( 1?
....-
mete O0
P P
-O
<i
RI.
^01X ACROPOLIS
?IL
T
>g3
RC.
29 30
-vIIV
A|B
i D HI| C|D
/
E E F F G
/
L M
I
N
f
LIMIi
J_
IQ
R I S
U | V I W I X I Y
ANDERSON 1991
'
1 ' ::
PLATE 36
PLAN B
D 2
H '.,,
K STOA
L ~.,
0
:
S
2
\
A
:j
|ATHEWNIAN
2 N D -C ENTUY
AGORA
A.D.
4
a,,e..
|8WELL
5
300m ,/
,E_
. 5
:"i
ARSENAL
I '
: .../:::
AN-;
T +- *. PHSILIPs_ ?
HOUSES
.r^
uN.':
'-,
5
< , ^^^L,*
i
I
STOA
*OF .
r
A t rheD
j/' y^^^0^
L
8
HEPH iSTI
L_t *
* ?
: :% ;,:b, i?
'X
517
h J /T r pI-' /
t `"^.:: ; ..
.;*.''',,:-
i.IMONOPTEROS
.... ...
q '
;:E ... ?
//
9
0 0 . . . , ;
*** *'; -
10
D ODE1ONo"AGRIPPA o -;::',,, ? ??~_~~ ,: ?: ~ ? ^ 3 :'I'.'i/?V:' --i tl^i~ r ____ Mr---^____ ^ ^ ^=__ -- I' 12::]?
'" h-ATTAL
oo~~~~
11
11 B /LEUROO S.WTEh
A..
...
12
PVgIRAEUS
V-'y
r-*;%'*':':*'*:* ,
PN O
MIDDLE STOA
13
!l^%
t~:.2 :.?: bIA> :
14
1:?'
':
;"T"
SOUTH
SOUTH t
SQUARE
STOA II I
S L<., _'A
"^ffi^-te^
%.^
:;
\-
.^^,,!:.,{ :.T:
i'-' i : HOUSE :
T:N s.
15
PIRAEVUS
w. J . 't..-A... llD~~~~I-
.:??.:-% aM j , ;**;^^\V :
? ^~~~~~~~~'. rf^
I:: 16
?:i?':' ,:.".l
;zer4-s<Si&U ' :. ! - .' ''R''-', ' . ...GAT....-E..., ,~.:.:.'.':.',:...-5..::,..:.:'; I,.":':';'2-{'/::'c:-:- ,., :..,.....:':. :::'? . .. , ; t ;' ?':,; ;; ?;, ?? ' ' -'r' ':`. -;'?
?? ?????
T S---TSOUTH l
III STOA . I - k- ,
?
e
'
B
16
.' SHRiNE
*-.FOUNTAIN Hi
I 1f
17 ,'
.~S,E
.? S. 7 PP '''.'''ql'lli I~~~~~~??.?
S OUSE
-\ PRE-ROMAN HOUSES 80
# 1t- .
17
18
20
18
- --
19 J D | I
E F
I..
rmFT-+ |
0 P
2( Ometers f III
ACROPOLIs
19
f`