You are on page 1of 6

In The District Court of the United States For the Eastern District of Oklahoma Pat Dobson, an individual, and

Donnie Dobson, an individual, plaintiffs, vs. Ronald A. White, et al., defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No.6:06-cv-00479- WFD

Pat Dobson and Donnie Dobson notice this Court under authority of F.R.E. r 201(d) as to the following facts, David E. OMeila and Cathryn D. McClanahan have conspired to, and in fact, have committed nonfeasance, misfeasance, malfeasance, misprision, and OMeila and McClanahan have also violated: 18 U.S.C. 3, 371, 913, 1001, & 1503 warranting remand of OMeila and McClanahan to the Attorney General of the United States for termination of OMeila and McClanahana employment and considered criminal prosecution NOTE: for all notices, see docket entries 253, 254, and 255 Notice of nonfeasance 1. It is a fact, material and relevant to these proceedings, that McClanahan was required, on May 22nd 2007, to proffer McClanahans required oaths; it is a fact that McClanahan failed or refused to proffer McClanahans required oaths. Further, it is a fact that McClanahan has violated 18 U.S.C. 913 by impersonating a federal officer. Finally, in regard to the nonfeasance of McClanahan, at all times McClanahan was acting in conspiracy with David E. OMeila to subvert justice, a federal crime. Notice of misfeasance 2. It is a fact, that McClanahan, after proffering McClanahans required oath, was appointed to enter an appearance in Eastern Federal District of Oklahoma case numbered as 6:06-cv-00479 for the purposes of: (1). Assisting private attorney generals Pat and Donnie

Dobson in prosecuting this civil RICO, and (2). Making inquiry into verified criminal conduct by defendants in this instant action including Grand Jury proceedings to determine whether, based on a grand jurys determination of probable case, to add criminal RICO charges to the now confessed civil RICO offenses. It is a fact that instead of acting in a manner consistent with the May 22nd 2007 directive, McClanahan willfully and knowingly attempted to rescue Mr. Seay. It is a fact that OMeila conspired with McClanahan to subvert justice by falsely claiming that the referenced appointment authorized McClanahan to represent Judge Seay. NOTE: OMeilas SPECIAL APPEARANCE BY THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ON BEHALF OF FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE FRANK H. SEAY violates law as: (1). There is nothing in the record to validate OMeilas claim that Frank H. Seay is a federal judge, (2). The appointment letter does not even mention Frank H. Seay, and (3). OMeilas putative reason that McClanahan is authorized to represent Mr. Seay is 28 U.S.C. 515; however, reading of 28 U.S.C. 515, cursorily or in exhausted depth, does not support the contention that 28 U.S.C. 515 has any relation to Mr. Seay whatsoever, to wit: 28 USC Sec. 515 01/03/05

TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE PART II - DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CHAPTER 31 - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Sec. 515. Authority for legal proceedings; commission, oath, and salary for special attorneys -STATUTE(a) The Attorney General or any other officer of the Department of Justice, or any attorney specially appointed by the Attorney General under law, may, when specifically directed by

the Attorney General, conduct any kind of legal proceeding, civil or criminal, including grand jury proceedings and proceedings before committing magistrate judges, which United States attorneys are authorized by law to conduct, whether or not he is a resident of the district in which the proceeding is brought.

Notice of malfeasance 3. It is a fact, material and relevant to these proceedings, that McClanahan, conditioned on proffering McClanahans required oaths, was to assist Pat and Donnie Dobson and making inquiry to determine whether a grand jury would return sufficient indictments to turn this case into a criminal RICO, engaged in a pattern of malfeasance intended to obstruct justice. Notice of misprision 4. It is a fact that McClanahan had a duty to conduct an investigation into the criminal misconduct of the defendants in this instant case. It is a fact that David E. OMeila and Cathryn D. McClanahan knew and understood that substantial violations of federal criminal statutes had occurred, yet OMeila and McClanahan failed to report the crimes they had knowledge of to a judicial officer and further relieved, comforted, and assisted Mr. Seay, a confessed and of-record offender, in order to hinder or prevent his (Mr. Seays) apprehension, trial, and punishment.

Combined notice under authority of F.R.E. r 201(d) and 18 U.S.C. 4 5. The following adjudicative facts are of-record: (1). May 22nd 2007, Peter T. McSwain, appointed Cathryn D. McClanahan to enter appearance in Eastern District of Oklahoma case number 6:06-cv-00479. McClanahan, in the appointment, was required to proffer oaths of office. (i).

McClanahan failed or refused to make the required oaths part of the record. (ii). Cathryn D. McClanahan was required by the appointment to represent the United States in civil and criminal proceedings including Grand Jury proceedings. David E. OMeila and Cathryn D. McClanahan falsely represented that McClanahans appointment was a directive to represent individual Frank H. Seay. (2). The combined conduct of OMeila violated 18 U.S.C. 3 as the conspired to conduct of OMeila and relieved, comforted and assisted Frank H. Seay to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial, and punishment. (3). The combined conduct of OMeila violated 18 U.S.C. 371 as the conspired to conduct of OMeila defrauded the U.S. Department of Justice of resources for the unauthorized benefit of a private individual, Frank H. Seay. (4). The combined conduct of OMeila violated 18 U.S.C. 913 as nothing has been entered into the record to verify that Cathryn D. McClanahan has taken the required oaths to perform as a Special Attorney. (5). The combined conduct of OMeila violated 18 U.S.C. 1001 as OMeila and McClanahan submitted false documents into the record in these proceedings. (6). The combined conduct of OMeila violated 18 U.S.C. 1503 as the false documents submitted by OMeila and McClanahan had the intended purpose of obstructing the due course of justice.

Prepared and submitted by:________________________________________________ Pat Dobson Donnie Dobson 415 W. Cherokee Wagoner, Oklahoma 74467 (918) 485-4554 Certificate of service I, Donnie Dobson, certify that ______________,____, 2007, I mailed a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing mandatory notice of adjudicative facts to: Peter T. McSwain U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys Room 8017, Bicentennial Building 600 E. Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Thomas M. Askew Address Address William G. James Address Address Brett D. Cable Address Address Eric D. Janzen Address Address Ron Wright Address Address James R. McClure Address Address Ronald A. White C/O courthouse address

Chris Collins Address Address Cathryn D. McClanahan 110 West Seventh Street, Suite 300 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119-1013 ______________ Donnie Dobson Copies to: Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States (or acting A.G.) U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Congressman John Conyers, Jr. 2615 West Jefferson Trenton, Michigan 48183 Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Chair Judicial Conduct and Disability Act Study Committee Supreme Court of the United States One First Street N.E. Washington, D.C. 20543
Governor Brad Henry 2300 North Lincoln, Room 212

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 The Federal Bureau of Investigation Media

You might also like