Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AAKASHDEEP - PGP/14/126, AMEYA - PGP/14/004, ARIFUDDIN - PGP/14/014, EMILIA - IE/14/05, GERHARD - IE/14/06, GOUTHAM - PGP/14/143, KUMARESAN - PGP/14/150, MORTEN - IE/14/10, OBULESU - PGP/14/156, TOBIAS - IE/14/11, UMESH - PGP/14/310 SHARATH PGP/14/ 241 VARUN-PGP/14/ 122
Company Overview
1 2 3
Inventions are popping-up in different places Inventions are unpredictable Inventions dont only come via well-founded product develop departments within large companies, but also from independent thinkers
BIG taps into & seeks for entrepreneurial power of legions of individual inventors
STEP 1
Hunts Outsourced Flow
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 4
WINNOWING
REFINING
CAPTURING VALUE
1000 +
100+
20-30
Ideas
DEAL
Professional Inventors
STEP 1
Overview of Elements
Hunts
Roadshow for finding ideas and entrepreneurs Inviting local entrepreneurs showing their concepts to industry experts + pooling inventors
Industry Outreach
Publishing research on industry trends + Giving BIG awareness and validation of trends
Outsourced Flow
Cooperation with major toy companies Unsolicited idea submissions each month, BIG helps in evaluating, winnowing and refinement + avoids good ideas from slipping through the cracks
Professional Inventors
Network of professional investors through hunts and WOM + Helped BIG connect with more inventors
STEP 2: WINNOW
Manageable number of ideas for refinement Pursue highest potential ideas Hunts: Evaluation by panel of industry experts incl. Collins
Breadth of knowledge Reduced personal bias New mix of panelists for each event Approximately 15 panelists Short form filled out for every invention
STEP 3: REFINE
Close cooperation with inventor Make concepts more appealing to kids companies
Draw on BIGs knowledge of what companies look for Production of appropriate presentation material
Monetized 35 different products through five contracts (Sept. 2001) Licensing deals:
Advance payment Royalty Guarantee
Why does BIG seem better able to identify and bring to market innovative toy concepts, whereas the major toy companies feel they are in a period of lack of innovation
How proprietary or defensible is BIGs system? Could one of the major toy companies replicate it? Why or why not?
Dimension Offerings
Example Looks for innovation from the most unpredictable ways. Captures the power of parallel processing for innovation from people from outside an organization who might not be affected by the organizations critical data like sales information, etc Designed the business model like that of a venture capital business with little overhead.
Platforms
Solutions
Create integrated and customized offerings that solve end-to-end customer problems.
Raw ideas , unsolicited inventor and vendor submissions which toy companies get frequently are forwarded to BIG BIG then performs a feasibility check and refining of the ideas
Adapted from : Sawhney et, al. (2006). The 12 different ways for companies to innovate.
10
Definition Redefine how company gets paid or create innovative new revenue streams.
Example Licensing a product to company (advances, royalty, guarantee for both BIG and inventor) Subcontract a product as a private-label Bundling of many concepts to sell to entrepreneurs
Processes
Redesign core operating processes to improve efficiency and effectiveness. Think differently about sourcing and fulfilment
Acts as a intermediary between inventors and idea-buying companies (manufacturers/retailers) Innovation engine tries to capture innovation and idea flows from the broadest range possible : hunts, outsourced flow, etc.
Supply Chain
11
Dimension
Networking
Definition
Create network-centric intelligent and integrated offerings
Example
According to Collins, you cant replicate the human side of business. Backed by his own charismatic personality, inventors approach and good relationship with inventor communities, BIG has created a valuable network of manufacturers, retailers, entrepreneurs, inventors, etc.
Brand
With the foray into the Home and Garden business, BIG would be venturing into a bigger market and would turn profitable provided it applies the business sense that has enabled it to succeed in the toy industry
12
How proprietary or defensible is BIGs system? Could one of the Personality, it? Why major toy companies replicateCreativity, or why not?
Intelligence
VC experience
Perspective of the Inventor: Higher probability of idea to revenue conversion with BIG than any single toy company Perspective of a Toy Company: Engaging with BIG would provide readymade and better solutions cost effectively compared to trying to replicate the model on its own More cost effective for the toy companies to pay for licences than take up the entire work on its own huge work and time involved in idea screening to idea refining, testing, customizing. Even if it could, the solutions would not be as great and out of the box
13
How proprietary or defensible is BIGs system? Could one of the major toy companies replicate it? Why or why not?
Lower Transaction Costs and Economies of Scale: Analogous to distributor or wholesaler in SCM
Inventor1 Company1 Company2
BIG
Company3 Company4
Ad-hoc rotating panel sourced from multiple associations and companies across the industry -> Impossible to replicate for a single company owing to (i) Industry competition, (ii) Full time employment (HR issues) In absence of ad hoc rotating panel, seasoned thinking sets in Brand already established as an idea incubator company Finally, even BIG is facing considerable challenges trying to replicate its own model for a different industry just about sums it up!
14
Can BIG replicate its system in other industries such as lawn and garden?
15
Major Constraints
Availability of a pool of large inventors: Products which involve high costs like engines etc., find less tinkerers than low cost items like toys. Hence the pool of ideas is inversely proportional to costs involved Finding the right Screeners/ winnowers : Winnowing is the crucial aspect of this model. It requires, different personality with vast industry experience, intuition, knowledge, judgment and taste Tacitness and specificity Involved: The process involves application knowledge which is tacit in nature which cannot be simply transferred to all industries and is more subjective The configuration of people, process, screeners, Managers , Innovators and giving them a fair share , companies all involved form an ecosystem Idiosyncratic nature of these eco systems : The technologies involved, level of manufacturing capacities, constraints Network Externalities: Externalities play a huge role in these system and carries risk of networked systems
16
Basic process applicable in any industry Sponsorship gives a more solid base compared to angel funding Low Revenue/High profit model combined with low investment in assets gives BIG good flexibility Garden and lawns apparently have a large pool of inventors
Finding Mike Collins in the home and garden segment is crucial for success Right of first refusal for Skil-Bosch might handicap BIGs process of finding the right partner for the right product ROFR for Skil-Bosch might limit the will of cooperation from inventors and/or potential qualified panelists
BIG may replicate with gardens and lawns, however, success is subject to the leadership and people involved
17
THANK YOU !!
18