Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The views expressed in this report are the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department for Education and Skills. University of Warwick 2004 ISBN 1 84478 330 8
CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ..........................................................................................................2 1. Summary of Main Findings ...................................................................................2 1.1 Positive Ethos.....................................................................................................................2 1.2 Specialisation and Expertise .............................................................................................2 1.3 Centres of Excellence........................................................................................................3 1.4 Community Links ..............................................................................................................3 1.5 Preparation for Application..............................................................................................4 2. Introduction and Background ...............................................................................5 3. Study Methodology ................................................................................................6 1. Collection of Documentary Evidence ........................................................................................6 2. Interviews ...............................................................................................................................7 3. Ethos Conditions Scale...........................................................................................................7 4. Main Findings........................................................................................................9 4.1 Positive Ethos.....................................................................................................................9 4.2 Specialisation and Expertise ...........................................................................................13 4.3 Centres of Excellence......................................................................................................16 4.4 Community Links ............................................................................................................21 4.5 Preparation for Application............................................................................................24 5. Conclusions.......................................................................................................... 26 5.1 Conclusions and Summary .............................................................................................26 5.2 Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................27 Appendix 1 Summary of Methodology ..................................................................... 28 Appendix 2 Case Study Schools................................................................................ 29 Appendix 3 Telephone Interviews............................................................................ 30 Appendix 4 - Conditions Survey Findings................................................................... 32 A4.1 Copy of Conditions Survey ............................................................................................32
CONTENTS
During the Spring and Summer terms of 2004, the Institute of Education at the University of Warwick, on behalf of the Department for Education and Skills, carried out a study of selected Specialist Schools in order to identify examples of best practice and the key components which make a Specialist School successful. This short study investigated the qualitative effects of specialism with the aim of informing national policy development concerning the future of Specialist Schools in this country and to encourage the transfer of successful practice within existing and aspiring Specialist Schools to maximise the benefits of the system. This summary presents the main findings from the report: 1.1 POSITIVE ETHOS Specialist School status has a strong reinforcing and positive effect upon school ethos. Specialist School status significantly enhances the schools kudos and appeal within the local community. The quality of leadership is an important factor in ensuring Specialist School status has a positive effect on school development and change. Schools that have benefited most from Specialist School status have ensured that the change process has been well managed (all staff involved, good communications throughout, clear vision, time dedicated to the process, etc.). Specialist School status is an important lever for school development and change. This is most effective when there is adequate internal and external support for innovation and change. Governors can play an important role in securing Specialist School status and supporting the changes that occur as a result of gaining Specialist School status. However, more work needs to be undertaken to ensure that governors at all schools are fully informed, supportive and involved in this process. The Specialist Schools Trust and Youth Sport Trust are both fundamental support mechanisms for schools and are recognised as being an important factor in securing positive change as a result of Specialist School status. 1.2 SPECIALISATION AND EXPERTISE Specialist School status is a powerful lever for school improvement and there is evidence to suggest that it is associated with raising academic performance.
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
In February 2003, the document A New Specialist System: Transforming Secondary Education was launched, outlining the next steps and future strategy in secondary education. The document states We aim to transform educational achievement in this country, with year-on-year increases in overall attainment and above average improvement for under-achieving groups. To achieve this, we aim to create a coherent secondary education system marked by high aspirations and diverse centres of excellence in every school. The document sets out the Governments agenda for transforming secondary education and, in particular, the need for a dynamic and diverse education system. The evidence suggests that schools with a distinctive or specialist ethos and mission are more likely to succeed. Promoting diversity leads to greater flexibility, more opportunities for schools to learn from each other and, above all, a wider range of opportunities and choices for pupils and parents. The term school diversity is used to describe the way in which the education system is structured to enable schools to differentiate themselves according to their individual ethos, special character and areas of specialist expertise. The two key principles that underpin the Government's agenda for supporting school diversity are specialisation and collaboration. Specialist Schools, Academies and many faith schools are at the centre of the drive to engender greater diversity in the provision of schooling and to promote collaboration. It is clear that the Specialist Policy is an important strand of the Governments Transformation Agenda and, consequently, imperative that evaluation evidence is collected to gauge its impact and success. The aims of this evaluative study of Specialist Schools Policy were to identify the key components of success within Specialist Schools and to explore the extent to which Specialist Schools Policy is making a positive impact upon schools and the wider community. The specific objectives of the study were to explore: the components and contributors towards achieving a positive ethos in schools and the optimum ways schools manage this, the difference that specialisation in one area makes to the pedagogy and organisation in other areas, the development of Specialist Schools into centres of excellence, community plan elements, preparation and the process of applying to become a Specialist School.
PAGE 5
The study methodology (Appendix 1) predominantly adopted an in-depth qualitative approach with some quantitative interrogation through the conditions survey component. A wide range of school-level data was collected via a series of semi-structured interviews at 18 case study schools (Appendix 2), telephone interviews at 30 feeder and partner schools (Appendix 3) and Conditions Survey data (Appendix 4). The study aimed to identify best practice and to determine the direct and indirect benefits of specialist status. In addition, it focused specifically on the following key areas: Ethos the study aimed to identify the components of positive ethos and the best ways for schools to manage this. In particular it investigated which components of a schools ethos are affected from achieving Specialist School status, Specialisation and Expertise the study explored the impact of Specialist School status, particularly the impact on whole-school improvement through the transfer of good practice, Development of Specialist Schools into Centres of Excellence - the study explored the extent to which Specialist Schools are leading pedagogic developments through collaborating with networks of other schools as well as with subject associations, Community Plan Elements- the study explored community links in two categories schools working with other schools to share facilities, succesful practice and activities; and working with local businesses and with community groups. The study aimed to identify more and less effective ways of doing this and the added value of such community work, Preparation for Application to become a Specialist School- the study examined several facets of the application process. The study data collected included: 1. Collection of Documentary Evidence
A range of documentary evidence was collected from case study schools, including Ofsted reports, school development plans, specialist status bids, minutes from key meetings and statistics on take-up of subjects within the school. This documentary evidence provided useful triangulation data on extent and quality of links with other schools, community engagement and collaboration with other schools.
PAGE 6
STUDY METHODOLOGY
In all 18 case study schools, interviews were conducted with a cross-section of school staff: - a parent governor, - the headteacher, - a member of the SMT, - a middle manager, - a classroom teacher, and - a classroom support assistant. The interviews focused upon the impact of Specialist School status on: teaching and learning quality, innovation in teaching and learning, not just within the specialism but in other subjects across the school, school ethos with a particular focus upon identifiable, positive changes in ethos and the main contributory factors to achieving this end, extent and quality of engagement with partner schools, extent and quality of links with other schools. Interviews allowed us to triangulate information collected primarily through documentary evidence. All interviews were digitally recorded and 25% were fully transcribed. Analysis of the interview data was undertaken using the Nvivo software programme. This software provided patterns across the data, allowing cross-case analysis and thematic interrogation. 3. Ethos Conditions Scale
At each of the schools, a short survey was administered to a cross-sample of staff to gauge how far the ethos of the school had altered as a result of the specialist status. This survey was based upon the successful School Conditions Scale (Hopkins et al, 1994) that has been shown to produce reliable and valid data about changes in internal school conditions in key areas. This scale provided an additional indicator of the factors that contribute to a change in ethos and provided quantitative data to complement the qualitative data at each case study site. The weight of study evidence that this report draws upon is primarily from the 18 case study schools. These schools represent a mix of specialisms and geographical/sociological spread. They were also selected because they were all rated above average on value-added criteria. This meant that they were all adding significant value to student learning, attainment and progress but that varied considerably in terms of external examination performance. In short, they were not all high attaining schools in crude exam performance measures.
PAGE 7
STUDY METHODOLOGY
PAGE 8
STUDY METHODOLOGY
The study explored the extent to which Specialist School status had made a positive impact on school ethos and how this was viewed both within and outside the school. The data showed a consistently positive relationship between Specialist School status and school ethos. This positive school ethos was generally characterised by high academic standards, good staff and student relationships, high expectations, broad staff engagement and supportive community involvement. In the cases of schools where a positive ethos already existed, there was evidence that Specialist School status had further enhanced both the image and the ethos within the school. The ethos is very much a kind of everyone is in the same boat; we all start off at the same place and we try and get as good at what we do as we can. Specialist Status has reinforced this ethos. (S6 NQT) I think we already had a good solid ethos. I think it can only get stronger because of Specialist School Status. I dont think it will sort of change tack or direction it will build on the coming of spirit that is already here. (S2 HT). It was clear from the data that receiving Specialist School status had meaning and kudos for the school and its wider community. The awarding of Specialist School status was viewed as further recognition and endorsement of the schools standing within the community and acknowledgement of its academic reputation for high standards. Being awarded Specialist School status further confirms that we are a high performing school with a positive ethos. (S17 Senior T). It made us realise that we were as good as we thought and that our school deserved its reputation. It wasnt just smoke and mirrors. (S13 NQT) For schools where the ethos was less positively or strongly developed, Specialist School status proved to be both an important symbolic and a real lever for change. The data showed that achieving Specialist School status prompted staff, pupils and parents to alter their view of the school. The norms and practices previously adopted were supplanted by new ways of working that resulted from a radically changed image of the school. For example, teachers in a specialist subject area were more willing to share ideas and to offer staff development sessions, new and improved links were established with the community and schools felt generally more confident to innovate and experiment with new approaches, ideas and developments. The overriding view was that Specialist School status raised the profile of the school and gave it more kudos. As one headteacher summarised: Kudos was certainly in it; we didnt want to be left behind; we wanted to be able to demonstrate were as good as anybody else. (S4 HT)
PAGE 9
MAIN FINDINGS
PAGE 10
MAIN FINDINGS
PAGE 11
MAIN FINDINGS
PAGE 12
MAIN FINDINGS
The study considered the impact of specialism on other subject areas and on teaching and learning generally, both within the school and in partner schools. The evidence suggests that the initial choice of specialism for some schools proved to be a particularly difficult decision. In certain cases, where there was a range of excellence across a number of specialist areas, choosing one proved to be quite difficult. Some people said why dont we go with science than art? I said we can't because X school are a technology college. It wouldnt be in our best interest. (S2 HT) Deciding on the subject that is to be the specialist subject is tricky and potentially divisive but ultimately there can only be one. (S6 T) 1 Inevitably, in some cases, this selection process caused initial resentment among teachers who felt that certain subjects were being favoured and others were being demoted. There was a general acknowledgement that agreeing the specialism proved to be difficult and had to be carefully managed by the head and leadership team. It was clear that some staff were less than happy with the choice of specialism. I spent some time smoothing ruffled feathers.. but ultimately they were happy. (S16 HT) I was very unhappy that we were to become a technology college, it just didnt fit with my view of the school. In hindsight there are benefits but I just couldnt see it then. (S11 T) Choosing the specialism was difficult and it took lots of time and energy. (S17 G) While it was difficult at the outset and we experienced some hostility towards us, and the subject, things did settle down as people saw the resources roll in. (S8 T) The data revealed that any initial resentment or dissent was quickly overcome where the benefits of specialism were clearly and immediately made apparent. The arrival of additional resources and materials that were shared across the school soon dispelled feelings of resentment. The data showed, however, that there were certain subject areas which made the sharing process easier and where it was possible to permeate other subjects and to make immediate and visible cross-curricular linkages. For example, in the case of Technology there were immediate and obvious ways in which this specialist subject was able to complement and serve other subject areas. In contrast, Modern Foreign Languages and Sports specialisms were considered to have less obvious points of transferability but in most cases successful curriculum links had been made between the specialist subject and other curriculum areas.
1 It is important to note that some schools in the study took the earliest opportunity to apply for Specialist Status and consequently the data doesnt adequately reflect the fact that it is now possible to combine two specialisms. (See footnote on page 25).
PAGE 13
MAIN FINDINGS
PAGE 15
MAIN FINDINGS
The study explored the extent to which Specialist Schools are leading pedagogic developments through collaborating with networks of other schools. There was strong evidence to suggest that all of the case study schools had successfully established pedagogic partnerships with both feeder primary and other secondary schools. In the case of Sports Colleges and Language Colleges there was evidence that they were playing a very important role as a hub-site not just with their immediate partner schools but with up to 30 schools in several cases. The data suggested that both Language Colleges and Sports Colleges were actively engaged in mapping provision and deciding how best to link with schools in their own region. We link with our immediate schools, of course, but we go beyond that to many more schools in the LEA because we have this networking role to fulfil. (S4 HT) As a Sports College our links are wide and varied, into the community, other schools and to some extent nationally. We see ourselves at the core of lots of activities and the Sports Co-ordinators have a major role to play beyond this school. (S9 T) The language work we do here is shared with other schools, of course, thats part of the remit to act as a conduit for good practice and sharing with other schools. (S6 T) In order to support the National Languages Strategy there are things we have to achieve. In particular we have to link with other schools and ensure there are opportunities for learning different languages across different schools. (S8 HT) From the perspective of partner schools, the Specialist Schools were seen as having an impact beyond the immediate locality of the school. Partner schools saw the role of the Specialist School, particularly Sports Colleges and Language Colleges, as being much broader than simply linking with local schools. As a Sports College, they are linked with schools up and down the country not just us. But we benefit enormously. (PS19 HT) Of course they work closely with us and our languages day was a great success but they also work with other schools, thats part of their role isnt it to help other schools. (PS28 T) It is possible that the particular infrastructure supporting Sports Colleges and Languages Colleges assists them in securing such positive and extensive links with other schools. It is evident that Specialist Sports Colleges play an active role in PE, School Sport and Club links (PESSCL) Delivery Plan. Sports Colleges can be funded to be the preferred hub sites for the proposed 400 School Sport Co-ordinator (SSCO) partnerships and part of the Governments wider Specialist Schools Programme. Similarly, all Language Colleges are required to show in their developmental plans how they will support the National Languages Strategy. While there is no central funding available for this work, Language Colleges
PAGE 16
MAIN FINDINGS
PAGE 17
MAIN FINDINGS
PAGE 18
MAIN FINDINGS
Certainly all the primary schools are benefiting from our sports college status because they get teachers going in all the time and doing things there and other secondary schools as well get involved with some of the schemes we run, as like the centre of the partnership. (S14 T) A lot of the kids especially the year 7 that come knowing its a language college, already have that respect for the languages. Im seeing already in year 7 the kids are much more willing to start a language that they dont think theyre going to use again, whereas before in year 7 they were saying well why cant I do Urdu? I dont understand why Ive got to do French but now theyre coming and realising that we are a language college; we are here to teach lots of different languages, then theyve a lot more respect for it, yes thats true. (S6 NQT) X has got a reputation for sport most definitely. In all of the primary schools the children are very keen to come here because of the sports college, you know, sort of thing. Ive been working with some of the kids recently in junior schools and theyre all very proud of the fact that theyve been invited to come to X to do something that were running at the moment because were a sports college, and the parents are like smiling my son or daughters been to X, so yes I think its definitely benefited us. ( S14 T) The support of the Youth Sport Trust was highlighted by the Sports Colleges in the study as being instrumental in the application process and intrinsically supportive of their subsequent networking and dissemination activities. The Youth Sport Trust has been very supportive and has guided our work with other schools, locally and nationally. (S9 T)
PAGE 19
MAIN FINDINGS
PAGE 20
MAIN FINDINGS
The study explored community links in two categories schools working with other schools to share facilities, good practice and activities, and working with local businesses and with community groups. The study aimed to identify more and less effective ways of doing this and the added value of such community work. The data showed quite clearly that all schools in the study had forged new links or enhanced existing community links through achieving Specialist School status. The degree of community involvement varied from school to school and subject to subject but in all cases there was evidence of community links and involvement prompted by Specialist School status. To a certain extent, the type of community link was heavily dependent on the existing links with the community and the nature of the subject specialism. In the case of Arts Colleges, Sports Colleges and Language Colleges for example, evidence of community involvement was easily found and it was acknowledged that achieving Specialist School status had simply strengthened the links that were in place. Certainly our primary schools and the partner schools know about our visual arts because the kids are coming in to the workshops here and you have probably again seen it in the foyer, the pictures of the local primary schools and the work that they have been doing. So those parents know already. The community per se because we have got such a good reputation. Anyway, I could not say hand on heart that it will significantly alter their impression of the school. (S2 HT) It was widely accepted that Specialist School status had generated positive benefits for the school and, in many cases, for the wider community. ... school receiving Specialist School status has been a catalyst for change in the area (problems with drugs/prostitution etc are now changing for the better). There are now much higher community expectations for children and parents because the school has raised aspirations. (PS 25 HT) So definitely there is additional kudos and the ability to be able to drip feed even more into the press and the community that this is us and this is what we stand for and hopefully we will become a centre of excellence which you are supposed to do if you are a specialist school. (S2 HT) Its certainly having an impact in the way of primary teaching as we said before; I get mums coming up to me while Im stood waiting for my lift outside school and theyre very positive; they love the fact that the kids are learning French and theyre only 6, 7 years old, to the extent that they even took it home and the mums want to try and learn French so that they can understand what their kids are learning which is really nice. We have lots of extra groups as well, for example I think theres we have a French GCSE lesson for adults after school so people can come in from the outside community if they want to learn French; thats been really good its improved the name of the school I think. (S6 NQT) We are working hard to bring technology into the community. We have a number of projects just starting. (S5 HT)
PAGE 21
MAIN FINDINGS
PAGE 22
MAIN FINDINGS
PAGE 23
MAIN FINDINGS
The study explored the process and practice of applying for specialist school status. Within the sample were schools who had applied for specialist school status in the late 1990s and it is acknowledged that significant and positive changes have been made to the application process in recent years. The data revealed that schools generally felt that the process of applying for Specialist School status was time consuming and hard work. It was evident that mainly headteachers and members of their leadership teams take the lead in preparing the initial application but in most schools there was a team approach to completing the final application. The application process was considered by schools in the study to be robust and rigorous but very demanding of time and energy. It was hard work doing the bid. It was incredibly time consuming. It was hard work raising the money, the sponsorship money. That was a nightmare, wasnt it? Its so time consuming and you know weve got 1000 plus children plus teaching all the time and this bid was the most important bid that weve written but we are writing 25 maybe 30 bids a year just to get extra resource this is what schools are in to. And that has to be taken into account however it was well worth it. (S1 HT) It was clear that for some schools, securing the initial funding to apply for Specialist School status had proved to be quite difficult. Conversely, some schools, by virtue of their links with the wider community, found the prospect of raising the resource less difficult than for other schools. Although having no effect on the schools in this study, the Partnership Fund1 was introduced in 2003 to help schools struggling to raise sponsorship despite reasonable efforts over time this extra source of funding should help to alleviate some of the issues identified in this study. For the schools in this study, however, raising the initial funding was not without its problems. I came back from maternity leave in the February and started writing it almost when I got back, I did no teaching for a year. Because I knew I had to raise the money we just sat down and we flogged ourselves for about six months raising the money.(S2 HT) However, despite the time-consuming nature of the application process, most schools felt it was rigorous and fair. They generally felt it was worth it to receive the status. The data also showed that some Specialist Schools were supporting other schools in applying for Specialist School status.
The Partnership Fund provides about 3 million per annum in support to schools that can demonstrate that their efforts over time to find sponsorship have been unsuccessful. The fund is administered by the Specialist Schools Trust in accordance with DfES criteria and is provided from both public and private sector finance. Over 130 schools were helped by the Partnership Fund to gain Specialist School status in the October 2003 and March 2004 application rounds.
1
PAGE 24
MAIN FINDINGS
1 In July 2004, the opportunity to take up a second specialism (with extra funding) was offered to some of the leading Specialist Schools who were applying for redesignation. The DfES Five Year Strategy sets out a vision where leading Specialist Schools have extra opportunities, at redesignation, to drive improvements and deliver personalised learning for all - one of these opportunities is the introduction of a second specialism.
PAGE 25
MAIN FINDINGS
The findings from this study suggest that Specialist School status is both a powerful vehicle of school improvement and means of raising attainment in specialist and partner schools. The evidence consistently shows that Specialist School status is felt to increase expectations of performance among students and teachers and to generate high levels of motivation among teachers in the specialist area and beyond. Specialist School status is considered by schools in the study to be a powerful catalyst for change and a useful mechanism for engaging community and school partners in the collective task of improvement. The degree of engagement, involvement and motivation among teachers in the schools with specialist subject is very high. For example, We eat and drink art now dont we! We eat, sleep and drink it but its not only fine art, its all the arts; its textiles, itsfrom fine arts, textiles to ceramics, photography to music; its moving right down there now. Every department gets some money from it. We have visual arts teaching across the curriculum; weve got drawing across the curriculum, weve got art displays in 2 exhibition centres. (S1 DHT) It is clear from the data that the additional levels of resource were a major contributing factor to the schools ability to improve its teaching within the subject area and across other subject areas. The specialist status offered teachers new opportunities and experiences that enhanced their teaching and led to improvements in classroom practice. Weve been able to increase the staffing so that we can give a more varied offering to the girls in terms of courses so we happen to do ceramics, photography and many other activities because of the extra resources. (S1 HT) We recognised that if we got Specialist School status it would provide us with new opportunities to improve further and to sustain that. The thrust of it is to do with the new opportunities it provides and the challenge that it provides for staff. It encourages them to think we are different and therefore we havent got to do things in the way weve always done them, were looking for new opportunities; were looking to experiment and in experimenting recognising on occasions like any other experiment, it will fail; you dont make progress if you dont try and you dont make progress if you dont make mistakes. (S4 HT) There are also strong indications in the data that Specialist School status has a positive effect on attainment. Last year we had our best GCSE results ever and our value added is amazing and I think that they are the result of sports college; the fact that the children are confident and healthy means that they learn better; the PE department are wonderful because they are very social. Most of them also teach in other departments. (S14 HT) In summary, this study found that Specialist School status is a major impetus for change and development within schools. It affords opportunities for collaboration and a pedagogical basis for networking between schools.
PAGE 26
SUMMARY
I would like to thank other members of the study team, particularly Sarah Dahl, Lucy Clarke and Sam Gorse who collected the data from the participating schools. Im grateful to Professor Daniel Muijs and Dr Christopher Chapman who assisted in the data analysis phase and to Rod Arthur for ensuring the project was managed effectively. The study team would like to acknowledge the schools who participated in this study and to thank staff for giving up their time to contribute to this project.
PAGE 27
SUMMARY
PAGE 28
TYPE Engineering Engineering Science Sports Technology Languages Arts Languages Sports Technology Technology Languages Technology Science Mathematics Languages Arts Business
SCHOOL NAME Kirkham Carr Hill 11-18 High School Eckington School Preston Manor High Perins Community School Grange Community College (The) Belle Vue Girls' School Watford Grammar School for Girls Hockerill Anglo European School King's School (the) Dene Magna School St Angela's Ursuline Convent School Didcot Girls' High School St Bonaventure's School Kingswinford School (The) Gilberd School (The) St Aidan's Roman Catholic Comprehensive School Kesteven and Sleaford High School Walton High
ADDRESS Royal Avenue, Kirkham, Preston, Lancashire, PR4 2ST Dronfield Road, Eckington, Sheffield, S21 4GN Carlton Avenue East, Wembley, HA9 8NA Pound Hill, Alresford, Hampshire, SO24 9BS Haycliffe Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD5 9ET Thirn Lane, Bingley Road, Bradford, BD9 6NA Lady's Close, Watford, Herts, WD18 0AE Dunmow Road, Bishop's Stortford, Herts., CM23 5HX Ottery St Mary, Devon, EX11 1RA Mitcheldean, Gloucestershire, GL17 0DU St George's Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 8HU Sherwood Road, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DA Boleyn Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 9QD Water Street, Kingswinford, West Midlands, DY6 7AD Brinkley Lane, Colchester, Essex, CO4 9PU Willow Bank Road, Ashbrooke, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, SR2 7HJ Jermyn Street, Sleaford, Lincolnshire, NG34 7RS Fyfield Barrow, Milton Keynes, MK7 7WH
VISIT DATES 27 Feb 04 05 Mar 04 05 Mar 04 08 Mar 04 09 Mar 04 10 Mar 04 17 Mar 04 22 Mar 04 24 Mar 04 26 Mar 04 30 Mar 04 31 Mar 04 31 Mar 04 01 Apr 04 19 Apr 04 22 Apr 04 29 Apr 04 12-May-04
PAGE 29
PAGE 30
INTERVIEWER Lucy Clarke Lucy Clarke Lucy Clarke Lucy Clarke Lucy Clarke
SCHOOL Brackenhill Primary Westhill Primary School Blandford mere primary School St Leonard's Primary School St Michael's C Of E High School
PARTNER SCHOOL WITH The Grange Technology College The King's School Kingswinsford School St Aidan's RC Comprehensive School Kingswinford School
PAGE 31
A copy of the Conditions Survey (Mapping Change in Schools - The Cambridge Manual of Research Techniques) used with all the case study schools is shown over the next 3 pages. Due to the volume of data, the outcomes of the survey are shown in a separate attachment (A Study of the Specialist Schools Programme Conditions Survey Outcomes).
PAGE 32
RATING SCALE
Attached is a series of 24 statements about your school. We would like to know how far these statements match your own perception of the school, in other words, your personal view of it. There are no 'right' answers, we are seeking your opinion. Please indicate in the boxes provided which statements reflect your personal view.
School
PAGE 33
As a school we review the progress of changes we introduce. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
1.3
Teachers make time to review their classroom practice. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
1.4
The school takes care over issues of confidentiality. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
PLANNING 2.1 Our long-term aims are reflected in the school's plans. RARELY 2.2 SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
In our school the process of planning is regarded as being more important than the written plan. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
2.3
Everyone is fully aware of the school's development priorities. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
2.4
In the school we review and modify our plans. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
INVOLVEMENT 3.1 In this school we ask students for their views before we make major changes. RARELY 3.2 SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
This school takes parents' views into consideration when changes are made to the curriculum. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
3.3
Governors and staff work together to decide future directions for the school. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
3.4
We make effective use of outside support agencies (e.g. advisers and lecturers) in our development work. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
PAGE 34
STAFF DEVELOPMENT 4.1 Professional learning is valued in this school. RARELY 4.2 SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
In devising school policies emphasis is placed on professional development. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
4.3
In this school the focus of staff development is on the classroom. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
4.4
The school's organisation provides time for staff development. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
CO-ORDINATION 5.1 Staff taking on co-ordinating roles are skilful in working with colleagues. RARELY 5.2 SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
We get tasks done by working in teams. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
5.3
Staff are kept informed about key decisions. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
5.4
We share experiences about the improvement of classroom practice. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
LEADERSHIP 6.1 Staff in the school have a clear vision of where we are going. RARELY 6.2 SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
Senior staff delegate difficult and challenging tasks. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
6.3
Senior management take a lead over development priorities. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
6.4
Staff are given opportunities to take on leadership roles. RARELY SOMETIMES OFTEN NEARLY ALWAYS
PAGE 35
Copies of this publication can be obtained from: DfES Publications P .O. Box 5050 Sherwood Park Annesley Nottingham NG15 0DJ Tel: 0845 60 222 60 Fax: 0845 60 333 60 Minicom: 0845 60 555 60 Oneline: www.dfespublications.gov.uk University of Warwick 2004 Produced by the Department for Education and Skills ISBN 1 84478 330 8 Ref No: RR587 www.dfes.go.uk/research