Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Analyzing Student Learning The assessment Ive chosen to represent the standards/ objectives and central focus of this unit is the writing style response. This is a major component in the overall formative assessment process. It helps determine students skill levels and abilities, as well as how well they are progressing in the overall unit. The writing style response focuses on language and literary techniques used in the students nonfiction books. Students must be able to demonstrate their knowledge of literary techniques and how literary language adds meaning to the overall purpose, theme, and style of the book. Students must be able to demonstrate, through the use of textual evidence, the types of diction the author uses, as well as the two most frequently used literary techniques. a. Evaluation Criteria: i. Overall student performance of this assignment was average or above average. The response was worth 25 points5 sections worth 5 points per section. Student sample I collected demonstrate above-average and average quality of work. The above-average student scored a total of ____points, the student with average performance scored a total of 18 points, and the final student sample scored a total of 18 points as well. This student is placed in the Fundamentals of Writing lab class and has been identified as a struggling reader and writer.
ii. Students have demonstrated a strong ability to identify the correct types of diction used in their books. Also, they appear to understand the types of literary techniques used. What appears to be the biggest struggle for students is being able to understand how these elements of writing style impact the overall meaning of the book and its characters. Generally, students do a fine job of
Copyright 2011 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. pages maximum All rights reserved. Page 1 of 5 | 8
Student 1 struggled a great deal with this assignment, and needed a lot of assistance in its completion. Student 1 has been identified as a struggling reader and writer, and has been placed in the Fundamentals of Writing Lab as a result of his below-proficient score on the Iowa Assessment Tests. Student 1 tends to demonstrate a lack of focus and willingness to stay on task while in the classroom. Despite his tendency to not focus, he is quite skilled at recalling evidence from the text. While working one-on-one with this student, I was very impressed with his ability to relate evidence to the text to specific literary techniques. His major struggle in this area, however, is taking the time to understand the connection between the two. My job, as his facilitator, was to help him focus in on specific quotes, break them down, and analyze them to determine how they show a broader meaning. Walking him through this process seemed to help him make more sense of the bigger concept.
Student 2 is an average performer in the classroom, but tends to struggle with reading comprehension. Student 2 needed little help completing this assignment, but the evidence of her conclusions show her lack of ability to form the necessary connections needed to understand the larger concepts of the unit. In the work sample, Student 2 was able to correctly identify literary language devices used by the author. Nearly all examples accurately represented the type of diction or literary technique Student 2 chose to discuss in her response. However, this student was unable to correctly explain how the authors language use added meaning to the book, and did not fully connect the relationships between her two
Copyright 2011 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. pages maximum All rights reserved. Page 2 of 5 | 8
b. As shown on the samples of work provided by my focus students, I made comments directly on the assignment sheet. As an evaluator, I divided my assessment into five sections, analyzing the depth and accuracy of content provided in the explanation, and the accuracy and appropriateness of the textual evidence (quotes from the book). Both students needed a type of feedback that encouraged them to further analyze the overall meaning of the book. For example, on Student 1s response, I said, How does survival and (the use of) low diction relate? What types of imagery does he provide? Why does he (the author) choose to use imagery most often? Do you think his main goal is to make the reader apart of the journey? and How does this help you connect to him (the character)? These open-ended questions will help Student 1 arrive at a deeper level of understanding. c. The writing style response outline assignment is one of three outlines students will complete throughout the Nonfiction Literary Analysis unit. These outlines were created as formative assessment tools to help the teacher and students practice relating literary concepts to real textual evidence. Once completed, they help the teacher gauge the overall comprehension level of students, and help identify strengths and weaknesses of students. The feedback I provide on each outline is used for students to reflect upon and to correct in preparation of the final unit essay. Students promptly receive feedback so they can make necessary changes or get help from the teacher. Corrections and modifications are not accepted for an improved grade, but will help improve the content of their unit essays, which is the largest assignment of the unit. If a student turns in poor
Copyright 2011 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. pages maximum All rights reserved. Page 3 of 5 | 8
c. The steps I will implement as a follow-up to the writing style analysis aid in
supporting the overall goal for the unit, which is for students to be able to accurately identify and interpret nonfiction literature using literary language devices. Students must understand how to analyze literature through the use of meaning-making from literary language.
4. Evidence of Academic Language a. Students have adequately demonstrated the necessary academic language required for them to be proficient in this unit. Many students are on target when identifying elements of writing style, but need to be more specific. For example, the first section of the writing style response asks students to identify the type of diction used by the author. Student 1 identified a frequent use of low diction. I would have liked for this student to be more specific in identifying the diction as either informal or neutral, but they are still on target. In the explanation, Student 1 mentions that the authors diction is more conversational, leading the reader to believe this is more similar to neutral diction. However, later when describing how the language adds meaning to the book, Student 1 chose a quote that contained a lot of profanity. This example would more accurately represent his use of low or informal diction, and therefore helps me understand how Student 1 arrived at his conclusion. b. My scaffolding resulted in a significant growth among the general majority of students. This is the second outline students have completed. To compare to the initial book response, the ability to identify literary techniques and apply them
Copyright 2011 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. pages maximum All rights reserved. Page 4 of 5 | 8
Copyright 2011 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. pages maximum All rights reserved.
Page 5 of 5 | 8