Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2008 ASCE
2008 ASCE
1
OwnerSpecs &Standards
3
ExplosionHazard Identification
2
BuildingRequirements: Criticality,Occupancy, Layout,Siting,etc. Owner Owner
Standard Practice
Site Study
New
Existing
4
FreeField BlastParameters
5
BuildingPerformance Requirements
7
Component Loads
6
SelectMaterials& StructuralSystem Material Properties
11
Analysis Method Preliminary MemberSizes
10
9
Deformation Limits
MDOF
12
DesignEngineer DesignEngineer Structural Analysis No Is DeformationLimit Satisfied?
13
Foundation Design
Yes
14 15
Ancillary Design
Details& Documentation
FIGURE1BLASTRESISTANTDESIGNPROCESS Several advanced analysis topics are given greater discussion in the updated report due to their increased usage in petrochemical plant design. These topics include Computational Fluid Dynamicstocomputeblastwaveeffectsincomplexenvironments,andNonlinearFiniteElement
2008 ASCE
Analysisforcomplexstructuralconfigurations.Furtherdetailsonthereport'scoverageofthese twotopicsareprovidedinacompanionpaperincludedintheconferenceproceedings.Basedon vigorous internal committee debate, discussion is also included on the wisdom of selecting advanced analysis techniques only for situations where improved results justify the additional computationaleffort. Three other major changes to the updated report are, trailers and blast resistant portable buildings, retrofit of existing buildings, and blast response criteria. Details on the report's implementation of these topics are also covered in companion papers in the conference proceedings. The numerical integration analysis method as described in the updated report has been enhancedandclarified.Updatestouseconsistentnomenclatureandtoprovideimprovedclarity have been incorporated. The effect of static loads is now incorporated into the procedure equations. The presentation of numerical integration in the example chapters were edited for clarity(Figure2).Asinthepreviousreport,theChapter6Appendixdescribesdetailedequations forperforminganumericalintegrationanalysis.Examplesprovidedinthereportillustrateusage andindicatenumerical resultswhenproperly implemented. New sections have been added to the updated report to provide basic coverage of design against blastgeneratedprojectiles,blastdesign in offshorestructures,andblasteffectsonnon buildingstructures. Chapter11coversthedetailedcalculationofashearwallbuildingusingSDOFprocedures. The most significant update is in calculating the blast load on supported elements. The "load tracking"methodwasreplacedwith the"tributaryarea"method.Loadtrackingbasicallyusesthe calculateddynamicreactionfromanumericalintegrationtocalculatethedynamicblastloadona supporting structural element. The tributary area method uses the externally applied blast pressureappliedtoanareaofthewallorroofdeemedtobetributarytothestructuralelement beingdesigned.Forexample,theroofareatributarytoacolumnwouldbedeterminedfromhalf thedimensiontotheadjacentcolumn.NewtotherevisedChapter11arecalculations forsteel connectionssubjectedtothebuilding's blast load.Updateddesigncodes including ACI31805 andAISC36005alsosignificantlychangedthecalculationsequence.Aneffortwasalsomade toproportiontheexamplecalculation'sstructuralelementstoproduceresultsthatareclosetothe limitingcriteria. Chapter 12 provides the design of a steel frame building using simple single degree of freedom methods as well as more advanced nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis. The chapter also includes calculation sequences for the initial trial selection of structural element sizes. Such calculations normally would not be included in a final refined calculation, but are includedinchapter12toillustratetrialmembersizing. Chapter13usessimplifiedmethodstoanalyzetheblastretrofitofamasonrybuilding.The chapterwasupdatedtoreflectACI53005,BuildingCodeRequirementsforMasonryStructures as well as ACI 31805, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. The example chapter identifiedandexaminesthreeupgradeoptions foramasonrywall inaconcreteframed building.
2008 ASCE
NumericalIntegration(ref:Chapter6,Appendix) AnalysisCaseDescription: Chapter11,Section11.8,roofbeam,caseA DynamicLoadingDescription: if(time<=0.006,105.8*time/0.006,max(105.8105.8*(time0.006)/0.05,0)) timeincrement= mass= stiffness= damping= positiveresistance= reboundresistance= staticload= time (s) 0.000 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.012 0.015 0.018 0.021 0.024 0.027 0.030 0.033 0.036 0.039 0.042 Dyn.Load (kips) 0.00 52.90 105.80 99.45 93.10 86.76 80.41 74.06 67.71 61.36 55.02 48.67 42.32 35.97 29.62 0.003s 0.028ks2/in 54.1k/in 0ks/in 97.5kips 97.5kips 14.9kips y (in) 0.275 0.278 0.298 0.348 0.429 0.537 0.668 0.818 0.982 1.156 1.335 1.512 1.684 1.845 1.991 v (in/s) 0.00 2.83 11.25 21.97 31.63 40.07 47.13 52.69 56.67 58.98 59.59 58.49 55.70 51.27 45.93 a (in/s2) 0 1,884 3,735 3,412 3,029 2,594 2,114 1,597 1,052 490 82 651 1,210 1,665 1,892 KEY=0iselastic KEY=+1ispositiveplastic KEY=1isreboundplastic Z=1isincreasingplasticdeformation Z=2isendofreboundplasticdeformation Z=3isendofpositiveplasticdeformation Z=4iscontinuedelastic Z=5isstartofreboundplasticdeformation Z=6isstartofpositiveplasticdeformation
ye+ (in) 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802
ye (in) 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802 1.802
KEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
effK (k/in) 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,721 18,667 18,667
incrF (kips) 53 369 938 1,511 2,020 2,455 2,810 3,079 3,255 3,338 3,324 3,215 3,011 2,725 2,407
incry (in) 0.003 0.020 0.050 0.081 0.108 0.131 0.150 0.164 0.174 0.178 0.178 0.172 0.161 0.146 0.129
incrv (in/s) 2.83 8.43 10.72 9.66 8.43 7.06 5.57 3.97 2.31 0.61 1.10 2.79 4.44 5.34 6.02
resistance (kips) 14.90 15.05 16.12 18.83 23.20 29.03 36.13 44.25 53.15 62.55 72.20 81.81 91.10 97.50 97.50
Ud 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.24 0.30 0.37 0.45 0.55 0.64 0.74 0.84 0.93 1.02 1.10
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 1
FIGURE2NUMERICALINTEGRATIONEXAMPLE Thetwoyearsofparticipationinthedevelopmentoftheupdatedreporthasbeenrewarding in that the effort provided valuable insight into the various member's backgrounds, representation,expertise,andexperience.Anumberoftopicswererepeatedlydebatedastothe most informative means of presenting new information, and the most unbiased means of describing new technologies, methods of analysis, and products. As are result, the committee envisions that the updated version of the report will continue to be a valuable resource for structuralengineersinthepetrochemicalandindustrialdesigncommunities.