Professional Documents
Culture Documents
=
= I
n
i
i Gf
x G
1
i
ESAL
100
1
(After Mukabi, 2002c)
7.4 Impact of Increased ESAL
The increase in traffic volume has contributed to higher values of cumulative ESAL as can be
derived from Tables 7.1 ~ 7.4. The cumulative ESAL was computed from Eq. 7.2, and an
example of the calculation for Trailer Trucks.
The cumulative number of standard axles was computed based on the principle of converting
a mixed traffic stream of different axle loads and axle configurations into a design traffic
number in the form of an equivalent number of 8.2 tonnes single axle loads summed over a
design period of 20 years
The equation adopted for this computation is :-
( )
( )
0
1 log
1 1
. . . . 365 =
(
+
+
=
r
r
P
r
v iv
G
G e
G
EF d C n N
DL
l
(7.3)
where,
N = number of equivalent standard axle repetitions
n
iv
= initial number of vehicles daily in one direction
C
v
= proportion of commercial vehicles expressed in decimal form
G
r
= annual growth rate expressed in decimal form
d
l
= proportion of vehicles using the design lane as a decimal (dl = 1)
P
DL
= design life for the pavement in years
EF = axle load equivalency factor expressed as:
EF = (Ls/80)
4.5
where Ls is the load in kN on the single axle considered taking a regional factor of 1.0
and Terminal Serviceability Index Pt = 2.0
As an example, for the computation of ESAL of trailer trucks, consider that: -
n
iv
= 22, C
v
= 1, G
r
= 0.2, d
l
= 1, P
DL
= 20 years and E
F
= 5.7 then applying Eq.
7.3 we obtain,
( )
( )
(
+
+
=
2 . 0 1
1 2 . 0 1
7 . 5 1 1 22 365
20
e
og
x x x x x N
l
= 365x22x5.7x173
= 7,918,383
Vehicle
Type
Value Adopted for the Basic Design Current Values Adopted in this Study
AADT
In
2006
Projected
Growth
Rate up to
2026%
Projected
AADT
in
2026
Estimated
8.2t
Equivalent
Revised
Cumulative
ESAL
ESALx10
6
(in 2006)
Computed
Cumulative
ESAL
ESALx10
6
in 2026
Percentage
Increase/
Decrease in
ESAL in relation
to BD Values
(G)
2026 2026
Sedan 93 20 145 Nil - - - -
Bus
(small)
101 20 158 Nil - - - -
Bus
(large)
34 20 53 1 0.00689 0.537 77.9 41.8
Cargo
Truck
114 20 178 3.2 0.0739 5.759 7.8 449.2
Trailer
Truck
44 20 69 5.7 0.0508 7.918 155.9 1,234.4
Total 386 - 603 - 0.13159 14.214 311.8 1,725.2
1Gf= 17..25
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 8
N = 7.918x10
6
Using the figures in Table 7.3.6, the Intensity Growth factor (I
Gf
) was computed from the
relation below proposed by Mukabi, 2002c:-
=
=
n
i
i i Gf
xESAL G I
1
100
1
(7.4)
The resulting Intensity Growth Factor was I
Gf
= 17.25
7.5 Analysis of Relative Damaging Effect
If the existing pavement has been subjected to repetitions of axle loads of various magnitudes
and as a consequence undergoes considerable amount of structural damage. The damaging
effect (RD
eff
.), the single passage of a load (Ls) or an axle group is computed from the
approximation equation introduced by Mukabi (2002c):-
GF
C
W
W
eff
I x
EL
L
RD ) 01 . 0 (
. (
= (7.5)
where,
RD
eff.
= Damaging effect
L
W
= Load on the axle group
EL
W
= 8.2 tonnes in the case of a single axle with dual tyres.
C = an exponent considered as C= 4 in this case
I
Gf
= Intensity of Growth factor related to increase in cumulative ESAL
Impact of Dynamic Loading on Structural Layer Thickness
Deterioration in pavement layer thickness usually results in the loss of structural capacity of
the road pavement. It is therefore imperative to investigate this component in order to
determine the appropriate engineering design and construction for proper maintenance. In
this section, the deterioration of layer thickness is treated as a structural component as the
actual deficiency in structural capacity in quantitative terms due to loss in pavement thickness
is also evaluated.
After computing the loss of pavement layer thickness by comparison of the pre-loading
and post-loading thicknesses for each layer and adopting the structural capacity depreciation
factor (f
sd
) and the corrected Resilient Modulus (M
r
cor.
), values determined from the equation
for the required thicknesses are computed.
The conversion factors (C
f
) of each existing pavement layer are computed as
depreciated values from the product of the proposed conversion factors C
f
P
and f
sd
(Mukabi,
2002c). Hence,
C
f
= C
f
P
x f
sd
(7.6)
The effective thickness is whence calculated as :-
T
e
= T
e
E
x C
f
P
x f
sd
(7.7)
where,
T
e
E
= Existing thickness.
The subgrade CBR
d
BD
determined during the Basic Design Study is also depreciated by the
same factor and the CBR
d
DD
adopted is therefore calculated as :-
CBR
d
DD
= CBR
d
BD
x f
sd
(7.8)
The overlay thickness (T
o
) required was then determined from :
T
o
= T
n
- T
e
(7.9)
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 9
7.6 Selection of Appropriate Traffic Class
This was based on the Traffic Classes specified by TRL Overseas Road Note 31 and
the traffic class was T7.
8. ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS
8.1 Intrinsic and OPMC Stabilized Material Properties
The intrinsic and OPMC stabilized material properties were presented, comprehensively
analyzed and discussed in Chapter 5 of Engineering Report no. SST1 of May 2007.
A summary of the main engineering parameters is presented in sub-section 7.2.2.
8.2 Analysis of The Impact of Environmental Factors
Under sub-section 4.1.9 of Engineering Report no. SST1 of May 2007, the concepts
applied for analyzing the impact of environmental factors were introduced.
Consequently, applying the data that was determined in this study, engineering analysis
of each environmental factor that is likely to affect the performance of the pavement
structure is made. The effect of OPMC stabilization components on some of the
environmentally related factors on the subgrade soils tested in this study is also
demonstrated in Figures 8.1 and 8.2, while some. In general terms, plasticity index is a
function of the amount of clay present in a soil, while the Liquid Limit and Plastic Limits
individually are functions of both the amount and type of clay. High plasticity indices are
analogous to high water contents whose lubricating effect of the water films between
adjacent soil particles tends to reduce the mechanical stability, strength and deformation
resistance. This phenomenon is quantitatively illustrated by the generalized empirical
equations proposed by Mukabi et al. (2001c) for tropical soils with a PI < 43.
On the other hand, Mukabi (2001e, 2003a) proposed an empirical formula relating the
bearing capacity based on CBR for materials where CBR 50, and Unconfined
Compression Strength (UCS) defined as:
where,
gl
= 14.4 and
gi
= 46.6
being the gradient linear and
gradient intercept of most
geomaterials tested in the
2001 Study and,
Figure 8.1 Effect of cement stabilization on the PI of sandy clay
and Figure 8.2 Effect of lime stabilization on the PI of sandy clay
OPMC gi u gl
f q CBR + = } { (%) (7.10)
Rewriting Equation 7.14 we obtain,
OPMC
gi
gl
u
f
CBR
q
1
(kgf/cm
2
) (7.11)
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 10
( )
opt
I I
c
r
s
opt OPMC
BR BR R f f - = is a strength and moduli ratio parameter derived from the
influence of OPMC Stabilization.
Substituting for
u
q in Equations proposed by Mukabi et al. (2001c) we obtain,
q q
OPMC
imc
gi
gl
OPMC
umc
gi
gl
mc
PI
f
CBR
f
CBR
| o
+ =
(
(
(
(
(
1
1
(%) (7.13)
Mukabi (2001e) also proposed the following empirical formula that correlates the bearing
capacity expressed in terms of CBR and the Plasticity Index, whi ch is expressed in
Equation 7.14.
{ }
35 >
A
m
BC
gl gi
CBR
PI
(%) (7.14)
Where,
gi
= 0.97,
gl
= 0.027 and
BC
A = 0.564 being the gradient linear, gradient intercept
and Bearing Capacity materials constant of most geomaterials tested and,
CBR
m
is the measured CBR value obtained at a density corresponding to 95% MDD in
accordance to AASHTO T-180 Method D for various soaking and curing periods.
A more universal empirical equation that considers all factors including the effects of
OPMC stabilization, variation in material properties, modes of mechanical and chemical
stabilization, the quantum of various etc. is presented in Equation 7.15 below.
gi gl u
CBR q q q = ln (kgf/cm
2
) (7.15)
Substituting for
u
q from Equation 7.15, we obtain Equation 7.16 as follows,
{ }
{ }
q q
imc
gi gl
umc
gi gl
mc
PI
CBR
CBR
| o
q q
q q
+ =
(
(
A
ln
ln
(%) (7.16)
Where,
gl
q = 12.9, and
gi
q = 36.5 being the gradient logarithmic, and gradient intercept materials
constants for most geomaterials tested.
Simulating Effect of Moisture~Suction Variation on The Unconfined Compression Strength
(UCS) for Natural Gravels (Without OPMC Stabilization)
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 11
- Simulating the Effects of Moisture-Suction Variation for Natural/Gravel without
OPMC Stabilization
Table8.1 When PI=12, M
ci
=5.1% q
u
at Initial q
u
= 13.8kgf/cm
2
for Subbase Material
Fig. 8.3 Variation of moisture content vs. variation in UCS when PI=12
Table 8.2 When PI=6, M
ci
=5.1% at Initial q
u
= 39.2kgf/cm
2
for Base course material
Fig. 8.4 Variation of moisture content vs. variation in UCS when PI=6
From the foregoing data, the significant impact of moisture~suction variation and
plasticity on the vital engineering parameters of geomaterials can be appreciated.
It is therefore vital that the use of combined cement and lime treatment be applied for the
relatively sandy clays found in the project area as can be derived from the graphs
presented in Figures 8.1 and 8.2.
Simulating Effect of Moisture~Suction Variation on The Unconfined Compression Strength
(UCS) With OPMC Stabilization
In this case the quantitative effects of moisture~suction variation for materials subjected
to OPMC stabilization are presented based on the data that was determined in this
Study.
The results are tabulated in Tables 8.3 ~ 8.4 and Figs. 8.5 ~ 8.6
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 12
- Simulating The Effects of Moisture-Suction Variation for Natural Gravel with
OPMC Stabilization
Table 8.3 When PI=12, M
ci
=5.1% at Initial q
u
= 13.8kgf/cm
2
for Subbase Material
Fig. 8.5 Variation of moisture content vs. variation in UCS
Table 8.4 When PI=6, M
ci
=5.1% at Initial q
u
= 39.2kgf/cm
2
for Base course Material
Fig. 8.6 Variation of moisture content vs. variation in UCS
- Effect of Swelling
As can be noted from previous discussions on swell characteristics, for even the worst of
geomaterials, the maximum swell actually reaches a residual state after a maximum of
10hrs and not 96hrs as conventionally considered.
Mukabi et al (2001a). also showed that for most geomaterials, swell can be contained by
applying a surcharge pressure of approximately 24KPa as can be derived from Equation
17.20.
sc sc sc sc
B + = A 0 ln (%) (7.7)
Where,
= A
sc
Swell in relation to surcharge pressure
=
sc
0 12.9; logarithmic gradient constant for standard tropical geomaterials
=
sc
Surcharge Pressure in KPa
= B
sc
36.5; logarithmic intercept constant for standard tropical geomaterials
Table 8.5 is a summary of swell at varying surcharge pressures, while the characteristi c curve
is plotted in Fig. 8.7.
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 13
Effect of Variation In
Design Moisture
Content
The selection of an
appropriate design
moisture content and
density condition is
critical to the design
analysis and
subsequent
construction Quality
Control. The moisture
content at which
subgrade, subbase and
base course strength
should be assessed is
that which can be
expected to be
exceeded only
rarely.
Pronounced
exceedance of
this factor is
known to have
adverse effects
on the pavement
structure.
Equation 7.8,
which defines
the relationship
between the
ratio of Design
Moisture Content
of the dry and
wet seasons and
the Plasticity Index, is applied in formulating the data in Table 8.34 and the graphical
representation in Fig. 8.8.
gl gl DMC
PI v v + = ln (7.8)
Where,
=
DMC
Design Moisture Content Ratio
=
gl
v 0.12; logarithmic DMC gradient constant for tropical geomaterials
= PI Plasticity Index of the geomaterial to be utilized for construction
=
gi
v 0.7; logarithmic DMC intercept constant for tropical geomaterials
Correction factors for the Plasticity Indices and the Design Moisture Contents
respectively during the wet and dry seasons are defined in the following relations.
w
Bp
p d
PI e A PI = (7.9)
Where,
p
A = 12; linear gradient constant for PI for tropical geomaterials
Table 8.6 Plasticity and Seasonal Effects on the Design Moisture Content
Fig. 8.8 Plasticity and Seasonal Effects on the Design Moisture Content
Table 8.5 Effect of Surcharge Pressure on Swell Factors
Fig. 8.7 Effect of Surcharge Pressure on Swell Factors
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 14
=
d
PI Plasticity Index of the geomaterial during the dry season
=
Bp
e Annual Evapotranspiration Factor
BP = 0.02; Exponential constant for PI for tropical geomaterials
=
w
PI Plasticity Index of the geomaterial during the wet season
mc
d Bm
m
mc
w
D e A D = (7.10)
Where,
m
A = 0.97; linear gradient constant for DMC for tropical geomaterials
= mc
w
D Design Moisture Content of the geomaterial during the dry season
=
BM
e Annual Evapotranspiration Factor
B
m
= 0.03; Exponential constant for DMC tropical geomaterials
= mc
d
D Design Moisture Content of the geomaterial during the wet season
From the above equations, Mukabi et al. (2007f) developed the relations in Equations
7.11 ~ 7.13, which correlate the ratio of the seasonal bearing strength, CBR and the
resilient modulus, M
r
, presented in Table 8.35, the graphs of which are shown in Figs.
8.9 ~ 8.12.
- Seasonal Effects On Bearing Capacity and Resilient Modulus
The combined effects of seasonal changes and soaking conditions on the bearing capacity
and resilient modulus of some subgrade, subbase, and base course materials is presented in
Table 8.7 and depicted in Figs. 8.9 ~ 8.12, while the equations that can be applied to correct
for this effect are presented as follows.
The relation between the CBR wet and dry season ratio vs. the CBR determined during the
wet season is correlated as follows.
gi w gl wdr
CBR i i + = + ln (7.11)
Where,
wdr
+ = Wet
to Dry Season Bearing
Strength Ratio
gl
i =
0.0022; logarithmic CBR
gradient constant for
tropical geomaterials
gi
i =
0.54; logarithmic CBR
intercept constant for
tropical geomaterials
The relation between the
CBR wet and dry season
ratio vs. the CBR
determined during the dry
season is correlated as
follows.
gi d gl ddr
CBR i i + = + ln (7.12)
Where,
wdr
+ = Wet to Dry Season Bearing Strength Ratio
Table 8.7 Comparison of wet and dry seasons,
CBR's and Resilient Modulus
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 15
gl
i = 0.0022; logarithmic CBR gradient constant for tropical geomaterials
gi
i = 0.54; logarithmic CBR intercept constant for tropical geomaterials
gi r gl wMr
M o o , + = ln (7.13)
Where,
wMr
, = Wet to Dry Season Resilient Modulus (M
r
) Ratio
gl
o = 0.0022; logarithmic M
r
gradient constant for tropical geomaterials
gi
o = 0.54; logarithmic M
r
intercept constant for tropical geomaterials
Fig. 8.9 Effect of CBr
w
/CBR
dr
on Wet CBR Fig. 8.10 Effect of CBr
w
/CBR
dr
on Dry CBR
Fig. 8.11 RM
wet
/RM
dry
vs. Wet RM Fig. 8.12 RM
wet
/RM
dry
vs. Dry RM
Intrusion Of Native Subgrade Material Into Upper Layers of Pavement Structure
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 16
Various research undertaken by Mukabi (2001) and Mukabi et al. (2003) indicate that
Intrusion of native subgrade material into the overlying layers of the pavement usually results
in the ultimate degradation of the layers whilst causing gross variability in the quality of
pavement layer materials and thickness.
Depending on the nature of the subgrade, topography of environment and seasonal
changes, intrusion of native subgrade material into overlying layers of the pavement structure,
as depicted in Figs. 8.14 of this paper, can be rampant and extremely detrimental.
The quantitative assessment of deficiency in the physical properties of pavement
materials with time due to the intrusion of fines into the upper pavement layers is undertaken
by employing Equation 7.14 proposed by Mukabi et al. (2003b) and Equation 7.15 proposed
by Mukabi et al. (2007f).
=
S
CBR | |
US m m
CBR PI B A (7.14)
Where,
S
CBR = Soaked CBR
m
A = 0.97; linear CBR
s
gradient constant for tropical geomaterials
m
B = 0.027; linear CBR
s
intercept constant for tropical geomaterials
US
CBR = Unsoaked CBR
D C B A
CBR
CBR
init
ult
+ I + I I
=
2 3
.
.
(7.15)
Where,
=
. ult
CBR Ultimate CBR
=
. init
CBR Initial CBR
A = 0.00057,
B = 0.028,
C = 0.15, and
+ + +
=
n n
m
CBR h CBR h CBR h
CBR (10.1)
Table: 10.1 Existing Sub-grade Characteristics Based on Plate Loading Tests
Test
No.
Testing
Depth
(m)
Pressure
on Plate
Average
Maximum
Settlement
(mm)
Basic Testing Conditions
1. 0.25 2.72 3.37 Test Under Relatively Moist Conditions
2. 0.25 2.51 0.92 Tested Under Relatively Dry Conditions
3. 0.53 2.11 0.45 Tested Under Relatively Dry Conditions
4. 0.25 2.17 20.9 Soaked for 24 hrs and Tested under Soaked
Conditions
5. 0.25 2.91 3.48 Tested Under Relatively Moist Conditions
6. 0.58 3.36 2.38 Tested Under Relatively Moist Conditions
7. 0.25 2.26 4.43 Tested Under Relatively Moist Conditions
8. 0.25 3.25 1.93 Tested Under Mildly Moist Conditions
9. 0.25 1.63 1.41 Tested Under Monotonic Cyclic Loading Conditions
10. 0.25 0.82 26.0 Soaked by Rain for 16 hrs and Time Controlled
Loading
Table 10.2 Subgrade Strength CBR Design Values
Subgrade Strength-CBR Design Values
Test
No.
Test
Condition
Test
Location
CBR
Mean
1 Dry RHS 16 10.04
2 Dry RHS
35.2
6.93
3 Dry LHS 70.2 21.54
4 Dry RHS
70.2
7.96
5 Saturated
soil
Near
river
bank
3.31
6 Swampy
Area
Near
river
bank
1.62
7 Dry Area Near
river
bank
3.92
8 Soaked RHS 16 17.93
9 Soaked RHS
35.2
12.32
10 Soaked RHS
70.2
18.69
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 24
Table 10.3 Subgrade Strength CBR by Sub Section of Juba River Port access road
Fig. 10.1 Subgrade CBR Mean by Sub-section and Location
On the other hand, the Subgrade Strength Classes based on CBR values as specified by TRL
Overseas Road Note 31 are presented in Table 10.4.
Utilizing the values in this table and the material
properties of subbase and base course
determined in this Study, the pavement structure
is then designed as illustrated in section 11.
The section CBRs will be determined after
further detailed in-situ testing of the subgrade by
use of DCP.
11. PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGN
11.1 Basic Method Applied
Having determined the design CBR values for the subgrade as well as the subbase and base
course, the pavement thickness of each layer is designed so that the desirable T
A
value is
assured and the total thickness H of the surface course, base course and the subbase course
is designed to be greater than 80% of the target value.
In this case a pavement structure that considers a double seal surfacing course, an OPMC
L4
stabilized base course and OPMC
L6
stabilized subbase course and against the existing
subgrade strength and intrinsic characteristics, which were previously discussed and the
analysis done in Chapter 5 of the Engineering Report No. SST1 of May 2007.
The calculated T
A
values are then compared with the standard target values listed in Table
11.1 subsequent to which another calculation is conducted to obtain the final pavement
structure configuration if the value of T
A
falls below the target, or the total pavement thickness
H is found to fall below more than 20%. The T
A
value is calculated by the following equation:
n n A
T a T a T a T ..... .......... ..........
2 2 1 1
+ + = (11.1)
Where,
n
a a a ..., .......... ,
2 1
= Conversion coefficients shown in Table 11.2
=
n
T T T .., .......... ,
2 1
Thickness of each layer in cm.
Table 10.4 Subgrade strength classes (CBR%)
S1= 2
S2= 3,4
S3= 5 7
S4= 8 14
S5= 15 29
S6= 30+
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 25
Table 11.1 Target Value for T
A
and Total Thickness
(Source: Japan Road
Association 1989)
Note 1: TA represents the
pavement thickness
required if the entire
depth of the
pavement were to
be constructed of
hot asphalt
mixtures, used for
the binder and
surface course (see
sections 2-1-3-6 and 2-1-3-7 of the JRA).
Note 2: In the case of a road with various CBR values in the vertical direction, a filter course need not be constructed,
provided the CBR value of the uppermost layer is 3 or more, and its thickness is 30cm or more, even if the design
CBR value is 2.
Note 3: Traffic Class T7 of The TRL Overseas Road Note 31 is equivalent to C Traffic of The Japan Road Association, 1989
and Class T2 of the Kenya Road Design Manual.
Notes: Conversion
coefficients listed in Table
7.6.2 indicate the ratio of
the thickness of the
pavement by each method
and material of construction
to the thickness of hot
asphalt mix for the binder
and the surface courses
corresponding to the
thickness of each material.
Thus, the term
n n
T a of
Equation 7.37 indicates the
corresponding thickness of
the n-th layer converted
thickness of hot asphalt mix
for the binder and surface
courses. For example; 1 cm
of pavement adopting
mechanical stabilization
corresponds to 0.35 of
pavement adopting the hot
asphalt mix method , and
20cm of pavement using the
hot asphalt mix method
(0.3520=7)..
Also note the OPMC
conversion Values determined empirically for varying OPMC Stabilization levels.
Table 11.3 Standard Thickness of One Finished Layer After Compaction (cm)
Stabilization
Method
Classification of Pavement
General traffic Light traffic
Base Subbase Base Subbase
Cement
stabilization
10~20 15~30 12~20 12 or more
Lime stabilization 10~20 15~30 10~20 10 or more
Table 11.2 Conversion Co-efficient for the Calculation of T
A
Pavement
Course
Method and
Material of
Construction
Conditions Standard
Coefficient, a
n
OPMC
Coefficient,
a
n(OPMC)
Surface &
Binder
course
Hot asphalt mix for
surface and binder
course
1.00
Base Bituminous
Stabilization
Hot-mixed stability:
350kgf or more
Cold mixed stability
250 kgf or more
0.80
0.55
Cement
Stabilization
Unconfined compression
strength (7days):
30 kgf/cm
2
0.55 OPMC Level
4 = 0.65
Lime stabilization Unconfined compression
strength (10 days):
10kgf/cm
2
0.45 OPMC Level
6 = 0.78:
Cement/Lime
Combination
Crushed stone for
mechanical
stabilization
Modified CBR value: 80 or
more
0.35
Slag for mechanical
stabilization
Modified CBR value:
80 or more
0.55
Hydraulic slag Unconfined compression
strength (14 days) 12
kgf/cm
2
or more
0.55
Sub-base Crusher-Run, slag,
sand, etc
Modified CBR value:
30 or more
20 to 30
0.25
0.20
Cement stabilization Unconfined compression
strength
(7 days):
10kgf/cm
2
0.25
(Source: Japan Road Association 1989 and Mukabi, 2004a for the OPMC Stabilization Conversion Coefficients)
Design
CBR
Target Value (cm)
L Traffic A Traffic B Traffic C Traffic D Traffic
T
A
Total
Thickness H
T
A
Total
Thickness H
T
A
Total
Thickness H
T
A
Total
Thickness H
T
A
Total
Thickness H
2 17 52 21 61 29 74 39 90 51 105
3 15 41 19 48 26 58 35 70 45 90
4 14 35 18 41 24 49 32 59 41 70
6 12 27 16 32 21 38 28 47 37 55
8 11 23 14 27 19 32 26 39 34 46
12 - - 13 21 17 26 23 31 30 36
20 - - - - - - 20 23 26 27
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 26
Note: Although the gradings listed in
Table 4.4 are not absolute
requirements, it is desirable that
materials include some coarse particles
and maintain continuous grading for
ease of mixing and compaction. Very
poorly graded materials, or a cohesive
soil of high plasticity, tend to require a
large amount of additives to achieve the
desired effect of stabilization, and are,
consequently, economically
unfavourable.
Design Computation For Type I :
- Case I-1: Base Course Directly Placed on Existing Subgrade
From Table 7.6.1, based on the results from Table 7.5.3 when the mean Design CBR =
8, the required T
R
A
= 26cm and the Total Thickness H = 39cm.
Considering that a
SC
= 1.0, T
SC
= 10cm, a
BC
= 0.78 and T
BC
= 20cm then the Design
T
D
A
is computed as :
T
D
A
= 1.010+0.7820
= 25.6cm
From the above computation and design criteria,
25.6 cm < 26cm, Hence, DESIGN VALUE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE
- Case I- 2: Slightly Thicker Base Course Directly Placed on
Existing Subgrade
Considering that a
SC
= 1.0, T
SC
= 10cm, a
BC
= 0.78 and T
BC
= 25cm then the Design
T
D
A
is computed as :
T
D
A
= 1.010+0.7825
= 29.5 cm
From the above computation and design criteria,
29.5 cm > 26cm, Hence, DESIGN VALUE IS ACCEPTABLE
In this case, the typical cross-section of the pavement structure would be as depicted
below.
Carriageway Shoulder
Gravel Wearing Course
for Shoulders
Carriageway Shoulder
Existing Sub grade
1.8<CBR<20
t
A
=250mm
BC OPMC Level 5 Stabilized
Gravel Base Course
50:25:25:8:4 {Natural Gravel:
Aggregate:Sand}:Cement: Lime
Side
Ditch
Table 11.4 Desirable Range of Grading (weight % of the Fraction
passing the sieve) and PI of Materials Used for Stabilization
Sieve size
Construction Method
Bituminous
Stabilization
Cement
Stabilization
Lime
Stabilization
53mm 100
37.5mm 95~100
19mm 50~100
2.36mm 20~60
75mm 0~10 0~15 2~20
[PI] 9 or smaller 9 or smaller 6~18
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 27
Fig. 11.1 typical Cross section Type I-2 depicting pavement structure
Fig. 11.1 Typical Cross section Type I-3 depicting pavement structure
- Case I- 3: Base Course Directly Placed on Existing Subgrade with
CBR > 20
From Table 11.1, based on the Table 7.5.., when the mean Design CBR > 20, the
required T
R
A
= 20cm and the Total Thickness H = 23cm.
Considering that a
SC
= 1.0, T
SC
= 10cm, a
BC
= 0.78 and T
BC
= 20cm then the Design
T
D
A
is computed as :
T
D
A
= 1.010+0.7820
= 25.6 cm
From the above computation and design criteria,
25.6 cm > 23cm: Hence, DESIGN VALUE IS ACCEPTABLE
In this case, the typical cross-section of the pavement structure would be as depicted
below.
Carriageway Shoulder
Gravel Wearing Course
for Shoulders
Carriageway Shoulder
Existing Sub grade
CBR>20
t
A
=200mm
BC OPMC Level 5 Stabilized
Gravel Base Course
50:25:25:8:4 {Natural Gravel:
Aggregate:Sand}:Cement: Lime
Side
Ditch
Design Computation For Type II:
- Case II-1: Base Course Directly Placed on Existing Subgrade in Swampy
Areas
From Table 11.1, based on the results from Table 7.5.., when the mean Design CBR
= 2 in swampy areas, the required T
R
A
= 39cm and the Total Thickness H = 90cm.
Considering that a
SC
= 1.0, T
SC
= 10cm for Surface Course, a
BC
= 0.78, T
BC
= 25cm,
Base Course then the Design T
D
A
is computed as :
T
D
A
= 1.010+0.7825
= 29.5 cm
From the above computation and design criteria,
25.6 cm < 39cm, Hence, DESIGN VALUE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE
- Case II-2: Base Course Placed on Improved Subgrade in Swampy
Areas
Applying the ReRap Method introduced in Table From Table 11.1, based on the results
from Table 7.5.., when the mean Design CBR is improved from CBR = 2 to CBR = 30
with a Capping Layer thickness of 40 ~ 50cm in the swampy areas, then the required
T
R
A
= 20cm and the Total Thickness H = 23cm with a Capping Layer Thickness of C
p
=
50cm.
Considering that a
SC
= 1.0, T
SC
= 10cm for Surface Course, a
BC
= 0.78, T
BC
= 20cm,
Base Course then the Design T
D
A
is computed as :
T
D
A
= 1.010+0.7820
= 25.6cm
From the above computation and design criteria,
25.6 cm > 23cm: Hence, DESIGN VALUE IS ACCEPTABLE
In this case, the typical cross-section of the pavement structure would be as depicted
below.
Table 10.3
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 28
Fig. 11.2 Cross section Type II-2 -typical pavement structure for swampy areas or expansive soils
In case of extreme environmental and geological problems, Type II-3 shall be applied. Cross
section Type II-3 is illustrated in Fig. 1.3.
Fig. 11.3 Typical Cross section Type II-3 depicting typical pavement structure for swampy areas or
expansive soils in extreme conditions
Design Computation For Type II:
- Case II-1: Base Course Directly Placed on Existing Subgrade in Swampy
Areas
From Table 11.1, based on the results from Table 7.5.., when the mean Design CBR
= 2 in swampy areas, the required T
R
A
= 39cm and the Total Thickness H = 90cm.
Considering that a
SC
= 1.0, T
SC
= 10cm for Surface Course, a
BC
= 0.78, T
BC
= 25cm,
Base Course then the Design T
D
A
is computed as :
T
D
A
= 1.010+0.7825
= 29.5 cm
From the above computation and design criteria,
25.6 cm < 39cm, Hence, DESIGN VALUE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE
- Case II-2: Base Course Placed on Improved Subgrade in Swampy
Areas
Applying the ReRap Method introduced in Table From Table 11.1, based on the results
from Table 7.5.., when the mean Design CBR is improved from CBR = 2 to CBR = 30
with a Capping Layer thickness of 40 ~ 50cm in the swampy areas, then the required
T
R
A
= 20cm and the Total Thickness H = 23cm with a Capping Layer Thickness of C
p
=
50cm.
Considering that a
SC
= 1.0, T
SC
= 10cm for Surface Course, a
BC
= 0.78, T
BC
= 20cm,
Base Course then the Design T
D
A
is computed as :
T
D
A
= 1.010+0.7820
= 25.6cm
From the above computation and design criteria,
25.6 cm > 23cm: Hence, DESIGN VALUE IS ACCEPTABLE
In this case, the typical cross-section of the pavement structure would be as depicted
below.
Existing Sub grade
Carriageway
Shoulder
Carriageway
Shoulder
Side
Ditch
Gravel Wearing Course
for Shoulders
t
A
=50mm
AS
OPMC Level 5 Stabilized Gravel Base Course
Sand Filter
Natural Sand and/or Gravel Pebbles, Filter Layer
t
A
=200mm
BC
t
A
=200mm
Bf
Natural Gravel Capping Layer t
A
=500mm
Af
DBST Wearing Course
Existing Sub grade
Carriageway
Shoulder
Carriageway
Shoulder
Side
Ditch
Gravel Wearing Course
for Shoulders
t
A
=50mm
AS
OPMC Level 5 Stabilized Gravel Base Course
Sand Filter
Natural Sand and/or Gravel Pebbles, Filter Layer
t
A
=200mm
BC
t
A
=200mm
Bf
Natural Gravel Capping Layer t
A
=500mm
Af
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 29
The results of other design computations with varying conditions that were assessed and
evaluated on site are given in Table 11.5.
Table 11.5 T
R
A
and Total Thickness, H Design Parameters for Varying Conditions
12. ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL SOUNDNESS OF COMPOSITE PAVEMENT
STRUCTURE
12.1 Analysis of Deterioration of Structural Capacity and Serviceability Levels with
Progression of Time
12.1.1 Definition of Functional and Structural Failures
Distinctively, there are two different types of failure. The Structural Failure includes a collapse
of the pavement structure or a breakdown of one or more of the pavement components of
such magnitude to make the pavement incapable of sustaining the loads imposed upon its
surface. The second type is classified as functional failure and may or may not be
accompanied by structural failure but is such that the pavement will not carry out its intended
function without causing discomfort to passengers or without causing high stresses in the
vehicle that passes over it due to roughness. Obviously the degree of distress for both
categories is gradational, and the severity of distress of any pavement is largely a matter of
opinion of the person observing the distress. As an example, consider a rigid highway
Item
No.
Pavement
Type
Sub-section Conditions
Sub-
section
Length (m)
Pavement Structure Design Parameters
Combined Sub-
grade CBR %
T
R
A
(cm)
Total
Thickness H
(cm)
Structural Layer Configuration
1 I-2
Existing Sub-grade
composed of Natural
Gravel with appreciable
Structural Capacity of
Layer Thickness t
NG
>
20cm
CBR 20
26
(29.5)
39
(39.50
2. I-3
Existing Sub-grade
composed of Natural
Gravel with High
Structural Capacity of
Layer Thickness t
NG
>
20cm
20
20
(26.5)
23
(30)
3. II-2
Swampy Areas with weak
sub-grade computed of
Expansive Soil
2
39/23
*
(26.5)*
90/31*
(90/30)*
4. II-3
Swampy Areas with weak
sub-grade computed of
Expansive Soil
2
39/23
*
(26.5)*
90/31*
(90/30)*
5. III-2
Areas with Type I-2
Subgrade but poor
Drainage
8 CBR 20
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 30
pavement that has been resurfaced with an asphaltic overlay. The surface may develop rough
spots as a result of breakup in the bituminous overlay (functional failure) without structural
breakdown of the overall structure. On the other hand, the same pavement may crack and
break up as a result of overload (structural failure). Maintenance measures for the first
situation may consist of resurfacing to restore smooth riding qualities to the pavement.
However, the structural type of failure may require complete rebuilding.
12.1.2 Analysis of Structural Capacity
Table 12.1.1 is a summary of design parameters determined at equilibrium moisture content.
On the other hand, a summary of the deterioration factors and depletion with the progression
of the pavement structure due to seasonal cycle and dynamic loading effects is given in Table
12.1.2 and 12.1.3, while the characteristic curves are presented in Figs. 12.1.1 ~ 12.1.3.
The data was
generated by
applying the
following empirical
equations
developed and
proposed by
Mukabi (2004) and
Mukabi et. al.
(2007f).
SC t SC t SC
SC
t
C N B N A f + = (12.1)
Where,
= SC
t
f Time dependent Structural Capacity Factor
=
SC
A 0.001, =
SC
B 0.0507 and =
SC
C 1.13 are Structural Capacity~Time related
constants
=
t
N Time Progression in Years
The Structural Capacity Deteriorating Factor, = SC
d
f is then computed as:
th ru msv
SC
t
SC
d
f f f f f =
. int
(12.2)
Where,
=
msv
f Moisture~Suction Depreciating Factor
. int ru
f = Inferior Material Intrusion Depreciating Factor
=
th
f Pavement Layer Thickness Depreciating Factor
Equations 7.24 ~ 7.28 are then applied.
a. Without Any Maintenance Scenario
The case whereby NO maintenance is undertaken is presented in Table 12.3.1 and Figs.
12.3.1 ~ 12.3.3.
It can be noted that in this case the pavement structure deteriorates to reach a critical state
that requires resurfacing after 8 years.
Table 12.1.1 Summary of design parameters at equilibrium moisture content
Mode of
stabilization
Layer
type
Design parameters
qu
(kgf/cm
2
)
Emax
(kgf/cm
2
)
(
a
)
ELS
x 10
-3
(%)
CBR
(%)
(kgf/cm
2
)
(cm
)
H
(cm)
OPMC
L6
Base
Course
39.2 237,53
6
0.578 611 454,663 29.5 35
OPMC
L4
Subbase
or
Shoulders
13.8 36,717 0.563 245 26,085 - -
(Nil) Natural
Gravel
Capping
Layer
7.4 1,437 0.015
1
30 1,362 39 90
NOTES: 1. OPMCL6: - 50:25:25:6:4% being Ratio of Natural Gravel:Aggregate:Cement:Lime
1. OPMCL4:- 100:4:2% being Ratio of Natural Gravel:Cement:Lime
2. The Ratio of Cement and Lime is aginst 100% of the geomaterial measured by volume.
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 31
b. With Maintenance Scenario
In this case it is considered that periodic maintenance and resurfacing will be implemented
accordingly. Also refer to Chapter 10.
The requirements are presented in Figs. 12.1.4 and 12.1.6.
From the above tables and figures, it can be clearly noted that, under normal circumstances
and provided that the traffic growth rate and loading do not exceed the parameters in section
7.3 of Chapter 7, the Juba River Port Access will require resurfacing after 8 years of post-
construction stage.
12.1.3 Analysis of Serviceability Level
The serviceability level can be monitored by applying the graphical representation proposed
by Mukabi (2004b), presented as Fig. 12.1.6.
Table 12.1.2 Summary of Deteroriation Factors and Depletion of
Structural Capacity Due to Seasonal Cycle and Dynamic Loading Effects
Design TAD=29.5,TAcr =23,H=35 tDBST=10cm,Nt>2.2 Years
Figure 12.1.3 Effect of Time progression on
the Resulting structural thickness
Fig. 12.1.4 Effect of Time progression on the
Resulting strusctural thickness
Fig. 12.1.5 Effect of Time progression on the Resulting
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 32
Fig. 12.1.6 Graph Depicting Depreciation Curves of Serviceability Level vs. period
of Cumulative Loading.
12.2 Structural Soundness Under Normal Loading Conditions
12.2.1 Analysis of Direct Surcharge Only
The extent and effect of surcharge loading on the subgrade was evaluated by applying
Equation 7.20, where the surcharge pressure
sc
= 53.8kPa then:
7 . 15 8 . 53 ln 98 . 4 + = A
s
= % 15 . 4
This implies that the swell in the swampy areas will be contained effectively.
12.2.2 Analysis of Surcharge and Dynamic Loading
The surcharge and dynamic loading analysis was carried out in section 12.1.2.
12.3 Structural Soundness Under Critical State Conditions
The structural soundness of the pavement structure under Critical State Conditions, whereby
all factors contributing to the deterioration of the pavement are within extreme boundary limits,
was analyzed and the results are summarized in Tables, while the corresponding
characteristic curves are depicted in figures.
Without Any Maintenance Scenario
The case whereby NO maintenance is
undertaken is presented in Fig. 12.3.1.
It can be noted that in this case the pavement
structure deteriorates rapidly after the third
year attaining a critical state that requires
resurfacing after only 4 years.
With Maintenance Scenario
In this case it is considered that periodic
maintenance and resurfacing will be
implemented accordingly. Also refer to
Chapter 10.
The requirements are presented in Fig. 12.3.2.
Fig. 12.3.1 Effect of Time progression (Nt) on
Depreciated Structural Capacity factor
Without Any Maintenance Scenario
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 33
13. CONCLUSIONS
Comprehensive testing and analytical
methods were employed in this Study in
order to realize the most Value Engineering
based solution for the pavement structure of
the Juba River Port Access Road in Juba
Town, Central Equatoria State of Southern
Sudan.
From both the laboratory and field
tests results analyzed and discussed in
Chapter 5 and summarized in Chapter 7 of
the Engineering Report No. SST1 of May
2007, it can be concluded that the design
proposed in this Engineering Report is
adequate for the project pavement structure
provided that the construction is undertaken in accordance with the Standard, Technical, and
Particular Specifications as well as the stipulations in the Method of Construction.
Furthermore, in all the cases considered, and as can also be observed from the
concluding tables and figures presented in the various chapters, it was derived that the
Optimum Mechanical and Chemical (OPMC) stabilizing method was effective in enhancing
the vital engineering properties of the geomaterials adopted as well as the composite
pavement structure. Fundamentally, this method was quite effective in;
1. Retaining a substantial proportion of their strength even with increased
saturation levels.
2. Reducing tremendously the surface deflection of the layers under loading.
3. Increasing resistance to erosion due to the scouring effect of water flow.
4. Increasing resistance to contamination by materials in underlying or
supporting layers that are not stabilized.
5. Increasing the effective elastic moduli of the composite pavement structure.
6. Realizing an acceptable cost-effective design.
The OPMC stabilization technique, developed on the basis of a new approach, was
determined to be the most cost-effective and value engineering based method in respect to all
prevalent conditions considered. It is envisaged to be an interesting structure in terms of Case
Study Analysis and Research for further development as an effective countermeasure for
landslides, foundations, slope stability, embankment and pavement structure design and
construction.
Fig. 12.3.2 With Maintenance Scenario
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 34
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author is highly indebted to the contributions of Professor Fumio Tatsuoka and the
University of Tokyo. Sincere appreciation is also expressed to the Japan International
Cooperation Agency (JICA), Japan Bank of International Cooperation (JBIC), Construction
Project Consultants Inc., Kajima Corporation and Kajima Foundation for funding the
subsequent part of the study conducted in Africa. The authors wish to express their sincere
appreciation to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Japan Bank of International
Cooperation (JBIC), Construction Project Consultants Inc., Kajima Corporation and Kajima Foundation
for funding most of the study. The paper would certainly not have been completed without the crucial
support of Ms. Piera Cesaroni, and the input of Kenneth Wambugu, Ms. Zekal Ketsella, Joram Okado,
Paul Kinyanjui, Bryan Otieno, Walter Okello, and Anthony Ngigi. It is also important to mention the
cooperation and assistance extended by the Ethiopian Roads Authority as well as the Ministry of
Roads, Public Works and Housing, Kenya.
MAIN REFERENCES
Ampadu, S.K (1988): The influence of initial shear on undrained Behaviour of normally consolidated Kaolin,
Master Thesis, University of Tokyo.
Bejerrum, L., 1993. Problems of soil mechanics and construction on soft clay and structurally unstable soils
(collapsible, expansive and other). In Proc. 8
th
Int. Conference on SMFE, Moscow. P111~159.
Blyth, F.G.H., & de Freitas M.H>(1998) A Geology for Engineers 7
th
Edition. Arnold, A member of Hodder
Headline Group LONDON. SYDNEY. AUCKLAND. Bulletin of Earthquake Resistant Structure Research
Centre No. 27 1994. dependence on Frequency of the Failure process of a slope Made up of Coarse
Particles. K. Konagai and T. Sato. Institute of Industrial Science University of Tokyo.
Burland, J.B. and Wroth, C.P., (1974) Review Paper : Settlement of buildings and associated damage, in
Proceeding of the Conference on Settlement of Structures, Pentech Press, Cambridge, 1974. pp.
611~654
Burland, J.B., Borroms, B.B., and De Mello, V., (1977) Behaviour of foundations and structures Proceedings of
the 9
th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics, Tokyo, 1977, Session 2
Burland, J.B (1990); On the compressibility and shear strength on clays and shades at constant water content,
Geotechnique, Vol. 2, PP,251.
Construction Project Consultant (1995). Tana Basin Road Development Project, Phase II Materials Report Vo. 3
Construction Project Consultant Inc., May, 2000, Hydrological Review and Analyses for Hydraulic Design of
Bridge and Major Culvert Structures and Determination of Areas of Protection, Volume I & II, Tana Basin
Road Project Phase II
Construction Project Consultant Inc., July, 2000 Engineering Report on the Design and Construction of
Reinforced Earth Embankments (The Terre Armee Method), Tana Basin Road Project Phase II.
Construction Project Consultant, 2001a. A Brief Report on the Computation of Capping Layer Thickness with
Reference to Native Subgrade Bearing Capacity, CPC Internal Report
Construction Project Consultants, 2001b. Analysis And Evaluation of the Structural Capacity and Serviceability
Level of the Existing Road Pavement (Phase III), CPC Internal Report
Construction Project Consultants, 2001c. Characterization of Black Cotton Soil as a Pavement Foundation
Material Based On Comprehensive Analysis (Stage 1), CPC Internal Report
CPC Consultants. Tana Basin Road Development Project, Phase II. Materials Report Vol. 3 Tatsuoka, F. &
Shibuya, S. Report of the institute of industrial science the University of Tokyo Vol. 37 No. (serial No.
235) (1992) Deformation Characteristics of soils and Rocks from Field and Laboratory Tests
Gidigasu. M.D. 1974a. Review of Identification of Problem Laterite Soils in Highway engineering, Transport
Research Board, Washington Recording, I, 497:96~111
Gidigasu. M.D. 1988. Potential application of engineering pedology in shallow foundation engineering on tropical
residual soils. In Geomechanics in Tropical Coils. Proc. of the II Intl Conference on Geomechanics in
Tropical Soils, Singapore, 1,17~24.
Gono, k., Mukabi, J.N., Koishikawa, K., Hatekayama, R., Feleke G., Demoze W., Zelalem A., (2003a).
Characterization of Some Engineering Aspects of Black Cotton Soils as Pavement Foundation Materials,
to be published in the proceedings of the International Civil Engineering Conference on Sustainable
development in the 21st Century.
Hansen, J. Brinch, (1968) A revised extended formula for bearing capacity, Danish Geotechnical Institute Bulletin
No. 28 and code of Practice for Foundation Engineering Danish Geotechnical Institute Bulletin No. 32
(1978)
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 35
Hardin, B.O and Drnevich, V.P. (1972), Shear-modulus and damping in soils : measurement and parameter
effects, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 98, No. SM6:603-624
Horii, N., Toyosawa, Y.& Ampadu, S.K Undrained shear characteristics of soft clay after cyclic loading .pp.
113~118.Housner, G. W.: The Behaviour of Inverted Pendulum Structures During Earthquakes, Bull. of
the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 403-417, 1963.
Honsen, J. Brinch, (1961) A general formula for bearing capacity, Danish Geotechnical Institute Bulletin No. 11
Imad L.Al-Qadi, Gerardo W. Flintsch, Amara Loulizi, Samer Lahouar & Walid M. Nassar Pavement
Instrumentation Responses at the Virginia Smart Road. IRF Road World Congress, Paris, June 2001.
Japan Road Bureau, Japan. 1993. In Road Design Manual, Vol. I (in Japanese).
Jardine, R.J. 1985. Investigations of pile-soil behaviour, with special reference to the foundation of offshore
structures. PhD Thesis, University of London.
JICA Study Team, 1999. The Study on Rural Roads Improvement In Western Kenya-Materials Testing Analyses
and Countermeasures for Design Purposes, Feasibility Study by The Government of Japan And The
Government of Kenya. Jardine, R.J. (1995): One perspective of the pre-failure deformation
characteristics of some geomaterials, IS Hokkaido 94,2,pp.855-885.
Kensetsu Kaihatsu, Juba River Port Access Road Design A Comprehensive Engineering Report on the Study,
Design and Method of Construction Engineering report No. SST1
Konagai
1
Kazuo and Sato
2
Takeshi. Dependence on Frequency of the Failure Process of Slope Made up of
coarse Particles. pp. 33~39
K.J. McManus, G. Lu and D. Ruan, The Effects on a Bridge Superstructure of Dynamic Loads Generated by
Long Wavelength Roughness in Road Surfaces. IRF Road World Congress, Paris, June 2001.
Meyerh of, G.G., (1963) some recent research on bearing capacity of foundations, Canadian Geotechnical
Journal, 1, 16-26.
Ministry of Transport & Public Works, Kenya, 1981. Materials and Pavement Design for New Roads. In Road
Design Manual Part III.
Ministry of Public Works & Housing Republic of Kenya, March 1999. Report to OECF Appraisal Mission for the
Additional Loan to Tana Basin Road Project in the Republic of Kenya, Volume I & II.
Mukabi, J.N.(1991): Behaviour of clays for a wide range of strain in Triaxial compression, Msc. Thesis, University
of Tokyo.
Mukabi, J. N. (1995): Deformation Characteristics of small strains of clays in triaxial tests PhD Thesis, Univ. of
Tokyo. Mukabi, J.N. (1998):Con-Aid Research and Development Proposal.
Mukabi.,J.N., Murunga P.A, Wambura.J.H. & Maina J.N., Behaviour of con-Aid treated fine grained Kenyan soils.
Geotechnics for Developing Africa, Wardle, Blight & Fourie (eds) 1999 Balkema, Rotterdam, ISBN 90
809 082 5.pp.583~519.
Mukabi J.N & Tatsuoka, F. 1995. Effects of swelling and saturation of Unsaturated Soil Behaviour and
Applications, Int. Symposium on the Behaviour of Unsaturated Soils, University of Nairobi, Nairobi,
Kenya.
Mukabi J.N & Tatsuoka, F., Kohata, Y. & Akino, N. 1994b. Small strain stiffness of Pleistocene clays. Proc.
Int.Symp. on pre-failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, IS-Hokkaido. 94 Balkema, Vol. 1,
PP. 189-195
Mukabi J.N & Tatsuoka, F. (1992); Effects of consolidation stress ratio and strain rate on the peak stress ratio of
Kaolin, the 27
th
Annual meeting of the JSSMFE, Kochi, PP.655~6
Mukabi J.N. & Tatsuoka, F. (1994); Small strain behaviour in triaxial compression of lightly over consolidated
Kaolin, proc. 49
th
Annual Conf. Of JSCE, III, pp.296~297Mukabi J.N & Tatsuoka, F. 1999. Effects of
stress path and ageing in reconsolidation on deformation characteristics of stiff natural clays. Proc. 2
nd
I.S on pre-failure characteristic of geomaterials, Torino.
Mukabi, J.N 1999. The Study on Rural Roads Improvement in Western Kenya Materials Testing Analyses and
Countermeasures for Design Purposes. In Internal Reports and Correspondence, Japan International
Cooperation Agency (JICA) & Ministry of Roads & Public Works, Kenya.
Mukabi, J.N. 2000. The design and construction of Reinforced Earth Embankments. In Internal Reports and
Correspondence, The Terre Armee Method, 2000. CPC, Nairobi.
Mukabi, J.N & Tatsuoka, F. 1994, 1999. Small strain behaviour in triaxial compression of lightly over-
consolidated Kaolin. In Proc. 49
th
Annual Conf. of JSCE, III: 286-297. Influence of reconsolidation stress
history and strain rate on the behaviour of kaolin over a wide range of strain. In Wardle, Blight & Fourier
(eds), Geotechniques for Developing Africa: Proc. 12
th
African Regional Conf. ISSMGE Durban, 1999.
Balkema, Rotterdam.
Mukabi, J.N. 2001a. Theoretical and empirical basis for a method of determining the optimum batching ratio for
mechanical stabilization of geomaterials. In Proc. 14
th
IRF road World Congress, Paris, June 2001.
Mukabi, J.N & Shimizu, N. 2001b. Strength and deformation characteristics of mechanically stabilized road
construction materials based on a new batching ratio method. In Proc. 14
th
IRF Road World Congress,
Paris, June 2001.
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 36
Mukabi, J.N. Njoroge, B.N. & Toda, T. 2001c. pragmatic method of evaluating design parameters adopting
Kenyan tropical soils for pavement structure, In Procl 4
th
IRF Road World Congress, Paris, June 2000.
Mukabi, J.N, 2001d. Derivation and application of consolidation and shear stress ratio functions with reference to
Critical State analysis of N.C clays. In Proc. ISSMGE Istanbul International Conference. August 2001.
Mukabi, J.N., 2002c. Some Recent Advances in highway and bridge foundation engineering, Seminar for
Ethiopian Roads Authority and Japan Overseas Development Assistance Ethiopia.
Mukabi, J.N., Gono K., Koishikawa K., Feleke G., Hatekayam H., Demoze W., R., Kunioka H., Zelalem A.,
(2003a). Innovating Modified NDT/DT Techniques for the Evaluation of An Existing Pavement Structure-
Method of Testing, published in the proceedings of the International Civil Engineering Conference on
Sustainable development in the 21
st
Century.
Mukabi, J.N., Gono K., Koishikawa K., Feleke G., Hatekayam R., Demoze W., Kunioka H., Zelalem A., (2003b).
Innovating Modified NDT/DT Techniques for the Evaluation of An Existing Pavement Structure-
Theoretical Considerations and Experimental Results, published in the proceedings of the International
Civil Engineering Conference on Sustainable development in the 21
st
Century.
Mukabi, J.N., Feleke G., Demoze W., Zelalem A., (2003c). Impact of Environmental Factors on the
Performance of Highway Pavement Structures, published in the proceedings of the International Civil
Engineering Conference on Sustainable development in the 21
st
Century.
Mukabi, J.N., (2003d). The Role of Enhanced Research Oriented Highway and Foundation Design for
Sustainable Development, published in the proceedings of the International Civil Engineering
Conference on Sustainable development in the 21
st
Century.
Mukabi, J.N., (2005a). Some Vital Engineering Aspects of The Consultancy Completion Report of the Addis
Ababa~Goha Tsion International Trunk Road, A JICA Study.
Newill, R.J. (1961). A Laboratory Investigation of Two Red Clays from Kenya, Geotechnique, 11(4)
302~318.Pandian, N.S., Nagaraj, T.S. & Sivakumar Banu, G.L (1993). Tropical Clays, Part II.
Engineering behaviour. J. Geotech. Engrag., ASCE.
Peck, R.B., Hanson, W.E. & Thornburn, T.H 1967. (2
nd
ed) Foundation Engineering, 271-276. New York, John
Wiley.
Richart, Jr., F.E. (1977); Dynamic stress-strain relationships for soils, S-SO-A ,Proc. Of 9
th
ICSMFE, Tokyo, 3,
pp.189-195.
Road Research. Catalogue of road surface deficiencies. 1978 Organization for economic cooperation and
development. Road Research Institute. MOC, Japan. 1990 Specifications for road and bridge design,
Vol. I & IV. (in Japanese)
Road Research Laboratory, 1970. A guide to the structural design of pavements for new road. Road Note No.
29.
Road Transport Research. Pavement Management Systems. Paris, 1987 Organization for economic cooperation
and development.
Skempton, A.W and MacDonald, D.H. (1956), The allowable Settlement of buildings, Proceedings, of the
Institution of Civil Engineers, part 3, 5, 727-784
Savage, P.F. & Leou, J. (1998). Guidelines on Use of CON-AID Liquid Chemical Stabilizer.
Savage, P.F. (1998). Some Experiences on the Use of Con-Aid: A Water-Soluble Ionic Additive, University of
Pretoria. Tatsuoka Fumio, Lo Presti Diego and Kohata Yukihiro, April 2-7, 1995, Third International
Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics.
Shultze, E. and sheriff, G., Prediction of Settlement from evaluated settlement observations for sand,
Proceedings of the 8
th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics, Moscow, 1973, Vol. 1, pp. 225.
Tatsuoka, F, Jardine, R. J., Lopresti, D., Benedetto, D. H. and Kodaka, T. (1997). Characterizing the pre-failure
Deformation Properties of Geomaterials, Theme lecture ICSMFE, Hamburg, vol. 4. pp.2129-2164.
Tatsuoka, F. 1992 Roles of facing rigidity in soil Reinforcing, Theme Lecture for International Symposium,
Kyushu, Japan.
Tatsuoka, F, Jardine, R. J., Lopresti, D., Benedetto, D. H. and Kodaka, T. (1999). Characterizing the pre-failure
Deformation Properties of Geomaterials, Theme lecture ICSMFE, Hamburg, 1997, vol. 4. pp.2129-
2164.2,pp.947-1063.
Tatsuoka, F. and Kohata, Y. (1995): Stiffness of hard soils and soft rocks in engineering applications, Keynote
Lecture, IS-Hokkaido 94,Vol.
Terzaghi, K. & Peck, R.b 1967. (2
nd
ed) Soil Mechanics in engineering practice, 310. New York, John Wiley.
Towhata, I., Kawasaki, Y., Harada, N. & Sunaga, M. Contraction of soil subjected to traffic-type stress
application. Proc. Int. Symp. On Pre-failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, IS-Hokkado
94, Balkema Vol. 1, pp. 305~310.
Transport and Road Research Laboratory. 1977. A guide to the structural design of bitumen surfaced roads in
tropical and sub-topical countries. Road Note No. 31Vanghn, P.R. 1985. Geotechnical Characteristics of
[Mukabi JN (Ph.D) KEYNOTE LECTURE] Page 37
residual soils. In J. Geotech. Engrg. ASCE, III(1) 77~94. Yoder, E.J & Witczak, M.W; (1975). Principles
of Pavement Design Second Edition, A Wile-Interscience Publication-John Wiley-Sons, Inc.