Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 2 1 1
2 2 2 22 1 21
1 1 2 12 1 11
where
, , 1 , , , 2 , 1 , , n j m i b a
i ij
are constants.
Example:1Consider the following system of linear equations:
6 7
8 3 2
3 , 4 2 5 2 3
4 3
3 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
+
+
+
x x
x x x
n m x x x
x x x
Example: 2 Which of the following are linear equations?
2
1 2 3
1 2 3
( ) 3 2 7 ( ) (sin ) 4 (log5) ( ) 2
3
1
( ) 2 4 ( ) sin 2 3 0 ( ) 4
x
a x y b x x x e c x y
d e y e x x x f x
y
+ + +
+ +
( ) and ( ) are linear equations. a b ( ), ( ), ( ), and ( ) are not linear. c d e f
Number of Solutions of a System of Linear Equations
Consider the following systems of linear equations
(a)
1
3
x y
x y
'
+
(b)
4
2
x y
x y
+
'
+
(c)
6 2 8
3 4
x y
x y
+
'
Back Substitution
Which of the following systems is easier to solve?
2 3 9
( ) 3 7 6 22
2 5 5 17
x y z
a x y z
x y z
+
+
'
2 3 9
( ) 3 5
2
x y z
b y z
z
+
+
'
1
1
1
1
]
1
1
1
1
1
]
1
n mn m m
n
n
x
x
x
a a a
a a a
a a a
Example:
6 5y - 2
1 3
x
y x
B X A
6
1
y
x
5 2
1 3
1
]
1
1
]
1
1
]
1
Row-Equivalent
Two
m n
matrices are said to be row-equivalent if one can be obtained by the
other by a series of elementary row operations.
Now we are in the stage to tackle
the question.
How to solve a linear system AX =
B?
First: Row operations
The key to solve a system of linear equations is to transform the original
augmented matrix to some matrix with some properties via a few elementary
row operations. As a matter of fact, we can solve any system of linear equations
by transforming the associate augmented matrix to a matrix in some
form. The form is referred to as the reduced row echelon form.
Definition of elementary row operation:
There are 3 elementary row operations:
1. Interchange two rows
2. Multiply a row by some nonzero constant
4
Add a multiple of a row to another row
Definition of a matrix in reduced row echelon form:
A matrix in reduced row echelon form has the following properties:
1. All rows consisting entirely of 0 are at the bottom of the matrix.
2. For each nonzero row, the first entry is 1. The first entry is called a
leading 1.
3. For two successive nonzero rows, the leading 1 in the higher row
appears farther to the left than the leading 1 in the lower row.
4.
If a column contains a leading 1, then all other entries in that column
are 0.
Note: a matrix is in row echelon form as the matrix has the first 3
properties.
Example 3
And
1
1
1
1
1
1
]
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
are the matrices in reduced
row echelon form.
The matrix
1
1
1
1
]
1
0 0 0 0
2 1 0 0
5 2 1 0
4 3 2 1
is not in reduced row echelon form but in row echelon form since the matrix
has the first 3 properties and all the other entries above the leading 1 in the third
column are not 0. The matrix
1
1
1
1
]
1
0 0 0 0
2 2 1 0
5 2 1 0
4 3 0 1
are not in row echelon form (also not in reduced row echelon form) since the
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
]
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
leading 1 in the second row is not in the left of the leading 1 in the third row
and all the other entries above the leading 1 in the third column are not 0.
Definition of elementary row operation:
There are 3 elementary row operations:
3. Interchange two rows
4. Multiply a row by some nonzero constant
5. Add a multiple of a row to another row.
1.1 Gauss-elimination method
(REF)
Step 1: Form augmented matrix
[ ] b A :
Step 2: Transform
[ ] b A :
to row echelon form matrix
[ ] D C :
using row
operations
Step 3: Solve the system corresponding to
[ ] D C :
, using back substitution
Example: Solve the following system of equations
3 - z - y 2 - x 3
1 y x
5 z 3 y - 2
+
+ x
using
Gauss elimination.
Sol.
1
1
1
]
1
3 : 1 2 3
1 : 0 1 1
5 : 3 1 2
1 1
R
2
1
R
1
1
1
]
1
3 : 1 2 3
1 : 0 1 1
2
5
:
2
3
2
1
1
R3 3R
R R
1 3
2 1 2
R
R
1
1
1
1
]
1
2 / 21 : 2 / 11 2 / 1 0
2
3
:
2
3
2
3
0
2
5
:
2
3
2
1
1
3 3
2 2
R 2
R
3
2
R
R
1
1
1
]
1
21 : 11 1 0
1 : 1 1 0
2
5
:
2
3
2
1
1
3 2 3
R R R
6
1
1
1
]
1
22 : 12 0 0
1 : 1 1 0
2
5
:
2
3
2
1
1
3 3
R
12
1
R
1
1
1
]
1
6
11
: 1 0 0
1 : 1 1 0
2
5
:
2
3
2
1
1
So, z = 11/6 , y = 5/6, x = 1/6
1.2 Gauss-Jordan Reduction
Method (RREF)
Step 1: Form augmented matrix
[ ] b A :
Step 2: Transform
[ ] b A :
to reduced row echelon form matrix
[ ] F H :
using
row operations
Step 3: for each nonzero row in
[ ] F H :
, solve the corresponding equations
Example: Solve the following linear system of equations
3 z - x 3
8 z y 2x
9 z 3 2y
+
+ + x
using
Gauss-Jordan reduction method
Sol.
1
1
1
]
1
3 : 1 0 3
8 : 1 1 2
9 : 3 2 1
3 1 3
2 1 2
R 3R -
R 2R
R
R
1
1
1
]
1
24 : 10 6 0
10 : 5 5 0
9 : 3 2 1
2 2
R
5
1
R
1
1
1
]
1
24 : 10 6 0
2 : 1 1 0
9 : 3 2 1
1 2 1
3 2 3
R 2R
R 6R
+
R
R
1
1
1
]
1
12 : 4 0 0
2 : 1 1 0
5 : 1 0 1
3 3
R
4
1
R
7
1
1
1
]
1
3 : 1 0 0
2 : 1 1 0
5 : 1 0 1
1 3 1
2 3 2
R R
R R
R
R
1
1
1
]
1
3 : 1 0 0
1 : 0 1 0
2 : 0 0 1
So, x = 2, y = -1, z = 3
1.3Using inverse matrix method
The Inverse of matrix A:
Definition: A square matrix A is said to be nonsingular (invertible) if there exist
a matrix B such that:
A
nxn
B
nxn
= B
nxn
A
nxn
= I
nxn
B is called the inverse of A and denoted by A
-1
so A A
-1
= A
-1
A = I
If B does not exist, then we say that A is singular (noninvertible) matrix
Example:
1
]
1
4 3
2 1
A
Nonsingular
1
]
1
4 2
2 1
A
Singular
Properties:
Let A be a nonsingular matrix, then:
1.
( A
-1
)
-1
= A
2.
( A
-1
)
T
= (A
T
)
-1
3.
(AB)
-1
= B
-1
A
-1
4.
(A
1
A
2
A
3
A
n
)
-1
= A
n
-1
A
n-1
-1
A
2
-1
A
1
How to find A
-1
?
Basically there are two methods
1. Row operation
2. Using determinant and adjoint matrix
8
Procedure of computing
1
A
using row operations
Let A be an nxn matrix
Step1: Form the
) 2 ( n n
matrix
[ ] I A|
Step2: Use elementary row operations to transform
[ ] I A|
to the form
[ ] B I |
Step3: If the form
[ ] B I |
is possible the
B A
1
otherwise A is singular.
Example: Use row operations to find the inverse of
10 1 - 1
4 5 2
3 2 1
1
1
1
]
1
A
If A is a nonsingular matrix, then A
-1
exist hence we can get the solution as
1
1
1 1
B A X
B A X I
B A A X A
-
-
-
1
]
1
1
]
1
2 3
1 - 2
A
1
]
1
,
Finding the Inverse of a 2 X 2 matrix
Let
a b
A
c d
1
1
]
and suppose det(A) = ad cb 0. Then
1
A
exists and is
given by
1
1
d b
A
c a D
]
.
det (A) = 7 0. So, A
-1
exist
1
]
1
2 3 -
1 2
7
1
A
1 -
y
x
1
1
7
7
7
1
5
1
2 3 -
1 2
7
1
B A
1 -
1
]
1
1
]
1
1
]
1
1
]
1
1
]
1
X
9
So the solution is x = y = 1
Calculation of Inverse Matrix:
Example
To find the inverse of
1
1
1
]
1
5 3 1
5 3 2
2 1 1
A
, we can employ the procedure
introduced above.
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
5
5
2
3
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
]
1
.
+
) 1 ( * 2 ) 2 ( ) 2 (
) 1 ( ) 3 ( ) 3 (
r r r
r r r
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
1
3
1
2
2
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
]
1
) 2 ( * 1 ) 2 ( r r
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
1
3
1
2
2
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
]
1
+
) 2 ( * 2 ) 3 ( ) 3 (
) 2 ( ) 1 ( ) 1 (
r r r
r r r
1
0
0
2
1
1
3
2
3
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
]
1
+
) 3 ( ) 2 ( ) 2 (
) 3 ( ) 1 ( ) 1 (
r r r
r r r
1
1
1
2
3
1
3
5
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
]
1
The inverse of A is
1
1
1
]
1
1 2 3
1 3 5
1 1 0
.
2. Using the adjoint
) ( A adj
of a matrix to calculate A
-1
As
0 ) det( A
, then
) det(
) (
1
A
A adj
A
.
Note: If
0 ) det( A
A is nonsingular
1.4 Using Cramers rule
This Method is to solve a linear system of equations AX = B, if A is nxn
matrix nonsingular matrix
Step 1: Find det (A). If det A = 0, then the method cant be applied
Step 2: If det (A) 0, then
(A) det
A det
i
i
x
10
where A
i
is the matrix obtained from A by replacing the i
th
column of A by B
If n 4 Cramers rule is computationally inefficient.
Example: Use Cramers rule to solve the system:
3 - z y - 2x -
4 z - 2y x
1 z - 3y 2x -
+
+
+
,
1 1 2
1 2 1
1 - 3 2 -
1
1
1
]
1
A
1
1
1
]
1
3 -
4
1
B
2 -
-1(3) (-1) 3 - (1) 2 -
4) (-1)(-1 2) - 3(1 - 1) - (2 2 -
+
+ +
2
A
A
x 4 - (2) (-1) 3(1) - ) 1(1
1 1 - 3 -
1 - 2 4
1 - 3 1
A
x
x
+
1
1
1
]
1
3
A
y 6 - (5) (-1) (-1) 1 - (1) 2 -
1 3 - 2 -
1 - 4 1
1 - 1 2 -
A
y
y
+
1
1
1
]
1
A
4
A
A
z 8 - 1(3) 3(5) - 2(-2) -
3 - 1 - 2 -
4 2 1
1 3 2 -
A
z
z
+
1
1
1
]
1
A
(A) is defined as:
A a A a ) det(
i2 i2 i1 i1 in
n
i
A a A + + +
where 1 i n expansion over the row i or
A a A a ) det(
2j 2j 1j 1j nj nj
A a A + + +
where 1 j n expansion over the column j
What is A
ij
?
A
ij
is the cofactor of a
ij
given by
A
ij
= (-1)
i+j
det (M
ij
), where M
ij
is the (n-1)x(n-1) submatrix of A obtained by
deleting the i
th
row and the j
th
column.
Whenever you want to use cofactor method choose the row or the column with
the highest number of zeroes
Example: Use cofactor method to evaluate the determinant of
1
1
1
]
1
7 3 2
5 0 1 -
3 2 1
A
A
21
= (-1)
2+1
det M
21
1
]
1
7 3
3 2
21
M
5 5 x (-1) A
1 2
21
+
A
23
= (-1)
2+3
det M
23
1
]
1
3 2
2 1
23
M
1 1 - x (-1) A
3 2
23
+
Since
0
22
a
no need to evaluate
0
22
A
and
10 1 5 5 1 - A a A det
23 23 21 21
+ + A a
Properties of Determinant
1.
det (AB ) = det A det B
2.
det (A
T
) = det (A)
12
3.
( )
1
1
A
1
A
A
4.
If r
i
= 0 or c
i
= 0 , then det(A) = 0
1 5 2
0 0 0
5 - 3 1
1
1
1
]
1
A
r
2
=0 So, A = 0
5.
if r
i
= r
j
or c
i
= c
j
, then det(A) = 0
1 - 5 1 -
2 2 2
1 3 1
1
1
1
]
1
A
c
1
= c
3
So, A =
0
6.
if we interchange : r
i
r
j
or c
i
c
j
then
) det( ) det( A A
New
7 1 5
2 1 - 1
2 1 3
1
1
1
]
1
A
r
3
r
1
2 1 3
2 1 - 1
7 1 5
1
1
1
]
1
B
if det A = c then
det B = - det (A) = - c
7.
if kr
i
r
i
or kc
i
c
i
, then det(A
New
) = kxdet(A
), ( k 0)
10 5 1 -
12 9 - 3
4 2 1
1
1
1
]
1
A
c
3
c
3
1
1
1
]
1
5 5 1 -
6 9 - 3
2 2 1
B
det (B) = (1/2)x det (A)
8.
if kr
j
+ r
i
r
i
or kc
j
+ c
j
c
j
, then det(A
New
) = det(A
)
Inverse of Matrix a Second Method
How can we use determinant to find the inverse of a matrix?
Definition: Let A be nxn nonsingular matrix. The inverse of A is given by:
13
(A) adj
(A) det
1
1
A
How to find adj (A)?
nn n n
n
n
A A A
A A A
A
A adj
2 1
2 22 12
1 21 11
A A
) (
If det A = 0, A
-1
does not exist and we say that A is singular
HW: Find the inverse of the matrix
1
1
1
]
1
2 1 7
6 5 4
2 1 - 3
A
Cofactor Expansion, Inverse Matrix And Determinants:
Definition of cofactor:
Let [ ]
ij
a A be
n n
matrix. The cofactor of
ij
a is defined as
( ) ) det( 1
ij
j i
ij
M A
+
,
where
ij
M is the
) 1 ( ) 1 ( n n
submatrix of A by deleting the ith row of
14
jth column o.f A
Definition of adjoint:
The
n n
matrix ) ( A adj , called the adjoint of A, is
T
nn n n
n
n
nn n n
n
n
A A A
A A A
A A A
A A A
A A A
A A A
A adj
1
1
1
1
]
1
1
1
1
1
]
1
2 1
2 22 21
1 12 11
2 1
2 22 12
1 21 11
) ( .
Important result:
n
I A A A adj A adj A ) det( ) ( ) (
and
15
) det(
) (
1
A
A adj
A
Example: Let
1
1
1
]
1
5 3 1
2 4 1
3 0 2
A
Then,
1
]
1
1
]
1
1
]
1
3 1
4 1
,
5 1
2 1
,
5 3
2 4
13 12 11
M M M ,
1
]
1
1
]
1
1
]
1
3 1
0 2
,
5 1
3 2
,
5 3
3 0
23 22 21
M M M ,
1
]
1
1
]
1
1
]
1
4 1
0 2
,
2 1
3 2
,
2 4
3 0
33 32 31
M M M
Thus,
( ) [ ]
( ) ( ) [ ]
( ) ( ) [ ]
( ) ( ) [ ]
( ) ( ) [ ]
( )
1 1
11
1 2 1 2
12
1 3 1 3
13
2 1 2 1
11
12
13
2 21
2 2 2 2
22
2 3
23
1
22
23
1 1 4 5 ( 2) ( 3) 14,
1 1 ( 1) 5 ( 2) 1 3
1 1 ( 1) ( 3) 4 1 1
1 1 0 5 ( 3) 3 9
1 1 2
det( )
det( )
det( )
det( )
det( )
de
5 3 1 7
1 t(
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
A
A
M
M
M
+
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
( ) [ ]
( ) ( ) [ ]
( ) ( ) [ ]
( ) ( ) [ ]
2 3
3 1 3 1
31
3 2 3 2
32
3 3 3 3
33
31
32
33
)
det( )
det( )
det
1 2 ( 3) 0 1 6
1 1 0 ( 2) 3 4 12
1 1 2 ( 2) 3 ( 1) 1
1 1 2 4 0 ( 1) 8 ( )
M
M
A
A
M A
+
+ +
+ +
+ +
1
1
1
]
1
1
1
1
]
1
8 6 1
1 7 3
12 9 14
) (
33 23 13
32 22 12
31 21 11
A A A
A A A
A A A
A adj
and
16
1
1
1
]
1
8 6 1
1 7 3
12 9 14
25
1
) det(
) (
1
A
A adj
A
.
Homework:
1
1
1
1
]
1
3 2 - 0 2
3 - 0 0 3
3 1 2 4 -
4 3 - 2 1
A Let
1. Evaluate det A
2.
Evaluate A
-1
using adj A
Use REF & RRFE to solve the following system:
5 - w 7 z 2 y 3 - x
-11 w 3 z - y x 2
3 - w 9 - z - y 5 x 2
3 w 5 - z 2 y
+ +
+ +
+
+ + x
Ex.6 Solve the following system by Gaussian-Jordan elimination.
2 8 10
2 2
7 17 7 1
y z
x y z
x y z
+
+
+ +
.
17
) sol
0 2 8 10 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 0 2 8 10 0 2 8 10
7 17 7 1 7 17 7 1 0 3 14 15
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 12
0 2 8 10 0 1 4 5 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 5
0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
_ _ _
, , ,
_ _ _ _
, , , ,
The
solution is
12, 5, 0. x y z
Ex.7 Find a condition on numbers a, b, and c such that the following
system is consistent. When that condition is satisfied, find all solutions.
3
2
3 7
x y z a
x y z b
x y z c
+ +
+
+
1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1
1 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 7 1 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 2
a a a
b b a a b
c c a c a b
_ _ _
+ +
+
, , ,
The
system is consistent
3
8
9
1
1
3
0
1
2
3
2
1
.
Step 2:The matrix in reduced row echelon form is
1
1
1
]
1
3
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
Step 3: The solution is 3 , 1 , 2
3 2 1
x x x
II. Infinite number of solutions:
Solve for the following system:
1 5 3
0 2 4 2
2 1
3 2 1
+
+
x x
x x x
[Solution:]The Gauss-Jordan reduction is as follows:
Step 1: The augmented matrix is
1
]
1
1
0
0
2
5
4
3
2
Step 2: The matrix in reduced row echelon form is
19
1
]
1
1
2
3
5
1
0
0
1
Step 3: The linear system corresponding to the matrix in reduced row
echelon form is
1 3
2 5
3 2
3 1
+
x x
x x
The solutions are
1 3 2 3
2 5 , 1 3 x x x x +
3
x is free variable or parameter and let 3
, x t t R
therefore
R t t x t x t x + , , 3 1 , 5 2
3 2 1
III. No solution:
Solve for the following system:
6 2
1 7 5 3
5 4 2 2
4 3 1
4 3 2 1
4 3 2 1
+ + +
+ + +
x x x
x x x x
x x x x
[Solution:]The Gauss-Jordan reduction is as follows:
Step 1:The augmented matrix is
1
1
1
]
1
6
11
5
2
7
4
1
5
3
0
3
2
1
1
1
Step 2: The matrix in reduced row echelon form is
1
1
1
]
1
1
0
0
0
3
2
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
Step 3: The linear system corresponding to the matrix in reduced row
echelon form is
1 0
0 3 2
0 2
4 3 2
4 3 1
+ +
x x x
x x x
Since , 1 0 there is no solution
Example: Solve for the following linear system:
20
5 7 2 3
-11 3 2
-3 9 5 2
3 5 2
4 3 2 1
4 3 2 1
4 3 2 1
4 3 2 1
+ +
+ +
+
+ +
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
x x x x
[Solution:] The Gauss-Jordan reduction is as follows:
Step 1: The augmented matrix is
1
1
1
1
]
1
5
11
3
3
7
3
9
5
2
1
1
2
3
1
5
1
1
2
2
1
0
3
2
5
0
2
3
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
.
Step 3:The linear system corresponding to the matrix in reduced row
echelon form is
3
4
2
3
2
4
3
2
5
4
2
1
+
x x
x x
x x
The solutions are
1 4 2 4 3 4
5 2 , 2 3 , 3 2 x x x x x x + +
R t t x t x t x t x + + , , 2 3 , 3 2 , 2 5
4 3 2 1
Example: Find conditions on a such that the following system has no solution,
one solution, or infinitely many solutions.
1
( 2) 1
2 2 ( 2) 1
x ay z
x a y z
x y a z
+
+ +
+ +
21
) sol
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 2 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
2 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 1
1 1 1 1
Case1: 1 0 0 1 1
0 0 0 0
1 1 1
Case2: 1 0 1 0 0
0 0 1
1 0 1 1
(a) 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 1
a a a
a a a
a a a a
a
a
a
a
a
_ _ _
, , ,
_
,
_
,
1 1 1
(b) 0 0 1 0 0
1
0 0 1
a
a
a
_
_
,
,
1 : has infinitely many solutions.
0 : has no solutions.
1 and 0 : has exactly one solution.
a
a
a a
Rank of Matrix A
Definition: The dimension of row space of A is called
the row rank of A, the dimension of column
space of A is called the column rank of A
row rank of A= column rank of A
How to find it?
Step1:
C A
RREF
Step2: rank A = the number of non zero rows in C
Theorem:Let A be an m x n matrix. Then,
22
{
dim
dim
dim
rowspace
nullspace
rank A nullity A n +
1 2 3
142 43
Rank and Singularity
First:
Nonhomogeneous system
The rank of square matrix can be used to determine whether the matrix
is singular or nonsingular, as the following theorem.
Theorem: An
n n
matrix A is nonsingular iff rank A = n
Corollaries (1)If A is an
n n
matrix, then rank A = n iff
det( ) 0 A
.
(2)
Let be an
n n
matrix. The linear system Ax = b has a unique solution
for every 1 n matrix b Iff rank (A) = n.
(3)
rank (A) = n, A is nonsingular so A
-1
exist Ax = b
AA
-1
x = A
-1
b; x = A
-1
Ex.8 Find the rank of the matrix
1 1 1 4
2 1 3 0
3 4 8 20
A
_
,
.
1 1 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 4
2 1 3 0 0 1 5 8 0 1 5 8
3 4 8 20 0 1 5 8 0 0 0 0
A
_ _ _
, , ,
Hence 2 rankA .
23
) sol
Ex.9 Find the rank of the matrix
2
1 1 2
1 1 2 0
2 2 6 4
a
A a
a a
_
,
2 2 2
2 2
2 2
2
2
1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2
1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
2 2 6 4 0 2 4 2 0 0 2 4
1 1 2 0
Case1: 0 0 0 1 2 2
0 0 0 0
1 1 2
Case2: 0 0 1 0
0 0 2 4
(a
a a a
A a a a a a
a a a a a a a
a rankA
a
a a
a a
_ _ _
, , ,
_
,
_
,
2
1 1 2 4
) 2 0 1 0 2 2
0 0 0 0
1 1 2
(b) 2 0 1 0 3
0 0 1 2
2 if 0 or 2
Hence
3 if 0 and 2
a rankA
a
a a rankA
a
a a
rankA
a a
_
,
_
+
,
'
(a)
Either or 1 1 rankA rankB r rankA rankB r .
(b)
{ } { } min , 1 , min , r rankB m n rankA m n +
.
24
) sol
(c)
If
m n <
then
r m n <
, hence either the system is inconsistent or it has
infinitely many solutions.
Ex.10:Find conditions on a such that the following system has no solution, one
solution, or infinitely many solutions.
1
( 2) 1
2 2 ( 2) 1
x ay z
x a y z
x y a z
+
+ +
+ +
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 2 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
2 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 1
1 1 1 1
Case1: 1 0 0 1 1
0 0 0 0
1 1 1
Case2: 1 0 1 0 0
0 0 1
1 0 1 1
(a) 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 1
a a a
a a a
a a a a
a
a
a
a
a
_ _ _
, , ,
_
,
_
,
1 1 1
(b) 0 0 1 0 0
1
0 0 1
a
a
a
_
_
,
,
1 : has infinitely many solutions.
0 : has no solutions.
1 and 0 : has exactly one solution.
a
a
a a
Theorem 3
Let be the coefficient matrix of an linear system.
The following statements are equivalent:
(a) The system has a unique solution.
(b)
(c) is row-equivalent to .
n
A n n
rankA n
A I
25
) sol
SECOND:
Homogeneous system
Theorem:
If A an
n n
matrix, the homogeneous system 0 Ax has a nontrivial solution
iff A is singular.
PROOF Suppose that A is nonsingular. Then A
-1
1 1
1
( ) 0
( ) 0
0
0
n
A Ax A
A A x
I x
x
+ + +
'
+ + +
L
L
M
L
Ex.1Show that the following homogeneous system has nontrivial solutions.
1 2 3 4
1 2 4
1 2 3 4
2 0
2 2 0
3 2 0
x x x x
x x x
x x x x
+ +
+
+ + +
1 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 1 0
2 2 0 1 0 0 4 4 3 0 0 4 4 3 0
3 1 2 1 0 0 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 0
1 1 2 1 0
1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
3
0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
4
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1 0
_ _ _
, , ,
_
_ _
, ,
,
Let
3
x t
. The general solution is
1 2 3 4
, , , 0 : x t x t x t x t arbitrary
.
By taking 0 t , we get a nontrivial solution.
Theorem 1:An
m n
homogeneous system is consistent. Moreover if
m n <
then
it has infinitely many solutions.
Theorem 2:Let A be the coefficient matrix of an
n n
homogeneous
system.The following statements are equivalent:
(a)
The system has only the trivial solution.
(b)
rankA n .
(c)
A is row-equivalent to
n
I
.
27
) sol