ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This book is prepared by group 4D0B of Centro Escolar University college of nursing.

We would like to thank the people who helped us to finalize this book. To Mr. Imaculata our Research Adviser who shared to us his knowledge and sharpened our mind in this book. To the College of Nursing for having this opportunity to raise and share this book to the readers. And to the respondents, without their help we wouldnt finish this book and also to our dear parents who supported us in our financial needs. Lastly to the Almighty God for giving us wisdom and providing our strength for the struggles we have encountered in making this book.

UNDERGRADUATE SCHOOL CHAPTER 1 1. The Problem and Its Background Introduction Background of the Study. . Statement of the Problem Assumption of the Study Significance of the Study Scope, Limitation, and Delimitation. Definition of Terms Theoretical Framework CHAPTER 2 2. Review of Related Literature and Studies Foreign Literature Local Literature CHAPTER 3 3. Methods and Procedure Method of Research Sampling Study.......... .. Subject of the Study... Procedure of Data Gathering CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
CLAY GO The studies are convincingly positive: CLAY GO program benefit students and the administration. With the implementation of successful air quality programs, schools can see an increase in productivity. Defined as cleaning to protect health without harming the environment, CLAY GO programs employ processes that promote health, safety and social consciousness, and include the use of environmentally friendly janitorial products and equipment. Thorough green cleaning programs will take a holistic view of the school facility. Each aspect of green building operations and maintenance will be viewed in the context of goals and benefits the school expects to derive from green cleaning and indoor air quality programs they wish to implement. 2 Background of the Study

The study was done at Centro Escolar University, Mendiola, Manila. There are selected college students, staff for the survey. This study aimed to know if CLAY GO program is implemented well. Centro Escolar University was established on June 03, 1907 by Dona Librada Avelino and Dona Carmen de Luna for the instruction and training of the youth in all branches of the arts and sciences. With some benches, a single blackboard and a few books, the two educators steadfastly nurtured a dream of establishing a nationalistic center for learning for Filipino women. The first college, that Pharmacy, opened in 3 1921.The College of Liberal Arts, Education and Dentistry followed one after the other. Three years later, the College of Optometry was established. Beginning as the Centro Escolar de Senoritas, the school was granted university status by the Philippine government in 1932. It has then steadily grown as an institution under the leadership of noted educators who have contributed much to the development of their respective professions. Past Presidents include Dr. Pilar Hidalgo-Lim, an educato and civic leader, Dr. Dionisio C. Tiongco, another renowned scholar and educator, and Dr. Lourdes T. Echauz, a distinguished philanthropist and educator. The immediate past President, Dr. Rosita l. Navarro is a recognized educator, a role model, leader of knowledge worker and advocate of balance between globalization and Filipinization. The current President, Dr. Ma. Cristina D. Padolina, was a former Commissioner of the Commission on Higher Eeducation (CHED) and Chancellor the University of the Philippines Open University. With three campus and over 50 academic programs, CEU has gone for beyond its founders vision, building steps towards dreams and goals of the Filipino youth. Statement of the Problem

The study determined the compliance of CLAY GO to the CEU students and staff in the practice of the program. Specifically, it sought to answer the following questions: 1. What were the demographic data of the respondent? 1.1 Age 1.2 Position 2. How do the respondent rate the students comply to Clay Go as perceived by: 2.1 faculty 2.2 student 2.3 BMS 3. Does the CLAY GO program implemented well? Assumption of the Study The researchers assumed that the questionnaires is answered honestly and that the records that is provided by certain people who are interviewed true and accurate. Significance of the Study This study helped determining the compliance of CEU students and staff in practicing the CLAY GO program in the University. In which the school can assess and evaluate the effectiveness of their implements program,that may help to administrator to reemprose and develop more effectice program not only in the school environment but also all other implemented program. Now adays, many student does not care Clay Go, they stay in the classroom, student area, they eat, crample paper, and a lot of tissue paper even the staff cannot influence them. 4 If this method is not utilized, students will remain passive, are environment will be affected. SCOPE and DELIMITATION of the STUDY This study was conducted to determine to the compliance of CEU students and staff on CLAY GO program in the University. The aspects looked into are the number of respondents who practice CLAY GO out of the total population, the respondents' awareness of CLAY GO, frequency of practice and the effectiveness of CLAY GO. DEFINITION OF TERMS: Academic achievement- is something you do or achieve at school, college or university - in class, in a laboratory, library or fieldwork. Pollutant- In general, substance or energy introduced into the environment that has undesired effects, or adversely affects the usefulness of a resource

Green Cleaning- is to use cleaning solutions and methods that keep our environment healthy. Indoor air quality (IAQ) is a term referring to the air quality within and around buildings and structures, especially as it relates to the health and comfort of building occupants. Sanitation- is a hygienic disposal or recycling of waste. It also considered as a practice that allows protecting health only with the help of hygienic measures. It is also commonly understood as term that is sued for treatment of waste water. Retention- is the process of ensuring that your members or volunteers remain active with your organization. It focuses on maintaining a welcome environment, members morale, and organizational progress. Productivity- by including other factors like energy and resources. Prefer the simplicity of time because in most cases factors like energy and resources are reducible to time anyway. Temperature - is a measure of the average heat or thermal energy of the particles in a substance. Since it is an average measurement, it does not depend on the number of particles in an object. In that sense it does not depend on the size of it. Climate- refers to the average, or typical, weather conditions observed over a long period of time for a given area. Janitorial- One who attends to the maintenance or cleaning of a building. And it was a doorman.

5 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Awareness Implementati on Sustainability Clay GO Progra m Complianc e of the students in the said program

10

CHAPTER 2 Review of Related Literature FOREIGN Teenage Consumption of Cleanliness: how to make sustainable by Hanssen That cleanliness practices are handed down from parents to children and also are subject to strong peer-group influence

New Child Safe Guidelines Announced for Green Cleaning Products Used in Schools Stringent Requirements Raise the Bar for Manufacturers Dr. Joel Forman, The connection between environmental quality, comfort, health and well-being, positive attitudes and behavior, and higher levels of educational performance Healthy Schools are Clean, Dry, and Productive ByMichael A. Berry, PhD A Fresh Look at School Environments The focus on school environments has evolved from an initial discussion on indoor air to a comprehensive view recognizing that total environmental quality is related to teaching and learning performance. Environmental management of school facilities has not traditionally received priority attention. If our national educational objectives are to be achieved, school offi cials must recognize the value of cleaning and maintenance programs to positive educational performance. HEALTHY SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT AND ENHANCED EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE By: Charles Young shows that aging city schools do not have to be abandoned; they can be successfully revitalized and made contribute effectively to the process of education. Regardless of where a school is located, a healthy school

environment is comfortable and secure from danger radiates a sense of wellbeing and a sends a caring message. These healthy school environments are the key to a high performance educational institution. Initiatives of Change-Odisha By: P.Divya
The objective of this program was to realize the fact that action speaks louder than words and thus its time for action rather than complaining. Accordingly we planned and successfully executed the cleanliness program with the full-fledged co-operation and support of the team members of Initiatives of Change.

LOCAL Deriquito (2001) stated that the garbage problem in Metro Manila reached near-crisis proportions. the metropolis was faced with the challenge of where to dump the more than 6,000 metric tons of garbage its residents generated daily. The program calls on these buildings and establishments to reduce their residual solid wastes, or the wastes that go to the dumpsites, by recovering materials that can be reused, recycled, or processed into compost. The basic requirement of the program is segregation of waste materials from the source all the way to disposal. Navarro (2002-2003) stated that the solid waste management situation in Metro Manila. A Systems Approach on Solid Waste Management in Metro Manila, Philippines waste that is under government responsibility. Although implementation has been quite slack, there is a growing awareness among the cities denizens and the townspeople from surrounding area. This awareness has inspired the growth of an organized group of NGOs devoted to the cause of solid waste management. Baula (2010) stated that the experiences of the students, teachers, and school administrators during their solid waste management program development and implementation. The studys goal is to draw out the lessons learned and identify the best practices from the first batch of participating high schools. The programs success relies on the collaboration of both public and private sectors of the community. Within the school, the participation of the student body, faculty, and administration is critical in achieving an effective solid waste management program. This will ensure that the next

batches of schools will achieve sustainability in their respective solid waste management program. Mercado (1998) stated that the management of the environment and natural resources would entail the scientific accounting of environmental damages and use of natural resources. Such determination would not only ensure sustainable management of resources and the environment but would also provide revenues for the local government units when these are used as basis for the implementation of regulatory instruments or other more effective instruments to minimize further environmental damage and natural resource depletion. Del Mundo (2009) stated that the statistical analysis revealed that total family monthly income and environmental awareness are negatively correlated with solid waste management practices. However, environmental knowledge and perception are positively correlated with solid waste management practices. Educational attainment and household size are negatively correlated with solid waste management practices in Barangay Talisay while these are positively correlated with solid waste management practices in Barangay Balibago.

Chapter 3

Methods and Procedures This chapter discusses mainly about the methods and procedures utilized for the gathering, sorting of data, and identification od the respondents, demographic profile, setting of the survey, the instrument used, the preparation of the questionnaire and the statistical treatment employed in the interpretations of data for the completion of this study

Sampling Technique The method used in the research is quota sampling technique. The researchers identified strata of the population and then determine how many participants are needed from each course to meet the quota. In quota sampling, the population is first segmented into mutually exclusive sub-groups, just as in stratified sampling. Then a judgment is used to select the subjects or units from each segment based on a specified proportion.

Subject of the Study The researches choose 10 students, 10 faculty and 10 Janitor from different colleges (BSN, BSMT, Optometry students) through quota sampling. A letter request done and presented to the office of different colleges of CEU to allow the researchers to conduct the study with the CEU students. The researchers obtained a copy of list of students per year level to allow the selection of the respondents.

Procedure of Data Gathering

The researchers will be using questionnaires in gathering data from respondents. This comprised a series of questions that will be filled in by all the participants sample. The questionnaire will be divided into three parts: the first part contained the profile of the respondents and the second included the broad or extensive type of questions. The third contained the specific or sub-types questions. These will be distributed to the chosen respondents in the schools, specifically the three groups.

Centro Escolar University

Mendiola, Manila

College of Nursing Compliance to CLAY GO program Part I Name: College: Nursing Position/Work: Student Part II
Rate the performance by checking the appropriate box using the following criteria:

Med. Tech. Professor/ Faculty

Optomentry BMS

4- Excellent (Comply to program efficiently, systematically and independently.) 3- VeryGood (Comply to program efficiently, systematically and independently but requires minimal guidance.) 2- Good (Comply to program inefficiently and unsystematically and requires close guidance.) 1- Poor (Not Complying to the program.) Parameters to follow:
1. Put chairs and table in place and functioning well 2. Trash and other waste material are classified and thrown in designated cans/bins 3. Study tables and chairs are kept clean and kept free from letters 4. The floor and surrounding areas are free from litters 5. Posters and banners are strategically posted. 6. The area is properly ventilated and well

Excellent

Very Good

Good

Poor

lighted. 7. Students are aware in proper decorum when in the are. 8. Clean as you go is practiced in the area all the time. 9. Students assigned take full responsibilities for maintaining the area clean. 10. The students arrange the chair before leaving the room. 11. Students erase the blackboard before leaving the room 12. After eating in the canteen or any part in the campus, the students throw their trash in proper bin.

Comments/Suggestion:___________________________________________________ _______

Chapter 4

COMPLIANCE TO CLAY GO PROGRAM TABLE 1 FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS OF AGE ACCORDING TO FACULTY, STUDENTS AND BMS Age 19-30 31-40 41-50 Total Frequency 10 15 5 30 Percentage 33.33% 50% 16.67% 100%

INTERPRETATION: This table shows the distribution of the respondents of age according to different college of Students, Professor and BMS. The 18-30 of the respondents of age is 33.33%, 50% are from age of 31-40 and 16.67% are from age of 41-50. The data shows that most 50% of the respondents of age of 31-40. TABLE 2 FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS OF POSITION ACCORDING TO FACULTY, STUDENTS AND BMS Position Frequency Percentage Professor 10 33.33% Students 10 33.33% BMS 10 33.33% Total 30 33.33% INTERPRETATION: This table shows the distribution of the respondents in position according to different college of Students, Professor and BMS. The 30% of the respondents in position are from the college of Faculty and BMS, 40% are from the college of Students. Therefore, the data shows that most respondents in position are from the Students which is 40%.

Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents according to Faculty in 3 Colleges (Nursing, Optometry, Medical Technology) Student Colleges Frequency Percentage Nursing 5 50% Optometry 2 20%

Medical Technology Total

3 10

30% 100%

Interpretation: This table shows the distribution of respondents according to the 3 different college Professors. The 40% of the respondents are in the college of optometry, 30% are from the college of medical technology. The data shows that most of the respondents are from the college of optometry. Students in different colleges were included in the demographic profile to evaluate the effectiveness of Clay Go Table 4 Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents according to students in 3 Colleges (Nursing, Optometry, Medical Technology) Student Colleges Frequency Percentage Nursing 3 30% Optometry 4 40% Medical Technology 3 30% Total 10 100% Interpretation: This table shows the distribution according to the 3 different college students. The 40% of the respondents are in the college of the optometry, 30% of the nursing students are in the college of the nursing and another 30% are from the college of medical technology. The data shows that most of the respondents are form the college of optometry. Students in different colleges were included in the demographic profile to evaluate the effectiveness of Clay Go Table 5 Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents Janitor (BMS) Janitor Frequency Percentage BMS 10 10% Total 10 100%

Interpretation: This tables shows that the respondent are all Bernardo Maintenance Service, This BMS usually works in the GDLSC building.

Table 6

FACULTY
Parameters to follow:
13. Put chairs and table in place and functioning well

Mean 2.9

INTERPRETATION Very Good

14. Trash and other waste material are classified and thrown in designated cans/bins 15. Study tables and chairs are kept clean and kept free from letters 16. The floor and surrounding areas are free from litters 17. Posters and banners are strategically posted. 18. The area is properly ventilated and well lighted. 19. Students are aware in proper decorum when in the are. 20. Clean as you go is practiced in the area all the time. 21. Students assigned take full responsibilities for maintaining the area clean. 22. The students arrange the chair before leaving the room. 23. Students erase the blackboard before leaving the room 24. After eating in the canteen or any part in the campus, the students throw their trash in proper bin.

3.3

Excellent

2.9 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.1 3 1.8

Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Excellent Very Good Good

2.3 2.8 2.9

Very Good Very Good Very Good

:_____________________Faculty_____________________________________

Interpretation: This table shows the distribution of the result, in this table the highest percentage is 3.3% in question number 2 and the lowest percentage is 1.8% in question number 9, most of the respondent answered very good in the compliance of clay go program.

TABLE 7 BMS(JANITOR)
Parameters to follow:
1. Put chairs and table in place and functioning well 2. Trash and other waste material are classified and thrown in designated cans/bins 3. Study tables and chairs are kept clean and kept free from letters 4. The floor and surrounding areas are free from litters 5. Posters and banners are strategically posted. 6. The area is properly ventilated and well lighted. 7. Students are aware in proper decorum when in the are. 8. Clean as you go is practiced in the area all the time.

Mean 2.9 2.4

INTERPRETATION Very Good Very Good

2.4 2.4 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.8

Very Good Very Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Very Good

9. Students assigned take full responsibilities for maintaining the area clean. 10. The students arrange the chair before leaving the room. 11. Students erase the blackboard before leaving the room 12. After eating in the canteen or any part in the campus, the students throw their trash in proper bin.

2.5

Very Good

2.4 2.5 2.5

Very Good Very Good Very Good

:_____________________BMS_____________________________________

INTERPRETATION:

This table shows the distribution of the result, in this table the highest percentage is 3.4% in question number 5 and the lowest percentage is 2.4% in question number 2,3,4 and 10, most of the respondent answered very good in the compliance of clay go program.

TABLE 8

STUDENTS :

Parameters to follow:
1. Put chairs and table in place and functioning well 2. Trash and other waste material are classified and thrown in designated cans/bins 3. Study tables and chairs are kept clean and kept free from letters 4. The floor and surrounding areas are free from litters 5. Posters and banners are strategically posted. 6. The area is properly ventilated and well lighted. 7. Students are aware in proper decorum when in the are. 8. Clean as you go is practiced in the area all the time. 9. Students assigned take full responsibilities for

Mean 2.9

INTERPRETATION Very Good

3.3

Excellent

2.9

Very Good

2.6

Very Good

2.7

Very Good

2.9

Very Good

3.1

Excellent

Very Good

1.8

Good

maintaining the area clean. 10. The students arrange the chair before leaving the room. 11. Students erase the blackboard before leaving the room 12. After eating in the canteen or any part in the campus, the students throw their trash in proper bin.

2.3

Very Good

2.8

Very Good

2.9

Very Good

:_____________________Faculty_____________________________________

Interpretation: This table shows the distribution of the result, in this table the highest percentage is 5.1% in question number 7 and the lowest percentage is 2.2% in question number 10, most of the respondent answered very good in the compliance of clay go program.

Chapter 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY http://www.uems.org.np/ongoing.php

http://iofcodisha.wordpress.com/2010/09/19/report-on-cleanliness-program/ www.sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol3iss2/0609-030.gram hanssen.html www.carpet.health.org/pdf/charlesyoung Elem.pdf