Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This problem set is completely optional, and it is just designed to give you the
opportunity to practice more before the exams. Do not hand in your answers;
no points will be awarded.
1. For each of the following factors, discuss whether it would change the
natural rate of unemployment, why, and how. Make sure your explanations
encompass all factors, even those that do not change the natural rate of
unemployment.
(a) Real GDP increases due to higher government spending.
(b) Changes in atmospheric conditions disable all long distance real-time
communication (for example, phone, internet) permanently.
(c) Technology stops improving, reducing the creation and destruction of
economic sectors.
2. Suppose President Bush is concerned about the size of the U.S. trade deficit
and convinces Congress to increase tariffs on imports, while he manages to
convince other countries not to retaliate and increase their tariffs on U.S.
products.
(a) What will be the short and long run effects of this policy on real GDP,
inflation, real interest rate, consumption, investment, and net exports? Use
three graphs (AD/IA, Keynesian cross/expenditure line, and monetary policy
rule) to show your answer and explain verbally.
(b) Now use the spending allocation model to analyze the long run effects of
the higher tariffs on imports. Explain verbally and graphically.
(c) Is your long run analysis using the AD/IA model in part (a) consistent with
your long run analysis using the SAM model in part (b)? Point out any similarities
and differences in your conclusions to parts (a) and (b).
Question 1
Remember that natural unemployment is the unemployment rate that exists when real GDP is
equal to potential GDP. Cyclical unemployment, on the other hand, is unemployment due to
deviations from potential GDP during recessions and booms. Natural unemployment consists of
frictional unemployment (arising from normal turnover in the labor market) and structural
unemployment (arising from structural problems).
(a) If real GDP increases due to higher government spending, then real GDP has departed
from potential GDP. This therefore lowers the cyclical unemployment rate but does not
affect natural unemployment.
(b) We would expect the destruction of long-distance communication capabilities to increase
frictional unemployment as it would make it harder for people changing occupations to
find new jobs and harder for new entrants in the labor markets to locate jobs. This
change would therefore increase the natural rate of unemployment.
(c) Since the lack of technological improvement is said to reduce the creation and destruction
of economic sectors, this would decrease structural unemployment because there would
be fewer changes in demand for different types of labor and skills in different sectors.
Therefore we would expect this change to decrease the natural rate of unemployment.
Question 2
a) Initially, the economy is in equilibrium, as shown on the graphs below.
AD-IA Monetary Policy Rule Keynesian Cross
AD0
Real GDP
Y0 Real GDP Inflation Y0
INF0
When President Bush increases tariffs on imports, this decreases imports. Since other
countries do not retaliate, exports do not change. Since net exports (X) = exports –
imports, the overall result is in an increase in net exports. Thus, the expenditure line
shifts up, which causes the aggregate demand curve to shift out.
1
In the SR. Real GDP increases and inflation stays constant. Nothing changes in the
monetary policy rule graph because inflation is constant and the Federal Reserve has not
changed the monetary policy rule. Thus, real interest rate is constant. Consumption
increases because of the increase in real GDP. Investment stays constant. The effect on
net exports is a little more complicated. The increase in income tends to increase imports
(which decreases net exports) but President Bush’s policy tends to decrease imports
(which increases net exports). Overall net exports have increased.
Please note that the analysis above disregards the fact that consumption includes both
domestic and imported goods. If you do take this information into account, there are two
possible approaches:
2) A more sophisticated approach would take into account the fact that the tariff on
imports would make imported goods relatively more expensive than
domestically produced goods (compared to the pre-tariff situation). Thus,
consumers would switch some of their purchases away from imported goods and
increase their consumption of domestic goods. The net effect would be that
the expenditure line shifts up, the aggregate demand shifts to the right,
and real GDP increases.
* For the purpose of this problem set, any of the three answers will be considered
correct. Note, however, that the third answer is the best.
In the LR. Because real GDP > potential GDP, inflation begins to rise. As inflation
rises, the Federal Reserve raises the real interest rate according to the monetary policy
rule, causing a movement along the new aggregate demand curve. This continues until
real GDP = potential GDP. In the long run, the higher real interest rate reduces
consumption and investment. Net exports, however, have increased.
In Summary
2
AD-IA Monetary Policy Rule Keynesian Cross
Potential GDP R
Inflation MPR Spending
RLR 45o line
ExpSR(At Ro)
IALR
R0 ExpLR(At RLR)
IASR
AD1
AD0
YLR INF0 INFLR YLR YSR Real GDP
YSR
b) Long -run effects can also be analyzed with the Spending Allocation (SAM) model. The
1-G/Y
net export curve shifts up and to the right, causing an increase in the non-government
share curve. This increases the equilibrium interest rate, which causes a decrease in C/Y
and I/Y. Since C/Y and I/Y have both decreased, while G/Y has remained constant (by
assumption), X/Y must have increased.
R R R R
R1
R0
C/YLR C/Y0 C/Y I/YLR I/Y0 I/Y X/Y0 X/YLR X/Y NG/Y
c) The LR results from the AD-IA model are consistent with the SAM model. C/Y, I/Y
have gone down, while X/Y has gone up. The real interest rate has increased. The only
difference lies in the fact that the AD-IA model demonstrates that inflation has also
increased – a fact not readily apparent from the SAM model.
Question 3
a) If the one credit card limit induces higher savings, individuals will spend less of their
income and consumption will fall. Using the SAM model, we find that C/Y will shift to
the left. In turn, this shifts the non-government share curve downward, and the
equilibrium interest rate falls. Hence, we will observe a movement along the I/Y and
X/Y curves, increasing their respective shares of GDP. G/Y remains constant (by
assumption). (Note that the effect on C/Y might be seen as ambiguous, because there is
a shift to the left and then movement along the curve to the right. However, since the
interest rate does not affect C/Y very much, we may assume that the net change is a
decrease.)
1-G/Y
R R R R
R0
R1
C/YLR C/Y0 C/Y I/Y0 I/YLR I/Y X/Y0 X/YLR X/Y NG/Y
3
b) The vertical intercept of the consumption line represents what is known as “autonomous
consumption,” the part of consumption spending that is independent of income. In this
question, we are told that autonomous consumption does not change. However, we
would still expect the one credit card limit to decrease the marginal propensity to
consume (MPC) where MPC = change in income/change in consumption i.e. the slope of
the expenditure line. In the short run, according to the Keynesian Cross model, the
expenditure line will have a smaller slope, therefore “rotating” down. The intersection
of the expenditure line with the 45-degree line now occurs at a lower level of spending
and real GDP.
45o line
Spending
Exp0
In the LR. Because real GDP < potential GDP, inflation begins to fall. As inflation
falls, the Federal Reserve lowers the real interest rate causing a movement along the new
aggregate demand curve. This continues until real GDP = potential GDP. In the long
run, the lower real interest rate increases investment and net exports. The effect on
consumption is a little more complicated. The lower interest rate tends to increase
consumption but if the one credit card policy is permanent, it will tend to decrease
consumption. Overall consumption thus decreases. Government spending remains
unchanged.
In Summary
4
Inflation Potential GDP
IASR
SR
IALR
LR
AD0
AD1
If the real interest rate in the United States rises, international investors will be more inclined to
put funds in dollar-denominated assets as they can earn more from doing so. Thus, they will
shift their funds from Tokyo to New York in order to take advantage of the higher interest rate.
As funds are shifted to the United States, the demand for dollars increases. This increased
demand puts upward pressure on the dollar exchange rate, and causes the dollar to appreciate
against the yen. A higher dollar exchange rate will tend to make goods imported into the United
States more attractive because it makes these foreign goods cheaper, and make exported goods
less attractive to other countries since it makes American goods more expensive. With more
imports and fewer exports, U.S. net exports will fall.
If the Fed shifts from rule 1 to rule 2, higher real interest rates decrease aggregate spending and
thus shift the AD curve to the left. The Fed might change its policy to end a prolonged episode of
high inflation expectations or perhaps to aggressively anticipate future inflation. Alternatively,
the Fed may simply become more hawkish in its policy toward inflation. The change will
decrease real GDP.
Alternative Policy Rules
10 Rule 1
0
0 2 4 6 8
Inflation
5
Taylor Chapter 24, Problem 5 on Page 625.
a) The rates are 0 in the United States and 1 percent in Europe, respectively.
b) Both rules have nominal interest rates rising by more than inflation so that the real
interest rate will rise. The slope of the policy rule for the ECB is 0.2, compared to
0.5 for the Fed. So, the Fed is more aggressive in terms of raising real rates – and
hence has a lower tolerance for inflation – than the ECB.
a)
b) The average rate of inflation is 3 percent, since the real GDP deviation from trend is
zero in the long run.
c) The central bank permanently increases the money supply by 2 percent, and so
inflation permanently increases by 2 percent.
6
Taylor Chapter 24, Problem 7 on Page 625.
(a) For the United States, net exports fall so that the expenditure line shifts down.
(b) AD shifts to the left, and real GDP decreases. In the diagram below, EXP0 is the old
expenditure line and EXP1 is the new expenditure line, while AD0 is the old
aggregate demand curve and AD1 is the new aggregate demand curve.
EXP0
SR IASR
EXP1
IALR
LR
AD0
AD1
a) As the figure in part b) shows, the current deviation from potential GDP is 2
percent.
b) Inflation will be 3 percent at potential GDP of $5,000 billion. The adjustment occurs
because the GDP deviation from potential is 2 percent. This puts upward pressure on
wages and prices that increases the rate of inflation. This will occur because as
contracts are renewed, they will reflect altered expectations about inflation so that
gradually the inflation rate will increase until it reaches 3 percent.
Potential GDP
6
5
Inflation (percent)
2 IA
1
AD line
0
-5% -4% -3% -2% -1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Deviation of Real GDP from Potential GDP (percent)
7
Taylor Chapter 25, Problem 6 on Page 644.
a) The Fed policy rule shifts to the left; it slows the growth of money to a rate compatible
with 2 rather than 3 percent inflation. This goal is accomplished by the open market sale
of government securities, which reduces liquidity in the financial system.
b) The scenario starts from potential GDP of $5,000 billion and inflation at 3 percent. The
decrease in the growth of money shifts the AD line from AD0 to AD1. In the short run,
the shift in the AD line results in a negative deviation of real GDP from potential of 2
percent, since AD1 has real GDP equal to $4,900 billion at inflation of 3 percent.
Potential GDP
6
5
Inflation (percent)
3 IA0
2 IA1
1
AD1 AD0
0
-8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6%
Deviation of Real GDP from Potential GDP (percent)
c) The negative deviation from potential in part b) reduces income through the multiplier.
In the short run, consumption spending falls, net exports spending rises, and investment
spending remains the same. The lower inflation target takes effect in the medium run as
real interest rates decline so that investment spending increases. In the long run, the
decline in inflation and real interest rate increases C, X, and I spending until potential
GDP is reached.
a) In the short run GDP is below potential at SR. The Fed is assumed to raise interest rates,
consistent with the description in the text.
b) This is portrayed in Text Figure 25.6. Real GDP may fall and inflation may increase,
but only temporarily. See the discussion of temporary shifts in the inflation adjustment
line on page 637.