Professional Documents
Culture Documents
90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0
85.0
65.0
Summary
The
purpose
of
GeSIs
Low-Carbon
ICT
Leadership
Benchmark
is
to
support
governments
and
other
stakeholders
wishing
to
integrate
low-carbon
ICT
solutions
into
their
climate
change
agenda.
Many
good
examples
exist
around
the
world
both
with
regard
to
supportive
policies
and
their
implementation,
ranging
from
concrete
targets
for
the
roll-out
of
ICT
solutions
such
as
teleworking
(e.g.
Japan)
to
references
to
dedicated
low-carbon
ICT
strategies
where
the
exports
of
low-carbon
ICT
solutions
are
promoted
(e.g.
Denmark).
The
first
round
of
the
Low-Carbon
ICT
Benchmark
assesses
leadership
in
the
national
communications
to
the
United
Nations
Framework
Convention
on
Climate
Change
(UNFCC),
which
set
out
how
governments
are
implementing
their
commitments
under
the
Kyoto
Protocol.
Initial
findings
show
that
Japan
ranks
first
place,
and
stands
out
as
a
clear
leader,
although
Denmark,
Germany
and
other
European
governments
including
the
European
Union
as
a
whole
are
not
far
behind.
The
study
also
covers
the
BASIC
bloc
(Brazil,
South
Africa,
India
and
China).
These
countries
have
focused
on
an
ICT
solution
agenda
and,
not
surprisingly,
have
all
scored
well
with
India
making
the
top
ten.
In
anticipation
of
a
successful
COP17
outcome,
it
is
encouraging
that
emerging
economies
focus
on
low-carbon
ICT
opportunities
and,
in
some
cases,
to
a
greater
extent
than
many
developed
countries.
Luis
Neves,
Chairman
of
GeSI,
commented
on
the
initial
findings
of
the
study:
The
ICT
industry
must
continue
to
work
with
governments
to
ensure
that
adequate
policy
frameworks
are
in
place
to
enable
the
transition
to
a
low-carbon
economy.
By
highlighting
low-carbon
ICT
leadership
amongst
governments,
GeSI
seeks
to
encourage
a
race
to
the
top
in
the
run
up
to
COP17
so
that
ICT
is
included
in
strategies
as
a
key
enabler
in
tackling
climate
change
and
creating
sustainable
business
models
and
growth
opportunities.
The
preliminary
findings
from
GeSI
indicate
the
need
for
integration
between
ministries
to
ensure
that
low-carbon
ICT
solutions
are
given
appropriate
attention
in
climate
negotiations.
Over
the
coming
months
GeSI
will
continue
to
work
with
stakeholders
including
ITU,
OECD,
UN
Global
Compact
and
the
Broadband
Commission
to
assess
different
aspects
of
low-carbon
ICT
leadership
in
the
run
up
to
COP17
at
Durban.
In
collaboration
with
the
South
African
government,
and
other
interested
stakeholders,
GeSI
is
now
preparing
an
assessment
framework
for
COP17.
The
final
results
will
be
launched
this
autumn
on
a
dedicated
web
portal.
GeSI
hopes
this
will
encourage
governments
to
integrate
low-carbon
ICT
solutions
into
COP17
and
support
a
21st
century
climate
change
agenda
beyond
Durban
such
as
at
Rio+20.
There
is
growing
recognition
that
the
time
has
come
to
focus
more
on
solution
providers,
not
just
the
big
emitters,
in
the
global
fight
against
climate
change.
As
the
Benchmark
for
integration
of
low-carbon
ICT
In
UNFCCC
communication
1.
Japan
85.0
2.
Denmark
65.0
3.
Germany
65.0
4.
Ireland
59.0
5.
European
Union
55.0
6.
Netherlands
55.0
7.
Australia
53.0
8.
Finland
53.0
9.
Romania
53.0
10.
India
44.0
world currently discusses 80% carbon reductions, or even more, it is clear that transformative low-carbon ICT solutions that provide services in new ways whilst creating sustainable growth and jobs are needed, not just incremental improvements to existing systems. The ICT sector can help provide both clusters with solution providers and transformative solutions that can help countries deliver 80% or more reductions. Still many countries only include measures resulting in incremental improvements in existing systems and improvements on the supply side in their national communications to the UNFCCC. GeSIs research follows on from the launch of its Guadalajara ICT declaration for transformative low-carbon solutions1 at COP16. The Low Carbon ICT Leadership Benchmark is based on 15 criteria ranging from the inclusion of ICT solutions in national communications to the UNFCCC to the integration of such solutions in key areas such as smart buildings, smart grid, smart transport, energy efficiency and innovation. For a full list of criteria and the full scores for the top ten governments, please contact GeSI. About the National communications to the UNFCCC National communications to the UNFCCC contain information on national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, climate-related policies and measures, GHG projections, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change, financial assistance and technology transfer to non-Annex I Parties, and actions on raising public awareness on climate change. The national communications are submitted by Annex I Parties every 45 years following decisions for each submission by the Conference of the Parties (COP). They are prepared and reported periodically by Annex I Parties based on agreed reporting guidelines (decision 4/CP.5). They are reviewed, within 12 years from the submission date, by international expert review teams (ERTs) following specific mandates included in COP decisions, including the general procedures for review that are enshrined in decision 2/CP.1. The fifth national communications were due on 1 January 2010. Decision 9/CP.16 calls for submission of the sixth national communications on 1 January 2014. These national communications provide an overview of how those reporting in countries priorities ICT solutions, they do not necessarily reflect the nature of actual low-carbon policies as these can exist in other ministries. The low-carbon leadership measured in though national communication is an indicator of how different countries priorities low-carbon ICT in the negotiations.
Description
of
index
The
low-carbon
ICT
assessments
of
the
national
communications
are
based
on
the
submissions
by
countries
to
the
UNFCCC.
All
countries
with
communication
in
English
have
been
assessed.
The
focus
was
the
fifth
national
communication
(due
1
January
2010)
from
the
annex
1
countries
and
for
non-annex
1
counties
the
latest
submitted
communication
was
used.
Four
areas
are
covered
in
the
assessment:
1.
Acknowledgement/understanding
of
ICT/IT
First
the
communications
are
searched
for
the
words
ICT
and
IT
to
see
if
countries
acknowledge
ICT/IT
at
all.
2.
Examples
and
targets
Here
examples
of
ICT/IT
solutions
are
identified,
their
savings
as
well
as
different
kind
of
targets.
Not
all
countries
use
ICT/IT
to
describe
relevant
solutions
to
any
examples
of
smart
solutions
in
key
areas
are
also
acknowledged.
3.
Areas
Here
key
areas
are
identified
in
the
text.
Smart
buildings,
smart
grids,
smart
transport,
smart
lifestyles
and
smart
health/education
are
identified.
Again
the
focus
here
is
on
smart
and
transformative
solutions
and
the
countries
do
not
have
to
mention
ICT/IT
specifically
only
give
example
of
solutions
where
ICT/IT
play
an
important
role.
4.
Focus
Finally
the
way
innovation,
efficiency,
transformative
and
dematerialization
are
analyzed.
For
innovation
and
efficiency
a
word
count
is
used
and
for
Transformative
and
dematerialization
a
qualitative
assessment
of
the
examples
is
used.
Factors/Weighting/Measure
In
the
matrix
the
different
factors
that
are
include
are
listed
together
with
the
weighting,
threshold
and
how
they
are
measured.
Factors
If
ICT
or
IT
is
included
in
the
text
ICT/IT
as
s
source
for
emissions
Examples
of
ICT/IT
solutions
that
help
reduce
emissions
Amount
of
current
savings
from
ICT/IT
solutions
stated
Individual
targets
for
ICT/IT
solutions
CO2
savings
Aggregated
target
for
ICT/IT
Smart
buildings
Smart
grids
Smart
transport
Sustainable
lifestyles
Smart
health/education
Innovation
Efficiency
Transformative
Dematerialization
TOTAL
Weighting
10
2
20
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
5
5
5
100%
Thresholds
8
50
Measure
Yes/no
Yes/no
Yes/no
Yes/no
Yes/no
Yes/no
Yes/no
Yes/no
Yes/no
Yes/no
Yes/no
Number
Number
Qualitative
Qualitative