EVALUATION PANEL GENERATOR ________________________________________________________________________

1. Introduction

1.1Problem Statement To develop a software for generating team for evaluation of projects and seminars. Proposed system aims automating the existing system . Tracks the faculty availability and maintains their records in the database for further use. To evaluate students based on various criteria.

1.2Project Scope / Objective Can be use in colleges to allot faculty for evaluation in an organized way. Efficient way of organizing seminars and projects Notification for students and faculty.

2. Literature survey and summary of current state of art

Currently the allotment of faculty for evaluation is done manually and are prone to clashes. Requires more human effort and a lot of paper work. This software intends to minimize the manual work. All data are collected and processed separately which is time consuming.

3. Proposal for dissertation

1. LOGIN AND PASSWORD Admin Login The administrator is given a login id and password. The administrator can set the access rights for various levels of user. Faculty Login The faculty can signup and provide the registration details. On approval of the administrator the faculty will be able to login Student Login Student can enter their details and signup. On approval from the administrator student will be able to login. 2. INPUTS GIVEN TO THE SYSTEM

_______________________________________________________________________ 1

EVALUATION PANEL GENERATOR ________________________________________________________________________

Administrator Time table of the class Time table of faculty concerned. Time slot for each project/seminar. The time period during which the allotment has to be done. Faculty Name, department ,area of study(priority wise listing),mobile number,address. Student Student id, student name, age, area of study of project/seminar Documents related to project/seminar.

3. ALLOTMENT The allotment or the selection of a particular faculty for evaluation is based on the following criteria. Area of study By comparing the time table of class and faculty, a matching slot is found and allocated. The of no of projects/seminars that has to be evaluated by each faculty is maintained. In case of project evaluation the guide should be a member of the evaluation panel.

4.

GENERATION OF REPORT

Admin Report on evaluated projects/seminars. Report on project/seminar to be evaluated. General report for a particular time span. Pending projects/seminars that has been delayed due to various reason) Based on various criteria Area of study Branch Semester Specify a particular time span (mention dates) Student gets a report which includes Date Time Topic Area of study Venue

Student

_______________________________________________________________________ 2

EVALUATION PANEL GENERATOR ________________________________________________________________________

5. NOTIFICATION Notifies the faculty on the day of evaluation Notifies the student one week before their presentation 6. EVALUATION SHEET Generate evaluation sheet based on the criteria specified. Allows each faculty of evaluation panel to print evaluation sheet and enter the

4. Tentative specification and System Overview

Our project is a web based model The details of faculty, student, project, time table are stored in databases. DBMS is used to access the data in the database. ASP.NET which is a language from Microsoft is used to design the front end of the project. 4.1. System Architecture 4.2. Product specification 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 4.3. Allotment of the faculties. Report generation for faculties and students. Evaluation sheets for the faculties. Notifications. File upload and download facilities. Fair allotment of evaluation work among the faculty.

External Interface Requirements

_______________________________________________________________________ 3

EVALUATION PANEL GENERATOR ________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________ 4

EVALUATION PANEL GENERATOR ________________________________________________________________________

ADMINISTRATOR

_______________________________________________________________________ 5

EVALUATION PANEL GENERATOR ________________________________________________________________________

4.4. Software and Hardware Requirements

Hardware requirements: Processor: Pentium IV System bus: 32 bit RAM: 512 Mb Printer, Keyboard, Mouse: windows Compatible

Software requirements: Front end: .NET Back end: MY SQL Operating system: windows 7

5.Work plan including time table

_______________________________________________________________________ 6

EVALUATION PANEL GENERATOR ________________________________________________________________________ Stages Group Formation Proposal for the project Allotment of project topic Study on existing system Submission of rough ppt Submission of preliminary report Presentation of preliminary report Submission of individual report Submission of consolidated report Submission of Mini Project Book Requirement analysis Design Coding Testing Date August 3rd 2011 August 7th 2011 August 11th 2011 August 18th2011 August 25th 2011 September 30th 2011 October 13th2011 November 4th 2011 November 4th 2011 November 4th 2011 October 31st 2011 Monday December 12th 2011 Monday February 27th 2012 Monday March 19th 2012 Monday

6. Implications of Research
The proposed project can be used as an additional feature in RSMS. It improves our knowledge on DBMS based projects, their working and their outcomes.

It enhances our skill in programming language.

7. Risks and Challenges

Some of the challenges that may be faced by software as follows: If the evaluation gets delayed, updation problem may occur. Fair distribution of project/ seminar among the faculties. Size of the files that can be uploaded cannot exceed beyond a limit.

_______________________________________________________________________ 7

EVALUATION PANEL GENERATOR ________________________________________________________________________

8. Conclusion
Minimize the problems existing in allotting the faculties for the
evaluation of both projects and seminars. Fair and efficient allotment of faculty. Reduces the manual work to a great extent

9. Bibliography
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/G/graphics.html

_______________________________________________________________________ 8