THE BLACK STUDIES IDEA AND THE MAKING OF A NEW WORLD: INSTITUTIONALIZATION AND ACTIVISM IN AN AGE OF DISASTER AND

DISBELIEF Opening Address 25 Annual Black Studies Conference Olive-Harvey College Chicago, Illinois April 18, 2002
th

By Dr. Floyd W. Hayes, III Associate Professor Africana Studies and Department of Political Science and Public Administration North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7107 Fwhayes@social.chass.ncsu.edu

Each generation must, out of relative obscurity, discover its mission, fulfil it, or betray it. Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth I want to express my deepest gratitude to Professor Armstead Allen, to the African American Studies Association, and to the conference planning committee for selecting me to present the opening address for the 25th Annual Black Studies Conference at Olive-Harvey College. Because of the recommendation of my dear brother Seneca Turner, who used to work in the Chicago Community College system and who now is retired in New York, I received my first invitation to this meeting in 1981. Since then, I have waited anxiously each year to receive a call from Professor Allen, inviting me to participate in what has been for me the most important conference that I attend each year. The Olive-Harvey College Black Studies Conference has contributed to my development in a variety of ways. Much of the thinking and preparation that went into my

anthology, A Turbulent Voyage: Readings in African American Studies, first published in 1992 and now in its third edition published in 2000, derived from my experience and participation in this annual meeting. Moreover, I have developed valuable friendships and associations with others who make the annual pilgrimage to this important gathering place. I have grown intellectually, my scholarship has advanced, and my commitment to the Black Studies Idea has been deepened, as a result of the opportunity to ground, as Walter Rodney used to say, with brothers and sisters at our annual Black Studies conference. Yes, I speak in the possessive because we create a needed community spirit and critical intellectual practice here. Each year, the conference includes a trans-disciplinary menu of issues that elicits serious and sometimes turbulent discourse and debate that span historical timefrom the ancient African past to the bio-technological future. At the end of a long series of charged sessions on some of the most important issues of our time, I often leave the annual Olive Harvey College Black Studies Conference physically exhausted. However, I always leave intellectually energized and with a renewed commitment to continue the daily struggles to liberate our lives as Black people. Most of you know that ours is the longest standing yearly Black Studies gathering at a college in America. So it was with this understanding that I waited with anticipation again this year, as I have done for over twenty years, for Professor Allens invitational call. However, when he called this time, Professor Allen informed that he and the planning committee had suggested that I be invited to give the opening address for this years annual Black Studies Conference. To be sure, this is the highest honor that I have received in all my years of

participation in the Black Studies movement. It is the most important recognition in my career! So, I sincerely thank you, Professor Allen, and I equally acknowledge my deep appreciation to the members of the planning committee and African American Studies Association.

All of you know that it is no small effort to plan and produce this conference each year. We owe a serious debt of gratitude to all of those involved in bringing about this meeting over the years. For their vision, innovation, persistence, determination, and workmanship in

bringing us together this year and for twenty-five years, please join me in congratulating and applauding Professor Allen and his yearly ensembles, and especially this years aggregation. I also want to thank the Ndigo Magpaper, and especially writer Kevin McNeir, for the fine story on this years 25th Annual Black Studies Conference (see McNeir 2002: 4). When Professor Allen calls each year, we participants get an assignmentoften we can negotiate that assignmentto participate in a particular session that is given an extraordinary and often daunting title. Over the years, I have attempted to construct remarks that hoped would have meaning to audiences and participants. Sure enough, Professor Allen gave me my assignment this year: Floyd, your subject is The Black Studies Idea and the Making of a New World. Without doubt, this title presents me with a daunting task this morning, for it possesses so many dimensions. Indeed, the topic forced me to ponder about whether I was up to the challenge of saying something meaningful in these uncertain times. I have tried to craft a few remarks that touch and concern this subject, to which I have added a subtitle: Institutionalization and Activism in an Age of Disaster and Disbelief. Hence, the revised title of my remarks is, The Black Studies Idea and the Making of the New World: Institutionalization and Activism in an Age of Disaster and Disbelief. In the wake of the spectacle of September 11, 2001, we now face the genuine insistence and persistence of having to think in the midst of disaster and disbelief. The end of World War II proclaimed the coming dissolution of the European colonial empire. Similarly, the willful attack on the symbol of the USAs military power and the complete destruction of the twin

pillars of the Western worlds economic dominancethat is to say, the Pentagon and World Trade Centerenunciated to the world the vulnerability and coming breakdown of the American Empire. Has America come to a point in its history when there is a growing senselessness of existence? To witness these disasters, one can no longer avoid posing the question of pessimistic disbeliefof nihilism today on a national and global scale (Conway 2000). Nihilism is not a belief in nothingness, it is the disbelief in what power represents as truth and perhaps the desire to go beyond that representation (see Camus 1984). American history has been built on nihilistic foundations. American democracy has not so much failed, as it has never actually been designed to commence. The advent of nihilism today has become necessary for our time because it represents the ultimate logical conclusion of great American values and ideas. Historically, white Americans articulated lofty principles and ideasof life, liberty, equality, justice, and the pursuit of happiness for all. Yet, by means of annihilating wars against Native Americans, enslaving captured Africans, appropriating Mexican land, exploiting Asian labor, supporting genocide in the Middle East, and employing other forms of terrorism, white Americans have devalued the nations highest values. American nihilism today represents the cynical disillusionment with the idea of American progress. For a half-century, many have lived under an illusion that the American Empire was invulnerable and invincible. Indeed, many came to believe that the last century was the American Century. For it represented American economic dominance and cultural

imperialism, as well as a white supremacist political organism, all buttressed by a logic and practice of global power and violence. Americas ruling managerial elites thought they could continue to police and terrorize the world well into the twenty-first century. However,

September 11, made these beliefs untenable. We have entered a new period of human history when illusions are being shattered and when the great lies are being exposed as lies for all to see. Americans can no longer play the politics of innocence, acting as if they are ignorant of the changing character of world affairs. Recent events now disillusion Americans, especially white Americans, forcing them to realize their vulnerability. We now are witnesses to the dawn of a new era of globalization; however, it is not a new ordered world. Rather, it is the coming of a new disordered and chaotic world, which signals the ascent of an era of nihilism and resentment. In the new global society, old ways of being, seeing, thinking, and doing no longer are capable of handling the complex realities of the new trajectory of human, and perhaps even post-human, evolution (see Baudrillard 2001; Brooks 2002; Fukuyama 2002; Kurzweil 1999). It is within the context of the ascent of nihilism and resentment, as I have characterized the emerging period, that we need to think about The Black Studies Idea and the Making of the New World: Institutionalization and Activism in an Age of Disaster and Disbelief. I want to discuss three themes: (1) the Black Studies idea: institutionalization and activism, (2) the struggle for a new language of inclusion in the making of a new world vision, and (3) unmasking whiteness: the Black Studies Idea and the making of a new world. Institutionalization and Activism: Contradictions and Dilemmas Black Studies, as an organized academic enterprise, grew out of the late 1960s struggle for black liberation. Before that, only a handful of historically black colleges in the south had paid attention to the scholarly examination of Africa and its American legacy, particularly in the discipline of history. The field of Black Studies developed simultaneously with the social movements that sought to transform both American society and its academy. By the mid-

1960s, the Black Power Movement was challenging the cultural and racial exclusivity of American society and its social institutions, including the academic institutions. Black studentactivists argued that the policies, programs, practices, and curricula at white supremacist colleges and universities discriminated against Black people. Consequently, the demands grew louder and stronger for more Black students, more Black faculty, and the establishment of Black Studies. In the years since the beginning of Black Studies, indications are that American society seems to be headed toward increasing state violence and a garrison-prison complex, citizen rage and outrage, and cultural nihilism and social anarchy (see Donner 1990; Garland 2001; Goldfarb 1991; James 1996; Lasswell 1941). In the 1960s, Black people demanded attention to their charges of white supremacy and economic exploitation, but the conventional channels of political demand largely were blocked or ineffective for working-class and impoverished urban residents. Dispossessed urban Blacks scarcely experienced the tangible benefits of civil rights legislation and policies. As a result, a number of major American cities were engulfed in a rising tide of violent uprisings and disturbances. The 1965, Watts rebellion signaled the watershed of urban Black outrage and frustration with anti-Black racism, police brutality, and economic disenfranchisement. Almost thirty years later, the 1992 Los Angeles insurrection (triggered by the exoneration of white policemen whose vicious beating of a Black man had been captured on videotape by a local citizen and later shown on television to the nation and to the world) reflected mounting discontent among impoverished Los Angelenos, who destroyed property throughout much of the city (see Oliver, Johnson, and Farrell 2000). As in the 1960s, todays American cities continue to be the visible terrain of frustration, rage, hopelessness, cynicism, and unrest brought on by decades of societys indifference to the growing pain and

suffering associated with urban economic and political underdevelopment. The urban polity also is characterized by mounting police-state repression (Parenti 1999). In contrast to the 1960s, however, it is apparent that as the twentieth-century ended and the twenty-first century begins, popular feelings of cynicism, resentment, and anger are expanding beyond impoverished Black and Latino communities to include alienated and dispossessed white Americans. Increasing incidents of popular political rage represent a

developing culture of nihilism and violence in Americathe Unabomber Manifesto, the 1995 domestic terrorism of Timothy McVeighs bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building that killed 168 people, the growing presence of the militia movement, and the mass murders of teachers and fellow students by white secondary school students. Moreover, todays increasing white supremacist hate crimes against, along with mounting police assaults and murders of, Black female and male citizens, from New York to California, represent continuing patterns of violence and control similar to the lynching, anti-Black riots, and segregation of the early twentieth century (Jeffries 2000a, 2000b, 2001). Like the culture of racism, the culture of violence is deeply rooted in the origin and development of American civilization (see Feagin 2000; Omi and Winant 1994). What must no longer be ignored is the historical truth that Americas beginning sprang from the violent and dehumanizing underside of the early modern European world-systemdiscovery, conquest, colonialism, genocide, and enslavement (Blackburn 1997; Dussel 1995). Americas native populations, along with captured Africans, were caught in the bubbling cauldron of barbaric systems of white supremacy. Contemporary Americas increasingly multicultural society, therefore, is deeply rooted in a historic culture of white supremacy and violence. If America is unable to break with its legacy of racist

barbarism and violence, then increasing internal and external chaos, anarchy, and disaster will characterize twenty-first century. It was in opposition to these trends and developments that the Black Studies Idea first emerged and has sustained itself. In the heat of the Black Power Movement more than thirty years ago, Black students led the struggle to establish Black Studies enterprises in white supremacist universities and colleges across America. Starting with San Francisco State

University in 1968, Black Studies erupted in the context of university protest (see Chrisman 1969; McEvoy and Miller 1969). This new field of study was insurrectionary and

emancipatory as its supporters sought to challenge and transform the policies and practices of institutional racism. Additionally, the Black Studies Idea represented a bold intellectual

movement that undertook to unmask the power/knowledge configuration of Eurocentrism and the white supremacist cultural domination of the American academy. Hence, the Black Studies Idea was intended to break the perceived connection between whiteness and rightness! The Black Studies Idea sought to resist the rigid barriers between traditional academic disciplines by emphasizing an innovative multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary approach to teaching and learning. To be sure, it was this new field of study that paved the way for current trans-disciplinary studies, perhaps the most progressive intellectual movement in the academy today. Long before contemporary postmodern theories and perspectives traveled to America and to the world, the Black Studies Idea challenged fundamentally the ideological basis of the Eurocentric paradigm, which assumes that the Western European structure of knowledge is true, objective, and politically neutral, and applicable equally to all peoples and circumstances. It was the Black Studies Idea early on, which pointed out that the Western European structure of knowledge resulted in a representation of civilization that not only idealized Western culture

and thought, but also devalued and distorted all others (see Asante 1980; 1987; 1990). Today, scholars around the world recognize the problematic status of the Eurocentric structure of knowledge, which holds that white Western European views and values are and should be the human norm, and which maintains that other cultural views and values can be discounted insofar as they deviate from some Western and Euro-American imperial notion of whiteness. We need to remember that it was the Black Studies Idea that set in motion a new wave of contemporary intellectual interventions, such as ethnic studies, womens studies, critical cultural studies, critical race theory, postcolonial studies, and subaltern studies. We must never forget the significance of the Black Studies Idea in contesting the intellectual domination of Eurocentrism on the global scene! However, as we fought to institutionalize and legitimize the Black Studies Idea throughout the American academy from the 1970s to the present, many of us lost sight of the dynamic intellectual-activism that initially set the Black Studies Idea in motion. Historically, the social role of intellectuals was to criticize and to speak truth to power, and that is what they should continue to do (Said 1994; see also Posner 2001). Rejecting this tradition, however, some of todays popular scholars associated with Black Studies have become public intellectuals, who seek to curry favor with, and become the servants of, managerial power brokers, while demanding gargantuan payoffs for forty- to sixty-minute lectures. Recently, considerable public attention has focused on Princeton Universitys purchase of a few Black public intellectual luminaries from Harvard Universitys African American Studies Department. Many of us may be asking ourselves about the new academic slave trade. Who will be the next intellectual commodities sold in this academic marketplace, and what academic plantation manager will grab them? Fortunately, the media-hyped trade in professional-

managerial Black minds and bodies does not dictate the evolving significance and intellectual dynamism of the Black Studies Ideacertainly not as we practice that idea here. The presence of prominent Black intellectuals and scholars has a relatively long tradition in America. Yet, many nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Black intellectuals were activiststhey were not tied to university settingswho spoke truth to white power in America. It needs to be said that early formulators of the Black Studies Idea sought to emulate that intellectual-activist tradition. However, since the establishment of Black Studies in the 1960s, the dynamic activism on the part of Black Studies intellectuals gradually faded. This happened as the American state-apparatus crushed the Black Power movement. As a result, most Black students turned away from campus activism. Additionally, many of us who

transitioned from student-activists to university professors found ourselves constrained by teaching a variety of courses, struggling for promotion and tenure, publishing our research, and often fighting white perceptions about the intellectual rigor of Black Studies. Yet, in the face of mounting white supremacy and anti-Black racism, which plague contemporary historically white universities and colleges, too many Black professors now remain silent and invisible, demonstrating little or no anti-racist leadership and resistance. In view of these develpments, it is not enough to write books, articles, and papers for our colleagues anymore. Therefore, I want to argue that, because of the transformation of American society, we need to revive the activism and popular struggle that gave rise to the Black Studies Idea in the first place. This is because in the evolving managerial era of knowledge, science, and advanced technology, educational institutions, as knowledge-producing organizations, are becoming important sites of political struggle.

10

The managerial transformation of American society is characterized by the transition from a capital-intensive economy based upon physical resources, which dominated the first half of the twentieth century, to a knowledge-intensive economy based upon human resources, which has characterized the second half of the last century to the present. The principal resource in Americas declining capital-intensive economy has been finance capital, invested in industrial plants, machinery, and technologies that increase the muscle power of human labor. In the evolving knowledge-intensive economy, the decisive resource is cultural capital: the nations investment in and management of education, knowledge, computers, robots, and other technologies that enhance the mental capacity of workers (see Botkin, Dimancescu, and Stata 1984; Drucker 1968, 1993; Lyotard 1984; Reich 1991; Toffler 1990). Important now are specialized knowledge, communication skills, the capacity to process and utilize collections of information in strategic decision-making processes, and an increasingly

professionalized/managerial approach to controlling people.

With this expanding role for

formal or specialized knowledge, professionals and expertsintellectuals and the technical intelligentsiahave become a new class in the public and privates sphere, particularly with regard to making public policies (Bazelon 1971; Derber, Schwartz, Magrass 1990; Ehrenreich and Ehrenreich 1979; Freidson 1970; Galbraith 1971; Nachmias and Rosenbloom 1979; Perkin 1989). Mental capacity and managerial skills are supplanting money and manufacturing as the sole sources of power. Life-long learning, therefore, is becoming an indispensable investment for social development, and educational credentials are more and more the key to a persons role in a knowledge-intensive society (Collins 1977). In view of these trends and

developments, more and more parents are becoming preoccupied with the educational

11

advantages they can confer on their children, and many university students are realizing the importance of advanced educational credentials, if not the need for advanced educational attainment. Societys new power wielders are located in government, elite universities, philanthropic foundations, the mass media, elite law firms, political action committees, and major policy research institutions (see Benveniste 1972; Burnham 1960; Fischer 1990; Keane 1984; Lebedoff 1981; Smith 1991). Their influence comes from the capacity to conceptualize the character of complex social problems and to design strategies for handling them; they also produce and manage ideas and images that direct the cultural, intellectual, and ideological development of managerial society. For example, recall that since the 1980s, policy

intellectuals of various ideological persuasions have driven the debate about the so-called urban underclass and the assault on welfare polices (see Auletta 1982; Cottingham 1982; Jencks and Peterson 1991; Jones 1992, 1998; Katz 2000, 2001; Lawson 1992; Loury 1995; Mead 1992; Murray 1984; Wilson 1987, 1996). In the future, criminal justice policy scholars now being trained in universities across the nation may very well become the professional experts who will legitimize the dramatically increasing incarceration of undereducated, dispossessed, unwanted, and disenfranchised urban dwellers in Americas emerging prison-garrison state. As Americas urban police forces become increasingly militarized, which began happening in Los Angeles under police chief Daryl Gates, criminal justice policy elites (as members of the professional-managerial class) will rationalize the prison-garrison state in lockdown America (see Parenti 1999). It is an understanding of this emerging reality that encourages me to see the growing need for Black struggle in educational institutions, especially at universities. Since the late

12

1970s, many urban school systems, including many of those controlled by Black educational managerial elites, have been engaged in undermining the intellectual development of Black youngsters (see Henig, Hula, Orr, and Pedscleaux 1999; Stone 1998). Many urban systems have placed quality education on the backburner. They have abandoned the distribution and mastery of the fundamental tools of knowledge, academic motivation, and positive character development. Denied quality education, many Black high school graduates matriculate to universities and colleges where they are scarcely equipped to handle the rigors of advanced academic performance (Hayes 1990; Mazique 2000). Moreover, many Black students find themselves increasingly caught in the crucible of intellectual sabotage and anti-Black racism at historically white universities. Hence, there are institutional strategies in place that prevent many Black students from obtaining the necessary quality education needed to perform optimally in a future American society that is based largely on knowledge, science, and advanced technology. For at least two decades, I have observed the increasing viciousness of white supremacy directed at Black students and faculty in the American academy. Largely unfamiliar with the history of campus struggles of the 1960s, many of todays Black students seem confused. In the face of racist assault, they appear to possess no armor; and many seem unprepared to negotiate university bureaucracies and institutionalized racism. At historically white

universities and colleges, when they come to Black faculty for assistance and support, we often are not available to them. Many Black faculty, staff, and managers are invisible, silent, and fearful, failing to demonstrate to our students courage, confidence, and leadership in challenging white supremacy and anti-Black racism. For we have abandoned the activism and popular struggles in the 1960s and 1970s that resulted in our employment at these institutions.

13

Perhaps many of us have forgotten that we stand on the shoulders of those who fought defiantly and tirelessly for future generations. It also needs to be stated that at many Historically Black Universities and Colleges there has existed an authoritarian leadership tradition that also has suppressed faculty and student dissent. This must stop! We must resist managerial repression! In the face of an increasingly oppressive managerial society (see Parenti 1999; Garland 2001), I call on all of us to renew a sense of self-respect, courage, confidence, and defiance. In a knowledge-intensive society in which universities (as knowledge-producing institutions) increasingly become sites of political conflict, Black faculty must become coalitions of defiance and advocates for social justice. In addition to our scholarly pursuits, Black faculty need to fight back against racist practices throughout university and college workplaces. We need to build coalitions with students and service workers. Black students deserve a quality education in a university learning environment free of racist harassment and violence. Black service employees deserve working conditions free of racism and exploitation. In the face of the intellectual sabotage of Black students, I call on Black faculty to become advocates for quality education. In the face of racist injustice, we need to demand racial justice. Indeed, we need to revive, politicize, and radicalize Black student and Black faculty and staff organizations in order to struggle for racial justice at historically white supremacist colleges and universities. Similar organizational arrangement also need to be established at Historically Black Colleges and Universities in order to challenge those leadership regimes that are repressive. The Black Studies Idea contains a dual mission: intellectual excellence and social responsibility. The present era of increasingly anti-Black hostility demands that we be clear about this mission. As we pursue academic achievement, let us also renew the mission of social activism. I urge all of us to remember and act on Frantz Fanons declaration: Each generation must, out of relative

14

obscurity, discover its mission, fulfil it, or betray it (1963: 167). Silence, invisibility, and fear in the face of injusticeconstitute betrayal and collusion with the forces of evil! New Language of Inclusion for a New Vision of the World My second theme has to do with the struggle to develop a new idea, a new vision, and a new language of inclusion necessary for the making of a new world. Indeed, we have to think about thinking itself. As I have previously argued, the new world that is dawning is an increasingly disordered, chaotic, and nihilistic world. The American reaction to the September 11, 2001, disaster and this nations continued intervention in the Middle East crisis, demonstrate the dramatic growth of global antagonism and anti-American resentment, especially in the Muslim world. Chaos is mounting everywhere, and resistance to American political hegemony is increasing by leaps and bounds. Moreover, old and new liberation struggles continue in various sectors of the world. What may be different from past eras is the increasing demand for reparations by those people who have been unjustly impoverishment as a result of the unjust enrichment of white, Western civilization. The dominant issue of the twenty-first century may well be the demand for restitution for the European and EuroAmerican imperialism and colonialism, especially crimes against African and African American humanity (Barkan 2000; Robinson 2000; Worrill 2001). Yet, even as the global demand for recognition and reparation continues to grow among the oppressed and exploited peoples of the world, the Black Studies Idea needs to find a new language of inclusion that connects the liberation struggles of disenfranchised people around the world. I speak of subordinated men, women, and children throughout the world whose right to exist and reproduce themselves is being threatened increasingly by nuclear and biological weapons of mass annihilation in the new age of knowledge, science, and advanced

15

technology. These are the laboring masses on the global scene, who are struggling for human dignity and personal worth, family survival and community solidarity, a living wage and adequate housing, quality education and good health care, and sustainable human development all with the hope of a livable environment on planet earth. Can the Black Studies Idea think through the many veils of illusion necessary for developing a discourse that links the damned of the earth, which would include the Palestinians as they struggle for a homeland of their own? Can the Black Studies Idea construct an alternative vision of the worldbeyond the encroaching disorder, chaos, and nihilismthat would save humanity and, thereby, save the African world? Can the Black Studies Idea fashion strategies and tactics the will make the new world work not for crass economic gain or human management and destruction, but for a new humanism and a new environmental theory and practice free of racist, economic, political, and cultural injustice (see Bullard 1994)? In the last analysis, if we do not protect the environment, all else may become irrelevant! Unmasking Whiteness: The Black Studies Idea and the Making of the New World My third and final theme centers on the struggle to dismantle the conception and power of whiteness in the imagination and in the lived experience of Black people. When I ask my white students what it is like (or what it means) to be white, they often get lockjaw and are silent. Generally, they say that they have never thought about being white. They seem largely invisible to themselves as whites. Only a few are aware of the manner in which Americas white supremacist social order is based upon power, profits, and pleasure derived from whiteskin privilege. Most of my white students even deny that they benefit from systematic

privileges that whiteness provides (but see McIntosh 2001). The spotlight needs to be turned on whiteness in such a way that it becomes problematicthat is, the subject of critical

16

examination from the standpoint and perspective of the Black Studies Idea. We need to break the supposed connection between whiteness and rightness! This proposal is not a new

departure; rather, it is an extension of the primary intellectual objectives of the Black Studies Idea. Since the dawn of the Black Studies Idea in the late 1960s, a number of founding scholars and theorists mentioned a need to re-examine the white experience as a corollary to the main mission of the new field of study. According to Harold Cruse (1969), the Black Studies Idea needed to employ Black cultural nationalism in the critical examination of both developments and contradictions within the Black American population as well as the manifestations of the larger American cultural apparatus and its effects on Black consciousness. Referring to the Black Studies Idea as the systematic examination of the historic and contemporary experiences of Black people, Maulana Karenga (1982) argued that its major objectives were to challenge and correct the distortions and lies of white studies (or the traditional university academic disciplines). Importantly, for over thirty years, he has

judiciously admonished Black people to tell their own cultural truths, which, as a result, would also mean to expose the accepted fictionalized data of white studies. It was Francis CressWelsing, who in her 1970 essay, The Cress Theory of Color-Confrontation and Racism (White Supremacy): A Psychogenetic Theory and World Outlook, leveled a frontal attack on white supremacy, arguing that it is a psychological/behavioral response to white peoples (especially the white males) fear of numerical deficiency and genetic extinction (see CressWelsing 1991). Additionally, Molefi Asante (1980, 1987, 1990) demanded and demonstrated a deconstruction of the fundamentally flawed Eurocentric grand-narrative. This earth-shaking and myth-shattering scholarship, as well as the work upon which it was based (for example, see

17

Ben-Jochannan 1970, 1971, 1972 ; Birley 1972; Budge 1961 Diop 1974; Jackson 1970, 1972; James 1954; Jones 1972a, 1972b, 1978, 1989; Massey 1970, 1974a, 1974b; Tompkins 1971; Weiner 1920, 1922) paved the way not only for new scholarship about the world African experience. Formulators of the Black Studies Idea also fostered a necessary counter-narrative about Europeans and their white American descendants. It is the expansion and elaboration of this earlier perspective that I call on the Black Studies Idea to focus its critical gaze. What is required is the critical examination of modern and contemporary European and white American culture and civilization refracted through the lens of the Black Studies Idea. This is not a call for arresting the ongoing intellectual

examination of the global African experience; rather, it is a proposal for expanding a counternarrative about the paradox of whiteness for the purpose of dismantling its hegemony. How do we mount a necessary critique of modern representations of whiteness? I want to touch a few themes, but these scarcely are exhaustive of the categories of whiteness that the Black Studies Idea needs to contest and dismantle. First, since Western cultures late

seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Enlightenment is major source of contemporary white supremacys justification, the Black Studies Idea needs to interrogate the relationship between modern Europes philosophical anthropology and anti-Black racism (see Ani 1994; Eze 1997; Gates 1985). Second, there is a serious need to expose what philosopher Charles Mills (1997, 1998) refers to as the racial contract, an historical agreement among whites which has buttressed the global political system of white supremacy. Calling into question Americas fictionalized history, this investigation also will demonstrate that the United States came into existence not as a democracy but as a white supremacist republic (see Saxton 1990). The third theme addresses the historical and social forces motivating Europeans to define themselves as

18

superior and white Americans and to define captured Africans and their American descendants as the inferior Black Other (Allen 1994, 1997; Barrett and Roediger 1997; Cleaver 1997; Ignatiev 1995; Johnson 1999; Roediger 1991; Sacks 1997). Fourth, the Black Studies Idea must challenge the view that whiteness is the invisible and unmarked norm in American culture and society; unmask whiteness as a system of unjust enrichment, entitlement, power, privilege, profits, and pleasure; and break the assumed linkage between whiteness and rightness (see Du Bois 1964; Feagin 2000; Frankenberg 1993, 1997; Harris 1995; Hill 1997; Lipsitz 1998; Rasmussen, Klinenberg, Nexic, and Wray 2001; Rothenberg 2002). Fifth is the need to explore systematically how Black people have viewed whitenessconquest, colonialism, genocide, enslavement, terrorism, segregation, and contemporary and more subtle forms of white supremacy and anti-Black racism (Bay 2000; Du Bois 1969; hooks 1992, 1994; Morrison 1992; Roediger 1998). Last, the Black Studies Idea needs to incorporate an investigation of what Eric Lott (1995) has called love and theft, meaning the ways in which whites historically have terrrorized, vilified, hated, and feared Black people while simultaneously embracing, appropriating, commodifying, and exploiting aspects of Black expressive and popular culture (see also Collier 1978; Daniels 2002; Davis 1989; DeVeaux 1997; George 1988; Jones 1963; Kofsky 1970; Lawrence 2001; Pieterse 1992; Porter 2002; Roach 1999; Szwed 1997; Ward 1998). Conclusion The dawn of the twenty-first century finds America engulfed by a rising tide of cynicism and nihilism; it is a cancer of the American spirit and a lethal assault on the nations immune system. Suspicion is increasing. Trust is declining. There is a mounting sense of despair about the modern culture of progress that America is supposed to embody. A growing

19

proportion of Americans seem skeptical about whether the institutions of progress are viable and beneficial: political leadership, public bureaucracies, business corporations, public schools, universities, political parties, religious organizations, the legal system, the mass media, and even the family. Popular discontent is becoming more comprehensive, penetrating, and

corrosive. The September 11, 2001, disaster served to broaden and deepen a consciousness of impending doom among the American public. Significantly, signs of growing cultural

decadence suggest that American culture and civilization are beyond redemption. The expanding fear and disillusionment with respect to Americas sense of invincibility, along with the growing instability of white supremacy as a global political system, hint at the coming decline and dissolution of Americas world dominance. Against an expanding sense of disaster and disbelief, what is needed is new thinking, new ideas, new concepts, and even new thinking about thinking itself. In this talk, I have discussed three major themes appropriate for advancing the Black Studies Idea(1) increasing intellectual activism, (2) developing a new language of inclusion for the worlds oppressed masses, and (3) constructing a counternarrative for unmasking and dismantling whiteness. The Black Studies Idea needs to break fundamentally with the dominant structures of thinking and knowledge that characterize the contemporary American academy. These critical and uncertain times demand, therefore, that the Black Studies Idea provide intellectual leadership in the academic and nonacademic world by developing new strategies and tactics that could save humanity and, thereby, save the world African community. This is the twenty-first century challenge that the Black Studies Idea must meet for the making of a new world.

20

Works Cited Allen, Theodore W. 1994. The Invention of the White Race: Racial Oppression and Social Control. Vol. 1. New York: Verso. _____. 1997. The Invention of the White Race: The Origin of Racial Oppression in AngloAmerica. Vol. 2. New York: Verso. Ani, Marimba. 1994. Yurungu: An African-Centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behavior. Trenton: African World Press, Inc. Asante, Molefi K. 1980. Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change. Buffalo: Amulefi Publishing Company. _____. 1987. The Afrocentric Idea. Philadelphia: Temple University. _____. 1990. Kemet, Afrocentricity, and Knowledge. Trenton: Africa World Press, Inc. Auletta, Ken. 1982. The Underclass. New York: Random House, Inc. Barkan, Elazar. 2000. The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. New York: W. W. Norton and Company. Barrett, James R., and David Roediger. 1997. How White People Became White. In Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic. Eds. Critical White Studies: Looking Behind the Mirror (pp. 402-406). Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Baudrillard, Jean. 2001. Impossible Exchange. New York: Verso. Bazelon, David T. 1971. Power in America: The Politics of the New Class. New York: The New American Library. Bay, Mia. 2000. The White Image in the Black Mind: African-American Ideas about White People, 1830-1925. New York: Oxford University Press. Ben-Jochannan, Yosef. 1970. African Origins of Major Western Religions. New York: Alkebu-Lan Books Associates. _____. 1971. Africa: Mother of Western Civilization. New York: Alkebu-lan Books Associates. _____. 1972. Black Man of the Nile. Rev. Ed. New York: Alkebu-Lan Books Associates. Birley, Anthony R. 1972. Septimius Severus: The African Emperor. New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc.
21

Blackburn, Robin. 1997. The Making of the New World: From the Baroque to the Modern: 1492-1800. New York: Verso. Botkin, James, Dan Dimancescu, and Ray Stata. 1984. The Innovators: Rediscovering Americas Creative Energy. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. Brooks, Rodney A. 2002. Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. New York: Pantheon Books. Budge, E. A. Wallis. 1961. Osiris: The Egyptian Religion of Resurrection. New York: University Books. Bullard, Robert D. 1994. Ed. Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books. Burnham, James. 1960. The Managerial Revolution. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Camus, Albert. 1984. The Rebel: An Essay on Man in Revolt. New York: Vintage Books. Chrisman, Robert. 1969. Observations on Race and Class at San Francisco State. In James McEvoy and Abraham Miller. Eds. Black Power and Student Rebellion (pp. 222-232). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. Cleaver, Kathleen Neal. 1997. The Antidemocratic Power of Whiteness. In Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic. Eds. Critical White Studies: Looking Behind the Mirror (pp. 157163). Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Collier, James L. 1978. The Making of Jazz: A Comprehensive History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Collins, Randall. 1979. The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press. Conway, Daniel. 2000. Revisiting the Will to Power: Active Nihilism and the Project of Trans-Human Philosophy. In Keith A. Pearson and Diane Morgan. Eds. Nihilism Now! Montsters of Energy (pp. 117-141). New York: St. Martins Press, Inc. Cottingham, Clem. 1982. Ed. Race, Poverty, and the Urban Underclass. Lexington: Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Company. Cress-Welsing, Francis. 1991. The Cress Theory of Color-Confrontation and Racism (White Supremacy). In Cress-Welsing. The Isis Papers: The Keys to the Colors (pp. 1-16). Chicago: Third World Press.

22

Cruse, Harold. 1969. The Integration Ethic as a Basis for Scholarly Endeavors. In Armstead Robinson, Craig C. Foster, and Donald H. Ogilvie. Eds. Black Studies in the University: Symposium (pp. 4-12). New Haven: Yale University Press. Darity, William A., Jr. 1986. The Managerial Class and Industrial Policy. Industrial Relations. Vol. 25 (spring): 217-227. _____. 1991. The Underclass and Overclass: Race, Class, and Economic Inequality in the Managerial Age. In Emily P. Hoffman. Ed. Essays on Economic Discrimination (pp. 67-84). Kalamazoo: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. Davis, Miles, with Quincy Troupe. 1989. Miles: The Autobiography. New York: Simon and Schuster. Derber, Charles, William A. Schwartz, and Yale Magrass. 1990. Power in the Highest Degree: Professionals and the Rise of a New Mandarin Order. New York: Oxford University Press. DeVeaux, Scott. 1997. The Birth of Bebop: A Social and Musical History. Berkeley: University of California Press. Diop, Cheihk A. 1974. The African Origin of Civilization: Reality or Myth. New York: Lawrence Hill & Co. Donner, Frank. 1990. Protectors of Privilege: Red Squads and Police Repression in Urban America. Berkeley: University of California Press. Druker, Peter F. 1968. The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. New York: Harper & Row. _____. 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. New York: HarperCollins. Du Bois, W. E. B. 1964. Black Reconstruction in America, 1860-1880. New York: Meridian Books/The World Publishing Company. _____. 1969. The Souls of White Folk. Darkwater: Voices from Within the Veil (pp. 29-52). New York: Schocken Books. Dussel, Enrique. 1995. The Invention of the Americas: Eclipse of the Other and the Myth of Modernity. Trans. Michael D. Barber. New York: Continuum. Ehrenreich, Barbara and John Ehrenreich. 1979. The Professional-Managerial Class. In. Pat Walker. Ed. Between Labor and Capital (pp. 5-45). Boston: South End Press. Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi. 1997. Ed. Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

23

Fanon, Frantz. 1963. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press. Feagan, Joe. 2000. Racist America: Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations. New York: Routledge. Fischer, Frank. 1990. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Frankenberg, Ruth. 1993. The Social Construction of Whiteness: White Women, Race Matters. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. _____. 1997. Ed. Displacing Whiteness: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism. Durham: Duke University Press. Freidson, Elliot. 1970. Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. Fukuyama, Francis. 2002. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Galbraith, John K. 1971. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Gates, Henry L. Jr. 1986. Ed. Introduction: Writing Race and the Difference It Makes. In Race, Writing, and Difference (pp.1-20). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. George, Nelson. 1988. The Death of Rhythm & Blues. New York: Pantheon Books. Goldfarb, Jeffrey. 1991. The Cynical Society: The Culture of Politics and the Politics of Culture in American Life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Harris, Cheryl L. 1995. Whiteness as Property. In Kemberle Crenshaw, Neil Gotanda, Gary Peller, and Kendall Thomas. Eds. Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement (pp. 276-292). New York: The New Press. Hayes, Floyd W. III. 1990. Race, Urban Politics, and Educational Policy-Making in Washington, D.C.: A Communitys Struggle for Quality Education. Urban Education. Vol. 25: 3 (October): pp. 237-257. Henig, Jeffrey R., Richard C. Hula, Marion Orr, and Desiree S. Pedescleaux. 1999. The Color of School Reform: Race, Politics, and the Challenge of Urban Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Hill, Mike. 1997. Ed. Whiteness: A Critical Reader. New York: New York University Press.

24

Hooks, bell. 1992. Representations of Whiteness. In Black Looks: Race and Representation (pp. 165-178). Boston: South End Press. _____. 1994. Outlaw Culture: Resisting Representations. New York: Routledge. Ignatiev, Noel. 1995. How the Irish Became White. New York: Routledge. Jackson, John G. 1970. Introduction to African Civilization. New York: University Books, Inc. _____. 1972. Man, God and Civilization. New Hyde Park: University Books, Inc. James, George G. M 1954. Stolen Legacy: The Greeks were not the Authors of Greek Philosopy, but the People of North Africa, Commonly Called the Egyptians. New York: Philosophical Library. James, Joy. 1996. Resisting State Violence: Radicalism, Gender, and Race in U.S. Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Jeffries, Judson L. 2000a. Police Brutality as a Major Public Health Issue: The Tragic Shooting of Former Tampa Bay Buccaneer Demetrius DuBose. In Floyd W. Hayes, III. Ed. A Turbulent Voyage: Readings in African American Studies (pp. 580-587). 3rd Edition. San Diego: Collegiate Press. _____. 2000b. Police Brutality as a Major Everyday Threat: Notes from an Angry Young Professor. Harvard Journal of African American Public Policy. Vol. VI, No. 1 (summer): 129-144. _____. 2001. Police Brutality of Black Men and the Destruction of the African-American Community. The Negro Educational Review. Vol. 52, No. 4 (October): 115-130. Jencks, Christopher, and Paul E. Peterson. 1991. Eds. The Urban Underclass. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution. Johnson, Walter. 1999. Soul by Soul: Life Inside the Antebellum Slave Market. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Jones, Edward L. 1972a. Profiles in African Heritage. Seattle: Edward L. Jones and Associates. _____. 1972b. Back Zeus: African Mythology and History. Seattle: Edward L. Jones and Associates. _____. 1978. Tutankhamon: Son of the Sun, King of Upper and Lower Egypt. Seattle: Edward L. Jones and Associates. _____. 1989. The Black Diaspora: Colonization of Colored People. Seattle: Edward L. Jones and Associates.
25

Jones, Jacqueline. 1991. The Dispossessed: Americas Underclasses from the Civil War to the Present. New York: Basic Books. _____. 1998. American Work: Four Centuries of Black and White Labor. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Jones, LeRoi. 1963. Blues People. New York: William Morrow and Company. Karenga, Maulana. 1982. Introduction to Black Studies. Inglewood: Kawaida Publications. Katz, Michael. 2000. Ed. The Underclass Debate: Views from History. Princeton: Princeton University Press. _____. 2001. The Price of Citizenship: Redefining the American Welfare State. New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt. Keane, John. 1984. Public Life and Late Capitalism: Toward a Socialist Theory of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kofsky, Frank. 1970. Black Nationalism and the Revolution in Music. New York: Pathfinder Press. Kurzweil, Ray. 1999. The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. New York: Penguin Books. Lasswell, Harold D. 1941. The Garrison State. The American Journal of Sociology. 46 (January): 455-468. Lawrence, A. H. 2001. Duke Ellington and His World: A Biography. New York: Routledge. Lawson, Bill E. 1992. Ed. The Underclass Question. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Lebedoff, David. 1981. The New Elite: The Threat to Democracy. New York: Franklin Watts. Lipsitz, George. 1998. The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit From Identity Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Lott, Eric. 1993. Love and Theft: Blackface Minstrelsy and the American Working Class. New York: Oxford University Press. Loury, Glenn C. 1995. One by One from the Inside Out: Essays and Reviews on Race and Responsibility in America. New York: The Free Press. Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

26

McEvoy, James, and Abraham Miller. 1969. San Francisco State On StrikeShit it Down. In McEvoy and Miller. Eds. Black Power and Student Rebellion: Conflict on the American Campus. (pp.12-31). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. McIntosh, Peggy. 2001. Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack. In Paul Rothenberg. Ed. Race, Class, and Gender in the United States (pp. 163-168). New York: Worth Publishers. McNeir, D. Kevin. 2002. Keeping Faith Amidst Shifting American and Global Realities: 25 th Annual Black Studies Conference Meets at Olive-Harvey College. NDigo Magpaper. April 18-24: p. 4. Marable, Manning. 2000. Introduction: Black Studies and the Racial Mountain. In Marable. Ed. Dispatches from the Ebony Tower: Intellectuals Confront the African American Experience. (pp. 1-28). New York: Columbia University Press. Massey, Gerald. 1970. Ancient Egypt: The Light of the World. 2 Vols. New York: Samuel Weiser, Inc. _____. 1974a. A Book of the Beginnings. 2 Vols. Secaucus: University Books, Inc. _____. 1974b. The Natural Genesis. 2 Vols. New York: Samuel Weiser, Inc. Mead, Lawrence M. 1992. The New Politics of Poverty: The Nonworking Poor in America. New York: Basic Books. Mills, Charles W. 1997. The Racial Contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. _____. 1998. Blackness Visible: Essays on Philosophy and Race. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Morrison, Toni. 1992. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Murray, Charles. 1984. Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950-1980. New York: Basic Books. Nachmias, David, and David H. Rosenbloom. 1980. Bureaucratic Government, USA. New York: St. Martins Press. Oliver, Melvin L, James H. Johnson, and Walter C. Farrell, Jr. 2000. Anatomy of a Rebellion: A Political-Economic Analysis. In Floyd W. Hayes, III. Ed. A Turbulent Voyage: Readings in African American Studies (Pp. 562-579). San Diego: Collegiate Press. Omi, Michael, and Howard Winant. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.

27

Parenti, Christian. 1999. Lockdown America: Police and Prisons in the Age of Crisis. New York: Verso. Perkin, Harold. 1989. The Rise of Professional Society: England Since 1880. New York: Routledge. Pieterse, Jan N. 1992. White on Black: Images of Africa and Blacks in Western Popular Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press. Porter, Eric. 2002. What is this Thing Called Jazz: African American Musicians as Artists, Critics, and Activists. Berkeley: University of California Press. Posner, Richard A. 2001. Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Rasmussen, Brigit B., Eric Klinenberg, Irene J. Nexica, and Matt Wray. 2001. Eds. The Making and Unmaking of Whiteness. Durham: Duke University Press. Reodiger, David R. 1991. The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class. New York: Verso. _____. 1998. Ed. Black on White: Black Writers on What It Means to Be White. New York: Schocken Books. Roach, Max. 1999. Jazz. In Hazel A. Ervin. Ed. African American Literary Criticism, 1773 to 2000. New York: Twayne Publishers. Robinson, Randall. 2000. The Debt: What America Owes to Blacks. New York: E. P. Dutton. Rothenberg, Paula S. 2002. Ed. White Privilege: Essential Readings on the Other Side of Racism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Sacks, Karin B. 1997. How Did Jews Become White Folks? In Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic. Eds. Critical White Studies: Looking Behind the Mirror (pp. 395-401). Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Said, Edward W. 1994. Representations of the Intellectual. New York: Pantheon Books. Saxton, Alexander. 1990. The Rise and Fall of the White Republic: Class Politics and Mass Culture in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Verso. Szwed, John F. 1997. Space is the Place: The Lives and Times of Sun Ra. New York: Pantheon Books. Stone, Clarence N. 1998. Ed. Changing Urban Education. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

28

Toffler, Alvin. 1990. Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth, and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century. New York: Bantam Books. Tompkins, Peter. 1971. Secrets of the Great Pyramid. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers. Ward, Brian. 1998. Just My Soul Responding: Rhythm and Blues, Black Consciousness, and Race Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press. Wiener, Leo. 1920. Africa and the Discovery of America. Vol. I. Philadelphia: Innes & Sons. _____. 1922. Africa and the Discovery of America. Vols. II & III. Philadelphia: Innes & Sons. Wilson, William J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. _____. 1996. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Worrill, Conrad. 2001. NBUF, Genocide, and the Reparations Movement. Chicago: National United Front.

29