Physics To XXI Century I - Revised 05/2011

PHYSICS
TO XXI
CENTURY-I
(PICTURE AUTHOR: REBELO FERNANDES)
1
Physics to XXI Century
(These works are protected by copyright, officially registered in IGAC under numbers 4961/2008 to 2290/2010)
Independent research
José Luís Pereira Rebelo Fernandes
Engineer - Course of the Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto
Portuguese nationality
Birth: Angola- Africa, 1957/01/29
E-mail. rebelofernandes@sapo.pt
Residence: Rua São João de Brito nº 491, 1º DTº
4100-454 Porto – Portugal
To my wife and daughter, your love, my encouragement.
The concept introduced for the new theory of relativity, where the space don’t bend, comes
to create a new vision of the universe and the proper physics. After that, I present the
boarded subjects in this document.
The gravitation variable. Page 4
Relativity NBS (Not Bend Space). Page 23
I General relativity inferred from the Universal gravitational potential. Page 24
II Restricted relativity inferred from concepts of the mass-energy equivalence in theory of relativity, of
energy - frequency in quantum mechanics. The notion of what is the time. Page 40
III Critical analysis of Einstein's relativity principles Page 44
IV The new principles of relativity NBS ( No Bend Space) Page 58
The new permeability of vacuum variable. Page 60
Relation between the speed, the atomic radius and the energy of the matter. Page 63
The atomic radius and energy of matter with the universal density of potential energy. Page 65
The age and radius of the Universe. Page 71
The Universal structure. Universal Hierarchy of gravitational fields. The creation of the unit of time and
mass in each field. Page 74
Values to find, under the analysis of this new theory of relativity NBS (No Bend Space). Page 77
2
Experience to perform with a pendulum, as evidence of the new theory of relativity NBS (Bend In Space.
Page 83
The new relativistic Doppler effect. Page 85
The apparent acceleration of the universal expansion (an incomplete approach) Page 89
Rotational platforms. Transmission of electromagnetic signals. Page 93
The velocity of the photons. "Quantum foam" Page 96
Radius of elementary particles and photons. Page 100
3
The gravitation variable
Abstract
Local cosmological phenomena, such as the systematic and constant Moon removal of 3.8 cm from the
Earth and the removal of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn from its planets, demand a review of the local
universe and the laws govern.
Keywords: Universe, gravitation, potential, gravity, speed, velocity, mass, physics, variable.
Universal view
The universal gravitational potential
There is a given that we already know, from Einstein, in the local universe, the "light velocity", C, and its
constancy in all directions.
Locally the "velocity of light”, C is the maximum velocity allowed in any direction in space.
The constancy of which we speak is C the velocity of propagation of waves of mass radiation.
This is the constant C found in the energy matter.
This is the maximum velocity allowed by the universal gravitational field at the local.
We are therefore in the presence of a maximum local escape potential.
The local light is subject to this maximum gravitational potential escape in any direction which causes the
velocity of propagation constant in all directions.
We will therefore have a local escape potential universal given by:
=
Because we are considering universal escape potential we in universal terms:
The density of universal potential energy
The "speed of light, " C in two different places in the universe, estimated from a given reference is always
constant.
Where:
4
- The radiation mass / energy that reaches the Universal local. Where one has to consider the
R
-
Doppler effect.
The average radius, resulting from the location where they were generating the masses of the
radiation that reaches the site at present.
The density of universal potential energy in local, , there is more than the ratio

.
= 2
We have to local o and local l *)
= 2

=
After all we have a variable and not a "constant" gravitational Universal.
The gravitational variable is inversely proportional to the density of universal potential energy at local.
*) – Let's look at an example to realize that the universal potential energy density varies from place to
place.
1 – On Earth surface, :
= = 6,7346700202E+26 kg/m

2 – In a satellite 20,200 km height, :
– Mass of the Earth
" – Radius of the Earth
= -
# #
# # $%.%%.%%%
+
= -
# #
# # $%.%%.%%%
+ = 6,7346700131E+26 kg/m
- = -7,1287702252E+17 kg/m
The local Universe
5
With the available information that the Moon is moving away from Earth at a rate of 3.8 cm per year
(http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/ApolloLaser.html) obtained as measured since 1969, ie
measurements taken for over 30 years, through the Apollo Laser Ranging Experiments Yield Results.
- Firstly I want to point out that the removal is consistent with the increase of the universal gravitational
variable.
'
=
'
'
" =
('
-Then try to understand why the removal is a constant value.
Universal terms then we have where (u) denotes universal.
Einstein characterized the speed of light as the escape potential for anywhere and in all directions.
) '
) =
'
= 2 ) "+
2
*)
, Universal mass / energy, is constant for all time.
C, will also be constant.
Where:
) 2
2 *)
=K
= K "+
Here is what is sensed, the local gravitational variable increases with the expansion of the universe.
Here is the reason why the masses of our local universe move away from the masses generating the
gravitational potential, the reason is now clear, is to increase the gravitational variable that causes the
phenomena about which we began our approach.
If a homogeneous universe is expanding globally, then locally also should be and the same proportion.
= K "
= K "% a)
, = K ", b)
6
If we divide b) by a):
- -

=
", ="
-

Locally the radius of a gravitational mass around the mass-generating potential will also grow in
proportion to the increase in variable universal gravitational Local, G.
Universally, because C is always constant for the time o and t=1, we have:
=

, =
- -
-
Since the universal mass / energy is constant for all time:
= ,
, =
- -
-
=
- -

=
If the velocity of light it constant in consecutive times, then the universal gravitational variable in local
must be proportional to the average radius of emission, resulting from the location where they were
generating the masses radiation that reaches the local at present.
We have again the proportionality between gravitational variable and a radius, in this case the average
radius of emission.
Locally, we have:
- -

=
Then:
- -

=
7
Given a homogeneous radial distribution of mass / universal energy, then the radius of the universe as the
average radius of the issue of mass / universal energy, also expected to grow at a constant value.
As shown in the Earth / Moon, the mass centers move away from the constant value, which leads to
the conclusion that the emission radius of all universal masses increase to the constant value.
The constant value to grow the local universe originated by the constant evolution of G, leads to the
conclusion of a consistent radial homogeneity of the universe.
The local gravitational potential
As we saw earlier, the gravitational radius of a mass subject to a gravitational field increases in proportion
to the increase in variable universal gravitational Local.

=%
.
-
, =,
-
, =
-

The mass-generating field is the same in consecutive years
, =
, =
- .
-
, =
.
=

The gravitational potential is always constant. The removal of the masses on the mass generating the
gravitational field is no more than the adjustment of the mass that has a certain potential to the potential
location, which now happens at a greater distance. This phenomenon is in accordance with the Law of
Inertia.
Just as the Moon is moving away from Earth, Earth is moving away from the Sun, this move away from
the center of the Milky Way, etc. And all the stars move at constant speed.
All the planets of the solar system are currently moving away from the Sun in proportion to the distance
they are from the Sun
8
As seen, the moon also are moving out, the planet that gravitate. In relation to the moon has spoken
before the removal of 3.8 cm per year relative to the Earth.
In the book "Discovering the Universe"by the Center for Astrophysics, University of Porto with
coordination of Teresa Lago, published in 2006 by Gradiva on page 73 we read: "Jupiter has more than
60 natural satellites, but only the top four deserve particular attention: Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto.
They have nearly circular orbits, and Io which is closest to Jupiter (followed by Europa, Ganymede and
Callisto) and exhibit the same face toward Jupiter. They are also slowly moving away from the planet, "a
reference to the removal of the Moon relative to Earth can also be found on page 66 of the same book.
Two notes must be excluded from what we have just read:
- Like the Moon, the moons of Jupiter also are moving out of this due to the increase of G. The rate of
removal of the satellites relative to Jupiter will be respectively: Io of 2.8 cm per year, Europe by 4.4 cm
per year, seven of Ganymede and Callisto cm per year of 12.4 cm per year.
On page 76 of the same book we read: "Saturn has over forty satellites, except for Phoebe and Hyperion,
always run with the same face toward the planet, and are slowly moving away."
- Moreover, as the moon, they always have the same face to the planet they orbit. This is because these
satellites have left the home planet due to the increase of G and kept in memory to its original position
when released from the planet.
The local gravitational potentials are constant.
Locally we have a gravitational variable to increase in proportion to the expansion of the universe.
The centers of mass move away in proportion to the increase of G.
We see now how is meaningless the old theory of Earth tides as an explanation for the expulsion of the
moon relative to Earth.
What is the growth rate of the universe?
For a radius anywhere in the local universe i:
What is M?
M as we have seen, is the radiation mass of a mass located at the local j, which reaches the local i, Muji.
We talk about mass radiation. But what are their characteristics?
In local gravity have mass radiation, although is controlled.
Is this radiation mass subject to gravity?
9
To answer, we look for black holes. Mass generate gravitational fields, capable of bending its own
radiation of light.
While this happens, the black holes continue to create gravitational field, so this type of radiation doesn’t
bend under the action of local gravity.
The gravity is not able to bend the radiation mass, spreads a straight line across the universe.
In its radial spread, there will always be perpendicular to the surface of the universe, and if we go back to
the Big Bang then we realize that the limit of mass radiation is spherical, and therefore:
The universe will grow at the speed of Light.
The distribution of density of potential energy in the universe is spherical hence the universal mass
distribution if is not completely spherical, walk very close to that.
The universe has a spherical design.
Now we know how fast the universe grows, C.
Formally, then we have:
Where:
Muji - It is the radiation mass of a mass located at the site j that reaches the local i.
As electromagnetic radiation, the radiation mass is limited to a maximum velocity C, a condition for
considering the Doppler effect.
Being /012' the Doppler effect between the mass at local j and local i.
1' = 1 /01'
What is R?
R is therefore the radius of emission of radiation mass j to the Universal site i, given the date of issue..
Reji. The radiation has a rectilinear propagation.
The universal escape gravitational potential at the local i will be:

= 2 ∑7, 4 6
1'
51'
=
'
8
1'
∑:
-4 6
95
1'
1'
= ∑7, 4 6
51'
10
'
=
'
The local gravitational variable is inversely proportional to the energy density universal potential at local.
Let us study the universal gravitational field.
At different locations with referential at relative in rest
Considering the locations “o” and “d”, we will have:
ρ< – Universal density of potential energy at the location o.
ρ= - Universal density of potential energy at the location d, measured from the referential o.
= 2 ρ<
= 2 0 ρ=
2 ρ< = 2 0 ρ<=
> ?@
?A
=
Now we know the manner in which the gravitational variable of a referential location relates with the
gravitational variable of a referential at another location, with one referential at rest in relation to the
other.
The value of variable gravitational on all referential in different places at rest is inversely proportional to
the pure potential of universal mass in location.
In a universe in expansion, with the largest removal of celestial bodies, the pure potential of universal
mass in location will decrease, because " will increase. As we have seen the gravitational variable is
inversely proportional to the universal density of potential energy, or the pure potential of universal mass,
as this will increase locally. We will explore this topic. Now we are dealing with the relativity.
What is the relationship between the average radius of emission and the radius of the universe?
The distribution of mass in the universe, regardless of their dispersion along the radius of the universe
will always radial symmetrical. Look at the distribution / radiation of mass / energy from the Big Bang.
As we have seen that in order to limit the universal mass distribution should be very close to spherical.
At the same distance from the universe center/Big-Bang, should appear the same cosmological events and
should be a radial symmetry.
11
We can thus speak of more or less finite slices of equal density or equal variation of mass density.
When we talk about the growth of the universe, we speak of an evolution of masses in space proportional
to their position in the universal radius.
Since, " the radius of the universe:
" = Ki "
The average radius of emission of radiation from point i Universal, one that takes place when the position
i, the same percentage of the radius of the universe, will be proportional to the radius Universal.
G = K "
As the increase of local gravitational radius are proportional to the increase in the value of universal
gravitational variable in place, and in turn, this increase is proportional to the average radius of universal
issue for the site, then the local radius of gravitation, will be proportional to the average radius of
universal issue for the local.
If the great universal gravitational field resulting from all local gravitational fields, we encountered a
potential universal gravitational constant, then it should happen in the constant gravitational fields in local
equilibrium, gravitational potential should be constant.
If locally every year, the gravitational radius, grow at constant value, then the universe must also grow at
constant value every year, which is to say that the universe grows at constant speed.
Local gravitation variable along time.
" = B C
I, is the age of the universe, to the same location:
" = B C
D ED
E
=
The radius of the universe is proportional to the age of the universe.
Locally should happen:
D D

=
D ED
E
=
12
D ED
E
=
In a stable gravitational field, the centers of mass that formed around the mass generating the field, will
depart from this proportion to the age of the universe.
The previous phenomena, discussed in the introduction, the thesis of this analysis, are only possible with
increased "gravitational constant" thus ensuring constant velocities of the planets, the quantities of
movement and energy, thereby respecting the Law of Inertia.
The appearance of the gravitational variable, leads to rethink the whole gravitation, including the concept
entity space-time.
We are now obliged to deduct relativity, from the universal gravitational field, verify the adequacy of
quantum mechanics to field theory and analyze the theory of relativity of Einstein.
Let us now try to understand the nature of G.
The gravitational potential
The purpose of the analysis:

U=
Analyzing the expression of gravitational potential in the local perspective, this can’t articulate a clear
concept for the local potential.
But this is the expression that gives the gravitational potential, whatever their nature. This is the scientific
concept that we have to analyze.
Method
Thought structuring
The purpose of the analysis:

U=
Analyzing the expression of gravitational potential in the local perspective, we see no relationship
understandable scientific point of view.
13
G – Still do not know their nature, because this is the reason for analyzing the expression.
F
G
– It has no scientific meaning clear.
In our view the gravitational potential, should be comprehensible to the form:

U = H
IJ
Where:

4L"
It is the potential of local mass, generated by radiation of local mass MC ^ 2.
This expression, have a scientific significance.
H - Can only be a factor controlling the radiation of gravitational mass location.
If we think in universal terms, so perhaps we will be able to understand the nature of H .
The universal gravitational potential
There is a given that we already know, from Einstein, in the local universe, the "light velocity", C, and its
constancy in all directions.
We will therefore have a local escape potential universal given by:
=
Because we are considering universal escape potential we in universal terms:
-
Where:
The radiation mass / energy that reaches the Universal local. Where one has to consider the
R
-
Doppler effect.
The average radius, resulting from the location where they were generating the masses of the
radiation that reaches the site at present.

2 = 2 H
I J GM

I J GM
- It is the universal potential of the mass that reaches the site, which logically includes the
Doppler effect.
14
H = 2L
*
Ru
H - Not more than the gravitational permeability of vacuum.
Is this then the limiting factor of the pure radiation (M2 ) of the local mass. As it was the "pressure" that
the universal density of potential mass / energy, has on the local mass, preventing its pure radiation, or
limiting it.
Given the usual expression:

2 = 2
GM
Implies:
= H
2
4L
Returning to the local potential:

U=
After the traditional expression of the gravitational potential, is no more than a formal expression of its
informality.

- It is the mass potential, but hidden by G. It is the informality of the potential.
Going forward I can work with one or another condition that has always in mind that after all the G value
corresponds formally:
H
O
4L
G – It is so too, albeit hidden factor inhibitor pure radiation mass.

G= *
Ru
Ru
*
G=
G has a nature clear.
The gravitational radiation, the gravitational attraction
15
Locally there is the gravitational radiation (no crepuscular radiation), the radiation allowed by the
EQ = R S
universal density of potential radiation (also no crepuscular radiation):
This gravity energy has negative.
The masses of the same sign, do not attract itself, it is the negative gravitational radiation (-) of a mass
attracts other masses positive (+) and vice versa.
FQ =
UV S 2 W XYZ
I J G2
Or:
FQ =
V XYZ
G2
Lack of understanding of this phenomenon has been one of the factors that led to the model of the
curvature of space to understand gravitation.
It is not possible to directly detect the matter or gravitational waves, since both are not crepuscular. The
detection of these waves is possible only in an indirect manner, through the variation of G.
As we are part of the material energy, just being able to build, devices that can detect interference of
material energy with matter which is our reality.
Interpret the constant removal between the Earth and Moon
In the local universe.
As seen previously.
D ED
E
=
Verification evidence:
Whereas a universal existence of K periods of years, the annual variation is given by:
[, = " \ R 1^
-
.
[, = " \ R 1^
_$,
_
[, =
"
_
", = " (1+ )

1
_
16
", = " (
`a1
_
)
[ = ", \ R 1^

-
[ = ", \ R 1^
_$
_$,
-
[ =
_$,
bc-
X Z
[ = b
_$,

[ =
_
[ = [,
The constant universal growth, causes the constant removal between the centers of mass.
We then proceeded to have a gravitational variable and not a gravitational constant.
The cosmological variable
Given the expression:

U= G
Will be:
,
=
(d'
K
I J 5'
=
e'
k
I J 5' e'
=
e' 5'
k – Informality.
IJ
=

k
IJ

= k
17
S=
f
gJ
f
h =
gJ
– The cosmological variable
If we are formal:

U = H
IJ
,
=
(d'
K
I J 5' e' i
e' I J 5'
= k
S=

h =

j
As we saw earlier this constant would be obtained through the product of G by the universal
As we saw earlier this constant would be obtained through the product of G by the universal potential
created by all universal masses:

= 4,49378E+16 m s V

K1 = G Uup =
The expansion of the universe don’t need "dark energy"
When we get a variable universal gravity, which grows proportionally to the radius of the universe, there
is the potential created by the masses for the same relative location of the universe (relative, because this
point will follow the growth of the universe itself) will always constant.
The universe expands, the energy density locally universal potential decreases, which increases the
gravitational variable in local, allowing the masses to deviate from the center of mass of the gravity field
generator without changing their velocities. The process is interactive and the universe keeps stable.
The local gravitational potential is constant for the same proportional local rise which means that the
velocities are also constants.
18
Therefore the universe, from the standpoint of constant gravitational potential created at a proportional
distance, it will behave the same way as a "static universe" and not collapse.
Now we don’t need any dark energy to explain the expanding universe.
“Dark energy” isn’t more than the increase in gravitational variable.
The velocity limit of expansion of the universe
Universal translation speed
The velocity of translation in different parts of the Universe, shall be that obtained from the gravitational
potential, generated simultaneously by the masses Universal, taking into account the propagation speed C
of gravitational radiation
Because there is a global symmetry in the universal mass distribution the potential created by the
universal masses at any point of the universe will be perpendicular to the radius of the universe in which
that point lies.
We will have to consider the potential generated by each mass, given the age of the radiation which
creates that potential, i.e. the value of the local gravity j, in any given date of emission of radiation,
because as proven before the gravity travels always at the “velocity of light”, C.
Because of that said, we expect a translation speed of zero at the center of the universe due to the
symmetrical distribution of universal masses.
Since the limit of the universe moves at the velocity of C, then the radiation of gravitational mass does
not reach the local, so the gravitational potential is null.
The translation velocity at the limit of the universe is null.
Radial velocity of the universe
At the universe´s core we have a null radial velocity, at its core the “velocity of light”, C. Mass radiation
doesn’t curve by action of universal mass, by which a part of these radiates perpendicularly to the
universal surface, making the universe grow to the velocity C.
As predicted by Friedmann and latter on was confirmed by Hubble, radial velocity of the stars is directly
proportional to the distance they are at.
The radial velocity of the stars will be proportional to the place they are in the universe´s radius, and is
given by:
19
Bm =
'

C
The limit velocity of expansion
The universe will grow in a radial way to the velocity C, because of the previously stated reasons.
Conclusion:
- A constant speed of light in consecutive years, in a expanding universe, also implies the existence of a
gravitational variable.
- The gravitational variable is inversely proportional to the universal density of potential energy.
-The weight of matter in each celestial body will increase because the gravity will increase, which means
we will be heavier.
-The escape velocity of the celestial bodies is due to increase. Leaving the Earth is going to get more
difficult every time? Which, we have to do sooner or later, to preserve ourselves.
- The planets in the past of the planetary system, are already placed closer to the stars.
-What has happened in the solar system?
-Mars has already been as far to the Sun as the Earth is now.
-Venus will soon be as far from the Sun as the Earth is now.
-Thermodynamically what has happened? What will happen?
- As the Sun evolved?
-Does the planet at any time before or after the necessary conditions for the development of life as we
know it on Earth? Considering the temperature 284.57K life that we received today on Earth?
- Now we have the cosmological variable and not the cosmological constant.
-No more it is necessary to consider repulsive forces, Black energy, to justify the expansion of the
Universe.
-Given the variation of gravitational variable trough out time, probably all dating made by radioactive
elements will have to be rethought. Is the solar system much older, about twice as old as we thought until
nowadays and is it own source very close to the universe itself?
-Never the limit of the universe´s radius will be seen, because any ray light, even if in the exterior radial
direction of the universe will achieve getting a limit travelling at the speed of light.
20
- Such as every year the Moon moves away from the Earth.
-All years Earth moves away from the Sun.
- Presently all the planets of the solar system are moving away from the Sun
- And all the natural moons are moving away from their planets.
- The Sun moves away from the center of the Milk Way
-All planetary systems, galaxies, clusters and super clusters of galaxies also removal, the constant value
of their gravitational centers.
- The universe grows at speed C.
- The appearance of the gravitational variable, leads to rethink the whole gravitation, including the
concept entity space-time?
- We are now obliged to deduct relativity, from the universal gravitational field, verify the adequacy of
quantum mechanics to field theory and analyze the theory of relativity of Einstein.
Porto, from December 2005 to June 21st 2009
21
Board 1:
Simplified board for better understand the relative question regarding Reui, and its proportion in
comparison to the universe radius.
Situação 1 - Ru=20
Potencial
Murj Rueji Murj/Rueji
30 15 2
50 10 5
20 12 1,66666667
sum(murj) 100 8,66666667 =sum(murj/Rueji)
Ruo= 20 11,5384615 = Ruei=sum(murj)/sum(murj/Rueji)
0,57692308 =Ki=Ruei/Ruo
22
RebeloFernandes
Relativity NBS (Not Bend Space)
RebeloFernandes@sapo.pt
Abstract
Relativity is generated in this universe and as such should be possible to infer it from the universal
gravitational field.
It said that the theory of relativity is a field theory.
Therefore we deduce the special and general relativity from the universal gravitational field. This analysis
leads us to the Relativity No Bend Space, NBS.
Special relativity is derived from the concepts of equivalence energy / mass in relativity theory and the
equivalent energy / frequency in quantum mechanics.
It verified the compatibility of quantum mechanics, with the new theory of relativity which was
impossible to reconcile with the old-relativity
Because it was deducted, a relativity different from that proposed by Einstein and aware that there may be
only a single unified physics, decided to analyze the principles that led to Einstein's relativity
Keywords: relativity, time, space, gravitational, potential, velocity, speed, energy, mass.
23
RebeloFernandes
I
General relativity inferred from the Universal gravitational
potential.
Here relativity is analyzed as field theory leading us to a new and general relativity. New relativities
between new variables are deducted.
Introduction
To better understand the development of the exhibition that follows, it is important to have a clear
concept of gravitational potential and gravitational field.
Introduction
Locally the velocity of “light”, C is the maximum velocity in any direction of space.
This velocity is the maximum allowed by the universal gravitational field on local.
We are therefore in the presence of an escape potential maximum.
If the light is subject to the gravitational potential of this trail, then any mass is, too.
Locally because C is the maximum velocity possible, then we will have a escape potential:
=
- Universal mass radiation which is radiated to the location. (Taking into account the Doppler effect).
" - The average emission radius of mass radiation.
ρno
a - At local reference a (observer)
c – Velocity measured in b from a
= ρ<< - Universal density of potential energy at the location o.

= 2

= 2 ρ<<
24
RebeloFernandes
Special relativity
Same location with different velocities
When a particle, at the same location, moves at a velocity of V, has a potential B , thereby we have a
potential of escape given by:
p – Universal "constant" gravitational observed in motion referential V from o.
p = - B
- B = 2 p ρ<<
ρ<< is constant for the same location in question, we will have the following, dividing one by the other:
( ?@@
=
(q q ?@@
= V r

q
= V r
,
q ,V
s
=
i
p =
V r

The universal gravitational "constant" varies with the velocity of the referential. There is not constant and
as such, from now on we came to call, universal gravitation variable.
Now we know the manner in which the gravitational variable in a referential location relates with the
gravitational variable in a motion referential at same location.
The value of the gravitational referential in the same place, but with different velocities, is directly
proportional to the value of their escape potential.
Velocities
From the escape potential in referential V assessed in our referential is as our reference in the velocity
of light remains , the escape potential measured in our reference remains .
= 2 p ρ<t
p = ?
(
@u

V r (
?@u
=
25
RebeloFernandes
ρ<t =
(
X Vr Z
This is de value of ρ<t assessed in our referential o:
Equivalent value p in our referential:
p = 2 ρ<t
p = 2
(
X Vr Z
p =
(
Vr
p = v

Vr

Given by relativity of velocities:
If the velocities curve, so the space can’t curve.
Lt = L<
Lt = Ct t t
L< = C< t <
Ct t t = C< t < 1)
p = v

Vr

p v R B = v 2)
Dividing 1) by 2):
zu z@
v Vr v

=
=v
q Vr

= v1 R
q r

The value found is equal to the value found by Einstein. The value now found was obtained by the
universal gravitational potential, which goes to show that relativity is really a field theory.
This method is more satisfactory because the method of Einstein is not taken into account the factor field
and is considered the curvature of space which doesn’t happen.
26
RebeloFernandes
The time and the variable gravitation
=1R
q r

= v1 R
q r

q q

=
Later on we resume the analysis of relativistic mechanics.*
General relativity
At different locations with referential at relative in rest
Considering the locations “o” and “d”, we will have:
ρ<< – Universal density of potential energy at the location o.
ρ=< - Universal density of potential energy at the location d, measured from the referential o.
= 2 ρ<<
= 2 0 ρ=<
2 0 ρ=< = 2 ρ<<
> ρoo
ρdo
=
Now we know the manner in which the gravitational variable of a referential location relates with the
gravitational variable of a referential at another location, with one referential at rest in relation to the
other.
The value of variable gravitational on all referential in different places at rest is inversely proportional to
the pure potential of universal mass in location.
In a universe in expansion, with the largest removal of celestial bodies, the pure potential of universal
mass in location will decrease, because " will increase. As we have seen the gravitational variable is
inversely proportional to the universal density of potential energy, or the pure potential of universal mass,
as this will increase locally. We will explore this topic. Now we are dealing with the relativity.
From the escape potential in referential d assessed in our referential is as our reference in the velocity
of light remains , the escape potential measured in our reference remains .
27
RebeloFernandes

q q

=

> >

=
> ?@@
?A@
=
?@@
>
=v
?A@
Referential at different locations with velocity V of one in relation to the other
In relation to velocity V
q V r

=
In relation to the pure potential of universal mass
> ?@@
?A@
=
Joined
>q ?@@ V r
?A@
=
Time and the universal gravitational variable
In addition to this solution, considering the result obtained before, for the relativity between the
gravitational variable, we will have:
>q

= >q

= v>q
>q

= v?@@
>q ?
Au
?@@
>q
=} i
?@A@
i 2s
28
RebeloFernandes
=v
>q ?@@ V r
?A@
>q > q

=
Now we have something completely new and more global.
We now know how time relates with the gravitational variable.
I am convinced that this will be one of the most important conclusions to be retained for the future.
Later on we resume the analysis of general relativistic mechanics.**
*Quantity of movement
From first postulate of relativity, the momentum must be constant in all referential.
m t Ct = m < C<
mt = m< q

mt = m< v1 R
r

ρ<t = ρ<< q

ρ<t = ρ<< v1 R
r

Now we can quantify the relativity.
Energy
Et = Yp Ct
C< XtoZ
t
Et = m < q
v
z@
Et = E<
zu
@
Et =

},V @
@
What is, according to Einstein's relativity.
Mass
Yp = Y

q
29
RebeloFernandes
Y = Y }1 R
B 2
2
In this new concept of mass, whenever V inclines to C, then the mass inclines to 0, or inclines to
transform itself into energy, because as we have seen, when V inclines to C, energy inclines to infinity.
Velocity
p =

q

p =
s
},V
i
Bp = B

q
r
Bp =
s
},V
i
Quantity of movement
Yp p = Y v1 R
r

s
},V
i
Yp p = Y
Now the quantity of movement is equal to all the referential. Now we check the 1st postulate of relativity.
The theory of Einstein from this principle.
He impose the constant speed of light, :
= p p
Energy

p =
s
},V
i
Mass
Yp p p = Y
Yp v1 R = Y
r

30
RebeloFernandes
+
Yp =
s
},V
i
As we can see in Einstein's relativity, a curious phenomenon occurs, if V inclines to C, Yp inclines to
infinity. Increasing velocity imply increasing energy, but only at the cost of the increase of mass. At the
speed of light, mass will never incline to transform itself into energy.
Yp = Y
= Y - an impossibility
+
B 2
}1R 2

This impossibility was only resolved beginning with the specific case V=0, or in other words, without
leaving our referential.
The quantity of movement is not maintained. Are the laws of physics not the same in all referential?
The local mass which results from the cancelling of a mass with velocity V.
Y – Local mass.
Y = Yp p
Y = Yp
q

Y = Y% }1 R
B 2
X1RB2Z
2
2
Y =
+.
B 2
}1R 2

When we cancel the velocity of the particle with velocity V, its kinetic energy is transformed into local
mass.
The total energy is preserved.
Einstein's theory of relativity reached this mass value. It did not obtain the mass at the referential V but
instead, the final mass of the particle, when captured by our referential V=0.
He did not get the mass of reference in motion but the mass equivalent to our benchmark given the
constancy of energy.
31
RebeloFernandes
The new kinetic
Uniform movement
Time:
t<
t t = t < v1 R
@
@
Velocity:
V<
Vo
Vt =
Vo 2
1R
2
Co
L< = V< to
Space:
Lt = Vt t t = t < v1 R = V< t <

@ @
@

},V @
@
Lt = L <
Varied uniform movement (accelerated)
V< = a < to
Velocity and acceleration:
@
a< =
z@
Vt = a t t t
Vo
V 2
1R o
2
u Co Vo
at =
zu
z@ X,V @ Z

= =
z@ },V @ @
@
n@
at =

X,V @ Z
@
at = a<
z@
zu
32
RebeloFernandes
t < v1 R
n@ @
Vt =
@
X,V @ Z
@
t<
n@
Vt =

},V @
@
@
Vt =

},V @
@
Vt = V<
to
tv
Space:
L< = V< t < + a< t <

,
Lt = Vt t t + at t t
,
@
Lt = t o v1 R t < (1 R Z
@ , n@ @
@
+

X,V @ Z @

},V @ @
@
Lt = V< t < + a< t <

,

Lt = L<
Relativistic unit
In the same local, with different velocities, with measures of self referential
As the electrical charges and mass, are energy, then all measurements are similar.
Referencial 0 Referencial V
E% Ep O E% ; Ep O E% }
z@ @

zu
@ V@
Energy of mass
m% ; mp O m% }

mp O m%
zu @ V@

z@ @
Mass
B% Vp O B% ; Vp O B% }
z@ @

zu
@ V@
Speed
a%
a p O a %( @ Z ; ap O a%
z @

zu
Acceleration

@ V@
L% Lp O L%
P% Pp O P%
Length
33
RebeloFernandes
Gp O G% X @ Z ; Gp O G% X } Z
z @
G%

zu @ V@
Variable gravitational
Fp O F% ; Fp O F% }
z@ @
F%

zu @ V@
Force
√% √p O √% ; √p O √% }
z@ @

zu @ V@
Frequency
Wavelength λ% λp O λ%
E% Ep O E% ; Ep O E% }

z@ @

zu
@ V@
Energy of electric loads
q% ; qp O q% }

Q p O q%
zu @ V@

z@ @
Electric loads
U% Up O U% ; Up O U% }
z@ @

zu
@ V@
Permeability
B% Bp O B% ; Bp O B% }
z@ @

zu
@ V@
Electromagnetic field
**
General relativistic mechanics
Relativistic mechanics can be developed from the expression of the conservation of the relationship
between energy and frequency of the matter.
Energy
Et t t = E< t <
Et = E< v
ρdo
V A ρoo
Therefore we consider:
E< = Y C<
Et = Yp Ct
Yp Ct t t = Y C< t <
34
RebeloFernandes
Yp . Ct = Y C<
Substituting in the expression of the conservation of energy:
XYp Ct Z Ct t t = XY C< Z C< t <
XY C< Z Ct t t = XY C< Z C< t <
Ct t t = C< t <
We make two conclusions:
1st - Velocity curves solely because time curves which leads to a different nature for the light.
Ct = C<
z@
zu
C=t = C<< v –
ρdo

A ρoo
It is evidence C curve, also V curve, because we are talking about speeds.
z@@
V=t = V<<
zAu
V=t = V<< v
>
V A
2ª- Space does not curve.
C=t t =t = L=t
too v
2 [ V A
L=t = C<< }
R Vd 2
2 >
L=t O C<< t <<
L<< O C<< t <<
=
Mass
Y0p C=t t =t = Y C<< t <<
35
RebeloFernandes
Y0p =
Y Coo 2 too
Cdv 2 tdv
Y0p =
Y Coo 2 too

@@ @@ zAu
Au
Y0p =
+ zAu
z@@
Y0p = Y v
ρoo V A
ρdo
Going back to quantity of movement:
Y0p C=t =Y v C<< v

ρoo V A ρdo
ρdo V A ρoo
Y0p C=t = Y C<<
Relativistic units between different references, with measurement made from our
reference.
t 2
Gp O G% X o Z
Co 2
tv
; Gp O G% 2
Co 2 RVo
Variable universal gravitational at local.
Depending on the speed with the same universal density of potential energy.
0 =
_,_ - Local, Velocity
0p = 2 0p 0p
XtoZ = 2 0p
t 2 q
v
0p = XtoZ

t 3
v
0p = X} Z
2 R B 2
2 R B[ 2
Depending on the density of potential energy.
36
RebeloFernandes
> >
0 =
>

¡ ¢ ¡ v
[

[

¡
=
[
[
K=v
[
0 = v

Globally.
0p = p£ tco X tcv′Z

t t 3
do ? dv v
0p = p£ v > X V A Z

V
¡ ¥
Relativists units. In different locations (d, v), with different speeds (c, v’)
– Universal density of potential energy ( /" ) or density of universal potential energy
Referential
C,v’ Referential d, V
E,p′ t o,t′ 0 – V′o

E0,p O Ep ; E0,p O E,p′ }
t =,t R V=
Energy of mass
¨ t =,t R V=
m0,p O m,p′ ; m0,p O m,p′ }
t o,< 0 – V′o
Mass
B,p′ t o,t£ 0 – V′o

V0,p O V,p′ ; V0,p O B,p′ }
t =,t R V=
Velocity
a,p£ ,p£ 0 – V′o

a0,p O a, ; a O a
0,p 0,p R V=
Acceleration
,p′
L 0
L0 O Lo ; L0 O L
0
Length ( independent from V)
Quantity of movement P Pp O P
G,p′
G0,p O ,p£ Xz ¥ Z? Xz ¥ Z ; G0,p O G,p′ v X Z
z z > V r£¡
¡ V r>
Variable gravitational
A A t
F,p£ t << 0 R B¨

F0p O Fp′ ; F0p O Fp′ }
t =t R V=
Force
√,p£ t << 0 R B¨

√0p O √p′ ; √0p O √p′ }
t =t R V=
Frequency
37
RebeloFernandes
λ,p ¨
λ0,p O λ,p′ ; λ Oλ
Wavelength
0,p ,p′
E,p£ to 0 – V′o
E0p O E, ; E0p O Ep£ }
t= R V=
Energy of electric loads
q,p£ t= 0 R V=
q0,p O q,p′ ; q0,p O qp′ }
to – V′o
Electric loads
U,p′ to 0 – V′o
U0,p O U ; Up O Up′ }
t= R V=
Permeability
B,p£ to 0 R Vo
B0,p O B,p£ ; B0,p O B,p£ }
Electromagnetic field t= R V=
Experiences of evidence
Many will argue with all the experiences to date show that the curvature of space.
We don’t know how they fit, when we have seen in Chapter I of the impossibility of the curvature of
space.
Some of the known experiments are devoid of any significant results.
The justification of their results must have another explanation.
Rotational platforms.
Older experience, proving this theory, was held in rotational platforms. The value found directly is only
possible of this actual theory doesn’t require the use of any inertial transformations.
Deny the directly result found in the rotational platform is denying the principles of relativity.
Change the radius displacement, of charged particles in the particle accelerator.
Until this day, was incomprehensible to increase the radius described by the charged particles in particle
accelerators.
We analyze the behavior of particles in the light of relativity NBS
" = |ª |
+ r
В@
In accelerates particles, the magnetic field is not relativistic because it is stopped.
"p = |ª q|
+ rq
q В@

+ u r @
"p =
@ u

|ª | u В@
@
38
RebeloFernandes
+ r
"p =
|ª | u В@
@
+ r z@
"p =
|ª | В@ zu
to
"p = " tv
"p = " }
@

@ V@
The radius described by the particles is inversely proportional to the particle proper time. The radius
increases.
39
RebeloFernandes
II
Restricted relativity inferred from concepts of the mass-
energy equivalence in theory of relativity, of energy -
frequency in quantum mechanics.
The notion of what is the time.
Introduction
Einstein introduced the concept that any mass has an associated energy and vice versa. This relationship
is expressed by the formula of equivalence:
E = m
Any energy is associated with its intrinsic frequency, and this energy, according to quantum mechanics,
should be proportional to the frequency and is related in the form:
√ - Intrinsic frequency of energy
E=h√
T - period of the electromagnetic wave (time):
,
√=
¬
– inverse of the period.
The period in a referential has to be necessarily proportional to the time of referential.
T=y t
√ = z
,
®
E = z
®
Et=
h and y are constant.
®

=k
E t=S
If this relationship is a constant in a referential, should be so in all referential.
40
RebeloFernandes
_ - On the referential o. At rest.
_r - On the referential V, moving with speed V.
Et t t = K
E< t < = K
Et t t = E< t <
Relativistic mechanics
The relativistic mechanics can be developed from the previous term.
Energy
Et t t = E< t <
z@
Et = E<
zu
z@ u
zu @
=
z@ h√ u
zu h√ @
=
z@ √u
zu √@
=
zu √@
z@ √u
=
Now I really know why time curved.
When we change the energy of matter, kinetic energy, changes its energy and thus changes its frequency.
The increased power is a reduction of the time.
An increase in energy, moor frequency, corresponds to a reduction in time. Time its invert proportional
to frequency. Time is a property of matter of its energy level. We have concept of time because we are
matter.
Therefore we consider:
E< = Y C<
Et = Yp Ct
41
RebeloFernandes
Through the 1st Postulate of Einstein, with which I completely agree, the quantity of movement must be
constant in all the referential.
Yp . Ct = Y C<
Yp = Y
@
u
Velocity
Replacing in the expression of the proportion of energy - frequency:
XYp Ct Z Ct t t = XY C< Z C< t <
XY C< Z Ct t t = XY C< Z C< t <
Ct t t = C< t <
We make two conclusions:
1st - Velocity curves solely because time curves which leads to a different nature for the light.
Ct = C< z@
z
u
It is evidence C curve, also V curve, because we are talking about speeds.
Vt = V< z@
z
u
It would be like having an "absolute" velocity of the constant light which is read with a different value at
each referential due to the curved time of the referential itself.
“Absolute”, only in the inverse concept of “relative”. A reference to an imaginary constant time the
velocity of light would always be constant.
Light runs the same course in the equivalent curved times of all the referential, not in the unit of time, but
the light run course in the curved times equivalent to all the referential, is constant.
Mass
Yp =
+ @ z@
u zu
Yp =
+ @ z@

\@ @ ^ zu
u
42
RebeloFernandes
Yp =
+ zu
z@
In this new concept of mass, whenever V inclines to C, then the mass inclines to 0, mass inclines to
transform itself into energy, because as we have seen, when V inclines to C, energy inclines to infinity.
Going back to quantity of movement
Yp . Ct = C<
+ zu z@
z@ zu
Yp . Ct = Y C<
Now the quantity of movement is equal to all the referential.
Considerations
As we can see quantum mechanics, is in line with the new relativity.
43
RebeloFernandes
III
Critical analysis of Einstein's relativity principles
The current paradigm
Einstein's postulates:
1st - Postulate
The laws of Physics are the same in all inertial referential. This is true both for mechanics and for
electromagnetism.
The laws of Physics are certainly the same in all referential, because if this was not so, we would not have
physics.
2nd - Postulate
The velocity of light in a vacuum is constant (c=+- 300.000 km/s) regardless of the velocity of the
observer, (and the source).
For the 1st postulate there is no repair.
The laws of physics are certainly the same in any reference, as if it were we would not physical.
For the 2nd postulate there are some doubts, which are the reason for writing this article.
Einstein's method:
Now we apply the same reasoning used by Einstein to calculate the curvature of time and the curvature of
space.
Let us bring here, the famous example of the observation of a light signal emitted within a train, which is
emitted from the floor of the train in the direction of the roof, where there is a mirror that reflects back to
the floor of the train.
The phenomenon is interpreted by an observer on the train stopped, referential V, and other in the train in
motion, referential O.
- The observer O in motion will observe the light path indicated on the left.
- The observer V, stopped, see the route indicated on the right.
44
RebeloFernandes
Referential O Referential V
Figure1.
Our stopped referential V, is the result of an initial in motion referential O.
To the observer who is in referential V (right).
The time of go and return is given by:
±r = ±
r =
²

=
²
s
a)
2 L= r
If we look to this model, to the referential moving Einstein uses L.
- L is the length not curved.
That is the analysis of referential in motion V Einstein used the length not curved.
To the observer who is in referential O (left).
± = ±
r
S = 2 d = 2 v± a \ ^

s D
v² $ \ ^
=

=
³
´ Vr
√ R B =
³

b)
2 L = √ R B
He equated the lengths:
45
RebeloFernandes
±r = ±
2L=2L
r C= √ R B
r = v 1 R
r

=v 1 R
s r
.
The time curve, with the premise that L not curve.
The space in this model is not curved.
The value found for the curvature of time is only possible with equal lengths, lengths not curved.
On the other hand velocity is always given by the ratio between length and the time it takes to go that
length.
At referential V, a) the velocity of light it C.
At referential O, b) the velocity of light it √ R µ
Einstein's reasoning for lengths.
The 2nd postulate of Einstein leads, a length.
It is incomprehensible experience in which Einstein based its conclusion that the velocity of light was
constant in all references.
From the experiments conducted on Earth, our reference, the only possible conclusion to draw is that the
velocity of light is independent of the direction of propagation.
How is equal in all directions the only possible conclusion is that the velocity of light depends only on the
velocity of the reference.
Later we analyze the problem.
The distance is given by:
±r = r C
± = C
±r = s
±
.
r = v 1 R
r

46
RebeloFernandes
±r = v 1 R
r

C
±r = ± v 1 R
r

The space come curved?
This contrasts with the premise to the calculation of the curvature of the time when the space is considered
not curved.
To determine the space curved Einstein enters with the curvature of the time factor that derives from
spaced not curved.
In the curvature of the time assumed 2±r = 2L and 2± = 2L. To obtain the value of the curvature was assumed
2L=2L, then ±r = ± .
This famous expression of the curvature of space is a mathematical impossibility.
A curved space can’t be generated by a space not curved.
The space in the same model can´t be simultaneously, curved and not curved at the same time.
Einstein can’t propose a model in which space does not curve, using the curvature of the time generated
in this model of equally spaced, to calculate and define a curved space.
We are convinced that this manipulation was not intentional.
Consider the constant velocity of light in all referential is the source of the problem.
Mathematical proof
±r = s
±
.
¶s
±r = i
¶ ±
´i 2s
= √ R B
It’s impossible.
If he had considered the length curved, the calculation for the motion referential V, would conclude,
r = .
Let's see what happens with the speed in this model.
In the moving referential we have:
47
RebeloFernandes
±r = r r
In the referential at rest we have:
± =
In equating the lengths:
r r = 1)
From the curvature of the time (equating the lengths too):
r C= √ R B 2)
Dividing 1) by 2):
s
´ Vr
=
r =

v ,V s
i
We conclude that within this model we find, the relativity between the velocity of light.
Let us now consider what will happen when the direction of light coincide with the
direction of displacement V.
Einstein's reasoning.
Reference V Reference O
Figure2.
To the observer who is in referential V, (left).
p =
²

2 ±= r
To the observer who is in referential O, (right).
The time to go is given by:
%, =
²
Vr
The time to return is given by:
48
RebeloFernandes
% =
²
$r
% = %, a % =
²
Vr
% = si
Vr
s Vr
.
=
Einstein's reasoning for lengths.
Einstein goes further.
s Vr
.
=
r = U% √ R B WX Z
´ Vr

±r = r
± = √ R B
±r = ±
´ Vr

But if you look at the 1st model:
r = √ R B
±r = ±
± = ±
´ Vr

= √ R B
It’s impossible.
The 2nd postulate of Einstein leads, a length.
The distance is given by:
±r = r C
± = C
±r = s
±
.
±r = ±
Vr

This curvature of space has nothing to do with what we are accustomed.
But we can’t lose the principle of reasoning.
49
RebeloFernandes
In the first model, Einstein, study the curvature of time and concludes:
=v
s Vr
.
We maintain consistency, and to study the curvature of time for the 2nd model.
As we have seen:
s Vr
.
=
We found one, bending time, different from the 1st model.
If we notice the different curves we find for the time, are for different angles between the direction of displacement
and direction of the ray of light.

J

Einstein chose to analyze the angle between the displacement and the ray of light to study the curvature of time,
without realizing the selection criterion.
Why not the angle 0 to study the curvature of the time?
Why not another any angle, through, in random order?
The curvature of time can’t depend on the direction of displacement, only depends on the speed, regardless of their
direction.
There must be any one phenomenon that has not yet managed.
We now need to study the model in all its dimensions.
Let us study the model in which the angle between the ray of light and the displacement is a variable.
Perhaps looking at the general term we reach any conclusion.
For the time and space
Let us bring here, the famous example of the observation of a light signal emitted within a train, which is
emitted from the floor of the train in the direction of the roof, where there is a mirror that reflects back to
the floor of the train.
Let's allow the movement of the train is not only in the direction perpendicular to the ray of light or the
direction of the light ray itself.
We deduce the general expression of the curvature of time, depending on the angle between the direction of the
displacement with the direction of the ray of light.
We consider the direction of the ray of light fixed and vary the direction of displacement.
50
RebeloFernandes
The new proposal
Referential V Referential O
Figure3.
To the observer who is in referential V (left).
r =
²

=
²
s
2 L = r
For the referential V, with time r Einstein considered the speed of light in our referential r takes the
value C.
r = C
If we look to the curvature of the time, to the referential moving Einstein uses L.
- L is the length not curved.
That is the analysis of referential in motion V Einstein used the length not curved.
To the observer who is in referential O (right).
, =
³$ <·XZ -
´ Vr X7XZZ
, =
³
´ Vr X7XZZ V <·XZ
=
³V <·XZ
´ Vr X7XZZ
51
RebeloFernandes
=
³
´ Vr X7XZZ $ <·XZ
, a = =
³´ Vr X7XZZ
Vr X7XZZ Vr X¸XZZ
=
³´ Vr X7XZZ

Vr XU7XZW $U¸XZW Z
=
³´ Vr X7XZZ
Vr
=
³´ Vr X7XZZ
Vr
Here L is not curved.
Equating the lengths:
s Vr
´ Vr X7XZZ
=
For this expression there are a multitude of solutions to the curvature of the time.
¹

The choice of Einstein now seems random, as for the curvature of the time chose i= and the space i=0.
If i=0:
s Vr

=
¹

If i= :
=v
s Vr

This value is only possible with the space not curved.

¹

In the interval between 0 and would have a very solutions.
But so it is not.
The time of a referential can only depend on the speed of displacement of the observer referential
and not the direction of displacement.
Cannot be, the emission of a ray of light, in any direction, in motion referential, the cause of change in
their own, time curved.
If the time of the referential, does not depend on the direction of its displacement, then the factor Sin (i)
has to be eliminated in the expression.
For any angle (i):
52
RebeloFernandes
=
³√ Vr
Vr
=
²
√ Vr
=
³

O √ R B
This is the speed of light measured by an observer at O, with velocity V in the time at a referential O,
.
Solving now the expression and substituting 2L.
s Vr
√ Vr
=
=v
s Vr

The time curve, with the premise that L not curve.
The time is independent of the direction of displacement of the referential.
The time in referential only depends on the value of the speed of displacement of the referential.
Given the uncertainty we feel in the options of Einstein, the curvature of the time deducted or was a
coincidence or a result of a priori knowledge of that.
The independence of the referential time relative to the direction of the light ray makes it clear that the
space does not curve.
Now, we know the value of the curvature of the time, whatever the direction of movement.
Velocity:
In the moving reference we have:
±r = r r
In the frame at rest we have:
± =
In equating the lengths:
r r = 1)
From the curvature of the time:
r C= √ R B 2)
53
RebeloFernandes
Dividing 1) by 2):
B
C ´2 RB2
=
r =

v ,V s
i
We can only find the value we found for the curvature of the time, if the space does not curve.
The time is independent of the direction of displacement of the referential.
The only time depends solely on the value of the forward speed of the referential of the observer.
Only the curvature of time and no curvature of space its able to respond to the principles of relativity.
Now we know the value of the curvature of the time, whatever the direction of movement.
This shows the curvature of time depending on the non curvature of space, which forces the curvature of
speeds.
We can conclude that the velocity of light, is relativistic, is not constant in all referential.
The value of the velocity curve, in inverse proportion, to the time curved of the referential.
It follows that the space is constant, not curve.
Note: In experiments on the speed of light in time, what changed was the direction of the ray of light and
not the referential. The only possible conclusion is that the velocity of light did not change with the
change in the direction on propagation. Not understand how they drew the conclusion that the velocity of
light was the same in all referential. No change of the referential, not out of the Earth.
Consider a ray of light emitted at one end of ruler over this and that is reflected at the
other end to its point of origin.
K - Is the coefficient of curvature of the time:
r =
C
_
54
RebeloFernandes
Observer stopped Observer in motion
Figure4.
Ruler stopped
To observer stopped.
=
²

To one observer in motion at speed V:
The direction of V is random.
p =
²
i
b
p =
²_

p = `
`= q

Dq
_
=
D

p O

_ q
=
p p O
±p O ±
Ruler in motion
If we consider the ruler moving at the velocity B, in the direction of the displacement along the ruler, we
get precisely the same conclusion.
To observer stopped.
55
RebeloFernandes
=
²
Vr-
2±=
Vr-

To one observer in motion at velocity V
The direction of V is random.
p =
²q
q Vr-
i
²
p = b
i 2s-
b
i 2s-
_
p = i
Vr-

p = `
p = v 1 R
r

The curvature of time is unique to the observer and is independent of the velocity of the rule and only
depends on the velocity of displacement of the observer.
If the observer moves at the same velocity and direction of the ruler, the curvature of the time, due to the
velocity of the observer, and is independent of the velocity of the ruler.
The method proposed by Einstein was not the best.
If the space does not curve so we have a serious problem with the 2nd postulate of Einstein.
The 2nd postulate is wrong.
So we have a problem with the constancy of the velocity of light at all referential.
We have to admit, a different velocity of light to the referential motion, r concerning the velocity of
light to the referential at rest.
Later we will confirm the value of the curvature of time based on the universal gravitational potential.
Let us analyze the reality.
We now know that space does not curve and as such we have:
Time
56
RebeloFernandes
=v
q Vr

Space
± =
±r = r r
±r = v 1 R
r

v ,V s
i
±r = ±
Velocity
t C = t < C<
C = C<
z@
z
C =
@

v ,V u

All velocities will come curved in referential motion.
Br =
r

v ,V q
i
Regardless of the referential, we will always:
r rs
s
=
57
RebeloFernandes
IV
The new principles of relativity NBS ( No Bend Space)
The universe we live is the universal gravitational field.
Relativity has to be a field theory.
We will deduct the following articles relativity from the perspective of relativistic energy and quantum
energy, subject to the universal gravitational field and deduce the general relativity from a field theory.
The deduction of relativity as a field theory seems of utmost importance, because the current method this
view is implied but not clearly.
New principles of the theory of relativity
1fst Postulate it the same.
Space does not curve, time curve.
The second postulate will have to be re-written:
2nd Postulate: The velocity of light in a vacuum, in the current curved time of our referential is
300.000 Km/s. The curse of light in a vacuum is constant in relation to the equivalent and
simultaneous curved times of any referential.
Or:
Light runs the same course in the equivalent and simultaneous curved times of all the referential.
In our referential, the current velocity of light is 300.000 Km/s.
Conclusions
Space and time
The space run by light in the equivalent curved times of all referential will be the same.
The velocity of light itself, "absolute to a absolute time", is invariant in the universe, in each referential
will have a different unit reading because with the curvature of time, when we divided the quantity run by
the unit of time, we will have different quantifications.
³ ³
zu z@
≠
Ct ≠ C<
58
RebeloFernandes
The space-time curvature, entity which has accompanied us for so long, will have to be abandoned
because only time curve.
Now galaxies that move at a greater velocity are further from the centre of the Big-Bang, in any
referential.
One day we will be able to travel close to the velocity of light and go on a long trip. If we followed the
previous theory, we would practically stay at home.
The revolution is felt at a level of astrophysics.
After all we have the local relativity, the local equivalent of general relativity, responding to local issues,
because in our place with V = 0, the space in Einstein's theory does not curve and therefore the theory
responds to local needs.
Einstein's relativity doesn’t respond correctly when we left for the universe.
As we shall see in later articles opens up a window for reconciliation of all physical and much more
information.
Transformations in relativity NBS ( Not Bend Space)
,

v,V s
t’ = t
i
X’ = X – V t
X’ = X – V’ t’
r
£
v,V s
V’ = V ; V’ =
i
t v1 R
r r

v,V s
X – V’ t’ = X – ( ) ; X – V’ t’ = X – V t
i
Y’ = Y
Z’ = Z
A matrix of transformation:
C’t’ 1 0 0 0 Ct
X£ ´ 0 1 0 0 X
º À
Y´ 0 0 1 0 Y
Z´ 0 0 0 1 Z
The matrix is symmetric, then, all laws of physics are unchanged under the transformations of relativity
NBS (Not Bend Space).
59
RebeloFernandes
The new permeability of vacuum variable.
A new vision of the Universe
(These works are protected by copyright, officially registered in IGAC under N.º
4961/2008 to 4879/2009)
http://rebelofernandes.com
Rebelofernandes@sapo.pt
To my dearest mother.
To the sweet memory of my father.
When creating a new theory of universal gravitation, where the universal constant
gravitation is substituted by the variable universal gravitation variable, I felt me obliged to
look at for the electromagnetic field, to analyze it to the light of new concepts, its nature.
It is in this direction that I elaborate this study.
Intro:
1-The arousal of the gravitational variable and its implications.
The new concept of gravitational variable, raise new questions about the structure of the universe and its
development. Some of the issues raised in the previous article “The new gravitational variable. A new vision of
the Universe”, will now be examined, taking into account the new model of the universe and even quantum
mechanics.
The magnetic permeability of vacuum.
The radiation mass of the universal matter, generating universal density of potential energy, should have
electromagnetic characteristic, because we know that the radiation in nature, crepuscular, and electromagnetic?
As the universal density of potential energy controls the local pure radiation of matters, through the
gravitational permeability of vacuum, is this universal density of potential energy that will control the radiation
of pure radiation of the electric charges. The radiation power, allowed by the universal potential energy density,
the magnetic permeability of vacuum, should be dependent on that density of potential energy.
As a higher energy density allows a lower potential universal gravitational radiation, a higher density of
potential energy it will also allow a minor electrical radiation, because we always speak of radiation energy,
60
RebeloFernandes
= F(G)
The magnetic permeability of vacuum should be based on the gravitational variable.
= F(Gk)
The magnetic permeability of vacuum should be a function of gravitational permeability of vacuum.
The lower the universal density of potential energy at local, the greater will be G and the magnetic
permeability of vacuum.
The potential is given by:
( Á
IJ
U=
As G is given by:

8

G=
9

= K

As G is inversely proportional to the universal radius:
- =
-

– Locally and generally.
The impact of the universal density of potential energy in the magnetic permeability of
vacuum variable value.
As seen previously, the magnetic permeability of vacuum increases with the increase of the universe’s radius
which implies, that the increase of the magnetic permeability of vacuum happens with the growth of the
universe.
The energy that varies linearly with the radius of the universe is the universal density of potential energy.
Because universal density of potential energy decreases with the increase of the universe’s radius, only one
entity inversely proportional to that potential will increase the value of the magnetic permeability of vacuum.
61
RebeloFernandes
Because the universal density of potential energy, is not equal in all points of the universe, then magnetic
permeability of vacuum will not be as well.
Now, the new fundamental lines of the new theory are defined.
62
RebeloFernandes
Relation between the speed, the atomic radius and the energy
of the matter.
rebelofernandes@sapo.pt
Now we go to study which the local characteristics, relatively to the atomic radius and energy of the
matter, when it subjects the speed alteration. This is plus a proposal of experience of verification of
relativity theory NBS, the not bending space.
Introduction:
Let us remember the mechanical transformations, gotten for relativity NBS, where the space don’t bend:
t t O t< v1 R @
@

Ct =

},V @
@
Yp = Y }1 R Vo 2
Co 2
/p = / }1 R Vo 2
Co 2
The gravitational permeability of vacuum, GÂt
GÂt = Gt
IÃ
@u
Ct = C<
z@
zu
GÂt = G<
z@ Ä IÃ

zu Ä @
@
u
GÂ< =
Q@ I Ã
@
63
RebeloFernandes
GÂt = GÂ<
z@
zu
Because the variable magnetic permeability of vacuum and variable gravitational permeability of vacuum has
the same nature:
Ut = U<
z@
zu
The dependence of the dimension and the energy of the matter with the speed:
Atomic ray:
IÃ
\ ^ n
®
R< =
+ ( @ Å Ã
IÃ
\ ^ n
®
Rt =
+q (q u Å q Ã
IÃ
\ ^ n
®
Rt = t t
+ tv ( to u Å q Ã
o v
Gu
=1
G@
Rt = R<
Rt = R<
The ray of the matter does not get excited when it subjects the speed alteration.
This phenomenon has that to be observed in the particle accelerators.
Energy;
Ã ,
\®^
+ ( @ f Å f
E< =
XI ÃZ Ç
Ã ,
\®^
+q (q u f Å q f
Et =
XI ÃZ Ç
t to 2
+ v ( u f Å q f Ã ,
Et = \®^
to tv 2
XI ÃZ Ç
z@
Et = E<
zu
What it is in perfect agreement with relativity.
64
RebeloFernandes
The atomic radius and energy of matter with the universal
density of potential energy

rebelofernandes@sapo.pt
Let us now consider what the local consequences, for the atomic radius and energy of matter, subject to
change of the density of potential energy at local. This is another draft of verification experience of
relativity NBS, theory of non-curved space.
Introduction:
Remember, the mechanical changes, obtained for the RF relativity in which space does not curve:
Consider therefore:
t < - Time on our site
t È - Time on site under study

EÈ t È = E< t < EÈ = E< t
l
;
CÈ t È = CÈ =

zÊ
;

Yp CÈ t È = Yp CÈ t È Yp = Y t
o
;
Similarly:

/p = / t
o
Relationship between the local variable gravitational, and the pure potential of the Universal mass.
The dependence of the atomic radius of matter and energy of matter with the
universal density of potential energy -ËÌÍ :
65
RebeloFernandes
As seen previously in the article “Relation between the speed, the atomic ray and the energy of the
matter.” the speed does not change the radius of the matter.
=v
z@ ÎÏ
General and from the new relativity:
zÊ ÎÏ

Y = Y t
o
The gravitational permeability in referential o.
GÂ< =
J

The gravitational permeability in reference l measured from the referential o.
GÂ< =
J

The gravitational permeability in reference l measured in referential l.
GÂÈÈ =
J

Ê
@
GÂÈÈ =
QÐ@

Ê
@
GÂÈÈ = GÂ<
z@
zÊ
Atomic radius:
As:

\ ^ n
IÃ ®
R< =
+ ( @ Å Ã

\ ^ n
IÃ ®
R ÈÈ =
+ ( Ê Å Ã

\ ^ n
IÃ ®
RÈ = D
D
+ Uo *
to
@ @ Å \ D ^ Ã
@ * tl @
* to
RÈ = R< R<
* t
=
t
The radius of the matter is directly proportional to the local universal density of potential energyl.
66
RebeloFernandes
Energy of photon;
Ã ,
\®^
+ ( @ f Å f
E< =
XI ÃZ Ç
Ã ,
\®^
+D ( Ê f Å f
EÈ =
XI ÃZ Ç
D Ñ D D
+ D X( @ Z X Zf Å X Zf Ã ,
Ez = \®^
@ Ñ Ê Ê @
XI ÃZ Ç
Ã ,
X D Z \ ^
+ ( @ f Å f
EÈ =
XI ÃZ z@ ® Ç
E t =E< X Z
Ä
3
O Eo X Z
*

* to
So let's do the calculation to the same local that will always have the same velocity, but the universal
density of potential energy varies with the universal radius that is proportional to time.
Is this the future on Earth.
G< =
Co 2
Ò
M@
ÓM@

Gz = Ò
M
ÓM

@ @
Gz =

Ò D
M@ D
@
D
ÓM@ X D Z
@
t
Gz = G< o

The variable of the gravitational permeability:
GÂz =
Q

4π
GÂ< =
Q@
@
4π
67
RebeloFernandes
QÐ Q @
QÐ@ Q@
=
QÐ Q @
QÐ@ Q@
=
X Z
QÐ z@ z
QÐ@
=
QÐ z
QÐ@
=
As the variable magnetic permeability of the vacuum and variable gravitational permeability of the
vacuum are the same nature:
t
Uz = U< t

Uz - is the value read at the site l, in his own time, on the value read at time o.
Being T - real-time clocks
Atomic radius:
As:

\ ^ n
IÃ ®
R< =
+ ( @ Å Ã

\ ^ n
IÃ ®
R Èz =
+D (D Å D Ã

\ ^ n
IÃ ®
RÈ =
D t D
+ Ô@ t @ @ Å \ D ^ Ã
@ @
to Tt
RÈ = R< = R<
t t To
The variation of the universal density of potential energy, causes the change of
atomic radius of the matter.
If we consider the universal density of potential energy at different locals, we have:
=
*Ö
Reuo
68
RebeloFernandes
2L
= *Ö
Reuo
2L
=
*
*
RÈ = R<
*
The radius of the matter is directly proportional to the value of the universal density of potential
energy at local.
This has to be observed in different places in our local universe.
The lengths on the surface of the Moon will be lower than those on Earth. -1.34 E-09, and in Mars-7.9E-
09.
Energy of photon;
Ã ,
\®^
+ ( @ f Å f
E< =
XI ÃZ Ç
Ã ,
\®^
+D (D f Å D f
Ez =
XI ÃZ Ç
D D D D
+ D XÔ@ D Z X Zf Å X D Zf Ã ,
Ez = \®^
@ @ @
XI ÃZ Ç
Ã ,
X D Z \ ^
+ ( @ f Å f
EÈ =
XI ÃZ z@ ® Ç
3
Et = E< Xt Z
o
Radius of the matter:
Its value is directly proportional to the raw potential of universal mass.
Locally as the pure potential of universal mass will decrease, the atomic radius will decrease which will
cause the stars are shrinking.
Soon the Earth is shrinking.
Currently, its radius shrinks in the order of 42cm per millennium.
The moon is shrinking 11.4 cm per millennium.
69
RebeloFernandes
Out of curiosity (http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/08/image-of-the-day-venus-moon-new-
nasa-space-observations-show-moon-is-shrinking.html) NASA has already found and reported that the
moon was shrinking.
The Sun for this purpose without regard to mass loss, will shrink 4580 cm in the next millennium.
Locally the centers of mass move away with the growth of the universe and the local bodies vary in
inverse proportion to that growth.
The Earth and all the other stars and planets are decreasing their radius, are getting smaller.
70
RebeloFernandes
The age and radius of the Universe
After studying the curvature of the time under the action of a local gravitational field in an expanding
universe and the variation of atomic radius of the matter with the density variation of potential energy on
local, we are able to study the size of the universe.
The age of the universe
Has:
- Distance from Earth to the Moon: 384,467,001.03 meters.
- The radius of the Earth, where is measured the time it takes the laser ray to go and back from the Moon:
6.369.323 m.
- Radius of the Moon: 1.738.000 m
- Virtual removal between the Earth and Moon: ØÙ - 0.038 m
D, – Real removal between the Earth and the Moon
I – Actual age of the Universe.
Actual velocity of the light - 299.792.458 m/s
Given the homogeneity of the universe, the growth of the local universe is proportional to the growth of
the Universe.
" - Radius of the universe
Ý Þßàá âãäåæ
ÛÜ =
ØÝ
* 384.467.001,03 m
Once it has been able to determine the annual removal of the Moon relative to Earth, we can easily
calculate the radius of the universe.
Correction of the correlation coefficient of the distance between the Earth and the
Moon
Considering the removal between the centers of mass in proportion to the age of the universe, and the
radius shrinking of the matter in inverse proportion to this growth and even the curvature of time due to
the expansion of the universe, we have:-
The removal between the Earth center of mass, and the Moon center mass:
71
RebeloFernandes
$çÝ è$Ý
è
=
The radius of the Earth:
é êæ = é ê = éê
è
è$Ý açÝ
é êæ = é ê

açÝ
The radius of the Moon:
é æ = é

$çÝ
The velocity of light at next year:
ëæìÝ = ë v

$çÝ
The real removal between Earth and Moon ØÝ :
$ç VXé ê$é Z $çÝ V Xé êæ $é æZ

ë ëæíÝ
=

$ç VXé ê$é Z $çÝ V Xé ê $é Z
cçÝ
ë ë v

=
cçÝ
î, = 0,0251564 m
This is therefore the real removal between the centers of mass of the Earth and Moon.
The Moon don´t moves away from the 0038 m per year but 0.0251564 m per year, due to increased time
local derivative of the increased value of the local gravitational variable.
L< = 384.467.001,7 m
Annual shrinking of the Earth:
∂R ¬ = -4,16757E-04 m
Annual shrinking of the equator of the Earth:
∂R ¬ (Equator) -4,17333E-04 m
Annual shrinking of the Moon:
∂R = -1,13721E-04 m
72
RebeloFernandes
Age of the Universe
gI.Iïð.%%,,ð
` =
0,0251564
` = 15.283.069.185,35 Years light Earth
" = 15.283.069.185,35 a.l
" = 1,44589E+26 m
73
RebeloFernandes
The Universal structure
Universal Hierarchy of gravitational fields.
The creation of the unit of time and mass in
each field
The whole universe is based on hierarchical gravitational fields.
While hierarchical, each field has a kinetic independence with regard to the fields to which it is subject.
Independence in the sense, that the center of mass for the field is the center of reference. This is because of the
field move the same speed of the center of mass of bodies that generate, can thus be considered that the field is
stationary in the center of mass.
From a physical place the center of mass is stationary, it is the center of reference.
In the physical location of the field, the masses of the hierarchical gravitational fields, only interfere with the
standard definition of time and the mass pattern of this field.
Fields promote a hierarchical gravitational pure potential mass, homogeneous in the subject field. This
homogeneity is found practically unchanged throughout the field and on their way of translation.
The density of potential energy is constant, and speed of translation is also constant.
This uniform density of potential energy and speed that moves the field are the defining characteristics of the
time and pattern of the mass field.
As such, any variation of the density of potential energy in the field is caused by the mass generating the field,
is the density energy potential of the local mass and the speed that will make the place significant changes
found in various parts of the field.
In default of an entity resident of the area of generating mass is modeled either by the density potential energy
generated by the mass to its surface, or the speed of rotation on the surface of the mass
Ró – On the local
Where:
74
RebeloFernandes
RÙ –The homogeneous potential subject of the field.
µó R Speed of displacement of center of mass, velocity of translation caused by the field that is submitted.
ô – Density of potential energy.
ôó = é â + ôÙ
õ
â
öó ôÙ Vµó
öÙ ôó
=
=v =v
÷ó öó ôÙ Vµó
÷Ù öÙ ôó
The influence outside the field, does not promote major changes in kinetics in the field, because as we saw the
pure potential of mass and speed across the field caused by the field officers, are almost constant.
Yes interfere in the pattern of unit of mass and time.
The bending of time under the action of a gravitational field has been studied in a separate article already
published.
As the concept of mass and velocity, are related to local time, with the local perspective of the universe, then
generally we can consider that a field of level i, we have:
öóø ôÙ VµóÝ ôÝ Vµó ô Vµóù ôø2Ý Vµóø

öÙ ôÝ ô ôù ôø
= …………
öóø ôÙ VµóÝ Vµó Vµóù Vµóø

öÙ ôø
= ……….
At the Earth's surface:
ôúûüüý = é êßááà
õ
êßááà
µúûüüý - Speed of rotation of the Earth
As we have seen previously, we have:
75
RebeloFernandes
öúûüüý ôÙ VµóÝ Vµó Vµóù Vµóø Vµúûüüý
öûþ÷üÙ úûüüý ôø
= ……….
Conclusion
- The center of reference is always the center of mass of the gravitational field in which the phenomenon
occurs.
- All offsets are measured with respect to this point, the reference center.
76
RebeloFernandes
Values to find, under the analysis of this new theory of
relativity NBS (No Bend Space)
Medida da velocidade da luz em diferentes referenciais.
Outra forma clara de confirmação da presente teoria, passará por medir a velocidade da luz em diferentes
referenciais.
Como todos hoje sabemos, existem dois locais frequentados pela humanidade que possuem tempos
diferentes dos da Terra. Referimo-nos logicamente à estação espacial e à Lua.
Se medirmos nesses referenciais a velocidade da luz obteremos sem dúvida velocidades aparentes
diferentes das encontradas na Terra.
É curioso como a humanidade criou as medidas padrão para regulação e para a velocidade da luz ainda
não foi criado o equipamento necessário para a sua definição.
É desde já proposta a sua criação.
Measuring the speed of light in different references
Another confirmation of this theory, happen to measure the speed of light in different referential.
As we all know today, there are two places to which mankind goes to which have different times to those
on Earth. We are of course referring to the space station and to the Moon.
If we measure these benchmarks the speed of light we obtain apparent velocities undoubtedly different
from those found on Earth.
It is curious how humanity created the standard measures for regulation and for the speed of light has yet
created the necessary equipment for their definition.
It is now proposed for creation.
To a photon with very low energy.
77
RebeloFernandes
Differential Universal
Place the surface Advance the Speed of light Differential Modification of Apparent speed apparent gravitation variable
with rotation clock for a day, C local - C the length of light. local C - C (G)
Ref: Earth time in for the time on Earth Earth
Ecuador, h = 0 Earth
nanoseconds
a)
Earth 0 299.792.458,49 0,00 0 299.792.458,49 0,00 6,6726000000E-11
Space station
h=380 km -24.895 299.792.458,58 0,09 -7,82796E-11 299.792.458,60 0,11 6,6725999932E-11
Satellite
h=20.200 km 38.596 299.792.458,36 -0,13 -1,05808E-09 299.792.458,67 0,18 6,6725999948E-11
Moon 56.050 299.792.458,30 -0,19 -1,30661E-09 299.792.458,69 0,20 6,6725999955E-11
Orbit around the
Sun
h=2.000.000km -69.650.075 299.792.700,16 241,67 1,07439E-06 299.792.378,07 -80,42 6,6725982008E-11
Mercury -1.974.301 299.792.465,34 6,85 3,00698E-08 299.792.456,33 -2,16 6,6725999439E-11
Venus -484.178 299.792.460,17 1,68 7,40791E-09 299.792.457,95 -0,54 6,6725999867E-11
Mars 487.948 299.792.456,80 -1,69 -7,89833E-09 299.792.459,16 0,67 6,6726000076E-11
a) - The atomic radius varies with the potential of pure mass universal. Not vary with speed. An
instrument that is carried to measure the speed of light will also do so. When considering the size it would
have on Earth we get the apparent speed of light.
As we will see in the same article, the speed of light on Earth will also vary throughout time. It currently
decrease around -0.009808 m/s by year, (-1 m/s in the next 102 years).
If we repeat the experiment in 1976 by the English group, Woods and Others, which concludes that the
speed of light would be 299.792.458.8 ± 0.2 m / s, it appears that the value measured today, 31 years
later, varying 0.32 m / s which are already outside the margin of error.
. We believe that, given the time elapsed; it should repeat the experiment under the same conditions of
1976.
The experience made in 1987 but should present a variation of 0.09 m / s would still be within the margin
of error.
Universal gravitation variable.
0p = v X Z
>q V ¥
¡ V A
On the Moon, the measured value of G, is -6.3945 E-10 lower than measured on Earth. (E-11
6.672599989 / 6.672599993 E-11)
The annual G variation on the Earth:
78
RebeloFernandes
= v
D

Year Variable gravitation

(G)
1978 6,672600000E-11
2005 6,672599994E-11
2011 6,672599993E-11
2030 6,672599989E-11
2055 6,672599983E-11
2075 6,672599979E-11
Gravity
to t t′
g 0p O p£ X ZI X Z
t= ? tt t
– V′o
O p£ X Z
0 R V=
g 0p

Annual variation of gravity:
g O X Z

The value of gravity on Earth or anywhere will increase in proportion to the square of the age of the
Universe.
Year Gravity
1978 9,8100000000
2005 9,8100000347
2011 9,8100000424
2030 9,8100000668
2055 9,8100000989
2075 9,8100001245
÷ future weight of a mass on a planet.
= X Z v
Vr
D VrD
79
RebeloFernandes
Evolution of future weight on Earth (annual):
= X Z

D
Year Weight
1978 1,0000000000
2005 1,0000000044
2011 1,0000000054
2030 1,0000000085
2055 1,0000000126
2075 1,0000000159
Speed of light in free space (annual). Ensuring the same intensity of the relativistic
photon
= X Z
D -

Year C
(m/s)
1978 299.792.458,800
2005 299.792.458,535
2011 299.792.458,476
2030 299.792.458,290
2055 299.792.458,045
2075 299.792.457,849
Speed of light measured in the same apparatus (annual).
= X Z
-
D
Year C
1978 299.792.458,800
2005 299.792.459,065
2011 299.792.459,124
2030 299.792.459,310
2055 299.792.459,555
2075 299.792.459,751
The annual curvature time of one day:
= X Z
-
D
80
RebeloFernandes
Year Time of one day 24 Differential in
hours (nanoseconds) relation to 1978
1978 86.400.000.000.000 0
2005 86.400.000.076.320 76.320
2011 86.400.000.093.280 93.280
2030 86.400.000.146.986 146.986
2055 86.400.000.217.653 217.653
2075 86.400.000.274.186 274.186
The meters, depending on the speed of light (annual).
Cvacuum = Co X Z
D -
The meter corresponds to the space traveled by light in the time interval 3.335640952 E-09 seconds.

Capparatus = Co X Z
. -
D
Contraction in
Year Velocity of light Bend of time atomic radius
(in vacuum) (in one
m/s apparatus)
1978 299.792.458,80 1,000000003E+00 1,000000003
2005 299.792.458,54 1,000000002E+00 1,000000004
2010 299.792.458,49 1,000000002E+00 1,000000004
2030 299.792.458,29 1,000000001E+00 1,000000004
2055 299.792.458,04 1,000000000E+00 1,000000005
2075 299.792.457,85 9,999999995E-01 1,000000006
The annual removal in planetariums systems.
Apparent Real
Velocity Velocity
Distance Annual removal Annual Removal removal
(m) Removal (m) (m/s) (m) (m/s)
Moon-Earth 384.467.001 0,038 0,0251564 -

Earth-Sun 1,50E+11 14,22 9,79 -
Sun-Centre of Milk
Way 2,84E+20 - - 1,85710E+10 588,48
Diameter Milk Way 9,37E+20 - - 6,12843E+10 1.941,98
Hubbell Law (m/s
*Mpc) 3,09E+22 - - 2,01902E+12 63.978,84
1,45E+26
Universe
15283069185,35 al 9,46070E+15al 299.792.458,80 9,46073E+15al 299.792.458,51
Real - Considering the curvature of the time.
81
RebeloFernandes
Planets in solar system
Increased of radius and period translation
Planet Radius Orbit radius Translation Translation Real Radius Superficial Delay Annual
velocity period removal contraction removal time average
from Sun Sun + Sun/Planet translation removal
Planet from
(m) (m) (m/s) (anos) (m) (m) (m) (Seg.) Sun (m)
Earth 6.378.136 1,49600E+11 29.785,85 1 9,79 0,05 9,83 0,001549 9,79
Mars 3.370.000 2,28000E+11 24.127,28 1,88 28,07 0,16 28,23 0,005482 14,93
Jupiter 69.900.000 7,78000E+11 13.061,29 11,86 603,73 7,05 610,78 0,217802 50,90
Saturn 58.500.000 1,43000E+12 9.634,03 29,55 2.765,23 43,12 2.808,35 1,352481 93,58
Neptune 22.100.000 4,50000E+12 5.430,87 164,98 48.576,13 1.278,84 49.854,98 42,146420 294,44
82
RebeloFernandes
Experience to perform with a pendulum, as evidence of the
new theory of relativity NBS (Bend In Space.
Variation of the period of a pendulum in time
It is made to study the variation of atomic time measurement for the same number of periods of a
pendulum during the year.
The period of a pendulum with amplitude of 30 ° is given by:

= 2π v
²
,ï

( 1+ )
± = ±
D

= X Z
VB
D VrD
ÑD
= }
Ñ
Ñ i 2B
X Z
ÑD i 2sD
= X Z v
D Ä VrD
Vr
To a pendulum with L = 1,20 m
Measurement of atomic time in 2000 periods of the pendulum.
Results that are expected to find:
Between the Aphelion and Perihelion, the clocks to 2000 periods of a pendulum with amplitude of 30 º
and L= 1,20 m, the atomic clock will mark more 3.469 nanoseconds.
The 4th of each month, approximate value.
(565 ; 568 ; 571 ; 585 ; 588 ; 592 ) total: 3.469 nanoseconds.
The 4th of each 3 month, exact value.
( 1.704 ; 1.765 ) total: 3.469 nanoseconds.
83
RebeloFernandes
Between the Perihelion and Aphelion, the clocks to 2000 periods of a pendulum with amplitude of 30 º
and L= 1,20 m, the atomic clock will mark less 3.907 nanoseconds.
The 4th of each month, approximate value.
( -665 ; -662 ; -658 ; -644 ; -641 ; -638) total -3.907 nanoseconds.
The 4th of each 3 month, exact value.
( -1.985 ; -1923 ) total: -3.907 nanoseconds.
After a year the atomic clock will mark less 439 nanoseconds.
This is certainly the experience easier and cheaper to make as a proof of this theory.
The time of that experiment: 1 hour, 14 minutes and 30 seconds.
Equipment needed:
For this purpose you will need:
-An empty chamber with the respective pump empty, will be installed where previously the pendulum.
- A photoelectric cell to count the cycles.
- An atomic clock to measure time.
- An electromagnet for the initial positioning of the pendulum.
System-control computer.
Note:
Between each test, the cable of the pendulum must remain at rest to prevent the phenomenon of
relaxation.
Measurements should be made at the same temperature.
The size of the pendulum does not influence the experiment.
The ideal condition of the chamber, where the pendulum is placed, it would be a vacuum, but if this is not
possible the closer the better vacuum.
Picked up an experiment to last approximately one hour, so that we get the idea of the variation of atomic
time commuting by each hour of the experiment.
84
RebeloFernandes
The new relativistic Doppler effect.
After defining the new theory of relativity, where the space does not bend,
we are in a position to consider the relativistic Doppler effect.
Determination of the Doppler effect.
In this relativity, in that space does not bend, we find a different Doppler effect, considered by the relativity of
Einstein.
As the space does not bend, we find a Doppler effect of the same type as found for the sound.
For V> 0, the source away from the observer:
For the frequency:
√ = √
$r

For the wavelength:

=
$r
For V <0, the source is close to the observer:
For the frequency:
√ = √
Vr

For the wavelength:

=
Vr
By quantum mechanics.
Analyzing the process of annihilation of pairs.
Of photons generated:
85
RebeloFernandes
2
= Ý + 1)
Canceling the momentum of the pairs:
2
µ = Ý -
Multiplying both terms by p :
2
µ = Ý - 2)
Adding 1) e 2):
2
X a µ ) = Ý
Ý =
X a µ )
Ý =
Ù vÝ R
µ Ù $µÙ
Ù
µ
}ÝV
Ù
Ý =
Ù XÙ a µÙ )
Ý =
Ù Ù
Ù $µÙ
Ù

Ý
=
cµ

Ù Ù Ù Ù

=
Ù
Ù
= Ù
Ù $µÙ
What confirms the expected for a source, approaching the observer.
Subtracting 2Z [/ 1Z:
Get:
86
RebeloFernandes
Ù
= Ù
Ù VµÙ
What confirms the expected for a source, the move away from the observer.
The impact on universal analysis.
If we take into account for example the building was considered for the Ursa Major, this would keep away from
us at a speed of 15,000 km / s, from the perspective of this new theory, we would have:
Ù
= Ù
Ù VµÙ
431,05409 = 410

Vr
B = 14.643 Km/s
Different from what was considered:
This new concept of the Doppler effect, will force me to review the impacts of varying gravitational and
magnetic permeability variable of the vacuum in the analysis of the cosmos.
What is the Doppler effect of a source that in our benchmark issues with frequency √Ù
The and this source is then to leave the our reference to the speed V.
A source that emits radiation √Ù when stopped, will deliver at a speed V, the velocity V is the velocity of
expulsion compared to our benchmark, with a frequency given by:
√=
√Ù

vÝVµ

The frequency that we received from a source in the previous condition will be given by:
√=
√Ù Vµ

vÝVµ

87
RebeloFernandes
√ = √Ù v v
XVµZXVµZ
X$µZXVµZ
√ = √Ù v
Vµ
$µ
What is according to Einstein's relativistic Doppler effect.
This condition is only valid for a source with frequency √Ù in our benchmark, which is then put into motion.
When the source approaches, then V =-V, we will have a Doppler effect given by:
√ = √Ù v
$µ
Vµ
Porto, 29/01/2009
88
RebeloFernandes
The apparent acceleration of the universal
expansion (an incomplete approach)
After defining the curvature of the time under the action of a gravitational
field, we are able to study what impact the analysis of the speed of expansion
of the universe, caused by the dilation of time due to the increase in severity,
the fruit of this expansion.
Introduction
Let us review the theory, developed for the curvature of the time under the action of a gravitational field.
For this theory we will focus on the development of different characteristics caused by the universal extension
of time.
As we already know.
vö Ù =
ö , √

= √q
v,V s q
=
i
√
= √q because we know the frequency is the inverse of time.
q
The variation of the speed of light over time.
From the above we conclude that when a locally variable gravitational increases also increases the time:
89
RebeloFernandes
With the expansion of the universe the variable gravitational local increases in proportion to the growth of the
universe.
v D =
D

As for the whole always remains the relationship:
=
=
D
= v

D
Considering that in the initial phase of the universe the value of would be smaller, locally then the speed of
light in the initial phase was much higher than today.
It makes sense, accept the principle of variable speed of light, because in the world, regardless of location, the
reading of the speed of light in the past was much higher than what can be measured today.
Just as we read a lower speed of light, all speeds will also be read in a lower value.
This will cause the speed of translation and the Earth or the Moon will appear in slower not because they
slowed down, but because our time will increase.
On the local mass what will happen:
Y = Y v D

-We then analyze what is happening locally with the wavelength of the photons
received:
Y = √
Y v D X v Z = √

D
Y v = √

D
√ v = √

D
90
Rebelo Fernandes

√ O √ }

The wavelength of will given by:
√O

O
√

v
O

√ v
O
Once the universe expands to a constant speed.
What is the error that was committed to conclude that the universe is expanding?
When measuring the characteristics of the radiation of light coming from stars, which is measured is the
frequency of radiation.
As currently still considering the constant speed of light, then we have to wave length:

O
√
is regarded as constant, then we have:
Cz = C<
As:

√ O √ }

So we have:

O

√ v
91
Rebelo Fernandes

O }

As:
v D > 1

>
Taking into account the Doppler effect:
Do not forget to consider constant C, which is wrong but so far considered academically right.
RF's relativity:

=
Vr

VrD
> Vr

B > B
That is, apparently the expansion of the universe is accelerating.
This error, as we come to consider C in and not the correct value given by:
= v

D
Porto, 29/01/20089
92
Rebelo Fernandes
Transmission of electromagnetic signals.

RebeloFernandes@sapo.pt
In order to understand the light and the electromagnetic transmission of information
in the universe I will develop this work. The rotational platform, have always been
controversial in the theory of relativity of Einstein, so I serve them to me to try
some understanding of the phenomenon.
To date there has been a great controversy regarding the rotational platforms.
All because an electromagnetic signal emitted towards the Earth's rotation, or a light signal on a rotational platform, it
takes more time to give back to the platform of an electromagnetic signal emitted in the opposite direction of rotation.
.Doing the calculation of the time in both directions would in our benchmark:
lo R V<t,
In the direction of rotation:
t, O
C<
lo
t, O
C< a V<
lo a V<t
In the opposite direction to the rotation:
t O
C<
lo
t O
C< R V<
This difference in values has created many difficulties, those who want the speed of light to obey the Lorentz
transformations.
93
Rebelo Fernandes
Instead of considering there is a serious problem with the theory, help resolve are the inertial transformations to solve
the problem.
The error is not accepting this is the way to the bottom where they will examine the problem.
At the very essence of relativity, when examining the curvature of space, this reasoning is used, leading to the
expressions calculated above.
Jeopardize the results of rotational platforms in our referential is concerned by the very relativity.
The results in rotational platforms, are evidence of the defense I do, the existence of an absolute speed of light, only in
the absolute opposite of concept of relative, as in the universe.
This observation leads to an experiment measuring the speed of light, measured in one direction for example in the
direction of rotation of the Earth will be different from what we find is measured in the opposite direction.
Even with mirror, round-trip time measured in the direction of rotation of the Earth, will differences in the measured
orthogonal to the rotation.
.If not, we have to change the founding principles of relativity.
How can an electromagnetic signal to the return to Earth or any other element circular?
This is only possible if the signal is transmitted to the middle, represents the potential energy of the radiation pure
mass universal, and that means being able to absorb the characteristics of the signal and transmit them by itself, the
environment.
This phenomenon is known, due to the differences, the sound. We hear the folding of a wall.
.The means of transmission of electromagnetic signal, is the pure constant potential of universal mass.
What is the power of the signal to an observer on Earth?
In the direction of rotation of the Earth have given a signal with a frequency:
94
Rebelo Fernandes
√ = √ v
$r
Vp
After a complete turn how frequently we will read, because we are departing from the sign?
√ = √ v
Vr
$p
√ = √ v v
$r Vr
Vp $p
√ = √
On the contrary it will give the opposite signal and will have the same frequency √ .
Of course it is not necessary to give the signal a turn, the process is for any observer who is on a surface in rotation.
If C is the speed of transmission of the signal, the values found may be those of the original expressions.
Even considering the movement of translation of the Earth around the Sun, the findings are always the same.
Logical to find always the same value, even considering the translation of the same or galactic cluster or super cluster.
The time a light signal takes to make a complete turn circular platform, only depends on the perimeter of the platform
and its speed of rotation. Never depends on its speed of translation because the means by which spreads have the
ability to transmit the signal to the speed of light.
Porto, 19/03/09
The velocity of the photons
"Quantum foam"
. rebelofernandes@sapo.pt
95
Rebelo Fernandes
Abstract
The time delays in the arrival time of photons of high energy gamma-ray bursts relative to the smaller energy
photon, implies that the speed of light is not constant.
Several conclusions can be drawn from this observation.
Different velocities of photons leads, the different velocities for the light, so we can say that the velocity of
light is not constant.
On the other hand, we know of relativity, which is the energy density potential universal locally produces a
constant escape potential , which leads to deduce that C is the maximum velocity permitted in our universe.
We also know that this is potential constant C ^ 2 which participates in the energy and that is constant for all
forms of energy.
The light, or photons, by their nature twilight should travel at velocity slightly less than C, because if it were
otherwise, they would only energy, and lose their crepuscular nature and as such no longer be photons.
Now, we know that the velocity of the most energetic photons moving at a reduced velocity so that the potential
energy of the photon interferes negatively with their movement.
Keywords: Velocity, photon, quantum foam, C, gamma-ray, energy.
Introduction
The velocity C
As we see below C is the speed of propagation of the radiation mass Y and C is the speed involved in the
energy.
Speed C is therefore the maximum speed allowed in the universe, in any direction.
Therefore, we are faced with a maximum universal escape potential.
As - density potential energy at our local.
= 2 G
It is this potential that generates the energy of matter.
96
Rebelo Fernandes
Y = 2 G m
Photons
Photons we have the same principle.
On the surface the photon we find:
- The density of potential energy of the local where the photon moves.
- The energy density generated by photon.
The density of potential energy surface of the photon is given by:
= +
Y = 2 G m
But > , although it is possible that the reference of the photon, it is not possible in our reference that
should be .
Y = 2 G m ( + )
As such we undertake a redistribution of changing frames of reference not to violate the principles of our
reference:

O X + )
$

Y = 2 G m ( + )
$
= 2 + 2

$ $
= +

$ $
There are therefore two parts of a different nature in the creation of photon energy.

Y
$
- The kinetic energy induced by the universal potential energy, causing the movement of
photons, ie their energy of motion.

Y a – The intrinsic energy to photon energy density induced by the potential energy of the photon
*
itself.
97
Rebelo Fernandes
The motion of photons is generated solely by the density of potential energy in the universal local he goes
through and not by its own potential energy.
We can then represent the photon energy in the form:
The kinetic energy of the photon is given by (mB ).
Y = Y B + 2 Y

$
= +

$ $
= B +

$
The speed of displacement of the photon:
The speed of displacement of the photon is given by.
B =

$
V = v
*
* a
The variation of the speed of photons for C ,µ, is given by
= B + [B
[B = - B
[B = -

$
[B = ( 1 -

$
)
[B = (

$
)
[B = v

* a
Now, we know the speed of photons.
+
Increased energy density of photons ( ), lead to a slower velocity photons.

+
m
Actually C is the speed of propagation of radiation mass ( ) and not the speed of propagation of photons.
98
Rebelo Fernandes
Photons of very low energy move very close to the speed C.
The photon need, universal density of potential energy to your motion.
Energy of particles
As we said before the energy of particles, such as the photon, is given by:
+ - Density of potential energy of matter.
Y = 2 Y + 2 Y +

$ $
Y = Y

+Y
$ $
That is the energy of matter is made up of two portions of different nature.
- Y

$
The potential kinetic energy given by the density of potential energy universal.
- Y

$
The intrinsic energy to matter itself
These are the readings on our referential.
Radius of elementary particles
Introduction
When we think, in the radius of a particle we must think of the equilibrium model of particle interaction with the
surrounding universe.
99
Rebelo Fernandes
The universal density of potential energy will exert traction on the particle and there will be part of a reaction of
equal magnitude but opposite direction.
This reaction implies that the energy of the particle necessarily has tendency to borrow, if it were not, she would
dissolve in the universe.
If the particle has a tendency to contract, then it will have an elastic nature, the energy will have a modulus
contract.
Condition base of balance
For the particle is in equilibrium, then the energy density of the contract, at the inner edge of its surface, must be
equal to the energy density potential universal in its outer surface.
The energy contract of the matter
If we admit that the matter has a tensile modulus K ', then your energy contract, should be proportional to its
mass and its volume:
= K m ( π Ö )
I
So, its contractive energy density is given by:
f
¢ X π m ÄZ
= Ä
I π m
= K m Ö
,
What is the value of K?
– Density of universal potential energy of all universal matter (with the exclusion of the particle in
Where:
+ – Density of potential energy of the particle itself on its surface.

question).
¨ – Superficial universal density of potential energy at the particle.

¨ = + +
Imagine the absence of all other universal mass. The density universal potential energy that we would find
= 0
would be the particle itself.
100
Rebelo Fernandes
K Y Ö =
, Y
Ö

m
K=
Regardless of the mass of the particle, all particles in the conditions now presented will tend to the same radius
regardless of their mass.
Generally we have:
+
m m
=
Ö = Ö
Ö = Ö
So we can say that in the limit of no universal masses if the masses are too far apart and the density of potential
to the same radius, Ö .

energy generated by them will tend to zero, we can imagine that all bodies regardless of their quantity will tend
Ö
Looking at the Big Bang, in which there was no mass outside that we can say that the whole universal mass
would be contained in
m r = Y Ö
And yet for a universal simultaneity and low energy particle will generally:
mr=K
At the same universal time in any particle of low energy the product of mass for its radius is always constant.
The balance between tensile strength and tensile universal particle will be:
K m Ö = +
, +
m
m Ö = +
, +
m m
= +
m +
m m
101
Rebelo Fernandes
The universal density of potential energy.
The particle is under the action of the universal potential energy density, .
=
The balance.
Equilibrium is then established between the energy density of matter and contractive energy density potential
universal:
=
K m Ö= ¨
As:
£
Ö=
¢m
Impact of measurement of the proton radius
According to the latest news was possible to measure the radius of the proton, using this new information we
can calculate the value of the elastic constant Ö of matter:

"hm 7 = 8,4184E-16 m
Taking into account the proton mass and radius, we can develop numerically, the present theory:
hm
Ö =
m
ã = 1,6726231E-27 m

$
e
Ö =v
mÖ
Y
*a Ö
Ö =4,5725205E R 35 m
Considering the values of the proton:
What is the greatest mass possible for a particle?
As we saw before we know what the radius of the particle depending on its mass. The highest possible mass for
a particle is what is on the cusp of turning into a black hole.
O
+
m
102
Rebelo Fernandes
O
+
m
O
+
m
m = r
= +
m
m
= 2
m
m
Ö = 2 Ö
r = √2 Ö
r = 6,4665205 R 35 m
m
m
m=
m= 4,3549882E-08 Kg
Radius of the largest particle that will be:
In general terms and specific, we have:
K m Ö= + +
+
K m Ö= +
r
+m +
= +
m r
Ö - r – m = 0
+
m

$ v $I
e

e
r=
Generalization for all particles
103
Rebelo Fernandes
The expression found for the radius of photons, the principle of definition of mass,Y should apply to any
particles, even at rest.
m eV Raio
Neutrão
1,6749286E-27 939565635,5 8,4068123E-16
Protão
1,6726231E-27 938272345,4 8,4184000E-16
Electrão
9,1093897E-31 510999,0672 1,5457468E-12
Particles in a different referential with energy density universal potential different from
our local.
Let us now analyze the behavior of particles/photons subject to a potential energy density of our site other than
- Density of potential energy in another referential.

Earth.
= A
r = S X a Z
Solving the equation to r:
m S X * a Z
m S X * a Z
=
m X * a Z
m X * a Z
=
m
m * *
=A+ - + …….

= ~ 0 and - =~0

*
m
m
= ~A
With computer support, for a photon of 1E24 eV:
Density of Radius of R/Ro Difference to C dV/dVo

potential photon
energy
d/do m m/s %
104
Rebelo Fernandes
0,5 3,94938E-31 0,50000 2,009 400,00%
1 7,89875E-31 1 0,502 0,00%
2 1,57975E-30 2,00000 0,126 25,00%
The radius of the photon varies almost in proportion to the potential energy density of the medium in which they
move.
The slope of the speed of propagation of photons for C varies practically in inverse proportion to the potential
energy density of the medium.
The photon in a medium with lower density of potential energy will move more slowly.
As the density of potential in the local earth will diminish in the future, then the radius of the photon will
decrease, as well as its speed.
Summary
- The low-energy photons move almost at the speed C, but never C.
- Photons of higher energy are those with greater deviation from C.
- The minimum radius of the photon tends to r = 6,4665205E R 35 m
Porto, 2 de Março de 2010.
Rebelo Fernandes
Values
We are now able to display tables with figures for both the travel speed of photons taking into account the
deviation of its speed in relation to C or to its radius.
Energy of Mass of Energy of Radius of Velocity of Energy of Deviation of

photon photon photon photon photon photon velocity on
1,275^n 1,275^n the photon
from C
eV m eV m m/s eV m/s
1,000E+00 1,783E-36 1 7,9E-07 299792458,8 1 5,02403E-49
1,275E+00 2,273E-36 2 6,2E-07 299792458,8 2 8,16719E-49
1,626E+00 2,898E-36 3 4,86E-07 299792458,8 3 1,32768E-48
2,073E+00 3,695E-36 4 3,81E-07 299792458,8 4 2,15831E-48
2,643E+00 4,711E-36 5 2,99E-07 299792458,8 5 3,5086E-48
105
Rebelo Fernandes
3,369E+00 6,006E-36 6 2,34E-07 299792458,8 6 5,70367E-48
4,296E+00 7,658E-36 7 1,84E-07 299792458,8 7 9,27202E-48
5,477E+00 9,764E-36 8 1,44E-07 299792458,8 8 1,50728E-47
6,984E+00 1,245E-35 9 1,13E-07 299792458,8 9 2,45028E-47
8,904E+00 1,587E-35 10 8,87E-08 299792458,8 10 3,98323E-47
1,135E+01 2,024E-35 11 6,96E-08 299792458,8 11 6,47524E-47
1,447E+01 2,58E-35 12 5,46E-08 299792458,8 12 1,05263E-46
1,846E+01 3,29E-35 13 4,28E-08 299792458,8 13 1,71118E-46
2,353E+01 4,195E-35 14 3,36E-08 299792458,8 14 2,78174E-46
3,000E+01 5,348E-35 15 2,63E-08 299792458,8 15 4,52207E-46
3,825E+01 6,819E-35 16 2,06E-08 299792458,8 16 7,35119E-46
4,877E+01 8,694E-35 17 1,62E-08 299792458,8 17 1,19503E-45
6,218E+01 1,109E-34 18 1,27E-08 299792458,8 18 1,94267E-45
7,928E+01 1,413E-34 19 9,96E-09 299792458,8 19 3,15805E-45
1,011E+02 1,802E-34 20 7,81E-09 299792458,8 20 5,1338E-45
1,289E+02 2,298E-34 21 6,13E-09 299792458,8 21 8,34564E-45
1,643E+02 2,929E-34 22 4,81E-09 299792458,8 22 1,35669E-44
2,095E+02 3,735E-34 23 3,77E-09 299792458,8 23 2,20547E-44
2,671E+02 4,762E-34 24 2,96E-09 299792458,8 24 3,58526E-44
3,406E+02 6,072E-34 25 2,32E-09 299792458,8 25 5,82829E-44
4,343E+02 7,741E-34 26 1,82E-09 299792458,8 26 9,47461E-44
5,537E+02 9,87E-34 27 1,43E-09 299792458,8 27 1,54022E-43
7,060E+02 1,258E-33 28 1,12E-09 299792458,8 28 2,50382E-43
9,001E+02 1,605E-33 29 8,78E-10 299792458,8 29 4,07026E-43
1,148E+03 2,046E-33 30 6,88E-10 299792458,8 30 6,61672E-43
1,463E+03 2,608E-33 31 5,4E-10 299792458,8 31 1,07563E-42
1,866E+03 3,326E-33 32 4,23E-10 299792458,8 32 1,74857E-42
2,379E+03 4,24E-33 33 3,32E-10 299792458,8 33 2,84252E-42
3,033E+03 5,406E-33 34 2,6E-10 299792458,8 34 4,62088E-42
3,867E+03 6,893E-33 35 2,04E-10 299792458,8 35 7,51181E-42
4,930E+03 8,789E-33 36 1,6E-10 299792458,8 36 1,22114E-41
6,286E+03 1,121E-32 37 1,26E-10 299792458,8 37 1,98511E-41
8,015E+03 1,429E-32 38 9,86E-11 299792458,8 38 3,22705E-41
1,022E+04 1,822E-32 39 7,73E-11 299792458,8 39 5,24598E-41
1,303E+04 2,323E-32 40 6,06E-11 299792458,8 40 8,52799E-41
1,661E+04 2,961E-32 41 4,76E-11 299792458,8 41 1,38633E-40
2,118E+04 3,776E-32 42 3,73E-11 299792458,8 42 2,25365E-40
2,700E+04 4,814E-32 43 2,93E-11 299792458,8 43 3,6636E-40
3,443E+04 6,138E-32 44 2,29E-11 299792458,8 44 5,95564E-40
4,390E+04 7,826E-32 45 1,8E-11 299792458,8 45 9,68163E-40
5,597E+04 9,978E-32 46 1,41E-11 299792458,8 46 1,57387E-39
7,136E+04 1,272E-31 47 1,11E-11 299792458,8 47 2,55852E-39
9,099E+04 1,622E-31 48 8,68E-12 299792458,8 48 4,1592E-39
1,160E+05 2,068E-31 49 6,81E-12 299792458,8 49 6,7613E-39
106
Rebelo Fernandes
1,479E+05 2,637E-31 50 5,34E-12 299792458,8 50 1,09913E-38
1,886E+05 3,362E-31 51 4,19E-12 299792458,8 51 1,78678E-38
2,404E+05 4,286E-31 52 3,29E-12 299792458,8 52 2,90463E-38
3,066E+05 5,465E-31 53 2,58E-12 299792458,8 53 4,72184E-38
3,909E+05 6,968E-31 54 2,02E-12 299792458,8 54 7,67595E-38
4,984E+05 8,884E-31 55 1,58E-12 299792458,8 55 1,24782E-37
6,354E+05 1,133E-30 56 1,24E-12 299792458,8 56 2,02849E-37
8,102E+05 1,444E-30 57 9,75E-13 299792458,8 57 3,29756E-37
1,033E+06 1,841E-30 58 7,65E-13 299792458,8 58 5,3606E-37
1,317E+06 2,348E-30 59 6E-13 299792458,8 59 8,71432E-37
1,679E+06 2,993E-30 60 4,7E-13 299792458,8 60 1,41662E-36
2,141E+06 3,817E-30 61 3,69E-13 299792458,8 61 2,3029E-36
2,730E+06 4,866E-30 62 2,89E-13 299792458,8 62 3,74365E-36
3,480E+06 6,204E-30 63 2,27E-13 299792458,8 63 6,08577E-36
4,438E+06 7,911E-30 64 1,78E-13 299792458,8 64 9,89317E-36
5,658E+06 1,009E-29 65 1,4E-13 299792458,8 65 1,60826E-35
7,214E+06 1,286E-29 66 1,09E-13 299792458,8 66 2,61443E-35
9,198E+06 1,64E-29 67 8,59E-14 299792458,8 67 4,25008E-35
1,173E+07 2,091E-29 68 6,74E-14 299792458,8 68 6,90903E-35
1,495E+07 2,665E-29 69 5,28E-14 299792458,8 69 1,12315E-34
1,906E+07 3,398E-29 70 4,14E-14 299792458,8 70 1,82582E-34
2,431E+07 4,333E-29 71 3,25E-14 299792458,8 71 2,9681E-34
3,099E+07 5,524E-29 72 2,55E-14 299792458,8 72 4,82501E-34
3,951E+07 7,044E-29 73 2E-14 299792458,8 73 7,84366E-34
5,038E+07 8,981E-29 74 1,57E-14 299792458,8 74 1,27509E-33
6,423E+07 1,145E-28 75 1,23E-14 299792458,8 75 2,07281E-33
8,190E+07 1,46E-28 76 9,64E-15 299792458,8 76 3,36961E-33
1,044E+08 1,861E-28 77 7,56E-15 299792458,8 77 5,47773E-33
1,331E+08 2,373E-28 78 5,93E-15 299792458,8 78 8,90473E-33
1,697E+08 3,026E-28 79 4,65E-15 299792458,8 79 1,44758E-32
2,164E+08 3,858E-28 80 3,65E-15 299792458,8 80 2,35321E-32
2,759E+08 4,919E-28 81 2,86E-15 299792458,8 81 3,82544E-32
3,518E+08 6,272E-28 82 2,25E-15 299792458,8 82 6,21874E-32
4,486E+08 7,997E-28 83 1,76E-15 299792458,8 83 1,01093E-31
5,719E+08 1,02E-27 84 1,38E-15 299792458,8 84 1,6434E-31
7,292E+08 1,3E-27 85 1,08E-15 299792458,8 85 2,67155E-31
9,297E+08 1,657E-27 86 8,5E-16 299792458,8 86 4,34294E-31
1,185E+09 2,113E-27 87 6,66E-16 299792458,8 87 7,05999E-31
1,511E+09 2,694E-27 88 5,23E-16 299792458,8 88 1,14769E-30
1,927E+09 3,435E-27 89 4,1E-16 299792458,8 89 1,86571E-30
2,457E+09 4,38E-27 90 3,21E-16 299792458,8 90 3,03295E-30
3,133E+09 5,585E-27 91 2,52E-16 299792458,8 91 4,93044E-30
3,994E+09 7,12E-27 92 1,98E-16 299792458,8 92 8,01504E-30
5,093E+09 9,078E-27 93 1,55E-16 299792458,8 93 1,30295E-29
107
Rebelo Fernandes
6,493E+09 1,157E-26 94 1,22E-16 299792458,8 94 2,1181E-29
8,279E+09 1,476E-26 95 9,54E-17 299792458,8 95 3,44324E-29
1,056E+10 1,882E-26 96 7,48E-17 299792458,8 96 5,59741E-29
1,346E+10 2,399E-26 97 5,87E-17 299792458,8 97 9,0993E-29
1,716E+10 3,059E-26 98 4,6E-17 299792458,8 98 1,4792E-28
2,188E+10 3,9E-26 99 3,61E-17 299792458,8 99 2,40463E-28
2,789E+10 4,973E-26 100 2,83E-17 299792458,8 100 3,90903E-28
3,556E+10 6,34E-26 101 2,22E-17 299792458,8 101 6,35461E-28
4,534E+10 8,083E-26 102 1,74E-17 299792458,8 102 1,03302E-27
5,781E+10 1,031E-25 103 1,37E-17 299792458,8 103 1,67931E-27
7,371E+10 1,314E-25 104 1,07E-17 299792458,8 104 2,72992E-27
9,399E+10 1,675E-25 105 8,4E-18 299792458,8 105 4,43783E-27
1,198E+11 2,136E-25 106 6,59E-18 299792458,8 106 7,21425E-27
1,528E+11 2,724E-25 107 5,17E-18 299792458,8 107 1,17277E-26
1,948E+11 3,473E-25 108 4,05E-18 299792458,8 108 1,90648E-26
2,484E+11 4,428E-25 109 3,18E-18 299792458,8 109 3,09922E-26
3,167E+11 5,645E-25 110 2,49E-18 299792458,8 110 5,03817E-26
4,038E+11 7,198E-25 111 1,96E-18 299792458,8 111 8,19017E-26
5,148E+11 9,177E-25 112 1,53E-18 299792458,8 112 1,33141E-25
6,564E+11 1,17E-24 113 1,2E-18 299792458,8 113 2,16438E-25
8,369E+11 1,492E-24 114 9,44E-19 299792458,8 114 3,51847E-25
1,067E+12 1,902E-24 115 7,4E-19 299792458,8 115 5,71972E-25
1,360E+12 2,425E-24 116 5,81E-19 299792458,8 116 9,29811E-25
1,735E+12 3,092E-24 117 4,55E-19 299792458,8 117 1,51152E-24
2,212E+12 3,942E-24 118 3,57E-19 299792458,8 118 2,45717E-24
2,820E+12 5,027E-24 119 2,8E-19 299792458,8 119 3,99444E-24
3,595E+12 6,409E-24 120 2,2E-19 299792458,8 120 6,49346E-24
4,584E+12 8,171E-24 121 1,72E-19 299792458,8 121 1,05559E-23
5,844E+12 1,042E-23 122 1,35E-19 299792458,8 122 1,716E-23
7,451E+12 1,328E-23 123 1,06E-19 299792458,8 123 2,78957E-23
9,501E+12 1,694E-23 124 8,31E-20 299792458,8 124 4,5348E-23
1,211E+13 2,159E-23 125 6,52E-20 299792458,8 125 7,37188E-23
1,544E+13 2,753E-23 126 5,11E-20 299792458,8 126 1,19839E-22
1,969E+13 3,51E-23 127 4,01E-20 299792458,8 127 1,94813E-22
2,511E+13 4,476E-23 128 3,15E-20 299792458,8 128 3,16694E-22
3,201E+13 5,707E-23 129 2,47E-20 299792458,8 129 5,14825E-22
4,081E+13 7,276E-23 130 1,94E-20 299792458,8 130 8,36912E-22
5,204E+13 9,277E-23 131 1,52E-20 299792458,8 131 1,36051E-21
6,635E+13 1,183E-22 132 1,19E-20 299792458,8 132 2,21167E-21
8,459E+13 1,508E-22 133 9,34E-21 299792458,8 133 3,59535E-21
1,079E+14 1,923E-22 134 7,32E-21 299792458,8 134 5,84469E-21
1,375E+14 2,452E-22 135 5,74E-21 299792458,8 135 9,50127E-21
1,753E+14 3,126E-22 136 4,5E-21 299792458,8 136 1,54455E-20
2,236E+14 3,985E-22 137 3,53E-21 299792458,8 137 2,51086E-20
108
Rebelo Fernandes
2,850E+14 5,081E-22 138 2,77E-21 299792458,8 138 4,08172E-20
3,634E+14 6,479E-22 139 2,17E-21 299792458,8 139 6,63534E-20
4,634E+14 8,26E-22 140 1,7E-21 299792458,8 140 1,07866E-19
5,908E+14 1,053E-21 141 1,34E-21 299792458,8 141 1,75349E-19
7,532E+14 1,343E-21 142 1,05E-21 299792458,8 142 2,85052E-19
9,604E+14 1,712E-21 143 8,22E-22 299792458,8 143 4,63388E-19
1,224E+15 2,183E-21 144 6,45E-22 299792458,8 144 7,53295E-19
1,561E+15 2,783E-21 145 5,06E-22 299792458,8 145 1,22458E-18
1,991E+15 3,549E-21 146 3,97E-22 299792458,8 146 1,9907E-18
2,538E+15 4,524E-21 147 3,11E-22 299792458,8 147 3,23613E-18
3,236E+15 5,769E-21 148 2,44E-22 299792458,8 148 5,26074E-18
4,126E+15 7,355E-21 149 1,91E-22 299792458,8 149 8,55199E-18
5,260E+15 9,377E-21 150 1,5E-22 299792458,8 150 1,39023E-17
6,707E+15 1,196E-20 151 1,18E-22 299792458,8 151 2,26E-17
8,551E+15 1,524E-20 152 9,24E-23 299792458,8 152 3,67391E-17
1,090E+16 1,944E-20 153 7,24E-23 299792458,8 153 5,97239E-17
1,390E+16 2,478E-20 154 5,68E-23 299792458,8 154 9,70887E-17
1,772E+16 3,16E-20 155 4,46E-23 299792458,8 155 1,5783E-16
2,260E+16 4,029E-20 156 3,5E-23 299792458,8 156 2,56572E-16
2,881E+16 5,136E-20 157 2,74E-23 299792458,8 157 4,1709E-16
3,674E+16 6,549E-20 158 2,15E-23 299792458,8 158 6,78032E-16
4,684E+16 8,35E-20 159 1,69E-23 299792458,8 159 1,10223E-15
5,972E+16 1,065E-19 160 1,32E-23 299792458,8 160 1,79181E-15
7,614E+16 1,357E-19 161 1,04E-23 299792458,8 161 2,9128E-15
9,708E+16 1,731E-19 162 8,14E-24 299792458,8 162 4,73513E-15
1,238E+17 2,207E-19 163 6,38E-24 299792458,8 163 7,69754E-15
1,578E+17 2,813E-19 164 5E-24 299792458,8 164 1,25133E-14
2,012E+17 3,587E-19 165 3,93E-24 299792458,8 165 2,0342E-14
2,566E+17 4,574E-19 166 3,08E-24 299792458,8 166 3,30684E-14
3,271E+17 5,831E-19 167 2,41E-24 299792458,8 167 5,37568E-14
4,171E+17 7,435E-19 168 1,89E-24 299792458,8 168 8,73884E-14
5,318E+17 9,479E-19 169 1,49E-24 299792458,8 169 1,42061E-13
6,780E+17 1,209E-18 170 1,17E-24 299792458,8 170 2,30938E-13
8,644E+17 1,541E-18 171 9,14E-25 299792458,8 171 3,75418E-13
1,102E+18 1,965E-18 172 7,17E-25 299792458,8 172 6,10289E-13
1,405E+18 2,505E-18 173 5,62E-25 299792458,8 173 9,92101E-13
1,792E+18 3,194E-18 174 4,41E-25 299792458,8 174 1,61278E-12
2,284E+18 4,072E-18 175 3,46E-25 299792458,8 175 2,62178E-12
2,913E+18 5,192E-18 176 2,71E-25 299792458,8 176 4,26203E-12
3,714E+18 6,62E-18 177 2,13E-25 299792458,8 177 6,92847E-12
4,735E+18 8,441E-18 178 1,67E-25 299792458,8 178 1,12631E-11
6,037E+18 1,076E-17 179 1,31E-25 299792458,8 179 1,83096E-11
7,697E+18 1,372E-17 180 1,03E-25 299792458,8 180 2,97645E-11
9,814E+18 1,749E-17 181 8,05E-26 299792458,8 181 4,83859E-11
109
Rebelo Fernandes
1,251E+19 2,231E-17 182 6,31E-26 299792458,8 182 7,86573E-11
1,595E+19 2,844E-17 183 4,95E-26 299792458,8 183 1,27867E-10
2,034E+19 3,626E-17 184 3,88E-26 299792458,8 184 2,07864E-10
2,593E+19 4,623E-17 185 3,05E-26 299792458,8 185 3,37909E-10
3,307E+19 5,895E-17 186 2,39E-26 299792458,8 186 5,49314E-10
4,216E+19 7,516E-17 187 1,87E-26 299792458,8 187 8,92979E-10
5,375E+19 9,582E-17 188 1,47E-26 299792458,8 188 1,45165E-09
6,854E+19 1,222E-16 189 1,15E-26 299792458,8 189 2,35984E-09
8,738E+19 1,558E-16 190 9,04E-27 299792458,8 190 3,83621E-09
1,114E+20 1,986E-16 191 7,09E-27 299792458,8 191 6,23624E-09
1,421E+20 2,532E-16 192 5,56E-27 299792458,8 192 1,01378E-08
1,811E+20 3,229E-16 193 4,36E-27 299792458,8 193 1,64802E-08
2,309E+20 4,117E-16 194 3,42E-27 299792458,8 194 2,67907E-08
2,944E+20 5,249E-16 195 2,68E-27 299792458,8 195 4,35516E-08
3,754E+20 6,692E-16 196 2,1E-27 299792458,8 196 7,07985E-08
4,786E+20 8,532E-16 197 1,65E-27 299792458,8 197 1,15092E-07
6,102E+20 1,088E-15 198 1,29E-27 299792458,8 198 1,87096E-07
7,781E+20 1,387E-15 199 1,02E-27 299792458,8 199 3,04148E-07
9,920E+20 1,768E-15 200 7,96E-28 299792458,8 200 4,94431E-07
1,265E+21 2,255E-15 201 6,24E-28 299792458,8 201 8,0376E-07
1,613E+21 2,875E-15 202 4,9E-28 299792458,8 202 1,3113E-06
2,056E+21 3,665E-15 203 3,84E-28 299792458,8 203 2,08616E-06
2,622E+21 4,673E-15 204 3,01E-28 299792458,8 204 3,45707E-06
3,343E+21 5,959E-15 205 2,36E-28 299792458,8 205 5,60284E-06
4,262E+21 7,597E-15 206 1,85E-28 299792458,8 206 9,11951E-06
5,434E+21 9,687E-15 207 1,45E-28 299792458,8 207 1,48416E-05
6,928E+21 1,235E-14 208 1,14E-28 299792458,8 208 2,41399E-05
8,833E+21 1,575E-14 209 8,94E-29 299792458,8 209 3,91603E-05
1,126E+22 2,008E-14 210 7,01E-29 299792458,8 210 6,37174E-05
1,436E+22 2,56E-14 211 5,5E-29 299792458,8 211 0,000103593
1,831E+22 3,264E-14 212 4,31E-29 299792458,8 212 0,000168383
2,334E+22 4,161E-14 213 3,38E-29 299792458,8 213 0,000273705
2,976E+22 5,306E-14 214 2,65E-29 299792458,8 214 0,000444949
3,795E+22 6,765E-14 215 2,08E-29 299792458,8 215 0,000723362
4,838E+22 8,625E-14 216 1,63E-29 299792458,8 216 0,00117588
6,169E+22 1,1E-13 217 1,28E-29 299792458,8 217 0,001911521
7,865E+22 1,402E-13 218 1E-29 299792458,8 218 0,003107429
1,003E+23 1,788E-13 219 7,88E-30 299792458,8 219 0,005051553
1,279E+23 2,279E-13 220 6,18E-30 299792458,8 220 0,008211911
1,630E+23 2,906E-13 221 4,85E-30 299792458,8 221 0,013349533
2,079E+23 3,705E-13 222 3,8E-30 299792458,8 222 0,021701336
2,650E+23 4,724E-13 223 2,98E-30 299792458,8 223 0,035278261
3,379E+23 6,023E-13 224 2,34E-30 299792458,7 224 0,057349265
4,308E+23 7,68E-13 225 1,83E-30 299792458,7 225 0,09322834
110
Rebelo Fernandes
5,493E+23 9,792E-13 226 1,44E-30 299792458,6 226 0,151554286
7,003E+23 1,248E-12 227 1,13E-30 299792458,6 227 0,246370435
8,929E+23 1,592E-12 228 8,85E-31 299792458,4 228 0,40050596
1,138E+24 2,03E-12 229 6,94E-31 299792458,1 229 0,651072443
1,452E+24 2,588E-12 230 5,44E-31 299792457,7 230 1,058399677
1,851E+24 3,299E-12 231 4,27E-31 299792457,1 231 1,720561028
2,360E+24 4,207E-12 232 3,35E-31 299792456 232 2,796986938
3,009E+24 5,363E-12 233 2,63E-31 299792454,3 233 4,546851754
3,836E+24 6,838E-12 234 2,06E-31 299792451,4 234 7,391475677
4,891E+24 8,719E-12 235 1,62E-31 299792446,8 235 12,01576704
6,236E+24 1,112E-11 236 1,27E-31 299792439,3 236 19,53312951
7,951E+24 1,417E-11 237 9,93E-32 299792427 237 31,7535392
1,014E+25 1,807E-11 238 7,79E-32 299792407,2 238 51,61933517
1,292E+25 2,304E-11 239 6,11E-32 299792374,9 239 83,9136501
1,648E+25 2,938E-11 240 4,79E-32 299792322,4 240 136,4120439
2,101E+25 3,746E-11 241 3,76E-32 299792237 241 221,7546079
2,679E+25 4,776E-11 242 2,95E-32 299792098,3 242 360,4892506
3,416E+25 6,089E-11 243 2,31E-32 299791872,8 243 586,0187951
4,355E+25 7,763E-11 244 1,81E-32 299791506,2 244 952,6427261
5,552E+25 9,898E-11 245 1,42E-32 299790910,2 245 1548,629056
7,079E+25 1,262E-10 246 1,12E-32 299789941,3 246 2517,461635
9,026E+25 1,609E-10 247 8,75E-33 299788366,4 247 4092,373323
1,151E+26 2,052E-10 248 6,86E-33 299785806,3 248 6652,465544
1,467E+26 2,616E-10 249 5,38E-33 299781644,9 249 10813,88889
1,871E+26 3,335E-10 250 4,22E-33 299774880,9 250 17577,9399
2,385E+26 4,252E-10 251 3,31E-33 299763887,3 251 28571,47097
3,041E+26 5,422E-10 252 2,6E-33 299746022 252 46436,8097
3,878E+26 6,913E-10 253 2,04E-33 299716995,5 253 75463,25616
4,944E+26 8,813E-10 254 1,6E-33 299669851,4 254 122607,4307
6,304E+26 1,124E-09 255 1,25E-33 299593323,2 255 199135,6054
8,037E+26 1,433E-09 256 9,85E-34 299469208,2 256 323250,647
1,025E+27 1,827E-09 257 7,74E-34 299268208 257 524250,7981
1,307E+27 2,329E-09 258 6,08E-34 298943456,6 258 849002,2472
1,666E+27 2,97E-09 259 4,79E-34 298420729,9 259 1371728,879
2,124E+27 3,786E-09 260 3,77E-34 297584349 260 2208109,823
2,708E+27 4,827E-09 261 2,99E-34 296258598 261 3533860,83
3,453E+27 6,155E-09 262 2,38E-34 294187233 262 5605225,776
4,402E+27 7,848E-09 263 1,9E-34 291019814,5 263 8772644,293
5,613E+27 1,001E-08 264 1,54E-34 286322952,6 264 13469506,21
7,156E+27 1,276E-08 265 1,27E-34 279640116,9 265 20152341,88
9,124E+27 1,627E-08 266 1,06E-34 270608880,5 266 29183578,3
1,163E+28 2,074E-08 267 9,09E-35 259100076 267 40692382,81
1,483E+28 2,644E-08 268 7,95E-35 245301736 268 54490722,77
1,891E+28 3,371E-08 269 7,12E-35 229690345,4 269 70102113,39
111
Rebelo Fernandes
2,411E+28 4,298E-08 270 6,49E-35 212908447,4 270 86884011,41
Porto, 2/3/ 2010.
112
Rebelo Fernandes

Physics To XXI Century I - Revised 05/2011

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Physics To XXI Century I - Revised 05/2011

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PHYSICS

(PICTURE AUTHOR: REBELO FERNANDES)

José Luís Pereira Rebelo Fernandes

Engineer - Course of the Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto

Birth: Angola- Africa, 1957/01/29

Residence: Rua São João de Brito nº 491, 1º DTº

4100-454 Porto – Portugal

To my wife and daughter, your love, my encouragement.

boarded subjects in this document.

The gravitation variable. Page 4

Relativity NBS (Not Bend Space). Page 23

I General relativity inferred from the Universal gravitational potential. Page 24

III Critical analysis of Einstein's relativity principles Page 44

IV The new principles of relativity NBS ( No Bend Space) Page 58

The new permeability of vacuum variable. Page 60

The age and radius of the Universe. Page 71

mass in each field. Page 74

The new relativistic Doppler effect. Page 85

Rotational platforms. Transmission of electromagnetic signals. Page 93

The velocity of the photons. "Quantum foam" Page 96

Radius of elementary particles and photons. Page 100

universe and the laws govern.

The universal gravitational potential

constancy in all directions.

This is the constant C found in the energy matter.

We are therefore in the presence of a maximum local escape potential.

velocity of propagation constant in all directions.

We will therefore have a local escape potential universal given by:

Because we are considering universal escape potential we in universal terms:

The density of universal potential energy

radiation that reaches the site at present.

After all we have a variable and not a "constant" gravitational Universal.

2 – In a satellite 20,200 km height,  :

 – Mass of the Earth

" – Radius of the Earth

The local Universe

(http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/ApolloLaser.html) obtained as measured since 1969, ie

-Then try to understand why the removal is a constant value.

Universal terms then we have where (u) denotes universal.

 , Universal mass / energy, is constant for all time.

C, will also be constant.

phenomena about which we began our approach.

proportion to the increase in variable universal gravitational Local, G.

Since the universal mass / energy is constant for all time:

generating the masses radiation that reaches the local at present.

conclusion of a consistent radial homogeneity of the universe.

The local gravitational potential

to the increase in variable universal gravitational Local.

The mass-generating field is the same in consecutive years

they are from the Sun

before the removal of 3.8 cm per year relative to the Earth.

Two notes must be excluded from what we have just read:

when released from the planet.

The local gravitational potentials are constant.

The centers of mass move away in proportion to the increase of G.

moon relative to Earth.

What is the growth rate of the universe?

For a radius anywhere in the local universe i:

We talk about mass radiation. But what are their characteristics?

In local gravity have mass radiation, although is controlled.

Is this radiation mass subject to gravity?

bend under the action of local gravity.

The universe will grow at the speed of Light.

2 – In a satellite 20,200 km height, :

– Mass of the Earth

" – Radius of the Earth

, Universal mass / energy, is constant for all time.

1' = 1 /01'

Since, " the radius of the universe:

H - Can only be a factor controlling the radiation of gravitational mass location.

If we think in universal terms, so perhaps we will be able to understand the nature of H .

H - Not more than the gravitational permeability of vacuum.

", = " (1+ )