Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment 1
SURNAME: Onder
GIVEN NAME: Michal
STUDENT NUMBER: u4798498
SUBJECT: ENGN8005 - Operations Management
WORD COUNT: 3056
u4798498
1
Question 1:
a) Productivity can be expressed as
0nits piouuceu
Laboui houis useu
in our case
boxes
houis
= 3 boxes per labour
hour.
b)
Tracking signal is calculated as
Where RSFE (running sum of the forecast errors) is calculated as
Fig 1, Sales of music stands and forecast.
MAD should be as low as possible and there is desire to try several smoothing coefficients to
determine lowest MAD.
Tracking signal should be in predefined range. It is not recommended use range higher than 8
MADs. If the tracking signal is higher or lower than this value, it indicates problem with forecasting
method or some error in calculation or input data error.
Fig 2, Tracking signal of forecast error.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
actual demand
forecast
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
M
A
D
Tracking signal
u4798498
7
Question 13:
a) Ridership for summer months in London subway is plotted below;
Fig 3, Ridership in London subway.
It can be seen linear relationship between number of tourists and sold tickets in subway.
b) In order to be able to analyse and predict future ridership it can be used least square method
to obtain linear regression model. It can be expressed by following equation,
= a + bx
where constant a and b are calculated from given data.
a = and b=
= 1796
b = (352.9 - 12*11*2.26)/(1796 12*11*11) = 0.159
a = 2.26 0.159*11 = 0.506
thus, = 0.506 + 0.159x
Detailed calculation and table of data is in appendix.
c) Ridership for 10 million visitors can be calculated by substituting 10 into given equation,
Y = 0.506 + 0.159*10 = 2.096 or 2.1 million.
y = 0.1593x + 0.506
R = 0.8403
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0 5 10 15 20 25
Ridership
Linear (Ridership)
u4798498
8
d) If there are no tourist, the ridership can be calculated by adding 0 to equation, thus
y = 0.506
This represents hypothetical ridership only by residents of London. The relevancy of this
number would be hard to determine as the function of ridership can be distorted when
number of tourists is low. It is only safe to use obtain equation in a range between 2 million
and slightly beyond 20 million tourists.
e) Standard error of estimate represents accuracy of regression estimate. It represents error
from depended variable (ridership) to regression line. In other words, this value can be seen
as a range for estimated value. It can be calculated as:
S
y,x
=
= 0.407
f) Correlation coefficient (r or R) expresses the degree of strength of linear relationship. It can
also be calculated coefficient of determination R
2
. This represents how many percent of
variable y is explained by linear regression.
r =
= 0.917
r
2
= 0.840
It is clear that there is strong positive linear relationship and around 84% of data is explained
by linear regression.
Question 14:
Dear John,
I reviewed and analysed given data and applied standard managerial tools to assess current situation and
to develop tools for better planning and prediction of future demands.
Firstly, I analysed each year separately to identify any seasonal patterns. From figure below it is clear that
every year there were several peaks and troughs. This should help us in better prediction of future
demands month by month.
Fig 4, Historic number of orders of phone cases in 2000-2002.
December, January & July peak times
February, April & August troughs
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
2000
2001
2002
u4798498
9
Secondly, I analysed average demand over three years. It can be seen that apart from seasonal variations
overall demand was constantly growing in all three years. There is clear trend over the period of time.
This will help us to predict overall demand in next year as well as in years to come.
Thirdly, I have analysed seasonal patterns and trends to develop model for prediction of demands month
by month in coming year. This model is accurate just over couple of months. However it is possible to
adjust it every month with actual demand to get a new prediction.
Main report:
Average demand for next year can be calculated by averaging of previous years and by analysing of this
data in order to find linear relationship. It is clear from graph that this relationship is almost exact line. I
have applied a linear regression (method of least squares) to obtain formula for prediction of next year
demand.
Fig 5, Average number of orders of phone cases in 2000-2002.
Average demand for 2003 = a + bx = 401.36+4*68.292 = 675 cases.
Please note that number 4 represents year 2003.
This is however average demand for whole year and does not consider seasonal demands. We could use
this for prediction for overall planning of resources.
To be able to predict demand month by month I have utilised seasonal time series forecast method which
consists of trend projection and seasonal adjustment for each month. This is called multiplicative seasonal
model. This method uses seasonal indexes which are calculated from past data per each month.
The way how it works is following.
y Firstly we calculate average demand for each year.
y Secondly we calculate average demand for each month from past data for all years.
y Thirdly we divide each average month demand by overall average demand.
This will create index per each month. This index represents by how much is demand different from
average whole year demand. In next step we will multiply already computed predicted demand for next
year by seasonal indexes to obtain prediction of number of orders per each month.
y = 68.292x + 401.36
R = 0.9939
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 1 2 3 4
Number of orders
Linear (Number of
orders)
u4798498
10
I have also used another technique called exponential smoothing with trend adjustment for comparison
and proofing of the first method. This method can also be used for prediction of future demands.
Fig 6, Orders of phone cases in 2000-2002 and predicted demand in 2003.
Horizontal axis denotes to number of months from January 2000 to December 2003
I have also created tool for analysing of forecasting model. This tool is using MAD (Mean Absolute
Deviation) and tracking signal to assess relevancy of model. Tracking signal should be in range 2 MADs,
however it is acceptable for variation up to 8 MAD.
This will help us to control quality of prediction model and make adjustments accordingly.
Fig 7, Tracking signal of forecast error.
Detailed calculations and tables of data are attached in appendix.
I believe this report give you comprehensive view of current situation and future predictions.
Should you have any query do not hesitate to discuss this matter after holidays.
y = 5.2484x + 440.85
R = 0.7621
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Past demands
Predicted demands
forecast trend
forecast demand
Linear (Past demands)
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
M
A
D
Tracking signal
u4798498
11
References:
[1] Heizer J., Render B., Operations Management, 8
th
revised edition, Pearson education, 2007.
[2] Warrack B., Keller G., Statistics for management and economics, 6
th
revised edition, Thomson,
2003.