Table 1A.

Age of the Respondents

Cumulative Frequency 18 and below above 18 Total 25 55 80 Percent 31.2 68.8 100.0 Valid Percent 31.2 68.8 100.0 Percent 31.2 100.0

Interpretation: Table 1A is the distribution of age of the respondents. It shows that out of 80 respondents, 31.2% are 18 and below while 68.8% are above 18 years old. Analysis:

Table 1B. Gender of the Respondents

Cumulative Frequency Female Male Total 54 26 80 Percent 67.5 32.5 100.0 Valid Percent 67.5 32.5 100.0 Percent 67.5 100.0

Interpretation: Same as table 1A Table 1C. Year Level of the Respondents

Cumulative Frequency Third Year Fourth Year Total 40 40 80 Percent 50.0 50.0 100.0 Valid Percent 50.0 50.0 100.0 Percent 50.0 100.0

Interpretation: Same as table 1A Basis of interpretation: If the value of the mean is: Below 1.80 strongly disagree 1.80 2.59 disagree 2.60 3.39 fairly agree 3.40 4.19 agree 4.20 and above strongly agree Table 2A. Descriptive Statistics of Toilet Practice of the Respondents
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation

I flush the toilet after using. I use dipper since there is no available toilet flush. I wash my hands using available soap and water. I use hand sanitizer because there is no available soap and water.

80 80

2 1

5 5

4.58 3.79

.632 1.240

Strongly agree Agree

80

3.84

1.195

Agree

agree 80 1 5 4.14 1.088

Interpretation: Table 2A is the summary of descriptive statistics of toilet practice of the respondents. Respondents are strongly agree that they flush the toilet after using with a mean of 4.58 and they agree on the following; they use dipper when there is no available flush, wash hands using available soap and water and on they use hand sanitizer because there is no available soap and water with a mean value between 3.40 to 4.19. Analysis:

Table 2B. Descriptive Statistics of Throwing Garbage Practice of the Respondents

N I dispose my garbage properly in the available trash bin. I place my garbage on my bag because there is no available trash bin. I throw my garbage anywhere. 80 1 5 2.14 1.290 Disagree 80 1 5 3.51 1.253 Fairly agree 80 1 5 4.40 .908 Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation Strongly agree

Analysis: Table 2B is the descriptive statistics of throwing garbage practice of the respondents. It shows that respondents strongly agree that they throw garbage properly in the available trash bin with a mean of 4.40. respondents fairly agree that they place their garbage on their bag in case there is no available trash bin with a mean of 3.51. Whereas, respondents disagree that they throw garbage anywhere with a mean of 2.14. Analysis: Table 2C. Descriptive Statistics of Drinking Water Practice of the Respondents
N I drink water on the available purified water fountain. I am sure that the water on the drinking fountain is safe. 80 Minimum 1 Maximum 5 Mean 3.17 Std. Deviation 1.348 Interpretation Fairly agree

80

2.90

1.279

Fairly agree

I drink 8-10 glasses of water a day.

80

3.49

1.191

Agree

Interpretation: Pls see interpretation of table 2A and 2B for reference Analysis:

Table 2D. Descriptive Statistics of Toilet Practice of the Respondents

N I eat foods from the cafeteria. I find the foods in the cafeteria safe to eat. I cook my own food. 80 80 80 Minimum 1 2 1 Maximum 5 5 5 Mean 4.10 4.30 3.05 Std. Deviation .976 .770 1.431 Interpretation Agree Strongly agree

Fairly agree

Interpretation: Pls see interpretation of table 2A and 2B for reference Analysis:

Facilities Table 3A. Descriptive Statistics on Toilet Facilities of the Respondents

N There is available water for flushing. There is an available soap and water in toilet. 80 Minimum 1 Maximum 5 Mean 3.60 Std. Deviation 1.208 Interpretation Agree

80

2.72

1.263

Fairly agree

Interpretation: Pls see interpretation of table 2A and 2B for reference Analysis:

Table 3B. Descriptive Statistics on Garbage Disposal Facilities of the Respondents

N There is an available trash bin within the campus. 80 Minimum 1 Maximum 5 Mean 4.18 Std. Deviation .911 Interpretation Agree

Interpretation: Pls see interpretation of table 2A and 2B for reference Analysis:

Table 3C. Descriptive Statistics on Drinking Water Facilities of the Respondents

N There is an available water fountain around the campus. 80 Minimum 1 Maximum 5 Mean 3.02 Std. Deviation 1.263 Interpretation Fairly agree

Interpretation: Pls see interpretation of table 2A and 2B for reference Analysis:

Table 3D. Descriptive Statistics on Food and Eating Facilities of the Respondents
N There are available healthy foods in the cafeteria. 80 Minimum 1 Maximum 5 Mean 4.43 Std. Deviation .792 Interpretation Strongly agree

Interpretation: Pls see interpretation of table 2A and 2B for reference Analysis:

Relationship. Table 4A. Correlation of Toilet Facilities and Toilet Practice of the Respondents
Toilet Facilities Toilet Practice Mean Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N .311
**

Interpretation

.005 80

Significant

Interpretation:

Table 4A is the correlation between school toilet facilities and toilet practice of the respondents. It shows that there is a significant relationship between them with a correlation coefficient of 0.311 and a p-value of 0.005. Results suggest that the better the toilet facilities the better the toilet practice of the respondents. Analysis:

Table 4B. Correlation of Garbage Disposal Facilities and Garbage Disposal Practice of the Respondents
There is an available trash bin within the campus. Garbage Disposal Practice Mean Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N .240
*

Interpretation

.032 80

Significant

Interpretation: Interpretation is the same as interpretation of table 4A that there is significant relationship between garbage disposal practice and availability of trash bin with a coefficient value of 0.240 and p-value of 0.032. this suggest that availability of trash bin is related to better disposal practice of the respondents

Table 4C. Correlation of Drinking Water Facilities and Drinking Water Practice of the Respondents
There is an available water fountain around the campus. Drinking Water Practice Mean Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N .486
**

interpretation

.000 80

Significant

Interpretation: There is a significant relationship between drinking water practice and availability of fountain around the campus. Pls modify this is the essence of the table Analysis:

Table 4D. Correlation of Food and Eating Facilities and Practice of the Respondents
Correlations There are available healthy foods in the cafeteria. Food and Eating Practice Mean Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N .557
**

Interpretation

.000 80

Significant

Interpretation: There is a significant relationship between food and eating practice and availability of food in the cafeteria