Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8 NO.4
VOL.4
Ellen F. Goldman
At the Top
Please note that gray areas reflect artwork that has been intentionally removed. The substantive content of the article appears as originally published.
Leadership
The data showed that strategic thinking arises from 10 specific types of experiences for instance, spearheading a major growth initiative or dealing with a threat to organizational survival. Moreover, executives appear to gain their expertise in strategic thinking through one of three developmental patterns. These findings help demystify the process by which strategic thinking is learned, offering important implications for management development and the practice of strategy.
thinking and strategy making are all synonymous, at least in best practice.4 To avoid any confusion, my study used the following definition: Strategic thinking is a distinctive management activity whose pur-pose is to discoverstrategic novel, imaginative strategies which can rewrite the rules of
Ellen F. Goldman is a visiting assistant professor of human and organizational learning in the Graduate School of Education and Human Development at George Washington University. She is also the principal of Growth Partners, a Reston, Virginia-based consul-tancy that specializes in strategic thinking. Comment on this article or contact the author through smrfeedback@mit.edu.
Expertise in thinking is not the product of innate ability and pure serendipity. It arises from specific experiences (personal, interpersonal, organizational and external) which occur over 10 or more years.
Ellen F. Goldman
75
Leadership
the competitive game; and to envision potential futures signifi-cantlymost falling somewhere in the middle. It should be noted, howdifferent from the present.5 Furthermore, strategic thinking wasever, that even the individual with the strongest pronature view specified as being conceptual, systems-oriented, directional (linkingfelt that experiences were still necessary to develop a persons
strategic thinking ability. And most participants felt that without the future with the past) and opportunistic.6 A related question is whether strategic thinking is an innate skillsome hard-wiring, learning to think strategically would be more or one that can be acquired. This question is at the heart of everydifficult but not impossible. discussion of individual abilities. But even those leadership theorists
who believe in inherent mental processing capabilities7 note that suchTen Contributing Experiences abilities must be enhanced as part of management development. MyThe study identified 10 experiences that contributed to the devel-opment study was concerned with identifying the ex-periences thatof a persons ability to think strategically, and those experiences contributed to the development of expertise in strategic thinking, notrepresented four levels of interaction: personal, in-terpersonal, with measuring any levels of cognitive functioning. As such, theorganizational and external. (See Ten Experiences That Contribute to nature-versus-nurture argument was moot to this research.the Ability to Think Strategically.) Every ex-ecutive did not benefit Interestingly, the study participants volun-teered views that spannedfrom all 10 experiences, and no two executives had the same set of the nature/nurture spectrum, with experiences. But each individual
2. 3. 4. 5.
I. Seidman, Interviewing As Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. (New York: Teachers College Press, 1998). C.M. Fiol and A.S. Huff, Maps For Managers: Where Are We? Where Do We Go From Here? Journal of Management Studies 29, no. 3 (May 1992): 267-285. C. Moustakas, Phenomenological Research Methods (Thousand Oak, California: Sage Publications, 1994). Y.S. Lincoln and E.G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry (Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, 1985).
sloanreview.mit.edu
described at least one experience at Ten Experiences That Contribute to the Ability to Think Strategically each of the four levels of interaction. Family Upbringing/Education Family
upExpertise in strategic thinking arises from the contributions of 10 experiences that can be grouped into four levels of interaction: personal, interpersonal, organizational and external. Every executive in the research study did not benefit from all 10 experiences, but each individual reported at least one experience at each of the four levels of interaction.
bringing and education are grouped together because the study participants discussed them interchangeably; the two types of experiences typically occurred simultaneously, reinforcing one another. One aspect noted was the value of exploring different perspectives, for example, through travel and
Level of Interaction
Personal
Experience
Family Upbringing/Education General Work Experiences
the Socratic method. General Work Experiences The participants cited experience in a variety of organizational types and locations, which provided exposure to numerous strategic issues and familiarity with a breadth of strategies. The most impor-
Organizational
External
tant factor here was the responsibility for significant projects (for example, implementing the merger of two organizations, evaluating a business for sale or turning around an organization that was facing bankruptcy) and the freedom to make most, if not all, of the decisions related to those initiatives. Becoming a CEO This experience is somewhat paradoxical.
Many
tions vice president of planning. In general, the interactions were private and spontaneous, with a wide range in tone from relaxed, informal conversations to highly aggressive, confrontational exchanges. Monitoring Results/Benchmarking participants cited the The
im-
boards want individuals who already have expertise in strategic thinking as their CEOs. But many of the study participants cited becoming a CEO as important to the development of their strategic thinking because, with that promotion, they gained access to important information (for instance, the views of important external parties) which enabled a big picture view of their business. [Note: All the individuals that the study identified as experts in strategic thinking were CEOs, even though this attribute was not a criterion in the selection process.] Being Mentored Many executives have mentors, but not all
men-
portance of their involvement in monitoring the operational and market performance of their organizations. Such efforts were usually extensive and fairly sophisticated. Market data, for example, were often segmented by geography and demographics, with information on purchaser preferences and use, and views of competitors detailed by the various market segments. Other key data tracked each market segments stated preferences in relation to the actual behavior of those customers. Doing Strategic Planning development of strategic thinking The
tors help others to develop their strategic thinking. Those who do are individuals who are in frequent contact with the executive (at least once daily), providing immediate feedback. Moreover, their influence starts early in an executives career, within a few years
ability is enhanced by participation in strategic planning processes with three characteristics. The first is having planning sessions with management teams on a regular basis, often monthly or quarterly. The second is preparation for these sessions, such as the required reading of materials that help focus peoples
think-
ing and provide a sense of the meetings purpose. The third is the formal output of the planning process: often an overall plan foll Being Challenged By a Key Colleague Colleagues played an impor- owed by business-unit goals and tactical plans. But even less tant role by challenging the thinking of the executives. structured output establishing a general direction and imIndividuals performing this role worked very closely with the mediate next steps, for example can help develop an executives executive, for example, as his boss, board chairman or organiza- strategic thinking.
sloanreview.mit.edu SUMMER 2007 MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW 77
Leadership
years with a wide range of frequency: The interaction could occur monthly for a few hours, quarterly for one day or three days twice annually. In many cases, the regular contact is enhanced by small group interactions and social time, for example, a monthly pro-fessional meeting of CEOs that includes sessions in which people break into smaller groups (perhaps geared toward specific topics) followed by dinner with ample time for networking opportuni-ties. The study participants also noted the benefit of vicarious experiences gained through indirect means, such as by reading business publications. Generally speaking, each of the 10 experiences took place over a significant period of time, often in excess of one year, and re-quired considerable responsibility on the part of the executive
usually the individual had to perform tasks that were materially new to him. Some of the experiences catalyzed others, but they did not occur in any specific order (except for the obvious categories of family upbringing/education, being mentored, and becoming a CEO).
In addition to the 10 experiences, the study identified two other important factors. The first was personal characteristics, specifically, being methodical, balanced, goal-oriented, curious, receptive to criticism, detail-oriented, a perfectionist and a mav-erick. The second was a supportive work environment, including the presence of a strong management team that frees up the CEOs time to focus on strategic issues and contributes to his thinking. Also of impor-tance was the attitude of the board, particularly regarding failure. As one executive explained, When you do make a mistake, theyre worried about fixing the problem, not fixing the blame. Neither of these factors is sufficient to develop strategic thinking ability without the requisite experiences described earlier, but they may amplify the value of those experiences. Avid Alone Time
Past Colleagues
Planning
Natural
Retreats
which can best be understood throughinto how expertise in strategic graphic maps that were created with thethinking is acquired. participants, provide valu-able insights
Boss Data
Monitoring
Mentors
Where
Problems/ Complaints
Use Past
Successes
Going?
(Vision)
(Models) Community Views General Business Knowledge (Standards) Sense of Ownership Beta Methodical Thinker
Mistakes
(Implementation)
Is Execution Efficient?
Pattern 1 The first pattern reflects a repetitive process of using past experiences toand the repeated application of the three consider alternative perspectives. (See Pat-tern 1: The Development of steps, no matter how big or small the Understanding.) One executive described the process this way: Theres a solution toissue, with expertise in strategic thinking every prob-lem, and if you cant come up with it, you need to look at the problem acquired after years of honing the from a different angle. The key ingredient here is a natu-ral curiosity that fuels the practice.
executives search for greater understanding, thus expanding his ability to think strategically. The result: The executive learns to see all sides of an issue and is able to Pattern 3 The final developmental pattern is alter the angle from which he views a problem to search for a better solution. In thisportrayed as the tackling of bigger and bigger manner through the exploration of different perspectives repeatedly over time business challenges, with the execu-tives ability to think strategically growing the executive develops expertise in strategic thinking.
continuously over time. (See Pattern 3: The Pattern 2 This pattern includes the three major steps of a logical planning processCompletion of a Hierarchy of Chal-lenges, p. understanding where you are, determining where you want to be and detailing how80.) Key features include modest initial to get there with each step informed by information, experience (both actual and activity followed by a step-like progression. vi-carious) and discussion. (See Pattern 2: The Practice of Rational Planning.) Key The catalysts to movement can be ei-ther positive or negative: opportunities to build features include the use of data to fuel thinking new services as well as pressures from financial losses, takeover attempts and other
challenges to survival. Expertise in thinking strategically is acquired by meeting andand how the ex-ecutives approached those effectively dealing with the challenges, with each experience improving the executivesexperiences (namely, by considering different ability. perspectives, by using a planning model or by The three patterns reflect how executives described the ways in which they learned tojust divthink strategically. They illustrate both what occurred (specifically, the 10 experiences)
sloanreview.mit.edu REVIEW 79 SUMMER 2007 MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT
Leadership
New Boss Scenario Evaluation Executive Payment Change Doing a Master Plan Evaluating an Acquisition Team and Mentored Observation Community Dialogu e Dialogue with External Parties Trade Organizations Education
Being
General Experience
Board Interactions
Consultants Questions
must be highly individual because no two people will absorb the same experience in exactly the same way. ing in and doing what was needed). TheNevertheless, some general salient point here is that all theguidelines do apply. Experiexecutives in the study described theirences that contribute most to development in a manner that wasthe development of strategic consistent with one of the three patterns. thinking tend to take place over a year or more and Improving Strategic require significant Thinking responsibility on the part of The study results have a number ofthe individual usu-ally the implications for companies in theirperformance of a task that is efforts to improve the strategicmaterially new to that person. thinking of their execu-tives. TheMoreover, its crucial to important thing to remember, though,remember that the developis that any development programment of expertise in strategic
thinking takes at least a decade, during which time many of those experiences must be continu-ally repeated. With all this in mind, the Include Strategic Thinking As a following approaches should benefit companies in their efforts to developFormal Component of the stra-tegic thinking of theirManagement Development Programs One of the most remarkable managers.
findings of the
study was the tacit expectation that an executive would, all of a sudden, think strategically upon becoming a CEO. But, clearly, if companies want expertise in strategic thinking they must take the necessary steps to nurture this ability. Management development programs should identify specific experiences (spearheading a growth initiative, for instance) and target their inclusion in the careers of high-potential executives. Although individual in na-ture, such experiences should, taken together, cross all four levels of interaction: personal, interpersonal, organizational and environmental. Moreover, each experience should contain the necessary attributes (being mentored, for example, must include frequent contact and immediate feedback). Finally, the experi-ences should be preceded by a briefing on strategy theory and vocabulary (if needed) to ensure that the executive understands key concepts that will help him obtain the maximum benefits from those experiences.
Require Executives to Develop the Strategic Thinking of Their Subordinates Because strategic
thinking develops gradually over a
long period of time, and because general work experiences and being mentored are two important experiences during this growth,business schools and others interested in management superiors are in a key position to influence their sub-ordinates education and development have vigorously debated how best to development. As such, companies should include thisteach strategy to future leaders. Some experts have ques-tioned responsibility as a part of an executives performance re-view:whether the topic should be taught at all or at least whether it What projects and roles have you given your subordinates toshould be taught to managers. Often missing from the debate, develop their strategic thinking? Are these assignments ofhowever, has been any in-depth discussion of how individuals sufficient size, and have your subordinates been given the requi-learn to think strategically in the first place. What specific site freedom to act? And have your efforts resulted in noticeable experiences are important and how do they contribute? Moreover, improvements in their strategic thinking, however subjectivelywhat are the different ways in which people absorb those determined? experiences to develop the ability to think strategically? Without adequate answers to these questions, its no wonder that schools have had trouble teaching strategy to students and that many Activities These two experiences contribute significantly to imcompanies have difficulty developing the strategic thinking of portant procedural knowledge related to strategic thinking. Without thistheir executives.
Encourage Early Participation in Strategic Planning and Benchmarking
knowledge, executives can waste considerable time by attempting strategy development or implementation in inef-ficient or inappropriate REFERENCES ways. Of course, companies will find it impractical for all their managers 1. J. Mason, Developing Strategic Thinking, Long Range to be involved in every strategic planning activity. Nevertheless, Planning 19, no. 3 (June 1986): 72-80; N.B. Zabriskie and A.B. executives can also be encouraged to participate in strategic planning Huellmantel, Develop-ing Strategic Thinking in Senior with other organizations, for example, with subsidiaries, professional Management, Long Range Planning 24, no. 6 (December 1991): 25-32; I. Bonn, Developing Strategic Thinking As a Core associations, community groups or small, local businesses.
Competency, Management Decision 39, no. 1 (2001): 63-71; and E. Essery, Reflecting On Leadership, Works Management 55, no. 7 (2002): 54-57. M. Easterby-Smith and J. Davies, Developing Strategic Thinking, Long Range Planning 16, no. 4 (August 1983): 39-48; D.L. Bates and J.E. Dillard, Generating Strategic Thinking Through Multi-Level Teams, Long Range Planning 26, no. 5 (October 1993): 103-110; and P.M. Senge, Mental Models, Planning Review 20, no. 2 (March/April 1992): 4-10, 44.
E.F. Goldman, Becoming an Expert Strategic Thinker: The Learning Journey of Healthcare CEOs (Ph.D. diss., George Washington Univer-sity Graduate School of Education and Human Development, 2005), Dissertation Abstracts International UMI No. 3181551.
3.
Companies should hold strategic planning sessions on a regular basis Busi-ness Review 72, no. 1 (January 1994): 107-114. (monthly or quarterly, for example), and those meetings should have 5. L. Heracleous, Strategic Thinking or Strategic Planning? a high degree of process regularity, with an emphasis on preparation: Long Range Planning 31, no. 3 (June 1998): 481-486. reviewing materials and thinking about specific questions that are 6. H. Mintzberg, Patterns in Strategy Formation, Management provided in advance. In addition, the meet-ings should include Science 24, no. 9 (May 1978): 934-948; P. Hanford, Developing Director and Ex-ecutive Competencies in Strategic Thinking, in B. content that expands peoples perspectives (for example, comparative Garratt (ed.) market information from another industry or the viewpoint of a Developing Strategic Thought: Rediscovering the Art of Directionconstituency that is seldom heard). During these sessions, the Giving (London: McGraw-Hill, 1995): 157-186; and J.M. Liedtka, company should ensure that the participants (not the planning staff orStrategic Thinking: Can It Be Taught? Long Range Planning 31, no. 1 outside consultants) perform the information synthesis and(February 1998): 120-129. interpretation. After all, the firm wants to develop the strategic 7. E. Jacques and S.D. Clement, Executive Leadership: A Practical Guide to Managing Complexity (Arlington, Virginia: thinking of the partici-pants and not necessarily that of the staff or Cason Hall & Co., 1991). consultants. Staff members could, however, provide valuable input into manage-
4.
ment development plans, because they might be able to identify Reprint 48418. specific aspects of strategic thinking that are lacking in indi-Copyright Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007. All rights reserved. vidual executives.
sloanreview.mit.edu SUMMER 2007 MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW 81
PDFs Reprints Permission to Copy Back Issues Electronic copies of MIT Sloan Management Review articles as well as traditional reprints and back issues can be purchased on our Web site: sloanreview.mit.edu or you may order through our Business Service Center (9 a.m.-5 p.m. ET) at the phone numbers listed below.
To reproduce or transmit one or more MIT Sloan Management Review articles by electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying or archiving in any information storage or retrieval system) requires written permission. To request permission, use our Web site ( sloanreview.mit.edu), call or e-mail:
Toll-free in U.S. and Canada: 877-727-7170 International: 617-253-7170 Fax: 617-258-9739 e-mail: smrpermissions@mit.edu MIT Sloan Management Review 77 Massachusetts Ave., E60-100 Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 email: smr-orders@mit.edu
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.