Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com>
Hon'ble Chief Justice of India is requested to kindly intervene - "8 Chief Justices of India corrupt, says former Law Minister" Vs "Finance min asked to probe former CJIs (Shri K G Balakrishnan) assets"
1 message
Bcc: Cabinet Secretary to Government of India <cabinetsy@nic.in>, riseindiarise@googlegroups.com, Vaghela B D <vaghelabd@yahoo.com>, Chairperson NHRC <chairnhrc@nic.in>, cmup@up.nic.in, Prashant Bhushan <prashantbhush@gmail.com>, letters@washpost.com, bmfeedback@indiatimes.com, chairperson@nac.nic.in, Manmohan Singh <manmohan@sansad.nic.in>, Finance Minister <fm@finance.nic.in>, Union Home Minister New Delhi <hm@nic.in>, "MR. VEERAPPA MOILY" <vmoily@kar.nic.in>, Smt Sushma Swaraj <sushmaswaraj@hotmail.com>, Arun Jaitley <ajaitley@sansad.nic.in>, Meira Kumar Speaker Lok Sabha Parliament <speakerloksabha@sansad.nic.in>, Hon'ble Vice President of India <vpindia@sansad.nic.in>, Smt Pratibha Patil President of India <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>
Respected Sir,
In the light of the above, I find that the action of the high level Union Govt functionaries to investigate into the complaint against Shri K G Balakrishnan is highly discretionary, ill-intentioned and simply atrocious when:
1.
Govt is knowingly not investigating into the serious allegations against other 6 Chief Justice of India for the reasons best known to Dr Manmohan Singh PM of UPA-II Govt, Shri Pranab Mukherjee Union FM and Shri P Chidambaram Union HM. Dr Manmohan Singh as PM & Shri Arun Jaitely and Smt Sushma Swaraj as other Committee Members with full knowledge about Shri K G Balakrishnan background selected him as NHRC Chairperson. However, no action is taken against the PM and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament for committing the blunder.
2.
3.
In the light of the foregoing, in larger public interest of stopping illegal, unethical and corrupt practices of the UPA Govt functionaries with main Opposition in the Parliament maintaining silence and thereby giving tacit approval, I hereby pray the Chief Justice of India to:
1.
Take Suo Moto action to restrain Union Govt & its instrumentalities from any investigation only against Shri K G Balakrishnan till the time the case filed
by Shri Shanti Bhushan, reportedly joined by his son Shri Prashant Bhushan, with the contention "8 Chief Justice of India out 16 corrupt", is finalised by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
2.
Take Suo Moto action to seek explanation of the PM, HM & FM of UPAII Govt for knowingly acting in partisan manner.
Any other relief as deemed fit in the interest of justice and to control the criminal abuse of discretionary power by the PM,
3.
HM & FM of UPA-II Govt to single out and harass one CJI after appointing him as NHRC Head.
Submitted.
-(Babubhai Vaghela) C 202, Shrinandnagar V, Makarba Road Vejalpur, Ahmedabad - 380051 M - 94276 08632
http://twitter.com/BabubhaiVaghela About me in Annexure at - http://bit.ly/9xsHFj http://www.youtube.com/user/vaghelabd (Administrator - Google Group - Right to Information Act 2005) http://groups.google.com/group/Right-to-Information-Act-2005/about?hl=en
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/getFiles.asp?Style=OliveXLib:LowLevelEntityToPrint_TOINEW&Type=text/html&Locale =english-skin-custom&Path=TOIA/2011/06/23&ID=Ar00306
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
8 Chief Justices of India corrupt, says former Law Minister: Former Union Law Minister Shanti Bhushan Thursday told the Supreme Court that at least eight of the 16 chief justices of India (CJIs) were "definitely corrupt". In an affidavit filed Thursday, senior counsel Shanti Bhushan said that six of the CJIs were "definitely honest" and he could not comment on the remaining two judges. The senior counsel sought to be impleaded in a case in which his son Prashant Bhushan is facing contempt proceedings. Shanti Bhushan in his affidavit said that two former CJIs had personally told him that their immediate predecessors and immediate successors were corrupt judges. He said that the names of those four CJIs were included in the list of eight corrupt CJIs.