You are on page 1of 25

2011

Industrials M&A Ac3vity Report

Tweet This!

Follow

www.axialmarket.com | December 2011

> Execu3ve Summary


AxialMarket is the online network for the private markets, helping deal professionals and company execu<ves access
and manage people, capital and opportuni<es powered by trusted rela<onships and proprietary deal sourcing and
deal management so>ware tools.
Since January 2011, 1,266 AxialMarket Members researched and managed over 3,559 transac<ons on AxialMarket.
This report analyzes Opportuni<es brought to market within the Industrials industry ver<cal during that <me. Through
November 2011, the Industrials industry represented 32% of all opportuni<es. 818 Industrials companies came to
market, ranging in company size from $0 to over $430 million in revenue.
Feel free to share this report with colleagues, clients, and partners. If you have any ques<ons regarding the report,
email us at research@axialmarket.com.

Some of 2011s Ac3ve Buyers...

Tweet This!

Follow

> Table of Contents


Overview
Industrials Overview
Subsector Overview
Region Heat Map
Most Pursued Opportuni<es
Capital Goods
Deal Ac<vity Overview
Deal Ac<vity by Revenue & EBITDA
Deal Ac<vity by Region
Commercial & Professional Services
Deal Ac<vity Overview
Deal Ac<vity by Revenue & EBITDA
Deal Ac<vity by Region
Transporta<on
Deal Ac<vity Overview
Deal Ac<vity by Revenue & EBITDA
Deal Ac<vity by Region

Tweet This!

Follow

4
5

13

17

21

> 818 Companies, $9B in Revenue.


This report analyzes deal ac<vity of 818 companies brought to market,
worth a total of $9 Billion in revenue, within the Industrials industry, on
the AxialMarket network since January 2011.
Opportuni<es represent companies across each US region, and are
broken-down by industry, revenue, and EBITDA. Investment banks,
business brokers, and M&A advisory rms use AxialMarket to research
prospec<ve buyers and lenders, and deliver Opportuni<es through
AxialMarkets secure network.
Through their Transac<on Proles, nancial buyers and corporate
acquirers are able to express interest in an Opportunity by either
Pursuing or Declining the Opportunity. Since January 2011, over
1,500 Transac<on Proles have executed more than 7,000 Pursuits.

Tweet This!

Follow

> Industrials Overview

Tweet This!

Follow

!"#$%"&'())*+','-./''''

> Industrial Sector Opportuni3es YTD

&#$

The Industrials industry is comprised of three sectors and 25


subsectors.

!#$

*#$
)#$

!"#$

(#$

!"##$%&'()*+*,%"-$..'"/()*0$%1'&$.*
2*345*

'#$

!#$

)#$
&&#$

!"#$%&'"(#)'$*+*,-.*

*#$
!"#$

&(#$

%"#$
&%#$

"#$

"#$

%#$
%#$

(#$

&'#$

!"#$

&'#$
"%#$
%!#$

+,-./0123,-$4$5-67-8807-6$

)*+,-./0$

9-:1./07;<$=;2>7-80?$

+,-./0,1.2$34556/7$3./-,8.0$

@17<:7-6$A0,:12/.$

9:-,/6:;.:7<=$>$?<8,=,@.0$3./-,8.0$

B0;:7-6$+,CD;-78.$4$E7./07F1/,0.$

A.0.</8B$>$C6:04=@:D$3./-,8.0$

;<*./3$

5<82/072;<$+,CD,-8-/.$4$5G17DC8-/$

E4;<:$A.064/8.$>$9;5=6F;.:7$3./-,8.0$

1.*=./39$

H80,.D;28$4$E8I8-.8$

C6;;./8,<=$G/,:@:D$

1.*>8*5$?3*@.,39$

HI8.$3./-,8.0$>$3455=,.0$

;<*./3$A8*59$6$?3*@.,39$

3.84/,7F$>$J=</;$3./-,8.0$

B<.=*8<C9$

+,-./0123,-$4$J;0C$=;2>7-80?$4$K8;L?$B012M.$
N;I8/?$5G17DC8-/$
K8;L?$5<82/072;<$5G17DC8-/$

1.*$2*3.045$6$780.9:,9$

D.04E<F9$6$B<.=5*<,-9$

9-:1./07;<$+,-6<,C80;/8.$

Tweet This!

Follow

> Industrials Heat Map

l High l Low
Average
Average
Total Buyer Pursuits Pursuit Rate
Pursuits
(per deal) (per deal)

Average Revenue
(per deal)

Average EBITDA
(per deal)

Average EBITDA
Margin
(per deal)

Deals

Total Buyers
Sent Deals

Aerospace & Defense


Building Products
Construc<on & Engineering
Construc<on & Farm Machinery & Heavy Trucks
Electrical Components & Equipment

617
38
76
185
30
52

35,458
2,292
4,153
10,837
1,794
3,163

2,290
185
227
544
162
180

3.7
4.9
3
2.9
5.4
3.5

6.50%
8.10%
5.50%
5.00%
9.00%
5.70%

$10,549,777
$6,647,864
$9,160,635
$13,779,224
$8,183,296
$13,010,898

$1,336,537
$1,144,481
$973,509
$1,669,324
$1,235,148
$1,894,110

12.70%
17.20%
10.60%
12.10%
15.10%
14.60%

Heavy Electrical Equipment


Industrial Conglomerates
Industrial Machinery
Safety Equipment

15
7
122
25

709
386
7,035
975

26
39
612
44

1.7
5.6
5
1.8

3.70%
10.10%
8.70%
4.50%

$7,590,088
$7,968,571
$7,798,501
$4,924,995

$1,064,875
$795,600
$1,200,278
$510,499

14.00%
10.00%
15.40%
10.40%

Trading Companies & Distributors

67

4,114

271

6.60%

$12,611,788

$1,224,693

9.70%

Commercial & Professional Services

Sector (Subsector)
Capital Goods

371

20,696

1,309

3.5

6.30%

$8,933,570

$1,238,697

13.90%

Commercial Prin<ng
Diversied Support Services

31
118

1,749
7,324

129
460

4.2
3.9

7.40%
6.30%

$7,175,165
$10,702,015

$1,065,001
$1,535,772

14.80%
14.40%

Environmental & Facili<es Services

96

4,856

314

3.3

6.50%

$7,695,060

$1,390,222

18.10%

Human Resource & Employment Services


Oce Services & Supplies
Research & Consul<ng Services

36
17
62

1,675
1,151
3,243

94
94
178

2.6
5.5
2.9

5.60%
8.20%
5.50%

$7,932,110
$12,027,962
$7,212,091

$754,571
$1,391,543
$799,891

9.50%
11.60%
11.10%

Security & Alarm Services

11

698

40

3.6

5.70%

$13,925,456

$1,040,460

7.50%

Air Freight & Logis<cs


Airlines
Airport Services
Highways & Railtracks
Marine
Marine Ports & Services
Railroads

163
40
11
8
3
16
8
4

10,360
2,526
914
510
223
725
372
344

679
193
61
32
13
31
16
26

4.2
4.8
5.5
4
4.3
1.9
2
6.5

6.60%
7.60%
6.70%
6.30%
5.80%
4.30%
4.30%
7.60%

$16,091,587
$12,469,067
$16,104,856
$10,322,830
$19,136,402
$8,837,048
$7,450,040
$28,533,724

$1,600,337
$1,238,415
$1,502,440
$1,135,612
$1,488,100
$923,861
$1,173,351
$2,997,652

9.90%
9.90%
9.30%
11.00%
7.80%
10.50%
15.70%
10.50%

Trucking

73

4,746

307

4.2

6.50%

$20,436,887

$1,987,441

9.70%

1,151

66,514

4,278

3.7

6.40%

$10,813,636

$1,342,359

12.40%

Transporta3on

Total

Tweet This!

Follow

*The color scales above are across all sectors by column.

> Industrials Heat Map Analysis

There is a rela<ve surplus of Opportuni3es in Construc3on & Engineering, and a rela<ve shortage in Industrial
Conglomerates.

Transporta3on accounted for the highest average revenue per Opportunity at $16M, buoyed by both
Railroads and Trucking at $28.5M and $20.4M, respec<vely.

The average Pursuit rate per Opportunity across all subsectors is 6.4%, and all three sectors mirror this gure.
Heavy Electrical Equipment has the lowest average Pursuit Rate of only 3.7%.

The Commercial & Professional Services sector averaged less than $9M in revenue per Opportunity, yet it has
included the most protable companies, with a sector-wide average EBITDA margin of almost 14%, 1.2
percentage points higher than that of Capital Goods and four percentage points higher than that of
Transporta<on.

Within Commercial & Professional Services, the Environmental & Facili3es Services subsector includes the
most protable companies, maintaining an average EBITDA margin of 18%. Highways & Railtracks and
Security & Alarm Systems were the least protable subsectors, both with average EBITDA margins less than 8%.

Tweet This!

Follow

> As usual, good companies are in short supply.


Supply

Demand
Pursuits per
Opportunity

Total Opportuni3es
YTD
Construc<on & Farm Machinery & Heavy
Trucks

5.4

Industrial Machinery

5.0

Diversied Support Services

Aerospace & Defense

4.9

96

Environmental & Facili<es Services

Air Freight & Logis<cs

4.8

76

Building Products

Trucking

4.2

73

Trucking

Commercial Prin<ng

4.2

67

Trading Companies & Distributors

Trading Companies & Distributors

4.0

62

Research & Consul<ng Services

Diversied Support Services

3.9

52

Electrical Components & Equipment

Electrical Components & Equipment

3.5

40

Air Freight & Logis<cs

Environmental & Facili<es Services

3.3

38

Aerospace & Defense

Building Products

3.0

36

Human Resource & Employment Services

Construc<on & Engineering

2.9

31

Commercial Prin<ng

Research & Consul<ng Services

2.9

30

Construc<on & Farm Machinery & Heavy


Trucks

Human Resource & Employment Services

2.6

25

Safety Equipment

Safety Equipment

1.8

185

Construc<on & Engineering

122

Industrial Machinery

118

Tweet This!

Follow

!#$

> Deal Ac3vity by US Region


Sector (Subsector)
Capital Goods
Aerospace & Defense
Building Products
Construc<on & Engineering
Construc<on & Farm Machinery & Heavy Trucks
Electrical Components & Equipment
Heavy Electrical Equipment
Industrial Conglomerates
Industrial Machinery
Safety Equipment
Trading Companies & Distributors

Commercial & Professional Services


Commercial Prin<ng
Diversied Support Services
Environmental & Facili<es Services
Human Resource & Employment Services
Oce Services & Supplies
Research & Consul<ng Services
Security & Alarm Services

Transporta3on
Air Freight & Logis<cs
Airlines
Airport Services
Highways & Railtracks
Marine
Marine Ports & Services
Railroads
Trucking

Total

*+,-.$
/01-$

)#$

l High l Low

Midwest

Northeast

South

West

129
4
10
30
15
11
3
1
37
2
16
73
5
16
23
9
4
16
0
29
7
2
2
0
2
0
0
16
231

85
5
12
24
2
8
2
0
19
0
13
68
4
21
19
8
3
12
1
24
7
0
0
0
2
2
1
12
177

212
16
29
69
3
15
9
2
37
14
18
127
10
46
32
11
5
19
4
57
14
4
4
1
7
5
0
22
396

114
11
17
38
4
10
0
0
19
2
13
77
12
23
15
6
4
11
6
32
8
3
1
2
2
0
2
14
223

!"#$

'(#$

234501-$
6+7-.081-$
98:848$
;:-07:8<+:8=$

%&#$
%&#$

Conclusion

The South has been the most


ac<ve region in the US with 34%
of the Industrials Opportuni<es.

Construc<on & Engineering,


Environmental & Facili<es
Services, and Trucking were
consistently ac<ve across the
en<re US.

Safety Equipment Opportuni<es


were heavily concentrated in the
South, while Construc<on & Farm
Machinery & Heavy Trucks were in
the Midwest.

*The color scales above are contained within each sector.

Tweet This!

Follow

10

> Most Pursued Opportuni3es


The Top 20 Industrials Opportuni<es represented a wide range of subsectors and sizes. Below is a redacted summary of
the most demanded Opportuni<es, as determined by Pursuit Rate.
25% of the Top 20 Industrials Opportuni<es fall within the Industrial Machinery subsector.

The Air Freight & Logis<cs subsector represented both the highest and lowest EBITDA Opportuni<es, with $7M and

($545,000), respec<vely.

Opportunity

Pursuit
Rate

Revenue

EBITDA

Industrials Subsector(s)

Specialized logis<cs

42.9%

$23,600,000

$3,500,000

Gas detec<on and


sensors

33.3%

$13,000,000

$1,600,000

Trading Companies & Distributors,


Trucking
Industrial Conglomerates, Industrial
Machinery, Safety Equipment

Mine equipment
maintenance
Crop machine design

31.7%

$2,700,000

$950,000

Construc<on & Engineering

27.7%

$13,600,000

$2,400,000

Construc<on & Farm Machinery &


Heavy Trucks

Retail warehouse
logis<cs

25.3%

$30,000,000

$7,000,000

Air Freight & Logis<cs, Diversied


Support Services, Trucking

Supply chain
management
Machine components

25.0%

$22,000,000

($525,000)

Air Freight & Logis<cs

24.3%

$11,000,000

$3,350,000

Industrial Machinery

Aerospace tools

24.1%

$5,000,000

$1,540,000

Aerospace & Defense

Tweet This!

Follow

11

Opportunity

Pursuit
Rate

Revenue

EBITDA

Industrials Subsector(s)

Commercial contractor

24.0%

$2,700,000

$550,000

Construc<on & Engineering

Chemical distributor

23.8%

$28,100,000

$3,800,000

Trading Companies & Distributors

Window and door


distributor

21.9%

$3,000,000

$140,000

Building Products

Recycling equipment

21.7%

$12,000,000

$3,600,000

Industrial Machinery

Reverse, recycling
logis<cs

21.4%

$14,000,000

$1,800,000

Environmental & Facili<es Services

Gaming devices

21.3%

$39,200,000

$3,700,000

Electrical Components & Equipment

Technology asset
management

20.9%

$1,500,000

$450,000

Diversied Support Services

Wire and cable


manufacturer

20.2%

$20,500,000

$1,700,000

Industrial Machinery, Trucking

Marke<ng energy
eciency

20.0%

$24,250,000

$3,100,000

Research & Consul<ng Services

Niche electrical
components

19.3%

$9,600,000

$1,900,000

Electrical Components & Equipment

High pressure wash


systems

18.4%

$840,000

$38,000

Industrial Machinery

17.3%

$2,500,000

$375,000

Industrial Conglomerates

Industrial and mining


Tweet This!
Follow
supplies

> Capital Goods

Tweet This!

Follow

13

!"#$%"&'())*+',##)-%./$01+'23'4."-%1-'

> Capital Goods: Deal Ac3vity


Overview

Although Construc<on &


Engineering was the most
ac<ve of all subsectors, it
exhibited a downward trend
from Q1 to Q4.
Building Products and Electrical
Components & Equipment
grew, respec<vely, 100% and
150% from Q1 to Q3.
Industrial Machinery was more
stable than Construc<on &
Engineering in the second half
of the year, and is close to
surpassing the laker in deal
ow in Q4.

Tweet This!

Follow

#!!"
!"
%#"

%$"

%&"

%'"

M%"

M&"

(!"

M#"

M$"

'!"

!"#$"%&&#'()*+,-."

$!!"

&!"
%!"
$!"
#!"
!"

)*+,-./01*+"2" 3760-.5087"
<.8=5+4"
3+45+66.5+4" )*9:*+6+-,"2" )*9:8+56,"2"
3;/5:96+-" >5,-.5?/-*.,"

@/57=5+4"
A.*=/0-,"

)*+,-./01*+"2" I+=/,-.587"
I+=/,-.587"
B8.9"
)*+47*96.8-6," C80D5+6.E"
C80D5+6.E"2"
F68GE"<./0H,"

F68GE"
3760-.5087"
3;/5:96+-"

J6.*,:806"2"
>6K6+,6"

L8K6-E"
3;/5:96+-"

14

> Capital Goods: Deal Ac3vity by Revenue & EBITDA

Led by Electrical Components


& Equipment and Heavy
Electrical Equipment, Q2 saw
the highest average EBITDA
margin per Opportunity, with
25% and 31% respec<vely.

!("%"""%"""#

M&#

M'#

M(#

MN#

!'$%"""%"""#

!"#"$%"&

Construc<on & Engineering is


the only subsector to average
over $10M in revenue per
Opportunity in each quarter.

!'"%"""%"""#
!&$%"""%"""#
!&"%"""%"""#
!$%"""%"""#
!"#

Safety Equipment was the


only subsector to have had a
quarter in which its average
EBITDA per Opportunity was
nega<ve.

)*+,-./01*+#2# 3760-.5087#
<.8=5+4#
3+45+66.5+4# )*9:*+6+-,#2# )*9:8+56,#2#
3;/5:96+-# >5,-.5?/-*.,#

@/57=5+4#
A.*=/0-,#

"*$(%%$%%%''

)*+,-./01*+#2# I+=/,-.587#
I+=/,-.587#
B8.9#
)*+47*96.8-6,# C80D5+6.E#
C80D5+6.E#2#
F68GE#<./0H,#

F68GE#
3760-.5087#
3;/5:96+-#

O#'

"*$%%%$%%%''

J6.*,:806#2#
>6K6+,6#

O)'

O*'

L8K6-E#
3;/5:96+-#

OP'

")$(%%$%%%''

!"#$%&'

")$%%%$%%%''
"#$(%%$%%%''
"#$%%%$%%%''
"(%%$%%%''
"%''
!"(%%$%%%&'
!"#$%%%$%%%&'

Tweet This!

Follow

+,-./0123,-'4' 5982/072:9'
>0:?7-6'
5-67-8807-6' +,;<,-8-/.'4' +,;<:-78.'4'
5=17<;8-/' @7./07A1/,0.'

B179?7-6'
C0,?12/.'

+,-./0123,-'4' K-?1./07:9'
K-?1./07:9' H8:IG'5982/072:9' L80,.<:28'4'
D:0;'
+,-69,;80:/8.' E:2F7-80G'
5=17<;8-/'
@8M8-.8'
E:2F7-80G'4'
H8:IG'>012J.'

N:M8/G'
5=17<;8-/'

15

>"
A":
?
.7
-

"D
)A
<E

:?
.7
*"

34
"5

34
"5

";
1C

9"
C"4 1

F'"

"?
.7
-

34
"5

34
"5

B"
E">
C
2;
1

."

"H
-E
@I

>C
2;
1
78
"9

78
"9

"?
5G

.1

-@

36
,2
.1
="

G1

78
"9

"C
2;
1

"8 5

B"

B"
1=
"> 8

5G
E">
8
.4

D1
6="
G1
"8 5

78
"9

5G

1=

=B
G1
85
36 ">

2.
1
",

":

-;

1"8

5G

1=

.F
678
"9

B"

"

1B"

"> <
53
1=

2;

2;
./

E">
<5
31=
"<
2A
":

/6
@/
"?

78
"9

78
"9

2"
D1
6-

.4

36
2.
1
",

"<
53
1=

"C
2;
1

1B"

B"
"> ?

@/

A
2;
1
@/
"> ?

36
2.
1
",

"<
53
1=

78
"9

-;
1

A
2;
1

B"

.6"
23
.45

0.
1
":

F&"

>"

>"
*-

)<

/)
2
(.
*-

*0
@2)
9"
C-

"4 1

1C
": 4

1C
A":
4

": 4
/)
2
(.
*-

C9"
"4 1
)7
"6

34
"5

-9

>"
-9

-9
1C

.)
7
": 8
1/
-9

*+

*B
2)
"8
.=
"6

34
"5

>"

->"

->"
.)
7

>"
*0
."
@2)
+2
<+

";
34
"5

34
"5

A":
81
/-9

": ;
<+
/)
2

"8
1/
-9

"8
1/
-9

"(

"(

.*
-

.*
-

,*
)7
"6
78
"9

Follow

=
.7
-

=
.7
": ;
<+

01
-.
/*
)

()

34
"5
.,-

Tweet This!

F%"

J#" J$" J%" J&"

#!"
+"
*"
)"
("
'"
&"
%"
$"
#"
!"
/"

The US West South Central was the only


region to grow every quarter in Pursuits
per Opportunity.

!"#$"%&$'()#'*((+#&",%&-'

>"

2"
*)

The Northeast and the East South Central


regions were comparable in Pursuits per
Opportunity from Q1 to Q3, though the
former lags the laker in Q4.

/)
2

"?
.7
-

There were more Canadian and


Interna<onal Opportuni<es within the
Capital Goods sector than either
Commercial & Professional Services or
Transporta<on.

"

F$"

#!"
'#"
'!"
&#"
&!"
%#"
%!"
$#"
$!"
#"
!"
+)

Representa<ve of the overall trend, the US


South Atlan<c region accounted for the
most Opportuni<es.

*)

!"#$"%&&#'()*+,-."

> Capital Goods: Deal Ac3vity by Region

16

> Commercial & Professional


Services

Tweet This!

Follow

17

> Commercial & Professional Services:


Deal Ac3vity Overview

!"##$%&'()*+*,%"-$..'"/()*0$%1'&$.*
233"%45/'6$.*78*95(%4$%*
$!!"
#!"
!"
%$"

%&"

%'"

H$"

H%"

%("

H&"

H'"

'!"

Diversied Support Services was


the most buoyant subsector
overall and the most ac<ve in
every quarter beside Q1. It has
already, in Q4, surpassed its total
in Q3.
Research & Consul<ng Services
deal ac<vity has increased 150%
from the rst half of the year to
the second.

&#"
!"#$"%&&#'()*+,-."

&!"
%#"
%!"
$#"
$!"
#"
!"

Tweet This!

Follow

()*+,-./"0" 78*)"(),5-*)6" :-5),6-;)<"


123,4"(),5-*)6" 0"(+992-)6"
(+99=,."
(),5-*)6"

>+43?" A?5-,=?4)?.32" @)6)3,*D"0"


@)6=+,*)"0" 0"B3*-2-C)6"
E=?6+2C?F"
A492=/4)?."
(),5-*)6"
(),5-*)6"
(),5-*)6"

E=44),*-32"
G,-?C?F"

18

Diversied Support Services, though


seeing a strong upward trend in the
amount of Opportuni<es coming to
market, trended downward in both
revenue and EBITDA per Opportunity.

Contrarily, in Human Resources &


Employment Services, though the
number of Opportuni<es per quarter fell
since Q1, the sizes of the Opportuni<es
by revenue and EBITDA grew.

Oce Services & Supplies in Q2


accounted for the highest EBITDA per
Opportunity, as well as the highest
average EBITDA margin at 27%.

Tweet This!

Follow

!)"%"""%"""#
!($%"""%"""#
!("%"""%"""#
!'$%"""%"""#
!'"%"""%"""#
!&$%"""%"""#
!&"%"""%"""#
!$%"""%"""#
!"#

!"#$%&'

!"#"$%"&

> Commercial & Professional Services: Deal


Ac3vity by Revenue & EBITDA

!)%"""%"""#
!(%$""%"""#
!(%"""%"""#
!'%$""%"""#
!'%"""%"""#
!&%$""%"""#
!&%"""%"""#
!$""%"""#
!"#

J&#

*+,-./01#2# 9:,+#*+.7/,+8# </7+.8/=+>#


345.6#*+.7/,+8# 2#*-;;4/+8#
*-;;?.0#
*+.7/,+8#

J(#

@-65A#
CA7/.?A6+A054# B+8+5.,F#2#
B+8?-.,+#2# 2#D5,/4/E+8#
G?A8-4EAH#
C6;4?16+A0#
*+.7/,+8#
*+.7/,+8#
*+.7/,+8#

J&#

*+,-./01#2# 9:,+#*+.7/,+8# </7+.8/=+>#


*-;;?.0#
345.6#*+.7/,+8# 2#*-;;4/+8#
*+.7/,+8#

J'#

J'#

G?66+.,/54#
I./AEAH#

J(#

CA7/.?A6+A054# B+8+5.,F#2#
@-65A#
G?A8-4EAH#
B+8?-.,+#2# 2#D5,/4/E+8#
*+.7/,+8#
*+.7/,+8#
C6;4?16+A0#
*+.7/,+8#

J)#

J)#

G?66+.,/54#
I./AEAH#

19

23
"4

="
@"9
>
-6
,

)"
(;
),

23
"4

0B
":

8"

23
"4

B,

">
-6
,

"3 0

"C
(@
;D

9>
-6
,

="

="
,8
"9 3

'),

.(
1

@"9
3
)/
?,
1(

8"
B,
"3 0

0B
,"3
(6

"5

23
"4

23
"4

0B

,8
0B

0B
"9 3
.(
1

-)
,
"'

,8

)A
1(

="

="
,8

,="
-(
6

,= "
"9 7
0.
,8

-(
6
)*

.(
1

@"9
70
.,8
"7
-<
"5

"'

23
"4

23
"4

":

;*

*1

-"
?,
1(

)/

-)
,

<
-6
,
">
-6
,
23
"4

>"
A":
?
.7
-

"D
)A
<E

:?
.7
)<

*1C
";

34
"5

34
"5

*"

": 4
/)
2
(.
*-

9"
C-

"?
.7
-

"4 1

>"

>"
1C

-9
1C
A":
4
*0

@2)
9"
C-

"4 1

34
"5

34
"5

-9

>"

>"

/)
2
.*
"(

-9
1C
-"4
)7

"6

34
"5

1C
": 4

": 8
1/
-9

.)
7

-9

->"

->"
*+

*B
2)

A":
81
/-9

34
"5

."
@2)
+2

<+
";

34
"5

"8
.=
"6

/)
2
.*
"(

"8
1/
-9

*0

<+
": ;

": ;
/)
2
.*
-

"(
34
"5

"?
.7
-

-"8
1/
-9

.)
7

>"
=
.7
-

=
.7
<+

01
-.
/*
)
,*

)7
"6

>"

2"
*)

"
+)
*)
()

Follow

"7
0.
,8

"9 :

;*

/0

.(
1
-)
,

"'
"5
23
"4

F'" F#" FG" F$"

34
"5

Tweet This!

"

="

1"
)(

"

'%"
'$"
'#"
'!"
&"
%"
$"
#"
!"

*(

The US East South Central region


consistently accounted for the most
Pursuits per Opportunity in 2011, the
only region to average over 10 Pursuits
per Opportunity in any quarter, a feat
that occurred in both Q2 and Q4 so far.

,.)
(

,"7
0.
,8

Q2 over Q1 showed the highest growth


in Pursuits per Opportunity across all
regions, followed by a sector-wide
decline in Q3.

)(

+)

The US Middle Atlan<c region has been


declining quarter-over-quarter in 2011.

E$" E%" E&" EF"

(6

&!"
%#"
%!"
$#"
$!"
#"
!"
'(

The US Pacic region is second to the US


South Atlan<c in the # of Opportuni<es
brought to market YTD.

!"#$"%&&#'()*+,-."

!"#$"%&$'()#'*((+#&",%&-'

> Commercial & Professional Services: Deal


Ac3vity by Region

20

> Transporta3on

Tweet This!

Follow

21

> Transporta3on: Deal Ac3vity


Overview

!"#$%&'"(#)'$*+,-('"*.&&'"(/$0),%*12*
3/#"(,"*
#!"

!"
$%"

Transporta<on, the least ac<ve of the


three sectors, has demonstrated an
increase in deal ow in Q4, exceeded
its Q3 total, a trend also represented in
Air Freight & Logis<cs.
Trucking rebounded in Q3 from a weak
Q2 and is on pace to stabilize or show
growth from Q3 to Q4.
Marine Opportuni<es were perfectly
stable across all four quarters.

$'"

$("

%#"

D$" D%" DE" DF"


%!"

!"#$"%&&#'()*+,-."

$&"

$#"

$!"

#"

!"

Tweet This!

Follow

&'()*+',-"

.*/01(23" 4(356'7-"8" :(*)(2;-"


&'()9*'01-"

:(*"<*;(359" :(*?+*9"
8"=+3(->0-" @;*A(0;-"

B'*(2;"

B'*(2;"
C+*9-"8"
@;*A(0;-"

22

> Transporta3on: Deal Ac3vity by Revenue & EBITDA

From Q1 to Q3 Airlines saw 12% growth in


average revenue, but average EBITDA
stayed rather at, and thus the average
EBITDA margin fell from 19.4% to 5.6% over
that period.

I&#

I'#

I(#

!("%"""%"""#
!'"%"""%"""#
!&"%"""%"""#
!$"%"""%"""#

Trucking Opportuni<es, accoun<ng for the


highest amount of deal ow in
Transporta<on, were on average the largest
by revenue. Airlines, un<l Q4 had the
highest growth rate in average revenue per
Opportunity.
The average EBITDA margin per
Opportunity in Airlines fell from 19.4% in
Q1 to 5.6% in Q3 before rebounding in Q4
to 10.7%.

I$#

!)"%"""%"""#
!"#"$%"&

!*"%"""%"""#

Railroads accounted for, on average, the


largest Opportuni<es by revenue, including
one with $48M revenue in Q3.

!"#

!*%"""%"""#

+,-./0,12# 3/456-78# 9-8:;,<2# ?-/.-7@2# ?-/#A/@-8:># ?-/D0/>#


=#
=#B08-2C52# E@/F-5@2#
+,-.>/,562#

I$#

G,/-7@#

I&#

G,/-7@#
H0/>2#=#
E@/F-5@2#

I'#

I(#

!)%"""%"""#
!"#$%&'

!(%"""%"""#
!'%"""%"""#
!&%"""%"""#
!$%"""%"""#
!"#

Tweet This!

Follow

+,-./0,12# 3/456-78# 9-8:;,<2# ?-/.-7@2# ?-/#A/@-8:># ?-/D0/>#


=#
=#B08-2C52# E@/F-5@2#
+,-.>/,562#

G,/-7@#

G,/-7@#
H0/>2#=#
E@/F-5@2#

23

(6
,"7
0.
,8

Tweet This!
Follow
23
"4

(6

"'

"3 0

E%"

="

="

9>
-6
,

="

."
@2)

/)
2

.*
-

/)
2

<+
<+

": ;

": ;

>"

2"

*)

=
.7
-

01

"

+)

"8
.=
"6

*0

F#"

@"9
>
-6
,

)"

,8

="

E$"

"C
(@
;D

(;

0B

,8

+2

"(

.*
-

-.
/*
)

*)

=
.7
->"
A":
81
/-9
*B
.)
34
2)
7"5 "
*+
>"
6)
"
:
781
"4 1
/-9
C.)
9"
7(
.*
>"
34
-/)
"5 "
41
2 ":
41
C34
9"
C"5 "
@9>
?
2
"
)*
.7
0A
-"4
": 4
1C
1C
-9
-9
"(
.*
>"
-/)
34
2 ":
41
"5 "
C;
9>
1C
"
*)<
*"
:
?
34
.7
"5 "
->"
D)
A<E
A":
?
.7
->"

<+

";
34
"5

34
"5

"8
1/
-9

"(

,*

()

F'"

23
"4

),

"9 3

0B

="

%#"

0B

.(
1

'),

,8

,="

-" 8
1/
-9
"?
.7
-

)7

!"#$"%&&#'()*+,-."
'#"

":

8"

B,

0B
@"9
3

"9 3

-(
6

,="

&!"

23
"4

"3 0

)/

.(
1

-)
,

-(
6

="

<
-6
,

="

1"

)(

<
-6
,

"9 7
0.
,8

?,
1(

"'
8"

,8
B,

0B

;*

"9 :

;*

"9 :

/0

@"9
70
.,8
)*

)A
1(

)/

.(
1

-)
,

-"
?,
1(

,"3
23
"4

"5

">
-6
,

23
"4

*1

"7
-<
"5

;*

":

23
"4

23
"4

.(
1

-)
,

34
"5

"6

In Q4 the US Middle Atlan<c region has


seen each Opportunity average an
outstanding 24.5 Pursuits.

,.)
(

"

34
"5

Canada has seen a rela<vely large amount


of deal ow YTD in the Transporta<on
sector, including a strong Q4.

"7
0.
,8

"'

+)

*(

)(

'(

Transporta<on Opportuni<es were


concentrated in the US South Atlan<c
region throughout the year.

">
-6
,

"5

23
"4

23
"4

!"#$"%&$'()#'*((+#&",%&-'

> Transporta3on: Deal Ac3vity by Region


FG"

E&"

F$"

'!"
&"

%"

$"

#"

!"

EF"

%!"

$#"

$!"

#"

!"

24

> Want to learn more about AxialMarket?


Let us know at hdps://www.axialmarket.com/get-demo/

About Us
AxialMarket is the online network for the private markets, giving deal professionals and company execu<ves access to
people, capital and opportuni<es based on trusted and powerful rela<onships and business development and rela<onship
management tools.
For more informa<on please contact:
Jaime Romero
VP, Marke<ng
AxialMarket, Inc.
646-616-8955
jaime.romero@axialmarket.com
www.axialmarket.com
On Twiker: @AxialMarket

Tweet This!

Follow

25

You might also like