Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Right-duty correlative
*the right-duty correlative gives rise to a COA e.g. if one has a right under a prestation provided by a contract, then it gets BREACHED (i.e. the duty was not performed), then the party whose right is breached has COA *a breach of duty can bring about several COA *What is a SECONDARY RIGHT? It is a right-duty correlative w/c exist whenever theres a breach of primary rights e.g. right to damages, reliefs -they are not all procedural (e.g. damages are not provided under ROC)
OVERVIEW of CIVPRO
2 types of remedy
1. ACTION: WON there is a breach of a right-duty correlative a. b. Criminal actions Civil Actions i. ii. 2. Ordinary Special civil actions: modify some procedures of ordinary civil action
PROCEEDING: WON status/fact exist all rights and obligations appertaining to status would be legally binding e.g. acknowledgment of legitimacy of child naturalization adoption guardianship
1|Cha
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
? T or F:
it is now possible that all disputes may be subject to ADR? FALSE. There are disputes that cannot be subject to ADR: Under ADR law, the ff are not subject to ADR: L3 S2 MJC Labor disputes under Labor Code Civil Status of persons Validity of marriage Any ground for Legal Separation Jurisdiction of courts Future Legitime Criminal liability Accdg to Law, cannot be compromised
*katarungang pambarangay applies only to NATURAL PERSONS, does not apply to government subdivisions and institutions so di applicable in this case ? isnt ADR law meant to make ADR MANDATORY? NO. it gives parties autonomy. ? what if Ford, before entering lease agreement, wants to have an arbitration agreement? Make an arbitration agreement CONTENTS: *Court w/c would have jurisdiction *# of arbitrators *(? )governing law: can one party insist that 1 law be followed? ?If can stipulate on what governing law should be, could a foreigner lawyer appear before RP arbiters and practice NY Law here>
1. 2.
Arbitration: voluntary dispute resolution process wherein, in accordance w/ agreement of parties, the dispute is resolved by rendering an AWARD Mediation: voluntary process in which a mediator, selected by the disputing parties, facilitates communicationand assist the parties in reaching a voluntary agreement re: dispute Conciliation
3.
*where arbitration would be conducted -usually apply law where the arbitration occurs -depends on the bargaining strength of another party 2|Cha Mendoza_Civil Procedure_Ordinary Civil Actions
Early neutral evaluation: parties and lawyers are brought together early in pretrial phase to present summaries of their cases and receive a nonbinding assessment by an experienced neutral person w/ expertise in the subject matter of dispute *status of agreement to submit to ENE: contractual and consensual ?is it mandatory? NO What if parties agree to a ENE b4 adjudication? Valid, forms part of contract Can it be different from initial contract? Yes Who chooses the evaluator? Law is silent *Sir wants to apply the rules on arbitration on the other forms of ADR 5. Mini trial: the merits of the case are argued before a panel comprising of SENIOR DECISION MAKERS, parties seek negotiated settlement 6. MED-ARB: involves both mediation and arbitration *Settlement vs. arbitration award -Settlement from negotiation, mediation; arbitration award from arbitration ?mediation: should it be neutral? The law does not provide for procedure only for arbitration ?What is the default? If no arbitration clause: may still undergo ADR (pretrial stage conducts ADR) If theres arbitration clause: arbitrate -this would include agreement as to the law applicable, court that would have jurisdiction, the arbitrators What if no agreement as to who is going to be the ARBITRATOR? Default: parties agree If none:
4.
DIFFERENCE IN ENFORCEMENT
?what if the amount involved is P1.3M? where would the settlement be enforced? Still depends on where the settlement was made LGC or ADR law ?did the ADR Law (later law) repeal LGC provs? NO! (note here the conflict: in ADR law, conciliation is voluntary while in KP, conciliation is a condition precedent to filing an action) response to conflict: not all disputes are subject to KP (see above!)
3|Cha
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
Law silent
maybe
ROYALES
IAC
-failure to undergo KPL is a ground for dismissal of the action, it being a condition precedent
GALUBA
VS .
LAURETA
-an Amicable settlement under the Katarungang Pambarangay law may only be annulled by repudiation w/n 10d after the date of settlement and not by filing a petition to nullify the settlement
Grounds for MTD: Lack of Jurisdiction vs. No COA vs. Failure to state a COA vs. Condition precedent
Lack of Jurisdiction Jurisdiction is conferred by law. Law is created by the Legislature. So parties, and the courts cannot change it by agreement or waiver. -lack of jurisdiction over the res is a MTD ground that can be raised anytime, even after appeal No COA COA is an act or omission by w/c a party violates the right of another -theres a rightduty correlative involved, as compared to the other grounds Failure to state a COA There may be a COA, but the plaintiff failed to properly allege it in the pleading. UF that establish the right-duty correlative absent in the pleading Condition precedent Law mandates that an act/procedure should be complied first before filing of an action -there may be a COA and the court may have jurisdiction but the action cannot be taken cognizance yet since theres a step missing
Remedies against
Repudiation w/n10d after date of settlement sworn statement/affid avit filed before lupon chair lupon chair would issue certificate to file action (based on FVI)
Examples of Condition Precedents 1. KB should obtain certificate to file action 2. If contract provides for arbitration agreement 3. Exhaustion of administrative remedies 4. In Petition for CPM (R65), need to exhaust all remedies available first ?How to take disputes out of KB? Ask for provisional remedies Civil Actions
4|Cha
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
ADR ulit
Mediation Domestic Institutional Rules governing Scope Rules of the institution Mediation subject to international rules Ad hoc Agreement of parties Mediation subject to the agreement of the parties regular Domestic Arb law RA 876 (parties can agree as to the procedure, but not to the law) Domestic Arbitration X: 1. Labor disputes under Labor Code 2. Civil Status of persons Construction CIAC law EO 1008 Construction Disputes, even if commercial and international in nature Same exceptions arbitration International UNCITRAL model law (parties may agree as to procedure that would be followed) Parties are international: -place of business outside RP -does not include domestic subsidiary of international party or a coventurer in a joint venture Commercial in nature Same exceptions
3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Validity of marriage Any ground for Legal Separation Jurisdiction of courts Future Legitime Criminal liability
Venue
Accdg to Law, cannot be compromised (NCC: future support) 1. agreement of the parties 2. place convenient and appropriate in the Philippines 1. Parties then the arbitrators (if 3 arbitrators) 2. Courts when: a. parties unable to agree b. appointed arbitrator unwilling/unable to serve, no successor named c. party fails/refuses to name arbitrator d. arbitrators fail to appoint 3rd arbitrator e. agreement silent as to # of arbitrator f. arbitrator initially appointed by RTC declines/fails to duly accept the appointment English and Filipino Maybe. Law is silent but ADR law sabi oo
1. agreement of the parties 2. place convenient and appropriate in the Philippines CIAC and parties
1. agreement of the parties 2. MM or place convenient 1. agreement (person, institution) 2. National President of IBP 3. the court, if 2 appointed arbitrators unable to appoint 3rd arbitrator
Agreement English
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
Justifiable doubts on impartiality or independence 2. No qualifications as agreed upon by parties File Motion to confirm Arbitral Award then Enforced as a Final and executor judgment: so needs motion for WOE before RTC
1.
Impartiality?
Vacation
Law silent
Since ADR law silent, could probably agree on anything as long as not contrary to law 1. agreement to publish mediation proceedings 2. agreement to subject parties to institutional rules 3. appointment of mediators 4. number of mediators
*Award procured through corruption, fraud *evident partiality on the part of the arbs *corruption of arbitrator *arbs guilty of misconduct *disqualification of arb not made known *Arbs exceeded powers 1. agreement to subject dispute to other forms of ADR 2. number of arbs 3. method for naming arbitrators 4. procedure 5. time w/n w/c arbitral award should be made 6. venue for arbitration 7. language to be used
Insufficient info
Recognition and Enforcement filed w/RTC -covered by NY convention Motion for recognition and enforcement -not covered by NY convention Follow ROC so motion for writ of execution? -if foreign arbitral award: confirmed by foreign court: Recognized NOT AS A FOREIGN JUDGMENT (THEREFORE NOT APPEALABLE) but a FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD -if foreign arbitral award: confirmed by RP courts Enforced as final and executor award in RP (appealable) (note: sabi ADR law grounds for modifying or correcting award under Domestic Arb law) *evident miscalculation of figures *award not among reliefs prayed for *award imperfect in form
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
agreement to publish proceedings (for confidentiality) procedure to subject parties to institutional rules venue language to be used appoint court that would be competent to a. appoint 3rd arbiter b. decide on challenges on arbitrator
6|Cha
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
Jurisdiction
JAVIER
The court would not take cognizance of a case under the exclusive original jurisdiction of an administrative agency vested by law (primary administrative jurisdiction)
VS.
CA
TIJAM
VS .
SIBONGHANOY
Sir said that this is NOT an EXCEPTION TO THE GENERAL RULE THAT the jurisdiction of the court may be assailed any time since the issue here is WON PARTY CAN RAISE THE ISSUE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION (not WON the court has jurisdiction) even after 15 yrs! Reqs for Jurisdiction by Estoppel/laches: 1. unreasonable length of time 2. unable to raise lack of jurisdiction 3. other party was lead to believe that the other party would not raise it as a ground for dismissal
7|Cha
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
BP 129
Original Jurisdict ion SC CPMHQ 1. Certiorari 2. Prohibition 3. Mandamus 4. Habeas Corpus 5. Quo Warranto 6. actions affecting ambassadors, public ministers and consuls None not a trial court CA CPMHQA 1. Certiorari 2. Prohibition 3. Mandamus 4. Habeas Corpus 5. Quo Warranto 6. Auxiliary Writs WON in aid of its appellate jurisdiction Actions for annulment of RTC JFOR RTC CPMQHI 1. Certiorari 2. Prohibition 3. Mandamus 4. Habeas Corpus 5. Quo Warranto 6. Injunction effective w/n respective regions 7. actions affecting ambassadors and other public ministers and consuls 1. incapable of pecuniary estimation 2. title to or possession of real property or any interest therein ASSESSED VALUE MM: exceeds 50k Outside MM: exceeds20k 3. all actions involving contract of marriage and marital relations 4. all civil actions and special proceedings falling w/n the EOJ of a JDRC CAR 5.all actions not w/n exclusive jurisdiction of any court, tribunal, etc. (CATCH-ALL COURT) 6. admiralty & maritime, claim or demand 7. Probate, Gross MTC Sorrycant issue writs!
--
--
1. Probate proceedings (gross estate value) 2. admiralty proceedings (demand) 3. all other actions (demand) MM: does not exceed 400k Outside MM: does not exceed 300k 4. title to or possession of real property or any interest therein (assessed value): does not exceed Outside MM: 20k MM: 50k (exclusive of IDALC) 6. forcible entry and unlawful detainer Civil Actions
(by appeal or certiorari) 1. constitutional ity or validity of a law 2. legality of a tax, impost.. 3. questions re: jurisdiction of lower courts 4. criminal cases where penalty RP + 5. error or questions of law ONLY
(petition for review) JDROA of -RTC -QJA *questions of fact and law
Family Courts 1. custody and guardianship of children 2. adoption 3. annulment of marriage 4. support 5. declaration of status of children as abandoned dependent neglected 6. constitution of family home Intracorporate disputes (petition for review) JDROA of MTC MTC MCTC In their respective territorial jurisdictions
--
8|Cha
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
3.
VS .
HEIRS
OF
PASTOR
-An expropriation suit is incapable of pecuniary estimation. Accordingly, it falls within the jurisdiction of the regional trial courts, regardless of the value of the subject property.
DUI
VS .
IBAJAN
FLORES
VS.
MALLARE-P HILIPS
Theres misjoinder of parties here so totality rule does not apply. TOTALITY RULE only applies when theres a proper joinder of COA and of parties as provided under the rules of court ?If proper joinder of COA, 1 plaintiff vs. 1 defendant: plaintiff may join different COA together following R2.5 But if several plaintiffs vs. 1 defendant, 2 or more COA Or 1 plaintiff vs. several defendants, 2 or more COA should follow R2.5 (joinder of COA) and R3.6 (joinder of parties) e.g. when a ship sinks, the victims would join together to file action vs. common carrier *TIP ON CAPTION: mali daw ung Action for Damages: dapat daw alam ung COA mo and not the relief! So pano title? Action based on Breach of Contract???
In ejectment cases, the sole issue is the physical possession of the property, and neither the claim of Juridical Possession nor an averment of ownership by the defendant can out rightly deprive MTC from taking cognizance of the case
DAR
MANCHESTER DEVT
VS .
CA
DAR has jurisdiction over matters involving the implementation of agrarian reform, agrarian conflicts and land tenure related problems. BUT RTC now conferred with jurisdiction of Agrarian Reform Courts so RTC may have jurisdiction, particularly in petition for determination of just compensation to land owners
VS.
C UENCA
The payment of docket fees is a mandatory requirement for the court to acquire jurisdiction over the action
SOUTHERN CROSS
SUN INSURANCE
VS .
ASUNCION
VS .
CEMENT MANUFACTURERS
Court could allow payment of docket fees w/n reasonable time. Docket fees are based not only on the prayer, but also on the body of the complaint (why complaint? A complaint asks for awards) Rules on payment of docket fees: 1. prescribed docket fee for filing of initiatory pleading: may pay kulang w/n reasonable time but not beyond applicable prescriptive reglementary period
COA
(Rule 2)
R2.1 every ordinary civil action should be based on a COA R2.2 COA defined: an act or omission by which a party violates the right of another R2.3. 1 suit for 1 COA di pede file marami suit for only 1 COA R2.4. Splitting of COA: if 1 COA, 2+ suits: Ground for dismissal if a. File of 1 action
9|Cha
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
FILIPINAS INDUSTRIAL
VS.
SAN DIEGO
BACOLOD
VS.
SMB
Every action must be prosecuted by the RPI and if the principal is DISCLOSED, action must be brought in the name of the principal and not in the name of the atty-infact/agent ? What should be the ground when a suit is brought by a party who is not the real party in interest? Failure to state a COA, not lack of capacity to sue sabi ni sir. Capacity is under R3.1, but if you dont have any COA, you dont stand to be benefitted or injured by the judgment or is entitled to the avails of the suit. R3.4. Spouses as Parties GR: husband and wife sued jointly X: as provided by law R3.5 Minor/incompetent persons -may still sue/be sued, w/ assistance R3.6. PERMISSIVE JOINDER OF PARTIES -All persons in whom or against whom ay right to relief in respect of or arising from the same transaction or series of transaction is alleged to exist Whether Jointly, severally, or in the alternative May join as plaintiffs or be joined as defendants in 1 complaint common question of fact or law R3.7. COMPULSORY JOINDER OF INDISPENSABLE PARTIES INDISPENSABLE PARTIES: w/o whom no final determination can be had of the action -should be joined Final determination: tapos na issue, res judicata na dapat forever! Wala na pedeng magfile ulit ng case! R3.8 NECESSARY PARTIES (also called PROPER PARTIES) -one who is not indispensable but who ought to be joined as a party if complete relief is to be accorded as to those already parties, OR for a complete determination or settlement of the claim subject of the action e.g. Insurance companies in case of TP liability: they are necessary parties since the defendant would have to claim from them to pay the liability if ever, but they are not indispensable in the sense that the action would not push through w/o them R3.9 NONJOINDER OF NECESSARY PARTIES TO BE PLEADED If necessary party not joined, should set forth name of necessary party not joined then state reason why not impleaded.
If 1 act or omission gives rise to 1 COA with several reliefs, cannot institute separate actions for the said reliefs or else it is deemed as splitting of COA *so a single COA may give rise to several reliefs. But if a transaction gives rise to different COA (different rights breached), could file separate actions and it would not be deemed splitting of COA *rule on JOINDER OF COA applicable also in a crossclaim, counterclaim, TPC Caveat: if several parties are involved, should ALWAYS FOLLOW R3.6! R2.4 (splitting of COA) vs. R2.6 (misjoinder of COA) Splitting of COA: grounds for dismissal (res judicata or litis pendentia) Misjoinder of COA: NOT a ground for dismissal but merely for severance ? WHY? If joined improperly, no repeating of COA but just wrongly joined. IF split, repeat COA (so PUNISH REPEATING OF COA!)
Parties (Rule 3)
R3.1 Who may be parties? 1. Natural Persons 2. Juridical Persons 3. Entities Authorized by Law (labor unions, UP, LGUs, Government agencies) Types of Parties 1. Real Parties in Interest 2. Representative parties a. Class suits (hybrid of joinder of COA and parties) b. Guardians c. Trustees d. Administrators e. Executors f. Parties authorized by law
OPOSA
VS .
FACTORAN
Generations yet unborn are not natural persons nor juridical persons nor entities authorized by law but the court still allowed the suit based on the Intergenerational responsibility of the petitioners R3.2 Real Parties in Interest: party who -stands to be benefited or injured by the judgment in the suit Or party entitled to the avails of the suit 10 | C h a Mendoza_Civil Procedure_Ordinary Civil Actions
Venue
(Rule 4) R4.1 Real Actions actions affecting title to or possession of real property, or interest therein -court w/c has jurisdiction over the area wherein the real property involved, or a portion thereof is situated -FEUD: MTC w/c has jurisdiction over the area wherein property located R4.2 Personal Actions all other actions -commenced and tried where 1. plaintiff or principal plaintiffs reside 2. defendant or any of the principal defendant resides 3. non-resident defendant: where he may be found -election of plaintiff R4.3 Venue vs. nonresidents -defendants: nonresident + not found in RP -action affects the >personal status of the plaintiff >any property of defendant located in RP VENUE: 1. Court where plaintiff resides 2. court where any portion of the defendants property may be found R4.4 RULES on venue not applicable when 1. Law specifies venue 2. Parties validly agreed in writing before filing of action of EXCLUSIVE VENUE (should always contain EXCLUSIVE!) ? When is venue a matter of jurisdiction? When WARSAW CONVENTION APPLIES. In the Warsaw convention, the venue where the action may be brought are limited to the following: 1. Domicile of airline 2. Principal place of business 3. Place of business through which contract was made 4. Final destination However, since Warsaw Convention is a treaty, adopted as a law in the Philippines by the Incorporation Clause, it specifies the rule on exclusive venue in accordance with the first situation under R4.4. Venue (R4) Real Actions: action affecting title to or possession of real property or any interest therein Personal Actions: all other actions Summons (R14) Action in Rem: Actions, the judgment of which affects the whole world.
MATHAY
VS.
C ONSOLIDATED BANK
An action does not become a class suit merely because it is designated as such in the pleadings. Whether the suit is or is not a class quit depends upon the attending facts, and the complaint, or other pleading initiating the class action. *Common interest: 1 subject matter, same reliefs that may be claimed, same COA *In class suits, there is joinder of COA (each party has a COA, but it is common) and joinder of parties (parties so numerous, their COA arise out of the same transaction + common question of fact or law) ?What is the proper remedy if there is an improper class suit? MTD based on Failure to state a COA. Elements of a COA lacking if improper class suit R3.13 ALTERNATIVE DEFENDANTS -certain as to who are liable, not certain against whom relief may be sought R3.14 UNKNOW DEFENDANT -doesnt know name or identity of defendant -if true name or identity later IF PARTY DIES 1. Determine WON claim is extinguished 2. If NOT EXTINGUISHED: Counsel should inform the court of death and submit names and addresses of the legal representative of the party -heirs could be substituted w/o requiring appointment of executor -if none: court may order opposing party to procure the appointment of an executor or administrator, costs may be recovered as costs in the judgment ...if defendant dies: and action on contractual money claims: >death before entry of final judgment in court: allowed to continue until entry of final judgment
Action in Personam: Actions, the judgment of which affects only the parties to the action *not all actions in personam are personal actions, the same way that actions in rem are real actions
11 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
Pleadings
Pleadings -written statements of the respective claims and defenses of the parties submitted to the court for appropriate judgment Pleadings Motions Orders Contains the claims Contains any relief not by -may be interlocutory or and defenses of the a pleading final orders parties for appropriate -relief asked merely -from the court judgment from the interlocutory: does not court asks for final resolve the case with relief finality
(Rule 6)
Complaint
-pleading alleging the plaintiffs COA/s -states name and address of the parties
(Caption) Plaintiff, (name of plaintiff), through counsel, (and to this Honorable Court), respectfully avers (= specifically allege): (paragraphs numbered: should contain 1 strain of thought, 1 sentence only )
1. 2.
Plaintiff is (then aver UF relevant for the capacity of the party to sue) and a resident of (specify address) Defendant (aver UF relevant to make defendant a real party in interest, aver capacity to sue) and may be served summons and other judicial processes at (specify address) (important: name of parties and their address where notices and summons may be served) Allege UF step by step. Dont forget anything. Check if it is subject to MTD, MBPno need to allege law violated If several COA, have subheadings! Mendoza_Civil Procedure_Ordinary Civil Actions
3.
12 | C h a
*note: the complaint should be served with the summons! So see summons
Republic of the Philippines (Court) (Judicial Region) Branch #, Location Plaintiffs name, Plaintiff Vs. Defendants name, Defendant x--------------------------------x Civil Case No. now with number FOR: (characterization of the action)
Answer
contains the defenses of the defendant Kinds of defenses: 1. Negative Defense: specific denial of the material facts/s alleged in the pleading of the claimant essential to his COA (so specific denial of UF) 2. Affirmative Defense: allegation of new matters which, while hypothetically admitting the material allegations in the complaint, would nevertheless prevent or bar recovery by the claimant. Includes a. Fraud b. Illegality c. Release d. Payment e. Former recovery f. Discharge in bankruptcy g. Estoppels h. Statute of limitations i. Statute of frauds j. Any other matter by means of confession or avoidance
Summons TO: (Name of Defendant) of (address) You are hereby required to enter your appearances in the above-entitled case within fifteen (15) days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of such service, and to answer the complaint of the plaintiff which is hereto attached and herewith served upon you, within the time fixed by the rules of Court. If you fail to appear within the time aforesaid, the plaintiff will take judgment against you by default and demand from this Court the relief applied for in said complaint. Witness the Honorable (name of judge), Judge of this Court, this (date of issue).
13 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
Answer Defendant, by counsel, respectfully state that: (notes) *defendant should SPECIFICALLY DENY each material allegation of facts -whenever practical, set forth substance of the matters upon which he relies -includes denial of the capacity of the party to sue or be sued *partial denial: specify which part is admitted and which part is denied specifically *if defendant WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE/INFORMATION SUFFICIENT TO FORM A BELIEF AS TO THE TRUTH OF THE MATERIAL AVERMENT, specifically state such *DENIAL OF ACTIONABLE DOCUMENTS: -under oath (not needed if not a party to the actionable document) -specifically denied -set forth what actually happened (defendants version) -genuineness: authenticity (WON it was forged):: due execution: formalities as to its execution (capacity of parties to contract) *Usury allegation also required to be under oath (but no usury anymore) Admissions/Denials
1.
2. 3.
4.
He admits the contents of paragraph #. (specific denial proper) He admits the contents of paragraph # in so far as.but specifically deny that (state substance of denial). (partial denial) He specifically denies the contents of paragraph #, as he lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to its truthfulness. (denial based on lack of knowledge) He specifically denies the genuineness and due execution of the document mentioned in paragraph #, it being that. (denial of actionable document) Affirmative Defenses Defendant repleads, reiterates, and incorporates by reference all the foregoing insofar as they are material and additionally submit that the complaint should be dismissed because:
I, (name of the person who caused the service), (job description) for (name of defendant), with address at (address of person), after being duly sworn, deposes and states: That on (date when served), I served a copy of the following pleadings/papers by registered mail in accordance with Section 10, Rule 13 of the Rules of Court: Answer For defendant (name of defendant) In Case No. (specify) entitled (title of the case), by depositing a copy in the post office in a sealed envelope, plainly addressed to (counsel of plaintiff) at (address of defendant), with postage fully prepaid, as evidenced by Registry Receipt No. (specify), attached and with instructions to the post master to return the mail to sender after ten (10) days if undelivered. Checklist: 1. Deposited in post office 2. In a sealed envelope 3. Plaintly addressed to the party or counsel at office or place of residence if known 4. With postage fully prepaid 5. Evidenced by registry receipt #
5.
14 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
To the truth of the foregoing, I have signed this affidavit on (date when signed), in the city of (location), Philippines. (sgd) person who caused the service (jurat I dont know if this would still be included since meron na sa baba. Sa bagay, ibang CTC NO.) Subscribed and Sworn before me this (date), affiant exhibiting to me his Community Tax Certificate No. (specify) issued at (place) on (date). (sgd) Notary Public Notary Public Until PTR #________ Issued at _____ On _____
Verification
(name of defendant), after having been duly sworn in accordance with law, deposes and states that: 1. He is the defendant in the pleading/document entitled (title of pleading/document); 2. He has caused its preparation; 3. He has read it and the allegations therein are true and correct to his personal knowledge or based on authentic records. (sgd) affiant-defendant (then add jurat) Subscribed and sworn to before me this (date), affiant exhibiting to me his Community Tax Certificate No. (fill up), issued at (place where issued) on (date where issued). (sgd) Notary Publics name Notary Public Until (date of validity) PTR # ________ Issued at (place) On (date when issued) Doc No. Page No.
Counterclaim
-any claim which a defending party may have against an opposing party COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM 1. Cognizable by regular courts of justice Both as to subject matter and amount involved If within RTC, complaint considered compulsory regardless of amount 2. Arises out of/
15 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
Reply
-a pleading, the office of which is to deny or allege facts in denial or avoidance of the new matters raised as affirmative defense in the answer -IF NO REPLY: deemed controverted X: if answer assails an actionable document: should file a reply or else deemed admitted -if plaintiff has a new claim arising from the new matters alleged in the answer: file motion to amend or supplement complaint.
TPC
-claim that a defending party may have against a person NOT A PARTY to the action for CRISA (contribution, reimbursement, indemnity, subrogation, and any other relief) in respect to plaintiffs claim (derivative claim requirement) the derivative claim should be in respect to plaintiffs claim: should arise out of the same transaction on which the plaintiffs claim is based (B ALBASTRO VS.
CA)
*if not CRISA, not TPC ? What if you want to implead a person NOT YET A PARTY to the action BUT NOT FOR CRISA? What to do? Bring them in, under Rule 6.12 *if TPC improperly filed (not for CRISA), but was not assailed, parties have waived that defense. (P ASCUAL VS. B AUTISTA) ?What if appealed judgment on TPC then the main case was sought to be enforced: -Cannot enforce TPC vs. the defendant who appealed TPC judgment: TPC makes another person aside from defendant guilty. If main action sought to be enforced against the defendant, then he may be made to pay without recourse to the TPdefendant. ---di ba baligtad? If the main action is appealed, cannot enforce judgment on the TPC because the liability of the TPdefendant would depend on WON the plaintiff has a valid claim in the main action??? *Remedies when TPC denied: Appeal judgment denying TPC
Time to plead
-when counting periods: exclude time from which period starts to run then include the date of performance of the act. -if last day falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday at the place where court sits, time will not run until next working day (so in computing the period, use calendar day. Working day only relevant in determining last day) -interruptions: start to run period again from day after notice of cessation of interruption Examples of interruptions: *filing with KB *granted MBP 8filing of MTD *filing of MNT, MFR (even given new period!) Answer to complaint Answer of a FPJE, summons 16 | C h a Mendoza_Civil Procedure_Ordinary Civil Actions w/n 15d w/n30d after SERVICE OF SUMMONS after receipt
*can file as many COA in the counterclaim as there are, but subject to the rules on joinder of COA and joinder of parties REMEDIES for failure to raise counterclaim *If ground for Counterclaim or crossclaim arose after the SERVICE OF THE ANSWER: file motion for leave to file a supplemental pleading *if failed to setup counterclaim due to OIEN (oversight, inadvertence, excusable negligence): file motion for leave to file an amended complaint
AFTER SERVICE from NOTICE admitting amendment from SERVICE of counterclaim after Service of summons After receipt if made on govt official, defendant is a FPJE From SERVICE of pleading responded to From NOTICE admitting supplement
Reply w/n10d Answer to supplemental w/n10d complaint Answer to complaint in w/n15d From NOTICE of order admitting the intervention same *Service: completeness of service, not day when service was made
Service Of pleadings, judgments and other papers (not summons) Rule 13 FILING
-act of presenting the pleading, and other paper to COC -PROMULGATION: act of the judge of filing w/COC the signed decision Manner of filing Personal How present ORIGINAL COPIES, plainly indicated as such to COC -COC would endorse on the pleading a. Date b. Hour of filing Registered mail(not by ordinary mail) : date of mailing = date of filing *As shown in the post office stamp on the envelope *OR by the registry receipt kept by the party Proof of Filing In the record, the copy of the pleading is included IF NOT IN THE RECORD: >written/stamped acknowledgement on copy of the same (which should be w/ the counsel) Registry Receipt AND AFFIDAVIT OF PERSON WHO DID THE MAILING Contains: *date *place where depositing post office *plainly addressed to the parties *with postage fully prepaid *with instructions to return to sender 10 if undelivered.
REGISTERED mail
Upon expiration of 10d after mailing 1. actual receipt by addressee 2. after 5d from date sender received 1st notice from postmaster
Affidavit of person who mailed 1. affidavit of person who caused registered mail 2. written admission of party who received it (signature on copy) 3. registry receipt and registry return card
SERVICE
-act of providing a party w/ a copy of the pleading/paper concerned -made to counsel of the other party 17 | C h a Mendoza_Civil Procedure_Ordinary Civil Actions
R13.11 Priorities in modes of service and filing(kaya may explanation part) 1st PERSONAL service/filing If other modes: should be w/ explanation why service not done personally if NO EXPLANATION: considered not filed
Class Notes for Finals Dean Leonen Amendment and Supplemental Pleadings
Amendment: add or strike out allegation in the pleading 1. As a matter of right -1x only -at any time before a responsive pleading is filed (or, if reply, w/n10d after service of reply wala nang magrereply eh) 2. By leave of court -w/leave of court -after responsive pleading already filed -no intent to delay 3. Amendment to conform to presentation of evidence -party presents evidence not w/n the issues in the pleadings -the opposing party consents to the presentation (express or implied) -treat as if it was raised in the pleadings and may amend pleading AT ANY TIME, EVEN AFTER JUDGMENT) -if evidence objected to for not being made in the pleadings, court may still allow presentation of evidence and amendment when ends of substantial justice may be served (may put on record CONTINUING OBJECTION) -motion to amend filed -so w/ notice and hearing *EFFECT OF AMENDMENT: supersedes the pleading that it amends -admissions in the superseded pleading may still be used as evidence vs the pleader -claims and offenses not incorporated are deemed waived *REMEDY if amendment not allowed: APPEAL, not SCA for certiorari Supplement -also upon motion, so may notice and hearing -set forth TOE (transactions, occurrences, events) which have happened since the date of the pleading sought to be supplemented -EFFECT: supplies deficiencies in aid of an original pleading, but not entirely substitute the latter the original pleading still exists side by side with the supplement to the pleadings
Intervention
WHO MAY FILE: a person 1. Who has a legal interest in the subject matter 2. Who has a legal interest in the success of the parties 3. Who has a legal interest against both 4. So situated as to be adversely affected by the distribution or disposition of the properties in the custody of the court PROVIDED *no undue delay in the adjudication of the rights of the original parties + intervenors right cannot be sufficiently protected in another proceeding *interest should be DIRECT, MATERIAL AND NOT INCHOATE BUT SHOULD BE PRESENT HOW: w/leave of court -file motion to intervene + either Complaint in intervention or answer in intervention WHEN: any time before the rendition of the judgment by TC (rendition: service of the copies of the final order)
METROBANK
VS.
PRESIDING JUDGE
When a motion to intervene has already been granted, as shown by an Order from the court, the intervenor is already a party to the proceeding and therefore has the right to all the notices and processes from the court. When the original parties enter an agreement, with the intervenor not made a party, to dismiss the case, the intervenor not being a privy to the said agreement is not bound by the dismissal and may continue his action of intervention.
Summons
Definition: a coercive order issued by the court to obtain defendant WHO issues: COC Who serves: a. sheriff b. his deputy c. person authorized by the court HOW SERVED Action in personam Natural 1. personal service persons -deliver summons + copy of complaint -defendant to defendant who may be: -tender summons + copy of complaint 1. defendant 2. substituted service 2. prisoner -only resorted to when: 3. entity w/o a. justifiable causes juridical b. cannot serve defendant w/n personality reasonable time 4. minors c. all reasonable diligent efforts have and been exerted incompetent -HOW: leave copies at s *defendants residence: person then 5. resident residing therein w/sufficient age and temporarily discretion jurisdiction over the
Supplemented complaint
New matters arised after service of pleading sought to be supplemented Merely adds to the pleading
Kinds
Action in rem 1. personal service (see left) 2. substituted service 3. extraterritorial service -only for the following situations: actions involve a. personal status of plaintiff b. relates to, or the subject of w/c, is property w/n RP in w/c defendant has claim or lien, actual or contingent c. relief demanded consists of excluding the
18 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
DIAL CORP
VS .
SORIANO
For purposes of extraterritorial service of summons, the property that should be attached should be tangible property *What happens after service of summons -w/n 5 days after service of summons, sheriff would file with court a RETURN If returned summons w/o being served, plaintiff may demand that alias summons may be served *substitute of summons: VOLUNTARY APPEARANCE -raising other grounds aside from lack of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant NOT considered voluntary appearance but merely in accordance w/ OMNIBUS MOTION RULE Example of RETURN Republic of the Philippines (court) (judicial region) Branch #, Location Plaintiffs name, Plaintiff Vs. Defendants name, Defendant x----------------------x
Juridical persons 1. DOMESTIC CORP (corporation s, partnership, association organized under RP Laws) 2. FPJE
Service by publication? Extraterritorial? But domestic nga eh so din a sha nonresident+not found in RP
Extraterritorial service
3. Public Corp
Hmmm
RETURN OF SUMMONS This is to certify that on (date when summons served), the undersigned caused the service of summons together with a copy of the complaint and its annexes upon the defendant (name of defendant) at (address where defendant was served). The copy of the summons together with a copy of the complaint and its annexes were (manner of service: personally/substituted) received by defendant at (time) on (date) at (location. The original copy of the Summons is therefore, respectfully returned, DULY SERVED. Date when return made. (sgd) name Sheriff Cc: Plaintiffs counsel Address
***Jurisprudence seem to suggest that even if domestic corp (so therefore even if RESIDENT and can be found in RP), once action in rem extraterritorial service and service by publication could be resorted to. Refer to Consolidated Plywood vs. Breva
VENTURANZA
VS.
CA
Substituted service may only be resordted to after earnest efforts to serve personally have been exhausted. The presumption of regularity of the official acts of the sheriff would attach only when earnest efforts (the specific acts) have been exerted, as stated in the return, within reasonable time.
LAUS
VS .
CA
Reasonable time: depends on 1. facts constituting service 2. reasonable diligence 3. reasonable time elapsed
19 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
Class Notes for Finals Dean Leonen Dismissal through a Motion for Leave to File a Demurrer to Plaintiffs Evidence
-filed after the plaintiffs presentation of evidence -evidence presented by evidence failed to show his right to relief -however, if plaintiff appealed this, and appeal was granted, Defendant cannot present evidence anymore: the case would be decided based only on what plaintiff was able to present MTD R16 MTD (demurrer to evidence) Grounded on preliminary objections on Based on insufficiency of evidence the allegations in the pleading Filed by DEFENDANT w/n time for But prior to filing answer ONLY after presentation of plaintiffs evidence DENIAL: should answer DENIAL: defendant present evidence GRANT: plaintiff may appeal GRANT: if plaintiff appeals, dismissal Or may refile case reversed, defendant cannot present evidence anymore ?Okay, after MTD, should file answer. What happens when one fails to file answer on time? Plaintiff files MOTION TO DECLARE DEFENDANT IN DEFAULT under R9.3 + proof of nonfiling Then Court issues an ORDER DECLARING DEFENDANT IN DEFAULT Vs. PRETRIAL: absence of defendant during PRETRIAL or non-filing of a PRETRIAL BRIEF -declared AS IN DEFAULT In default Failure to file answer As in default Failure to appear during pre-trial OR submit a pre-trial brief Defendant entitled to notice but cannot take part in the proceedings Presentation of evidence ex parte Relief to be awarded limited by the Relief to be awarded dependent on what prayer the plaintiff could prove 2. Interest which in whole or in part is not disputed by claimants WHO WOULD FILE: person who may be claimed against? WHY: to compel the conflicting claimants to interplead and litigate their several claims among themselves File > ORDER to interplead -court may order that subject matter be paid/delivered to court SUMMONS: served w/ copy of complaint + order to interplead MTD allowed -file w/n time for filing answer (15d from service) -grounds: a. impropriety of interpleader b. other appropriate grounds under R16 -period to file answer TOLLED by MTD -if MTD DENIED: may still file answer w/n the remaining period but not less than 5d from NOTICE OF DENIAL ANSWER (directly or after notice of denial of mtd) -w/n 15d from service -set forth claim -responded to by a reply -FAILURE TO FILE ANSWER: >motion to declare in default >judgment: bar claimant from any claim in respect to the subject matter!!! NO pleadings prohibited (not a summary proceeding) DETERMINATION OF RESPECTIVE RIGHTS AND ADJUDICATION OF CLAIMS -after pleadings filed -after pretrial conducted DOCKET FEES, lawful fees, litigations expenses lien upon subject matter of the action
LIM TANHU
VS.
REMOLETE
If the defendants are indispensable parties sued under 1 COA and interposed 1 common defense, the non-appearance of 1 during pre-trial does not make the others in default
R62. INTERPLEADER
When to file: 1. Conflicting claims upon same subject matter are/maybe made against a person who claims no interest whatsoever in the subject matter 21 | C h a Mendoza_Civil Procedure_Ordinary Civil Actions
EFFECT OF FILING of PETITION: GR: shall not stay execution of JFOR X: SC says so SUBMISSION FOR DECISION If none of these required or after these complied w/ (or after expiration of period to do the same) a. Sets case for oral arguments b. Requires parties to submit memoranda
R65: CPM
R65.1 PETITION FOR CERTIORARI
Requisites: 1. WHO: TBO (tribunal, board or officer) exercising JUDICIAL or QJ functions 2. WHAT: a. Acted w/o jurisdiction b. Acted in excess of its jurisdiction c. Acted w/ GADALEJ 3. No appeal, nor any PSA (Plain, Speedy, Adequate) remedy in the ordinary course of law 4. VERIFIED petition 5. Before the proper court (SC, CA, RTC) 6. Allege facts w/ certainty 7. PRAYER: Either a. Annul b. Modify the PROCEEDINGS of TBO c. Grant incidental reliefs 8. Accompanied by:
3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
8.
CMP in general
WHEN FILED: NOT later than 60d from >NOTICE of JOR >from the NOTICE OF DENIAL OF MFR/MNT
23 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
a. b. c.
Person who usurps, intrudes into, unlawfully holds/exercises a public office/position/franchise Public officer who does/suffers an act = ground for forfeiture of his office
Association acting as a corporation w/n RP w/o being legally incorporated OR w/o lawful authority to so act WHO COMMENCES: a. SOLGEN/PUBLIC PROSEC b. SOLGEN/PUBLIC PROSEC at the request of another c. Person claiming to be entitled to the office/position USURPED/UNLAWFULLY HELD WHEN: a. b. When DIRECTED by President of RP When upon complaint/otherwise SOLGEN/PUBLIC PROSEC has good reason to believe that any case specified in the proceeding can be established by proof c. WITH PERMISSION FO THE COURT (W/ LEAVE OF COURT?) if to be commenced at the request and upon the relation of another person SOLGEN/pubprosec may 1st require INDEMNITY for expenses and costs HEARING: COURT will >upon application (when w/ permission of court): DIRECTS NOTICE to respondent >if permission approved: issue ORDER to RESPONDENT serve copies to ALL INTERESTED CONTENTS OF PETITION *if vs. person ururping a public office: a. name of the person claiming to be entitled to the position b. aver right to the position c. aver that respondent is unlawfully in possession VENUE if SOLGEN: RTC in City of Manila/CA/SC If not SOLGEN: SC/CA/RTC exercising jurisdiction over territorial area where RESPONDENT resides PERIOD: court would provide (consider expediting the proceeding) may be given precedence JUDGMENT for usurpation: a. Respondent be ousted + excluded from position b. Petitioner recover costs i. Vs. petitioner/relator ii. Respondent iii. Person/s claiming to be a corporation iv. May apportion cost c. May Determine respectiverights in and to the public office PETITIONER: a. Take oath of office b. Execute official bond c. Take upon himself the execution of the office
24 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
R67. EXPROPRIATION
FIRST: Determine WON plaintiff has right to expropriate for public use or purpose
COMPLAINT -VERIFIED -CONTENTS: state w/ certainty 1. right to expropriate 2. purpose for expropriation 3. description of the real/personal property to be expropriated 4. show interest of all defendants -join as DEFENDANTS ALL persons owning claiming to own occupying any part/interest thereof 5. aver details of titleif TITLE a. in RP but OCCUPIED by private individuals b. OBSCURE/doubtful, plaintiff cannot w/ accuracy or certainty specify who are the real owners WHEN PLAINTIFF COULD TAKE/ENTER POSSESSION 1. File complaint/anytime after 2. Give DUE NOTICE TO DEFENDANT 3. Deposits w/ authorized government depository a. IF REAL PROPERTY INVOLVED amount: ASSESSED VALUE OF PROPERTY FOR PURPOSESE OF TAXATION IN MONEY (unless court authorizes CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT OF A GOVT BANK OF RP PAYABLE ON DEMAND TO AUTHORIZED GOVT DEPOSITORY) b. IF PERSONAL PROPERTY INVOLVED VALUE: provisionally ascertained, fixed by court 4. After DEPOSIT, court ORDER sheriff/proper officer to place plaintiff in possession of property 5. Sheriff would place plaintiff in possession 6. Sheriff would submit a report to court, serving copies to ALL PARTIES ACTION OF DEFENDANT A. NO OBJECTION/DEFENSE TO THE ACTION FILE and SERVE: a. Notice of appearance b. Manifestation of appearance Contents: specify property in which he claims to be interested PERIOD TO FILE: w/n time specified in the summons Effect: DEFENDANT entitled to NOTICE of all proceedings affecting his claim B. W/ OBJECTION/DEFENSE Serve ANSWER PERIOD: w/n time specified in the summons
25 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
IF OWNERSHIP UNCERTAIN CONFLICTING CLAIMS TO ANY PART OF THE PROPERTY Awarded sum may be ordered to be paid to the court for the benefit of the person adjudged to be entitled *PAYMENT ALWAYS REQUIRED to the court or the person awarded before the plaintiff may a. Enter the property b. Retain it for public use or purpose, if entry already made RIGHTS OF PLAINTIFF after the judgment and payment 1. Right to enter upon the property 2. Right to appropriate it for the public use or purpose defined in the judgment 3. Right to retain it (if already in possession) WHEN DEPOSIT to court = payment 1. Defendant/counsel absent themselves from the court 2. Defendant/counsel decline to receive the amount tendered APPEAL shall not delay rights of defendant to expropriate if appellate court decide that plaintiff has NO RIGHT TO EXPROPRIATION: judgment rendered: a. Enforce the restoration to the defendant of the possession of the property b. Determine damages w/c defendant sustained and may recover COSTS *fees of the commissioner: taxed as part of the costs of the proceedings *all costs (except those of rival claimants litigating their claim): paid by plaintiff X: judgment APPEALED, judgment of lower court affirmed cost of APPEAL paid by owner who appealed RECORDING of JUDGMENT Contents of judgment: state definitely by an adequate description 1. Particular property/interest therein expropriated 2. Nature of the public use or purpose for which it is expropriated If Real estate Expropriated: certified copy of judgment RECORDED in registry of deeds of place where property is situated >effect of recording: vest in plaintiff TITLE to real property POWER OF GUARDIAN should be w/ approval of the court
26 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
R69 PARTITION
WHO MAY FILE: person who has right to compel partition of real estate CONTENTS OF COMPLAINT: 1. Nature and extent of title 2. adequate description of the real estate of which partition is demanded 3. join ALL other persons interested in the property as defendants ORDER OF PARTITION When issued: -after trial -court finds that plaintiff has right thereto -then: a. parties may partition among themselves by proper instruments of conveyance then COURT WOULD CONFIRM the partition so agreed partition would be RECORDED in the registry of deeds -appealable b. parties may not agree: so COURT shall appoint max 3 competent and disinterested commissioners to make partition commissioners would set off to plaintiff and to each party such part and proportion of the property as the court shall direct SO PAG MAY COMMISSIONERS 1. Take and subscribe oath that they will faithfully perform their duties as commissioners 2. File Oath to court 3. Commissioners would view and examine the real estate After due notice to the parties to attend at such view and examination 4. Commissioners would hear parties as to their *preference in the portion of the property *comparative value Commissioners would then SET APART the properties to the parties in lots or parcels as will be most ADVANTAGEOUS AND EQUITABLE Consider: *improvements *situation *equality of different parts OR, instead of apportioning the properties among the heirs, the commissioners may instead ASSIGN to an heir or SELL the property in a public sale WHEN? It is made to appear to the commissioners that the real estate, or a portion thereof, CANNOT BE DIVIDED W/O PREJUDICE TO THE INTERESTS OF THE PARTIES 1. Assignment to one of the parties -by court order -party should pay the amounts ast he commissioner deem EQUITABLE 2. Public sale
5.
27 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions
28 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
DIRECT CONTEMPT
Grounds: 1. misbehavior in the presence of the court 2. misbehavior so near a court as to obstruct/interrupt proceedings before the same: a. disrespect toward the court b. offensive personalities toward others c. refusal to be sworn or to answer as a witness d. refusal to subscribe an affidavit or deposition when lawfully required -summarily adjuged -penalty: IF RTC+ 1. fine: max P2k
INDIRECT CONTEMPT
-w/charge in writing filed -w/ opportunity to comment and be heard -GROUNDS: MDAIASR 1. misbehavior in performance of official duties 2. disobedience of/resistance to a lawful writ/process/order/judgment of court 3. abuse of/any unlawful interference w/ processes and proceedings of court not constituting DIRECT CONTEMPT 4. improper conduct tending to impede/obstruct/degrade administration of justice 5. assuming to be an attorney/officer of a court, w/o authority 6. failure to obey subpoena duly served 7. rescue, attempted rescue of person/property in the custody of an officer -how commenced: *motu proprio by court against w/c contempt was committed *any formal charge VERIFIED PETITION -order respondent to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt Other formalities: 1. verified nga 2. supported by a. particulars b. CTC of docs, papers involved 3. comply w/ requirements for filing initiatory pleadings -if arose out of/related to a PRINCIPAL ACTION pending petition shall be docketed, heard and decided Gr: SEPARATELY X: court orders consolidation (no motion needed, discretionary upon court) WHERE TO FILE vs. RTC/officer appointed by it: w/ RTC Vs. lower court: w/RTC in place where lower court is sitting or w/ lower court, subject to appeal to RTC HEARING: release on bail -if no hearing: may release respondent on BOND (conditioned on appearance of respondent if may hearing na) -hearing day: court investigate charge, consider any comment, testimony, defense PUNISHMENT FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT vs. RTC + 1. fine: P30k max 2. imprisonment: 6m max or both
30 | C h a
Mendoza_Civil
Procedure_Ordinary
Civil
Actions