Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summer 2012 Instructor: Jennifer Carroll Email: jencarr2@uw.edu Office Hours: Denny 407, 10:00-11:00am M/W and by appointment Hegel remarks somewhere that all great world-historic facts and personages appear, so to speak, twice. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce. -Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon So in this case, the question becomes: What sort of social theory would actually be of interest to those who are trying to help bring about a world in which people are free to govern their own affairs? -David Graeber, Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology I was at the jail where a lot of protesters were being held and a big crowd of people was chanting 'This Is What Democracy Looks Like!' At first it sounded kind of nice. But then I thought: is this really what democracy looks like? Nobody here looks like me. -Jinee Kim, at the WTO Protests in Seattle
Texts
Required: Barbara Epstein 1991 Political Protest and Cultural Revolution: Non-Violent Direct Action in the 1970s and 1980s. Berkeley: University of California Press. Franz Fanon 1963 The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.
David Graeber 2004 Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC. David Graeber 2009 Direct Action: An Ethnography. Oakland: AK Press. Doug McAdam 1999[1982] Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency: 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Course Reader* (local print shop- TBA) *All readings for this course are available either in print or online through the UW library system on are available on the Internet. You are not required to purchase the course reader, but if you choose not to purchase it, you are responsible for accessing and reading all assigned materials on your own. Recommended: Some of our course readings come from these books. The selections assigned are available in the course reader, but if you have a strong interest in social theory and social movements, then I highly recommend that you add these books to your personal library. The Marx-Engels Reader, Second Edition. 1978 Robert C. Tucker, ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. The Antonio Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings 1916-1935. 2000 David Forgasc, ed. New York: New York University Press.
than 800 words will not be accepted. Even though these are short papers, they should be wellorganized, properly edited, and thoroughly proofread prior to submission.
o the scope of the paper (what part of the movement will be looked at, which people, which places, and why?) o the major theoretical frameworks that the authors are employing in the paper o the data that is used in the analysis (interviews, mass media, websites, blogs, etc) and why it was chosen. A detailed explanation of the theory that is being used to frame the analysis and arguments in the paper. A brief discussion of the data that is used in the paper. How was it collected? What are its strengths? What are its weaknesses? How is this data useful for answering the major question? An anthropological analysis or critique of that data which attempts to answer the major question posed in the introduction, supports the main argument of the paper, and offers new and interesting insights and/or realizations that in some way deepen our understanding of the social meanings, structures, and processes within the Occupy movement.
Part 2 of the paper will consist of five conclusions, each one written independently by each individual group member. Each students conclusion will be 3 pages in length (no more, no less), which means that Part 2 will be 15 pages long in its entirety. (An exception will be made if, due to class size, there are more or less than five students in a group. A group of 4 will have 12 pages total, a group of 6, 18 pages, etc.) The 3-page conclusion of each group member must: Identify what the author believes to be the most salient points made in the group paper, and explain why these messages, observations, or conclusions are so important. Discuss briefly what questions were left unanswered or areas left unexamined by the theories used in Part 1, and what new kinds of theoretical approaches could be or need to be developed in order to better understand these issues (For example, does our understanding of violence really apply to police brutality? Is there a need to better understand the role that social class plays in the Occupy movement? Do we need to develop better theories about blogging and personal narrative on the Internet? Does our definition of hegemony need to be changed or updated? Etc.). Discuss what he or she thinks the role of anthropology or anthropologists should be in the Occupy movement and/or in social movements and direct action campaigns now and in the future. Each group will submit a single, finalized paper into Catalyst Drop Box. Group Proposals for paper topics will be due on Friday, August 3. Paper Outlines, which describe the structure and content of Part 1 of the paper will be due on Friday, August 10. Group Presentations (described below) will be made in class on Thursday August 16. Final Drafts of the paper will be due on Saturday, August 18.
Extra Credit
Extra credit assignments may be given at the discretion of the instructor. If the instructor specifies a due date for an extra credit assignment, no extensions will be allowed, and the assignment will not be accepted after that date.
Grade Disputes
The University of Washington has procedures in place to handle grading disputes and appeals. This and other information about grading policies can be found online at http://www.washington.edu/students/gencat/front/Grading_Sys.html
It is expected each student will be prepared for class. Preparation is defined in this course as having read all of the material prior to the class period, cell phones either turned off or put on silent, possession of a functioning writing utensil and something which to write on, and have on their person the relevant textbooks/reading material for the class period. The student can determine the relevant information for the class period by referring to the course schedule, which is available on the class website. Students are welcome to bring laptops to class for note taking and accessing relevant on-line references and course materials. Email checking, chatting, game playing, and web surfing are highly inappropriate uses of class time and are disrespectful to the instructor and the other students in class. Students blatantly misusing technology in the classroom (including cell phones) will be asked to leave and will receive no credit for classroom participation on that day.
Academic Honesty
I take academic honesty very seriously. When flagrant cheating or plagiarism occurs, it is an insult to me, to the students in this course, and to the guilty student. It is an insult to the time we spend here teaching and learning from each other. Academic instruction, particularly in the liberal arts, is unique in its focus on intellectual fluency and collaborative effort rather than taskbased competition and self-promotion. Your college education does not consist of a collection of hoops that you need to get through. This course requires you to engage with course materials, with other students, with the instructor, and with the greater academic community in a productive
and innovative fashion. Academic dishonesty defeats the purposes of this class and of this institution, and it will not be tolerated. Especially in a discipline that requires you to be able to engage with the ideas of others and to cite multiple unique sources, plagiarism is an incredibly self-defeating activity. Plagiarism is, at the very least, grounds for a zero grade for that assignment. If a student is suspected of deliberate plagiarism on an assignment, that student will be reported to the Dean Representative on Academic Conduct in accordance with UWs Academic Honesty Policy. More information on UWs academic honestly policies can be found online: http://www.washington.edu/uaa/advising/help/academichonesty.php
Course Schedule
WEEK 1: Intro: Anthropology, Meet Anarchy. Anarchy, Meet Anthropology: Tuesday: Course introduction. Thursday: Graeber, David. 2002. The New Anarchists. The New Left Review MODULE 1: THEORETICAL ENGAGEMENTS WEEK 2: How We Think Direct Action Succeeds: The Case of the Civil Rights Movement Tuesday: Doug McAdam. Selections from Chapters 1, 2, and 3 Thursday: Doug McAdam. Chapters 6 and 7 Short Paper #1 Due Friday at Midnight WEEK 3: Why We Think It Fails: Two Classical Texts Tuesday: Karl Marx. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon Thursday: Antonio Gramsci. Selections on Hegemony and the Historic Bloc Short Paper #2 Due Friday at Midnight WEEK 4: Physical Violence and Structural Violence Tuesday: Franz Fanon. Concerning Violence from The Wretched of the Earth Thursday: John Galtung 1969. Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research 6(3): 167-191. Short Paper #3 Due Friday at Midnight WEEK 5: What Does Democracy Look Like? Tuesday: --Barbara Epstein. Political Protests and Cultural Revolution. Chapter 2 --David Graeber. Direct Action. Selections from Chapters 6 and 7 Thursday: --Barbara Epstein. Political Protests and Cultural Revolution. Chapter 5 --Anna Hutsol. Freedom to Bare Breasts in Public Essential to Democracy. Kyiv Post June 17, 2010. http://www.kyivpost.com/news/opinion/op_ed/detail/70059/print/ --Pink Revolution: Ukrainian Girl-Activists Undress in Flash-Mob Protests http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6n_3JfCtz4 Short Paper #4 Due Friday at Midnight WEEK 6: What Might A Radical Anthropology Look Like? Tuesday: David Graeber. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology, Pages 1-64. Thursday: David Graeber. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology, Pages 65-105. Short Paper #5 Due Friday at Midnight
MODULE 2: CONTEMPORARY CASE STUDIES WEEK 7: Tuesday: Movement for Indigenous Autonomy, Chiapas Mexico --Stephen, L. 1997. The Zapatista Opening: The Movement for Indigenous Autonomy and State Discourses on Indigenous Rights in Mexico, 1970-1996. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 2(2) 2-41 --Collier, G. 1997. Reaction and Retrenchment in the Highlands of Chiapas in the Wake of the Zapatista Rebellion. Journal of Latin American and Carribbean Anthropology 3(1): 14-31. Thursday: World Trade Organization, Seattle WA --Smith, Jackie 2001 Globalizing Resistance: The Battle of Seattle and the Future of Social Movements. Mobilization. 6(1): pp. 1-21. --Epstein, Barbara 2000 Not Your Parents Protest. Dissent 47(2): 8-11. --Martinez, Elizabeth 2000 Where Was the Color in Seattle? Looking for Reasons Why the Great Battle was So White. Monthly Review. 52(3): 141-148. Group proposal for final paper due Friday at midnight. WEEK 8: Summit of the Americas, Quebec QC Canada Tuesday: David Graeber, Direct Action: Introduction, Chapters 1 and 4. Thursday: David Graeber, Direct Action: Chapter 5, Selections from Chapter 8 Outline for Part 1 of final paper due Friday at midnight. WEEK 9: Tuesday: Summit of the Americas, Quebec QC Canada David Graeber, Direct Action: Chapter 10 Thursday: The Occupy Movement GROUP PRESENTATIONS! Group Papers due into Catalyst Drop Box on Saturday, August 18 by midnight.