Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Umesh P, G.Varaprasad
Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
B.M.S. College of Engineering,
Bangalore 5600 19,
India.
Email:drvaraprasad@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
NOMENCLATURES
3. PROPOSED METHOD
The proposed model considers an area of Figure 6 summarizes the packet delivery
7KmX7Km with a set of regular nodes deployed ratio. Based on the results, it concludes that up to
randomly over the network. The vehicle traffic density of 5vehicles/km, the packet
transmission range is 50m. The simulation delivery ratios of two models are 93.56% and
consists of 10,000 nodes moving around a 98.35% respectively. At traffic density of
circular and square road of 6283m length with 16vehicles/km per line, the packet delivery ratio
four lines. Here, it uses UMPS simulator to of proposed model has decreased as compared to
evaluate the network performance of two routing FleetNet model. If the traffic density is
algorithms. 25vehicles/km per line, then the proposed model
delivers 95.86% of the data packets due to
Table I. Simulation parameters. reactive algorithm principles.
Simulation time 2000s
Topology size 7KmX7Km
No. of nodes 1000
No.of clusters 10
No.of cluster heads 10
No. of malicious nodes 7
Transmission range 50m
Routing protocol ZRP
Frequency 2.4Ghz
Channel capacity 2Mbps
Traffic type CBR
Figure 6. Number of vehicles against packet
CBR packet size 512 bytes
delivery ratio.
Simulator UMPS
Total packets 30000 The average delay of a data packet is shown
in Figure 7. The average delay of two models
5. SIMULATION RESULTS varies from 113ms to 1.10s. The FleetNet model
has experienced more delay for all traffic
This simulation considers three performance densities. The route-discovery process will take
metrics namely packet delivery ratio, average long time in FleetNet model as compared to
packet delay and throughput. From the results, it proposed model. If the traffic density is
is noticed that the throughput of two models is 25vehicles/km per line, then the proposed model
increased if the number of vehicles is takes only 0.19s.
6vehicles/km per line. The proposed model
clearly outperforms for 25vehicles/km per line as 6. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK
compared to Fleet model. The connectivity in
network is significantly better than that of small In urban areas, the VANET play an
density traffic as shown in Figure 5. important role to provide transport facility
efficiently. The performance evaluation is an
important factor in VANET. It is also noticed
that the proposed model has shown the better
results in terms of packet delivery ratio, average
delay and throughput. In this work, transmission Review”, In Proc. of IEEE ITS, pp. 585-
range and parameters are fixed. However, it also 590(2004).
observed that low transmission range will not 7. O. Sidla, L. Paletta, and C. Janner, “Vehicle
guarantee the connectivity among all nodes to Recognition for Highway Lane Safety”, In
ensure effective communication. Proc. of IEEE ITS, pp. 531-536(2004).
8. Wilfried E, “FleetNet Applications for Inter-
Vehicle Communication”, IEEE Intelligent
Vehicles Symposium, pp. 162-167(2003).
9. Tatsuaki. O, Kazuya. M, Shoji F, Susumu
Matsui, “Performance Measurement of
Mobile Ad Hoc Network for Application to
Internet-ITS”, In Proc. of International
Symposium on Applications and Internet,
pp. 83-87(2004).
10. J. P. Singh, Nicholas B, “Proposal and
Demonstration of Link Connectivity
Figure 7. Number of vehicles against delay. Assessment Based Enhancements to Routing
in Mobile Adhoc Networks”, IEEE
REFERENCES Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 15,
pp. 2834-2838(2003).
1. J. Beutel M. Dyer, L. Meier, “Scalable
Topology Control for Deployment-Sensor Author’s information
Networks”, In Proc. of International
Conference Information Processing in Umesh P obtained B.E Degree in Electronics
Sensor Networks, pp. 359-363(2005). and Communication Engineering from
2. J. Ding S. Y. Cheung, and P. Varaiya Visveswaraiah Technological University,
“Signal Processing of Sensor Node Data for Belgaum in 2004. Currently he is doing M.Tech
Vehicle Detection”, In Proc. of IEEE ITS, Degree in Computer Science and Engineering in
pp. 70-75(2004). B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bangalore. His
3. AutoNet: Adhoc Peer-to-Peer Information areas of interests are embedded system, wireless
Technology for Traffic Networks communications.
www.its.uci.edu/ monally/mgmautonet.htm
4. C. Li K. Ikeuchi, M. Sakauchi, “Acquisition G.Varaprasad received B.Tech Degree in
of Traffic Information using Video Camera Computer Science and Engineering from Sri
with 2DSpatiotemporal Image Venkateswara University, Tirupati in 1999 and
Transformation Technique”, In Proc. of M.Tech Degree in Computer Science and
IEEE ITS, pp. 634-638(1999). Engineering from B.M.S. College of
5. D. McErlean, S. Narayanan, “Distributed Engineering, Bangalore in 2001 and PhD Degree
Detection and Tracking in Sensor in Computer Networks from Anna University,
Networks”, In Proc. of ASILOMAR, pp. Chennai in 2004 and worked as a Postdoctoral
1174-1178(2002). fellow at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
6. Z. Sun, G. Bebis, and R. Miller, “On-road in 2005. Currently, he is working as an Asst.
Vehicle Detection Using Optical Sensors: A Professor in B.M.S. College of Engineering,
Bangalore. His areas of interests are wireless
communications and sensor network.