Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The goal of a Ph.D. research is not making a voluminous book with the information that one gets his hands on. It should be an original contribution. It should resolve certain dilemmas confronting the academics and practitioners in a chosen area.
these web libraries, contact me on mobile: 0-984841011)The primary purpose of literature review is: identification of research gaps. It means that you have to understand where extant research has stopped or what is left unresearched. The gap so found can be converted into hypotheses. 2. Hypotheses -framing (hypotheses formulation or identification of hypotheses) is the most critical part of research. Hypotheses are the research questions or dilemmas that the academic community is faced with and are waiting to be resolved by a scholar like you. 3. A hypothesis looks like a question. For example, Are women more satisfied than men on their jobs? is a hypothesis. This is just an example. (This might have already been resolved by a research scholar like you.) Ideally, a Ph.D. thesis should comprise resolution of 10-50 most critical and interesting hypotheses. 4. Literature review reveals to you what hypotheses were already resolved and you dont have to solve again. Literature does not mean anything that you find in the newspapers, magazines, websites, textbooks etc. Literature should primarily comprise the articles made based on empirical research. Empirical research is the one done based on experiments, observations and data collected with scientifically-developed research instruments. Research articles are found in scholarly journals, particularly online journals carried by online libraries like emeraldinsight, jstor, proquest, ebscohost etc. 5. Literature review, if diligently done, will provide the researcher with a proper background of his research for logical documentation. The background presented in the thesis will explain how the subject or research question evolved or how it was understood till now, where it stands now and what the researcher is going to do on that. 6. Literature review gives: (1) research questions/ hypotheses,(2) justification for the study/ research topic. 7. It is needless to say that research topic should be identified only after extensive literature review. It is quite sad that the universities ask for research topic and hypotheses at the time of application for enrolment itself (at a time when the candidate did not read even a single research article yet). Ideally, the universities should have identified research questions/hypotheses; but it is never the case with our universities over here. 8. While doing literature review, the important findings should be noted. These notes are the main part of the thesis under heads like: introduction, background, literature review, etc. All the referred articles should be properly listed under References. There should be cross linkages between the articles noted in the references list and text in the thesis. What you note in
the main text is called in-text citation. It means that if you have something in the list of references, it should appear in the main text. In-text citation looks like (for example): (Meesala, 2011). This should be expanded in the references list. The way these references are noted is called , academic referencing style, academic format, academic style etc. 9. The referencing style follows certain order in noting authors names, year of publication etc. and also the punctuation. Read the information by Googling. There are many academic formats like Harvard style, APA style, MLA style, CMS style etc. 10.Referencing for your thesis is very easy if you are familiar with how to use References in MS Word 2007. If you dont know how to use, you can visit me and I will give you a brief tutorial for a small fee.
The process is: (1) conduct a meeting of some experts, and with their help, generate as many statements as possible, on that particular construct. Delete all the duplicates. With the remaining items, conduct a pilot survey. Do item analysis by arranging all the responses to an item in ascending order and finding t-statistic for two groups of extreme responses. If the t-value is 1.75 or more, the item is good and can be retained. After that, for all the items in the construct, find out Cronbachs alfa. If the Cronbachs alfa is more than 0.60, the construct is reliable. Reliability means that the items (statements in the questions) are well-correlated. It is the average of item-to-item correlations. I can find out Cronbachs alfa for your constructs, if you give your data in an Excel sheet. Further, the researcher has to work out Content Validity Index. If the index is more than 4.00, the scale can be considered a valid scale. Search google for content validity index. For construct validity, factor analysis has to be done; for criterion validity, correlation between the construct and the outcome measure should be worked out. It should be noted with care, that questionnaire should relate to hypotheses but not any questions that occur to an innocent researchers mind. The instrument, of course, should contain a section consisting of questions about the respondents profile like age, gender, income, length of service etc. The data on these items can be checked for their relationship with other constructs.
Report Writing
What one has to master for good thesis is to write a clear paragraph. One should have skill in making thesis statement, tie-in/transitional phrases, tie-in words, paragraph-writing, topic sentence etc. Literature review should be presented systematically so that the reader understands the evolution of the topic over a period of time. It should flow like a story but relevant and precise to the point. Idiomatic and standard English has to be used.
For help and guidance, you may contact: Prof. Appalayya ameesala@gmail.com or appalayyastrategypearson@gmail.com or 9848514011
Meesala call: 0-