Professional Documents
Culture Documents
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
note that these objectives should not be activities that will be used in the lesson plan. Rather, they should be the learning outcomes of those activities. You would probably find out exactly what materials you are going to use later, however, they should be shown early in your lesson plan. This way, if someone else decided to start using your lesson plan, they would know in advance what materials would be required. You may also want to write out an Anticipatory Set, which would be a great way to lead into the lesson plan and develop the students' interest in learning what you are getting ready to teach. A good example deals with a lesson on fractions. The teacher could start by asking the students how they would divide up a pizza to make sure each of their 3 friends got an equal amount of pie, and tell them that they can do this if they know how to work with fractions. At this point you need to write the step-by-step procedures that will be performed to reach each of the above mentioned objectives. These don't have to involve every little thing that the teacher will say and do, but they should list the relevant actions that the teacher needs in order to perform them. After the above mentioned procedures have been completed, you may want to provide your students with time for independent practice. For the example of above, students could be given some time to add different numbers of unifix cubes together that a partner would provide them with. Just before you start moving on to the assessment phase you should be prepared to create some sort of closure for the lesson plan. A good idea for this is to return to your anticipatory set, for example, you can ask students how they would divide up that pie now that they know how to work with fractions (check step 4). Now you want to write your assessment/evaluation. Many lesson plans don't really need them, but most of them should have some sort of evaluation of whether or not the objectives were reached. The key to doing this is to make sure that the assessment specifically measures whether the objectives were reached or not. You should make different directions for students with learning disabilities and extensions for others. Examples of this would be adding 1 unifix cube to 1 unifix cube for students with learning disabilities and adding 9 unifix cubes to 13 unifix cubes for the more advanced students and somewhere in between for everyone else. This is most effective when you use specific adaptations for specific students to take into account their individual differences. It's a really good idea for you to include a Connections section, which really shows how the lesson plan could be integrated with other subjects. An example of this would be to have students paint 2 oranges, then 3 more oranges below them, etc. so that they can learn how to integrate Art into the lesson plan.
There are some usefull steps to developing students worksheet: Prompting Instructional Planning Designing Performance Tasks Identifying Specific Criteria for a Particular Assignment Selecting Specific Behaviours of Interest Adapting to Suit Specific Situations or Students Recording Observations Prompting Student Self-Evaluation Collaborating with Other Teachers and Support Staff Adapting the Scale for Other Grade Levels Adjusting for Other Times of Year The criteria of good students worksheet: Make the students found their own mathematics To promote the students to construc their own mathematics The teacher can employe the discovery method Students can found the mathematics formula by their selves
2. Presentation, introducing new material 3. Association, whereby the new is compared with the old and connected (the stage of apperception) 4. Generalization, whereby the teacher presents other instances of the new idea 5. Application, whereby the ideas are applied to further material, carried out by the child individually (a problem-solving phase)
consideration short-term and long-term memory of educational content, as well as time spent on learning . With programmed learning participants are guided by questions and tasks which stimulate their inner mental activity, while the possibility to check the correct answer influences the so-called self-confirmation which causes the feeling of extrinsic and intrinsic reward and motivation. The use of programmed learning is especially useful in distance education and computer-based instruction. Computer-based instruction (CBI) is based on automation and individualization of the presentation of educational content and interaction with the students. Computer-based instruction can be applied in the following areas: drills and practical problems, handbook teaching, educational games, modelling and simulations, hypertext, multimedia and distance education. Computer based instruction uses numerous teaching methods: problem solving , guided dialogue, linear teaching, network teaching, adaptive teaching, algorithmic request generating, simulation, computer-guided experimenting, monitoring of the learning process, self-assessment and diagnostic testing.
fundamental and direction, involved in the more difficult production of displays, charts, dioramas, puppets, models, mock-ups and other materials.
The error must be considered as a necessary learning and personality development, unknowingly used as a source of encouragement and development is an important element of the educational process. The teacher must be well prepared in their knowledge of personality on individual resources such as conversation, theories of group dynamics, and others, where traditional training is generally inadequate. Educators should not lose sight of the use of all forms and ways of activation, in which students have to justify and defend their views, decisions and practice assertiveness tests, which provide demonstrations for the formation of beliefs and modes of action leading to personal development. The system of educational influences in schools must meet the specific needs of personality in the age at which the student is. The style of work, the content of activities, methods used, should arouse the interest of the students for their performance and contribute to educational objectives and external practical processes, be transformed into training grounds and psychological personality . The student as the subject of the educational process, it automatically treats the external influence, but was incorporated into the developing personality through a process of psychological transformation in which it plays an essential role active social practice, individual experience accumulated the subjects needs. The teacher does not always support the personal views and opinions of adolescents and youth, which may create tensions in relationships and a negative representation at work in shaping the personality of the same. It is necessary to take into account opinions, evaluations, and judgments of others, this allows us to enter their inner world and know them better, to guide and communicate more effectively. The teachers task to coordinate information activities and personality development of students, through the systematization of communicative interactions, presenting reality in a clear, lucid, simple and interactive. It should maximize the possibilities and potentialities of the group to contribute to personal development of each of its members. It is that knowledge is produced primarily in terms of the objectives set by the students themselves, taking into account their particular personality. The potential for selfregulation of behavior generally manifest in the possibilities of students view their own objectives and goals, as well as in the domain of the results to be achieved through its activities in the different tasks it performs. When learning from a developer approach allows reflection of the psychological subject which is involved in the situation causing not only an assessment of the situation or the intellectual resources of their own, but reflects and enriches content and higher mental functions in regulating the behavior settings . For better development of self-regulatory capabilities of the students personality, it must have a thorough understanding of its current features and potential, this will enable us to study it achievable goals, be persistent in their achievement, find ways and means according to their particularities to achieve, be creative and look after their own development. There is evidence that the peculiarities of self-esteem also related to the potential for students to develop personally, as they help to develop the ability to set goals that can be actually achieved, along with enough objectivity to evaluate them. Besides self-esteem may constitute a major cause of behavior that drives the personality to overcome their own limitations and disagreements.
In the communication process the teacher must foster the right conditions, a space for the development of greater interaction between members of the group, communicate more effectively making it a condition not only growth but also personal growth group, and this is only achieved if the teaching is organized as a group activity, generating and mediating the relationships between its members, that encourages the establishment of dependency relationships to achieve meaningful learning. The group interaction is not easily achieved, often does not manifest a real working group, each participant the more defended their views, but does not learn, or is enriched by the vision of others, which is typical intervention decoupled negative phenomenon that affects the group dynamics. The development is socially determined, this being its essence. The interactions in which the subject is committed to lifelong allows this process to achieve that with the increasing complexity of social contexts of the subject demand restructuring and new psychological formations capable of adapting to life in the middle and then be able to transcend the immediacy of their behavior, being the most important result of the development achievement of behavioral self-regulation. It has proposed an approach to teacher-student and student-student, and group as a whole, emphasizing the possibilities of the student to perform beyond their current development with the help of significant other, giving the teacher a role different from Presenter and controller of the strategy but part of the felt need to develop or introduce the strategy and that he himself, in conjunction with the student who transfers and guide their practice and their co-learners, whereas learning situation can be from specific areas or from the multidisciplinary nature in a teaching or professional practice.
very interesting question or situation, the students will need some time to think and formulate a response. If you have very reticent students, you can try asking them to write down one or two ideas before you open up discussion. Or try handing out a list of discussion topics at the end of the session for the next session to give them time to think. Even so, there may be times when there is just no response. That's when you need to re-state the topic, use a different example, take only a part of it at a time, or throw out a "what if" scenario or devil's advocate proposition. But the important thing is to learn to bide your time and bite your tongue and wait for the students to respond. When possible, set up the room for discussion. A circle works best, especially if the group can sit around a table. If you can't re-arrange the furniture, then move around the room, sit among the students; become a discussion participant rather than a teacher. Get to know the students' names and who they are. Students are more likely to be engaged with the group if addressed by name rather than by being pointed at. If you know the interests, majors, experiences, etc. of the students, it becomes much easier to think of ways to involve them. For example, if you ask "Jane" to contribute a perspective based on her semester in Rome, you're more likely to get her involved in the discussion than if you ask if anyone wants to say something about the Coliseum. Provide positive feedback for participation. If a student is reluctant to speak up and then makes a contribution that just lies there like a dead fish, that student is not likely to try again. If you can't think of anything better, thank the student for his/her contribution. But it's much better to build on what the student has said, add an insight, ask others how they would respond to what the student said, and otherwise weave that contribution into the fabric of the discussion. Feedback can be a good means of getting through a lull in the discussion also. A recap of what has been discussed so far lets students know that you heard what they said, helps to reinforce main points, and often stimulates further discussion. Show enthusiasm for the subject. You can't expect students to become interested in a discussion topic for which the instructor shows no enthusiasm. This usually means that the instructor has not done his/her homework, a part of which is to think about what is interesting, why the subject is worthwhile or relevant, personal experience with the subject, how the topic relates to current events, etc. If you are interested in the subject, then you will be interested in discovering what your students think and feel. Teach your students how to participate. Many of them may have had little or no experience with small group discussion, and most of those who have experience have never been taught how to do it well. There are all kinds of resources in the library in the Speech/Communications area about small-group discussion. You could prepare a handout for your students or assign a project (preferably in small groups) that involves their preparing information for the rest of the group about small-group communications. Ease students into discussion. One tactic is to arrive at the classroom early and engage the first students to arrive in "chit chat" about the weather, a recent sports event, something in the news, etc. The point is to get students comfortable and talking so that as you ease them into the subject for the day, you are not making a sudden demand for performance. You will also be establishing the idea that discussion is a natural process, not cruel and inhuman punishment, or something with which they have no experience. Clarify for yourself how you see your role as a discussion facilitator. If you are uncomfortable, your students will also be uncomfortable. So don't try to make yourself into the "Great Communicator" if you are not. Are you more comfortable with a prepared list of topics and questions or do you like a more free-wheeling atmosphere? Do you feel that
some topics are strictly off limits or do you feel that you can manage even very "touchy" topics by keeping the discussion relevant and on course? Are you able to give over enough control to the students so that they feel some ownership and responsibility to making the course work? Provide opportunities for students to talk to each other in smaller, unsupervised groups so that they get to know each other and become comfortable with sharing ideas. You can do this with small "break-out" groups which are assigned a specific task about which they will report to the larger group. You can assign group projects, encourage the formation of small study groups, or have the class form interest groups which are responsible for contributing something related to their particular interest periodically. The point is to encourage interaction that is not under the watchful eye of the instructor and helps students to become comfortable with each other. Manage both process and content. This is often rather difficult at first but becomes much easier with practice. Good discussion is as much about process as it is about content and if you concentrate on one but neglect the other, you are likely to have problems. The tendency is to become caught up in the content and forget to encourage quiet students to contribute or forget to minimize your own contributions. But concentrating too much on making sure everyone contributes or on acknowledging and rewarding contributions can allow the conversation to stray too far afield or become mired in a tangle of irrelevant minutiae. To a great extent, you will need to take your cues from the students. While you are part of the discussion, you have the added responsibility of monitoring it as well. During the course of a class session, you will probably have to do some of each. Bringing students into the process of the course and even having them contribute to content does not mean that you have to give over total control. It's still your course and your responsibility to inform the students what information they should study, how they will be expected to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding, and your standards for performance. It is their responsibility to read, study, participate, and perform. When you ask students to participate, you are not asking them to simply voice their unformed and uninformed opinions. At the developmental stage for most freshmen and sophomores, students tend to believe fervently that everyone has a right to his/her opinion. Unfortunately, the corollary, for them, is that therefore all opinions are equal. Part of your mission, therefore, is to help them understand the difference. Listen, learn, and adapt. There is no single prescription for all groups. Much like individual people, groups have individual characters and you will need to adapt your style to them as much as is comfortable for you. If you can be open to those differences, they will become part of what makes teaching an interesting challenge year after year after year.
challenges, and apply that knowledge to setting goals for the future. We believe strongly in developing active learners and the final presentation is a cornerstone of that belief. Students begin to seriously prepare for the annual presentation during the 4th quarter. They are given developmentally appropriate assistance to prepare for the presentation. Younger students are given more structure and guidance in helping them prepare to participate in a formal interview. Older students develop a 20-25 minute presentation. Whatever the format, each student must give a brief introduction of themselves, address each outcome specifically with supporting evidence of their growth, tie things together in a conclusion and address judges questions.
most of the research report and jump to the conclusions and recommendations. That is a mistake. Conclusions and recommendations are not an automatic extension of the results. They require careful inference in light of the delimitations of the study (the bounds on the questions of the study, the contexts studied, the population and sampling frame, and the interventions that occurred or were administered) and in light of the limitations of the study (the methodological shortcomings). They also require broad knowledge of the topic being addressed, they require combining facts and values, and they involve some speculation. Even eminent researchers occasionally blow the conclusions and recommendations of a study. It is not uncommon to find a conclusion or two with no real support from the results, and occasionally a conclusion will be contradicted by the results. The most common reasons for that are fatigue and ambition. The conclusions and recommendations cannot be generated until the rest of the research is completed, and by then the research has usually taken more time and money than expected. So the conclusions and recommendations are often hastily assembled. In addition, many researchers have hopes of making important contributions, and, at the end, they sometimes succumb to concluding and recommending more than is well justified by their study. Whether there is good justification for the conclusions can usually be determined by reading the research report. Indeed, readers may infer additional conclusions that are well supported by the study but not stated in the report. It should be noted, however, that some omissions in the report may make some conclusions appear unjustified even though the researcher actually has good justification for them. Common errors when generating the conclusions and recommendations are the following: 1. Stating conclusions that the researcher thinks are correct and important, but for which the study provides no support. 2. Generalizing well beyond the questions, contexts, population, and interventions that were actually studied. 3. Not adding cautions when there are important limitations in methods and/or their execution in the study. 4. Falsely interpreting statistical significance and the lack thereof (This is explained in 5. Selectively focusing on some results while ignoring others and the pattern of results 6. Moving from inference to values and speculation, with using wording that clearly indicates that is involved.
include: promoting student learning by providing the student with feedback, normally to help improve his/her performance; valuating student knowledge, understanding, abilities or skills; providing a mark or grade that enables a student's performance to be established. The mark or grade may also be used to make progress decisions; enabling the public (including employers), and higher education providers, to know that an individual has attained an appropriate level of achievement that reflects the academic standards set by the awarding institution and agreed UK norms, including the frameworks for higher education qualifications.
References: http://www.learnatlast.com/10steps-to-developing-a-quality-lesson-plan.html http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/perf_stands/worksheet_intro.pdf http://fmgmpbatangbarat.wordpress.com/pengembangan-rencana-pelaksanaanpembelajaran-matematika/ http://www.carnet.hr/referalni/obrazovni/en/mkod/dev_teaching.html http://www.centrorisorse.org/personal-development-from-the-interaction-studentstudent-and-student-teacher-and-as-a-group.html http://www.celt.iastate.edu/teaching/small_group.html http://www.gallaudet.edu/clerc_center/information_and_resources/info_to_go/transition_ to_adulthood/portfolios_for_student_growth.html http://www.gwu.edu/~litrev/a08.html