Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ol
http://theologytoday.ptsem.edu/apr1993/v50-1-bookreview7.htm Generated by Foxit PDF Creator Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
discussion of biblical inspiration; the usual distinction between revelation that is natural and that which is special is discarded; the section on the person and work of Christ, though completely orthodox, is remarkably short; and the discussion on the Christian liferegeneration, justification, sanctification, perseverance, and electioncomes toward the end of the book as a sub-topic under the church. Despite the firmly traditional cast to the volume, then, it is not without innovative flourishes. These innovations are not, however, the grounds for the claim of the subtitle, that this book advances a new paradigm for doing theology. This rests on the author's contention that theology has been hobbled over the centuries by a bifurcation between the two spheres of sacred and secular (and confused by those who merge the spheres into a monism), that this is what has set theology and philosophy marching down different and competing paths, and that the time is now ripe for a fresh realignment. The point of integration between the two spheres, the way in which theology and philosophy can again work together cooperatively, needs to be found through a common point of identity in the written Word of God that is "the religious bond, the unbreakable link, which binds the Creator and his creatures together in covenant relationship." This is the new paradigm. Spykman's observations about the disintegrating field of knowledge in the modern world and the need to find a way of thinking more comprehensively are correct. For him to suggest, however, that his solution constitutes a new paradigm stretches the meaning of the words a bit. It is not really a paradigm and it certainly is not new. After all, is this not what Jonathan Edwards and a host of others have attempted, even if they did not have the Kuyperian nuances that the author favors? Perhaps Spykman, who has a foot
1 de 2
11/15/2010 9:49 PM
http://theologytoday.ptsem.edu/apr1993/v50-1-bookreview7.htm Generated by Foxit PDF Creator Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
in the Dooyeweerdians' world, is here reflecting the internecine warfare that has gone on for years in this corner of modern Calvinism, for Dooyeweerdians have been relentlessly hostile to theology. It is a mistake, however, to imagine that a peace proposal presented in the context of an extremely obscure, and often parochial debate, is a new paradigm for doing theology. There is a sense of proportion missing here. This book is really written for those who have already given their consent to the Belgic Confession. For that reason, there are many assumptions made, comparatively little persuasive argument offered, and modern thought is largely ignored. Those, however, who want their traditional, Dutch Calvinism in more deliberately biblical form, who want it simply and directly spelled out, will find this an excellent treatment. David F. Wells Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, South Hamilton, MA
2 de 2
11/15/2010 9:49 PM