Boe Agenda 2011 12 13

POST *** NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING *** BOARD OF EXAMINERS
LOCATION: Capitol Building The Guinn Room 101 N. Carson Street Carson City, Nevada December 13, 10:00 a.m.
DATE AND TIME:
Below is an agenda of all items to be considered. Action will be taken on items preceded by an asterisk (*). Items on the agenda may be taken out of the order presented, items may be combined for consideration by the public body; and items may be pulled or removed from the agenda at any time at the discretion of the Chairperson.
AGENDA
1. *2. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR POSSIBLE ACTION APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 8, 2011 BOARD OF EXAMINERS MEETING MINUTES REQUEST FOR GENERAL FUND ALLOCATION FROM THE INTERIM FINANCE COMMITTEE (IFC) CONTINGENCY FUND
Pursuant to NRS 353.268, an agency or officer shall submit a request to the State Board of Examiners for an allocation by the Interim Finance Committee from the Contingency Fund. A. Department of Education Education State Programs - $4,521
*3.
Pursuant to NRS 353.268, the Department of Education is requesting an allocation of $4,521 from the Interim Finance Contingency Fund to provide funding for travel for the top three applicants for the Superintendent of Public Instruction position which is anticipated to become vacant in April 2012.
Board of Examiners Meeting December 13, 2011 - Agenda Page 1
B.
Office of the Governor Ethics Commission - $65,000
Pursuant to NRS 353.268, the Ethics Commission is requesting an allocation of $65,000 from the Interim Finance Contingency Fund to provide funding to contract with a temporary, full-time attorney for a 6-month period from January through June 2012 in order to assist the Commission in addressing its over two-year backlog in writing and publishing its opinions.
*4.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT WITH A FORMER EMPLOYEE

A. Department of Tourism & Cultural Affairs Nevada Magazine
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 240, Section 1, Subsection 3 of the 2011 Legislature, the Department of Tourism & Cultural Affairs Nevada Magazine hereby seeks a favorable Board of Examiners decision regarding Nevada Magazines determination, as an enterprise fund, to use a temporary services contract to employ a former Ad Director for Nevada Magazine for the purpose of continuing advertising sales for the Nevada Magazine and Visitors Guide for the current Ad Director who is on leave for the period not to exceed 4 months.
*5.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION AUTHORITY TO PAY MINING CLAIM REFUNDS

A. Department of Taxation $522,960
Pursuant to Senate Bill 493, Section 16.7 of the 2011 Legislature, the Department of Taxation must submit mining claim refund requests to the Board of Examiners for approval. The Department is requesting authority to pay 61 refund requests totaling $522,960.
*6.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION STATE VEHICLE PURCHASE

Pursuant to NRS 334.010, no automobile may be purchased by any department, office, bureau, officer or employee of the State without prior written consent of the State Board of Examiners. AGENCY NAME Department of Wildlife Directors Office Department of Wildlife Diversity Department of Wildlife Heritage Department of Wildlife Game Management Department of Wildlife Habitat Department of Wildlife Law Enforcement Total: # OF VEHICLES 1 1 1 6 1 3 NOT TO EXCEED: $33,055 $23,964 $38,949 $154,560 $38,949 $72,539 $362,016
*7.
STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL REVISIONS

The State Administrative Manual (SAM) is being submitted to the Board of Examiners for approval of additions and revisions in the following Chapters: 0328 - Lease Contracts, 1600 Information Technology, 2622-Stale Claims.
*8.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TORT CLAIM

Approval of tort claim pursuant to NRS 41.037
A. Donald Hixon TC15995 Amount of Claim $175,000
*9.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION LEASES

BOE # LESSEE LESSOR AMOUNT $492,234 Department of Business and Industry White Cross, LP Housing Division
Lease Description:
Term of Lease: 12/01/2011 11/30/2016
1.
This is an extension of an existing lease which has been negotiated to house the Department of Business and Industry, Housing Division.
2.
Department of Health and Human Services Aging and Disability Services

Lease Description:
Term of Lease:
JS Park Sahara, LLC $277,366
This is an extension of an existing lease which has been negotiated, has a rate reduction and an addition to current facilities to house the Department of Health and Human Services, Aging and Disability Services.
01/01/2012 01/31/2016
3.
Department of Health and Human Services Aging and Disability Services

Lease Description:
JS Park Sahara, LLC $89,156
This is a relocation to accommodate the need for space for consolidations, rate reduction and an addition to current facilities to house the Department of Health and Human Services, Aging and Disability Services.
Term of Lease: 01/01/2012 01/31/2016
4.
Department of Health and Human Services Health Division

Lease Description: Lease Description: Lease Description:
Term of Lease:
Pearce Family, LLC
$140,124
This is an extension of an existing lease which has been negotiated to house the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Division, Early Intervention Services.
01/01/2012 12/31/2016
Secretary of State 5.
Term of Lease:
Bauserman Group, LLC

03/01/2010 04/30/2015
$238,695
This is an amendment to the original lease to identify the current party as Landlord and the original lease as a sublease
Department of Wildlife 6.
Las Vegas Boat Harbor, Inc.
$3,192
This is a new boat slip lease at the only marina in the area in which the boat will be used. The boat is used by the Department of Wildlifes Fisheries Division for biological research on an ongoing, year-round, basis. Storing the boat at the marina is more efficient than storing the boat on land and frequently transporting it to a launch site.
Term of Lease: 07/01/2011 06/30/2012
*10. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION CONTRACTS

BOE # DEPT # 011 1.
Contract Description:
STATE AGENCY
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE - STATE ENERGY OFFICE ENERGY CONSERVATION
CONTRACTOR
BOARD OF REGENTS OBO NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, UNR
FUNDING SOURCE
FEDERAL
AMOUNT
$264,541
SOLE SOURCE/ PROFESSIONAL SERVICE EXEMPTION
This is the fourth amendment to the original interlocal agreement, which provides funding to allow the contractor to purchase equipment, materials, and certifications for local jurisdiction building departments and staff. The amendment will also allow the Nevada State Office of Energy to provide an outreach program campaign to Nevada's businesses that will be affected by the new law and to consumers. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $577,546.19 to $842,087.19.
Term of Contract: 08/11/2010 - 03/15/2012 Consultant: NO Contract # 11370
012 2.
NUCLEAR PROJECTS OFFICE - HIGH LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE
STROLIN CONSULTING LLC
HIGHWAY
$50,000
This is a new contract for services necessary to implement the agency's mission in light of staff reductions and the continuing requirements of oversight of the Yucca Mountain repository program and the on-going Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing proceeding, including work related to transuranic and low-level radioactive waste shipments within Nevada, work associated with the Agreement-in-Principle between the State of Nevada and the US Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration/Nevada Site Office, and other services required for the effective operations of the agency.
Term of Contract: Upon Approval - 12/31/2012 Consultant: NO Contract # 12850
030 3.
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE SPECIAL FUND
JONES VARGAS CHARTERED
OTHER: STATUTORY CONTINGENCY FUND - SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT
$165,000
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
This is a new contract to provide legal representation of the defendants in the case of Treasury Solutions Holdings, Inc., et al. v. State of Nevada, Ex Rel Board of Trustees of the College Savings Plans of Nevada, et al. including (1) conducting informal investigations and witness interviews with current and former employees and consultants of the State of Nevada Treasurer's Office; (2) preparation of Answer and Counterclaim and all other pleadings in this lawsuit on behalf of the defendants; (3) perform all discovery; (4) perform all pre-trial and trial work, including appearing at the pre-trial and trial of any issues which remain after dispositive motions.
030 4.
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TORT CLAIM FUND
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
OTHER: INSURANCE PREMIUM TRUST FUND
$40,000
This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides services which includes, but is not limited to project administration and meetings, and review of report by plaintiff's expert. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $19,999.98 to $59,999.98 due to additional field investigations and research before possible trial.
030 5.
LUMOS & ASSOCIATES
$30,000
This is the third amendment to the original contract, which provides preliminary investigations and compiles a report of findings and possibly trial testimony. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $59,998 to $89,998 due to an increase in potential trial testimony.
BOE #
DEPT # 030
STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR
TURNIPSEED ENGINEERING, LTD
FUNDING SOURCE
AMOUNT
$30,000
6.
This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides preliminary investigations, a report of findings and possibly trial testimony. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $19,998 to $49,998 due to the continuing work that is required for the State to complete a thorough investigation for possible trial testimony and the additional requirements handed down by the court.
051 7.
TREASURER'S OFFICE - COLLEGE SAVINGS TRUST
COX MEDIA, LLC
OTHER: NEVADA COLLEGE SAVINGS
$24,604
SOLE SOURCE
This is a new contract to provide direct marketing of the Nevada College Savings Plans and Prepaid Tuition programs to parents and other family members on selected television advertisements provided by Cox Media.
051 8.
TREASURER'S OFFICE - COLLEGE SAVINGS TRUST
THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING MOTHERS
OTHER: NEVADA COLLEGE SAVINGS
$50,000
SOLE SOURCE
This is a new contract to provide an increase in awareness for financial literacy in the state of Nevada by reaching out to women and working mothers in implementing a Women's Money Conference in Reno and Las Vegas, with the Nevada State Treasurer's Office as the title sponsor.
052 9.
TREASURER'S OFFICE - HIGHER EDUCATION TUITION ADMINISTRATION
WOLF PACK SPORTS PROPERTIES
OTHER: NEVADA PREPAID TUITION
$20,000
SOLE SOURCE
This is a new contract to provide direct marketing of the Nevada College Savings Plans and Prepaid Tuition programs to parents and other family members attending basketball games at UNR and UNLV.
054 10.
TREASURER'S OFFICE UNCLAIMED PROPERTY
INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION
OTHER: UNCLAIMED PROPERTY RECEIPTS
$41,493
SOLE SOURCE
This is the second amendment to the original contract to reconcile the quantity and value of stocks and cash held in the holder database prior to paying a stock claim. This amendment extends the termination date to December 31, 2013 and increases the contract amount from $76,117.50 to a maximum of $117,610.50 due to the continued need for these services.
BOE #
DEPT # 070
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
CONTRACTOR
GARY A. PULLIAM, ESQ.
FUNDING SOURCE
OTHER: PERSONNEL ASSESSMENTS
AMOUNT
$350,000
11.
This is a new contract to provide for ongoing professional services (NV licensed attorney) as one of several independent contracts for Hearing Officers, as provided by NRS 284, responsible for scheduling and convening hearings as a result of appeals filed by State employees, communicating with all involved parties as necessary, conducting the hearings, issuing decisions, and preparing finalized written copies of their determinations.
070 12.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
LAMBOLEY, PAUL H DBA LAW OFFICES OF PAUL H. LAMBOLEY
OTHER: PERSONNEL ASSESSMENTS
$350,000
This is a new contract to provide for ongoing professional services (NV licensed attorney) as one of several independent contracts for Hearing Officers, as provided by NRS 284, responsible for scheduling and convening hearings as a result of appeals filed by State employees, communicating with all involved parties as necessary, conducting the hearings, issuing decisions, and preparing finalized written copies of their determinations.
082 13.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS
AMERICAN CHILLER SERVICES, INC.
FEE: BUILDINGS & GROUNDS BUILDING RENT INCOME FEES
$50,000
This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides ongoing heating, ventilation and air conditioning services to various state buildings as needed. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $124,999 to $174,999 due to unanticipated expenditures in order to maintain the HVAC systems for multiple state buildings and updates the insurance requirements.
Term of Contract: 11/01/2008 - 10/31/2012 Consultant: NO Contract # CONV5799
082 14.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS
BREEZE BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
FEE: BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS BUILDING RENT INCOME FEES
$150,000
This is a new contract to provide ongoing general contracting work for the Buildings and Grounds section at various state owned buildings in the Las Vegas area.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION - BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS
CONTRACTOR
RAY HEATING PRODUCTS, INC. DBA RHP MECHANICAL SYSTEM
FUNDING SOURCE
AMOUNT
$100,000
082 15.
This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides ongoing service, maintenance and water treatment of heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems for multiple state buildings in Reno, Nevada. Contractor will perform extra services, on an as needed basis and at the request and approval of a Buildings and Grounds designee for various state buildings in the Reno/Carson City areas. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $184,247 to $284,247 to be available for extra services.
082 16.
SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.
$300,118
This is the third amendment to the original contract, which provides the ongoing labor necessary to maintain the fire protection systems and equipment as required by applicable local, state and federal codes and regulations for various state buildings in Las Vegas. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 and increases the maximum amount from $417,534.50 to $717,652.50 due to the extension and adding new rates for various state buildings in the Las Vegas area.
082 17.
TRUGREEN LANDCARE OF NEVADA
$187,096
This is a new contract which provides landscaping services to the Department of Motor Vehicles, 8250 Flamingo; Department of Motor Vehicles, 4110 Donovan; Department of Health and Human Services, 620 & 628 Belrose; and the Sahara Complex, which consists of the Department of Motor Vehicles, 2701 E. Sahara; Bradley Building, 2501 E. Sahara; and Public Works Division-Buildings and Grounds Section, 2621 E. Sahara, Las Vegas, Nevada; and provides $10,000 for extra services at the above mentioned buildings and various State buildings in the Las Vegas area as needed and requested and approved by the Buildings and Grounds Section designee.
082 18.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION HHS CIP PROJECTS-NONEXEC
DG KOCH ASSOCIATES, LLC
BONDS: PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF BONDS
$57,000
This is a new contract to provide professional architectural/engineering services for the HVAC Renovation - Desert Regional Center Building 1391, Las Vegas, NV; SPWD Project No. 11-M38; Contract No. 7622.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION HHS CIP PROJECTS-NONEXEC
CONTRACTOR
JBA CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
FUNDING SOURCE
OTHER: TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
AMOUNT
$22,500
082 19.
This is a new contract to provide professional architectural/engineering services for the HVAC Renovation - Desert Regional Center Building 1300 Project No. 11-M37; Contract No. 7641.
082 20.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION DEPT OF CORRECTIONS 2011 CIP PROJECTS
PURCELL KROB ELECTRICAL PROFESSIONAL, PK ELECTRICAL, INC.
OTHER: TRANSFER FROM OTHER B/A SAME FUND
$160,000
This is a new contract to provide professional architectural/engineering services for the Ely State Prison Surveillance Cameras and Recording Devices; Project No. 11-M60; Contract No. 12610.
082 21.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION - 2005 MILITARY CIP PROJECTS LVRC-NON-EXEC
WESTERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
BONDS: PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF BONDS 9% OTHER: TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 24% FEDERAL 67%
$210,861
This is a new contract to provide materials testing and engineering services for a new 68,000 square foot single story Readiness Center for the Nevada Army National Guard; Project No. 09-C14; Contract No. 8322.
082 22.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION MILITARY 2011 CIP PROJECTSNON-EXEC
HERSHENOW & KLIPPENSTEIN ARCHITECTS, INC.
BONDS: PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF BONDS 26% FEDERAL 74%
$84,000
This is a new contract to provide architectural/engineering services for the Elko Army Aviation Support Facility - Advance Planning; Project No. 11-E08; Contract No. 10357.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION 2011 STATEWIDE CIP-NON-EXEC
CONTRACTOR
PURCELL KROB ELECTRICAL PROFESSIONAL, PK ELECTRICAL, INC.
FUNDING SOURCE AMOUNT

GENERAL 21% BONDS: PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF BONDS 79% $30,000
082 23.
This is a new contract to provide professional architectural/engineering services for the Blasdel Building Electrical Upgrade; Project No. 11-M09; Contract No. 12467
082 24.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION - CNR & AGRICULTURE MAINT PROJECTSNON-EXEC
DOMINGO CAMBEIRO PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION DBA DCC ARCHITECTS
BONDS: TRANSFER FROM SALE OF BONDS 68% OTHER: TRANSFER FROM PARKS DIVISION 32%
$28,200
This is a new contract to provide professional architectural/engineering services for upgrades to the Valley of Fire Visitor Center; Project No. 11-M32; Contract No. 10982.
082 25.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION All Budget Accounts
INTERNATIONAL COMMISSIONING ENGINEERS WEST, INC.
OTHER: DEPENDS UPON THE PROJECT REQUIRING THIS SERVICE
$200,000
This is a new contract to provide ongoing third party commissioning services as required.
180 26.
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION - ENTERPRISE IT SERVICES NETWORK TRANSPORT SERVICES

Term of Contract:
SOUTHERN NEVADA AREA COMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL
OTHER: REVENUE CONTRACT
$25,917
This is a new revenue contract that is ongoing and provides for rack spaces and a DS1 circuit at Apex Peak in Clark County.
07/01/2011 - 06/30/2013 Consultant: NO Contract # 12790
240 27.
OFFICE OF VETERANS SERVICES COMMISSIONER FOR VETERANS' AFFAIRS
LLOYD'S REFRIGERATION, INC.
GENERAL 63% OTHER: FEDERAL FUNDS 37%
$15,000
This is a new contract to provide ongoing air conditioner maintenance services to the Southern Nevada Veterans Memorial Cemetery.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
OFFICE OF VETERANS SERVICES VETERANS' HOME ACCOUNT
CONTRACTOR
CLARK COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
FUNDING SOURCE
OTHER: REVENUE CONTRACT WITH CLARK COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
AMOUNT
$672,000
240 28.
This is a new interlocal revenue agreement between Clark County Social Services and the Nevada State Veterans Home (NSVH) to place Clark County residents/veterans who qualify into the NSVH.
240 29.
RESOURCE PHARMACY, OMNICARE
OTHER: FUNDING FROM MEDICARE/MEDICAID AND PRIVATE FUNDS 50% FEDERAL 50%
$150,000
This the first amendment to the original contract, which provides ongoing pharmaceuticals and pharmacy delivery services 24 hrs/day, 7 days per week, to residents of the Nevada State Veterans Home (NSVH). This amendment increases the maximum amount from $250,000 to $400,000 due to increased use of prescription drugs by NSVH residents and changes in the mix of residents who require prescriptions.
240 30.
VITAL CARE RESPIRATORY (PRINCIPAL MEDICAL EQUIPMENT)
OTHER: 50% PRIVATE/50% FEDERAL 50% FEDERAL 50%
$20,000
This is the 3rd amendment to the original contract which provides ongoing respiratory therapy, equipment, and related services to the Nevada State Veterans Home (NSVH). This amendment increases the maximum amount of the contract from $75,000 to $95,000 due to the increased need for small oxygen tanks by the residents of the facility.
300
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (IDEA)
SCHNEIDER HUFFMAN, VICKI
FEDERAL
$92,964
31.
This is a new contract to provide ongoing support for collection, validation, correction, preparation, and submission of federally required data associated with the provision of special education and related services for students with disabilities, age 3-22 in Nevada. School districts are required to prepared and submit to State Education Agencies the data identified under the individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 34 CFR part 300, 300.618. State Education Agencies in turn are required to ensure that those data are in turn submitted to the US Department of Education (USDOE) and are submitted as accurate and timely. This requires that ongoing technical assistance be provided to district data managers and special education administrators to ensure that the data be submitted in adherence with required protocols, within required timelines. Data will be aggregated and configured for submission from the state level in accordance with requirements of USDOE.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH CARE FINANCING & POLICY - NEVADA MEDICAID, TITLE XIX
CONTRACTOR
CHURCHILL COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
FUNDING SOURCE
OTHER: COUNTY PROVIDES NONFEDERAL SHARE
AMOUNT
$663,690
403 32.
This is a new Interlocal agreement for the Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP) and the Division of Welfare and Supportive Services (DWSS) to provide the administrative services necessary to operate the Medicaid County Match program. The Counties provide the non-federal share to DHCFP for medical and Medicaid administrative services. Pursuant to NRS 428.010, counties are required to provide medical care to indigent persons who reside in the county. The County Match program provides federal matching funds for indigent long-term care costs, when the indigent is Medicaid eligible.
403 33.
CLARK COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
$41,216,657
403 34.
DOUGLAS COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
$999,306
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR
LINCOLN COUNTY
FUNDING SOURCE
AMOUNT
$158,381
403 35.
403 36.
LOGISTICARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
GENERAL 46.1% FEDERAL 53.9%
$4,779,585
This is the third amendment to the original contract that provides non-emergency transportation to and from medical providers for eligible Medicaid recipients. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to April 30, 2012, and increases contract authority from $44,000,000 to $48,779,585.
403 37.
NYE COUNTY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
$1,297,212
This is a new Interlocal agreement for the Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP) and the Division of Welfare and Supportive Services to provide the administrative services necessary to operate the Medicaid County Match program. The Counties provide the non-federal share to DHCFP for medical and Medicaid administrative services. Pursuant to NRS 428.010, counties are required to provide medical care to indigent persons who reside in the county. The County Match program provides federal matching funds for indigent long-term care costs, when the indigent is Medicaid eligible.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR
WASHOE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
FUNDING SOURCE
AMOUNT
$11,588,178
403 38.
406 39.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH CONSUMER HEALTH PROTECTION
DOUGLAS COUNTY CLERK
OTHER: REVENUE
$245,580
This is a new revenue contract to receive the county assessment, in accordance with Senate Bill 471 of the 2011 legislative session, for services provided by the Health Division pursuant to chapters 439 (Administration of Public Health), 444 (Sanitation), 446 (Food Establishments) and 583 (Meat, Fish, Poultry and Eggs) of the Nevada Revised Statutes.
406 40.
LYON COUNTY LEPC
OTHER: REVENUE
$123,970
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR
WHITE PINE COUNTY CLERK
FUNDING SOURCE
OTHER: REVENUE
AMOUNT
$51,256
406 41.
406 42.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH IMMUNIZATION PROGRAM
CARSON CITY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
FEDERAL
$539,989
This is a new interlocal agreement to create a strategic plan to implement billing within Nevada county health departments. Currently the three county health departments are only capable of billing Medicaid and Medicare along with a couple of private health insurance plans such as Culinary and Blue Cross Blue Shield. This contract will allow Carson City Health & Human Services to create a plan on how to become an in-network provider and start billing private health insurance plans, eventually including Washoe County Health District and Southern Nevada Health District.
406 43.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH BIOSTATISTICS AND EPIDEMIOLOGY
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA & NORTHERN NEVADA
OTHER: REVENUE
$22,500
This is a new contract to incorporate questions about cognitive impairment in the Nevada 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). This request is contingent upon approval of work program C22562 anticipated to be heard at the December 2011 Interim Finance Committee meeting.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES WELFARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
CONTRACTOR
BOARD OF REGENTS-UNR
FUNDING SOURCE
FEDERAL
AMOUNT
$36,713
407 44.
This is the first amendment to the original interlocal agreement, for the Division of Welfare and Supportive Service (DWSS), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to provide nutrition education to low income families. Through a grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), DWSS collaborates with various public and non-profit agencies to provide education to SNAP recipients to improve the likelihood that recipients and those eligible for benefits will make healthy food choices. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $915,934 to $952,647 and adds Attachment B - Project Plan due to the approval of the State Plan by USDA.
407 45.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES WELFARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES - CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
CLARK COUNTY TREASURER
OTHER: STATE SHARE OF COLLECTIONS 34% FEDERAL 66%
($704,721)
This is the first amendment to the original interlocal agreement, which provides for the sublease of space at the Greystone Building in Las Vegas from Clark County to house the Division of Welfare and Supportive Services Child Support Enforcement Program and State Collections and Disbursement Unit. This amendment corrects the start date to March 1, 2010 and extends the termination date from December 31, 2019 to February 29, 2020 to synchronize with Clark County and building owner; decreases the maximum amount from $3,978,683 to $3,273,962.00; revises the sublease and adds a memorandum of commencement as a new attachment.
407 46.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES WELFARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES - CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
CHASE GLOBAL SERVICES
FEDERAL
$655,500
SOLE SOURCE
This is a new contract for the Division of Welfare and Supportive Services (DWSS) Child Support unit to enhance the Business Intelligence module by developing a data warehouse so that child support staff can retrieve and customize ad hoc reports to manage caseloads so that federal performance measures are met or exceeded (Phase II). Business Intelligence is a computer based decision support system that indentifies, extracts and analyzes data to support better business decision-making. This contract contains an option to amend to include Phase III, contingent upon availability of additional funding.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES SOUTHERN NEVADA ADULT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
CONTRACTOR
BOARD OF REGENTS-UNSOM DEPTARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY & BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
FUNDING SOURCE
GENERAL
AMOUNT
$425,000
EXEMPT
408 47.
This is a new contract for the purpose of providing outside regular service to the Rawson-Neal Psychiatric Hospital. It provides a valuable training program for residents and enables services such as on-call, patient observation unit (POU), high risk rounds and psych evaluations to be performed on a 24-hour basis.
408 48.
Term of Contract:
DOMBRIAL, INC. DBA ELITE SERVICES
GENERAL
$21,288
This is a new contract to provide ongoing janitorial services to the Laughlin Rural Clinic.
Upon Approval - 10/31/2013 Consultant: NO Contract # 12745
408 49.
JACKSON & COKER LOCUM TENENS, INC.
GENERAL
$2,000,000
This is a new contract to provide ongoing Locum Tenen services to Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services, pursuant to NRS 433.344 and NRS 436.123 and the Joint Commission requirements.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR
MEDICAL DOCTOR ASSOCIATES, INC.
FUNDING SOURCE
GENERAL
AMOUNT
$2,000,000
408 50.
This is a new contract which will provide ongoing Locum Tenen services to Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services, pursuant to NRS 433.344 and NRS 436.123 and the Joint Commission requirements.
408 51.
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
GENERAL
$1,600,000
This is a new contract to provide physician level general medical services for the Rawson-Neal Hospital in Las Vegas. This will include one physician and three nurse practitioners.
408 52.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES NORTHERN NEVADA ADULT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS
GENERAL 37% OTHER: TRANSFER FROM LCC AND NNCAS 63%
$1,611,316
This is an amendment to the original contract which provides food services to inpatient consumers at Northern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services (NNAMHS), Lake's Crossing Center (LCC) and Northern Nevada Child and Adolescent Services (NNCAS), all located on the NNAMHS campus in Sparks, NV. This amendment will extend the expiration date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 and increases the total authority by $1,611,316 from $2,000,000 to $3,611,316 to cover the time extension, due to the continuing need for this service.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES RURAL REGIONAL CENTER
CONTRACTOR
BOARD OF REGENTS - UNR
FUNDING SOURCE
GENERAL 59% OTHER: MEDICAID FUNDS 41%
AMOUNT
$62,920
EXEMPT
408 53.
This is a new interlocal agreement with the University of Nevada Psychology Department for ongoing services of a Psychology Extern, who will provide psychological evaluations, testing, treatment planning, therapy and consultation at designated Rural Regional Center sites in the rural underserved areas of the state.
408 54.
CARSON CITY
OTHER: REVENUE FROM COUNTY
$1,149,664
This is a new revenue contract to provide services to children with developmental disabilities and the County to reimburse Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services the non-federal share of funding as payment for services.
408 55.
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
$35,285
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR
WHITE PINE COUNTY
FUNDING SOURCE
AMOUNT
$32,096
408 56.
408 57.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES DESERT REGIONAL CENTER
SOUTHWEST AIR CONDITIONING SERVICES
$10,000
This is Amendment #1 to the original contract which provides inspection and repairs to facility air conditioning systems including, but not limited to, compressor, air handler, piping, electronics, duct work, valves, belts, bearings, and coils. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $20,000 to $30,000 due to the unexpected need to replace equipment.
408 58.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES DESERT REGIONAL CENTER
WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION DBA STATEWIDE FIRE PROTECTION
$21,066
This is the first amendment to the original contract, which provides fire sprinkler, fire extinguisher, fire hydrant inspection and repair services. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 due to the continued need for these services. This amendment also adds an additional $21,000.00 to the contract, making the new total $42,066.00.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES - CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES YOUTH ALTERNATIVE PLACEMENT
CONTRACTOR
CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SERVICES
FUNDING SOURCE
GENERAL
AMOUNT
$974,500
409 59.
To provide residential living care for boys and girls who have been adjudicated delinquent and committed by the Juvenile Division of the District Court to Spring Mountain Youth Camp, as space is available.
409 60.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES - CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES YOUTH ALTERNATIVE PLACEMENT
DOUGLAS COUNTY CHINA SPRINGS YOUTH CAMP
GENERAL 34.4% OTHER: COUNTY 65.6%
$6,089,698
To provide residential living care for boys and girls who have been adjudicated, delinquent, and committed to China Springs Youth Camp or Aurora Pines Girls Facility, as space is available.
409 61.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES - CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES SOUTHERN NEVADA CHILD & ADOLESCENT SERVICES
NEVADA PEP, INC
GENERAL
$648,820
This is a new contract to provide family support services to children with severe emotional disabilities and their families. These services include providing direct parent support, parent mentoring, family and consumer leadership training, joint parent/staff training, informing parents of the services available for their children and being the parents advocate while they work to obtain the appropriate services and support for their children.
431 62.
ADJUTANT GENERAL AND NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY
BIGHORN INDUSTRIES, INC. DBA BIGHORN ENERGY SERVICES
GENERAL 40% OTHER: RENTAL INCOME 20% FEDERAL 40%
$99,960
This is a new contract to perform ongoing electrical services on an "as needed" basis for a four-year period. The scope of work for electrical services could range from replacing/installing light switches and outlets to repairing/installing major circuits, installing conduit, and repairing/installing major electrical components such as switch gear for emergency generators, new sub panels and uninterruptible power supply systems.
BOE #
DEPT # 431
STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR
BRADLEY ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING & HEATING
FUNDING SOURCE
AMOUNT
$99,960
63.
This is a new contract to perform ongoing electrical services on an "as needed" basis for a four-year period. The scope of work for electrical services could range from replacing/installing light switches and outlets to repairing/installing major circuits, installing conduit, and repairing/installing major electrical components such as switch gear for emergency generators, new sub panels and uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems.
431 64.
CAL 1 SERVICES, INC.
GENERAL 50% FEDERAL 50%
$90,000
This is the first amendment to the original contract, which provides for locksmithing services. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $99,999.96 to $189,999.96 due to all 3 armories in Stead needing to be rekeyed to comply with Federal security regulations.
431 65.
DIAMOND DEVELOPMENT, INC. DBA AVILLA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
FEDERAL
$84,299
This is a new contract to repair the fire water retention ponds and pump turbines for the Army Aviation Support Facility (AASF) located at the Harry Reid Training Center in Stead, Nevada. The specific work being performed will be to repair all damage to pond liners; pull both pumps from their mountings and inspect for damage; clean the cistern(s) out under the pump house along with the supply line(s) that connect the ponds to the cistern(s) of all debris, sludge, and foreign materials; refill the ponds and run the turbine pumps; supply the owner a set of drawings of the fire ponds, the pump house and connecting water lines.
431 66.
FINEST FENCE, LLC
FEDERAL
$10,250
This is a new contract to provide and install 435 feet of 6 foot three strand barb wire steel chain link perimeter fence, with four gates to secure the Combined Support Maintenance Shop building, military equipment, military vehicles and parking area.
431 67.
HERSHENOW & KLIPPENSTEIN ARCHITECTS, INC.
FEDERAL
$44,350
This is a new contract to provide additional design and bid documents for the northwest corner of the Army Aviation Support Facility airfield apron. The additional topographic survey is to assess the feasibility of relocating the existing fence and light poles. The information obtained from the survey will be provided in the form of drafted exhibits for the Nevada Army National Guard to use in discussions with the Airport Authority.
BOE #
DEPT # 431
STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR
LUX ENERGIES, INC.
FUNDING SOURCE
AMOUNT
$99,960
68.
This is a new contract to perform ongoing electrical services on an "as needed" basis for a four-year period. The scope of work for electrical services could range from replacing/installing light switches and outlets to repairing/installing major circuits, installing conduit, and repairing/installing major electrical components such as switch gear for emergency generators, new sub panels and uninterruptible power supply systems.
431 69.
MCKEON DOOR OF NEVADA, INC.
GENERAL 10% FEDERAL 90%
$300,000
This is a new contract to provide and install three coiling insulated service doors with new control and line voltage circuits at the Plumb Lane armory in Reno, NV and one at the Floyd Edsall Training Center in Las Vegas, NV.
431 70.
SILVER KNOLLS ELECTRIC, INC.
$99,960
This is a new contract to perform ongoing electrical services on an "as needed" basis for a four-year period. The scope of work for electrical services could range from replacing/installing light switches and outlets to repairing/installing major circuits, installing conduit, and repairing/installing major electrical components such as switch gear for emergency generators, new sub panels and uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems.
440 71.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMS
RIDGE HOUSE INCORPORATED
GENERAL
$20,000
This is the second amendment to the original contract which provides ongoing post release mental health and substance abuse evaluation and counseling services for inmates. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $39,999 to $59,999 due to the continued need for these services.
500 72.
COMMISSION ON MINERAL RESOURCES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SERVICES
FEE: MINING CLAIM FEES
$80,000
This is the fifth amendment to the original contract, which provides visitation to previously fenced abandoned mines to assess fence condition and repair if necessary. This amendment extends the termination date from June 8, 2012 to June 8, 2013 and increases the maximum amount from $200,000 to $280,000 due to the increased number of abandoned mines requiring inspection.
BOE #
DEPT # 500
STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR
GEOTEMPS, INC.
FUNDING SOURCE
FEE: MINING CLAIM FILING FEES
AMOUNT
$40,000
73.
This is the fifth amendment to the original contract, which provides courthouse research to determine ownership, discovery, and securing of abandoned mines. This amendment extends the termination date from June 30, 2012 to June 30, 2013 and increases the maximum amount from $165,000 to $205,000.
500 74.
PETER A. HERRERA HERGON MINE SECURING SOLUTIONS
FEE: MINING CLAIM FEES
$50,000
This is the first amendment to the original contract to investigate abandoned mines, assess the securing, and make repairs if necessary to those mines which had been previously secured. This amendment extends the termination date to December 14, 2012 and increases the maximum amount from $80,000 to $130,000 due to the increased number of mines requiring inspection.
650 75.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CRIMINAL HISTORY REPOSITORY
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
FEE: CIVIL NAME CHECK
$301,136
EXEMPT
This is a new interlocal agreement to enable the Criminal History Repository to access the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department's Shared Computer Operations for Protection and Enforcement (SCOPE) records system in order to provide Nevada employers complete criminal history needed to make employment decisions.
651 76.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY HIGHWAY PATROL
RSVP TRANSPORT, INC.
HIGHWAY
$14,700
This is a new contract to provide transport services for Nevada Highway Patrol vehicles to and from regional commands. The most common use will be to relocate vehicles that will be excessed to Reno, Nevada.
651 77.
WASHOE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
GENERAL 2% HIGHWAY 98%
$240,000
This is a new interlocal agreement to provide toxicology laboratory analysis for various divisions of the Department of Public Safety. Analysis includes testing of blood or urine for presence of controlled substances.
651 78.
WASHOE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
GENERAL 46% HIGHWAY 54%
$456,767
This is a new interlocal agreement to provide forensic laboratory analysis for various divisions of the Department of Public Safety. Analysis includes but is not limited to testing of evidence for crime scene investigations, firearms examinations, shoeprint and tire track comparisons, and DNA analysis.
BOE #
DEPT # 702
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HERITAGE-NonExec
CONTRACTOR
BOARD OF REGENTS-UNR
FUNDING SOURCE
OTHER: 100% HERITAGE FUND
AMOUNT
$30,000
79.
This is a new contract for genetic assessment of the Mule Deer population of Nevada. Management of Nevada's Mule Deer population will be enhanced by identifying the geographic distribution of genetic diversity in this species. This project was selected competitively by the Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners under Nevada's Heritage Program.
702 80.
JERSEY VALLEY CATTLE COMPANY, LLC
OTHER: HERITAGE TRUST FUND
$18,000
This is a new contact to reduce mountain lion wildlife depredation in the Tobin, Stillwater and East mountain ranges and the Fish Creek and Clan Alpine Mountains. Predator reduction (hunting mountain lions) under this project is in accordance with the Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners (NBWC) Mountain Lion Plan (1995) and the NBWC's Wildlife Action Plan. The project will also provide NDOW with data on the mountain lions that are killed. This project was selected competitively by the NBWC as part of the Heritage program.
702 81.
QUICKSILVER AIR, INC.
OTHER: HERITAGE FUND 30% FEDERAL 70%
$330,000
This is the first amendment to the original contract to provide aerial wildlife capture and transport services. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $192,725 to $522,725 as the original funding included a budget for only one season. Subsequent to the original contract, federal and special program state dollars for a second season became available, as did an increased supply of collars; bighorn sheep populations grew far beyond expectations; and a more intensive mule deer research project was undertaken.
702
DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE OPERATIONS
SYSTEM CONSULTANTS
FEE: LICENSE AND BOATING FEES
$216,000
82.
This is the third amendment to the original contract, which provides for the programming, implementation and transaction processing for the Nevada Wildlife Data System (NWDS). NWDS processes the sale, recording and issuance of hunting and fishing licenses, boat registrations and boat titles; and processes registration for hunter education classes, data from the Harvest Information Program and citations by game wardens. NWDS's development history to date and planned enhancements during this amendment period reflect legislatively-driven and other required changes. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 21, 2012, and increases the maximum amount from $879,551.61 to $1,095,551.61 to fund enhancements and a one-year post-implementation operation and management phase.
704 83.
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & NATURAL RESOURCES PARKS - STATE PARKS
WILLIAM MICHAEL URRUTIA
OTHER: REVENUE CONTRACT
$28,175
This is the first amendment to the original revenue contract, which provides continued grazing of up to 1,400 Animal Units Months (AUM's) on 1570 acres of designated pasture known as the North Ghigial Ranch in Lyon County. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012 and increases the maximum amount from $28,175, to $56,350 due to the extension.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & NATURAL RESOURCES WATER RESOURCES USGS CO-OP-NonExec
CONTRACTOR
U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
FUNDING SOURCE
OTHER: PASS THROUGH FUNDS
AMOUNT
$273,200
705 84.
This is a new cooperative agreement to provide hydrologic monitoring along the Carlin Trend through the operation and maintenance of nine stream gaging stations within the Humboldt River Region.
708 85.
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & NATURAL RESOURCES NEVADA NATURAL HERITAGE
DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE
FEDERAL
$289,348
This is a new interlocal agreement to assist with finalizing a Nevada Wetland Program Plan and assessing biotic integrity of the state's priority wetlands.
709
86.
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION WASTE MANAGEMENT AND FEDERAL FACILITIES
MCGINLEY & ASSOCIATES INC
FEDERAL
$189,204
This is the 2nd amendment to the original contract, which provides ongoing consulting services to aid the state to identify, assess and remediate properties that have hazardous substances, pollutants or is contaminated. This function is related to/associated with a national program designed to redevelop and/or promote economic restoration of abandoned, underutilized or vacant properties that have been identified as properties that are contaminated or potentially contaminated with hazardous substances. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $428,908 to $617,204 to provide for ongoing needed services at the current contracted scope of work and rate. Note: The amendment amount in the contract summary has been adjusted by $908 to correct an inadvertent error in the contract summary of the original contract (the contract summary amount of the original contract should have been $428,908, but was stated as $428,000).
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, TRAINING & REHABILITATION - EMPLOYMENT SECURITY
CONTRACTOR
GOVERNORS OFFIVE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
FUNDING SOURCE
OTHER: STATE CAREER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM FUNDS
AMOUNT
$250,000
EXEMPT
902 87.
This is the first amendment to the original interlocal agreement, which provides ongoing funding in support of the Nevada Commission on Economic Development's training program, Train Employees Now (TEN). This amendment increases the maximum amount from $500,000 to $750,000 due to an increased demand by businesses using the incentives and services provided by the Train Employees Now program. This amendment allows the Commission to continue to provide incentives for businesses to locate or expand operations in the state through the remainder of the contract term.
902 88.
NEVADAWORKS
FEDERAL
$75,000
This is a new interlocal agreement to provide ongoing incentive funds authorized under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998, CFR part 652 et al. Governor's Reserve funds, approved by the State Workforce Board on April 12, 2010. Funds are utilized for staff incentive pay, contractor performance awards, administration, and board initiatives.
902 89.
NEVADAWORKS
FEDERAL
$715,000
EXEMPT
This is the first amendment to the original interlocal agreement, which provides ongoing employment and training services to adults in northern Nevada. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $1,837,461 to $2,552,461 to transfer funds from the Dislocated Workers Program to the Adult Workers Program. This transfer is allowable pursuant to State Compliance Policy 3.8 and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 667.140 (b) and 661.358.
902 90.
NEVADAWORKS
FEDERAL
($715,000)
EXEMPT
This is the first amendment to the original interlocal agreement, which provides ongoing employment and training services to dislocated workers in northern Nevada. This amendment decreases the maximum amount from $2,930,208 to $2,215,208 due to the transfer of funds from the Dislocated Workers Program to the Adult Workers Program. This transfer is allowable pursuant to State Compliance Policy 3.8 and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 667.140 (b) and 661.358.
BOE #
DEPT #
STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR
WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS
FUNDING SOURCE
FEDERAL
AMOUNT
$75,000
902 91.
This is a new interlocal agreement to provide ongoing incentive funds authorized under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998, CFR part 652 et al. Governor's Reserve funds, approved by the State Workforce Board on April 12, 2010. Funds are utilized for staff incentive pay, contractor performance awards, administration, and board initiatives.
902 92.
DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, TRAINING & REHAB EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION All Budget Accounts
DAVIS GLASS & MIRROR, INC.
OTHER: ALL DETR BUDGET ACCOUNTS
$9,500
This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides ongoing glass repair and replacement for the department owned facilities in southern Nevada. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $9,500 to $19,000 due to increased window repairs and replacements.
902 93.
DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, TRAINING & REHAB EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION All Budget Accounts
J&L JANITORIAL SERVICES
OTHER: ALL DETR BUDGET ACCOUNTS
$57,000
This is the first amendment to the original contract which provides ongoing janitorial services as specified, including snow removal, for the department at 500 East Third Street Carson City, NV. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 and increases the maximum amount from $55,000 to $112,000 due to extension of the contract.
920 94.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
ARNERICH MASSENA, INC.
OTHER: VENDOR REIMBURSEMENTS
$395,000
This is a new contract which provides for a consultant who will provide quarterly investment advice for over $550 million in participant assets, provide biannual regulatory reviews to ensure compliance with federal law and conduct a service provider Request for Proposal.
BDC 95.
LICENSING BOARDS & COMMISSIONS OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE

Term of Contract:
BERKLEY, BERKLEY & ANDREWS
FEE: LICENSURE FEES
$19,800
The Board requires outside accounting services and assistance with its internal use of QuickBooks.
Upon Approval - 12/13/2013 Consultant: NO Contract # 12799
BOE #
DEPT # BDC
STATE AGENCY
LICENSING BOARDS & COMMISSIONS OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
CONTRACTOR
THE GRESH GROUP
FUNDING SOURCE
FEE: LICENSING FEES
AMOUNT
$54,000
96.
This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides lobbying services and representational services at all committee/subcommittee meetings regarding the continuation of quality osteopath medical services to Nevada citizens and to assure passage of the appropriate laws enabling Nevada to have a continuous supply of qualified osteopathic physicians and assist the board with the preparation and passage of bill draft requests at the next legislative session. The amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 and increases the maximum amount from $54,000 to $108,000.
11.
INFORMATION ITEM
A. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Division of State Lands
Pursuant to NRS Chapters 111, Statutes of the Nevada, 1989 at page 263, the Division of State Lands is required to provide the Board of Examiners quarterly reports regarding lands or interests in lands transferred, sold, exchanged, or leased under the Tahoe Basin Act program. Also, pursuant to Chapter 355, Statutes of Nevada, 1993, at page 1153, the agency is to report quarterly on the status of real property or interests in real property transferred under the Lake Tahoe Mitigation Program. This submittal reports on program activities for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2011 (reference NRS 321.5954). 1989 Tahoe Basin Act The agency reports there were no transfers of lands or interests in lands during the quarter. There were no acquisitions of lands or interest in lands during this quarter. Lake Tahoe Mitigation Program The agency reports that there was one land coverage sales transaction under this program for the quarter. That transaction involved the sale of 2,473 square feet of Class 1a potential land coverage in the Incline Village Hydrological Zone. This transaction generated $43,879 in proceeds and administrative fees for the Nevada Land Bank. No other transactions are reported for the first quarter of FY12.
12. BOARD MEMBERS COMMENTS/PUBLIC COMMENTS *13. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION ADJOURNMENT
Notice of this meeting was posted in the following locations: Blasdel Building, 209 E. Musser St., Carson City, NV Capitol Building, 101 N. Carson St., Carson City, NV Legislative Building, 401 N. Carson St., Carson City, NV Nevada State Library and Archives, 100 Stewart St., Carson City, NV Notice of this meeting was emailed for posting to the following location: Capitol Police, Grant Sawyer State Office Building, 555 E. Washington Ave, Las Vegas, NV Hadi Sadjadi: hsadjadi@dps.state.nv.us Notice of this meeting was posted on the following website: http://budget.state.nv.us/ We are pleased to make reasonable accommodations for members of the public who are disabled and would like to attend the meeting. If special arrangements for the meeting are required, please notify the Department of Administration at least one working day before the meeting at (775) 684-0222 or you can fax your request to (775) 684-0260.
DETAILED AGENDA
December 13, 2011
1.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Comments:
*2.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 8, 2011 BOARD OF EXAMINERS MEETING MINUTES
Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Comments: Seconded By: Vote:
*3.
REQUEST FOR GENERAL FUND ALLOCATION FROM THE INTERIM FINANCE COMMITTEE (IFC) CONTINGENCY FUND
Pursuant to NRS 353.268, an agency or officer shall submit a request to the State Board of Examiners for an allocation by the Interim Finance Committee from the Contingency Fund. A. Department of Education Education State Programs - $4,521
Pursuant to NRS 353.268, the Department of Education is requesting an allocation of $4,521 from the Interim Finance Contingency Fund to provide funding for travel for the top three applicants for the Superintendent of Public Instruction position which is anticipated to become vacant in April 2012. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Comments: B. Seconded By: Office of the Governor Ethics Commission $65,000 Vote:
Pursuant to NRS 353.268, the Ethics Commission is requesting an allocation of $65,000 from the Interim Finance Contingency Fund to provide funding to contract with a temporary, full-time attorney for a 6-month period from January through June 2012 in order to assist the Commission in addressing its over two-year backlog in writing and publishing its opinions. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Comments: Seconded By: Vote:
Board of Examiners Meeting December 13, 2011 Detailed Agenda Page 1
*4.

A. Department of Tourism & Cultural Affairs Nevada Magazine
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 240, Section 1, Subsection 3 of the 2011 Legislature, the Department of Tourism & Cultural Affairs Nevada Magazine hereby seeks a favorable Board of Examiners decision regarding Nevada Magazines determination, as an enterprise fund, to use a temporary services contract to employ a former Ad Director for Nevada Magazine for the purpose of continuing advertising sales for the Nevada Magazine and Visitors Guide for the current Ad Director who is on leave for the period not to exceed 4 months. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Comments: Seconded By: Vote:
*5.

A. Department of Taxation $522,960
Pursuant to Senate Bill 493, Section 16.7 of the 2011 Legislature, the Department of Taxation must submit mining claim refund requests to the Board of Examiners for approval. The Department is requesting authority to pay 61 refund requests totaling $522,960. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Comments: Seconded By: Vote:
*6.

Pursuant to NRS 334.010, no automobile may be purchased by any department, office, bureau, officer or employee of the State without prior written consent of the State Board of Examiners. AGENCY NAME # OF VEHICLES NOT TO EXCEED:
Department of Wildlife Directors Office Department of Wildlife Diversity Department of Wildlife Heritage
AGENCY NAME
1 1 1
# OF VEHICLES
$33,055 $23,964 $38,949

NOT TO EXCEED:
Department of Wildlife Game Management Department of Wildlife Habitat Department of Wildlife Law Enforcement Total:
Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Comments: Seconded By:
6 1 3
$154,560 $38,949 $72,539 $362,016
Vote:
*7.
STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL REVISIONS
The State Administrative Manual (SAM) is being submitted to the Board of Examiners for approval of additions and revisions in the following Chapters: 0328 - Lease Contracts, 1600 Information Technology, 2622-Stale Claims. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Comments: Seconded By: Vote:
*8.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TORT CLAIM

Approval of tort claim pursuant to NRS 41.037
A. Donald Hixon TC15995 Amount of Claim $175,000
Recommendation: The report recommended that the claim be paid in the amount of $175,000. Motion By: Comments: Seconded By: Vote:
*9.
LEASES
Six statewide leases were submitted to the Board for review and approval. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Comments: Seconded By: Vote:
*10. CONTRACTS
Ninety-six independent contracts were submitted to the Board for review and approval.
Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Comments: Seconded By: Vote:
11.
INFORMATION ITEMS
A. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Division of State Lands
Pursuant to NRS Chapters 111, Statutes of the Nevada, 1989 at page 263, the Division of State Lands is required to provide the Board of Examiners quarterly reports regarding lands or interests in lands transferred, sold, exchanged, or leased under the Tahoe Basin Act program. Also, pursuant to Chapter 355, Statutes of Nevada, 1993, at page 1153, the agency is to report quarterly on the status of real property or interests in real property transferred under the Lake Tahoe Mitigation Program. This submittal reports on program activities for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2011 (reference NRS 321.5954). 1989 Tahoe Basin Act The agency reports there were no transfers of lands or interests in lands during the quarter. There were no acquisitions of lands or interest in lands during this quarter. Lake Tahoe Mitigation Program The agency reports that there was one land coverage sales transaction under this program for the quarter. That transaction involved the sale of 2,473 square feet of Class 1a potential land coverage in the Incline Village Hydrological Zone. This transaction generated $43,879 in proceeds and administrative fees for the Nevada Land Bank. No other transactions are reported for the first quarter of FY12. Comments:
12.
BOARD MEMBERS COMMENTS/PUBLIC COMMENTS
Comments:
*13.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION ADJOURNMENT
Comments:
MINUTES MEETING OF THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS

November 8, 2011 The Board of Examiners met on November 8, 2011, in the Annex on the second floor of the Capitol Building, 101 N. Carson St., Carson City, Nevada, at 10:00 a.m. Present were: Members: Governor Brian Sandoval Secretary of State Ross Miller Clerk Jeff Mohlenkamp
Others Present: Katherine Yonkers, Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation Janet Lufrano, Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation Keith Wells, Department of Administration, Motor Pool Patrick Cates, Department of Wildlife Shelley Blotter, Department of Administration, Human Resource Management Carrie Hughes, Department of Administration, Human Resource Management Robert Halstead, Nuclear Projects Johnean Morrison, Department of Public Safety, Highway Patrol Jennifer Bauer, Department of Public Safety Clark Leslie, Attorney Generals Office William Chisel, Department of Taxation Brody Leiser, Department of Taxation Kent Robison, UNR Lynn Carrigan, Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care, Financing and Policy Greg Cox, Department of Corrections Wendy Simons, Department of Health and Human Services, Health Division Melanie Young, Department of Public Safety, Records and Technology Dennis Pinkerton, Department of Public Safety, State Fire Marshal Brenda Berry, Department of Health and Human Services, Aging and Disability Services Division Dave Prather, Department of Health and Human Services, Mental Health and Developmental Services John Whaley, Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care, Financing and Policy Mike Chapman, Department of Transportation Joe Ward, UNR Luana Ritch, Department of Health and Human Services, Health Division Lori Myer, Department of Business and Industry, Industrial Relations Brenda Ford, Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation Deborah Reed, Department of Corrections Dawn Rosenberg, Department of Corrections Marta Adams, Attorney Generals Office
Katie Armstrong, Attorney Generals Office Mark Winebarger, Treasurers Office David Gustofson, Department of Administration, Enterprises Information Technology Teri Preston, Department of Administration Margene Stenger, Commission on Economic Development Patrick Conmay, Department of Public Safety, Records and Technology Sue Smith, Department of Health and Human Services, Welfare and Supportive Services Phil Weyrick, Department Health and Human Services, Health Division Jack Zenteno, Department of Health and Human Services, Welfare and Supportive Services Romaine Gilliland, Department of Health and Human Services, Welfare and Supportive Services Jane Splean, Department of Education Tamara Nash, Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation Mike Torvinen, Department of Health and Human Services Greg Weyland, Department of Education Cindy Jones, Department of Administration, Budget Division Dennis Gallagher, Attorney Generals Office
PRESS Sean Whaley, Nevada News Bureau Sandy Briggs, Associated Press Ed Vogel, Las Vegas Review Journal Cy Ryan, Las Vegas Sun Geoff Dornan, Nevada Appeal
Board of Examiners Meeting November 8, 2011 - Minutes Page 2
1.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Comments: Governor: Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Id like to call the Board of Examiners meeting to order. Mr. Secretary, youre present in Las Vegas? Secretary of State: Yes, Governor. Governor: And I understand that the Attorney General will not be present for this meeting. Well commence with Item 1 of the Agenda, Public Comment. Is there anybody present in Carson City that would like to provide Public Comment to the Board of Examiners? Is there anyone present in Las Vegas who would like to provide Public Comment? Secretary of State: No, Governor.
*2.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 11, 2011 BOARD OF EXAMINERS MEETING MINUTES
Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Secretary of State Comments: Seconded By: Governor Vote: 2-0
Governor: We will move on to Agenda Item No. 2, Approval of the October 11, 2011 Board of Examiners Meeting Minutes. Mr. Secretary, have you had an opportunity to review the minutes? Secretary of State: Yes, I have, Governor. Governor: And do you have any changes or deletions? Secretary of State: No, Governor. With your approval, I move for approval. Governor: All right. The Secretary has made a motion for approval of the October 11, 2011 Board of Examiners Meeting Minutes. I will second the motion. Is there any discussion or questions on the motion? Hearing none, all in favor of the motion please say aye. Motion passes.
*3.

A. Department of Taxation $8,184,269.50
Pursuant to Senate Bill 493, Section 16.7 of the 2011 Legislature, the Department of Taxation must submit mining claim refund requests to the Board of Examiners for approval. The Department is requesting authority to pay 335 refund requests totaling $8,184,269.50. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Secretary of State Comments: Seconded By: Governor Vote: 2-0
Governor: Agenda Item No. 3, Authority To Pay Mining Claim Refunds. Mr. Mohlenkamp. Clerk: Thank you, Governor. Item No. 3, this is the first time this has been before the Board, so Im going to provide a little bit of background. Assembly Bill 6, Section 47 during the 26 Special Session authorized an additional fee on filings made pursuant to NRS 517.230 for improvements or work performed on mining claims by persons who hold 11 or more claims in the State. What you have before you is pursuant to Senate Bill 493 of the 2011 legislature, is they authorize the ability to either credit or refund to these companies after theyve applied through the Department of Taxation. So what you have before you is claims in the amount of $8,184,269.50. I do want to make a note that we had one of these items, if you look at your package, Attachment B under the third tab. On page five we have one entity, Nevada Mine Properties II, Inc. which is not properly agendaed. That is actually an incorrect name of the payee, so were gonna pull that from the Agenda. Governor: Can we redo the math? Clerk: I have done that. The amount now is $8,179,929.50. Governor: Mr. Mohlenkamp, does this track with what the legislature anticipated in terms of payments that were going to be made under this legislation? Clerk: Governor, we estimated, the Legislative Counsel Bureau and the Budget Division estimated a little over $18 million in payments that would be due over the biennium, so this is essentially youve got the first half of it coming here. Governor: I guess another way to ask the question is, obviously were going to be paying more as time moves on and we have more requests for refunds, are we comfortable that the amount that we have set aside is going to be sufficient to make all those payments? Clerk: Yes, Governor. This is included in the executive budget, and so we have budgeted for not only these payments but those to come. Governor: And how does that process work? Do we seek out each of these claimants and pay them, or do they have to come and file an application for refund?
Clerk: Governor, I can give you some basics. They have one year to make a claim, and they have to make a claim to the Department of Taxation. The actual mechanics Id have to defer to the Department on. And I know theres a representative if you want some details on that. Governor: What is their deadline to seek a refund? Clerk: I will have to get the deadline on that from the Department as far as a specific date certain. I believe its one year from the date of the bill, but Im not certain about that. Governor: I thought I saw something in the memo here. It says refunds -- Ill answer my own question. Applications for mining fee refunds will be accepted until June 30, 2013. Is that accurate, Mr. Chisel? William Chisel: Thats correct. Governor: All right. Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions with regard to this Agenda item? Secretary of State: No. Governor: Okay. Chair will accept a motion to approve a refund request totaling $8,179,929.50, and that would be 334 refund requests. Secretary of State: So moved. Governor: There is a motion by the Secretary, and I will second the motion. Is there any discussion or questions on the motion? Hearing none, all in favor of the motion please say aye. Motion passes unanimously.
*4.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION VICTIMS OF CRIME QUARTER REPORT AND FY 2012 2ND QUARTER RECOMMENDATION
2012
1ST
NRS 217.260 requires the Board of Examiners to estimate available revenue and anticipated claim costs each quarter. If revenues are insufficient to pay anticipated claims, the statute directs that claim payments must be reduced proportionately. The Victims of Crime Program Coordinator recommends paying the Priority 1 & 2 claims at 100% and Priority 3 claims at 100% of the approved amount for the 2nd quarter of FY 2012. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Secretary of State Comments: Seconded By: Governor Vote: 2-0
Governor: Agenda Item No. 4, Victims of Crime 2012 First Quarter Report and Fiscal Year 2012 Second Quarter Recommendation. Mr. Mohlenkamp.
Clerk: Thank you, Governor. Before you is a normal Agenda item. This is the recommendation from the Victims of Crime Unit. They are recommending that we pay the full priority three payment level. Looking at the funding levels while State -- well, the typical revenues, that being from fines, restitution, court assessment, et cetera, are coming in lower than we have seen historically. We have received a considerable bump in federal funding. As a result, I believe we can make those payments and still add to the reserves in the amount of about $868,000. Governor: Thank you, Mr. Mohlenkamp. My question is this, and we were -- we being the State of Nevada, were very fortunate to get that federal funding that we did. According to the memo, its anticipated that that wont happen again and, in fact, it will be less than likely that which we would seek. So my question is, should we be starting to save for that rainy day, or is the money that you described that were banking sufficient to do that? Clerk: Im being advised by staff that they feel that the quarterly adjustment process will give us adequate time to make those adjustments. Theyre still maintaining to make the full payment on the priority three payment levels, but that we need to watchful of that going forward. And if we need to adjust, theres the ability to adjust the payment levels on an ongoing basis. Governor: And I do want to take this opportunity to compliment the staff with Victims of Crimes for their efficiencies and how theyre performing in terms of making those payments, but at the same time, saving a significant amount of money. Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions? Secretary of State: No, Governor. Governor: Does this require action, Mr. Mohlenkamp? Clerk: Yes, it does, Governor. Governor: Okay. The chair will accept a motion to approve the action as recommended within Agenda Item No. 4. Secretary of State: So moved. Governor: Theres a motion by the Secretary. I will second the motion. Any questions or discussion on the motion? Hearing none, all in favor please say aye. Motion passes.
*5.

A. Office of the Governor Agency for Nuclear Projects
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 240 of the 2011 Legislature and Chapter 0300 of the State Administrative Manual, the Agency for Nuclear Projects seeks approval to enter into a contract
with the former Acting Executive Director/Planning Division Administrator of the Nevada agency for Nuclear Projects. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Secretary of State Comments: Seconded By: Governor Vote: 2-0
Governor: Agenda Item No. 5, Authorization to Contract with a Former Employee. It is my understanding, Mr. Mohlenkamp, this is the first of its kind as required by Assembly Bill 240. Please proceed. Clerk: Thank you, Governor. Youre exactly right. This is the first approval for essentially the Board to approve the association of a former employee dealing with a State agency. Before you, you have the request by the Nuclear Projects group to have a contract with a former employee, and they have provided what I consider to be fairly strong rationale. This individual has expertise that is not easy to find, so we dont have any opposition to this. Joseph Strolin and Strolin Consulting LLC is the individual involved here, and so were in support of this because of the specific nature of the skill set needed. Governor: Mr. Halstead, are you present? Robert Halstead: Yes, Governor. Good morning, Governor. Governor: Good morning. Robert Halstead: Staff members. Governor: Mr. Halstead, if you would and Ms. Adams, Marta Adams is here as well from the Attorneys Generals office, if you would perhaps provide a more detailed background with regard to the nature of this association. Robert Halstead: Well, first let me say, Governor, that, you know, given the budget situation, Im sure that any manager or director in State service hates to come and ask for any kind of an exception, and yet we have a unique situation here which requires the services of a truly unique individual in a situation where we face a serious resumption of the controversy over Yucca Mountain coming in January and February, partly because of the timing of the Bipartisan Blue Ribbon Commission Report which will be out at the end of January, and partly because of last weeks federal court action which has set a briefing and hearing schedule for the State of Washington and South Carolina efforts to reopen the licensing process. Under these circumstances, I very much need the kind of work that Mr. Strolin can provide, as he provided formerly when he was the planning administrator. And were lucky that in this case we have an individual who can provide these services since we no longer have the budget for the planning administrator position which was eliminated. Were able to get the services that we need for approximately a savings of between 75 and $100,000. Again, I understand the intent of the legislature to set a high bar for the approval of these types of exceptional requests. We have a
situation where we have an extreme need. We have an individual with unique capabilities and experience, and it will help us live within a difficult budget. Governor: Thank you very much. And just a little more specificity with regard to what his services mean, what will we be getting, will the State be getting through this -- via this contract. Robert Halstead: Well, Governor, there are some general things that this position does to assist the executive director, and thats generally in fulfilling our responsibilities to the Commission with preparing reports, preparing for meetings and reviewing documents. Then there are some duties that are more specific to this position, for example, duties that have to do with contract administration in the areas of impact assessment and transportation. There are duties that are specific to the agreement and principle activities regarding the Nevada nuclear security site. I keep wanting to say Nevada test site. Ill have to train myself after many years to get the nomenclature right. And in particular, there are a range of duties that have to do with interactions with other agencies, particularly the agencies like DEP, Emergency Management, the agencies that have regulatory authority in nuclear areas. And then there is another range of activities that have to do with dealings with the Western Governors Association and the Western Interstate Energy Board. These are duties that for a new person to learn these duties certainly would require three to six months of training, and yet that person, even if they were trained up, would not bring the advantage that Mr. Strolin brings because he has the established personal relationships with those agencies, with the people in other states. And while this is not set forward in the task, Mr. Strolin also very importantly has ties with the local governments and county governments in Nevada, which is an important, but somewhat unwritten part of that job. Governor: One final question, and you eluded to that in your introductory remarks, but you characterized the need for this because of the serious resumption of Yucca Mountain issues. Some are maybe under the impression that its counter to that, that this is winding down. Why do you -- I know you could probably spend an hour talking about the Blue Ribbon Report and the federal court action, but if you could briefly discuss why you characterize this as a serious resumption of the Yucca Mountain Project. Robert Halstead: Well, first let me say that I believe, and Ive been an observer of this process for this entire 23 years, that we are in the best position we have been in since the 1987 Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act kicked in, which of course put the sole focus on Yucca Mountain as a candidate site for a geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste, which must be isolated from the environment and from human beings for a period somewhere between 10,000 and a million years. And so this is a very, very serious issue that we face. For a variety of reasons, mostly because the Obama administration withdrew the license application through the action that Secretary Chu took soon after he came into office, I think were in the best position that we are to win this -- that weve been in to win this battle. On the other hand, there are numerous forces that believe that Yucca Mountain should go forward. There are numerous individuals who have a professional and emotional stake in seeing the licensing process resumed. And there is a serious effort in the U.S. House of Representatives to do just that, to force the reopening of the licensing process. There is also a serious effort through the federal courts, through the lawsuits that have been brought by the states of Washington and South Carolina and
a number of associated friends of that position. The next big battles for us occur in January and February, and thats what puts some urgency in my request for this approval of Mr. Strolins contract. There is no way that anyone else could help us prepare for the events that will occur towards the end of January with the Bipartisan Blue Ribbon Commission Report, and then that will trigger all kinds of Congressional and public debate. And at the same time, just last week we saw the briefing schedule for the federal court case. And it looks like in February we will have hearings based on filings coming up in December. And then we would likely have a decision in the spring before the court recesses for the summer. So on the one hand, I dont want to come before you and say that Yucca Mountain is alive again, but our job is to keep Yucca Mountain dead. And there is a serious effort on the part of a number of parties to resume the licensing process and thats why its important for Nevada to maintain its vigilance both through the Agency for Nuclear Projects in your office and through the Attorney Generals office. Governor: Thank you very much, Mr. Halstead. Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions? Secretary of State: No, Governor. I think he did an outstanding job outlining the issues. Governor: The only other comment I have with regard to this Agenda item, and correct me if Im wrong, Mr. Mohlenkamp, its process statement is that in a prior Board of Examiners meeting we had had a discussion of putting the authorization to contract as well as the approval of the contract on the same agenda. And its my understanding that it is the advice of the Attorney Generals office that we cant do that, that we have to do that on two separate Agendas; is that accurate? Clerk: Governor, youre exactly right. On October 19th we received a memorandum from the Attorney Generals office providing guidance that in fact it would be not possible under the current laws set up to have the approval of the relationship and the approval of the contract at the same Agenda. Governor: Thank you. My comment is that I believe that Mr. Halstead has made a compelling argument and statement as to why its necessary for the State to enter into a contractual relationship with Mr. Strolin. Mr. Secretary, I am prepared to accept a motion to approve the authorization to contract with a former employee, that being Mr. Joseph Strolin. Secretary of State: So moved, Governor. Governor: Theres a motion by the Secretary of State to approve the request for authorization to contract with a former employee as described in Item 5 of the Agenda. I will second the motion. Is there any discussion or questions on the motion? Hearing none, all in favor of the motion please say aye. Motion passes unanimously. Thank you very much. Robert Halstead: Thank you, Governor.
*6.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION APPROVAL TO PAY A CASH SETTLEMENT
Pursuant to NRS 41.037, the State Board of Examiners may approve, settle or deny any claim or action against the State, any of its agencies or any of its present or former officers, employees, immune contractors or State Legislators. A. Department of Transportation Administration $25,000,000
The Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) is requesting approval to settle two eminent domain lawsuits with Wall Street Nevada, LLC and related persons and entities. Both suits involve the same property, consisting of 7.04 acres of undeveloped land in Las Vegas that is associated with NDOTs Project NEON. This project will make improvements to I-15, U.S. 94, and surface streets to help traffic flow. NDOT and the landowners have been in settlement discussions since 2009 and have now jointly agreed to settle for $25 million. If the Board approves the settlement, NDOT intends to seek participation of federal funds in the cost to acquire the property. NDOT has contacted the Federal Highway Administration to determine the amount of participation. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Secretary of State Comments: Seconded By: Governor Vote: 2-0
Governor: Next item on the Agenda is Agenda Item No. 6, Approval to Pay a Cash Settlement with regard to the Department of Transportation. Mr. Mohlenkamp. Clerk: Thank you, Governor. The Department of Transportation is requesting approval to settle two lawsuits with Wall Street Nevada, LLC. They are asking for payment of $25 million. Including in your documents is the understanding that they will then turn around and request from the federal government to offset some portion of this $25 million payment which would then be returned to the Highway Fund if and when those amounts are received. We do not currently have an estimate of how much would be received from the federal government. I believe the Department is here to provide testimony. Governor: Thank you. I do see Mr. Gallagher here. Mr. Gallagher. Dennis Gallagher: Good morning, Governor, Mr. Secretary. For the record, Dennis Gallagher, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Chief Counsel for NDOT. To my left is Michael Chapman from the Chapman Law Firm, outside law firm, thats been representing that State in these two cases for which this settlement is being recommended. Governor: Thank you, Mr. Gallagher. Good morning, Mr. Chapman. I havent seen you in a while. Its always a pleasure. Michael Chapman: Thank you, Governor.
Governor: Would you set more of a background in terms of the settlement and the litigation, please? Michael Chapman: Yes, your honor. Force of habit, sorry. The case goes back a few years to about 2004. Neon has been in the planning stages for quite a few years. And in 2005 the Wall Street landowners negotiated for this particular piece of property, seven acres near Charleston Boulevard. They bought the property in 2006, purchased it at that point in time for $21.4 million, and demolished some buildings on the property, made some other expenses with respect to the property such as getting streets vacated, making some development plans and so on. In 2009 they filed an inverse condemnation lawsuit against the Department alleging that actions by the city of Las Vegas, in conjunction with NDOT, namely planning activities such as holding public meetings and other announcements, actions by the city of condemning some property along the path for the Martin Luther King connector, not the Neon property but other properties, and that all of these actions taken in concert together had essentially deprived the landowners of their use and benefit and ownership essentially, even though title had not transferred for their property. The State takes the opposite view that that was not a taking. Nevertheless, there is some exposure to the State from the claim. The Attorney Generals office, prior to our office becoming involved, had a extensive settlement discussion with the landowners. The landowners and the State together decided that lets just get an appraisal and find out what the propertys worth, because in the end the State does want the property for the project. That appraisal came in at $21.4 million as well, coincidentally pretty close to the purchase price originally and that was using a 2009 date of value. The case did not settle. The demands were around $29 million at that point in time. Our office was hired shortly thereafter the Complaint was answered and the landowners filed a motion for partial summary judgment to set a date that the taking actually occurred. The judge in the case decided that it would be a 2007 date of value, which would actually have the effect of pushing the property value back closer to the top of the real estate bubble. More negotiations were had and they were quite hard fought negotiations. But I always think that these negotiations are useful to have early in a case rather than later because a lot of times your best bargains on behalf of the taxpayers can be made early in the process as opposed to a week before the trial. We were able to negotiate, you know, by then the demand had gone up to 31, $35 million. We were able to negotiate it down to $25 million. And considering all of the risks of perhaps $100 million dollars in exposure, compared to the ability to settle the case now for $25 million, we decided it was worthwhile to present that the Department for their consideration of all of the pros and the cons which we laid out very carefully for them. And it was decided that consistent with the federal statutes, that this made a -- in terms of a business decision, a prudent, wise and good settlement with respect to weighing the benefits and the burdens of going forward. Governor: Thank you. Very thorough explanation. When you say that the District Court ruled that the value would be based on its value in 2006, which would be that $100 million figure, or could be that $100 million figure that you talked about for the value of the property? Michael Chapman: Well, according to the landowners it could. You know, our evaluation was no, but we do know in fact that in 2006 they paid $21.4 million for the property. In 2007, which
was the date the judge selected, the property values were rising up until that time. They began to fall -- housing values began to fall in July of 2006. That was the peak in Las Vegas and the beginning of the crisis that we all know too well today. The values on some properties were still rising as of 2007, and the bottom basically fell out when the recession began in December of 2007. So I guess thats a long way of saying yes. Governor: And that issue was decided by the District Court. Is that issue before the Nevada Supreme Court as we speak? Michael Chapman: No, it is not, Governor. When the parties entered into kind of the third or fourth round of settlement negotiations, we were in the process of filing motions for reconsideration based on what we think is incorrect legal analysis by the District Court judge. By the time that worked its way to a hearing, and shortly before, the parties arrived at the $25 million settlement, and it was decided to present that to the clients on both sides for their consideration. The District Judge then stayed the inverse condemnation action and has not ruled on any of these motions pending the approval of the settlement by the Wall Street folks and by the Board of Examiners. Governor: And if we reach this settlement, does that buy eternal peace in terms of litigation associated with this piece of property? I probably shouldnt use that term, but how about if I change that and use, do we have certainty now with regard to that property? Michael Chapman: We have built as best as we can closure into the settlement agreement by doing a couple of things. One is a full release obviously from the Wall Street people. The other is a direct condemnation action for the same land. And as part of that, we have named everyone who needs to be named according to statute. We have named some other folks who dont need to be named according to statute, but we thought it would just be prudent in order to extra, extra clarify the title. In addition to that, the statutes provide for notice and service by publication of anybody unknown and not entitled who might have a claim to the interest of the property. That has all been done and, in fact, is ongoing at this time. The publication began about two or three weeks ago. The Complaint was filed on October the 20th. Everyone has been served now. Were beginning to get in these things. So we should be able to ferret out any interest before the money is paid, and thats the way the settlement is structured. Governor: I think we approved that in our last Board of Transportation meeting if my recollection serves me correctly. And last question, you said the settlement amount is 25 million. We may have some participation or contribution from the federal government. Is there local government contribution as well in this settlement? Michael Chapman: There will be a contribution from the City of Las Vegas which is still being worked out. Governor: Thank you very much, Mr. Chapman. Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions with regard to this Agenda item?
Secretary of State: Just a couple. How many other potential similar lawsuits are out there related to Project Neon? And what is the overall potential exposure to the State related to these issues? Michael Chapman: There are some similar lawsuits. We dont know exactly how many because they have not been filed yet. Whenever you settle a case, theres always a risk that a copy cat lawsuit will present itself, that this will be attempted to be used as precedential value to settle the next case. Thats a risk, we acknowledge that. We have tried to take care of that in the settlement agreement by saying that this is not the States opinion as to the value of the land, and that this settlement will not be admissible in another court. And so to the extent that we can take care of that, I think we have. Will somebody else file the same thing? Perhaps. One of the things we are recommending is that the Department file its cases as soon as it is ready to do so rather than waiting for inverse condemnation cases, simply because the direct cases establish the date of value by statute and they are easier to defend than the inverses which are pretty tough cases. Secretary of State: So is this then a strategic legal decision to try to settle this matter when we were handed an adverse ruling on when the takings occurred that would put us in a better position to perhaps litigate this issue before any, as you referred to, copycat lawsuits that may arise in the future? Michael Chapman: More than that, it is a decision which makes financial sense. If we are getting appraisals of $21 million or so as of 2009 values, and these dates of value being somewhat in flux in imminent domain cases, we are probably paying around where we would end up irrespective of the District Courts decision. Was the settlement discussions accelerated and moved forward by the decision? I would have to say yes, that that was a helpful catalyst as well. Secretary of State: But just so I understand, I mean, this was a strategic legal decision as I understand it to not appeal the order of the District Court in terms of the finding as to when the takings occurred as opposed to trying to settle it? Michael Chapman: It is a recommendation that is being submitted for the consideration of the DOT and this particular Board. We have filed motions for reconsideration to the District Court, but I suppose it would be a strategic decision if the Board decided to press forward and get a ruling from the judge on the reconsideration, and then a ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court on the point. That is the other possibility. And of course the risk of accepting the settlement is that you do not have that ruling to rely on and perhaps a clear answer from the Nevada Supreme Court for future cases. Secretary of State: But just so Im clear, you weighed both of those options and it is your recommendation that this settlement is in the best interest of the State? Michael Chapman: This is the best settlement that we could negotiate at the time. And weighing all of the risks with the benefits, we think it does tilt in favor of recommending a
settlement, and so that is why we have presented it to the client, this Board, and also the folks at NDOT for their consideration. Secretary of State: Thank you, Governor. Governor: Mr. Chapman, just a follow up. This number 25 million is essentially very close to what the likely minimum amount wed get if we were to proceed to trial? Michael Chapman: In my gut reaction, because whenever you do these settlements, you know, its like the song says, you gotta know when to hold em and know when to fold em. You never quite know what the opportunity cost is that youre giving up. My gut reaction is yes, and the reason for that is a couple of different things. Even if Judge Corey reversed himself on the inverse condemnation case, there is still a pre-condemnation damages claim which is another thing which is allowed by our Supreme Court. That is a jury issue. Interest runs on any amount of money that would be paid by the landowner. On inverses cases they are allowed their attorney fees and their costs and so on. And according to Pistol, the new Constitutional amendments by referendum on eminent domain, the government is no longer allowed to receive attorneys fees from the property owner in a case that the government might win. So it would probably come close to that number anyway is a gut feeling that I have. Governor: Thank you. I have no further questions. Mr. Secretary, are you prepared to make a motion with regard to Agenda Item No. 6? Secretary of State: Yes, Governor. Ill move for approval of the Agenda Item No. 6, recommendation for approval of a cash settlement in the amount of $25 million. Governor: Okay. The Secretary has made a motion to approve a cash settlement as described in Item 6 of the Agenda in the amount of $25 million. I will second the motion. Is there any discussion or questions on the motion? Hearing none, all in favor of the motion please say aye. Motion passes. Thank you, gentlemen. Michael Chapman: Thank you, Governor. Thank you, Mr. Secretary.
*7.
Pursuant to NRS 334.010, no automobile may be purchased by any department, office, bureau, officer or employee of the State without prior written consent of the State Board of Examiners. AGENCY NAME Department of Administration Enterprise IT Services Network Transport Services Department of Public Safety Highway Patrol Department of Public Safety Highway Patrol Highway Safety Grants Account
# OF VEHICLES 1 123 1
NOT TO EXCEED: $39,236 $5,331,325 $23,401
Total: Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Secretary of State Comments: Seconded By: Governor
$5,393,962
Vote: 2-0
Governor: Mr. Mohlenkamp, Agenda Item No. 7. Clerk: Thank you, Governor. Before you, you have three separate requests for State vehicle purchases, Department of Administration, Enterprise IT Services, for one vehicle; Department of Public Safety Highway Patrol, 123 vehicles; and the Department of Public Safety, the Highway Safety Grants Account, one vehicle. All of these vehicle purchases are in the authorized legislative budget. And I believe there are representatives here if you have any questions. Governor: I have no questions. Mr. Secretary? Secretary of State: No, Governor. Governor: Mr. Secretary, are you prepared to make a motion with regard to Agenda Item No. 7? Secretary of State: Move for approval of Agenda Item No. 7 of three State vehicle purchases. Governor: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. The Secretary has made a motion to approve Agenda Item No. 7, State Vehicle Purchase in the total amount of $5,393.962. Ill second the motion. Are there any questions or discussion on the motion? Hearing none, all in favor of the motion please say aye. Motion passes.
*8.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION LEASES
Three statewide leases were submitted to the Board for review and approval. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Secretary of State Comments: Seconded By: Governor Vote: 2-0
Governor: Agenda Item No. 8, Mr. Mohlenkamp. Clerk: Thank you, Governor. Before you are three separate leases. And I wanted to point out on the second item, which is Department of Education, Nevada Public Charter School Authority, it doesnt show it on your Agenda, but I wanted to make sure you understood that over the biennium there was a $9,123 savings. This is a 19 percent reduction over the rate that was previously being paid, so I want to point that out and kudos to the agency on that.
Governor: Thank you, Mr. Mohlenkamp. I have no questions with regard to the proposed leases. Mr. Secretary? Secretary of State: Ill move for approval of Agenda Item No. 8, the three leases. Governor: The Secretary has made a motion for approval of the three leases described in Agenda Item No. 8. Ill second the motion. Are there any questions or further discussion on the motion? Hearing none, all in favor of the motion please say aye. Motion passes.
*9.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION CONTRACTS
Sixty-two independent contracts were submitted to the Board for review and approval. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Secretary of State Comments: Seconded By: Governor Vote: 2-0
Governor: Agenda Item No. 9, Contracts. Mr. Mohlenkamp. Clerk: Thank you, Governor. Before the Board are 62 contracts. I do want to make a note to the Board that Contract No. 62 has been withdrawn, leaving 61 contracts to be considered. Governor: Thank you. I have questions regarding Agenda Item No. 4, 5 through 8, No. 11, No. 15 and 16, and No. 25. And I know there are a lot of associated contracts with that with the various counties, No. 26, No. 37, No. 44, No. 51, No. 53, No. 59 and No. 61. Mr. Secretary, do you have any contracts that you wanted to hold out for questions? Secretary of State: No, Governor. Governor: Well then begin with Contract No. 4. Good morning, Sir. Please identify yourself for the record, sir. Kent Robison: Im independent counsel for UNR, Milton Glick and Carrie in the litigation. My name is Kent Robison and Im here with Joe Ward from the University of Nevadas counsel. Joe Ward: Thank you. For the record, Joe Ward for University of Nevada Reno. Governor: Good morning, Mr. Ward. Its good to see you. How long have you been with University now? Joe Ward: A little over a year, a year and three months. Governor: Now, my question isnt really with the proprietary of the contract. I know this is a longstanding contract with the Robison, Belaustegui, Sharp firm representing the university
system. One question I had is, we have paid out $320,000. Is there a reason, or does the university participate in the costs of those legal fees? Joe Ward: I understand that there has been recently some awards that have gone up to the Nevada Supreme Court with respect to attorneys fees. As far as the university itself participating in those costs, I dont believe so. I believe that this is through the State Contingency Fund that we get the compensation to reimburse the Robison firm. Governor: Is that a -- and I know we worked together, Mr. Ward, when I was the Attorney General. But historically has the State always stepped in to pay legal fees on behalf of the university when the university doesnt, within its own legal department, have the ability to defend those lawsuits? Joe Ward: My understanding is that historically, yes. The Nevada System of Higher Education is a State entity and there are two universities, the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, the University of Nevada, Reno, and about six community colleges that make up this Nevada System of Higher Education, a State entity. There are three attorneys at the University of Nevada, Reno. And I understand at the time, and I wasnt there, that this litigation involving Ms. Batra (sp?) commenced, there were two lawsuits brought. Those cases were consolidated, 19 claims resulted, and the same claims are also part of the Whistle Blower case, a third case. But to answer the question, I believe that being a State entity, yes. The State Contingency Fund is available for the State entity. Governor: Thank you, Mr. Ward. Mr. Robison, how are we doing? I know this is a longstanding litigation with multiple defendants and multiple claims. Are we approaching trial or where are we procedurally? Kent Robison: Were doing well. We prevailed on motions for summary judgment in 2009 on all claims that the plaintiff brought. We made a motion for attorneys fees. In the interim, the plaintiff challenged, the judge raised several procedural issues that got quite expensive. We prevailed on a motion for fees. We were awarded $111,000 in fees. Both of the primary cases went up on appeal as did the award of attorneys fees. Later that summer we had some disturbing activity by the plaintiff. We obtained a temporary restraining order, later an injunction. That went up on appeal. A week ago Monday, August 31 we argued all four of those matters before the Nevada Supreme Court. Theyre under submission. We feel pretty good about them. Governor: Do you -- and I know this isnt probably a question that can be answered. Do you anticipate a decision by the Court in the near future? Kent Robison: Governor, I do, hopefully within the next four weeks. As you probably know, one of three things can occur. A remand for further proceedings, a total reversal which would put us up on a trial calendar, but the work is done for the trial. And if we get complete affirmation, I expect that the plaintiff will move for reconsideration and then probably consideration. So I do expect a little bit more activity in the Supreme Court and hopefully no more activity in the District Court.
Governor: Thank you, Mr. Robison. Kent Robison: Thank you. Governor: Mr. Monroe, I understand that you are here and may be able to answer that question I have with regard to the States obligation to pay legal fees in this matter. Mr. Monroe: Good morning. For the record, the States obligation, this is a request made by a State entity, and this is the normal process for paying these types of fees. Governor: Thank you, Mr. Monroe. Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions with regard to Agenda Item No. 4? Secretary of State: No, Governor. Governor: Thank you very much. Are there representatives here from the Treasurers office? Mark Winebarger: Good morning, Governor. Governor: Good morning. Could you just identify yourself for the record? Mark Winebarger: Mark Winebarger, Chief Deputy Treasurer. Governor: Mr. Winebarger, my question isnt, again, with regard to the propriety of these contracts. I know theyre important and necessary. I just was interested more mechanically how these work. Do these entities make our investment decisions with regard to the LGIP? Mark Winebarger: Governor, this is a -- the State contracts with these particular four vendors or investment managers. And then after we sign these contracts, then its sort of like a good of the State contract where local governments can then individually select one of these four investment managers depending on what their needs are and how they want to design their portfolio, and they work directly with those local governments. We review and make sure everything is up to speed and reconciling and the fees are appropriate. Governor: And were approving a -- this is an up to $5 million, not for $5 million. And I appreciate your follow up because we have only -- I shouldnt say only. We have expended annual fees to these entities in the amount of $169,747 and $264,502. Why is the 5 million figure so high comparable to these amounts that Mark Winebarger: Governor, we dont want to come back to the Board of Examiners and request contract amendments in the instance that a local government would add additional or get more local governments adding to this investment portfolios. Were tied very closely to the base point fee, so the max not to exceed is basically a function of the purchasing documents and the
contracts that are required. Its just one of those things that we do when we have a fixed rate applied to a variable balance that could be greatly increased. Governor: And what would be an action that would get us up to that $5 million? Mark Winebarger: Right now approximately $400 million is across all these portfolios. It would take, I dont know, I didnt do the math, seven, eight, nine times that amount to go from, you know, $200,000 a year for Atlantic Capital to over a million to reach those top limits. Governor: In other words, would they be making more investment decisions, which would cause that type of expenditure? Mark Winebarger: These fees are based on the balance of the portfolios. So if for instance Clark County went from Im guessing $125 million to $500 million, then those fees would be exponentially increased based on the value of the portfolio and the agreed upon fees. Governor: Thank you very much. Very helpful. Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions with regard to these Agenda items? Secretary of State: No, Governor. Governor: Thank you. Contract No. 11. Good morning. If youd just identify yourselves for the record, please. Shelley Blotter: Certainly. Shelley Blotter, Deputy Administrator for the Division of Human Resource Management. And with me is Carrie Hughes. Shes a Personnel Analyst for the Division as well. Governor: Thank you. Again, Im not going to question the need for this contract. It just piqued my interest because I think it -- I dont know how well known it is, perhaps it is, that the State provides these counseling services to all State employees. And I do appreciate the followup memo that you provided. Were spending essentially $350,000 for this. This was something that we used to do internally, and now we are outsourcing that to this entity in Dove Canyon, California. I dont know where Dove Canyon is. But in any event, the utilization in 2009 was 976 of 18,000 State employees; is that accurate? Shelley Blotter: Thats correct. And youll notice that we had declining utilization. And as I explained, we had two State employees performing these services in 2007, and so they were long-term employees. Our State employees had trust in them. There were relationships built up in the community. And then we had turnover. And so there was time of vacancy and we didnt have a person in Las Vegas. Once that position was filled, then those relationships had to be built. And then that individual ended up leaving. And finally the supervisor at that unit retired, and so this was a great opportunity to not harm a current employee. We were able to provide a much more robust service to employees, so I think this is one of the shining bright spots and good news for employees.
Governor: Thank you. An opportunity to talk about that is Im also interested, but if Im a State employee whos in need of these services, we have Psych Corporation out of California, do they - where do I go if Im a State employee and Im seeking these types of services both in Carson City, Reno and Las Vegas? Shelley Blotter: Im gonna defer to Carrie Hughes. Shes been working directly with the vendor and she can talk about the implementation. Carrie Hughes: For the record, Carrie Hughes. The services will be offered -- primary access will be through a toll-free number, also online access that will go into a dedicated call service for State of Nevada employees. They will have access at that point to either a masters level or doctoral level counselor on the phone. At that point an assessment will be made and a referral to resources, which in many circumstances will be a referral back to subcontracted counselors within the own employees community that they can go and see and develop a relationship with. Governor: Thats fantastic. So we will have Ph.D. level counselors or M.D.? Shelley Blotter: Governor, I believe it was masters level. Governor: Okay. Or masters level who will make that initial assessment, and then there will be referral to a local provider, whereas before we had two or three people within State government to provide that service. Shelley Blotter: And just for clarification, they were providing that same type of referral, so long-term counseling was always handled in the communities, but there will be a larger provider network. And not only including marital or mental health counseling or alcohol counseling, you know, that type of thing, but also financial and also resources related to child care and elder care and so much more expanded network of providers that theyll have contact with. Governor: My last question is there was nobody in Nevada that could provide this service? Shelley Blotter: We did interview quite a number of vendors. We had one vendor that was primarily located in Nevada and they just did not perform as well in the evaluation process. We were hoping that we could provide, you know, business to a Nevada employer and a Nevada business, but unfortunately they did not come out on top. Governor: Thank you very much. Congratulations. Shelley Blotter: Thank you. Governor: Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions with regard to Contract No. 11? Secretary of State: No, Governor.
Governor: Thank you again. Next item is No. 15, Commission on Economic Development. Please state your name for the record. Margene Stenger: Margene Stenger with Economic Development. Governor: Good morning, Ms. Stenger. And I did receive your memo, the follow-up with regard to this contract. And Im gonna overuse this word today, but, you know, we get one sentence to describe what this interlocal agreement to provide training for employees of Nevada businesses that have been approved by the Governors office of Economic Development. And what Im looking for is just a little more detail as to how that works. Do we have potential companies that are relocating to Nevada that were providing them with employees via this program, or how does this work mechanically? Margene Stenger: How it works is the company, they can be a company within Nevada or an outside company thats going to move to Nevada. And the Department of Employment Training and Rehab has money set aside for us in which we can go to them and receive the money and then we pay the university system to conduct training for their employees to create a stronger workforce. Governor: Do you have a concrete example of how that works right now? Is there a current employer that needed a certain kind of employee and we provided that type of training? What kind of employees are we training as a result of this contract? Margene Stenger: I dont have one, a for instance, but it goes through the commission. The commission has to make sure that the wages are met, that the employer is going to be paying a specific wage and theres also a match brought up from the employer. And then we either go to the Nevada Industrial and Excellence through the Board of Examiners and they are the trainers that provide statewide. And then Washoe County we use Truckee Meadows Community College. Governor: So if Im an employee at a company and I need that specific training and the Economic Development has approved it, I go to one of the community colleges, attend a class and get that specific kind of training, and then the Commission on Economic Development pays that tuition associated with that? Margene Stenger: Yes. Governor: Okay. Ive got it. Thank you. Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions with regard to Contract No. 15? Secretary of State: No, Governor. Governor: All right. Contract No. 25 is between Healthcare Financing and Policy and Carson City. I know there are several contracts within our Agenda. My understanding is that things are progressing well in terms of our agreements with the respective counties throughout the State?
Lynn Carrigan: Yes, sir. In fact, all of the counties have signed the contracts. Pardon me. Im Lynn Carrigan. Im Administrative Services Officer for the Division of Healthcare Financing and Policy. All of the counties have actually signed their contracts and well be bringing the additional contracts before the Board of Examiners in future months. Governor: So congratulations in order. Weve signed up all 17? Lynn Carrigan: Yes, sir. Governor: Wow. All right. Clerk: Governor, I just want to clarify. This is a contract for county match is it; is that correct? Governor: And I may, you know, there are several Lynn Carrigan: Yes, yes, it is. Its a county-match contract. Clerk: Okay. But there are some other items weve been dealing with the diversion of some services to the county and thats a separate item; is that correct? Lynn Carrigan: Yes, it is. Clerk: Okay. I just wanted to make sure were clear on that. Lynn Carrigan: This is exclusively for the county indigent program for Nevada Medicaid. Governor: But with regard to that issue, everything is completed; is that correct? Lynn Carrigan: Yes, sir. Its just dotting the Is and crossing the Ts at this point. Governor: Thank you very much. Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions with regard to these items? Secretary of State: No, Governor. Governor: Next item is Contract No. 37. Phil Weyrick: Good morning, Governor, members of the Board. For the record, Phil Weyrick, Administrative Services Officer for the Health Division. To my left is Luana Ritch who is the Bureau Chief for the Bureau of Statistics, Planning, Epidemiology and Response. Governor: Thank you very much. And I do appreciate the follow-up memo that essentially explains the nature of this contract, because when I first looked at it, $727,000 sounded like a lot
of money, and I wasnt -- I didnt know what the utilization was, but I was surprised to see that we have 3,767 average calls per month with regard to poison control; is that accurate? Phil Weyrick: Yes, sir, that is accurate. And you should probably also know for the record that this contract is actually supplemented by HRSA funds that are given directly to the Poison Control Center. So were actually paying a reduced rate because HRSA is funding some of this effort directly. Governor: Pardon my ignorance, but what is HRSA? Luana Ritch: Governor, HRSA is the Health Resources Services Administration. Its part of the Federal Department of Health and Human Services. For the record, this is Luana Ritch. Governor: And Ill keep asking this Nevada question over and over again, but, you know, I see that perhaps the call center is in Colorado; is that correct? Luana Ritch: Governor, thats correct. Its located in Denver, Colorado. It is an agency -- it has a quasi-governmental agency relationship with the State of Colorado. Governor: And theres not a similar entity that could perhaps provide this service in Nevada; is that correct? Luana Ritch: For the record, this is Luana Ritch. Governor, no. We did take this out to RFP. However, the trend in poison control centers because of the expertise needed to be able to handle these type of calls, were seeing a regionalization across the country, and so states with relatively small numbers such as Nevadas partner or plug into regional poison control centers. We did not have any bidders on our RFP from any Nevada providers. The types of specialists and expertise that is there isnt something that we find in Nevada. Governor: I was surprised to learn you even provide or they provide advice or service with regard to animals as well; is that accurate? Luana Ritch: For the record, Luana Ritch. Yes, Governor. They provide information regarding -- to the public, and those calls are calls that are often calls that my dog ate something or got into an over-the-counter medication or that kind of thing. Governor: And you promote this number. Where do I find this number to make that phone call? Luana Ritch: Again, Luana Ritch. The number is the National Poison Control hotline number and it can be found online, in the front of your phone book and in various other places around community directories, all of those kinds of places. Governor: Thank you very much. That was very informative. Appreciate it. Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions with regard to Contract No. 37?
Secretary of State: No, Governor. Governor: Move on to Contract No. 44. Mr. Cox, do I see you there in Las Vegas? Greg Cox: Yes, Governor. This is Greg Cox, Director of Department of Corrections. Governor: Mr. Cox, will you provide more background with regard to this contract? And I understand that it is a grant. Greg Cox: Correct, Governor. The grant we applied for the Department of Corrections to federal funds from the Department of Justice basically referred to as a second chance grant. This contract is being funded with federal funds. Governor: So you went out and got this grant. Was this a competitive process? Greg Cox: Correct. Governor: Well, congratulations are in order, Mr. Cox. Have you provided a service like this previously? Greg Cox: Yes, we did, Governor, through another community organization. This one was somewhat different. We have 200 inmates, a statewide program with 70 violent, 30 sex offenders and 100 non-violent offenders in this program. Its basically done within 90 days of release. This enhances our current programs that we provide through the Department (inaudible) throughout the State. The program basically focuses on life skills, family reunification, substance abuse, mental health counseling and some job development services along with an individual reentry plan. Governor: Do you have -- how do you measure the success of this program? Greg Cox: Well, interestingly enough, we did put some performance measures in it and some discussion with (inaudible) concerning the processes. We have a monthly and a quarterly report thats required. We can hold back ten percent of the funding for the program if theyre not performing. Governor: Thank you, Mr. Cox. And I believe there was another contract while we have you here, No. 61. Greg Cox: Again, Governor, Greg Cox, Director of Department of Corrections. Contract 61 along with Workforce Connections and DETR is what we refer to as the Pride Program. Basically it again supports prerelease inmates through our Casa Grande transitional housing center in Las Vegas. It is a statewide program whereas we identify inmates throughout the Department to bring to Vegas to our transitional housing center. It encompasses 270 inmates over the term of the contract. It focuses on basically job vocational training with different
providers such as a company known as Alpine Steel in Vegas, Truckee Meadows Community College and then Apex, which is an inventory control warehouse basically system, and also through the College of Southern Nevada, CSN, down here. We identify these inmates throughout the State and then work with the employees from Pride. Governor: And how do you determine which inmates are eligible for that program? Greg Cox: We basically look at the scope of, you know, what we believe this program can provide individually to that inmate in regards to identifying what needs they have, vocational training, a course in regards to, you know, their community college whether they are of course here in Vegas, where theyre gonna live after leaving our system and after leaving our supervision. Governor: Thank you. I dont know if you ladies wanted to identify yourselves or -- all right. Thank you. Mr. Secretary, did you have any questions with regard to those two contracts? Secretary of State: No, Governor. Governor: Okay. All right. I missed a big one. What was that? Here it is, No. 26. They thought they got lucky, but I just missed it or went over the top of it. Mike Torvinen: Ill let them know. Thank you, Governor. Mike Torvinen with the Department of Health and Human Services. Governor: Mr. Torvinen, are you in a position to answer the questions with regard to this Agenda item? Mike Torvinen: It depends on the questions, Governor. I do review all the contracts. I didnt go back and spend a lot of time with this one. I know the amount is large and we had to do some programming changes to even get it into the system. But my recollection when I did review this was it was pretty much in the normal course of business, but it just ended up being a very large amount. Governor: Yeah, and when you say large amount, were extending a contract in the sum of -for this extension alone is $405,636,327. That is a lot of money. I had asked some questions when I was doing some review with regard to how do we measure how well this contractor is performing. And I dont know if you have any information about that. Mike Torvinen: Thank you, Governor. I dont. I Im not sure I was even privy to that followup request, but I know the Division of Healthcare Financing and Policy has a lot of procedures in place to ensure that were only paying for services that were getting. And the quality of those services are also monitored on a regular basis. Governor: So is this $405 million an up to amount?
Mike Torvinen: Yes, Governor. Its a projection on the need based on historical service levels that have been provided. And Im pretty rigorous in my requests for the staff to quantify and explain and document their estimated amounts, so they did that as a normal course of business through this process, and their projections would take it up to that amount, yes. Its not guaranteed that well spend that much. And a lot of times I encourage a little bit of rounding in that estimate I guess just to make sure that, again, were within the ballpark, but we have some authority to -- that conditions might change and increase that estimate. Governor: And the prior amendment was $382,331,850. Did we spend all that? Or did we save some money beneath that cap? Mike Torvinen: I wouldnt be able to answer that question without going back and taking a look at the expenditures -- the specific expenditures that have taken place. Governor: And I had also asked, you know, this is a big amount of money and its a very important issue for the State. Why not put it out to an RFP to see if theres another entity that might be interested in performing this service? Mike Torvinen: If Im not mistaken, I think were headed down that road now, and that the timing was that we werent able to get to that point, and we needed the authority right now at this point. Clerk: Governor, Jeff Mohlenkamp for the record. I also had a discussion with the agency yesterday. And one of the extenuating factors here and the reason theyve extended it out for an additional two years is because of the Healthcare Reform Act and some of the uncertainties associated with that. They believe that it would be better to stay where they were for another two years until how that, you know, was gonna be played out, so I think that was part of the consideration as well. Governor: And thats basically what I have in this memo, and Im not trying to keep your own departments memo from you, but Im trying to read it as well. And, you know, Ill back up because I wanted to get my question answered with regard to measurement indicators. Id asked that question and it said -- one of the responses was Amerigroup had a remarkable 15 out of 18 reportable rates above the 50th percentile, including 9 rates above the 90th percentile. And I apologize that I dont understand what that means. Mike Torvinen: Im not sure what it means either, Governor. Im sorry. Governor: And, again, I just want to ensure -- these are large amount of monies. Its a huge part of our budget. I want to ensure that were spending our dollars wisely, that the entity that were contracting with is performing as well as possible, and at least the indication in this memo is that it is, and that I wanted some more specifics as to why we dont feel theres anyone else capable of doing this given the possible implementation of the Affordable Care Act. I mean, this is no secret and there are other providers in other states. And why is it that only our Healthcare Financing and Policy feels that this is the only entity that can accomplish this?
Mike Torvinen: I think a little history maybe, Governor, is when the managed care option came about in Medicaid, there werent that many plans out there willing to provide the service, so I think that might be part of how we got to where we are now. Again, as Mr. Mohlenkamp said, as the healthcare reform process takes place, there should be more people, you know, as you know, I think we expect an increase in the number of Medicaid caseloads. And so, again, the more business being out there, the more people might be willing to enter the market. Governor: And I was going to ask this question, and I dont know if youll be able to respond to this one. This is only (inaudible). So are we exploring managed care for the ABD population? Mike Torvinen: We have in the past and I believe we are now. I think those discussions were had at the legislature, so its an ongoing analysis and consideration. Governor: I dont mean to pick on you, but thats the answer Ive been getting is that weve been exploring this for months, and Im wondering if that exploration has matured to a decision point. Mike Torvinen: Im sorry. I wouldnt be able to give you that specific answer. I apologize, Governor. Governor: Again, I just am looking for a little more information and I can do that through other means. Mr. Secretary, did you have any questions with regard to Contract No. 26? Secretary of State: No, Governor. Governor: Thank you. All right. 51, Division of Water Resources. And just for the benefit of everyone here, this was a contract between Division of Water Resources and Associated Underwater Services for the retention of divers to inspect the outlet works at South Fork Dam. And its not a large amount. Its $58,000. I was just curious if there was a Nevada company that could provide the same services. The response that I received was that when the RFP was issued that none of the companies that applied were from Nevada. Next is Contract 53, Environmental Protection and Board of Regents UNR. Did I skip over and is that why everyone laughed when I didnt? Clerk: Governor, I dont know why representatives arent here. Ill contact them and get some further information for you. Governor: My question here is this. I have no problem with the propriety of the contract. I know its necessary, its between Environmental Protection and the Board of Regents to provide for water testing services. This is a contract extension. The original contract was for $9,500. This extension is in the amount of $470,000. My question was, was this put out for an RFP for bidding by other entities to provide these services?
Clerk: And, Governor, the response to some of these questions I was able to explore that, that since this an interlocal, its not a competitive bidding process that they would go through, and thats why it shows up as an exempt item on No. 53. As far as the timeliness of it, quite honestly, they couldnt pull it together in time to get the full contract in front of the Board, and there were some delays that they encountered, and thats why youre looking at the two-step process. Governor: Originally when they did the approval for $9,500, that was put out there for an RFP and there was competitive bidding for that? Clerk: In this particular case since it was interlocal, there was no competitive bidding. You know, when youre dealing with another governmental entity, theres no requirement to go forward with the competitive bidding process. Governor: Would there be interest by other entities to compete for that contract? Clerk: You know, Im not certain whether theres interest. I think Id have to look at two things. One, is it statutorily -- are we allowed to or is it required to go through another governmental entity? I think wed have to look at that first. And then the second question would be certainly pertinent. I can explore that for you. Governor: All right. Thank you. And finally with regard to this Agenda Item, No. 59, Employment Security Division and the Board of Regents. Tamara Nash: Good morning. Tamara Nash, DETR Directors Office. Governor: My question here is the explanation is that CSN has an apprenticeship program providing training to eligible participants in several fields such as electrical, plumbing and carpentry. Does that program adjust according to demand? Tamara Nash: Thats a good question. I got all sorts of information from the community college and I dont have that, but can I get that answer for you? Governor: Our largest amount of unemployed in the State are construction workers in these exact fields. And Im just wondering are we training people in areas where we may not have available positions for them? Tamara Nash: I would hope that wouldnt be the case, but Im gonna verify that for you. Governor: Okay. Thank you. Thats my only question. Mr. Secretary, I have no further questions. Contract No. 62 has been withdrawn. The chair will accept a motion for approval of Contracts 1 through 61. Secretary of State: Ill move for approval of Contracts 1 through 61.
Governor: I will second the motion. Are there any questions or discussion on the motion? All in favor of the motion please say aye. Motion passes.
*10. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENTS

Four master service agreements were submitted to the Board for review and approval. Clerks Recommendation: I recommend approval. Motion By: Secretary of State Comments: Seconded By: Governor Vote: 2-0
Governor: Agenda Item No. 10, Master Service Agreements. I have no questions. Mr. Secretary, do you have any questions regarding Master Service Agreements 1 through 4? Secretary of State: Agreements. No, Governor. Ill move for approval of the four Master Service
Governor: The secretary has moved for approval of the four Master Service Agreements as described in Agenda Item No. 10. Ill second the motion. Are there any questions or discussion on the motion? Hearing none, all in favor please say aye. Motion passes.
11.
BOARD MEMBERS COMMENTS/PUBLIC COMMENTS
Comments: Governor: Agenda Item No. 11, Public Comment. Is there any member of the public here in Carson City that would like to provide Public Comment? Is there anyone present in Las Vegas who would like to provide Public Comment? Secretary of State: Just me and my chief, Governor, (inaudible). Governor: All right. Mr. Secretary, this also provides for Board member comments. Do you have any comments? Secretary of State: No, that does it for me. Thank you. Governor: And nor do I.
*12.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION ADJOURNMENT

Seconded By: Governor Vote: 2-0
Motion By: Secretary of State Comments:
Governor: Well move on to Agenda Item No. 12, Adjournment. Mr. Secretary, do you move for adjournment of the Board of Examiners meeting? Secretary of State: So moved. Governor: Ill second the motion. All in favor please say aye. Motion passes. The Board of Examiners meeting is adjourned. Thank you very much ladies and gentlemen. Respectfully submitted, ________________________________________________________________________ JEFF MOHLENKAMP, CLERK APPROVED: ________________________________________________________________________ GOVERNOR BRIAN SANDOVAL, CHAIRMAN ________________________________________________________________________ ATTORNEY GENERAL CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO ________________________________________________________________________ SECRETARY OF STATE ROSS MILLER
REQUEST FOR CHANGES TO THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (SAM)
Agency Code: 080 Department: Department of Administration Division (if applicable): Budget & Planning Appointing authority: Jeff Mohlenkamp Agency contact (name, phone and e-mail): Kristen Kolbe
1. Reason/purpose for requested change: Streamline processes for certain leases.
2. Existing and recommended language in SAM (blue bold italics is new language being proposed and red strikethrough is deleted language being proposed).
0328 Lease Contracts 1. State Offices - The Chief of the Buildings and Grounds Division has the authority to lease and equip office rooms outside of State buildings whenever sufficient space cannot be provided within State buildings. No such lease may extend beyond the term of one (1) year unless it is reviewed and approved by the Board of Examiners. (NRS 331.110). The Attorney General shall approve each lease entered into pursuant to this section as to form and compliance with law. 2. Land - The Division of State Lands acquires and holds all lands and interests in land owned or required by the State except: 1.Lands or interests used or acquired for highway purposes; 2. Lands or interests the title to which is vested in the Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education. 3. Office buildings leased by the Chief of Buildings and Grounds; or 4. Lands used or acquired for the Legislature or its staff. 3. Equipment - The Purchasing Administrator has sole authority to contract for equipment unless otherwise specifically provided by law (NRS 333.150). Agencies requiring equipment lease contracts should contact the Purchasing Division. (SAM 1500) Lease contracts must be ratified by appropriate official action of the governing body of each party to the contract as a condition precedent to its entry into force. Lease contracts ranging in cost from zero to $1,999 require approval of the agency head; lease contracts ranging in cost from $2,000 to $9,999 require the approval of the Clerk of the Board of Examiners, or designee, on behalf of the Board of Examiners; lease contracts totalling $10,000 or more require the approval of the Board of Examiners.
4.
3. Explain how the recommended change(s) will benefit agencies or create consistencies or efficiencies, etc. (provide examples if applicable): Currently, all leases including boat slip rentals, repeater rack space, non-office storage space leases, etc. must be approved by the BOE. Amending SAM 0328 to mimic that of SAM 0316 will allow agency heads to approve leases ranging from a cost of zero to $1,999 and leases ranging from $2,000 to $9,999 may be approved by the Clerk of the Board rather than the BOE streamlining processes.
4. Will recommended change have a fiscal impact (if yes, explain): No
5. Proposed effective date: Upon approval
BOARD OF EXAMINERS APPROVAL DATE:__________________________________ (for BOE use only)
REQUEST FOR CHANGES TO THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (SAM)
Agency Code: 180 Department: Administration Division (if applicable): EITS Appointing authority: David Gustafson, CIO Agency contact (name, phone and e-mail): David G. Miller, 684-5852, dgmiller@admin.nv.gov
1. Reason/purpose for requested change: The changes are consistent with the current services provided by EITS after the recent merger. Updates reflecting changed processes are also incorporated and services that are no longer provided have been eliminated. 2. Existing and recommended language in SAM (blue bold italics is new language being proposed and red strikethrough is deleted language being proposed). Affected sections provided. See Attached 3. Explain how the recommended change(s) will benefit agencies or create consistencies or efficiencies, etc. (provide examples if applicable): Aligns SAM with current services provided by the Division EITS will no longer review and approve work programs The changes will provide accurate information about EITS and provide proper and clear direction to agencies.
4. Will recommended change have a fiscal impact (if yes, explain): There will be no fiscal impact. 5. Proposed effective date: ASAP as these changes need to be incorporated into the training materials EITS is providing regarding the technology investment life cycle.
BOARD OF EXAMINERS APPROVAL DATE:__________________________________ (for BOE use only)
Global Changes Department name to new Division Name Change It in sections to IT where appropriate
1602 General
Chapter 242 of the Nevada Revised Statutes authorized the creation of the Department of Administration, Enterprise Information Technology Services (EITS) for the coordinated, orderly and economical processing of information in State government, to ensure economical use of information systems and to prevent the unnecessary proliferation of equipment and personnel among the various State agencies. The purpose of the Department Division is to perform information services for State agencies and to provide technical advice but not administrative control of the information systems within the State agencies. The Department Division provides the following services: Communication Systems: Provides primary public safety communication infrastructure support for State agencies, federal and local public safety entities operating in Nevada. Also provides communication transport services, microwave communication channels, mountaintop communication site space and engineering. Computer Operations: Provides computer-processing services (24 x 7 x 365) using various computing platforms, including mainframe and server farm. Also provides hosting of server hardware for agencies. Contract Administration: Responsible for developing and issuing Requests for Proposals that include information technology components, contract review and monitoring, and coordination and monitoring of State agency requests for IT consultants through the DoIT Master Service Agreements. Data Networking (SilverNet): DoITs EITS statewide data network providing highspeed/broadband network connectivity services for State agencies, local and county governments. Secure services include high-speed internet access, dialup and Virtual Private Network connectivity. Database Administration: Provides comprehensive database and information management services for the executive branch of State government. This includes database and information administration services such as database design and support, and specialized and multi-user data file design and management. Documentation: Coordinates departmental and statewide IT policies, standards and procedures and the online State Telephone Directory. Enterprise Architecture: Enterprise Architecture develops and maintains enterprise-wide IT models, standards, and best practices for use in strategic planning, technology planning, IT budgeting, IT procurement, RFP development and review, and project management to assist
State agencies with IT reusability, integration, interoperability, and IT alignment with strategic and business goals. Help Desk: Assists customers with IT problems and IT service requests. Internet Services: Hosts websites and web applications. Also provides specialized web functions such as e-mail and online conferencing. Planning: Several planning services are provided: Strategic Planning: identifies and documents the Information Technology IT vision, supporting strategies, and guiding principles to meet the State's current business needs and support longterm strategies. Capacity Planning: forecasts technology resource needs for mainframe, internet, network, server farm and storage for the State. Coordinates with users to insure that enterprise capacity and performance needs are met. Agency Planning: Consults with customer agencies to assess their needs and develop in their development of IT Strategy information technology plans. This comprehensive planning effort includes developing the technology plans, obtaining cost estimates and developing proposed project budgets. Technical assistance is and workshops are also provided for completing the Technology Investment Request (TIR) document. Policy: Responsible for developing an enterprise-wide IT strategic plan as well as policies and standards for the information systems and the IT infrastructure of the executive branch of State government. Production Services: Coordinates off-line processing for customer agencies business applications and report generation. IT Governance: Supports the Governors IT Governance committee structure. Guide agencies in transitioning through the IT investment lifecycle, which involves project planning, vendor and resource acquisition, project implementation and agency accountability. This includes guidance in acquiring appropriate professional project management and quality assurance resources. Project Management: Provides project management and oversight of project budgets, schedules and resources. Also provides technical support for Requests for Proposals, vendor evaluation, as well as software and hardware evaluation. Project Oversight: Provides project management and quality assurance oversight on State information technology projects regardless if the project management and quality assurance is provided by state agency staff or contractors. Quality Assurance (QA): QA monitors, evaluations and measures the progress of major project development. Performance of these functions ensures operational improvements and reduces risk so quality projects are delivered and all critical project deadlines are met.
Research: Provides research on current and emerging areas of technology and other states trends to ensure efficient and cost effective deployment of governmental services and to reduce the risks of innovation through IT. Security: Provides information security and contingency planning consulting services for State agencies. Also provides project oversight on all Ssecurity aspects of information technology IT projects. Software Design and Development: Provides all aspects of software systems development, including project design and analysis, programming, installation, documentation and maintenance. Provides web development, administration and support of agency websites. Applications can be developed on a complete range of platforms from mainframe systems to the latest web-enabled applications. Provides team leads for software consultants and assists in drafting and overseeing software deliverables. Additionally, programmers provide technical support on all aspects of program and software development and can assist as technical advisers. Technical Support: Provides installation and maintenance of Local Area Networks (LAN), PCs and related hardware system software. Web Page Presence: The Web Development Unit of AD&D assists State agencies with all aspects of their offices internet presence. This unit offers new development of web sites for agencies with no web presence, continuous maintenance of existing web sites and training of agency employees if requested. The web unit is proactive in developing and implementing procedures for State agencies to offer new web technologies as they become available and making it possible for all agencies to be able to offer them with minimal expense and effort. Voice/Telephone: Coordinates agency telephone system design, installation and maintenance, system administration of the State Telephone System, issuing of phone cards, toll-free numbers; phone and data wiring installation, moves, adds, changes of telecommunications equipment; cellular and paging services and State Operator assistance.
1604 Responsibility
The Department's major responsibilities are: 1. To provide information technology IT systems/services to State agencies (see NRS 242.115 and .131 for exemptions). 2. To develop policies, procedures, standards and regulations for the procurement, development, implementation, and maintenance of information technology and systems within the Executive Branch and for elected officials. 3. To establish and maintain a statewide information infrastructure that provides easy access to government information for everyone authorized to use it. 4. To assist State agencies in the selection of solutions for their information needs that meet established standards.
5. To develop standards to ensure information systems security and disaster recovery. 6. To create and publish strategic plans for information technology for the Executive Branch and elected officials. 7. To assist provide guidance to agencies in developing short and long-term information systems plans. 8. To assist provide guidance to agencies in developing their information technology budgets for appropriate EITS services.
1606 Funding
The Department Division operates as an Internal Service Fund. All funding is received through billings for user services or assessments. Annually, the Department Division establishes billing rates for the services provided by the operating divisions. These rates are developed in accordance with federal ratemaking standards and are monitored on a monthly basis. Adjustments are made to the established rates as needed, but usually no more often than annually.
1608 How and When to Utilize Services

Executive Branch agencies and elected officials should contact the Department of Administration, Enterprise Information Technology Services at the time of initial planning for any information system/project regardless of technology being considered (voice, data, image, video, etc.). This includes the telephone equipment, local telephone service and long distance telephone service. Requests for such services should be initiated by contacting the EITS DoIT Help Desk at (775) 684-4333. The Department Division and an agency requesting services will jointly develop a needs assessment. The needs assessment will specify the scope of the project required services, anticipated benefits and results, cost benefit analysis, cost and time estimates for project development and operation, and other information pertinent to the decision of project initiation. projected growth of services needed and the corresponding budget required for service. For biennial planning and budgeting, various planning and estimating forms for IT services are included in the biennial budget instructions.
1610 Hardware Repairs

Agencies that do not have in-house repair and maintenance resources should call the Department Divisions help desk immediately when assistance is needed. Department Division staff or contractual assistance will be provided.
1612 Policy, Procedures, Standards And Guidelines
The Director Chief Information Officer of the Department Division is responsible for developing policy, procedures, standards and guidelines for information technology activities within the Executive Branch. The most current policies, standards and procedures are posted to the Departments Divisions website.
1614 Telephone Toll Calls

Toll calls should be held to an absolute minimum. Agencies should institute proper internal controls of toll calls in order to verify toll billing. Personal long distance calls including 900 service are not to be placed from State telephones at State expense.
1616 Cellular Telephones

Personal phone calls are not to be placed or received from State owned cellular telephones except in an emergency. When personal calls are placed, the employee will reimburse the State within five working days of receipt of the bill from the Department Division for all costs associated with the personal telephone call. The State will reimburse employees for the cost of all State business calls placed from their personal cellular telephone. The State will not reimburse any portion of the monthly service charges associated with personal cellular telephones nor will the State accept any fiscal or legal liability for a personal cellular telephone used for business. Agencies may develop policies limiting or prohibiting employees from making business calls on personal cellular telephones
1618 Technology Investment Request

An IT project is defined as the implementation of IT improvements (computer, telecommunications or other information technology improvements) or enhanced capabilities using IT services (Vendor, DoIT EITS or agency) within a defined period of time (i.e. not maintenance or ongoing IT services and support). Any Executive Branch agency wishing to invest in an IT project that costs more than $50,000 must develop a business case with a Technology Investment Request (TIR) form. TIRs are required for Executive Branch agencies as part of their biennial budget process as well as for interim funding of IT projects. They apply regardless of the funding source (including grant funding), as well as in situations where the funding already exists and the agency is requesting authority for expenditure. This also applies to projects mandated by either the federal government or the Nevada State Legislature. Agencies with federally funded and mandated interim projects should contact EITS for guidance on how to best proceed regarding potentially concurrent TIR and RFP processes. The TIR must be submitted to DoIT EITS for review and approval prior to submittal to the Budget Division.
For agencies appearing before IFC to either request interim funding for an IT project or approval to expend Federal or Grant funds for an IT Project the agency must submit a TIR to DoIT for review and approval prior to the submittal of the work program to the Budget Division. Work programs will not be approved without an approved TIR. Agencies preparing IT contracts for the BOE should contact EITS regarding TIR requirements. New contracts related to an IT project may require a TIR. Contract amendments may require a TIR Waiver for Enhancements (TWE). In cases when Work Programs fund more than $50,000 of an IT Project EITS should be consulted to see if a TIR or TWE are required. Every agency submitting a TIR that is: An investment of $500,000 or more or Critical in nature to State operations or Significant risk of adverse consequences to the State of Nevada will make a presentation to the Nevada IT Strategic Planning committee. During the biennial budget session, this committee will submit its recommendations to the Governor regarding the prioritization and inclusion of IT projects in the biennial budget.
1620 Project Management Quality Assurance and Project Oversight

All IT projects as defined below must have a qualified IT Project Manager, a Quality Assurance Manager, and Project Oversight staff assigned to the project. The level of resources for these services must be budgeted in accordance with accepted IT industry standards and included in the TIR, and if funded, utilized specifically for these services. Once the project is approved, these funds must be utilized for these services. An Information Technology Project is a temporary endeavor undertaken to realize the expected benefits of an information technology investment resulting in a unique computer, network, telecommunications, or internet based system, service, or product. This does not include: This requirement does not apply to: Projects for ongoing / routine replacement of existing hardware (PCs, routers, servers, etc) and software (upgrades, releases, licenses, etc) Projects of short duration where 1. Vendor or internal involvement is at a minimum 2. There is only minor component reconfiguration 3. Installation is only within the agency 4. Purchases are internal to the agency 5. The project is transparent to the users A qualified Project Manager is an individual who meets or exceeds the experience and credentials as outlined in the IT Project Manager Qualification and Selection Standard 9.12 developed by the State of Nevada Information Technology Project Oversight Committee
EITS should be contacted if there are questions regarding what constitutes a qualified Project Manager or Quality Assurance Manager. A qualified Quality Assurance Manager is an individual who has an understanding and working knowledge of quality standards and concepts, has implemented organizational assessments and related functions, can assess quality needs in relation to overall strategic plans for the project, and can impellent quality programs to attain and maintain customer satisfaction and successful project implementation. They must have at least five-years experience in all aspects of quality assurance and proven experience with large, complex IT projects. They must follow industryProject Oversight is an essential management practice to help ensure the successful implementation of information technology projects. The purpose of Project Ooversight is to determine that a qualified project manager is assigned to the project, the project is being managed in compliance with the project plan, that sound management practices are being observed, that the project is adequately staffed, schedules are reasonable and are being met, and to identify and take action to assist in remediation of risky and potentially unsuccessful project activities and problem situations at the earliest possible time.
1622 Utilization of DoIT EITS Services as Budgeted

Executive Branch agencies that receive funding for DoIT EITS services, as part of their biennial budget request must use the funding for that purpose. If an agency believes an exception is warranted, they must submit a written request to the Director Chief Information Officer of the Department of Division of Enterprise Information Technology Services. Both the DoIT Director Chief Information Officer and the Director of the Department of Administration must approve the request. The Chief Information Officer DoIT Director will notify the requesting agency of the decision.
1624 Grant Applications with IT Components

All Executive Branch agencies applying for grants that have IT components must submit the IT portion of their grant application to the Department Division for review and approval prior to submittal of the grant. Also, if the grant contains funding for IT positions, the requested funds must be based on standard usage of hourly rates, rather than salaries for dedicated positions. This will ensure that the IT component is technically feasible, within State standards and the funding requested is adequate to accomplish the project.
1626 Contracts for ITt Services

Prior to submitting a contract for IT services to the Board of Examiners for approval, agencies must submit the contract to DoIT EITS for review and approval. Agencies are encouraged to schedule that review prior to obtaining signatures on the contract documents, thus avoiding delays resulting from modifications to the documents. Contracts related to IT projects must adhere to section 1618 regarding TIRs and TWEs.
1628 Work Programs Containing An It Component

Prior to submitting a work program containing an IT component to the Budget Division, agencies must submit the document and supporting documentation to DoIT for review and approval. Supporting documentation includes quotations from vendors for hardware and/or software, approved TIR documentation, etc.
REQUEST FOR CHANGES TO THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (SAM) Agency Code: 080 Department: Administration Division (if applicable): Budget Division Appointing authority: Jeff Mohlenkamp Agency contact (name, phone and e-mail): Stephanie Day - 684-0207 sday@admin.nv.gov 1. Reason/purpose for requested change: To provide the definition of a stale claim per AB 530 of the 2011 Legislative Session 2. Existing and recommended language in SAM (blue bold italics is new language being proposed and red strikethrough is deleted language being proposed).
2622 Stale Claims

Stale claim means a any claim other than a claim for medical expenses submitted by a third- party administrator or a claim which is $100 or more and which is presented for payment after the funds from which the claim should have been paid were reverted. Payment of stale claims for an agency may not exceed the amount reverted by that agency for the fiscal year during which the obligations liabilities were incurred. A state agency may pay from the appropriate budget account in the current fiscal year an obligation of the state agency which: (a) Is: (1) Less than $100; or (2) For medical expenses pursuant to a claim from a third-party administrator; and (b) Was incurred in the previous fiscal year but was not submitted for payment until after the date on which it is provided by law that money appropriated to that state agency for the previous fiscal year reverts to the fund from which appropriated. 3. Explain how the recommended change(s) will benefit agencies or create consistencies or efficiencies, etc. (provide examples if applicable): Clarifying the definition of stale claim per AB 530 as stated in NRS 353.097 will provide agencies guidelines and proper application of the use of a stale claim. There is a difference between obligation and claim where a liability has actually been incurred. The current language references if the funds were obligated and relies upon the use of obligated throughout the section. If an agency had an obligation to make a purchase but failed to do so, it can be argued the funds were obligated even though no liability was created. The proposal is to modify the language in SAM to define a stale claim as an actual liability incurred in a prior fiscal period. 4. Will recommended change have a fiscal impact (if yes, explain):
No fiscal impact is anticipated. The proposed language provides clarification only to the current policy. 5. Proposed effective date: Upon approval as no impact is anticipated. BOARD OF EXAMINERS APPROVAL DATE:__________________________________ (for BOE use only)
Assembly Bill No. 530Committee on Ways and Means CHAPTER.......... AN ACT relating to state financial administration; revising provisions relating to stale claims by state agencies; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Legislative Counsels Digest: Under existing law, a state agency is authorized to present a claim to the State Board of Examiners for payment from the Stale Claims Account in the State General Fund of an obligation if, for the year in which the obligation was incurred, an amount of money at least equal to the claim was appropriated to the state agency and reverted to the fund from which the money was appropriated. (NRS 353.097) This bill authorizes a state agency to pay from the appropriate budget account in the current fiscal year an obligation which is less than $100 or is for medical expenses pursuant to a claim by a third-party administrator and which was incurred in the previous fiscal year but was not submitted for payment until after money appropriated to the state agency for the previous fiscal year was reverted.
EXPLANATION Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. NRS 353.097 is hereby amended to read as follows: 353.097 1. As used in this section, stale claim means [a] any claim other than a claim for medical expenses submitted by a third-party administrator or a claim which is $100 or more, and which is presented by a state agency to the State Board of Examiners after the date on which it is provided by law that money appropriated to that state agency for the previous fiscal year reverts to the fund from which appropriated. 2. There is hereby created a Stale Claims Account in the State General Fund. Money for the Account must be provided by direct legislative appropriation. 3. Upon the approval of a stale claim as provided in this section, the claim must be paid from the Stale Claims Account. Payments of stale claims for a state agency must not exceed the amount of money reverted to the fund from which appropriated by the state agency for the fiscal year in which the obligations represented by the stale claims were incurred. 4. A stale claim must be approved for payment from the Stale Claims Account by the State Board of Examiners, except that the State Board of Examiners may authorize its Clerk, under such circumstances as it deems appropriate, to approve stale claims on behalf of the Board. A state agency that is aggrieved by a
determination of the Clerk to deny all or any part of a stale claim may appeal that determination to the State Board of Examiners. 5. A stale claim may be approved and paid at any time, despite the age of the claim, if payable from available federal grants or from a permanent fund in the State Treasury other than the State General Fund. 6. A state agency may pay from the appropriate budget account in the current fiscal year an obligation of the state agency which: (a) Is: (1) Less than $100; or (2) For medical expenses pursuant to a claim from a thirdparty administrator; and (b) Was incurred in the previous fiscal year but was not submitted for payment until after the date on which it is provided by law that money appropriated to that state agency for the previous fiscal year reverts to the fund from which appropriated. Sec. 2. This act becomes effective on July 1, 2011.
20
~~~~~
11
BOE Date:
For Board Use Only 12/13/2011
CONTRACT SUMMARY
(This form must accompany all contracts submitted to the Board of Examiners (BOE) for review and approval)
I. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT
1. Contract Number: 11370 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 4 Board of Regents obo Nevada System of Higher Education, UNR Board of Regents obo Nevada System of Higher Education, UNR 1664 N. Virginia Street MS 0032 Reno, NV 89557
Agency Name:
STATE ENERGY OFFICE
Agency Code: 011 Appropriation Unit: 4868-25 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Jennifer Booth 775-784-4040 Vendor No.: D35000816 NV Business ID: D35000816 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2011-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 08/11/2010
03/15/2012 1 year and 217 days Interlocal Agreement SEP Building Codes
5. Purpose of contract: This is the fourth amendment to the orginal contract, which provides funding to allow the contractor to purchase equipment, materials, and certifications for local jurisdiction building departments and staff. The amendment will also allow the NSOE to provide an outreach program campaign to Nevada's businesses that will be affected by the new law and to consumers.This amendment increases the maximum amount from $577,546.19 to $842,087.19. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $200,000.00 $377,546.19 $264,541.00 $842,087.19
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Section 410 of HR 1 ARRA (2009) and NRS 701 allow funding to support the State's goals of 2009 IECC, Code adoption. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Based on the contract signed between Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Authority (REEEA) and the Nevada State office of Energy (NSOE) the training workshop will be conducted by vendors such as the University System (please see contact #10768, Attachment A Scope of Work, II. Terms, C4). 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 11370
No
Page 1 of 2 1
Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date:
No
Anticipated re-bid date: No
10. Does the contract contain any IT components?
III. OTHER INFORMATION

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User sbrook3 sbrook3 sbrook3 sbrook3 jmurph1 jmurph1 jmurph1
Signature Date 11/07/2011 09:31:46 AM 11/07/2011 09:31:53 AM 11/07/2011 09:31:57 AM 11/07/2011 09:32:05 AM 11/18/2011 13:52:53 PM 11/18/2011 13:52:57 PM 11/18/2011 13:53:01 PM
Contract #: 11370
Page 2 of 2
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12850 Legal Entity Strolin Consulting LLC Name: Contractor Name: Strolin Consulting LLC Address: 2559 Nye Drive City/State/Zip Minden, NV 89423
Agency Name: NUCLEAR PROJECTS OFFICE Agency Code: 012 Appropriation Unit: 1005-11 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Joseph Strolin 775-720-4938 Vendor No.: T29022105 NV Business ID: NV20091397942 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % X Highway Funds 100.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
12/31/2012 1 year and 31 days Contract JCS3
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract for services necessary to implement the agency's mission in light of staff reductions and the continuing requirements of oversight of the Yucca Mountain repository program and the on-going Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing proceeding, including work related to transuranic and low-level radioactive waste shipments within Nevada, work associated with the Agreement-in-Principle between the State of Nevada and the US Department of Energy/NNSA/Nevada Site Office, and other services required for the effective operations of the agency. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $50,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $50.00 per hour
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Due to budget reductions, it was not possible to fund the Planning Division Administrator position for the foreseeable future. Mr. Strolin has agreed to assist the agency on a part-time basis to assure that important Planning Division work can continue. Mr. Strolin has unique qualifications, knowledge, and experience as a result of his long tenure with the agency and intimate involvement with the Yucca Mountain program and other nuclear waste issues/activities in Nevada, especially with regard to the Nevada National Security Site (formerly the NTS). The Yucca Mountain licensing proceeding, while currently suspended, has not been terminated. Therefore, providing for the continued services of Mr. Strolin is essential for the effective functioning of the agency. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work:
Contract #: 12850
Page 1 of 3
Even if funding were available to fill the Planning Division Administratror posititon (which there is not), it is not feasible nor possible to spend the years required to train someone new in order to have him or her attain the knowledge and competence needed to perform theses services in the timeframe required. This is especially true, given the uncertainties surrounding the Yucca Mountain program. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Board of Examiners approval of this contract pursuant to AB 240 on November 8, 2011. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? Yes See the attached Authorization to Contract form for details. c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Contractor was employed by this Agency from July 1, 2009 through January 17, 2011. This contract was terminated effective January 19, 2011 when Mr. Strolin was appointed as Acting Executive Director by Governor Sandoval. He served in that capacity from January 20, 2011 to September 19, 2011 when a permanent Executive Director was appointed. The quality of service for both activities was exceptional. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: LLC 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval
Contract #: 12850
User slync1 slync1 slync1 slync1 kkolbe jmurph1
Signature Date 11/08/2011 16:16:26 PM 11/08/2011 16:16:30 PM 11/08/2011 16:16:34 PM 11/08/2011 16:16:36 PM 11/15/2011 07:32:26 AM 11/17/2011 14:40:32 PM
Page 2 of 3 2
BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
jmurph1 Pending
11/17/2011 14:40:35 PM
Contract #: 12850
Page 3 of 3
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12849 Legal Entity JONES VARGAS CHARTERED Name: Contractor Name: JONES VARGAS CHARTERED Address: PO BOX 281 City/State/Zip RENO, NV 89504-0281
Agency Name: ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE Agency Code: 030 Appropriation Unit: 1031-10 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Denise Lenaburg 702/862-3300 Vendor No.: T80589670B NV Business ID: NV19691002865 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Statutory Contingency Fund - Special Counsel Agreement Agency Reference #: 030 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 09/15/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain A retroactive memorandum is attached setting forth the reasons this contract is retroactive. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 10/21/2014 3 years and 37 days Contract Legal Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide legal representation of the defendants in the case of Treasury Solutions Holdings, Inc., et al. v. State of Nevada, Ex Rel Board of Trustees of the College Savings Plans of Nevada, et al. including (1) conducting informal investigations and witness interviews with current and former employees and consultants of the State of Nevada Treasurer's Office; (2) preparation of Answer and Counterclaim and all other pleadings in this lawsuit on behalf of the defendants; (3) perform all discovery; (4) perform all pre-trial and trial work, including appearing at the pre-trial and trial of any issues which remain after dispositive motions. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $165,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $300.00 per hour Other basis for payment: 20% discount on all legal fees (not hard costs).
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? This is a new contract to provide legal services on behalf of the defendants in the case of Treasury Solutions Holdings, Inc., et al. v. State of Nevada, et al., 1st J.D., Carson City, Case No. 11OC-00268, including preparing all pleadings, appearing at all court hearings, pre-trial, trial and performing interviews of current and former state employees and conducting all necessary discovery. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: There is a strong likelihood that the court will determine that the Office of the Attorney General has a conflict of interest in this case and, therefore, special counsel will need to appear on behalf of the defendants in this case.
Contract #: 12849 Page 1 of 2 3
9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? This vendor was chosen due to their expertise, experience and qualifications. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User dcallens chowle chowle shanshew jstrandb cwatson cwatson Pending
Contract #: 12849
Page 2 of 2
File Name: Jones Vargas.docm PDF Conversion Status is Warning: File type not supported
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10940 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 2 HDR ENGINEERING INC. HDR ENGINEERING INC. 9805 DOUBLE R BLVD STE 101 RENO, NV 89521-5917
Contact/Phone: KIMBERLY TOUSLER 775.337.4700 Vendor No.: T80971730 NV Business ID: NV19851010291 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Insurance Premium Trust Fund Agency Reference #: 030 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 04/16/2010
06/30/2012 2 years and 76 days Contract Expert
5. Purpose of contract: This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides services in litigation against the State of Nevada (Buildings & Grounds) which includes, but is not limited to project administration and meetings, and review of report by plaintiff's expert. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $19,999.98 to $59,999.98 due to additional field investigations and research before possible trial. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $9,999.99 $9,999.99 $40,000.00 $59,999.98
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? This is a new Contract to provide expert services in a litigation against the State of Nevada (Buildings & Grounds) requiring the assistance of experts in the field of Hydrology, Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees do not have the requisite expertise. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 10940
No
Page 1 of 2 4
Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Expert witness. They are the experts for another party who is a State Agency and were highly recommended. They already have knowledge of the case in question. There is no conflict of interest with the other agency. The agency verified the vendor has a Nevada business license and is in good standing in all areas of the Secretary of State business requirements. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
Contract #: 10940
User dcallens clesli1 chowle dgrass csawaya jmurph1 jmurph1
Signature Date 11/02/2011 14:52:12 PM 11/03/2011 08:37:43 AM 11/04/2011 15:22:37 PM 11/08/2011 16:17:30 PM 11/09/2011 08:47:13 AM 11/10/2011 13:35:47 PM 11/10/2011 13:35:50 PM
Page 2 of 2 4
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 11294 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 3 Lumos & Associates Lumos & Associates 800 E College Pkwy Carson City, NV 89706
Contact/Phone: null775/883-7077 Vendor No.: T80912843 NV Business ID: NV19791006982 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Insurance Premium Trust Fund 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 06/18/2010
06/30/2012 2 years and 13 days Contract Expert
5. Purpose of contract: This is the third amendment to the original contract, which provides preliminary investigations and compiles a report of findings and possibly trial testimony. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $59,998 to $89,998 due to an increase in potential trial testimony. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $9,999.00 $49,999.00 $30,000.00 $89,998.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? An expert is needed to provide assistance, analysis, preparation of documents and possibly testify at trial. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: There are no State employees with this type of expertise. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 11294
No No
Page 1 of 2
Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Per NAC 333.150 2(b)1, Lumos & Associates was chosen in preference to others due to their experience in hydrology and are very familiar in this case. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

User dcallens clesli1 chowle dgrass jmurph1 jmurph1 jmurph1
Signature Date 10/20/2011 13:56:23 PM 10/21/2011 08:27:27 AM 10/24/2011 10:30:30 AM 11/08/2011 16:07:56 PM 11/17/2011 14:20:53 PM 11/17/2011 14:20:58 PM 11/17/2011 14:21:01 PM
Contract #: 11294
Page 2 of 2
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 11293 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 2 Turnipseed Engineering, LTD Turnipseed Engineering, LTD 204 N Minnesota St Carson City, NV 89703
Contact/Phone: null775/885-2101 Vendor No.: T29020390 NV Business ID: NV20041556542 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Insurance Premium Trust Fund 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 06/18/2010
06/30/2012 2 years and 13 days Contract Expert/Consultant
5. Purpose of contract: This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides preliminary investigations, a report of findings and possibly trial testimony. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $19,998 to $49,998 due to the continuing work that is required for the State to complete a thorough investigation for possible trial testimony and the additional requirements handed down by the court. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $9,999.00 $9,999.00 $30,000.00 $49,998.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? An expert is needed to provide assistance, analysis, preparation of documents and possibly testify at trial. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: There are no State employees with this type of hydrology expertise. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 11293
No No
Page 1 of 2 6
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Per NAC 333.150 2(b)1, Turnipseed Engineering was chosen in preference to others due to their experience and knowledge in hydrology and their knowledge of this case. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

User dcallens clesli1 chowle dgrass csawaya jmurph1 jmurph1
Signature Date 10/20/2011 13:56:49 PM 10/21/2011 08:26:47 AM 10/24/2011 10:30:58 AM 11/08/2011 16:10:31 PM 11/09/2011 09:05:38 AM 11/17/2011 14:18:30 PM 11/17/2011 14:18:34 PM
Contract #: 11293
Page 2 of 2
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12781 Legal Entity COX MEDIA LLC Name: Contractor Name: COX MEDIA LLC Address: 6725 VIA AUSTIN PKWY STE 100 City/State/Zip LAS VEGAS, NV 89119-3540
Agency Name: COLLEGE SAVINGS TRUST Agency Code: 051 Appropriation Unit: 1092-04 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Javier Ortiz 702-933-2641 Vendor No.: PUR0004758 NV Business ID: NV20051242973 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Nevada College Savings 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
02/26/2012 87 days Contract Marketing Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide direct marketing of the Nevada College Savings Plans and Prepaid Tuition programs to parents and other family members on selected television advertisements provided by Cox Media. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $24,604.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $24,604.00 per contract term
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? We have been asked by the Legislatures to reach out and capture more Nevada participants, and we feel this is one of many marketing efforts that will help us expand the level of understanding of the advantages of the programs we offer. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: This is a partnership with Cox Media wherein we supply the information for the programs and they provide the marketing medium. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable No No
Contract #: 12781
Page 1 of 2
b. Soliciation Waiver: Sole Source Contract (As Approved by Chief of Purchasing) Approval #: 110907 Approval Date: 09/15/2011 c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User mwinebar mwinebar mwinebar cthurst1 kkolbe jmurph1 jmurph1 Pending
Signature Date 10/25/2011 14:47:22 PM 10/25/2011 14:47:25 PM 10/25/2011 14:47:30 PM 10/25/2011 15:03:24 PM 11/01/2011 16:39:52 PM 11/18/2011 14:13:16 PM 11/18/2011 14:13:20 PM
Contract #: 12781
Page 2 of 2
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12782 Legal Entity The International Association of Working Name: Mothers Contractor Name: The International Association of Working Mothers Address: P.O. Box 50008 City/State/Zip Henderson , NV 89106
Agency Name:
COLLEGE SAVINGS TRUST
Contact/Phone: Gina Robison-Billups 702-353-1392 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: NV20061198072 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Nevada College Savings 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide an increase in awareness for financial literacy in the state of Nevada by reaching out to women and working mothers in implementing a Women's Money Conference in Reno and Las Vegas, with the Nevada State Treasurer's Office as the title sponsor. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $50,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $50,000.00 per contract term
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Funding has been set aside for FY2012 by the Nevada College Savings Plans Board and the Nevada State Legislature for financial literacy. We feel partnering with this vendor in offering this money conference to women helps to fulfill that initiative. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Our staff has neither planning expertise nor the time commitment required to put on a conference of this magnitude. The selected vendor has extensive experience with planning and implementing money conferences and in reaching out to women. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 12782
No No
Page 1 of 2
Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Sole Source Contract (As Approved by Chief of Purchasing) Approval #: 110909 Approval Date: 09/19/2011 c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Non-profit Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. Not Applicable 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Signature Date 10/25/2011 14:48:37 PM 10/25/2011 14:48:40 PM 10/25/2011 14:48:43 PM 10/25/2011 15:00:11 PM 10/27/2011 10:18:13 AM 11/18/2011 14:15:02 PM 11/18/2011 14:15:06 PM
Contract #: 12782
Page 2 of 2
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12783 Legal Entity WOLF PACK SPORTS PROPERTIES Name: Contractor Name: WOLF PACK SPORTS PROPERTIES Address: 505 HOBBS RD City/State/Zip JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109-5788
Agency Name: HIGHER EDUCATION TUITION Agency Code: 052 Appropriation Unit: 1081-04 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null573/893-7200 Vendor No.: T27023659 NV Business ID: NV20071223372 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Nevada Prepaid Tuition 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide direct marketing of the Nevada College Savings Plans and Prepaid Tuition programs to parents and other family members attending basketball games at UNR and UNLV. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $20,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $20,000.00 per contract term
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? We have been asked by the Legislatures to reach out and capture more Nevada participants, and we feel this is one of many marketing efforts that will help us expand the level of understanding of the advantages of the programs we offer. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: This is a partnership with Wolf Pack Sports wherein we supply the goods and services and they supply the venue and publications to exhibit the materials we provide. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable No No
Contract #: 12783
Page 1 of 2
b. Soliciation Waiver: Sole Source Contract (As Approved by Chief of Purchasing) Approval #: 110905 Approval Date: 09/15/2011 c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: LLC 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Contract #: 12783
Page 2 of 2
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10294 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 2 INTERACTIVE DATA CORP INTERACTIVE DATA CORP 32 CROSBY DR BEDFORD, MA 01730
Agency Name: UNCLAIMED PROPERTY Agency Code: 054 Appropriation Unit: 3815-04 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null781/687-8071 Vendor No.: T29016581 NV Business ID: NV20031410407 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Unclaimed Property Receipts 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 12/10/2009
01/31/2012 4 years and 22 days Contract Stock Tracking
5. Purpose of contract: This is the second amendment to the original contract to reconcile the quantity and value of stocks and cash held in the holder database prior to paying a stock claim. This amendment extends the termination date to December 31, 2013 and increases the contract amount from $76,117.50 to a maximum of $117,610.50 due to the continued need for these services. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $36,900.00 $39,217.50 $41,493.00 $117,610.50 12/31/2013
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? NRS 120A.500(c) requires unclaimed stock or other equity interests to be turned over to the Nevada Unclaimed Property Administrator. The stock or equity interest is either returned to the rightful owner or subsequently sold and the cash value held to be claimed at a future date. Xcitek is a web based site that verifies dividends, stock splits, reverse splits, mergers and other corporate actions in real time to assist the Unclaimed Property Administrator in accurately paying out claims. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees to not have access to this information.
9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Sole Source Contract (As Approved by Chief of Purchasing) Approval #: 070705 Approval Date: 07/11/2007 c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? This is the only company that offers this type of service. Other company systems are far less capable and the information is not available real time requiring complex manual calculations. Using this vendor decreases the potential for claimant over/under payments and saves hours of labor to process securities related claims. *Original contract was approved with a sole source. This amendment does not meet the the current requirement of a solicitation waiver but does meet the criteria explained in SAM 0338. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User mwinebar mwinebar mwinebar llamm kkolbe jmurph1 jmurph1
Contract #: 10294
Page 2 of 2
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12830 Legal Entity Gary A. Pulliam, Esq Name: Contractor Name: Gary A. Pulliam, Esq Address: City/State/Zip 2025 Winter Wind Street Las Vegas, NV 89134
Agency Name:
DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Agency Code: 070 Appropriation Unit: 1363-04 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null702-467-7196 Vendor No.: Pending NV Business ID: NV20111689463 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Personnel Assessments 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2012 211 days Contract Hearing Officer
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide for ongoing professional services (NV licensed attorney) as one of several independent contracts for Hearing Officers, as provided by NRS 284, responsible for scheduling and convening hearings as a result of appeals filed by State employees, communicating with all involved parties as necessary, conducting the hearings, issuing decisions, and preparing finalized written copies of their determinations. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $350,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $100.00 per hour Other basis for payment: Maximum contract amount represents a "pool" amount encompassing several independent contracts with NV Licensed Attorneys for services as Hearing Officers (NRS 284). Contractor will be paid based on hourly services rendered as a result of assigned cases as well as reimbursement for travel and per diem allowance in accordance with State of Nevada travel policy and GSA rates.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Independent third party resolution of employee appeals. NRS 284.091 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Necessary to have neutral fact-finder and decision-maker in employee appeals. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 12830
No No
Page 1 of 2 11
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? A member of the Personnel Commission was appointed to conduct a preliminary review of applicants and recommendations were made to the Personnel Commission who made the final selection on March 31, 2010. d. Last bid date: 02/16/2010 Anticipated re-bid date: 01/01/2012 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Sole Proprietor 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User kaplin kaplin kaplin kaplin rhage1 jteska jteska Pending
Contract #: 12830
Page 2 of 2
11
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12829 Legal Entity LAMBOLEY, PAUL H DBA Name: Contractor Name: LAMBOLEY, PAUL H DBA Address: LAW OFFICES OF PAUL H LAMBOLEY 50 W LIBERTY ST STE 645 RENO, NV 89501-1946
Agency Name: Agency Code:
DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 070
Appropriation Unit: 1363-04 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
City/State/Zip
Contact/Phone: null775/786-8333 Vendor No.: T29022472 NV Business ID: NV20111621142 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Personnel Assessments 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2012 211 days Contract Hearing Officer
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide for ongoing professional services (NV licensed attorney) as one of several independent contracts for Hearing Officers, as provided by NRS 284, responsible for scheduling and convening hearings as a result of appeals filed by State employees, communicating with all involved parties as necessary, conducting the hearings, issuing decisions, and preparing finalized written copies of their determinations. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $350,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $100.00 per hour Other basis for payment: Maximum contract amount represents a "pool" amount encompassing several independent contracts with NV licensed attorneys for services as Hearing Officers (NRS 284). Contractor will be paid based on hourly services rendered as a result of assigned cases as well as reimbursement for travel and per diem allowance in accordance with State of NV Travel policy and GSA rates.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Independent third party resolution of employee appeals. NRS 284.091 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Necessary to have neutral fact-finder and decision-maker in employee appeals. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 12829
No
Page 1 of 2 12
Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? A member of the Personnel Commission was appointed to conduct a preliminary review of applicants and recommendations were made to the Personnel Commission who made the final selection on March 31, 2010. d. Last bid date: 02/16/2010 Anticipated re-bid date: 01/01/2012 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Judicial and Foreclosure, service satisfactory 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Sole Proprietor 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User kaplin kaplin kaplin kaplin rhage1 jteska jteska Pending
Contract #: 12829
Page 2 of 2
12
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: CONV5799 Amendment 2 Number: Legal Entity American Chiller Services, Inc Name: Contractor Name: American Chiller Services, Inc Address: City/State/Zip . 745 Greg St., Suite 5 Sparks, NV 89431
Agency Name:
BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS DIVISION Agency Code: 082 Appropriation Unit: 1349-12 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null7753229900 Vendor No.: T29015907 NV Business ID: NV19921063155 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2009-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % Buildings & Grounds building rent income fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 11/01/2008
10/31/2012 4 years Contract Industrial Equipment Maintenance and Repair Servic
5. Purpose of contract: This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides ongoing heating, ventilation and air conditioning services to various state buildings as needed. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $124,999 to $174,999 due to unanticipated expenditures in order to maintain the HVAC systems for multiple state buildings and updates the insurance requirements. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $24,999.00 $100,000.00 $50,000.00 $174,999.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The HVAC systems in State buildings need to be kept in good working condition. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Lack of manpower and equipment. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: CONV5799
Yes
Page 1 of 2 13
Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? American Chiller Services is one of multiple contracts on file for HVAC services. Per SAM 0338.0, each contractor will be contacted to submit bids for available jobs. d. Last bid date: 09/01/2008 Anticipated re-bid date: 09/01/2012 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: 2008-2011, Buildings & Grounds, service satisfactory 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User kaplin kaplin kaplin kaplin jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson
Signature Date 11/08/2011 08:52:28 AM 11/08/2011 08:52:32 AM 11/08/2011 08:52:36 AM 11/08/2011 08:52:40 AM 11/08/2011 17:44:13 PM 11/18/2011 08:12:28 AM 11/18/2011 08:12:32 AM
Page 2 of 2
13
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12714 Legal Entity Breeze Brothers Construction, LLC Name: Contractor Name: Breeze Brothers Construction, LLC Address: 3203 Johannan Lane City/State/Zip N. Las Vegas, NV 89032
Agency Name: STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION Agency Code: 082 Appropriation Unit: 1349-12 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null702-648-1222 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: NV20041237255 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2016 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % Buildings and Grounds building rent income fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: 9734 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 11/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
10/31/2015 4 years Contract GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide ongoing general contracting work for the Buildings and Grounds section at various state owned buildings in the Las Vegas area. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $150,000.00 Other basis for payment: Payments on services quoted and provided.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The need to maintain State buildings in a safe and secure condition. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Lack of expertise and manpower. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable
Yes No
c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Per SAM 0338.0, each contractor will be contacted to submit bids on projects. Breeze Brothers Construction, LLC is a Nevada Public Works Board Contractor. Pursuant to NRS 338.13862, Buildings and Grounds is using a Public Works board pre-qualified bidder. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User dgrimm dgrimm dgrimm dgrimm jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson Pending
Signature Date 10/11/2011 08:36:42 AM 10/11/2011 08:36:44 AM 10/11/2011 08:36:47 AM 11/04/2011 15:38:06 PM 11/07/2011 16:49:05 PM 11/18/2011 08:02:19 AM 11/18/2011 08:02:23 AM
Contract #: 12714
Page 2 of 2
14
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: CONV6521 Amendment 2 Number: Legal Entity Ray Heating Products, Inc. dba Name: Contractor Name: Ray Heating Products, Inc. dba Address: City/State/Zip RHP Mechanical Syst 1008 E 4th ST/PO Box 2957 Reno, NV 89505
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null7753229434 Vendor No.: PUR0002724 NV Business ID: NV19531000169 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % Buildings & Grounds building rent income fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 08/01/2009
07/31/2013 4 years Contract General Equipment Maintenance and Repair Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides ongoing service, maintenance and water treatment of heating, ventilation and air conditoning systems for multiple state buildings in Reno, Nevada. Contractor will perform extra services, on an as needed basis and at the request and approval of a Buildings and Grounds designee for various state buildings in the Reno/Carson City areas. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $184,247 to $284,247 to be available for extra services. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $174,248.00 $9,999.00 $100,000.00 $284,247.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The HVAC systems need ongoing maintenance and improvements for the comfort and safety of the employees and public. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Lack of manpower. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Yes
Page 1 of 2 15
No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Vendor received the highest weighted average from the Evaluation Committee for RFP #1062. d. Last bid date: 04/01/2009 Anticipated re-bid date: 04/01/2013 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: 2008-2011, Buildings & Grounds, service satisfactory 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User kaplin kaplin kaplin kaplin jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson
Signature Date 10/27/2011 16:02:50 PM 10/27/2011 16:02:56 PM 10/27/2011 16:03:01 PM 10/27/2011 16:03:07 PM 11/01/2011 16:56:36 PM 11/18/2011 07:59:23 AM 11/18/2011 07:59:27 AM
Page 2 of 2
15
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10236 Amendment 3 Number: Legal Entity SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC Name: Contractor Name: SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC Address: City/State/Zip 6295 S PEARL ST 200 LAS VEGAS, NV 89120
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null702-855-5300 Vendor No.: T81081810B NV Business ID: NV19981356462 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % Buildings & Grounds building rent income fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 01/12/2010
12/31/2011 3 years and 354 days Contract Fire Systems
5. Purpose of contract: This is the third amendment to the original contract, which provides the onging labor neccessary to maintain the fire protection systems and equipment as required by applicable local, state and federal codes and regulations for various state buildings in Las Vegas. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 and increases the maximum amount from $417,534.50 to $717,652.50 due to the extension and adding new rates for various state buildings in the Las Vegas area. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $315,769.50 $101,765.00 $300,118.00 $717,652.50 12/31/2013
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Fire system maintenance/certifications/inspections are required by Local, State and Federal regulations. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Lack of manpower and expertise.
9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Yes No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Siemens was the only proposal received. d. Last bid date: 09/25/2009 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
09/25/2013

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: 2008-2011, Buildings and Grounds, service satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User kaplin kaplin kaplin kaplin cwatson cwatson cwatson
Signature Date 11/09/2011 16:52:52 PM 11/09/2011 16:52:56 PM 11/09/2011 16:53:00 PM 11/09/2011 16:53:05 PM 11/18/2011 08:15:27 AM 11/18/2011 08:15:31 AM 11/18/2011 08:15:36 AM
Contract #: 10236
Page 2 of 2
16
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12806 Legal Entity TRUGREEN LANDCARE OF NEVADA Name: Contractor Name: TRUGREEN LANDCARE OF NEVADA Address: LLC 4221 W OQUENDO RD City/State/Zip LAS VEGAS, NV 89118-3004
Contact/Phone: null702/385-4590 Vendor No.: T29004589 NV Business ID: NV20001008059 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % Buildings & Grounds building rent income fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 01/01/2012
12/31/2013 2 years Contract landscaping services
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract which provides landscaping services to the Department of Motor Vehicles, 8250 Flamingo; Department of Motor Vehicles, 4110 Donovan; Department of Health and Human Services, 620 & 628 Belrose; and the Sahara Complex, which consists of the Department of Motor Vehicles, 2701 E. Sahara; Bradley Building, 2501 E. Sahara; and Public Works Division-Buildings and Grounds Section, 2621 E. Sahara, Las Vegas, Nevada; and provides $10,000.00 for extra services at the above mentioned buildings and various State buildings in the Las Vegas area as needed and requested and approved by the Buildings and Grounds Section designee. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $187,096.00 Other basis for payment: $2,398.00/month-DMV, Flamingo; $1,370.00/month=DMV, Donovan; $606.00/month-620 & 628 Belrose; $3,005.00/month-Sahara Complex(DMV, Sahara-Bradley Building-B & G Building) and extra services at $10,000.00 with hourly rates of $27.88 for DMV, Flamingo; $26.35 for DMV, Donovan; $35.65 for Belrose; and $28.89 for the Sahara Complex.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The necessity to keep the grounds outside of State buildings in a clean and safe condition. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Lack of manpower and equipment. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Yes
Contract #: 12806
Page 1 of 2
17
No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? The Evaluation Committee for RFP#1073 awarded TruGreen LandCare the highest overall weighted score. d. Last bid date: 07/01/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 07/01/2013 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: 2008-2011, Buildings & Grounds, service satisfactory 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: LLC 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User kaplin kaplin kaplin kaplin jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson Pending
Contract #: 12806
Page 2 of 2
17
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12736 Legal Entity DG KOCH ASSOCIATES LLC Name: Contractor Name: DG KOCH ASSOCIATES LLC Address: 2000 S JONES BLVD STE 110 City/State/Zip LAS VEGAS, NV 89146
Contact/Phone: null702/221-5160 Vendor No.: T29026336 NV Business ID: NV20061487757 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % X Bonds 100.00 % Proceeds from sale of bonds Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: 7622 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 11/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2015 3 years and 242 days Contract PROF SERV AGR
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide professional architectural/engineering services for the HVAC Renovation - Desert Regional Center Building 1391, Las Vegas, NV; SPWD Project No. 11-M38; Contract No. 7622. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $57,000.00 Other basis for payment: Monthly progress payments on services provided.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? 2011 CIP 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Professional Services are provided by SPWB to support the State Capital Improvement Program. Consultants are selected based on their ability to provide design and engineering services to meet the goals established by the Legislature. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150)
c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Demonstrated the required expertise for work on this project. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: SPWD, currently and/or in the past for various amounts with satisfactory results. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User dgrimm dgrimm dgrimm dgrimm jrodrig9 sday sday Pending
Contract #: 12736
Page 2 of 2
18
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12771 Legal Entity JBA CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC Name: Contractor Name: JBA CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC Address: 5155 W PATRICK LN STE 100 City/State/Zip LAS VEGAS, NV 89118-2828
Contact/Phone: null702/362-9200 Vendor No.: T80928382 NV Business ID: NV20091413391 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Transfer from Capital Projects Fund Agency Reference #: 7641 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 11/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2015 3 years and 242 days Contract Mech/Engr Servs
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide professional architectural/engineering services for the HVAC Renovation - Desert Regional Center Building 1300 Project No. 11-M37; Contract No. 7641. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $22,500.00 Other basis for payment: Monthly progress payments on services provided.
II. JUSTIFICATION

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: SPWD, currently and/or in the past for various amounts with satisfactory results. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? Yes If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Signature Date 10/19/2011 11:22:59 AM 10/19/2011 11:23:01 AM 10/19/2011 13:49:40 PM 10/19/2011 13:49:44 PM 10/19/2011 15:53:24 PM 11/17/2011 13:37:56 PM 11/17/2011 13:38:01 PM
Contract #: 12771
Page 2 of 2
19
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12833 Legal Entity PURCELL KROB ELECTRICAL PROF Name: Contractor Name: PURCELL KROB ELECTRICAL PROF Address: PK ELECTRICAL INC 681 SIERRA ROSE DR STE B City/State/Zip RENO, NV 89511
Contact/Phone: null775/826-9010 Vendor No.: T81016802 NV Business ID: NV19961128650 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % transfer from other B/A same fund Agency Reference #: 12610 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2015 3 years and 211 days Contract Arch/Engr Srvs
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide professional architectural/engineering services for the Ely State Prison Surveillance Cameras and Recording Devices; Project No. 11-M60; Contract No. 12610. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $160,000.00 Other basis for payment: Monthly progress payments on services provided.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? 2011 CIP 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Professional Services are provided by SPWD to support the State Capital Improvement Program. Consultants are selected based on their ability to provide design and engineering services to meet the goals established by the Legislature. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150)
c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Demonstrated the required expertise for this project. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: SPWD, currently and/or in the past for various amounts with satisfactory results. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Contract #: 12833
Page 2 of 2
20
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12738 Legal Entity WESTERN TECHNOLOGIES INC Name: Contractor Name: WESTERN TECHNOLOGIES INC Address: 6633 W POST RD STE 100 City/State/Zip LAS VEGAS, NV 89118
Contact/Phone: null702/798-8050 Vendor No.: T80821910 NV Business ID: NV19821000805 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 67.00 % X Bonds 9.00 % proceeds from sale of bonds Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 24.00 % transfer from capital project fund Agency Reference #: 8322 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 11/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2013 1 year and 242 days Contract Matl Test/Engr Srvs
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide materials testing and engineering services for a new 68,000 square foot single story Readiness Center for the Nevada Army National Guard; Project No. 09-C14; Contract No. 8322. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $210,861.00 Other basis for payment: Monthly progress payments on services provided.
II. JUSTIFICATION

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: SPWD, currently and/or in the past for various amounts with satisfactory results. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Contract #: 12738
Page 2 of 2
21
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12827 Legal Entity HERSHENOW & KLIPPENSTEIN Name: Contractor Name: HERSHENOW & KLIPPENSTEIN Address: ARCHITECTS INC 5485 RENO CORPORATE DR STE 100 City/State/Zip RENO, NV 89511-2262
Contact/Phone: null775/332-6640 Vendor No.: T80984709 NV Business ID: NV19941047730 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 74.00 % X Bonds 26.00 % proceeds from sale of bonds Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: 10357 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2015 3 years and 211 days Contract Arch/Engr Servs
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide architectural/engineering services for the Elko Army Aviation Support Facility Advance Planning; Project No. 11-E08; Contract No. 10357. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $84,000.00 Other basis for payment: Monthly progress payments on services provided.
II. JUSTIFICATION
c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Demonstrated the required expertise for this project. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: SPWE, currently and/or in the past for various amounts with satisfactory results. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Contract #: 12827
Page 2 of 2
22
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12828 Legal Entity PURCELL KROB ELECTRICAL PROF Name: Contractor Name: PURCELL KROB ELECTRICAL PROF Address: PK ELECTRICAL INC 681 SIERRA ROSE DR STE B City/State/Zip RENO, NV 89511
Contact/Phone: null775/826-9010 Vendor No.: T81016802 NV Business ID: NV19961128650 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2013-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 21.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % X Bonds 79.00 % proceeds from sale of bonds Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: 12467 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2012 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2015 2 years and 210 days Contract Arch/Eng Servs
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide professional architectural/engineering services for the Blasdel Building Electrical Upgrade; Project No. 11-M09; Contract No. 12467 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $30,000.00 Other basis for payment: Monthly progress payments on services provided.
II. JUSTIFICATION

Contract #: 12828
Page 2 of 2
23
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12832 Legal Entity DOMINGO CAMBEIRO PROF CORP Name: Contractor Name: DOMINGO CAMBEIRO PROF CORP Address: DBA DCC ARCHITECTS 3555 PECOS MCLEOD City/State/Zip LAS VEGAS, NV 89121-3803
Contact/Phone: null702/732-0084 Vendor No.: T29008776 NV Business ID: NV19871029805 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % X Bonds 68.00 % transfer from sale of bonds Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 32.00 % transfer from Parks Division Agency Reference #: 10982 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2015 3 years and 211 days Contract Arch/Engr Servs
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide professional architectural/engineering services for upgrades to the Valley of Fire Visitor Center; Project No. 11-M32; Contract No. 10982. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $28,200.00 Other basis for payment: Monthly progress payments on services provided.
II. JUSTIFICATION

Contract #: 12832
Page 2 of 2
24
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12753 Legal Entity INTERNATIONAL COMMISSIONING Name: Contractor Name: INTERNATIONAL COMMISSIONING Address: ENGINEERS WEST INC 800 N RAINBOW BLVD STE 212 City/State/Zip LAS VEGAS, NV 89107-1189
Agency Name: STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION Agency Code: 082 Appropriation Unit: All Budget Accounts - Category 00 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null702/588-5780 Vendor No.: T29021397 NV Business ID: NV20071377893 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % depends upon the project requiring this service Agency Reference #: 6166 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2013 1 year and 211 days Contract COMMISS SERVICES
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide ongoing third party commissioning services as required. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $200,000.00 Other basis for payment: Progress payments based on services provided
II. JUSTIFICATION

Contract #: 12753
Page 2 of 2
25
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12790 Legal Entity Southern Nevada Area Communications Name: Council Contractor Name: Southern Nevada Area Communications Council Address: 575 East Flamingo City/State/Zip Las Vegas, NV 89119
Agency Name:
ENTERPRISE IT SERVICES
Contact/Phone: David Goss 702-455-7390 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: Not Applicable To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Revenue Contract Agency Reference #: 5524 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2012 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain To ensure continous public safety communications remain uninterupted between the expiration date of the last contract (6/30/2011) and the start date of the new contract (7/1/2011). 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Revenue Contract Rack/DS1 rental
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new revenue contract that is ongoing and provides for rack spaces and a DS1 circuit at Apex Peak in Clark County. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $25,916.58 Other basis for payment: FY12, $5,540.07 + $7,005.36 = $12,545.43; FY13, $6,099.39 + $7,271.76 = $13,371.15
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? This is a revenue generating contract 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: This is a revenue generating contract 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable
Contract #: 12790
No No
Page 1 of 2
26
c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Not Applicable d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: SNACC has been under a revenue contract with EITS for many years with satisfactory results. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User dbaughn capple capple bbohm cwatson cwatson cwatson Pending
Signature Date 11/03/2011 11:36:37 AM 11/03/2011 13:01:50 PM 11/03/2011 13:01:52 PM 11/07/2011 14:28:47 PM 11/17/2011 13:39:44 PM 11/17/2011 13:39:47 PM 11/17/2011 13:39:51 PM
Contract #: 12790
Page 2 of 2
26
Brian Sandoval Governor
Jeff Mohlenkamp Director David Gustafson Chief Information Officer
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Enterprise I.T. Services Division

100 N. Stewart Street, Suite 100Carson City, NV 89701 Phone: (775) 684-5800
October 19, 2011
MEMORANDUM
To: From:
Janet Murphy Ben Bohm Enterprise Information Technology Services, Communications Contract Manager to request the BOE retroactively approve the attached Intrastate Interlocal Contract with Southern Nevada Area Communications Council (SNACC)
Purpose:
The attached Revenue Intrastate Interlocal Contract has been submitted for the BOEs approval. Due to the expiration date of the past contract (June 30, 2011) and the necessity of having continuous coverage to ensure the effective date of this contract is met and public communications are not interrupted, we are asking the Board of Examiners to retroactively approve this contract to July 1, 2011. I appreciate your time and assistance. Should you have questions please call me at (775) 684-5859 or email to bnbohm@admin.nv.gov.
Sincerely, Ben Bohm
26
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12679 Legal Entity Lloyd's Refrigeration, Inc. Name: Contractor Name: Lloyd's Refrigeration, Inc. Address: 5701 W. Sunset Road City/State/Zip Las Vegas, NV 89118
Agency Name: OFFICE OF VETERAN'S SERVICES Agency Code: 240 Appropriation Unit: 2560-15 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Steve Martinson 702-798-1010 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: NV19781009048 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2013-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 63.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 37.00 % Federal funds 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2012 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
12/13/2013 1 year and 12 days Contract Air Conditioners
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide ongoing air conditioner maintenance services to the Southern Nevada Veterans Memorial Cemetery. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $15,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $1,095.00 per 3 month period Other basis for payment: Payments every three (3) months for maintenance, plus money for parts and labor.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Air conditioning units at the Southern Nevada Veterans Memorial Cemetery need scheduled preventive maintenance to stay in optimum running condition for the comfort of staff and guests. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees at the Cemetery do not have necessary technical knowledge and skills to maintain these units. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable
Yes No
c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Better pricing - familiarity with equipment. d. Last bid date: 09/01/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
09/01/2013

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Contractor installed air conditioner at the Nevada State Veterans Home in 2010. Service was satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User jpalme5 jpalme5 jpalme5 mnobles jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson Pending
Signature Date 10/26/2011 10:16:53 AM 10/26/2011 10:16:56 AM 10/26/2011 10:17:00 AM 10/27/2011 14:31:29 PM 11/01/2011 10:45:37 AM 11/18/2011 07:58:04 AM 11/18/2011 07:58:08 AM
Contract #: 12679
Page 2 of 2
27
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12111 Legal Entity Clark County Social Services Name: Contractor Name: Clark County Social Services Address: 1600 Pinto Lane City/State/Zip Las Vegas, NV 89106
Contact/Phone: Deborah Johnson 702-456-6277 Vendor No.: T41189000 NV Business ID: N/A To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Revenue Contract with Clark County Social Services 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 01/01/2012
06/30/2013 1 year and 180 days Interlocal Agreement Clark County-NSVH
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new interlocal revenue agreement between Clark County Social Services and the Nevada State Veterans Home (NSVH) to place Clark County residents/veterans who qualify into the NSVH. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $672,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $0.00 per Patient Other basis for payment: Revenue Contract with Clark County paying the Veterans Home for services. Rate will be $2.00 over Medicaid rate.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Clark County Social Services has a need to procure nursing home services for qualified Clark County residents, and NSVH has available personnel and resources necessary to provide nursing home services. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees at NSVH will provide these services. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable
Contract #: 12111
No No
Page 1 of 2
28
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? N/A d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User jpalme5 jpalme5 jpalme5 mnobles jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson Pending
Contract #: 12111
Page 2 of 2
28
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10626 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 1 RESOURCE PHARMACY, OMNICARE RESOURCE PHARMACY, OMNICARE 1525 East Sunset Road, Ste. 16 Las Vegas, NV 89119
Contact/Phone: Chirag Patel 702/456-4229 Vendor No.: T81030736 NV Business ID: NV20041059914 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 50.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 50.00 % Funding from Medicare/Medicaid and Private funds 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 04/01/2010
03/31/2012 2 years Contract Pharmacy Service
5. Purpose of contract: This the first amendment to the original contract, which provides ongoing pharmaceuticals and pharmacy delivery services 24 hrs/day, 7 days per week, to residents of the Nevada State Veterans Home (NSVH). This amendment increases the maximum amount from $250,000 to $400,000 due to increased use of prescription drugs by NSVH residents and changes in the mix of residents who require prescriptions. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $250,000.00 $0.00 $150,000.00 $400,000.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Pharmacy services are required by Federal and State laws pertaining to long-term care. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: NSVH employees do not have the necessary training and expertise to perform this work. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Yes
Contract #: 10626
Page 1 of 2
29
Yes
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Best score among participating vendors by selection committee. d. Last bid date: 10/27/2009 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
10/31/2013

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Contractor has provided pharmacy services for Nevada State Veterans Home for more than 6 years. Service has been satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User jpalme5 jpalme5 jpalme5 mnobles jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson
Contract #: 10626
Page 2 of 2
29
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: CONV5088 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 3 Vital Care Respiratory (Princi Vital Care Respiratory (Princi pal Medical Equip) 707 Canyon Rd, 103B Boulder City, NV 89005
Contact/Phone: Deborah Beall 7022946513 Vendor No.: T81038119 NV Business ID: NV19981171140 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2008-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 50.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 50.00 % 50% Private/50% Federal 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 03/11/2008
01/31/2012 3 years and 326 days Contract Health Related Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is the 3rd amendment to the original contract which provides ongoing respiratory therapy, equipment, and related services to the Nevada State Veterans Home (NSVH). This amendment increases the maximum amount of the contract from $75,000 to $95,000 due to the increased need for small oxygen tanks by the residents of the facility. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $44,000.00 $31,000.00 $20,000.00 $95,000.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Respiratory therapy services are required by Federal and State laws pertaining to Long Term Care Facilities. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: There are no sources for oxygen or respiratory therapists in the State system. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
No No
Page 1 of 2 30
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Under current contract. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

User jpalme5 jpalme5 jpalme5 mnobles jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson
Signature Date 10/13/2011 12:05:03 PM 10/13/2011 12:05:07 PM 10/13/2011 12:05:10 PM 10/14/2011 10:31:01 AM 10/19/2011 15:55:56 PM 11/17/2011 13:36:22 PM 11/17/2011 13:36:27 PM
Page 2 of 2
30
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12848 Legal Entity SCHNEIDER HUFFMAN, VICKI Name: Contractor Name: SCHNEIDER HUFFMAN, VICKI Address: 5416 67TH ST NE City/State/Zip MARYSVILLE, WA 98270
Agency Name: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Agency Code: 300 Appropriation Unit: 2715-14 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null360/658-1344 Vendor No.: T29015163 NV Business ID: NV20111651497 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 11/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
12/31/2012 1 year and 61 days Contract Special Edu Data
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide ongoing support for collection, validation, correction, preparation, and submission of federally required data associated with the provision of special eduation and related services for students with disabilities, age 3-22 in Nevada. School districts are required to prepared and submit to State Education Agencies the data identified under the individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 34 CFR part 300, 300.618. State Education Agencies in turn are required to to ensure that those data are in turn submitted to the US Department of Education and are submitted as accurate and timely.This requires that ongoing technical assistance be provided to district data managers and special education administrators to ensure that the data be submitted in adherence with required protocols, within required timelines. Data will be aggregated and configured for submission from the state level in accordance with requirements of USDOE. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $92,964.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $61.00 per hour
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Federal law requires the development and submission of special education data as articulated in Section 618 of the individuals with disabilities Act in order to access federal funding and support. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The scope of work and the qualifications require specialized expertise and a non-employee status that cannot be met with the agency or other State agency. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 12848
No
Page 1 of 2 31
Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? There were other potential vendors with similar qualifications and expertice. The individuals with some similarity in qualifications and expertice lack the comprehensive expertice of the contractor. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Nevada Department of Education, current contract and the quality of service has been excellent. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Sole Proprietor 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User amccalla amccalla amccalla ebarraga jteska jteska jteska Pending
Signature Date 11/08/2011 14:50:04 PM 11/08/2011 14:50:08 PM 11/08/2011 14:50:10 PM 11/08/2011 14:50:55 PM 11/21/2011 10:29:01 AM 11/21/2011 10:29:04 AM 11/21/2011 10:29:06 AM
Contract #: 12848
Page 2 of 2
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12803 Legal Entity Churchill County Name: Contractor Name: Churchill County Address: City/State/Zip Churchill County Social Srvcs 485 West B St #105 Fallon, NV 89406
Agency Name:
HEALTH CARE FINANCING & POLICY Agency Code: 403 Appropriation Unit: 3243-00 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Shannon Ernst 775-428-0211 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: Government Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % County provides non-federal share 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain This contract is retroactive due to a delay in negotiations that could not take place until after the passage of SB 485 in June, 2011. Additional negotiations delayed the contract even further. Since the prior contract expired June 30, 2011, this contract is retroactive to ensure the county is responsible for their share of costs from July 1, 2011 and forward. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Revenue Contract County Match
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new Interlocal agreement for the Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP) and the Division of Welfare and Supportive Services (DWSS) to provide the administrative services necessary to operate the Medicaid County Match program. The Counties provide the non-federal share to DHCFP for medical and Medicaid administrative services. Pursuant to NRS 428.010, counties are required to provide medical care to indigent persons who reside in the county. The County Match program provides federal matching funds for indigent long-term care costs, when the indigent is Medicaid eligible. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $663,690.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Pursuant to NRS 428.010 counties are required to provide care, support, and relief to the poor, indigent, incompetent, and incapacitated persons who lawfully reside in the county and are not supported by other means. The county match program provides fiscal relief to the counties for indigent long-term care costs for these individuals. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees operate the county match program. DHCFP pays providers and the counties reimburse the State for the non-federal share. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 12803
No
Page 1 of 2 32
No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: DHCFP has had similar contracts with the county to facilitate the county match program since 1989. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User llamborn llamborn mtorvine dkingsle nhovden jteska jteska Pending
Contract #: 12803
Page 2 of 2
32
32
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12802 Legal Entity Clark County Name: Contractor Name: Clark County Address: City/State/Zip Clark County Social Services 1600 Pinto Lane Las Vegas, NV 89106
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: John Huddle 702-455-3283 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: Government Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % County provides non-federal share 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new Interlocal agreement for the Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP) and the Division of Welfare and Supportive Services (DWSS) to provide the administrative services necessary to operate the Medicaid County Match program. The Counties provide the non-federal share to DHCFP for medical and Medicaid administrative services. Pursuant to NRS 428.010, counties are required to provide medical care to indigent persons who reside in the county. The County Match program provides federal matching funds for indigent long-term care costs, when the indigent is Medicaid eligible. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $41,216,657.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
Contract #: 12802
No
Page 1 of 2 33
No

Contract #: 12802
Page 2 of 2
33
33
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12698 Legal Entity Douglas County Name: Contractor Name: Douglas County Address: City/State/Zip Douglas County Social Services PO Box 218 Minden, NV 89423
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Karen Goode 775-782-9825 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: Government Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % County provides non-federal share 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 11/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain This contract is retroactive due to a delay in negotiations that could not take place until after the passage of SB 485 in June, 2011. Since the prior contract expired June 30, 2011, and since final negotiations were further delayed, this contract is retroactive to ensure the county is responsible for their share of costs from July 1, 2011 and forward. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Revenue Contract County Match
II. JUSTIFICATION
Contract #: 12698
No
Page 1 of 2 34
No

Contract #: 12698
Page 2 of 2
34
34
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12766 Legal Entity Lincoln County Name: Contractor Name: Lincoln County Address: City/State/Zip PO Box 539 Pioche, NV 89043
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Shawn Frehner 775-962-5497 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: Government Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % County provides non-federal share 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
II. JUSTIFICATION
Contract #: 12766
No
Page 1 of 2 35
No

Contract #: 12766
Page 2 of 2
35
35
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: CONV4651 Amendment 3 Number: Legal Entity Logisticare Solutions LLC Name: Contractor Name: Logisticare Solutions LLC Address: City/State/Zip 1800 Phoenix Blvd College Park, GA 30349
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Henry Hardy 7709077596 Vendor No.: T27000299 NV Business ID: NV20041034149 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2008-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 46.10 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 53.90 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 10/01/2007
12/31/2011 4 years and 213 days Contract Health Related Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is the third amendment to the original contract that provides non-emergency transportation to and from medical providers for eligible Medicaid recipients. This amendment extends the terminaton date from December 31, 2011 to April 30, 2012, and increases contract authority from $44,000,000.00 to $48,779,585.00. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $44,000,000.00 $0.00 $4,779,585.00 $48,779,585.00 04/30/2012
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? 42 CFR 431.53 requires necessary non-emergency transportation for Medicaid recipients to travel to and from health care providers. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The State has limited resources to provide Medicaid recipients with adequate non-emergency transportation. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Yes
Page 1 of 2 36
Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date:
No
11/30/2011

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Amending an existing contract that has been effective since 10/1/2007. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: LLC 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User llamborn llamborn mtorvine dkingsle nhovden jteska jteska
Page 2 of 2
36
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12804 Legal Entity Nye County Name: Contractor Name: Nye County Address: City/State/Zip Nye County Health & Human Svcs 250 N. Hwy 160, Suite 4 Pahrump, NV 89060
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Shirley Trummell 775-751-7095 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: Government Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % County provides non-federal share 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Pursuant to NRS 428.010 counties are required to provide care, support, and relief to the poor, indigent, incompetent, and incapacitated persons who lawfully reside in the county and are not supported by other means. The county match program provides fiscal relief to the counties for indigent long-term care costs for these individuals. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees operate the county match program. DHCFP pays providers and the counties reimburse the State for the non-federal share.
9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date:
No No

Contract #: 12804
Page 2 of 2
37
37
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12811 Legal Entity Washoe County Name: Contractor Name: Washoe County Address: City/State/Zip Washoe County Social Services PO Box 11130 Reno, NV 89520
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Karen Kay 775-328-2769 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: Government Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % County provides non-federal share 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain This contract is retroactive due to a delay in negotiations that could not take place until after the passage of SB 485 in June, 2011. Additional negotiations delayed the contract further. Since the prior contract expired June 30, 2011, this contract is retroactive to ensure the county is responsible for their share of costs from July 1, 2011 and forward. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Revenue Contract County Match
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Pursuant to NRS 428.010 counties are required to provide care, support, and relief to the poor, indigent, incompetent, and incapacitated persons who lawfully reside in the county and are not supported by other means. The county match program provides fiscal relief to the counties for indigent long-term care costs for these individuals. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees operate the county match program. DHCFP pays providers and the counties reimburse the State for the non-federal share.
9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date:
No No

Signature Date 11/21/2011 17:24:58 PM 11/21/2011 17:40:06 PM 11/22/2011 13:33:10 PM 11/28/2011 08:58:22 AM 11/28/2011 09:01:54 AM 11/28/2011 10:18:26 AM 11/28/2011 10:18:29 AM
Contract #: 12811
Page 2 of 2
38
38
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12770 Legal Entity DOUGLAS, COUNTY OF Name: Contractor Name: DOUGLAS, COUNTY OF Address: DOUGLAS COUNTY CLERK PO BOX 218 City/State/Zip MINDEN, NV 89423
Agency Name: HEALTH DIVISION Agency Code: 406 Appropriation Unit: 3194-00 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null775/782-9013 Vendor No.: T40174400H NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Revenue Agency Reference #: HD 12074 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain This revenue contract is a result of action by the Legislature. Notification, and negotiations with the county, was not able to be completed until the end of June, 2011, and the county did not approve the contract until October 6, 2011. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Revenue Contract Health Assessment
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new revenue contract to receive the county assessment, in accordance with Senate Bill 471 of the 2011 legislative session, for services provided by the Health Division pursuant to chapters 439 (Administration of Public Health), 444 (Sanitation), 446 (Food Establishments) and 583 (Meat, Fish, Poultry and Eggs) of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS). 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $245,580.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $30,698.00 per Quarter
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Legislative action, changes to chapter 439 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) approved as Senate Bill 471, requires that each county pay an assessment to the Health Division for the costs of services provided in that county by the Health Division 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: This is an assessment for work performed by State employees. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 12770
No No
Page 1 of 2
39
Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: No

User pweyrick pweyrick mtorvine cschmid2 jborrowm jteska jteska Pending
Signature Date 10/23/2011 11:59:26 AM 10/23/2011 11:59:30 AM 10/26/2011 14:52:32 PM 11/01/2011 07:49:54 AM 11/01/2011 10:54:16 AM 11/02/2011 13:02:25 PM 11/02/2011 13:02:36 PM
Contract #: 12770
Page 2 of 2
39
STATE OF NEVADA
BRIAN SANDOVAL Governor MICHAEL J. WILLDEN Director RICHARD WHITLEY, MS Administrator TRACEY D. GREEN, MD State Health Officer
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
HEALTH DIVISION Frontier and Rural (FaR) Public Health Program

3427 Goni Road #108 Carson City, Nevada89706 Telephone: (775) 687-7550 Fax: (775) 684-3492
October 19, 2011 MEMORANDUM To: John Borrowman Budget Analyst Budget Division Phil Weyrick Administrative Services Officer IV Health Division Administration
Through:
From: Subject:
Mary Wherry, Clinical Services Manager Request for a Retroactive Start Date for Contract # HD 12074 (CETS 12770)
This memorandum requests that the above referenced Health Division Contract be approved for a retroactive start date effective July 1, 2011. The contract requires a retroactive start date because the revenues cover a two-year period (July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2013). The contract was not able to be submitted to the Board of Examiners in a timely fashion due to the pending passage of Senate Bill 471, requiring counties to pay an assessment for services provided by the Health Division pursuant to chapters 439 (Administration of Public Health), 444 (Sanitation), 446 (Food Establishments) and 583 (Meat, Fish, Poultry and Eggs) of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS
IC
cc:
Colman Schmidt, Management Analyst II Health Division

Public Health: Working for a Safer and Healthier Nevada
39
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12735 Legal Entity LYON, COUNTY OF Name: Contractor Name: LYON, COUNTY OF Address: LYON COUNTY LEPC 27 S MAIN ST City/State/Zip YERINGTON, NV 89447
Contact/Phone: null775/463-6537 Vendor No.: T40156600A NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Revenue Agency Reference #: HD 12073 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain This revenue contract is a result of action by the Legislature. Notification, and negotiations with the county, was not able to be completed until the end of June, 2011. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Revenue Contract Health Assessment
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new revenue contract to receive the county assessment, in accordance with Senate Bill 471 of the 2011 legislative session, for services provided by the Health Division pursuant to chapters 439 (Administration of Public Health), 444 (Sanitation), 446 (Food Establishments) and 583 (Meat, Fish, Poultry and Eggs) of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS). 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $123,970.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $15,496.25 per quarter
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Legislative action, changes to chapter 439 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) approved as Senate Bill 471, requires that each county pay an assessment to the Health Division for the costs of services provided in that county by the Health Division. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: This is an assessment for work performed by State employees. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 12735
No No
Page 1 of 2
40

Contract #: 12735
Page 2 of 2
40
STATE OF NEVADA

Through:
From: Subject:
IC
cc:

40
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12729 Legal Entity WHITE PINE, COUNTY OF Name: Contractor Name: WHITE PINE, COUNTY OF Address: WHITE PINE COUNTY CLERK 801 CLARK ST STE 4 City/State/Zip ELY, NV 89301
Contact/Phone: null775/289-2341 Vendor No.: T80971176T NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Revenue Agency Reference #: HD 12072 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain This revenue contract is a result of action by the Legislature. Notification, and negotiations with the county, was not able to be completed until the end of June, 2011. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Revenue Contract Health Assessment
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new revenue contract to receive the county assessment, in accordance with Senate Bill 471 of the 2011 legislative session, for services provided by the Health Division pursuant to chapters 439 (Administration of Public Health), 444 (Sanitation), 446 (Food Establishments) and 583 (Meat, Fish, Poultry and Eggs) of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS). 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $51,256.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $6,407.00 per quarter
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Legislative action, changes to chapter 439 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) approved as Senate Bill 471, requires that each county pay an assessment to the Health Division for the costs of services provided in that county by the Health Division. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: This is an assessment for work performed by State employees. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 12729
No No
Page 1 of 2
41

Contract #: 12729
Page 2 of 2
41
STATE OF NEVADA

Through:
From: Subject:
IC
cc:

41
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12824 Legal Entity CARSON CITY, CITY OF Name: Contractor Name: CARSON CITY, CITY OF Address: CARSON CITY HEALTH & HUMAN SRC 900 E LONG ST City/State/Zip CARSON CITY, NV 89706
Agency Name: Agency Code:
HEALTH DIVISION 406
Appropriation Unit: 3213-21 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null775/887-2190 Vendor No.: T80990941J NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: HD 12138 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
08/31/2013 1 year and 273 days Interlocal Agreement Billing Plan
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new interlocal agreement to create a strategic plan to implement billing within Nevada county health departments. Currently the three county health departments are only capable of billing Medicaid and Medicare along with a couple of private health insurance plans such as Culinary and Blue Cross Blue Shield. This contract will allow Carson City Health & Human Services to create a plan on how to become an in-network provider and start billing private health insurance plans, eventually including Washoe County Health District and Southern Nevada Health District. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $539,989.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $26,999.00 per month Other basis for payment: Amount of monthly invoices may vary.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Currently the three county health departments are only capable of billing Medicaid and Medicare along with a couple of private health insurance plans such as Culinary and Blue Cross Blue Shield. This contract will allow Carson City Health & Human Services to create a plan on how to become an in-network provider and start billing private health insurance plans. Once this plan is finished, it will include Washoe County Health District and Southern Nevada Health District. Currently the county health departments see many privately insured patients, but are not able to recoup costs involved with treating these patients. Once the plan is implemented and the health departments are contracted with several private health insurance plans, health departments in Nevada will be able to recoup their costs on services provided.
8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The State Health Division does not have the personnel or resources to create this plan. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date: No No

Contract #: 12824
User pweyrick pweyrick mtorvine cschmid2 jborrowm jborrowm jteska Pending
Signature Date 11/04/2011 08:10:21 AM 11/04/2011 08:10:25 AM 11/08/2011 15:30:07 PM 11/09/2011 07:25:23 AM 11/09/2011 09:08:15 AM 11/18/2011 17:24:15 PM 11/21/2011 11:59:31 AM
Page 2 of 2
42
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12747 Legal Entity ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF NO Name: Contractor Name: ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF NO Address: CA & NO NV 251 Lafayette Circle, Suite 25 City/State/Zip Lafayette, CA 94549 Contact/Phone: Kimberly Weber 925-284-7942
Agency Name: HEALTH DIVISION Agency Code: 406 Appropriation Unit: 3219-00 Is budget authority No available?: If "No" please explain: This is an un-budgeted revenue agreement. A Work Program (C22562) is in process for authority to receive these funds.
Vendor No.: T81060164A NV Business ID: Exempt To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Revenue Agency Reference #: HD 12129 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 01/01/2012
12/31/2012 1 year Revenue Contract Conduct Survey
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to incorporate questions about cognitive impairment in the Nevada 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). This request is contingent upon approval of work program C22562 anticipated to be heard at the December 2011 Interim Finance Committee meeting. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $22,500.00 Other basis for payment: Full payment upon approval of the contract.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The Alzheimer's Association requires that a survey be done to address the issue of cognitive impairment. The State Biostatistician has the ability to perform the survey. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The work is being done by the state. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 12747
No No
Page 1 of 2
43

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Non-profit Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. Not Applicable 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Signature Date 10/25/2011 08:09:09 AM 10/25/2011 08:09:13 AM 10/27/2011 15:15:40 PM 11/01/2011 07:50:14 AM 11/01/2011 10:52:26 AM 11/02/2011 14:35:06 PM 11/02/2011 14:35:12 PM
Contract #: 12747
Page 2 of 2
43
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12464 Amendment 1 Number: Legal Entity BOARD OF REGENTS-UNR Name: Contractor Name: BOARD OF REGENTS-UNR Address: City/State/Zip UNR CONTROLLERS OFFICE MAIL STOP 0124 RENO, NV 89557-0025
Agency Name:
WELFARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES Agency Code: 407 Appropriation Unit: 3228-42 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null775/784-4062 Vendor No.: D35000816 NV Business ID: Gov't Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 10/01/2011
09/30/2012 1 year Interlocal Agreement SNAP Education
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original interlocal agreement, for the Division of Welfare and Supportive Service (DWSS), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to provide nutrition education to low income families. Through a grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), DWSS collaborates with various public and nonprofit agencies to provide education to SNAP recipients to improve the likelihood that recipients and those eligible for benefits will make healthy food choices. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $915,934 to $952,647 and adds Attachment B - Project Plan due to the approval of the State Plan by USDA. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $915,934.00 $0.00 $36,713.00 $952,647.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Division of Welfare and Supportive Services receives a grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to implement the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Nutrition Education (SNAP-Ed) to low income families in Nevada. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work:
Contract #: 12464
Page 1 of 2
44
Division of Welfare and Supportive Services partners with various public and non profit agencies to provide nutrition education through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Nutrition Education (SNAP-Ed) therefore extending state resources and personnel. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Federal funding is provided from the USDA. All agencies that develop a plan that meets the requirements of the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program Nutrition Education (SNAP-Ed) and is approved by the USDA are incorporated into the State of Nevada plan as funding allows. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Currently under contract with DWSS and provides satisfactory service. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
Contract #: 12464
User tdufresn msmit5 mtorvine afrancis cglover jteska jteska
Signature Date 10/07/2011 09:04:49 AM 10/24/2011 12:39:27 PM 10/27/2011 15:25:38 PM 11/01/2011 09:19:16 AM 11/04/2011 09:32:18 AM 11/21/2011 12:18:22 PM 11/21/2011 12:18:26 PM
Page 2 of 2 44
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10274 Amendment 1 Number: Legal Entity CLARK COUNTY TREASURER Name: Contractor Name: CLARK COUNTY TREASURER Address: City/State/Zip 500 S GRAND CENTRAL PKWY LAS VEGAS, NV 89106
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null702-455-4616 Vendor No.: T40150700 NV Business ID: N/A To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2020 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 66.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 34.00 % State Share of Collections 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 09/2011 01/12/2010
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain DWSS is requesting the contract be approved retroactively to March 1, 2010 so that the contract can be synchronized with the start and end dates of the Memorandum of Commencement Date, as well as to realize negotiated lower rent costs and rent savings due to the elimination of the Employer Assistance Program and the staff that was located at the Clark County Greystone building. 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 12/31/2019 10 years and 50 days Interlocal Agreement Greystone Sublease
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original interlocal agreement, which provides for the sublease of space at the Greystone Building in Las Vegas from Clark County to house the Division of Welfare and Supportive Services Child Support Enforcement Program and State Collections and Disbursement Unit. This amendment corrects the start date to March 1, 2010 and extends the termination date from December 31, 2019 to February 29, 2020 to synchronize with Clark County and building owner; decreases the maximum amount from $3,978,683 to $3,273,962.00; revises the sublease and adds a memorandum of commencement as a new attachment. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $3,978,683.00 $0.00 -$704,721.00 $3,273,962.00 02/29/2020
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done?
Contract #: 10274
Page 1 of 2
45
The co-location of State and County Child Support Enforcement Services in Southern Nevada will benefit DWSS operations and the citizens of Clark County. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: N/A 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? A RFP is not a requirement of an interlocal contract. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Currently under contract with DWSS and providing satisfactory service. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
Contract #: 10274
User tdufresn msmit5 mtorvine afrancis cglover jteska jteska
Page 2 of 2 45
45
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12658 Legal Entity Chase Global Services Name: Contractor Name: Chase Global Services Address: City/State/Zip 321 Cheney Street Reno, NV 89502
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Robert Malmrose 775-287-9120 Vendor No.: T29028922 NV Business ID: NV20031499292 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 11/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2013 1 year and 242 days Contract Child Support
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract for the Division of Welfare and Supportive Services (DWSS) Child Support unit to enhance the Business Intelligence module by developing a data warehouse so that child support staff can retrieve and customize ad hoc reports to manage caseloads so that federal performance measures are met or exceeded (Phase II). Business Intelligence is a computer based decision support system that indentifies, extracts and analyzes data to support better business decision-making. This contract contains an option to amend to include Phase III, contingent upon availability of additional funding. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $655,500.00 Other basis for payment: Actual per Invoice
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Enhancements to the Business Intelligence module will result in child support staff being able to retrieve and customize ad hoc reports. Ad hoc reports are needed by field staff to manage caseloads so that federal performance measures are met or exceeded. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees do not have the expertise to do this type of work. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 12658
No No
Page 1 of 2 46
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Sole Source Contract (As Approved by Chief of Purchasing) Approval #: 110703 Approval Date: 07/20/2011 c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: Yes

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval DoIT Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User tdufresn msmit5 mtorvine afrancis lmuelle1 cglover jteska jteska Pending
Signature Date 09/22/2011 11:32:25 AM 10/07/2011 08:21:47 AM 10/19/2011 16:02:00 PM 10/21/2011 09:36:35 AM 11/09/2011 07:38:52 AM 11/09/2011 09:36:05 AM 11/10/2011 13:16:24 PM 11/10/2011 13:16:27 PM
Contract #: 12658
Page 2 of 2
46
ATTACHMENT E
46
46
46
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12757 Legal Entity Board of Regents-UNSOM Dept. of Name: Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences Contractor Name: Board of Regents-UNSOM Dept. of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences Address: 1664 N. Virginia St. M/S 1332 City/State/Zip Reno, NV 89557-1332
Agency Name:
MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES Agency Code: 408 Appropriation Unit: 3161-08 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Gail Smith 775-784-6003 Vendor No.: D35000816 NV Business ID: NV19981273600 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 100.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain This contract was to start on July 1, 2011; however due to an unexpected amount of contract revisions and gathering of documentation at the Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services business office, contract preparation and submission was regrettably delayed. The residency program assists in providing training and enables certain services to be performed on a 24-hour basis. As a result, services were provided prior to approval of the contract to give continuity of care. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Interlocal Agreement Residency
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract for the purpose of providing outside regular service ("moonlighting") to the Rawson-Neal Psychiatric Hospital. It provides a valuable training program for residents and enables services such as on-call, patient observation unit (POU), high risk rounds and psych evaluations to be performed on a 24-hour basis. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $425,000.00 Other basis for payment: Payment is based on services provided as outlined in the scope of work in the contract. This document has been attached to the Contract Summary.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The agency operates outpatient/inpatient programs requiring the services of psychiatrists. Pursuant to NRS 433.344 and NRS436.123, when vacancies occur in the medical staff, contract psychiatrists are needed for adequate coverage. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Staff psychiatrists typically perform these functions. When vacancies occur, adequate coverage is required by the Joint Commission. In addition, the function provides valuable training experience to medical school residents. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 12757
No
Page 1 of 2 47
Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Exempt (Per statute) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? In accordance with NRS 277.180, the Division is authorized to contract with other governmental entities for the provision of services. d. Last bid date: 06/01/2009 Anticipated re-bid date: 05/01/2013 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Currently under contract with Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services and is providing satisfactory service. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Non-profit Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. Not Applicable 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User pripple dprather mtorvine tpollar2 rhage1 jteska jteska Pending
Contract #: 12757
Page 2 of 2
47
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12745 Legal Entity DOMBRIAL INC DBA Name: Contractor Name: DOMBRIAL INC DBA Address: City/State/Zip ELITE SERVICES 720 S 7TH ST STE 100 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null702/382-0377 Vendor No.: T81101343 NV Business ID: NV19991275505 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 100.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
10/31/2013 1 year and 334 days Contract Janitorial Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide ongoing janitorial services to the Laughlin Rural Clinic. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $21,288.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $887.00 per month
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Pursuant to NAC 449.322 and NRS 449.037 for health and safety requirements and Section 5.2 of the negotiated lease requiring tenant to provide janitorial services. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The Laughlin Clinic is not staffed for janitorial service and is located in a rural area that does not have any current state employees available to do the work. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other?
Yes No
This was the only vendor to respond with a bid. d. Last bid date: 08/01/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
08/01/2013

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Currently under contract with the Rural Clinics and Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services and is rated as satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Contract #: 12745
Page 2 of 2
48
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12817 Legal Entity JACKSON & COKER LOCUM TENENS Name: Contractor Name: JACKSON & COKER LOCUM TENENS Address: City/State/Zip INC 3000 OLD ALABAMA RD #119-608 ALPHARETTA, GA 30022-5860
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null800/272-2707 Vendor No.: T27018312 NV Business ID: NV20101531718 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 100.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
12/31/2013 2 years and 31 days Contract Locum Tenens
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide ongoing Locum Tenen services to Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services, pursuant to NRS 433.344 and NRS 436.123 and the Joint Commission requirements. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $2,000,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $145.00 per Hour
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Pursuant to NRS 433.344 and 436.123, agencies are authorized to contract with qualified professionals for delivery of services. Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services operates both inpatient and outpatient programs requiring the services of psychiatrists. When vacancies occur in the medical staff, contract psychiatrists are needed for adequate coverage. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Staff psychiatrists typically perform these services, however, when vacancies occur, adequate coverage is required by the Joint Commission until other psychiatrists are hired or return to work from leave or other time off. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 12817
Yes No
Page 1 of 2
49
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? This vendor was not chosen in preference to others, there are and will continue to be several locum tenens companies under contract including the other two vendors mentioned to ensure the continuity of services to consumers in the absence of staff psychiatrists. d. Last bid date: 08/01/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 08/01/2013 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: This contractor is currently under contract with Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services and is performing satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: LLC 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Signature Date 11/02/2011 14:58:36 PM 11/07/2011 13:20:17 PM 11/16/2011 11:23:34 AM 11/16/2011 12:00:03 PM 11/17/2011 13:29:41 PM 11/21/2011 15:28:00 PM 11/21/2011 15:28:04 PM
Contract #: 12817
Page 2 of 2
49
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12740 Legal Entity MEDICAL DOCTOR ASSOCIATES INC Name: Contractor Name: MEDICAL DOCTOR ASSOCIATES INC Address: City/State/Zip 145 TECHNOLOGY PKWY NORCROSS, GA 30092-2913
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Jim Edmondson 800/780-3500 Vendor No.: T80960656 NV Business ID: NV20081672330 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 100.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
12/31/2013 2 years and 31 days Contract Locum Tenens
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract which will provide ongoing Locum Tenen services to Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services, pursuant to NRS 433.344 and NRS 436.123 and the Joint Commission requirements. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $2,000,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $145.00 per Hour
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Pursuant to NRS 433.344 and 436.123 agencies are authorized to contract with qualified professionals for delivery of services. SNAMHS operates both inpatient and outpatient programs requiring the services of psychiatrists. When vacancies occur in the medical staff, contract psychiatrists are needed for adequate coverage. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Staff psychiatrists typically perform these services, however, when vacancies occur, adequate coverage is required by the Joint Commission until other psychiatrists are hired or return to work from leave or other time off. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Yes No
Contract #: 12740
Page 1 of 2
50
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? This vendor was not chosen in preference to others; there are and will continue to be several locum tenens companies under contract including the other two vendors mentioned to ensure the continuity of services to consumers in the absence of staff psychiatrists. d. Last bid date: 09/01/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 10/01/2013 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Currently under contract with SNAMHS and NAMHS and has performed satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: LLC 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Contract #: 12740
Page 2 of 2
50
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12801 Legal Entity Wexford Health Sources Inc. Name: Contractor Name: Wexford Health Sources Inc. Address: City/State/Zip 425 Holiday Drive Foster Plaza Two Pittsburgh, PA 15220
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: John Froehlich 412-937-8590 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: NV20111669976 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 100.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: RFP #2013 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 01/01/2012
12/31/2013 2 years Contract General Medical Ser.
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide physician level general medical services for the Rawson-Neal Hospital in Las Vegas. This will include one physician and three nurse practitioners. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $1,600,000.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $66,666.67 per Month
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Pursuant to NRS 433.344 and 436.123 agencies are authorized to contract with quailified professionals for delivery of services. Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services operates inpatient services at the Rawson-Neal Hospital requiring the services of physicians and internists. This is required to ensure adequate coverage for consumers. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: As of July 1, 2012 we no longer have any people on staff to perform these jobs. They have either been eliminated through attrition or retirement and adequate staffing is required by the Joint Commission. We will be able to save a minimum of $ 200,000.00 per year by using contracted labor to fill these positions. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 12801
Yes Yes
Page 1 of 2
51
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? The contractor has the experience in providing physician level general medical services and was the highest scoring vendor selected by the evaluation committee. d. Last bid date: 08/24/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 08/24/2013 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Signature Date 10/27/2011 10:06:16 AM 11/01/2011 07:38:02 AM 11/02/2011 08:59:28 AM 11/02/2011 11:13:41 AM 11/07/2011 11:04:13 AM 11/21/2011 15:32:27 PM 11/21/2011 15:32:55 PM
Contract #: 12801
Page 2 of 2
51
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10036 Amendment 1 Number: Legal Entity MORRISON MGEMENT SPECIALISTS Name: Contractor Name: MORRISON MGEMENT SPECIALISTS Address: City/State/Zip 1727 AXENTY WAY REDONDO BEACH, CA 90278
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null310-798-4017 Vendor No.: PUR0002019 NV Business ID: NV200111302439 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 37.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 63.00 % Transfer from LCC and NNCAS 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 01/01/2010
12/31/2011 4 years Contract FOOD SERVICES
5. Purpose of contract: This is an amendment to the original contract which provides food services to inpatient consumers at Northern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services (NNAMHS), Lake's Crossing Center (LCC) and Northern Nevada Child and Adolescent Services (NNCAS), all located on the NNAMHS campus in Sparks, NV. This amendment will extend the expiration date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 and increases the total authority by $1,611,316 from $2,000,000 to $3,611,316 to cover the time extension, due to the continuing need for this service. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $2,000,000.00 $0.00 $1,611,316.00 $3,611,316.00 12/31/2013
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? TO PROVIDE NUTRITIONALLY ADEQUATE AND ATTRACTIVE MEALS ADAPTED TO MEET THE NEEDS AND PREFERENCES OF INDIVIDUALS IN RESIDENCE AT NNAMHS, LCC AND NNCAS 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: THE AGENCY HAS NEITHER THE STAFF NOR BUDGET TO PERFORM THESE DUTIES
Yes Yes
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? MORRISON IS THE CURRENT CONTRACTOR FOR THIS SERVICE AND THE ONLY RESPONDENT TO THE RFP d. Last bid date: 09/30/2009 Anticipated re-bid date: 09/30/2013 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: 2002 TO PRESENT - NNAMHS - SATISFACTORY 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User eobrien dprather mtorvine cweil rhage1 jteska jteska
Signature Date 11/04/2011 10:33:09 AM 11/07/2011 15:48:32 PM 11/08/2011 16:54:37 PM 11/09/2011 08:31:10 AM 11/09/2011 11:06:33 AM 11/21/2011 13:08:53 PM 11/21/2011 13:08:57 PM
Contract #: 10036
Page 2 of 2
52
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12200 Legal Entity Board of Regents - UNR Name: Contractor Name: Board of Regents - UNR Address: City/State/Zip UNR Psychology Dept Spon. Proj/325 204 Ross Hall Reno, NV 89557-0240
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Kelly Larson 775-784-4040 Vendor No.: D35000816 NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 59.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 41.00 % Medicaid funds 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2013 1 year and 211 days Interlocal Agreement Psychology Extern
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new interlocal agreement with the University of Nevada Psychology Department for ongoing services of a Psychology Extern, who will provide psychological evaluations, testing, treatment planning, therapy and consultation at designated Rural Regional Center sites in the rural underserved areas of the state. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $62,920.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $31,460.00 per Fiscal Year Other basis for payment: Reimbursement of actual costs not to exceed 31,460.00 for each fiscal year, FY's 12 and 13; to be billed at the end of each semester.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Pursuant to NRS 433.344 and 436.123, the Division and its agencies contract with qualified practitioners to deliver necessary services to consumers. This contract will also provide a setting for graduate education to enhance Rural Regional Center's ability to attract and maintain better qualified psychologists. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Rural Regional Center only has a limited number of FTE to provide services and the use of externs will assist the agency to deliver services in a timely manner and comply with Medicaid requirements for eligibility and services. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 12200
No No
Page 1 of 2 53
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Exempt (Per statute) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Interlocal contract - bids are not required per SAM 314.0 UNR is the only qualified provider in this area. This is a requirement for graduate level training and experience of advanced psychology students. This combined with our noted needs make contracting with UNR in the best interest of the State. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The contractor successfully provided this extern service for Rural Regional Center from State Fiscal Year 1998 thru State Fiscal year 2011. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User khoward dprather mtorvine jlyma2 rhage1 jteska jteska Pending
Signature Date 10/17/2011 13:15:10 PM 11/02/2011 11:01:07 AM 11/07/2011 17:31:39 PM 11/08/2011 12:48:43 PM 11/09/2011 13:30:30 PM 11/21/2011 12:53:42 PM 11/21/2011 12:53:45 PM
Contract #: 12200
Page 2 of 2
53
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12841 Legal Entity Carson City Name: Contractor Name: Carson City Address: City/State/Zip C/O Larry Werner City Manager 201 N Carson St #2 Carson City, NV 89701
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null775-887-2100 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: Not Applicable To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Revenue from County 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain The contract was to start on July 1, 2011; however, due to unexpected, lengthy negotiations the contract submission was regrettably delayed. This agreement authorizes the Division to contract with the County to continue to provide services to children with developmental disabilities and to reimburse the Division the nonfederal share of funding as payment for services. NRS 435.020 obligated the State to continue to provide these services to ensure continuity of patients' care. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Revenue Contract Carson City
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new revenue contract to provide services to children with developmental disabilities and the County to reimburse Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services the non-federal share of funding as payment for services. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $1,149,664.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Pursuant to NRS 435.010 and NRS 435.020 Mental Health and Developmental Services is obligated to provide services to children with developmental disabilities and the County to reimburse MHDS the non-federal share of funding as payment for services. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Not Applicable. State employees are providing the services for the County. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 12841
No No
Page 1 of 2
54
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Not Applicable. Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services is currently providing the services. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User cmurph3 dprather mtorvine khawkin1 rhage1 jteska jteska Pending
Signature Date 11/07/2011 15:58:48 PM 11/07/2011 17:13:54 PM 11/08/2011 16:25:18 PM 11/09/2011 11:18:35 AM 11/09/2011 11:20:59 AM 11/21/2011 13:22:28 PM 11/21/2011 13:23:13 PM
Contract #: 12841
Page 2 of 2
54
54
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12839 Legal Entity County of Humboldt Name: Contractor Name: County of Humboldt Address: City/State/Zip C/O William Deist Administrato 50 West 5th St #205 Winnemucca, NV 89445
Agency Name:
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain The contract was to start on July 1, 2011; however, due to unexpected, lengthy negotiations the contract submission was regrettably delayed. This agreement authorizes the Division to contract with the County to continue to provide services to children with developmental disabilities and to reimburse the Division the nonfederal share of funding as payment for services. NRS 435.020 obligated the State to continue to provide these services to ensure continuity of patients' care. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Revenue Contract County of Humboldt
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new revenue contract to provide services to children with developmental disabilities and the County to reimburse Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services the non-federal share of funding as payment for services. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $35,285.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
Contract #: 12839
No No
Page 1 of 2
55

Contract #: 12839
Page 2 of 2
55
55
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12836 Legal Entity County of White Pine Name: Contractor Name: County of White Pine Address: City/State/Zip C/O Lin Burleigh Clerk 801 Clark St #4 Ely, NV 89301
Agency Name:
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain The contract was to start on July 1, 2011; however, due to unexpected, lengthy negotiations the contract submission was regrettably delayed. This agreement authorizes the Division to contract with the County to continue to provide services to children with developmental disabilities and to reimburse the Division the nonfederal share of funding as payment for services. NRS 435.020 obligated the State to continue to provide these services to ensure continuity of patients' care. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Revenue Contract County of White Pine
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new revenue contract to provide services to children with developmental disabilities and the County to reimburse Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services the non-federal share of funding as payment for services. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $32,096.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
Contract #: 12836
No No
Page 1 of 2
56

Contract #: 12836
Page 2 of 2
56
56
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10971 Amendment 1 Number: Legal Entity SOUTHWEST AIR COND SVCS Name: Contractor Name: SOUTHWEST AIR COND SVCS Address: City/State/Zip 3020 S VALLEY VIEW BLVD LAS VEGAS, NV 89102
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null702/876-5444 Vendor No.: PUR0001434 NV Business ID: NV19721003279 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 50.20 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 49.80 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 10/2011 06/08/2010
06/30/2012 2 years and 23 days Contract Air Conditioning Srv
5. Purpose of contract: This is Amendment #1 to the original contract which provides inspection and repairs to facility air conditioning systems including, but not limited to, compressor, air handler, piping, electronics, duct work, valves, belts, bearings, and coils. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $20,000 to $30,000 due to the unexpected need to replace equipment. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $20,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $30,000.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Per the Code of Federal Regulations Title 42, Chapter 4, Part 483.70: The facility must provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for the residents, staff and the public. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Employees do not have necessary tools or expertise to perform this work. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 10971
Yes
Page 1 of 2 57
No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? One of three lowest responsible vendors. d. Last bid date: 01/25/2010 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
01/24/2014

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Desert Regional Center, FY06 - present, satisfactory 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User dhanse6 dprather mtorvine dhanse6 jborrowm jteska jteska
Signature Date 10/11/2011 07:56:00 AM 10/11/2011 07:59:32 AM 10/19/2011 14:56:58 PM 10/20/2011 17:00:40 PM 10/26/2011 14:27:29 PM 11/02/2011 15:18:05 PM 11/02/2011 15:18:09 PM
Contract #: 10971
Page 2 of 2
57
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10018 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 1 WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION DBA STATEWIDE FIRE PROTECTION 3130 WESTWOOD DR LAS VEGAS, NV 89109
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null702/737-1055 Vendor No.: T81029059 NV Business ID: NV19861001951 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 54.30 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 45.70 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 01/01/2010
12/31/2011 4 years Contract Fire Protection Serv
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original contract, which provides fire sprinkler, fire extinguisher, fire hydrant inspection and repair services. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 due to the continued need for these services. This amendment also adds an additional $21,000.00 to the contract, making the new total $42,066.00. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $21,000.00 $0.00 $21,066.00 $42,066.00 12/31/2013
II. JUSTIFICATION
Contract #: 10018
Page 1 of 3
58
NAC 477.335 Inspections. (NRS 477.030) 1. All pre-engineered or engineered fixed fire extinguishing systems, fire alarm systems, standpipe systems or sprinkler systems must be inspected in accordance with schedules recommended in the appropriate adopted standards as published by the N.F.P.A. Those inspections, other than a required inspection and certification, may be conducted by any person, including an employee of a firm, who, in the opinion of the authority having jurisdiction, has sufficient knowledge of the system to conduct such an inspection and who will maintain an accurate record of such inspections of the system in the designated place for each system. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees, within DRC, are neither trained nor certified to perform these services. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Yes No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? They were the only vendor to submit a bid. d. Last bid date: 09/01/2009 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
06/15/2012

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Desert Regional Center, FY06-FY11, service has been satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval
Contract #: 10018
User dhanse6
Signature Date 11/03/2011 16:32:33 PM

Page 2 of 3 58
Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
dprather mtorvine dhanse6 rhage1 jteska jteska
11/07/2011 15:47:07 PM 11/09/2011 17:01:59 PM 11/14/2011 08:37:56 AM 11/17/2011 13:28:54 PM 11/21/2011 15:02:11 PM 11/21/2011 15:02:14 PM
Contract #: 10018
Page 3 of 3
58
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12710 Legal Entity CLARK, COUNTY OF Name: Contractor Name: CLARK, COUNTY OF Address: City/State/Zip DEPT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SVCS 601 N PECOS RD LAS VEGAS, NV 89101-2408
Agency Name:
DIVISION OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES Agency Code: 409 Appropriation Unit: 3147-11 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null702/455-5210 Vendor No.: T81026920C NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 100.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 11/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain Verification of contract renewal came after the fiscal year had started. The general fund was budgeted by the Legislature for the residential care of boys who have been adjudicated, delinquent and committed by the Juvenile Division of the District Court to this facility. The alternative would be to not fund this facility and revert the general fund. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Interlocal Agreement Juvenile Justice
5. Purpose of contract: To provide residential living care for boys and girls who have been adjudicated delinquent and committed by the Juvenile Division of the District Court to Spring Mountain Youth Camp, as space is available. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $974,500.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $40,604.17 per month
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Legislative appropriation for the operation of Spring Mountain Youth Camp, a regional juvenile detention facility as defined in NRS 62A.280. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The state operates the correctional facilities and this facility is an alternative to the state placement and is run by Clark County. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 12710
No No
Page 1 of 2
59

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: This contractor has been under Interlocal Agreeement with the Division of Child and Family Services for years and has provided residential living care for delinquent youth. The service has been satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User pcolegro dkluever mtorvine rjacob3 nhovden jteska jteska Pending
Signature Date 11/01/2011 15:20:43 PM 11/03/2011 10:05:13 AM 11/08/2011 09:08:30 AM 11/08/2011 13:15:35 PM 11/10/2011 09:40:53 AM 11/21/2011 12:25:14 PM 11/21/2011 12:25:18 PM
Contract #: 12710
Page 2 of 2
59
59
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12713 Legal Entity DOUGLAS, COUNTY OF Name: Contractor Name: DOUGLAS, COUNTY OF Address: City/State/Zip CHINA SPRING YOUTH CAMP PO BOX 218 MINDEN, NV 89423
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null775/265-5350 Vendor No.: T40174400J NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 34.40 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 65.60 % County 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain Services need to be provided without lapse. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Interlocal Agreement Juvenile Justice
5. Purpose of contract: To provide residential living care for boys and girls who have been adjudicated, delinquent, and committed to China Springs Youth Camp or Aurora Pines Girls Facility, as space is available. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $6,089,698.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Legislative appropriation for the operation of China Springs Youth Camp and Aurora Pines Girls Facility, a regional juvenile detention facility as defined in NRS62A.280. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Local juvenile forestry camps are administered by county entities. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other?
Contract #: 12713
No No
Page 1 of 2
60
d. Last bid date:

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: For the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child and Family Services from July 1, 2009 to current. Service has been satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User pcolegro dkluever mtorvine rjacob3 nhovden jteska jteska Pending
Signature Date 11/02/2011 16:16:09 PM 11/03/2011 10:04:52 AM 11/08/2011 09:12:26 AM 11/10/2011 09:01:50 AM 11/10/2011 09:15:16 AM 11/21/2011 12:23:29 PM 11/21/2011 12:23:33 PM
Contract #: 12713
Page 2 of 2
60
60
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12810 Legal Entity Nevada PEP, Inc Name: Contractor Name: Nevada PEP, Inc Address: City/State/Zip 2101 S. Jones Blvd Suite 120 Las Vegas, NV 89146-3171
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Karen Taycher 702-388-8899 Vendor No.: T80975409 NV Business ID: NV19931063169 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 100.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: RFP #1936 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 01/01/2012
12/31/2013 2 years Contract Support Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide family support services to children with severe emotional disabilities and their families. These services include providing direct parent support, parent mentoring, family and consumer leadership training, joint parent/staff training, informing parents of the services available for their children and being the parents advocate while they work to obtain the appropriate services and support for their children. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $648,820.03 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $40.63 per hour
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Families in need of assistance for counseling when not yet in DCFS program. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State and Division employees don't provide family counseling. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 12810
Yes Yes
Page 1 of 2
61
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Only bidder, met criteria per Scope of Work d. Last bid date: 09/01/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
09/01/2012

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Contracted with DCFS since 1999 and the services is satisfactory 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Non-profit Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. Not Applicable 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User dkluever dkluever mtorvine rjacob3 nhovden jteska jteska Pending
Contract #: 12810
Page 2 of 2
61
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12794 Legal Entity BIGHORN INDUSTRIES INC DBA Name: Contractor Name: BIGHORN INDUSTRIES INC DBA Address: City/State/Zip BIGHORN ENERGY SERVICES 1885 S ARLINGTON AVE STE 105 RENO, NV 89509-3370
Agency Name:
ADJUTANT GENERAL & NATL GUARD Agency Code: 431 Appropriation Unit: 3650-04 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: JAMES D. PAULK 775/745-9632 Vendor No.: T27027442 NV Business ID: NV20111100899 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2016 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 40.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 40.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 20.00 % Rental Income Agency Reference #: NVMD # 003-2012 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
12/30/2015 4 years and 30 days Contract Electrical Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to perform ongoing electrical services on an "as needed" basis for a four-year period. The scope of work for electrical services could range from replacing/installing light switches and outlets to repairing/installing major circuits, installing conduit, and repairing/installing major electrical components such as switch gear for emergency generators, new sub panels and uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $99,960.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $24,990.00 per fiscal year
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? This is a service contract that will allow vendors to be under contract so we can comply with NRS & NAC. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Some electrical services are beyond the scope and abilities of our maintenance employees and require a licensed electrician to perform. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 12794
Yes No
Page 1 of 2
62
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Mulitple vendors were chosen by the Evaluation Committee that was held on October 25, 2011 d. Last bid date: 10/21/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

User criley criley jmcentee criley jborrowm jborrowm jteska Pending
Signature Date 11/01/2011 08:12:04 AM 11/01/2011 08:12:07 AM 11/01/2011 10:12:58 AM 11/09/2011 10:15:53 AM 11/09/2011 13:31:04 PM 11/18/2011 17:26:03 PM 11/21/2011 11:09:08 AM
Contract #: 12794
Page 2 of 2
62
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12797 Legal Entity DAVID W BRADLEY SR Name: Contractor Name: Bradley Electrical, Plumbing & Heating Address: 250 Village Blvd Ste B P.O. Box 4162 City/State/Zip Incline Village, NV 89450
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Dave 775-831-2252 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: NV20101330870 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2016 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 40.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 40.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 20.00 % Rental Income Agency Reference #: NVMD # 003-2012 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
II. JUSTIFICATION
Contract #: 12797
Yes No
Page 1 of 2
63
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Multiple vendors were chosen by the Evaluation Committee that was held on October 25, 2011. d. Last bid date: 10/21/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Sole Proprietor 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? No b. If "No", please explain: THE VENDOR IS A SOLE PROPRIETOR. 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Signature Date 11/01/2011 07:07:53 AM 11/01/2011 07:07:57 AM 11/01/2011 15:12:26 PM 11/09/2011 10:29:23 AM 11/09/2011 13:21:27 PM 11/18/2011 17:27:17 PM 11/21/2011 11:04:23 AM
Contract #: 12797
Page 2 of 2
63
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 11660 Amendment 1 Number: Legal Entity CAL 1 SERVICES INC Name: Contractor Name: CAL 1 SERVICES INC Address: City/State/Zip 3439 BASALT DR CARSON CITY, NV 89705
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null775/883-5625 Vendor No.: PUR0003600 NV Business ID: NV19991283712 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2011-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 50.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 50.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: NVMD # 34-2010 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 12/14/2010
12/14/2014 4 years and 1 day Contract Locksmith Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original contract, which provides for locksmithing services. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $99,999.96 to $189,999.96 due to all 3 armories in Stead needing to be rekeyed to comply with Federal security regulations. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $99,999.96 $0.00 $90,000.00 $189,999.96
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? This is 4 year contract so we have locksmithing services with set pricing available 24-7. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The agency is in need of licensed locksmith for large projects. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 11660
Yes
Page 1 of 2 64
No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? This vendor has demonstrated competence for us over the years and was the only vendor to submit a bid. d. Last bid date: 10/17/2010 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The Office of the Military contracted with this vendor in FY09, FY10 and FY11; the services provided are satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User jmcentee jmcentee jmcentee criley jborrowm jborrowm jteska
Signature Date 11/05/2011 16:34:49 PM 11/05/2011 16:34:52 PM 11/05/2011 16:34:54 PM 11/08/2011 10:48:50 AM 11/15/2011 08:59:00 AM 11/18/2011 17:28:13 PM 11/21/2011 11:11:48 AM
Contract #: 11660
Page 2 of 2
64
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12793 Legal Entity DIAMOND DEVELOPMENT, INC. Name: Contractor Name: DIAMOND DEVELOPMENT, INC. Address: City/State/Zip dba - Avilla Construction Co. P.O. Box 70266 Reno, NV 89570
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Joe Avilla 775 324-3765 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: NV19871022763 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: NVMD #002-2012 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
03/30/2012 119 days Contract Fire Pond Repair
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to repair the fire water retention ponds and pump turbines for the Army Aviation Support Facility (AASF) located at the Harry Reid Training Center in Stead, Nevada. The specific work being performed will be to repair all damage to pond liners; pull both pumps from their mountings and inspect for damage; clean the cistern(s) out under the pump house along with the supply line(s) that connect the ponds to the cistern(s) of all debris, sludge, and foreign materials; refill the ponds and run the turbine pumps; supply the owner a set of drawings of the fire ponds, the pump house and connecting water lines. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $84,299.24 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $76,639.24 per invoice Other basis for payment: Progress payments can be made per invoice at the rate of project completion.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? This facility works on helicopters with jet fuel; a functioning fire protection system must be in place. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: A crane and specific vendor training is required to work on this type of fire turbine; special equipment is required to bond fiberglass-reinforced rubber seams and we do not have the equipment or training. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 12793
Yes
Page 1 of 2 65
No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? This vendor was the only vendor to submit a bid out of ten (10) others who attended the mandatory site walk through held on October 11, 2011. d. Last bid date: 10/21/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

Contract #: 12793
Page 2 of 2
65
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12831 Legal Entity FINEST FENCE LLC Name: Contractor Name: FINEST FENCE LLC Address: City/State/Zip 1125 EAGLE CT CARSON CITY, NV 89701
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Tracy Hintin 775/883-1117 Vendor No.: T29018105 NV Business ID: 19951017083 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: NVMD #008-2012 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
02/13/2012 74 days Contract CSMS Fencing
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide and install 435 feet of 6 foot three strand barb wire steel chain link perimeter fence, with four gates to secure the Combined Support Maintenance Shop (CSMS) building, military equipment, military vehicles and parking area. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $10,250.00 Other basis for payment: $10,250 to be invoiced upon completion.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Security requirements by National Guard Bureau. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees do not possess requisite skills and certifications to install the new fence components and safety bollards. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable
Yes No
c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? They were the lowest responsible vendor. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The Office of the Military contracted with this vendor in FY09 and the services provided were satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: LLC 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User jmcentee jmcentee jmcentee criley jborrowm jteska jteska Pending
Contract #: 12831
Page 2 of 2
66
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12807 Legal Entity HERSHENOW & KLIPPENSTEIN Name: Contractor Name: HERSHENOW & KLIPPENSTEIN Address: City/State/Zip ARCHITECTS INC 5485 RENO CORPORATE DR STE 100 RENO, NV 89511-2262
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: Max Hershenow, AIA 775/332-6640 Vendor No.: T80984709 NV Business ID: NV19941047730 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: NVMD #010-2012 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2012 211 days Contract AASF Apron add Desig
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide additional design and bid documents for the northwest corner of the Army Aviation Support Facility airfield apron. The additional topographic survey is to assess the feasibility of relocating the existing fence and light poles. The information obtained from the survey will be provided in the form of drafted exhibits for the Nevada Army National Guard (NVARNG) to use in discussions with the Airport Authority. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $44,350.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The condition of the AASF (Army Aviation Support Facility) airfield poses a flying debris potential that could cause injury to personnel or damage to aircraft. The design of a new apron is required in order to meet aviation criteria for a flight line. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees do not possess necessary skills and certifications to perform requisite design requirements. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable
Contract #: 12807
No No
Page 1 of 2
67
b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Vendor's qualifications meet project requirements. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The Office of the Military has contracted with this vendor on numerous occasions and the services provided have always been satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Contract #: 12807
Page 2 of 2
67
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12796 Legal Entity LUX ENERGIES INC Name: Contractor Name: LUX ENERGIES INC Address: City/State/Zip 2465 SUTRO ST RENO, NV 89512-1612
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null775/287-2296 Vendor No.: T27024529 NV Business ID: NV20081302169 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2016 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 40.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 40.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 20.00 % Rental Income Agency Reference #: NVMD # 003-2012 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
II. JUSTIFICATION
Contract #: 12796
Yes No
Page 1 of 2
68

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The Department of Public Safety contracted with this vendor in FY10 and the services provided were satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Contract #: 12796
Page 2 of 2
68
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12812 Legal Entity MCKEON DOOR OF NEVADA INC Name: Contractor Name: MCKEON DOOR OF NEVADA INC Address: City/State/Zip 3174 W POST RD BLDG C LAS VEGAS, NV 89118-3838
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: KEVIN SWEENEY 702/636-9338 Vendor No.: T27024374 NV Business ID: NV20051496054 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 10.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 90.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: RFP/CONTRACT #1933 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 12/15/2011
12/31/2014 3 years and 17 days Contract Coiling Door Replace
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide and install three coiling insulated service doors with new control and line voltage circuits at the Plumb Lane armory in Reno, NV and one at the Floyd Edsall Training Center in Las Vegas, NV. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $300,000.00 Other basis for payment: $32,782.00 for doors one (1) and (2); door three (3) $29,272.00 and door four (4) $31,428.00. Labor rates shall be $195.00 per hour for usual business hours, $250.00 for after hours of 3:30pm-5:30pm Monday-Friday; $310.00 per hour for after 5:30pm Monday-Friday. Labor rates for weekends and holidays to be $250.00 per hour Saturday until 3:30pm; $310.00 per hour after 3:30pm Saturday and $310.00 all day Sunday and holidays. As invoiced, not to exceed $300,000.00 for the full length of this contract.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? This is a continuing effort to comply with Executive Order 13423 to reduce energy consumption. Replacing the non-efficient doors are a significant energy-saving measure. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees do not have the requisite skills or equipment for a project of this magnitude. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 12812
Yes Yes
Page 1 of 2 69
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? The contractor was chosen as the best qualified contractor by evaluation committee. d. Last bid date: 09/22/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The Office of the Military contracted with this vendor in FY10 and FY11 and the services provided were satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User criley criley jmcentee criley jborrowm jteska jteska Pending
Signature Date 11/01/2011 16:08:59 PM 11/01/2011 16:09:01 PM 11/02/2011 07:21:53 AM 11/08/2011 11:50:24 AM 11/09/2011 10:30:26 AM 11/10/2011 12:47:12 PM 11/10/2011 12:47:49 PM
Contract #: 12812
Page 2 of 2
69
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12795 Legal Entity SILVER KNOLLS ELECTRIC INC Name: Contractor Name: SILVER KNOLLS ELECTRIC INC Address: City/State/Zip 10400 SILVER KNOLLS BLVD RENO, NV 89506
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: TOM HODGES 775/827-1077 Vendor No.: T81105747 NV Business ID: NV19931096023 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2016 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 40.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 40.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 20.00 % Rental Income Agency Reference #: NVMD # 003-2012 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
II. JUSTIFICATION
Contract #: 12795
Yes No
Page 1 of 2
70

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The Department of Transportation has contracted with this vendor since FY02 and the services provided are satisfactory. State Public Works contracted with this vendor in FY04 and FY05 the services provided were satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Contract #: 12795
Page 2 of 2
70
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10531 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 2 RIDGE HOUSE INCORPORATED RIDGE HOUSE INCORPORATED 900 West 1st Street, Suite 102 RENO, NV 89503
Agency Name: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Agency Code: 440 Appropriation Unit: 3711-15 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Steven Burt 775.322.8941 Vendor No.: T80938781 NV Business ID: NV19821007967 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 100.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: 7180 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 09/18/2009
06/30/2013 3 years and 286 days Contract Counseling
5. Purpose of contract: This is the second amendment to the original contract which provides ongoing post release mental health and substance abuse evaluation and counseling services for inmates. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $39,999 to $59,999 due to the continued need for these services. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $9,999.00 $30,000.00 $20,000.00 $59,999.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? To provide post-release, substance abuse counseling services to assist released inmates with re-entry into the community. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The Department of Corrections does not have qualified personnel and/or licenses required to perform these services. No other State agency offers these services. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 10531
Yes
Page 1 of 2 71
No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Multiple contract awards were made from Solicitation 200914. The Ridge House was one of the vendor's who responded and were able to meet the needs of the Department. d. Last bid date: 05/13/2009 Anticipated re-bid date: 05/13/2013 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: FY09 - current; NDOC. Services have been verified as satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Non-profit Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. Not Applicable 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User dmartine bfarris dreed cphenix cwatson cwatson cwatson
Signature Date 10/19/2011 16:11:31 PM 10/20/2011 09:05:40 AM 11/03/2011 09:20:31 AM 11/03/2011 10:13:51 AM 11/22/2011 08:02:30 AM 11/22/2011 08:02:34 AM 11/22/2011 08:02:39 AM
Contract #: 10531
Page 2 of 2
71
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 11138 Amendment 5 Number: Legal Entity Environmental Protection Servi Name: Contractor Name: Environmental Protection Servi Address: City/State/Zip PO Box 21025 Carson City, NV 89721
Agency Name:
COMMISSION ON MINERAL RESOURCE Agency Code: 500 Appropriation Unit: 4219-39 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null775-220-6687 Vendor No.: T27022506 NV Business ID: NV20101332284 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % Mining Claim Fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: 500 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/08/2012 1 year and 189 days Contract revisit abandoned mi
5. Purpose of contract: This is the fifth amendment to the original contract, which provides visitation to previously fenced abandoned mines to assess fence condition and repair if necessary. This amendment extends the termination date from June 8, 2012 to June 8, 2013 and increases the maximum amount from $200,000 to $280,000 due to the increased number of abandoned mines requiring inspection. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $30,000.00 $170,000.00 $80,000.00 $280,000.00 06/08/2013
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? NRS 513 requires the discovery and securing of dangerous conditions resulting from practises which took place at mines that are no longer operating. This work will insure the mines remain secure. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: NDOM employees do not have the time. Employees of other state agencies do not have the knowledge.
Yes No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? This vendor submitted the only bid, which was acceptable. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Division of Minerals beginning in May 2009 to present. Work has been satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User ddriesne ddriesne ddriesne ddriesne jmurph1 jmurph1 jmurph1
Contract #: 11138
Page 2 of 2
72
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10146 Amendment 5 Number: Legal Entity GEOTEMPS INC Name: Contractor Name: GEOTEMPS INC Address: City/State/Zip 970 Caughline Crossing, #102 PO BOX 11532 RENO, NV 89510-1532
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null775/746-7146 Vendor No.: T81107798 NV Business ID: NV19861016214 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % mining claim filing fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2012 1 year and 211 days Contract Geotemps
5. Purpose of contract: This is the fifth amendment to the original contract, which provides courthouse research to determine ownership, discovery, and securing of abandoned mines. This amendment extends the termination date from June 30, 2012 to June 30, 2013 and increases the maximum amount from $165,000 to $205,000. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $9,999.00 $155,001.00 $40,000.00 $205,000.00 06/30/2013
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? NRS 513 requires the discovery, and securing and determination of ownership of dangerous conditions resulting from mining practices which took place at mines that are no longer operating. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: NDOM employees do not have the time. Other state employees do not have the expertise. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 10146
Yes
Page 1 of 2 73
No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Geotemps is only vendor that submitted a proposal. d. Last bid date: 10/29/2009 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
05/02/2011

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User ddriesne ddriesne ddriesne ddriesne jstrandb jmurph1 jmurph1
Contract #: 10146
Page 2 of 2
73
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 11727 Amendment 1 Number: Legal Entity Peter A. Herrera Name: Contractor Name: Peter A. Herrera Address: City/State/Zip Hergon Mine Securing Solutions 9424 Morehouse Place Las Vegas, NV 89123
Agency Name:
Contact/Phone: null702-496-4709 Vendor No.: in progress NV Business ID: NV20101651848 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2011-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % Mining Claim Fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: 500 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 12/14/2010
12/14/2011 2 years and 1 day Contract AML Investigation
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original contract to investigate abandoned mines, assess the securing, and make repairs if necessary to those mines which had been previously secured. This amendment extends the termination date to December 14, 2012 and increases the maximum amount from $80,000 to $130,000 due to the increased number of mines requiring inspection. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $80,000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $130,000.00 12/14/2012
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? NRS 513 requires the discovery and securing of dangerous conditions resulting from practices which took place at mines that are no longer operating. This work will insure the mines remain secure. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: NDOM employees do not have the time. Employees of other state agencies do not have the knowledge.
Yes No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? This contractor will provide more actual field time than the others. d. Last bid date: 08/27/2010 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Since December 14, 2010 for the Division of Minerals. Service has been verified as satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Sole Proprietor 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User ddriesne ddriesne ddriesne ddriesne jstrandb jmurph1 jmurph1
Contract #: 11727
Page 2 of 2
74
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12395 Legal Entity LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE Name: Contractor Name: LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE Address: DEPT 400 STEWART AVE City/State/Zip LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
Agency Name: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Agency Code: 650 Appropriation Unit: 4709-11 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null702/229-3444 Vendor No.: T81038884 NV Business ID: Interlocal To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % Civil Name Check Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain In February 2011, an amendment to the original contract was prepared, and forwarded to Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. The amendment unfortunately had an error in the total dollar amount, which was not identified timely. Due to the error and the contract approval process, there was not enough time to submit a corrected amendment to the board for approval prior to the original contract expiration. For this reason, this new contract is being submitted for approval. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Interlocal Agreement Interlocal contract
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new interlocal agreement to enable the Criminal History Repository to access the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department's Shared Computer Operations for Protection and Enforcement (SCOPE) records system in order to provide Nevada employers complete criminal history needed to make employment decisions. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $301,136.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $4.00 per transaction Other basis for payment: Not to exceed $150,568.00 per fiscal year.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The Criminal History Repository is required to provide Nevada employers complete criminal history needed to make employment decisions. Access to the SCOPE system ensures that the Repository has the most up-to-date information available. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Only Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department has this information available on the SCOPE system. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 12395
No
Page 1 of 2 75
Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Exempt (Per statute) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Interlocal agreement d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: This is the current contractor for these services and performance has been satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User jdibasil jdibasil mteska jbauer jstrandb jmurph1 jmurph1 Pending
Signature Date 10/21/2011 15:34:42 PM 10/21/2011 15:35:23 PM 10/24/2011 09:57:54 AM 10/27/2011 15:35:39 PM 11/04/2011 07:54:26 AM 11/09/2011 15:09:00 PM 11/09/2011 15:09:03 PM
Contract #: 12395
Page 2 of 2
75
75
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12673 Legal Entity RSVP Transport, Inc. Name: Contractor Name: RSVP Transport, Inc. Address: 75 Bank Street Ste. #1 City/State/Zip Sparks, NV 89431
Agency Name: DPS-HIGHWAY PATROL Agency Code: 651 Appropriation Unit: 4713-13 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Neal McCoy 775.722.8744 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: NV20091557675 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % X Highway Funds 100.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
11/30/2013 2 years Contract Transport NHP Cars
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract to provide transport services for Nevada Highway Patrol vehicles to and from regional commands. The most common use will be to relocate vehicles that will be excessed to Reno, Nevada. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $14,700.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $325.00 per Operational Vehicle Other basis for payment: $375.00 per non-operational vehicle - but rollable.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Nevada Highway Patrol vehicles must be relocated to various parts of the state from time to time. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: State employees do not have the specialized car carrier/transport equipment to accomplish the moving of vehicles from one location to another. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable
Yes No
c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? RSVP was the sole respondent to the solicitation. d. Last bid date: 08/19/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
10/14/2013

User dgortar1 pbowers mteska jbauer jstrandb jmurph1 jmurph1 Pending
Contract #: 12673
Page 2 of 2
76
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12822 Legal Entity WASHOE, COUNTY OF Name: Contractor Name: WASHOE, COUNTY OF Address: WASHOE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 911 PARR BLVD City/State/Zip RENO, NV 89512-1000
Contact/Phone: Trish Beckman 775-328-2810 Vendor No.: T40283400R NV Business ID: N/A To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 2.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % X Highway Funds 98.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain Due to staff turnover in the Department of Public Safety, the duration of attorney reviews, and the final board approval in Washoe County, the signature approvals by all parties were not obtained until after the June BOE deadline. Based on the knowledge gained in the process of drafting this contract, a delay in future contract review and approval is not anticipated. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Interlocal Agreement Tox Lab Analysis
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new interlocal agreement to provide toxicology laboratory analysis for various divisions of the Department of Public Safety. Analysis includes testing of blood or urine for presence of controlled substances. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $240,000.00 Other basis for payment: Quarterly payment upon receipt of invoice
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? NRS 484C.110 - 484C.190 requires preliminary and evidentiary toxicology analysis of certain samples. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The State does not have a laboratory or expertise to test for the presence of controlled substances. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable
Contract #: 12822
No No
Page 1 of 2
77
c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Washoe County currently performs service for DPS and the services are satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User mteska mteska mteska jbauer jstrandb jmurph1 jmurph1 Pending
Contract #: 12822
Page 2 of 2
77
77
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12844 Legal Entity WASHOE, COUNTY OF Name: Contractor Name: WASHOE, COUNTY OF Address: WASHOE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 911 PARR BLVD City/State/Zip RENO, NV 89512-1000
Contact/Phone: Trish Beckman 775-328-2810 Vendor No.: T40283400R NV Business ID: N/A To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. X General Funds 46.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % X Highway Funds 54.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain Due to staff turnover in the Department of Public Safety, the duration of attorney reviews, and the final board approval in Washoe County, the signature approvals by all parties were not obtained until after the June BOE deadline. Based on the knowledge gained in the process of drafting this contract, a delay in future contract review and approval is not anticipated. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 06/30/2013 2 years Interlocal Agreement Forensic Analysis
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new interlocal agreement to provide forensic laboratory analysis for various divisions of the Department of Public Safety. Analysis includes but is not limited to testing of evidence for crime scene investigations, firearms examinations, shoeprint and tiretrack comparisons, and DNA analysis. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $456,767.00 Other basis for payment: quarterly upon receipt of invoice
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? NRS 484C.110 - 484C.190 requires evidentiary forensic analysis of certain samples. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The State does not have a laboratory or expertise to perform testing and analysis of evidentiary samples. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable
Contract #: 12844
No No
Page 1 of 2
78
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Washoe County currently performs service for DPS and the services are satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User mteska mteska mteska jbauer jstrandb jmurph1 jmurph1 Pending
Contract #: 12844
Page 2 of 2
78
78
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12792 Legal Entity BOARD OF REGENTS-UNR Name: Contractor Name: BOARD OF REGENTS-UNR Address: UNR CONTROLLERS OFFICE MAIL STOP 0124 City/State/Zip RENO, NV 89557-0025
Agency Name: WILDLIFE Agency Code: 702 Appropriation Unit: 4457-28 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Marjorie Matocq 775/784-4621 Vendor No.: D35000816 NV Business ID: SM00220683 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2013-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % 100% Heritage Fund Agency Reference #: 12-19 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2012 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2012 -154 days Interlocal Agreement UNR Heritage Mule De
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract for genetic assessment of the Mule Deer population of Nevada. Management of Nevada's Mule Deer population will be enhanced by identifying the geographic distribution of genetic diversity in this species. This project was selected competitively by the Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners under Nevada's Heritage Program. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $30,000.00 Other basis for payment: Receipt of a valid contractor invoice and project manager's approval.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? This is an approved Wildlife Heritage Trust Account project. The Wildlife Heritage program was set up in 1995. This statutory program provides funds each year for approved wildlife projects. If a submitted project proposal fits within the guidelines of the program, that project may be selected for funding through the Heritage account. This contract was awarded pursuant to NRS 501.3575 and NAC 501.320 by the Board of Wildlife Commissioners and complies with the statutory requirements. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Projects are submitted to the Wildlife Heritage Committee. Any organization or individual can submit a proposal for project funding. Funds are awarded upon Board of Wildlife Commission approval. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 12792
No No
Page 1 of 2 79
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Any individual or organization may submit a proposal for project funding. Once all proposals are received they are reviewed and ranked by the Wildlife Heritage Committee, and then final approvals are given the by the Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners. This contract was awarded pursuant to NRS 501.3575 and NAC 501.320 by the Board of Wildlife Commissioners and complies with the statutory requirements. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Numerous projects with NDOW. Work is satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User bmcdani bmcdani bmcdani mkrumena kkolbe jmurph1 jmurph1 Pending
Contract #: 12792
Page 2 of 2
79
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12398 Legal Entity JERSEY VALLEY CATTLE COMPANY Name: Contractor Name: JERSEY VALLEY CATTLE COMPANY Address: LLC PO BOX 1098 City/State/Zip WINNEMUCCA, NV 89446-1098
Contact/Phone: null775-635-5445 Vendor No.: T29027162 NV Business ID: NV20031177051 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Heritage Trust Fund Agency Reference #: 12-04 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 08/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2012 334 days Contract Heritage Predator
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contact to reduce mountain lion wildlife depredation in the Tobin, Stillwater and East mountain ranges and the Fish Creek and Clan Alpine Mountains. Predator reduction (hunting mountain lions) under this project is in accordance with the Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners (NBWC) Mountain Lion Plan (1995) and the NBWC's Wildlife Action Plan. The project will also provide NDOW with data on the mountain lions that are killed. This project was selected competitively by the NBWC as part of the Heritage program. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $18,000.00 Other basis for payment: Receipt of a valid invoice with back-up documentation, signed Harvest Report, and project manager approval
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? This is a Wildlife Heritage Trust Account project, awarded pursuant to NRS 501.3575 and NAC 501.300 by the Nevada Board of Wildlife (NBWC) as part of the Heritage program. The Wildlife Heritage program was created in 1995. Projects are submitted to the Wildlife Heritage Committee. This statutory program provides funds each year for approved wildlife projects. If a submitted project fits the guidelines of the program it might be selected for funding from the Wildlife Heritage Trust Account. This project complies with the statutory requirements and was selected by the NBWC as part of the Heritage program. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Any organization or individual can submit a proposal for project funding. Funds are awarded upon Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners approval.
Yes No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? This vendor applied for Wildlife Heritage grant funds through a competitive process and the project was approved by the Board of Wildlife Commissioners along with other Heritage projects and awarded pursuant to NRS 501.3575 and NAC 501.300. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Contract with NDOW for same services in FY 2011. Performance satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: LLC 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
Contract #: 12398
User mkrumena mkrumena mkrumena mkrumena kkolbe jmurph1 jmurph1 Pending
Signature Date 06/29/2011 08:57:18 AM 06/29/2011 08:57:20 AM 06/29/2011 08:57:23 AM 10/31/2011 16:10:25 PM 11/04/2011 12:49:39 PM 11/17/2011 14:42:49 PM 11/17/2011 14:42:52 PM
Page 2 of 3 80
Contract #: 12398
Page 3 of 3
80
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 11561 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 1 QUICKSILVER AIR, INC. QUICKSILVER AIR, INC. 2721 CORMORANT ST FAIRBANKS, AK 99709
Contact/Phone: null907/457-1941 Vendor No.: T27015472 NV Business ID: NV20101670006 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2011-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 70.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 30.00 % Heritage Fund Agency Reference #: 11-12 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 10/12/2010
06/30/2012 1 year and 262 days Contract Aerial game capture
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original contract to provide aerial wildlife capture and transport services. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $192,725 to $522,725 as the original funding included a budget for only one season. Subsequent to the original contract, federal and special program state dollars for a second season became available, as did an increased supply of collars; bighorn sheep populations grew far beyond expectations; and a more intensive mule deer research project was undertaken. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $192,725.00 $0.00 $330,000.00 $522,725.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? As the agency responsible for conservation of wildlife in state of Nevada, the contract allows NDOW to execute wildlife capture and release strategies as outlined in the Nevada Department of Wildlife Big Game Release Plan and to continue to monitor big game animals to describe critical habitat areas . 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: NDOW uses private vendors due to extreme safety issues related to big game netgun captures from a helicopter.
Yes No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? New proposals were not solicited for the amendment (SAM does not require such solicitation). Purchasing Division approved adding $330,000 to the original contract amount based on NDOW's submission to Purchasing proving that adding funds to this contract was in the best interests of Nevada and soliciting new bids would not be beneficial. Quicksilver has two highly experienced pilots and multiple helicopters in case of mechanical issues; best references, proven track record with NDOW in reliability in scheduling and completing requested work. d. Last bid date: 08/01/2010 Anticipated re-bid date: 08/01/2012 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: October 2006 - present for Nevada Department of Wildlife. Quicksilver's service in aerial capturing of big game animals was exemplary. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User mkrumena mkrumena mkrumena mkrumena kkolbe jmurph1 jmurph1
Contract #: 11561
Page 2 of 2
81
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: CONV6905 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 3 Donald Sefton System Consultants PO Box 2040 Fallon, NV 89407
Contact/Phone: Don Sefton 7754231345 Vendor No.: T80965873 NV Business ID: NV20101587444 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2009-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % License and boating fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: 09-72 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2012 03/10/2009
12/31/2011 3 years and 297 days Contract Computer Related Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is the third amendment to the original contract, which provides for the programming, implementation and transaction processing for the Nevada Wildlife Data System (NWDS). NWDS processes the sale, recording and issuance of hunting and fishing licenses, boat registrations and boat titles; and processes registration for hunter education classes, data from the Harvest Information Program and citations by game wardens. NWDS's development history to date and planned enhancements during this amendment period reflect legislatively-driven and other required changes. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 21, 2012, and increases the maximum amount from $879,551.61 to $1,095,551.61 to fund enhancements and a one-year post-implementation operation and management phase. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $820,551.61 $59,000.00 $216,000.00 $1,095,551.61 12/31/2012
II. JUSTIFICATION
Page 1 of 3
82
The Nevada Wildlife Data System (NWDS) processes the sale, recording and issuance of hunting and fishing licenses, boat registrations and boat titles; and processes registration for hunter education classes, data from the Harvest Information Program and citations by game wardens. This amendment will allow completion of the development through PostImplementation operation and maintenance, and permit at least two necessary enhancements for Apprentice Hunting Licenses and federal license certification compliance. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The completion of a system of this magnitude requires expertise beyond that of State staff. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Continuing our contract with Systems Consultants is the most cost effective approach to bringing the remaining NWDS functionality to fruition for NDOW and for our license agents statewide. Bringing in a new vendor would be detrimental, setting back the completion date for the system. There would be significant delays and additional expenses to the State and NDOW; therefore there would be loss of revenue and expense to the State and the Department. An RFP will be issued for future development and processing for the period beginning after this extension. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? Yes

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The contractor has developed and engaged in transaction processing for both the NWDS system and the processesing of hunting tag applications and issuance of tags, both of which are critical to NDOW's operations. Work has been satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Sole Proprietor 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? No b. If "No", please explain: Systems Consultants is the d/b/a name for Donald Sefton, a sole proprietor. 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval
User mkrumena
Signature Date 10/27/2011 17:51:06 PM

Page 2 of 3 82
Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval DoIT Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
mkrumena mkrumena mkrumena lmuelle1 kkolbe jmurph1 jmurph1
10/27/2011 17:51:09 PM 10/27/2011 17:51:12 PM 10/27/2011 17:51:15 PM 11/15/2011 11:16:34 AM 11/15/2011 11:24:31 AM 11/17/2011 14:34:07 PM 11/17/2011 14:34:10 PM
Page 3 of 3
82
82
82
82
82
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 11941 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 1 William Michael Urrutia William Michael Urrutia dba Urrutia Ranch, Mike Urruti PO Box 226 Friant, CA 93626
Agency Name: PARKS DIVISION Agency Code: 704 Appropriation Unit: 4162-00 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Mike Urrutia 559-281-6676 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: NV20101836083 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2011-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Revenue Contract 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 04/12/2011
12/31/2011 1 year and 264 days Revenue Contract Grazing of cattle
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original revenue contract, which provides continued grazing of up to 1,400 Animal Units Months (AUM's) on 1570 acers of designated pasture known as the North Ghigial Ranch in Lyon County. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012 and increases the maximum amount from $28,175, to $56,350 due to the extention. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $28,175.00 $0.00 $28,175.00 $56,350.00 12/31/2012
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Noxious weeds need to be removed from the property. Grazing cattle on the property is an environmentally friendly means of getting rid of the weeds. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: N/A 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 11941
Yes
Page 1 of 2 83
No
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Mr. Urritia received the hightest score based on the scoring criteria by the RFP committee. d. Last bid date: 01/10/2011 Anticipated re-bid date: 01/12/2013 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: 2009 - present - State Parks. Quality of service has been satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Other Sole Proprietor 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User sdecrona sdecrona sdecrona sdecrona jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson
Contract #: 11941
Page 2 of 2
83
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12846 Legal Entity U. S. Geological Survey Name: Contractor Name: U. S. Geological Survey Address: 2730 Deer Run Road City/State/Zip Carson City, NV 89701
Agency Name: DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Agency Code: 705 Appropriation Unit: 4157-10 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Steve Berris 775-887-7600 Vendor No.: T80838030 NV Business ID: N/A To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Pass through funds 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date or b. other effective date 01/2012 10/01/2011
Retroactive? Yes If "Yes", please explain Funding agreement documents necessary to the processing of this joint funding agreement were received from Barrick on November 7, 2011. 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: 09/30/2013 2 years Cooperative Agreement Carlin Trend JFA
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new cooperative agreement to provide hydrologic monitoring along the Carlin Trend through the operation and maintenance of nine stream gaging stations within the Humboldt River Region. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $273,200.00 Payment for services will be made at the rate of $34,150.00 per quarter
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The data collection and monitoring are necessary to document hydrologic conditions and the effects of activities of the major water users in the study area. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The U. S. Geological Survey has the scientists, equipment and expertise to provide the products and services. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other?
Contract #: 12846
No No
Page 1 of 2
84
The U.S. Geological Survey has the necessary equipment in place and experience in delivering the desired product, and the State Engineer is authorized to enter into agreements with the U.S. Geological Survey under NRS 532.170. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The Division of Water Resources has executed many agreements with the U.S. Geological Survey that have resulted in products widely used by governmental agencies and the public. The results have been satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User bkordono bkordono bkordono bkordono jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson Pending
Contract #: 12846
Page 2 of 2
84
84
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12821 Legal Entity Desert Research Institute Name: Contractor Name: Desert Research Institute Address: 2215 Raggio Parkway City/State/Zip Contact/Phone: Reno, NV 89512 Dr. Donald W. Sada 775-673-7359
Agency Name: NATURAL HERITAGE Agency Code: 708 Appropriation Unit: 4101-39 Is budget authority No available?: If "No" please explain: Approval of contract is contingent upon approval of Work Program #C22600 authority from IFC scheduled on 12/15/2011.
Vendor No.: D35000802 NV Business ID: Government Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
11/30/2014 3 years Interlocal Agreement Data Analysis/Resear
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new interlocal agreement to assist with finalizing a Nevada Wetland Program Plan and assessing biotic integrity of the state's priority wetlands. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $289,348.00 Other basis for payment: Quarterly upon receipt of valid invoice with appropriate backup that is approved by the Project Manager.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? To fulfill the agency's requirement under a grant provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to create a Nevada Wetland Program Plan that addresses the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Monitoring and Assessment Core Element and Core Actions. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The Desert Research Institute is considered a State agency. Employee's at Nevada Natual Heritage Program do not have the expertise needed for laboratory assessments, nor the ability to conduct detailed field inventories. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals:
Contract #: 12821
No No
Page 1 of 2
85

User dmunns dmunns dmunns dmunns jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson Pending
Contract #: 12821
Page 2 of 2
85
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10679 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 2 MCGINLEY & ASSOCIATES INC MCGINLEY & ASSOCIATES INC 815 MAESTRO DR RENO, NV 89511-2387
Agency Name: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Agency Code: 709 Appropriation Unit: 3187-54 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null775/829-2245 Vendor No.: T81202459 NV Business ID: NV20021218343 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2009-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: DEP 10-008 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 06/09/2009
06/30/2012 3 years and 22 days Contract Environment cleanup
5. Purpose of contract: This is the 2nd amendment to the original contract, which provides ongoing consulting services to aid the state to identify, assess and remediate properties that have hazardous substances, pollutants or is contaminated. This function is related to/associated with a national program designed to redevelop and/or promote economic restoration of abandoned, underutilized or vacant properties that have been identified as properties that are contaminated or potentially contaminated with hazardous substances. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $428,908 to $617,204 to provide for ongoing needed services at the current contracted scope of work and rate. Note: The amendment amount in the contract summary has been adjusted by $908 to correct an inadvertant error in the contract summary of the original contract (the contract summary amount of the orginal contract should have been $428,908, but was stated as $428,000). 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $428,000.00 $0.00 $189,204.00 $617,204.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? NDEP has Federal and State requirements to address corrections at sites where groundwater or soil is affected by hazardous substance contamination.
8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The Division has limited staff and resources necessary to investigate releases on a statewide basis. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Yes Yes
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? The evaluation team scored McGinley; McGinley achieved the highest ranked score. d. Last bid date: 12/23/2008 Anticipated re-bid date: 12/01/2012 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: University of Nevada Reno and NDEP. Work currently performed for NDEP is satisfactory. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User lfleming jnajima jnajima dbenson jrodrig9 cwatson cwatson
Contract #: 10679
Page 2 of 2
86
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12121 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip Contact/Phone: 1 NEVADA COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEVADA COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 808 WEST NYE LANE CARSON CITY, NV 89703-4240 null775/687-4325
Agency Name:
EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION
Agency Code: 902 Appropriation Unit: 4770-12 Is budget authority No available?: If "No" please explain: Funding contigent upon approval of Work Program C22494 submitted for approval at the December 15, 2011 Interim Finance Committee meeting.
Vendor No.: D10200000 NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2011-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % State Career Enhancement Program Funds Agency Reference #: FY12-CEP-CED 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 06/14/2011
06/30/2012 1 year and 17 days Interlocal Agreement Economic Development
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original interlocal agreement, which provides ongoing funding in support of the Nevada Commission on Economic Development's training program, Train Employees Now (TEN). This amendment increases the maximum amount from $500,000 to $750,000 due to an increased demand by businesses using the incentives and services provided by the Train Employees Now program. This amendment allows the Commission to continue to provide incentives for businesses to locate or expand operations in the state through the remainder of the contract term. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount:
$500,000.00 $0.00 $250,000.00 $750,000.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
Contract #: 12121
Page 1 of 3
87
Nevada Revised Statures 231.068 grants for programs for occupational education; accounting of money appropriated for awarding grants. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The division does not employ staff whose responsibility is to provide training, only to connect workers to training opportunities. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Exempt (Per statute) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Interlocal Contract d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The Commission on Economic Development has been under contract with the Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation since 1999 with satisfactory service. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval
Contract #: 12121
User tmyler tnash rolso1 bfor1 knielsen
Signature Date 11/02/2011 11:36:19 AM 11/02/2011 15:32:10 PM 11/02/2011 15:44:06 PM 11/14/2011 16:15:35 PM 11/14/2011 16:26:24 PM
Page 2 of 3 87
Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
cwatson cwatson
11/17/2011 13:40:39 PM 11/17/2011 13:40:43 PM
Contract #: 12121
Page 3 of 3
87
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12768 Legal Entity NEVADAWORKS Name: Contractor Name: NEVADAWORKS Address: BLDG A 6490 S MCCARRAN BLVD STE 1 City/State/Zip RENO, NV 89509-6119
Agency Name: EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION Agency Code: 902 Appropriation Unit: 4770-11 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null775/284-1338 Vendor No.: T27003177 NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: PY11-GR(10)-I-01 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2013 1 year and 211 days Interlocal Agreement Incentive Award
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new interlocal agreement to provide ongoing incentive funds authorized under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998, CFR part 652 et al. Governor's Reserve funds, approved by the State Workforce Board on April 12, 2010. Funds are utilized for staff incentive pay, contractor performance awards, administration, and board initiatives. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $75,000.00 Other basis for payment: State will process payment when approved request for funds form is received and approved by the Department, normally once each week for the duration of the contract, not to exceed the contract maximum of $75,000 for the term of the contract.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The Governor's Workforce Investment Board designated the Local Workforce Investment Boards to facilitate the required employment and training services in compliance with WIA. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 12768
No No
Page 1 of 2
88
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Nevadaworks has been under contract with the Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation since 1999 and performing satisfactorily. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User tmyler tnash tnash tnash knielsen cwatson cwatson Pending
Contract #: 12768
Page 2 of 2
88
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12273 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 1 NEVADAWORKS NEVADAWORKS BLDG A 6490 S MCCARRAN BLVD STE 1 RENO, NV 89509-6119
Contact/Phone: null775/284-1338 Vendor No.: T27003177 NV Business ID: Government Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: PY11-A-01 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
06/30/2013 2 years Interlocal Agreement Nevadaworks-Adult
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original interlocal agreement, which provides ongoing employment and training services to adults in northern Nevada. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $1,837,461 to $2,552,461 to transfer funds from the Dislocated Workers Program to the Adult Workers Program. This transfer is allowable pursuant to State Compliance Policy 3.8 and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 667.140 (b) and 661.358. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $1,837,461.00 $0.00 $715,000.00 $2,552,461.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The Governor's Workforce Investment Board designated the Local Workforce Investment Boards to facilitate the required employment and training services in compliance with WIA. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 12273
No
Page 1 of 2 89
Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Exempt (Per statute) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? CFR Part 652 et al - Governor's Designated Entity d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Nevadaworks is currently under contract with DETR and is performing satisfactorily. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User tmyler tnash rolso1 bfor1 knielsen cwatson cwatson
Contract #: 12273
Page 2 of 2
89
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12272 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 1 NEVADAWORKS NEVADAWORKS BLDG A 6490 S MCCARRAN BLVD STE 1 RENO, NV 89509-6119
Contact/Phone: Beth Wicks 775/284-1338 Vendor No.: T27003177 NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: PY11-DW-01 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 07/01/2011
06/30/2013 2 years Interlocal Agreement Nevadaworks-DW
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original interlocal agreement, which provides ongoing employment and training services to dislocated workers in northern Nevada. This amendment decreases the maximum amount from $2,930,208 to $2,215,208 due to the transfer of funds from the Dislocated Workers Program to the Adult Workers Program. This transfer is allowable pursuant to State Compliance Policy 3.8 and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 667.140 (b) and 661.358. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $2,930,208.00 $0.00 -$715,000.00 $2,215,208.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The Governor's Workforce Investment Board designated the Local Workforce Investment Board to facilitate the required employment and training services in compliance with WIA.
9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Exempt (Per statute) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? CFR Part 652 et al - Governor's Designated Entity d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Nevadaworks is currently under contract with the department and is performing satisfactorily. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
Contract #: 12272
Page 2 of 2
90
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12769 Legal Entity WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS Name: Contractor Name: WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS Address: 7251 W LAKE MEAD BLVD STE 200 City/State/Zip LAS VEGAS, NV 89128-8365
Contact/Phone: null702/638-8750 Vendor No.: T81079028 NV Business ID: Governmental Entity To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2013 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % X Federal Funds 100.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: PY11-GR(10)-I-02 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
06/30/2013 1 year and 211 days Interlocal Agreement Incentive Award
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new interlocal agreement to provide ongoing incentive funds authorized under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998, CFR part 652 et al. Governor's Reserve funds, approved by the State Workforce Board on April 12, 2010. Funds are utilized for staff incentive pay, contractor performance awards, administration, and board initiatives. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $75,000.00 Other basis for payment: State will process payment when approved request for funds form is received and approved by the Department, normally once each week for the duration of the contract, not to exceed the contract maximum of $75,000 for the term of the contract.
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Workforce Investment Act of 1998 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The Governor's Workforce Investment Board designated the Local Workforce Boards to facilitate the required employment and training services in compliance with WIA 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 12769
No No
Page 1 of 2
91
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? CFR Part 652 et all - Governor's designated entity d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: The Workforce Connections has been under contract with the Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation since 1999 and performing satisfactorily. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is not registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office because the legal entity is a: Governmental Entity 15. Not Applicable 16. Not Applicable 17. Not Applicable 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User tmyler tnash rolso1 bfor1 knielsen cwatson cwatson Pending
Contract #: 12769
Page 2 of 2
91
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10918 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 2 DAVIS GLASS & MIRROR INC DAVIS GLASS & MIRROR INC 5135 S VALLEY VIEW BLVD LAS VEGAS, NV 89118-1726
Agency Name: EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION Agency Code: 902 Appropriation Unit: All Budget Accounts - Category 04 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Kim Houle 702/368-7722 Vendor No.: T81087951 NV Business ID: NV19961120126 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2012 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % ALL DETR Budget Accounts Agency Reference #: 1514-12-DETR 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 06/15/2010
06/30/2012 2 years and 16 days Contract Glass Repair
5. Purpose of contract: This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides ongoing glass repair and replacement for the department owned facilities in southern Nevada. This amendment increases the maximum amount from $9,500 to $19,000 due to increased window repairs and replacements. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $9,500.00 $19,000.00
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? To provide regular and emergency glass service, repairs, and maintenance for staff and client safety. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Staff does not have the equipment or expertise necessary. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division?
Contract #: 10918
Yes No
Page 1 of 2 92
a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? One in a vendor pool. d. Last bid date: 06/15/2010 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
03/01/2014

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Davis Glass & Mirror, Inc is currently providing satisfactory services to the Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User tmyler tnash rolso1 tnash knielsen cwatson cwatson
Signature Date 10/13/2011 15:45:31 PM 10/26/2011 11:14:18 AM 10/26/2011 13:45:30 PM 11/02/2011 15:01:11 PM 11/09/2011 13:41:37 PM 11/17/2011 13:46:10 PM 11/17/2011 13:46:14 PM
Contract #: 10918
Page 2 of 2
92
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10427 Amendment Number: Legal Entity Name: Contractor Name: Address: City/State/Zip 1 J&L Janitorial Services J&L Janitorial Services 2850 DEER RUN DR RENO, NV 89509-7039
Agency Name: EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION Agency Code: 902 Appropriation Unit: All Budget Accounts - Category 04 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: JESSICA R. WILLIAMS 775-787-2192 Vendor No.: T27022849 NV Business ID: NV20101116972 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2010-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % ALL DETR Budget accounts Agency Reference #: 1453-12-DETR 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 01/01/2010
12/31/2011 4 years Contract Janitorial Services
5. Purpose of contract: This is the first amendment to the original contract which provides ongoing janitorial services as specified, including snow removal, for the department at 500 East Third Street Carson City, NV. This amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 and increases the maximum amount from $55,000 to $112,000 due to extension of the contract. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $55,000.00 $0.00 $57,000.00 $112,000.00 12/31/2013
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Need to maintain premises in as clean and sanitary a manner as possible for staff and the public. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Staff is not available and does not have the correct cleaning equipment. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited?
Contract #: 10427
Yes
Page 1 of 2 93
Yes
b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? Lowest bid and best services offered. d. Last bid date: 09/01/2009 Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No
09/01/2013

11. a. Is the contractor a consultant that is providing an opinion or advice as defined in S.A.M. Chapter 300? (S.A.M. states "a consultant is a person that provides information, an opinion, or advice for a fee") No b. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", is contractor planning to render services while on annual leave, compensatory time, sick leave, or on his own time? (Please explain) Not Applicable c. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the past one (1) year? No If "Yes", please provide employment termination date. d. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: J&L has been performing janitorial service and snow removal service for the Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation since December 2009 and has performed satisfactorily. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: LP 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
Signature Date 10/13/2011 14:02:12 PM 10/26/2011 11:10:22 AM 10/26/2011 16:11:41 PM 11/02/2011 14:34:31 PM 11/14/2011 09:25:44 AM 11/17/2011 13:42:03 PM 11/17/2011 13:42:08 PM
Contract #: 10427
Page 2 of 2
93
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12842 Legal Entity Arnerich Massena, Inc. Name: Contractor Name: Arnerich Massena, Inc. Address: 2045 NE Martin Luther King Jr City/State/Zip Portland, OR 97212
Agency Name: DEFERRED COMPENSATION Agency Code: 920 Appropriation Unit: 1017-04 Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: null503-239-0475 Vendor No.: pending NV Business ID: NV20111146731 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2015 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % Fees 0.00 % Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % X Other funding 100.00 % Vendor reimbursements 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of No Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No or b. other effective date 12/2011 01/01/2012
12/31/2014 3 years Contract Inv & Reg Adv/RFP
5. Purpose of contract: This is a new contract which provides for a consultant who will provide quarterly investment advice for over $550 million in participant assets, provide biannual regulatory reviews to ensure compliance with federal law and conduct a service provider Request for Proposal. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $395,000.00 Other basis for payment: See Schedule 1 for CETS entry attached in the Additional Information tab
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The committee oversees over $550 million of participant defined contribution retirement funds and the adviser is a contractual co-fiduciary who provides investment and regulatory expertise to assist the committee in fulfilling its fiduciary duties. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: Lack of required level of knowledge and expertise. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable
Yes No
c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? The contractor has a competitive fee structure, extensive experience in advising governmental 457(b) plans with over $1 billion in plan assets, advanced analytics to assist the committee in plan design, and a commitment to reduce participants' costs through the service provider Request for Proposal or forfeit half of their $75,000 fee. Expenses for these services were lowered by $65,000.00 over the current contractor. d. Last bid date: 08/01/2008 Anticipated re-bid date: 07/01/2014 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? No If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Not Applicable 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Foreign Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User kaplin kaplin kaplin kaplin leaston sday sday Pending
Contract #: 12842
Page 2 of 2
94
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 12799 Legal Entity Berkley, Berkley & Andrews Name: Contractor Name: Berkley, Berkley & Andrews Address: City/State/Zip 2984 E Russell Rd Las Vegas, NV 89120
Agency Name:
LICENSING BOARDS & COMMISSIONS Agency Code: BDC Appropriation Unit: B026 - All Categories Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Kent Berkley 702-478-6888 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: NV20061378093 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % Licensure Fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % Agency Reference #: 11-01 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
12/13/2013 2 years and 13 days Provider Agreement Accounting Services
5. Purpose of contract: The Board requires outside accounting services and assistance with its internal use of Quickbooks. 6. NEW CONTRACT The maximum amount of the contract for the term of the contract is: $19,800.00 Other basis for payment: $175 per hour for Partner services and $135 per hour Senior Accountant services invoiced monthly not to exceed $9900 per year
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? The Board requires a professional accountancy firm to assist it with the making and keeping of its books and to assist with the Board's internal use of Quickbooks. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work: The Board's staff is small and does not include any person with the expertise or knowledge in accounting and Quickbooks needed to make and keep the Board's books. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable
Contract #: 12799
No No
Page 1 of 2
95
b. Soliciation Waiver: Professional Service (As defined in NAC 333.150) c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Previously contracted with the Board of Osteopathic Medicine from September 2009 through September 2011 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: LLC 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval BOE Final Approval
User 55443282 55443282 55443282 55443282 kkolbe jmurph1 jmurph1 Pending
Contract #: 12799
Page 2 of 2
95
BOE Date:
CONTRACT SUMMARY
1. Contract Number: 10417 Amendment 2 Number: Legal Entity The Gresh Group Name: Contractor Name: The Gresh Group Address: City/State/Zip 10763 Hobbiton Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89135
Agency Name:
LICENSING BOARDS & COMMISSIONS Agency Code: BDC Appropriation Unit: B026 - All Categories Is budget authority Yes available?: If "No" please explain: Not Applicable
Contact/Phone: Bryan Gresh 702-645-5959 Vendor No.: NV Business ID: NV19941134412 To what State Fiscal Year(s) will the contract be charged? 2012-2014 What is the source of funds that will be used to pay the contractor? Indicate the percentage of each funding source if the contractor will be paid by multiple funding sources. General Funds 0.00 % X Fees 100.00 % Licensing Fees Federal Funds 0.00 % Bonds 0.00 % Highway Funds 0.00 % Other funding 0.00 % 2. Contract start date: a. Effective upon Board of Yes or b. other effective date: Examiner's approval? Anticipated BOE meeting date 12/2011 Retroactive? If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 3. Previously Approved Termination Date: Contract term: 4. Type of contract: Contract description: No NA
12/31/2011 2 years and 31 days Contract Lobbyist
5. Purpose of contract: This is the second amendment to the original contract, which provides lobbying services and respresentational services at all committee/subcommittee meetings regarding the continuation of quality osteopatch medical services to Nevada citizens and to assure passage of the appropriate laws enabling Nevada to have a continuous supply of qualified osteopathic physicians and assist the board with the preparation and passage of bill draft requests at the next legislative session. The amendment extends the termination date from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013 and increases the maximum amount from $54,000 to $108,000. 6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1. The maximum amount of the original contract: 2. Total amount of any previous contract amendments: 3. Amount of current contract amendment: 4. New maximum contract amount: and/or the termination date of the original contract has changed to: $21,000.00 $33,000.00 $54,000.00 $108,000.00 12/31/2013
II. JUSTIFICATION
7. What conditions require that this work be done? Some work will be performed at the committee/subcommittees at the Legislature in Carson City, Nevada. 8. Explain why State employees in your agency or other State agencies are not able to do this work:
Contract #: 10417
Page 1 of 2
96
The Nevada State Board of Osteopathic Medicine is located soley in Las Vegas, Nevada. All employees are domiciled in Las Vegas. The Board decided it was more cost effective to contract with a lobbyist than to acquire another employee. 9. Were quotes or proposals solicited? No Was the solicitation (RFP) done by the Purchasing No Division? a. If yes, list the names of vendors that submitted proposals: Not Applicable b. Soliciation Waiver: Not Applicable c. Why was this contractor chosen in preference to other? This lobbyist group represented the Board during this last legislative session and the Board was very pleased. The contracted group has unique knowledge of and legislative experience with the osteopathic profession having recently served as a lobbyist for Touro University College of Osteopathic Medicine. d. Last bid date: Anticipated re-bid date: 10. Does the contract contain any IT components? No

11. a. Is the contractor a current employee of the State of Nevada or will the contracted services be performed by a current employee of the State of Nevada? No b. Was the contractor formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months or will the contracted services be performed by someone formerly employed by the State of Nevada within the last 24 months? No c. Is the contractor employed by any of Nevada's political subdivisions or by any other government? No If "Yes", please explain Not Applicable 12. Has the contractor ever been engaged under contract by any State agency? Yes If "Yes", specify when and for which agency and indicate if the quality of service provided to the identified agency has been verified as satisfactory: Contracted by NV State Board of Osteopathic Medicine to represent us at the 2011 legislative session in Carson City, Nevada. 13. Is the contractor currently involved in litigation with the State of Nevada? No If "Yes", please provide details of the litigation and facts supporting approval of the contract: Not Applicable 14. The contractor is registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office as a: Nevada Corporation 15. a. Is the Contractor Name the same as the legal Entity Name? Yes 16. a. Does the contractor have a current Nevada State Business License (SBL)? Yes 17. a. Is the legal entity active and in good standing with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office? Yes 18. Agency Field Contract Monitor: 19. Contract Status: Contract Approvals: Approval Level Budget Account Approval Division Approval Department Approval Contract Manager Approval Budget Analyst Approval Team Lead Approval BOE Agenda Approval
User 55443282 55443282 55443282 b0260000 kkolbe jmurph1 jmurph1
Contract #: 10417
Page 2 of 2
96

Boe Agenda 2011 12 13

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Boe Agenda 2011 12 13

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

POST *** NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING *** BOARD OF EXAMINERS

DATE AND TIME:

Board of Examiners Meeting December 13, 2011 - Agenda Page 1

Office of the Governor Ethics Commission - $65,000

FOR POSSIBLE ACTION AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT WITH A FORMER EMPLOYEE

FOR POSSIBLE ACTION AUTHORITY TO PAY MINING CLAIM REFUNDS

FOR POSSIBLE ACTION STATE VEHICLE PURCHASE

Board of Examiners Meeting December 13, 2011 - Agenda Page 2

STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL REVISIONS

FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TORT CLAIM

FOR POSSIBLE ACTION LEASES

Department of Health and Human Services Aging and Disability Services

JS Park Sahara, LLC $277,366

Department of Health and Human Services Aging and Disability Services

JS Park Sahara, LLC $89,156

Department of Health and Human Services Health Division

Pearce Family, LLC

Bauserman Group, LLC

Las Vegas Boat Harbor, Inc.

Board of Examiners Meeting December 13, 2011 - Agenda Page 3

*10. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION CONTRACTS

SOLE SOURCE/ PROFESSIONAL SERVICE EXEMPTION

NUCLEAR PROJECTS OFFICE - HIGH LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE

STROLIN CONSULTING LLC

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE SPECIAL FUND

JONES VARGAS CHARTERED

OTHER: STATUTORY CONTINGENCY FUND - SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TORT CLAIM FUND

HDR ENGINEERING, INC.

OTHER: INSURANCE PREMIUM TRUST FUND

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TORT CLAIM FUND

LUMOS & ASSOCIATES

OTHER: INSURANCE PREMIUM TRUST FUND

Board of Examiners Meeting December 13, 2011 - Agenda Page 4

SOLE SOURCE/ PROFESSIONAL SERVICE EXEMPTION

TREASURER'S OFFICE - COLLEGE SAVINGS TRUST

COX MEDIA, LLC

OTHER: NEVADA COLLEGE SAVINGS

TREASURER'S OFFICE - COLLEGE SAVINGS TRUST

THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING MOTHERS

OTHER: NEVADA COLLEGE SAVINGS

TREASURER'S OFFICE - HIGHER EDUCATION TUITION ADMINISTRATION

WOLF PACK SPORTS PROPERTIES

OTHER: NEVADA PREPAID TUITION

TREASURER'S OFFICE UNCLAIMED PROPERTY

INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION

OTHER: UNCLAIMED PROPERTY RECEIPTS

Board of Examiners Meeting December 13, 2011 - Agenda Page 5

SOLE SOURCE/ PROFESSIONAL SERVICE EXEMPTION

DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

LAMBOLEY, PAUL H DBA LAW OFFICES OF PAUL H. LAMBOLEY

OTHER: PERSONNEL ASSESSMENTS

DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

AMERICAN CHILLER SERVICES, INC.

FEE: BUILDINGS & GROUNDS BUILDING RENT INCOME FEES

DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

BREEZE BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, LLC

FEE: BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS BUILDING RENT INCOME FEES

Board of Examiners Meeting December 13, 2011 - Agenda Page 6

SOLE SOURCE/ PROFESSIONAL SERVICE EXEMPTION

DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION - BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.

POST * NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING * BOARD OF EXAMINERS