You are on page 1of 131

WHO/HRB/98.2 Distr.

: Limited English only

Workload indicators of staffing need (WISN)

A manual for implementation

World Health Organization Division of Human Resources Development and Capacity Building Geneva, Switzerland 1998

WHO/HRB/98.2 Distr.: Limited English only

Workload indicators of staffing need (WISN) A manual for implementation


Prepared for the World Health Organization by Peter J. Shipp Initiatives Inc. Boston USA

World Health Organization Division of Human Resources Development and Capacity Building Geneva, Switzerland 1998

Acknowledgements
The manual Workload Indicators of Staffing Need (WISN) has been developed and field-tested by the World Health Organization with financial support through the voluntary contribution from the Government of Japan to the Division of Human Resources Development and Capacity Building. Its contribution is greatly appreciated.

World Health Organization

This document is not issued to the general public, and all rights are reserved by the World Health Organization (WHO). The document may not be reviewed, abstracted, quoted, reproduced or translated, in part or in whole, without the prior written permission of WHO. No part of this document may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic, mechanical or other without the prior written permission of WHO. The views expressed in documents by named authors are solely the responsibility of those authors.

Table of contents
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Section A The WISN method and its uses ...................................................................................... 3 1. The need for a new method ......................................................................................................... 3 2. The basis of the WISN Method................................................................................................... 5 3. Features of the WISN Method .................................................................................................... 6 4. How the WISN Method works: differences and ratios ............................................................. 11 5. Using the WISN Method: identifying priority situations .......................................................... 12 6. Using the WISN Method: improving the current staffing situation .......................................... 13 7. Using the WISN Method: human resource management and planning .................................... 18 8. The constraints and limitations of the Method .......................................................................... 19 Section B Steps in design and implementation of the method ...................................................... 23 1. Starting the process: setting the objectives ............................................................................... 23 2. Choosing the basic design of the procedure to be implemented ............................................... 26 3. Setting up the implementation group ........................................................................................ 28 4. Procedure for establishing standards of professional performance ........................................... 31 5. Mobilizing commitment to the WISN Method ......................................................................... 32 6. Collecting and handling the data ............................................................................................... 32 7. Plan and budget for operating the new procedure in regular use .............................................. 34 8. Workplan and budget for implementation ................................................................................ 35 Section C Technical factors........................................................................................................... 37 1. Determining available working time per year ........................................................................... 37 2. Setting Activity Standards ........................................................................................................ 43 3. Turning Activity Standards into Standard Workloads .............................................................. 56 4. Using standard workloads and allowance standards to calculate staffing requirements ........... 61 5. Computerization of the WISN calculations .............................................................................. 67 Annex A Staffing requirements for time-specified posts 69 Annex B Instructions for groups which are setting activity standards 71 Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories ........................................................................................................... 77

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction

Introduction
This Manual sets out all the activities which are necessary in order to design and implement the WISN Method in a country. The material in this Manual is based on the experience and results of implementing the WISN Method in Papua New Guinea (supported by the Asian Development Bank), in the United Republic of Tanzania (supported by DANIDA through WHO), in Kenya (supported by USAID); in Sri Lanka (supported by the World Bank); and also in six other countries: Bahrain, Egypt, Hong Kong, Oman, Sudan and Turkey which participated in a field trial of an early draft of this Manual (supported by WHO headquarters and the WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean). The Manual is divided into four sections:

Section A The WISN method and its uses


A description of the principles and the main policy/management uses of the method. This section has two main purposes. First, it provides an overall picture or context for those who will design and set up the procedure, so that they can better understand how the different tasks contribute to the overall result. Second, it provides material which can be used to explain to potential users of the results, and to others who will be involved in the implementation, how the method operates and how it can be used to improve their work.

Section B Steps in design and implementation of the method


How to carry out the implementation of the method. The section describes a step-by-step procedure for designing and installing the WISN Method and how these may be fitted together into an overall work plan for the implementation exercise.

Section C Technical factors


How to deal with the technical/mathematical aspects of the method. This section covers the setting of activity (time) standards for government health staff, how to translate these into standard (annual) workloads for use in the WISN calculations, the calculation procedures to be used, and the use of computers in performing the calculations and producing tables of results.

Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories
This section lists the Activity Standards which have been used for staff categories and subcategories in countries which have either implemented the WISN Method or which for other reasons have set Activity Standards for their health staff. Because conditions and circumstances vary so much from one country to another, these figures are offered for guidance only. In normal circumstances, a Manual for Implementation like this is of interest and comes into use only when a decision has already been made to undertake an exercise to implement a new procedure. However, the WISN Method is novel, it produces information which has not been available before now, and it is based on a principle (setting activity times or standards for health staff) which has not been used in health services, although it has been widely employed in manufacturing and commercial organizations for many years. The senior staff concerned may well find that they require information about the basis of the method, its operation, its results and their uses before they can come to the initial decision on whether to implement the method.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 1

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Although this document covers all the normal requirements for a Manual of Implementation, it also takes account of this unusual situation where the method is entirely novel. The material in sections A and B is set out so that it can be summarized and/or edited in order to provide decision-makers with the background information on how the WISN Method works and how the results can be used, should this be necessary, in order to help them take the initial decision on whether to implement the method. This material can also be used to prepare presentations for managers, administrators and others who will be the eventual users of the method and its results.

2 __________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Section A The WISN method and its uses

Section A: The WISN method and its uses


This section sets out a description of the principles on which the WISN Method is based, what information it can produce, and how this information can be used by health managers and administrators in order to improve the current health personnel situation, for example, how to deploy the available health staff more effectively, and also how to plan for future improvements in services and in human resource management. Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The need for a new method ................................................................................................ 3 The basis of the WISN Method .......................................................................................... 5 Features of the WISN Method ............................................................................................ 6 How the WISN Method works: differences and ratios.................................................... 11 Using the WISN Method: identifying priority situations ................................................ 12 Using the WISN Method: improving the current staffing situation ................................ 13 Using the WISN Method: human resource management and planning .......................... 18 The constraints and limitations of the Method ................................................................. 19

1.

The need for a new method


For many years there has been a need for a rational method of setting the correct staffing levels in health facilities. In earlier decades, when developing countries first addressed the issues of human resource planning and management in their health services, they used population ratios (numbers of doctors, nurses, etc. per 1,000 population). For a time this was sufficient to tackle the major problem of the period - assessing the overall staffing requirements and the training loads for health services in the country. Later, attention naturally shifted to the more detailed question of the staffing of individual health facilities, and standard staffing schedules were used (fixed patterns of staff for health posts, health centres, district hospitals, etc. in the country). While both these methods were useful in their time, they have serious disadvantages. Population ratios do not distinguish between the employment of health staff in the different services in an area, for example, the numbers of nurses who should be employed in referral hospitals, district hospitals, health centres, health posts, etc. With standard staffing schedules the distribution of the facilities themselves is also a major factor; for example, a district may have well-staffed facilities, but far too few of them. But most important, these methods do not take account of the wide local variations which are found within every country, such as the different levels and patterns of morbidity in different locations, the ease of access to different facilities, the patient attitudes in different parts of the country to the services provided, and the local economic circumstances. All these factors considerably affect the demand for services in an area and at individual facilities, and therefore they affect the staffing levels actually required to meet the demand. The WISN Method frequently shows that staffing requirements vary widely between health facilities of the same type, according to their workloads. Staffing norms based on population ratios or standard staffing schedules are usually set somewhere in the middle of this range. This leads to overstaffing in some facilities and under staffing in

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 3

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

others. Those facilities which are unable to cope with their workloads (because they have only the staffing norms or standard staffing schedules) apply for more staff, and frequently get an increase because the request is in fact justified. Once this precedent has been established, other facilities also seek staff increases even though their staffing levels are in fact adequate for their workloads. Thus the authority of the norms or standard staffing schedules disappears and their value in personnel management and control is lost. Health administrators have long sought a method of calculating health staffing requirements which does not have these disadvantages. Furthermore, as national health staffing establishments and training volumes have been brought under some degree of control, health administrators have been turning their attention to further issues, for example, the optimal deployment of staff, particularly to rural areas; the equitable deployment of staff in accordance with the demands actually experienced; and the optimal determination of staff categories, particularly with a view to reducing the large number of staff categories found in some countries. In many countries ministries of health are experiencing a double pressure. On the one hand there is a strengthening popular demand for better health services to an ever-increasing population, coupled with a stronger and more detailed interest from the population at large (and particularly in the national news media) in both the performance of the country's health services and the equity of its distribution. On the other hand, resources for health are at best increasing slowly; in most countries they are at a standstill or even reducing. Certainly resources are not keeping pace with the increase in demand. Health administrators must attempt to achieve maximum coverage of services (extending into the rural and remote areas where the unit costs of service delivery are higher) with greater impact (by improving current effectiveness levels), equity in the provision of services (i.e. overall staffing deployment according to demand) and economy of operation (in staff categories, numbers and mix). Until now there has been no technique available which will calculate: - the optimal allocation and deployment of current staff geographically, i.e. allocating staff to provinces within a country, districts within a province, areas within a district, and so on, according to the volume of services which are being delivered and the different types of health staff which are required to deliver these services; - the optimal allocation and deployment of current staff functionally, i.e. allocating staff between the different types of health facilities or different health services in the country as a whole, in a province, in a district, in an area, etc., according to the volume of services which are being delivered and the different types of health staff which these services call for; - the optimal staffing patterns and levels (categories and numbers) in individual health facilities according to local conditions (morbidity, access, attitudes) and not based on national averages (population ratios and standard staffing schedules); - the optimal staff categories and their activities, i.e. identifying where combining existing staff categories or creating new categories will achieve maximum health impact with maximum economy. The WISN Method will produce all these types of results. The pressing need now is to ensure that questions of the optimal allocation and deployment of staff can be answered at two levels at the national/provincial level, so that staff can be allocated or distributed to districts equitably; and at district level, so that staff can be deployed to different locations, services and facilities to best effect. In addition there are longer term strategic issues

4 __________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Section A The WISN method and its uses

which must be tackled at the national level, concerned with volumes of training and determining the optimal staff categories to employ in the health services. In order to provide useful information to both medical and non-medical administrators at all levels of the health service in these times of economic stringency and staff shortages, the new technique should be: - simple to operate, using data which is already collected and available; - simple to use, so that the results can contribute to staffing decisions at all levels of the health service; - technically acceptable, so that health service managers are prepared to use the results in their decisions; - comprehensible, so that the results will be accepted by non-medical managers, e.g. finance, planning, personnel administration; - realistic, so that the results will offer practical targets for budgeting and resource allocation. The WISN Method will meet all of these requirements.

2.

The basis of the WISN Method


The WISN Method is based on the work which is actually undertaken by health staff. Every health facility has its own pattern of workload which may include inpatients, surgical operations, deliveries, outpatients, clinics of various types, health education, home visits, outreach activities, inspection visits, etc. Each type of workload calls for effort (i.e. time) from specific health staff categories. For example, a supervised home delivery requires the time of a midwife or trained traditional birth attendant; a hospital outpatient may require time from a nurse (preparation and recording), a doctor (examination), a laboratory technician (performing tests), a dispenser (filling a prescription), and so on, depending on the medical practices and procedures which are followed in the country. Sometimes treating a case requires time from several different staff categories working together as a team, for example, in performing a surgical operation. For each type of workload (inpatient, outpatient, MCH clinic, etc.) we can set an Activity Standard. This is a unit time for each staff category - how much time on average a case, a prescription, etc. should take each staff category which is involved in it, working to acceptable professional standards. Alternatively we can set a standard rate - how many patients, laboratory tests, etc. can be dealt with to an acceptable standard of performance per hour or per day. This unit time or rate will differ, depending on the type of work (inpatients, outpatients, clinics, home visits, etc.), on the category of staff dealing with the clients (on average ward nurses spend longer per day with hospital inpatients than doctors do) and also on the type of facility (more complex cases are referred to the higher level hospitals where on average they take more staff time per case). This Activity Standard, an activity time or a rate of working (either can be used), can now be converted into the equivalent annual workload, that is, how much of this type of work could be done by one person in a year working to these professional standards and also making due allowance for time spent on vacation, holidays, training, sickness absence, etc. This equivalent annual workload is called the Standard Workload. The amount of each type of work done in a health facility in a year is reported in its annual statistics. Thus applying the Standard Workloads (annual work rates) to these annual statistics will show how many staff in each category are required in order to accomplish this workload to

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 5

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

acceptable professional standards. This figure is the staffing requirement of the facility calculated according to the WISN Method. The formula is:
Workload in the facility (service statistics) Standard workload (for one staff) = Staffing requirement

To be useful to decision-makers and managers, this figure of calculated staffing requirement must be compared with the actual staffing level in the facility in order to identify where the shortages and surpluses are, and how big, by staff category, in each health facility. Actual staffing figures must therefore be available for the WISN calculations. Sometimes these staffing figures are not compiled with the annual service statistics, and must be collected as a separate exercise.

3.

Features of the WISN Method


The WISN Method takes account of the different type or complexity of care offered in different facilities. For example, the treatment of an inpatient in a teaching hospital is usually more complex and time-consuming than it is in a district hospital or a health centre. For this reason the ward nurse spends longer in total each day with a patient in a teaching hospital than the nurse in a district hospital does. This is reflected in the different unit times or rates set for inpatient care in these different facilities. By using these unit times or rates, the calculations will show, for example, that more ward nurses are required in a teaching hospital for the same number of inpatients as compared with a district hospital or health centre. Calculations always show that more doctors are required in the higher level referral hospitals for the same reason each patient takes more doctor time on average. A similar result is obtained with clinic attendances in teaching hospitals as compared with, say, district hospitals. However, where one particular activity is performed in the same way in all health facilities, e.g. immunizations, then the same Activity Standard, i.e. the same unit time or rate (and its annual equivalent the Standard Workload), is used for this activity in all facilities. Thus a number of different Activity Standards may be used for one activity for technical reasons, for example, to allow for more complex cases being treated in some health facilities. However, no adjustment in Activity Standards is made because of location. In the calculations the same Activity Standard for each activity is applied to all facilities of the same type, for example, health centres, throughout the country. This means that the calculated staff requirements in each type of facility are based on the same medical standards throughout the country. This is the basis of the calculated equitable distribution of staff; it is the staff distribution which will offer the same standard of service in health facilities of the same type. The method can be applied to health facilities and services run by voluntary agencies, commercial organizations, private practitioners, etc. provided only that their annual service statistics and their actual staffing levels are available for the calculations. The results can be used to compare on a consistent basis the relative staffing levels in government facilities and all these other facilities. The method can be used by managers and staff in charge in individual facilities (health posts, health centres, hospitals, etc.) if this is preferred. These results will show how the current levels of each staff category employed in the facility compare to the staffing levels which should be employed according to the national Activity (professional) Standards in order to cover the annual workload in the facility. For this use, where managers and staff in charge apply the method themselves, only simple calculations would be possible, and these can be set out on a pro forma; an example used for nursing staff in health centres in Papua New Guinea is shown in Fig.1. The

6 __________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Section A The WISN method and its uses

pro forma specifies what figures must be entered on the sheet (the workloads and current staffing levels) and lays out the calculations (involving only simple arithmetic) in such a way that they can be accomplished by clerical staff with very little training. Alternatively these simple calculations can be done by the staff at district level, where the service statistics for individual facilities are held. On the other hand, the calculations are particularly appropriate for computers in the sense that they can be set up (programmed) on such machines by computer operators (rather than the more sophisticated computer programmers) using the standard facilities provided in widely available computer packages (spreadsheets or databases). Thus the WISN calculations could be performed on a central computer which can be programmed to produce the results for each health facility, together with district, regional and national summary tables. This centralized approach is certainly best where annual statistics for individual facilities are already sent to and held at the centre, and its advantages may make it worthwhile to have these annual statistics sent to the centre where this is not already done. In larger countries these calculations could be carried out at regional level, with the results sent on to the centre for consolidation into national tables. The method uses whatever service statistics are currently available rather than calling for special data-collection systems to be set up, which is usually both time-consuming and expensive. Thus using the WISN Method will extract extra information from the statistics which are already collected at present and so offers an increased benefit from the current expenditure of resources in collecting these regular statistics. The method is flexible in that it can take advantage of any later improvement in these statistics, for example, wider coverage or greater detail, and thereby produce more comprehensive or detailed WISN results. It can also highlight where changes in the statistics would have the greatest effect in improving the quality of the WISN information provided.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 7

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Figure 1 Pro forma used for nursing staff in health centres in Papua New Guinea

Note: Use annual figures for the most recent complete year (Jan-Dec) Province: District: Southern Highlands Nipa HC Nipa Year: 1986

Workload Admissions 1 291 /

Calculation

Recommended nursing officers

Workload Admissions

Calculation

Recommended CHWs

600

2.15

1 291

300

4.30

Outpatients** 18 014 / 11 000 = 1.64

Admissions 18 014 / 6 500 = 2.77

Total clinic Attendances*** 20 764 Supervised births 275 / 150 = 1.83 / 700 = 2.97

Admissions 20 764 / 9 000 = 2.31

Total

9.38

Total

8.59

Nursing officers ACTUAL 7 / Total 8.59 = ISN 0.81

Community health workers ACTUAL 11 / Total 9.38 = ISN 1.17

* ** ***

CHWs = Community health workers including nurse aides, aid-post orderlies and orderlies working in the centre. Outpatients do not include clinic attendances. Total clinic attendances = new attendances and reattendances at antenatal, family-planning and child health clinics.

Some essential work activities never appear in the annual statistics, for example, record keeping, administration, supervision, staff management, etc. Full allowance for the workload caused by these activities is made in the calculations.

8 __________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Section A The WISN method and its uses

This approach is perfectly general and can be used for all health staff. However there is an easier and better way of calculating the requirements of hospital ward staff (mainly nurses). It is not easy to add up the durations of all individual contacts between nurse and inpatient to give the average amount of time a nurse (or other category of ward staff) should give to each inpatient during a 24hour period. Rather the nurses are asked to specify the number of inpatients (occupied beds) for which a nurse on duty should be responsible, e.g. one registered nurse per 16 occupied beds, one nurse aide per eight occupied beds. These figures can vary according to the shift (morning, afternoon, night) and the type of ward (medical, paediatric, etc.) One major advantage of this approach is that it is much easier for nurses to estimate how many inpatients they can cover adequately when they are on duty than it is for them to add up the total average time which should be spent with each patient totalled over three shifts during a 24-hour period. And the results are found to be more accurate as well. The general WISN Method as applied to nurses (setting Activity Standards in terms of contact time rather than inpatients covered) is based on a similar principle to the many methods currently used for calculating immediate nurse staffing requirements for a particular ward. These methods divide the inpatients into a number of dependency levels and specify the nursing effort (time) required by inpatients at each level, usually derived from work study observations. These are more detailed and sophisticated calculations which require detailed statistics (numbers of inpatients at each dependency level) and produce detailed results, e.g. how many nurses of each type are required in Ward 4 tomorrow morning? The general WISN Method can also be applied to non-medical staff, e.g. administration, office staff and support staff (laundry, kitchens, cleaners, drivers, etc.) Some of these calculations are based on the service statistics, for example, for laundry and kitchen staff, but the remainder are based on other data, e.g. the number of cleaning staff depends on the size of the facility, the number of personnel administration staff depends on the number of staff employed, and so on. In using annual statistics, the method calculates the average staffing levels required throughout the year in order to cope with the recorded workload, even though the work is frequently seasonal with higher workloads in some months than in others. In doing this the method corresponds to the practicalities of the situation in that the staff employed in a facility are expected to cope with the workloads as they arise, in the heavy months as well as the light. There is no regular procedure for posting extra staff to facilities in their busier months. However, it would be possible to extend the WISN Method to calculate what the seasonal staffing levels should be at different times of the year, if ever these results should have a practical use for managers and administrators. The practical use of the method by operational managers also requires figures for current staffing in each of the health facilities covered by the WISN calculations. Sometimes these figures are not readily available at the centre and a special data collection exercise must be undertaken to obtain them from the district offices. The WISN Method is based on setting unit times or rates of working for the different activities which are undertaken by different staff categories. These unit times or rates are in effect quality standards. Specifying 15 minutes per antenatal examination by a doctor, or specifying one registered nurse on duty during the afternoon shift per 12 occupied beds in a hospital ward, implies certain standards of health care quality and therefore certain codes of professional practice and standards of professional performance. There can be a significant practical advantage in addressing the question of what unit times or rates (Activity Standards) to use for each staff category employed in the health service. The nursing cadre frequently has a written code of professional practice, that is, Activity Standards, which can
_________________________________________________________________________________________ 9

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

be translated into Standard (Annual) Workloads for each nursing category. On the other hand, many other cadres have no similar document, and setting Activity Standards for staff categories within these cadres (for the purpose of the WISN Method) can be made the first step in setting explicit national standards for staff performance and also producing written codes of professional practice for these other cadres. Sometimes the national standards of performance and professional practice which are officially set in a country are much higher than current practice and would therefore require staffing levels in health facilities which are very much higher than the current numbers employed. While these high standards of health care quality are very desirable, it may in practice be impossible within the next few years for the country to achieve them, that is, to recruit, train and pay sufficient staff to achieve them. They could be considered as longer-term staffing and health care quality targets. The WISN Method can assist in the planning to achieve these longer-term targets (see point 7 below). However, the results produced by the WISN Method are also intended for immediate use by managers and administrators in order to improve the current operation of health services. The Activity Standards which are set for staff in a WISN exercise (and hence their Standard Workloads) should not be too far from the current average conditions in the country. Otherwise, the results (the calculated health workforce requirements) will be too high to be considered as realistic staffing targets for individual facilities, districts, provinces and the country as a whole. Such exaggerated results will not be of practical use in dealing with current problems and so will not get any serious consideration from managers and administrators, who are mainly concerned to improve the current situation. Activity Standards which are set only somewhat higher than the current average professional practice in the country could be used to calculate interim or temporary staffing targets; these figures would correspond to an improved standard of performance and professional practice which could be achieved in the medium-term future in the light of the current circumstances of the country. If the standards of performance and professional practice are set too high by comparison with the current situation, they produce figures for staffing requirements which are far too high to be useful to managers and administrators. However, the method also produces from the same data comparative figures of workload pressures, for instance, which facilities are under the greatest pressure and therefore most in need of support; these results remain valid however realistic or otherwise the standards of performance and practice used in the calculations may be. It should be noted that the WISN Method calculates the staffing levels required to provide health services according to certain professional standards in the country. If a facility has these staffing levels, it does not necessarily mean that the staff there are working to these standards that is a matter for the supervisors concerned. Rather, what the calculation says is that in this situation there are sufficient staff resources in the facility to provide the volume of health services which are shown in its annual statistics according to the professional standards laid down for these services. The method can also be used as part of the annual budgeting process. The salary and staff establishment component of budget submissions can be compared with the corresponding calculations of staffing requirements, for instance, the number of staff required to deliver existing services to acceptable professional standards, in order to evaluate and/or justify existing posts as well as any requests for new ones. If required, this calculation can be done for individual staff categories and for individual health facilities.

10 _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Section A The WISN method and its uses

4.

How the WISN Method works: differences and ratios


From the actual staffing level in a particular facility and its calculated staffing requirement according to the WISN Method, two separate figures are calculated. The difference, i.e. actual - calculated. This shows the level of shortage or surplus. For example, if the actual number of nurses in a facility is six and the calculated requirement to meet the current volume of work according to the Standard Workload is eight, then there is a shortage of two nurses in the facility to meet acceptable professional standards of service delivery. The six nurses in post are working under some pressure to cope with the nursing workload in the facility, which is actually enough for eight nurses. Or if the actual number of midwives in a facility is 10 and the calculated staffing requirement according to the Standard Workload is eight, then the facility employs two midwives more than it requires in order to meet its midwifery workload to acceptable professional standards. (This is not to say that two midwives are idle in the facility, but rather that the facility can deliver a higher quality of service, for instance, more midwifery services and care to patients, than other facilities which do not have such a surplus.) There is a very important point here. When we use the WISN Method to calculate staffing requirements, these figures are not based on some theoretical need for staff according to the health status or morbidity statistics in the population, or according to desirable staffing patterns in health facilities. With these more theoretical methods, a calculated staff shortage (e.g. less staff in post than the standard staffing pattern calls for), says nothing at all about the work pressures in the facility. But staff requirements calculated by the WISN Method are based on the work which is actually being done in the health facilities, for instance, the number of patients who are actually being treated and the number of clients who are actually being served in the facilities. In these cases a calculated shortage of staff in a facility actually does mean pressure of work on those employed in the facility, which almost invariably leads to a reduction in professional standards. A figure measuring this pressure of work is given by the ratio. The ratio, i.e. actual/calculated. This ratio is called the Workload Indicator of Staffing Need (WISN) and gives its name to the method as a whole. If the WISN ratio is 1.00, i.e. actual staff = calculated staffing requirement, then the current staff is just sufficient to meet the workload according to the professional standards which have been set. If the WISN is less than 1.00, then the current staff is not sufficient to meet these standards. Continuing with the example above, if a facility has six nurses but is calculated to need eight, then the WISN for this category is 6/8 = 0.75 or 75%, and only 75% of the required staff are available or only 75% of the standards can be achieved. If the WISN is greater than 1.00, then there are more than enough staff to meet the standards set. For example, the facility mentioned above has 10 midwives but is calculated to need only eight; the WISN for this category is 10/8 = 1.25 or 125%, and there is an excess of 25% in the midwives above the number needed to achieve the standards set. The WISN ratio is one of the novel features of this method. It shows the degree of pressure which each staff category is under in coping with the annual workload it is actually dealing with in the facility.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 11

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

5.

Using the WISN Method: identifying priority situations


The two figures the difference and the ratio (WISN) are used in combination and each has its own function. The difference between the two figures shows how big the imbalance (shortage or excess) is, and where it is. It shows which facilities have a shortage in a particular staff category and which facilities have an excess (as compared with calculated requirements) in the same staff category. It is used for planning where any new staff should be posted and also for determining how staff can be redeployed between facilities (to the extent that this is possible), in both cases with the aim of achieving a more equitable distribution of staff and overall a more cost-effective service. The ratio (WISN) shows where the workload pressure is the greatest and where it is the least, and so where it is most urgent to take action in order to adjust staffing levels. It is used for identifying which facilities should have priority when considering staffing changes (both increases or reductions). For example, compare the following two situations: - a shortage of three nurses in a health centre where there are seven nurses but there should be 10 to cope with the workload. WISN = 7/10 = 0.7, i.e. 70% of staff requirements available, 30% understaffed; - a shortage of 10 nurses in a hospital where there are 90 nurses but there should be 100 to cope with the workload. WISN = 90/100 = 0.9, 90% of staff requirements available, 10% understaffed. The nurses in the health centre are under much greater work pressure (30% understaffed) and therefore merit more urgent attention than the nurses in the hospital (10% understaffed). Unfortunately the larger shortage (of 10 nurses in the hospital) would usually command attention over the smaller shortage (of three nurses in the health centre), particularly when the larger figure is backed by the authority of the hospital director or matron. These calculations offer an objective method of prioritising situations of staff shortage, that is, identifying where the need is greatest and so offering assistance in making decisions on staff deployment, for example, where best to post new staff. The same calculations can also be used to prioritise situations of staffing excess as well, that is, identifying those places where staff can most easily be spared. For example, consider the following two situations: - an excess of four nurses in a health centre where there are 12 nurses employed but the calculations show that only eight are needed to cope with the workload. WISN = 12/8 = 1.5, i.e. 150% of staff requirements available, or 50% excess; - an excess of 20 nurses in a hospital where there are 120 nurses employed but the calculations show that only 100 are needed to cope with the workload. WISN = 120/100 = 1.2, i.e. 120% of staff requirements available, or 20% excess. In most instances the manager or administrator concerned would consider reducing the number of nurses in the hospital ("They have well over 100 nurses, they will not notice a reduction so much ...) rather than in the health centre. However, the four extra nurses in the health centre give a much greater degree of overstaffing (50% excess) and therefore some of these staff should be

12 _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Section A The WISN method and its uses

considered for transfer before reducing the 20 extra nurses in the hospital (20% excess). If the health centre gave up two nurses and reduced its staffing to 10, then: Actual staff = 10 Calculated requirement = 8 WISN = 10/8 = 1.25, i.e. 125% of staffing requirements available, or 25% excess. This reduction of two nurses would bring the excess of the health centre nurses (25%) to be roughly the same as the excess of the hospital nurses (20%). Thus if any nurses are to be moved in order to relieve shortages elsewhere then, from the viewpoint of equity, moving two nurses from the health centre should be considered before moving any nurses from the much larger number in the hospital. These examples show how the combination of difference and ratio (WISN) offers an objective basis for making what are always difficult decisions of staff allocation, deployment, posting and transfer. These examples also show that the method can be used to compare directly the staffing situations and workload pressures in different types of health facility (e.g. nurses in a health centre and in a hospital), even where the staff category concerned may be engaged in different activities in these facilities.

6.

Using the WISN Method: improving the current staffing situation


The examples above show how the difference between the actual staffing levels and the calculated staffing requirements in one health facility denotes the shortage or excess of staff in the facility according to the actual workloads and the professional standards laid down in the country. The ratio between actual and calculated staffing levels (WISN) shows whether these staff are working under pressure in coping with these workloads and how much pressure there is on them, that is, to what extent the professional standards can be upheld in the facility. For example, in one country employing the WISN Method two categories of nurse (nursing officers and nursing aides) are employed in health centres. Nursing officers deal with inpatients, outpatients, clinic attendances and deliveries; nursing aides deal with inpatients and outpatients only. In one health centre the results of WISN calculations for one year were as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Results for nursing staff in one health centre Actual staff Nursing officers Nursing aides 6 10 Required staff 8 8 WISN ratio 0.75 1.25 Difference -2 +2

From these results the health centre manager concluded: a) the shortage of two nursing officers balances the excess of two nursing aides; the total nurse staffing of the health centre is correct but it is incorrectly allocated between the categories according to their tasks (job descriptions);

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 13

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

b)

it is likely that wherever possible some of the tasks of the overburdened nursing officers in relation to inpatients and outpatients are being undertaken by the nursing aides (with an excess of staff), who also attend these patients.

Similar calculations can be done for all staff categories in each health facility in a district, a province and the country as a whole. By comparing the calculation results (ratios and differences) for a group of such facilities, a manager can identify whether there are any staffing inequities between the facilities and, moreover, what can be done to improve the situation. In particular, the manager can determine: a) which staff categories in which facilities are under pressure, how much pressure they are under, and how big the staffing deficit is at each facility; which facilities have staff in excess of their workload requirements, and how big the excess is at eachfacility; what staff movements (transfers) would bring about a more equitable distribution of staff in the group of facilities; which facilities should be considered first in these possible staff movements; how many extra staff are required to bring the total staffing in the group of facilities up to the level which corresponds to acceptable professional standards; where any new staff should be posted in order to achieve maximum impact on the quality of services provided.

b)

c)

d) e)

f)

A further example from the same country shows a summary of the results for nursing staff in four health centres in the same district. These include those given above in Table 1, which are shown as health centre A in the following Table.
Table 2 Example of a district summary Nursing officers Health centre A B C D District totals Actual staff 6 4 7 9 29 Staff reqd. 8 4 7 9 28 WISN ratio 0.75 1.00 1.14 1.22 1.04 Short/ surpl. -2 0 +1 +2 +1 Actual staff 10 6 8 15 39 Nursing aides Staff reqd 8 7 11 18 44 WISN ratio 1.25 0.86 0.73 0.83 0.89 Short/ surpl. +2 -1 -3 -3 -5

14 _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Section A The WISN method and its uses

From these figures the district medical officer concluded: a) the district has about the correct number of nursing officers in its health centres, but they are not optimally distributed. It would be very desirable, if it were possible, to transfer two nursing officers from health centres C and/or D to health centre A; the district has a net shortage of five nursing aides in its health centres, but even so the situation could be improved by transferring up to two of these staff from health centre A. The highest priority for employing extra nursing aides is at health centre C; although both C and D are three nursing aides short, those in C are under the greater pressure (only 73% of nursing aides in post) as compared with D (83% of nursing aides in post). In fact the pressure on nursing aides in D (83% staffing, three short) is about the same as in B (86% staffing, although only one short), because B is much smaller.

b)

The results show: - how the workload pressure in each facility can be compared with the average of the group; - where the staff shortages or workload pressures are greatest for the different staff categories; and therefore - where new staff in each category should best be posted or where staff transfers would improve the overall situation. In other words, these results are used to identify staffing inequities between facilities and moreover they can also be used to determine what specific actions can be taken in order to achieve equity in the situation. This will work even if there is an overall staff shortage in a group of facilities. For example, the most equitable distribution of the 39 nursing aides shown in Table 2 can be calculated using the WISN Method. The results are shown in Table 3, which sets out the actual situation (repeated from Table 2) and also the calculated equitable distribution of these staff among the four facilities.
Table 3 Equitable distribution of nursing aides Actual situation Health centre A B C D District totals Actual staff 10 6 8 15 39 Staff reqd. 8 7 11 18 44 WISN ratio 1.25 0.86 0.73 0.83 0.89 Short/ surpl. +2 -1 -3 -3 -5 Equit staff 7 6 10 16 39 Equitable distribution Staff reqd 8 7 11 18 44 Equit WISN 0.83 0.86 0.91 0.89 0.89 Staff movements -3 0 +2 +1

The calculated staff requirements in the four facilities remain the same, since this is based on the workloads at each of them. The ratio between the calculated equitable staffing and the calculated staffing requirement (called the Equitable WISN) lies between 0.83 and 0.91 for the different facilities; this is the most equitable distribution of these staff that can be achieved in this situation. The final column of the Table shows that it can be achieved by transferring three staff from health
_________________________________________________________________________________________ 15

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

centre A, two of these to health centre C and one to health centre D. The calculation shows what is the most equitable distribution of the available staff which would enable all facilities in a group to work under an equal degree of pressure. The same approach can be used to review the workload pressures and the corresponding staffing levels within a large facility, for example, the allocation of nurses to wards or departments in a large hospital. This would identify instances of over- and under-staffing and determine what would be an equitable distribution of staff. This is worthwhile only where there are large staff categories in a health facility. These calculations can be extended to compare staffing levels and workload pressures in several different types of health facility in a district, for example, health posts, health centres, hospitals, MCH clinics, etc. The results will show: a) which staff categories in all these facilities are under the greatest pressure and therefore are most in need of support; what transfers of staff within the district would give a more equitable distribution of staff between the facilities and a greater health impact if the same staff category is employed in several different types of facility.

b)

Some shortage categories are employed in only one facility, for example, X-ray staff or laboratory staff may be employed only in the district hospital, and no transfers within the district are possible. The calculations show which of these staff categories is under the most severe work pressure and therefore which requests for extra staff should be pushed the hardest. The calculations also supply a mathematical justification for such requests. Another powerful feature of the method is that the results for each staff category can be aggregated at different levels of the health service to produce the total in post, total calculated requirement, total shortage/excess and average WISN (workload pressure). Thus the results can be produced for each health centre in a district, together with the district totals and average, as shown in Table 2. Then these district totals and averages can be listed for each of the districts in a region, together with the regional totals and averages. Finally these regional totals and averages can be listed for each of the regions in the country, together with the national totals and averages. Such aggregated results can also be produced for each type of health facility (health posts, hospitals, MCH clinics, etc.) or each category of staff (doctors, nurses, pharmacy staff, etc.) throughout the country. Additionally, the results for all types of health facility in a district can be combined to produce a comprehensive picture of the health staffing in a district, for instance, the total in post, total calculated requirement, total shortage/excess and average WISN (workload pressure). These figures can also be aggregated to produce similar comprehensive pictures of the health staffing for each region and for the country as a whole. Such aggregations are very powerful tools for human resource management in a district, a region or in the country as a whole. However, such aggregations can give really accurate results only if the figures are comprehensive, that is, they cover all the relevant health facilities which should contribute to the tables. If an aggregation is based on statistics from only a proportion of the health facilities which should be covered, then the results can give useful information on WISN ratios (workload pressures) in the country, depending on how representative are the health facilities which are covered by the figures. However, such calculations can give only an estimate of the real staffing requirements (by correcting for the missing facilities), and hence only an estimate of the real recruitment rates and training volumes which would meet these requirements. Of course, if

16 _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Section A The WISN method and its uses

nearly all the health facilities return their statistics then this estimate will be fairly accurate and certainly sufficient to offer the basis of realistic recruitment and training plans. An important aspect of these aggregated figures at all levels is that they take account of how the local conditions (population, morbidity, access, attitudes, etc.) differ at each separate facility covered in the calculations and how these variations affect the demand for services in different facilities. For example, where these local conditions lead to a low demand for services, the calculated staffing requirement by the WISN Method will be correspondingly low. These WISN results can be used as the basis for allocating staff from the centre to regions, from regions to districts, and to individual facilities within districts. In addition these figures are used to guide future recruitment and training plans. The calculations may show that there is a widespread and major imbalance between two related staff categories, e.g. a shortage of qualified nurses and a surplus of nursing assistants. This frequently signals that the surplus category may well be undertaking some of the activities of the shortage category, e.g. nursing assistants performing injections instead of nurses. This shift of activity occurs because of the pressures in health facilities from patients who are waiting for this treatment. If such a shortage is expected to persist, it may be prudent to consider changes in the training of staff (in the example, training nurse assistants to give injections). This can also work in the reverse direction, for example, nurses performing essential cleaning or bed-making activities in hospitals where there are persistent shortages of nursing assistants. Here the results show the extent to which there is an inefficient and uneconomic use of highly trained professional staff.

Poor service quality and cost-effectiveness


In some situations the WISN results show that staff are under extreme workload pressure (calculated staff requirement much larger than current staffing, WISN ratio small). This may arise because the number of established posts in the facility is too small, or because most of the established posts are vacant or, in some countries, because most of the staff are on secondment elsewhere. These results mean that because of the workload pressures the staff are spending much less time on average on each activity (e.g. patient consultation) than is set by the Activity Standards and this indicates that the quality of the service being delivered is very much poorer than the quality of service (acceptable professional standards in the circumstances of the country) on which the Activity Standards are based. This is the situation, for example, in a health centre with one doctor where the staffing requirement according to the workload is calculated to be four doctors (WISN ratio 0.25). If the Activity Standard for outpatient attendances in this facility is eight minutes, these results mean that the doctor spends on average only two minutes with each outpatient. In these days of cost-effectiveness and value for money, countries may wish to establish some minimum average times for certain activities on the argument that with shorter times the service is too ineffective and not worth the money it is costing. This would be equivalent to setting a minimum WISN ratio, which may differ depending on the staff category and type of health facility. If there is a health facility where there are WISN ratios less than this minimum level for a category of staff and where there is no prospect of posting more of these staff, its situation should be examined as a matter of priority. In some facilities there may be a compensating excess of staff in a related staff category who undertake extra tasks (not in their job description) in order to equalise the workload between staff categories. If a severe staff shortage in one category and loss of its service quality occurs more generally in the country, it is a signal to consider alternatives, for example, restricting the shortage category to perform only their more highly skilled tasks and

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 17

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

transferring their remaining tasks to another category in more plentiful supply; or allowing vacant posts which are established for the shortage category to be occupied temporarily by staff in another category; or changing the designation of some established posts which are continually vacant in the facility in order to open them to another staff category in more plentiful supply; etc. All of these would require professional, administrative, financial and perhaps union approval.

7.

Using the WISN Method: human resource management and planning


The first use of the WISN Method in a country is usually to review the current staffing levels in relation to the current workloads in health facilities using current medical procedures to current professional standards, as described above. However, once the method is established, a whole range of further uses are then available to assist in planning health services and to help solve specific management problems as they arise. The first calculations are based on current workloads, i.e. actual demand for health services. a) By inserting in the calculations the anticipated workloads of planned future services e.g. resulting from a planned increase in Primary Health Care services, the method will show the staffing requirements in each category corresponding to future planned increases or other changes in health services. By inserting in the calculations what health services will meet the health needs (rather than the demand for services) of the population, the method will show what the ideal health staffing in the country should be.

b)

The first calculations are based on the current professional standards set for each staff category. a) Comparing the current staffing levels with the current workloads will show what is the current professional performance, i.e. to what extent these desired professional standards can now be met by each staff category, and which categories are most in need of support in order to achieve them. By inserting in the calculations new workload standards corresponding to improved professional standards for some categories, the method will show how many extra staff would be required in these categories in order to achieve the improved standards.

b)

The first calculations are based on current conditions of employment, i.e. working hours, annual vacation, sickness and other absence, etc., and also off-the-job training time required by current in-service training policies. a) By inserting in the calculations the figures corresponding to changed conditions of employment for some categories, i.e. a shorter working week, increased vacation, etc., the method will show how many extra staff would be required in these categories in order to maintain services if these changes were introduced or to what extent services would be expected to deteriorate if no extra staff were made available. By inserting in the calculations the off-the-job training time required by new in-service training policies, the method will show how many extra staff would be required in these categories in order to maintain services with these changes or to what extent services would be expected to deteriorate if no extra staff were made available.

b)

18 _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Section A The WISN method and its uses

The first calculations use unit times or rates which are based on staff following the current medical practice using currently available equipment. a) By inserting in the calculations the new unit times or rates corresponding to new medical practices, the method will show what effect these changes would have on the requirement for each staff category concerned, e.g. what staff savings or redeployment could be expected from new medical procedures. By inserting in the calculations the new unit times or rates corresponding to the use of new medical equipment, the method will show what effect these changes would have on the requirement for each staff category concerned.

b)

The first calculations are based on the unit times or rates of the current staff categories undertaking their currently prescribed functions. By reviewing the range of these functions for each category, their workloads and the overlap between the work done by different staff categories, the results can be used to identify: a) where there is a major imbalance and it would be an advantage to transfer functions between existing categories of staff; how best to allocate new functions to existing or new categories of staff, if new services or procedures are to be introduced; whether it would be an advantage to rationalize, i.e. reduce the number of existing staff categories, and also how many staff would be required in the remaining staff categories to cover the same workload; what would be the staffing (and therefore financial) consequences of creating a new staff category to take over specified functions from existing staff categories.

b)

c)

d)

8.

The constraints and limitations of the Method


The WISN Method is a management tool for improving decisions at all levels of the health service about the provision, allocation and deployment of staff. Its calculations and results are based on the annual service statistics. These statistics in effect provide a summary picture of a facility's workload over the whole year. These factors can impose a number of constraints and limitations on the method and the results it produces, mainly related to the use of the annual service statistics. Most of these constraints and limitations can be dealt with in the calculations. In using annual statistics, the accuracy of the method is determined by the accuracy of the statistics themselves. Where the initial record-keeping in a facility is poor, the results will be inaccurate, almost invariably in the direction of under-recording workload and hence under-estimating the staffing requirements of the facility. However, if the WISN Method comes into general use and managers, staff in charge, etc. come to realize that their staffing allocations are based on their annual service statistics, the record keeping will improve and the errors may even move in the opposite direction of ove-recording. Annual statistics are usually produced by aggregating monthly returns and it is not uncommon for some monthly returns to be missing from the records at the end of the year. This particular

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 19

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

situation is not a problem. The method automatically allows for incomplete records and bases the calculation on the monthly returns which are available. In using annual statistics, the detail which can be achieved in the initial results of the calculations is determined by the detail which is available in the statistics themselves. Initial calculations of the requirements for a staff category are based on statistics of the activities (workload) of these staff. If two similar staff categories undertake the same activities (or if the different activities they undertake are combined and reported as a single figure in the annual statistics) then calculating the separate requirements for each category is not immediately possible. In these cases, calculations based on this single figure would produce a single figure showing the combined requirement for the two staff categories. A further step in the calculation is then necessary in order to produce the requirements for each staff category separately. For example: in one country which has implemented the method, two categories of nurses undertake the same activities in health posts. Calculations based on the annual statistics for these activities show the combined requirement for the two categories. The managers there have also decided that the activities undertaken by both categories should be 60% by one of the staff categories and 40% by the other. A further step in the calculation divides the combined requirement in the ratio 60:40, to produce a figure for the requirement for each of the two staff categories separately. The level of detail in the statistics can also affect the accuracy of the results. For example, where the service statistics show a single figure for antenatal examinations, the Standard Workload is based on an average unit time or rate for all antenatal examinations. However, the first examination of an antenatal client should take longer than the subsequent visits. Where the statistics show separate figures for first visits and subsequent visits, a different unit time or rate can be used for each of these two figures to produce a more precise figure for the staffing requirement for this activity of antenatal examinations. Exactly the same effect occurs in the treatment of outpatients, with the first visit usually taking longer than subsequent visits. Again, some service statistics show a single figure for all laboratory tests performed whereas others show the numbers of haematology, bacteriology, parasitology, etc. tests separately. Using an appropriate unit time or rate for each type of test in the calculations gives a more precise figure of the requirement for laboratory staff as compared with using one overall average unit time or rate together with a total figure for all laboratory tests. These more detailed calculations would also show directly the requirement for staff working in haematology, bacteriology, parasitology, etc. in the laboratories, where this specialization is warranted. In using annual statistics, the method calculates retrospectively, what the staffing levels should have been last year, when the statistics were collected. This is usually not a serious practical problem since facility workloads change relatively slowly in step with catchment populations and economic circumstances. If necessary a percentage correction can be made to the results to allow for the annual trend in a facility's workload. Sometimes lack of materials can reduce the workload in a facility. If such shortages are relatively few and minor during the year, their effects can usually be ignored. But if the shortages are major and long-lasting, then the recorded annual workload in the facility is determined not by the demand for services in the locality but by the lack of materials. For example, if no X-ray films are available in a hospital for much of the year, then the X-ray machines cannot operate and the recorded annual number of X-rays taken in the hospital may reflect how much film was available rather than how many patients needed X-rays. Similarly, if there is a longstanding shortage of drugs, the recorded volume of workload in the dispensary (e.g. number of prescriptions filled) may reflect more the drug supply situation than the number of patients who were given prescriptions and should have been served. In both cases the results of the ordinary WISN calculations will show the number of

20 _________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Section A The WISN method and its uses

staff required which corresponds to the low workload figures, that is, the staff which would be required while such shortages continue. Of course, when supplies increase the recorded workload will also increase and the WISN calculations will show how many staff are required in the new situation. However, it may be unacceptable to wait for a whole year before calculating the new staffing requirements corresponding to an improved supply of materials. If it is known that supply shortages are seriously limiting the volume of health services which are being delivered, so that the annual statistics show figures lower than they would otherwise be, then special adjustments can be made to the WISN calculation. For example, the workload figure used in the calculation can be an estimate of what the volume of services should be (or is expected to be when the supply position improves) rather than what it currently is.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 21

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

22 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________ Section B Steps in design and implementation of the method

Section B: Steps in design and implementation of the method


This section covers the basic steps in implementation. It sets out the administrative arrangements for designing and implementing the WISN Method in order to achieve two objectives: first, so that the new procedure will function effectively; and second, so that its operation and results will be integrated with the ongoing management and budgeting procedures. It describes the main activities which must be undertaken during implementation and how these may be fitted together into an overall workplan for the implementation exercise. Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Starting the process: setting the objectives ...................................................................... 23 Choosing the basic design of the procedure to be implemented ...................................... 26 Setting up the implementation group ............................................................................... 28 Procedure for establishing standards of professional performance .................................. 31 Mobilizing commitment to the WISN Method................................................................. 32 Collecting and handling the data ...................................................................................... 32 Plan and budget for operating the new procedure in regular use ..................................... 34 Workplan and budget for implementation ........................................................................ 35

For convenience this Manual assumes that the Ministry of Health (MOH) or its equivalent in the country, is commissioning the work to design and implement the WISN Method, and that it will provide most of the resources (staff, materials, transport) in getting the new procedure up and running. In countries where the initiative is being taken by another body (Regional or Provincial Health Authority, health consortium, etc.), the name of this body should replace Ministry of Health or MOH in what follows.

1.

Starting the process: setting the objectives


The decision to implement the WISN Method and to set specific objectives for the new procedure must be approved by the most senior staff in MOH for two reasons: a) Use of the results: resource allocation decisions, particularly those concerning staff, are taken at the highest levels of MOH and frequently involve strongly-held views and hardfought battles. A new technique which aims to provide an objective basis for making many of these decisions must be approved by the staff at these senior levels. Otherwise, if its results are unwelcome in these decision-making processes, it will not be used there and it will not then command respect at lower levels. The method must secure top level support and a public commitment to use its results if it is to operate effectively.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 23

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

b)

Coverage: the method can be applied to all facilities, services, staff, areas, etc. A decision to exclude some parts of the health service from the calculations, and therefore from an assessment of the service quality and equity of staff distribution in them, requires a top-level decision.

Considering the novelty of both the WISN Method and the information it produces, these top level decision-makers may require some background on the basis of the method, its operation, its results and their uses before they can come to the initial decision on whether to approve the implementation of the method. This background material will be found in Section A of this Manual. Once the decision to implement the method has been taken and backed by the most senior staff, it is necessary to set specific objectives for the exercise. The objectives which are set at this stage should include: - the services and types of health facility which are to be covered by the WISN procedure; - the geographical areas to be covered; - the staff categories to be covered (which in the first instance should be health professionals, not staff without health training); - the use of the results - who will use them, and for what purposes. The decision-makers may choose a phased implementation of the WISN Method and set initial objectives which will cover only part of the total health service. This phased approach may be by staff categories. Covering the largest cadres first gives the maximum pay-off for a given amount of effort. For example, the initial implementation in Papua New Guinea covered nursing staff in all rural health centres, urban clinics and hospitals and also aid post staff; these comprised 87% of the total government health staff in the country. The method was later extended to other paramedical staff (laboratory, X-ray, pharmacy, anaesthesia, physiotherapy, occupational therapy) throughout the country and then to hospital-based doctors. It may be desirable to cover first those staff categories which have priority staffing problems. In Kenya the method was applied first to hospital technical staff where major mismatches between supply and demand were suspected (radiographers, laboratory staff, pharmacy staff and physiotherapists) and the work was later extended to hospital doctors, nurses, etc. In Sri Lanka the method was first applied to dental staff because there was very strong support from the most senior level of the cadre and also detailed and comprehensive dental service data was readily available. These results provided to senior staff in other cadres a convincing demonstration of how the method works and its value. Alternatively the phased approach can be geographical and/or by type of health facility. The implementation work can start in a few localities, e.g. districts, and then expand in a number of carefully planned phases to cover the whole country. For example, the initial implementation in Tanzania covered all staff categories in the health centres and dispensaries in two districts (one urban and one rural) in different regions. The method was later extended to all health centres and dispensaries in the remaining districts in the two regions. Subsequently all hospital staff in the two regions were covered. Finally the method was extended to all health facilities in the remaining regions in the country. A phased implementation which starts in a fairly small way with a few staff categories and/or geographical area and/or types of facility has two main benefits. It allows the implementation group (see point 3) to learn from direct experience how best to do their job. It also provides early examples of in-country results which can be used to good effect when introducing the method

24 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________ Section B Steps in design and implementation of the method

subsequently to other locations, staff categories, types of facility, etc. in the later phases of the work. It is usually best to complete the implementation for MOH services before considering extending it to other government health services (armed forces, prison health services, etc.) or to nongovernment health services (provided by missions, companies, plantations, privately-owned health facilities, etc.) It is also important to consider how the results are intended to be used, and by whom, as part of the objectives of the exercise. There are a number of possibilities here: - the centre e.g.the Ministry of Health, and within that: - service departments, e.g. curative services, PHC, etc., to monitor the allocation and deployment of staff to different types of health facility and geographical areas, to identify particular situations of staff shortage/excess, to determine how best to deploy each staff category in relation to actual requirements; - vertical programmes, e.g. malaria, to monitor the allocation and deployment of staff in relation to workload in different geographical areas in the country, and to determine how best to deploy staff in relation to actual requirements; - personnel administration, to monitor the overall deployment of different staff categories in the country, to have a rational basis for reviewing requests for staff increases and determining the posting of new staff, to have a rational basis for reviewing requests for staff transfer and to control the transfer of staff in accordance with actual service requirements, to have quantitative estimates of the shortages in each staff category; - finance, to secure a quantitative basis for the salary and other emoluments component of annual budgets, to be able to provide figures for the service effects of proposed budget increases or cuts; - planning, to have estimates of the staffing requirements by category for planned services or proposed changes to them; - provincial and/or district health offices, and the service, personnel, finance and planning functions at province and/or district level, particularly for countries with decentralised services. The decision on the use of the results at these levels will depend on the responsibilities and authority delegated to each of these levels. The WISN results can only be used in practice at those levels which have the responsibility and authority for one or more of the following: posting new staff, deployment of existing staff, transferring staff between facilities, setting staffing targets, health workforce planning); - large hospitals, for the allocation of staff to Departments and wards; - ministry of local government (if local health services are part of local government services); - ministry of education, if it is responsible for the teaching hospitals, school health services, etc. and approves their budgets, deploys their staff, etc.; - any other government ministry which has the responsibility for providing a significant amount of health services and also controls the budget for these activities, e.g. the armed services, the prison service, etc.; - public services commission or its equivalent, to monitor the medical activities undertaken by health staff categories and their workloads, consider the need for changes in the number and scope of health staff categories;

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 25

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

- missions and other health NGOs, company/plantation health services and private health organizations which employ substantial numbers of staff in order to provide health services to the population at large, to employees, etc. - medical and other professional bodies and trades unions for health staff. This is an exhaustive list of those organizations, bodies and groups in a country which could find the results of the WISN Method useful. It covers all the possibilities which usually arise. However, only the most important of them should be included in the initial objectives. The purpose of the list above is to offer a number of suggestions from which to choose those organizations, etc. which should be selected as the first set of users of the results of the WISN Method.

2.

Choosing the basic design of the procedure to be implemented


Once the objectives have been established it is necessary to consider one major aspect of the procedure which will be used in the implementation whether it will be manual or computerized. This must be done before it is possible to determine the timetable and the resources required for implementing the method. The WISN procedure which is to be implemented is best considered as being divided into three main activities: 1. 2. 3. Collecting the data to be used in the calculations. Performing the calculations and producing the tables of results. Using the results in management decisions.

When the procedure has been established as a regular component of the annual cycle of operations, the first two activities are performed once a year, as soon as the new set of annual service statistics are available. The third activity is continuous and always uses the most recent set of WISN results available. In deciding on the system to be implemented in the country, there is one major choice to make how and where the calculations are to be performed and there are two principal options to consider in making this choice. One option is manual calculations, in which each health facility which is to be covered in the exercise could carry out its own calculations to produce its own results for its own use. These results are sent to the next higher level (e.g. district health office) to be consolidated with similar results from other facilities to produce the aggregated tables of district results (totals, averages and comparison of units) for use by the district health team. These district tables of results are then sent to the next higher level (for example, provincial health office) for consolidation and use by the provincial health team, and so on up to the MOH. This way of doing the calculations calls for the design and printing of a set of pro formas (one for each staff category) for all the individual facilities. At each facility the data items (annual service statistics and actual staffing) are entered and the calculations (simple arithmetic only) are performed. An example of such a pro forma, which was used in Papua New Guinea, is shown in Fig.1, Section A. (Whether this is a practicable option depends on the calibre and educational level of the staff in charge of the health facilities being covered in the exercise; in rural health facilities in some countries this option could not be considered.) In addition, a separate set of pro formas must be designed and printed for each level of aggregation of the results (district, province, MOH).

26 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________ Section B Steps in design and implementation of the method

An alternative here is for the manual calculations for each facility to be performed by the clerical staff in the district health offices (where the annual service statistics and actual staffing levels for each facility are usually available); the results for each facility are then sent to the facilities for local use. These results for each facility are combined by the district health office staff to produce aggregated tables of district results for use by the district health team. They are also sent to the next higher level, as described above. The other option is to use computer calculations in which the data (annual service statistics and actual staffing for each facility) are sent to a centre (MOH if computers are available there) and the results for each province, district and facility are printed out and sent back to them. It is undoubtedly easier, cheaper and more reliable for computers to do the calculations and to print out tables of results for each province, district and the individual facilities. By using computers it is also relatively easy to do more complex and sophisticated calculations in order to extract more useful information from the data. The main disadvantage of this choice is the large volume of data input into the computer which must be done at the centre. If computers are available at province or district levels, the data input and calculations can be done there (using standard computer programmes supplied by the centre), with printed tables of results sent to the lower levels and diskettes of data sent to the higher levels for aggregation. In Tanzania the data sheets for each health facility were sent by the district health offices to MOH to be entered into a computer, and the printed-out tables showing the results for each facility and district totals/averages were sent back to each district. In considering which of these two approaches to use, it is important to consider what must be accomplished and what it costs in order to implement each of them.

Manual calculations
1. Pro formas for the calculations, one for each staff category employed, must be designed and printed; different pro formas are needed for each type of facility (clinic, health centre, hospital, etc.) and also for each level of the health service at which results will be produced (facility, district, province, centre). Instruction booklets on how to complete each of these pro formas (for each staff category, for each type of facility, and for each level of the organization) must be written and tested. A sufficient quantity of pro formas and booklets must be printed to supply all the facilities and all the district and provincial offices covered by the exercise. Training sessions will be necessary in each district to introduce the pro formas to those staff who will fill them in and to go through the instruction booklet with these staff using worked examples. For the implementation exercise the pro formas and booklets to be used in the facilities can be distributed during this training. In subsequent years, when the same pro formas will be used, no training is necessary so the pro formas will have to be distributed to the facilities by a different method.

2.

3.

4.

Computer calculations
1. The implementation exercise will need the services of an individual who is able to use spreadsheets, in order to design and enter the data input format and the calculation formulae.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 27

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

2.

Both in the implementation exercise and also in subsequent years there will need to be access to a computer with a spreadsheet programme (Lotus 1-2-3, Excel, etc.), and the method calls for the purchase of a number of diskettes each year for data storage (one per district). The annual service statistics and actual staffing levels of individual facilities must be made available for input into the computer from the most convenient source. Sometimes these statistics are already available at the centre and perhaps some of them may even have been computerized. At worst they are available in the district health offices. It is rarely costeffective to arrange to collect them from individual facilities. If the annual statistics for individual facilities are not compiled from their monthly figures in the district health offices it may be necessary to design and send out a form to each district office on which the monthly figures are copied from the files by the district health office staff and returned to the centre. Normally completing these forms, which are then used as computer input sheets, requires no special training. The annual service statistics and actual staffing levels of each facility must be input into the computer. This procedure is not difficult to perform, but it does require individuals who are capable of focused attention and of maintaining their application to a task.

3.

4.

Although either computers or a purely manual method can be used, the computer-based system is a good deal cheaper in running costs, significantly faster in operation and much more powerful and reliable in doing the calculations. Also most MOHs have at least one computer with a spreadsheet package on which the calculations can be done once a year. The remainder of this manual describes the implementation of the WISN Method based on using a computer to perform the calculations and to produce the tables of results. A manual method using specially designed pro formas for the calculations follows exactly the same principles, although some of the practical details of operation are different.

3.

Setting up the implementation group


The implementation group is the name given to all those who are concerned with the design of the new procedure and its implementation according to the objectives which have been agreed. The implementation group consists of two sets of people: - the steering committee, whose functions are to set the policies for the work within the agreed objectives, to approve strategies for implementation, to agree workplans and budgets for the development, to monitor progress, and to maintain an overall supervision of the work; - the implementation manager and his/her task force, whose function is to do the job.

The steering committee


Normally the primary responsibility for designing and implementing the WISN Method in a country is given to one MOH department or unit, e.g. planning department, health manpower planning unit, personnel department, etc. A senior member of MOH whose responsibility includes this department or unit should be the chairman of the steering committee. The implementation manager should be a member of the department or unit which has been selected to carry out the implementation. The steering committee should consist of:
28 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________ Section B Steps in design and implementation of the method

- representatives of the providers of the information: representatives of the MOH functional departments responsible for the type of health facilities and/or the Provinces and Districts in which the initial implementation is to take place. Thus if the objectives specify that the rural health services are to be covered in the first implementation, then a representative of the MOH department responsible for these services should be a member of the steering committee. If implementation is to start in one specific province or district or a number of them, the corresponding provincial or district health officers should be members of the steering committee. (If there are also central (MOH) Departments responsible for the health services in geographical areas, then representatives of those departments which cover the areas of initial implementation should also be members of the steering committee.) - representatives of the users of the results: representatives of the organizations, bodies and groups which are to be initial users of the results of the WISN Method, according to the objectives which have been set for the initial implementation. This will very likely include many who are also providers of information. The chairman, responsible for the department or unit undertaking the implementation of the method, is also responsible for the budget which is giving the major support to this work.

The implementation manager


The steering committee must appoint an implementation manager to be responsible overall to the steering committee for the implementation of the WISN Method and also for its integration into the management and budgeting procedures of the organization, that is, the institutionalisation of the new procedure. The implementation manager will be a senior officer in the department or unit selected to undertake the implementation exercise. The implementation manager must be a sufficiently senior officer to have access to the senior decision-makers in the MOH, and also have sufficient status to command respect from Provincial and/or district health officers, staff in other government departments, representatives of the health professions, etc. The implementation manager acts as the secretary of the steering committee.

The task force


The task force is led by the implementation manager and consists of: - full time core staff, drawn largely from the implementation manager's own staff and located in the task force office; - full time or part time technical resource persons, e.g. a statistician, a computer operator, etc., usually seconded from another group to work in the task force office; - liaison persons, undertaking some local activities as and when necessary, e.g. arranging meetings, obtaining documents or information, etc., in the cooperating MOH departments and the initial provinces/districts. The task force usually starts with whatever staff and other resources the implementation manager can mobilize by his/her own ingenuity and enterprise. The actual task force requirements become clear when the workplan for the implementation exercise is produced.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 29

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Administrative locus of the WISN implementation activity


The steering committee and the task force are intended to be temporary groups which exist during the implementation of the WISN Method for the sole purpose of achieving that implementation. When this is completed, the WISN activity should be a regular annual procedure (like budget and training school intakes) located in personnel or planning or some other appropriate department. For example, if the health service statistics are computerised, the WISN results could be produced automatically as a sub-programme of the annual statistics, and the WISN function could be part of the health information system. The manual recommends a steering committee function to oversee the exercise and a task force (executive function) to carry out all the activities required (set Activity Standards, collect data, set up computer spreadsheets, input data, produce results). Often these functions are performed by a Steering Committee and Task Force set up for the purpose. But for convenience the WISN exercise may be integrated into an ongoing programme of work, for example, producing a personnel plan for one or more categories of health staff, reviewing the budgets and established posts (staffing review) in some or all health facilities, planned reduction in the number of health staff categories, etc. There are both potential advantages and disadvantages in integrating the implementation of the WISN Method into an ongoing (usually larger) programme of work. Advantages: if the ongoing programme already has high-level backing within the ministry and a substantial budget, the WISN task force has the use of this authority (access to senior staff at the centre and in the provinces) and resources (office space, transport, photocopying, computers) in order to undertake its activities without having to establish or procure them for itself. Disadvantages: the aims of the ongoing programme will be at least wider and perhaps even different from the aims of a WISN steering committee and task force. If a task force is appointed from within the ongoing programme, the skills and capabilities (and also the interests) of the staff may not be directly relevant to the tasks of WISN implementation. In addition, if one or more existing working groups are given the extra responsibilities of a WISN task force, their focus on the aims of the ongoing programme may delay, constrain or even negate progress on WISN implementation.

Liaison between steering committee and task force


It is very desirable for the liaison between the steering committee and the task force to be institutionalized. This is done in Egypt, where the leader of the task force is the secretary of the steering committee, and in Oman, where the Director General of Planning is a member of the steering committee and the Director of Planning is the leader of the task force.

30 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________ Section B Steps in design and implementation of the method

4.

Procedure for establishing standards of professional performance


The workload standards to be used in the calculations are based on standards of adequate professional performance and service delivery. If these professional standards (Activity Standards, see A.3) are to be applied nationally and the results are to be useful, they must be realistic. It is of course understandable that a country would like to have the best medical services for its population. However, if Activity Standards for the exercise are set too high they will produce calculated staffing requirements which are very large and quite beyond the country's capacity, either to train them or to employ and pay them, in the near or medium term future. The Activity Standards set in the exercise must be practicable in the circumstances of the country, that is, they must be achievable in the medium-term future, if the results are to have any practical value as a basis for current managerial decision-making. These practicable standards can be considered if necessary as a set of intermediate targets. When these intermediate standards have been achieved, higher professional standards can be set as new targets for achievement and the WISN calculations are then repeated to produce new staffing requirements. Furthermore, the standards which are set must be authoritative, that is, they must have the backing of senior and respected individuals who can speak on behalf of a cadre. One way of achieving this is for the standards for a cadre to be set by a group of selected senior staff in the cadre who have a wide-ranging and long experience of the duties and working activities of the cadre, for example, a group of nurses each in charge of several rural health facilities who themselves have worked in a number of such facilities, a group of senior laboratory technologists in charge of the major hospital laboratories in the country, a group of hospital matrons from different types of hospital (district, provincial, national, teaching), a group of medical officers each with some years of experience of working in different types of hospital in the country, a group of consultants and professors from one specialty in the teaching hospitals (at this level each medical specialty must be dealt with separately; similarly the specialist hospitals must be dealt with separately as well). Each of these groups of staff is expected to bring to bear professional expertise ("how should things be done?") and recent working experience and/or observation ("how much of this is practicable?") concerning their cadre. Each such "cadre group" should include a representative of the relevant department of MOH which deals with the cadre being considered. An alternative approach which has been found successful, particularly for hospital staff, is to invite the senior staff from all departments or units in a facility to work together to set the Activity Standards for all the staff categories who work in their own and similar facilities. Thus all the senior staff in a hospital could be invited to a workshop in which carefully selected working groups draft the Activity Standards for all the cadres employed in the facility; these standards are then discussed and approved in plenary session. Representatives of the relevant MOH departments should also attend the workshop. In using such a "facility group" it is usual to select a hospital, etc. which is generally reckoned to have a good performance in order to set Activity Standards. The aim is to use the results of the workshop as the national standards for the staff employed in this type of facility in the country. The detailed instructions and guidance for producing Activity Standards are the same for both approaches - cadre groups or facility groups. They are given in Section C.2. This procedure establishes the Activity Standards which are to be used for all the staff categories which will be covered in the implementation of the WISN Method. Setting the Activity Standards which are to be used in the implementation exercise is a task which must be fitted into the early part of the workplan for the implementation exercise.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 31

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Sometimes a cadre has already established its own standards of professional practice. For example, in many countries the nursing cadre has produced a handbook of nursing standards (or practice) which stipulates for each category of nurse the number of hospital inpatients which should be supervised per ward nurse on duty (which may differ for different types of hospital and/or ward and/or shift), the number of outpatients which can be treated per day, and the number of clinic clients which can be seen per day (which may differ for different types of clinic). Normally some items in these handbooks or standards of practice can be converted directly into Activity Standards for use in the WISN Method. Also the health services research groups in some countries have carried out job analyses or work study exercises on certain staff categories and can supply accurate timings for various activities.

5.

Mobilizing commitment to the WISN Method


There is one further activity which must be undertaken during the implementation exercise. If the WISN Method is to succeed in the country, it will be necessary to mobilize the commitment of the potential users of the WISN results which the method produces. Unless the results will be used to improve the management and operation of health services in the country, the work should not be undertaken. It should be emphasized that the WISN Method produces an entirely new type of information (workload pressure) as well as detailed information not normally available (staff shortage/surplus for each staff category in each health facility). Therefore managers at several levels (national, province, district) must be trained in how to use the WISN results for their own decision-making. This is best done in half-day or one-day workshops for groups of up to 20 at a time, although larger groups have been used successfully. In these workshops the material in Section A is presented, using examples and results from the country itself wherever possible. After each segment of the presentation the participants split into working groups to review sample tables of results and identify what management action they call for. These workshops should be scheduled soon after the implementation exercise has begun so that some tables of results from the country itself are available for demonstration and for working group exercises. It can also be most desirable (depending on the circumstances of the country) for representatives of the professional bodies (for doctors, nurses, dentists, etc.) and of any trade unions representing health staff to be invited to these workshops as participants, so that they can understand what the new method is and how the results are to be used.

6.

Collecting and handling the data


Before starting to plan and budget for the implementation exercise, there are two major factors which must be investigated and decided - how the most recent set of annual statistics from health facilities are to be assembled for input into the computer, and what resources will be required for computerizing this data and producing the results.

Collecting the data


Assess the possible sources of the data required (annual service statistics and actual staffing numbers for each facility) and how the data can be obtained. This could require visiting a number of district health offices to investigate: a) the service statistics which are received from health facilities and stored: do all facilities make statistical returns? are those which are received complete or are some items or even some months missing? how promptly are they received? do the district health offices

32 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________ Section B Steps in design and implementation of the method

actually aggregate the annual statistics for each facility from the monthly figures? how accurately is this done (e.g. are missing months ignored)? b) c) data on the actual staffing in health facilities: is it complete? up-to-date? the form in which the statistics are held: are summary sheets prepared which contain the workload data required by the WISN Method? if so can these sheets be borrowed or photocopied for computer input? is there adequate administrative and clerical capacity in the district health offices to undertake various activities, e.g. to assemble the statistics for each facility from the files, to transcribe these statistics from the records to computer input sheets? the practical scheduling of the activities in (d): are there other priority activities which will occur in the district health offices during the planned period of the implementation exercise and which would cause difficulty or delay? what transport will be available for visits to district health offices and provincial health offices to arrange for and/or undertake the collection of the data?

d)

e)

f)

When the answers to all these questions have been assembled, it will be possible to make an informed judgement on the best method of collecting the data for the WISN calculations, and also to set out the reasons for justifying this judgement to the steering committee. If all the data (service statistics and staffing for each facility) is already available at the centre, this part of the investigation will be easier and less time-consuming.

Producing the results


Assess what resources will be required to computerize the data and to what extent these resources are available: a) Which computers might be used? How much spare capacity do they have? Would any regular production jobs they may have clash with developing the WISN spreadsheets and running the calculations? It might be possible to identify the computer which will be used when the new WISN procedure is in regular operation but also it could be desirable to use a different computer during the implementation, e.g. a computer used for research, where access for setting up and testing the computer calculations may be easier. Which staff with a knowledge of spreadsheets could be available to set up the WISN calculations on the computer? Under what circumstances or arrangements can they be made available for the task? What arrangements must be made for the task force to supply its own materials (paper, printer ribbons, etc.)?

b)

c)

Answers to the questions are necessary in order to decide on how to computerize the data and justify these decisions to the steering committee.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 33

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

7.

Plan and budget for operating the new procedure in regular use
Before undertaking the detailed design and planning to set up the new procedure it is most desirable to look briefly beyond the implementation activities and consider how the procedure will operate in subsequent years when it is established as a regular component of the annual cycle of operations in the health services. The results of this assessment could affect what is to be done during the implementation exercise. The questions which should be addressed here are: 1. Who will be responsible for the effective operation of the procedure? Which unit will perform the annual exercise of obtaining service statistics for each facility to be covered, entering these service statistics into a computer, and printing out the tables of results? Which unit will respond to particular enquiries and requests for calculations during the remainder of the year? (These could be two different units.) Where will the unit(s) fit in the organogram? Will the procedure require employing extra staff? (This is most unlikely since it occurs only once a year soon after the beginning of the financial year, when the annual service statistics for the previous year become available.) What staff will be used in operating the new procedure? What will their respective tasks be? What changes will be required to existing job descriptions? What will be the annual direct costs of operating the procedure, e.g. obtaining computer diskettes to store district data, etc.? On whose budget will these costs appear? Which computer will be used? (The computer will be used fairly intensively for these calculations for a few weeks each year when the new set of annual service statistics becomes available.) How is the data to be collected each year? Where from? By what means? How long before all the data is received at the centre? If it is to be collected at district health offices, are there other priority activities which occur annually in the district health office at the same time as the new set of annual service statistics becomes available thus delaying the WISN data collection?

2.

3.

4.

5.

At this stage some of these items must be estimated, but the exercise of doing so is most valuable in clarifying and sharpening ideas about what alternatives should be considered and what will be practicable in the circumstances of the MOH. This in turn will help determine what should be implemented. A brief description of how the new procedure is intended to operate once it is established should be included with the implementation workplan and budget which is put to the steering committee for its consideration (see below).

34 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________ Section B Steps in design and implementation of the method

8.

Workplan and budget for implementation


The workplan for the implementation activities should cover the following steps: 1. Determine the Activity Standards for the categories of staff to be covered in the exercise (as set out in the objectives, see point 1). These figures are a vital part of the calculations and must be available before any WISN results can be produced. This will entail holding a halfor one-day meeting for each cadre or a two- or three-day workshop to cover all the cadres in one type of facility, e.g. hospitals. The two different approaches are described in point 4. This should be one of the first activities in the workplan schedule. Convert the Activity Standards set by the professionals (unit times, rates of working, fixed time allowances, etc.) for each staff category into the corresponding standard (annual) workload figures to be used in WISN calculations. These calculations are set out in Section C.3. This must be completed before the calculations can be set up on the computer spreadsheets. Set up on the computer the data entry format and the calculations of staff requirements for each type of health facility (see Section C.5). This must be done after 1 and 2 are completed. The computer set-up should be tested on the first data collected, to ensure that it is working correctly. Obtain the data (annual service statistics and current staffing levels) for entry into the computer. Whether this comes from district health offices or is already at the centre, it is best to secure a small amount first and use it to test the computer set-up before committing the task force to the whole of the planned data-gathering exercise. Enter all the data for one District and produce the first district summary table, i.e. listing the results for all the facilities of one particular type in the district with district totals and averages (see example, A.7). This tests the instructions in the computer for producing the tables and provides results for the first training sessions of the users (see step 7 below). Enter the data for the remaining districts to be covered in the implementation exercise and produce the results according to the objectives which have been set for the exercise (district summaries, province summaries, national summary as appropriate). Design the training for user managers (materials and exercises for a half- or one-day event). This is described in point 5. It should be scheduled into the timetable soon after the first district summary table is produced (see step 5 above) so that these results can be used in training. Schedule into the workplan regular progress reports to the steering committee. Present the final results and a brief description of the exercise to the steering committee.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8. 9.

If districts are to be covered separately and in sequence, it is most desirable for the workplan schedule to allow sufficient time to produce the results from the first district(s) and to have them available as examples when working in the subsequent districts.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 35

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Once the workplan (list of activities to be undertaken, their sequence and the effort required for each) has been produced it is then possible to determine jointly the task force staffing requirements (numbers and skills), other resource requirements (access to a computer, computer materials, transport, etc.) and the timetable for the workplan. These items are interdependent - the larger the task force the shorter the timetable (within limits). From the workplan a detailed budget should be produced; this will presumably follow the government budgeting regulations of the country (travel allowances, per diem, etc.) The workplan and budget for implementation and a brief description of the proposed design of the WISN procedure being implemented should be presented to the steering committee for its approval before implementation starts.

36 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

Section C: Technical factors


This section describes how to deal with the technical/mathematical components which underlie the whole method and which apply to calculating the Staffing Requirements for all staff categories. Contents 1. Determining available working time per year .................................................................. 37 How to calculate for each staff category, the amount of time available per year for delivering health services, taking account of the time spent on training, vacations, sickness and other absences. 2. Setting Activity Standards ................................................................................................ 43 How to set the Activity Standards for the main activities and functions undertaken by each staff category employed in health facilities. 3. Turning Activity Standards into Standard Workloads ..................................................... 56 Translating Activity Standards (activity times, rates of working, time allowances) into the equivalent Standard Workloads (the volume of work done in one year) for use in the calculations. 4. Using standard workloads and allowance standards to calculate staffing requirements .. 61 The procedures and format for performing the WISN calculations. 5. Computerization of the WISN calculations ...................................................................... 65 The principles and main guidelines for implementing the computerization of the WISN calculations and producing tables of results. Annex A Staffing requirements for time-specified posts ........................................................ 69 Annex B Instructions for groups which are setting activity standards .................................... 71

1.

Determining available working time per year


The WISN Method is based on the calculated Standard Workload for each staff category in each type of health facility. This Standard Workload is the amount or volume of work in delivering health services which can be accomplished during the course of a year by a competent and motivated staff member working to acceptable professional standards. Health professionals can deliver their services only during the time which they actually spend on the job, that is, allowing for time spent away from their duties during the year on vacation, sickness absence, training, etc. The calculation of the time which is available from staff to undertake work tasks is designed to cover all situations including those countries where the working days are not all of equal length, e.g. a short day is worked before or after the weekly break, and also in order to cover those staff who undertake shift or night working.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 37

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

The calculation of the health personnel required to perform the current workload (i.e. to deliver the volume of services which is shown in the annual service statistics) must take account of the fact that sometimes employees are quite legitimately not available to deliver services at their normal place of work throughout the whole year because of: 1. Vacation: assumed to be a fixed number of working days per year according to regulations; the length of annual vacation may be different for different staff categories. Public holidays: assumed to be a fixed number of working days per year according to regulations, which is the same for all staff categories. Off-the-job training: courses, conferences, workshops, study tours, etc. which are (or should be) approved in advance according to staff development policies. This is usually not a set number of days per year for each staff member, and so an average per staff member must be obtained, which may differ according to staff category. The average may be obtained from training statistics if they are available. Alternatively it is frequently good enough to have this average estimated for a staff category by the group which is setting the Activity Standards (unit times or rates) for the category (see Section C.2 below). Sickness and all other absence: an estimated average number of days absence per year which may differ according to staff category. The average number of days per staff member may be obtained from personnel statistics if they are available. Alternatively it is frequently good enough to have this average estimated for a staff category by the group which is setting the Activity Standards (unit times or rates) for the category (see Section C.2 below).

2.

3.

4.

The steps in the calculation are the same for every staff category: a) total the number of days per year for the items 1-4 above; this is the average number of working days per year on which a staff member is not available for delivering services and for which a correction must be made; divide the total from (a) by the number of working days in the week (e.g. 5, 5.5 or 6) to obtain the equivalent number of weeks in the year for which a correction must be made; subtract the result in (b) from 52; this gives the number of weeks in the year on average for which this category of staff is available to undertake normal service delivery activities; multiply the result in (c) by the statutory number of working days in a week (5, 5.5 or 6 as in (b) above); this gives the average number of days in the year for which this category of staff is available to undertake normal working duties; multiply the result in (d) by the statutory number of working hours in a full working day; this gives the average number of hours in the year for which this category of staff is available to undertake normal working duties.

b)

c)

d)

e)

Example 1 The working week is six days of six hours per day, i.e. 6 days x 6 hours per day = 36 hours per week. All staff categories:

38 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

- have five weeks annual vacation - are away from the job for training on average for two weeks per year - have on average 10 days per year of sickness and other absence. In the country there are 12 days statutory public holiday per year.

Calculation
1. 2. 3. 4. a) b) c) d) e) Vacation days/yr (5 weeks x 6 days/week) = Public holidays days/yr Training days/yr (2 weeks x 6 days/week) = Absences days/yr 30 12 12 10 64 10.7 41.3 248 1,488

TOTAL unavailable days/yr Unavailable weeks/yr (divide by 6) Available weeks/yr (subtract from 52) Available days/yr (multiply by 6) Available hours/yr (multiply by 6)

Usually statistics are not available on training days and absence days per year (items 3 and 4 above), and it is necessary to obtain estimates for each staff category which is being covered in the WISN calculations. These estimates are best supplied for each staff category by the groups setting the Activity Standards for the staff category (see Section C.2). The figures shown in items (c), (d) and (e): 41.3 available weeks per year 248 available days per year 1,488 available hours per year are actually the same piece of information (available time per year) expressed in three different ways - in weeks, days and hours. It is useful to calculate all three figures. They are frequently all used in the calculation of Standard Workloads because some unit times, rates or allowances will be set per week, some per day and some per hour. Sometimes unit times, rates and allowances are set per month, e.g. pharmaceutical assistants in the country spend two days per month for stocktaking in dispensaries. The average available working time per month (averaged over the year) is calculated from:
Available days per year Available working time per month = 12

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 39

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Thus the available working time per month in the example above is:

248 days/year 12 = 20.7 days/month

If pharmaceutical assistants in the country spend two days per month stocktaking, then this activity occupies: 2/20.7 = 0.097 = 9.7% of their available working time. Example 2 The working week is five days of eight hours per day and one day of four hours, i.e. 5.5 days or 44 hours/week. A senior staff category (A), e.g. medical officer has six weeks annual vacation; is away from the job for training on average for three weeks per year; has on average five days per year of sickness and other absence. A more junior staff category (B), e.g. medical aide has four weeks annual vacation; is away from the job for training on average for one week per year has on average 15 days per year of sickness and other absence. There are 10 days statutory public holiday per year for all staff.

Calculation
Category A (Medical officer) 1. 2. 3. 4. a) b) c) d) e) Vacation days/yr Public holidays days/yr Training days/yr Absences days/yr Total unavailable days/yr Unavailable weeks/yr (divide by 5.5) Available weeks/yr (subtract from 52) Available days/yr (multiply by 5.5) Available hours/yr (multiply by 8) 6 x 5.5 = 33 10 3 x 5.5 = 16.5 5 64.5 11.7 40.3 222 1,776 Category B (Medical aide) 4 X 5.5 = 22 10 1 x 5.5 = 5.5 15 52.5 9.5 42.5 234 1,872

Although calculations for only two staff categories are shown here, more columns could be used to perform the corresponding calculations for as many different staff categories as is necessary, i.e. where there are different figures in any of the items 1-4.

40 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

The figures shown in items (c), (d) and (e) for Category A, i.e. 40.3 available weeks per year 222 available days per year 1,776 available hours per year are actually the same piece of information (available time per year for staff in Category A) expressed in three different ways in weeks, days and hours. The corresponding figures for the available time in a year for staff in Category B are: 42.5 available weeks per year 234 available days per year 1,872 available hours per year The average available working time per month for these staff categories is:
222 days/year = 18.5 days/month 12 234 days/year = 19.5 days/month 12

Category A:

Category B:

The results of calculating the average available working-time per year for different staff categories can be used directly to calculate the Staffing Requirements of posts which must be manned according to a fixed time pattern rather than according to workload, for example, an office receptionist post which must be staffed continuously throughout the year during normal working hours irrespective of the number of callers, a hospital pharmacy in-charge post which must be staffed while the pharmacy is open for business irrespective of the volume of dispensing being done, a security guard post or an intensive care unit post, which must be manned day and night continuously throughout the year. Examples of these calculations are shown in Annex A.

On-call service
One type of working arrangement, on-call service, does not fit into the calculations of available working-time per year given above. In on-call duty, staff are available for service during official off-duty hours at nights and weekends and they work during this period only when there is a demand for their services. This is frequently the arrangement with laboratory and X-ray staff in the smaller hospitals, particularly those which operate 24-hour accident and emergency services, and also with midwifery staff. Arrangements for on-call service differ. Sometimes the on-call staff are available within the health facility itself; they are provided with a room there but they are not disturbed until their services are required. Alternatively, particular staff are nominated as being on-call and are brought in from their own homes when needed. The question arises as to what levels of staffing are required to cover on-call service as well as duty during normal working hours. The accommodation arrangements for staff on on-call services are irrelevant to the WISN calculation. The sole factor of importance is the method of recompense used for on-call duty. Two main methods are used: time off in lieu and extra payment.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 41

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

In some countries a proportion of the on-call duty time is given as time off in lieu. This proportion may be 100%, i.e. the whole of the on-call time is counted as duty time, so that a night on-call (4.00 p.m. 8.00 a.m., i.e. 16 hours) is followed by two days (8-hour shifts) off. More usually the arrangement is that a night or week on-call is followed by one day or week off, since normally the workload at night is very light. For WISN purposes the actual duration of the on-call time is ignored and the time off in lieu is counted as ordinary working time. Thus if a facility uses on-call duty as a permanent feature of its staffing arrangements, then the calculation of its Staffing Requirement has two components: - staff required to cope with the normal workload as shown in the service statistics, calculated by the WISN Method; - the staff equivalent of the time off in lieu. For example, a large health centre schedules a particular category of staff for day duty on rota for seven days a week and covers all (365) nights by having one person on-call with the following day off. This on-call duty requires extra staff, which is equivalent to 365 days service per year. Suppose, for the sake of example, that staff in this category are available for duty on average for 234 days per year, like the medical aides in the example earlier. Then the extra staff required is 365 / 234 = 1.56 staff. The calculated Staffing Requirement for the facility is then: staff requirements according to the WISN Method based on service statistics PLUS an extra 1.56 staff for the on-call duty. This does not mean that one or two staff are appointed solely for on-call duty but rather that the on-call duty is shared among all the staff and this will be possible only by employing one or two more staff. If the on-call time is recompensed by payments (at whatever rate) and not by any time off in lieu, then it is not counted as part of the WISN calculations. In effect, the extra on-call duty time is provided by staff out of their own off-duty time and does not affect their ordinary working time. Other types of arrangement, e.g. a different amount of time off for the on-call duty, on-call duty at weekends only, etc. is treated in the same way by focusing solely on the average amount of time off in lieu which is given in a year, and the extra staff which will be required to cover it. If it is a mixed arrangement, with both extra payments and time off in lieu, only the time off in lieu is included in the WISN calculations.

Scheduled/actual working hours


In nearly all countries there are situations where the actual hours worked by staff are less than the scheduled working hours specified in the conditions of service or the contract of employment. This may be general or it may apply to only certain categories of staff and/or certain types of health facility and/or certain locations. One possible reason for this is that the public attends for treatment only at particular times. For example, in one rural health facility with working hours 8.00 am to 3.00 pm (seven hours/day), the public attended only 8-10 am and 1-3 pm, that is four hours/day. Or the staff themselves may curtail their working hours because of private practice or other earning activities, or because it is the custom and practice, etc. In all these circumstances the question arises as to how to frame the WISN calculations, i.e. whether to use the formal contracted hours (e.g. seven hours/day) or the actual working hours (e.g. four hours/day) in order to set the Standard Workloads (the amount of work one staff can do in a year).

42 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

The decision as to which to use depends on whether the situation is outside the effective control of the MOH. For example, it would be realistic to use the attendance times of the public, say four hours out of seven hours per day, in the short term because these are determined by social or cultural factors, although the ministry may attempt to change these in the medium to long term by an education process to encourage the public to attend during the current dead periods, or it may attempt to reduce the financial burden of the situation by instituting part time employment of staff (e.g. 08.00-10.00 and 13.00-15.00 daily) if possible. If the situation is theoretically within the authority of the ministry, e.g. staff leaving early to attend to private practice or other activities, the decision is more difficult. Using the formal working hours gives results of what the government is entitled to it shows the staffing which the government is entitled to expect will do the job, i.e. carry out the workload to an acceptable professional standard. This is usually strongly favoured by departments of finance. Using actual working hours shows the staffing levels that will be required if the current situation continues. This is usually strongly favoured by local managers. As an entirely separate issue (from which time to use in the calculations) is the question of how to calculate the results if the actual working hours are used to set Standard Workloads. The manual shows how to set up the calculations using formal or contract working hours. To use actual working hours in the WISN calculations there are two options: 1. Insert the actual working hours instead of the formal working hours in the calculation of the working time available per year as set out in the manual. This will probably mean repeating these calculations for several different categories of staff. Use the formal working hours in the calculation of the working time available per year as set out in the manual and include the "missing" hours, i.e. the formal or contract hours per day which are not worked, as an extra allowance in the later calculation of Standard Workloads (see Section C.3). The WISN Method is already set up to take account of different allowances for different categories of staff. This extra allowance can easily be adjusted in the calculations if the situation should change.

2.

2.

Setting Activity Standards


An Activity Standard must be set for each type of health care activity. An Activity Standard is a unit time (or rate) for a health care activity how much time, on average, performing an examination, filling a prescription, taking an X-ray, etc. should take to complete by qualified staff who are working to acceptable professional standards. These Activity Standards are a vital factor in the WISN calculations; they have a direct effect on all the results that are produced. Also, setting these Activity Standards is a novel procedure in virtually all countries and so the staff who undertake it must be carefully oriented before the procedure and guided during it if they are to perform the task successfully. For these reasons the procedure to use in setting Activity Standards is set out in some detail. The Activity Standards for health staff in a country are usually set by working groups of senior and knowledgeable staff with substantial experience of the work for which the standards are being set. Two different types of working group can be used to set Activity Standards: - a cadre group, which consists of the senior and knowledgeable staff in a cadre who set the Activity Standards for all the staff categories in their own cadre working in all the different types of health facilities in which the cadre is employed in the country. Using this approach, each cadre employed in the health service requires a cadre group to set its Activity Standards;

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 43

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

- a facility group, which consists of the senior and knowledgeable staff in a health facility which is generally reckoned to have good performance. Together the group sets the Activity Standards for all the staff categories who work in this type of health facility in the country. In theory each type of health facility requires a facility group to set the Activity Standards of the staff employed in it. However, in practice if the activities carried out in one type of health facility are very similar to those carried out in another, e.g. dispensary/health centre or regional/national hospitals, one facility group can produce the Activity Standards for the staff in both types of facility, even where the Activity Standards for an activity may be different in the two types of facility. In order that these groups can perform their task and produce results which will be useful in the WISN calculations, the participants in these groups must be oriented to understand the steps in the procedure: a) b) What is an Activity Standard? What is the scope of their task, i.e. which staff categories and facilities are they to cover in producing Activity Standards? What are the main activities or functions (components of workload) for each of these staff categories in each type of facility in which they are employed? Setting an Activity Standard for each of the main activities or functions (components of workload) in each type of facility. Estimating the amount of time spent away from the working situation on staff training and different types of absence.

c)

d)

e)

Each of these steps is explained in the following subsections, which could be used as the introductory material/presentation to these groups. a) What is an Activity Standard?

The Activity Standard for a particular activity is the time it would take a trained and well-motivated member of a particular staff category to perform the action to acceptable professional standards in the circumstances of the country (its medical practices, equipment available, etc.). In the WISN Method, all Activity Standards are set in terms of the time taken to perform certain actions or the rate at which these actions should be performed. b) What is the scope of the group's task, i.e. which staff categories and facilities are to be covered?

Activity Standards can be set for a cadre by a group of senior and knowledgeable staff in the cadre. This is known as the "cadre group" method. The group sets the Activity Standards by reviewing the work of each of the staff categories in the cadre in each type of health facility in which they work in the country. For example, a pharmacy group setting Activity Standards in one country set out its task as follows:

44 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

Pharmacy group
Staff categories Facilities senior pharmacist; pharmacist; pharmaceutical assistant; pharmaceutical attendant national hospital; regional hospitals; district hospitals; health centres

In setting out its task, the group took account of the fact that: a) Senior pharmacists are employed as the person in charge of pharmaceutical services in the national and regional hospitals. The job of the senior pharmacist is the same in national and regional hospitals, so only one set of Activity Standards is required for this staff category. Pharmacists are employed in the national, regional and district hospitals. The job of a pharmacist is the same in a national and a regional hospital (mainly filling prescriptions) but has extra tasks and responsibilities in a district hospital (where the pharmacist is the person in charge of the pharmacy), so two sets of Activity Standards for pharmacists are required for this staff category. Pharmaceutical assistants are employed in the national, regional and district hospitals and in health centres. The job of a pharmaceutical assistant is the same in national, regional and district hospitals but has extra tasks and responsibilities in a health centre (where the pharmaceutical assistant is the person in charge of the pharmacy). Pharmaceutical attendants are also employed in the national, regional and district hospitals and in health centres. The job of pharmaceutical attendants in cleaning, replenishing stocks, etc. is the same in all the health facilities.

b)

c)

d)

The Activity Standards to be determined by the group were then set out in a table: Senior pharmacist Pharmacist Pharmaceutical assistant Pharmaceutical attendant national/regional hospitals 1. 2. 1. 2. national/regional hospitals district hospitals national/regional/district hospitals health centres

national/regional/district hospitals/health centres

Similarly the laboratory group set out its task as follows:

Laboratory group
Staff categories Facilities laboratory technologist; laboratory technician; laboratory assistant; laboratory attendant national hospitals; regional hospitals; district hospitals; health centres

The group determined that the job (and hence Activity Standards) of laboratory technologist was the same in the national and regional hospitals (where a pathologist is in charge of the laboratory)

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 45

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

but different in district hospitals (where the laboratory technologist is in charge); that the laboratory technician has one job (set of Activity Standards) in hospitals and a different job (set of Activity Standards) in health centres where the laboratory technician is in charge; and that the job (Activity Standards) of a laboratory attendant in cleaning, replenishing stocks, etc., is the same in all health facilities. As before, the Activity Standards to be determined by the group could then be set out in a table: Laboratory technologist Laboratory technician Laboratory attendants 1. 2. 1. 2. national/regional hospitals district hospitals national/regional/district hospitals health centres

national/regional/district hospitals/health centres

Doctors group
Following the same procedure, the doctors group set out its task as follows: Staff categories Facilities consultant; registrar; medical officer; medical assistant; rural medical assistant national hospitals; regional hospitals; district hospitals; health centres; health posts

Here again the job of each staff category (and hence its Activity Standards) was different depending on the type of health facility. For example, consultants in the national hospital undertook more complex cases (more time per case) and more research (larger time allowance for this activity) than the consultants working in the regional hospitals, while in the district hospitals consultants are in charge of departments and so have a major management function there (requiring a corresponding time allowance); registrars work only in the national and regional hospitals, where the training posts are available; medical assistants work in district hospitals and also in health centres (where they are in charge); rural medical assistants work in health centres and also in health posts (where they are in charge). The Activity Standards to be determined by the group could then be set out in a table: Consultants 1. 2. 3 national hospital regional hospitals district hospitals national/regional hospitals 1. 2. 1. 2. 2. 1. 2. 2. national/regional hospitals district hospitals district hospitals health centres district hospitals health centres health posts district hospitals

Registrars Medical officers Medical assistants

Rural medical assistants

46 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

A cadre group can be set up for any cadre employed in the health service, in order to set the Activity Standards for all the categories of staff in the cadre in all the types of health facility in which they are employed in the country. Alternatively the Activity Standards can be set for all the staff categories employed in one type of facility by a group of senior staff who between them are knowledgeable about all the activities of all staff categories employed in this type of facility. This is known as the "facility group" method. These groups set out their task by listing all the staff categories which are employed in this type of facility, for which Activity Standards must be set. Some examples are:

Health post group


Staff categories rural medical assistant; MCH aide; nursing assistant; nursing attendant; health assistant

Health centre group


Staff categories medical assistant; rural medical assistant; MCH aide; nurse midwife; nursing assistant; nurse attendant; laboratory assistant; medical records assistant; health assistant; cooking staff; laundry staff; driver; watchman

The same method can also be used for clinics and other relatively small health facilities. However, when this facility group approach is used for hospitals, particularly the larger hospitals, it would be unwieldy and inefficient to follow exactly the same format. A list of the staff categories employed in a large hospital is exceedingly long and must be divided up in some way to make the work practicable. The most convenient way of doing this is to combine the two methods, that is, first to make a list of all the hospital staff categories (the facility group approach) and then to divide the list by cadre (the cadre group approach). For example, the task of setting Activity Standards for the laboratory staff in a large hospital was set out as follows:

Regional hospital: laboratory group


Staff categories laboratory technologist; laboratory technician; laboratory assistant; laboratory attendant

and the task of setting Activity Standards for the radiography staff was also set out simply:

Regional hospital: radiography group


Staff categories senior radiographer; radiographer; radiographic (darkroom) assistant

However some staff categories in a large hospital, e.g. nurses, work in many different locations and do many different jobs. For this reason the regional hospital nurses group had a rather larger task, which was most conveniently set out in the facility/cadre group format, as follows:

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 47

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Regional hospital: nurses group


Staff categories Facilities nursing officers; nurse midwives; registered nurses; enrolled nurses; nursing assistants; nursing attendants general medical wards; paediatric wards; psychiatric wards; maternity wards; general surgery theatres; obs. & gynae. theatres; eye surgery; outpatient clinics; MCH/FP clinics; ophthalmic clinics; psychiatric clinics; accident & emergency department; intensive care unit.

It is a major task to set Activity Standards for all the different combinations of nurse staff categories and the types of work they do in a large hospital. One simplification which is frequently used is to group together types of ward or types of clinic and set average Activity Standards for each of these groupings, e.g. the wards (general medical/paediatric/psychiatric wards but not including maternity wards); maternity wards; all operating theatre work; all clinics; etc. Even where this simplification is used the situation is still fairly complicated because different nursing categories are employed in each of the working situations. These complications are best clarified by setting out a matrix (two-way table) showing the staff categories down the side and the facilities or working situations along the top. An example from one country is as follows:
Nurses group Nursing officer Nurse midwife Registered nurse Enrolled nurse Nursing assistant Nursing attendant x x x x x x x x x x Wards x Operating theatres Maternity x x Acc. & emergency x x x x x x x x Clinics

Each "X" denotes a set of Activity Standards which had to be produced. In some cases the activities of a nursing category, e.g. nursing attendant, are the same in several working locations and the same Activity Standards can be used in all of them. The same situation arises with the medical staff in a large hospital (several different categories of medical staff working in a number of different situations), and the same approach of setting the task out in matrix form works well in this case also. In one country four main facility groups were assembled: Health post group: comprising eight district-level staff and people in charge of health centres with long experience of supervising health posts, and representatives of MOH departments. Health centre group: comprising ten district-level staff and people in charge of health centres with long experience of supervising health centres, and representatives of MOH departments. District hospitals group: comprising the senior staff from all departments in one high performance district hospital, and representatives from the regional health team and MOH.

48 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

Regional and national hospitals group: comprising senior staff representing all departments from the national hospital and the best regional hospital, together with representatives from MOH. The health post group met and took half a day to complete its work on setting Activity Standards for the five staff categories (listed above) employed in the health posts. Subsequently the health centre group, which included many of the same individuals, took one day to complete its work on setting Activity Standards for the thirteen staff categories (listed above) employed in health centres; some of the categories, e.g. driver and watchman, could be dealt with very quickly. The meeting of the district hospitals group and of the regional and national hospitals group took the form of workshops. In these, an initial plenary session introduced the task, explained its content and described the procedures to be used (based on the material set out earlier in this section). Then the participants listed all the cadres/staff categories and working situations (wards/clinics/theatres etc.) to be covered. Participants were then divided into a number of working groups at each session, and each working group produced the Activity Standards for one of the cadres employed in the hospital. In each workshop session the chairman and secretary of each working group both came from the cadre being considered by the working group. The Activity Standards produced by each working group were reported back to a plenary meeting of the workshop for consideration and approval. Some cadres (radiography, pharmacy) occupied a working group for half a day, but others (doctors, nurses) took a full day or more. The workshop for the district hospitals group lasted three days, and for the regional and national hospitals group five days. In addition each of the specialist hospitals, i.e. TB hospital, eye hospital, etc., set up its own group of senior staff which was joined by representatives of MOH. Each of these specialist hospital groups set the Activity Standards for all the staff categories employed in their own hospital. Wherever possible these Activity Standards were the same as those set out for staff in the national hospitals. Whichever method (cadre group or facility group) is being used to set Activity Standards, each group should first set out the task it is to tackle under the headings of: - staff categories, in order to list all the different types or grades of staff it is to cover; and where appropriate - facilities, in order to list all the different working situations it is to cover. Only then should the group decide which jobs are the same so that the same Activity Standards will apply. It is very desirable to draft out beforehand a list of the staff categories and facilities for each cadre group, facility group or working group in a workshop so that it can start its task by correcting the draft lists if necessary and thereby understand the extent of its work from the start. c) What are the main activities or functions (components of workload) for each of these staff categories?

Having decided which staff categories/working situations need to have Activity Standards set, the next step is to determine what activities or staff functions should be covered by these Activity Standards. Most staff categories employed in a health facility each has a number of major functions or activities which it performs. These are the functions or activities which together take up most of the working time of the staff concerned. These major functions or activities are called the components of workload for the staff category in the health facility. There are usually not more

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 49

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

than three or four components of workload for each staff category. For example, the main tasks of a pharmaceutical assistant in a district hospital are: filling prescriptions preparing materials and cleaning up These are performed under the supervision of the pharmacist in charge of the hospital dispensary. Each of these components of workload must have its Activity Standard. However, the components of workload for a staff category depend on which types of health facility they are employed in. To continue the example, the same staff category working in a health centre, where the pharmaceutical assistant is in charge, has additional tasks. Not only filling prescriptions preparing materials and cleaning up as in the district hospital, but also recording and reporting ordering stock, checking deliveries and supervising storage. The workload of the pharmaceutical assistant in the health centre must take account of these extra tasks and the time they take. These two extra components of workload must each have its own Activity Standard also. In one country the registered nurses in health centres (where a medical assistant is in charge) have the following main activities: inpatients outpatients scheduled clinics supervised births recording and reporting. The nursing aides in the same health centres have only two main activities: inpatients outpatients. It is a matter of judgement to decide what level of detail to go to in listing the components of workload for a staff category. For example, the main components of workload for a dental assistant in a district hospital could be listed as: treating patients setting out and clearing away recording and reporting and an Activity Standard could be set for each of them. However the first item, treating patients, could be broken down into: extractions fillings scaling polishing with each of these items having its own Activity Standard (average time to perform each type of treatment).

50 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

Similarly the components of workload for laboratory assistants could be: performing tests specimen collection record keeping. Here again the first item, performing tests, could be broken down into: haematology bacteriology parasitology clinical chemistry immunoserology with an Activity Standard (average time to complete) set for each type of test. This same type of detailing can be done with the components of workload for all categories of staff, e.g. inpatients can be divided into medical/surgical/paediatric/psychiatric etc., filling prescriptions can be divided into one item/two item/three item prescriptions, etc. Working in more detail like this gives the possibility of more precise results from the WISN calculations. However, it does require more effort - both in collecting much more data (frequently a great deal more) and also in entering this larger volume of data into a computer. Although the level of effort required for the WISN calculations is an important factor in deciding what level of detail to work at in applying the method, an even more important factor is the level of detail currently available in the service statistics which are regularly collected in the different health facilities and returned by them to the local district or regional health office or to the centre. The WISN calculations can be performed only to the level of detail in the statistics themselves. If these statistics show only the total numbers of dental patients treated and not the numbers receiving each type of treatment (extractions, fillings, etc.), then the calculations can only be done and the Activity Standards should only be set in terms of the total number of patients treated and not the numbers of extractions, fillings, etc. which are done. Similarly if a single bed occupancy figure is available for each hospital rather than the occupancy figures for each type of ward (medical, paediatric, etc.), then Activity Standards must be set for nurses in the hospital as a whole rather than for individual wards. Such average Activity Standards may be thought of as crude, but they are much more effective in setting realistic Staffing Requirements than the usual alternatives (population ratios, standard staffing schedules). d) Setting an Activity Standard for each of the main activities or functions (components of workload) for each staff category

When the components of workload have been identified for all the staff categories in each type of facility in which they are employed, each group then sets an Activity Standard for each component of workload. In undertaking their task, the groups set two types of Activity Standard: a) Standards for the services and activities which are reported in the annual service statistics, e.g. number of inpatients (or bed occupancy) in various types of ward, number of outpatient visits, number of clinic patient visits of various types, number of births, number of major/minor surgical operations, number of dental treatments of different types, etc. In the calculations these standards are applied to the reported workloads which are shown in the latest annual service statistics. They are called service standards.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 51

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

b)

Standards which apply to those activities which are not reported in the annual service statistics. This may be because the activities cannot easily be measured, e.g. recording and reporting, stores management, performing ward procedures, attending meetings, general administration, etc. Alternatively this may be because the regular collection of service statistics in the country does not yet cover these activities, e.g. in some countries the number of laboratory tests performed in health centres are not reported. An allowance is made in the calculations for these activities according to the amount of working time they should absorb. These are called Allowance Standards.

The first step in setting the Activity Standards for a staff category working in a particular type of facility is to mark each of its components of workload according to whether it is covered in the regular service statistics which are readily available in the country (and so must have a service standard) or whether it is not (and so must have an Allowance Standard). In many cases a component of workload corresponds directly to an item in the regular service statistics: - inpatients or bed occupancy, for the workloads of doctors, nurses and most ward staff; - tests performed, for the workloads of laboratory staff; - outpatient visits, for the workloads of staff in health posts, health centres and the outpatient departments of hospitals; - antenatal examinations, child weighings, immunizations, etc., for the workloads of staff in MCH clinics. In other cases a component of workload is clearly related to the general level of workload in a health facility, but a directly relevant item of data is not collected and included in the regular statistics. For example, the workload of hospital laundry staff increases directly as the general level of workload in the hospital itself increases. In countries where the number of items washed is recorded, the statistics provide an item of data which corresponds directly to the main component of workload of this staff category. However most countries do not collect statistics on the volume of laundry processed in hospitals, and so it is necessary to find a proxy item, i.e. an item of data which will serve as a proxy measure of the volume of laundry to be done. The item of data most frequently used for this purpose is the number of inpatients, or bed occupancy. The group estimates how many laundry staff would be required to deal with bed linen from 100 inpatients, and this then serves as the Activity Standard. Similarly, in countries where kitchen staff are employed to provide food for inpatients and/or staff in health facilities, the number of meals provided per day is not recorded. However, the number of meals daily can be estimated from the service statistics as: 3 x (no. of inpatients + no. of staff eligible for meals). The group sets an Activity Standard as the number of kitchen staff required to prepare 100 meals per day. Wherever possible, components of workload should be linked to items in the service statistics, either directly or by proxy. Only if no relevant statistics are collected or if the activity is independent of the service workload, or very nearly so, should an Allowance Standard be set; the way of doing this is set out later.

52 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

For each of the components of workload which is covered by or linked to an item in the regular statistics, the group should: a) specify the statistics item to be used, e.g. outpatient visits, antenatal examinations, home deliveries, X-ray examinations, clinic attendances, inspections of premises, etc. set an Activity Standard as a unit time for the item, e.g. 10 minutes/outpatient visit, four hours/home delivery, 15 minutes/X-ray examination, etc. alternatively, for some activities it is easier and more natural to set an Activity Standard in terms of a rate of working, e.g. 40 clinic attendances per day for a nurse, six inspections per day for a health assistant, etc.

b)

c)

In setting a unit time as an Activity Standard, e.g. for an outpatient visit, laboratory test, home delivery, dental treatment, X-ray examination, etc., it is important to include in the unit time all the tasks related to the individual item, e.g. a doctor writing up a patient's notes after the consultation, recording the results of each laboratory test twice (once for the laboratory records and once for the doctor who sent the sample), setting out and clearing away for each dental patient, etc. The unit time is the average time which should elapse between the start of an item of service activity (outpatient visit, laboratory test, etc.) and the start of the following item of the same activity if all procedures are working efficiently according to practices of the country and there are no delays between successive items of service activity. Anything done for each patient or item should be included in the unit time for each patient or item, e.g. recording and reporting. Anything done regularly (once a day, a week, a month, etc.) irrespective of service workload, should be covered by an Allowance Standard, e.g. daily, weekly, etc. reports. It is normally better, wherever possible, to set a unit time for a component of workload rather than set a daily or weekly rate, for two reasons. First, it is easier to visualize a single activity (outpatient examination, laboratory test, dental treatment, etc.) and estimate its duration. Thus an estimate of an actual elapsed time for an activity is likely to be more accurate than a rate. Certainly discussions within groups are more specific and disagreements more quickly resolved. Second, when the groups set a daily rate, for example, it is never quite clear to what extent they are including an allowance for other activities, e.g. recording and reporting, setting up and clearing away, supervision, etc. If it is clear that these allowances are included in the rates set by a group, then the allowances should not be included as separate Allowance Standards in the subsequent WISN calculations. Hospital ward staff who deal directly with inpatients (mainly nurses) merit a special procedure in this method. It is possible to use the standard approach and set a unit time per patient for those ward staff whose main work consists in dealing with inpatients, and this method has been used in some countries. In this approach an estimate is made of the average amount of time in total which a nurse (or other category of ward staff) should give to each inpatient during a 24-hour period. This average time is then used as the Activity Standard. However, the Staffing Requirements of ward nurses and other ward staff are best calculated using another type of Activity Standard, which is to specify the number of inpatients (occupied beds) for which a nurse on duty should be responsible, e.g. one nurse per 10 occupied beds. This figure can vary with the shift, e.g. one nurse per eight occupied beds on the morning shift, one per 12 occupied beds in the afternoon shift and one nurse per 20 occupied beds during the night. It can also vary with the type of ward (it is usually smaller for paediatric wards, e.g. one nurse per five occupied beds, than for general medical wards, e.g. one nurse per 10 occupied beds, and for intensive care units it can be one nurse for each occupied bed.) One major advantage of this method is that it is much easier for nurses to estimate
_________________________________________________________________________________________ 53

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

how many inpatients they can cover adequately when on duty than it is for them to add up the total average time which should be spent with each patient totalled over three shifts during a 24-hour period. And because the number of inpatients (occupied beds) covered conforms with their direct work experience, rather than the average accumulated time spent with each inpatient over a 24hour period, these estimates are not only easier for them to make but more accurate as well. Figures for nurse/inpatient ratios for different types of wards should only be set where the regular service statistics show bed occupancy rates separately for each of these types of ward. If bed occupancy rates are known only for the hospital as a whole, then groups should set a nurse/inpatient ratio for the hospital as a whole. For each of the components of workload which is not covered by an item in the regular statistics, the group must set an allowance either as a percentage of working time, e.g. 20% for administration by the person in charge of a laboratory, or as a time allowance, e.g. one hour per day for recording and reporting by ward nurses, five hours per week for clinical meetings of hospital doctors, two days per month for checking and replenishing supplies by pharmaceutical assistants in a dispensary. This allowance may apply to all the staff in a particular category, e.g. all doctors in a particular type of hospital attend clinical meetings for five hours per week; all pharmaceutical assistants working in district hospitals spend one hour per day cleaning equipment, utensils, etc. Alternatively the allowance may refer to a task or function performed by one or two individuals only in the working situation, e.g. one nurse in the ward completes the ward returns, taking one hour per shift; two pharmaceutical assistants spend two days per month checking and replenishing dispensary supplies. The group must state clearly for each component of workload for which an allowance is made, whether the task or function is performed by a fixed number of staff (one, two, ...) or by all the staff in the category. These two types of allowance (applied to a fixed number of staff or to all staff) require slightly different mathematical formulae in the WISN calculations. Some jobs consist wholly of activities (components of workload) which are not directly related to the workloads shown in the service statistics; in other words if the service workloads in the facilities changed, the workloads of these jobs would not be affected to the same extent. For example, the jobs of some staff are wholly or mainly administrative, e.g. staff employed in the Ministry of Health HQ and in regional and district health offices, hospital secretaries, matrons in large hospitals, etc. Other staff, usually in the lower grades, may also have jobs which are not directly related to delivering health services and therefore are not significantly affected by the volume of service delivery, e.g. cleaners, messengers, gardeners, watchmen, guards, drivers, etc. But note that the workloads of cooks and laundry staff do depend directly on the number of occupied beds, which normally appear in regular hospital statistics. In addition there may be other categories of staff whose jobs are related to service delivery but no figures on their activities are collected in the regular statistics, e.g. health educators in some countries, health assistants in some countries, etc. Since no workload statistics are available for these categories of staff, calculations of Staffing Requirements based directly on workloads are not possible. For all those staff where none of their components of workload is covered by an item in the service statistics, a different type of Activity Standard must be set. This standard must be one of the following types: a) A ratio on other staff, e.g. one medical assistant per four rural medical aides in a health centre (for five or more RMAS the management and supervision workload in the health

54 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

centre is too great for one MA), one laboratory assistant per two rural medical aides in a health centre (where no laboratory statistics were being collected); one nurse supervisor per 30 nurses employed in a hospital. In these cases the number of rural medical aides, hospital nurses, etc. are calculated from the workload statistics in the health centre, hospital, etc. using the WISN Method, so the number of medical assistants, laboratory assistants, nurse supervisors, etc. are also based on workload, but at one remove; b) A fixed number per facility, e.g. three watchmen per health centre, one matron per hospital, one nursing attendant per dispensary, etc., whatever the size of facility covered and the workload in it; A fixed number per item of equipment e.g. one driver per vehicle, two radiographers per Xray machine (where no X-ray statistics are being collected); A fixed number per administrative unit, e.g. one health assistant per electoral ward, one district medical officer per district, etc...; Staffing according to organizational structure, where a number of senior posts are specified, e.g. director general, deputy directors general, directors, deputy directors, etc. in the ministry/department of health, regional offices, etc. (In these structures only the numbers of more junior staff, e.g. at clerical grades, are determined by workload).

c)

d)

e)

In all these cases no separate allowances (for administration, supervision, etc.) are made; these factors are already included in the types of standard listed above.

Activity Standards for acceptable alternative procedures


In some countries different medical services are provided according to the different cultural traditions of the country (e.g. Moslem, French, Anglo-Saxon) and these may operate different medical procedures in order to deal with the same situation (e.g. outpatient attendances). These different medical procedures normally take different times to perform, i.e. have different Activity Standards. Provided all these cultural differences are accepted within the country, then separate Activity Standards should be set for the activities in each of them where they are required. There should be no attempt to set a single representative or average Activity Standard to cover all the different practices which deal with the same medical situation; this would simply give an incorrect result for the Staffing Requirements in some, perhaps all, types of these facilities. It should be noted that dividing the working time of a staff category between its components of workload, e.g. for a health sub-centre nurse 40% 10% 30% 10% 10% treating outpatients health education sessions home visits school visits administration

is not setting an Activity Standard. Such a list shows the expected pattern of activities for this category of staff, but these figures do not show how much work is expected of these staff (how

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 55

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

many inpatients per day, how many home visits per day), and hence how many of them would be required in a health facility in order to deal with its recorded workload. Setting the unit times, rates and allowances is the most critical step in the whole task of calculating WISNs. It should be emphasized to groups which are setting these Activity Standards that: a) The unit times, rates and allowances should correspond to the standard of performance which would be expected of experienced and well motivated staff taking into account the general situation or circumstances found in these facilities in the country, e.g. medical practices, availability of equipment and supplies. International comparisons should be made with the utmost care. Medical practices and equipment differ greatly between countries; also staff categories with the same title in two countries may be performing very different functions; Although groups are naturally anxious to set highly professional standards of performance in the country, their targets cannot be too far from the prevailing practice otherwise the resulting Staffing Requirements will be so high that they are impracticable and will therefore be ignored, and the whole WISN exercise will be futile. It is better to set intermediate targets for Activity Standards which can be improved later as the staffing situation improves.

b)

A sample set of briefing notes and instructions for groups on setting Activity Standards is in Annex B. e) Estimating the amount of time spent away from the working situation on staff training and absence

One component of the calculation of available working time per year (see Section C.1) is making an allowance for the training time, sickness and other absence times of each staff category. Where possible these figures are obtained from staffing statistics or personnel records. However in many countries this is not possible and an estimate of training time and absence time must be made. The cadre group or facility group which has sufficient knowledge and experience of a staff category to set its Activity Standards, is also best placed to make these estimates of training time and absence time. For convenience this task is added to the list of tasks for these groups. The estimates for training time and absence time may be made separately or as a single figure covering both, and also they may be set as a percentage of working time or as a number of days or weeks per year.

3.

Turning Activity Standards into Standard Workloads


Once the expert groups have set the Activity Standards for each staff category in each type of health facility in which they are employed, their task is complete. The service standards are unit times (e.g. 15 minutes/patient) or rates (e.g. 30 patients/day). The Allowance Standards are percentages of working time or actual working time (e.g. one hour/day, two days/month, etc.) for a fixed number of staff or for all staff in the category in the working situation. These standards must be combined and translated into the equivalent volumes of work per year per employee (Standard Workloads) so that they can be compared with the volumes of workload reported in the annual statistics in order to calculate the numbers of staff required. The Standard Workloads are the figures which are actually used in the computer calculations to produce the Staffing Requirements. Calculating the Standard Workloads from service standards, and the Allowance Factors from the Allowance Standards is a job for the task force.

56 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

The steps in the process are: a) Calculate the annual volume of activities according to the service standards alone, i.e. activities for which unit times or rates have been set; Calculate a multiplier factor based on the Allowance Standards which apply to all staff in the category, i.e. activities which are undertaken by all staff in the category; Finally, add in the Allowance Factors for tasks or functions performed by a fixed number of staff in the working situation.

b)

c)

All the examples shown below are based on figures given in Section C.1, Example 2.

Standard Workloads based on unit times


The formula for calculating the annual workload (Standard Workload) for an activity based on the time required to perform the activity (Activity Standard) is
Available time in the year Standard workload for an activity = Unit time for the activity (Activity standard)

Examples If the dental screening of a school takes one day and is carried out by a school dental therapist (Category B staff), who have available working time of 234 days per year, then the Standard Workload is 234 / 1 = 234 schools/year This does not mean that a school dental therapist would be expected to carry out 234 school screenings every year. These staff also undertake other activities, e.g. administration, equipment cleaning and maintenance, etc. Rather it means that each school screened takes 1/234th of a working year for a school dental therapist. If a major surgical operation takes on average two hours, the corresponding Standard Workload for category A (medical) staff, with available working time of 1,776 hours per year, is 1,776 / 2 = 888 major operations/year This does not mean that a surgeon would be expected to carry out 888 major operations in a year (s)he has many other activities which take up working time. All these other activities are allowed for in the calculations. Major operations are only one component of a surgeon's workload. The result shown actually means that one major operation will take up 1/888 of the working year of a surgeon. For Category B (support) staff a major surgical operation takes on average two and a half hours (15 minutes setting up, two hours operation, 15 minutes clearing away). The corresponding Standard Workload is: 1,872 / 2.5 = 749 major operations/year

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 57

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

If a minor operation takes on average 15 minutes, the corresponding Standard Workload for Category A staff is: Category A: 1,776 x 60 / 15 = 7,104 minor operations/year There is no setting out and clearing away between minor operations, only at the end of the operating session, so the average time requirement for Category B staff is also 15 minutes and the corresponding Standard Workload is: Category B: 1,872 x 60 / 15 = 7,488 minor operations/year In addition there will be an Allowance Factor (see later) included in the calculation to cover the setting out and clearing away time at the beginning and end of the operating session; this time is the same no matter how many minor operations (workload) are performed during the session. If a pharmaceutical assistant (Category B) takes on average five minutes to fill a prescription, the corresponding Standard Workload is: 1,872 x 60 / 5 = 22,464 prescriptions/year

Standard Workloads based on rates


The formula for calculating Standard Workloads based on a rate for an activity is: Standard Workload = rate x available time in the year Example If a health assistant (Category B) can inspect 10 commercial premises per day, then the corresponding Standard Workload is: 10/day x 234 days/year = 2,340 inspections/year This does not mean that a health assistant would be expected to carry out 2,340 inspections every year. These staff also undertake many other activities. Rather it means that each inspection takes 1/2,340th of a working year for a health assistant. If a registered nurse (Category A) can deal with 35 outpatient attendances per day, then the corresponding Standard Workload is: 35/day x 222 days/year = 7,770 outpatient attendances a year This does not mean that a nurse in the outpatient department would be expected to treat 7,770 outpatients every year. These staff also undertake many other activities. Rather it means that each outpatient treated will take 1/7,770th of a working year for such a nurse.

Allowance Factors
There are two types of Allowance Factor: a) Those which apply to all staff in a particular category, however many are employed in a facility, e.g. one hour per day cleaning up by all pharmaceutical assistants employed in a dispensary; all hospital doctors employed in a department attend clinical meetings for 5.5 hours per week. This is a Category Allowance Factor.

58 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

b)

Those Allowance Factors which apply to a fixed number of staff in a particular category, however many are employed in a facility, e.g. two pharmaceutical assistants undertake stock unloading and storage which occupies them for two days per month; one doctor in each hospital department produces notes of the clinical meetings, which occupies four hours per week. This is an Individual Allowance Factor (so called because it originally applied to single individuals in a working situation, although it can apply to any fixed or specified number of staff).

Category Allowance Factors


All category Allowance Factors are converted into percentages. All the separate allowances for a particular staff category working in a particular type of health facility are totalled before being used to calculate the Staffing Requirements for the category. Examples An allowance of 10% for administration is already in the required form of a percentage. An allowance of one hour per day for all pharmaceutical assistants undertaking cleaning in dispensaries is equivalent to:

1 hour/day = 12.5% 8 hours/day

In another country, where the normal working day is six hours, an allowance of one hour per day would be equivalent to:

1 hour/day = 16.7% 6 hours/day

An allowance of two days per month for all staff (including pharmaceutical assistants) to collect their salaries is equivalent to: 2 days/month x 12 = 24 days/year
24 days/year = 10.3% 234 days/year

The total category Allowance Factor for pharmaceutical assistants (daily cleaning + monthly collection of salaries) is: 12.5% + 10.3% = 22.8% An allowance of five hours per week for clinical meetings of medical staff in a hospital is equivalent to:

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 59

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

5 hours/week = 11.4% 44 hours/week

If all the hospital doctors spend a further 10% of their time on administration, the total category Allowance Factor for these doctors would be: 11.4% + 10% = 21.4% The use of these total category Allowance Factors in the calculations requires the application of a further mathematical formula. The form of the Allowance Standards which the expert groups estimate, i.e. actual time or percentage time taken, is designed to make it as easy as possible for these groups to accomplish their task. However, in order to use these figures in the WISN calculations a further arithmetical stage required. The complete procedure is: a) Category Allowance Standards which are specified in terms of actual time (hours/day, days/week, etc.) are converted to percentages; All the percentage allowances for a particular staff category working in a particular type of health facility are added together; The allowance Multiplier to use in the WISN calculation for the staff category in the type of health facility is computed using the total % category allowance from (b) according to the formula:
Allowance multiplier = 11 total % category allowance 100

b)

c)

The computer can be programmed to calculate this multiplier from the list of category Allowance Standards for a staff category and then automatically include it in the calculations.

Individual allowance factors


An Individual Allowance Factor indicates the need for a fixed extra Staffing Requirement rather than for a multiplier which is applied to the whole of the calculated requirement for a staff category in a health facility. For example, a task requiring four hours per week of one doctor's time throughout the year takes up 4 x 52 = 208 hours per year. The doctor is in Category A (1,776 hours per year available working time) and so the task requires: 208 / 1,776 = 0.12 whole time equivalent This fixed amount is added to the total calculated requirement for medical staff in those facilities where this task is performed. If two pharmaceutical assistants are required to undertake a task for two days per month, the annual workload of the task is:

60 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

2 staff x 2 days/month x 12 months = 48 days/year These staff are in Category B (234 days per year available working time) and so the task requires 48 / 234 = 0.21 whole time equivalent This fixed amount is added to the total calculated requirement for pharmaceutical assistants in those facilities where this task is performed.

4.

Using standard workloads and allowance standards to calculate staffing requirements


The calculation of the Staffing Requirements for a staff category employed in any health facility is performed according to the following steps: 1. For each component of workload (main activity) which has a Standard Workload i.e. it is related to an item in the service statistics, apply the Standard Workload to the most recent annual service statistics from the facility in order to calculate the Staffing Requirement for each of these components of workload. Add together the calculated Staffing Requirements for all these components of workload. Calculate the Allowance Multiplier based on the category Allowance Standards. Apply the Allowance Multiplier from step 3 to the total from step 2. Add the Staffing Requirement for any Individual Allowance Factors which apply.

2. 3. 4. 5.

The steps in the complete calculation of the Staffing Requirements (SR) for each staff category can be set out on a pro forma for manual calculation or they can be programmed into a spreadsheet. They are as follows:
Volume of activity 1 in a year (from annual statistics) Volume of activity 2 in a year (from annual statistics) ..... ..... Sub-total Category Allowance Standard 1 = Category Allowance Standard 2 = ..... ..... Category Allowance Factor [CAF] % x [AM] Intermediate Staffing Requirement Individual Allowance 1 = Individual Allowance 2 = ..... [IA1] WTE [IA2] WTE [ISR] [CAS1] % [CAS2] % [SR(Sub)] / / Standard Workload for activity 1 Standard Workload for activity 2 = [SR1] = [SR2]

Allowance Multiplier derived by formula from [CAF]:

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 61

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

..... Total Individual Allowance [IA total] Calculated Staffing Requirement + [IA total] [CSR]

62 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

Examples a) Calculating the number of school dental therapists required in a district Components of Workload: School dental screening Administration, all staff Activity Standards 1 screening/day 10% Standard Workload 234/year

Workload last year: Number of school dental screenings last year = 648 Calculation: 648 screenings / 234 = 2.77 Category Allowance Factor = 10% Allowance Multiplier = 1 / (1 - 0.1) = 1.11 INTERMEDIATE Staffing Requirement = 2.77 x 1.11 = 3.07 staff No Individual Allowance Factors CALCULATED Staffing Requirement = 3.07 school dental therapists The district requires three school dental therapists to maintain the current level of school screening achieved. b) Calculating the number of community health workers (CHW) required in a health post Components of Workload: Outpatients Home visits Category Allowance Standard Travelling Individual Allowance Standard Administration, 1 CHW Workload last year: Outpatients Home visits Calculation: Activity Standards 10 mins/patient 12 mins/visit Standard Workload 11,232 pats/yr 9,360 homes/yr

1.5 hours/day

18.75%

15%

15%

15,381 7,437

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 63

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

15,381 outpatients

11,232 =

1.37

7,637 home visits /

9,360 = Sub-total

0.82

2.19

Category allowance = 18.75% Allowance Multiplier = 1 / (1 - 0.1875) = 1.23 INTERMEDIATE Staffing Requirement = 2.19 x 1.23 = 2.69 staff Individual Allowance Factor: 0.15 x 52 weeks x 5.5 days/week = 43 days/yr spent on administration = 43 / 234 = 0.18 staff CALCULATED Staffing Requirement = 2.69 + 0.18 = 2.87 staff The health post requires three community health workers for the volume of service it delivers. c) Calculating the number of medical records officers required in a hospital Components of Workload: Outpatient registration Inpatient admission Inpatient discharge Category Allowance Standards Shelving returned files Compiling daily data Activity Standards 3 mins/patient 10 mins/patient 5 mins/patient Standard Workload 37,440 11,232 22,464

0.5 hours/day 0.5 hours/day

6.25% 6.25% 12.5%

Category Allowance Factor Individual Allowance Factors Compiling patient data, 1 person Administration, 1 individual Workload last year: Outpatients Inpatient admissions Inpatient discharges Calculation:

2 days/month 10%

25,319 2,817 2,674

64 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

25,319 outpatients

37,440 =

0.68

2,817 admissions /

11,232 =

0.25

2,674 discharges

22,464 = Sub-total

0.12

1.05

Category Allowance Factor = 12.5% Allowance Multiplier = 1 / (1 - 0.125) = 1.14 INTERMEDIATE Staffing Requirement = 1.05 x 1.14 = 1.20 staff

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 65

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Individual Allowance Standards: 2 days/month x 12 = 24 days/yr spent on compiling data = 24 / 234 working days/yr = 0.10 staff 0.1 x 52 weeks x 5.5 days/week = 29 days/yr on administration = 29 / 234 working days/yr = 0.12 staff Individual Allowance Factor = 0.10 + 0.12 = 0.22 staff CALCULATED Staffing Requirement = 1.20 + 0.22 = 1.42 staff One medical records officer would be 42% overloaded in this situation. Two staff will be required, and these would be sufficient to cope with a 40-50% expansion of the hospital's workload. Other things being equal, this would be an excellent place to post a new and inexperienced medical records officer as an assistant or apprentice where there would be plenty of time for supervision. Alternatively, if local circumstance permit, the figure would justify employing one part-time staff (half time) under the supervision of one full- time staff.

Fractional results
When the calculated Staffing Requirement comes at or near a whole number of staff, as in examples (a) and (b) above, rounding off to give a practical figure for the staff requirement is no problem. However, when the calculated Staffing Requirement shows a substantial fraction, as in example (c), some explicit rounding off rule must be adopted. Rounding down to the next whole number produces a calculated Staffing Requirement slightly less than the workload actually indicates; rounding up produces a figure for staffing slightly greater than the workload actually indicates. One principle which has been used is to round down by amounts of 10% or less for figures of five or less. This is based on the view that staff should be expected to carry a 10% overload in their work if necessary. This results in the following rule: 1.0 - 1.1 is rounded down to 1; 1.1 - 1.9 is rounded up to 2 2.0 - 2.2 is rounded down to 2; 2.2 - 2.9 is rounded up to 3 3.0 - 3.3 is rounded down to 3; 3.3 - 3.9 is rounded up to 4 4.0 - 4.4 is rounded down to 4; 4.4 - 4.9 is rounded up to 5 5.0 - 5.5 is rounded down to 5; 5.5 - 5.9 is rounded up to 6 For all larger numbers, fractions are rounded in the usual way i.e. up or down to the nearest whole number, as is done for 5.1 - 5.9 in the table. This rounding procedure can be done automatically by a computer before printing tables of results. In the smallest health facilities, particularly in sparsely populated areas, the workloads are small to the point of being insufficient to keep even one member of staff occupied full time. In these situations the calculated Staffing Requirement is less than 1.0 and special considerations apply. The choice here is between rounding up to 1, where the staff member would be under utilized, or rounding down to 0 and in effect stopping the service which this category of staff provides and perhaps even closing the facility. This is not a technical matter but rather an administrative decision, which presumably would take into account the financial costs of maintaining a underutilised service, achieving national targets of coverage of services, access to alternative facilities, etc.

66 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

Overlapping staff categories


Sometimes one calculation covers two or more staff categories at the same time, because the main functions of these categories overlap and the workloads undertaken by each category are not reported separately in the service statistics. For example, in many countries the medical assistant or equivalent who is the person in charge at the health centre joins other staff e.g. rural medical assistants, to deal with outpatients when other duties permit; naturally these outpatients are not listed separately in the annual statistics but are reported as part of the total workload of the health centre. Again, in many hospitals the in-charge in the technical support departments (laboratories, X-ray, dispensary, physiotherapy, occupational therapy) spends some time on management and administration (for which Individual Allowance Standards are set) and the remainder on the main task of the department (performing tests, taking X-rays, filling prescriptions, etc.) along with the other staff in the department. In these situations it is usual to calculate the total Staffing Requirement for the department, based on reported workloads and Allowance Factors. This total Staffing Requirement is subsequently divided between the individual staff categories employed e.g.

7 staff required in a hospital X-ray department according to WISN calculations = 1 senior radiographer + 6 radiographers

5 staff required in a health centre dispensary according to WISN calculations = 1 pharmaceutical assistant + 4 dispensers

This principle can also be used to apply a predetermined balance between two or more staff categories. For example, it is possible to calculate the total ward nursing staff required in a hospital and then to divide this total between different nursing categories according to a national policy for ward staffing. Or if, in the example above, there were a national policy to employ equal numbers of radiographers and radiographic assistants in hospital X-ray departments, then the calculated Staffing Requirement would be: 7 staff required in a hospital x-ray department according to WISN calculations = 1 senior radiographer + 3 radiographers + 3 radiographic assistants

These predetermined factors (one person in charge + remaining staff, fixed ratios between staff categories, etc.) can easily be included in the spreadsheet formulae so that a computer would print out the results as shown above.

5.

Computerization of the WISN calculations


This section sets out the principles and main guidelines which should be followed in designing and implementing the computerization of the WISN calculations; it does not seek to be a mini-textbook of computer operations. Each implementation of the WISN Method will require access to a computer, for short working sessions spread over a period of some weeks during set-up and implementation, and subsequently for a relatively short period once a year (when the annual service statistics become available). Each implementation will also require the services of a computer operator who is familiar with the operation of a spreadsheet programme e.g. Lotus 123, Quattro, Supercalc. This operator will be able to follow these principles and guidelines in order to set up the computer so that:

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 67

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

a)

Service statistics for individual health facilities are entered into the computer. A pro forma is shown on the computer screen specifying the data items to be entered; The computer automatically performs the WISN calculations; The computer automatically prints out tables of results showing individual health facility Staffing Requirements, district summaries, regional summaries, and national summaries as required.

b) c)

No special computer programming is required; the standard commands in any generally available spreadsheet package are sufficient for the purpose. If the data collection, input, calculations and printing of results are centralized in this way, it throws on to the centre the responsibility for the prompt feedback of results, when they are produced, to the regional and district levels. If a country has computerized its health service statistics, whether on a spreadsheet or database package, much of the work in computerizing the WISN Method is already done. The calculations and print-outs of WISN results could be an additional procedure carried out on the health statistics already held in the computer i.e. a procedure additional to the annual compilation of individual facility statistics and their consolidation into district, regional and national summaries which are already performed. In this case the WISN calculations are a sub-routine in the programme for the annual compilation of service statistics. a) Data entry

For calculating the requirements of each staff category, the data items to be entered from the service statistics are those specified in the Activity Standards which have been set for each of the staff categories. For each type of health facility the task force should: a) b) c) List all the staff categories employed in this type of facility; List the Activity Standards set for each of these staff categories; List the data items required by each of these Activity Standards;

This should already have been done by the groups setting the Activity Standards. In some cases a data item is used for the calculations of the staff categories in one cadre only e.g. laboratory tests for laboratory staff, X-ray examinations for X-ray staff, physiotherapy patients or sessions for physiotherapy staff, etc. In other cases a single data item is used in the calculations of the Staffing Requirements for several categories, perhaps in different cadres e.g. the average number of inpatients or bed occupancy for calculating the Staffing Requirements of several categories of hospital doctors, several categories of nurses, kitchen staff, laundry staff; the annual number of outpatients for the calculations of several categories of doctors, several categories of nurses, medical records staff, several categories of pharmacy staff, etc. in hospitals and health centres. Therefore: d) Consolidate these lists of data items in order to produce a comprehensive master list of the data items from each type of health facility required by the WISN calculations.

These are the data items which must be entered into the computer for each health facility.

68 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

It would be possible to set up a separate spreadsheet for the WISN calculations for each cadre i.e. each with its own input format, data entry, calculations and table of results. Perhaps this is how it would be arranged if the task were to be done manually in order to avoid the complexity and the possibility of errors when dealing with calculations covering several cadres based on the same set of input data. However, the computer is designed to handle this type of complexity with ease. Also separate spreadsheets for each cadre would entail duplication of data entry, which can be a considerable workload. The best approach is to have a single consolidated pro forma for the data entry for each type of health facility which covers all the data items required for the WISN calculations for all the staff categories employed in these health facilities. The computer itself will select from this format the appropriate data items for each calculation, and insert the results into the appropriate place in a comprehensive table of results. It is usual to provide space in the data entry format for the figures for each month or quarter (depending on the frequency of reporting in the country), so that a correction can be made for the common situation in which some of the monthly or quarterly figures are missing for some health facilities.
Data item Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec No. of Estimated months annual reports figure

If some individual entries are missing, the spreadsheet is set up to make a pro rata adjustment in order to calculate best estimates of annual figures which are required by the WISN Method. The estimated annual figure is given by the formula:
Sum of available entries x 12 Annual figure = Number of available entries

The final column of this spreadsheet, Estimated Annual Figure, is the starting point of the WISN calculations themselves. Where only annual figures are available, they are entered directly into the "annual figure" column of the data entry format, ignoring all the other entry columns. In these circumstances it is not possible to make any correction for missing monthly figures or other imperfections which these annual figures may contain. The current staffing of each facility is also entered into the computer, since this is part of the WISN calculation. The staff categories employed in the facility are listed below the service statistics items in the final column of the spreadsheet as part of the starting point of the WISN calculation for each facility. Each type of health facility employs its own set of staff categories with their own Activity Standards, and therefore each type of health facility has its own set of data items (service statistics and staff categories) and data entry format. A separate data entry format must be produced for each type of health facility covered by the WISN calculations. Thus there will be a health post data entry format, a health centre data entry format, a district hospital data entry format, etc. Each health post and health centre format is copied several times in one spreadsheet to provide enough data entry tableaux for all the health posts and health centres in one district. When the data has been entered and checked, the spreadsheet is saved as a file of the basic data for the WISN

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 69

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

calculations for one type of health facility in one district. Many such files can be saved on to one diskette, and this provides the basic data for all health facilities in a district, a region or the whole country. When the data entry has been completed for a number of health facilities, the data file in the computer memory represents a considerable investment in time and effort in collecting, entering and checking the data. It is prudent to protect this investment. One way of doing this is to treat the spreadsheet containing the data on a set of health facilities as an interim product of the calculation process. When the data entry is completed the file is saved on to a diskette which is then made "read only". The final column of this spreadsheet is copied to become the first column of a second spreadsheet, the staffing calculation, which performs the WISN calculations for all these health facilities and tabulates the results. Thus each type of health facility has a data file and a calculation file stored on separate diskettes. The final column of each data file is copied to become the first column of the corresponding calculation file. b) WISN calculations

The computer is programmed to perform calculations of the type shown in the examples set out in Section C.4 above. The data entry format for one type of health facility e.g. health centres, is used for all facilities of that type throughout the country. Also the mathematical formulae for calculating Staffing Requirements for each cadre is the same for all health facilities of the same type throughout the country. Thus these formulae (which may be complex) need be entered into a calculation file in the computer only once and then copied to provide a separate calculation for each health facility. c) Tables of results

The result of the WISN calculations for each staff category in each health facility consists of four items: Actual staff: part of the data entry for each facility Required staff: according to the WISN calculations Difference: actual staff - required staff Ratio (WISN): actual staff / required staff. These four items are automatically inserted into preprogrammed tables of results. These tables normally show the results for each staff category in a group of facilities e.g. all the health posts in an area, all the health centres in a district, all the MCH clinics in a district, all the district hospitals in a region, etc., for easy comparison between different facilities and between different staff categories within a facility. A simple example of such results is shown in Section A.7, Table 2. Such tables of results (covering one type of health facility) also shows the totals or averages for each staff category employed in the group of facilities: Actual staff: total for all facilities listed in the table Required staff: total for all facilities listed in the table Difference: net shortage or excess of staff in the group Ratio (WISN): average ratio throughout the group. These will be totals or averages for an area, district, etc. Another table must be programmed which assembles these total/average figures for all the areas in a district in order to produce district totals and averages, for all the districts in a region to produce the regional totals and averages, etc.

70 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

Annex A - Staffing requirements for time-specified posts


It is instructive to use the calculated available working time per year for different staff categories in order to make a few illustrative calculations of the staffing resources required in a number of special situations. In all these situations the Staffing Requirement is not determined by the workload of a post; rather they are the staffing resources required to man a post for a specified time pattern during the year. Each calculation uses the figures from Section C.1 example 2: a) Manning a post during normal working hours throughout the year i.e. not on weekends, public holidays, etc.

This is required in many posts e.g. in day clinics, district and provincial offices, MOH. The total time for which the post is manned during the year is: 52 weeks x 44 hours/week - 10 public holidays x 8 hours/day = 2,288 - 80 = 2,208 hours/year One staff in Category A is available 1,776 hours/year, so the post would require 2,208/1,776 = 1.24 staff of Category A In other words, if this is a Category A post, manning it on normal working days throughout the year requires one full time staff in Category A and another 0.24 or 24% of a similar staff member's time, in order to cover for vacation, training, sickness and all other absences. Manning 4 of these posts would require 4 x 1.24 = 4.96 , i.e., 5 staff to be employed. One staff of Category B is available 1,872 hours/year, so the same type of post would require 2,208/1,872 = 1.18 staff of Category B In other words, if this is a Category B post, manning it on normal working days throughout the year requires one full time staff in Category B and another 0.18 or 18% of a similar staff member's time, in order to cover for vacation, training, sickness and all other absences. Manning five of these posts would require 5 x 1.18 = 5.90 i.e. 6 staff to be employed. b) Manning a post 8 hours/day, 7 days/week throughout the year

This is required for some posts in support departments in major hospitals e.g. maintenance staff. The total time for which the post is manned during the year is: 52 weeks x 7 days/week x 8 hours/day = 2,912 hours/year One staff in Category A, e.g. senior engineer, is available 1,776 hours/year, so the post would require 2,912/1,776 = 1.64 staff of Category A In other words, if this is a Category A post, manning it on day shifts throughout the year requires one full time staff in Category A and another 0.64 of a similar staff member's time, in order to cover not only for vacation, training and sickness as before, but also now for weekends and public holidays as well. Manning one such post in a facility would require employing two staff, but three of these posts (in a much larger facility) would require 3 x 1.64 = 4.92, i.e. only five staff to be employed. One staff of Category B, e.g. maintenance engineer, is available 1,872 hours/year, so the post would require 2,912/1,872 = 1.56 staff of Category B
_________________________________________________________________________________________ 71

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

In other words, if this is a Category B post, manning it on days throughout the year requires one full time staff in Category B and another 0.56 of a similar staff member's time, in order to cover not only for vacation, training and sickness as before, but also now for weekends and public holidays as well. Manning two of these posts would require 2 x 1.56 = 3.12, i.e. three staff to be employed. c) Manning a post 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. six days a week and 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sundays

These are the dispensary opening hours in the main hospitals in one country. The total time for which the post is manned during the year is: 52 weeks x 6 days/week x 14 hours/day + 52 days x 10 hours/day = 4368 hours/year + 520 hours/year = 4,888 hours/year One staff in Category A e.g. pharmacist, is available 1,776 hours/year, so a Category A post in such a dispensary would require 4,888/1,776 = 2.75 staff of Category A In other words, manning a Category A post in this dispensary requires employing 3 full time staff in Category A. These staff would operate a shift rota to keep the post manned. One staff of Category B is available 1,872 hours/year, so the post would require 4,888/1,872 = 2.61 staff of Category B In other words, manning each Category B post in this dispensary requires employing two full time staff in Category B and finding another 0.61 of a similar staff member's time. These staff would operate a shift rota to keep the post manned. d) Manning a post continuously throughout the year

There are many such posts in hospitals e.g. ward nurses. The total time for which the post is manned during the year is: 52 weeks x 7 days/week x 24 hours/day = 8,736 hours/year One staff in Category A is available 1,776 hours/year, so the post would require 8,736/1,776 = 4.92 staff of Category A In other words, manning a Category A post continuously requires employing about five full time staff in Category A to cover the continuous shift working, weekends and public holidays, and the vacation, training and absence time of all the staff involved. One staff of Category B is available 1,872 hours/year, so the post would require 8,736/1,872 = 4.67 staff of Category B In other words, manning a Category B post continuously also requires employing five full time staff in Category B. Of course, only a few posts in hospitals are manned continuously for three shifts; some are manned for two shifts, and many for the day shift only. Even where there is continuous operation e.g. on the wards or in the outpatient department (accident and emergency), there is differential manning on the three shifts, with the fewest staff on duty during the night.

72 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

Annex B Instructions for groups which are setting activity standards


These are the instructions for a cadre group, i.e. a group of senior and experienced staff in a cadre who will set the Activity Standards for all the staff categories within the cadre in all of the health facilities in which these categories are employed. The instructions also apply with very little adjustment to a facility group i.e. a group of staff from one type of health facility who will set the Activity Standards for all the staff categories which are employed in this type of facility. These adjustments are all noted in the text. 1. List all the types of health facility which are to be covered. [For a facility group the type of health facility is already determined and they list all the departments/units within the facility which are to be covered by the exercise.] Select one type of facility [department/unit]. List all the staff categories which have established posts in this type of facility [department/unit] i.e. all the staff categories which should be employed in them. [A cadre group will list only the staff categories within its own cadre employed in each type of facility. A facility group will list all staff categories employed in each department/unit.] For each of these staff categories in turn, list the major activities which these staff undertake in the work of the facility. The major activities are those which together take up all or virtually all of the working time of the staff category in the health facility [department/unit]. These are called the components of workload for the job. For most staff categories there are not more than four of these components of workload; some staff categories have only one or two. If necessary combine some related activities into one component of workload. [Using job descriptions to identify the components of workload of a staff category is usually not helpful; job descriptions are frequently out of date and in any case are too detailed for this purpose. It is better for those with direct experience of the work in these facilities to suggest from their own experience the major activities undertaken there by each staff category.] Take the first category of staff and identify which of the components of workload are covered by items in the statistics which are regularly collected and reported in these facilities, and also which of the components of workload are not covered by these statistics. If none of the data items in the reported statistics are directly relevant to one of the components of workload, try to find a proxy measure of the workload e.g. number of outpatient attendances instead of prescriptions filled, for the workload of hospital dispensers; number of hospital admissions instead of bed occupancy, for ward staff; number of inpatients instead of items washed, for the workload of launderers.5. For each of the components of workload which are covered by an item in the statistics, specify what the item is e.g. outpatient visits, antenatal examinations, inspections of premises, etc. and set a unit time for it e.g. 10 mins for an outpatient visit, 20 mins per antenatal examination, or set a rate for the activity e.g. 10 inspections/day.

2.

3.

4.

This is the most critical step in the whole task. These unit times or rates should correspond to the standard of performance which would be expected of experienced and well motivated staff taking into account the general situation or circumstances found in these facilities in the country e.g. availability of equipment and supplies.
_________________________________________________________________________________________ 73

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

6.

For the components of workload which are not covered by items in the statistics, set a time allowance for each activity. This allowance may be in the form of a percentage e.g. administration: 10% of total time. Alternatively it may be in the form of a time allowance e.g. cleaning: one hour per day; clinical meetings: five hours per week; stocktaking and replenishing two days per month. The allowance may apply to all staff in a category, e.g. all doctors in a hospital attend clinical meetings, or it may apply only to a fixed number of staff however many staff are employed e.g. one person in charge carries out the administration in the unit, or two staff perform the stocktaking and replenishment. Now repeat steps 4-6 for each of the remaining staff categories listed in step 2 as being employed in these facilities, using the list of components of workload for each of these categories from step 3. Is there a staff category with none of its major work activities covered by any item in the annual service statistics e.g. cleaners, drivers? if there is, this category must be given a different type of workload standard, which must be one of the following: ratio on other staff e.g. one medical assistant per four rural medical aides in a health centre, one laboratory assistant per two rural medical aides in a health centre; fixed number per facility e.g. three watchmen per health centre, one nursing attendant per dispensary; fixed number per item e.g. one driver per vehicle, two radiographers per X-ray machine; fixed number per administrative unit e.g. one health assistant per electoral ward; staffing according to organizational structure e.g. one district health officer per district, one regional pharmacist per region.

7.

8.

In these cases no separate allowances (for administration, supervision, etc.) are made; these factors are already included in the workload standard. 9. Now estimate for each of the staff categories employed in the facility: average number of days per year engaged in off-the-job training; average number of days per year for sickness and other absence.

These figures are used in determining the working time available per year, see Section B.1. 10. Now repeat steps 2 to 9 for all the remaining types of facility [department/unit] listed in step 1. Make a table of the results as follows:

11.

74 _________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section C Technical factors

Facility type 1
Staff category 1 Major activity 1 Statistics item Major activity 2 Statistics item Allowance 1 Number of staff (1, 2 .... all) Allowance 2 Number of staff (1, 2 .... all) Average off-the-job training time Average total absence, sickness etc. Staff category 2 etc. Unit time or rate Unit time or rate % or hours per day/ week/month/etc. % or hours per day/ week/month/etc. days per year days per year

Facility type 2
Staff category 1 etc.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 75

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

76 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Section D: Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories
This section lists some of the activity standards which have been used in WISN calculations in various countries. They are offered for guidance only. Each country must set its own activity standards. These activity standards offer two types of information: - how the jobs of different staff categories have been broken down into their main functions and tasks (components of workload) in order to set activity standards for each; - what actual times or rates (activity standards) have been set for these functions and tasks. There are no absolutely correct or incorrect activity standards for any of the staff categories. The same job title may refer to two very different jobs in different countries. For example, in some countries the community health nurse has six months training and is one of two staff in the smallest type of local health facility operated by the government, whereas in other countries the same title refers to a three-year trained nurse with a number of years' experience and a further one-year public health qualification who is in charge of all public health nursing in a sub-district. The main activities (and the corresponding components of workload) are quite different for these two categories of staff. Even if the two jobs are the same in principle, their tasks may be very different because of different medical practices in the countries. For example, in some countries the threeyear trained ward nurse carries out all tasks related to inpatients (clinical procedures, administering medication, feeding, personal hygiene, etc.) whereas in other countries the three-year trained ward nurse is a technical worker who only performs clinical procedures and issues medication (but does not administer it), with the other patient-related tasks being performed by other categories of ward staff. While the list of the components of workload may be nearly the same for the two staff categories, the activity standards will be quite different. For these reasons the examples which follow, which show what activity standards have been used in other countries, are offered for guidance only. They show what components of workload have been used for a number of staff categories, which may be more directly useful than the associated unit times, rates, etc.

Country or territory
United Republic of Tanzania ...................................................................................................... 76 Papua New Guinea ..................................................................................................................... 89 Kenya .......................................................................................................................................... 94 Hong Kong.................................................................................................................................. 94 Oman .......................................................................................................................................... 95 Sri Lanka..................................................................................................................................... 95

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 77

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

United Republic of Tanzania


Performance standards for staff in dispensaries/health posts Staff category Rural medical aide Component of workload Outpatient care First visit Subsequent visits Administrative duties Collecting salary MCH aide Antenatal examinations First visit Subsequent visits Under-5 examinations First visit Subsequent visits Family planning First visit Subsequent visits Immunisations Supervised deliveries Home visits Health education Cleaning Supervision of TBA &VHW School health Collecting salary Nursing assistant Attending outpatients Cleaning Collecting salary Home inspections Food premises Disease control Health education Administrative tasks Collecting salary Nursing attendant Medical assistant Cleaning full-time Outpatients First visit Subsequent visits Ward rounds Medical/surgical procedures Administration, supervision, public relations Collection salary Rural medical aide Outpatients First visit Subsequent visits Ward rounds ) 15 mins/patient 5 mins/patient 3 hrs/day ) ) 4.5 hrs/day 3 days/month 15 mins/patient 5 mins/patient 9 hrs/week 30 mins/client 10 mins/client 7 mins/immun. 5 hours/delivery 2 hours/visit 15 mins/meeting 1 hr/weekday + 5 hrs on Saturday = 10 hrs/week 10% of working time 2 hrs/week 3 days/month 30 patients/day 1 hr/day: 6 hrs/week 3 days/month 10 homes/day 5 premises/day 1 day per outbreak 30 mins/meeting 2 hrs/day 3 days/month Allow 1 per facility 15 mins/child 10 mins/child 30 mins/patient 15 mins/patient 15 mins 5 mins 20% of working time 3 days/month Unit time, allowance

Health assistant

78 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Medical/surgical procedures Collection salary ) 3 days/month 40 patients/day

Unit time, allowance

Nurse/midwife

Outpatients Inpatients Administration Collection salary

1n/m per 20 inpatients 20% of working time 3 days/month 30 mins/patient 15 mins/patient 15 mins/child 10 mins/child 30 mins/client 10 mins/client 7 mins/immun. 5 hours/delivery 2 hours/visit 15 mins/meeting 1 hr/weekday + 5 hrs on Saturday = 10 hrs/week 10% of working time 2 hrs/week 3 days/month 1 NA per 10 inpatients 3 days/month 10 homes/day 5 premises/day 1 day per outbreak 30 mins/meeting 2 hrs/day 3 days/month 25 mins/specimen 30 mins/specimen 15 mins/specimen 3 days/month 120 patients/day 1 hr/day 3 days/month 1 staff/12 inpatients 3 days/month 1 staff/12 inpatients 3 days/month 1/10 beds

MCH aide

Antenatal examinations First visit Subsequent visits Under-5 examinations First visit Subsequent visits Family planning First visit Subsequent visits Immunisations Supervised deliveries Home visits Health education Cleaning Supervision of TBA &VHW School health Collecting salary

Nursing assistant Health assistant

Inpatients Collecting salary Home inspections Food premises Disease control Health education Administrative tasks Collecting salary

Laboratory assistant

Haematology Bacteriology Parasitology Collecting salary

Medical records assistant

Registration of outpatients Maintaining records ) Compiling analyses ) Collecting salary

Cooking staff Laundry attendant Nursing attendant Driver Watchman

Feeding inpatients Collecting salary Laundering Collecting salary Cleaning Allow 1 driver per vehicle Allow 3 per health centre

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 79

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Performance standards for staff in hospitals Doctors Medical specialists, medical officers, assistant medical officers and medical assistants are employed in regional and district hospitals. The components of workload which cover most medical staff in most specialties and the measures of workload appropriate for each, were identified to be: Ward rounds, minutes per inpatient Outpatient clinics, minutes per outpatient Medical procedures following the ward rounds, hours per day Postmortems, hours per pm (including writing the report) Clinical meetings (daily and weekly), total hours per week Administration (letters, meetings, etc.), hours per week Outside service in major emergencies, e.g. epidemics, floods, etc., weeks per year Research, person weeks per year. Specialists are not employed in district hospitals and so no standards for them are shown in these facilities. Standards are not shown for medical assistants in regional hospitals in accordance with the national policy although it was recognized that this policy was not followed. This became apparent in the results of the WISN exercise, when the calculated staffing requirements according to the policy were compared with actual staffing in the hospitals. The standards are based on one ward round in each ward per day; in regional hospitals the standards allow for specialists' rounds twice a week in surgery and in obstetrics and gynaecology, and three times a week in all other specialist departments. The clinical meetings nearly all follow the same pattern - half an hour per day and a three-hour meeting once a week, total 5.5 hours/week. a) General medicine
Regional hospital SPEC Wd rds, mins/pat Procs, hrs/day Outpts, mins/pat Pstmtms, hrs/pm Cln mtgs, hrs/wk Admin, hrs/wk Emy svce, wks/yr Rsch, mwks/yr (1)
1

District hospital AMO 10 1 8 2 5.5 3 1 13 MO 10 1 8 2 5.5 3 1 13 AMO 10 1 8 2 5.5 3 1 13 MA 10 1.5 6 0 5.5 0 0 13

MO 10 1 8 2 5.5 3 1 13

10 0.5 5 2 5.5 3 1 13

All doctors allowed three months research per year.

80 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

b)

Surgery
Regional hospital SPEC Wd rds, mins/pat Procs, hrs/day Outpts, mins/pat Pstmtms, hrs/pm(1) Cln mtgs, hrs/wk Admin, hrs/wk Emy svce, wks/yr Rsch, mwks/yr major minor MO AMO MO District hospital AMO MA

10 2
1/4

5 2
1/4

5 2
1/4

10 2
1/4

10 2
1/4

5 0
1/4

10
0 5.5 3 1 4

8
2 5.5 2 1 2

8
2 5.5 2 1 1

10
2 5.5 3 2 4

10
2 5.5 2 2 2

10
0 5.5 2 1 1

Specialist does very few postmortems per year, no calculation made of this workload.

c)

Paediatrics
Regional hospital SPEC Wd rds, mins/pat Procs, hrs/day Outpts, mins/pat Stmtms, hrs/pm Cln mtgs, hrs/wk Admin, hrs/wk Emy svce, wks/yr Rsch, mwks/yr (1) 10 3/wk 10 2 5.5 3 1 1.3 MO 8 1 10 2 5.5 3 1 1.3 AMO 8 1 10 2 5.5 3 1 1.3 MO 8 1 10 2 5.5 3 1 1.3 District hospital AMO 8 1 10 2 5.5 3 1 1.3 MA 8 1 10 0 5.5 0 0 1.3

Research is undertaken by 10% of staff, each of whom are engaged on it for 13 weeks per year i.e. an average of 1.3 weeks for all staff.

d)

Obstetrics & gynaecology


Regional hospital SPEC Wd rds, spec mns/pt ordy mns/pt Procs, hrs/day Outpts, mins/pat Ptmtms, hrs/pm(1) Cln mtgs, hrs/wk Admin, hrs/wk Emy svce, wks/yr(2) Rsch, mwks/yr (3) MO AMO MO District hospital AMO MA

20
-

20
15

20
15

15

15

4/wk 15 0 5.5 3 0
8 for dept

3 15 2 5.5 3 0

3 15 2 5.5 3 0

3 15 2 5.5 4 0
8 for dept

3 15 2 5.5 4 0

0 0 0 5.5 0 0

1 2 3

Specialist does very few postmortems per year, no calculation made of this workload. These staff not called out for emergency service. Research undertaken by one doctor at a time in each hospital for two months per year.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 81

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

e)

Psychiatry
Regional hospital(1) SPEC Wd rds, mins/pat Procs, hrs/day Outpts, mins/pat Pstmtms, hrs/pm Cln mtgs, hrs/wk(2) Admin, hrs/wk Emy svce, wks/yr Rsch, mwks/yr (3) 30 0.5 30 2 8.5 3 1 MO 20 1 20 2 8.5 2 1 AMO 20 1 20 2 8.5 2 1 MA 10 1 10 0 8.5 0 1

---20 for dept---

1 2 3

No psychiatric medical staff in district hospitals. Clinical meetings include an extra three-hour meeting per week. Research undertaken by two staff at a time in each regional hospital for ten weeks per year.

f)

Ophthalmology
Regional hospital(1) SPEC Wd rds, mins/pat Procs, hrs major minor Outpts, mins/pat Pstmtms, hrs/pm(3) Cln mtgs, hrs/wk Admin, hrs/wk Emy svce, wks/yr Rsch, mwks/yr(4) Mobile clinics (5) AMO(2)

8 0.5
1/4

10 0
1/4

15 5.5 3 1

10 5.5 3 1
4 for dept

1 day travel per clinic

1 2 3 4 5

No ophthalmology medical staff in district hospitals. Only eye specialist and AMOs employed in these departments. Ophthalmology staff do not undertake postmortems. One member of staff in the department undertakes research for four weeks per year. Mobile clinics require one day for travelling; patient contact time already allowed for under other items.

g)

Public health

There should be one public health doctor for each district and one for the region, whose annual time allocation should be: Dealing with epidemics Health education Endemic diseases Administration Research 6 weeks/year 12 weeks/year 15% 35% 20%

82 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

h)

Anaesthesiology
Regional hospital SPEC Wd rds, mins/pat Procs, hrs major(4) minor(4) Other hrs/wk Outpts, mins/pat(2) hrs/pm(2) Pstmtms, MO MA District hospital(1) MO MA

10 3.75
0.5

10 3.75
0.5

10 0
0

3.75
0.5

3.75
0.5

2 5.5 3 5 for dept

2 5.5 3 -

0 5.5

5.5 2 -

5.5 -

Cln mtgs, hrs/wk Admin, hrs/wk Emy svce, Rsch,


1 2.

wks/yr(2)

mwks/yr (3)

District hospital requires one anaesthetic officer + medical assistants sufficient to cover the workload. Anaesthetic staff do not undertake outpatient clinics, post mortems or outside work in major emergencies. 3. One member of staff in the department undertakes research for five weeks per year. 4. Staff time required on average for operations is as follows: Major Pre-op examination Preparing equipment Pre-op medication, induction Operation Post-op monitoring Cleaning equipment Follow-up, 5 mins every 4hrs for 24 hours, 6 x 5 mins Totals 3hr 45 mins 30 mins 15 mins 10 mins 5 mins 2 hours 30 mins 15 mins 30 mins ) ) ) 10 mins ) ) ) 15 mins 5 mins Minor

Nursing staff Some Performance Standards for nurses were already covered by a Handbook of Nursing Practice (or Standards). This specified the number of outpatients or clinic attendances per day per nurse, and in general terms the number of occupied beds a nurse can supervise. The Performance Standards for ward nurses, set out below, are much more detailed and specific. The standards for the senior nurses were: Matron Asst. matron Nursing officer Asst. nursing officer One for each regional or district hospital One for each regional or district hospital One for up to 30 nursing staff employed in the ward, unit, etc. One for each further 30 nursing staff employed in the ward, unit, etc.

The Performance Standards for nurses, nurse midwives and nurse assistants who work on the wards were based on inpatient ratios, i.e. the number of inpatients which a member of staff could reasonably be expected to cover in performing their nursing functions during the shift. This inpatient ratio was lower in regional hospitals (i.e. requiring more staff for the same number of

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 83

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

inpatients) where the more serious cases are treated by specialists. The ratio varied with the shift; fewer nurses were needed on the wards at night. Where a variation between shifts is specified, it is allowed for in the calculation of staff need. This ratio also differed for different types of nursing, e.g. paediatric, psychiatric, etc., and these ratios were estimated because bed occupancy figures for each ward were available in the service statistics. The workload standards for nurse attendants, whose task is mainly cleaning, were based on the number of beds in the ward (as a proxy for size) not the number of inpatients (occupied beds); they also show variation by type of hospital and by shift. The mathematical formula for calculating the number of nurses needed to staff a ward with specific inpatient ratios is as follows: Morning shift: Afternoon shift: Night shift: Nurses required/ inpatient (occupied bed) A hours long, ratio 1 nurse to K inpatients B hours long, ratio 1 nurse to L inpatients C hours long, ratio 1 nurse to M inpatients 365 = x (A/K + B/L + C/M)

AWT where AWT = Available Working Time in hours per year Exactly the same formula is used to calculate the number of nurse attendants required. In this case K, L and M are the number of beds in each ward instead of the average number of inpatients. The shift rota in the hospitals was 7-2, 2-8 and 8-7 i.e. 7 hours/6 hours/11 hours, and so in the formula: A=7 B=6 C = 11 The values of K, L and M in different situations are given in the tables below. In the tables ips = inpatients; bds = beds a) General medical wards
District hospitals Category / shift NM/Trnd Nse Nse Asst Nse Attdt 7-2 1/10 ips 1/5 ips 1/10 bds 2-8 1/10 ips 1/10 ips 1/20 bds 8-7 1/20 ips 1/20 ips 1/20 bds : : : : : 7-2 1/5 ips 1/5 ips 1/10 bds Regional hospitals 2-8 1/5 ips 1/10 ips 1/20 bds 8-7 1/10 ips 1/20 ips 1/20 bds

b)

Paediatric wards
District hospitals : 8-7 1/10 ips 1/10 ips 1/20 bds : : : : 7-2 1/5 ips 1/5 ips 3/20 bds Regional hospitals 2-8 1/10 ips 1/10 ips 1/20 bds 8-7 1/10 ips 1/10 ips 1/20 bds 7-2 1/5 ips 1/5 ips 3/20 bds 2-8 1/10 ips 1/10 ips 1/20 bds

Category / shift NM/Trnd Nse Nse Asst Nse Attdt

84 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

c)

Psychiatric wards
District hospitals : 8-7 1/20 ips 1/20 ips 1/10 ips 1/20 bds : : : : : : : 7-2 1/5 ips 1/4 ips 1/10 bds 1/8 ips 1/4 ips 1/10 bds Regional hospitals 2-8 1/10 ips 1/8 ips 1/4 ips 1/10 bds 8-7 1/20 ips 1/16 ips 1/8 ips 1/20 bds 7-2 1/5 ips 1/5 ips 1/10 bds 1/10 ips 1/5 ips 1/10 bds 2-8 1/10 ips 1/10 ips 1/5 ips 1/10 bds

Category / shift NO Curative NO Community N0 Occ Therapy NM/Trnd Nse Nse Asst Nse Attd

d)

Maternity unit
District hospitals : 8-7 : 7-2 Regional hospitals 2-8 8-7 7-2 2-8

Category / shift NO NM/Trnd Nse Nse Asst Nse Attd

---------------------1 in charge + 1/10 deliveries/day ------------------------------------------- 4 hrs/delivery + 2 hrs/shift -------------------------------------------------------3 hrs/delivery -------------------------------1/10 bds 1/10 bds 1/20 bds : 1/10 bds 1/10 bds 1/20 bds

Patients admitted for antenatal care before delivery or for postnatal care afterwards are in the general medical wards. e) Operating theatres

Average duration of surgical operations:


General surgery Major operations Minor operations 2 hrs 15 mins Obst & gynae 2 hrs 15 mins Ophthalmology 30 mins 15 mins

General surgery and obs & gynae Major operations: a team of 1 NO + 2 NMs + 4 nurse assistants for 30 mins preparation + duration of operation + 30 mins clearing. Minor operations: 1 NO or NM for 15 mins preparation + duration of operation + 15 mins clearing. Ophthalmic surgery All operations: 1 NO or ANO, preparation and clearing times as given above. Nurse attendants, all types of surgery: SHIFT Regional hospitals District hospitals 7-2 4 3 2-8 2 1 8-7 1 1

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 85

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Nurses also staffed the regular outpatient clinics. These workload standards were set in terms of the average number of minutes of nurse time occupied by each patient seen, or by the nursing team required to be on duty throughout the clinic to support the doctor. In some of the older hospitals these standards could not be met because of the restricted space available. f) Ophthalmic clinic

Nursing officer and assistant nursing officer: Screening 4 mins Dispensing Eye investigations 4 mins 5 mins

Admitting patients 8 mins (on average 10% of patients are admitted) Nursing officer: administration 3 hrs/week Nurse assistant/attendant: 1/clinic g) General medical clinic Nurse midwife Nurse assistant Nurse attendant h) Psychiatric clinic NO counselling Nurse midwife Nurse assistant Nurse attendant i) MCH clinic : : : : 2 hrs/patient, new and repeat cases; all others 1 hr/new case, 15 mins/repeat case 1/clinic 1/clinic 1/clinic : : : 10 mins per patient 1/clinic 1/clinic

1 PHN A for each clinic. PHN B/nurse midwife: same workload standards as the MCH aide in health centres. Nurse attendant: 3/clinic in regional hospitals; 2/clinic in district hospitals. Hospital technical and support staff a) Dental staff There should be one dental officer in each regional and district hospital, spending 20% of the working time on preventive activities and 10% on administrative activities Owing to the shortage of dental officers, an assistant dental officer could be appointed in the place of a dental officer Because there were so very few of this category in the country, and their duties were covered by the dental officer, no workload standards were proposed.

Dental officer

Assistant dental officer Dental technician

86 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Dental assistant

School pupil screening and data analysis Extractions Fillings Scaling Polishing Admin. (supervision, reporting budgeting, salary) Extractions Fillings Scaling Polishing Cleaning and sterilisation Salary collection

1 day/school 15 mins/extraction 30 mins/filling 1 hr/patient 10 mins/patient 20% 15 mins/extraction 30 mins/filling 1 hr/patient 10 mins/patient 2 mins/pat + 1 hr/day 2 hrs/month

Dental auxiliary

The dental auxiliary remains in close attendance on the dental assistant during patient treatment, so has the same unit times for extractions, etc. Owing to the severe shortage of instruments, each set is scrubbed and rinsed after use (two mins) and then sterilised; cleaning and sterilisation at the end of the day takes one hour. b) Pharmacy staff There should be two pharmacists per regional hospital and one pharmacist per district hospital. They undertake costing, ordering, procurement, stores management (receipt and issue), compounding, dispensing, clinical consultations, continuing education and administration (meetings, reports, supervision, budgeting, etc.) Dispensing Stores management Administration Salary collection Dispensing Salary collection 5 mins/patient 1.5 hrs/day 1 hr/day 2 hrs/month 5 mins/patient 2 hrs/month

Pharmacist

Pharmaceutical assistant

Pharmaceutical auxiliary

In addition, one hour's compounding was done each day by one of the above staff; it required one hour of preparation and one hour of clearing, done by the pharmaceutical auxiliary. Pharmaceutical attendant Cleaning the rooms and equipment, loading and unloading pharmaceutical supplies and messenger duties require one pharmaceutical attendant per four pharmaceutical assistants and auxiliaries

c)

Laboratory staff Most advanced clinical chemistry: SGOT/SGPT, acid phosphates, alkali phosphates, G6PD Microbiology Immuno-serology: Elisa Trace transfusion reaction L.E.test 30 mins/test

Laboratory technologist

45 mins/test 1 hr/test 2 hrs/test 30 mins/test

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 87

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Bone marrow Administration (supervision, QA, meetings, supplies, etc.) Laboratory technician Advanced clinical chemistry: uric acid, choloresterol, total protein, albumen, bilirubin, amelase, electrolytes Histopathology: seminal fluid analysis, wet preparation, counts, pap smear Record keeping Salary collection Laboratory assistant Specimen collection Haematology: sickling test, haemoglobin test, ESR, PCV, WBC (total and differential), bleeding time, clotting time Bacteriology: sputum - AFB, skin AFB, gram stain Parasitology: stool, urine, malaria parasites, skin snip. Simple clinical chemistry: Urine (sugar, protein) Blood (urea, sugar, createnim) Immunoserology: VDRL, HIV, pregnancy test, widal. Blood donation: Cross matching, Coombs test. Record keeping Salary collection Laboratory attendant

30 mins/test 30%

20 mins/test

5 mins/test

1 hr/day 2 hrs/month 5 mins/ specimen 7 mins/test

30 mins/test

10 mins/test

5 mins/test 40 mins/test 7.5 mins/test

42 mins/specimen

1 hr/day 2 hrs/month

General cleaning and support, needs one laboratory attendant per 3 laboratory assistants

88 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

d)

Radiography staff Preparation, positioning, operating machine, evaluating, patient care. Administration (management, stock, budgets, supervision, meetings, etc.) 20 mins/patient

Radiographer

40%

Radiographic assistant

Skeletal examinations Processing film Administration (registering, etc.)

20 mins/patient 10 mins/film 25%

Radiographic attendant

Cleaning the radiographic accommodation, allow one per facility

e)

Medical records staff

The unit times for the major activities were the same for both medical records officers and medical records assistants: Outpatient registration Inpatient admission Inpatient discharge Shelving files and register books Sorting files Compiling patient data Administration f) Catering staff Management, supervision, meetings, etc. requires one trained cook per four cooks Cooking duties Cleaning Laundry staff 1 cook/20 inpatients 2 hrs/day 3 mins/patient 10 mins/admission 5 mins/discharge 1 hr/day 3 mins/file 2 days/month 20%

Trained cook (head cook)

Cook

g)

There were no staff categories in this cadre. The standard workloads were: Regional hospital District hospital 1 laundryman/16 inpatients 1 laundryman/30 inpatients

In addition, the person in charge at each facility spends 10% of time on administrative duties. h) Hospital secretaries

The duties of a hospital secretary cover a very wide range of different types of activity, for most of which statistics were not available. The factor which determined this workload was the number of staff employed in the hospital and the standard workload was set at 250 staff, i.e. in a hospital with more than 250 staff the hospital secretary should have an assistant hospital secretary for each extra 250 staff employed by the hospital.
_________________________________________________________________________________________ 89

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Outpatient department Separate from the scheduled outpatient clinics, the outpatient department provided a service on demand in dealing with casual illnesses and unspecified referrals. The person in charge should be an MO in a regional hospital and an AMO in a district hospital. The workload standards for other staff in the department were the same for both types of hospital. For a unit receiving 200 patients/day, the staffing required was: Morning 4 1 4 8 2 2 SHIFT Afternoon 2 2 4 2 2 Night 2 1 2 1 1

Medical assistant Nursing officer Nurse midwives Nursing assistants Nurse attendants Medical recorders

Staffing standards for other sizes of outpatient department are calculated pro rata.

90 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Papua New Guinea


Staff category Component of workload Activity standard

Consultant paediatricians in a teaching hospital

Inpatients Teaching rounds Business rounds Patient care Operative delivs. Postnatal ward Outpatients General outpatients Observation room Consultations Ultrasound Outside visits Other activities Teaching prep. Administration Research 780 contact hrs/yr half day/week half day/week 5 attends./hour 20/hr seen twice, 365 days/yr 6 attends./hr 2 staff do 2 in 12 hours 1 day/visit 3 hrs/round, 6 days/week 8 pats/hr, 365 days/yr 1 hr/admission 30 mins/delivery 2.5 mins/delivery

Consultant physicians in a teaching hospital


Staff category Component of workload Activity standard

Consultant physicians in a teaching hospital

Inpatients Teaching rounds

3 hrs/round, 2 rounds/ week/unit

The specified teaching schedule requires one consultant, one registrar and one resident on each teaching round. Patient care rounds General med. units 8 patients/hr, 6 days/wk 52 weeks/yr registrar + resident TB unit 33 patients/hr, 6 days/wk 52 weeks/yr registrar + resident Medical admissions Consultant 0.25 hr/adm. Registrar 1 hr/adm. Resident 2 hrs/adm. Procedures in Gen. med. units 15 patients/hr, 6 days/week, 52 wks/yr registrar + resident

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 91

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category

Component of workload

Activity standard

Outpatients Gen. med. clinics 3/hour for all staff consultant, registrar, resident Specialty clinics: Asthma, diabetes, cardiology 6/hr, each staff takes half the patients consultant and registrar 3/hr, each staff takes half the patients consultant and registrar 2/hr, consultants only

Ultrasound

Intermediate clinics Outside visits Hospitals Health centres Other activities Teaching Administration

Days spent consultants only Days spent registrars only

Consultant 780 hrs/yr Consultant half day/week Registrar 1 hr/week

Research

consultant half day/week Registrar half day/week

Doctors in non-teaching hospitals These workload standards cover both general medical officers and resident medical officers in nonteaching hospitals.
Staff category Component of workload Activity standard

Doctors in non-teaching hospitals

Inpatients Daily ward rounds 15 patients/hr i.e. admin. assistance from nurses during rounds 1 hr/MO admission 20 mins/HEO admission proportion 50:50. Procedures Radiology Lumbar puncture Traction, plaster casts 30 mins/patient 15 mins/patient 30 mins/patient

Admissions

92 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload

Activity standard

Operations

All scheduled theatre time filled, 2 doctors for each operation

Outpatients General Clinics Surgery Medicine Antenatal Gynae (FV = first visit, SV = subsequent visit) Consultations, incl. interm'te Other activities Outside visits, supervision Days/yr spent on outside visits by all doctors Urban clinics Hrs/week for clinics throughout the year Clinical meetings hours/week for meetings attended by all doctors Research Administration 2 hrs/week/doctor 12.5% 40 mins/patient 8 mins/patient FV: 40 mins/patient SV:15-20 mins/patient FV: 30 mins/patient SV: 10 mins/patient FV: 30 mins/patient SV: 10 mins/patient 20 mins/patient

Health centres and sub-centres


Staff category Component of workload Activity standard

Nursing officers

Admissions Outpatients Clinic attds. Mobile attds. Supervised births

0.5hr/patient/day 50/day 670/month 500/month +travelling 12.5/month 1 hr/patient/day 30/day 2 CHWS to 3 nos 500/month +travelling

Community health workers

Admissions Outpatients Clinic attds. Mobile attds.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 93

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Aid posts
Staff category Component of workload Activity standard

Community health workers

Outpatients

22/half day + activities outside the aid post

Urban clinics
Staff category Nursing officers Component of workload Outpatients Clinic attds. Community health workers Outpatients Activity standard 50/day 670/month 30/day

Hospitals
Staff category Nursing officers + nursing auxs. Component of workload Inpatients Deliveries Outpatients Activity standard 2 hrs/patient/day 9 hrs/delivery 44/day

The calculated total nurse staffing for hospitals is divided between nursing officers and nursing auxiliaries after the WISN calculation.

Pharmacy staff
Staff category Pharmacists Component of workload Advising specialists employed in hospitals Activity standard 0-1 speclsts: 0 2-7 speclsts: 1 8-20 speclsts: 2 21+ speclsts: 3 Dispensers Filling prescriptions Checking and replenishing ward orders Regular replenishment Resetting imprest 15/hr Wards without imprest replenished 3 times/week, 30 mins/order each imprest cleared annually, 1 week each Regular stock check checked once a week 30 mins/check Orders filled for other facils. 20 mins/aid post order 15 mins/hlth cntr order Monthly stocktaking 20 mins/yr for each item stocked

94 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Replenishing first aid kits in schools and govt. depts. Making bulk supplies in base hospitals only

Activity standard 10 mins/replenishment

Allow 0.25 staff

Storemen

Ward replenishment

wards and clinics replenished 3 times/week, 2 hrs/ward or clinic

Receive supplies Deliver medical gases Clerk/typist Pathology staff in base and provincial hospitals Type orders, maintain records Haematology Biochemistry Microbiology VDRL Blood bank Supervision visits Research) Cleaning) Clerical/ typing Management

40 mins/yr for each item stocked 1.5 hours/delivery 300 outpatient prescriptions/day 7 mins/test 9 mins/test 15 mins/test 12 mins/test 21 mins/test 1 day/visit 25%

12% 7%

X-Ray staff in base and provincial hospitals


Staff category Radiographers Component of workload Taking X-rays Developing film Scanning ECG Clerical/typing Nursing staff Specialist examinations Activity standard 15 mins/patient manual: 200/day machine:300/day 3/hour 40 mins each 15 mins/patient 1 hour each

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 95

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Kenya
Medical laboratory staff The activity standard was set at 24 specimens per day for all types of tests. This standard allows for the necessary time to be spent on cleaning, setting out, replenishing supplies, management, recording and reporting, and all the other essential activities in a hospital laboratory which are not recorded in the annual statistics but which must be done if the laboratory is to function effectively. X-ray staff The activity standard was set at 25 minutes per X-ray, 15 minutes for taking the X-ray and 10 minutes for developing. Pharmacy staff Province hospitals: one pharmaceutical technologist per five wards. District and sub-district hospitals: one pharmaceutical technologist per 10 wards

Hong Kong
PHC and Public Health: direct service delivery activities
Staff category Registered nurse Component of workload General outpatient Family health services Child health Maternal health Family planning Comprehensive observation Clinical genetics Child assessment TB & chest Social hygiene & special skin 15 mins/attendance 15 mins/attendance 5 mins/attendance 23 mins/attendance 7.5 mins/attendance 1 hr 10 mins/assessmt. 17.5 mins/attendance 45 mins/attendance Activity standard 7 mins/attendance

96 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Oman
Staff category Laboratory technician Component of workload Haematology Blood grouping Biochemistry Bacteriology Culture Other Administration 30 mins/sample 10 mins/sample 15% Activity standard 2 mins/sample 3 mins/sample 3 mins/sample

Sri Lanka
Consultants and supporting medical staff in teaching, province, base and district hospitals
Staff category Cancer surgery Component of workload Conslt Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 7 mins 100% 15 mins 100% 30 mins 40% 30 mins 60% 180 mins 100%100% 180 mins 7 mins 60 mins 8 mins 90 mins _ _ 15 mins 100% Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 97

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category Cardiology

Component of workload Conslt Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 4 mins 20% 10 mins 100% 4.5 mins 15 mins 20%

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

20 mins 80% 5 mins 45 mins

5 mins 80%

Dermatology

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed 4 mins 5 mins 120 mins 10 mins 100%

98 _________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Conslt Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 20% 7 mins 100%

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

5 mins 80%

General surgery

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Post graduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs 4 mins 20% 5 mins 80% 7.5 mins 100% 20 mins 20% 15 mins 80% 120 mins 100% 120 mins 100% 3 mins 20 mins 4 mins 90 mins 10 mins 100%

Genito-urinary surgery

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds 10 mins 100%

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 99

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category

Component of workload Conslt Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs 4 mins 20% 7.5 mins 100% 20 mins 20% 120 mins 100% 3 mins 20 mins

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO 4 mins 90 mins

120 mins 100% 15 mins 80%

5 mins 80%

Gynaecology

Inpatients Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen 7 mins 20% 7 mins 80% 10 mins 100% 20 mins 20% 20 mins 80% 60 mins 100% 60 mins 100% 3 mins 15 mins 3 mins 60 mins 7 mins 20% 10 mins 80%

100 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Conslt Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

General medicine

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 100 hrs 5 mins 20% 7 mins 80% 10 mins 100% 4 mins 5 mins 90 mins 10 mins 10% 12 mins 90%

Neurology

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations 4 mins 5 mins 90 mins 20 mins 20% 30 mins 80%

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 101

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category

Component of workload Conslt Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 100 hrs 4 mins 10% 10 mins 100%

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

4 mins 90%

Neurosurgery

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 100 hrs 4 mins 10% 5 mins 90% 10 mins 100% 60 mins 50% 90 mins 50% 180 mins 100% 180 mins 100% 4 mins 20 mins 5 mins 90 mins 20 mins 10% 30 mins 90%

102 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category Obstetrics

Component of workload Conslt Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Caesarian Time per operation % performed Forceps delivery Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Post graduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs 5 mins 20% 5 mins 100% 10 mins 40% 30 mins 80% 3 mins

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

10 mins 100% 4 mins 60 mins

45 mins 20% 15 mins 60%

6 mins 80%

Oncology

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed 7 mins 60 mins 8 mins 90 mins 15 mins 100%

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 103

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category

Component of workload Conslt Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 15 mins 100%

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

7 mins 100%

Ophthalmology

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs 6 mins 20% 80% 10 mins 100% 20 mins 20% 20 mins 80% 60 mins 90% 60 mins 10% 4 mins 6 mins 10 mins 10% 10 mins 90%


6 mins

Orthopaedic surgery

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds

12.5 mins 100%

104 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Conslt Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Post graduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs 5 mins 20% 10 mins 100% 20 mins 20% 120 mins 100% 4 mins 10 mins

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO 5 mins 60 mins

120 mins 100% 30 mins 80%

6 mins 80%

Otolaryngology

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV 4 mins 5 mins 7.5 mins 100% 20 mins 20% 15 mins 80% 120 mins 100% 120 mins 100% 3 mins 20 mins 4 mins 90 mins 10 mins 100%

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 105

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category

Component of workload Conslt % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs 20%

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO 80%

Paediatric surgery

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs 4 mins 20% 5 mins 80% 7.5 mins 100% 20 mins 20% 15 mins 80% 120 mins 100% 120 mins 100% 3 mins 20 mins 4 mins 90 mins 10 mins 100%

Paediatrics

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation 4 mins 20 mins 5 mins 60 mins 10 mins 100%

106 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Conslt % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 100 hrs 5 mins 20% 8 mins 100%

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

6 mins 80%

Plastic surgery

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs 3 mins 20% 5 mins 80% 5 mins 100% 30 mins 30% 40 mins 70% 180 mins 100% 180 mins 100% 4 mins 20 mins 5 mins 60 mins 8 mins 80% 10 mins 20%

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 107

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category Psychiatry

Component of workload Conslt Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs 15 mins 20% 30 mins 60% 2 mins 90 mins 30 mins 30%

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

40 mins 70% 2 mins 120 mins

30 mins 40% 20 mins 80%

Rheumatology & rehabilitation

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed 4 mins 4 mins 120 mins 30 mins 80% 40 mins 20%

108 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Conslt Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 192 hrs 96 hrs 15 mins 20% 30 mins 100%

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

20 mins 80%

Thoracic surgery

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year Postgraduates, time per year 300 hrs 75 hrs 5 mins 20% 7.5 mins 80% 12 mins 100% 45 mins 95% 60 mins 5% 240 mins 100% 240 mins 100% 4 mins 20 mins 5 mins 90 mins 20 mins 100%

Venereology

Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 109

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category

Component of workload Conslt Time per inpatient Procedures per round Operations Major operations Time per operation % performed Minor operations Time per operation % performed Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Teaching Students, time per year ) Postgraduates, time per year ) 300 hrs 5 mins 20% 10 mins 100%

Activity standard SHO/MO/HO

5 mins 80%

Medical staff in district hospitals with no consultants


Staff category Medical officers Component of workload Inpatients Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Outpatients Time per outpatient 5 mins 5 mins 100% 10 mins 100% 6.25 mins 20 mins Activity standard 10 mins

10 mins
100%

110 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Medical staff in peripheral units and rural hospitals


Staff category Medical officers Component of workload Inpatient Admissions Time per admission % seen Ward rounds Time per inpatient Procedures per round Clinics First visits Time per FV % seen Subsequent visits Time per SV % seen Outpatients Time per outpatient 5 mins 6 mins 100% 10 mins 100% 4 mins 20 mins 10 mins 100% Activity standard

Teaching hospitals
Staff category Nursing staff Ward nurses Component of workload Ward duty Surgical Medical Paediatric GYN/OBS Neurosurgery Orthopaedic Psychiatric Burns Plastic surgery Eye ENT Rheumy. & rehab. Dermatology Accident ICU nurses Premature baby unit ICU duty Prem. baby duty 3 occ beds/nse 3 occ beds/nse 3 occ beds/nse 3 occ beds/nse 2 occ beds/nse 2 occ beds/nse 4 occ beds/nse 2 occ beds/nse 2 occ beds/nse 5 occ beds/nse 5 occ beds/nse 6 occ beds/nse 6 occ beds/nse 6 occ beds/nse 5 nses/bed 5 nses/cot Activity standard

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 111

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category Labour room Clinic nurses

Component of workload Deliveries Clinic duty Medical Psychiatric Eye ENT Surgical Skin Orthopaedic FP All others

Activity standard 4 nses/available bed 2 nses/clin 2 nses/clin 3 nses/clin 3 nses/clin 3 nses/clin 3 nses/clin 15 nses/clin 2 nses/clin 2 nses/clin

OT nurses

Theatre duty Full lists Part lists Casualty 13 nses/list 10 nses/list 2 nses/list 75 outpatients/day 10 nurses Performing tests Haematology Biochemistry Histology Bacteriology Clin pathology Parasitology Receiving samples Log, send results Allowances Stocks and reordering Compiling statistics Night laboratory 1 MLT continuously 1 MLT for 3 hrs/month 1 MLT on duty every night 1 labr/2 MLTs 80 outpatients/day 80 outpatients/day 25 tests/day 25 tests/day 15 tests/day 25 tests/day 25 tests/day 25 tests/day 1.2 mins/test 2.4 mins/test

OPD nurses CSSD 24 hours

OPD duty

Laboratory staff MLT

Labourer Pharmacy staff / Pharmacist

Number of MLTS required OPD Clinics

112 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Inpatients

Activity standard 9,000 admissions/yr 40/day 30 mins/patient

X-ray staff / Radiographer

Plain X-rays Special techniques

Female labourer Physiotherapy staff Physiotherapist ECG staff / ECG recordist

At least 1 Treating patients 12 half-hour units/day

Ambulant patients Ward patients Allowance administration

15 mins/patient 25 mins/patient 1 recordist 4 hrs/week

Province hospitals
Staff category Nursing staff Ward nurses Component of workload Ward duty Surgical Medical Paediatric GYN/OBS Orthopaedic Psychiatric ENT Dermatology Antenatal Accident service ICU nurses ICU duty Prem baby duty Deliveries Clinic duty Theatre duty Full lists Part lists Casualty OPD nurses OPD duty 3 occ. beds/nse 4 occ. beds/nse 3 occ. beds/nse 3 occ. beds/nse 2 occ. beds/nse 3 occ. beds/nse 5 occ. beds/nse 8 occ. beds/nse 5 occ. beds/nse 6 occ. beds/nse 5 nses/bed 5 nses/cot 3 nses/available bed 1 nse/clinic, all types Activity standard

Premature baby unit Labour room Clinic nurses OT nurses

13 nses/list 10 nses/list 2 nses/list 75 outpatients/day

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 113

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category CSSD 8 hours

Component of workload

Activity standard 8 nurses

Laboratory staff MLT

Performing tests Haematology Biochemistry Histology Bacteriology Clin pathology Receiving samples Log, send results Allowances Stocks and reordering Compiling statistics Night laboratory 1 MLT continuously 1 MLT for 3 hrs/month 1 MLT on duty every night 3 Labrs/7 MLTs 40,000 outpatients/yr 40,000 attendances/yr 13,750 admissions/yr 25 tests/day 25 tests/day 15 tests/day 25 tests/day 25 tests/day 1.2 mins/test 2.4 mins/test

Labourer Pharmacy staff / Pharmacist

Number of MLTs required OPD Clinics Inpatients Allowances Main store Surgical store Relief

2 pharms. 1 pharm 2 pharms 40/day 30 mins/patient

X-ray staff / Radiographer

Plain X-rays Special techniques

Female labourer Physiotherapy staff Physiotherapist ECG staff ECG recordist

At least 1 Treating patients 12 half-hour units/day

Ambulant patients Ward patients Allowance administration

15 mins/patient 25 mins/patient 1 recordist 4 hrs/week

114 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Base hospitals
Staff category Nursing staff Ward nurses Component of workload Ward duty Surgical Medical Paediatric GYN/OBS Premature baby unit Labour room/maternity nurses Clinic nurses OT nurses Clinic duty Theatre duty 2 wings Full lists Part lists Casualty 1 wing 2 tables Full lists Part lists Casualty OPD nurses CSSD (8 hours) Performing tests Haematology Biochemistry Histology Bacteriology Clin pathology Receiving samples Log, send results Allowances Stocks and reordering Compiling statistics Labourer No. MLTS required 1 MLT 1 hour/day 1 MLT 3 hrs/month 1 Lbr/2 MLT 25 tests/day 25 tests/day 15 tests/day 25 tests/day 40 tests/day 1.2 mins/test 2.4 mins/test OPD duty 9 nses/list 6 nses/list 2 nses/list 75/day 8 nurses 13 nses/list 10 nses/list 2 nses/list 1 nse/clinic all types Prem baby duty Deliveries 3 occ. beds/nse 5 occ. beds/nse 3 occ. beds/nse 3 occ. beds/nse 5 nses/cot 2 nses/available bed Activity standard

Laboratory staff MLT

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 115

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category Pharmacy staff / Pharmacist

Component of workload OPD Clinics Inpatients Allowance Relief

Activity standard 40,000 outpatients/yr 40,000 attendances/yr 1/50 occ. beds

2 pharms. 40/day 30 mins/patient

X-Ray staff / Radiographer

Plain X-rays Special techniques

Female labourer Physiotherapy staff Physiotherapist ECG staff ECG recordist

At least 1

Treating patients

12 half-hour units/day

Ambulant patients Ward patients Allowance Administration

15 mins/patient 25 mins/patient

1 recordist 4 hrs/week

District hospitals
Staff category Nursing staff Ward nurses Premature baby unit Labour room/maternity nurses Clinic nurses OT nurses Clinics duty Theatre duty Full lists Part lists Casualty OPD nurses Laboratory staff / MLT OPD duty Performing tests 5 nses/list 4 nses/list 1 nses/list 100 outpatients/day 40 tests/day 1 nse/clinic, all types Prem baby duty Deliveries 5 nses/cot 2 nses/available bed Component of workload Ward duties Activity standard 5 beds/nse

116 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Receiving samples Log, send results Allowances Stocks and reordering Compiling statistics

Activity standard 1.2 mins/test 2.4 mins/test

1 MLT 1 hour/day 1 MLT 3 hrs/month 1 labourer/2 MLTs

Labourer Pharmacy staff / Pharmacist OPD Clinics Inpatients Allowance: relief X-ray staff / Radiographer Plain X-rays Special techniques Female labourer Physiotherapy staff Physiotherapist ECG staff ECG recordist Ambulant patients Ward patients Allowance Administration At least 1 Treating patients

40,000 outpatients/yr 40,000 attendances/yr 1/50 occ. beds 2 pharms 40/day 30 mins/patient

12 half-hour units/day

15 mins/patient 25 mins/patient

1 recordist 4 hrs/week

Consultant dental surgeons and associated staff in general hospitals, provincial hospitals, base hospitals, dental institute
Staff category Consultant Dental surgeons Component of workload Trauma (dental, maxillo-facial) Conservative management Closed reduction Open reduction Management of residual deformities Infections (dental, oro-facial) Conservative management Incision and drainage 10 mins 10 mins 15 mins 30-45 mins 30-45 mins 30-45 mins Activity standard

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 117

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category

Component of workload Decortication/sequestrotomy Segmental resections of jaw Dento-alveolar surgery Surgical removal of impacted Teeth and retained roots Surgical endodontics Periodontal surgery Pre-prosthetic surgery Facial deformities Cleft-lip and palate repair Jaw deformities Ankylosis of TMJ Syndromes Cyst Enucleation and packing Marsupialization and packing Neoplasm Incisional biopsy Excision biopsy Flap procedure Bone grafting Salivary glands Major Minor Special investigations Malignant disease and reconstruction Excision of jaw Glossectomy Excision of cheek/lips Tracheostomy Elective Emergency Extractions under general anaesthesia Non-surgical management Oral mucosal diseases Bite raising applications Short wave diathermy Root canal therapy Splints Obturators/prosthesis

Activity standard 30 mins 3 hrs

30 mins 30 mins 30 mins 30 mins

1 hr 2 hrs 2 hrs 3 hrs

30 mins 30 mins

10 mins 45 mins 2 hrs 2 hrs

1.5 hrs 30 mins 15 mins

5 hrs 5 hrs 5 hrs

30 mins 10 mins 30 mins 15 mins 20 mins 15 mins 20 mins 20 mins 20 mins

118 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Ward activities Ward rounds Clinical procedures Allowances Clinical meetings Unit management Postgraduate training (dental institute only)

Activity standard

2 mins/occ. bed 1 hr/day

1.5 hrs/month 2 hrs/month 2 hrs/month

Senior house officers

All consultant procedures are performed with assistance of one senior house officer except allowances, so SHO Activity Standards are as given above.

House officers

All consultant procedures are performed with assistance of one house officer except allowances, so HO Activity Standards are as given above with the addition of: Taking history Preparing patients for surgery Diagnosis card, medical certificate 20 mins/admission 20 mins/operation 15 mins/discharge

Dental surgeons and associated staff in A* B* C* Teaching hospitals, general hospitals, provincial hospitals, base hospitals District hospitals, peripheral units, central dispensaries, health centres, adolescent clinics, prison hospitals, chest hospital Dental institute
Component of workload Emergency Extractions Deciduous Permanent Caries Periodontal Other D.A.A. treated Fractures treated Medico-legal Post op. Haemorrhage Infections Oral medicine Pre-malignant Leucoplakia A,B 5 mins A,B A,B 15 mins 5 mins A,B A,B A,B A,B A,B A,B 10/hour 10/hour 10/hour 5 mins 10 mins 15 mins A,B 10 mins Activity standard *

Staff category standard Dental surgeon

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 119

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Staff category standard

Component of workload Others Oral carcinoma Candida albicans Routine Restorations Temporary Permanent Amalgam Composite Advanced conservation Periodontal Scaling Manual Machine Surgery Surgery Incisions & drainage Impacted Apicectomy Fractures Biopsies Other Referrals All activities above Allowances Health edn. talks to the community MOH monthly conference Recording & reporting Maintaining stocks (1 person only) Supervising, preventive maintenance and cleaning

Activity standard * A,B A,B A,B 5 mins 5 mins 5 mins

A,B A B A B A,B

10 mins 15 mins 20 mins 20 mins 25 mins 20 mins

A,B A A,B

30 mins 15 mins 30 mins

A,B A,B A,B A,B A,B A,B A,B

15 mins 30 mins 30 mins 1 hour 20 mins 30 mins 10 mins

C add 20% to B figures

A,B,C A,B,C A,B,C A,B,C A,B,C A A,B,C

0.5 day/month 0.5 day/month 10 mins/day + 30 mins/month 30 mins/month 1 hr/month 1/clinic 1/chair

Nurses Trained attendants

120 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

School dental clinics


Staff category Dental therapists Component of workload Fillings Deciduous Permanent Dressings Deciduous Permanent Extractions Complete scaling Initial Examination Complete Revision Examination Complete Referral Health education session Outreach Allowance Supervisory visit Monthly MOH meeting Recording & reporting Collecting salary Inventory (1 person only) Labourer 1 hour/month 1 day/month 15 mins/day + 1 hour/month 0.5 days/month 1 hour/month 1/clinic 5 mins 5 mins 5 mins 20 mins 2-3 days 10 mins 5 mins 15 mins 15 mins 15 mins 10-15 mins Activity standard 20 mins 20 mins

Dental institute and all hospitals


Staff category Dental technicians Component of workload Orthodontic plate Denture Full Partial Obturator Crown Gunning splint Repairs Rebasing Relining Labourer 2 hours 1 hour 1 hour 45 mins 1 hour 30 mins 30 mins 1 hour 1/6 dental technicians Activity standard 1 hour

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 121

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

Activity standards (service standards and allowance standards) for MCH staff
Staff category Public health Nursing sister Component of workload Inspections PHMS SPHMS MCH clinics Conducted Supervised School health Medical inspections Follow up visits Investigations Maternal deaths Infant deaths Senior public health midwife Inspections PHMS Reports submitted MCH clinics Assisted Supervised Homes visited Supervision Investigation Public health midwife Registration Eligible families Pregnant mothers Home visits to pregnant mothers FVS - at risk - normal SubseqVs - normal - at risk Natal care Home deliveries - normal - at risk - abnormal Investigations Still births Maternal deaths Infant deaths 45 mins 3.5 hours 1 hour 6 hours 9 hours 9 hours 17.5mins 30 mins 20 mins 25 mins 17.5 mins 17.5 mins 25 mins 22.5 mins 3.5 hours 3.5 hours 2.5 hours 45 mins 2.5 hours 25 mins 11 mins 5 mins 5.5 hours 2.5 hours 2.5 hours 2.5 hours Unit time, allowance

122 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Staff category

Component of workload Postnatal care: home visits FVs SubseqVs Infant care: home visits FVs SubseqVs Pre-school child care: home visits FVs SubseqVs Family planning acceptors Oral pill IUCD Injectable LRT Vasectomy Clinic activities Pregnant - FVs - SubseqVs Infant - FVs - SubseqVs Pre-school - FVs - SubseqVs

Unit time, allowance

30 mins 25 mins

17.5 mins 12.5 mins

12.5 mins 10 mins

12.5 mins 12.5 mins 12.5 mins 12.5 mins 12.5 mins

15 mins 12 mins 10 mins 10 mins 10 mins 10 mins

Time allowances for regular activities


The time allowances to be made for regular activities which are not directly covered by the service statistics are of two types: standard allowances which are the same in all MOH areas (for conferences, maintaining registers, etc.); and an allowance for travelling time between the base and work locations during field activities. The amount of such time spent on travel depends on the size and population density of the MOH area. Four types of area were identified, and the corresponding time allowances for travel by each staff category are:
Type of area Urban good Urban bad Rural good Rural bad code UG UB RG RB PHNS 0.5 hr/day 1 hr/day 1.5 hrs/day 2 hrs/day SPHM 0.5 hr/day 1 hr/day .5 hrs/day 2 hrs/day PHM 1 hr/day 1.75 hr/day 2 hrs/day 3 hrs/day

Field activities are undertaken 14 days per month (averaged throughout the year).

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 123

Workload indicators of staffing need A manual for implementation _________________________________________________________________________

The total time allowances, standard + travelling, for each staff category in each type of MOH area, and the corresponding percentage allowances to be used in the WISN calculations are as follows: Public health nursing sister Staff conference: 1 day/month Local conferences: 1 day/month Maintain register of infant death ) Consolidate and forward area data ): 3 days/month File and maintain records ) Educational programmes: 1 day/month Travelling base to location of homes: UG/UB/RG/RB as above Travelling between homes: 30 minutes/day Allowances: 6 days/month = 6/19.7 = 30.5% UB/UG/RG/RB = 0.5 to 2.0 x14x12/1,785 = 5.5%/11.0%/16.5%/22.0% 30 mins/day = 0.5x14x12/1,785 = 5.5% Total allowance: UG UB RG RB 30.5%+5.5%+5.5% = 41.5%, say 42% 30.5%+11%+5.5% = 47.0% 30.5%+16.5%+5.5% = 52.5%, say 52% 30.5%+22%+5.5% = 58.0%

Senior public health midwife Ordering supplies: 1 day/month Data returns: 7 days/qr Staff conferences: 1 day/month Other activities: 2 days/month Travelling base to location of homes: UG/UB/RG/RB as above Travelling between homes: 30 minutes/day Allowances: 4 days/month + 7 days/qr = 76 days/year = 76/238 = 31.9% UB/UG/RG/RB = 0.5 to 2.0 x14x12/1,785 = 5.5%/11.0%/16.5%/22.0% 0.5x14x12/1,785 = 5.5% Total allowance: UG UB RG RB 31.9%+5.5%+5.5% = 42.9%, say 43% 31.9%+11%+5.5% = 48.4%, say 48% 31.9%+16.5%+5.5% = 53.9%, say 54% 31.9%+22%+5.5% = 59.4%, say 59%

Public health midwife Attending staff conference: 1.5 days/month Collecting salary: 0.5 days/month Assisting school health activities: 1 day/year Recording and reporting ) Planning ) 1 hour/day + Administration ) 0.5 day/month Updating records and charts ) Travelling: UG/UB/RG/RB as above

124 ________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________ Section D Examples of WISN activity standards already used for individual staff categories

Allowances: 2.5 days/month = 2.5/20 = 12.5% 1 day/year = 1/240 = 0.4% 1 hour/day = 6/45 = 13.3% UB/UG/RG/RB = 1 to 3 x14x12/1,785 = 9.3%/16.3%/18.7%/28.0% Total allowance: UG UB RG RB 12.5%+0.4%+13.3%+9.3% = 35.5%, say 36% 12.5%+0.4%+13.3%+16.3% = 42.5%, say 42% 12.5%+0.4%+13.3%+18.7% = 44.9%, say 45% 12.5%+0.4%+13.3%+28.0% = 54.2%, say 54%

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 125

You might also like