Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Articles appearing in this magazine are indexed in Environmental Periodicals Bibliography and ArchiText Construction Index: afsonl.com.
m
a
t
t
h
e
w
g
r
o
c
o
f
f
,
g
r
e
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
t
v
22
CasE sTudy
|
A Historic Home
Goes Net-Zero-Energy
By Mathew Grocof
In retrofting their 110-year-old Victorian, Mat and
Kelly Grocof ofer a model for restoring the nations
existing houses.
28
GSHP Value Rising
By Piljae Im, Xiaobing Liu and Jef Munk
In an East Tennessee demonstration project, Oak Ridge
National Lab and partners evaluate two ground-source
heat pump technologies that together promise to reduce
the up-front investment and increase energy cost savings.
34
Harnessing the Sun,
Lakota Style
By Mike Koshmrl
On the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, solar
air heating helps ease crippling winter heating bills, while
providing jobs.
38
A Little Co-op
and How It Grew
By Robert Robinson
In Washington, D.C., a group of neighbors banded
together to win the fght for residential solar.
22
34
contents
D
a
n
B
i
h
n
.
c
o
m
features
28
1_64_March_ST11.indd 3 2/14/11 3:46:54 PM
Get all that AEE Solar has to oer:
go to
>
solartoday.org
Solar@Work
>
delivered to your inbox.
Solar ToDaY digital
>
go paperless.
InTeRAcTIve
>
video, discussion.
X
environmental statement
Trees Energy Water Greenhouse Solid
Gases Waste
SOLARTODAY is printedwithvegetable ink
onpaper containing100percent post-
consumer waste. the paper is producedat a
biomass-poweredmill. This issue saves:
sOLaR TODAY
288 208 12.5 tons 44,595 12.2 tons
million Btu gallons
in every issue
6 Whats New at SolarToday.org
8 Perspective
20 View from the States: Policy Shifts
48 New Products Showcase:
Solar Manufacturing Equipment
58 Inside ASES
60 Dates
60 Ad Index
P
e
l
a
m
i
s
46
42
62
j
o
h
n
f
a
n
s
e
l
o
w
,
t
h
i
r
D
s
u
n
s
o
l
a
r
,
c
i
n
c
i
n
n
a
t
t
i
s
u
n
l
i
g
h
t
&
P
o
w
e
r
1_64_March_ST11.indd 5 2/14/11 3:47:07 PM
6 March 2011 SOLAR TODAY solartoday.org
Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
whats new at solartoday.org
Follow American Solar Energy Society
INSIDE THIS ISSUE:
Clicks for Web Extras
Site evaluation just got easier.
The new SunEye 210.
One-handed operation makes your shade
measurements a snap. Preview mode shows the
sun path overlay adjusted to the devices orientation.
Pitch and azimuth measurements are built-in.
Expert Tools.
Better Solar.
Watch an introductory video
at www.solmetric.com
Keep an electronic
copy of this issue and
search the sOLAR
TODAY archives.
access the digital
edition at solartoday.
org/digital.
Download
This Issue
SoLARToDAy.oRG exclusives
Plug-In Electric Vehicles:
How Ready is Your City?
By Antonio Benecchi and Shamsuddin Syed
Te conversation about plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs)
has matured greatly over the past year. Mass market
PEVs are fnally here. Te frst wave of commercial PEVs
will likely fourish in only the readiest of cities
including traditional leaders like Portland and some
surprisingly aggressive followers, such as Houston. r
o
l
a
n
D
B
e
r
g
e
r
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
s
l
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
B
e
r
K
e
l
e
y
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
a
B
o
r
a
t
o
r
y
Expanded from
View from the
States, page
20
>
Find policy
updates: solartoday.
org/states.
Expanded from
A Historic Home
Goes Net-Zero-En-
ergy, page 22
>
See a video and
case study on the
restoration of the
Grocofs 110-year-
old windows: solar
today.org/video.
20 March 2011 SOLAR TODAY solartoday.org Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
view from the states
Iowa
Four years ago former Gov. Chet Culver, a Democrat, created the Iowa Power Fund, which provides matching grants and loans for new renewable energy projects. The Power Fund has helped grow Iowas wind market into the nations second larg- est. New Gov. Terry Barnstad, a Republican, campaigned against the fund, telling the Sioux City Journal it was a colossal failure and the $25 million budget should be reallocated to reducing taxes. More recently Barnstad reversed course, saying that he expects the Power Fund to continue under the management of a dierent department. At press time, the programs fate hung in the balance. The states renewable energy community is skeptical. We think its highly unlikely the Barnstad administra- tion extends [the Power Fund], says Steve Fugate, managing director of the Iowa Renewable Energy Association. A lot of his budget proposals are extremely draconian. The chances it continues to exist are nil.
Policy Shifts: Where the States Are Headed
The shift in political power following the November 2010 elections may threaten solar and wind policies in key states. Heres whats happening.
New Mexico
One of the rst moves for Republican Gov. Susana Martinez was to re every member of the states Environmental Improve- ment Board. Martinez alleged that the board promoted anti- business policies. The same week the new governor appointed Harrison Schmitt, an outspoken climate change skeptic, to run New Mexicos Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Depart- ment. Martinez also halted a new greenhouse gas emissions regulation that had been passed in the closing days of former Gov. Bill Richardsons administration. The move threatens to derail the Western Climate Initiative, which was designed to regulate emissions in seven U.S. states and four Canadian prov- inces. We currently have common sense, balanced approaches to protecting our environment, says Sanders Moore of Environ- ment New Mexico. We need to maintain the protections and safeguards that are in place.
Wisconsin
Wisconsins solar and wind economies are booming, driven by a robust renewable portfolio standard, the statewide Focus on Energy program and a number of municipal incentive programs. In Milwaukee, the number of solar installers has increased 250 percent since the beginning of 2009. The states wind capacity is up to 630 megawatts nearly 90 percent of which has come online since mid-2008. But new Gov. Scott Walkers support of renewable energy is unproven. During his campaign, Walker criticized Tom Barrett, his Democratic opponent, for support- ing a radical environmental agenda that will cost us jobs. After taking oce, Walker turned down $810 million in federal stimulus funds to build a train line from Milwaukee to Madison. Then, in his rst executive order, Walker proposed a regulatory reform that would prohibit developers from siting a wind tur- bine within 1,800 feet of the nearest property line. When youre operating with setback distances this extreme, a lot of projects will cease to be economically feasible, says Michael Vickerman, executive director of RENEW Wisconsin. Its a shooting war right now. Whole businesses could shut down.
m
a
t
t
h
e
w
g
r
o
c
o
f
f
,
g
r
e
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
t
v
Installed PV Costs Plummet in 2010
By Galen Barbose, Nam Darghouth and Ryan Wiser
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory research-
ers track trends in the installed cost of photovoltaics
(PV), which dropped more than 30 percent from
1998 to 2009. Early indications show that the rate of
decline accelerated in 2010.
MARCH 2011
VOL. 25, NO. 2
In an East Tennessee demonstration project, Oak Ridge
National Lab and partners evaluate two ground-source
heat pump technologies that together promise to reduce
the up-front investment and increase energy cost savings.
By PILJAE IM, XIAoBING LIU and JEFF MUNK
associated with drilling boreholes or excavating
trenches and installing vertical or horizontal
ground heat exchangers (or loops) in them. Te
FHX concept is based on the premise that today,
in many climates, it is economically feasible to
build new homes and home additions having
thermal loads so modest that they can be met
by a GSHP system whose loop is installed in the
construction excavations without any extra
drilling or digging. Tese construction excava-
tions commonly include the overcut around the
basement and below the basement foor, util-
ity trenches (for buried water, sewer and power
lines) and footer drains. If this premise is true,
FHX has the potential to signifcantly reduce
GSHP cost premiums. ORNLs research project
was designed to test this premise.
Unlike conventional horizontal ground heat
exchangers, loops buried in the overcut may
experience thermal interference with the base-
ment wall, an efect not accounted for by any
design tools for ground heat exchangers. Tis
research project focused on developing what is
needed to engineer loops in the overcut around
the basement. A team from Oklahoma State
University (OSU), led by Dr. Jef Spitler and
including Dr. Simon Rees (De Montfort Univer-
sity, United Kingdom) and several post-gradu-
ate students, joined the research partnership to
develop the necessary overcut-loop-design tool
and a model of the entire FHX (overcut, under-
foor, utility trench) suitable for integration into
EnergyPlus, the U.S. Department of Energys
fagship whole-building energy modeling sof-
ware. Te team uses experimental data collected
from a real installation of the FHX to validate the
design tool and simulation model.
Schaad Cos. (schaadcompanies.com),
ORNLs founding partner in ZEBRAlliance
a public-private collaboration to maximize
cost-efective energy efciency in buildings (zebr
alliance.com) has built four energy-efcient
test houses in the Crossroads at Wolf Creek Sub-
division in Oak Ridge, Tenn. Houses 1 and 2
are three-level buildings with walkout basements
used for the FHX research.
Te side-by-side research houses have iden-
tical 3,700-square-foot floor plans. In these
unoccupied research houses, human impact on
energy use is simulated to match the national
average, with showers, lights, ovens, washers
and other energy-consuming equipment turned
on and of at exactly the same times. Simulating
occupancy eliminates a major source of uncer-
tainty in whole-house research projects of this
type. Houses 1 and 2 each test diferent envelope
strategies, but both have very low air leakage and
high levels of insulation, and thus have very low
heat gain and loss through the building enve-
lope. In short, they are exactly the type of home
where FHX should work. Te details of each
houses envelope characteristics are described
in a recent paper.
2
Owing to their high-quality
thermal envelopes, the 3,700-square-foot houses
have been adequately served by one 2-ton GSHP
system each, whereas 4 to 5 tons of space-condi-
tioning capacity are typically installed in homes
of that size in East Tennessee.
Te objective of this research project was
to develop and validate the FHX design tools,
so these tools obviously were not available for
the design of the loops for houses 1 and 2. Te
two houses cooling and heating design loads
were calculated using Manual J: Residential
Load Calculation and associated sofware tools
developed by the Air Conditioning Contractors
of America (ACCA). Our team sized the heat
pumps using ACCAs Manual S: Residential
Equipment Selection. Te overcut loops were
sized to take advantage of all the existing overcut,
and several team members at ORNL and OSU
estimated the remaining heat source/sink capac-
ity needs so that conventional loop-design sof-
ware could be used to size additional horizontal
loops needed to maintain the entering fuid tem-
perature of the heat pump between 35F and
95F (2C to 35C), given soil temperature and
thermal conductivity at the site. All overcuts and
Dr. Piljae im is a staf scientist at the Building tech-
nologies research and Integration center (BtrIc) of
Oak ridge National Laboratory and one of the prin-
cipal investigators for the project described here. he
has performed feasibility studies for the application of
gshP systems for numerous u.s. Navy and air Force
bases.
Dr. Xiaobing liu is a staf scientist at BtrIc. he has
been working on applying and improving gshP
technology for more than 10 years. he is the princi-
pal investigator of various gshP-related r&d projects
ongoing at Oak ridge National Laboratory.
jefrey munk is the BtrIc staf scientist responsible for
the experimental gshP systems in the ZeBralliance
(zebralliance.com) research houses.
ZeBralliances FhX research project has been sup-
ported by BtrIcs numerous r&d stafs, including dr.
moonis ally, Van Baxter, John shonder, anthony gehl
and Patrick hughes, director of BtrIc.
notes
1
Xiaobing Liu, 2010, Assessment of National
Benefts from Retrofting Existing Single-Family
Homes with Ground Source Heat Pump Sys-
tems, ORNL/TM-2010/122.
2
Miller et al., 2010, Advanced Residential Enve-
lopes for Two Pair of Energy-Saver Homes, Pro-
ceedings of 2010 American Council for an Energy-
Efciency Economy Summer Study.
1_64_March_ST11.indd 29 2/14/11 3:47:33 PM
30 March 2011 SOLAR TODAY solartoday.org
Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
trenches received six-pipe loops (three circuits
of one-inch-diameter high-density polyethylene
pipe, out and back) with a minimum 1 foot of
spacing between pipes.
To obtain data for validating the overcut
loop-sizing method and performance-simulation
model, it is important that the overall loop be
sufciently sized so that loop operating tempera-
tures are in the design range. To accomplish this,
for the purposes of this experiment, our team
used horizontal loops installed in all the util-
ity trenches plus some additional trenching to
provide adequate capacity, rather than installing
loops below the basement foor. However, cal-
culations indicate that if the loop were installed
below the basement foor, no additional trench-
ing would have been necessary.
comparing standard,
integrated heat Pumps
Construction of houses 1 and 2 was com-
pleted in November 2009, and data collection
began in December. Baseline data was collect-
ed during the frst year, when each home used
one water-to-air heat pump for space condi-
tioning (the two-stage ClimateMaster model
TV026) and a separate water-to-water heat
pump for water heating. Te three-circuit (six-
pipe) ground loop was headered into a single
supply and return in the basement, allowing
the two heat pumps to operate in parallel, con-
nected to the common supply and return. Te
baseline data documents the performance of
the FHXGSHP system using the best water-
source heat-pump equipment commercially
available, from industry partner ClimateMas-
ter; the equipment fully satisfes the space-con-
The loops of the FHX are placed in the foundation
excavation before being buried by backfll. Pre-
liminary data shows that this method of installing
heat exchangers in the construction excavations
rather than in separate boreholes or trenches
could signifcantly reduce the cost premiums
associated with ground-source heat pumps, with-
out sacrifcing their efciency.
Left, in the foundation heat exchanger (FHX) con-
cept, heat-exchange loops are installed only in
the construction excavations, without extra drill-
ing or digging. But unlike conventional horizontal
ground heat exchangers, with FHX the mass of
soil around the houses foundation is subject to
heat transfer from the foundation itself (qw) and
from the heat-exchanger pipes by way of con-
duction within the soil (qp). Moisture fow takes
place within the soil as well. At the surface, heat
is transferred through convection, radiation and
evapotranspiration (qs). Researchers are develop-
ing tools to engineer loops in the overcut.
early estimates indicate that when
implemented at scale in the test
region of east tennessee, the
[foundation heat exchanger]
may be feasible at $1,000 per ton
a fraction of the cost of the
outdoor portion of traditional
gshP systems.
advances in ground-source heat pump systems
1_64_March_ST11.indd 30 2/14/11 3:47:37 PM
solartoday.org SOLAR TODAY March 2011 31
Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
ditioning and water-heating loads in houses 1
and 2 with national average occupancy.
In November 2010, we replaced each homes
two heat pumps with a single prototype GS-IHP
that provides both space conditioning and water
heating. For several years ClimateMaster has
been collaborating with ORNL under a Coop-
erative Research and Development Agreement
to develop the GS-IHP, which is expected to
be signifcantly more energy efcient than cur-
rently available heat pumps. Comparing data
from years one and two will establish the energy
savings of the GS-IHP compared to the two-
heat-pump confguration. However, the most
common GSHP confguration on the market
is a single water-to-air heat pump with a desu-
perheater, which provides only a portion of the
required hot water as a byproduct when the
compressor operates for space heating or cool-
ing. Afer the GS-IHP data is available, our team
will use calibrated models to compare the per-
formance of all three confgurations (one heat
pump with desuperheater, two heat pumps and
the GS-IHP). Cost estimates will also be pro-
vided. ClimateMaster anticipates launching a
Trilogy water-source heat-pump product line
based on the GS-IHP technology in 2011.
assessing early results
Preliminary analysis of the data measured at
the ZEBRlliance research houses since Novem-
ber 2009 indicates that space-conditioning and
water-heating needs could have been provided
to the houses with ground heat exchangers
installed in just the excavations required for
construction the basement overcut, below
the basement foor and the utility trenches. As
mentioned, no extra digging or drilling would
have been required except making the utility
trenches slightly deeper than normal.
Te data showed that the installed loops and
heat pumps all performed as expected, indicat-
ing that they were adequately sized for the
3,700-square-foot homes. Temperatures of the
fuid entering the heat pumps ranged from 33F
to 93F (0.6C to 34C) at house 1 and 34F to
90F (1C to 32C) at house 2 within good
proximity to the design range of 35F to 95F
(2C to 35C). Heating and cooling set points
maintained throughout the year were 71F
and 76F (22C and 24C), respectively. From
January through March 2010, the supplemental
electric resistance heater was never activated at
house 1 and consumed only 66 kilowat-hours
at house 2.
Early estimates indicate that when imple-
mented at scale by a production builder in this
region, this FHX approach may be feasible at
$1,000 per ton. Tat compares with traditional
vertical-loop and six-pipe-per-trench horizon-
tal-loop systems that typically are installed in
this region at $3,000 per ton and $2,250 per
ton, respectively. Te actual cost of a particu-
lar project may vary depending on drilling/
trenching conditions, regional cost variations,
underground soil thermal properties and build-
ing geometry.
Tis September were scheduled to release
the FHX-sizing tool and performance-simu-
lation model integrated with EnergyPlus, as
well as a comprehensive technical report doc-
umenting the basis for the FHX-sizing tool,
the performance-simulation model, the data
measurements and the validation of the sizing
tool and simulation model. ClimateMaster also
plans to make its Trilogy line of water-source
heat pumps, based on the GS-IHP technology,
commercially available in 2011. Tese and other
innovations may provide the afordability break-
through for GSHP systems that homebuilders,
homeowners and energy-efciency advocates
have been seeking. ST
Here, the frst stage of backflling has been com-
pleted, with the soil being well compacted to
ensure good contact and reliable heat exchange
between the earth and the loop.
During the frst year of data collection, the water-to-air heat pump at left and the water-to-water heat
pump (square box in the middle) installed in the basement supplied space conditioning and water heat-
ing, respectively. During the second year, these two units were replaced by an integrated heat pump that
is expected to show signifcant gains in efciency. oRNL and its partners will compare the performance
of both options, plus the common confguration of a water-to-air heat pump with desuperheater.
1_64_March_ST11.indd 31 2/14/11 3:47:38 PM
Extra cool.
The Fronius IG Plus PV Inverter
Now with a certied operational temperature range of -13 to +131 F
The innovative Fronius IG Plus PV inverter for residential and commercial installations
just got cooler with an operational temperature range of -13 to +131F (-25 to +55C) for
functionality even in the harshest climates. The IG Plus also offers:
Models from 3 to 12 kW available in a single inverter
Lightweight even the commercial size inverters
Smart, integrated MIX technology to maximize
energy harvest even on cloudy days
A built-in six circuit string combiner
Field programmable to 208, 240, and 277 volts with
no loss in output power
Removable power stage for eld service
Standard 10-year warranty, upgradable to 15 years
Visit www.fronius-usa.com, or call 810-220-4414, for more information on this
exciting line in the Fronius family.
1_64_March_ST11.indd 32 2/14/11 3:47:38 PM
Extra cool.
The Fronius IG Plus PV Inverter
Now with a certied operational temperature range of -13 to +131 F
The innovative Fronius IG Plus PV inverter for residential and commercial installations
just got cooler with an operational temperature range of -13 to +131F (-25 to +55C) for
functionality even in the harshest climates. The IG Plus also offers:
Models from 3 to 12 kW available in a single inverter
Lightweight even the commercial size inverters
Smart, integrated MIX technology to maximize
energy harvest even on cloudy days
A built-in six circuit string combiner
Field programmable to 208, 240, and 277 volts with
no loss in output power
Removable power stage for eld service
Standard 10-year warranty, upgradable to 15 years
Visit www.fronius-usa.com, or call 810-220-4414, for more information on this
exciting line in the Fronius family.
1_64_March_ST11.indd 33 2/14/11 3:47:39 PM
34 March 2011 SOLAR TODAY solartoday.org
Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
forging a local solar economy
On the Pine Ridge Reservation
in South Dakota, solar air heating
helps ease crippling winter
heating bills, while providing jobs.
By MIKE KoSHMRL
Photos by DAN BIHN
Harnessing the Sun,
lakota style
I
n the Great Plains snowbelt, the wintertime spike in utility costs is an annoyance for
all, and burdensome for many. In Pine Ridge, S.D., per capita annual income is less
than $6,300. Shannon County, home to 80 percent of the residents at Pine Ridge, is
the second-most impoverished in the United States. Unemployment hovers near 90
percent. Life expectancy is 47 years for men and 54 years for women among countries in
the Western Hemisphere, only Haiti is worse. A $300 monthly utility bill can mean holding
of on a trip to the grocery store, or forgoing reflling a prescription medication. In the worst
cases, when a storm has set in and a propane tank is empty, it can be deadly.
We do lose elders here every year because of this, said Richard Fox. Fox is national
program director at Trees, Water and People (TWP; treeswaterpeople.org), a nonproft
headquartered in Fort Collins, Colo., that supports sustainable heat, light and cooking tech-
nology for native peoples across the Americas. Tey run out of propane on the 25th, and
mike Koshmrl (mkoshmrl@solartoday.org) is SOLAR TODAYs assis-
tant editor.
To reduce the Lakotas heating expenses, Trees, Water and People helped
to establish Lakota Solar Enterprises, manufacturing and installing active
solar heaters. LSE now employs eight locals full-time and has provided
more than 700 supplemental solar air heaters, at no cost, to households
at impoverished reservations across the Great Plains.
1_64_March_ST11.indd 34 2/14/11 3:47:39 PM
solartoday.org SOLAR TODAY March 2011 35
Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
theyre waiting for a check to come on the frst.
Tey convince themselves that they can go with-
out heat for fve days, then a storm hits and they
end up being found dead.
Tis reality of life at Pine Ridge became a
priority afer TWP hired Cynthia Isenhour, an
anthropologist who had identifed the most
pressing socioeconomic issues afecting the aver-
age Lakota family. A key issue was the high cost
of heating, caused by housing typifed by thin-
walled trailers and ramshackle one-story ram-
blers and exacerbated by the grossly inadequate
natural gas infrastructure. More than 90 percent
of residences on the reservation are heated with
pricier options, mostly propane, electric heat and
wood stoves. Isenhours research showed that
heating expenses consumed 50 to 70 percent of a
typical households cash income during the cold-
est months of the year.
Beginning in 2002, TWP researched ways
to reduce the Lakotas heating expenses. Tey
concluded that active solar heaters, due to their
simple, low-cost construction, would return
more British thermal units (Btu) for every dol-
lar invested than any other technology. Tey
then helped to establish a manufacturing and
installation business, Lakota Solar Enterprises
(LSE), which now employs eight locals full-time.
Te venture has provided more than 700 supple-
mental solar air heaters, at no cost, to house-
holds at impoverished reservations across the
Great Plains, including Pine Ridge, Rosebud and
Cheyenne River in South Dakota, Spirit Lake in
North Dakota and White Earth in Minnesota.
a natural Partnership forms
TWPs Fox said that from the start, active
solar air heaters ofered to bring jobs to a com-
munity desperate for them. Te air heaters
dont require a high degree of technical expertise,
Active Solar Air Heating
at a glance
S
olar air heaters, while not commonplace,
are a tried and true technology. The
frst solar air heater was patented in 1890,
and a number of models came on the mar-
ket before the energy crises of the 1970s.
When a federal incentive was launched
in 1975, investment and development of
solar air heaters spiked, and by 1980 some
85 companies offered systems. After 1985
the federal incentive was pulled, innovation
nearly ceased, and the number of manufac-
turers and installers declined rapidly. Today,
unglazed solar air heaters developed by
the National Renewable Energy Lab, called
transpired collectors, are the more common
air-heating technology, but a couple of com-
panies still offer glazed-box collectors. These
include Lakota Solar Enterprises (lakota
solarenterprises.com) at Pine Ridge, S.D.; AAA
Solar Supply (aaasolar.com) of Albuquerque
N.M.; and YourSolarHome (yoursolarhome.
com) in Ontario, Canada.
(Top left) With Henry Red Cloud at the helm, Lakota Solar Enterprises (LSE) has trained 52 solar warriors
from tribes nationwide as solar technicians. (Top right) After struggling to fnd work, Silas Red Cloud
joined his father at LSE, on the manufacturing line. (Bottom) LSEs Bret Tschacher navigates Skyview
monitoring software for the Red Cloud Renewable Energy Centers SkyStream 3.7 residential wind turbine.
Listening in are Kyanne Dillabaugh (left) and Jef Parsons (right) from the Cheyenne River Reservation.
1_64_March_ST11.indd 35 2/14/11 3:47:41 PM
36 March 2011 SOLAR TODAY solartoday.org
Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
which we knew was important if we wanted to
get the community involved and put to work,
Fox said. He also knew the heaters would be a
good hook for fundraising eforts, an important
consideration for a nonproft. We can go to a
foundation and say: You put in $50,000 and
youre directly providing 25 families with a solar
air-heating system, he said. Ten in 2004, while
giving a workshop in air heater installation at
Oglala Lakota College on the Pine Ridge Reser-
vation (olc.edu), Fox had a fortuitous encounter
with a local.
Fox was teaching a group gathered around a
solar panel when Henry Red Cloud drove by the
community college. Red Cloud pulled a U-turn
and started listening. Earlier that year, while
operating his frewood business, Red Cloud had
heard about solar air heaters. Curiosity aroused,
he had found an online do-it-yourself guide and
phoned Bret Tschacher, a friend, to participate
in some garage magic. Using a walk-in freezer
door as the back end, Red Cloud and Tschacher
pulled together a crude solar air heater that day,
working into the night. When the sun came up,
they were surprised to fnd it serviceable.
Te following spring, TWP came up with
some fnancial support and was able to fund an
expanded program at Pine Ridge. Fox asked Red
Cloud to lead TWPs Pine Ridge efort, not only
for his personal experience with the technology,
but also because of his name, which had signif-
cance in the community. Henrys great-great
grandfather, Chief Red Cloud, led the Oglala
Lakota from 1868 to 1909 and is regarded as the
last great Lakota war chief. TWP would provide
marketing and business development assistance
if Red Cloud would run a Lakota-owned-and-
operated manufacturing and installation busi-
ness. Red Cloud signed on, and Lakota Solar
Enterprises was formed.
Business grows, heating Bills shrink
Before the manufacturing side of the busi-
ness was shifed to Red Cloud, TWP undertook
a two-year reengineering program, aimed at
incorporating efcient materials that were not
available when solar air heaters frst became pop-
ular in the 1970s. Engineers built a succession of
prototypes with incremental improvements, but
the project eventually was run by an engineer
who calls himself Lotus, from Rocky Mountain
Solar & Wind (RMSW; rockymtnsolar.com) in
Colorado Springs, Colo. Te reengineering pro-
cess looked at every possible part and confgura-
tion, and many parts were re-sourced to increase
heat production and retention. Some materials,
like the adhesives, were changed to accommo-
date an absorber that could reach temperatures
higher than 160F (71C).
The final design was a 32-square-foot
(2.97-square-meter) solar heating panel. Orient-
ed south and tilted 59 degrees from horizontal,
it captured solar heat with an efciency of 48.8
percent, which projected to 4.9 million Btu per
South Dakota heating season. Tats equivalent
to 1.436 megawat-hours of electricity. Satisfed
with this performance, TWP contracted with
RMSW to begin manufacturing. Lotus and the
TWP team standardized an efcient manufactur-
the lakota sun Panel
Lakota Solar Enterprises (LSEs) standard air-heating kit sells for $1,400 plus shipping and
handling. Installation brings the total to about $2,000. Because of the simplicity of the
design, an entire system can be manufactured and installed by Henry Red Cloud and his
crew in less than a day. The primary components of a Lakota Sun Panel are
l One 4-foot (1.2-meter) by 8-foot (2.4-meter) solar collector panel, with a black metal
absorber plate covered by tempered glass with an aluminum frame. A layer of miro-
therm, produced by Analod Solar (alanod-solar.com), is applied to the collector to maxi-
mize absorption.
l Wooden support stand, made of 2x4 and 4x4 lumber and some plywood.
l A 60-watt squirrel cageelectric blower ftted with 6-inch-diameter (15-cm-diameter)
ductwork.
l An adjustable thermostat that automatically turns on when air in the collector reaches
110F (43C).
For more information, see lakotasolarenterprises.com.
We do lose elders here
every year because of this.
they convince them-
selves that they can go
without heat for fve days,
then a storm hits and they
end up being found dead.
forging a local solar economy
1_64_March_ST11.indd 36 2/14/11 3:47:42 PM
solartoday.org SOLAR TODAY March 2011 37
Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
ing process and visited Pine Ridge to teach it to
Red Cloud and Tschacher. TWP handed over
the tooling and a step-by-step training video, and
LSE assumed manufacturing.
Te LSE solar air heater looks nothing like the
product of a NASA lab. Its a 1970s-era technol-
ogy, implemented with 21st-century materials
and tweaked Lakota style, as Red Cloud puts
it. It looks makeshif but is sturdy and reliable.
Te goal was not to market a consumer product
to the outside world, but to create a simple, envi-
ronmentally friendly, inexpensive way to reduce
Lakota heating bills.
It works. For $2,000, including shipping,
manufacturing and installation, the system can
ofset 15 to 30 percent of an average households
heating costs for 25 years. Te heaters are purely
supplemental, with no heat storage. Te 4.9 mil-
lion Btu produced annually displace 82 gallons of
propane burned in a 65 percent-efcient furnace,
saving the homeowner $150 per year at todays
regional propane rates. Because TWP provides
the heaters for free, that is money in pocket.
Trough 2008, TWP fnanced LSEs heat-
ers primarily through individual donations and
small foundation grants. Tey managed to fund
just over 200 systems, most of which were dis-
tributed on a needs basis around the Pine Ridge
Reservation. TWP received several federal
grants in 2009, under the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act. It proved be a watershed
year at LSE. Demand spiked, and the shop, now
named the Red Cloud Renewable Energy Center
(RCREC), hired fve full-time laborers. Tat year
278 LSE kits went out, and in 2010, another 203
lef the production line. To date, TWP and LSE
have placed about 700 solar air-heating kits.
Most systems produced during the last two
years have been sold outside Pine Ridge. To
accommodate this export business, RCREC
has doubled as a one-of-a-kind training facility,
where tribes from around the nation can learn
about the LSE installation techniques. Fify-two
solar warriors have now received Solar Tech-
nician I certifcates from Red Cloud. His tute-
lage has enabled installation of 443 air heaters by
locals on reservations as far away as White Earth,
of the Band of Ojibwe, in Minnesota.
a new way to honor the old ways
Since 2005, TWP and LSE have worked to
import other renewable energy technologies
onto tribal lands. Tat year they set up a demon-
stration home on the Rosebud Reservation, just
west of Pine Ridge. Partnering with Rosebuds
Clean Energy Education Partnership, TWP and
LSE outfted the Litle Tunder residence with
a 2.4-kilowat (kW) wind turbine, 1.3-kW photo-
voltaic (PV) system, windbreak and shade trees,
and an LSE solar air heater.
Te Red Cloud Renewable Energy Center
now matches those fve applications and is add-
ing a sixth, with a ground-source heating system
along its north wall. Tschacher, Red Clouds
wind warrior, now leads wind turbine-instal-
lation workshops at RCREC. Along with Red
Cloud and LSE staff, Tschacher installed a
SkyStream 3.7 turbine (skystreamenergy.com)
at RCEC last May. A 2-kW PV array followed in
July, courtesy of Namaste Solar (namastesolar.
com) of Boulder, Colo. Red Cloud and Tschach-
er plan to acquire NABCEP certifcation under
open scholarships to Solar Energy International
(solarenergy.org) in Carbondale, Colo.
Red Cloud calls renewable energy a new
way to honor the old ways drawing on nature
in alignment with Native American cultural and
spiritual beliefs. At Pine Ridge, the electricity
displaced by the LSE project means less reliance
on the Nebraska Public Power District, which
generates 96 percent of its electricity from coal.
Te Lakota, and other tribes, will have plenty
of opportunity to move away from fossil fuels.
Research at the National Renewable Energy
Lab has shown that wind and solar potential on
tribal lands is quite good. Ironically, this is in part
because their reservations were ofen situated on
the hotest, driest, windiest, and therefore least
desirable, parcels in the West.
While a renewable energy venture like LSE
might still be in a philanthropy-dependent stage,
its a frst step to pulling Native American com-
munities out of generational poverty. ST
cynthia Isenhours research
showed that heating
expenses consumed
50 to 70 percent of a
typical households cash
income during the coldest
months of the year.
Bret Tschacher has been a partner to Henry Red Cloud since Lakota Solar Enterprises inception in 2005.
Tschacher leads the wind installation trainings at the Red Cloud Renewable Energy Center and oversees
operations on the LSE manufacturing line.
1_64_March_ST11.indd 37 2/14/11 3:47:43 PM
38 March 2011 SOLAR TODAY solartoday.org
Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
T
his is a story about two determined teen-
age boys, a politically savvy mom and the
movement they created that has put solar
arrays on dozens of roofs in the urban heart of
Washington, D.C.
Te Mt. Pleasant neighborhood lies 2 miles
north of the White House. Its a middle- and
working-class neighborhood of old row houses,
most dating from the early 1920s. About 100 of
these houses roughly one-tenth now have
grid-tied solar systems. Half a dozen other D.C.
neighborhoods have emulated this success.
once upon a time
In September 2006, afer atending a screen-
ing of Al Gores An Inconvenient Truth, best
friends Diego Arene-Morley and Walter Lynn
then 12 years old sat at a kitchen table with
Diegos dad, Jef Morley, and Walters mom, Anya
Schoolman. Tey wanted to know how global
warming would afect them and what they might
do about it. Can we go solar? Walter asked.
Anya replied, We already looked into solar.
Its expensive and really complicated. If we are
going to do all the work to fgure this out, we
might as well do the whole neighborhood. Are
you guys in?
They were. Thus, the Mt. Pleasant Solar
Co-op was conceived. Anya had the experience
to launch the movement. Afer earning a masters
degree in international relations and environ-
mental policy at Columbia Universitys School
of International and Public Afairs, she held
senior policy positions in the U.S. Department
of the Interior and went on to advise foundations
and nonprofts on environmental strategy and
program design.
A few neighbors joined the co-op right away
and the group developed a strategic plan:
Sign up every neighbor interested in going
solar;
Findaninstallerwillingtooferthegroupa
big discount;
launch a solar cooperative
A Little co-op
and how it grew
Set goals. Make solar energy accessible to all,
reduce the costs and remove the barriers. Costs are
coming down anyway, but group buying provides
effciencies of scale and helps installers deal more
effectively with permitting agencies.
Create an organizational structure to support
the mission. Were registered as a co-operative
under D.C. law. Unlike 501 (c) (3) organizations, we
dont raise funds, manage, govern or report to the
IRS. But we can lobby.
Find a good web developer. The website is an
indispensable communication tool. It not only gets
the word out, but it helps to pool resources and
avoid duplication of effort. Sample our sites:
mtpleasantsolarcoop.org
solardc.blogspot.com
sites.google.com/site/capitolhillenergycoop/
georgetownenergy.com
Participation is voluntary. People do what theyre
comfortable doing.We have few meetings and dont
browbeat those who dont show up.We avoid ask-
ing for money, unless its for something concrete like
our co-op yard signs.
Energy and information fow in both directions.
Few come to the co-op knowing a lot about renew-
ables or going solar. Its easy to go to our periodic
meetings and ask questions of those whove been
there and done it.
Start small and focused, but broaden the base.
Now that weve succeeded with homeowners and
have expanded our political clout into other neigh-
borhoods, we can focus on the energy issues faced
by renters, multifamily buildings, small businesses
and nonproft organizations.
Share expertise. We dont exercise control over
sister co-ops, but we share what we learn and act
collectively in the political arena.
making a co-op work
People want to go solar because its in their best interests to do so and they contact us
because our mission is to help them. They want control over energy costs for the same rea-
son they want a fxed-price mortgage. In Washington, D.C., our electric bills increased 41 per-
cent over the past fve years (from July 2005 to July 2010). Small businesses and nonprofts
need to stabilize their energy costs just to stay afoat.
r
i
c
K
r
e
i
n
h
a
r
D
(From left) Mt. Pleasant Solar Co-op founders Jef Morley, Diego Arene-Morley,
Walter Lynn and Anya Schoolman spoke at the Solarama expo in September 2009.
1_64_March_ST11.indd 38 2/14/11 3:47:44 PM
solartoday.org SOLAR TODAY March 2011 39
Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
sOLaR TODAY
MARCH 2011
VOL. 25, NO. 2
In Washington, D.C., a group of neighbors banded
together to win the fght for residential solar.
By RoBERT RoBINSoN
Identifyfriendsingovernmentandbusiness
and environmental organizations willing to sup-
port legislation to create a rebate program; and,
Startinstallingthosepanels.
It wasnt that simple, of course. At the
time, photovoltaic (PV) arrays were installing
for about $8 per wat, or about $24,000 for a
3-kilowatt (kW)
residential system.
With no federally
or locally funded
rebate programs
yet in place and
electricity retailing
at about 14 cents
per kilowat-hour,
it looked as if the
payback period
might be 10 years.
And it was ques-
tionable whether
the nei ghbor-
hoods 85-year-old
roofs would bear
the load of solar
arrays without
substantial struc-
tural and water-
sealing work. Te few solar installers who had
experience with the fat roofs on Washington
row houses werent sure they wanted to install
in the city. Finally, political support for local
legislation to provide cash rebates for solar sys-
tems got shaky when rumors began circulating
in the Council of the District of Columbia (the
Council) that only rich, tree-hugging home-
owners wanted solar panels.
anya counseled us
to take Baby steps . . .
Diego and Walter leafeted the neighbor-
hood with adolescent zeal. Two hundred mem-
bers signed up and provided electric consump-
tion data. Members then conducted energy
audits and began conserving electricity. Walter
and Diego ran comparison tests and identifed
the most efcient and dependable compact
fuorescent lights (CFLs). Keith Ware, owner
of Eco Green Living, sold us $3,000 of these
CFLs below cost and we all went on an ef-
ciency binge.
Anya climbed
up and surveyed
more than 70
roofs. Installer
Chris Graves, of
Switch Energy, ran
financial pro for-
mas that showed,
given expected fed-
eral incentives and
renewable energy
credits, a payback
period less than
six years (see table).
Legal firms Skad-
den, Arps and Kaye
Scholer stepped
up with pro bono
legal services on
regulatory, legisla-
tive, liability and contracting maters.
The District of Columbia already had a
renewable portfolio standard (RPS), estab-
lished in 2005. Anya lobbied relentlessly with
the Council for solar renewable energy credits
(SRECs), with the result that they were includ-
ed in Councilmember Mary Chehs Clean
and Afordable Energy Act of 2008 (CAEA).
CAEA expanded the RPS (it now calls for 20
percent renewable by 2020, with a 0.4 percent
solar carve-out and high alternative compliance
payments). Te law also created a Renewable
Energy Incentive Program (REIP), providing a
$3-per-wat rebate for small renewable energy
systems funded at $2 million per year from
robert robinson is a communications consultant,
formerly chief of staf to a councilmember and an
administrator in the Office of the mayor in the
Washington, d.c., government. he lobbies for and is
active with the mt. Pleasant solar co-op and with d.c.
solar united Neighborhoods. a graduate of Lycoming
college in Pennsylvania, robinson attended Fettes
college in edinburgh, scotland. he lives with his wife
in mt. Pleasant. they went solar in 2009. contact him
at robrobin@me.com.
Policy goals
Program implementation and access. Most
of the federal funding for renewable programs
is targeted to large utility-scale and com-
mercial programs. We prefer that the benefts
of solar be widely dispersed to directly help
struggling homeowners, businesses, churches
and nonprofts.
Instead of offering grants only to commer-
cial entities going solar, the federal govern-
ment should make the 30 percent federal tax
credit available as a grant to any entity that
wants to go solar, including private individuals
and especially nonprofts like churches and
community-based organizations.
We need a national solar-garden or virtual
net-metering bill, requiring utilities nation-
wide to allow any citizen to get a credit on
their bill for a solar panel they own anywhere
in their billing area. Doesnt matter if its on the
roof of a corporate-owned warehouse, a family
owned barn, a big box store or a church.
Focus funding on end-users. Our greatest
frustration came from watching millions of
dollars in renewable energy surcharges we
paid on our utility bills get expropriated by
local government to fll budget gaps else-
where. People dont mind paying a surcharge
on their electric bills if the money is going to
be used to provide solar power and create
green jobs for the community!
2010 Estimated Costs/Benefts for a 3-kW Solar PV System
via the D.C. Renewable Energy Incentive Program
Expenditure/Revenue Up-Front Sale Annualized No Sale
Elements of SRECs* SREC Payments* of SRECs*
Return-on-investment
(break-even year) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Total 3-kW system cost $18,000 $18,000 $18,000
REIP cash rebate -$9,000 -$9,000 $9,000
Up-front SREC sale -$5,400
Other payments $1,200
per annum
Actual costs to applicant $3,600 $9,000 $9,000
Federal tax credit (30%) $5,940 $5,940 $5,940
Energy savings
($1,500 per year + $1,500 $1,500 $1,500
7% annual increases)
Annual revenues $1,200
after break-even year per annum
* Solar renewable energy credits
1_64_March_ST11.indd 39 2/14/11 3:47:44 PM
40 March 2011 SOLAR TODAY solartoday.org
Copyright 2011 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.
utility-bill surcharges. It really helped
when federal rules removed the caps
on rebates to permit them to cover
30 percent of the total cost of a solar
install.
At last, we had a rebate program
in place! Installations went forward.
Creative ways were found to deal with
structural issues for instance arrays
could anchor on the load-bearing
party walls between adjacent (and
connected) homes.
By September 2009, we celebrated
our frst 50 systems with a 12-home
solar tour and a Solarama festival to
promote our installers and related busi-
nesses. Two months later, the co-op
formalized relationships with solar installers and
neighborhood job trainers to stabilize REIP fund-
ing for green-collar jobs.
Te program grew. Anya helped to orga-
nize sister co-ops in the Capitol Hill, George-
town, Petworth, Shepherd Park, Palisades and
Ward 8 neighborhoods (this would give us a
wider base of political support). Articles on the
co-op appeared in the Scientifc American blog,
Grist and CNBC blog. Te Discovery Chan-
nel produced a program called Powering the
Future, Leading the Charge, featuring the
co-op. By the close of 2010 we watched the
completion of our 100th solar installation in
the Mt. Pleasant neighborhood.
Tere have been bureaucratic and political
problems. We have had to work vigilantly with
the members of the Council to keep the city gov-
ernment from hijacking REIP funds to spend on
other programs. In the spring of 2010 we con-
ducted two lobbying ofensives to recover pro-
gram funding and hire staf to clear the backlog
of REIP applications for FY 2010 and 2011.
utility issues
Te 2008 action by the Council also estab-
lished a net-metering requirement, but the Pub-
lic Service Commission (PSC) didnt issue fnal
rules until June 2010. So co-op members waited
month afer sunny month for the utility company,
Pepco (originally the Potomac Elec-
tric Power Co.), to install meters
that would measure current in both
directions. Until those meters come
online, systems that produce more
electricity than the home uses pro-
duce exaggerated bills. Te old meters
dont calculate negative numbers
all electric fow is additive. Since solar
inverters track our electric produc-
tion but not consumption, and the
old meters track our consumption
but not solar electricity passing back
to the grid, our monthly bills are all
but unverifable.
As utilities move toward critical
peak pricing, net-metering debates
return. Why assess transmission and distribution
charges for surplus PV power, if it will reduce
peak load and if its not being wheeled to other
distribution circuits?
Meanwhile, Pepco received $149.4 mil-
lion in federal stimulus funding for smart grid
design. We want to see the company incor-
porate renewable-friendly standards and best
practices regarding net-metering and solar
credits, such as those proposed by the Inter-
state Renewable Energy Council. Tis efort
may require some years of adversarial processes
before the PSC, unless national or local legis-
lation is enacted to set policies supportive of
distributed generation. ST
Get started with online and local resources.
Find out what the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE), solar co-ops, solar gardens and community
solar are doing:
eere.energy.gov
mtpleasantsolarcoop.org
solargardens.org
nwseed.org
To learn about the laws and programs appli-
cable in your community, go to the Database of
State Incentives for Renewables and Effciency,
dsireusa.org. The website also lists local offcials
responsible for administering these programs.
This is an invaluable contact list.
Find out about your local interconnection and
net metering policies at the Interstate Renewable
Energy Council site, irecusa.org.
Ask your electric utility and public utility com-
mission (PUC) if they offer programs to install solar
energy on homes, multifamily buildings and busi-
nesses. Make sure you know who to go to if you
are in a dispute with the utility. Is it the PUC, a
consumer advocacy offce, a peoples counsel or
something else?
Calculate your potential solar energy produc-
tion by going to rredc.nrel.gov/solar/calculators/
PVWATTS/version1/.
Meet with potential co-op members and
decide what organizational structure is right for
you and fle with the state or local government.
Explore getting pro bono legal representation to
help you adopt an organizational structure and
get you up and running. Remember: If you orga-
nize as a 501 (c) (3) nonproft corporation, you can
raise money, but you must fle annually with the
IRS and you may not lobby.
Go to work.
1) Have co-op members collect their monthly bills
and become familiar with their usage patterns
and costs for the past two years.
2) Urge them to get energy audits (some jurisdic-
tions offer them free of charge) and initiate eff-
ciency measures to improve the performance
of insulation, window and door sealing, HVAC,
appliances and lighting.
3) Visit FindSolar.com to obtain a list of solar
installers in your area.
4) Contact licensed and bonded roofers to assess
the readiness of your members roofs to
support thin-flm or solar panel photovoltaic
systems.
5) Work with local offcials responsible for admin-
istering incentive programs to help your co-op
and installers understand how to comply with
the application, permitting and interconnec-
tion processes.
6) Explore with your co-op and legal advisers
what benefts of membership you can provide
immediately and over time, including:
information sharing between members;
buying power/economies of scale/negotiations:
with solar installers, roofers, panel manufactur-
ers, other renewable and effciency equipment
suppliers;
building your co-ops political muscle to improve
and extend funding and support for renewable
energy incentive programs; and,
using that muscle to push for more solar-friendly
programs, policies and rules.
Develop an organizational
infrastructure, including:
a detailed database to help you capture informa-
tion about potential and current members,
a co-op website, and
a media contact list including local, state and
trade media.
launch a solar cooperative
r
i
c
K
r
e
i
n
h
a
r
D
The co-ops frst installation was built by Standard
Solar for Tom Kelly (foreground). Hes talking with
electrician Amacire Bocoum.
How to Start a Solar Co-op
1_64_March_ST11.indd 40 2/14/11 3:47:45 PM