Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
BETWEEN 1990 AND 2030, it is estimated that the global population will increase by approximately 3.7 billion people. Ninety per cent of this increase will be located in developing countries, and 90 per cent of that will take place in urban areas. At least 600 million people already live in life-threatening situations in cities, and up to one third more live in sub-standard housing. At least 250 million urban dwellers lack access to safe drinking water and 400 million lack access to adequate sanitation. Although the proportion of people in the developing world defined as poor may be declining in some regions (particularly East Asia), absolute numbers are still rising: from 1051 million people in 1985 to 1133 million in 1990 according to the World Bank.1 And out of this total of 1133 million poor, an estimated 800 million live in the Asian and Pacific region. Given the magnitude of the challenge facing urban authorities in the Asian and Pacific region, there is a clear and crucial need for appropriate tools and methodologies that detail how to implement programmes of good and effective urban governance. The Urban Governance Initiative (TUGI) of the United Nations Development Programme has undertaken the task of compiling a set of 13 exemplary tools and methodologies for good urban governance and presented them here in a brief and easily referenced publication. Action for Better Cities ~ Tools and Methodologies for Good Urban Governance is a sourcebook for local authorities, non-governmental organisations and the private sector who are keen on examining an array of programmes and initiatives that have been implemented in other Asian cities, in order to find one that is most suitable and adaptable to the needs of the city in which they live. Each of the thirteen modalities showcases a programme or initiative that reflects one, or as in some cases, a number of characteristics of good governance. These include: participation of people in decision-making; rule of law; transparency; responsiveness; consensus orientation; equity; effectiveness and efficiency; accountability and strategic vision. We have also endeavored to provide further information in the appendix regarding relevant organisations, networks and fora in which issues of urban governance continue to be discussed, and where new and improved methodologies continue to be developed. It is our hope that by providing a summary description of what we have felt to be exemplary methodologies for good urban governance in one publication, the task of identifying and adapting a suitable programme for the distinctive needs of each city would become easier and less timeconsuming.
United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat), Review of national action to provide housing for all since Habitat I 1976 Report of the Executive Director to the Commission on Human Settlements, January 1995. As quoted in Living in Asian Cities: The impending crisis-causes, consequences and alternatives for the future Report of the Second Asia-Pacific Urban Forum, United Nations, New York, 1996.
1
CHAPTER 2:
THE ASIA PACIFIC CITIES FORUM exemplifies the first characteristic of good urban governance - that of participation. By creating a forum in which business entities, local government and other urban stakeholders can come together to share ideas and views, the Asia Pacific Cities Forum makes it possible for people to participate constructively towards the creation of better-managed and more livable cities. The Forum emphasizes the importance of networking as well as the essential process of information dissemination in an attempt to gain the most from the expertise of each participating organisation or individual. This in turn can then be translated towards improving existing decision-making practices and the current method of management of a citys resources.
APCF... Strengthening Links between the entrepreneurial spirit of the business sector and urban leaders ...
THE MISSION
To foster the development of partnerships that focus primarily on strengthening links between the entrepreneurial spirit of the business sector and urban leaders, towards creating a synergy for better decision-making practices and the effective management of resources in cities within the region.
In total, APCF has exposed over 500 business and urban leaders to the value of business leadership and helped inspire several specific business citizenship programmes in a number of cities in Asia. Urban leaders from other cities and countries have also approached APCF with their interest in setting up business citizenship programmes.
1. CHENNAI:
Pest Control India (a private business organisation) agreed to sponsor a malaria eradication pilot project, while the Confederation of Indian Industries undertook an initiative to collaborate with Exnora (a Chennai based NGO that focuses on issues of solid waste management and the environment) and the Sustainable Chennai Project to develop a City Partnership that would be sponsored by business leaders.
2. BANGALORE:
The Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development Finance Corporation (KUIDFC) made an offer to match half of all resources raised by the business sector for social investment projects while the Public Affairs Centre agreed to work with Swabhimana (an NGO that consists of business organisations, NGOs and government bodies which work towards the objective of Keeping Bangalore Green) and business leaders to generate viable projects that can be implemented in the short term.
3. COLOMBO:
The Celyinco Insurance Company agreed to build 6 public toilets in partnership with the city administration. One business organisation committed to planting 100 trees in cooperation with the Lions Club, while another agreed to launch an education campaign on the environment. Agreement was also reached to form a committee as a precursor to a Colombo City Partnership, with several businesses committing to specific contributions on a yearly basis. The Konrad Adenauer Foundation offered to assist with this process and to support future meetings.
4. KANDY:
This forum concluded with a commitment towards the revitalisation of Kandy Lake, as well as the launching of the Kandy City Partnership.
The above information was adapted from the APCF Website, available at http://www.apcf.org. For further information, please contact Akhtar Badshah, Executive Director, Asia Pacific Cities Forum, 2203, 246th Pl., NE Redmond, WA-98053, USA. Tel: (1-425) 898 9739 Fax: (1- 425) 898 9649. Email: abadshah@msn.com; Website: http://www.apcf.org.
CHAPTER 3:
HOW IS IT TO BE ACHIEVED?
The project employs modern management techniques such as benchmarking and continuous improvement towards creating support networks between municipalities as well as providing a state-of-the-art methodology for increasing the capacity of Asian municipalities to deliver their services. By applying the above mentioned management strategies to the delivery of their services, the pilot project in these municipalities would provide evidence towards supporting the argument for the applicability of such management strategies within municipal services in order to improve their service delivery. The program would also demonstrate that cooperation between municipalities is a vital component in assisting innovation.
WHAT IS BENCHMARKING?
Benchmarking is a process which aims to stimulate improvement through comparisons of services, processes and organisational performance between a number of organisations. Usually, one of these organisations has the best practices for the process or service. Through detailed comparisons, participating organisations identify opportunities to improve their services or processes. In order for benchmarking to be effective, existing practices must be studied and performance indicators selected to judge service performance. Service staff must be involved in the benchmarking process, so that they develop the commitment to change existing practices. For example, in Australia, there was a substantial gap between the best and the worst practices in terms of service quality, cost, timeliness and customer satisfaction in such services as planning, rural road maintenance, solid waste disposal, home help, payroll services, revenue collection and corporate services. Based upon the benchmarking process, the municipalities were able to redesign their service delivery practices and lift their performance. Benchmarking may seem simple at first, but in practice the process requires trained staff to conduct the necessary analysis and develop proposals for change. It also achieves greatest success if it is conducted within the context of a Continuous Improvement Strategy.
Usually, a number of teams operate at any one time to address specific processes or problems and the members of these teams are trained in improvement techniques. Recognition and reward systems underpin the change culture and regular reporting of key performance measurements enables everyone to understand the progress the organisation is making towards its goals. The gains that stand to be achieved include better quality products and services, faster process and service times, lower costs and greater customer satisfaction.
METHODOLOGY
Organise a number of the municipality staff into teams that are given specific training; Critically examine selected services; Compare these with similar services in other municipalities; Improve upon existing services based upon these comparisons; Use this as a basis for implementing an organisational-wide sustained approach to identifying and implementing improvement in services, process and performance of the municipality.
NETWORKING...
The ADB Project aims to set up a network of cities that will collaborate in benchmarking their processes and driving change through their own continuous improvement programmes. The participating municipalities form the nucleus of this network. In turn, they would then hopefully become role models for other Asian cities. The Asian Development Bank Institute has established an archive of Asian Mayors eForums on their web site. To visit, please go to www.adbi.org/ mayors/news.htm.
THE PROCESS
The ADB obtained the services of an international management consultancy firm, the Australian Continuous Improvement Group (ACIG) www.asiancities.bench marking.acig.com.au, which specialises in continuous improvement and benchmarking as a strategy for achieving sustainable change in organisation culture, processes and customer service. The ACIG would train and assist two staff (benchmarking coordinators) from each municipality to facilitate and support detailed process mapping, setting of performance standards and the establishing of a continuous improvement program within their municipality. These Benchmarking Coordinators are then tasked with the training of the work-based teams in each of the municipalities. These work-based teams in turn have the responsibility of mapping out the processes involved within selected services that are provided by the municipalities in order to identify the areas in which the delivery of services can be improved.
There are six services that were selected for benchmarking within this project: 1. Solid waste management, especially education and regulation. 2. Customer complaints resolutions services.
3. 4. 5. 6.
Road maintenance services. Parking services. Street vendors. Property tax assessment and collection.
The Benchmarking Project continues to grow and develop. For recent updates regarding the project implementation, please e-mail Ms. Penelope Price, Learning Specialist, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan at pprice@adbi.org, or call (81 3) 3593 5500; fax: (81 3) 3593 5587 to receive the Asian Development Bank Institutes electronic newsletter, Asian Mayors E-Forum.
The above information was adapted from: 1. Communications with Dr. Naved Hamid, Senior Strategy and Policy Officer, Program Manager of the Asian Development Bank Benchmarking Project. 2. Communications with Ma. Mildred R. Villareal, Asian Development Bank Benchmarking Project. 3. Asian Development Bank - Enhancing Municipal Service Delivery Capability. [Document] Brief Guide. 15 September 1998. 4. Asian Development Bank - Enhancing Municipal Service Delivery Capability. [Document]A Project Summary and Progress Report. 15 September 1998. 5. Asian Development Bank - Enhancing Municipal Service Delivery Capability. [Document] Inception Report. 15 September 1998. 6. Asian Development Bank - Enhancing Municipal Service Delivery Capability. [Document]Report on the Mayors Forum-Cebu City, Philippines, 2-4 December 1998. 15 September 1998. For further information, please contact Dr. Naved Hamid, Senior Strategy and Policy Officer, Program Manager of the Asian Development Bank Benchmarking Project, No. 6, ADB Avenue, Ortigas Centre, Mandaluyong City, Philippines. Tel: (632) 632 5760; Fax: (632) 636 2181; Email: nhamid@mail.asiandevbank.org; Website: www.adb.org.
LIST OF CONTACTS
Shanghai, PRC Maning Song, Vice Section Chief Shanghai Municipal Government 200 Renmin Dadao, Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China. Tel: (86 21) 6311 9688 Fax: (86 21) 6358 1722 Email: micsunny@hotmail.com or Zhiwei Jiang, Asst. Economist Tel: (86 21) 6321 2810 ext. 3162 Fax: (86 21) 635 81728 Email: jiangjerry@usa.net
Surabaya, Indonesia Ir Indati Kusumawardani, Head of Education & Campaign Cleansing Services Department Surabaya Municipal Council Jl. Taman Surya, Surabaya, Indonesia Tel: (62 31) 534 6303 Fax: (62 31) 535 3776 or Irvan Dani Ananda, Chief of Input Department Office of Electronic Data Processing Tel: (62 31) 534 3051 Fax: (62 31) 535 3776 Email: kpde@sby.mega.net.id
Peshawar, Pakistan Gul Haider Khan, Assistant Engineer Peshawar Municipal Corporation Chawk Hashtnagri Peshawar, Pakistan Tel: (92 91) 253 547 ext. 2004 Fax: (92 91) 271 356 or Javed Amjad,Taxation Officer Tel: (92 91) 218 034 Fax: (92 91) 271 356
Cebu City, Philippines Dr. Tomas L. Fernandez, City Health Officer Gen. Maxilom Avenue Cebu City 6000 Philippines Tel: (63 32) 253 7455/(63 32) 232 5731 Fax: (63 32) 232 1527 Email: tomtlf@nexmil.com or Mike Lucero, Executive Director Waterfront Development Commission Rm. 104 WDC Bldg. Osmena Blvd. Cebu City, Philippines Tel: (63 32) 255 7207 Fax: (63 32) 255 7209
Bangalore, India Dr. S.D. Nagaraj, Additional Health Officer Bangalore City Corporation N.R. Square, Bangalore, India Tel: (91 80) 224 5216/222 2387 Fax: (91 80) 222 3194 or H.B.S. Aradhya, Revenue Officer Tel: (91 80) 558 2580 Fax: (91 80) 222 3194
Kuantan, Malaysia Ahmad Hairi Bin Hussain, Head of Human Resource and Administration Department Kuantan Municipal Council Pahang, Malaysia Tel: (60 9) 513 2311 Fax: (60 9) 513 0644 Email: jas@mpk.gov.my or Zulkipli Bin Abdul Majid, Head of Parks and Recreation Tel: (60 9) 567 3333 Fax: (60 9) 513 0644
Bandung, Indonesia Priana Wirasaputra. Drs., Secretary of BAPPEDA Bandung Municipal Council Bandung, Indonesia Tel: (62 22) 433 606 Fax: (62 22) 431 929 or Bulgan Alamin, Drg., Head Officer for Municipal Organisation Tel: (62 22) 434 635 Fax: (62 22) 436 150
Colombo, Sri Lanka K.A.D.N. Wickramarathne, Superintending Engineer Colombo Municipal Council Town Hall, Colombo 07 Sri Lanka Tel: (94 1) 691 941 Fax: (94 1) 684 290 Email: munici@slt.lk or K.T.D. Mallawa Arachchi, Superintending Engineer Tel: (94 1) 693 161 Fax: (94 1) 694 640 Email: munici@slt.lk
Lahore, Pakistan Tariq Bin Aslam Khan Deputy Chief Officer Metropolitan Corporation Lahore Shahrah-e-Quaid-e-Azam Lahore, Pakistan Tel: (92 42) 9211185/192/387 Fax: (92 42) 9211050/9242 5867146 Email: mis@lahore.org.pk or tariqaslam@usa.net
Semarang, Indonesia Budi Tjahjanto, Sub Head in Urban Division Semarang Municipal Council Jl. Pemuda 148, Semarang Indonesia Tel: (62 24) 568 400 Fax: (62 24) 542 522
CHAPTER 4:
This chapter details the Community Action Planning (CAP) process which embodies the good governance characteristic of participation and emphasizes the importance of consensus in the process of planning and implementing projects that benefit a particular community. This has resulted in a methodology that ensures that issues of equity are well reflected in all their undertakings.
10
PROGRAMME
The Million Houses Programme (MHP), and its successor, the Million Five Hundred Thousand Houses Programme (1.5 MHP) were countrywide national processes that ran from 1984-1989 and 1989-1994 respectively. Both programmes were really umbrellas for several sectorspecific sub-programmes. In the six years from 1984-1989, the rural subprogramme successfully provided shelter for 231,752 poor families at an average loan per completion of approximately US$117. The central feature of the programmes was the role of the poor in need of shelter. These people owned and managed the programmes, with the State and others acting as active supporters. This Sri Lankan case represents one of the earliest instances in the world of shifting national housing policy from direct provision to support or enablement.
11
more capital investment and effective organisational and managerial structures. Examples of these sort of solutions included environmentally sound houses, individual amenities and sustainable community organisations. In the implementation of the Community Action Plan, the first priority was to solve the sanitation problem. The repair of all common toilets was undertaken immediately through organising community labour. Then, the CDC took on the role of organising the community, obtaining municipal approval, collecting contributions, supervising and monitoring construction and working as a liaison with families and external agencies. The National Housing Development Authority provided all technical drawings and estimates for a sewer system to which private household toilets could then be connected. Sevanatha was responsible for planning, organising education and training activities, raising funds, providing technical advice for community organisation and building partnerships with community and other resource agencies. The Japan Embassy provided building material for construction of septic tanks and main sewer lines for the three CDC settlement areas under its small grants scheme. Residents contributed unskilled labour and each household contributed between Rs. 4000- Rs. 6500 for the construction of a private toilet. Three years since the completion of the project, two community organisations involved in the construction of the sewerage system are still functioning as Community Development Councils. They have taken on other infrastructure development projects and welfare activities. Womens savings and credit groups have also found the area to be fertile ground for the development of such community based activities.
The above information was adapted from: 1. Website of the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS). 2. Community Managed Sewer Disposal System Process and Progress. (1993). Produced by the Sevanatha Urban Resource Centre, Colombo, Sri Lanka. 3. K.A. Jayaratne. (1998). Community Managed Sewerage System in Colombo. Evolution of Clean Settlements Concept for Community Based Urban Environmental Improvement and Management. Sevanatha: Colombo. For further information, please contact SEVANATHA-Urban Resource Centre, 220/3, Nawala Road, Rajagiriya, Sri Lanka. Tel/Fax: (94-1) 878893 Email: sevanata@sri.lanka.net
12
CHAPTER 5:
THE CITYNET AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION AMONG DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (TCDC) TRANSFER PROCESS OF BEST PRACTICES
http://www2.itjit.ne.jp/~citynet/ or http://www.undp.org/tcdc/index2.html
The CityNet and TCDC Transfer Process of Best Practices is an example of an urban governance modality that promotes effectiveness and efficiency. By supporting the direct technical exchange and transfer of expertise between cities, the TCDC transfer programmes have proven to be politically more acceptable, institutionally more viable and economically more efficient. This is a modality that describes well how cities can meet the needs of their population while making the best use of available resources.
These transfers were based on the realisation that many of the highly
13
A b e s t p r a c t i c e t r a n s f e r becomes both feasible and desirable when an organisation recognizes that another organisation has successfully implemented a solution for a set of problems or issues which the former is seeking to address and is willing to inspire its own actions based on lessons derived from that success. Nicholas You of the Best Practices and Local Leadership Programme.
successful solutions documented by the UNCHS Best Practices and Local Leadership Programme (please see Appendix II), addressed common social, economic and environmental issues and problems. With financial support from UNDP, many transfers were enabled and facilitated by CityNet, with most of them using the conceptual and methodological framework developed by the Best Practices and Local Leadership Programme of UNCHS (Habitat). These transfers took place between 1993 to 1997 and were discussed and appraised during the TCDC Forum on Transfers of Best Practices that was held during the CityNet 97 Yokohama Congress in November 1997. The TCDC Transfer Programme supports the direct technical exchange and transfer of expertise between cities (peers) as such exchanges have proven to be politically more acceptable, institutionally more viable and economically more efficient.
TYPES OF TRANSFERS
Transfers can fall within three main categories: technical: the transfer of skills and technology applications/processes; informational: the transfer and exchange of ideas and solutions; managerial: a system or series of decision-making and resource allocation processes that can be transferred and adapted.
Key components of a transfer can be identified as knowledge derived from real-world experience together with the human expertise capable of transforming that knowledge into social action
14
15
YOKOHAMAS FLOOD
Bangkok is situated in the downstream flat deltoid plain of the Chao Phraya River, a scant 27 to 56 kilometers from the river mouth. The citys ground level is an average of 0.0 to 1.5 meters above the mean sea level. Bangkok suffers from frequent floods due to the low elevation and rapid urban construction that is turning the natural land into buildings and urban structures. A technical transfer was initiated by dispatching experts from the Sewage Works Bureau of Yokohama to visit Bangkok in July 1997 to provide advice on flood-control strategies for Bangkoks flooding problem. Officials from the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) became interested in this project after hearing about the innovative flood control methods developed by Yokohama. The project concept is simple, focusing on the development of reservoirs and retention ponds which store rainwater temporarily, especially in the early minutes of rainstorms, to retard the outflow and thereby reduce peak discharge volume. The project concept is applied in more than a thousand places in Japan, but especially in the river basin around Yokohama. Experts from Yokohama worked with experts from the BMA, showing them how to design these retention ponds within the urban fabric of the city. This was similar to the design developed and applied in Yokohama and the Tsurumi River Basin area. Two engineers from the city of Yokohama went to Bangkok for a week to work with Thai planners at the Bangkok City Hall and establishedthe validity of this approach. The Thai engineers are now so confident of this approach that they are developing an application handbook and a computer programme with Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok to assist architects and engineers in applying this effective urban flood-control system nation-wide.
CONCLUSION
Transfer processes are not a panacea, but a process that requires time, commitment and an open, participatory system that allows for different voices and opinions to be heard. Although benefits to the recipient may seem obvious, hosts stand to benefit as well, through developing their capacity as a learning organisation, or one that continually grows in the knowledge of its own strengths, weaknesses and challenges.
16
The above information was adapted from: 1. CITYNET Regional Network of Local Authorities for the Management of Human Settlements. Guidelines for Transferring Effective Practices : A Practical Manual for South-South Cooperation. Commissioned by CITYNET Regional Network of Local Authorities for the Management of Human Settlements, UNDP Special Unit for Technical Cooperation among Developing Countries (TCDC), UNCHS (Habitat) Best Practices and Local Leadership Programme (BLP). For further information, please contact: CityNet, The Regional Network of Local Authorities for the Management of Human Settlements, 5F, International Organizations Center, Pacifico-Yokohama, 1-1-1 Minato-Mirai, Nishi-ku, Yokohama 220-0012, Japan. Tel: +(8145) 2232161; Fax: +(81-3) 223-2162; Email: citynet@po.iijnet.or.jp; Website: http:// www2.itjit.ne.jp/~citynet/
17
CHAPTER 6 :
LOCAL AGENDA 21
www.iclei.org/iclei/la21
Local Agenda 21 has been recognised as a valuable approach towards harmonizing urban development and the environment by utilizing consultative processes with the urban population in order to reach a consensus on a Local Agenda 21 for their community. This methodology for good governance embodies the principles of participation, consensus orientation as well as transparency and accountability, because not only does the LA 21 focus on building a common vision for sustainable development, it also promotes methods for ensuring that the programmes are carried out effectively and efficiently.
WHAT IS ICLEI?
The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, or ICLEI, was founded by environmentally concerned local authorities. Currently, it is supported by more than 220 members, consisting of communities of all sizes from around the world. The World Secretariat was established in Toronto in 1991, while the European Secretariat was opened in Freiburg, Germany, in 1992. There are regional offices located in Harare (Africa), Santiago (South America), Tokyo (Asia/Japan) and Berkeley (USA). ICLEIs mission is to build and serve a worldwide movement of local authorities to achieve tangible improvements in global environmental conditions through cumulative local actions. During the period of 1992-1996, ICLEI has been providing training and technical assistance to local planning efforts towards sustainable development. It has also been building regional and international networks to support the worldwide Local Agenda 21 process. In particular, ICLEIs Local Agenda 21 Model Communities Programme (MCP) has supported 14 local governments in Africa, Europe, Latin America,
18
North America and Asia and the Pacific to work together to test and evaluate different planning approaches and methods. Their experiences have guided the development of the Local Agenda 21 approach worldwide.
The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, ICLEI, World Secretariat, City Hall, East Tower, 8 th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2, Canada. Tel: (1-416) 392 1462 Fax: (1-416) 392 1478 Email: iclei@iclei.org Website: http:// www.iclei.org
Sustainable development is a programme of action for local and global economic reform. The challenge of this programme is to develop, test and disseminate ways to change the process of economic development so that it does not destroy the ecosystems and community systems that make life possible and worthwhile. No one fully yet understands how, or even if, sustainable development can be achieved; however, there is a growing consensus that it must be accomplished at the local level if it is ever to be achieved on a global basis. At the local level, sustainable development requires that local economic development supports community life and power, using the talents and resources of local residents. It further challenges us to distribute the benefits of development equitably, and to sustain these benefits for all social groups over the long term. This can only be achieved by preventing the waste of ecological wealth and the degradation of ecosystems by economic activities.
19
Community-based issue analysis involves two components: 1. Establish a process to gather and discuss the knowledge and wisdom of local residents about local conditions. 2. Undertake technical assessments to provide stakeholders with further information that may not be readily available to them. Popular knowledge and technical research are then reviewed together by the stakeholders to establish a consensus about local problems. The benefits of community-based issue analysis are the creation of a process whereby the local community can establish priorities for action, and to establish baseline data and indicators against which progress and future changes in conditions can be measured.
3. ACTION PLANNING
Following the identification and analysis of priority service issues, the partners can then begin the process of creating Action Plans. The action planning process has three basic components: Action Goals: Action goals are the specific aims that the community wishes to strive towards to achieve its vision for the future. They should translate this Community Vision into focused directives and resource allocation priorities. They are used to guide organisations, experts or professional staff to develop specific programmes, and in this way they serve as an intermediate step between a Community Vision statement and specific measurable targets for improvement of conditions related to sustainability. Targets and Triggers: After action goals are established, professional staff should work with stakeholders to define specific targets to be achieved within specified time frames. These targets permit managers to evaluate both the adequacy of actions being taken and the progress made in implementing an Action Plan. Triggers, on the other hand, are unique forms of targets. They are agreed-upon future conditions that trigger further action by stakeholders when addressing a problem. For example, a community with air pollution problems may not be able to agree at present to establish restrictions on private automobile use, but they could agree that when local roadway use reaches a certain level, they will introduce a system of road pricing, such as toll collection. Action Strategies and Commitments: It is essential that an Action Plan specifies the action strategies and commitments of different stakeholders in order for them to work as partners in achieving the different objectives of an Action Plan. Action strategies and commitments should be very precise and contain specific projects, time schedules for implementation, and commitments to allocate money, time and human resources. It is recommended that action strategies be designed to commence immediately. This is especially important because the sustainable development planning process will inevitably raise community expectations for action and change.
20
CONCLUSION
In summary, the sustainable development planning approach embodied in the Local Agenda 21 programme is a participatory planning process. It can be used to improve municipal sector performance, to mobilise and focus resources available in a community , and to address the sustainable development challenge at the local level. Since the programme emphasizes partnership approaches to service delivery, values the concerns of residents and validates their role and contribution in development, and addresses the need to preserve environmental and community systems, it will almost certainly contribute towards the implementation of Agenda 21. The Local Agenda 21 methodology as a whole is complex and there is no ready recipe for implementation. The approach must be tailored to local circumstances, and much learning must occur to discover the best procedures, mechanisms and methods to prepare a LA 21 action plan for sustainable development. Conceptually, LA 21 is an inclusive, participatory, comprehensive agenda for action. Operationally, this means that different community sectors join in a partnership to decide on actions that address immediate priorities, while establishing a plan to sustainably meet long-term needs and aspirations. In such a process, local government is one of the many partners working together to establish a vibrant and healthy environment and an economy that respects the limits of natural systems. More than 2000 local governments worldwide are now instituting LA 21 planning.
The above information was adapted from the following sources: 1. The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide An Introduction to Sustainable Development Planning. (1996). The International Council for Local and Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI)/The International Development Research Centre (IDRC)/The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Canada. 2. Local Agenda 21 Model Communities Programme - Programme Summary. (1998). International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). Canada. 3. The Website of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) at http://www.iclei.org. For further information, please contact: World Secretariat, 16th Floor, West Tower, City Hall, Toronto, M5H 2N2, Canada. Fax: (1-416) 392-1478; Email: iclei@iclei.org; Website: http://www.iclei.org or The Asia-Pacific Secretariat, Japan Office, Iikura Building, 3rd Floor, 1-9-7 Azabuda, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106 Japan. Fax: (81-3) 5561-9737; Email: icleij@ceres.dti.ne.jp; Website: http://www.ceres.dti.ne.jp/~iclei-j/
21
CHAPTER 7:
The LIFE Programme is a methodology for achieving sustainable human development through participatory local government. It promotes three very important aspects of good governance, namely participation, transparency and equity. Building the local-local level dialogue between various groups ensures that all stakeholders within an urban environment participate in the process of decision-making when considering ways in which they can improve their living environments. This process implicitly assumes a free flow of information between the various institutions, as well as allowing for everyone concerned to have their interests represented equitably.
WHAT IS LIFE?
LIFE...local solutions to local problems... LIFE is a methodology for achieving sustainable human development through participatory local governance. Its goal is to help city dwellers help themselves, to find local solutions to local problems. The programme is part of a worldwide initiative by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) to promote local dialogue and practical action to improve the living conditions in low-income urban communities. LIFE was launched as an innovative pilot programme, building upon the guiding principles of Local Agenda 21, developed at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. These principles acknowledge that central governments and international donor agencies alone cannot be expected to resolve all the urban development and environmental issues rapidly erupting in the municipal, metropolitan and mega-urban centres of the world. Not only are financial and manpower resources limited, but their efforts are often misdirected due to an incomplete understanding of local actors and regional situations. Local initiatives, that include community-level, cross-sectoral partnerships and participatory processes, which attempt to resolve some of these problems, are the primary focus of LIFE projects. In addition to this, the LIFE Programme has also expanded its reach and impact to country, regional and international levels, acting as a sort of global conduit for the transference of successful projects and experiences.
22
The LIFE Programme has helped to provide a modern sanitation system for the Mominabad section of Gujranwala, a city in Pakistans Punjab province. With a LIFE grant, the otherwise selffinanced and self-managed project has provided flush toilets in homes and underground sewerage systems in the community. The low-cost project will be copied in other slums of Gujranwala, eventually providing modern sanitation for some 52,000 people in 6,465 homes.
working together to solve and surmount problems. LIFE works towards creating dialogue amongst local actors to help them learn how to work together effectively. While the focus of LIFE activities is at the country level, LIFE is reinforced and sustained by regional, inter-regional and global partnerships and alliances. Coordination and cooperation with a network of regional and global organisations has brought a rich variety to LIFE and has bolstered the overall programme. In fact, through the support and collaboration with other networks and regional organisations, the LIFE methodology has spread faster and more efficiently than would have otherwise been possible with the national level programmes alone.
PHASE 1:
Catalyse a national dialogue, set strategies, gather support Identify the key local actors: local authorities, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and community-based organisations (CBOs). Recruit a national coordinator to animate the LIFE process, run the national programme on a daily basis, mobilize local resources and help support, document and evaluate projects. Hold a national participatory workshop at which local, national and international participants create a local and national strategy for the programme. Include as participants representatives of government, NGOs, CBOs, civic leaders and potential donors. Activate a national selection committee of local and national figures to promote the programme, review and select projects to receive funding, mobilize human and financial resources and act as an on-going forum for policy dialogue on the urban environment.
PHASE 2:
Ensure effective, collaborative, small-scale projects Conduct provincial workshops to help potential participants formulate collaborative projects. Solicit project proposals from CBOs and NGOs as well as local authorities. Select and fund suitable, well-designed small-scale projects. Help implement projects by providing training, monitoring and networking.
PHASE 3:
Initiate the dissemination and exchange of information nationally and internationally Help evaluate and document the projects. Assist in disseminating and exchanging information on successful ways to improve the urban environment. Start and upstream policy dialogue based on project results. Conduct national and international workshops to share effective project, programme and policy approaches.
All phases of the programme use the LIFE method which is essentially local-local dialogue within each community. The method is also applied at regional and global levels. This process of local dialogue leading to local cooperation and local action underpins the philosophy of all LIFE projects. This process is then extended at the country, regional and global levels.
23
24
CONCLUSION
The LIFE programme is a conduit through which successful local projects are transferred to other districts in the same city, to other towns and cities in the same country and to urban areas in other countries. It is hoped that the effect of this process would be to strengthen local institutional capacity that would allow city dwellers and their institutions to continue to deal effectively and independently with emerging environmental problems and issues of poverty. By the year 2000, the LIFE programme would be completed and the methods and materials will be available to others. Meanwhile, in the 12 pilot countries in which LIFE was implemented, LIFE will continue to serve as a global laboratory for future development efforts.
The above information was adapted from 1. UNDP (97). Participatory Local Governance: Technical Advisory Paper 1. Local Initiative Facility for Urban Environment (LIFE). Lifes method and experience 1992-1997. For further information, please contact Pratibha Mehta, Life Global Coordinator, Management Development and Governance Division, Bureau for Policy Development, United Nations Development Programme, 1 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017, United States of America. Tel: (1-212) 906 6602; Fax: (1-212) 906 5365 Email: pratibha.mehta@undp.org; Website: www.magnet.undp.org
25
LIST OF CONTACTS
Global Coordinator Pratibha Mehta Life Global Coordinator, Management Development and Governance Division, Bureau for Policy Development, United Nations Development Programme, 1 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017, United States of America. Tel: (1-212) 906 6602 Fax: (1-212) 906 5365 Email: pratibha.mehta@undp.org Website: www.magnet.undp.org
Pakistan Fayyaz Baqir LIFE Coordinator, UNDP Islamabad, UN Boulevard, Diplomatic Enclave No. 1, Block No. 2, Ramna-5, Islamabad, Pakistan. Tel: (92 51) 822 071-9 Fax: (92 51) 213 959
Thailand Sompong Patpui LIFE Coordinator, Director, Grassroots Development Institute, 100/22, Loc 6, Art-Narong Rd., Klongtoey, Bangkok 10110, Thailand. Tel: (662) 671 6911 Fax: (662) 671 6910 Home: (662) 249 7313
Bangladesh LIFE Coordinator UNDP Bangladesh, House No. 60, Road No. 11A, Dhanmaondi Residential Area, Dhaka, Peoples Republic of Bangladesh. Tel: (873) 150 6710/6711 Fax: (873) 2 813 196/817 811
26
CHAPTER 8 :
The Sustainable Penang Initiative is a model for participation and consensus orientation in its broadest form. The Initiative brings together the three sectors of government, civil society and the business community within a partnership that strives towards building a consensus vision of sustainable development for the island state of Penang. The Initiative promotes greater transparency and accountability on the part of local government, while at the same time, involving the community in the monitoring and implementation of better development policies through the specific use of popular community indicators.
27
Canada-ASEAN Governance Innovations Network Programme (CAGIN). The Initiative also receives assistance from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
WHO IS INVOLVED?
The Initiative involves people from all strata of organisations, with consultations initiated since September 1997 with the following agencies: State government agencies and local authorities State assembly representatives and parliamentarians Members of the business community and industrialists Non-governmental organisations and community-based organisations Academics and concerned individuals
28
29
The above information was adapted from the following sources: 1. The Sustainable Penang Initiative website which can be accessed at www.seri.com.my/spi/index.htm. 2. Sustainable Penang Initiative: Case Study of a Community and Sustainability Indicator Project, (1999). Canada-ASEAN Governance Innovations Network Programme (CAGIN). Website: www.iog.ca. 3. The Sustainable Penang Initiative: Penang Peoples Report 1999. SocioEconomic and Environmental Research Institute (SERI), Penang. For further information on the Sustainable Penang Initiative, please contact Khoo Salma Nasution, Coordinator, The Sustainable Penang Initiative, The SocioEconomic & Environmental Research Institute (SERI), No. 10, Brown Road, 10350 Penang, Malaysia. Tel: (604) 228 3306; Fax: (604) 226 7042; Email: seripg@tm.net.my; Website: www.seri.com.my/spi/index.htm.
30
CHAPTER 9:
THE UNITED NATIONS CENTRE FOR HUMAN SETTLEMENTS (UNCHS) SUSTAINABLE CITIES PROGRAMME (SCP)
www.unep.org/unon/unchs/scp/scphome.htm
The Sustainable Cities Programme is geared towards the development of a sustainable urban environment, founded on broad-based public participation. The use of urban indicators within the context of the Sustainable Cities Programme is discussed in terms of ways in which to build in-country and local capacity to collect and use indicators as an integral part of the national and local policy and development framework. The modality also focuses upon social equity in the distribution of development benefits and costs, as well as building a strategic vision in which future development options are examined and actively pursued.
31
The Environmental Management Information System (EMIS) is a tool for collecting, organising and applying information relevant to urban development and the environment. It is designed to assist in clarifying issues, formulating strategies, implementing action plans, monitoring progress and updating changes. To access EMIS, please go to www.unep.org/unon/unchs/scp/ tools/emis/index.htm.
A series of city demonstrations adapt and apply the concepts and approaches of the programme, leading to their institutionalisation at the municipal level, and their subsequent replication regionally. Cross-sectoral, issue-specific Working Groups, whose members are drawn from among the city stakeholders, are the core element in the Programme. The SCP also operates as an inter-agency programme, mobilising technical and financial resources and facilitating the implementation of technical expertise and knowledge as practical city level operations. As a global programme, the SCP encourages and assists the exchange of knowledge and expertise among cities worldwide.
The Sustainable Chennai Project is supported by the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Other partners of the initiative include Canadas International Centre for Sustainable Cities (ICSC). The priority issues of the Sustainable Chennai Project included the following: * Surface Water Pollution * Groundwater Contamination and Scarcity of Potable Water * Inadequate Solid Waste Management * Air and Noise Pollution For further information on the Sustainable Chennai Project, please contact Mr. Allauddin, IAS, Member Secretary, Project Director, Sustainable Chennai Project, 8 Gandhi Irwin Rd., Egmore, Chennai 600 008, India. Tel: (91-44) 830 802; Fax: (91-44) 842673; Email:msmmda@giasmd01.vsnl.net.in
A Sustainable City is a city where achievements in social, economic and physical development are made to last.
32
Operational support at city, national and regional levels; Development of urban environmental management tools; Networking among cities and international programmes; Information and awareness building; and Programme resource mobilisation and management.
In October 1997, all SCP projects attended the SCP 97 meeting in Shenyang, China where the focus was on the sharing of information and specialised know-how concerning the implementation of projects. In the year 2000, the annual meeting of the Sustainable Cities Programme will be held in Cape Town, South Africa.
The above information was adapted from the Sustainable Cities Programme website, which can be accessed at www.unep.org/unon/unchs/scp/scphome.htm. For further information about the Sustainable Cities Programme, please contact the Sustainable Cities Programme, UNCHS/UNEP, P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel: (254-2) 623 225 Fax: (254-2) 624 264; Email: eleanor.cody@unchs.org; Website: www.unep.org/unon/unchs/scp/scphome.htm.
33
CHAPTER 10:
WHAT IS UDLE?
UDLE...increasing the capability of municipalities to initiate and manage urban development... The Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE) programme is a joint initiative of His Majestys Government of Nepal and the Federal Republic of Germany. UDLEs main aim is to assist the municipalities of Nepal to be responsible for the management of their urban areas.
34
The core programme has three phases that extend over a period of five weeks: i. ii. iii. Entry phase: Trust, relations and awareness building Orientation and programme setting Participation analysis Diagnosis phase Situation assessment Problem assessment Possible solutions Resource assessment Implementation phase Activity analysis Activity planning Activity implementation
iv. Follow-up Activity monitoring Counseling and reinforcement The MODA approach promotes: Action Learning: Self propelled interest for improvement through internalised learning and action. Client Value: Respect for the municipal staff and elected representatives as clients. Decisions and actions are made by the clients and therefore are more sustainable. Informality and Flexibility: There are no pre-determined recommendations. The output of MODA is unique to each municipality.
3. URBAN PLANNING
According to the 1992 Municipality Act, all municipalities were required to prepare a town development plan to guide and control the process of urbanisation, but few municipalities actually have such an up-to-date plan nor can they actively practice urban planning in the absence of qualified staff. Urban Planning is therefore introduced through this particular UDLE component by using a new approach called integrated action planning (IAP). Through this method, urban development projects are identified with the participation of the people, in order to solve their most urgent needs. UDLE also assists the municipalities with local area planning, town planning legislation and by-laws as well as training in all the above fields. These projects are then matched against the available financial resources of the municipality and systematically prioritised as a multi-sector investment plan. The projects are linked to a physical and environmental development plan to guide rapid urbanisation and to coordinate the provision of roads, drainage and other municipal services. The integrated action planning process is conducted with the participation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, UDLE and the elected officials and staff of the municipalities.
35
Nepals National Policy on Solid Waste Management, 1996 The National Policy stresses that: Awareness programmes are necessary to promote peoples participation in solid waste handling; Formal education in the schools as well as nonformal education in the communities, should include adequate learning contents on solid waste handling; Simple technologies to reduce waste generation from the home, community and business establishments should be developed; and Non-governmental social organisations should be involved in waste handling efforts.
36
CONCLUSION
UDLE as a whole works towards creating municipal bodies that are better trained to administer their municipalities in a system that incorporates improved financial management practices, better urban planning methodology that allows a more systematic and appropriate spending of funds, and the increased ability to manage waste in order to conserve the natural assets, with which Kathmandu has been so richly endowed.
The above information was adapted from the following sources: 1. Urban Hygiene and Environmental Education Programmes (UHEEP). [Leaflet] Produced by the Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE) Programme. 2. Financial Management (FiMa). [Leaflet] Produced by the Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE) Programme. 3. Municipal Organisation Development and Administration (MODA). [Leaflet] Produced by the Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE) Programme. 4. Urban Planning. [Leaflet] Produced by the Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE) Programme. 5. Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE). [Leaflet] Produced by the Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE) Programme. 6. Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE). [Book] Produced by the Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE) Programme and the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ). 7. Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE) Project. UDLE Operations Fourth Implementation Phase: Mid 1998 to Mid 2001. June 1998 Edition. Produced by the Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE) Programme. 8. Report on the Project Progress Review for the project : Promotion of Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE). January/February 1998. 9. United nations Conference on Human Settlements (HABITAT II). The City Summit: 1996. Improving Environments Through Best Practices Nepal. His Majestys Government of Nepal, Ministry of Housing and Physical Planning, National Habitat II Committee. Kathmandu, Nepal 1996. For further information, please contact the Urban Development through Local Efforts (UDLE) office at P.O. Box 1457, Kathmandu, Nepal. Tel: (977-1) 482378/482969/ 482935; Fax: (977-1) 482767; Email: udle@gtz.org.np.
37
CHAPTER 11:
URBAN FORUMS
www.unescap.org/huset/forums/urbanforums_th.htm
The Urban Forum creates a platform for representatives of national and local governments, multi-lateral and bilateral agencies, non-governmental organisations, academic institutions and representatives from the private sector can meet to discuss urban issues, arrive at a common strategic vision for the city or country, and jointly develop action plans to achieve this vision. It promotes the concept of consensus orientation, where differing interests are mediated towards a conclusion that reflects the best interests of the whole group.
38
KARACHI
The Urban Resources Centre (URC) in Karachi, Pakistan, started as a group of students and teachers from the Architecture and Urban Planning Department of Dawood College of Engineering and Technology. From 1987, it met regularly to discuss and understand better the situation of Karachi as a city, and gradually expanded to include other professionals and grassroots activists until it was finally registered in 1989 under the Societies Act. It was URCs point of view that the greatest impediment to good governance and citizens participation in civic affairs was the lack of information. So URC collected and disseminated information through their regular newsletter Facts and Figures. URC also organised mass forums on public transportation , but there were difficulties in developing concrete links between government planners and civil society groups die to the fact that Karachi did not have a representative government at that time. The breakdown of law and order in the city continued to hamper their efforts at improving public participation in local governance.
39
SONGKHLA
As a result of the centralised system of government in Thailand, the local government had a limited ability to solve problems on its own, requiring instead assistance and approval from provincial and central governments. However, as Songkhla was a small city, it was relatively easy to access the local government officials and to develop partnerships with different sectors within the city. Unlike other cities, the Songkhla Municipality was not just involved in one formal urban forum but had initiated several ward-level informal forums where issues relating to a particular ward were discussed and communities and residents mobilised to participate in urban affairs. As a result of these joint activities, Songkhla was awarded the Clean City Prize for Thailand.
CONCLUSION
Urban development is the responsibility of each and every sector of the urban community and the role of the national government is to help create a cohesive, integrated and united city or town. In this light, it becomes necessary to achieve integration among different groups, perspectives and interests. It is necessary that urban forums should exist perpetually for generating collaborative efforts and learning from others experiences. These forums help disseminate information and experiences, create a basis for conflict resolution, moderate and report on consultations, collating information and data and generating an urban agenda for future consultations. The activities of the urban forum network should be closely linked with Agenda 21, with the focus on capacity building and the creation of sustainable partnerships. To date, there are several other forums that have just started anew in other countries, other than those listed below. Most of them are indigenous efforts that have been initiated solely through the efforts of local groups and organisations. Currently, these developments and the experiences of the urban forums are being documented. There is also a move towards creating what has been referred to as CivicNet, which are national and regional networks of urban forums. In addition to this, existing forums are being assisted in order to prepare State-of-the City reports in relation to the urban observatory programme of the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, UNCHS. It is envisioned that both these activities would strengthen the urban resource centre functions of the various forums.
The above information was compiled and adapted from the following sources: 1. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). New York 1996. Report and Proceedings of the Workshop on the Use of Urban Forums as Consultative Mechanisms for Urban Planning and Policy Making : Bangkok, 19-21 September 1995. United Nations. ST/ESCAP/1602. 2. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). New York 1996. Living in Asian Cities : The impending crisis- causes, consequences and alternatives for the future. Report of the Second Asia-Pacific Urban Forum. United Nations. ST/ESCAP/1660. For further information, please contact Mr. Adnan Aliani, Human Settlements Officer, ESCAP/UNCHS Joint Section on Human Settlements, Rural and Urban Development Division, ESCAP, UN Building, Rajadamnern Nok Avenue, Bangkok, Thailand. Tel: (662) 288 1234; Fax: (662) 288 1000/288 1097; Email: aliani.unescap@un.org or huset.unescap@un.org; Website: www.unescap.org/ huset/forums/urbanforums_th.htm.
40
CHAPTER 12:
The Urban Governance Initiative (TUGI) reflects and promotes all nine characteristics of good urban governance, and endeavours towards making information concerning these concepts accessible and adaptable to local authorities by enhancing the tools that are currently available to urban administrators and decision-makers. TUGI acts as a regional hub that promotes demand driven urban governance through information sharing, networking and special pilot activities within and between cities in Asia and the Pacific.
WHAT IS TUGI?
TUGI...a regional hub that promotes demand driven urban governance through information sharing, networking and special pilot activities within and between cities in Asia and the Pacific... The Urban Governance Initiative (TUGI) is a project of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) executed by the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS). Its major objective is to contribute to making cities in the Asia Pacific region more livable through strengthening capacities, promoting good governance principles, and enhancing the tools available to urban administrators and decision makers. It manages a current awareness service called Urban Links and an interactive network with key government, civil society and private sector groups working on habitat issues following the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements that was held in Istanbul, Turkey, in 1996.
THE CHALLENGE
Governments at all levels find it challenging to perform some of the priority tasks of urban governance. The nature of the state is also changing, affecting not only social welfare systems but also governance itself. The impetus for change includes democratic and administrative decentralisation of the state, local control and community empowerment. Good governance therefore requires a policy framework that mandates accountability, transparency and participation as a prerequisite for sustained change. It is in this vein that good urban governance is both a goal and a process which seeks to create an environment in which government, business, private citizens and other institutions take ownership of the management of their communities.
41
The TUGI logo consists of 3 circles and 3 arms. The 3 circles represent the essential partnership between the 3 principal stakeholders of a city government, business and c i v i l s o c i e t y. T h e 3 a r m s represent the need to address the 3 Es equity, ecology and the economy. In addition, the 3 arms, like that of a windmill, also represent the core business of TUGI capacity building, information and networking.
All good politics begin with good local politics. By bringing good governance closer to those who have elected you, by showing that honest, efficient government is possible, you are giving new life and reason to politics.
- Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the United Nations
A NEW INITIATIVE
Initiated in October 1998, The Urban Governance Initiative (TUGI) seeks to assist mayors, governors and other stakeholders in building the capacity of local governments to perform their tasks effectively. It advances the five principles for livable and sustainable cities, namely social justice, ecological sustainability, political participation, economic productivity and cultural vibrancy. TUGI is a response to the United Nations Development Programmes continuous commitment to work on urban issues, building upon its earlier investment and insights from the Urban Management Programme for Asia and the Pacific (UMPAP) and Asia Pacific 2000 (AP2000).
42
GOALS
T h e g o a l o f g o v e r n a n c e initiatives should be to develop capacities that are needed to realise development that gives priority to the poor, advances women, sustains the environment and creates needed opportunities for employment and other livelihoods.
-UNDP Initiatives for Change
The Urban Governance Initiative is directed at assisting local governments in making cities in the Asia Pacific region more livable through strengthening capacities, promoting good governance principles and enhancing the tools available to urban administrators and decision-makers. Specifically, TUGI aims towards improving the quality of urban life through developing good governance indicators, tools and methodologies as well as by identifying positive references that can enhance the capacities of local authorities. TUGI also works towards developing mechanisms to share and enhance the quality of information available on urban governance for sustainable human development in order to improve the quality of life of people throughout the region. It also provides assistance to mayors and city governments to enable them to take full advantage of the increasing flow of information and other networking mechanisms.
PROJECT STRATEGY
This project is intended to build upon what has already been done to provide capacity building support and intellectual leadership to cities of the region by targeting city leadership. Amongst other things, the project will: Support urban capacity building pilot projects leading to collaborative city level activities; Support local and regional efforts to build partnerships with a wider range of local government, civil society and private sector organisations; Act as a regional support and coordination facility for information activities on urbanisation, globalisation and urban governance throughout the Asia Pacific region, at the national and city levels.
In the year 2010, 4.2 billion of the worlds seven billion population is projected to be residing in the Asia Pacific region. About half (45%) of the GDP growth will take place in Asia. 43% of the Asian population will live in cities. Thirty three Asian cities will have populations greater than 5 million in the next millennium.
43
The above information was adapted from the TUGI Website which can be found at www.tugi.apdip.net. For further information, please contact the Programme Manager, The Urban Governance Initiative (TUGI), c/o United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Wisma UN, Kompleks Pejabat Damansara (Block C), Jalan Dungun, Damansara Heights, 50490 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tel: (603) 255 9122; Fax: (603) 253 2361; Email: tugi@undp.org or sri.sofjan@undp.org; Website: www.tugi.apdip.net.
44
CHAPTER 13:
The Urban Management Programme provides advice to local and national governments on how they can improve the management of urban development in their countries through organising city consultations in which all stakeholders can participate. In this manner, UMP promotes participation as well as efficiency and effectiveness through the adoption of exemplary urban management policies and techniques.
PARTICIPATING CITIES
Cities in the Asia Pacific region that participate in the Urban Management Programme include Lalitpur, Nepal,; Palembang and Semarang, Indonesia; Phuket, Thailand; Phuentsholing, Bhutan; Bangalore, India; Bangkok, Thailand; Colombo, Sri Lanka; Dhaka, Bangladesh; Hanoi, Vietnam; Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Lahore, Pakistan; Tianjin, Wuhan and Shenyang of the Peoples Republic of China; and Surat, India.
The above information was adapted from the UMP-Asia website at www.hsd.ait.ac.th/ump/ump.htm. For further information on UMP activities in the Asia Pacific region, please contact Nathaniel von Einsiedel, The Regional Coordinator, UNDP/UNCHS Urban Management Programme, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific c/o Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), P.O.Box 4 Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand. Tel: (66-2) 524 5779; Fax: (66-2) 524 5778; Email: ump@ait.ac.th; Website: www.hsd.ait.ac.th/ump/ump.htm; or The Regional Advisor, Mr. Ramanath Jha, South Asia, UMP-South Asia, c/o All India Institute of Local Self-Government, 2223 Institutional Area, D Block, Janakpuri, Panka Road, New Delhi 11000058, India. Tel: (91-11) 5522473; Fax: (91-11) 5500117; Email: umpsa@nda.vsnl.net.in
46
CHAPTER 14:
The WHO Healthy Cities Project promotes the development of a structure and process that works towards creating a city that is committed to health. The Project involves the development of a strategic vision for health in the urban environment, as well as encouraging innovation and change in local health policy. As such, it embodies the governance characteristic of responsiveness as well as equity because the Healthy Cities Project emphasizes health promotion strategies that recognise and mediate the interests of different groups in each community.
A Healthy City is one that is continually creating and improving those physical and social environments and expanding those community resources which enable people to mutually support each other in performing all the functions of life and in developing to their maximum potential.
47
48
Healthy Cities is a public health approach that builds upon the work of Professor T. McKeown who found that contrary to popular belief the major factor in the improvement of health in the United Kingdom and other developed countries in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries was not advances in medical care and technology, but certain social, environmental and economic changes, being: 1. Limitation of family size 2. Increase in food supplies 3. A h e a l t h i e r p h y s i c a l environment 4. Specific preventive and therapeutic measures
3. Generates inter-sectoral action, a process through which organisations working outside the health sector change their activities so that they contribute more to health. 4. Emphasises community participation by providing the means through which people have a direct influence on project decisions and on the activities of city departments and other organisations. 5. Utilises processes of innovation and creating the opportunities for innovation within a climate that supports change, as well as spreading knowledge of such innovative methods, creating incentives for innovation and recognising the achievements of those who experiment with new policies and programmes. 6. Works towards achieving healthy public policy.
49
When Kuching City agreed to participate in the WHO Healthy Cities Movement in August 1994, the City did so because it believed that the Healthy Cities Movement could provide a useful concept and approach to address the problems faced by the City. This view was further enhanced after conducting a thorough situational analysis of the City and a series of discussions among the participating agencies on whether and how to develop and implement a Healthy Cities project in the City.
50
Problems faced by Kuching included the existence of several urban slum areas, inappropriate housing, especially for workers in the construction industry, unhealthy sanitary practices at wet markets, and insufficient drainage in certain areas that have resulted in flash floods. There was also a need to improve the public transport system and the tendency for government departments to work in isolation. Some of the benefits that were hoped to be gained from participating in the Healthy Cities Movement included: 1. To be able to develop a coordinated plan to resolve the existing problems and to prevent possible future problems from occurring; 2. To make the Healthy Cities concept the methodology by which all planning and coordinating activities are carried out in future; 3. To ensure that the health and welfare of the people are given a high priority in planning; and 4. To learn from, and share experiences and ideas with other participating cities through networking. At the initiative of the Sarawak State Health Department, an invitation was issued to the Mayors of Kuching North and Kuching South to briefly introduce them to the idea and explain the concept. The first Inter-Agency Conference on Healthy City Kuching was held in November 1994. This was followed by a second similar event in March 1995, when almost all the departments and agencies that had been invited were finally convinced that they indeed have important roles to play in the Healthy City Kuching Project and were enthusiastic about it. The scope of the project included: 1. A definition of what constitutes the New Public Health policy, which is an approach that brings together environmental changes and personal preventive measures with appropriate therapeutic interventions, and emphasises the importance of lifestyles as a determinant of health; 2. The pre-requisites of health, as laid out in the Ottawa Charter; 3. The priority areas that were tackled by cities that have already started the Healthy Cities Project. The Kuching Healthy Cities project targeted three groups of community/public that needed to understand and get involved in the Project, namely ordinary citizens or the general public, private sector business establishments and non-governmental organisations. Various activities were run in order to harness the energies and enthusiasm of these three sectors, towards creating a clear common objective of making Kuching a healthy city. Since its inception in August 1996, Kuching City has achieved a number of milestones. Future steps that are to be undertaken in this initiative include: 1. To continue to implement the Healthy City Kuching Plan and identify and implement activities to solve newly identified priority problems; 2. To maintain the momentum of the Project; 3. To identify and select easily obtainable and sensitive indicators for the Project; 4. To sustain the Project in terms of technical, social, political, financial and managerial sustainability; 5. To ensure that the Healthy City Kuching Project will graduate from being just a project to being a concept, a movement and a way of planning for cities and towns in the state of Sarawak; 6. To secure the support, cooperation, and involvement of the ordinary citizends, businesses and NGOs in the Healthy City Kuching Project; and 7. To extend the Project to three major towns in Sarawak, namely, Miri, Sibu and Bintulu, under the Seventh Malaysia Plan (1996-2000). For further information on the Healthy City Kuching Project, please email huckcho@pop.jaring.my.
51
The above information was adapted from the following sources: 1. World Health Organisation, Regional Office for Europe. (1995). Twenty Steps for Developing a Healthy Cities Project. 2nd Edition, 1995. 2. World Health Organisation, Geneva. (1994) Healthy and productive lives in harmony with nature - A WHO Global Strategy for Health and Environment. WHO/EHE/94.1 3. World Health Organisation, Geneva. (1995) Building a Healthy City : A Practitioners Guide - A Step-by-step Approach to Implementing Healthy Cities Projects in Lowincome Countries. WHO/EOS/95.10 4. Beijing Municipal Health Bureau. (1997). Towards Healthy Cities - Proceedings of the International Conference on Healthy Cities, Beijing, China, 14-16 October 1996. Foreign Languages Press. 5. The WHO-Europe Regional Office Website at www.who.int.
For further information, please contact Mr. Stephen A. Tamplin, WHO Regional Officer for the Western Pacific, P.O. Box 2932, 1000 Manila, Philippines. Tel: (632) 528 8001; Fax: (632) 521 1038; Email: tamplins@who.org.ph; or Dr. Agis Tsouros, Regional Advisor, Urban Health Policy Coordinator, Healthy Cities Project Head, WHO Centre for Urban Health, Healthy Cities Project Office, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 8 Scherfigsvej, DK-2100 Copenhagen , Denmark. Tel: (45 39) 17 12 24/ 17 15 09; Fax: (45 39) 17 18 60; Email ats@who.dk; Website: www.who.dk. In addition to the above, the website of the International Healthy Cities Foundation is also very helpful and can be found at www.healthycities.org. Also check out the CityNet-WHO Collaborating Centre in Healthy Cities at www.iupui.edu/~citynet/ cnet.html, or contact them at IARCH c/o Healthy Cities, 1111 Middle Drive, Room 236, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, U.S.A. Phone: (1 317) 274-3319; Fax: (1 317) 274-2285.
52
APPENDIX I:
HE URBAN INDICATORS PROGRAMME and the Best Practice and Local Leadership Programme (BLP), together, make up the Global Urban Observatory, a United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS Habitat) facility for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the Habitat Agenda and Agenda 21. The Urban Indicators Programme is a policy and strategy development and technical cooperation programme which aims to build in-country and local capacity to collect and use indicators as an integral part of the national and local policy and development framework. Wherever possible, the indicators are intended to be part of an enabling process, measuring sector-wide progress of all actors towards achieving social goals, rather than as a narrow measure of government activity. The indicators of government activity emphasize sustainability and efficiency goals rather than simple production goals that have been a feature of government performance indicators in the past.
WHAT IS AN INDICATOR?
To access the UNCHS List of Key Indicators, please go to http://www.urbanobservatory. org/indicators/database/ An indicator is a measure that summarizes information about a particular subject and may point to particular problems. It provides a reasonable response to specific needs and questions asked by decision- and policy-makers. Indicators show trends and provide quantitative and qualitative information. They can also be more than pieces of information if designed in response to well-defined policy objectives. Policy-oriented indicators help prioritize and define targets.
SUMMARY
Indicators are not data; rather, they are models simplifying a complex subject to a few numbers, which can be easily grasped and understood by policy-makers and the general public. Indicators are statistics directed specifically towards policy concerns and which point towards successful outcomes and conclusions for policy. They are required to be user-driven and are generally highly aggregated and have easily recognizable purposes. Classic indicators include the unemployment rate or GDP growth, numbers which are powerful and immediately recognizable indicators of the performance of the economy.
53
SINCE THE ADOPTION of the HABITAT Agenda at the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II) in Istanbul, Turkey, numerous efforts have been made at the local, national and international levels to implement the Agendas recommendations. Important lessons have emerged from these experiences, as well as from experiences in the implementation of Local Agendas 21. Local plans of action (Habitat Action Plans) are possible and necessary for marketing and realising the local visions. Habitat Action Plans are local initiatives that are preferably derived from the National Habitat Plan of Action; your national or local Agenda 21; or from citywide plans and policies that aim towards improving the urban living and working environment. It may be a newly formulated plan or it may be an on-going activity. The implementation of your local vision is possible and more likely to happen if the five strategic objectives of the Habitat Agenda are applied: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Form partnerships. Adopt enabling approaches. Use the participation of all interested players. Build capacity among all partner groups. Monitor and assess your progress through networking with other groups that are undertaking similar activities.
The Local Action Plan should include the following elements: An overall vision for the future of the city; Benchmarks; Priority issues; Objectives for each issue; Programmes of action to attain the objectives; A strategy to engage civil society; A strategy with specific indicators for each objective UNCHS Habitat has established a global urban observatory system as a tool for assisting in the implementation of the Habitat Agenda worldwide. Detailed information on how to join the Global Urban observatory Network can be found in the publication: Setting up an Urban Observatory - A Guide to Joining the Global Urban Observatory Network. This document can be accessed from the following website: http://www.urbanobservatory.org/network/
54
The above information was adapted from the UNCHS-UIP website that is available at http://www.urbanobservatory.org/. For further information, please contact Dr. Jay Moor, Coordinator, The Global Urban Observatory, UNCHS (Habitat), P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel: (254 2) 623184 Fax: (254 2) 623080, 624266, 624267 E-Mail: guo@unchs.org.
55
APPENDIX 2:
HE BEST PRACTICES and Local Leadership Programme of the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements, UNCHS (Habitat) is a global effort in identifying and disseminating effective urban solutions and in developing a Best Practices Database. Introduced at Habitat II, this global effort has now consolidated with the biennial Dubai International Award for Best Practices in Improving the Living Environment and a global network of capacity building institutions dedicated to the continuous identification, analysis and application of best practice knowledge, expertise and experience at both the project and policy levels. The BLP partners network identifies initiatives in such areas as housing, urban development and governance, the environment, economic development, social inclusion, crime prevention, poverty reduction, women, youth, infrastructure and social services. Every two years, up to 10 outstanding initiatives receive the Dubai International Award for Best Practices in Improving the Living Environment. Those initiatives meeting the criteria for a Best Practice are included in the Best Practices Database. The lessons learnt from selected best practices are analyzed in case studies and guides, which are then transferred to other countries, cities or communities. The objectives of the Progamme are: To build awareness of proven solutions, demonstrated experience and innovative strategies for policy and decision-making at all levels; To develop and disseminate effective learning tools and processes for implementing local and national plans of action and the Habitat Agenda; To promote the transfer of knowledge, expertise and experience derived from Best Practices through peer-to-peer learning, transfers and cooperation. The BLP works through a decentralised network of partners including government agencies, local authorities, civic organisations, professional organisations, the private sector and training institutions. These institutions and organisations serve as regional and thematic resource centres to ensure geographic coverage and the coverage of the key sectoral and cross-cutting issues of the Habitat Agenda and of Agenda 21. BLP Partners, by virtue of their proximity to clients and users, serve as implementing agents in their respective areas of expertise. They apply the knowledge, expertise and experience derived from best practices to on-going training, capacity-building, leadership and policy development activities, and help match supply with demand for expertise. BLP partners also ensure dissemination of best practice knowledge, expertise and experience through more conventional means such as newsletters, journals, occasional papers and training materials. Together with the Urban Indicators Programme (please see Appendix 1), the BLP forms the Global Urban O b s e r v a t o r y, w h i c h i s t h e U N C H S (Habitat)s facility for monitoring global trends in sustainable urban development and evaluating progress in the implementation of the Habitat Agenda and Agenda 21. The policy implications and lessons learned from Best Practices are incorporated into Habitats State of the Worlds Cities report series.
56
The above information was adapted from the following sources: 1. CITYNET Regional Network of Local Authorities for the Management of Human Settlements. Guidelines for Transferring Effective Practices : A Practical Manual for South-South Cooperation. Commissioned by CITYNET Regional Network of Local Authorities for the Management of Human Settlements, UNDP Special Unit for Technical Cooperation among Developing Countries (TCDC), UNCHS (Habitat) Best Practices and Local Leadership Programme (BLP). The UNCHS Best Practices and Local Leadership Programme Website at http:/ /www.sustainabledevelopment.org/blp/ For further information, please contact The UNCHS Best Practices and Local Leadership Programme, Asia and the Pacific, Habitat Fukuoka Office, ACROS Fukuoka Building, 1-1-1 Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka 810, Japan. Tel: (81-92) 724 7121 Fax: (81-92) 724 7124 Email: habitat.fukuoka@unchs.org Website: http:// www.sustainabledevelopment.org/blp/
57
APPENDIX 3:
ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION (APEC) SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TRAINING & INFORMATION NETWORK
The APEC Sustainable Development Training & Information Network (APEC Network) was established by the APEC Human Resource Development Working Group to support local economy capacity building and human resource development to promote sustainable development practices among the public, non-governmental and private sectors in five priority areas: sustainable cities, sustainability of the marine environment, cleaner production/clean technology; sustainable agriculture and forestry, and energy. The APEC Network is active in promoting Local Agenda 21 (LA21) activities and provides the following services to cities undertaking LA21 initiatives training/capacity building, technical assistance, and information. Website: <http://www/apecnetwork.org> Ms. Pauli Merriman Operations Manager APEC Sustainable Development Training & Information Network One World Trade Centre, 121 SW Salmon, Suite 210 Portland, Oregon 97204, U.S.A. T: 1-503-2799565; F: 1-503-2799381 E-mail: <apecnetwork@apecnetwork.org>
ASIA URBS
The Asia Urbs programme aims to promote mutual understanding and lasting cooperation between Asia And Europe, by bringing together local governments and communities in both continents to work on the challenges of urban development issues. The programme, and the pilot partnerships it supports, creates an environment in which European and Asian local communities can work together, bringing their own ways of working and their own experience, to tackle urban problems they all face. It aims to make cities and towns better places for people living and working in them. Publication: Asia-Urbs Magazine. Website: <http://www.asia-urbs.com/> Asia Urbs Secretariat 205 rue Belliard, Bte. 8 B-1040 Brussels, Belgium. T: 32-2-2307688; F: 32-2-2306973 E-mail: <secretariat@asia-urbs.com>
58
59
60
61
62
CAPACITY 21
Capacity 21 of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) was created to assist developing countries in building their capacities to integrate the principles of Agenda 21 into national planning and development. Capacity 21 provides cities with the following support services for their local sustainability initiatives workshops, training/ capacity building, technical assistance, information, and funding. Capacity 21 supports a number of sustainable development activities at local level in the Asia Pacific region. While these programmes may not necessarily be called LA21, they are using innovative approaches to formulating sustainable development at the local level. Website: <http:/ /www.sdnp.undp.org/c21/> Ms. Anita Nirody Capacity 21, United Nations Development Programme One UN Plaza (FF-948) New York, NY 10016 U.S.A. T: 1-212-9065059; F: 1-212 906-5896 E-mail: <anita.nirody@undp.org>
63
OF
The Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto has an international urban research project to document the state of the art urban research in Asia, Africa and Latin America. The project is funded by the Ford Foundation. Dr. Richard Stern Director Centre for Urban and Community Studies University of Toronto 455 Spadina Avenue, Toronto Ontario, M5S 2G8 Canada. T: 1-416-978-4093; F: 1-416-978-7162
64
65
66
THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC (ESCAP)
The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) is the largest of five regional commissions of the United Nations, both in terms of the land area (35 million sq. km.) and the people it serves (3165 million, approximately 56% of the world population). The ESCAP/UNCHS Joint Section on Human Settlements collaborates with the regional programme of the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHSHabitat). This Section is part of the Rural and Urban Development Division. ESCAP is one of the four partners in the UNDP-funded Urban Management Programme for Asia and the Pacific (UMPAP) and works with CITYNET to implement the Intra-regional Participatory Urban Management (IPUM) component. This component fosters Technical Cooperation among Developing Countries (TCDC). The framework for ESCAPs activities is provided by the Regional Action Plan on Urbanisation in Asia and the Pacific which was adopted by the Ministerial Conference on Urbanisation which was held in October 1993. ESCAP also established an Inter-Organisational Committee on Urbanisation which facilitates cooperation and coordination in the implementation of urban-related programmes in this region. Website: <http://www.unescap.org/huset/index.html> Mr. Yap Kioe Sheng Chief, Human Settlements Section Rural and Urban Development Division ESCAP, United Nations Building Rajadamnern Avenue Bangkok 10200, Thailand. T: 66-2-2881600; F: 66-2-2881097 E-Mail: <huset.unescap@un.org>
67
HABINET NETWORK
The HABINET Network links six institutions which have institutional partnership with the Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS), Rotterdam. The network aims to strengthen the south-south cooperation between institutes in the same field of work through exchange of know-how and training opportunities which they have. They would also complement each others knowledge and experience, and also provide learning experience in other developing countries. The six institutions that form the network are the Centre for Housing Planning and Building, Sri Lanka; Centre for Housing and Human Settlement Studies, Thailand; Centre for Housing Studies, Tanzania; Centre for Popular Habitat Studies, Colombia; Indian Human Settlements Programme, Human Settlements Management Institute, India; and Training for Integrated Urban Infrastructure Development Programme, Cipta Jaya, Indonesia. Project Coordinator Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies Weena 716, P. O. Box 1935 3000 BX Rotterdam; The Netherlands. T: 31-10-4021523; F: 31-10-4045671 Dr. Kulwant Singh Human Settlement Management Institute (HSMI) F-212, Asian Games Village Complex, Khelgaon Marg New Delhi, India. T: 91-11-6493445; F: 91-11-6493726
68
with the commitments established in Agenda 21. HIC supports a Women and Shelter Network and has a Housing Rights Subcommittee. HIC operates regionally through a series of Regional Focal Points. Publication: HIC News & Women and Shelter. Mr. Eldridge Jerry Executive Secretary Habitat International Coalition (HIC) HIC Secretariat, P. O. Box 34519 Groote Schuur 7937 South Africa T: 27-21-6962205/6962207; F: 27-21-6962203 E-mail: <hic@mweb.co.za> Mr. Kirtee Shah President Habitat International Coalition (HIC) c/o Ahmedabad Study Action Group Dalal Building - Behind Capri Hotel Relief Road Ahmedabad 380 001, India. T: 91-79-7707841 F: 91-79-5507842/449997 E-mail: <asag@ad1.vsnl.net.in> Mr. Scott Leckie Executive Director COHRE International Secretariat Rue de Montbrillant, 83 1202 Geneva, Switzerland. F/T: 41-22-7341028 E-mail: <sleckie@ibm.net> Mr. Davinder Lamba c/o Mazingira Institute P. O. Box 14550 Nairobi, Kenya. T: 254-2-443219; F: 254-2-444643 Mr. Malick Gaye c/o ENDA-RUP Rue Carnot 54 B. P. 3370 Dakar, Senegal. T: 221-220942; F: 221-222695 Ms. Somsook Boonyabancha Secretary General Asian Coalition for Housing Rights (ACHR) 73 Soi Sonthiwattana 4, Ladprao Road Bangkok 10310, Thailand. T: 66-2-5380919; F: 66-2-5399950 E-mail: <achrsec@email.ksc.net> Mr. Philippe Debry c/o Habitat et Participation 1, Place du Levant B-1348 Louvain-la Neuve Belgium. T: 32-10-472314; F: 32-10-472179 Mr. Alejandro Florian c/o FEDEVIVIENDA Ave. Calle 40, 15-69 Apartado Aereo 57059 Bogot, Colombia. T: 571-2880711; F: 571-2871941 Mr. Stephen Hodges c/o Construction Resource and Development Centre 11 Lady Musgrave Avenue Kingston 5, Jamaica. T: 1-809-978-4061; F: 1-809-978-4062 Mr. Randy Sach c/o Rooftops Canada Foundation 22 Mowat Ave., Suite 100 Toronto, Ontario M6K 3E8, Canada. T: 1-416-538-7511; F: 1-416-538-7523
69
70
71
72
IIED-AMERICA LATINA
IIED has a Latin America counterpart office called IIED-America Latina. Its work extends beyond that of the Human Settlements Programme. In addition to work outlined already, recent projects have included a study of sustainable development in Argentina prepared for the Earth Summit (the 1992 United Nations Conference in Environment and Development). The Institute has undertaken a three year programme throughout Latin America of training workshops and seminars for government officials and for the managerial and technical staff of non-governmental organisations who work in low-income settlements. IIED-America Latina has a long-term commitment to support community organisations in a low-income district in the outskirts of Buenos Aires. Publication: Medio Ambiente y Urbanizacion. IIED-America Latina Piso 6, Cuerpo A Corrientes 2835 1193 Buenos Aires, Argentina. T: 54-1-9613050; F: 54-1-9611854
73
IULA Africa Section Public Service Association Bldg 9 Livigstone Avenue Harare Zimbabwe T/F: 263-4-726289
IULA Latin America Agustin Guerrero 219 y Pacifico Chiriboga P. O. Box 1701-1109 Quito, Equador. T: 593-2-469365; F: 593-2-435205 IULA - North America c/o Federation of Canadian Municipalities 24 Clarence Street, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1N 5P3. T: 1-613-2415221; F: 1-613-2417440
IULA East Mediterranean & Middle East Sultanahmet Yerebatan Cad. 2 Istanbul Turkey. T: 90-212-5111010; F: 90-212-5190060 IULA Europe 41, Quai dOrsay 75007 Paris, France. T: 33-1-45514001; F: 33-1-47059743
74
THE NETWORK OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRAINING AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC (LOGOTRI)
The Network of Local Government Training and Research Institutes in Asia and the Pacific (LOGOTRI) is a network of training and research institutes in the region whose primary focus is on training and research in local government. It was established under an ESCAP project in March 1999. LOGOTRI has a membership of 22 institutes and organizations from 12 countries in the region. Mr. Girija Prasad Gorkhaly Coordinator of LOGOTRI Urban Development Training Centre Nagar BikaPrashishen Kendra Bagar, Pokhara Nepal. T: 977-61-20282; F: 977-61-20146/20098 E-mail: <urbannet@udtc.mos.com.np>
75
76
PERI-URBAN NETWORK
The network aims to encourage specialists in water and environmental sanitation in peri-urban settings to share common issues, concerns, and lessons learned from project successes and failures. Its objectives are to promote information sharing, create a forum for discussing common issues and lessons learned, and increase knowledge about peri-urban water and environmental sanitation by learning more from field workers. Publication: Peri-Urban News. Mr. Dan Campbell Water and Sanitation for Health Project 1611 N Kent Street, Room 1001 Arlington, Virginia 22209-2111, U.S.A. T: 703-243-8200; F: 703-243-9004
THE REGIONAL HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OFFICE (RHUDO) - USAID
The United States Agency for International Developments (USAID) Regional Housing and Urban Development Programme administers the Housing Guarantee Programme as well as grant funded technical assistance, research and training activities. The Housing Guarantee Programme provides financing and technical assistance for low -cost housing initiatives such as sites-and-services and core housing; urban neighbourhood infrastructure; municipal facilities, and financial and technical management skills through training for municipal administrative and technical staff. Mr. William Frej RHUDO/USAID American Embassy Jln Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110, Indonesia. T: 62-21-360360; F: 62-21-3806694 E-mail: <wfrej@usaid.gov> Ms. Julie Otterbein Regional Housing and Urban Development Office for Asia USAID 37 Soi 15 Phetchaburi Road Bangkok 10400, Thailand. T: 66-2-255-2650; F: 66-2-255-3730 Mr. Earl Kessler Regional Housing and Urban Development Office (RHUDO/New Delhi) c/o USAID New Delhi B-28 Institutional Area New Mehrauli Road (Near Qutab Hotel) New Delhi 110 016, India. T: 91-11-686-5301; F: 91-11-686-8594
77
MANAGEMENT
CITYNET is a network of cities, NGOs and CBOs which aims to promote the creation of conditions and appropriate mechanisms for communities to plan and manage their own settlements and environment. It serves as a catalyst to encourage partnerships for technical exchange of expertise among local authorities, NGOs and grassroots organisations in Asia and the Pacific. It also contributes to selfreliant development and international understanding among its members. Publication: City Voice. Website: <http://www2.itjit.ne.jp/~citynet/> Ms.. Bernadia Irawati Tjandradewi Programme Manager CITYNET Secretariat 5F International Organisation Centre Pacifico-Yokohama 1-1 Minato Mirai, Nishi-ku Yokohama 220, Japan. T: 81-45-223-2161; F: 81-45-223-2162 E-mail: <citynet@po.iijnet.or.jp>
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT ACTION NETWORK FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC (SUSTRAN)
The Sustainable Transport Action Network for Asia and the Pacific (SUSTRAN) is a network of interested government officials, transport and urban planners, NGO representatives, academicians and others which was set up to respond to the challenges of transportation planning and management in the region. SUSTRAN taps into the expertise of many civil organisations and it represents the interests of thousands including its own membership and its affiliated organisations. SUSTRAN calls for encouraging full-cost accounting of private motor travel, promoting public transportation, limiting urban sprawl, fairly allocating road space, and improving access for bicyclists and pedestrians. Publication: News-Flashes & Streets for People. Website: <http://www.malaysiakini.com/sustran/> Mr. Bambang Santono Coordinator Sustainable Transport Action Network for Asia and the Pacific (SUSTRAN) c/o PELANGI Jalan Danau Tandono A-4 Jakarta 10210, Indonesia.. Tel: 62-21-5735020/5732503; Fax: 62-21-571 9360 E-Mail: <bsantono@pelangi.or.id> Mr. Abdul Rahman Paul Barter Director Information and Research SUSTRAN Resource Centre P. O. Box 11501 50748 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. T/F: 603-22742590 E-Mail: <sustran@po.jaring.my>
78
79
80
Ms. Joana Merlin-Scholtes Chief - Regional Programme and Policy Division Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific United Nations Development Programme One United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017, U.S.A. T: 1-212-9065838; F: 1-212-9065898 E-mail: <joana.merlin-scholtes@undp.org> Mr. Jonas Rabinovitch Senior Urban Advisor Management Development and Governance Division Bureau for Programme Planning and Support United Nations Development Programme One United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017, U.S.A. T: 1-212-9065780/906 6791; F: 1-212-9066471 E-mail: <jonas.rabinovitch@undp.org> Mr. Phillips J. Young Resident Representative United Nations Development Programme P. O. Box 12544, 50782 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. T: 603-2559122; F: 603-2552870 E-mail: <phillips.young@undp.org>
81
Professor Yap Kioe Sheng c/o Urban Management Centre Human Settlements Development Programme Asian Institute of Technology G. P. O. Box 2754 Bangkok 10501, Thailand. T: 66-2-5245610; F: 66-2-5162126/5246132 E-Mail: <umc@ait.ac.th> Ms. Marlene Fernandes Instituto Brasileiro de Administracao Municipal Largo IBAM, Humaita 22271-070 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil. Tel: 55-21-5377595; Fax: 55-21-5371262 E-mail: <marlene@ibam.org.br>
82
83
84
WATERWATCH ASIA
WaterWatch Asia is a light action oriented participatory network to exchange information and facilitate advocacy amongst civil society groups concerned about water resources and management. WaterWatch Asias activities include producing a resource book that will help NGOs to correct policies as well as undertake specific activities like rapid mapping of water deficient areas and quick and clean tests on the quality of water; developing and updating an NGO Bulletin Board and Web-site on water issues; developing a programme linking NGOs with UN efforts in this area particularly that of the Global Water Partnership supported by UNDP. Water Watch Penang c/o Socio-economic and Environment Research Centre (SERI) 10 Lorong Brown 10350 Penang Malaysia. T: 604-2283306; F: 604-2267042 E-mail: <seripg@tm.net.my>
85
WISE-CITIES NETWORK
The Wise-Cities Network is a new global network of local initiatives and visions that bring into practice ideals for a better city life . It aims to facilitate communication, inspire and strengthen organisations and individuals involved in tangible and direct initiatives and activities for the improvement of the local urban situation; to stimulate linkages among emancipatory movements; and to influence changes in policies of local and national governmental institutions regarding urban processes. Michel Ligthart World Information Service on Energy Wise-Cities International P. O. Box 18185 1001 ZB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. T: 31-20-639-2681; F: 31-20-639-1379
86
87
APPENDIX 4:
Centre for Human Settlements, University of British Columbia. : http://www.interchange.ubc.ca.chs/ This site contains information about the Centres research projects and a list of available publications. Centre for new Town development Studies, De Montfort University, United Kingdom. : http://www.mk.dmu.ac.uk/depts/benv/cntds/ The Change Project: Healthy Cities/Healthy Communities : http://www.well.com/user/bbear/hc_articles.html Articles on building healthy cities and communities can be found here. The Citistates Group : http://www.citistates.com/ The Citistates Group a network of journalists, speakers and consultants who believe that successful metropolitan regions are todays key to economic competitiveness and sustainable communities. City of Bits Online : http://www-mitpress.mit.edu/City_of_Bits/ This is William J. Mitchells (dean of the School of Architecture and Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology) book City of Bits on-line. This site is not only important for planners but also relevant for the face of city due to the modern age of electronics and information. City Development Strategies Initiative (CDSI). : http://www.citydev.org CDSI is a development practice that works with the authorities responsible for the major urban areas of Latin America, Africa and Asia. It has an online facility which allows case studies and examples of best practice be shared to achieve wide-scale global exposure. City Informatisation Initiative of UN-DESA and UNDP : http://www.apcity.org A regional initiative to promote the usage of information communication technologies (ICT) at the city level to improve urban governance and management. CityNet : http://www2.itjit.ne.jp/~citynet CityNet is a network promoting local urban improvement initiatives in the Asia Pacific region. Concept 5 : http://www.concept-5.com An exploration of Japan and the city of Tokyo- the architecture, culture, urban living, technology, observation. The Creative Town Initiative : http://www.creativetown.com The Cyber City Initiative. : http://www.cc.inet.ab.ca/city-of-gp/ccy_ini.htm#Table_of_Contents This site looks at the ways we might best prepare a city (example given City of Grande Prairie, Canada) and its residents for the Information Age and how one can exploit information for economic and general benefits. It also contains information relevant for future planning. The Development Planning Unit (DPU) of London Strategic Environmental Planning and Management website. : http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/pui List of various research information and discussion groups related to environment planning and management. Development Resource Centre, New Zealand. : http://www.drc.org.nz The Dubai International Award for Best Practices in Improving the Living Environment (DIABP). : http://www.sustainabledevelopment.org/blp/wards Eco Hab International (EHI). : http://www.panix.com/~urbanomi/ecohab.html EHI is a service corporation committed to promoting the organization, financing, planning, building and management of environmentally sustainable, affordable communities. Environment Australia : http://www.ea.gov.au The site of the Department of Environment and Heritage, Australia. GalingPook Awards : http://www.galongpook.org This site features excellent and innovative practices of local government in the Phillippines. Gender in Development Programme of UNDP : http://www.undp.org/gender/ 90
: http://www.Australia.EU.net/gv95/e_index.html A site of a project that studies the human habitat of the future, where telematics and information technology enable us to create smaller communities that feature more diversity, sustainability and open natural spaces. Global Urban Observatory Initiative of UNCHS (Habitat). : http://www.unhabitat.org/guo/index An initiative made up of the Urban Indicators Programme and the Best Practices and Local Leadership Programme. Government Performance Measures/Benchmarking http://financenet.gov/financenet/start/topic/perf.htm This site is built into FinanceNet, the Internets home for public financial management workdwide. Governments on the World Wide Web. : http://www.gksoft.com/govt/ Habitat Advice and Research Platform. : http://harp.antenna.nl/ Habitat in Developing Countries : http://obelix.polito.it/forum/links/ The site contains information on improving the habitat in developing countries including housing, architecture, urban design, building-infrastructures, planning, Habitat II, environment, and many more. Healthy Cities Programme of the World Health Organisation (WHO) : http://www2.unimaas.nl/~who-city/ Human Settlements in Asia : http://www.hsd.ait.ac.th/ The site of the Human Settlements Department (HSD) of the Asian Institute of technology (AIT). Information available from this iste includes statistics on 13 largest cities in Asia, new publications on Human Settlements in Asia with annotated bibliography, findings of research and publication of the HSD. Human Settlements Issues in Asia and the Pacific. : http://www.unescap.org/huset/index.html This site contains information on human settlements issues in Asia and the Pacific and on activities of the ESCAP/UNCHS Joint Section on Human Settlements. Human Settlements Programme of the Institute of Environment and Development (IIED). : http://www.iied.org/eandu IIED is an independent, international non-profit organisation which promotes sustainable patterns for Third World development with a particular focus in the rights and needs of the poor. The Institute has research programmes in a number of areas critical to sustainable development including human settlements, sustainable agriculture, forestry, dry lands, environmental economics, climate change and southern networks. Indigenous Knowledge Initiative. : http://www.worldbank.org/html/afr/ik The site of a World Bank program designed to preserve and exchange indigenous knowledge of development practices in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Innovations Group : http://www.og.org A network of top cities and local government leaders that provides support services like research, training, publications, programmes and networking opportunities necessary to pioneer new approaches in managing cities. A learning organization and community on benchmarking and best practices. Institute of Government : http://www.ncinfo.iog.unc.edu/ This Institute which is based in the University of North Carolina, is the largest and most diversified university-based local government training, consulting and research organisation in the U.S.A. Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS) : http://www.his.nl IHS is one of the largest institutes in Europe specializing in housing, urban environmental management and urban management in Asia, Africa, Latin America, Central and Eastern Europe. Institute for Sustainable Futures (ISF), University of Technology, Sydney. : http://www.isf.uts.edu.au ISF works with people and organizations to develop sustainable futures. In partnership with industry, government and the community, ISF applies its transdisciplinary expertise to reseach and develop training programmes. Institute for Sustainable and Development Policy (ITDP) : http://www.itdp.org
91
Institute for Sustainability and Technology Policy (ISTP), Murdoch University, Australia. : http:www.istp.murdoch.edu.au/istp.htm The Inter-Agency Benchmarking & Best Practices Council : http://va.gov/fedsbest The Councils vision is to serve as a resource for leveraging information and knowledge on benchmarking and best practices using the World Wide Web. International City/Country Management Association (ICMA) : http://www.icma.org ICMA is a professional and educational organization representing appointed managers and administrators in local governments throughout the world. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) : http://www.iclei.org ICLEI is an association of local governments dedicated to the prevention and solution of local, regional and global environment problems through local action. Approximately 300 cities, town. Counties and their associations from around the world are members of the council. International Healthy Cities Foundation : http://www.healthycommunities.com International Labour Office (ILO). : http://www.ilo.org/enterprise International Local Government Home Page. : http://world/localgov.org A Clearinghouse for information on local government and its organizations globally, with links to home pages around the world. International Society for City and Regional Planners (ISOCARP). : http://titsoc.soc.titec.ac.jp.80/isocarp Includes information on ISOCARPs projects, membership, publications, events and links to other international planning resources. The International Union of Local Authorities (IULA) : http://www.iula.org Istanbul+5 : http://www.istanbul5.org This is the home page of the Istanbul+5 Conference and all preparatory information and documents related to it. Library of Congress State and Local Government Websites : http://lcweb.loc.gov/global/state/stategov.html The Library of Congress Internet Resource page for state and local government websites. Local Government Institute : http://www.lgi.org/ An independent, nonprofit organisation dedicated to improving the quality of local government. The Local Initiative Facility for Urban Environment (LIFE) programme of UNDP : http://magnet.undp.org/ The programme is part of a worldwide initiative by UNDP to promote local dialogues and practical action to improve the living condition in low-income urban communities. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. : http://www.lincolninst.edu/lincoln A site of a non-profit educational institution that seeks to disseminate information on land and tax policy issues throughout the world through research, courses, conference, and publications. The site also as an on-line version of its Landlines Newsletter. Local Government Network : http://www.localgov.org An on-line resource for city. Country and state government innovators. Localising Agenda 21 Initiative of UNCHS. : http://www.unchs.org/habrdd/capagd21.htm This is a programme that responds to Chapter 28 of Agenda 21, where local authorities are called upon to develop and implement a Local Agenda 21 with their communities. Micro-enterprise Unit of the Inter-American Development Bank. : http://www.iadb.org/sds/mic/ The Municipal Forum : http://www.munisource.org The largest collection of municipal government related information on the web, with direct links to over 2,700 official municipal sites in 26 countries. The National Community Building Network : http://www.ncbn.org/ The Network is an alliance of locally driven urban initiatives working to reduce poverty and create social and economic opportunity through comprehensive community-building strategies. 92
: http://www.nlc.org/ The National League of Cities is the largest and most representative organisation in the U.S.A. serving municipal governments. Through the League, mayors and city council members join together to establish unified policy positions, advocate these policies forcefully and share information that strengthens municipal government throughout the nation. News and Events related to Urban Governance, Sustainable Development, Best Practices. : http://www.sustainabledevelopment.org/blp/news OECD : http://www.oecd.org One World-Virtual Gateway : http://www.oneworld.org A site that list the world of non-governmental organizations. PanAsia Site for Regional Networking. : http://www.panasia.org.sg/index2.htm Partner Cities Network : http://www.citydev.org/cities/ A site developed by the City Development Strategies Initiative (CDSI) which enables citis to list their website at the most comprehensive collection of local government websites available. Planning Schools. : http://www.his.nl/ The site of the Institute of Housing and Urban Development Studies in Rotterdam, Netherlands. Regional Studies Association (RSA) : http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk Home Page of the RSA. Regional Studies Home Page at the University of Sussex : http://geosun.geog.susx.ac.uk:80/regional_studies/regional.html Research on Links between Crime and Neighbourhood Design and Urban Development. : http://www.spacesyntax.com Sister Cities International : http://www.sister-cities.org Sister Cities International is the national membership organization for sister city, country and state programmes in the United States. As the premier citizen diplomacy network in the United States it leads the national movement for global community partnerships and volunteer action. State and Public Administration Reform (Conference). : http://clad.org.ve/congre4i.html The Society of Writers on the Environment and Development : http://www.swed.org.eg Sustainable Cities Programme (SCP) of UNCHS. : http://www.unchs.org/scp/scphome.htm SCP is a joint UNCHS/UNEP programme that works towards the development of a sustainable urban environment, building capacities in urban environmental planning and management, and promoting a broad-based participatory process. Sustainable Communities Network : http://www.sustainable .org This site offers information to help make communities more livable and to increase the visibility of successful community projects in the U.S.A> and other countries. It covers a wide range of issues related to community sustainability, including creating community, smart growth, growing a sustainable economy, protecting natural resources, and governance. The Sustainable Penang Initiative (SPI) : http://www.seri.com.my Sustainable Transport Action Network for Asia and the Pacific (SUSTRAN) : http://www.malaysiakini.com/sustran/ The site for the network that promotes and popularizes people centred, equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on Asia and the Pacific. U.S. Conference of Mayors : http://www.usmayors.org/uuscm/ The U.S. Conference of Mayors is the official nonpartisan organisation of cities with populations of 30,000 or more. Conference of Mayors members speak with a united voice on matters pertaining to organizational policies and goals. Individually, each member-mayor contributes to development of national urban policy through service on one or more of the organisations 10 standing committees. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS - Habitat) : http://habitat.unchs.org/home.htm 93
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) : http://www.undp.org United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO.) : http://www.unesco.org UNESCO Cities for Peace Prize. : http://www.unesco.org/culture/citiesforpeace UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre. : http://www.unep.or.jp/ A site that lists information on environmentally sound technologies to address urban environmental problems. United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM). : http://www.undp.org/unifem/ Urban Environment Forum of UNCHS : http://www.unchs.org/uef Urban Environmental Management Research Initiative (UEMRI). : http://www.soc.titech.ac.jp.uem Urban Futures. : http://sunsite.wits.ac.za/urbanfutures Urban Indicators Programme of UNCHS(Habitat) : http://www.unhabitat.org.guo/uip.htm#uip The Urban Governance Initiative (TUGI) : http://www.tugi.apdip.net TUGI is a project of UNDP and is executed by the United Nations Office for Project services (UNOPS). Its major objective is to contribute to making cities in the Asia Pacific region more liveable through strengthening capacities, promoting good governance principles, and enhancing the tools available to urban administrators and decision makers. Urban Management Programme For Asia and the Pacific (UMP-Asia) : http://www.hsd.ait.ac.th/ump/ The site of a global technical cooperation Programme of the United Nations, executed by UNCHS (Habitat), with core funding from UNDP, and several bilateral agencies. UMP-Asia is working in 14 cities in the Asia Pacific region. Western New York Regional Information Network : http://www.rin.buffalo.edu An overview of some of the newest innovations in public service delivery. WomenAction : http://www.womenaction.org/ WomenAction is a global information, communication and media network that enables NGOs to actively engage in the Beijing review process with the long term goal of womens empowerment, and special focus on women and communications. The Women & Habitat Programme of UNCHS. : http://www.unchs.org/unchs/english/women/womenbody.htm World Academy for Local Governance and Democracy (WALD). : http://www.waldacademy.org/organization.htm World Bank Urban Development Home Page : http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/urban/ World Bank Global Knowledge Partnership : http://www.globalknowledge.org/ World Directory Of Development Organizations : http://clausius.energ.polimi.it/development/
94
APPENDIX 5:
Muscat, Oman Islamabad, Pakistan Waigani, Papua New Guinea Beijing, Peoples Republic of China Manila, Philippines Doha, Qatar Seoul, Republic of Korea Sanaa, Yemen Apia, Samoa Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Singapore Colombo, Sri Lanka Damascus, Syria Bangkok, Thailand Apia, Tokelau (Western Samoa) Nukualofa, Tonga Ankara, Turkey Funafuti, Tuvalu Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Port Vila, Vanuatu Hanoi, Viet Nam
Panzhihan Baishan Chengdu Guangzhou Tongchuan Chizhou Hefei Yiohang Jiaxing Huzhou Wuxi Yixing Hangzhuo Dafeng Qingdao INDIA Bangalore Bombay Delhi Madras Mysore Ahmedabad Belgaum Bhopal Panaji-Goa Vadodara Jhansi Orchha Hyderabad Chandigarh Khajuraho Nagpur Chikniakhali Shillong INDONESIA Bandung Jakarta Surabaya Tana Toraja Semarang Balikpapan Sukoharjo Wonosobo Saensuk City MALAYSIA Petaling Jaya Miri Kuantan Kerian PHILIPPINES Metro Manila Guimaras Iloilo City Boracay Island
4. LOCAL AGENDA 21
CHINA Shanghai Zhangjiagang Beijing Hubei Guizhou Hebei Henan Shanxi Jiangxi Sichuan Shannxi Anhui Fujian Tianjin Liaoning Jiling Shandong Jiangsu Yunnan Zhejiang Giunangdong Chongging Ganslu Inter-Mongolian Autonomous Region Guanxi Xinjiang Benxi Changzhou Nanyang Shenyang Wuhan Dalian
95
Baguio City Dagupan City Cebu City San Jose del Monte Puerto Princessa City Naga City Mandaue City Tacloban City Zamboanga City General Santos City Ilo Ilo Bulacan Bohol Makati City Imus Municipality Batangus Mandaue Irosin Municipality Cavite Laguna Davao Lipa Tagbilaran Cagayan de Oro SRI LANKA Colombo Kandy THAILAND Bangkok Songkhla Lamphan Phayao Chieng Mai Nong Khai Samut Prakan Trad Paak Phanang Phuket Choubuti Pattaya Dhuket Hat Yai Udon Thani Chonburi City Lamphoon Pitsanulok Nakorn Ratchasima Khonkaen Nonthaburi Rayong Sri Racha Laemchabang Saensuk Thakam KOREA Kumi City
96
8. URBAN FORUMS
Bangkok, Thailand Songkhla, Thailand Nakorn Srithamarat, Thailand Nakorn Suwan, Thailand Nakorn Ratchasima, Thailand Hat Yai, Thailand Phuket, Thailand Chiang Mai, Thailand Surat Thani, Thailand Bangalore, India Mysore, India Bombay, India Karachi, Pakistan Rawalpindi, Pakistan Kuching, Malaysia Cebu, Philippines
Unley Whyalla Wanneroo Stirling CAMBODIA Phnom Penh CHINA Beijing Shanghai Chongqing Haikou Baoding Dalian JAPAN Tokyo (and 96 others, but not specified) LAO PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC Vientiane MALAYSIA Johor Bahru Kuching Melaka MONGOLIA Ulaanbaatar Darkhan NEW ZEALAND Manukau Otago Nelson North Shore Wanganui Masterton Porirua Lower Hutt Gibson REPUBLIC OF KOREA Kwachun VIETNAM Haiphong Hue COOK ISLANDS Rarotonga FIJI Kadavu Island Ovalau Island Suva Sigatoka
KIRIBATI NAURU NIUE PAPUA NEW GUINEA Morobe Mt. Hagen Madang Port Moresby SAMOA SOLOMAN ISLANDS Honiara Town TONGA Vavau Island TUVALU
INDONESIA Bandung Surabaya Banjarmasin Semarang Medan Jakarta IRAN Mashad Tehran NEPAL Biratnagar Bharatpur Kathmandu Pokhara PAKISTAN Lahore PHILIPPINES Davao Metro Manila Cebu SRI LANKA Colombo
If you have any additional information, corrections or would like to add new cities to the above list, please contact: The Programme Manager, The Urban Governance Initiative (TUGI), c/o United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Wisma UN, Kompleks Pejabat Damansara (Block C), Jalan Dungun, Damansara Heights, 50490 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tel: (603) 255 9122; Fax: (603) 253 2361; Email: tugi@undp.org; Website: http://www.tugi.apdip.net.
97
Rule of Law
Legal frameworks should be fair and enforced impartially, particularly the laws on human rights.
Transparency
Transparency is built on the free flow of information. Processes, institutions and information are directly accessible to those concerned with them, and enough information is provided to understand and monitor them.
Responsiveness
Institutions and processes try to serve all stakeholders.
Consensus Orientation
Good governance mediates differing interests to reach a broad consensus on what is in the best interest of the group and, where possible, on policies and procedures.
Equity
All men and women have opportunities to improve or maintain their well-being.
Accountability
Decision-makers in government, the private sector and civil society organisations are accountable to the public, as well as to institutional stakeholders. This accountability differs depending on the organisation and whether the decision is internal or external to an organisation.
Strategic Vision
Leaders and the public have a broad and long-term perspective on good governance and human development, along with a sense of what is needed for such development. There is also an understanding of the historical, cultural and social complexities in which that perspective is grounded.
TUGI
The Urban Governance Initiative (TUGI) c/o The United Nations Development Programme Wisma UN, Kompleks Pejabat Damansara (Block C) Jalan Dungun, Damansara Heights 50490 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tel: (603) 255 9122 Fax: (603) 253 2361 E-mail: tugi@undp.org Website: www.tugi.apdip.net
ACTION
FOR
TOOLS
AND FOR
BETTER CITIES
METHODOLOGIES
ACTION ACTION
FOR
TOOLS
AND
METHODOLOGIES
FOR
TOOLS
AND
METHODOLOGIES
FOR
100
101