Professional Documents
Culture Documents
116
Daily
By ElizaBEth carr Senior Staff Writer
the Brown
Chafee 75 From Ivy League wild child to Harvard-lite asks DEA to Brown once relished its niche as the undergrad Ivy. Today, it is acutely aware of peer competitors loosen pot and is becoming more like them. restrictions
By Sahil luthra and Emma Wohl Senior Staff Writer and Contributing Writer
Herald
Since 1891
place among Americas elite colleges. But according to Dean of Admission Jim Miller 73 the man
Gov. Lincoln Chafee 75 P14 and Christine Gregoire, governor of Washington, filed a petition with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration to request that marijuana be reclassified as a Schedule II controlled substance, allowing it to be prescribed in states that legalized medical marijuana.
In 1946, President Henry Wriston wrote in a letter to the Corporation that Browns defining feature was its status as a university-college an undergraduate-centric institution focused on the liberal arts with the resources of a large university. The term which has found its way into the Universitys mission statement established a unique niche for Brown in the world of higher education, attracting a specific breed of students and professors. For decades, it defined Browns
Mission drift?
Part 3 of a 4-part series
perhaps most attuned to Browns position relative to its peers and its niche within academia Brown continued on page 4
The University has long embraced its comfortable niche in academia defined by the university-college model and the New Curriculum. But recent changes have tended to bring Brown in line with other Ivies, and it is positioning itself more and more to take rivals like Harvard head-on.
Students discussed the need for a community-based University mission statement at last nights Janus Forum Town Hall event, The Search for Browns Next President. Its high time for students to rally together and redefine Browns values, said Simon Liebling 12, one of three panelists at the event, which drew about 30 students. Liebling and fellow panelists Samuel Howard 14 and Paul Tran 14 cited three documents that have
outlined the Universitys mission: former President Henry Wristons letter describing a university-college, the New Curriculum and the cornerstone of President Ruth Simmons term, the Plan for Academic Enrichment. But Liebling, a Herald opinions columnist, said the PAE does not outline goals for the University. Rather, it looks at tactics, ignoring questions of what Brown should prioritize and what it should sacrifice. He also criticized the plans top-down imposition, contrasting it with grassroots initiatives like
the New Curriculum or the student debate about athletics. But Howard noted the value of the PAE and said it has faced little to no community resistance, which he suggested indicates students are comfortable with the direction the University is going. He said he would only try to unite undergraduate and graduate programs to make a more dynamic relationship between the two and move funding from hard sciences to humanities for a more equitable division of resources. The discussion then turned to
the question of what kind of mission statement the presidential search should require whether it should be a new document to replace the New Curriculum, a rewritten and expanded version of the existing document or a brief statement outlining Browns values. Howard questioned the practicality of radically reevaluating the Universitys entire mission during a presidential search. But Liebling said practical concerns should not override the necessity for a new continued on page 3
How confident or worried are you about getting a desirable job after graduation?
Corner office or a corner in your parents basement? Students reported varying levels of confidence in their ability to obtain a desirable job after graduation in a recent Herald poll.
percent are male and 10.6 percent are female. About 18.2 percent said they are neither worried nor confident. Despite a 9 percent unemployment rate nationwide, we dont see Brown students in a state of wholesale unemployment, said Andrew Simmons, director of the CareerLAB. It doesnt matter if the economy is bad or good, its inevitable that this is a very anxious time for anyone, getting towards the end of college, he said. Our basic message is always the same, which is youve gotten a great education at Brown, youve got great skills. But many students are concerned about the job market. Its a really tough market, and theres lots of competition, said Evan Gill 12, an economics concentrator. Many students also said they
think career advising at Brown could be improved. Theres no one organized place where I can see all the advising and find someone to help me pinpoint what I want to do and explore career opportunities, Gill said. Some seniors have already found jobs. Drew Kunas 12 interned as a quantitative analyst at Two Sigma Investments LLC over the summer and was offered a job there. Kunas is an applied math concentrator, and he said he thinks his rigorous concentration coursework made him an attractive hire. Hard sciences are more career practical, he said. Anny Li 15 also said she saw a discrepancy in the degree to which concentrations prepare students for the job market. I continued on page 3
inside
weather
Just Jerking
Public masturbators are within rights
OPiniOns, 7
t o d ay
tomorrow
50 / 30
52 / 31
MENU
SHARPE REFECTORY Chicken Pot Pie, Falafel with Pita and Tzatziki, Fried Tortillas, Green Peas VERNEY-WOOLLEY DINING HALL LUNCH Cavatini, Enchilada Bar, Falafel in Pita, Marinated Cucumbers, Grilled Montreal Chicken
DINNER Cheese Tomato Strata, Cajun Corn and Tomatoes, Beef Strips Shish Kabob, Frosted Brownies BBQ Chicken, Cajun Pasta, Cheese Souffle, Saffron Rice Pilaf, Frosted Brownies
SUDoKU
CR oSSWoRD
The Rhode Island Board of Elections is revising a proposal to ban voters and poll workers from carrying political paraphernalia such as T-shirts, buttons and pins within 50 feet of state polling places. If the ban were enacted, individuals could be asked to conceal political paraphernalia while at the polling place, said Ray Marcaccio, the boards attorney. He said that no one, under any condition, would be restricted from voting due to the ban. The purpose of the ban is to
make sure that when you go into the polling place, you do so without any unnecessary campaign activity, Marcaccio said. You have a place to quietly think and exercise your vote. The boards commissioners rejected the proposal Nov. 8, when one of them objected to its lack of clarity on enforcement. Board of Elections staff, who are currently redrafting the proposal, aim to present a version to the boards commissioners for ratification at the end of January, said Bob Rapoza, director of elections for the board. One thing we would address in
Daily
the Brown
Herald
Matthew Burrows, Treasurer Isha Gulati, Secretary
The Brown Daily Herald (USPS 067.740) is an independent newspaper serving the Brown University community daily since 1891. It is published Monday through Friday during the academic year, excluding vacations, once during Commencement, once during Orientation and once in July by The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. Single copy free for each member of the community. POSTMASTER please send corrections to P.O. Box 2538, Providence, RI 02906. Periodicals postage paid at Providence, R.I. Subscription prices: $280 one year daily, $140 one semester daily. Copyright 2011 by The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. All rights reserved.
eDIToRIAl
BuSIneSS
the next draft is that the purpose of the regulation would not be to prohibit one from voting, Marcaccio said. Similar regulations already exist across the country. Passive electioneering the term commonly used to represent the practice of influencing individuals votes through conscious decisions like personal dress and action is already prohibited in six states. Theres history here, said Wendy Schiller, associate professor of political science. The idea behind the ban, she said, is over 100 years old. Still, groups like the American Civil Liberties Union have opposed restrictions on passive electioneering, calling them an infringement of First Amendment rights. But in 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the inside of a polling place is not a public forum and therefore the restrictions do not violate the First Amendment. The benefit of having a neutral voting space as regulated by the proposal is not a violation of free speech that cannot be tolerated by society, Schiller said. New technologies further complicate the debate, Marcaccio said. He suggested that cell phones, iPads and laptops all easily portable items present a danger to neutral voting, because people can easily access campaign materials to influence voters directly before they enter the voting booth. The ban, though not set to pass until at least January, may encourage greater voting participation, Schiller said, because citizens may feel more free to go to the ballot booth and feel that their vote is as much their own as possible.
Campus news 3
marijuana legalization
continued from page 1 Marijuana is currently classified as a Schedule I substance, which designates it a drug with high potential for abuse and no accepted medical uses, according to the DEA website. The same classification is applied to LSD, peyote and heroin. Chafees collaboration with Gregoire shows a bicoastal and bipartisan effort to work together and these facilities and charging their operators. In January, the DEA released a document reasserting its position on marijuana. One section of the document, entitled The Fallacy of Marijuana for Medicinal Use, cites the Food and Drug Administrations declaration that no scientific data support the safety or efficacy of marijuana for general medical use. The DEA and FDA are horrible organizations when it comes to this issue, said Casey ODea 14, co-president of Students for Sensible Drug Policy. The scheduling of marijuana as it is right now completely flies in the face of all scientific and empirical evidence. ODea added that marijuanas classification as a Schedule I drug severely restricts academic research on its potentially beneficial uses. Theyre really creating their own roadblocks, he said. This is the first time any governor has openly asked the federal government to reschedule, ODea said. Hopefully, this will be a positive step.
ences. Liebling and Howard, who are concentrating in history and development studies, respectively, acknowledged disparity in funding between the two disicplines, though Howard said funding for research can apply to humanities and social sciences as well as hard sciences. Liebling said humanities have suffered at the expense of expanding physical sciences. No administrator has really been honest about trade-offs, he said. In the last question, Katherine Haves 12 asked the panelists to use what had been discussed to define what they would like to see in the next University president. The next president needs to value a history of Brown that fosters community engagement, Li-
ebling said. Howard agreed with Liebling and added the need to expand the Universitys global presence and follow through with the PAE. Tran, who arrived an hour into the forum, said that, as the first in his family to graduate high school, he wanted to see a president who also came from the margins. Forum attendants also included Chung-I Tan, professor of physics and chair of the Campus Advisory Committee, and student members of the committee. Tan said though he could not comment on deliberations, the forum will be helpful in future discussions. Its nice to hear from three very articulate persons, he said, expounding visions about the future of Brown very passionately.
4 Mission Drift?
continued from page 1 is now a high-powered research university. We do it on a smaller scale than some of our peers, but I think the university-college concept is not as relevant to people, Miller said. Brown once included smaller liberal arts colleges among its perceived peers, but applicants now compare the University to larger institutions, Miller said. Administrators have oriented the University to compete with its Ivy League rivals and a select handful of other schools. The fierce competition does not end with enrolling the best and brightest undergraduates. The University also must distinguish itself to attract graduate students, faculty, research dollars and prestige. When it comes to a particular field to determine the range of programs we should be offering, we are comparing ourself to what our peers are doing, said President Ruth Simmons. We want to remain competitive with them in every sense. Simmons tenure has marked the beginning of a redefinition of Browns place relative to its peers. For many students, the benefits of these changes are apparent gleaming new buildings, smaller classes and need-blind admission. But as Brown has departed its comfortable perch within the Ivy League and turned to confront its larger peers head-on, it has placed increased emphasis on the university part of university-college. Today, administrators face the difficult tasks of maintaining Browns traditional identity, remaining relevant on the national stage and establishing a global presence all while raising enough money to keep up with the Joneses, the Harvards and the Yales. With all these balls to juggle, it will only become increasingly difficult for administrators to maintain undergraduate education as the top institutional priority and Browns distinguishing feature. When Simmons arrived in 2001, Brown lacked crucial infrastructure. To prevent the University from being left in the dust, she embarked on a series of reforms that have continued through her presidency. I always saw my time at Brown as trying to build a foundation for the next president to be able to take the University to the next level, Simmons said. I never thought that based on what I inherited as president of Brown that I would actually be able to do that myself because there was simply too much to do. The most immediate obstacle was money. Browns endowment was significantly smaller than those of the other Ivy League schools, so
undergraduates and the PaE
icine and Biological Sciences Edward Wing told the Alpert Medical School alumni magazine last year. In evaluating Browns research profile, a critical measurement is peer-reviewed research grant dollars, Wing told the magazine. We pay a lot of attention every month to how many proposals we are submitting, how many are awarded, how much money we have and how much we are expending. Simmons presidency has also seen BioMed undertake a marketing campaign to boost its cachet, said Sarah Baldwin-Beneich, director of biomedical advancement communications. The divisions hope is that the increased outreach to media, potential donors and funding agencies will boost recruitment and strengthen the Universitys reputation. While it has not yet been able to quantitatively assess the impact of the campaign, the division has seen anecdotal success, she said. As part of this campaign, Brown turned to a strategy pursued more often at corporate headquarters than in the halls of academia: hiring outside branding consultants. The practice of selling a university has become in many ways like selling jeans, soap or any branded product. In conjunction with Orange Square, which bills itself as a leading strategy and design firm that works with mission-driven companies, BioMed launched an annual
Mission Drift? 5
enues other than physical expansion. Brown took an active role in helping to establish the Rhode Island Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship and recently announced plans to strengthen its relationship with Lifespan, the parent company for the Medical Schools partner hospitals. These expansions and partnerships entail benefits for many students and recent alums, such as support for entrepreneurs and potential internships, Spies said. Still, there is a legitimate worry that expanding the Universitys role in the city and the state, as part of a transition to a research-heavy model, could detract from focus on undergrads, as has happened at other universities, Spies said. But, if treated appropriately, Spies said the university-college model is not incompatible with a research university. As long as we make sure that we are every bit as good for our undergraduates as weve always been and better, getting better all the time and that all of the assets of resources associated with benefits of the research university support and enhance undergraduate education, then were doing what we ought to do, he said. Ten years ago, the only American schools with name recognition in China were Harvard, Yale, Stanford and the University of California at Berkeley, said Karen Sibley, dean of continuing education. Today, Brown is working to make a place for itself on that list. The Universitys mission statement distinguishes between national and world communities but to some extent, that divide may be a relic of the past. We used to talk about local and global, but its pretty clear today that they are virtually one and the same, Simmons said. So its imperative that Brown have a place in the international sphere, to be seen as an institution that is important globally. The push to make Brown internationally visible will be another legacy of Simmons presidency. Alums outside the United States would often come back to the University with reports that Brown was just not known enough, Simmons said. So in a 2007 review of the PAE, the University introduced a series of Phase II initiatives, one of which was a drive to internationalize. Through globalization efforts, Brown has formed partnerships with institutions in China, France, India, Mexico and Turkey as well as
Going global
tention that they receive at the best small colleges, former Professor of Political Science Erwin Hargrove wrote in a 1976 curriculum report. And the faculty are very badly overworked as they struggle to meet the demands of both graduate and undergraduate teaching and research commitments. Thirty-five years later, the increased pressure to publish or perish can only make it more difficult for Brown professors to devote personal attention to their undergrad pupils. Brown has also embarked on a more visible departure from the activities of a university-college, putting itself at the center of an effort to reinvent Rhode Islands dying industrial economy. In doing so, it follows the lead of larger institutions like Harvard, MIT and Carnegie Mellon University, which have enmeshed themselves in local industries. The initiative has pushed Browns footprint over the Providence River as it works with municipal and state governments, a consortium of hospitals and private industry to create a new knowledge economy in the formerly dilapidated Jewelry District. At the geographic center of this effort is the new Medical Education Building at 222 Richmond St. While the University has gradually grown since its establishment a fact also noted in the mission statement it missed a beat or two going into the 21st century, said Richard Spies, executive vice president for planning and senior advisor to the president. With Simmons arrival, the University sought to get back on track, creating a master plan for physical expansion in 2004, Spies said. The plan explored potential expansions both on and off College Hill, including the land made available by the I-195 relocation. Efforts were largely driven by the hope that expansion might foster the growth of research and teaching, Spies said, but it was also important for the University to consider expansion from the perspective of what peer institutions were doing. We couldnt find an example of what we think of as a successful university a competitive university that hasnt had pretty regular growth throughout its history, Spies said. A preeminent municipal institution for centuries, in recent years the University has also increased its presence in Providence through avdoing good in the neighborhood
undertaking efforts to increase the numbers of international student applicants. PAE reports emphasize the need to stand out among competitor universities as the impetus for globalization. Just as the 1969 curriculum successfully distinguished Brown among its national peer institutions 40 years ago, we must now work to develop our own innovative contribution to global education, states the PAE. These international attempts to play catch-up with Harvard and Yale come with both potential gains and potential pitfalls. And as administrators cast their eyes on China, India and other far reaches of the globe, the risk of losing sight of the classroom experience on College Hill grows. Driven in large part by a compulsion to both keep up with and distinguish itself from world-class competitors, Brown is rapidly expanding on several fronts. While the benefits of a larger research profile and a stronger presence in local and world communities may reach some undergraduates, this expansion indicates an identity crisis of sorts. Ironically, it is only on account of Wriston, the great proponent of the university-college, that Brown ever made it into the Ivy League. The University was not included in initial plans for the league, but Wristons tremendous stature led to Browns inclusion when it formed in the mid-1950s. Today, the Universitys emulation of its Ivy peers leads it ever further afield from the model Wriston championed. The current president sees the changes as a necessary means of preserving Wristons model. Browns future as a universitycollege cannot be assured by just being a college, Simmons said. If you look at all the underlying factors, you can see that if we adhered to that and only looked at that part of our identity, in 25 years, we would be off the map. Expansion is absolutely necessary just to stay where we are, she said. The most tangible appraisal of the Universitys place on the map remains the annual spectacle of Ivy League admissions. Though Browns pool of applicants was once a selfselecting group attracted by the university-college and New Curriculum, todays applicants form a larger, less distinct group. High school seniors today apply to more schools than ever before,
competitive in every sense
and Browns adoption of the Common Application widens its net further. Every January for the past several years, the Admission Office has announced a new record-high number of applicants. Browns applicant pool has also grown to more closely resemble those of peer institutions. For the class of 2015, 80 percent of students who declined Browns offer of admissions went to another Ivy, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford or Duke University, according to Miller. After Harvard and Princeton eliminated their early admission programs in 2007, other Ivies saw significant growth in early applications a telling illustration of the convergence in pools. As Brown evolves, there is a risk that departures from the New Curriculum could attract a contingent of generic, very driven students who apply to Brown not because of its unique academic structure but simply because it is another elite school, said Matt Gelfand 08. Gelfand, a Harvard Law School student and co-founder of the Open Jar Foundation, which promotes curricular freedom. While Browns burgeoning reputation and prolific expansion play a role in its ever-increasing ability to attract applicants, for decades the heart of its allure has been the unique undergraduate education it offers. If that allure fades, so will the original foundation of Browns phenomenally successful half-century. The University is pinning its plans for another successful 50 years on hiring new faculty, expanding and modernizing the campus, investing in research and keeping Brown competitive with its peers. But the schools Brown calls peers all have something it does not: money. In 2010, Browns endowment per student stood at around $260,000. Harvard, Yale and Princeton all had per-student endowments well over $1.2 million. In other words, for every dollar Brown could afford to spend from its endowment on an undergraduate, Princeton could spend seven times as much. When Brown defined its place in academia with a unique educational philosophy and employed a more selective approach to the activities it took on, it crafted a strategy that allowed it to compete with the best schools using fewer resources. Whether the University can successfully transition to this more ambitious model will depend, more than any other factor, on its ability to bring in money.
CoMIC
Dreadful Cosmology | oirad Macmit
EDIToRIAL CARTooN
by a l e x y u ly
t h e b r ow n da i ly h e r a l d
Editors-in-chiEf Sydney Ember Ben Schreckinger editorial kristina fazzalaro rebecca Ballhaus claire Peracchio talia kagan amy rasmussen tony Bakshi Ethan mccoy ashley mcdonnell Sam rubinroit anita mathews Sam carter hunter fast arts & Culture editor City & State editor City & State editor Features editor assistant Features editor News editor Sports editor Sports editor assistant Sports editor editorial page editor Opinions editor Opinions editor ManaGinG Editors Brigitta Greene anne Speyer sEnior Editors dan alexander nicole friedman Julien ouellet Business GEnEral ManaGErs matthew Burrows isha Gulati aditi Bhatia danielle marshak margot Grinberg lisa Berlin ManaGErs Justin lee Collections Collections Sam Plotner nicky robbins Invoice Staff kevin lynch daniel Slutsky analytics Jared davis Sales and Communications alumni engagement nikita khadloya Emily Simmons ad relations Human relations James Eng angel lee Business Development owen millard Business Development Gregory chatzinoff Web relations Post- maGazine editor-in-Chief Sam knowles editor-in-Chief amelia Stanton BloG dailY Herald david Winer editor-in-Chief matt klimerman Managing editor officE ManaGEr Shawn reilly
Graphics & photos abe Pressman Emily Gilbert rachel kaplan Glenn lutzky Jesse Schwimmer Graphics editor photo editor photo editor assistant photo editor Sports photo editor
production dan towne olivia conetta anna migliaccio leor Shtull-leber katie Wilson neal Poole Copy Desk Chief assistant Copy Desk Chief Design editor Design editor Design editor Web producer
opinions 7
expected or desired context can stir up powerful emotions. Harming people by causing these emotions to arise may be an injustice. But not all harm is unjust. If Mary plays her music too loudly in the park, it will bother people. Mary is being a huge jerk. She has not committed an injustice. The story does not end there. Sex produces thoughts and feelings that are different from mere annoyance. Traumatic experiences such as sexual assault can cause post-traumatic stress disorder and related serious jerk is not unjust. A common conception holds that justice is based on rights. An act is unjust if it violates a persons rights. What our question comes down to is this: Does each of us have a right not to be masturbated at in public? As nice as this would be, we must answer no. Earlier I claimed that triggering experiences were different from annoyances. But the difference is one of degree, not kind. Why should an acts sexuality mark the difference between just and unjust? mains the question of whether these acts are unjust. When someone goes out in public, they willfully give up some of their security in order to interact with others. Though your rights still protect you from being physically harmed, you must take your psychological health into your own hands. When you go out in public, you consent to a lot of unwanted sights, sounds and smells. Thankfully, I do not have to show why going outside means giving a kind of consent. It is enough for me to show that this is true. And this should be obvious again remember Marys stereo. Our rights do not protect us from small psychological harms. Since they do not recognize distinctions of degree, we are similarly unprotected from big and serious psychological harms. We do not have any grounds for controlling such behaviors in public. We only have that kind of power on our own property. This means the trespassing masturbators were acting unjustly. But Matthew Hoile (Another masturbator arrested as spree continues, Nov. 14) and an unnamed person (DPS detains masturbator suspect in car, Nov. 10) have allegedly acted fully within their rights. What is the moral here? Public masturbation is something only an awful person would do, but it is our right as human beings to do it. David Hefer 12 is the new Voltaire.
As a member of the College Hill community and choker of the occasional chicken, I could not help but take an interest in the recent spate of public masturbatings. While the John Street and the copycat masturbator are doing something reprehensible, they are not necessarily doing anything unjust. We must be clear about our aims. The purpose is not to show that the masturbators have not committed any crimes leave that to the courts! Instead, we will see that public masturbation is not against the principles of justice, which law can come apart from. The argument clearly vindicates most types of public indecency. We cannot pin the injustice on the fact that public masturbation violates a law. Laws should be based on what is just not the other way around. If justice always matched law, we could never have statesanctioned injustices. Obviously, masturbating is not in itself unjust. Only the public nature of the act can supply the injustice. Moreover, it is masturbations sexual nature which is purportedly to blame. Why should this be? Sex is important to a lot of people. Seeing it outside of its
maladies. An encounter with a masturbator runs a real risk of triggering traumatic memories. This is not something to be taken lightly. A person who is triggered may face panic attacks and worse. I do not know whether anyone has been triggered by the masturbators. It is not my business to know. The reasonable possibility is enough to make public masturbation a bad idea. Public masturbation is rightly condemned. Doing it shows a blatant disregard for the feelings of others. The masturbators are a group of real jerk-offs. But as we saw before, even in public, a really
This can only come down to the fact that these issues are much more intense for us as people. Good principles do not allow for arbitrary boundaries, and differences of degree smack of arbitrariness. If someone says a good movie is one that 83 out of 100 people enjoy, we laugh. There can be no reason not to say that it is 84. Similarly, exactly how much psychological harm must be incurred before we say that an act is unjust? To recap, if public masturbation is unjust at all, it is in the same way that playing your stereo too loudly is. There still re-
Brown is considered a particularly open and liberal environment, even earning nicknames such as the granola-liberal Ivy. But as an applied mathematics-economics concentrator, I find that it becomes very easy to forget this fact. Day after day I get numerous emails from the economics and computer science departments advertising countless information sessions for Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and other investment banks and consulting firms. It can often be overwhelming. Particularly in my concentration, it often seems that there are few career options other than investment banking or finance. In the midst of the Occupy movement, when many of these same students would gladly admit that these firms are not doing a very good job of making socially responsible decisions, where did this liberal thinking go? What makes investment banking jobs so popular among Brown students, and what can Brown do to provide alternatives? For many students, applying for jobs in investment banking is too easy not to consider. This may seem counterintuitive, but let me compare the choice of the job search with a more familiar process: the college hunt. When you applied to college, how many schools were you really choosing from? I would wager that many of you looked at
Why spend the effort trying to find a more suitable or academically stimulating job when Brown makes it so simple for you to take the easy way out?
were unaware of before the college search, think more actively about the different programs that fit their strengths and probably seek significant help along the way. Now let us bring this back to the job hunt after college. What makes investment banking appealing to so many smart Brown students? Most people have heard of these banks. Students who choose to work for them will make connections and earn a livable income until they figure out what else to do with their lives or continue in finance. Brown makes this process simple by providing career fairs where these banks court students and throwing information sessions and dinners for them. Choosing to attend these info sessions is natural and completely understandable. alize that this is not completely Browns fault. The banking, consulting and technology firms probably put a considerable amount of money into recruiting, and they make sure to have representation at all of these fairs. Still, it is Browns responsibility to put more money, resources and energy into providing other options for students. Even though I do not count myself among the Occupiers, it is a shame that many of the best and brightest Brown students go off to careers on Wall Street. A friend of mine who graduated in 2009 told me that his job at a reputable hedge fund is decent mostly because of the pay and prestige but he has to live with the fact that he helps make money out of money for people with money. This pay and prestige form the basis for many,
In response to the recent pepper spraying of students at the University of California at Davis by campus police, the University Council of Students passed a statement defending students inalienable right to peaceful assembly during its final general body meeting of the semester last night. Following last weeks incident at UC Davis, students around the country have spoken out against the use of excessive force on protesters. The UCS statement appeals to the Brown administration to reinforce its commitment to students freedoms and right to protest. UCS calls on the Brown University Administration and the Department of Public Safety to express support for students right to demonstrate peacefully without fear of violent recourse, the statement reads. UCS Vice President David Rattner 13 stressed that the statement should not be seen as an endorse-
ment of the Occupy movement or any other protest but rather of the broader idea of freedom of speech and protest. Todd Harris 14, chair of the Academic and Administrative Affairs Committee, suggested sending the statement directly to UC Davis administration in addition to distributing it on campus. The Harvard Undergraduate Council also passed a recent resolution condemning the incident at UC Davis, Rattner said. Browns UCS statement goes a step further by demanding that the UC Davis police force and Chancellor Linda Katehi be held accountable for their actions, he said. Earlier in the meeting, Daniel Pipkin 14, the councils UCS/UFB liaison, presented on the progress his committee made this semester on the Capital Closet, a project aimed at limiting costs of student events. As part of the project the Undergraduate Finance Board signed a $70,000 contract with Media Technology Services this
UCSs resolution calls for UC Davis officials to be held accountable for the excessive force used on protestors last week.
semester that will allow Category III groups to use media services equipment without paying rental fees. The money saved by the change will be funneled back into use for student groups, Pipkin said. Pipkin said he was hopeful this will allow them to start a conversation about eliminating the payments for groups of lesser categorizations. Michael Lin 14, chair of the
Admissions and Student Services Committee, said his committee has submitted a formal proposal for the addition of a printing station to Pembroke campus, an initiative that has been loosely discussed by the council this semester. Holly Hunt 13, a member of the committee, said she will be meeting with administrators including Marisa Quinn, vice president of public affairs and University rela-
tions, and a representative from Computing and Information Services to discuss changes to Morning Mail. The changes could include appearance and functionality changes, including the ability to click titles to jump to their entries and possible categorizations of events. The discussion is still in the brainstorming phase, but Hunt said she expects the meeting to be very productive.
Students, Swearer Center team up Program seeks to boost for proposed social service house U. language offerings
By Gadi cohEn Contributing Writer
Service-oriented students already have an umbrella organization for their groups soon, they could get a roof. A group of undergraduates filed an application with the Residential Council for a social activism-based program house Nov. 18. According to the application, the house would create an intentional community of students who want social justice, social activism and community service to be a central component of their Brown experience. Commitment to activism is an active lifestyle, said Ben Chesler 15, the driving force behind the proposal. Were going to have people who are active 24/7 with a level of energy that is focused on improving the community. Chesler came up with the idea after he learned that ResCouncil was accepting applications for program houses to fill the void created by the termination of Interfaith House. After mentioning the idea at a gathering of the University Community Academic Advising
Program, a pre-Orientation advising program with a service focus, Chesler held a meeting Nov. 6 to discuss and flesh out the proposal with interested students. We wanted something that would involve the entire campus community through social activism, Chesler said. Its something that we think will foster new collaboration between all the social activists and service organizations on campus. By facilitating collaboration, a social service program house would foster new ideas for projects and help strengthen old ones, according to Chesler. Because they would be living together, student activists would be able to develop and work on service projects constantly. If the proposal is accepted, Chesler said he thinks the house will host many service-oriented events. He also hopes to initiate an annual collaborative service project between house residents. To develop the proposal, Chesler consulted with Alan Flam, director of advising and community collaborations at the Swearer Center for Public Service. According to Chesler, Flam helped the students
patch up flaws in the application. Part of the work of the Swearer Center is to impact the educational experience of students by encouraging and provoking conversations about community service and social change, Flam said. A residential community that gathers students together with a shared focus on community work can be a powerful place for these conversations to take place. Though many campus groups offer service opportunities, supporters of the proposal hope the program house will encourage new ways of approaching service. If everyone is living together, then students can get a broad perspective on all of the issues they are working on, said Angela Ramponi 15, one of several students who helped Chesler draft the application. It will enable us to see what issues arent being covered and to come together to address those issues. ResCouncil and the Office of Residential Life plan to announce which program house application will be selected sometime this month.
apps.facebook.com/wpsocialreader
Interested in Swahili? Armenian? Well, the Brown Language Society is interested in you. Next semester, the society will be piloting the Brown Student Language Exchange program, which is designed to support and foster student interest in languages outside those offered by the University. The society, founded last year by Kai Herng Loh 14, was created as a Departmental Undergraduate Group to stir up student interest in foreign language learning and provide an outlet for maintaining fluency. The group works with faculty sponsor Elsa Amanatidou, director of the Center for Language Studies, and aims to support and supplement language programs offered by academic departments, said Amelia Friedman 14, a member of the societys executive board, who has taken courses at Brown in Spanish, Portuguese, French and Polish. The new exchange program, an entirely student-run initiative, will allow participants to experience languages and cultures in informal 90-minute crash courses led by student discussion leaders. We really want to pique student interest in other languages and cultures, Friedman said. The program was slated to begin this semester, but its launch was pushed back due to difficulty finding facilitators mid-semester. The University already offers
about 30 languages to the student body, but the exchange will allow students to interact with languages farther off the beaten path by both informing students about available resources and creating new programming. The thing missing from the linguistic community at Brown is communication, Friedman said. The society is trying to increase awareness of the opportunities that exist while providing new, exciting programs to further language exploration. The society has already launched one program this semester. The Charla program provides an outlet for students to work on Spanish outside of class time. In Charla, which means chat in Spanish, four teams of student facilitators lead weekly discussion or activity sessions, creating a space where only Spanish is spoken a sort of temporary immersion where youll only speak, hear and hopefully even think in Spanish, said Ben Stephenson 13, head of the Charla program and a member of the societys executive board. Looking to the future, the society is confident and excited for its new programs. Stephenson explained there are French chat sessions tentatively on the horizon as well as the upcoming exchange program. Knowing languages is a tangible and relevant skill to have, Stephenson said. Im confident the interest of the Brown community will be enough to make BLS successful.