METHOD STATEMENT AND DESIGN

OF Temporary Shoring Wall for

Proposed Mafraq Dialysis Centre Abu Dhabi

Client :

M/s Seha, Abu Dhabi Health Services Co.

Consultant :

M/s Burt Hill

Main Contractor :

M/s ASCON

Temporary Shoring Wall AMENDMENT RECORD SHEET Section No. Revision Amendment Nos. Details

Date of issue

Prepared Checked by by

Issued by

LIST OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 CANTILEVER H-BEAM WALL 2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 METHOD STATEMENT FOR H-BEAM AND CONCRETE PANEL 2.3 DESIGN CRITERIA 2.4 STRENGTH DESIGN OF H-BEAMS 2.5 DESIGN OF PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS 3.0 ANALYSIS OF H-BEAM SHORING USING WALLAP PROGRAM 4.0 SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT - BOREHOLE LOGS 5.0 SECTIONAL PROPERTIES OF UNIVERSAL STEEL BEAMS

1.0 INTRODUCTION The excavation required for the construction of the building has necessitated the requirement of shoring system along the plot sides. The maximum excavation level is -4.5 m while the existing ground level is at 0 m. The shoring system is approximately 2 m away from the proposed under ground water tank. 1.1 Sequence of Activities at Site 1. Trial trenches shall be undertaken by the main Contractor to re-locate all the under ground services. The services passing very close to the shoring system shall be brought to the notice of the Engineer for diversion or removal. 2. Existing ground level 0.00 m 3. Outer side of the shoring wall will be levelled to 0 m for a width of 2.00 m. 4. Installation of the cantilever H-beams along the side. 5. Excavation up to final level (-4.50 m along with installation of concrete panels). 1.2 Standard / Documents This method statement is based on the following documents. 1. ICE Specification 2. Project Specification 3. BS 8004 - Foundation 4. BS 8110 - Structural use of Concrete 5. BS 8002 - Earth retaining structures 1.3 Materials 1.3.1 H-Beam wall According to BS 4 Part-1, Grade 43A 1.3.2 Concrete panel Concrete grade is C30

Reinforcement grade is Fy 460 1.4 Resources The following equipment are planned to be used at site. Drilling rig with accessories, one number for the borehole for H-beam installation or alternatively vibro hammer & power pack. One crane for handling of H-beam & precast planks. Petrol based concrete vibrator for precast yard. Other power & hand tools. Other accessories: 1. Generator 2. Augur for 600 mm diameter 3. Bucket for 600 mm diameter 4. Cleaning bucket for 600 mm diameter 5. Turntable for 600 mm diameter 6. Kelly 1.5 Staff The following staff will be made available on the site : 1. Projects in-charge (Part Time) 2. Site Engineer 3. Foreman 4. Operators 5. Helpers 6. Electrician, welders and mechanics (Part Time)

2.0 CANTILEVER H-BEAM WALL 2.1 INTRODUCTION As retaining wall system for the excavation from 0 m to -4.5 m, we propose H-Beams placed into the drilled boreholes. Horizontal concrete panels are to be installed between the H-Beams. We have considered retaining height of 4.50 m (-4.500 m from 0.00 m) in our design. 2.2 METHOD STATEMENT FOR H-BEAM AND CONCRETE PANEL INSTALLATION 2.2.1 CONSTRUCTION OF BOREHOLES The location of the H beams shall be marked on the ground by the main contractor's surveyor as per the approved drawings. A temporary collar casing will be rotated in to the ground by the drilling rig. After setting the casing, the borehole will be excavated using bucket or auger, till reaching the required depth. This can be done by a CFA augur also. The minimum clearance from the site boundary shall be 50 mm. 2.2.2 INSTALLATION OF BEAMS The beams to be installed to the center of the borehole and it shall be secured in position by tack welding to the casing. Aggregate of size 10 mm and down mixed with sand will be discharged to the borehole manually once Bobcat brings the dry mix to the borehole location. The aggregate filling shall be continued till it reaches the proposed excavation level. Further filling to the top of casing shall be done with non-cohesive sand.The temporary casing shall be removed after cutting off its connections to the H-beam. Alternatively H-beams can be driven by vibro-hammer & power pack with out doing the pre-boring also. In case of refusal of penetration of H-Beam, pre-boring has to be undertaken. 2.2.3 INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE PANELS The installation of the panels between the H-beams will be done progressively down to the final excavation level in two stages. First, excavation will be undertaken down to 1.00 m below the existing ground level and planks will be placed up to this level. Further excavation shall be done and the precast panels would slide down to new excavated depth. New precast panels would added using cranes. If the water table is encountered, well points for the dewatering shall be installed and dewatering shall be commenced. Dewatering shall be done in such a way that there remains a dry surface at least down to 1.0 to 1.5

meters below the progressive excavation. The concrete panels must be fixed tight to the H-beams and pressed against the undisturbed soil. For this, excavated soil must be placed manually to fixed-tight these precast panels. Any soil movements behind the wall from over excavation or too high free stands be refilled by back filling. 2.3 DESIGN CRITERIA 2.3.1 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION According to our attached calculation, based on the available soil investigation report by Swissboring, Report No. E-1983 an H-beam wall will be installed to ensure the safe excavation to final level. General Excavation : A cantilever H-beam wall with top level at 0.00 / 0.000 m and toe level at -10.00 m required for a safe excavation up to -4.50 m. Center to center distance between the adjacent H-beams shall be 1.200 m. Software used : WALLAP Retaining Wall Analysis Program

2.3.2 SURCHARGE LOADS In our design, we have considered varying surcharge of 20.00 kPa to 30 kPa behind the shoring wall. 2.3.3 WALL STIFFNESS Location : Excavation to facilitate the construction of under ground water tank UB 457 x 191 x 74 x kg/m 33300 cm4 205 GPa 1.200 m c/c 2.7750000E-04 m4/m run
2 56.888 MN/m

Proposed beam size :

Major moment of inertia of proposed beam : Modulus of elasticity of steel : Spacing of beams : Moment of inertia per unit of wall : Wall stiffness = E x Izz (major) per meter run :

2.3.4 WATER TABLE LEVEL The ground water table does not have any effect on the design of H-Beam (soldier piling) shoring system as this type of shoring system is not water tight and at any given time, the water head would be same on both sides (excavated and retained sides). 2.4 STRENGTH DESIGN OF H-BEAMS For maximum bending moment etc. refer attached output of WALLAP Proposed beam size : Section modulus : Spacing of beams : Length of beam : Level at maximum excavation : Top level of H-beam : Therefore, toe level of H-beam : Therefore, embedment length : Max. bending moment at service (WALLAP analysis) : Maximum bending moment per beam =155.0x1.200 = Allowable flexural stresses in beam : Flexural stresses in H-beam (working) : < UB 457 x 191 x 74 x kg/m 1460 cm3 1.200 m c/c 10.00 m -4.500 m 0.000 m -10.00 m 5.500 m 155.0 kN-m 186 kN-m 165.0 N/mm2 127.4 N/mm2 2 165.0 N/mm OK

Hence the proposed H-beam is satisfactory to resist the applied bending moment It is to be noted here that the structural beams are not susceptible to lateral torsional buckling (LTB) as the concrete planks restrain the compression flange.

2.5 DESIGN OF PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS For maximum lateral pressure etc. refer attached output of WALLAP We would design the precast panel for unit width. Concrete grade : Steel grade : Width of precast panels : Thickness of precast panels : Clear cover to main reinforcement (longer bars) : Effective depth : Center to center of H-beams : Width of flange of H-beams : Clear distance between the flanges of H-beams : Length of precast panels : Average bearing at each end of precast panel : Maximum earth pressure on precast panel : (Refer Wallap output) Moment = 23 x 1.84 x 1.84 / 8 = Load factor : Mu/bd2 : z/d : Ast : Proposed size of bar : Required spacing of T10 mm bar : Provide T10@170 (main bars) on excavation side C30 Fy 460 1000 mm 100 mm 15 mm 80 mm 1200 mm 191 mm 1009 mm 1840 mm 415.5 mm 23.00 kN/m
2

9.73 kN-m 1.40 2.129 0.91 457 mm2/m T10 170 mm c/c

3.0 ANALYSIS OF H-BEAM SHORING USING WALLAP PROGRAM

Licensed to LND Program: WALLAP

| Sheet No. Version 5.03 Revision A19.B32.R29 | Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Job No. Run ID. Shoring-ASCON-100 | Made by : rk Proposed Shoring at Mafraq Dialysis Center | Date:13-12-2010 Shoring with Soldier H BEAM WALL | Checked : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Units: kN,m INPUT DATA SOIL PROFILE Stratum Elevation of no. top of stratum 1 0.00 2 -2.50 3 -5.00 4 -8.00 5 -15.00 SOIL PROPERTIES -- Soil type -No. Description (Datum elev.) 1 Med. Dense 2 3 4 5 Med. Dense Dense Very dense Dense Note: Bulk Young's At rest Consol Active Passive density Modulus coeff. state. limit limit Cohesion kN/m3 Eh,kN/m2 Ko NC/OC Ka Kp kN/m2 (dEh/dy ) (dKo/dy) ( Nu ) ( Kac ) ( Kpc ) ( dc/dy ) 18.00a 99000 0.460 OC 0.248 5.773 19.00b (0.300) (0.000) ( 0.000) 19.00a 108000 0.420 OC 0.220 7.207 20.00b (0.300) (0.000) ( 0.000) 19.00a 114000 0.380 OC 0.200 8.446 20.00b (0.300) (0.000) ( 0.000) 19.00a 120000 0.360 OC 0.182 9.000 20.00b (0.000) (0.000) ( 0.000) 19.00a 126000 0.380 OC 0.165 9.000 20.00b (0.000) (0.000) ( 0.000) ---------- Soil types ---------Active side Passive side 1 Med. Dense 1 Med. Dense 2 Med. Dense 2 Med. Dense 3 Dense 3 Dense 4 Very dense 4 Very dense 5 Dense 5 Dense

(a) and (b) are Bulk Densities above and below the water table

GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Density of water = 10.00 kN/m3 Initial water table elevation Active side -12.00 Passive side -12.00 No

Automatic water pressure balancing at toe of wall : WALL PROPERTIES Elevation of toe of wall Maximum finite element length Youngs modulus of wall E Moment of inertia of wall I E.I SURCHARGE LOADS Surcharge no. 1 Elev. 0.00 Distance from wall 0.10(A) Length parallel to wall 50.00 Width perpend. to wall 11.00

= -10.00 = 0.60 = 2.0500E+08 kN/m2 = 2.7750E-04 m4/m run = 56888 kN.m2/m run Surcharge ----- kN/m2 ----Near edge Far edge 20.00 30.00

Note: A = Active side,

P = Passive side

A trapezoidal surcharge is defined by two values: N = at edge near to wall, F = at edge far from wall CONSTRUCTION STAGES Construction Stage description stage no. -------------------------------------------------------1 Apply surcharge no.1 at elevation 0.00 2 Excavate to elevation -4.50 on PASSIVE side

FACTORS OF SAFETY and ANALYSIS OPTIONS Type of structure Retaining wall Stability Method Factor Factor analysis: of analysis - Strength Factor method on soil strength for calculating wall depth = on soil strength for calculating tie force = = =

1.40 1.00

Parameters for undrained strata: Minimum equivalent fluid density Maximum depth of water filled tension crack Bending moment and displacement Method - Subgrade reaction Open Tension Crack analysis? Non-linear Modulus Parameter

5.00 kN/m3 0.00 m

calculation: model using Influence Coefficients - No (L) = 12.00 m

Boundary conditions: Length of wall (normal to plane of analysis) = 100.00 m Width of excavation on active side of wall Width of excavation on passive side of wall = 20.00 m = 20.00 m

Distance to rigid boundary on active side = 20.00 m Distance to rigid boundary on passive side = 20.00 m OUTPUT OPTIONS Results to be stored on disk? Results to be output on the printer?

Yes No

Stage ------ Stage description ----------- ------- Output options ------no. Displacement Active, Graph. Bending mom. Passive output Shear force pressures 1 Apply surcharge no.1 at elev. 0.00 Yes Yes Yes 2 Excav. to elev. -4.50 on PASSIVE side Yes Yes Yes * Summary output Yes Yes Program WALLAP - Copyright (C) 2005 by DL Borin, distributed by GEOSOLVE 69 Rodenhurst Road, London SW4, UK. Tel: +44 20 8674 7251

Licensed to LND Program: WALLAP

| Sheet No. Version 5.03 Revision A19.B32.R29 | Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Job No. Run ID. Shoring-ASCON-100 | Made by : rk Proposed Shoring at Mafraq Dialysis Center | Date:13-12-2010 Shoring with Soldier H BEAM WALL | Checked : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Units: kN,m

Licensed to LND Program: WALLAP

| Sheet No. Version 5.03 Revision A19.B32.R29 | Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Job No. Run ID. Shoring-ASCON-100 | Made by : rk Proposed Shoring at Mafraq Dialysis Center | Date:13-12-2010 Shoring with Soldier H BEAM WALL | Checked : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Units: kN,m Stage No. 2 Excavate to elevation -4.50 on PASSIVE side STABILITY ANALYSIS according to Strength Factor method Factor of safety on soil strength FoS for toe elev. = -10.00 --------------Factor Moment of equilib. Safety at elev. 1.689 -9.38 Toe elev. for FoS = 1.400 ------------Toe Wall elev. Penetr -ation -8.70 4.20 Strut force for F=1.000 ----------Strut force kN/m run

Stage No. 2

--- G.L. --Act. Pass. 0.00 -4.50

Strut Elev. Cant.

BENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT CALCULATION - Assumptions: Subgrade reaction model - Boussinesq Influence coefficients Soil deformations are elastic until the active or passive limit is reached Open Tension Crack analysis - No Length of wall perpendicular to section = 100.00m Rigid boundaries: Node no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Y coord 0.00 -0.60 -1.20 -1.80 -2.15 -2.50 -3.05 -3.60 -4.05 -4.50 -5.00 -5.50 -6.00 -6.60 -7.20 -7.60 -8.00 -8.50 -9.00 -9.50 -10.00 Nett pressure kN/m2 0.00 6.68 9.95 12.88 14.54 16.18 14.31 16.69 19.04 20.95 22.85 -43.52 -57.49 -135.85 -97.14 -1.86 48.89 58.31 61.13 15.88 14.51 10.62 5.83 5.40 Active side 20.00 from wall Passive side 20.00 from wall Wall disp. m 0.045 0.040 0.034 0.029 0.026 0.023 0.023 0.019 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.006 0.006 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 Wall rotation rad. 8.58E-03 8.57E-03 8.55E-03 8.48E-03 8.40E-03 8.29E-03 8.29E-03 7.99E-03 7.52E-03 6.97E-03 6.24E-03 5.18E-03 5.18E-03 3.91E-03 2.59E-03 1.29E-03 5.00E-04 2.16E-04 5.78E-05 5.78E-05 -4.58E-05 -9.16E-05 -1.06E-04 -1.09E-04 Shear force kN/m 0.0 2.0 7.0 13.8 18.6 24.0 24.0 32.5 42.4 51.4 61.2 56.0 56.0 7.7 -50.5 -80.2 -66.1 -44.7 -20.8 -20.8 -13.2 -6.9 -2.8 0.0 Bending moment kN.m/m 0.0 0.9 3.5 9.6 15.3 22.8 22.8 38.2 58.8 79.8 105.1 135.8 135.8 153.4 146.5 100.0 51.5 29.2 16.0 16.0 7.6 2.8 0.7 -0.0 Strut forces kN/m

Run ID. Shoring-ASCON-100 | Sheet No. Proposed Shoring at Mafraq Dialysis Center | Date:13-12-2010 Shoring with Soldier H BEAM WALL | Checked : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Stage No.2 Node no. Y coord Excavate to elevation -4.50 on PASSIVE side (continued)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Node no.

0.00 -0.60 -1.20 -1.80 -2.15 -2.50 -3.05 -3.60 -4.05 -4.50 -5.00 -5.50 -6.00 -6.60 -7.20 -7.60 -8.00 -8.50 -9.00 -9.50 -10.00 Y coord

------------------------ ACTIVE side --------------------------------- Effective stresses ------Total Soil Water Vertic Active Passive Earth earth stiffness press. -al limit limit pressure pressure coeff. kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29981 0.00 26.90 6.68 155.27 6.68 6.68a 29981 0.00 40.08 9.95 231.36 9.95 9.95a 29981 0.00 51.88 12.88 299.49 12.88 12.88a 29981 0.00 58.57 14.54 338.10 14.54 14.54a 29981 0.00 65.18 16.18 376.25 16.18 16.18a 29981 0.00 65.18 14.31 469.73 14.31 14.31a 32707 0.00 76.00 16.69 547.74 16.69 16.69a 32707 0.00 86.72 19.04 625.01 19.04 19.04a 32707 0.00 95.43 20.95 687.77 20.95 20.95a 32707 0.00 104.09 22.85 750.18 22.85 22.85a 32707 0.00 113.66 24.96 819.13 24.96 24.96a 32707 0.00 113.66 22.75 959.93 22.75 22.75a 34524 0.00 123.17 24.66 1040.30 24.66 24.66a 34524 0.00 132.64 26.55 1120.26 26.55 26.55a 34524 0.00 143.94 28.81 1215.73 39.74 39.74 34524 0.00 155.19 31.07 1310.72 62.19 62.19 40575 0.00 162.66 32.56 1373.81 70.12 70.12 40575 0.00 170.11 34.05 1436.74 74.48 74.48 40575 0.00 170.11 30.98 1530.99 61.76 61.76 35938 0.00 179.40 32.67 1614.59 64.49 64.49 35938 0.00 188.66 34.36 1697.96 65.97 65.97 35938 0.00 197.90 36.04 1781.14 66.99 66.99 35938 0.00 207.13 37.72 1864.17 70.20 70.20 73558 ----------------------- PASSIVE side --------------------------------- Effective stresses ------Total Soil Water Vertic Active Passive Earth earth stiffness press. -al limit limit pressure pressure coeff. kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72427 0.00 9.50 2.09 68.47 68.47 68.47p 72427 0.00 9.50 1.90 80.24 80.24 80.24p 76451 0.00 19.00 3.80 160.51 160.51 160.51p 76451 0.00 28.51 5.71 240.83 123.69 123.69 76451 0.00 39.94 8.00 337.33 41.59 41.59 76451 0.00 51.38 10.29 433.99 13.30 13.30 40575 0.00 59.03 11.82 498.54 11.82 11.82a 40575 0.00 66.68 13.35 563.19 13.35 13.35a 40575 0.00 66.68 12.14 600.14 45.88 45.88 35938 0.00 76.27 13.89 686.42 49.99 49.99 35938 0.00 85.88 15.64 772.90 55.35 55.35 35938 0.00 95.51 17.39 859.61 61.17 61.17 35938 0.00 105.17 19.15 946.54 64.80 64.80 73558

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

0.00 -0.60 -1.20 -1.80 -2.15 -2.50 -3.05 -3.60 -4.05 -4.50 -5.00 -5.50 -6.00 -6.60 -7.20 -7.60 -8.00 -8.50 -9.00 -9.50 -10.00

Run ID. Shoring-ASCON-100 | Sheet No. Proposed Shoring at Mafraq Dialysis Center | Date:13-12-2010 Shoring with Soldier H BEAM WALL | Checked : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Stage No.2 Excavate to elevation -4.50 on PASSIVE side Note: 13.35a Soil pressure at active limit 160.51p Soil pressure at passive limit (continued)

Licensed to LND Program: WALLAP

| Sheet No. Version 5.03 Revision A19.B32.R29 | Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Job No. Run ID. Shoring-ASCON-100 | Made by : rk Proposed Shoring at Mafraq Dialysis Center | Date:13-12-2010 Shoring with Soldier H BEAM WALL | Checked : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Units: kN,m

Licensed to LND Program: WALLAP

| Sheet No. Version 5.03 Revision A19.B32.R29 | Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Job No. Run ID. Shoring-ASCON-100 | Made by : rk Proposed Shoring at Mafraq Dialysis Center | Date:13-12-2010 Shoring with Soldier H BEAM WALL | Checked : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Units: kN,m Summary of results STABILITY ANALYSIS according to Strength Factor method Factor of safety on soil strength FoS for toe elev. = -10.00 --------------Factor Moment of equilib. Safety at elev. Conditions 1.689 -9.38 Toe elev. for Strut force FoS = 1.400 for F=1.000 ----------------------Toe Wall Strut elev. Penetr force -ation kN/m run unsuitable for FoS calc. -8.70 4.20

Stage No. 1 2

--- G.L. --Act. Pass. 0.00 0.00 0.00 -4.50

Strut Elev. Cant. Cant.

Licensed to LND Program: WALLAP

| Sheet No. Version 5.03 Revision A19.B32.R29 | Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Job No. Run ID. Shoring-ASCON-100 | Made by : rk Proposed Shoring at Mafraq Dialysis Center | Date:13-12-2010 Shoring with Soldier H BEAM WALL | Checked : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Units: kN,m Summary of results BENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT CALCULATION - Assumptions: Subgrade reaction model - Boussinesq Influence coefficients Soil deformations are elastic until the active or passive limit is reached Open Tension Crack analysis - No Length of wall perpendicular to section = 100.00m Rigid boundaries: Active side 20.00 from wall Passive side 20.00 from wall Shear force maximum minimum kN/m kN/m 0.0 0.0 2.0 -0.2 7.0 -0.4 13.8 -0.3 18.6 -0.2 24.0 0.0 32.5 -0.1 42.4 -0.2 51.4 -0.3 61.2 -0.4 56.0 -0.4 7.7 -0.5 0.0 -50.5 0.0 -80.2 0.6 -66.1 1.5 -44.7 2.9 -20.8 1.1 -13.2 0.0 -6.9 0.0 -2.8 0.0 0.0

Bending moment, shear force and displacement envelopes Node Y Displacement Bending moment no. coord maximum minimum maximum minimum m m kN.m/m kN.m/m 1 0.00 0.045 0.000 0.0 0.0 2 -0.60 0.040 0.000 0.9 0.0 3 -1.20 0.034 0.000 3.5 0.0 4 -1.80 0.029 0.000 9.6 -0.0 5 -2.15 0.026 0.000 15.3 -0.1 6 -2.50 0.023 0.000 22.8 -0.1 7 -3.05 0.019 0.000 38.2 -0.2 8 -3.60 0.015 0.000 58.8 -0.2 9 -4.05 0.011 0.000 79.8 -0.4 10 -4.50 0.008 0.000 105.1 -0.5 11 -5.00 0.006 0.000 135.8 -0.7 12 -5.50 0.003 0.000 153.4 -0.9 13 -6.00 0.002 0.000 146.5 -1.2 14 -6.60 0.001 0.000 100.0 -1.6 15 -7.20 0.000 0.000 51.5 -1.6 16 -7.60 0.000 -0.000 29.2 -1.2 17 -8.00 0.000 -0.000 16.0 -0.3 18 -8.50 0.000 -0.000 7.6 0.0 19 -9.00 0.000 -0.000 2.8 0.0 20 -9.50 0.000 -0.000 0.7 0.0 21 -10.00 0.000 -0.000 0.0 -0.0

Maximum and minimum bending moment and shear force at each stage Stage --------- Bending moment ----------------- Shear force ---------no. maximum elev. minimum elev. maximum elev. minimum elev. kN.m/m kN.m/m kN/m kN/m 1 0.8 -9.00 -1.6 -7.20 2.9 -8.00 -0.8 -9.50 2 153.4 -5.50 -0.0 -10.00 61.2 -4.50 -80.2 -6.60 Maximum and minimum displacement at each stage Stage -------- Displacement --------Stage description no. maximum elev. minimum elev. ----------------m m 1 0.000 -4.05 -0.000 -10.00 Apply surcharge no.1 at elev. 0.00 2 0.045 0.00 -0.000 -8.00 Excav. to elev. -4.50 on PASSIVE side

Licensed to LND Program: WALLAP

| Sheet No. Version 5.03 Revision A19.B32.R29 | Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Job No. Run ID. Shoring-ASCON-100 | Made by : rk Proposed Shoring at Mafraq Dialysis Center | Date:13-12-2010 Shoring with Soldier H BEAM WALL | Checked : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Units: kN,m

5.0 SECTIONAL PROPERTIES OF UNIVERSAL STEEL BEAMS