Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Letters to the Editor • Letters to the Editor • Letters to the Editor • Letters to the Editor • Letters to the Editor • Letters to the Editor • Letters to the Editor • Letters to
Quarterly Report of the made available substantial documentation to With the substantial adverse criticism car- action were ignored to the ratepayers and
MPPs Scott and Tarr reflecting the poor per- ried in the article, M.E.C. Zweli Mkize will interested and affected parties’ detriment.
Chief Financial Officer, formance of uMngeni Municipality the be hard pressed to explain his Department’s The Title Deed itself shows that the recy-
uMngeni Municipality MPPs were quoted in subsequent articles failure to prevent the present situation de- cle centre has been built in contravention of
stating that the municipality’s record was veloping as the Minister of finance has del- its zoning and use for parking and toilets, a
Dear Sir, above reproach. egated this function to him. condition that could only be approved by the
The Quarterly report for June 2007 just Now it would seem that the “unholy Al- Claude Edwards, Concerned Ratepayers/ “State”. To date the Title Deed remains un-
received reveals the following:- Salary and liance” of Mayor and Manager need to be Residents Group, Howick amended.
Wages Vote Overspent (R2 970 219), Sav- recalled to explain subsequent developments. The facts: It is a fact that the Centre had
ings Remuneration of Councillors It is incongruous that the performance been built in defiance of proper zoning.
R1 165 162, Interest external loans bonus percentage is reflected as consider-
Recycle centre disregard It is a fact that neither interested and af-
R1 759 991, Income under-recovered for ably higher than that previously awarded to of procedure and public fected parties, nor the community at large,
Property Rates R17 027 916, user charges Dr. Michael Sutcliffe (75%) by eThekwini. Sir, were consulted prior to its establishment.
for services R2 358 456 and Income over- Any percentage above that is beyond the In response to the letter by uMngeni It is a fact that the building encroaches
recoveries for Grants and subsidies R1 155 pale. Only misdirected political support Municipal Manager F D Vilakazi in respect across a street surveyed as long ago as 1850!
599. could reflect the uMngeni figure. of the Recycle Center blunder “The Facts “ It is a fact that no road closure was publi-
There are numerous other under- and over- Scott states that there is legislation in the published in Village Talk, 4 July 2007. cized. It is a fact that the public was never
recoveries but insufficient to meet the defi- pipeline from National Government to limit Mr Vilakazi insinuates in his letter that consulted.
cit. the capacity of municipalities to determine proper authority was obtained. He is called It is a fact that we, the public, are over-
The rates problem is attributed to farm- rates randage. upon to prove his statements. whelmingly in support of recycling, but not
ers. In fact this legislation already exists. Evidence to the contrary suggests that of administrative disregard for procedure and
The Debtor’s analysis reveals the total Section 20 of the PRA provides that the neither the Planning Department nor the public opinion, resulting in ratepayer’s
outstanding as at 30 June 2007 as Minister (DPLG) may proclaim a percent- Planning Committee were consulted, nor money being used to pay a legal team to de-
R98 611 711.08 of which R80 993 603.29 is age limitation on rate randage increases. plans approved by the Building Inspectorate fend arrogant disregard of our legislation
150 days or more. Rates debtors are reflected This year of course the rate randage de- at that time. against its law-abiding residents.
as R48 375 816.74 and water debtors as creased because of the revaluation and such As a consequence, due process of the ad- The relevant provincial authority is called
R25 483 696.52. power was of course ineffective. ministration itself was not followed. Now upon to protect the interests of its people
Perhaps the M.E.C. Finance could com- More seriously, DPLG have stated in court action is in progress one senses the and investigate the manner in which this in-
ment hereon together with the Portfolio correspondence that it is not obligatory for Municipal Manager is simply attempting to sult to the law-abiding public has been in-
Committee on Finance. the Minister to issue a Proclamation. legitimize these actions after the fact with- stigated.
The now-infamous uMngeni budget Can ratepayers therefore expect another out transparency or accountability and hence Officials who act in a wasteful or negli-
Nalini Naidoo’s article on 20 July, headed unbridled increase in 2008/2009 ? without due regard to our country’s laws, gent fashion, in disregard of due process,
“uMngeni Budget under fire”, is pertinent. A senior Parliamentarian has stated that our municipality’s by-laws, and the public. should be held accountable in their personal
Notwithstanding that “complex” ratepay- the above is not in the spirit of the legisla- Opportunities to resolve this matter ami- capacities.
ers and the Concerned Ratepayers Group tion. cably prior to the High Court enforcing such R D MacKellar