Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
(SFRC) and natural rubber latex under cyclic loading. Test results have
enhances the ductility and energy absorption capacity of the joint. Also
conventional joint.
INTRODUCTION
difficulties.
using SFRC in framed beam-column joints. All these tests have shown
been made so far to study the combined effect of steel fibres and
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
beam-column joints were cast and tested under flexural cyclic loading.
joint are given in Fig 1. The column was reinforced with six 12-mm
diameter high yield strength deformed (HYSD) bars and the beam was
bars at top and bottom. HYSD bars of 6-mm diameter were used for
(p.) namely, 0.89 and 1.22, four different values of dry rubber content
(DRC) of natural rubber latex(L) namely, 0.5 percent and 1.0 percent
were used. As the value of volume fraction of steel fibres exceeds two
percent, the normal concrete mix becomes less workable. Hence the
studies, it has been noted that as the percentage of DRC exceeds above
CASTING OF SPECIMENS
Materials used:-
1989.
CASTING:-
Reinforcing cage was fabricated and placed inside the mould. The ratio
of cement, sand and coarse aggregate used in the nominal mix was 1:2:4
To start with, 50 percent of the water was added and the remaining 50
percent of the water, mixed with latex and a superplasticiser was added
later and mixing was done till a uniform mix was obtained. The
from workability test for a flow of 40 cm. The concrete mix was
poured into the mould in layers and the mould was vibrated for
and air dried for 24 hours and then cured under wet gunny bags for 28
days.
TESTING OF SPECIMENS:-
stimulate column axial load. A hydraulic jack was used to apply the
load at the free end of the beam. To record the load precisely, a load
cell with a least count of 0.098 kN(10 kg) was used. The increment of
loading selected was 4 kN. The beam was loaded gradually upto 4 kN,
then unloaded and reloaded to the next increment of load and this
pattern of loading was continued for each increment until failure. The
deflection of the beam at the point of loading during the test was
measured using a dial gauge with a least count of 0.01 mm. Other
near the joint. These LVDTs measured deformation over a guage length
of 200 mm. The locations of LVDTs are shown in Fig 2. From these
Deflection dial
guage
after the first crack load. As the loading is increased additional cracks
developed wide cracks at the joint and the cracking was more or less
closely spaced finer cracks and width of such cracks was smaller than
observed that the use of SFRC in the joint core could increase the joint
stiffness and minimise damage to the concrete. The core and cover
the demand for more energy for further propagation, which in turn
did not enhance the ultimate strength. This may be due to ‘balling
percentage of fibre content, the mix becomes less workable and the
Desciption ρs Vf Lp P u kN δ u mm φ u x 10 3 /m φu
φy
specimens. This in turn may have led to lot of voids in the concrete
and hence might have caused reduction in the value of ultimate load.
With the addition of 0.5 percent of latex, there is a slight increase in the
latex is added to the fresh concrete, the polymer particles are uniformly
and the water in the pore drains out, the adhesive and autohesive
polymer particles fill the resulting micropores and the closely packed
However, as the latex content increases, the excess latex will lead to the
the curve. Hence the area under the load deflection curve considered in
this study consists of the area under the ascending portion up to the
F = ρ s (1+ V f A f +L p ) .................(1)
capacity with this parameter F. Fig 3 shows the plot relating the energy
1.35 and beyond that value, the energy absorption capacity decreases.
relationship for all the specimens using the test results. The strains
above the extreme tension fibre have been used to calculate the
curvature, φ of the beam for every loading stage using the relation.
å1+ å1
φ = ............................(2)
d1
where,
depends upon the ductility factor which is defined as the ratio of the
Φu
Curvature ductility factor = .........................(3)
Φy
Where
fy
Φ y = curvature at yield = ............(4)
Es ( d – x )
Where
factor thus calculated for all specimens are given in Table 1. From the
table it may be noted that the latex modified SFRC specimens have
indicate that addition of steel fibres and latex improve the ductility of
ultimate strength (33.648 kN) and curvature ductility (2.56) than the
centres). This indicate that the ties/stirrups at the core of the beam-
column joint can be replaced by the addition of steel fibres and latex
CONCLUSION
(i) Addition of steel fibres and latex, to the core of the conventional
of the joint.
construction difficulties.
REFERENCES
Vol. 18 ( 1988)
By M.S. Shetty