SPE 109878 Pore-Level Analysis of the Relationship Between Porosity, Irreducible Water Saturation, and Permeability of Clastic Rocks

T. Torskaya, SPE; G. Jin, SPE; and C. Torres-Verd SPE, The University of Texas at Austin n,

Copyright 2007, Society of Petroleum Engineers This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2007 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Anaheim, California, U.S.A., 11-14 November 2007. This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE Program Committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material, as presented, does not necessarily reect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its ocers, or members. Papers presented at SPE meetings are subject to publication review by Editorial Committees of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper was presented. Write Librarian, SPE, P.O. Box 833836, Richardson, Texas 75083-3836 U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.

ducible water saturation is established for these computergenerated rocks. We compare calculated permeability values of computer-generated rocks and laboratory measurements of core samples to those estimated from dierent empirical approaches, such as Tixier, Coates, and Timur models. It is found that the latter models cannot be applied to general cases of clastic rocks even if their free parameters are adjusted to t core measurements. Our simulations also show that spatial distributions of clay minerals and irreducible water play a fundamental role in establishing an accurate correlation between permeability, porosity, and irreducible water saturation. Specic deterministic equations must be established for rock formations that exhibit distinct grain-size distributions, clay types, structural clay distributions, and grain cementation.

Abstract
Permeability is one of the most important, most spatially variable, most uncertain, and hence least predictable transport properties of porous media. Various empirical models, such as Tixiers, Timurs and Coates equations, are widely used to quantify permeability from welllog calculations of porosity and irreducible water saturation. However, these models do not explicitly include the role played by rock structure, spatial uid distribution in the pore space, wettability, or clay mineral distribution on permeability. We present a pore-scale approach to investigate the inuence of these factors on the permeability of clastic rocks for explicit pore geometries of brine-saturated granular rocks. Synthetic pore-scale models are constructed to represent granular sands with variable grain-size distributions. These models include the structural eects of compaction, cementation, and distribution of dispersed hydrated clay minerals. Irreducible water is geometrically distributed on grain surfaces of the synthetic rocks. Permeability is calculated from lattice-Boltzmann ow simulations. A nonlinear relationship between permeability, porosity, and irre-

Introduction
Permeability governs the displacement of uids through the pore space of porous media. It is one of the most important and least predictable transport properties of porous media in reservoir characterization. Permeability is usually evaluated from core samples and/or well tests. However, core samples and well-test data are often only available from few wells in a reservoir while well logs are available from the majority of wells. Therefore, accurate and reliable evaluation of permeability from well-log data embodies a signicant technical and economic advantage.1 Various empirical models have been proposed to infer permeability from well-log data, based on calculations of porosity, water saturation, capillary pressure, and formation resistivity factor.26 Permeability is estimated via correlations among other rock petrophysical properties. In many cases, there may exist deterministic relationships among these properties, but such correlations usually are empirically derived for a given formation in a given area, are often statistical in nature and, therefore, cannot be applied to general cases.7

T. TORSKAYA, G. JIN, AND C. TORRES-VERD IN

SPE 109878

Permeability has also been observed to be a strict function of porosity and/or residual water saturation in certain reservoirs.5 A general empirical relationship proposed by Wyllie and Rose,4 relates the permeability, k, of a porous medium to its porosity, , and irreducible water saturation, Swi , as b (1) k=a c , Swi where a, b, and c are statistically determined model parameters. Based on this general expression, various empirical relationships3, 57 have been proposed to calculate permeability from values of porosity and irreducible water saturation derived from well logs, including: Tixier:3 k = 62.5 Timur:5 k = 8.58 and Coates:7 k = 4.90 4 (1 Swi )2 , 4 Swi 6 2 , Swi 4.4 2 , Swi
(a) Generation (b) Sedimentation

(2)

(3)

(c) Compaction

(d) Cementation

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the numerical rock generation processes: (a) grain generation, (b) grain sedimentation, (c) compaction, and (d) cementation.

(4) cannot be reproduced in the laboratory. As an alternative to both experimental determination of rock properties and petrophysical correlations, we make use of a numerical approach11, 12 in this paper. We construct synthetic pore-scale models to represent granular sands with variable grain-size distributions. These models include the structural eects of compaction, cementation, and distribution of dispersed hydrated clay minerals. A D3Q19 lattice-Boltzmann algorithm12 is used to simulate viscous ow of the single-phase uid in the pore space of computer-generated rock samples. Permeability is calculated directly from the simulated velocity eld using Darcys equation. We compare the permeability calculated from computer-generated rocks and laboratory measurements of core samples to those estimated from dierent empirical models, such as those introduced by Tixier, Coates, and Timur.

where the unit of permeability is Darcy (D). The units of porosity and irreducible water saturation are expressed in terms of fraction of bulk volume and pore space volume, respectively. Despite their widespead use, existing models used to calculate permeability from porosity and irreducible water saturation do not explicitly include the role played by rock structure, grain geometry, grain-size distribution, wettability, and spatial distribution of irreducible water in the pore space. Laboratory studies have shown that permeability depends on a long list of parameters: porosity, pore size and shape, pore size distribution, clay content, uid type, and saturation a nearly overwhelming complexity.7, 8 The objective of this paper is to investigate the inuence of rock microstructure and spatial distribution of clay minerals on the permeability of clastic rocks for explicit pore geometries of brine-saturated granular rocks. Hydrated clay minerals are responsible for the presence of excess irreducible water whose spatial distribution in the pore space further conditions the geometry of pore throats.9, 10 Therefore, presence of clays in sands can substantially aect the relationship between porosity, irreducible water saturation, and permeability in ways that depart from standard parametric models such as those of Tixier,3 Timur,5 and Coates7 (see Eqs. (2)-(4)). The macroscopic properties and detailed microstructural information of a porous medium can be obtained from experiments. However, the associated experiments are often time-consuming and expensive. In addition, routine laboratory testing is not easily applied to damaged core material or drill cuttings and often reservoir conditions

Numerical Methods
In general, sedimentary rocks originate by deposition of grains followed by compaction and cementation. The latter two processes determine the nal pore-space geometry and connectivity. A physics-based depositional model11 serves to reconstruct natural sedimentary rocks, and generates 3D images of the pore space at an arbitrary degree of spatial resolution. This model provides detailed microstructure of the rock, and makes it possible to calculate the steady-state velocity eld for single-phase uid ow. Figure 1 illustrates the simulation procedures used to contruct numerical rock samples with this method. Dispersed clay minerals in sandstones are of three mor-

SPE 109878

PORE-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POROSITY, IRREDUCIBLE WATER . . .

Fraction of grain volume

1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.1

Fraction of grain volume

1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

(a) PU growth

(b) PT growth
Fraction of grain volume
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.05

Grain radius (mm)

(a) Type 1

Grain radius (mm)

(b) Type 2

Fraction of grain volume

Figure 2 Schematic diagram of dierent growth patterns of pore-lining clay minerals (blue color) on grain surfaces (gray color). Clay minerals distributed uniformly on grain surfaces grow with dierent growth rates: (a) a uniform rate in all directions, and (b) a growth rate larger in the narrow pore region than in other regions.

1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

phological types: (1) pore lining, (2) pore bridging, and (3) discrete particles.13, 14 Pore-lining clays are attached to pore walls to form a relatively continuous and thin clay mineral coating.14 In this paper, we assume that clay minerals, independent of its composition, are homogeneously deposited on grain surfaces within the sample according to a proposed cement overgrowth algorithm.11, 15, 16 Figure 2 shows the idealized patterns of clay mineral distribution on grain surfaces in two dimensions. Two dierent patterns are used: (1) PU growth: clay minerals grow uniformly in all directions on grain surfaces; and (2) PT growth: clay minerals preferentially grow in narrow graincontact regions. Clay shell (region of blue color in Figure 2), which is composed of exceedingly ne-grained particles, often exhibits very high porosity. Water held in this shell is responsible for presence of irreducible water saturation. Dierent volumes of the clay shell correspond to dierent values of irreducible water saturation. In addition, because pores and pore channels are equally small, for all practical purposes clay shells exhibit zero permeability. Therefore, we model clay shells as highly porous, but impermeable layers in numerical simulations. A no-ow boundary condition is enforced at uid-solid interfaces. We use the D3Q19 lattice-Boltzmann algorithm12, 17 to simulate viscous ow of a single-phase uid in the pore space of computer-generated rock samples. In this paper, we use the improved incompressible lattice-Boltzmann model18 together with a pressure boundary condition19 enforced on the inlet and outlet faces. Simulations are performed individually for each of the x, y, and zdirections. Absolute permeability is derived directly from the simulated velocity eld using Darcys equation. Eective absolute permeability is dened as the arithmetic average of the calculated absolute permeabilities in the x, y, and zdirections. Only eective permeability is considered in this paper.

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

Grain radius (mm)

(c) Type 3
Fraction of grain volume
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2

Grain radius (mm)

(d) Type 4

0.0 0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

Grain radius (mm)

(e) Type 5

Figure 3 Grain-size distributions used to generate dierent numerical rock samples. Total volume of all grains with the same size is expressed in terms of fraction of total solid volume in the rock. Only one rock sample is constructed from each of the types 1, 2, and 4, respectively. Type 3 is used to generate two rock samples with dierent porosities. There are 371 samples with dierent porosities and clay morphology constructed from the same grain-size distribution, type 5.

Results and Analysis

Five dierent grain-size distributions, shown in Figure 3, are used to generate numerical rock samples with

dierent degrees of compaction and cementation. Total volume of all grains with the same size is expressed in terms of fraction of total solid volume in the rock. Only one rock sample originates from each of the grain-size distributions of types 1, 2, and 4, respectively. They are labeled as A, B, and E, respectively. Two additional rock samples, C and D, are constructed from the same grain-size distribution, type 3, except that they exhibit dierent values of porosity. The grain-size distribution, type 5, is used to generated 371 rock samples with dierent porosities and clay morphology, labeled as samples F. Initial properties of these samples are listed in Table 1. Note that, due to the number of samples F, we did not list their properties in Table 1. We assume that clay minerals in samples A-E grow uniformly in all directions on grain surfaces and exhibit PU growth patterns, while clays in samples F form according to two dierent patterns: PU growth and PT growth. Water held in clay shells is responsible for the saturation of irreducible water. Due to the fact that clay shells are

T. TORSKAYA, G. JIN, AND C. TORRES-VERD IN

SPE 109878

Sample A B C D E F

t (%) 27 34 29 40 25 -

Ra (mm) 0.42 0.21 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.10

k (Darcy) 98.1 82.6 45.4 199.0 40.1 -

k (Darcy)

Table 1 Initial values of porosity , average radius Ra , and absolute permeability k of samples A-F. The average radius is 3 4 calculated from the expression Vt = N 3 Ra , where Vt is the total volume of all grains, and N is total number of grains in the pack. Permeability is calculated with lattice-Boltzmann ow simulations.

15 10 5 0 0.4 0.4 0.2

Swi

0.2 0.0 0.0

(a) PU pattern

10

Sample A Sample B Permeability (Darcy) Sample C

10

Sample D Sample E k (Darcy)

15 10 5 0 0.4

10

10 0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

0.4 0.2
Swi

0.2 0.0 0.0

(b) PT pattern

Irreducible water saturation, Swi

Figure 4 Variations of calculated permeability for dierent values of irreducible water saturation, Swi (samples A-E).

highly porous, we further assume that the volume of clay shells is equal to the volume of irreducible water in the rock pore space. Therefore, dierent volumes of clay shells correspond to dierent values of irreducible water saturation in the simulations. Figure 4 describes variations of the calculated permeability for dierent values of irreducible water saturation, Swi , for samples A-E. We note that rock permeability decreases with increasing values of irreducible water saturation for all samples A-E. For increasing values of irreducible water saturation, all samples exhibit a similar trend of decreasing permeability. Figure 5 displays the calculated permeability of samples F for dierent values of porosity and irreducible water saturation. There are 184 computergenerated samples in which clays exhibit the PU growth pattern, and 187 samples in which clays exhibit the PT growth pattern. To establish a general relationship between permeability, k, porosity, , and irreducible water saturation, Swi , for these numerical rocks, we use the generalized form, described by Eq. (1). All simulation data in Figures 4 and 5 are used to calculate the parameters a, b, and c in

Figure 5 Calculated permeability versus porosity and irreducible water saturation for samples F. There are 184 samples in which pore-lining clays exhibit the PU growth pattern, and 187 samples that include clays with PT growth.

Eq. (1). We have obtained the following forms for samples A-F with the PU growth pattern and PT growth pattern, respectively: PU pattern: k = 1.68 102 and PT pattern: k = 5.53 102 5.09 1.03 , Swi (6) 4.07 0.97 , Swi (5)

where the unit of permeability is Darcy. Porosity and irreducible water saturation are expressed in terms of fraction of bulk volume and pore space volume, respectively. Different values of model parameters a, b, and c indicate that similar correlations derived for a given formation in a given

SPE 109878

PORE-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POROSITY, IRREDUCIBLE WATER . . .

10

10
this study, Eq. (5) Tixier 1949, Eq. (2) Permeability from Eq. (6), Darcy

SIM EXP
0

Permeability, Darcy (COR)

Timur 1968, Eq. (3) Coates 1981, Eq. (4)

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

Permeability, Darcy (LBS)

Permeability, Darcy (Numerical/Core samples)

(a) PU pattern

10

this study, Eq. (6) Tixier 1949, Eq. (2) Permeability, Darcy (COR) Timur 1968, Eq. (3) Coates 1981, Eq. (4)

Figure 7 Permeability from lattice-Boltzmann simulations on computer-generated rock samples (SIM) and laboratory measurements on core samples (EXP), together with the corresponding values calculated via correlation, Eq. (6).

10

10

Eq. (6) Eq. (2) Permeability, mD (COR) Eq. (3)

0

10

Eq. (4)

10

10

10

10

10

Permeability, Darcy (LBS)

(b) PT pattern

Figure 6 Calculated permeabilities from lattice-Boltzmann simulations (LBS) compared to those calculated with dierent empirical models (COR), Eqs. (2)-(6), for all computergenerated rock samples with dierent clay-growth patterns (a) PU pattern, and (b) PT pattern.

10

10

10

10

10

Permeability, mD (EXP)

basin of the world may not be applicable to other formations with a dierent diagenetic history. Figure 6 compares permeability values rendered by lattice-Boltzmann ow simulations to those estimated with dierent empirical models, Eqs. (2)-(6), for all computergenerated rock samples with dierent clay morphologies. If we assume that the calculated permeabilities with latticeBoltzmann simulations are true values of these numerical samples, empirical models, such as Tixiers, Timurs, and Coates (Eqs. (2)-(4)) generally underestimate the actual values of permeability. One also observes that the spatial distribution of clays in the pore space (or irreducible water) has a signicant eect on the accuracy of permeability estimates obtained with dierent empirical equations. Empirical models give a better estimate of permeability for samples with a PT clay growth pattern than for those with a PU growth pattern.

Figure 8 Measured permeabilities from core samples (EXP) compared to those estimated with dierent empirical models (COR), Eqs. (2)-(6). Note that experimental data are from Salazar et al.s paper20 (Figure 1).

To further verify and compare empirical models discussed previously, we have chosen core data from a tightgas reservoir consisting of sand units of turbiditic origin.20, 21 Core samples were acquired from a shallow interval of A1-A5 m and a deep interval B1-B5 m. Laboratory measurements on these samples, including porosity, irreducible water saturation, and permeability, were well conducted and documented. Figure 7 displays the measured permeability of core samples, together with the calculated permeability of computer-generated rock samples F with PT clay morphology. These calculated/measured values are compared to the estimated values determined from the developed correlation in this paper, Eq. (6). Our model overestimates the permeability of core samples. This dis-

T. TORSKAYA, G. JIN, AND C. TORRES-VERD IN

SPE 109878

This study: k, mD A1 102101 100 101 102

EXP Eq. (6)

Tixier: k, mD 102101 100 101 102

EXP Eq. (2)

Timur: k, mD 102101 100 101 102

EXP Eq. (3)

Coates: k, mD 102101 100 101 102

EXP Eq. (4)

A2

Depth, m

A3

A4

A5

Figure 9 Measured permeability of core samples compared to their estimated values from dierent empirical models: Tixier: Eq. (2), Timur: Eq. (3), Coates: Eq. (4), and this study: Eq. (6). Core samples were acquired in the shallow interval of A1-A5 m. The length of each tick mark in depth is 5 m.

crepancy may be caused by dierent grain size distributions and dierent types of clays present in the core samples and computer-generated samples. It is well known that dierent clay morphologies signicantly aect rock porosity/permeability, capillary pressure curve, and associated pore-size distributions in various ways.14 Dierent values of these parameters in Eqs. (5) and (6) further conrm the eect of the spatial distribution of irreducible water on specic parameters included in the calculations. Figure 8 shows the overall comparison of permeability between laboratory measurements on core samples and those estimated with empirical models, Eqs. (2)-(6). We observe that Timurs model gives the best estimate of permeability, while Tixiers and Coates equations underestimate the permeability, and our correlation, Eq. (6), overestimates the measured permeabilities. In Figures 9 and 10, we observe more clearly the dierence between permeability estimates for dierent models, where permeability is plotted as a function of depth. The length of each tick mark in depth is 5 m. Timurs predictions of permeability are in excellent agreement with laboratory measurements for both depth intervals, while our model overestimates the permeability approximately by one order of magnitude, and Tixiers model underestimates it by one order of magnitude. Coates predictions nearly match experimental data in the deep depth interval B1-B5, but underestimate slightly their values in the

shallow interval A1-A5. The above discrepancy is due to dierent values of free parameters included in Eqs. (2)-(6). Table 2 lists all the free parameters together for comparison. Compared to values in Timurs (or Coates) model, we observe that the value of b in Tixiers model is larger (the dierence is about 2), whereas the coecient a is also one order of magnitude larger. Average values of porosity and irreducible water saturation of core samples studied in this paper are about 10% and 50%, respectively. Therefore, Tixiers model would underestimate the permeability by approximately one order of magnitude, as reected by the plots of Figures 9 and 10. Similarly, our equation (PT pattern) yields larger values of a (about 2 order of magnitude larger) and b (the dierence is about 1). It also yields a smaller value of c (the dierence is about 1). These dierences of parameters in our equation contribute to overestimate the permeability of core samples by approximately one order of magnitude. However, we note that the fact that Timurs model yielded a better estimate of permeability for core samples does not indicate that it is superior to other empirical models and that this model gives the best estimates of permeability for all types of rock formations. Moreover, we emphasize that our equations (5) and (6) were derived from computer-generated samples, which exhibit the same uniform grain size distribution. Our approach to assign the

SPE 109878

PORE-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POROSITY, IRREDUCIBLE WATER . . .

This study: k, mD B1 102101 100 101 102

EXP Eq. (6)

Tixier: k, mD 102101 100 101 102

EXP Eq. (2)

Timur: k, mD 102101 100 101 102

EXP Eq. (3)

Coates: k, mD 102101 100 101 102

EXP Eq. (4)

B2

Depth, m

B3

B4

B5

Figure 10 Measured permeability of core samples compared to their estimated values from dierent empirical models: Tixier: Eq. (2), Timur: Eq. (3), Coates: Eq. (4), and this study: Eq. (6). Core samples were acquired in the deep interval of B1-B5 m. The length of each tick mark in depth is 5 m.

Table 2 Values of parameters a, b, and c in the general form

k = a S c , for dierent empirical models. The unit of permewi ability is Darcy. Porosity and irreducible water saturation are expressed in terms of fraction of bulk volume and pore space volume, respectively.
b

Empirical model Tixier Timur Coates This study, PU This study, PT

a 62.5 8.58 4.90 1.68 102 5.53 102

b 6 4.4 4 4.07 5.09

c 2 2 2 0.97 1.03

spatial distribution of irreducible water on grain surfaces ignores many complications and, of course, may not accurately represent the real distribution of irreducible water saturation in complex rock formations.

Discussion and Conclusions

We introduced a pore-level procedure to investigate the relationship between rock permeability, porosity, and irreducible water saturation. We rst constructed synthetic rock samples using a physics-based depositional model. Starting with an unconsolidated random grain pack, we simulated rock compaction and cementation. The spa-

tial distribution of clay-bound water was geometrically determined using a simple approach, similar to that of the cement overgrowth algorithm.11 Single-phase uid ow within computer-generated rocks was simulated using the lattice-Boltzmann method. Absolute permeability of the sample was estimated directly from the velocity eld using Darcys equation. Such an approach provided detailed rock microstructure and distribution of irreducible water in the pore space, thereby enabling the study of their inuence on the permeability of clastic rocks. We established a relationship between permeability, porosity, and irreducible water saturation for our computer-generated rock samples. To test and compare existing empirical models, such as Tixiers, Timurs and Coates, we compared permeability values predicted with these models to permeability values of both computergenerated rocks and laboratory measurements performed on core samples. We found that all existing models underestimated the permeability of our numerical rocks. For core samples, Timurs predictions were in excellent agreement with laboratory measurements, while our model overestimated the permeability by approximately one order of magnitude, whereas Tixiers underestimated them by one order of magnitude. Coates estimates nearly matched experimental data for core samples acquired in a deep interval, and it underestimated them for core samples acquired in a shallow interval.

T. TORSKAYA, G. JIN, AND C. TORRES-VERD IN

SPE 109878

Our correlations were derived from computer-generated rocks, in which we used the same uniform grain-size distribution and spherical grains. A simple but exible cementgrowth algorithm was used to geometrically distribute irreducible water on grain surfaces. This approach ignores many complications, and of course, may not represent the real distribution of irreducible water in the pore space. We expect that all these factors will play a signicant role in establishing a correlation between permeability, porosity, and irreducible water saturation. Therefore, we emphasize that the correlation developed in this paper is only valid for our numerical rocks and is not universal. It is well known that permeability is dominated by the smallest portions (pore throats) of ow channels in the rock pore space, while porosity and water saturation are controlled by the volume of large pores, not by pore throats. Irreducible water saturation may be closely related to the solid surface area of a rock. Hence, correlations for permeability may be inherently limited in their accuracy and reliability when assuming specic correlations with porosity and water saturation, or with any other rock property, that is not strongly aected by the pore throats of porous media. These factors explain why empirical permeability models are not universal; dierent predictive equations must be established for dierent types of rocks. Therefore, it is necessary to address these factors suitably when establishing a correlation among rock properties to calculate permeability. In addition, empirical permeability models, such as Tixiers, Timurs and Coates, relates the permeability of a porous medium to its porosity with only one constant parameter for all values of porosity. Laboratory measurements performed on Fontainebleau sandstones22 have shown that the correlation between permeability and porosity has two dierent families (low and high porosities) for which the correlation law has the same mathematical shape, but not the same characteristic parameters. Therefore, we also do not expect that a simple correlation between permeability, porosity, and irreducible water saturation would work well for all rock formations with dierent values of porosity. Our fully-explicit pore-scale geometrical approach enables one to study the sensitivity of permeability to amount and spatial distribution of hydrated clay minerals and their exchange cations, brine salinity, and irreducible water saturation for clastic rocks with variable grain-size distributions. Compared to laboratory measurements, this numerical approach is particularly attractive, due to its low cost and high speed of calculation. Our study is but a rst step toward applying pore-scale models to well-log interpretation.

liburton Energy Services, Hydro, Marathon Oil Corporation, Mexican Institute for Petroleum, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Petrobras, Schlumberger, Shell Inter national E&P, Statoil, TOTAL, and Weatherford. The authors acknowledge the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) at The University of Texas at Austin for providing high performance computing resources that have contributed to the research results reported in this paper.

References
[1] S. Ameri, D. Molnar, S. Mohaghegh, and K. Aminian. Permeabilitty evaluation in heterogenous formations using geophysical well logs and geological interpretations. In SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anchorage, Alaska, 1993. [2] G. E. Archie. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. AIME, 146:5462, 1942. [3] M. P. Tixier. Evaluation of permeability from electric-log resistivity gradients. Oil and Gas Journal, June 16, 1949. [4] M. R. J. Wyllie and W. D. Rose. Some theoretical considerations related to the quantitative evaluation of the physical charateristics of reservoir rock from electrical log data. Petroleum Transactions, AIME, 189:105, 1950. [5] A. Timur. An investigation of permeability, porosity, and residual water saturation relationships for sandstone reservoirs. The Log Analyst, 9(4):817, 1968. [6] George R. Coates and J. L. Dumanoir. A new approach to improved log derived permeability. The Log Analyst, XV(1):1729, 1974. [7] Schlumberger. Log Interpretation Principles/Applications. Houston, 1989. [8] Gray Mavko and Amos Nur. The eect of a percolation threshold in the Kozeny-Carman relation. Geophysics, 62(5):1,4801,482, 1997. [9] Guodong Jin, Carlos Torres-Verd Sarath Devarajan, n, Emmanuel Toumelin, and E. C. Thoms. Pore-scale analysis of the Waxman-Smits shaly-sand conductivity model. Petrophysics, 48(2):104120, 2007. [10] Guodong Jin, Carlos Torres-Verdin, F. Radaelli, and E. Rossi. Experimental validation of pore-level calculations of static and dynamic petrophysical properties of clastic rocks. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 2007. [11] Guodong Jin, Tad W. Patzek, and Dmitriy B. Silin. Physics-based reconstruction of sedimentary rocks. In SPE Western Regional/AAPG Pacic Section Joint Meeting, Long Beach, California, USA, 2003. [12] Guodong Jin, Tad W. Patzek, and Dmitriy B. Silin. Direct prediction of the absolute permeability of unconsolidated and consolidated reservoir rock. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 2004. [13] Michael D. Wilson and Edward D. Pittman. Authigenic clays in sandstones: recognition and inuence on reservior properties and paleoenvironmental analysis. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 47(1):331, 1977.

Acknowledgements
The work reported in this paper was funded by the University of Texas at Austins Research Consortium on Formation Evaluation, jointly sponsored by Anadarko, Aramco, Baker Atlas, BHP Billiton, BP, British Gas, ConocoPhillips, Chevron, ENI E&P, ExxonMobil, Hal-

SPE 109878

PORE-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POROSITY, IRREDUCIBLE WATER . . .

[14] John W. Neasham. The morphology of dispersed clay in sandstone reservoirs and its eect on sandstone shaliness, pore space and uid ow properties. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1977. [15] James N. Roberts and Lawrence M. Schwartz. Grain consolidation and electrical conductivity in porous media. Physical Review B, 31(9):59905998, 1985. [16] S. L. Bryant, Christopher Cade, and David Mellor. Permeability prediction from geologic models. The American Association of Petrolem Geologists Bulletin, 77(8):1,338 1,350, 1993. [17] Guodong Jin. Physics-based modeling of sedimentary rock formation and prediction of transport properties. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 2006. [18] Qisu Zou, Shuling Hou, Shiyi Chen, and Gary D. Doolen. An improved incompressible lattice Boltzmann model for time-independent ows. Journal of Statistical Physics, 81(1/2):3548, 1995. [19] Qisu Zou and Xiaoyi He. On pressure and velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann BGK model. Physics of Fluids, 9(6):15911598, 1997. [20] Jess M. Salazar, Mayank Malik, Carlos Torres-Verd u n, Gongli Wang, and Hongyan Duan. Fluid density and viscosity eects on borehole resistivity measurements acquired in the presence of oil-based mud and emulsied surfactants. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 2007. [21] A. J. Martin, D. Robertson, J. Wreford, and A. Lindsay. High-accuracy oriented perforating extends the sand-free production life of Andrew Field. In 2005 Oshore Europe, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, 2005. [22] Thierry Bourbie and Bernard Zinszner. Hydraulic and acoustic properties as a function of porosity in Fontainebleau sandstone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(B13):1152411532, 1985.