Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The celebration of racial diversity in the city, on the other hand, has been more subtle and
problematic. While ethnic minorities now in fact constitute the majority of the
population in many California cities, including San Francisco, ethnic minority groups
continue to be over-represented in poverty and incarceration rates, school dropouts, and
in the prevalence of many preventable diseases, including HIV/AIDS. In the city, racial
“segregation” of neighborhoods and establishments is common, with Latinos and African
American living in working class neighborhood that are considered predominantly Black
(e.g., Bayview Hunters’ Point) or predominantly Latino (The Mission). In addition, the
recent dramatic rise in housing prices has pushed many ethnic minorities out of low-
income housing and created racial tensions in traditionally ethnic neighborhoods.
Similarly, many social establishments are overtly identified by the particular ethnic/racial
groups that patronize them. In the gay community, complaints of racial discrimination
are common by gay men of color who often report feeling uncomfortable in
predominantly white gay bars or clubs. A recent protest was held in the Castro against a
local popular gay bar that, according to protesters, systematically asked multiple
identifications of men of color at the entrance while allowing white patrons enter without
any identification at all. Men of color are often sexually objectified in the media as well
as in sex clubs in ways that are blatantly racist; this, and other racial tensions in the gay
community, have prompted the emergence of numerous organizations of gay men of
color that aim to fight racism in the gay community. It is clear that San Francisco will be
a fruitful and productive setting to study the interaction of race, sex and gender and we
are delighted to be asked to be part of this important collaboration.
Research Objectives
Research Program
The first step of the research program involves mapping the most prominent social
venues where African-American, Latino, and White young people interact for socializing,
flirting, and potential sexual partnering (i.e., “cruising”) in the city of San Francisco. We
will focus particularly on those settings that are not ethnically/racially identified (e.g., a
Latino salsa dance hall or an African-American hip-hop club) but rather, we will focus on
clubs and social spaces where participation and intermingling of different racial groups is
the norm. The major reason for such selection of venues is that we want to focus our
attention on young people that do socially and (potentially) sexually interact with other
racial groupings, rather than participants whose social and sexual networks are ethnically
and racially homogeneous. After mapping all potential venues, we will select four social
venues (two predominantly heterosexual, one predominantly gay male, and one
predominantly lesbian) to be observed. For the first three months of the project, three
graduate student ethnographers from Human Sexuality and/or Ethnic Studies programs at
San Francisco State University (SFSU) will conduct a minimum of 10 hours of
participant observation in each of the settings, for a total of 40 hours of observation. The
10 hours of observation will be distributed in at least three visits per setting. Under the
guidance and supervision of the SF project’s principal investigator (R.M. Diaz), field
notes will be written immediately after each visit to the venue.
During the following six months, we will recruit and interview six young persons from
each of the four selected venues (total N=24), so that we have 2 research participants for
each of the 12 cells created by the interaction of gender (2: male/female) x sexual
orientation (2: heterosexual/homosexual) x race/ethnicity (African
American/Latino/White). Study participants will be recruited in the context of the
informal social interactions with the student ethnographers who will continue more
informal visits to the selected venues during recruitment/interviewing months; however,
student ethnographers will be instructed to select participants who would qualify as
adequate “informants” according to criteria determined by the international collaborative
research team.
With those informants who so consent in writing, a two-hour formal in-depth, semi-
structured interview will be conducted at a safe interview space at the Cesar Chavez
Institute (CCI), a community-based research facility of SFSU, directed by R.M. Diaz (see
www.sfsu.edu/~cci). The CCI is strategically and conveniently located in the multi-
ethnic Mission district of San Francisco with easy access to public transportation. The
Institute has comfortable, inviting, and warmly decorated interview rooms where
interviews can be audio taped for future transcription and analysis. After each interview,
participants will be given a paper-and-pencil self-administered “exit” interview with
close-ended questions. Each participant will be paid a modest stipend for their
participation in the in-depth and exit interviews. Each participant will then be given a set
of 5 additional exit interviews with self-addressed stamped envelopes, and will be
encouraged to distribute the interviews to friends who are similar in age and racial/ethnic
self-identification. If we obtain on average 2 returned self-administered interviews per
participant, we will have a total of (24x3) 72 close-ended interviews that will allow us to
contextualize the ethnographic and qualitative data collected in the project.
The specific questions for the interview protocols will be determined in dialogue among
all regional sites in the collaborative. However, we anticipate that both in-depth and
close-ended questions will be of three types: 1) a set of questions that will be identical in
all regional sites; 2) a set of questions that will be similar but adapted and tailored to the
specific situation of each regional site; and 3) a region-specific set of questions that
address unique site-specific realities and situations.
Proposed Budget
Cesar E. Chavez Institute
San Francisco State University
TwoYear Budget
PERSONNEL YEAR I YEAR II TOTAL
Rafael Diaz, PhD In-Kind In-Kind InKind
Project Principal Investigator
Miguel Casuso, Data Manager 4,700 4,700 9,400
FTE .10 ($47,000 annual salary)
Fringe Rate 40% 1,880 1,880 3,760
Student Research Assistants 9,500 3,000 12,500
Year I (3) students/$14 hr./678 hrs.
Year II (2) students/$14 hr./214 hrs.
Fringe Rate 12% 1,140 360 1,500
Total Personnel 17,220 9,940 27,160
OTHER THAN PERSONNEL
Participant Stipends 3,200 -0- 3,200
24 interviews $50 each ($1,200)
100 questionnaires $20 each ($2,000)
Research Venue Entry Fees 100 -0- 100
Supplies, Telephone, Postage & Printing 1,800 1,195 2,995
Transcription Services 7,500 2,500 10,000
Computer Workstation 2,000 -0- 2,000
Total Other Than Personnel 14,600 3,695 18,295