Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AN FU ORIONIS OUTBURST OBJECT IN THE CYGNUS OB7 MOLECULAR CLOUD. T.A. Movsessian, T.Yu. Magakian,
E.H. Nikogossian, Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory, 378433 Aragatsotn reg., Armenia, (tigmov@bao.sci.am), T. Khanzadyan,
Max-Planck Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany (khtig@mpia-hd.mpg.de), C. Aspin, T. Beck,
Gemini Observatory, 670 N. Aohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA, A. Moiseev, Special Astrophysical Observatory,N.Arkhyz,
Karachaevo-Cherkesia, 369167 Russia, M.D. Smith, Armagh Observatory, College Hill, Armagh BT61 9DG, Northern Ireland,
UK.
1,6
1,4
1,2
1,0
F lu x
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,0
disk
and HH635A north-east of the IR Nebula. Our FP scanning
LVF
interferometry of this region confirms the suggestion in [1]
that these HH objects represent a bipolar outflow from the
source
stellar source associated with the IR-nebula. HH629 has a
negative radial velocity of −81 km s−1 while HH635A has a
positive value of +57 km s−1 (and also a significant velocity
gradient). The FP data also confirm that the optical nebula is
HVF
purely reflective in nature with no trace of any emission lines
such as Hα emission along its extent.
Figure 3: Image of the nebula in K band (contours) and in I The 2 µm spectrum of the near-IR star-like source is shown
band (grayscale) (left panel) and the scheme of formation of in the lower part of Fig. 2. This spectrum shows a rising
double helical structure in high and low velocity flows (right red continuum with no strong features other than deep CO
panel). absorption from 2.3–2.4 µm. Yet again, this type of spectrum
is typical of FUor objects where the continuum emission is
dominated by the circumstellar disk and the absorption by the
tion/excitation, which is confirmed also by the photometry of low surface gravity atmosphere of the disk itself (rather than
its brightest curving region. the stellar atmosphere). We conclude from this spectrum that
In near-IR Ks band image (see Fig. 1 lower left) the source the circumstellar disk around this young star is dominant at
appears dramatically different from the optical one. At 2 µm near-IR wavelengths.
we observe a cometary reflection nebula, with very bright core. Conclusion: To summarize, without doubts, we see that
The nebula is ∼1’ in total extent and again exhibits a curving, the variable optical nebula is illuminated by the bright IR
possibly helical morphology. The same region imaged in the object which increased in NIR in several magnitudes between
2MASS survey does not show any nebular or stellar source in pre- and post-outburst. We did not observe directly the process
this point. Photometry of the IR Nebula indicates a near-IR of the brightening of the IR object; nevertheless, it took place
brightening of at least 4 magnitudes. shortly after 21.06.1999 (set by 2MASS observation date)
If we look at the core star-like object at slightly higher This object represents a still rare case of FUor with op-
spatial resolution from our Gemini NIRI image (Fig. 1 lower tically detected outburst, which also is a source of bipolar
right), we see that at low contrast, the star is resolved in a point- outflow. As in other similar cases: e.g., V346 Nor [4] and
like source with linear extensions protruding to the south-west probable FUors Z CMa [5] and Re 50 [6], the age of outflow
and west. These are most likely the walls of the inner region (about 2000 years in our case) is much greater than the period
of the outflow cavity from the young star. The full-width of outburst. This brings two possibilities: either each FUor
half-maximum (FWHM) of the stellar profile is ∼0.800 in this outburst adds new HH condensations in the flow (thus such
image while other stellar sources im the region have a FWHM outbursts much be recurrent), either these two phenomena are
of ∼0.5500 . This suggests that even at 2 µm, we have still not directly related.
not detected the stellar photosphere itself probably due to the As was already mentioned in [1], the appearance of the
presence of a dense, overlying circumstellar envelope around reflection nebula is quite different in optics and NIR. How-
it. We also note that at high contrast we detect the existence ever, morphologically both images have indications to helical
of a faint counter-flow, extending to the north-east from the structure, but with different opening angle and step. This can
brightest point of the nebula. be schematically repersented as two helices enclosing one an-
Our optical spectra of the brightest knot of the optical other (Fig.3). Such structure can be formed if two components
nebula show strong and wide Hα absorption with a small with significantly different velocities exist in the outflow; each
redshifted emission component. The BaII absorption blend one of them will be responsible for the formation of separate
is also present (see Fig. 2). The existence of the young star helix.
indicator absorption line λ6707Å Li I is yet to be confirmed. All these results strongly support the idea that the source
These features make this spectrum similar to that of FU Orionis star, still invisible in optics, can be the genuine FU Ori object.
itself and another known FUor, BBW 76 [2]. This work was mainly supported by INTAS grant 03-51-
One noteworthy point is the strong asymmetric Hα ab- 4838 and by grant of CRDF/NFSAT AS 062-02/CRDF 12009.
sorption profile. The central radial velocity of Hα absorption T.Yu.M. and T.A.M. thank the administration of Gemini Ob-
(deepest absorption) corresponds to −220 km s−1 , and its blue servatory for the support of their visit.
wing can be traced out to −540 km s−1 . Such profile usually References: [1] Movsessian, T., Khanzadyan, T., Maga-
is considered as an evidence of a high mass loss in the form kian, T., Smith, M.,D., & Nikogosian, E. (2003), A&A, 412,
of a stellar wind and is a typical characteristic of FUors. The 147. [2] Reipurth, B., Hartmann, L., Kenyon, S.J., Smette,
velocity of probable emission component is low: +20 km s−1 A. & Bouchet, P. (2002), AJ, 124, 2194. [3] Herbig, G.H.,
and may correspond to ongoing and active accretion. As whole Petrov, P.P. & Duemmler, R. (2003), ApJ, 595, 384. [4] Gra-
this profile is quite similar to the spectra of classic FUors [3]. ham, J.A. & Frogel, J.A. (1985), ApJ, 289, 331. [5] Hartmann,
In [1] it was noted that just on the axis of optical reflection L., Kenyon, S.J., Hewett, R., Edwards, S., Strom, K.M., Strom,
nebula two HH objects are seen: HH629 to the south-west S.E. & Stauffer, J.R. (1989), ApJ, 338, 1001. [6] Reipurth, B.
(1989), A&A, 220, 249