Professional Documents
Culture Documents
phytate,
in humans13
R Lynch,
the
phytate
was by
in soy-proexamined using in an
Materials
32 Preparation cxhy- Eleven
and
methods
isolates
measured meals
ofsoybean-protein
different soybean-protein isolates were prepared from containing different batches of soy flour (Table ). Isolates 1 I-IV were egg white or one of three a isolates containing much of their native amount of phytate contents. Iron standard phytic acid (4.9-8.4 mg/g of isolate). Isolates V-VII were lowabsorption increased fourto fivefold when phytic acid was rephytate isolates (0.2-1 .0 mg phytic acid/g) in which the phytic duced from its native amount of 49-8.4 < to 0.01 mg/g of isoreduced by continuous acid-salt washing and ullate. Even relatively small quantities of residual phytate wereacid had been trafiltration. In isolate VIII the phytic acid was reduced < 0.01 to strongly inhibitory and phytic acid had to be reduced < 0.3 to mg/g by enzyme treatment. Isolate IX (< 0.01 mg phytic acid/ mg/g of isolate (corresponding <to 10 mg phytic acid/meal) enzyme treated and ultrafiltered. Finally, in isolates before a meaningful increase in iron absorption was observed. g) was both drolyzed corn starch, series ofsoy-protein oil, and either with different
However, absorption
the egg inhibitory that from other these
all the phytic acid, iron x and amount was still only half that of
that phytic in soy-protein poor acid is a major lates from isolates but
acid
was
restored
its original
first
contribute
bioavailability
Am Soy-protein
J C/in
of ironII, VI, and X were made were fed in study 2. The third batch
from
the second
batch
were
ofsoy
made
flour
from 4.
and
the de-
remaining
KEY
WORDS
absorption
All
fatted water
of soy flour isolates ( 1-2 kg) soybean flour to water system that at native adjusted by
soaked
deionized
(flour
ratio :7.5, 1
and
then
centrifuged
the
in
fibrous
Introduction
Soy protein in the United one-quarter is a major ingredient in infant formulas States where soy formulas now account of infant-formula sales1 ). The use of soy (
X g at 37#{176}C remove to
phytate isolates (I-IV), the resulting to pH to precipitate 5.2 the protein, centrifugation, washed with deionized
is also
dairy-type and material
increasing
foods. for the excellent
in extended
Good functional development protein
meat
quality, of properties
products,
low make new cost,
baked
it an
protein goods,
with
#{176}C, and and mg
potassium
spray-dried. reason acid/g Those washing way is the
hydroxide,
The why our compared isolates and except
sterilized
washing native with in which ultrafiltration that after step phytate 9.0-1
by steam
removes isolates 7.0 mg/ phytate (V-VII)
plentiful attractive
phytic
manufactured
One
an
potential
inhibitory
drawback
effect on
to the
iron
use of soy
in
protein
humans
is that
(3-7).
absorption
the
precipitation
fat soy flour, textured soy flour, and isolated soy protein all protein the fraction was ultrafiltered in a two-step process at pH markedly reduce nonheme-iron absorption. The isolated protein 52 and pH 7 in the presence ofsodium chloride (9). has the greatest inhibitory effect (3). For isolates in which the phytate was removed by enzyme The nature ofthe substances in soybean products that inhibit treatment (VII and IX), the soybean milk was treated at pH 5.2
iron absorption to contain inhibitor is unclear. appreciable of iron However, quantities absorption absorption ofsoy-protein were meals in soy-protein ofphytate, in wheat products which bran (8). are is an From Nestec Ltd, Nestl#{233} Research Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland, Center, Kansas City, KS 66103. and AID Cooperative Agreement known important
The
present
study
was
designed
to define
the
role
the University of Kansas Medical of phytate and 2 Supported by NIH grant DK39246
in modifying nonheme-iron isolates in humans. A series fold variation in phytate absorption tein isolates radioisotopic Am J C/in
content
from soybean-protein DAN-S I S-A-00-7908-00. isolates with a 10003 Address reprint requests prepared. Nonheme-iron Centre, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, containing human these volunteers soy-pro- zerland. with a Received Accepted Society
to RF Hurrell, Nestec Ltd, Nestl#{233} Research PGBox 44, CH-l000 Lausanne 26, Swit-
in USA.
1992
American
for Clinical
574 TABLE
Analytical
HURRELL 1
data on soybean-protein isolates
ET
AL
Percent
Soy-isolate fractiont protein
%N
X
crude
Phytic mg/g acid Trypsin TIU/mg inhibitor N Iron mg/g Calcium mg/g
Inorganic
phosphorus mg/g
6.25
Native I IIi
0.41 0 1.1
5.3 5.3
0.145 0.175
0.278 0.563
0.1 1 0.21
IIIC
IVC
89.1
90.1 phytate
6.50.7
8.8
6.7
0.130
0.140
0.616
0.462
0.50
0.09
Acid-salt-reduced
V VP VIIC
Enzyme-reduced phytate
92.0 92.6
90.1
0.2 1.0
0.3 00l 0.01 99 3.7
0 0.1
0.01 0.01 0 02 0.2 without further
4.5 3.6
3.5 21.7 14.5 7.2 8.8 moisture
0.145 0.180
0.146 0.135 0.155 0.162 0.145 removal.
0.070 0.440
0.077 0.820 0.289 0.364 0.142
0.08 0.19
0.05 0.68 0.28 0.17 0.22
VIIIC
IXC Restored XL fl phytate
89.7
91.8 91.1 90.8 data the were same followed sodium sodium obtained superscript on the spray-dried were prepared
x1c11
S
products
t Isolates
from
the same
batch
of soy flour.
t ; SE. Enzyme-reduced
II Produced #{182} Produced
by adding by adding
with Finland)
phytase before
centrifuged, described
an additional
Helsinki, VII then was washed, neutralized, sterilized, and spray-dried above. For isolate IX the coagulum was subjected to
precipitation ofthe protein. Isolate ultrafiltration treatment to remove the
from Aspergillus
niger (Alko
Ltd.
lates,
and
and were
a control
meal corn
meal
were starch
Three 2,
a control
asmeals
formula Brand,
containing
Products,
67
American
by12 mL vanilla extract (McCormick V 200 mL deionized distilled water, and the enzyme-treated isolate VIII, respectively, before thex 6.25) derived from either a soy-protein isolate or egg white neutralization step. (Monarch Egg Corporation, Kansas City, MO). The calcium content of the soy-protein-isolate meals within each study was Analytical methods equilibrated by adding calcium chloride (CaCI2 2H2O) to raise the calcium content to 44 mg/meal in study 1, 19.2 mg in study Iron and calcium were determined by atomic-absorption 2, and 27.4 mg in studies 3 and 4. The amount of calcium (96 spectroscopy after dry ashing. Total nitrogen was determined mg/meal) in the egg white-control meal was not modified. by using an automatic nitrogen analyzer(Type NA Carlo1500; The test meals for studies 1-4 are described in Table 2. The Erba, Milan, Italy). Trypsin inhibitors were measured according test meals in study 1 included soy-protein isolate (I) containing to the method of Kakade et al (10) and trypsin inhibitor units its native phytic acid content and a low-phytate isolate produced (TIU) were expressed per milligram nitrogen.
adding sodium phytate back to the acid-salt-washed isolate
-
lecular-weight
compounds.
Isolates
and
XI
were
made
Phytic
acid
was
measured
by
using
modification
of
by the
continuous
acid-salt
washing
and
ultrafiltration
(V).
Both
method of Makover (1 1) in which cerium replaced iron in theisolates were prepared from the same soy flour. The test meals precipitation step. Phytic acid was calculated from the phos- for the second study comprised a soy-protein isolate containing phorous content of the precipitate by using a factor 3.55. of its native amount of phytic acid (II), a low-phytate isolate proInorganic phosphorous was extracted from mg dried iso200 duced by continuous acid-salt washing and ultrafiltration (VI), late with 10 mL 1 mol H2SO4/L. Phosphorous was measured and the same isolate to which phytic acid had been added back immediately by using a microtitration plate assay based the on (X). Again, all isolates were prepared from the same soy flour. complex formation of malachite green with phosphomolybdate In the third study the test meals included a control soy-protein under acidic conditions (12). isolate containing its native amount ofphytic acid (III), an isolate from which the phytate had been removed by enzyme digestion Iron-absorption studies (VIII), and the same phytate-free isolate to which phytic acid back (XI). For study 4 the meals were a control Four iron-absorption studies were carried out in groups of 7- had been added isolate containing its native phytic acid (IV), a low-phytate isolate 9 human subjects. In study 1 the volunteers were fed two test produced by acid-salt washing and ultrafiltration (VII), and an meals, each containing one ofthe experimental soy-protein iso-
SOY
PROTEIN,
PHYTATE,
AND
IRON
ABSORPTION
575
removal
on iron absorption
from
soy isolates
Absorpti on ratio vs meal D
Mealst
Iron
absorption5 % of dose
vs meal A
1, (6 M, 2 F), 24 y
44
2, (5 M, 4 F), 23 y
43
3, (7 M,
1 F), 23 y
45
68 (60-77)
4, (3 M, 4 F), 22 y
43
35 (28-45)
Isolate I (native phytate) Isolate V (A-S-reduced phytate) Egg white control Isolate II (native phytate) Isolate VI (A-S-reduced phytate) Isolate X (restored phytate) Egg white control Isolate III (native phytate) Isolate VIII (E-reduced phytate) Isolate XI (restored phytate) Egg white control Isolate IV (native phytate) Isolate VII (A-S-reduced phytate) Isolate IX (E-reduced phytate) D Egg white control
1.50 3.15 6.34 0.92 1.91 1.08 5.75 0.53 2.50 0.78 5.48 1.36 4.17 5.48 9.72
(1.10-2.06) (2.32-4.28) (4.72-8.5 )1 (0.65-1.32) (1.34-2.71) (0.75-1.54) (3.96-8.33) (0.41-0.68) (2.10-2.97) (0.52-1.15) (3.63-5.94) (0.94-1.98) (3.01-5.76) (4.16-7.21) (7.56- 12.5 )1
2.l0
-
0.24t 0.50
-
2.07 1.17
-
4.75* 1.45
-
3.06* 4.02
-
Geometric
i (1
0.01.
isolate
treatment
from
which
followed
the
by
phytate
ultrafiltration
had
from differed
been
(IX).
removed
All
by enzyme second
isolates fed 3, and in
pair of meals was given on days 4. Only a single meal was fed on
2,
studies 3 and 4 were produced As indicated above, isolate IX been The mean exhibited concentrations and denied the gastrointestinal was obtained tigation Human Center. Double absorption The meals sequential from were four radioiron separate water with administered and all Subjects subjected volunteer age of a wide 23 to an subjects y. range between a history from There ofiron 1 1 and additional
low-molecular-weight
compounds.
ranged were status 138
the same batch ofsoy flour. final blood sample was drawn 2 wk after the last test meal to from isolate VIII by having measure the increase in circulating red cell radioactivity. Raultrafiltration step to remove dioiron measurements were made on duplicate 10-mL samples of whole blood by a modification of the method of Eakins and in age from 20 to 3 1 y with Brown a ( I 5). Percentage absorption was calculated on the basis and All were are known 1 1 women. by serum in good to as reflected g/L. that They the blood of volume fen-itin and an assumed red health of8O% influence (18). estimated from cell incorporation height and for absorbed weight (16, radioactivity 17)
2 1 men
Percentage
absorption
values
were
converted
to
logarithms
to each antilostudy
experimental Committee
procedures were approved at the University ofKansas labels meals between was the allowed extrinsic were consumed 0700 and used to measure by each 0900 after
by the contained several independent Medical paired t tests were used to test meals within the same iron mean subject. log absorption ratios
an
Results
3 (13) The results of the iron-absorption 2. In study of 1, subjects fed the the control soy isolate (I) with mg/g had a mean iron studies are shown in Table liquid-formula meal containing a native phytic acid content of of 1.5%, which increased
overnight fast and only h. All meals were labeled by adding 37 56FeCl3 in 0.01 to adjust 1, 6.4 On drawn (14), meals days the kBq mol total
content
in study8.4
absorption
mg in study 2, and5.5 mg in studies 3 and 4. to 3. 1 5% (P = 0.01) when the phytic acid content of the soy the day preceding the first test meal,5 mL 1 blood was isolate was reduced to 0.2 mg/g by acid-salt washing and ultrafor the measurement ofpacked cell volume, serum femtin filtration (isolate V). In study there 2 was a similar twofold inand background radioactivity. The first and second test crease in iron absorption on feeding another low phytate isolate were 2 and labeled with either 59Fe or Fe 3 of the study. Blood (25 mL) incorporated red cell radioactivity. and was administered drawn on day on produced 16 turned acid was by to added acid-salt back. washing its In this and, original study, in addition, amount decreasing absorption when the the phytic rephytic acid approximately
to measure
A similarly
labeled
576
HURRELL
7.2 (isolate from II) 0.92% to to 1.0 mg/g
<
ET
abuJ
AL
0-a 0.7
from
sorption
(isolate 0.02).
VI) Adding
increased back
iron phytic
L9 1 % (P
0.6
0.5
0.2).
A low
vestigated
phytate
in study
isolate
3. This
0.4
OOl mg/g, compared with 0.2-1.0 mg/g in the low-phytate 0.3 isolates produced by acid-salt washing and ultrafiltration (Table 0.2 1). In this study (Table 2), reducing the native phytic acid content 0.1 ofthe control isolate (III) from 6.5 to 0.01 mg/g (isolate VIII) increased iron absorption almost fivefold from 053% to 2.50% 0.0 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 (P < 0.00 1). Again, adding back phytic acid to 3.7 mg/g decreased PHYTIC ACID Cmg I g soy isolate I iron absorption to 078%, whichwas not significantly different from its original value (P > 0.2). FIG 2. Relationship between phytate content (mg/g) of soy-protein Study 4 compared directly a low-phytate isolate produced byisolate and mean iron absorption 1 SE ofeach soy-protein-isolate meal relative to its respective egg white control meal. (Data compiled from acid-salt washing (isolate VII) with a similar isolate produced studies 1-4 as listed in Table 2). Approximate phytic acid content (mg) by enzyme treatment (isolate IX). Both isolates were ultrafiltered by multiplying the phytic acid content (mgi to remove the low-molecular-weight compounds. Mean iron per meal can be calculated g) of the soy-protein isolates by 33. absorption from the control isolate (VI) containing 49 mg phytic
acid/g washing was 1.36%. increased Reducing absorption phytic acid to 4. 17% (P
<
to 0.3 0.001)
to the egg white control. Thus, in Figure 2, iron absorpacid to 0.01 mg/g by enzyme treatment in- relative tion from meals containing the different soy-protein isolates relcreased absorption to 5.48% (P < 0.05). In this study there was the egg white-control meal fed in the same no significant difference in iron absorption between these twoative to that from subject (relative absorption 1.0) is compared with the phytic low-phytate isolates (P > 005). However, when all absorption the acid content ofthe isolates. At phytic acid contents between 9.9 ratios ofthe low-phytate isolates relative to their respective conand 3.7 mg/g, iron absorption relative to the egg white control trols were combined (Fig 1), it is seen that acid-salt washing to varied randomly from 0. 10 to 024. Only after produce isolates with 0.2-1.0 mg phytic acid/g increased iron was low and acid was reduced to 0.3 mg/g was there a substantial absorption 2.3-fold, whereas enzyme treatment to give isolates phytic in iron absorption to 0.43-0.56 ofthe egg white control. with 0.01 mg/g phytic acid produced a significantly greater increase Relative iron absorption can also be compared with ap-the 4.4-fold increase (P < 0.01). phytic acid content of the meal. Because the hydroThe mean iron absorption from the egg white-control meal proximate contained no measurable phytic acid, the soywas 6.34%, 5.75%, 548%, and 9.78%. respectively, in studies 1- lyzed corn starch isolates were the only phytic acid-containing components 4. As absorption from the egg white-control meal was measured protein of Each meal contained 30 g crude protein from the in all subjects, it is possible to compare the absorption from the meal.
ducing
phytic
different
meals
between
studies
by
comparing
their
absorption
test
isolate,
and,
because
the
protein
contents
of
the
isolates
50
differed slightly (Table 1), is equivalent to 33 g isolate per meal. The phytic acid content per meal can be obtained by multiplying the phytic acid content of the isolate (mg/g) by 33. It can be seen that a substantial increase in iron absorption occurred only after phytic acid was reduced <to 10 mg/meal.
20#{149} Discussion 10
S.
The
that Widdowson
of wheat McCance of
I
5
S
important
Subsequent
but
investigations
other studies
with
have
bran
yielded
have
confirmed
contradictory
I..
#{149}1#{149}
1
.5
I
results as to the inhibitory nature of phytate study (21) the reduction of phytate in wheat to have no effect on nonheme-iron absorption
.
S
phytate,
which
represents
half
the
iron
in wheat
to be well
absorbed.
In other
did improve rolls inhibited
studies,
the
reduction
of
and doseas
(23).
The
from
role
soy
of phytate
products was
in modifying
even more
nonhemeunclear
acid/g.
Short
horizontal
lines represent
mean
values.
SOY
PROTEIN,
PHYTATE,
(24) suggest isolates. influenced
AND
(28). made
IRON Our
from
ABSORPTION indicate
soy
577
produced nonheme-iron
under
conditions
results formula.
still
that
iron
absorption
would be similar
from isolate,
absorption.
formulas
to that from
phytate-free moderately
isolate inhibitory
Phytate-free
soy-protein
to iron
casein,
and
The in-
hibitory nature of whey would appear to be due to its high calofphytic acid to 0.01 mg/g ofisolate increased iron absorption fourto fivefold whereas adding back the phytic acid reduced cium and phosphorous contents and not to its protein compoiron absorption to its original low value. Our results also dem- nent (29). The inhibitory nature of casein and phytate-free soy onstrate that relatively small amounts of phytic acid can still isolate on the other hand is due probably to the binding of iron strongly centration mally absorption. in low failed in soy a meal amounts to products to
<
inhibit in 0.3
and
that
the 1 .0 mg/g
acid opti-
conto tides
in peptides
the
The serine be
pep(29).
to
<
those
in iron The
The
corresponds
to10 mg phytic
acid
these phytic studies
a high
very
proportion
of carboxylic
acid
groups.
13
containing phytic
24).
explain
demonstrate
of reducing
acidReferences
1.
Beard
et al (24)
reduced
conditions, of soybeans
from 7.04 to 3.76 mg/g. or pur#{233}e meals in providing phytate They not
beans acid in
meal
showed increase
and
that iron
I 10 mg phytic
reducing absorption phytic
acid
relative
in the
acid to by
low-phytate
these amounts reference
meal.
did meal.
3.
Our
content on
<
results
of iron
would
a meal iron absorption
also
from but
suggest
220 that to
that
by
decreasing
the
have
phytic
little
acid 4.
effect acid S. to
6.
1 10 mg decreasing would
phytic
10 mg/meal,
absorption
be increased
substantially.
Enzyme
than isolates mg/g. the was
treatment
acid-salt
was more
washing
effective
at removing
with ultrafiltration, compared in addition
phytic
acid
giving
combined
7.
phytic
removes
oflow-molecular-weight
pounds,
which
could
also
influence
iron
absorption.
To
inves-
Witherly SA. Soy formulas are not hypoallergenic. Am I Clin Nutr 1990:1:70S-6. Erdman 1W, Fordyce El. Soy products and the human diet. Am I Clin Nutr 1989:49:725-37. Cook ID, Morck TA, Lynch SR. The inhibitory effect ofsoy products on nonheme iron absorption in man. Am I Clin Nutr 1981:34: 2622-9. Morck TA, Lynch SR, Skikne BS, Cook ID. Iron availability from infant food supplements. Am I Clin Nutr 1981:34:2630-4. Morck TA, Lynch SR. Cook ID. Reduction ofthe soy-induced inhibition of nonheme iron absorption. Am Clin Nutr 1982:36:219-28. I Hallberg L, Rossander L. Effect of soy protein on nonheme iron absorption in man. Am I Clin Nutr l982;36:5l4-20. Derman DP, Ballot D, Bothwell TH, et al. Factors influencing the absorption of iron from soya-bean protein products. Br I Nutr 1987;57:345-53. Hallberg L, Rossander L, Skanberg A-B. Phytates and the inhibitory effect ofbran on iron absorption in man. Am I Clin Nutr 1987;45:
988-96.
Dc Rham 0, Jost T. Phytate-protein interaction in soybean extracts and low phytate soy protein products. Food Sci 1979;44:596-600. I 10. Kakade ML, Rackis II, McGhee IE, Puski G. Determination of absorption. Absorption from the meal containing the enzymetrypsin inhibitor activity in soy products: A collaborative analysis reduced phytate isolate VIII (Table 2) was 2.50% compared with of an improved procedure. Cereal Chem 1974;5 1:376-82. 5.48% for the egg white-control meal. Absorption from soy iso- 1 1. Makover RU. Extraction and determination ofphytic acid in beans. late VIII relative to the egg white-control meal was thus 0.46. Cereal Chem 1970;47:288-9S. Absorption from the enzyme-reduced phytate isolate (Table IX 12. Van Veldhoven PP, Mannaerts GP. Inorganic and organic phosphate 2) subjected to an additional ultrafiltration was 5.48% compared measurements in the nanamolar range. Anal Biochem 1987;161:45-8. ID, Layrisse M, Martinez-Ton-es C, Monsen E, Finch CA. with 9.72% from the egg white-control meal in the same subjects. 13. Cook Food iron absorption measured by an extrinsic tag. I Clin Invest Absorption of soy isolate IX relative to the control meal was
ultrafiltration
0.56.
The
phytic studies
acid
content
of both different
isolates protein
mg/g. incorpo14.
I 972:1:80-1S.
Miles LEM, Lipschitz DA, Bieber CP, Cook ID. Measurement of serum femtin by a 2-site immunoradiometric assay. Anal Biochem rated into the same liquid-formula meals as administered in the 1974;6 I:209-24. present investigation demonstrated that soy-protein isolate was 15. Bothwell TH, Charlton RW, Cook ID, Finch CA. Iron metabolism the most inhibitory ofthe protein sources tested. Iron absorption in man. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1979. from a soy-protein-isolate mealwith its native phytic acid content 16. Wennesland R, Brown E, Hopper I, et al. Red cell, plasma and was 020 ofthe egg white-control meal (3) compared with 0.31 blood volume in healthy men measured by radiochromium (Cr) for wheat gluten, 0.40 for whey protein (25), 0.55 or 1 08 for cell tagging and hematocrit: influence ofage, somatotype and habits ofphysical activity on variance after regression ofvolumes to height casein (3, 25), 1 .90 for bovine serum albumin (26), 3.00 for beef and weight combined. I Clin Invest 19S9;38:106S-77. muscle (27), and 3.53 for the protein-free meal (26). In the pres17. Brown E, Hopper I, Hodges IL, et al. Red cells, plasma and blood ent study, removal ofvirtually all the phytic acid from soy-protein volume in healthy women measured by radiochromium cell-labelling isolates increased iron absorption from 0. 10-0.24 to 0.55 of and hematocrit. I Clin Invest 1962;4l:2182-90. the absorption from the egg white-control meal, indicating that 18. Hosein F, Marsaglia G, Finch CA. Blood ferrokinetics in normal even after the removal of phytate, soy protein itself is still relman. I Clin Invest 1967:46:1-9. atively inhibitory to iron absorption. 19. Cook ID, Layrisse M, Finch CA. The measurement ofiron absorpEarlier studies have shown that, at the same amount of ascorbic tion. Blood 1969:33:421-9. acid in the formula, iron absorption from milk-based infant for20. Widdowson EM, McCance RA. Iron exchange of adults on white mulas is two to three times higher than that from soy formulas and brown bread diets. Lancet 1942;l:588-9l. Earlier comparing
578
21.
HURRELL
ET
AL
RF, Lynch SR. Trinidad TP, Dassenko SA, Cook ID. Iron Simpson KM, Morris ER, Cook ID. The inhibitory effect of bran 26. Hun-elI on iron absorption in man. Am I Clin Nutr 198 l;34:l469-78. absorption in humans: bovine serum albumin compared with beef 22. Morris ER, Ellis R. Isolation ofmonoferric phytate from wheat bran muscle and egg white. Am I CIin Nutr l988;47:l02-7. and its biological value as an iron source in rats. J Nutr l976;l06: 27. Cook JD, Monsen ER. Food iron absorption in human subjects. III 753-60. Comparison of the effect of animal proteins on nonheme iron absorption. Am I Clin Nutr 1976:29:859-67. 23. Hallberg L, Brune M, Rossander L. Iron absorption in man: ascorbic acid and dose dependent inhibition by phytate. Am I Gin Nutr 28. Gillooly M, Torrance ID, Bothwell TH, et al. The relation effect of ascorbic acid on iron absorption from soy-based and milk-based 1989;49: 140-4. infant formulas. Am I Clin Nutr l984;40:522-7. 24. Beard IL, Weaver CM, Lynch S, Johnson CD, Dassenko S, Cook RF, Berrocal R, Lynch SR. Dassenko SA, Cook ID. The ID. The effect of soybean phosphate and phytate content on iron 29. Hun-elI bioavailability. Nutr Res l988;8:345-52. influence ofbovine milk proteins on iron absorption in man. In: 25. Hun-eli RF, Lynch SR, Trinidad TP, Dassenko SA, Cook JD. Iron Hercberg 5, Galan P, Dupin H, eds. Recent knowledge of iron absorption in humans as influenced by bovine milk proteins. Am J and folate deficiencies in the world. Paris: INSERM, 1990: 265-74. Clin Nutr l989;49:546-52.