Quotes Basics Science History Social Other Search

home india and greece contents

Indian civilization is distinctive for its antiquity and continuity. Apart from its own vitality, the continuity of
Indian civilization is largely due to its ability to adapt to alien ideas, harmonize contradictions and mould
new thought patterns. Her constant contacts with the outside world also gave India the opportunity to
contribute to other civilizations. Whilst other ancient civilizations have long ceased to exist, Indian
civilization has continued to grow despite revolutionary changes. The ancient cultures of Egypt,
Mesopotamia and Persia have not survived. But in India today, Hindus seek inspiration from concepts
similar to those originally advanced by their ancestors.

Jawaharlal Nehru says in his book The Discovery of India " Till recently many European thinkers
imagined that everything that was worthwhile had its origins in Greece or Rome. Sir Henry Maine has
said somewhere that except the blind forces of nature, nothing moves in this world which is not originally
Greek."

However, Indian contacts with the Western world date back to prehistoric times. Trade relations,
preceded by the migration of peoples, inevitably developed into cultural relations. This view is not only
amply supported by both philological and archaeological evidence, but by a vast body of corroborative
literary evidence as well: Vedic literature and the Jatakas, Jewish chronicles, and the accounts of Greek
historians all suggest contact between India and the West. Taxila was a great center of commerce and
learning. "Crowds of eager scholars flowed to it for instruction in the three Vedas and in the eighteen
branches of knowledge." Tradition affirms that the great epic, the Mahabharata, was first recited in the
city." (An Advance History of India, R. C. Majumdar, H. C. Raychanduri p.64) Buddha is reputed to have
studied in Taxila. Pythagorean and Platonic philosophy owe their origin to Indian thought and spirituality.

Alexander's raid, which was so significant to Western historians, seemed to have entirely escaped the
attention of Sanskrit authors. From the Indian point of view, there was nothing to distinguish his raid in
Indian history. Jawaharlal Nehru says, " From a military point of view his invasion, was a minor affair. It
was more of a raid across the border, and not a very successful raid at that."

Indian Thought and the West

Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, has said,

"The Europeans are apt to imagine that before the great Greek
thinkers, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, there was a crude
confusion of thought, a sort of chaos without form and void.
Such a view becomes almost a provincialism when we realize
that systems of thought which influenced countless millions of
human beings had been elaborated by people who never heard
the names of the Greek thinkers."

(source: Eastern Religions and Western Thought - By Dr.

Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan p. 350).

There has been too much inclination among Western writers to

idealize the Greeks and their civilization, and they have tended to
discover too much of the contemporary world in the Greek past. In
fact almost everything was traced to ancient Greece. In all that
concerned intellectual activity and even faith, modern civilization was
considered to be an overgrown colony of Hellas. The obvious Greek failings, their shortcomings and the
unhealthy features of their civilization, was rationalized and romanticized.
In the words of Sir Charles Eliot, who affirms that "it is clearly absurd for Europe as a whole to pose
as a qualified instructor in humanity and civilization. He writes: "If Europeans have any
superiority over Asiatics it lies in practical science, finance and administration, not in philosophy,
thought or art. Their gifts are authority and power to organize; in other respects their superiority
is imaginary."

(source: Hinduism and Buddhism - By Sir Charles Elliot Curzon Press ISBN 0700706798 volume I
(1920), pp. xcvi and xcviii )

Modern research, however, has marred this comforting image and is helping to put Greek culture into its
proper historical perspective showing that, like any other culture, it inherited something from preceding
civilizations, profited from the progress of its neighboring cultures (like India and Persia) and, in turn,
bequeathed much to later generations.

We are not completely in the dark on the question of Indian influence

on Greece. Speaking of ascetic practices in the West, Professor Sir
Flinders Patrie (1853-1942) British archaeologist and Egyptologist,
author of Egypt and Israel (1911) observes:

" The presence of a large body of Indian troops in the Persian army in
Greece in 480 B.C. shows how far west the Indian connections were
carried; and the discovery of modeled heads of Indians at Memphis,
of about the fifth century B.C. shows that Indians were living there for
trade. Hence there is no difficulty in regarding India as the source of
the entirely new ideal of asceticism in the West."

(source: Eastern Religions and Western Thought - By Dr.

Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan p. 150).

Gods of heaven

It is significant to note that although the Indians and Greeks (Yavanas) had come from the same
Indo-European stock, they met as strangers in the sixth century B.C. Persian Empire. Soon, however, the
cousins became associates in a a common cultural enterprise. Similarities in language, associated by
similarities in religious beliefs, indicate that these two peoples must have either been in close contact at
some early period or have had a common origin, even though neither had any recollection of those
times.
For example, the gods of
heaven (Varuna - Ouranos;
Dyaus - Zeus ) and the dawn
(Ushas - Aurora) were
common to the Greeks and
Indians. The most prominent
characteristics of the gods of
both races was their power
of regulating the order of
nature and banishing evil.
The Olympian religion of the
Greeks and Vedic beliefs had
a common background. The
Greek concept of logos was
very close to the vedic Vac,
which corresponds to the Latin Vox.

Both Greeks and Romans habitually tried to understand the religions of India by trying to fit them as far
as possible into Greco-Roman categories. Deities in particular were spoken of, not in Indian but in Greek
terms and called by Greek names. Thus Shiva was identified as 'Dionysos', and Hare Krishna as '
Hercules'.

In a passage of the Rig Veda, Vac is praised as a divine being. Vac is

omnipotent, moves amongst divine beings, and carries the great gods,
 Mitra, Varuna, Indra and Agni, within itself. The doctrine of Vac teaches
that "all gods live from Vac, also all demi-gods, animals and people. Vac
is the eternal being, it is the first-born of the eternal law, mother of the
Vedas and navel of immortality." Vedic Aryans attached such great
importance to the spoken word that one who could not correctly
pronounce Sanskrit was called barbar (meaning stammering).

The Greek barbaroi had the same meaning. The brisk intercourse
between India and Greece is attested by the fact that a special rule was
inserted in the great grammar of Panini to distinguish three feminine
forms of yavana: a Greek woman was yavani, the curtain was yavanika,
and the Greek script was yavanani. There is also a striking similarity between the social life described in
the Homeric poems- the Illiad and Odyssey- and that found in the Vedas. Homeric gods, like the heroes
who believed in them, often rode in the horse driven chariots. Horse-chariotry was a feature of the life of
the Indo-European people. The Homeric idea of a language of the gods is also found in Sanskrit, Greek,
Old Norse, and Hittite literatures. Some scholars, like Fiske, have even asserted that elements of the
Trojan war story are to be found in the war between the bright deities, and the night demons as described
in the Rig Veda. It is clear from Homer that even they used articles of Indian merchandise which were
known by names of Indian origin, such as Kassiteros (Sanskrit, Kastira), elephas (Sanskrit, ibha), and
ivory.

Alain Danielou (1907-1994), son of French aristocracy, author of numerous books on philosophy,
religion, history and arts of India, remarks that: "the Greeks were always speaking of India as the sacred
territory of Dionysus and historians working under Alexander the Greek clearly mentions chronicles of the
Puranas as sources of the myth of Dionysus." He quotes Clement of Alexandria who admitted that "we
the Greeks have stolen from the Barbarians their philosophy."

Alexander's Insignificant Raid

Alexander is supposed to have invaded the Punjab in 326 B.C. Every schoolboy is
taught and is expected to know, that he invaded India's Northwest. Strangely, this
event, so significant to Western historians, seemed to have entirely escaped the
attention of Sanskrit authors. Nowhere did Sir William Jones, (1746-1794),who came
to India as a judge of the Supreme Court at Calcutta and pioneered Sanskrit studies,
find any mention of Greeks or any sign of Greek influence.

(source: India Discovered - By John Keay p. 33).

British historian Vincent A. Smith, conservatively appraised the impact of Alexander's invasion as
follows:

"The Greek influence never penetrated deeply (into the Indic civilization)...On the other hand, the
West learned something from India in consequence of the communications opened up by
Alexander's adventure. Our knowledge of the facts is so scanty and fragmentary that it is difficult to
make any positive assertions with confidence, but it is safe to say that the influence of Buddhist ideas on
Christian doctrine may be traced in the Gnostic forms of Christianity, if not elsewhere. The notions of
Indian philosophy and religion which filtered into the Roman empire flowed through channels opened by
Alexander."

(source: In Search of The Cradle of Civilization: : New Light on Ancient India - By Georg
Feuerstein, Subhash Kak & David Frawley p. 252-253).

Even more than the Vedas and the Epics, Sindh figures very prominently in, of all places, the annals of
Sikander that is Alexander. British historians used to talk of Alexander as ``the world conqueror'' who
``came and saw and conquered'' every land he had visited. He is still advertised in Indian text-books as the
victor in his war with India's Porus (Puru).

However, the facts as recorded by Alexander's own Greek historians tell a very different tale. And
Marshal Zhukov, the famous Russian commander in World War II, said at the Indian Military Academy,
Dehra Dun, a few years back, that India had defeated Alexander.
Alexander fared badly enough with Porus in the Punjab. Indeed, Porus put him on the spot when he told him:
``To what purpose should we make war upon one another. if the design of your coming to these parts be not to
rob us of our water or our necessary food, which are the only things that wise men are indispensably obliged to
fight for? As for other riches and possessions, as they are accounted in the eyes of the world, if I am better
provided of them than you, I am ready to let you share with me; but if fortune has been more liberal to you than
to me, I have no objection to be obliged to you.'' Alexander had no reply to the questions posed by Porus.
Instead, with the obstinacy of a bully, he said: ``I shall contend and do battle with you so far that, howsoever
obliging you are, you shall not have the better of me.'' But Porus did have the better of Alexander. In the fighting
that ensued, the Greeks were so terrified of Indian prowess that they refused to proceed farther, in spite of
Alexander's angry urgings and piteous lamentations. Writes Plutarch, the great Greek historian: ``This last
combat with Porus took off the edge of the Macedonians' courage and stayed their further progress in India....
Alexander not only offered Porus to govern his own kingdom as satrap under himself but gave him also the
additional territory of various independent tribes whom he had subdued.'' Porus emerged from his war with
Alexander with his territory doubled and his gold stock augmented. So much for Alexander's ``victory'' over
Porus. However, what was to befall him in Sindh, was even worse. In his wars in Iran. Afghanistan, and
north-west India, Alexander had made so many enemies that he did not dare return home by the same route he
had come. He had, therefore, decided to travel via Sindh. But in Multan the Mallas gave him hell.

(source: Alexander's Waterloo in Sindh - By K R Malkhani).

According to Indian historian Dr. R. C. Majumdar, " The invasion of Alexander has
been recorded in minute details by the greek historians who naturally felt elated at the
progress of their hero over unknown lands and seas. From the Indian point of view,
there was nothing to distinguish his raid in Indian history. It can hardly be called
a great military success as the only military achievement to his credit were the
conquest of petty tribes and States by installments. He never approached even within
a measurable distance of what may be called the citadel of Indian military strength,
and the exertions he had to make against Poros, the ruler of a small district between
the Jhelum and the Chenab, do not certainly favor the hypothesis that he would have
found it an easy task to subdue the mighty Nanda empire."

According to Paul Masson-Oursel and others, "The importance of this Indian campaign of
Alexander has been exaggerated. It had no decisive influence on the destinies of India, for its
results were short-lived.

H. G. Rawlinson, refers to the invasion, " had no immediate effect, and passed off like countless other
invasions, leaving the country almost undisturbed."

Vincent A. Smith " India remained unchanged. She was never Hellenised. She continued to live
her life of splendid isolation, and forgot the passing of the Macedonian storm. No Indian author,
Hindu, Buddhist, or Jain, makes even the faintest illusion to Alexander or his deeds."

(Source: Ancient India - By V. D. Mahajan 1994. published by S. Chand & Company New Delhi. p.
265-268)

Jawaharlal Nehru in his book Discovery of India says, " From a military point of view his invasion, was a
minor affair. It was more of a raid across the border, and not a very successful raid at that." He met with
such stout resistance from a border chieftain that the contemplated advance into the heart of India had to
be reconsidered. If a small ruler on the frontier could fight thus, what of the larger and more powerful
kingdom further south? Probably this was the main reason why his army refused to march further and
insisted on returning."

(source Discovery of India - By Jawaharlal Nehru p. 114-115)

Another myth is propagated by the Western historians that Alexander was noble and
kind king, he had great respects for brave and courageous men, and so on. The truth
is other-wise. He was neither a noble man nor did he have a heart of gold. He
had meted out very cruel and harsh treatment to his earlier enemies. Basus of
Bactria fought tooth and nail with Alexander to defend the freedom of his
motherland. When he was brought before Alexander as a prisoner, Alexander
ordered his servants to whip him and then cut off his nose and ears. He then
 killed him. Many Persian generals were killed by him.

The murder of Kalasthenese, nephew of Aristotle, was committed by Alexander

because he criticised Alexander for foolishly imitating the Persian emperors.
Alexander also murdered his friend Clytus in anger. His father's trusted
lieutenant Parmenian was also murdered by Alexander. The Indian soldiers
who were returning from Masanga were most atrociously murdered by
Alexander in the dead of night. These exploits do not prove Alexander's
kindness and greatness, but only an ordinary emperor driven by the zeal of
expanding his empire.

(Source: Alexander, the Ordinary - By Prof. Dinesh Agarwal

http://www.itihaas.com/ancient/1.html )

The religious scripture of ancient Iranians was the Avesta. The Avesta available
today is only a fraction of what existed thousands of years ago. When Alexander
captured Iran (Persia) in 326 B. C. after a bloody war, he destroyed each copy
of the Avesta available. After return of political stability Persian priests tried to
salvage the Avesta and much had to be written from memory. Another cruel legacy of Alexander.

(source: Vedic Physics - By Raja Ram Mohan Roy p. 8)

Marshal Zhukov, the famous Russian commander in World War II, said at the Indian Military Academy,
Dehra Dun, a few years back, that India had defeated Alexander

Indian Philosophy

By contrast, philosophical thought in India in the sixth century B.C. had become quite mature. It had
reached a stage which could have been arrived at only after long and arduous philosophical quest.
Jainism and Buddhism, the latter enormously influential in Indian and neighboring cultures, had emerged
by this time. But even before their advent, the philosophical reflections of the early Upanishads (900-600
B.C.) had set forth the fundamental concepts of Hindu thought which have continued to dominate the
Indian mind.

It is perhaps necessary to point out that there has often been a wide divergence between Indian
and Western interpretations of Indian thought. Dr. Ananda K. Coomaraswamy once even declared
that a true account to Hinduism may be given in a categorical denial of most of the interpretation
that have been made by Westerners or Western-trained Indians.

The tradition of Indian philosophic thought is as

complex as it is long. The complexities of Indian
philosophy have arisen through centuries of deep
reflection on the many aspects of human experience,
and, in the search for some reality behind the external
world, various methods have been restored to ranging
from experimental to the purely speculative. It is the
oldest philosophical tradition in the world is to be traced
in the ancient Vedas. Although the religious and
philosophical spirit of India emerges distinctly in the Rig
Veda, the Upanishads are its most brilliant exposition, for the Vedic civilization was naturalistic and
utilitarian, although it did not exclude the cosmological and religious speculation.

Older than Plato or Confucius, the Upanishads are the most ancient philosophical works and contain the
mature wisdom of India's intellectual and spiritual attainment. They have inspired not only the orthodox
system of Indian thought but also the so-called heterodox schools such as Buddhism. In profundity of
thought and beauty of style, they have rarely been surpassed not only in Indian thought but in the
Western and Chinese philosophical traditions as well.

The Upanishads have greatly influenced Indian culture throughout history and have also found
enthusiastic admirers abroad. Schopenhauer was almost lyrical about them. Max Muller said: " The
Upanishads are the .... sources of .....the Vedanta philosophy, a system in which human speculation
seems to me to have reached its very acme." The Upanishads are saturated with the spirit of inquiry,
intellectual analysis, and a passion for seeking the truth.

India, is the home of philosophy. Certainly India is a

country where philosophy has always been very popular
and influential. An American scholar has stated that
teachers of philosophy in India were as numerous as
merchants in Babylonia. The sages have always been
heroes of the Indians. If philosophy did emerge in India
earlier than in Greece, and if the two countries were in
close contact soon after this emergence, it is not
unlikely that Indian thought had some influence on
Greek philosophy.

Indian Inspiration of Pythagoras

The similarity between the theory of Thales, that water is

the material cause of all things, and the Vedic idea of
primeval waters as the origin of the universe, was first
pointed out by Richard Garbe. The resemblances, too,
between the teachings of Pythagoras (ca. 582-506 B.C.)
and Indian philosophy are striking. It was Sir William
Jones, the founder of comparative philology, who first
pointed out the pointed out the similarities between
Indian and Pythagorean beliefs. Later, other scholars
such as Colebrooke, Garbe, and Winternitz also
testified to the Indian inspiration of Pythagoras.

Professor H. G. Rawlinson writes: " It is more likely

that Pythagoras was influenced by India than by Egypt.
Almost all the theories, religions, philosophical and mathematical taught by the Pythagoreans, were
known in India in the sixth century B.C., and the Pythagoreans, like the Jains and the Buddhists,
refrained from the destruction of life and eating meat and regarded certain vegetables such as beans as
taboo" "It seems that the so-called Pythagorean theorem of the quadrature of the hypotenuse was
already known to the Indians in the older Vedic times, and thus before Pythagoras (ibid). (Legacy of
India 1937, p. 5).

Professor Maurice Winternitz is of the same opinion: "As regards Pythagoras, it seems to me very
probable that he became acquainted with Indian doctrines in Persia." (Visvabharati Quarterly Feb. 1937,
p. 8).

It is also the view of Sir William Jones (Works, iii. 236), Colebrooke (Miscellaneous Essays, i. 436 ff.).
Schroeder (Pythagoras und die Inder), Garbe (Philosophy of Ancient India, pp. 39 ff), Hopkins
(Religions of India, p. 559 and 560) and Macdonell (Sanskrit Literature, p. 422).

(source: Eastern Religions and Western Thought - By Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan p. 143).

Ludwig von Schröder German philosopher, author of the book Pythagoras und die Inder (Pythagoras
and the Indians), published in 1884, he argued that Pythagoras had been influenced by the Samkhya
school of thought, the most prominent branch of the Indic philosophy next to Vedanta.

(source: In Search of The Cradle of Civilization: : New Light on Ancient India - By Georg
Feuerstein, Subhash Kak & David Frawley p. 252).

" Nearly all the philosophical and mathematical doctrines attributed to Pythagoras are derived
from India."

Orphic religion, Pythagorean philosophy, Neo-Platonism, Stoicism and several others not so well-known
have been influenced by the Samkhya-Vedanta thought of India. In pre-Christian centuries Persia served
as a middle ground between India, and Greece. It is known that Indian archers with their long bows, one
end of which was planted in the ground, fought in Darius's war against Greece. Brahmins and Buddhists
were in Greece before Socrates. Later Alexandria became a great center of commerce and learning,
where Buddhists and Brahmins congregated and where Neo-Platonism was born. The great
astronomical observatory at Ujjayini (now Ujjain) in central India was linked to Alexandria in
Egypt. The first Greek book about India was perhaps written by Scylax, a Greek sea-captain whom
Darius commissioned to explore the course of the Indus about 510 B.C. (Herodotus, iv. 44 ).

An American Mahant: Rama-priya Das poses in a yoga posture. His body is covered with ashes from
holy sadhu-fires. A bead (made of sacred tulsi wood) hangs on a thread around his neck and over his left
shoulder he wears a string which may only be worn by ‘twice-born’, high-caste Hindus and sadhus of this
sect.

(source: Sadhu: Holy Men of India - By Dolf Hartsuiker. For more on Sadhus refer to chapter on
Glimpses XV).

***

Vitsaxis G. Vassilis, in his book Plato and the Upanishads, argues that exponents of literature,
science, philosophy and religion traveled regularly between the two countries. He points to accounts by
Eusebius and Aristoxenes, of the visits of Indian sages to Athens and their meetings with Greek
philosophers. And reference to the visit of Indians to Athens is found in the fragment of Aristotle
preserved in the writings of Diogenes Laertius who was also one of Pythagoras’ biographers.

The essence of Socratic and Platonic philosophy has remained unintelligible in the West because of lack
of insight into Indian thought. Plato's view of Reality is the same as that of the Upanishads. His method of
attaining knowledge of the Good is that of Vedanta. In the Phaedo, Plato describes silent meditation as
withdrawal of the senses from their objects and as stilling the processes of mind.

The Greek theoria of the Pythagoreans, of Socrates and Plato, from which the world 'theater' comes is
the vision or darshana of the Upanishads. Plato mentions that philosophic wisdom can only be
communicated directly from a teacher to disciple, like lighting one lamp by another. The Timaeus
indicates after the manner of the Upanishads that the receiver of philosophic truth must be a fit person -
fit by character and not by reason of intellect alone. Platonic thought is so un-Greek in the sense in which
Greek thought is generally taken, namely, purely rationalism, that some philosopher, such as Nietzsche,
have called it " un-Hellenic."

According to Voltaire, "The Greeks, before the time of Pythagoras, traveled into India for
instruction. The signs of the seven planets and of the seven metals are still almost all over the
earth, such as the Indians invented: the Arabians were obliged to adopt their cyphers."
(source: The Philosophy of History p. 527).

Some sources even credit Pythagoras with having traveled as far as India in search of knowledge,
which may explain some of the close parallels between Indian and Pythagorean philosophy and religion.
These parallels include:

a. a belief in the transmigration of souls;

b. the theory of four elements constituting matter;
c. the reasons for not eating beans;
d. the structure of the religio-philosophical character of the Pythagorean fraternity, which resembled
Buddhist monastic orders; and
e. the contents of the mystical speculations of the Pythagorean schools, which bear a striking
resemblance of the Hindu Upanishads.

According to Greek tradition, Pythagoras, Thales, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Democritus and others
undertook journey to the East to study philosophy and science. By the time Ptolmaic Egypt and Rome’s
Eastern empire had established themselves just before the beginning of the Common era, Indian civilization
was already well developed, having founded three great religions – Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism – and
expressed in writing some subtle currents of religious thought and speculation as well as fundamental theories
in science and medicine.

(source: The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of Mathematics - By George Gheverghese
Joseph p. 1 - 18). For more refer to chapter on Hindu Culture1).

Pythagoras was particularly influenced by Indian philosophy. Professor R. G. Rawlinson remarks that:

"almost all the theories, religious, philosophical, and mathematical, taught by the Pythagorians
were known in India in the sixth century B.C."

Even Aristotle, the great rationalist and empiricist, upheld so strongly by teachers of philosophy in the
West, is not fully understood. Aristotle speaks of intellect in the same sense as do the Upanishads-
intellect which is not thinking logically but which grasps truth immediately. The Indian term for intellect is
buddhi, the purest understanding.

The thought of Plotinus is Hindu. Eusebius in his

biography of Socrates, relates an incident recorded
in the fourth century B.C. in which Socrates met a
Brahmin in the agora or the market place. The
Brahmin asked Socrates what he was doing.
Socrates replied that he was questioning people in
order to understand man. At this, the Brahmin
laughed and asked how one could understand man
without knowing God.

The Socrates conception of freedom and virtue is

that of the Upanishads. Socrates defined virtue as
knowledge. Virtue is character, the realization of the
essence of man. Know thyself, which is exactly the
same as the Upanisadic command, Atmanam
biddhi. In the Gita, knowledge or wisdom is defined
as character. Virtue, comes from the Vedic word vira
(hero, man).

Greek philosophy began in Asia Minor and Greek writers refer to the travels of Pythagoras, and others, to
the East to gain wisdom. According to his biographer Iamblichus,

"Pythagoras traveled widely, studying the esoteric teachings of the Egyptians, Assyrians, and
even Brahmins." According to Gomprez, "It is not too much to assume that the curious Greek
who was a contemporary of Buddha, and it may be of Zoraster, too, would have acquired a more
or less exact knowledge of the East, in the age of intellectual fermentation, through the medium
of Persia."

Pythagoras's theorem discovered in India in 800 BC according to renowned historian Dick Teresi. author
and coauthor of several books about science and technology, including The God Particle. He is
cofounder of Omni magazine and has written for Discover, The New York Times Magazine, and The
Atlantic Monthly.

"Two thousand years before Pythagoras, philosophers in northern India had understood that
gravitation held the solar system together, and that therefore the sun, the most massive object,
had to be at its center."

"Our Western mathematical heritage and pride are critically dependent on the triumphs of ancient
Greece. These accomplishments have been so greatly exaggerated that it often becomes difficult to
sort out how much of modern math is derived from Greece and how much from...the Indians and so on.

"Our modern numerals 0 through 9 were developed in India. Mathematics existed long before the Greeks
constructed their first right angle. On the other hand George Cheverghese Joseph (author of The Crest
of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics) points out that the early Indian mathematics
contained in the Sulbasutras (The Rules of the Cord) contain their own version of the
Pythagorean theorem as well as procedure for obtaining the square root of 2 correct to five
decimal places. The Sulbasutras reveal a rich geometric knowledge that preceded the Greeks."

(source: Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science - By Dick Teresi p. 32). For more
on Dick Teresi refer to chapter on Quotes301_320).

Vivekananda said that Samhkya was the basis of the philosophy of the
whole world. " There is no philosophy in the world that was not
indebted to Kapila. (Kapila is the founder of the Sankhya philosophy).
Krishna says in the Gita that, among the perfected sages, he is Kapila.
Pythagoras came to India and studied his philosophy and that was the
beginning of the philosophy of the Greeks. Later it formed the
Alexandrian school, and still later the Gnostic."

Panini, who speaks of the Greek script as yavanani lipi. The Prakrit
equivalent of yavana, viz. yona, is used in the inscriptions of Ashoka to
describe the Hellenic princes of Egypt, Cyrene, Macedonia, Epirus, and
Syria.

"It is believed that the Dravidians from India went to Egypt and laid the
foundation of its civilization there. the Egyptians themselves had the tradition that they originally came
from the South, from a land called Punt, which an historian of the West, Dr. H.R. Hall, thought referred to
some part of India.

The Indus Valley civilization is, according to Sir John Marshall who was in charge of the
excavations, the oldest of all civilizations unearthed (c. 4000 B.C.) It is older than the Sumerian
and it is believed by many that the latter was a branch of the former.

Some people called the Brahui who dwell in Baluchistan which is at present a part of Pakistan, still speak
the Dravidian language. It is likely that their ancestors were the people who sailed across the narrow
waters at the entrance of the Persian Gulf to Oman and then to Aden along the southern littoral of Arabia,
crossing over to Africa at the narrow strait of Bab-el-Mandeb, near Somaliland and proceeding north
along the Nile Valley."

(Source: The Bhagvad Gita: A Scripture for the Future - Translation and Commentary by Sachindra K.
Majumdar p. 28).

"We hear of Arabian trade with Egypt as far back as 2743 B.C. probably as
ancient as was the trade with India."

(source: The Story of civilizations - Our Oriental Heritage ISBN:

1567310125 1937 vol. 4 p. 157).
 Klaus K. Klostermaier, in his book A Survey of Hinduism pg 18 says:

"For several centuries a lively commerce developed between the ancient

Mediterranean world and India, particularly the ports on the Western coast.
The most famous of these ports was Sopara, not far from modern Bombay,
which was recently renamed Mumbai. Present day Cranganore in Kerala,
identified with the ancient Muziris, claims to have had trade contacts
with Ancient Egypt under Queen Hatsheput, who sent five ships to
obtain spices, as well as with ancient Israel during King Soloman's
reign. Apparently, the contact did not break off after Egypt was conquered
by Greece and later by Rome.

According to I .K. K. Menon:

"there is evidence of a temple of Augustus near Muziris (Cranganore, Kerala) and a force of 1200 Roman
soldiers stationed in the town for the protection of Roman commerce." Large hoards of Roman traders,
who must have rounded the southern tip of India to reach that place."

(Note: The ancient Alexandrian port of Muziris, now Cranganore, Kerala is where the Romans built a
temple to Augustus in the first century.)

Thus, both upon archaeological and historical grounds, India is the mother of civilizations.
Material skill and spiritual ideas spread from the Indus valley to Nineveh and Babylon, to the
entire Middle East, to the Nile Valley and thence to Greece and Rome.

Other Indic Influences:

American mathematician, A. Seindenberg has demonstrated that the Sulbhasutras, the ancient Vedic
mathematics, have inspired all the mathematic sciences of the antique world from Babylonia to Egypt and
Greece". "Arithmetic equations from the Sulbhasutras were used in the observation of the triangle by the
Babylonians and the theory of contraries and of inexactitude in arithmetic methods, discovered by
Hindus, inspired Pythagorean mathematics." writes Abraham Seidenberg.

In astronomy, too, Indus were precursors: Jean-Claude Bailly (1736–93) 18th century French
astronomer and politician. His works on astronomy and on the history of science (notably the Essai sur la
théorie des satellites de Jupiter) were distinguished both for scientific interest and literary elegance and
earned him membership in the French Academy, the Academy of Sciences, and the Academy of
Inscriptions. Bailly had already noticed that:

"the Hindu astronomic systems were much more ancient than those of the Greeks or even the Egyptians
the movement of stars which was calculated by Hindus 4,500 years ago, does not differ even by a minute
from the tables which we are using today." And he concludes: "The Hindu systems of astronomy are
much more ancient than those of the Egyptians - even the Jews derived from the Hindus their
knowledge." There is also no doubt that the Greeks heavily borrowed from the "Indus."

Alain Danileou (1907-1994), son of French aristocracy, author of numerous books on philosophy,
religion, history and arts of India, including Virtue, Success, Pleasure, & Liberation : The Four Aims
of Life in the Tradition of Ancient India. He was perhaps the first European to boldly proclaim his
Hinduness. He settled in India for fifteen years in the study of Sanskrit. He had a wide effect upon
Europe's understanding of Hinduism. He has remarks that:

"the Greeks were always speaking of India as the sacred territory of Dionysus and historians working
under Alexander the Great clearly mention chronicles of the Puranas as sources of the myth of
Dionysus." Alain Danielou quotes Clement of Alexandria who admitted that "we the Greeks have
stolen from the Barbarians their philosophy."

We know that the Greeks had translated the Bhagvad-gita and French philosopher and historian
Roger-Pol Droit writes in his classic "L'oubli de l'Inde (India forgotten) "that there is absolutely not a
shadow of a doubt that Greeks knew all about Indian philosophy."
 William Jones (1746-1794) came to India as a judge of the Supreme
Court at Calcutta. He pioneered Sanskrit studies. A linguist of British
India, his admiration for Indian thought and culture was almost limitless.
He noted that "the analogies between Greek Pythagorean
philosophy and the Sankhya school, are very obvious."

(source: Arise O' India - By Francois Gautier ISBN 81-241-0518-9

Har-Anand Publications 2000. p. 21-22).

Jean-Paul Droit, French philosopher, and Le Monde journalist, recently

wrote in his book "The Forgetfulness of India, that:

"The Greeks loved so much Indian philosophy that Demetrios Galianos

had even translated the Bhagavad-Gita"

Top of Page

The Roman Empire - A Gangster State?

According to Peter Beckman, author of 'A History of Pi: " While Alexandria had become the world
capital of thinkers, Rome was becoming the capital of thugs. Rome was not the first state of organized
gangsterdom nor was it the last; but it was the only one that managed to bamboozle posterity into an
almost universal admiration. Few rational men admire the Huns, the Nazis or the Soviets; but for
centuries, schoolboys have been expected to read Julius Caesar's militaristic drivel. They have
been led to believe that the Romans had attained an advanced level in the sciences, the arts, law,
architecture, engineering and everything else.

It is my opinion that the alleged Roman achievements are

largely a myth; and I feel it is time for this myth to be debunked
a little. What the Romans excelled in was bullying,
bludgeoning, butchering and blood bath. They enslaved
peoples whose cultural level was far above their own. They not
only ruthlessly vandalized their countries, but they also looted
them, stealing their art treasures, abducting their scientists and
copying their technical know-how, which the Romans' barren
society was rarely able to improve on.

Then there is Roman engineering: The Roman roads,

acquaducts, the Coliseums. Warfare, alas, has always been
beneficial to engineering. In a healthy society, engineering
design gets smarter and smarter; in gangster states, it gets
bigger and bigger.

The architecture of the Coliseums and other places of Roman

entertainment are difficult to judge without recalling what
purpose they served. It was here that gladiators fought to the
death; that prisoners of war, convicts and Christians were
devoured by a many as 5,000 wild beasts at a time; and that
victims were crucified or burned alive for the entertainment of
Roman civilization. When the Roman screamed for ever
more blood, artificial lakes were dug and naval battles as many as 19,000 gladiators were staged
until the water turned red with blood. The only Roman emperors who did not throw Christians to
the lions were the Christian emperors. They (Christians) threw the pagans to the lions with the
same gusto and for the same crime - having a different religion.

Romans were not primitive savages, but were sophisticated killers. The Roman contribution to sciences
was mostly limited to butchering antiquity's greatest mathematicians, burning the Library of Alexandria.
and it demonstrates an abysmal ignorance of sciences. Pliny tells us that in India there is a species of
men without mouths who subsist by smelling flowers.

Yet most historians extol the achievements of Rome. "it accustomed the Western races to the idea of a
world-state, and by pax romana....."

(source: A History of Pi - by Peter Beckan St. Martin's Press; ; 19th edition (August 1976) 0312381859
p. 55-59).

Top of Page

Did You Know

Iron with Mettle

Ancient India developed advanced metallurgical technology that made it

possible to cast a remarkable iron pillar, dating to about 300 B.C.E. Still
standing today in Delhi. This solid shaft of wrought iron is about 24 feet high
and 16 inches in diameter. It has been exposed to weather and pollution
since its erection, yet shows minimal corrosion, a technology lost to current
ironmakers. Even with today's advances, only four foundries in the world
could make this piece and none were able to keep it rust-free.

The earliest known metal expert (some 2,200 years ago) Rishi Pantanjali.
His book Loha Shastra, "metal manual" describes in detail metal
preparation.

The pillar is a solid shaft of iron sixteen inches in diameter and 23 feet high. What is most
astounding about it is that it has never rusted even though it has been exposed to wind and rain
for centuries! The pillar defies explanation, not only for not having rusted, but because it is
apparently made of pure iron, which can only be produced today in tiny quantities by electrolysis!
The technique used to cast such a gigantic, solid pillar is also a mystery, as it would be difficult
to construct another of this size even today. The pillar stands as mute testimony to the highly
advanced scientific knowledge that was known in antiquity, and not duplicated until recent times.
Yet still, there is no satisfactory explanation as to why the pillar has never rusted!

(source: Technology of the Gods: The Incredible Sciences of the Ancients - By David Hatcher
Childress p. 80)

Refer to Delhi Iron Pillar - By Prof. R. Balasubramaniam - Professor Department of Materials and
Metallurgical Engng Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016. Contributed to this site by
Prof. R. Balasubramaniam. URL : http://home.iitk.ac.in/~bala

The iron pillar near Qutub Minar at New Delhi is in the news, thanks to the research by Prof. R.
Balasubramaniam of IIT, Kanpur and his team of metallurgists. The pillar is said to be 1,600 years old. A
protective layer of `misawite' — a compound made up of iron, oxygen and hydrogen on the steel pillar, which is
said to contain phosphorus -
is claimed as the reason for the non-corrosive existence.

(source: Iron pillar and nano powder - http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/seta/stories/2002082900020200.htm

For more information refer to chapter on Hindu Culture).

Top of Page
home india and greece contents
Copyright © 2001 - All Rights
Guest Book Updated - September 7, 2005
Reserved.