IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Bench at Luck now

Civil Misc. writ Petition No. of 2006

( Under Article 226 0f the Constitution Of India
District- Raibarelly
Ravi Kant Khare, (Baba Ji) S/O Sri Rama kant Khare, Journalist/ Writer/Publisher and
President of Sarva Hitkari seva Sansthan,(unregistered Society of elite citizens, scholars,
Advocates and Writers)., R/O D.S.- 13, Nirala Nagar, Lucknow- 226020 ----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union of India through its Secretary of Human Resources Ministry,
Govt. Of India, New Delhi.
2. Election Commission of India, through chairman, Election
commission of India, New Delhi
3. State Election Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Luck now
4. Smt. Sonia Gandhi alias Sania Maino of Turin, Italy W/O Late Sri Rajiv Roberto “Gandhi”
President of National Congress Party, 10,Jan Path, New Delhi
To,
The Hon’ble Chief Justice and his Lordship’s other companion Judges.
The humble application of the applicant submit as under:-
1. That this petition is filed as public Interest litigation as the petitioner’s organization, which
is rendering their service to the downtrodden people after collecting the data’s useful to the
fellow citizens as being submitted in this petition from the contribution given by the number
of the advocates, elite class of citizens, who wants to save the nation, but on account of fear
from the people ruling this Nation, including of the fear of the “yes men” of respondent no. 4,
these person or others do not want take the risk of their life, nor they are interested to take
undue advantages of any type of popularity. The true copy of the book published by the
petitioner relating to his Publications are filed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE NO. 1 to
3 to this Writ petition.
2. That thus the present public Interest Petition is maintainable according to the different yard
sticks imposed by the Apex Court in various recent and past Decision.
3. That the petitioner is the representatives of Unregistered Social organizations, meant for
rendering their services and are also the senior citizen, retired as the Sale Tax Officer by
having their creditability of being honored by different organizations for his forceful writing
benevolent to the citizens and are also beneficial to the citizens of India in individual
capacities. He is having his desire to protect the integrity, unity and solidarity of our Nation
from the inefficacious designed to rule our country from the instructions of the alien power
as the respondent no. 4 is having the adherence to the foreign State namely the Italy and is
Christian by religion.
4. That the petitioners seek direction, for the purposes of enlightenment of the people casting
the vote in favour of right candidate contesting the election to the respondent no. 1 to
provide him the information contained in the following books for the purposes of
enlightenment to the voters of Amethi constituency participating in the election scheduled to
be held on 8th may of 2006. The name of the books and the writers thereof are “The Nehru
Dynasty”, Written by Astrologer K. N. Rao, “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age” written by Sri
M. O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary, of Jawaharlal Nehru) in his renowned (but now
suppressed by the GOI) and Mohammad Yunus book, ‘Persons, Passions & Polities’. The true
copy of the book published by Hindu Writers Forum relating to the Extracts of all these
prohibited Publications is filed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE NO. 4 to this Writ
petition.
5. Why the extract of this book are prohibited for being known to general public, who has right of
Information Guarantee under Article 19(1) (a) of the constitution of India and Under the
Provision of Right of Information Act, 2002?
6. That the reason for the purposes of demand of these books on cost to the public is that
the politicians in the conspiracy have deceived the people of India, who is now called as the
Father of the Nation, in connivance with Sri Jawaharlal Nehru, the First prime minister of
India. As the part of conspiracy to rule our nation and thereby have the extinction of the
Hindu Religion for ever by getting the partition of our country on Geographical basis and not
on the basis of the reasons of religious fanatics, on which the country was divided in two
parts as it may hamper the progress and the hatred be perpetuated which may not provide
the growth to the Nation as super power of the world.
“The Nehru Dynasty”, astrologer K. N. Rao mentions the names of Jawahar Lal’s
father and grandfather. Jawahar Lal’s father was believed to be Moti Lal and Moti
Lal’s father was one Gangadhar Nehru.
sri Jawaharlal Nehru’s grand-father belong to Kaul Clan of Kasmir. Sheikh Mohd.
Abdullah hails from their ancestors whose Grand Father was Bal Mukund Kaul.
That Jawahar Lal’s only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru, Kamala Nehru
was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis. She was totally against
Indira’s proposed marriage with Feroze Khan, Why? No one tells us now, who is this
Feroze Khan?
One frequently hears that Rajeev/Rajiv Gandhi’s grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But
then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the material
grandfather. In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important
grandfather in most societies. Why is it then nowhere we find Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal
grandfather’s name?
It appears that the reason is simply this Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal grandfather was a
Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujrat. This Muslim grocer by the
name of Nawab Khan, the grocer who supplied wines etc. to Anand Bhavan, had
married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam.
This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Rajiv’s
father Feroze was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru’s
wishes. Feroze mother’s family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis
and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with Indira by an
affidavit.
Indira Gandhi was Chased out of the Shanti Niketan University by Guru Dev
Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, She was an isolated girl by herself, while
father Jawaharlal was busy with polities, pretty women and illicit sex; the mother
was in hospital. Feroze Khan, the grocer’s son was then in England and he was quite
sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim
women and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque.
Indira Gandhi name was also changed as Smt. Maimuna Begam after the
marriage with Firoj Khan?
The news of this married eventually reached Mohandas Karan Chand Gandhi.
Gandhi ji urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man to
change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion,
from Islam to Hindustan for instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an
affidavit.
And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi. The surprising thing is that the apostle
of truth, the old man soon to be declared India’s Mahatma and the ‘Father of the
Nation’ didn’t mention this game of his in the famous book. ‘My Experiments with
Truth’ Why?
When they returned to India, a mock ‘Vedic marriage’ was instituted for public
consumption. On the subject, writes M. O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary of
Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI) ‘Reminiscences of the
Nehru Age’ on page no. 94, second paragraph: “For some inexplicable reason, Nehru
allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rite in 1942. An inter-
religious and inter-caste marriage Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be
legal, it had to be a civil marriage. It’s a known fact that after Rajiv’s birth Indira and
Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru
frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru’s political activities. Nehru got fed
up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister’s residence Tri-
Murthi Bhavan?
Why does the death of Feroze Gandhi in 1960, when he was consolidating to make
his own political set up remained the Mystery?
Feroze had even planned to remarry.
Those who try to keep tabs on our lenders in spite of all the suppressions and
deliberate misinformation are aware of the fact that the second son Indira (or Mrs.
Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze. He was the
son of another Moslem gentleman, Mohammad Yunus. Here in passing, we might
that the second son was originally named Sanjeev. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder
brother’s name.
Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. M. O. Mathai very graphically
describes at least one case in his “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age” page 206. Muthai
writes: “In the autumn of 1948 ( India became free in 1947 and a great deal of work
needed to be done) a young woman from Banaras arrived in New Delhi as a
sanyasin named Shraddha Mata ( an assumed and not a real name). She was a
Sanskrit Scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology. People
including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses. One day S. D. Upadhyaya,
Nehru’s old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her
an interview in the PM’s House.
As her departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, shapely and
beautiful. Meetings with her became rather frequent, mostly after Nehru finished his
work at night. During one of Nehru’s visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up
there, and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply,
and she visited Nehru at midnight…. Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared.
In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with
a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the
convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her
name or give any particulars about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was
well enough to move out but left the child behind.
She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other
things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother superior, who was a foreigner,
had the letters examined and was, told they were from the Prime Minister. The
person, who brought the letters surrendered them,. “I (Mathai) made discreet
inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his whereabouts.
Convents in such matters are extremely tightlipped and secretive.
Had I succeeded in locating the boy. I would have adopted him. He must have grown
up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was.”
It was claimed to Sanjeev/ sanjay, when the British police in England and his
passport impounded, for having stolen a car, arrested him. Krishna Menon was
then India’s High Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another
passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay.
Incidentally, Sanjay’s marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka
for Indira Gandhi found the name of Lord Indra’s court dancer rather offensive) took
place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus house in New Delhi. And the marriage
with Manaka who was a model (She had modeled for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a
towel) was not so ordinary either.
Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Sanjay too rendered
Menaka pregnant. It was then that her father. Colonel Anand threatened Sanjay with
dire consequences, if he did not marry her daughter. And that did the trick. Sanjay
married Menaka.
It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at
the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka; apparently he had wanted to get him married
with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who carried the most-,
when Sanjay died in the plane accident.
In Yunus book, ‘Persons, Passions & Polities’ one discovers that baby Sanjay had
been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason stated was
phimosis.
It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this
she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as
though if were his personal fiefdom.
 Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was? When the news
of Sanjay’s death reaches Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was
about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him.
Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called Parisi
religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy. Rajiv
become Roberto. His daughter’s name is Bianca and son’s name is Raul. Quite
cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul.
What is amazing is the extent of our people’s ignorance in such matters. The press
conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime
minister of India was very informative.
In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parisi.
Mind you, speaking of the Parisi religion, he had no Parisis ancestor at all. His
grandmother (father’s mother) has turned Muslim after having abandoned the
Parisi religion to marry Nawab Khan. It is the western press that waged a blitz of
misinformation on behalf of Rajiv.
From the New York Times to the Los Angles Times and the Washington Post the big
guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children’s encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a
qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge.
The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University, Rajiv had not
passed a single examination. He had, therefore, to leave Cambridge without a
certificate. Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be
student in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mislead Indian. She was a
student in Cambridge all right but not of the University of Cambridge but of one of
those fly by night language schools where foreign student come to leave English.
Sonia was working as an ‘an pair’ girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the
same time. And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic rites in
full view of India’s public. This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now an
Italian leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification – being
married into the Nehru family. Maneka Gandhi itself is being accepted by the non-
Congress parties, not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but for her
links to the Nehru family. Saying that an Italian should not lead India will amount to
narrow mindedness

7. That Christianity and Muslims have plundered the concept of Vedic religion from about
2006 A.D. years, prior to it there was the Hindu Religion was flourishing through out the
world. Baba Ambedkar in his book on “Thoughts on Pakistan” has described the
apprehension against the appeasement policy for Muslims, which as per its gospel of Jihad
being professed in religion speaks of killing of Hindu citizens as Khafir and Kufr, who are
meant for killing instead of being saved for enjoying by keeping Nihamat and Hurreys for
pacifying the carnal Sexual desire, on the basis of which, the foundations are kept and
based in the other religion.
8. That the background of Sri Jawaharlal Nehru was obviously converted to be the full-fledged
Muslim, as he was nurtured at the place of Anand Bhawan belonging to Mr. Mubarak Ali, a
barrister, at Nawab of Avadh palaces and at place of Rani of Amethi. Gandhi ji has never
thought of avoiding Martyr Bhagat Singh’s death sentence/ Assassination, for which, even
the British pleaded for him , but was demanding the release of Mr. Abdul Rasheed, the
death sentence convict, who killed Sri Nitya Nand Swami, when he was suffering from viral
fewer. The invitation of Ali Brothers sponsored by Gandhi Ji, for invading our country by
Afghanistan/ Teliban was declared to be the sedition by British Ruler and thus it appears
that our country has not been ruled by Indian but by Foreign Invaders from such time.
9. That what was the religion of Rajeev Gandhi? . What is the religion of Sonia Gandhi and her
Children? Whether Sonia Gandhi is living in this country on the strength of Italian Passport?
How she can take the citizen ship and contest the election without disclosing her Religious
Ambitions and political ambition to the people of the constituency, from where she will get
her votes? When assets of the candidate may be directed to be disclosed by the election
commission on the dictates of the Hon’ble Supreme court of India, why not the president of
the biggest party of the country may be directed to disclose her Religion? During visit of Pope
in India, the entire country became Christian. Why president Bush and Sonia Gandhi are
against the Kingdom of Nepal as the Hindu Nation?.
10. That Whether Indira Gandhi was married twice or she was married once?. When she
changed her name from Smt. Magnoona Begham to Indira Gandhi? Whether Rajeev Gandhi
 and Sanjay Gandhi were the real Brothers? For being born out of one father or from different
fathers? Whether the people of this country may be befooled forever or there is any limit of
falsehood imposed upon them by these people, who have never acted for integrity, Solidarity
and security of our Nation.
11. That whether we are still slave of our orthodox, primitive and superstitions? Why we are still
trusting with them, who are the anti-national rather the criminals, who have betrayed our
trust , which was reposed by you? How long we will have the enforced Silence?
12. That Whether the Long slavery, paradoxically enough, makes the slave to look upon the very
change that bind him as his life support?. This story was told to the convict in ancient time
and who was confined in the dingy cell for fifteen years. After fifteen year the detainee was
set free and he gingerly step out of the prison gate. His eyes, which were used to the dim
light wilted at the bright sunshine outside everything including traffic, the gazing eyes were
the strange look to the detainee and as such he felt terrified. He took a long look at the
outside world and thereafter he inhaled a deep breath and there after by a sudden dash he
again reached to his dog’s tether in the cell as his imprisonment has sapped his self-
confidence. This is what has happened in India. Truth will not make us rich, but it will
certainly make us free.
13. That the citizens were having the orthodox feeling and they were very much living under the
domination of superstitions. This was the reason that the Hindus were subjected to the
cruelty by the foreign invaders.
14. That this feeling of utter destitution, dejection, desperation and the loss of all confidence is
the result of our slavery, by which the Indians have forgotten their own past history, lost
freedom and obliviousness of the delights of an unfettered life. Thus it is necessary to keep
the flame of the truth burning in the heart of every enlightened citizen, as the majority of the
public is unaware of the truth. The glory of our country may only be restored, when our
traditional heritage culture may revive every citizen from unadulterated history. The
historical concepts, which were distorted during the long period of slavery, may become a
task of utmost importance and urgency. An inadequate understanding on impressionable
citizen has resulted the further accessibility in implanting the misleading concepts and
thereby breaking the heads and idols of the fellow citizen, due to the segmentation of the
society in many compositions.
15. That no man can survive in isolation. There is a rule of give and take. The moment, one
person is inclined to accept everything as a matter of his right, the person who is inclined to
give him his extra potential, withdraw the basic offer. This becomes the end of social
collaboration. No country is able to survive except by the will of the people. The bitterness
amongst the people may ultimately lead to a crisis on psychological level. Thus the country
required the coercive method for the enforcement of law and order situation. This was on
account of partition of India.
16. That the disqualification prescribed for membership of Parliament under article 102 (1) (d) of
the constitution of India that the individual contesting the election may not in any
acknowledgement of allegiance or adherence to a foreign state. It is known to every citizen
that the respondent No.4 is a foreign lady and her husband namely Rajeev Khan “Gandhi”
converted his religion prior to his marriage with respondent No.4, which he had admitted to
the world media after becoming the Prime Minister of India.
17. That the matter pertaining to the disqualification was referred to the Election Commission of
India for referring the same to the President Of India by Srimati Sushama Swaraj, than
Minister after consultation with Sri Arun Jaitelly than Law Minister and also Sri R.V.
Bhasin, all Advocates practicing at Supreme court of India, but it appears that on account of
the status of the respondent No. 4, being the president of Indian Congress party, no body
could take any decision in the matter. Since the Respondent No. 4 is now contesting again
the election as to become full fledge prime Minister Of India and is having allegiance and
adherence to the foreign Country, Particularly Italy, where she owns the property namely the
House, as she has herself disclosed on affidavit submitted to the District election
officer/District Magistrate and also have her affiliation with Political parties of such Nation
and since the election process has now started again, the declaration of the result of such
result may be withheld till the decision may not be taken by Election Commission in this
regards.
18. That the extracts passages written in all the three books may further disclose the game is
played with the country men by the guardian of our nation to whom the people in India have
always regarded as equivalents to the father of the Nation and they were trusted as head of
the Government. The deceptive approach may be visualized from the passages of all the
 three books, which have been suppressed from the approach of general public or being
suppressed by Govt. Of India during Congress regimes during the dynasty of these person.
19. That whether it is worthwhile to shout a voice and thereby invite some lighter sleeper to
suffer the agony of the death and this purpose achieved through my writing, may serve some
purpose. Since the daylight shallows the darkness, I have written articles to take the
intellectual from apathetically approach towards rectification of prevailing maladies as to
wake up. The politicians have imposed mindless socialism, which held in thrall the peoples
endeavor and enterprise resulting in transfer of potential from the honest benevolent to the
dishonest opportunist.
20. That there is always an excuse for tyranny and mal-administration, which has degenerated
the national character. The power given needs a safeguard from such arbitrary power and
unfair exercise. In present set up freedom has become an abuse and liberty as license.
Therefore the moral damage is more terrible. An oppressive system is more to be feared, than
a Tiger.
21. That the people of this country have completely forgotten the sacrifices given by guru Teg
Bahadur Singh and his brothers, who were poured inside the boiled oil and beheaded by
Aurangzeb period as the refused to give up Hindu religion. The preaching of Guru Govind
Singh have been forgotten so early by our present prime-minister.
22. That Neta Ji Sri Subhash Chandra Bose, after being elected as the president of the Congress
party was denounced to rule the congress in league with Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal
Nehru and at that occasion Mr. Govind Ballabh Pant and said that the Congress party
(created by Mr. A.Hume and carrying it’s activities on instruction of British Government)
wants the nominated members of the choice of Mahatma Gandhi be remained as Executives.
Neta Ji Left the Party and the Nation and was declared as War Prisoner, who was required to
be handed over to the British govt., if he would have found alive in our Country. Jhinnah
passed the Pakistan Resolution on 6th June 1940 at Lahore.
23. That all the peace loving Hindu organizations like R.S.S. and Jansangh were virtually
banned during the period of Indira Gandhi and Rajeev Gandhi and there were number of
cow and bullock slaughter houses opened in Andhra Pradesh and west Bengal, while
subsidy was provided to number of haz voyages meant for slaughtering the thousands of
cows , camels and sheep’s from the donations of the temples offered by our Hindu citizens.
This was the mockery of situation in our country.
24. That every one knows that we are seeing the integrated nation only on account of
indulgences of Iron Man Sardar Sri Ballabha Bhai patel and denouncement of the policy of
Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru, who has created the insurgencies in Kashmir by keeping it beyond
the control of Home Minister purposely for ruling this nation on the cherished principles of
“Divide And Rule” fully experienced in this country and now the respondent No. 4 is trying to
rule upon it from Italy in consultation of U.S.A. for which George Bush was invited to our
Nation , in spite the insurgencies of Muslims during relevant period on the issue of cartoon
at Denmark’s news papers.
25. That Baba Ambedkar wrote a book named as “Thoughts on Pakistan” specifying the
tendencies of Muslims towards Hindus and ultimately resigned from parliament as he was
deceived by Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru to capture the votes of Schedule Castes and other
backwards class citizen as he was against reservation of the posts in employment. He
adopted Buddhism on before Two months prior to his death. The rising of Mahatma Gandhi,
when Kamal Passa, the hereditical line of successions of Mohammad Shahab, was
denounced from Turks by allied powers by doing and participating in KHALIFAT
MOVEMENT, the planning to Get Ali brothers soliciting the support from Afghanistan, now
Teliban, and tendering of apologies to the British Govt. when this Sedition plan was came to
their notice. These were the well known planning of mahatma Gandhi to take the command
of our Nation. The denouncement of Ambedkar Ji as the representative of Schedule caste
and other backward class citizen in the Round Table Conferences and thereafter the reason
for the arrival of Simon Commission are now well known to people of this nation and as
such Baba Ambedkar had shown his resentment at the time of Quit India Movement
Launched By Mahatma Gandhi. Then Why he was made the Chairman of Drafting
committee of Constitution of India. The Answer is dividing and Rule Policy adopted By Mr.
Nehru. The hatred is created purposely to perpetuate the policy of DIVIDE AND RULE in this
country by Congress Govt. Unfortunately the change in the Govt. during B.J.P. Regime has
again given power to the Opportunists, which was prevalent during Congress Regime.
26. That the system of governance is in the hands of Criminal. They have protection of Article
20 (3) of the Constitution of India, when they commit crime in animosity or where no witness
may be allowed to turn up against them. The acquittal of the accused in Parliament attack
and acquittal to the accused of Jaisikalal Murder case is not a Blot on our System. Who is
going to accept the truth as defense in Contempt proceedings and fixing the responsibility of
the officer pronouncing a wrong Judgement? No one. The concept of Plea Bargaining shall
further be abused thus we cannot implement any reform in this nation. Thus the appease
meant with criminals is justified to our citizens. Kindly wake the people lest it will be too
late. The religious non- violent People will be killed in Godhara train Carnage Genocides, but
the retired Supreme court Judge will report this in his one Man Inquiry Commission report a
mere accident as could not smell the kerosene, petrol , naphtha and thus safely declared it
on the inefficacious planning of Railways Minister, An accused in fodder Scam, as having no
smell of crime committed by the traitors of our nation.
The sovereignty and the people should form three Councils,
Educational, Religious and Administrative. One individual should not have the
absolute power of government, the sovereignty being the general president of the
councils .The qualifications of the president the presidents of separate councils
are their interest in the welfare of the country, their excellence of learning and
character, and their influence over the people. A country prospers as long as the
people are righteous. Also their welfare requires the appointment of learned
educational officers, appointment of learned men as the dignitaries of the
spiritual council and of virtuous learned men as administrators. Obedience to
law is required of all.

27. That “It is common knowledge that 70 percent of the people living in rural areas are illiterate
and even more than that percentage of the people are not aware of the rights conferred upon
them by law.
28. That Even literate people do not know, what are their rights and entitlements under the law.
It is this absence of legal awareness which is responsible for the deception, exploitation and
deprivation of rights and benefits, from which the poor suffer in this land.
The Student/children, the future citizens under taking the education of Indian
History on the misconception/ pattern of Anglo Saxon teaching meant for division
of Indian society on the policy of “Divide and Rule”. There is a important question
posed as to whether we have actually gain our independence or we have to under
take another journey full of animosity, aggresses on account of terrorism and
fanatic ideology a prevalent throughout the World of a particular religion. Thus on
account of being sentinel /Guardian at large, this is the voice of the majority of
Hindu Citizens to save our ancestral cultural heritage and there by to give
protection to our future citizens
29. That their legal needs always stand to become crisis-oriented because their ignorance
prevents them from anticipating legal troubles and approaching a lawyer for consultation
and advice in time and their poverty magnifies the impact of the legal trouble and difficulties
when they come.
30. That more over, because of their ignorance and illiteracy, they cannot become self-reliant;
they cannot even help themselves. The law ceases to be their protector because they do not
know that they are entitled to the protection of the law and they can avail of the legal service
programmer for putting an end to their exploitation and winning their rights.
31. That the result is that poverty becomes with them, as a condition of total helplessness. This
miserable condition in which the poor find themselves can be added to situations”
32. That “The busybodies meddlesome interlopers, wayfarers, or officious interveners having
absolutely no public interest, except for personal gain or private profit, either for themselves
or as proxy of others or for any other extraneous motivation or for glare of publicity break
the queue muffling their faces.”
33. That Article 14 has a pervasive potency and a versatile quality, equalitarian in its soul, but
allergic to discriminatory dictates. It is well known that equality is anti-thesis to
arbitrariness. Since the license may not be given to a blind man to drive a car, how
worthwhile, it may be to give the similar license to a criminal to do every sort of atrocities
being committed by indulging into the crime of the innocent people.
34. That there are inherent restrictions applicable for the enforcement of the individual personal
right under article 19, which empowers the state to enforce reasonable restriction on the
exercise of the right of the people in the interest of sovereignty, integrity of India security of
 the state, friendly relations with foreign state, public order, decency or morality etc.
including the incitement to an offence pertaining to the reasonable restrictions regarding
freedom of speech and expression, to assemble ,to form associations and freedom to reside
and move freely throughout the territory of India.
35. That “ We, the People” are still like cavemen with our back turn to light watching the shadow
of the wall. There is an iron cage, not having any ventilation and people are living in the state
of suffocation, virtually on the verge of their death point. There is a complete apathy of the
custodian of the power towards their welfare and in our country "We, the people" who are
regarded to be the sovereign of the nation, are living a life full of abrogation and subjugation.
a. All the members of the court are considered as wounded, where justice is
found wounded with inequity, and judges do not extract the dart of inequity
from justice or remove its blot and destroy inequity, in other words where the
innocent are not respected and the criminal are not punished.
b. A virtuous and just person should never enter a court and when he does so,
he should speak the truth; he who holds his tongue on seeing injustice done,
or speaks contrary to truth and justice, is the greatest sinner.
c. Justice destroyed destroys its destroyer; and justice preserved, preserves its
preserver. Hence, never destroy justice, lest being destroyed; it should
destroy thee.
d. In this world justice or righteousness alone is man’s friend that goes with
him after death. All other things or companions part on the destruction of
the body and he is detached from all company. But the company of justice is
never cut off.
e. When injustice is done in the government court out of partiality, the criminal
or doer of injustice, the second by the witness, the third by the judges, and
the fourth by the president king of an unjust court divides it into four parts
of which one is shared.
2. That the lawyers are always having perplexed with fear of change. He knoweth not the law,
who knoweth not the reason there of, therefore, it is not advisable to live in cloistered
seclusion, detached from the world and all its pursuits. If you are ever tempted to join in the
fierce hunt after the vulgar prizes of the world, remember that after all. That accretes and
frets his hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more.
“There is a land in the present age,
Where the people live in graves
Liberty, freedom all unknown,
Service and be slaves.
The people are living in free past glory of their own,
As an outright, beggars would had sung,
Well once upon a time. I was a king
When such of the attitude of the people
How can they get the freedom,
Least to talk of liberty.
Yet a certain day may come
When the people will hum
In the orchard of freedom
Taste the juice of liberty”.
(Not hearsay, not gossip, not publicity, but action.)

3. That it has been observed by the Hon’ble Courts “where the power is conferred to
achieve a purpose it has been repeatedly reiterated that the power must be exercised
reasonably and in good faith to effectuate the purpose. And in this context ‘ in good
faith’ means ‘for legitimate reasons’. Where power is exercised for extraneous or
irrelevant considerations or reasons, it is unquestionably a colorable exercise of
power or fraud on power and the exercise of power is vitiated”.

4. That the Hon’ble Supreme Court has also held that ‘ Pithily put, bad faith which invalidates
the exercise of power- sometimes called colorable exercise or fraud on power and oftentimes
overlaps motives, passions and satisfactions- is the attainment of ends beyond the
sanctioned purposes of power by simulation or pretension of gaining a legitimate goal. If the
use of the power is for the fulfillment of a legitimate object the actuation or catalysation by
 malice is not legicidal. The action is bad where the true object is to reach an end different
from the one for which the power is entrusted, goaded by extraneous considerations, good or
bad, but irrelevant to the entrustment. When the custodian of power is influenced in its
exercise by considerations out side those for promotion of which the power is vested the
court calls it a colorable exercise and is undeceived by illusion’.
5. That Transparency of action and accountability are perhaps two possible safeguards, which
the court enforcing the protection of fundamental rights must insist upon. Thus police in
India requiring to perform a difficult and delegate task in view of the deteriorating law and
order situation, communal riots, politics turns to student unrest, terrorist activities, dealing
with hard core criminals, drug peddlers, smugglers having strong root in society, will feel
difficulties in the detection of the crime committed by the hardened criminals. Thus a
balanced justice approach is needed to meet the ends of justice. The cure cannot however,
be worst them the diseased itself.

In Keshavanand Bharti Vs state of Kerala A.I.R 1973 S. C. Page 1431 Justice

Matthew held "The fundamental rights have no fixed content, most of them are empty
vessels into which each generation must pour its content in the light of its
experience. It is relevant in this context to remember that in building of just social
order, it is sometimes imperative that the fundamental rights should be somewhat
related to directive principles. The following rights are held to be covered world under
article 21.
6. That Hon’ble Supreme court has taken into account two spheres of dimensions to the right
of personal liberty against the sovereign power exercising its functioning. Thus personal
liberty is a sacred and cherished right under the constitution (UBI JUS IBI REMIDIUM).
7. That Where the public functionaries were involved in such a malafide and colourable
exercise of power that may abridge or abrogate the right of livelihood of a citizen duly
guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.
8. That we are now slave of destructive elements and foreign ambitions. Politicians act in
nefarious designs with impunity. Political parties motivated with vested interests are dancing
to usurp power through any means, fair or foul even at the cost of sacrificing the Nation’s
existence to personal interest. Party systems have pushed to advance its own schemes upon
the ruin of the rest. Our politicians are Mafia dons next to the invaders. Robbers have
generally plundered the rich who are seldom subjected to legislation always plunder the
common citizens and protect those Mafia dons under the phraseology of “law making
sovereign power” having the connotation “procedure establish under law to be cherished
instead of due process”.
That the Freedom of expression may be necessarily including right of information.
There is no expression with out having an idea on the subject, regarding which the
expression of an individual may be given effect to change the existing values an
ideology which are based on the notable extracts of certain facts .An enlightening
informed citizen would undoubtedly enhance democratic values (People’s Union for
Civil liberty (P U C L) Vs. Union of India) (2003) 4 SCC Para 94.
9. That “The freedom of speech and expression is basic to indivisible from a democratic polity
.It includes right to impart and receive information. Restriction to the said right could be
only as provided in article 19(2). Right of a voter to know the bio-data of the candidate is the
foundation of the democracy. The old dictum let the people have the truth and the freedom
to discuss it and all will go well with the Government should prevail. The true test for
deciding the validity of the Act is whether it takes away or abridges fundamental right of the
citizens. If there is direct abridgement of the fundamental right of freedom of speech and
expression, the law would be invalid. If the provisions of the law violate the constitutional
provisions, they have to be struck down and that is what is required to be done in the
present case .It is made clear that no provision is nullified on the ground that the Court does
not approve the underlying policy of the enactment. (Para 69 to 71 and 66). (People’s Union
for Civil liberties (P U C L) Vs. Union of India, (2003) 4 SCC 399:AIR 2003 SC 2363.
The right to live with human dignity free from exploitation (A.I.R 1980 S. C 849) and
the right of livelihood (A.I.R 1986 S. C. 180) respectively was also considered to be
within ambit of article 21. Every endeavor has been provided till now to make this
article reverberate with life and articulate with meaning.

10. It has been held that authority not performing their statutory duties to enforce laws for the
protection of environment inre- J.T 1996 (2) S. C 196 and J.T 1996 (7) S. C. 775 are
 jeopardizing the right of life of the citizen. However the authorities have still to provide
protection by providing a fool proof.
The constitution is required to kept young energetic and alive .The attempt be
endure to expand the ambit of fundamental right. It is said that the dignity of the
ocean lies not in its fury capable of causing destruction, but in its vast extent
and depth with enormous tolerance. Thus the wider the power, the higher the
need of caution and care, while exercising the power.

11. They have the threat of being subjected to atrocities if the drastic step to save the citizens
from the oppression and exposure of falsehood may not be done at an earliest time. Thus
every nationalist who has got a slightest patriotic cult in his inhibition has got a
Fundamental Right and a Constitutional Duty to safe guard our cultural heritage against the
falsehood. Imparting of education is a State function. The State, however, having regard to
its financial and other constraints is not always in a position to perform its duties. The
function of imparting education has been, to a large extent, taken over by the citizens
themselves. Some do it as pure charity; some do it for protection.
Now the sovereignty is attributed upon the three institution namely the
legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The combined effect of the three
institutions makes a democratic society. The legislature is creature like lord
Brahma while the executives like lord Vishnu may provide the welfare to the
public. The judicial institutions like lord Shiva is the dispenser of justice and is
also the protector of all subjects. The law of retributive justice wakes when the
people sleep. Hence wise men regard the law or punishment as virtue or religion.

12. The constitution as it stands does not proceed on the “melting pot “theory while it represents
a “salad bowls” where there is homogeneity without any obliteration of identity. The
foundation of the religion is spiritualism, which is based on trust and confidence and an
ability to strive for the good self of the other individual.
The freedom of speech and expression is basic to indivisible from
a democratic polity .It includes right to impart and receive information.
Restriction to the said right could be only as provided in article 19(2) to (6)
of our Costitution. Right of a voter to know the bio-data of the candidate is
the foundation of the democracy. The old dictum let the people have the
truth and the freedom to discuss it and all will go well with the
Government should prevail. The true test for deciding the validity of the Act
is whether it takes away or abridges fundamental right of the citizens. If
there is direct abridgement of the fundamental right of freedom of speech
and expression, the law would be invalid. If the provisions of the law violate
the constitutional provisions, they have to be struck down and that is what
is required to be done in the present case .It is made clear that no
provision is nullified on the ground that the Court does not approve the
underlying policy of the enactment.

13. The people of our country has right to know every public Act and the principle of finality
may not be insisted upon as the maxim “interest reipublicae ut sit finis litiun”. Wisdom and
advisability of public policy may be demonstrated in order to given effect to the statutory
provisions under our constitution.
“To control the ill effects of money power and muscle power the commissions
recommend that even the election system should be overhauled and drastically
changed lest democracy would become a teasing illusion to common citizens of this
country. Not only a half hearted attempt in the direction of the reform of the election
system is to be taken as has been done by the present legislation by amending some
provisions of the act here and there, but a much improved election system is required
to be evolved to make the election process both transparent and accountable as that
influence of tainted money and physical force of criminals do not make democracy a
farce the citizens fundamental “Right to Information” should be recognized and fully
effectuated (Para 127) (People’s Union for Civil liberties (P U C L) Vs. Union of
India,(2003) 4 SCC 399:AIR 2003 SC 2363.
 14. The ambit and scope of “Right to Know “ is conferred fundamental right under article19 (1)(a)
of the Constitution of India read with the provision of Freedom of Information Act,2002 .The
right to get information in democracy is recognized all throughout and it is a natural right
flowing from the concept of democracy itself Freedom of expression may be necessarily
include right of information. There is no expression with out having an idea on the subject,
regarding which the expression of an individual may be given effect to change the existing
values an ideology which are based on the notable extracts of certain facts.
Justice is a virtue, which transcends all barriers in the way of
administration of justice. This is the acknowledged position of law that no
party can be forced to suffer for the inaction or omission on the part of law
enforcement agencies and whosoever he may be strong. Every decision will
be passed according to the procedure established by law. Thus the law has
to bend before justice. No court can restore the broken heart of the justice
and he should provide such protection, which is necessary for them like
dutiful parents.

It is fundamental that if rule of law is to have any meaning and content,

the authority of the court or a statutory authority and the confidence of the
public in them should not be allowed to be shaken, diluted or undermined.
The courts of justice and all tribunals exercising judicial functions from the
highest to the lowest are by their Constitution entrusted with functions
directly connected with the administration of justice. It is that expectation
and confidence of all those, who have or are likely to have business in that
court or tribunal, which should be maintained so that the court/tribunal
perform all their functions on a higher level of rectitude without fear or
favour, affection or ill-will.

15. That It has been held that “The newspapers serve as a medium of exercise of freedom of
speech. The right of its shareholder to have a free press is a fundamental right.
Advertisements in newspapers play an important role in the matter of revenue of the
newspaper and have a direct nexus with its circulation. For the purpose of meeting the costs
of the newsprint as also for meeting other financial liabilities, which would include the
liability to pay wages, allowances and gratuity etc. To the working journalist as also liability
to pay a reasonable profit to the share holders vis-a-vis making the newspapers available to
the readers at a price at which they can afford to purchase it , the petitioners have no other
option but to collect more funds by publishing commercial and other advertisements in the
newspaper.(Paras 33,36,34and 38) .Hindustan Times Vs State of U. P.(2003) 1 SCC 591,AIR
2003 SC 250,(2003) 1 LLJ 206: (2002) 258 ITR 469.
16. That under these circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that the decision on the
disqualification as contemplated under Article 102 (1) (d ) read with Article 9 of the
Constitution of India may be directed to be taken by the Respondent No. 2 for its
recommending to the matter to the President of India regarding adherence of the Respondent
No. 4 with Foreign Country as per her own affidavit submitted in respect of her family assets
and since the election process has been commenced , the counting and declaration of the
result may be differed till such decision.
Grounds
1) Because this petition is filed as public Interest litigation as the petitioners are rendering
their service to the downtrodden people after collecting these data’s submitted in this
petition from number of the advocates, elite class of citizens, who wants to save the nation
but on account of fear from the people including of the fear of the yes men of respondent no.
4, the petitioners or they do not want take the risk of their life, nor they are interested to
take undue advantages of any type of popularity
2) Because the petitioners seek direction, for the purposes of enlightenment of the people
casting the vote in favour of right candidate contesting the election to the respondent no. 1
to provide him the information contained in the following books for the purposes of
enlightenment to the voters of Amethi constituency participating in the election scheduled to
be held on 8th may of 2006.
3) Because one may know that what was the religion of Rajeev Gandhi? . What is the religion
of Sonia Gandhi and her Children? Whether Sonia Gandhi is living in this country on the
strength of Italian Passport? How she can take the citizen ship and contest the election
 without disclosing her Religious Ambitions and political ambition to the people of the
constituency, from where she will get her votes? When assets of the candidate may be
directed to be disclosed by the election commission on the dictates of the Hon’ble Supreme
court of India, why not the president of the biggest party of the country may be directed to
disclose her Religion?
4) Because this feeling of utter destitution, dejection, desperation and the loss of all
confidence is the result of our slavery, by which the Indians have forgotten their own past
history, lost freedom and obliviousness of the delights of an unfettered life. Thus it is
necessary to keep the flame of the truth burning in the heart of every enlightened citizen, as
the majority of the public is unaware of the truth. The glory of our country may only be
restored, when our traditional heritage culture may revive every citizen from unadulterated
history. The historical concepts, which were distorted during the long period of slavery, may
become a task of utmost importance and urgency.
5) Because the busybodies meddlesome interlopers, wayfarers, or officious interveners having absolutely no
public interest, except for personal gain or private profit, either for themselves or as proxy of others or for any
other extraneous motivation or for glare of publicity break the queue muffling their faces.”
6) Because the lawyers are always having perplexed with fear of change. He knoweth not the law, who knoweth
not the reason there of, therefore, it is not advisable to live in cloistered seclusion, detached from the world and
all its pursuits. If you are ever tempted to join in the fierce hunt after the vulgar prizes of the world, remember
that after all.
7) Because it has been observed by the Hon’ble Courts “where the power is conferred to achieve a purpose it has
been repeatedly reiterated that the power must be exercised reasonably and in good faith to effectuate the
purpose. And in this context ‘ in good faith’ means ‘for legitimate reasons’. Where power is exercised for
extraneous or irrelevant considerations or reasons, it is unquestionably a colorable exercise of power or fraud on
power and the exercise of power is vitiated”.
8) Because the Hon’ble Supreme Court has also held that ‘ Pithily put, bad faith which invalidates the exercise of
power- sometimes called colorable exercise or fraud on power and oftentimes overlaps motives, passions and
satisfactions- is the attainment of ends beyond the sanctioned purposes of power by simulation or pretension of
gaining a legitimate goal. If the use of the power is for the fulfillment of a legitimate object the actuation or
catalysation by malice is not legicidal. The action is bad where the true object is to reach an end different from
the one for which the power is entrusted, goaded by extraneous considerations, good or bad, but irrelevant to the
entrustment. When the custodian of power is influenced in its exercise by considerations out side those for
promotion of which the power is vested the court calls it a colorable exercise and is undeceived by illusion’.
9) Because Transparency of action and accountability are perhaps two possible safeguards, which the court
enforcing the protection of fundamental rights must insist upon. Thus police in India requiring to perform a
difficult and delegate task in view of the deteriorating law and order situation, communal riots, politics turns to
student unrest, terrorist activities, dealing with hard core criminals, drug peddlers, smugglers having strong root
in society, will feel difficulties in the detection of the crime committed by the hardened criminals. Thus a
balanced justice approach is needed to meet the ends of justice. The cure cannot however, be worst them the
diseased itself.
10) Because in Keshavanand Bharti Vs state of Kerala A.I.R 1973 S. C. Page 1431 Justice Matthew held "The
fundamental rights have no fixed content, most of them are empty vessels into which each generation must pour
its content in the light of its experience. It is relevant in this context to remember that in building of just social
order, it is sometimes imperative that the fundamental rights should be somewhat related to directive principles.
The following rights are held to be covered world under article 21.
11) Because Hon’ble Supreme court has taken into account two spheres of dimensions to the right of personal
liberty against the sovereign power exercising its functioning. Thus personal liberty is a sacred and cherished
right under the constitution (UBI JUS IBI REMIDIUM).
12) Because where the public functionaries were involved in such a malafide and colourable exercise of power that
may abridge or abrogate the right of livelihood of a citizen duly guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.
13) Because we are now slave of destructive elements and foreign ambitions. Politicians act in nefarious designs
with impunity. Political parties motivated with vested interests are dancing to usurp power through any means,
fair or foul even at the cost of sacrificing the Nation’s existence to personal interest. Party systems have pushed
to advance its own schemes upon the ruin of the rest. Our politicians are Mafia dons next to the invaders.
Robbers have generally plundered the rich who are seldom subjected to legislation always plunder the common
citizens and protect those Mafia dons under the phraseology of “law making sovereign power” having the
connotation “procedure establish under law to be cherished instead of due process”.
14) Because the Freedom of expression may be necessarily including right of information. There
is no expression with out having an idea on the subject, regarding which the expression of
an individual may be given effect to change the existing values an ideology which are based
on the notable extracts of certain facts .An enlightening informed citizen would undoubtedly
 enhance democratic values (People’s Union for Civil liberty (P U C L) Vs. Union of India)
(2003) 4 SCC Para 94.
15) Because “The freedom of speech and expression is basic to indivisible from a democratic
polity .It includes right to impart and receive information. Restriction to the said right could
be only as provided in article 19(2). Right of a voter to know the bio-data of the candidate is
the foundation of the democracy. The old dictum let the people have the truth and the
freedom to discuss it and all will go well with the Government should prevail. The true test
for deciding the validity of the Act is whether it takes away or abridges fundamental right of
the citizens. If there is direct abridgement of the fundamental right of freedom of speech and
expression, the law would be invalid. If the provisions of the law violate the constitutional
provisions, they have to be struck down and that is what is required to be done in the
present case .It is made clear that no provision is nullified on the ground that the Court
does not approve the underlying policy of the enactment. (Para 69 to 71 and 66). (People’s
Union for Civil liberties (P U C L) Vs. Union of India, (2003) 4 SCC 399:AIR 2003 SC 2363.
16) Because the right to live with human dignity free from exploitation (A.I.R 1980 S. C 849) and the right of
livelihood (A.I.R 1986 S. C. 180) respectively was also considered to be within ambit of article 21. Every
endeavor has been provided till now to make this article reverberate with life and articulate with meaning.
17) Because it has been held that authority not performing their statutory duties to enforce laws for the protection
of environment inre- J.T 1996 (2) S. C 196 and J.T 1996 (7) S. C. 775 are jeopardizing the right of life of the
citizen. However the authorities have still to provide protection by providing a fool proof.
18) Because the constitution is required to kept young energetic and alive .The attempt be endure to expand the
ambit of fundamental right. It is said that the dignity of the ocean lies not in its fury capable of causing
destruction, but in its vast extent and depth with enormous tolerance. Thus the wider the power, the higher the
need of caution and care, while exercising the power.
19) Because the threat of being subjected to atrocities if the drastic step to save the citizens from the oppression and
exposure of falsehood may not be done at an earliest time. Thus every nationalist who has got a slightest patriotic
cult in his inhibition has got a Fundamental Right and a Constitutional Duty to safe guard our cultural heritage
against the falsehood. Imparting of education is a State function. The State, however, having regard to its
financial and other constraints is not always in a position to perform its duties. The function of imparting
education has been, to a large extent, taken over by the citizens themselves. Some do it as pure charity; some do
it for protection.
20) Because now the sovereignty is attributed upon the three institution namely the legislature, the executive and
the judiciary. The combined effect of the three institutions makes a democratic society. The legislature is creature
like lord Brahma while the executives like lord Vishnu may provide the welfare to the public. The judicial
institutions like lord Shiva is the dispenser of justice and is also the protector of all subjects. The law of
retributive justice wakes when the people sleep. Hence wise men regard the law or punishment as virtue or
religion.
21) Because the constitution as it stands does not proceed on the “melting pot “theory while it represents a “salad
bowls” where there is homogeneity without any obliteration of identity. The foundation of the religion is
spiritualism, which is based on trust and confidence and an ability to strive for the good self of the other
individual.
22) Because the disqualification prescribed for membership of Parliament under article 102 (1) (d) of the
constitution of India that the individual contesting the election may not in any acknowledgement of allegiance or
adherence to a foreign state. It is known to every citizen that the respondent No.4 is a foreign lady and her
husband namely Rajeev Khan “Gandhi” converted his religion prior to his marriage with respondent No.4, which
he had admitted to the world media after becoming the Prime Minister of India.
23) Because the matter pertaining to the disqualification was referred to the Election Commission of India for
referring the same to the President Of India by Srimati Sushama Swaraj, than Minister after consultation with Sri
Arun Jaitelly than Law Minister and also Sri R.V. Bhasin, all Advocates practicing at Supreme court of India, but
it appears that on account of the status of the respondent No. 4 being the president of Indian Congress party, no
body could take any decision in the matter. Since the Respondent No. 4 is now contesting again the election as to
become full fledge prime Minister Of India and is having allegiance and adherence to the foreign Country,
Particularly Italy, where she owns the property namely the House, as she has herself disclosed on affidavit
submitted to the District election officer/District Magistrate and also have her affiliation with Political parties of
such Nation and since the election process has now started again , the declaration of the result of such result may
be withheld till the decision may not be taken by Election Commission in this regards.
24) Because the extracts passages written in all the three books may further disclose the game is played with the
country men by the guardian of our nation to whom the people in India have always regarded as equivalents to
the father of the Nation and they were trusted as head of the Government. The deceptive approach may be
visualized from the passages of all the three books, “The Nehru Dynasty”, Written by Astrologer K. N. Rao,
 “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age” written by Sri M. O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary, of Jawaharlal
Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI) and Mohammad Yunus book, ‘Persons, Passions &
Polities’ which have been suppressed from the approach of general public or being suppressed by Govt. Of India.

Prayer
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously
be pleased to :-
1)issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the
respondent no. 2 to decide the matter relating to the disqualification of the respondent no. 4
pertaining to her adherence and allegiance to the foreign state namely Italy, for which, the
matter was already represented for having the decision thereof after the previous election ,
under article 103 of Constitution of India to the President of India and till the decision was
not taken by the respondent no. 2, the election result in furtherance of the election of
Respondent no. 4 may not be declared.
2)issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the
respondent no. 1 to produce the books namely ”The Nehru Dynasty” written by Sri K. N.
Rao, Reminiscences of “Nehru Age” written by his long time private secretary, Sri M. O.
Mathai and Book written by Mohammed Yunus book person “Persons, Passion & Politics”.
For the perusal of this Hon’ble Court to confirm the authenticity of the Article published by
the Hindu Writers Forum filed as Annexure 4 to this writ petition
3) Any other order or direction /writ, which may deemed fit by the Hon’ble Court.

Dated 3rd May,2006 (Yogesh Kumar Saxena)

Advocate
Counsel for the Petitioner
Chamber No. 139, High Court, Allahabad

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Bench at Luck now

Civil Misc. Ad- Interim Application No. of 2006

 (Under Chapter XXII Rule 1 of the Rules of the Court read with section 151 C. P. C. )
Civil Misc. writ Petition No. of 2006
( Under Article 226 of constitution of India)
District- Raibarelly
Ravi Kant Khare, (Baba Ji) S/O Sri Rama kant Khare, Journalist/ Writer/Publisher and
President of Sarva Hitkari seva Sansthan,(unregistered Society of elite citizens, scholars,
Advocates and Writers)., R/O D.S.- 13, Nirala Nagar, Lucknow- 226020 ----Petitioner
Versus
3. Union of India through its Secretary of Human Resources Ministry,
Govt. Of India, New Delhi.
4. Election Commission of India, through chairman, Election
commission of India, New Delhi
5. State Election Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Luck now
6. Smt. Sonia Gandhi alias Sania Maino of Turin, Italy W/O Late Sri Rajiv Roberto “Gandhi”
President of National Congress Party, 10,Jan Path, New Delhi
To,
The Hon’ble Chief Justice and his Lordship’s other companion Judges.
The humble application of the applicant submit as under:-
1. That this petition is filed as public Interest litigation as the petitioner’s
organization, which is rendering their service to the downtrodden people after
collecting the data’s useful to the fellow citizens as being submitted in this
petition from the contribution given by the number of the advocates, elite class
of citizens, who wants to save the nation, but on account of fear from the people
ruling this Nation, including of the fear of the “yes men” of respondent no. 4,
these person or others do not want take the risk of their life, nor they are
interested to take undue advantages of any type of popularity.
2. That this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased by directing the respondent
no. 2 and 3 to decide the matter relating to the disqualification of the respondent
no. 4 pertaining to her adherence and allegiance to the foreign state namely
Italy, for which, the matter was already represented for having the decision
thereof after the previous election , under article 103 of Constitution of India to
the President of India and till the decision was not taken by the respondent no.
2, the election result in furtherance of the election of Respondent no. 4 may not
be declared.

Prayer
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously
be pleased to directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the matter relating to the
disqualification of the respondent no. 4 pertaining to her adherence and allegiance to the
foreign state namely Italy, for which, the matter was already represented for having the
decision thereof after the previous election , under article 103 of Constitution of India to the
President of India and till the decision was not taken by the respondent no. 2, the election
result in furtherance of the election of Respondent no. 4 may not be declared. Or to pass
any other order or direction /writ, which may deemed fit by the Hon’ble Court.

Dated 3rd May,2006 (Yogesh Kumar Saxena)

Advocate
Counsel for the Petitioner
Chamber No. 139, High Court, Allahabad
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Bench at Luck now
Index
Civil Misc. writ Petition No. of 2006
( Under Article 226 0f the Constitution Of India
District- Raibarelly
Ravi Kant Khare, (Baba Ji) S/O Sri Rama kant Khare, Journalist/ Writer/Publisher and
President of Sarva Hitkari seva Sansthan,(unregistered Society of elite citizens, scholars,
Advocates and Writers)., R/O D.S.- 13, Nirala Nagar, Lucknow- 226020 ----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union of India through its Secretary of Human Resources Ministry,
Govt. Of India, New Delhi.
2. Election Commission of India, through chairman, Election
commission of India, New Delhi
3. State Election Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Luck now
4. Smt. Sonia Gandhi alias Sania Maino of Turin, Italy W/O Late Sri Rajiv
Roberto “Gandhi” President of National Congress Party, 10,Jan Path,
New Delhi---------------------------------Respondents

Dated 3rd May,2006 (Yogesh Kumar Saxena)

Advocate
Counsel for the Petitioner
Chamber No. 139, High Court, Allahabad