The Evolution of Basic Color Terms in Chinese

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE Jianshe Wu Beijing International Studies University
ABSTRACT This paper makes an attempt to construct a framework of how Chinese basic color terms evolve over the past 4000 years, which is divided into several periods, by an analysis of the relevant literature in history on the basis of word frequency counts. Then we discuss what stage each period should be classified into under Berlin & Kays framework and its recent developments. Against these findings, the similarities and differences between our corpus and Berlin & Kays assumptions are analyzed and presented. In addition, the replacement of Chi by Hong is also discussed with reference to the Lexical Diffusion theory. SUBJECT KEYWORDS Basic Color Terms 1. INTRODUCTION In 1969, Berlin & Kay advanced the following two hypotheses: [1] the referents for the basic color terms of all languages appear to be drawn from a set of eleven universal perceptual categories, and [2] these categories become encoded in the history of a given language in a partially fixed order (Berlin & Kay 1969: 4-5). Accordingly, they formulated a temporal-evolutionary ordering as follows: Diachronic Study Lexical Diffusion Color Category
Figure 1: The Berlin & Kays hierarchy of basic color terms (1969: 4)
THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE
77
Their theory of color universals runs counter to then standard Whorfian doctrine and marks a phase-shift in our understanding of the color categories. Before their work the prevailing view was that color categories were culturally relative. Since 1969, the dominant view has shifted toward a belief in color universals. Following Berlin & Kays (1969) study, a large amount of cross-linguistic data concerning the basic color terms have been collected. This has led to four substantial theoretical revisions (Kay & McDaniel 1978; Kay, Berlin & Merrifield 1991; Kay, Berlin, Maffi & Merrifield 1997; Kay & Maffi 1999). First, according to Kay & McDaniel (1978), the idea of exactly eleven universal perceptual categories has been replaced with the six Hering (1964) primaries (black, white, red, green, yellow, blue) along with a restricted subset of their possible unions (i.e. Composite categories such as [red or yellow],[blue or green]) and intersections (i.e., Derived categories such as [orange], [purple], [pink], [gray], [brown]). In this formulation, sets of color categories below Stage V must include at least one composite category and any composite categories should have dissolved into the two primary categories before the appearance of any derived categories; all languages with more than six basic color terms should have at least one derived color category; and grey has been listed as Less predictable (as shown in Figure 2).
Figure 2: The evolution of basic color categories (Kay & McDaniel, 1978: 639) Second, based on the findings of the World Color Survey (WCS), Kay, Berlin & Merrifield (1991) propose some relaxations to the constraints of Kay & McDaniels (1978) version. The composite category grue (green or blue) could be accompanied by the derived categories brown or purple and either brown or
78
JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
purple or both not infrequently appear before the green/blue composite is dissolved; and a scheme (see Figure 3), allowing nine of the logically possibly 63 composite categories to occur, has been proposed to include the composite categories so far observed; at the same time, they present five evolutionary possibilities at Stage III and three at Stage IV.
Figure 3: Permissible composite categories: Observed composite categories (Kay et al. 1991) Third, Kay, Berlin, Maffi & Merrifield (1997) classify the 110 basic color terminology systems of the WCS into eleven basic types, based on the combinations of Herings primary terms they contain (Figure 4 [This is an adapted version consisting only of nine types]). Their theory now concern only those basic color terms and derived color categories are not incorporated in those types, where every stage contains one more basic color term than the preceding stage and an arrow indicates the transitions from the type occurring on its left to the type toward which it points.
Figure 4: Types and evolutionary stages of basic color term systems (Kay, Berlin, Maffi & Merrifield 1997, as cited in Kay & Maffi 1999: 748)
79
Fourth, Kay & Maffi (1999) place 83% (91 out of 110 languages, see numbers in Figure 5) of the languages somewhere on the main line of five evolutionary trajectories of basic color term systems. And a model of one language-based principle [Partition] and three color-appearance-based principles [Black & White, Warm & Cool and Red] has been presented to account for the data in WCS. In this model, they claim an order of application of those principles as 0) Partition Principle: languages tend to assign significata to lexical items in such a way as to partition the denotata of the domain; 1) Black & White Principle: black and white should be distinguished; 2) Warm & Cool Principle: the warm primaries (red and yellow) should be distinguished from the cool primaries (green and blue); and 3) Red Principle: red should be distinguished.
Figure 5: Main line (Trajectory A) of evolutionary development of basic color lexicons (Kay & Maffi 1999: 750) By adopting the above-mentioned revisions, it is believed that the theory of universality and evolutionary emergence of basic color terms moves gradually out of anthropological linguistics into color science (Saunders 2000). In the wake of this process, revolving around two questions ([1] Is color naming across languages largely a matter of arbitrary linguistic convention? [2] Do cross-language differences in color naming cause corresponding differences in color cognition? [Kay & Regier 2006]), a number of empirical studies (Heider 1971, 1972; Heider & Olivier 1972; Rosch 1973; Berlin & Berlin 1975; Kay 1975; Kay & Kempton 1984; Ratliff 1976; De Valois & De Valois 1993; MacLaury 1997; Davies & Corbett 1998; Regier, Kay & Cook 2005), computer modeling and simulations (Belpaeme 2002; Steels & Belpaeme 2005; Belpaeme & Bleys 2005; Dowman 2002, 2007, 2008) and disputes (Wierzbicka 1990; Saunders 1992, 1999,2000; Saunders & Brakel 1997, Lucy 1997a, 1997b; Lyons 1997; Roberson, Davies & Davidoff 2000, Roberson, Davidoff, Davies & Shapiro 2005) ensue.
80
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
Nonetheless, among all those inspiring works, it is very rare to locate a diachronic study of basic color terms, whether in English or in any other languages, based on the relevant literature in history available now. It is believed that the relationship between language and society could be understood in a more comprehensive way through such diachronic study and it will reveal to us additional information more reliable and interesting. And it is for this purpose that the present paper will turn to Chinese basic color terms. In the following parts, after a general review of contemporary works concerning the studies of basic color terms in Chinese, we attempt to conduct a corpus-based diachronic study of basic color terms in Chinese. We argue that the evolution of Chinese basic color terms might not fully match the main-line trajectory of Berlin & Kays hypothesis as illustrated above. Meanwhile, how words and naming are progressing with the development of society has been discussed in view of our findings. In so doing, we expect that such a diachronic perspective could provide a supplementary look at other synchronic studies and simulation studies. 2. BASIC COLOR TERMS RESEARCH IN CHINA There exist a number of researches on Chinese basic color terms (henceforth CBCT). In general, synchronic studies prevail. Some ground their studies solely on Oracle bone inscriptions (, hereinafter called OBI), Bronze Inscriptions ( ), Shijing ( , or The Book of Songs), or Shuowen jiezi ( , the etymological dictionary compiled by Xu Shen [][c. A.D. 58-148] in the second century.)(Hu 1941, Zhang 1991, Xu 1995, Baxter 1983, Wang 1993); some review CBCTs development from a lexical and / or grammatical point of view (Zhang 2001, Xu 2003, Li 2003); some attempt to explicate the cultural and social significance underlying CBCT; whereas, at the same time, a diachronic analysis of CBCTs evolution could also be found. After analyzing each hieroglyph form of Bai ( , white), Chi ( , red)(including Dan [, red] and Zhu [, vermillion]), Huang (, yellow), Hei (, black) and Qing (, black or grue [blue or green]) in OBI, Hu (1941) deduces its respective process of being generated. Zhang (1991) bases his study on OBI, Bronze Inscriptions, Erya ( or Near Corretness), Shuowen jiezi, in which the semantic constituents of those color terms are introduced and the cultural connotations in Chi, Hei, Huang, Bai are revealed.
81
Xu (1995) relies his study more on Shuowen jiezi. All the color terms are counted and their frequencies are listed so as to determine which should be classified as CBCT (in China, the distinction between Zheng se [, Pure Color] and Jian se [, Secondary Color] is more or less equal to the BCT and non-BCT ) while which not. Viewing from grammatical angle, Zhang (2001) lays more emphasis on the adjectives in OBI and his suggestion of the color terms used at that time are Bai, Hei, You ( or , bright black), Chi, Huang, Li ( or , multi-colored or black). Xu (2003) also analyzes the adjectives in OBI. The color terms listed includes Chi, Huang, Zhi ( , red or clayey), Bai, You, Hei, Wu ( multi-colored). Li (2003) has studied the grammar of OBI and at last produced a list of adjectives of the following color terms: Bai, Hei, You, Xuan, Chi, Zhi, Huang, Li. In Zhang (2003), he presents a general review of the studies on vocabulary and grammar of OBI. Therein Wang Shaoxin () has mentioned: Bai, Chi, Huang, L (, green) as the color terms; Xiang Xi () has included Bai, Chi, Huang, L, You in his list of adjectives; and Guan Xiechu () presents Bai, Huang, You while Cheng Mengjia () claims Bai, Huang, Hei, You, Chi instead. Liang Yinfeng () identifies seven color terms: Wu, You, Hei, Bai, Chi, Huang, Zhi and at the same time, Yang Fengbin () reviews all the adjectives claimed by each scholar and at last figures out a list of You, Huang, Hei, Bai, Chi. Based on his study on the culture of the Shang () dynasty, Zhao (2000) works out a list of Chi, Huang, Hei, You, Bai. Moreover he points out the wider connotation as shown in each color terms. These studies are mainly concerned with the development of ancient Chinese. In contrast, a modern study of color terms could be found in Xies unpublished doctoral dissertation, in which each basic color terms are analyzed in terms of semantic field and codability. Consequently a list of contemporary color terms is given (Xie 2004). A more comprehensive work has been done by Yao (1988), who reviews the history of color studies and in view of Berlin & Kays theory of Basic Color Terms, divides the Chinese history into five stages: the Late Shang dynasty (ca. 1500-1122 B.C.), the Western and Eastern Zhou () through Qin () dynasties (ca. 1121-207 B.C.), the Han () through Jin () to Southern & Northern dynasties or ,
82
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
() (ca. 206 B.C. 589 A.D.), the Tang () through Song () to Qing () dynasties (ca. 581-1911 A.D.) and Modern China () (ca. 1911-present) so as to present an evolutionary pattern of basic color terms in Chinese. He concludes that the evolution of CBCT from the Late Shang to Tang Dynasty does not comply with Berlin & Kays theory, and he is expecting a more elaborated explanation. Three additional researches concerning Chinese basic color terms are carried out respectively by Baxter, a famous American sinologist, Wang Tao, a British citizen of Chinese origin, and Cheung Sauying (). Baxter has compared the CBCT in the Earlier Period (referring to the Shang and Western Zhou [] dynasties [ca. 1500-771 B.C.], having recourse to Shijing and the reconstruction of Old Chinese) with those in the Late Period (extending from the Eastern Zhou [] through the Han [] dynasty [ca. 770 B.C. -220 A.D], with the help of Shuowen jiezi and Shijing) in relation to Berlin & Kays evolution theory of basic color terms. He proposes two stages of the Chinese languages: a later period, perhaps ending with the Han dynasty, which had five basic color terms (a stage IV system: Bai, Huang, Hei, Chi and Qing), and an earlier period, probably ending with the end of the Western Zhou dynasty or somewhat earlier, which had four basic color terms (a stage IIIb system: Bai, Huang, Xuan [, reddish black], Chi)(Baxter 1983: 21). The study conducted by Wang Tao complements Baxters. By his particular review of the use of Chi, Xing (, red-yellow), Bai, Wu, Zhi, Huang, Hei, You, Xuanin the Late Shang OBI, he asserts that Baxters conclusion is overall correct, but subject to some minor modifications (Wang 1996). Cheungs study on Chi and Hong (, red) provides us both synchronic and diachronic analysis on their usages in the corpora, focusing on semantic extensions of color terms towards non-physical color senses. As a result, the replacement of Chi by Hong is discussed against the framework of lexical diffusion theory and prototype theory and an Object-Process-Quality process in semantic change of color terms is highlighted (Cheung 2004). In summary, the above studies, except Yaos review and Cheungs corpus-based study, could be classified as some synchronic then-descriptions about Chinese color terms (not necessarily basic color terms). Even though some have touched on its evolution, it is either not so comprehensive or confined to a short time span. Among them, Yaos work is really pioneering and more related to our research here (Cheungs study is also closely connected to our analysis on semantic extensions of basic color terms here). However, the sequential appearance of CBCT in his
83
framework is questioned by many scholars (see Xie 2004), and such doubt should be clarified; moreover, his division of Chinese history into five stages could be further delineated in hopes of locating the specific dynasty in which each CBCT turns up as the basic color term; and furthermore, in Yaos review, all the relevant evidence are omitted due to the limits of space length. Admittedly, it is of great regret to see those necessary supporting details missing. 3. METHODS In view of both the status quo of basic color term studies lacking in a diachronic study and these discreet literature found in Chinese studies, we attempt to reveal the evolution process of Chinese basic color terms by statistic counting on a continuum of 25 history books1 from Western Han Dynasty (206B.C.25A.D.) to Qing Dynasty(1644A.D.-1911A.D.). In dosing, we also wish to establish a comparison between our findings and Berlin & Kay (1969), Kay & McDaniel (1978), Kay et al. (1991), Kay, Berlin, Maffi & Merrifield (1997), Kay & Maffi (1999). It is specified as follows: 1 The corpus is based on The Twenty-Five Histories (, Dynastic histories from remote antiquity till the Qing Dynasty) and its special editing tradition makes this diachronic study possible. And for the dynasties which have not been covered by these books, i.e., before Western Han and after Qing Dynasty, we complement these 25 volumes of history books with Oracle Bone Inscriptions in the Late Shang dynasty () (ca. 1500-1122 B.C.), Bronze Inscriptions in the Western Zhou dynasty () (ca. 1121-771 B.C.), and Zhu zi bai jia (, The classics from all schools in ancient China) in the Spring & Autumn and Warring States Periods () (ca. 770-221 B.C.) for the former (there is no any other book available today for these periods), and with Modern Novel Collections in modern times for the latter. 2 To ensure the corpus is not biased by the official documenting system, we further add those books written in vernacular Chinese into our corpus for comparison purpose (see each section below for details). And such relevant etymological dictionaries as Shuowen jiezi, Yu pian (), Lei pian () are also included for reference purpose. 3 All those books, with a few exceptions (e.g., OBI, the color words are handpicked by the author), are in electronic version, within which these color words
84
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
have been searched with the help of Acrobat software (Version 7.0). 4 To exclude the same words which are not used as color words here, the author further identifies each color words based on the searching results produced by Acrobat software. 5 6 The number of color words for each item is added up and the percentage Whether a color word belongs to basic color terms or not is judged with These color terms are known by all speakers; These color terms are highly salient; These color terms do not denote a subset of colors denoted by another word; The meaning of these color terms is not predictable from the meaning of their parts. And their four complementing features are also considered. 4. FINDINGS CONCERNING THE EVOLUTION OF CBCT Referring to Wang (1958), L (1985) and Xiang (1993), we group the Chinese history into eight periods, for the purpose of our analysis. They are: the Late Shang dynasty () (ca. 1500-1122 B.C.), the Western Zhou dynasty () (ca. 1121-771 B.C.), the Spring & Autumn and Warring States Periods () (ca. 770-221 B.C.), the Qin and Han dynasties () (ca. 221 B.C.-220 A.D.), the Three Kingdoms, through Jin to Southern & Northern dynasties ( ) (ca. 220 589 A.D.), the Sui through Tang, Five Dynasties & Ten Kingdoms to Song dynasties () (ca. 581-1279 A.D.), the Yuan through Ming to Qing dynasties () (ca. 1271-1911 A.D.), Modern China ( ) (ca. 1911-present). We will introduce each stage as follows: 4.1 The Late Shang Dynasty (ca. 1500-1122 B.C.) Basic Color Terms: Bai (white), Huang (yellow), You (black), Chi (red) We have searched The Dictionary of OBI (Xu 1988), The Concise Dictionary of is calculated within each table. the guidelines provided by Berlin & Kay (1969), i.e.,
85
OBI (Cui 2001) and The Collected Papers on OBI (Li 1965), and it is found that in the Late Shang dynasty, the basic color terms could be: Bai, Emerging at Period I, II, III, IV and V
2
Cui 786: (hui / bai-white / sheep / have / big / rain: We should sacrifice a white sheep, and there will then be heavy rain.) Huang, Emerging at Period I and V
Cui 545: (hui / huang-yellow / ox: We should sacrifice a yellow ox.) ZhiEmerging at Period I, II, III, IV and V Heji 35995: (qi / zhi- red or clayey / ox / this / use: We shall perhaps sacrifice a red ox. This was used.) Jin,( 3) Emerging at Period I and II
Cui 551: (qi / use / jin-? / ox: We shall perhaps use jin-colored ox.) Chi, Emerging at Period I and III Tie 10.2: X4 X (guichou / crack / X / divine / left / chi-red / horse / qi / X / not / wild: Cracking made on guichou [indicating time], X divining: the red horse on the left side will be tame, not wild.) Hei, Emerging at Period I, III and V Ninghu 113: (not / use / hei-black / sheep / no / rain / hui / bai-white / sheep / use / for / it / have / big / rain: We should not use black sheep, there will otherwise no rain. We should sacrifice a white sheep for it, there will then be heavy rain.) You, Emerging at Period I and III Yi 7121: (hui / you-bright black / ox / plus / huang-yellow / ox: We should sacrifice a black ox together with a yellow one.) Xuan, Emerging at Huayuanzhuang Dongde () Heji 33276: (xuan-reddish black / ox: A black ox.)
86
JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS Li, Emerging at Period I and V
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
Heji 25020: (li-multi-colored or black / sheep: A multi-colored or black sheep.) Wu, Emerging at Period I, II and III Yi 203: (hui / no / wu-multi-colored / horse: We do not sacrifice multi-colored horses.) The other words like Xing (then it means a red-horse), Bo (, multi-colored horse), L (, emerging at Period II, with an unidentified meaning), Zhu (then it is used as a place name), Dan (also a place name), Qing (it could be a name for imperial clan) should not be employed as a color term at that time. Among the above-mentioned color terms, Jin, Li, Xuan is seldom used, while the frequency of Bai, Huang, You, Hei, Chi used as an adjective is 97/22/11/10/3 respectively (Yang, as cited in Zhang 2003). Here, You and Hei are both referring to Black, whereas You could be more possibly used to represent Black (see Guan and Xiang, as cited in Zhang 2003). In accordance with the four main and additional features of basic color terms as proposed by Berlin & Kay (1969), Zhi, Wu, Hei could also be excluded. As for Chi, in the light of the conclusions held by most of the scholars (see Part 2: Basic color terms research in China), it should be a basic color term at that time. But with its low frequency of occurrence, it still calls for a plausible explanation. 4.2 The Western Zhou Dynasty (ca. 1121-771 B.C.) Basic Color Terms: Bai (white), Chi (red), Huang (yellow), Xuan (black) According to Collection of Bronze Inscriptions (Volume I: The Late Shang and Western Zhou dynasties)5(CRC of ECNU 2002), in Western Zhou Period, Bai, Huang, Chi, You, Zhi, Hei could still be found in Bronze inscriptions of the Western Zhou dynasty with the exception of Li and Wu. Moreover, Xuan starts to emerge as a color word in large quantities. Among other things, we could observe such color terms as:
THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE Emerging in the Early Western Zhou: Zhe (, reddish brown)
87
Jicheng 11.6015: () (Nobleman / be-granted / Zhe / slaves / two / hundred / family: A nobleman has been granted reddish brown cloth and two hundred servants.) Emerging in the Mid Western Zhou: Su (, white) Jicheng 15.9702: (White / silk / bundle: A bundle of white silk.) Zhu (, vermilion) Jicheng 16.9898: (Be-granted / apron-like clothes / Zhu / jade worn as a pendant: An apron-like clothes and vermilion jade pendant have been granted.) Tong (, red) Jicheng 5.2780: (Be-granted / / Tong / arrow: Red arrows are granted.) Xun ( or , light crimson) Jicheng 8.4343: (Xun / liner: Light crimson liner.) Xing (, red) Jicheng 8.4165: (Be-granted / Xing / bull: A red bull has been granted.) Emerging in the Late Western Zhou: Cong ( or , turquoise) Jicheng 5.2841: (Vermilion / apron-like clothes / Cong / jade worn as a pendant: Vermilion apron-like clothes and turquoise jade pendant.) Furthermore, we could have recourse to the report on the frequency of those characters being used in Bronze Inscriptions of the Western Zhou dynasty (Zhang 2004). In this report, he notes the frequency as follows (here he makes no distinction between the use as color terms and the use as others): Bai 849, Chi 111, Huang 107, Zhu 70, Xuan 55, You 27, Tong 18, Zhi 10, Xun 10, Cong 8, Qing 3, Dan 3, Su 3, Hei 2, Xing 1. In summary, the then basic color terms in Western Zhou Period are still dominated by Bai, Chi, Huang, Xuan. Here, Zhu, You should not be voted as one of them in accordance with both the stipulations by B&K and its frequency; by Collection of Bronze Inscriptions, Xuan at this time is used more to represent Black while Hei fails to be ranked as a basic color term in view of its frequency.
88
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
During this period, Qing and Dan could be found thrice in Bronze inscriptions but serves not as basic color terms; whereas Cang ( or , black or grue) appears in the late Western Zhou only in the name of granary. It is noted that Cong emerges as a new color word, which significantly reveals the obvious perception of color Cyan at that time. 4.3 The Spring & Autumn And Warring States Periods (ca. 770-221 B.C.) Basic Color Terms: Chi (red), Huang (yellow), Hei (black), Bai (white), Qing/Cang (black or grue) According to Collection of Bronze Inscriptions (Volume II: the Spring & Autumn and Warring States Periods)in the Spring & Autumn and Warring States Periods, Bai Hei Huang Chi You, Xuan, Zhu are used in common as major color terms while the usage of Cang, Hong (, referring to pink at that time), L (, green), Zi (, purple), Xun, Cong, Su, Tong, Zhi, Xing, Li, Wu is not found in Bronze Inscriptions of the Spring & Autumn and Warring States Periods. During this period, Qing emerges four times and only serves as a color word one time (in the Spring & Autumn Period, Jicheng 16.10136: [Qing-colored bronze]). During this period Bronze inscriptions are found increasingly decreasing. In this view, we refer to other possible books existing at that time like Shang shu ( ) 6 , Shijing 7 , Yi li () 8 , Zhou yi () 9 , the Analects () 10 , Chunqiu zuozhuan ()11, the Works of Mencius ()12 and Zhou li ()13. Here are their respective frequencies of use in each book: Table 1
Ba Shang shu Shijing Yi li Zhou yi Analects zuozhuan 2 25 12 8 2 6 Hu 1 35 4 13 1 6 Xu 3 7 32 4 2 8 13 11 2 2 3 2 2 Su Qi 1 9 3 Ch 1 6 2 2 Zh 2 5 7 1 1 4 5 1 He 1 3 3 1 2 1 1 17 Xun 1 14 10 1 1 Ca L Zi Ho Co
89
Mencius Zhou li Sum %
20 17 92 21
2 10 72 17
2 9 67 15
1 12 44 10 14 29 7 14 27 6
1 6 27 6 11 24 6 2 21 5 1 15 3 11 3
4 1
1 0
1 0
* Ba- Bai; Hu- Huang; Xu- Xuan; Su Su; Qi-Qing; Ch - Chi; Zh- Zhu; He- Hei; Xun- Xun; Ca- Cang; L- L; Zi - Zi ; Ho- Hong; Co- Cong. * Percentages here and below are all in rounding-off numbers. It could be generalized that Bai, Huang, Xuan, Su, Qing, Chi, Zhu, Hei, at that time, serve as major color terms while Cang, L, Zi, Hong, could not be determined. As for Cong, it is rarely used. In order to ascertain which one of Xuan, Hei could be the basic color term representing Black and the possible usage of Qing, Cang, L, Zi, Hong at that time, we further search all the works available14, written at that time, collected in Si bu cong kan ()15. Table 216
The Warring States Period Lie zi () (Early) Mo zi () (Early) Wu zi () (Early) Liu tao () (Early) Shang zi () (Mid) Zhuang zi ()(Mid) Xun zi () (Late) Han zi () (Late) Guan zi () (believed to be) Sum % Ba 9 33 1 6 1 16 10 31 34 141 33 4 10 14 35 107 25 4 1 8 2 4 51 80 19 10 2 2 20 47 11 26 6 1 3 22 4 3 3 1 18 4 9 2 2 1 0 0 2 2 4 He 6 34 Hu 4 10 Qi 3 5 2 3 Zi Xu 3 1 1 2 3 Ca Ho L
* Ba- Bai; He- Hei; Hu- Huang; Qi-Qing; Zi - Zi ; Xu- Xuan; Ca- Cang; Ho- Hong; L- L. As is noted in Table 2, Hei is more often used than Xuan in the late Warring States Period. It is more convincing to claim that during this period, Hei has been
90
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
elevated to be a basic color term to represent Black. As for Qing, its abusive use in the Warring States Period could be observed easily by the following facts. It has been listed as one of Five Colors ( or ) in Shang shu Yu Gong (.) and Zhou li and ranked as one of Six Zhang (, Six Colors) in Yi li, and one of Six Colors () (Qing, Bai, Chi, Hei, Xuan, Huang) in Chunqiu zuozhuan. With reference to the frequency as shown in Table 1 and 2, Qing should be listed as a basic color term at that time. Cang, first emerging as a color term in Shijing, Zhou li, i.e., in the Spring and Autumn Period, grows gradually in quantities. In Yi zhou shu Xiao kai wu ( ), it has been mentioned that Wu Xing (, Five Agents)17 includes: Water in Hei, Fire in Chi, Wood in Cang, Metal in Bai and Earth in Huang ( ). It seems that Cang at that time is popular as an alternative of Qing and could appear in Qings place. As for the emergence of Zi, according to Table 1, its appearances in The Works of Mencius, Chunqiu zuozhuan and the Analects suggest the period of the Mid Warring States Period, while in the light of Table 2, it fails to present itself in the Early Warring States Period and its showing up could only be observed in several works of the Mid or Late Warring States Period. So it is safe to say Zi starts to be employed as a color term not until the Mid Warring States Period (it could be tightly bound up with the wearing of purple clothes by Heng Gong () of the Qi State in the Warring States Period) but it still does not prevail. As regards L, it could only be found in Shijing (among them, 9 times in Guo Feng [] and one time in Lu Song []) and Yi li ([vermilion and green silks]). Besides, we could notice its occurrence once respectively in Xun zi and Lie zi of the Warring States Period, both in the form of L er (), one of Eight Fine Horses (). It is self-evident that L has its debut in the Late Spring and Autumn Period but has not been granted the position of basic color terms. Hong (it refers to pink at that time) wins its initial performance in The Analects and Han zi of the Late Warring States Period. However, obviously, it fails to obtain the status of being a basic color term. At the same time, Zi, L and Hong could not be located in Bronze inscriptions of the same period, which, on the other hand, justifies their peripheral status in the then society. Another important work which we could refer to is Lshi chunqiu (), since it has been completed just eight years after the founding of the Qin dynasty, i.e.,
91
immediately after the Warring States Period. Here the frequencies of color terms are shown as follows: Bai 55, Chi 23, Hei 20, Huang 18, Xuan 15, Qing 13, Cang 10, Zhu 8, Su 4, L 1. It should be noted that Zhe, He (, brown), Hong, Zi, Lan (, blue), Cheng (, orange), Hui (, grey), Dian (, indigo), Cong, Xun, Dan, You fail to present themselves here. To a large extent, the above data concerning color terms could serve as an essential proof of the above analysis. In summary, during this period, the basic color terms are confined to Chi, Huang, Hei, Bai, Qing/Cang. In this period, You fades out and Five Colors (including Qing, Chi, Bai, Hei, Huang) or Six Colors (plus Xuan) (see Shang shu Yu Gong and Zhou li respectively) steps on stage. 4.4 The Qin And Han Dynasties (ca. 221 B.C.-220 A.D.) Basic Color Terms: Bai (white), Huang (yellow), Hei (black), Chi (red), Qing (black or grue) During the Qin and Han dynasties, the earliest classics we could refer to is Erya, Li ji ()18, Shi ji () and Han shu ()19. Accordingly, the frequencies of their usage are listed as follows: Table 3
Ba Erya Li ji Shi ji Han Sum % 49 38 180 252 519 30 Hu 21 19 133 275 448 26 Ch 6 14 38 114 172 10 Qi 6 17 49 91 163 9 He 12 22 40 82 156 9 Xu 7 52 24 35 118 7 1 10 30 41 2 Zi Ca 2 1 16 16 35 2 5 2 15 22 1 L Xu 2 12 1 1 16 1 2 14 16 1 4 1 7 12 1 2 7 9 1 Zh Da Ho
* Ba- Bai; Hu- Huang; Ch - Chi; Qi-Qing; He- Hei; Xu- Xuan; Zi - Zi ; Ca- Cang; L- L; Xu- Xun; Zh- Zhe; Da- Dan; Ho- Hong.
92
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
It could be concluded that the then major color terms could cover Bai, Huang, Chi, Qing/Cang, Hei, Xuan,. Among them, the usage of Xuan, Cang is gradually reduced; Zi awaits further confirmation of whether it belongs to the basic color terms or not; and Hong and L are not prevalent at that time. As a frame of reference, Shuowen jiezi, completed in the Eastern Han () Dynasty by Xu Shen, could serve as an essential source for verification. The major color terms used in this work are20: Bai 82, Hei 68, Chi 54, Huang 53, Qing 36, Dan 9, Zhu 7, Xuan 5, Jiang (, crimson) 5, Wu2 (, black) 3, Zi 2, Liu-Huang (, brown)1, Huang-Hei (, yellow-black) 6 / Huang-Bai (, yellow-white) 2, Qing-Hei (, grue-black) 6 / Qing-Chi (, grue-red) 2 / Qing-Huang (, grue-yellow) 2 / Qing-Bai (, grue-white) 1, Chi-Huang (, red-yellow) 3 / Chi-Hei ( , red-black) 3 / Chi-Bai ( , red-white) 1, Bai-Huang ( , white-yellow) 1 / Bai-Qing (, white-grue) 1 / Bai-Hei (, white-black) 1, Zi-Qing ( , purple-grue) 1 / Xuan-Huang ( , black-yellow) 1 / Dan-Huang (, red-yellow) 1 (Xu 1995)among other things, Cang 0. It should be noted that here Zi is not frequently used and more importantly, its definition in Shuowen jiezi reads: of cloth, a grue-red color (). Another noteworthy fact lies in the use of Xuan and Cang. Obviously, they are not employed as basic color terms again. Furthermore, another important work, Shi ming Shi Cai Bo (.), completed at the end of The Eastern Han dynasty by Liu Xi (), includes such color terms as Qing, Chi, Huang, Bai, Hei, Jiang, Zi, Hong, Xiang (, pale yellow), L, Piao (, light grue), Zi2 (, black), Zao ( or , black), Su, Gan (, dark purple). In his work, Xuan and Cang are not listed. And its definition of Zi goes like this: Zi means a flaw. It holds its status as a secondary color term and is regarded as a flaw of five Pure Colors (, , , ). In summary, Zi still fails to obtain the status as a basic color term at that time, while Xuan, Cang are no longer used as basic color terms. Correspondingly, we could have the following basic color terms: Bai, Huang, Hei, Chi, Qing.
93
4.5 The Three Kingdoms, Through Jin To Southern & Northern Dynasties (ca. 220 589 A.D.) Basic Color Terms: Bai (white), Huang (yellow), Hei (black), Chi (red), Qing (black or grue), Zi (purple) During this period, we could locate such history books as San guo zhi (), Hou han shu (), Song shu (), Nan qi shu () and Wei shu ()21. Here we take Chi, Qing as a reference, and the other color terms are listed in terms of their frequencies. Table 4
Ch San guo Hou han Song Nan qi Wei Sum % 19 124 170 91 118 522 34 Qi 31 98 164 58 93 444 29 Zi 6 38 71 48 31 194 12 Ji 5 25 47 33 10 120 8 L 1 12 24 22 6 65 4 10 62 4 26 26 Za Ga 2 10 8 7 3 30 2 5 9 10 5 29 2 3 6 13 6 28 2 6 5 2 12 25 2 Ho Bi Zi2 Pi 2 8 7 2 1 20 1 9 1 4 4 1 2 8 1 4 4 0 1 5 Xu Xi Fe
* Ch - Chi; Qi-Qing; Zi - Zi ; Ji- Jiang; L- L; Za- Zao; Ga- Gan; Ho- Hong; Bi- Bi; Zi2-- Zi2; Pi- Piao; Xu- Xun; Xi- Xiang; Fe- Fei. In Table 4, we could observe the slow rising of Zi in the late period and its frequency far overtakes those of others like Jiang, L, Zao, Gan, Hong, Bi (, bluish green). It could be inferred that apart from those basic color terms, Zi has been ranked as important. To do justice to this assertion, we go further to another important etymological dictionary, Yu pian (), compiled at that time, for confirmation. Among them, these color terms are listed: Bai 163, Hei 137, Chi 89, Huang 76, Qing 45, Cang 19, Xuan 12, Zi 9, Zhu 5, L 5, Hong 3, Jiang 3, Dan 2, Gan 1, Piao 1, Fei (, bright red) 1 (Besides, there are still another 60 color terms listed, which are less used). What we should pay attention to is its definition of these words like L, which is interpreted as of cloth, a grue-yellow color (), Lan, which is defined as a kind of grass, from which color Qing (black or grue) could be extracted ( ), Bi, which is explained as blue or green precious stone (), and Fei, which is conceived as crimson boil silk (). Among them, Zi
94
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
has been used only less frequently than those basic color terms as well as Cang, Xuan, the late basic color terms. Such fact could be more revealing if we review the so-called Pure Color and Secondary Color theory, which has been formulated during this period. As early as in Li ji Yu Zao (.), it has been stated that clothes take pure color while skirts employ secondary color (, ). Upon such statement, Zheng Xuan (), a famous scholar in the Eastern Han Dynasty, interprets it as the crown should be in black while its dress in yellow (). Liu Xi, in his Shi ming Shi Cai Bo, also explains Zi means a flaw. It holds its status as a non-basic color term and is regarded as a flaw of five basic color terms , , , . Taiping yu lan (), completed in the Song dynasty (ca. 960 1279 A.D.), quotes Huan ji yao le (), completed in this period, as saying: Pure Colors include Qing, Chi, Huang, Bai, Hei while Secondary Color consist of Gan, Hong, Piao, Zi, Liu-Huang. This is the first time when Pure and Secondary Colors are systematically distinguished. Also in this period, Huang Kan ( ), from the Southern Liang ( ) Dynasty, comments that Pure Colors comprise Qing, Chi, Huang, Bai, Hei while Secondary Colors contain L, Hong, Bi, Zi, Liu-Huang. Although different assertions are made, Zi, Hong, Liu-Huang are all included as one part of Secondary colors. It could be deduced that those three colors, are ranked as the next most important at that time. In view of such complicated situation, we turn again to those works written in spoken language for further confirmation of the status of Zi. We include Shi shuo xin yu () and Qi ming yao shu (), written both in this period, in our corpus. The final search results are presented as follows: Table 5
Ba Shi shuo xin yu Qi ming yao shu Sum % 21 222 243 33 Hu 9 127 136 19 Ch 1 96 97 13 Qi 7 84 91 13 He 3 83 86 12 Zi 3 43 46 6 L 0 16 16 2 Bi 1 5 6 1 Ho 0 4 4 1 Ga 0 1 1 0 Pi 0 2 2 0 LH 0 0 0 0
* Ba- Bai; Hu- Huang; Ch - Chi; Qi- Qing; He- Hei; Zi - Zi ; L- L; Bi- Bi; HoHong; Ga- Gan; Pi- Piao; LH- Liu-Huang. It is found that the frequency of Zi in these two works are highly consistent
95
with the data we have collected in the history books as well as dictionaries. At that time, its use has far outrun those of other non-basic color terms and could be safely listed as an equivalent of the other basic color terms. In summary, Zi could be ranked among the basic color terms at that time. So the list should be Bai, Huang, Hei, Chi, Qing, Zi. 4.6 The Sui Through Tang, Five Dynasties & Ten Kingdoms To Song Dynasties (ca. 581-1279 A.D.) Basic Color Terms: Bai (white), Huang (yellow), Hei (black), Chi/Hong (red), Qing (grue), Zi (purple), L (green) During this period, we could find such history books as Liang shu (), Chen shu (), Bei qi shu (), Zhou shu (), Jin shu (), Sui shu (), Nan shi (), Bei shi (), Jiu tang shu (), Jiu we dai shi (), Xin tang shu (), Xin wu dai shi ()22. Accordingly, we list Chi, Zi as a reference data here and the frequencies of the other major color terms are: Table 6
Ch Liang Chen Bei qi Zhou Jin Sui Nan Bei Jiu tang Jiuwudai Xin tang Xinwudai Sum % 23 10 23 12 238 304 51 84 126 19 220 11 1121 36 Zi 39 17 11 18 79 101 60 49 365 75 168 8 990 31 4 22 44 11 8 42 10 46 2 198 6 167 5 L 8 1 Ji 3 1 2 1 43 98 16 3 1 42 48 7 8 19 3 7 1 146 5 Za 6 4 Ho 8 2 1 2 6 21 14 6 31 6 31 4 132 4 1 3 13 7 4 18 3 22 3 79 3 69 2 64 2 55 2 43 1 34 1 8 18 5 3 10 4 14 16 11 3 34 6 28 1 1 11 1 5 7 8 2 2 2 2 18 3 1 8 4 4 5 6 32 1 19 1 9 22 3 3 4 3 3 7 1 1 1 Bi 5 Cu 7 Xu Ga 1 Zi2 1 Pi 1 Zh 6 Xi 2
* Ch - Chi; Zi - Zi ; L- L; Ji- Jiang; Za- Zao; Ho- Hong; Bi- Bi; Cu- Cui; Xu- Xun; Ga- Gan; Zi2-- Zi2; Pi- Piao; Zh- Zhe; Xi- Xiang.
96
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
In Table 6, Zi is found to have firmly established its status as a basic color term. And eventually, L and Hong start to appear as color terms in common use. At the same time, Lan emerges the first time23 and Hui initiates its use in a metaphoric way24. It could be noticed that He, Zong (, brown), Cheng still kept using as the names of articles. Taking all these into account, the basic color terms in this period, should at least contain Bai, Huang, Hei, Chi, Qing, Zi, while L, Hong, Lan, Hui call for further justification. We first turn to Lei pian (), another etymological dictionary compiled in this period, and have produced the following frequency list: Bai 295, Hei 248, Huang 165, Chi 162, Qing 122, Xuan 28, Zi 14, Su 13, Jiang 12, Zhu 10, Dan 8, Gan 6, Zhe 5, Bi 4, Zi2 3, Hong 3, Zao 3, Tong 3, Piao 3, Xun 2, L 1; in this book, Lan, Hui, Zong, Cheng, Cui (, jade green), He, Dian are not listed as color terms and there are another 124 less-used color terms composed of Chi, Hei, Bai, Huang, Xi. Anyway, it is easily perceived that L and Hong have been listed as color terms but they are not used frequently. As for Hui and Lan, they are still excluded from color terms. Now, we cast a look at what Dunhuang bianwen () 25, written in spoken language, has provided us. We get the following data: Qing 85, Hong 70, Zi 61, Chi 34, L 14, Hui 0, Lan 0. Conspicuously, Hong has achieved an equal status as Zi and Chi. At the same time, there is an increasing use of L, though its frequency of use still falls short of those of the other basic color terms. On the other hand, Hui and Lan could not be claimed to be basic color terms. To ascertain what position Hong and L hold at that time, we refer to Quan tang shi () and Quan song ci () (in electronic version). The relevant frequencies are stated as follows (here we make no distinction between the use as the color terms and the other usages, since we lay emphasis more on L, Hong, which are mainly employed as color terms there): Bai 12829 / 2320, Qing 6467 /3620, Huang 4240 / 3242, Hong 4168 / 5748, Bi 2841 / 2160, L 2792 / 2773, Cui 2555 / 2993, Zi 2294 / 1105, Dan 2140 / 1245, Zhu 1867 / 1201, Cang 1733 / 703, Xuan 1431 / 220, Su1323 / 1043, Chi 807 / 302, Fen( , pink) 785 / 1171, Hei 528 / 136, Hui 415 / 117, Lan 259 / 198, He 148 / 22, Tong 127 / 63, Zong 36 / 5, Cheng 28 / 91. Obviously, Bi, Cui, Dan achieve a high frequency in usage because of its reference to the objects, while Chi, Hei get a relatively low frequency due in large part to their tone and cultural images. Whereas Hong, L top even other basic color
97
terms in contrast to the low frequency of Hui, Lan, Zong, Fen, Cheng, He, which are mainly or totally used as the names of objects. As another way of evidence, the search results of Meng liang lu ()26 and Wulin jiu shi ()27, which have been completed shortly before or around the Yuan Dynasty, assure us of the above analysis. Table 7 Ho Wulin jiu shi Meng liang lu Sum % 33 103 136 42 Zi 27 61 88 27 L 19 41 60 18 He 4 18 22 7 Ch 4 18 22 7 Hu 0 0 0 0 La 0 0 0 0
* Ho- Hong; Zi - Zi; L- L; He- Hei; Ch - Chi; Hu- Hui; La- Lan. As shown in Table 7, Hong has overpowered such basic color terms as Zi, Hei and Chi in its frequency and L could also be ranked as one member among those basic color terms. In summary, it could be perceived that at that time, Chi and Hong coexists as basic color terms and Chi is going to be replaced by Hong to represent Red. Concurrently, Hong, L are increasingly employed since the Tang and Song dynasties as a possible result of the prevalence of poems and Ci, classical Chinese poetry conforming to a definite pattern. Accordingly, Basic Color Terms should include Bai, Huang, Hei, Chi/Hong, Qing, Zi, L. 4.7 The Yuan Through Ming To Qing Dynasties (ca. 1271-1911 A.D.) Basic Color Terms: Bai (white), Huang (yellow), Hei (black), Hong (red), Qing (grue), Zi (purple), L (green) All history books in this period are Liao shi (), Jin shi (), Song shi ( ), Yuan shi (), Ming shi ()28. Here in contrast to the frequency of such basic color terms as Chi, Hong, Qing, Zi, L, we list those of other major color terms as follows:
98
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
Table 8
Qi Liao Jin Song Yuan Ming Sum % 67 124 1033 400 335 1959 27 Ch 14 110 1244 215 179 1762 24 Ho 17 177 242 245 547 1228 17 Zi 20 136 498 58 74 786 11 Fe 10 100 314 102 31 557 8 55 365 5 301 Zh 9 L 10 28 87 81 84 290 4 Bi 1 29 48 12 13 103 1 Cu 2 6 60 15 9 92 1 6 12 21 40 1 13 10 7 30 0 11 13 0 2 1 6 2 9 0 La 1 He Fen Hu
* Qi- Qing; Ch - Chi; Ho- Hong; Zi - Zi; Fe- Fei; Zh- Zhu; L- L; Bi- Bi; Cu- Cui; La- Lan; He- He; Fen- Fen; Hu- Hui. Table 8 witnesses a full-scale replacement of Chi by Hong. (during this period, Chiis mainly employed in Tianwen zhi [, Records of Astronomy] and Yufu zhi [, Records of Vehicle and Clothing] of those books. ) and L is stabilized as a basic color term. Lan, He have now entered the list of color terms but fail to claim the status of being basic color terms; Hui is now on stage as a color word in grey spoon ()(in Song shi) and grey and black mouse ( ) / silver grey plate () (in Yuan shi); Fen shows up in terms of Fen-Hong (, pink-red)(in Song shi) and Fen-Bai (, pink-white), Fen-Qing (, pink-grue) , Fen-Mo (, pink-black) (in Ming shi); on the contrary, Zong remains to be the name of object as shown in a house of palm ( ), a carriage of palm () respectively in Song shi and Ming shi; and Cheng retains its status as a name of object. The only surprise lies in the mass production of Fei, which, after scrutiny, proves to be closely related to the color of the officials gown of the Ming dynasty. With regard to the spoken-language corpus, we refer to A Dream of Red Mansions (), a classic written in Vernacular Chinese () and completed at the end of the Qing dynasty (in electronic version). Its frequencies of relevant color terms are: Hong 391, Qing 134, L 86, Hei 74, Zi 38, Chi 18, Hui 15, Lan 2, Fen-Hong 1, He 0, Cheng 0, Zong 0, Fei 0. Not surprisingly, the frequency we got is similar to the data we have collected from those history books (the exception of Fei has been illustrated above.) Again, the
99
replacement of Chi by Hong is irrevocable, while it is more fitting not to regard Hui and Lan, though with a considerable increase in its frequency compared with the previous stage, as basic color terms. In view of the above analysis, we asserts the following basic color terms: Bai, Huang, Hei, Hong, Qing, Zi, L. 4.8 Modern China (ca. 1911-present) Basic Color Terms: Bai (white), Hong (red), Hei (black), Huang (yellow), Zi (purple), L (green), Lan (blue), Hui (grey) There exists a controversy over what are basic color terms in Modern China. Different claims are listed here: (as cited in Xie 2004:97): Table 9 Source TY JM XD LYQ ZRF LDQ YJ YXP WFX LHY * The shadow part indicates this color is regarded as belonging to basic color terms. * TY- Tongyici cilin ( ); JM- Jiaming hanyu yilei cidian ( Ho Hu Ch Qi L La Di Zi Zh He Hei Ba Hu
); XD- Xiandai hanyu fenlei cidian ( ); LYQ- Liu Yunquan

( ); ZRF- Zhan Renfeng ( ); LDQ- Liu Danqing ( ); YJ- Ye Jun ( ); YXP-Yao Xiaoping ( ); WFX- Wang Fengxin ( ); LHYLi Hongyin ( ). * Ho- Hong; Hu- Huang; Ch- Cheng; Qi- Qing; L- L; La- Lan; Di- Dian; Zi - Zi; Zh- Zhe; He- He; Hei- Hei; Ba- Bai; Hu- Hui.
100
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
From Table 9, it could be found that Hong, L, Lan, Hei, Bai as basic color terms are not disputed. As for Zi, Huang, Hui, they await further confirmation. In contrast, He is alternating between acceptance and denial while Qing, Zhe, Cheng, Dian receive doubts in many respects. In order to verify the actual usage of each major color terms, we look to Qing shigao ()29 for a possible solution. The frequency of relevant color terms are specified as follows (here the routine name and official title such as Zheng hong qi [ , Primary Red Battalion], Lanling shiwei [ , Blue-Plume Housecarl] are not counted): Table 10
Hu Qing shi 941 25 Ba 756 20 Ho 561 15 La 279 7 Hei 246 7 Ch 201 5 Zi 137 4 L 93 3 Hu 6 0 Zo 3 0 Zh 3 0 He 0 0 Qi 522 14
* Hu- Huang; Ba- Bai; Ho- Hong; La- Lan; Hei- Hei; Ch - Chi; Zi - Zi; L- L; HuHui; Zo- Zong; Zh- Zhe; He- He; Qi- Qing. We could easily figure out Huang, Bai, Hong, Lan, Hei, Zi, L as the major color terms. The only exception could be Qing, which is frequently used, but denotes, like Cang, three different colors, i.e., Hei, L, Lan. After the emergence of Lan, it is not fitting to classify it as a basic color term according to B & Ks definition. As for Chi, it could only be found in Tianwen zhi and Yufu zhi, confining to a larger extent to some special fields. As a result, Hui, Zong, Zhe are still very rare while He, Dian, Cheng could not be traced. But since the May 4th Movement, Vernacular Chinese develops by leaps and bounds. To further verify the positioning of Hui, Zong, Zhe, He, Dian, Cheng in modern Chinese, we take most of celebrated works30 by modern writers into account and the relevant data is listed as follows: Bai-se ( )210, Hong-se ( ) 192, Hui-se ( ) 190, Hei-se ( ) 178, Huang-se ( ) 125, L-se ( ) 101, Lan-se ( ) 83, Qing-se ( ) 54, Zi-se ( ) 48, Chi-se ( ) 39 He-se ( ) 33, Zong-se ( ) 22, Zhe-se ( ) 10, Cheng-se ( ) 0, Dian-se ( ) 0. And the respective occurrences of Hong and Chi as color terms are 1763 and 121. In summary, in modern Chinese, Qing should be excluded according to B & Ks standard; and Bai, Hong, Hei, Huang, L, Lan, Zi could be regarded as the
101
basic color terms. The only uncertainty lies in Hui, which, though not in accordance with B&Ks requirement that it shall not specify one class of objects, is different from He, Zong, Cheng. It enjoys a higher freedom while used together with a noun (se [) in the combination could be omitted) and could be modified by such adjuncts as hen (, very) or feichang (, very). It seems that Hui is undergoing the last lexicalization stage of being a basic color term. On the contrary, He, Zong, Cheng have to combine se in representing color and cannot be modified by hen or feichang. Moreover, they, more often than not, specify one class of objects as Jin (, gold / of gold color), Yin (, silver / of silver color), Yu (, jade / of jade color) do. In view of all these, Hui could barely be accepted as a basic color term and thus form a constellation of Bai, Hong, Hei, Huang, L, Lan, Zi, Hui. 4.9 Conclusion To sum up, we could come up with the following table, which illustrates the long-history evolution of CBCT. Table 11 Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 * 1- The Late Shang dynasty; 2- The Western Zhou dynasty; 3- The Spring & Autumn and Warring States Periods; 4- The Qin dynasty and Han dynasties; 5- The Three Kingdoms Dynasties through Jin to Southern & Northern dynasties; 6- The Tang and Song dynasty; 7- The Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties; 8- Modern China. 5RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Based on the diachronic analysis of CBCT, its evolution could be divided, Bai Hei You Xuan Huang Hong Chi Chi Chi Chi Chi Chi/Hong Qing/Cang Qing Zi L Lan Hui
102
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
as it is, into five phases. They are: Table 12 Phase 1. The Shang and Western Zhou dynasties 2. The Eastern Zhou, Qin and Han dynasties 3. The Southern & Northern dynasties 4. The Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties 5. Modern China 6 7 8 Bai Hei Huang Qing Zi L Chi/Hong Bai Hei Huang Qing Zi L Hong Bai Hei Huang Hong Lan Zi L Hui Period 1 2 3 4 5 Basic Color Terms Bai You Huang Chi Bai Xuan Huang Chi Bai Hei Huang Chi Qing/Cang Bai Hei Huang Chi Qing Bai Hei Huang Chi Qing Zi
* 1- The Late Shang dynasty; 2- The Western Zhou dynasty; 3- The Spring & Autumn and Warring States Periods; 4- The Qin dynasty and Han dynasties; 5- The Three Kingdoms Dynasties through Jin to Southern & Northern dynasties; 6- The Tang and Song dynasty; 7- The Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties; 8- Modern China. 5.1 Chinese Basic Color Terms against The Recent Developments of Berlin & Kays Theory Based on the above analysis, we could figure out the evolutionary development of CBCT. Without knowing what stages have preceded its development, CBCT starts from Stage III with white, red, yellow and black (Phase 1), moves to Stage IV containing white, red, yellow, black and grue (Phase 2), develops further to include purple (Phase 3), then reaches a Special Stage including white, red, yellow, black, grue, green and purple (Phase 4), and ends with Stage V having white, red, yellow, black, green, blue, purple and grey (Phase 5). The Main-line Hypothesis Against the latest revision of Berlin & Kays theory of basic color terms suggested by Kay & Maffi (1999), the evolution of CBCT does not fall into the assumed main line (Trajectory A, see Figure 5). Instead, it fits better into Trajectory B by following an order of Stage I, Stage II, Stage IIIBk/G/Bu, Stage IVG/Bu and Stage V. However, before we make such a claim, some further considerations should be given to the status of You and later Xuan as Black or Green or Blue in Stage
103
IIIBk/G/Bu. It should be noted that in Period 1: the Late Shang Dynasty, apart from four basic color terms, we could observe such color terms as Wu (multi-colored), Li (multi-colored or black) but not Cong (cyan); whereas in Period 2: The Western Zhou Dynasty, Cong emerges to represent Cyan and Wu and Li disappear in our searching results. Though due to the limits of historical literature available now, it is not safe to assert that Composite Category Black or Green or Blue in Stage III Bk/G/Bu could be represented in CBCT by both a basic color term meaning black (You in Period 1 and Xuan in Period 2) and another color term referring to either multi-colored (Wu or Li in Period 1) or cyan (Cong in Period 2), we should not simply claim the former doctrine while discard the latter possibilities. Another noteworthy point lies in the Special Stage of CBCT with both Qing (black or grue) and L (green) entering the list of basic color terms. It is really surprising why Qing could persist even up to Period 7 without losing its glamour (in Contemporary China, Qing as a color term is less frequently used31). It seems that we could classify this Special Stage in CBCT into a transition stage between Stage IV and Stage V, but a transition period spanning between 600 years (counting from the Song Dynasties to 1911) and 1300 years (counting from the Tang Dynasty to 1911) is really challenging us to wonder how transition takes shape. In view of this, it would be more proper to defend that there is another stage existing between Stage IV and Stage V. Most important of all, the evolution of CBCT falsifies the significance of the Main line proposed by Kay & Maffi (1999). By virtue of this fact, we are cautioned that a number of synchronic studies do not amount to a diachronic study. Though 83% of languages in the world could be grouped under this Main-line framework (Chinese included), it does not necessarily mean that this is exactly an evolutionary development of most basic color lexicons. Obviously, the evolution of Chinese basic color terms adopts another less traveled route and reaches the same point in the Main line. Derived categories: Zi (purple), Hui (gray) and He / Zong (brown) According to Kay & McDaniel (1978) as well as Kay, Berlin & Merrifield (1991), gray, brown and purple could appear before Stage V, when the green or blue composite category is dissolved. Judging from the evolution of CBCT, those revisions are essential to the original Berlin & Kays (1969) model. It is conspicuous that in Chinese, Zi has been holding the status of a basic color term long since Period 5. Amazingly, this is also corresponding to Bosters (1986) and Davies & Corbetts
104
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
(1998) recapitulation hypothesis studies in which it is reported that there are cases of derived categories appearing before all the composite categories had split and the most common case of a derived category appearing too early is for purple to be put in a group on its own before blue and green had split. At the same time, Kay, Maffi & Merrifield (1997) reports 16 in 110 WCS languages have found a basic color term for purple together with at least one undivided composite category. Though Bosters findings concerning English Speakers, Davies & Corbetts conclusions concerning English, Russian and Setswana speakers and our schemes in CBCT are all consistent with Kay, Berlin & Merrifields (1991) version of theory, it should be noted that no other derived categories have been reported so often with such premature cases. No doubt, a special attention should be given to the emergence of purple instead of just taking it for granted. In our study, Hui ascends to the membership of basic color terms before He or Zong (brown) (against Berlin & Kays theory but consistent with Kay & McDaniels revision) but after the blue or green composite has been dissolved. Thus it changes the list of CBCT to include 6 basic categories and 2 derived categories in total. And it is anticipated that the next possible candidate of basic color term should be Zong (or He). Admittedly, in Modern Chinese, Zong / He are more plausible to turn into a basic color term among the possible candidates Zong / He, Cheng and Fen-Hong (see Discussions and statistics in 3.8 and Footnote 30). Is the order of emergence of the above-mentioned derived categories in Chinese just a coincidence or an evidence of certain underlying principles, which have not been discussed in both Kay, Berlin, Maffi & Merrifield (1997) and Kay & Maffi (1999)? More thinking in this respected is called for. It should be noted that the evolution of CBCT, to a larger extent, justifies the rationality of the theory of Basic Color Terms. Allowing for the tremendous geographical, social and historical discrepancy lying between Sino-Tibetan language family and Indo-European language family, such similarity is really surprising and it throws some light on the study of universality of language and thought. However, the evolution trajectory of CBCT as well as the emergence of a Special Stage in CBCT has broken the harmonious marriage between the evolution of CBCT and the recent developments of Berlin & Kays theory and consequently it drives scholars to think more about the assumption as predicted by the theory of Basic Color Terms, or doubt its rationality. How to account for the unorthodoxical evolution of CBCT could be both challenging and revealing.
THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE 5.2 Shifts In Color Naming And Usage
105
According to the Lexical Diffusion theory proposed by William S-Y Wang, language changes in an S-curve fashion (gradual beginnings, rapid spread and gradual tapering off) that is lexically gradual, diffusing across the lexicon (Wang 1969, 1979, 1983). Though his theory is more phonologically and morphologically oriented, many investigations into syntactical and semantic change have also been conducted (Romaine, 1983; Kroch, 1989; Stein 1990; Ogura & Wang, 1993; Hundt 2001; Company 2002; Cheung 2004). Based on the Lexical Diffusion theory, Wang points out that this hypothesis of lexical diffusion suggests that, at any given time in any living language, we should expect to find several sets of morphemes with dual pronunciations (Wang, 1969: 15). In the same vein, we could focus on shifts in color naming and usage to locate several sets of senses with dual lexemes. It is interesting to note that in the long history of evolution of CBCT, 1) Black is sequentially represented by You, Xuan, Hei; 2) Blue and Green are universally represented by Cong, Cang, Qing before they became basic color terms; 3) Red has been represented by Chi, but when it comes to the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties (Period 7), Hong takes its place; 4) Zhu has faded out gradually after the Ming dynasty as a possible result of taboo on using the personal names of emperors; 5) since the Movement of Vernacular Chinese, the CBCT tends to develop from monosyllabic words to be disyllabic words, for instance, Huang is more frequently adopted as Huang-se. Could such interesting transformations in color naming and usage be accompanied by a slight shift in category perception, especially for 1), 2) ,3) and 5)? For example, in Bai Yun Cang Gou (), Cang means black or gray which shifts from its original meaning in early historical period. That is not an easy question to be answered and invites further investigations. However, as suggested above, we could further analyze such transformations in the light of the Lexical Diffusion theory for a more revealing picture. For the purpose of convenience, we now turn to the replacement of Chi by Hong for a close look at how such change proceeds.
106
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
0.08% 0.06% 0.04% 0.02% 0.00% Chi 3 4 5 6 7 8
0.018% 0.032% 0.035% 0.022% 0.059% 0.009%
Hong 0.001% 0.006% 0.002% 0.002% 0.016% 0.048%
Graph 1: Contrast between Chi and Hong: Usage in General * Percentages are based on each words total occurrences / total tokens for each period. Each number indicates a corresponding Period, e.g., 3 refers to Period 3. Furthermore, we present a contrast between Chi and Hong when they are used as color terms32 as follows (Graph 2):
0.04% 0.03% 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% Chi 3 4 5 6 7 8
0.006% 0.012% 0.015% 0.012% 0.018% 0.002%
Hong 0.000% 0.001% 0.001% 0.001% 0.013% 0.029%
Graph 2: Contrast between Chi and Hong: Usage as Color Terms * Percentages are based on each words total occurrences as color terms / total tokens for each period. Each number indicates a corresponding Period. To illustrate how much percentages Chi and Hong as color terms account for in their total occurrences, we generate another graph here (Graph 3).
107
100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Chi 3 4 5 6 7 8
34.62% 38.65% 43.98% 55.50% 31.00% 21.68%
Hong 33.33% 11.84% 52.73% 92.31% 79.90% 60.42%
Graph 3: Contrast between Chi and Hong: Color Sense * Percentages are based on each words total occurrences as color terms / total token for each word. Each number indicates a corresponding Period. In Graph 1 & 2, it could be observed how Chi is replaced by Hong gradually. In terms of Hong, it complies well with the Lexical Diffusion theory in both its total tokens and its occurrences as a color term: It begins gradually from Period 3 to Period 6 and rises rapidly at Period 7 and 8. We are not sure whether it still gains momentum or is going to taper off. As for Chi, it looks more stable than Hong in every respect and falls obviously into a tapering-off period33. In Graph 3, amazingly, Hong of color sense also conforms excellently to the predications suggested by the Lexical Diffusion theory, which reaches its peak at Period 6 and then tapers off34, whereas Chi is used most frequently as color terms at the same time as Hong (Period 6). It runs counter to our expectation of how each words prototypical center changes: Chi could proceed Hong in its change of prototypical center since it has appeared as a basic color term representing Red long before Hong serves this function. Taking this into account, we could assume that the change of prototypical center for one word does not necessarily follow a Bell-shape curve. Instead, a Wave-curve change could be more acceptable and plausible with reference to our corpora here. Of course, such tentative suggestion should be subject to more rigorous verifications in the future. 5.3 Different Time Span Between Different Nations From Stage III to Stage V, CBCT spends some 3500 years (from the Late Shang dynasty [ca. 1500 B.C] to the present). Whereas the evolution of English Basic Color
108
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
Terms, originating from the Old English Anglo-Saxon (about 449 A.D.), at most amounts to 1500 years for its development into Stage VII (referring to the present English basic color terms system). If we have taken the possible time for Chinese to develop into Stage VII into account, such gap could be astonishing35. Could level of technological development and degree of cultural complexity, as suggested by most scholars, account for such huge gap conceived in the same biological features? It seems a more plausible answer is expected. 5.4 Motivation For Language Evolution In many of previous literatures concerning the evolution of basic color terms, explanations about the possible driving forces for the above-mentioned changes have been less discussed. Some simulation work suggests that cultural factors could be a force, and even Kays work suggests that cultural evolution may serve a role to adjust color terms around some universal focal colors. With reference to the uniqueness of Chinese history, the philosophy of Wu Xing or Five Agents, Taboo in calling names of emperors or parents (), Rhyming in poetry as well as Language policy could be possible candidates for such driving forces, but such explanations are not firmly grounded. Furthermore, it is still pending whether language evolution is biologically-based or culturally-based. Biologists, neurologists, anthropologists, archaeologists, computer scientists, philosophers and linguists have presented to us many contrasting and confusing arguments in both directions. In view of this fact, the biologist George C. Williams, or Chomskys proposal is worth considering as a possible way out. According to Williams, language is not an organism, but it is a biologically based characteristic of a certain species of organism36. It is therefore reasonable to look in it for crystalline features (due to laws of form), i.e., Organism-as-crystal; artifactural features (due to natural selection), i.e., Organism-as-artifact, and documentary features (due to historical accident), i.e., Organism-as-document (Williams, 1992: 6). These seem closely parallel to Chomskys three-way conditions (though Chomsky is concerned with the initial state of the language faulty in an individual prior to linguistic experience and admittedly there exist some differences between these two classification systems): Unexplained elements of the initial conditions, Interface conditions (including the sensorimotor and conceptual-intentional systems, the principled part of the initial conditions), and General properties of computational efficiency (Chomsky 2001: 2-3). Since it is
109
difficult or impossible at present for us to verify or falsify these initial conditions of an individual prior to linguistic experience or any language, it is feasible to cast a look at its resultant conditions. Still, we take the semantic field of color for example. Below, we present a list of those basic color terms with the relevant number of their hyponyms, with a contrast between Modern English (E) and Modern Chinese (C) (Table 13). Table 13Source: Xie, 2004: 100-167
Hong E P M 85 27 C 127 26 Huang E 57 24 C 129 32 L E 41 18 C 140 33 Lan E 28 20 C 75 16 Zi E 19 10 C 37 21 Hei E 62 5 C 99 16 Bai E 55 15 C 95 11 Hui E 33 17 C 53 25
* P Pure hue; M- Mixed hue. As we know, in modern English and Chinese, their basic color terms are fundamentally corresponding with each other, e.g., Hei-se vs Black, Bai-se vs White, Hong-se vs Red, Huang-se vs Yellow, Lan-se vs Blue, L-se vs Green, Zi-se vs Purple and Hui-se vs. Grey. They even share the same contrast in hue between Cool vs Warm or Dark vs Light. As for their hyperonymy, Yan-se() or Color, they are exactly the same in their meaning. However, when we turn to its hyponymy, two major differences could be detected immediately: 1) the number of hyponyms in Chinese for each basic color terms is larger than that in English, with a few exceptions in term of mixed hue (); and 2) most of Chinese hyponyms follow a Object-Basic color terms configuration in their naming, e.g., Xue-Hong-se (, sanguine). In contrast, such compounds are less adopted for hyponyms in English and usually another new word is coined or borrowed to serve this function, e.g., Azure (Tian-Lang-se, ). Obviously, these hyponyms are, to a larger extent, influenced by their respective cultures in terms of both its defining of color sub-categories and its naming or perception. On the contrary, these basic color terms are less affected, differing only in the number of basic color terms: 11 for English and 8 for Chinese. As for their umbrella terms (the hyperonym of basic color terms), we may claim they are universal in almost every respect. Thus, if we combine Williams three-way distinction of language evolution with Chomskys three-fold initial conditions of an individual, we could tentatively describe the status-quo of basic color terms as
110
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
bio-culturally-based, that of their hyperonym as more biologically-based and that of their hyponyms as more culturally-based. It follows that other semantic fields will reveal the same picture to us. In view of this fact, Williams and Chomskys proposals are worth further pursuing, e.g., with reference to high- or low-frequency words, so that a more analytic framework about language evolution could be established and testified or falsified. 6CONCLUSION In this paper, we first sketch out how Chinese basic color terms evolve. And then with reference to the relevant findings, we have compared the actuality in Chinese with the assumption held by the theory of Basic Color Terms. We have noted that the evolution in Chinese conforms to a great degree to the hypothesis suggested in the recent revisions, with exception to the unorthodoxical route chosen by CBCT and the possible explanation of a Special Stage in CBCT. In a sense, the universality of color perception could be justified semantically. And it is also very interesting for us to note how words and naming are progressing with the development of society. However, there are also several limitations to this study. It is not an experimental study due to its diachronic perspective and unique corpus. What is more important, our study is closely connected to Chinese literature and its own naming system in color words, which will certainly make the reading a little bit difficult. We should also notice that our corpus could not be exhaustive, it is possible that many incidents or highlights in CBCT fail to be noted. More relevant research is expected to discover those latent imprints in color category and its relation with society. Nonetheless, by virtue of frequency counts, we have initiated a diachronic study concerning basic color terms and come up with an evolutionary scheme of CBCT in a more acceptable way. Resorting to different dynasties of Chinese history books and other documentations still available now, we intend to have a try in verifying or falsifying some findings in cross-sectional studies. We think such path is less traveled and is worthwhile to be further pursued. At the same time, we believe our research could also be revealing to the following further studies: First, the similarity and difference between the evolution of CBCT and that of
111
other languages could be compared so as to highlight their abnormalities in relation to their respective languages and cultures. For example, Hebrew in The Bible37, is estimated to be classified as Stage IV, with its basic color terms being: adom red, laban white, sahorblack, yaroq green, sahob yellow (Brenner, 1982). This is highly complying with the evolution of CBCT both in terms of time (the Spring & Autumn and Warring States Periods) and stage (both are on Stage IV). If we contrast these basic color terms in the present Hebrew (after its revival) with CBCT now, it could be enlightening to the questions above; Second, the lexicalization of color category could be reviewed with reference to our findings concerning the specific historical development of color terms. Just as Wang has suggested, the lexicon is mostly enriched via a process which biologists call pre-adaptation, i.e., making use of pre-existing structures for novel functions (Wang 1999: 253). Such semantic extension could be better observed if it is confined to such a domain like Color; Third, the temporal order of CBCTs emergence could be used in archaeology so as to locate the exact date of ancient books, paintings, relics etc. In general, through the survey of the evolution of CBCT, we are anticipating to explore a new way in studying color category. And we wish such an attempt should not be wrongly made.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to Professor William Shi-Yuan Wang, the Editor, not only for his generous help in the writing process, but also for his constructive comments on an earlier draft that have greatly improved this article. I am also indebted to anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. grant SM201010031001 and PHR201108165. The research described here has been supported by Special Items Fund of Beijing International Studies University, BMEC
NOTES 1. Usually, such history book of one dynasty will be recorded and compiled by
112
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
scholars of the next dynasty. Starting from Shiji (), the first book of this kind, which had recorded the important historic moment ever since ancient times till Western Han Dynasty when the author was in, this tradition lasts until the time when the last book of Qing Dynasty has been published. 2. Previous scholars have tried to attribute the inscriptions to the different royal reigns which are usually divided into five periods: Period I = King Wu Ding []; Period II = King Zu Geng [], King Zu Jia []; Period III = King Lin Xin [ ], King Kang Ding []; Period IV = King Wu Yi [], King Wen King []; and Period V = King Di Yi [], King Di Xin []. See Dong [1935]. 3. Is it yellow? There is no verdict among scholars. 4. X means a word having not recognized yet. 5. It is edited by Chinese Research Center of East China Normal University, a work which is based on 9916 pieces of bronze wares with inscriptions made in the Late Shang and Western Zhou dynasties and 2253 pieces of bronze wares with inscriptions made in the Spring & Autumn and Warring States Periods. 6. It is believed by Sima Qian () and Ban Gu () that this book is edited by Confucius (551 B.C.- 479 B.C.). Here we only refer to Five Mandates of the Early Zhou Dynasty () and Yao Dian (), Shun Dian () and Yu Gong ( ).We dont include the last 25 pieces since they are possibly not written at that time. 7. It is selected and edited by Confucius. 8. It is trimmed and edited by Confucius. 9. It is believed to be written by Confucius, who once comments that if there would be several years added to me, I would have mastered the quintessence of Zhou yi well. I could easily become without major faults ( ). In this view, this book is written at least in the late Spring and Autumn Period before Confucius died. 10. It is written in the Early Warring States Period. 11. Chunqiu () is edited by Confucius in his late years while the author of Chunqiu zuozhuang is claimed by Sima Qian and Ban Gu to be Zuo Qiuming ( ), an official historiographer () of the same age as Confucius. The recent studies seem to suggest this book is edited around the Early Warring States Period. 12. The Works of Mencius is regarded by Sima Qian as a narration by Mencius, together with his disciples Wanzhang () and Gongsun Chou () and Mencius plays a dominant role in completing it. There is still controversy over
113
Mencius birthdate. But it is generally believed that Mencius was born in 372 B. C. i.e, the Mid Warring States Period. 13. It is believed, by different scholars, to be written by Zhou Gong Dan () in the Western Zhou, or to be completed in the Warring States Period, or to be authored by Liu Xin ( ) in the Western Han Dynasty. The recent study, based on inscriptions in the bronze wares made in the Zhou and Qin dynasties, suggests that it should be a work in the Warring States Period. 14. Among them, Guan yin zi () by Yin Xi (), Shen zi () by Shen Dao (), Kang cang zi () by Geng Sangchu (), Yan zi () by Yan Ying (), Yin wen zi () by Yin Wen () are not included in our analysis since it is possibly not written at that time. 15. This collection is more trustworthy than Si ku quan shu (). 16. The search results show that there is almost no use of color words in Deng xi zi () and Lao zi (). Consequently, theirs results are not listed in the table. 17. Wu Xing assumes complex and cosmic interrelationships among the five agents (metal, wood, fire, water and earth), the five directions (north, south, east, west and the middle ), the five colors, the five tastes, the five notes of the musical scale, etc. 18. It is verified that these two works were written in the Western Han () Dynasty. 19. Shi ji and Han shu are two of The Twenty-five Histories. 20. The other color words composed of Bai, Hei, Chi, Huang, Qing, Dan, Zhu, Xi (, the silk radical) account for another 155 words (Hu 1941). Due to their low frequencies, they are not included here. 21. They are all from The Twenty-five Histories. 22. They are all from The Twenty-five Histories. 23. Two instances could be found: to go beyond Lan, we get Qing () (Bei qi shu: 292) / to go beyond Lan, we get Qing () (Bei shi: 1233). 24. Three instances could be found: as grey as ash () (Jin shu: 185) / of ash color and with short legs () (Jin shu: 1276) / as grey as ash () (Sui shu: 405). 25. Here we choose A New Collection of Dunhuang Bianwen verified and edited by Pan Chonggui (). 26. As for its completion, it is generally believed to be after the fall of Linan (), the then Capital of The Southern Song Dynasty. However the date in the book is stipulated as on the Mid-Autumn Festival of the year Jiaxu (), i.e.,
114
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
1274, just before the Fall. But in terms of its content, the book is still assumed by most scholars to be completed after the fall of the Southern Song Dynasty. 27. It should be completed before 1290. 28. All books are from The Twenty-five Histories. 29. This is the last book of The Twenty-five Histories. 30. Here 30 collections of works are included: The Works of Lu Xun (), The Works of Hu Yepin (), The Works of Jiang Guangci (), The Works of Qu Qiubai (), Ideal and Energy (), The Works of Liang Qichao (), The Works of Liang Yuchun (), The Works of Lu Yin (), The Works of Peng Jiahuang (), The Works of Shi Pingmei (), The Works of Wang Shiwei (), The Works of Rou Shi (), The Works of Zou Taofen (), The Works of Dai Wangshu ( ), The Works of Kang Youwei ( ), The Collection of Prose of Xiao Hong (), Novels of Xiao Hong (), Aimei Qiaoyu (), Poems of Xu Zhimo (), Prose of Xu Zhimo ( ), The Works of Xu Dishan (), The Works of Ye Zi (), Prose of Yu Dafu (), Novels of Yu Dafu (), The Works of Zhu Xiang (), The Collection of Prose of Zhu Ziqing (), The Collection of Poems of Wen Yiduo (), The Last Public Speech ( ), The Works of Liu Bannong (), and The Works of Zou Rong (). 31. By searching on www.google.cn (Time: 11: 50 a.m., July 9th, 2007), we have been feedback the following data (Unit: million): L-se 65.2, Hei-se 52.5, Hong-se 42.1, Bai-se 40.8, Huang-se 25, Hui-se 20.6, Zi-se16.2, Lan-se13.8, He-se 7.25, Cheng-se 6.9, Zong-se 5.83, Qing-se 4.25, Fen-Hong-se 1.17, Zhe-se 0.074, Dian-se 0.037. 32. Cheng has provided detailed quantitative data for each History Book, other classical records and dictionaries, on the basis of which we have counted the total tokens for each period as 438,444 (Period 3); 1,378,494 (Period 4); 3,381,302 (Period 5); 9,356,725 (Period 6) and 9,621,840 (Period 7). For Period 8, we use the Traction Software Rapid PDF Count (V2.03) to obtain the total tokens (6,096,357) for those 30 collections. 33. A search in our corpora shows that for Chi, its total occurrences are 78 (Period 3), 445 (Period 4), 1187 (Period 5), 2020 (Period 6), 5683 (Period 7) and 558 (Period 8); for Hong, 3 (Period 3), 76(Period 4), 55 (Period 5), 143 (Period 6), 1537 (Period 7)
THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE and 2918 (Period 8).
115
34. See each table and list in Section 4 for detailed figures. It should also be noted that here we do not distinguish Hong of Pink sense from Hong of Red sense due to its complexity. 35. Period 7 is an exception for Chi. A further analysis indicates that Chi () exists in numerous names for officials and military ranks in Yuan shi, like Hu-chi ( ), Hua-chi () [2789 occurrences in total (49.08% of Period 7) in Yuan shi], and at the same time, Chi is used frequently in describing the royal rites and astronomical phenomenon in Song shi, like Chi-ma (), Chi-qi () [1800 occurrences in total (31.67% of Period 7) in Song shi]. 36. Period 3 is an exception for Hong. This is largely due to its rare occurrences. In our corpora, we have detected only 3 tokens for Hong, and one of them is used as a color term. 37. According to Kurgans hypothesis, the pro-Indo-European language could be traced back to as early as 4000 B.C. But it could hardly be testified. 38. Coincidently, William S-Y Wang has also contributed an article on this topic. See Wang, 2006 for details. 39. The Old Testament has been completed around the age from 1440 B.C. to 400 B.C. Among them, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy have been claimed to be the earliest.
REFERENCES English Sources BAXTER, William. 1983. A look at the history of Chinese color terminology. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 18: 1-25. BELPAEME, Tony. 2002. Factors influencing the origins of color categories. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Artificial Intelligence Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. BELPAEME, Tony and Joris Bleys. 2005. Explaining universal color categories through a constrained acquisition process. Adaptive Behavior 13: 293310. BERLIN, Brent and Elois Ann Berlin. 1975. Aguaruna color categories. American Ethnologist 2: 61-87.
116
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
BERLIN, Brent and Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. L.A.: University of California Press. BOSTER, James. 1986. Can individuals recapitulate the evolutionary development of color liexicons? Ethnology 26 (1): 61-74. BRENNER, Athalya. 1982. Colour terms in the old testament. Sheffield: JSOT Press. CHEUNG, Sauying. 2004. A Corpus-based Study of Semantic Extensions of Color Terms in Chinese from Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives. Unpublished Master Dissertation, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P. R. China. CHOMSKY, Noam. 2001. Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT occasional papers in linguistics 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. COMPANY, C. Company. 2002. Grammaticalization and category weakness. In New reflections on grammaticalizaton, eds. by Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DAVIES, Ian, and Greville Corbett. 1998. A cross-cultural study of color-grouping: Tests of the perceptual-physiology account of color universals. Ethos 26 (3): 338-360. DE VALOIS, Russell L. and Karen K. De Valois (1993). A multi-stage color model. Vision Research 33(8): 1053-1065. DOWMAN, M. 2002. Modelling the acquisition of colour words: a bayesian approach to fuzzy sets. In Advances in artificial intelligence, eds. by B. McKay and J. Slaney. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. ______. 2007. Explaining color term typology with an evolutionary model. Cognitive Science 31: 99-132. ______. 2008. Evolution of basic color terms. In Language, evolution, and the brain, eds. by J.W. Minett and W.S.-Y. Wang. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press. HEIDER, Eleanor Rosch. 1971. "Focal" color areas and the development of color names. Developmental Psychology 4 (3): 447-455. ______. 1972. Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93: 1-20. HEIDER, Eleanor Rosch and Donald C. Olivier. 1972. The structure of the color space for naming and memory in two languages. Cognitive Psychology 3:337-354.
117
HERING, Ewald. 1964. Outlines of a theory of the light sense. Translated by L. M. Hurvich and D. Jameson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. HUNDT, Marianne. 2001. What corpora tell us about the grammaticalisation of voice in get-constructions. Studies in Language 25: 49-87. KAY, Paul. 1975. Synchronic variability and diachronic change in basic color terms. Language in Society 4: 257-270. KAY, Paul and Willett Kempton. 1984. What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist 86: 6579. KAY, Paul and Luisa Maffi. 1999. Color appearance and the emergence and evolution of basic color lexicons. American Anthropologist, New Series 101: 743-760. KAY, Paul and Chad McDaniel. 1978. The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms. Language 54: 610-46. KAY, Paul and Terry Regier. 2006. Language, thought and color: recent developments. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 10: 51-54 KAY, Paul, Brent Berlin, and William Merrifield. 1991. Biocultural implications of systems of color naming. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1: 12-25. KAY, Paul, Brent Berlin, Luisa Maffi, and William Merrifield. 1997. Color naming across languages. In: Color categories in thought and language, eds. by C. L. Hardin and L. Maffi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. KROCH, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language variation and change I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. LUCY, John A. 1997a. The linguistics of "color." In: Color categories in thought and language, eds. by C. L. Hardin and L. Maffi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ______. 1997b. Linguistic Relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 291-312. LYONS, John. 1997. The vocabulary of colour with particular reference to Ancient Greek and Classical Latin. In: The Language of colour in the Mediterranean, ed. by Alexander Borg. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. MACLAURY, Robert E. 1997. Color and cognition of mesoamerica: Constructing categories as vantages. Austin, TX: Univ. Tex Press. OGURA, Mieko, and William S-Y Wang. 1995. Lexical diffusion in semantic change: With special reference to universal changes. Folia Linguistica
118
JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS Historica 16: 29-73.
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
RATLIFF, Floyd. 1976. On the psychophysiological bases of universal color terms. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 120: 311330. REGIER, Terry, Paul Kay, and Richard S. Cook. 2005. Focal colors are universal after all. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 8386-8391. ROBERSON, Debi, Jules Davidoff, Ian R.L. Davies, and Laura R. Shapiro. 2005. Color categories: Evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology 50: 378-411. ROBERSON, Debi, Ian R.L. Davies, and Jules Davidoff. 2000. Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a Stone-Age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129: 369398. ROMAINE, Suzanne. 1983. Syntactic change as category change by reanalysis and diffusion. In Proceedings of the second international conference on English historical linguistics (Odense University Studies in English. Vol. 4), eds. by M., Davenport, E., Hansen, and H-F, Nielsen. Odense: Odense University Press. ROSCH, Eleanor H. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328350. SAUNDERS, Barbara. 1992. The Invention of basic color terms. Utrecht, Netherlands: ISOR. ______. 1999. Review of color categories in thought and language. American Anthropologist, New Series 101: 657-659 ______. 2000. Revisiting basic color terms. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6: 81-99. SAUNDERS, Barbara and J. van Brake1. 1997. Are there non-trivial constraints on colour categorization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 167-228. STEELS, Luc, and Tony Belpaeme. (2005). Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for color. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, 469529. STEIN, Dieter. 1990. The semantics of syntactic change: Aspects of the evolution of do in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. WANG, Tao. 1996. Colour terms in shang oracle bone inscriptions. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies Volume LIX (Part 1): 63-101. WANG, William S-Y. 1969. Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45: 9-25.
119
______. 1979. Language change: A lexical perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 8: 353-371. ______. 1983. Variation and selection in language change. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology. 53: 467-491. Taiwan: Academia Sinica. ______. 1999. Language emergence and transmission. In Linguistic Essays in Honor of Mei Tsu-Lin: Studies on Chinese Historical Syntax and Morphology, eds. by Alain Peyraube and Chaofen Sun. WIERZBICKA, Anna. 1990. The meaning of color terms: semantics, culture, and cognition. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 99-150. WILLIAMS, George. 1992. Natural selection: Domains, levels and challenges. New York: Oxford University Press. Chinese Sources CHENG, Chin-Chuan (). 1998. Quantification for understanding language cognition (). In Quantitative and computational studies on the chinese language (), eds. by Benjamin K. Tsou, Tom B. Y. Lai, Samuel W. K. Chan, and William S-Y. Wang. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press. CRC of ECNU (Chinese Research Center of East China Normal University, ). 2002. Collection of bronze inscriptions ( ). Shanghai: East China Normal University Press. CUI, Hengsheng (). 2001. Concise dictionary of OBI (). Hefei: Anhui Education Publishing House. DONG, Zuobin (). 1935. A periodization study of OBI ( ). In A Collection of Essays:Iin honor of the 65 th anniversary of Mr. Cai Yuanpei ( ). National Central Research Institute of History and Language ( ). HU, Puan (). 1941. An analysis on color perception and pigmentation of ancient chinese in terms of Chinese characters ( ). In An Analysis on Ancient Chinese Rhyme and Speech in terms of Chinese Characters ( ). Longmen Bookstore.
120
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
LI, Xi (). 2003. Grammar of the late Shang oracle bone inscriptions ( ). Xian: Shanxi Normal University Press. LI, Xiaoding (). 1965. The collected papers on OBI (). Taipei: Special Issue 50 on History and Linguistic Studies by Taiwan Central Research Institute (). L, Shuxiang (), and Jiang, Lansheng (). 1985. The pronoun of Vernacular Chinese (). Shanghai: Xuelin Publishing House. PAN, Chonggui (). 1994. A new collection of Dunhuang Bianwen ( ). Taiwan: Wenjin Press. WANG, Li ( ). 1958. A sketch history of Chinese grammar ( ). Beijing: Science Publishing House. WANG, William, S-Y (). 2006. The exploration into language evolution (). In Essays in Honor of Cheng Chin-Chuan: Langugae and Linguistic Special Issue (: ), eds. by Rongfu, Zhong, Xianqin, Liu, Jialing, Xu, and Daan, He. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica. XIANG, Xi (). 1993. A concise history of Chinese grammar (). Beijing: Hign Education Press. XIE, Haijiang (). 2004. A Study on Chinese Codability (). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, China. XU, Chaohua (). 2003. A history of ancient Chinese lexicon ( ). Beijing: Commercial Press. XU, Jialu (). 1995. Of Pure Color: A review of color terms in Shuowen jiezi (). Chinese Classics and Culture ( ) 3: 7-14. XU, Zhongshu (). 1988. A dictionary of OBI (). Chengdu: Sichuang Dictionary Publishing House. YAO, Xiaoping (). 1988. A review of basic color terms: The evolution of Chinese basic color terms ( ). Foreign Language Teaching and Research ( ) 1: 19-28. ZHANG, Qingchang (). 1991. Color terms in Chinese: Outline ( []). Language Learning and Research () 3: 64-80 Xiamen University, Xiamen, P. R.
121
ZHANG, Yujing (). 2001. Grammar of OBI (). Shanghai: Xuelin Publishing House. ______. 2003. Linguistic studies of OBI in the 20 th century (20 ). Shanghai: Xuelin Publishing House. ZHANG, Zaixing (). 2004. The system of characters in the Western Zhou Bronze Inscriptions (). Shanghai: East China Normal University Press. ZHAO, Cheng (). 2000. OBI and culture in the Shang Dynasty ( ). Shenyang: Liaoning Peoples Publishing House. Electronic Sources BEIJING UNIHAN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD. ( ). 2001. Si bu cong kan dianzi ban (). BEIJING YINGUAN ELECTRONIC AND TECHNOLOGY CO. ( ). 2001. Zhonghua lishi wenku dianzi ban ( ). JIA, Sixie (). The Northern Wei Dynasty (). Qi ming yao shu (). LIU, Yiqing (). The Southern Dynasty (). Shi shuo xin yu (). SHANGHAI PEOPLES PUBLISHING HOUSE & DIGITAL HERITAGE PUBLISHING LIMITED ( & ). 1999. Wenyuange si ku quan shu dianzi ban (). WU, Zimu (). The Southern Song Dynasty (). Meng liang lu (). ZHOU, Mi (). The Southern Song Dynasty (). Wulin jiu shi ().
4000 Berlin & Kay
122
Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)
Berlin & Kay :

The Evolution of Basic Color Terms in Chinese

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Evolution of Basic Color Terms in Chinese

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE Jianshe Wu Beijing International Studies University

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS Li, Emerging at Period I and V

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

Mencius Zhou li Sum %

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

); XD- Xiandai hanyu fenlei cidian ( ); LYQ- Liu Yunquan

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

0.08% 0.06% 0.04% 0.02% 0.00% Chi 3 4 5 6 7 8

0.018% 0.032% 0.035% 0.022% 0.059% 0.009%

Hong 0.001% 0.006% 0.002% 0.002% 0.016% 0.048%

0.04% 0.03% 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% Chi 3 4 5 6 7 8

0.006% 0.012% 0.015% 0.012% 0.018% 0.002%

Hong 0.000% 0.001% 0.001% 0.001% 0.013% 0.029%

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Chi 3 4 5 6 7 8

34.62% 38.65% 43.98% 55.50% 31.00% 21.68%

Hong 33.33% 11.84% 52.73% 92.31% 79.90% 60.42%

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011)

THE EVOLUTION OF BASIC COLOR TERMS IN CHINESE

JOURNAL OF CHINESE LINGUISTICS