Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction to
Pavement Design
Concepts
Presented By:
Engr. Qaiser Rafiq
07 - MS - TE - 08
Contents:
❧ Pavement
❧ Types of Pavement
❧ Principal of Pavement Design
❧ Failure Criteria
❧ Aspects of Pavement Design
❧ Relative Damage Concept
❧ Pavement Thickness Design approaches
❧ Empirical Method
❧ Mechanistic-Empirical Method
PAVEMENT
The pavement is the structure which
separates the tyres of vehicles from the
underlying foundation material. The later is
generally the soil but it may be structural
concrete or a steel bridge deck.
TYPES OF
PAVEMENT
Flexible Rigid
Pavements Pavements
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
Flexible Pavements are
constructed from bituminous or
unbound material and the stress is
transmitted to the sub-grade
through the lateral distribution of
the applied load with depth.
Asphalt Concrete Aggregate Base Course
Wheel Load
Bituminous Layer
Sub-grade
Typical Stress Distribution in Flexible Pavement.
Vertical stress
Foundation stress
RIGID PAVEMENTS
In rigid pavements the stress is transmitted
to the sub-grade through beam/slab effect.
Rigid pavements contains sufficient beam
strength to be able to bridge over localized
sub-grade failures and areas of inadequate
support.
Thus in contrast with flexible pavements the
depressions which occur beneath the rigid
pavement are not reflected in their running
surfaces.
Concrete Slab
Sub-grade
PRINCIPLES OF PAVEMENT
DESIGN
The tensile and compressive stresses induced in a
pavement by heavy wheel loads decrease with increasing
depth. This permits the use (particularly in flexible
pavements) of a gradation of materials, relatively strong
and expensive materials being used for the surfacing and
less strong and cheaper ones for base and sub-base.
Rut Depth
Bitumen Layer
Fatigue Crack
Unbound Layer
Elastic Modulus ’E1’
Poison’s Ratio ‘ v1’
Bituminous bound Material Thickness ‘H1’
Er
Maximum Tensile Strain at Bituminous Layer
Functional Structural
Can sustain
Safety Riding Quality
Traffic Load
Structural Performance
Strength
Functional Performance
Safety
Comfort
RUDIMENTARY DEFINITION
150 Psi
Asphalt Concrete Thickness?
Base Course Thickness?
Subbase Course Thickness? 3 Psi
Climate/Environment
Load Magnitude
Traffic
Volume
Asphalt Concrete
Base
Material
Properties Subase
Roadbed Soil (Subgrade)
Truck
Base Course
? Thickness ?
Traffic/ Age
11.3 Tons
Failure = 100,000 Repetitions
4.5 Tons
Failure = 1,000,000 Repetitions
2.3 Tons
Failure = 10,000,000 Repetitions
4.5 Tons
13.6 Tons
Failure = Repetitions ?
11.3 Tons 2.3 Tons
RELATIVE DAMAGE CONCEPT
Equivalent
18000 - Ibs Damage per
Standard ESAL Pass = 1
(8.2 tons)
Axle Load
=
16.4 Tons 8.2 Tons
Axle Axle
Consider two single axles A and B where:
B-Axle = 4.1 tons
Damage caused per pass by B-Axle = (4.1/8.2)4 = 0.0625
This means that B-Axle causes only 0.0625 times damage per
pass as caused by 1 pass of standard 8.2 tons axle.
In other words, 16 passes (1/0.625) of B-Axle cause same amount
of damage as caused by 1 pass of standard 8.2 tons axle i.e.,
=
4.1 Tons Axle 8.2 Tons Axle
AXLE LOAD & RELATIVE DAMAGE
75.2
80
63.4
70
DAMAGE PER PASS
53.1
60
44.1
50
36.3
29.5
40
23.8
18.9
30
14.9
11.5
20
8.7
6.5
4.7
3.3
2.3
10
1.1
1.0
0
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
SINGLE AXLE LOAD (Tons)
PAVEMENT THICKNESS DESIGN
Comprehensive Definition
Pavement Thickness Design is the determination of
thickness of various pavement layers (various
paving materials) for a given soil condition and the
predicted design traffic in terms of equivalent
standard axle load that will provide the desired
structural and functional performance over the
selected pavement design life.
PAVEMENT THICKNESS DESIGN APPROACHES
MECHANISTIC-
EMPIRICAL
EMPIRICAL
PROCEDURE
PROCEDURE
EMPIRICAL PROCEDURES
• These procedures are derived from experience
(observed field performance) of in-service pavements
and or “Test Sections”
These procedures define the interaction
Loop 4 23
Loop 5
Loop 3 Loop 6
2 1
US
Army Barracks US
6 71
178 6
AASHO Adm’n Frontage Road
Ottawa
71 23
Utica
Pre-stressed /
Test Tangent Reinforced Concrete
Flexible
X X
X X
X X
X X
Rigid
Steel I-Beam Test Tangent
Typical Loop
AASHO ROAD TEST CONDITIONS
ENVIRONMENT
•Climate -4 to 24oC
•Average Annual Precipitation 34 Inches (864 mm)
•Average Frost Penetration Depth 28 Inches
Soil
•Classification A-6/A-7-6 (Silty-Clayey)
•Drainage Poorly Drained
•Strength 2-4 % CBR (Poor)
LOAD
2.7 10.9 24.6
FRONT LOAD
1
4 FRONT LOAD LOAD
2.7 8.2 19.1
1
5 FRONT LOAD LOAD
2.7 10.2 23.2
•condition,
AASHTO performance model/procedure determines for a given soil
the thickness of Asphalt Concrete, Base Course and Subbase
Course needed to sustain the predicted amount of traffic (in terms of 8.2
tons ESALs) before deteriorating to some selected level of ride quality.
RIDE QUALITY
Initial
Asphalt Concrete = ?
Base = ?
Terminal
Subbase = ?
ESALs Soil
LIMITATIONS OF THE AASHTO EMPIRICAL PROCEDURE
EXAMPLES
• Asphalt Institute Procedure (USA)
• SHRP Procedure (USA)
Mechanistic - Empirical Methods
base course.
● The time and temperature dependency of the
asphaltic layers.
Benefits of Mechanistic - Empirical
Design Approach
❧ Estimates of the consequences of new loading conditions
can be evaluated. For example, the damaging effects of
increased loads, high tire pressures, and multiple axles,
can be modeled by using mechanistic processes.
❧ Better utilization of available materials can be
accomplished by simulating the effects of varying the
thickness and location of layers of stabilized local
materials.
❧ Seasonal effects can be included in performance
estimates.
Benefits of Mechanistic - Empirical
Design Approach
❧ One of the most significant benefits of these methods is
the ability to structurally analyze and extrapolate the
predicted performance of virtually any flexible pavement
design from limited amounts of field or laboratory data
prior to full scale construction applications. This offers
the potential to save time and money by initially
eliminating from consideration those concepts that have
been analyzed and are judged to have little merit.
Draw Back of Mechanistic - Empirical
Design Procedures
n
sig
Ma
ter
De
ial
ess
n
De
n
sig
sig
Ma
Ma
kn
sig
De
ic
ter
De
ter
n
Th
ial
ia l
ess
ess
Construction Practices
De
De
kn
&
n
sig
ick
Quality Control
sig
ic
n
Th
Th
n
Construction Practices Construction Practices
& &
Quality Control Quality Control
1 7 13 19
2 8 14
20
3 9 15
4 10 16
21
5 11 17
6 12 18 22
Plastic Flow Rutting
Rutting in Sub-grade or Base