Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introductional part
2. Main part
3. Reference part
Aurell Model:
2. Method, 1/3
1. Introductional part
1.3.Table of Contents
1.4.Preword
2. Main part
2.1.Introduction
2.1.1.Thesis
2.2.Background/Theory
2.2.1.About FHL
2.2.1.1.1.Symptom description:
2.2.1.1.2.Patient groups:
2.2.2.Diagnostics in FHL
2.3.Objective
The project turned out to be complex, actually consisting of two separate problems.
The main objective of this research is to find a solution to the medical problem.
However, to do this an appropriate analysis method must be developed and
established.
Move to ---?: The idea to this project sprung from an actual need to diagnose a
group of patients with FHL-symptoms. By the year of 2006 (???) the department of
childhood oncology (?) had 15 cases where the patients were diagnosed as having
FHL, based on their symptoms, although none of them were positive to mutations in
any of the known FHL-involved genes. Obviously there must exist further, undefined
regions in their genomes, possessing defects causing the FHL disease state.
The genetic information was available. The main problem was that there exists no
target mutation to screen for; nobody knew what to search/look for. Without a
known disease causing mutation in a defined gene, it is impossible to make a
diagnosis. Without a diagnosis, it is impossible to cure the disease, or to guarantee
an/provide effective treatment. Conclusively, it is necessary to find the disease
causing dysfunctional gene in the genome of each of these patients, in order to
make a diagnosis and offer treatment and cure.
The main objective/the objective of this part of the project is to map the disease loci
of FHL. That is, to identify one or more homozygous regions in the human genome
where undefined genes involved in the regulation of the immune response are
located, potentially contributing to/involved in the disease causing mechanism of
FHL.
The need to identify the disease causing dysfunctional genes to be able to provide
effective treatment to these patients revealed another problem. Namely, to find the
target regions obviously existing in the genomes of the patients, the genetic
material must be analyzed by a suitable method. Although other diseases with
similar autosomal recessive hereditary patterns are subject to research by other
teams, there seems to be no established method that completely satisfies the
analytical needs.
The genetic material to analyze was available. The first problem to attack was how
to analyze this material in an adequate way, in order to find the target regions
specific to each patient. This is performed by bioinformatic methods. Thereby, the
need of bioinformatic competence in the research was recognized.
The method developed for mapping FHL-causing genes can be applied as well for
other autosomal recessive diseases.
2.4.Method
To solve the medical main problem, it is necessary to first solve the analytical
problem. That is, in order to find the unidentified mutated genes involved in the
disease mechanism of the affected patients, a bioinformatic method must be
developed, by/through which the genetic material can be analyzed.
The blood of each patient was analyzed by SNP-arrays and the material was sent to
an external laboratory. (The samples were analysed by Affymetrix GCOS, to
generate data files containing the SNP-maps.) The data received was constituted by
two CEL-files for each patient, one containing Sty-data and one containing Nsp-data.
Phone meeting with Affymetrix support -> Turned out that files were incomplete ->
need complete DDT-files, constituted by CEL, CAB, CHP, EXP. DDT is created by
GCOS. We had received only the CEL-file, which is ONLY an image of the chip (???),
no SNP-signal data (chp???), no experimental data (exp), cab=??
Thorigh DataTransfer Tool – transfer CEL (???) to txt, subsequently (ie export cel-file
as txt).
Txt- can be used in AutoSNPa. The Uppsala group first restructured the columns in
the txt-files according to the recommendations in the AutoSNPa manual by I. Carr,
To do this they used MatLab, algorithm written by Affymetrix platform responsible
Hanna Göransson.
However, not necessary. Instead, use DDT to create ddt-files from CAB (???), which
can be imported into GTYPE
Use ddt-files.
2.4.2.1.1.2. Others?
2.4.2.1.2.Autozygozity mapping
Use txt-files.
2.4.2.1.2.1.1. AutoSNPa
Used AutoSNPa to find the “best” autozygous regions. i.e. those containing greatest
number of homozygous SNP.
Used MatLab to examine as well other homozygous regions, which were not
selected bu AutoSNPa as “best regions”.
2.5.Results
2.5.1.Homozygous regions
2.5.2.Candidate regions
2.5.3.Gene list
2.5.4.Candidate genes
2.6.3.Candidate genes
2.6.4.Next step
2.6.4.1.further narrowing
2.6.4.3.expanding regions
2.7.Summary
3. Reference part
3.1.Reference literature
3.2.Study visits
Check as well:
• Struktur
o Följer rapporten en klar struktur, från problem till resultat eller hoppar
man fram och tillbaka i rapporten?
• Innehåll
o Kapitel 1 bör innehålla en beskrivning som sätter läsaren in i
problemställningen, själva problemet skall framgå, examensarbetets
syfte, så att läsaren kan bedöma om syftet är uppfyllt, och metoden
eller arbetssättet som använts. Finns alla dessa ingredienser i kapitel
1?
o Finns det klart uttryckta avgränsningar? Om ja, är det avgränsningar
av syftet? Om nej, har man i arbetet gjort avgränsningar som borde ha
uttryckts explicit?
o Finns det i slutet av rapporten ett resonemang, som klargör hur väl
man har uppfyllt syftet? Framgår det att relevant bakgrundslitteratur
har lästs?
o Genomförande: finns arbetet beskrivet så att man förstår omfattningen
och problemen i samband med genomförandet? Följer genomförandet
det man förväntar sig av ett arbete inom den aktuella inriktningen, dvs
tillämpar man de metoder och tekniker som ingår i respektive
inriktningens ram?
• Form och språk
o Är layouten på rapporten tilltalande?
o Har avstavningar gjorts i tillräcklig omfattning?
o Är språkliga formuleringar klara och tydliga?
o Är meningarna lagom långa?
o Är meningarna korrekta enligt det aktuella språkets grammatik?
o Finns det en ordlista? Om ja, behövs den till den aktuella målgruppen?
Om nej, borde en ordlista varit med?
o Följer litteraturförteckningen någon allmänt accepterad standard?
o Finns det fler än 10 slarv- och stavfel?
o Finns det bilagor? Om ja, behövs de? Finns det i rapporten hänvisning
till bilagorna? Om nej, skulle man kunnat lyfta något av rapporten till
bilagor? Vilka delar?
Frågor
Jan-Inge