Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EuropeanJournalofChemistry
Journalhomepage:www.eurjchem.com
Antimicrobialinvestigationsonsyntheticptolylazoderivativesof
thienopyrimidinonebasedonanorthofuntionalizedthiophenenucleus
HatemM.Gabera,*,MarkC.BagleybandSherifM.Sherifc
aNationalOrganizationforDrugControlandResearch(NODCAR),Cairo,Egypt
bSchoolofChemistry,MainBuilding,CardiffUniversity,ParkPlace,Cardiff,CF103AT,U.K
cDepartmentofChemistry,FacultyofScience,CairoUniversity,Giza12613,Egypt
*Correspondingauthorat:NationalOrganizationforDrugControlandResearch(NODCAR),Cairo,Egypt.Tel.:+201.64703765;fax:+202.35726406.
Emailaddress:hatem.gaber@yahoo.com(H.Gaber)
ARTICLEINFORMATION
Received:11March2010
Receivedinrevisedform:12April2010
Accepted:12April2010
Online:30June2010
KEYWORDS
Thienopyrimidinone
Aminoformylation
Acetylation
Hydrazinolysis
Antimicrobialactivity
ABSTRACT
derivatives of thieno[2,3d]pyrimidin4one, 4ac, and 6 were respectively synthezised
New
based on thiophene derivative, 2c, bearing orthodisposed amino and ester groups.
Carbohydrazide, 7, was obtained by hydrazinolysis of 3ethoxycabonylmethyl derivative, 4c.
Compounds 4b and 7 were used to build up two series of novel 3substituted
methylthieno[2,3d]pyrimidin4ones, 711, and their corresponding 3substitutedamino
analogues 12, 15a,b, 18, which were of significant interest for biological study. The new
thieno[2,3d]pyrimidin4one derivatives, with various groups in position 3, were screened
for their preliminary antimicrobial activity against a representative panel of Grampositive
andGramnegativebacteriaaswellasfungistrains.Thecompoundstesteddisplayeddifferent
levels of antibacterial and antifungal effects, with the assays carried out on six pathogenic
bacteria and six pathogenic fungi. Of these compounds, the 3unsubstitutedthieno[2,3
d]pyrimidin4(3H)one, 4a, showed the lowest effect on pathogenic bacteria, while the
corresponding3substitutedanaloguesproducedinhibitoryeffectsagainstbacteriasimilaror
superiortothereferencedrugTetracycline.Forthosederivativesofthieno[2,3d]pyrimidin4
one in which the 3position contains a methylene moiety, it has been observed that the
antibacterial effect was in general found to be significantly higher than the corresponding
analogues with a substitutedamino moiety in position 3. Despite promising in vitro
antibacterial activity of the new thienopyrimidin4ones, only compounds 7, 10 and 11,
among the compounds tested, exhibited some kind of antifungal activity. The detailed
synthesisandbiologicalscreeningdatawerereported.
1.Introduction
2.Experimental
2.1.Instrumentation
EuropeanJournalofChemistry
ISSN21532249(Print)/ISSN21532257(Online)2010EURJCHEM
DOI:10.5155/eurjchem.1.2.115123.56
116
Gaberetal./EuropeanJournalofChemistry1(2)(2010)115123
2.2.Synthesis
2.2.1.Generalprocedureforthesynthesisofethyl5arylazo
2amino4phenylthiophene3carboxylates(2b,c)
Afinelygroundpowderofthepsubstitutedaniline(0.002
mol) was dissolved in a mixture of concentrated hydrochloric
acid(2mL)andwater(15mL),andstirredovernightatroom
temperature. The solution was cooled to 05 oC, a well cooled
saturated solution of sodium nitrite (0.0021 mol) was added
portionwiseat510oC,andthereactioncontentwasstirredfor
afurther1hatthesametemperature.Excessnitrousacidwas
destroyedbytheadditionofurea,andthesolutionwascooled
to05 oC.Theresultingcleardiazoniumsaltsolutionwasthen
added dropwise over 20 min with constant stirring and with
frequent addition of ice to a cold (05 oC) stirred solution of
couplingcomponentaminoester1(0.0018mol)dissolvedin20
mL of ethanol containing sodium acetate (0.01 mol) while
maintaining temperature at 05 oC. After addition of the
diazoniumsalt,themixturewasstirredforanadditional3hat
510oC.Theprecipitatedproduct,ineachcase,separatedupon
dilutionwithcoldwater(30mL)wasfilteredoff,washedwith
hot water and with cold water, and dried. Recrystallization
fromthe appropriatesolvents gave thearylazo derivatives 2b
(0.40g;57%)and2c(0.51g;77%),respectively.
2.2.1.1.Ethyl2amino5(4chlorophenylazo)4phenyl
thiophene3carboxylate(2b)
2.2.1.2.Ethyl2amino4phenyl5(ptolylazo)thiophene3
carboxylate(2c)
2.2.2.Synthesisofethyl2[(dimethylaminomethylene
amino]4phenyl5(ptolylazo)thiophene3carboxylate(3)
2.89(2s,6H,NMe2),4.23(q,2H,J=7.2Hz,esterCH2),7.347.70
(m, 9H, PhH, ArH), 8.87 (s, 1H, amidineH). 13C NMR ( ppm):
13.9 (ester Me), 21.5 (ArMe), 33.8, 38.3 (NMe2), 59.8 (ester
CH2), 118.5 (C3), 125.6, 127.6, 128.5, 128.9, 129.4, 129.8,
131.4, 134.8, 138.7, 152.4, 155.2 (amidine CH), 164.9 (C2),
166.1 (ester CO). Anal. Calcd. for C23H24N4O2S (420.527): C,
65.69; H, 5.75; N, 13.32; S, 7.62. Found: C, 65.54; H, 5.63; N,
13.09;S,7.51.
2.2.3.Synthesisof5phenyl6(ptolylazo)thieno[2,3d]
pyrimidin4(3H)one(4a)
2.2.3.1.MethodA
2.2.3.2.MethodB
2.2.4.Synthesisof3amino5phenyl6(ptolylazothieno
[2,3d]pyrimidin4(3H)one(4b)
2.2.5.Synthesisofethyl2[4oxo5phenyl6(ptolylazo)
thieno[2,3d]pyrimidin3(4H)yl]acetate(4c)
Gaberetal./EuropeanJournalofChemistry1(2)(2010)115123
esterMe),2.37(s,3H,ArMe),4.13(q,2H,J=7.5Hz,esterCH2),
4.83(s,2H,NCH2CO),7.307.75(m,9H,PhH,ArH),8.49(s,1H,
pyrimidine H2). 13C NMR ( ppm): 14.3 (ester Me), 21.0 (Ar
Me),45.3 (NCH2), 61.4 (esterCH2), 119.1 (C4a), 125.3, 127.4,
128.2, 128.7, 129.5, 129.9, 132.3, 134.5, 138.5, 150.2 (C2),
152.5, 157.6 (C6, C7a), 160.1 (pyrimidine CO), 168.6 (ester
CO);Anal.Calcd.forC23H20N4O3S(432.495):C,63.87;H,4.66;N,
12.95;S,7.41.Found:C,63.65;H,4.49;N,12.76;S,7.20.
2.2.6.Synthesisofethyl2acetamido4phenyl5(ptolylazo)
thiophene3carboxylate(5)
2.2.7.Synthesisof3amino2methyl5phenyl6(ptolylazo)
thieno[2,3d]pyrimidin4(3H)one(6)
ThiscompoundwassynthesizedfromNacetylderivative5
(0.002 mol) and hydrazine hydrate (0.02 mol, 1 mL) in a
mannersimilartothatdescribedforthesynthesisof4b.Itwas
purified by recrystallization from a mixture of ethanol and
water(4:1)toobtaincompound6asadarkbrownsolid(0.44
g;59%).M.p.:241242C.IR(/cm1):3321,3200(NH2),3036
(CHarom),29402861(CHaliph),1679(CO);1HNMR(ppm):
2.26, 2.45 (2s, 6H, 2Me), 5.02 (s, br, 2H, NH2, D2O
exchangeable), 7.417.78 (m, 9H, PhH, ArH). Anal. Calcd. for
C20H17N5OS (375.447): C, 63.98; H, 4.56; N, 18.65; S, 8.54.
Found:C,63.76;H,4.40;N,18.45;S,8.43.
2.2.8.Synthesisof2[4oxo5phenyl6(ptolylazothieno
[2,3d]pyrimidin3(4H)yl]acetohydrazide(7)
Hydrazinehydrate(0.015mol)was addedtoasolution of
compound 4c (0.003 mol) in absolute ethanol (25 mL). The
reaction mixture was refluxed for 4 h, concentrated in vacuo,
cooled and diluted with water. The obtained precipitate was
collected by filtration, washed with cold water, dried and
purifiedbyrecrystallizationfromanethanolandwatermixture
togiveyellowishwhitecrystalsofthetitlecompound7(0.82g;
65%),M.p.:210212C.IR(/cm1):33613158(NHNH2),3062
(arom CH), 2920 (aliph CH), 1681 (pyrimidine CO), 1657
(hydrazideCO). 1H NMR(ppm): 2.32(s,3H, ArMe),4.45 (s,
2H, NH2, D2Oexchangeable), 4.64 (s, 2H, NCH2CO), 7.337.71
(m,9H,PhH,ArH),8.43(s,1H,pyrimidineH2),9.50(s,1H,NH,
D2Oexchangeable). Anal. Calcd. for C21H18N6O2S (418.472): C,
60.27; H, 4.34; N, 20.08; S, 7.66. Found: C, 60.03; H, 4.15; N,
19.86;S,7.52.
117
2.2.9.Synthesisof2{2[4oxo5phenyl6(ptolylazo)thieno
[2,3d]pyrimidin3(4H)yl]acetyl}Nphenylhydrazine
carbothioamide(8)
2.2.10.Synthesisof5phenyl3[(5phenylamino1,3,4
thiadiazol2yl)methyl]6(ptolylazo)thieno[2,3
d]pyrimidin4(3H)one(9)
To0.003molofthiosemicarbazide,8,concentratedsulfuric
acid (5 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at
room temperature for 30 min. The reaction mixture was
poured over ice/water mixture with stirring. The precipitated
solidwasfilteredoff,washedwithsodiumcarbonatesolution,
followed by water and recrystallized from ethanol to obtain
compound 9 as a yellow solid (0.85 g; 53%), M.p.: 265 C. IR
(/cm1): 3240 (NH), 3076 (arom CH), 2924 (aliph CH), 1680
(CO). 1HNMR(ppm):2.28(s,3H,ArMe),4.99(s,2H,NCH2),
6.957.58 (m, 14H, 2PhH, ArH), 8.50 (s, 1H, pyrimidine H2),
10.52 (s, 1H, NH, D2Oexchangeable). 13C NMR ( ppm): 20.9
(ArMe),45.7(NCH2),117.5, 118.9,122.8,125.2,127.7, 128.1,
128.6, 129.0, 129.6, 130.1, 132.5, 134.6, 138.5, 140.2, 149.8,
152.4 (C2, C6), 155.1 (thiadiazole C2), 157.5 (C7a), 160.9
(pyrimidine CO), 165.0 (thiadiazole C5). Anal. Calcd. for
C28H21N7OS2 (535.643): C, 62.78; H, 3.95; N, 18.30; S, 11.97.
Found:C,62.54;H,3.81;N,18.08;S,11.78.
2.2.11.Synthesisof5phenyl3[(4phenyl5thioxo4,5
dihydro1H1,2,4triazol3yl)methyl]6(p
tolylazo)thieno[2,3d]pyrimidin4(3H)one(10)
118
Gaberetal./EuropeanJournalofChemistry1(2)(2010)115123
2.2.12.Synthesisof3{5(NacetylNphenylamino)1,3,4
thiadiazol2yl]methyl}5phenyl6(ptolylazo)thieno[2,3
d]pyrimidin4(3H)one(11)
2.2.13.Synthesisof3(benzylideneamino)5phenyl6(p
tolylazo)thieno[2,3d]pyrimidin4(3H)one(12)
2.2.13.1.MethodA
2.2.13.2.MethodB
2.2.14.Synthesisof2amino4phenyl5(ptolylazo)
thiophene3carbohydrazide(13)
Thesameexperimentalproceduredescribedbeforeforthe
synthesisofcompound7wasfollowedexceptusingcompound
2c (0.003 mol) instead of 4c. Recrystallization from ethanol
gave the corresponding aminocarbohydrazide 13 as a reddish
brown crystals (0.79 g; 75%). M.p.: 174175 C. IR (/cm1):
34103182(NH,NH2),3035(aromCH),2922(aliphCH),1659
(CO). 1H NMR ( ppm): 2.27 (s, 3H, ArMe), 4.30 (s, 2H, NH2
carbohydrazide, D2Oexchangeable), 6.92 (s, 2H, NH2, D2O
exchangeable), 7.357.70 (m, 9H, PhH, ArH), 9.17 (s, 1H, NH,
D2Oexchangeable). Anal. Calcd. for C18H17N5OS (351.425): C,
61.52; H, 4.88; N, 19.93; S, 9.12. Found: C, 61.27; H, 4.74; N,
19.69;S,9.01.
2.2.15.SynthesisofaminoN'benzylidene4phenyl5(p
tolylazo)thiophene3carbohydrazide(14)
2936(aliphCH),1668(CO). 1HNMR(ppm):2.27(s,3H,Ar
Me), 6.76 (s, 2H, NH2, D2Oexchangeable), 7.327.79 (m, 14H,
2PhH, ArH), 8.10 (s, 1H, N=CH), 11.06 (s, 1H, NH, D2O
exchangeable). Anal.Calcd.forC25H21N5OS(439.532):C,68.32;
H,4.82;N,15.93;S,7.30.Found:C,68.09;H,4.64;N,15.73;S,
7.22.
2.2.16.Synthesisof3[(dimethylamino)methyleneamino]5
phenyl6(ptolylazo)thieno[2,3d]pyrimidin4(3H)one
(15a)
2.2.17.Synthesisof3[(Ethoxymethylene)amino]5phenyl6
(ptolylazo)thieno[2,3d]pyrimidin4(3H)one(15b)
2.2.18.Synthesisof3(formylamino)5phenyl6(ptolylazo)
thieno[2,3d]pyrimidin4(3H)one(18)
2.2.19.Reactionof15a,bwithhydrazinehydrate
Toasolutionofeither15aor15b(0.001mol),inmethanol
(20 mL), hydrazine hydrate (0.0025 mol) was added and the
reaction content was then stirred under reflux for 24 h. The
reaction mixture was cooled and diluted with a threefold
amountofwaterandtheprecipitatewasfilteredoff,driedand
Gaberetal./EuropeanJournalofChemistry1(2)(2010)115123
2.3.AntimicrobialAssay
Thepreliminaryantimicrobialactivitywasinvestigatedon
a dozen of newly synthesized thienopyrimidin4one
derivatives having different groups in position 3 in order to
increase the selectivity of these derivatives towards test
microorganisms. The antimicrobial profile was tested against
three Grampositive bacteria species (Bacillus subtilis,
Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus faecalis), three Gram
negative bacteria species (Escherichia coli, Neisseria
gonorrhoeae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), two moulds
(Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger) and four yeasts (Candida
albicans,
Candida
parapsilosis,
Candida
tropicalis,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae) using a modified KirbyBauer disc
diffusionmethod[20].Briefly,100lofthetestbacteria/fungi
weregrownin10mLoffreshmediauntiltheyreachedacount
ofapproximately108cells/mLforbacteriaor105cells/mLfor
fungi[21].Onehundredlofmicrobialsuspensionwasspread
ontoagarplatescorrespondingtothebrothinwhichtheywere
maintained.
Isolatedcoloniesofeachorganismthatmightbeplayinga
pathogenic role should be selected from primary agar plates
and tested for susceptibility by disc diffusion method [22]. Of
the many media available, National Committee for Clinical
Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) recommends MuellerHinton
agar as it results in good batchtobatch reproducibility. Disc
diffusion method for filamentous fungi was tested by using
approved standard method (M38A) developed by the NCCLS
[23] for evaluating the susceptibilities of filamentous fungi to
antifungal agents. Disc diffusion method for yeasts was
developed by using approved standard method (M44P)
accordingtoreference[24].Theplateswereincubatedat25 oC
for48hforfungisuchasAspergillusflavusandat3537 oCfor
2448 h for bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus
subtilis,Escherichiacoli,Pseudomonasaeuroginosa,whereasfor
yeastsuchasCandidaalbicanstheywereincubatedat30oCfor
2448 h. The resulting inhibition zone diameters (IZDs) were
measured in millimeters and used as criterion for the
antimicrobial activity [20]. The size of the clear zone is
proportional to the inhibitory action of the compound under
investigation.
Standard discs of the bactericide Tetracycline and the
fungicide Amphotericin B served as positive controls for
antimicrobialactivitybutfilterdiscsimpregnatedwith10lof
solvent (distilled water, chloroform, DMSO) were used as a
negative control. The agar used is MeullerHinton agar that is
rigorouslytestedforcompositionandpH.Furtherthedepthof
the agar in the plate is a factor to be considered in the disc
diffusion method. This method is well documented and
standard zones of inhibition have been determined for
susceptibleandresistantvalues.Blankpaperdisks(Schleicher
&Schuell,Spain)withadiameterof8.0mmwereimpregnated
with 10l of the tested concentration of the stock solutions.
Whenafilterpaperdiscimpregnatedwithatestedchemicalis
placedonagarthechemicalwilldiffusefromthediscintothe
agar. This diffusion will place the chemical in the agar only
aroundthedisc.Thesolubilityofthechemicalanditsmolecular
sizewilldeterminethesizeoftheareaofchemicalinfiltration
aroundthedisc.Ifanorganismisplacedontheagaritwillnot
grow in the area around the disc if it is susceptible to the
chemical.Thisareaofnogrowtharoundthediscisknownasa
"Zoneofinhibition"or"Clearzone".Forthediscdiffusion,the
zone diameters were measured with slipping calipers of the
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [22].
Agarbased methods such as Etest and disk diffusion can be
119
3.ResultsandDiscussion
3.1.Chemistry
120
Gaberetal./EuropeanJournalofChemistry1(2)(2010)115123
Scheme1
typicallyatH 10.52ppmasasingletwhichdisappearedupon
additionofdeuteriumoxide.SuchanupfieldNHresonanceisin
complete agreement with the thiadiazole structure 9 rather
than with the triazoline structure 10, forwhichthe thioamide
NH proton would be expected to be deshielded due to the
adjacentthionegroup.Asaresult,theisomericstructure10,if
isolated,wouldbeexpectedtodisplayadownfieldshiftforthe
thioamide NH proton, typically in the range of H ca. 13.00
14.00ppmasreportedbydifferentauthorsinsimilarprotocols
[2936].Thelackofsignalsarisingfromthethionefunctionin
thedownfieldregionatCvalueabove169ppm[3639],inthe
13C NMR spectrum of the product isolated from the studied
reaction, is also evidence in favor of the structure 9. On the
basis of such data, it is not unreasonable to conclude that the
studiedreactioniscompletelyregioselectiveandthestructure
of the isolated product is thiadiazole 9; the alternative
cyclization direction to the corresponding triazoline 10 is
therefore discarded. The preferred formation of thiadiazole
ringundersuchacidicconditionscouldbeexplainedbytheloss
of nucleophilicity of N4 of the carbothioamide moiety as a
resultofitsprotonationorbythehighernucleophilicityofthe
sulfuratominthisNphenylthioureatypegroupandproceeds
by nucleophilic attack by the sulfur atom on the acyclic
carbonyl carbon, followed by elimination of water [40].
Therefore,5phenylaminothiadiazole9wasisolatedasthesole
product(Scheme2).
In support of this hypothesis, the alternative structure 10
could be successfully obtained from the cyclodehydration of
acetylhydrazinecarbothioamide, 8, in boiling ethanolic sodium
hydroxidesolutionatreflux.Theconfigurationoftheresulting
triazoline derivative, 10, is worth a special mention. Both IR
andNMRspectrawereinformativeinestablishingstructure10.
ItsIRspectrumhaveimportantabsorptionbandsat3192and
1186 cm1 belonging to stretching vibrations of NH and CS
groups, respectively. The absorption bands associated with
other functional groups appeared in the expected regions. In
the 1H NMR spectrum of 10, a signal for the triazoline CSNH
proton was observed to be shifted downfield to 13.75 ppm.
This downfield shift of NH proton in this reaction product as
comparedtothecorrespondingNHprotonincompound9can
be rationalized on the basis of the deshielding effect of the
adjacent CS group, thus establishing the thione structure, 10,
[2935].Conclusiveevidencefortheproposedstructure10was
provided by 13C NMR spectrum of the isolated product, in
whichanimportantsignalatC171.6ppmwasdetected.Sucha
lowfieldsignalcanbeassignedonlytothethioamideCScarbon
atom,whichwasreportedtoappeararoundthatchemicalshift
value [3739]. It is worthwhile to report here that compound
Gaberetal./EuropeanJournalofChemistry1(2)(2010)115123
121
Scheme2
Scheme3
3.2.AntimicrobialEvaluation
Theresultsoftestingforantibacterialandantifungaleffects
aresummarizedinTables1and2.Asshownbytheseresults,
thenewthienopyrimidinonestesteddisplayedvariableinvitro
antibacterial and antifungal actions. In general, the chemical
structure of the whole molecule, comprising the nature of the
heterocyclic system as well as the type of the substituted
function present in the heterocyclic ring structure, has a
pronouncedeffectonantimicrobialactivity.Inparticular,ithas
122
Gaberetal./EuropeanJournalofChemistry1(2)(2010)115123
Table1.Invitroantibacterialactivityoftestcompounds.a
IZDb(mm)
Grampositive
Gramnegative
B.subtilis
S.aureus
S. faecalis
E.coli
N.gonorrhoeae
4a
13
9
15
0.0
13
4b
36
33
24
33
25
4c
33
33
24
36
29
7
37
48
28
36
30
8
41
45
32
43
28
9
38
51
30
36
31
10
40
39
28
38
30
11
34
39
25
38
26
12
37
35
29
38
30
15a
36
33
24
34
25
15b
39
31
29
34
28
18
36
38
31
38
32
Standardc
32
27
33
32
34
aDMFhasnoantibacterialactivityattheconcentrationusedtodissolvethetestcompounds.
bIZD:inhibitionzonediameter.
cStandardforbacteria:Tetracycline.
Compound
Table2.Invitroantifungalactivityoftestcompounds.a
IZDb(mm)
A.flavus
A.niger
C.albicans
C.parapsilosis
4a
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4b
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4c
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7
0.0
10.0
0.0
9.0
8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
11
0.0
0.0
15.0
0.0
12
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
15a
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
15b
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Standardc
16.0
12.0
18.0
13.0
aDMFhasnoantifungalactivityattheconcentrationusedtodissolvethetestcompounds.
bIZD:inhibitionzonediameter.
cStandardforfungi:AmphotericinB.
Compound
beenfoundthatantimicrobialactivitywasrelativelydependent
onthetypeofsubstituentinthe3positionofpyrimidinering.
It was observed that the synthesized compounds substituted
with a methylene moiety in the 3position of the heterocyclic
nucleusfavoredtheantibacterialactivityespeciallyagainstthe
Grampositivestrains.Replacementofthemethylenemoietyby
a substituted amino moiety diminished the antibacterial
activityslightly.Onthecontrary,therewasnoessentialinvitro
antifungal profile of the test compounds against moulds and
yeasts. Only a few thienopyrimidin4ones with a methylene
moiety (compounds 7, 10 and 11) revealed poor activity
against the test fungi isolates. Based on the biological
evaluation, compounds 8 and 9 may be considered promising
forthedevelopmentofnewantibacterialagents.
4.Conclusion
P.aeruginosa
12
34
34
38
40
36
40
30
36
37
34
36
33
C.tropicalis
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.0
S.cerevisiae
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.0
0.0
0.0
9.0
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
Acknowledgements
References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
Cohen,M.L.Nature2000,406,762767.
Barrett,C.T.;Barrett,J.F.Curr.Opin.Biotechnol.2003,14,621626.
Andrade, S. S.; Jones, R. N.; Gales, A. C.; Sader, H. S. J. Antimicrob.
Chemother.2003,52,140141.
Finch,R.Clin.Microbiol.Infect.2002,8(3),2132.
Daidone,G.;Maggio,B.;Schillaci,D.Pharmazie1990,45,441442.
Franchini,C.;Muraglia,M.;Corbo,F.;Florio,M.A.;Mola,A.D.;Rosato,
A.; Matucci, R.; Nesi, M.; Bambeke, F. V.; Vitali, C. Arch. Pharm. Chem.
LifeSci.2009,342,605613.
Balalaie, S.; Bararjanian, M.; Rominger, F. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 2006,
43,821826.
Ram,V.J.;VandenBerghe,D.A.;Vlietinck,A.J.LiebigsAnn.Chem.1987,
797801.
Gaberetal./EuropeanJournalofChemistry1(2)(2010)115123
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
[15].
[16].
[17].
[18].
[19].
[20].
[21].
[22].
[23].
[24].
[25].
[26].
[27].
[28].
[29].
[30].
[31].
[32].
[33].
[34].
[35].
[36].
[37].
[38].
[39].
[40].
[41].
[42].
[43].
[44].
[45].
[46].
[47].
[48].
Wang, Y. D.; Johnson, S.; Powell, D.; McGinnis, J. P.; Miranda, M.;
Rabindran,S.K.Bioorg.Med.Chem.Lett.2005,15,37633766.
Duval,E.;Case,A.;Stein,R.L.;Cuny,G.D.Bioorg.Med.Chem.Lett.2005,
15,18851889.
Dai,Y.;Guo,Y.;Frey,R.R.;Ji,Z.;Curtin,M.L.;Ahmed,A.A.;Albert,D.H.;
Arnold, L.; Arries, S. S.; Barlozzari, T.; Bauch, J. L.; Bouska, J. J.;
Bousquet,P.F.;Cunha,G.A.;Glaser,K.B.;Guo,J.;Li,J.;Marcotte,P.A.;
Marsh, K. C.; Moskey, M. D.; Pease, L. J.; Stewart, K. D.; Stoll, V. S.;
Tapang,P.;Wishart,N.;Davidsen,S.K.;Michaelides,M.R.J.Med.Chem.
2005,48,60666083.
Azab,M.E.Phosphorus,Sulfur,andSilicon2008,183,17661782.
Chambhare,R.V.;Khadse,B.G.;Bobde,A.S.;Bahekar,R.H.Eur.J.Med.
Chem.2003,38,89100.
ElSherbeny, M. A.; ElAshmawy, M. B.; ElSubbagh, H. I.; ElEmam, A.
A.;Badria,F.A.Eur.J.Med.Chem.1995,30,445449.
Gaber,H.M.;Bagley,M.C.ChemMedChem2009,4,10431050.
Filichev, V. V.; Gaber, H.; Olsen, T. R.; Jrgensen, P. T.; Jessen, C. H.;
Pedersen,E.B.Eur.J.Org.Chem.2006,17,39603968.
Gaber,H.M.;Elgemeie,G.E.H.;Ouf,S.A.;Sherif,S.M.Heteroat.Chem.
2005,16,298307.
Tormyshev,V.M.;Trukhin,D.V.;Rogozhnikova,O.Y.;Mikhalina,T.V.;
Troitskaya,T.I.;Flinn,A.Synlett.2006,16,25592564.
Gewald,K.;Gruner,M.;Hain,U.;Sueptitz,G.Monatsh.Chem.1988,119,
985992.
Bauer,A.W.;Kirby,W.W.M.;Sherris,J.C.;Turck,M.Am.J.Clin.Pathol.
1966,45,493496.
Pfaller,M.A.;Burmeister,L.;BartlettGhorab,M.A.;Rinaldi,M.G.J.Clin.
Microbiol.1988,26,14371441.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Antimicrobial
SusceptibilityofFlavobacteria;PerformanceVol41,1997.
NationalCommitteeforClinicalLaboratoryStandards,ReferenceMethod
for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of ConidiumForming
FilamentousFungi;ProposedStandard,NCCLSDocumentM38A;Wayne,
PA,USA,2002.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Method for
Antifungal Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Yeast; Proposed
Guideline,NCCLSDocumentM44P;Wayne,PA,USA,2003.
Matar,M.J.;OstroskyZeichner,L.;Paetznick,V.L.;Rodriguez,J.R.;Chen,
E.;Rex,J.H.Antimicrob.AgentsChemother.2003,47,16471651.
Crespo, M. I.; Pags, L.; Vega, A.; Segarra, V.; Lpez, M.; Domnech, T.;
Miralpeix,M.;Beleta,J.;Ryder,H.;Palacios,J.M.J.Med.Chem.1998,41,
40214035.
Ahmed,E.Kh.;Sensfuss,U.;Habicher,W.D.J.HeterocyclicChem.1999,
36,11191122.
Abdel Hafez, A. A.; Kamal ElDean, A.; Hassan, A. A.; ElKashef, H. S.;
Rault,S.;Robba,M.J.HeterocyclicChem.1996,33,431438.
Kkgzel,.;Kkgzel,.G.;Rollas,S.;tkSani,G.;zdemir,O.;
Bayrak,I.;Altu,T.;Stables,J.P.ILFarmaco2004,59,893901.
Oru, E. E.; KoyigitKaymakioglu, B.; Oral, B.; AltunbasToklu, H. Z.;
Kabasakal,L.;Rollas,S.Arch.Pharm.Chem.LifeSci.2006,339,267272.
Wujec,M.;Kosikowska,U.;Paneth,P.;Malm,A.Heterocycles2007,71,
26172626.
Grsoy,A.;Demirayak,.;Cesur,Z.;Reisch,J.;tk,G.Pharmazie1990,
45,246250.
Rollas, S.; Kalyoncuolu, N.; SurAltiner, D.; Yeenolu, Y. Pharmazie
1993,48,308309.
Ergenc,N.;Ilhan,E.;tk,G.Pharmazie1992,47,5960.
Kkgzel, S. G.; Rollas, S.; Erdeniz, H.; Kiraz, M. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
1999,34,153160.
Cho,N.S.;Kim,G.N.;Parkanyi,C.J.HeterocyclicChem.1993,30,397
401.
Elmoghayar,M.R.H.;Ghali,E.A.;Ramiz,M.M.M.;Elnagdi,M.H.Liebigs
Ann.Chem.1985,19621968.
BartelsKeith,J.R.;Burgess,M.T.;Stevenson,J.M.J.Org.Chem.1977,
42,37253731.
Pappalardo,S.;Bottino,F.;Tringali,C.J.Org.Chem.1987,52,405412.
ElEssawy,F.A.;Khattab,A.F.;AbdelRahman,A.A.H.Monatsh.Chem.
2007,138,777785.
Shaker,R.M.;Mahmoud,A.F.;AbdelLatif,F.F.Phosphorus,Sulfur,and
Silicon2005,180,397406.
AbdelRahman,H.M.;Hussein,M.A.Arch.Pharm.Chem.LifeSci.2006,
339,378387.
Zou,X.;Jin,G.J.HeterocyclicChem.2001,38,993996.
Dogan, H. N.; Duran, A.; Rollas, S.; Sener, G.; Uysal, M. K.; Glen, D.
Bioorg.Med.Chem.2002,10,28932898.
Oru, E. E.; Rollas, S.; Kandemirli, F.; Shvets, N.; Dimoglo, A. S. J. Med.
Chem.2004,47,67606767.
Karaku,S.;Rollas,S.ILFarmaco2002,57,577581.
ElHawash,S.A.M.;Wahab,A.E.A.Arch.Pharm.Chem.LifeSci.2006,
339,437447.
Makarov,V.A.;Ryabova,O.B.;Alekseeva,L.M.;Shashkov,A.S.;Granik,
V.G.Chem.HeterocyclicCompds.2003,39,238243.
123