138 views

Uploaded by jlenis

- Polymorphism, Salts Amp Crystallization
- BOM MPAP June 2005.pdf
- An activated-state model for the prediction of solid-phase crystallization.pdf
- Sieverts Apparatus and Methodology for Accurate Determination of Hydrogen Uptake by Light-Atom Hosts
- crystallization, drying of solid
- cr1
- rotarydryersizingdesign.pdf
- 1-s2.0-S0022113915000226-756_goooood
- Determination of Densities & Chemical Periodicity
- Tugas Strategi Rencana Proses
- Calculo de Coeficientes de Vavrinecz Para Remolacha
- Lube of Manufacturing Brief Report
- Tres
- 2005 Generation of Size-Controlled Submicron Protein Crystals
- session_9
- 01-4771-405
- program of physics i & oral questions (1).pdf
- Chapter 2-Thermodynamics 1
- Diffusion Final Report 2
- Assignment 5

You are on page 1of 5

of thin sugar films

E. Ben-Yoseph, R.W. Hartel*

Department of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, 1605 Linden Driven, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Abstract

A computer model was developed to predict drying and crystallization during processing of thin sugar films under

the conditions of importance for sugar-coated cereals. The three-dimensional model analyzed simultaneous heat and

moisture transfer, accounting for shrinkage, with temperature and moisture-dependent transport properties. Crystal

growth was evaluated from crystallization kinetics based on supersaturation and temperature. The influence of growth

on the solution concentration and drying were taken into account. Concentration profiles around the growing crystals

during drying of the thin films were evaluated. The model predicts a concentration reduction around the growing

crystals, and film temperatures that are higher than the drying temperature (as a result of the release of fusion heat).

A phenomenon of case hardening was observed for dried films with a high density of seeds on surface. 1999 Elsevier

Science B.V. All rights reserved.

oping a specific appearance, is severely lacking.

Controlling crystallization of sugars in thin films Cereal companies have problems getting consistent

is critical to development of the proper appearance results with this process. Usually, the film is frosty

of sugar-coated cereal products. In this process, at the end of the process, which is the desired

a thin sugar film is applied to the surface of a cereal appearance. However, sometimes the appearance is

piece, and then allowed to dry. By proper control of glossy, which is undesired.

the crystallization and drying processes, the appro- The objective of this work was to develop a com-

priate appearance, either frosted or glazed, can puter model for predicting crystallization kinetics

be developed. However, our understanding of the during drying of thin sugar films under the condi-

tions of importance for sugar-coated cereals. This

includes developing a three-dimensional model

* Corresponding author. Fax: #1 608 263 1965; e-mail: that evaluates changes in all dimensions within the

hartel@calshp.cals.wisc.edu. film, evaluating the concentration profile around

0022-0248/99/$ — see front matter 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

PII: S 0 0 2 2 - 0 2 4 8 ( 9 8 ) 0 1 0 1 4 - 8

E. Ben-Yoseph, R.W. Hartel / Journal of Crystal Growth 198/199 (1999) 1294–1298 1295

the growing crystals, and accounting for crystals z are dimensionless depth into the box in the x, y,

growing together. The simulation program deter- and z directions, respectively, defined as

mined the crystal size, shape and distribution in the

X ½ Z

film. Using this information, the final appearance of x" , y" , z" (3)

X ½ Z

the film, either frosty or glassy, will be predicted in

the next phase of the study. where X, ½, and Z are the depth into the box in the

x, y, and z directions, respectively, and X , ½ , and

Z are the thickness of the box in the x, y, and

2. Theory, modeling and experimental procedure z directions, respectively, as a function of time. D ,

V

D and D are the mutual diffusion coefficients in

W X

2.1. Computer simulation of drying process water-sucrose system in the x, y, and z directions,

respectively. S , S , and S , are the shrinkage magni-

V W X

Okazaki et al. [1] presented the mass transfer tude of the box in the x, y, and z directions.

equation in a one-dimensional, two component sys- The initial conditions describe the temperature

tem with shrinkage, assuming all moisture move- and concentration of the solution at the beginning

ment was by diffusion. This equation was expanded of the process:

to three dimensions, since crystal growth is a

at t"0 for all i, j, or k: C "1, (4)

three-dimensional phenomenon, to get GHI

at t"0: S"1,¹"¹ , (5)

jC j D jC x jS jC

" V # V where i, j, and k are subscripts which refer to nodes

jt jx Xj x S j t jx

R V in the grid point system in the x, y, and z directions.

2D 1 jC The boundary conditions supply information on

! V

C#C SX j x external conditions surrounding the solution,

V R which affect the behavior of the surface solution

j D jC y jS jC temperature and heat and mass transfer rates dur-

# W # W

jy ½j y S j t jy ing drying. The boundary conditions used were

R W

2D 1 jC for z"0 and t'0:

! W

C#C S½ j y jC

W R "0 (6)

jz

j D jC z jS jC

# X # X

jz Zj z S j t jz for z"1 and t'0:

R X

2D 1 jC ¼ D o jC

X , (1) ! X "k (P !P ) (7)

!

C#C SZ j z (C#C)SZ jz E

X R

where C is the dimensionless moisture in film and dS k

!o " (P !P ) (8)

t is time. C, C and ¼ are defined as follows: dt Z

[m c #c Z X ½ (o !o )

C"

¼ !¼

, C "

¼#¼

,

¼ !¼

¼ !¼

d¹

#c Z X ½ (o !o )#c Z X ½ o S ]

dt

o

¼" , (2)

o!o dS

"h X ½ (¹ !¹)#r o Z X ½ , (9)

dt

where, ¼ is the mass fraction of water, ¼ is

the equilibrium water mass fraction, ¼ is the where, o is the solution density, k is the mass

initial water mass fraction, o is the density of pure transfer coefficient at the solution surface, P is

water, o is the density of pure sucrose. x, y, and the partial pressure of water vapor at film surface,

1296 E. Ben-Yoseph, R.W. Hartel / Journal of Crystal Growth 198/199 (1999) 1294–1298

P is the partial pressure of water vapor in hot air, temperature, ¹ , during the drying process. Roos

m is the mass of the flake, c is the heat capacity of and Karel [6] gave a method to calculate ¹ for

the flake, c is the heat capacity of sucrose, c is the sucrose by applying the Gordon and Taylor equa-

heat capacity of water, o is the initial density of tion:

solution, o is the water density at the initial w ¹ #kw ¹

¹ " , (10)

solution temperature, r is the latent heat of vapor-

w #kw

ization of water, h is the heat transfer coefficient at

where w and w are weight fractions of component

film surface, ¹ is the solution temperature and ¹ is

the drying air temperature. compounds, ¹ and ¹ are the absolute glass

Calculating the temperature only as a function transition temperatures (K) of the component

of time, and not as function of location, we assume compounds, and k is a constant. In our case,

that the temperature distribution is negligibly ¹ "138 K (¹ of water), ¹ "335 K (¹ of pure

small because of the film being very thin and there sucrose), and k for sucrose—water equal to 4.7.

is no convection flow in the film at this high visco- For supersaturated, non-glassy solution, the

sity of the solution. Furthermore, the thermal model calculated the supersaturation level as

diffusivity of sucrose/water system in high concen- a function of the local concentration and the satu-

tration of sucrose, as given by Bhowmik and ration concentration (which is a function of temper-

Hayakawa [2] and by Hayakawa and Bakal [3], is ature). The growth rate of sugar crystals as a

3 fold higher than the mass diffusivity of the function of the supersaturation level and temper-

system. ature was calculated from a sucrose growth model

The resulting system of nonlinear partial differ- based on data given by Hartel et al. [7]. Regression

ential equations in time and three dimensions were from this data (R"0.9697), gave the following

solved numerically by applying the finite difference equation, valid for temperature range of 44—54°C

method. In the classical finite difference applica- and supersaturation ratio above 1.0576:

tion, the distance between the nodes is constant. G"7.0538S!7.46, (11)

However, since shrinkage is not negligible during

drying (the film shrinks when dried at a rate de- where, G is the growth rate for a single crystal

pending upon the solution concentration and the (lm/min) and S is the supersaturation ratio (con-

degree of drying) the physical dimension of the film centrations of grams sucrose per grams of water).

is changing during drying. Therefore, the variable

grid central finite difference method was applied 2.3. Evaluation of the crystal growth influence

[4,5]. on the film

The physical parameters used during calcula-

tion were assumed to be functions of local con- All the following phenomena were taken into

centration and/or temperature. These parameters account in the simulation program:

were defined explicitly from several literature (1) Reduction in concentration: when a crystal

sources. grew, sucrose was removed from the solution and

the concentration around the crystal decreased.

2.2. Predicting the state of solution, and crystal The change in concentration was calculated from

growth rate, size, shape and distribution mass balance of sucrose and water.

(2) Generation of fusion heat: when a crystal

The information about temperature and concen- grew, it generated heat that raised the film temper-

tration at any location in the film during the drying ature. An additional term was added to the heat

process located each point in the film in the phase transfer equation, relative to the amount of mass

diagram; either it is an undersaturated, metastable, that was built on the crystal [8].

labile or glassy solution. (3) Decrease in diffusivity: the volume of a crys-

A region in the film was considered glassy if its tal acted as a barrier for diffusion of sucrose and

temperature reached below the glass transition water. To model this influence, a mass transfer of

E. Ben-Yoseph, R.W. Hartel / Journal of Crystal Growth 198/199 (1999) 1294–1298 1297

Fig. 1. Concentration profiles during drying of thin sucrose film without nucleation sites. Drying air was at 50°C, 0% RH and velocity

of 3.0 m/s.

zero was used between two points when a crystal a plateau very fast near the surface and then the

was present between them. change was mild. At the initial stages of drying the

(4) Decrease in drying rate: crystals that grew on concentration gradient was high, whereas at later

the surface of the film decreased the surface area for stages the concentration gradient flattened.

water migration from the solution to the air. In Simulating a drying process that includes crystal-

order to take this into account, the drying surface lization showed the concentration fields around

area was multiplied by one minus the ratio of growing crystals (Fig. 2). Here, we placed two

crystal cross sectional area to film cross sectional spherical seed crystals (diameter of 5 lm) in the

area in the direction of water flux. film, at 24 and 120 lm distance from the surface.

The seed that was closer to the surface grew much

faster than the other. A concentration reduction

3. Results around the fast growing crystal can be seen, as well

as interference for diffusion by both crystals. The

The concentrations at any time and location in film temperature was higher than the drying tem-

the film during drying were determined using the perature due to release of fusion heat. After 5 min of

simulation program. The initial conditions of the drying the film temperature reached 51.4°C.

film, for all the simulations, were: concentration of When high density of seed crystals were placed

70% TS, temperature of 40°C and thickness of on the surface of the film, the seeds grew very fast

200 lm. The drying air velocity was 3.0 m/s and its during drying and formed a closed crust after ap-

relative humidity was 0%. The drying air temper- proximately one minute. This crust inhibited moist-

ature was 50°C. ure migration from the film to the drying air (case

Simulating a dehydration process without crys- hardening). In the first 12 s, the sucrose concentra-

tallization, we observed a concentration increase of tion was high at the surface and decrease toward

sucrose as the drying time increased, at any loca- the bottom (Fig. 3). Later (25 and 40 s in the chart),

tion in the film (Fig. 1). The rate of change and the the concentration was high between the growing

final concentration were higher for locations closer crystals, but low in the immediate layer below the

to the surface of the film (after 2 min of drying the crystals, because of the concentration reduction

concentration was 96% in the surface, compared to during the growth. After 60 s of drying, the film

87% near the flake). The concentration reached reached equilibrium, with crystalline material on

1298 E. Ben-Yoseph, R.W. Hartel / Journal of Crystal Growth 198/199 (1999) 1294–1298

Fig. 2. Concentration field around two growing sucrose crystals after 5 min of drying of thin film of sucrose solution. Drying air was at

50°C, 0% RH and velocity of 3.0 m/s.

Fig. 3. Concentration profiles in a thin film of sucrose with high density of seeds on its surface. Drying air was at 50°C, 0% RH and

velocity of 3.0 m/s. The values above the curves are the drying times. After one minute the film temperature was 45.2°C, then, the

saturation concentration was 71.2% w/w.

the surface, and saturated solution (with uniform [3] K.I. Hayakawa, A. Bakal, J. Food Sci. 38 (1973) 623.

concentration) below. [4] B.A. Finlayson, Numerical Methods for Problems with

Moving Fronts, Ravenna Park, Seattle, WA, 1992.

[5] M. Balaban, G. M Pigott, J. Food Sci. 53 (1988) 935.

References [6] Y. Roos, M. Karel, Food Technol. (December 1991) 66.

[7] R.W. Hartel, K.A. Berglund, S.M. Gwynn, P.M. Schierholz,

[1] M. Okazaki, K. Shioda, K. Masuda, R. Toei, J. Chem. Eng. V.G. Murphy, AlChE Symp. Ser. 193 (1980) 65.

Japan 7 (1974) 99. [8] A. Benard, S.G. Advani, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 38 (1995)

[2] S.R. Bhowmik, K. Hayakaw, J. Food Sci. 44 (1979) 469. 819.

- Polymorphism, Salts Amp CrystallizationUploaded byRahul Yadav
- BOM MPAP June 2005.pdfUploaded byRashmi Prasad
- An activated-state model for the prediction of solid-phase crystallization.pdfUploaded byAmalia Rizka
- Sieverts Apparatus and Methodology for Accurate Determination of Hydrogen Uptake by Light-Atom HostsUploaded bySaumya Sinha
- crystallization, drying of solidUploaded byetayhailu
- cr1Uploaded byMuhammad Mujahid
- rotarydryersizingdesign.pdfUploaded byMohammed Alnasry
- 1-s2.0-S0022113915000226-756_gooooodUploaded bykian34
- Determination of Densities & Chemical PeriodicityUploaded byJason Raquin Roque
- Tugas Strategi Rencana ProsesUploaded bygeafitria
- Calculo de Coeficientes de Vavrinecz Para RemolachaUploaded bydavid2006xx
- Lube of Manufacturing Brief ReportUploaded bySiddharthSaraswat
- TresUploaded bybernard
- 2005 Generation of Size-Controlled Submicron Protein CrystalsUploaded byedtrawtmam
- session_9Uploaded byAnonymous KpVxNXs
- 01-4771-405Uploaded byoldinaid
- program of physics i & oral questions (1).pdfUploaded byfrandi93
- Chapter 2-Thermodynamics 1Uploaded byarunramakrishnan
- Diffusion Final Report 2Uploaded byVanessa Denise Aguilar
- Assignment 5Uploaded byShirish Maheshwari
- Modes of Heat TransferUploaded byAshish Anand
- Attachment 2：Sweet Gas From Amine Unit--Summer CaseUploaded byrohitkush
- Ps Platform DsUploaded bymefathi
- dhUploaded byavdv
- ScienceUploaded bypetro2m
- Second-Law Analysis in Heat Transfer and Thermal DesignUploaded byAdemar Bender
- SM Chapter1Uploaded byJorge Avella
- Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics ReviewUploaded byLouie George McQuiles
- Heat Release RateUploaded byh4harish
- Work Done by an Expanding GasUploaded bystreetrat133

- 30-05-16-UAS-Kimia-FisikaUploaded byNIA
- Method Computes Pvt Properties for Gas CondensateUploaded bySergio Flores
- Refluxing Condensation Systems (Dephlegmators)Uploaded byjdgh1986
- Appendix AUploaded byPaulaGuerraPinto
- Distillation Innovative Applications and Modeling.pdfUploaded byvaleriuisac
- acetone - chloroform+methanol and binary at 101.3 kPahiak1994Uploaded byCristina Merino Rojas
- Gas Turbine Fuel ConsiderationsUploaded byioan1946
- Separation of Liquids by Fractional Distillation and Analysis by Gas Chromatography (4).docxUploaded byMunna Patel
- General Chemistry Ch. 11 TBUploaded byZara V. Feldman
- ChE Degree Courses Description in KFUPMUploaded bysalem aljohi
- Mitigation of BTEX Emission From Gas Dehydration Unit by ApplicationUploaded byarispriyatmono
- MI-106 Tut ThermoUploaded byDhananjayLekshmiNarayan
- Multiflash ManualUploaded byEkundayo John
- VP Transp Ore Deposits Willi_Jo Heinrich 2005Uploaded bycarlin1980
- A Short Primer for Using AspenPlusUploaded byAnuj Juneja
- Vukovic OptimUploaded bychrysaor_tr
- DistillationUploaded bynarayanarajudvs
- Product RD Session 16 - Phase Eqm Part 3Uploaded byRishabh Jain
- SPE-95760-MS-PUploaded byRahul Marathe
- Chemical EquilibriumUploaded byShashank Jaiswal
- Unit Operation of Chemical Engineering - Solutions ManualUploaded bymickey_54db
- CN4122 Module SynopsisUploaded byGary Liang
- Density, Viscosity, Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium, And Excess Molar Enthalpy OfUploaded byArun Ebenezer
- Fizicka Hemija - Fazna RavnotezaUploaded bySilvester Kolic
- CH3 LPG Pre-Treatment.docxUploaded byAlaa El-sherbin
- Use of Aspen Plus and SPLIT to Calculate Phase Equilibria and Ternary Residue CurvesUploaded byPaulo Sérgio
- 14 BishopUploaded byMaryrose Bauza
- Bubble Point Dan Dew PointUploaded byastri
- ISBN-978-0-471-66174-0Uploaded byNeelkanth Nirmalkar
- Handouts Lecture # 7 Current GKFDUploaded byLance Meyers