Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Learn basic concepts of public health / epidemiology Begin to think quantitatively Understand how causes of disease are identified Learn examples of how prevention works Consider the application of prevention science to Africa
1. 2. 3.
Natural populations are the target. Surveillance systems provide information. Public health infrastructure links institutions that gather, disseminate and act on surveillance information.
4. 5.
Communities are mobilized. Health and disease are the result of social processes.
Peace Shelter Education Food Income A stable eco-system Sustainable resources Social justice Equity
Public health is the science of protecting and improving the health of communities through education, promotion of healthy lifestyles, and research for disease and injury prevention.
Public health involves the application of many different disciplines including: biology sociology mathematics anthropology public policy medicine education psychology computer science business engineering and much, much more . . . . Public health is concerned with protecting the health of entire populations. These populations can be as small as a local neighborhood, or as big as an entire country. Public health professionals try to prevent problems from happening or re-occurring through implementing educational programs, developing policies, administering services, and conducting research, in contrast to clinical professional, such as doctors and nurses, who focus primarily on treating individuals after they become sick or injured.
What is Epidemiology?
Classic definition: Study of the distribution and determinants of disease in populations.
Also: Study of outcomes and effectiveness of medical interventions. In its technical application epidemiology relies heavily on statistics.
Science and medicine have different ends. The intellectual foundation for medicine lies not in basic science but in epidemiology. The epidemiological setting provides the proper ground on which debates about the applicability of research evidence to practice should take place.
Lancet, 1995
Measures of risk:
Relative risk
Odds Ratio
Attributable Risk
Age adjustment
Deaths
40,046 26,107
1,263 98
315 37
Rest of London
256,423
1,422
59
Deaths
Midyear pop.
Age-specific mortality
Age-adjusted mortality
Tobac c o Die t/In a c tiv ity Alc o h o l M ic ro b ia l Ag e n t T o x ic Ag e n ts M o tor Ve h ic le s F ire a rm s Se x ua l Be h a v io r Illic it Dru g s 0 5 10 15 20
T ob a c c o Die t/In a c tiv ity Alc o h o l M ic ro b ia l Ag e n t T ox ic Ag e n ts M otor Ve hic le s F ire a rm s Se x ua l Be h a v ior Illic it Dru gs 0 5 10 15 20
www.cdc.gov, 2004
Fat
5050-70
6060-75
20
Sugar
2525-30
Starch
Protein
70
Percent of Population
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Ov e rwe i g h t o r Ov e rwe i g h t
Ob e s e
Ob e s e
18
16
80 70
Gasoline lead
60 50
12
10 40 30 8
1975
1976
1977
1978 Year
1979
1980
1981
80
60
Stomach
40
20
Pancreas
Leukemia
Liver
1930
1935
1940
1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
Men,
Hypertension Obesity / Diabetes Diet High in Animal Fat Elevated Cholesterol Physical Inactivity Atherosclerosis
Smoking
Pathway Social and Environmental Conditions Adverse Behavioral Patterns Major Risk Factors First Event/ Sudden Death Disability/ Risk of Recurrence Late Death
Target Population Whole Population Whole Population Persons with Risk Factors Cases with First Fatal or NonNon-Fatal Events Survivors Late Deaths
Interventions Policy and Environmental Change Behavior Change Risk Factor Detection and Control Emergency Care/Acute Case Management Rehabilitation /Long/Long-Term Care End-OfEnd-OfLife Care
600 500
Rate Per 100,000
CHD 70%
Stroke
70%
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
Goal of adjustment
Age Adjustment
- Age influences rate of most disease - Comparison of rates must account for age differences in populations
To reduce distortions and incomparability of rates when making comparison over time and among populations So we are not comparing apples to oranges
25
Total Pop.
12,335,000
524,000
Rate (/100,000)
1,062
394
= 1,062
Incidence =
Cohort Study
Exposed or subjects
With Outcome
Without Outcome
Onset of study
80
Women
60
40
20
<2 2
<2 3
2 -2 .9 3 3
2 -2 .9 4 4
2 -2 .9 5 6
2 -2 .9 7 8
2 -3 .9 9 0
3 -3 .9 1 2
BMI
Chan JM Diabetes Care 1994;17:961-69.
3 -3 .9 3 4
3+ 5
A A+B
C C+D
Incidence in Exposed =
Study Design
10 Controls
25 Vaccinated
25 Unvaccinated
10 Survivors
23 Dead 2 Moribund
With Outcome
Onset of study
XXXX
Intervention
Time
Yes A C
No B C
A+B C C+D
Control 4 13 3 12 6 14 52
Randomized Controlled Trial Lipid Research Clinics CHD Primary Prevention Trial Disease Outcome
Incidence in exposed - ie, treated = 155 1906 = 8.1 per 100
Incidence in unexposed - ie, untreated = 187 1900 Relative Risk = 8.1 9.8 = 0.83
Percent
Women
Cappuccio et al, in press
Men
NEJM, 2001
The Potential of Population-wide Prevention of Diabetes . . . Per capita Daily Energy Intake in Cuba, 1980-2005
3500 3250
FAO data
Prevalence of Obesity %
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5
Havana
Cienfuegos
Trends in Mortality from Diabetes, CHD, Cancer and All-Causes, Cuba, 1980 - 2005
Diabetes
125
25
Cancer
20
120
15
115
10
110
105
Mortality Rate
Mortality Rate
100
CHD
160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70
80 19 82 19 84 19 86 19 88 19 90 19 92 19 1 4 99 1 6 99 98 19 00 20 02 20 04 20
6.3 6.1 5.9 5.7 5.5 5.3 5.1 4.9 4.7 4.5
80 19 82 19 84 19 86 19 88 19 90 19 92 19 94 19 96 19 98 19 00 20 02 20 04 20 06 20
Year
Year
Per 100,000
Measures to improve public health, relating as they do to such obvious and mundane matters as housing, smoking, and food, may lack the glamour of high-technology medicine, but what they lack in excitement they gain in their potential impact on health, precisely because they deal with the major causes of common disease and disabilities.
Geoffrey Rose, The Strategy of Preventive Medicine. Oxford University Press, 1992