You are on page 1of 2

Facts about Shakespeares England relevant to Julius Caesar

1. Drama at the time of the English Renaissance flourished and plays got
increasingly complex, especially those of Shakespeare. Although elements of the medieval morality plays still can be seen, in the temptation of characters, and their internal conflict between such forces as ambition and conscience, Shakespeares plays demonstrate the invention of the human, to borrow Blooms phrase, as a modern, complex personality often torn by many conflicting forces, both internal and external.

2.

At the time of Shakespeare people believed there was good and evil in everyone that all humans consisted of opposing forces such as these, and it was important to guard against evil in case you give in to temptation. This idea was reinforced by sermons in the church. In Shakespeares time it was against the law to miss church, and the church often taught people how to resist temptation. Interestingly, Shakespeares great tragedies often show the disastrous consequences of giving in to temptation as Brutus does in Julius Caesar, complete with an allusion to the Fall in the Garden of Eden as Brutus falls in his orchard. Also, Shakespeare has characters that act as tempters Iago in Othello is one, and Cassius is another.

3. The Renaissance was obsessed by the ideal of order, seen symbolically in


such diagrams as the music of the spheres or the ideal person being a balance of all four humors. There was a lot of instability in society at the time conflict with Spain abroad, outbreaks of plague in London, plots against the queens life, riots and conspiracies supposedly involving witchcraft.

4. In Julius Caesar we see the result of killing a popular leader chaos. In this

way the play might be read as a warning against creating instability in the state. The fact that Caesar is a king in all but name, and is murdered, is more significant to an Elizabethan audience, as a monarch was believed to be the representative of God on Earth. Assassination was thus not merely murder, but also sacrilege.

5. Most people believed in fate, and ideas such as predestination were


prevalent. Thus people only had limited control over their own destinies, and had to accept the hardships of life as forces beyond their control. Fate or fortune was often represented as a wheel, the turning of which determined the course of life. Superstition was everywhere, and the devil and black magic were real, and strange happenings could always be signs of bad things

to come. A popular notion was that when the heavens raged in storms, something must be wrong on Earth see Act I Scenes 2 and 3 in the play.

6. It was a time of great political change across England, which transformed


from a semi-medieval society to a more cosmopolitan one in the 16 th century. The old order, bound by ancestry and tradition, came under threat from a new and growing middle class and a new kind of politician, the subject of Machiavellis book The Prince. The new politician is not bound by blood-ties or obligation to tradition, although he might appear to be anything if it proves useful for achieving or holding on to power. The Machiavellian personality is willing to use deceit, manipulation, even cruelty and murder provided the outcome is beneficial. A good example is Claudius in Hamlet, who kills his older brother to become king of Denmark, and uses all sorts of deviousness he ignores tradition, kinship and obedience to Gods laws in order to hold on to power. In Julius Caesar, Caesar himself, Cassius and Antony all have some Machiavellian characteristics.

7. Revenge tragedies were the most popular of the time for example, Thomas

Kyds A Spanish Tragedy. Many of Shakespeares plays involve some kind of revenge plot, including Julius Caesar. Just like in Hamlet the ghost of the murdered king returns to haunt the living world, an embodiment of wrongness that must be balanced. And Mark Antony in Julius Caesar is the willing hero of revenge tragedy, complete with a bloody and horrifying vocabulary see his soliloquy at the end of Act 3 Scene 1.

8. Shakespeare combined all these elements fear of disorder, the appeal of


the supernatural, revenge plots, the changing world order and types of political leadership, temptation, characters torn apart by conflicting forces, belief in fate into a drama that therefore seems just as relevant to audiences today. After all , many of us fear chaos, believe in destiny or a higher power governing our lives, are torn inside, have moral choices, live in a changing world ruled by two-faced politicians, are thrilled by ghost stories and the supernatural.

M.Turver 2006

You might also like