Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How Will This Affect English Language Learners (ELLs) and Students with Disabilities?
These students often learn at different rates than other students. Standardized tests are not always the best measures of what they know and learn. Also, because these students need to learn specific skills different from those of the general education population, measuring what they learn is different. ELLs are learning English skills, and students with disabilities are learning according to their Individualized Education Programs. For example, a student with a disability may be working on social skills or learning how to use a computer program to assist learning. There are also not enough teachers for these students, so a new evaluation system has to create incentives, rather than disincentives, for teachers to work with them. The new system needs to account for the unique attributes of these student populations to make sure teachers who work with these students are fairly evaluated.
Tenure
It will affect who teaches your children, and could impact how your children are taught.
Will the state and city create ways to evaluate these teachers based on their students unique learning needs and objectives?
Teachers and principals of grades 4-8 ELA and Math are scheduled to be evaluated under the new system. (This step may be delayed until districts reach agreement with the teachers union and pending litigation is resolved.)
2012-2013 All teachers and principals are School scheduled to be evaluated under the new system. Year
Advocates for Children of New York 151 West 30th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10001 Phone: (212) 947-9779 Fax: (212) 947-9790 www.advocatesforchildren.org
Pros:
State tests are easy to measure because they
Watching teachers in the classroom; Reviewing lesson plans and student work; Surveying parents and students; or Asking teachers to evaluate themselves.
are based on numbers and because most students take them. Once a system is created, it is a quick way to measure teachers.
Cons:
More reliance on state tests can lead to more
teaching to the test and the development of more tests. Many factors explain how a student performs on standardized tests, and it is difficult, if not impossible, to determine with any precision how a teacher affects a students exam score. Because teachers are compared to each other, it can lead to competition rather than cooperation between teachers. The state tests have been criticized for a number of problems. If there are problems with the tests, these problems will taint the teachers and principals ratings.
Measuring how students progress on assessments given in the classroom that are created by teachers or by the school district; Reviewing student portfolios (a gathering of student work throughout the year to see how they improve on skills); Using information from the statewide standardized tests.