5 Reasons Why Science Wont Give You All the Answers to Life

(And What You Can Do About It)

by Melissa Karnaze
http://mindfulconstruct.com

You may republish excerpts from this report as long as you provide an attribution link back to http://mindfulconstruct.com.

Copyright 2010 Mindful Construct.

Science lets us probe our physical universe. It helps us gain greater control over our inner and outer worlds: Through medicine, we have more control over our bodies and our health. Through technology, we have more control over our environment and our productivity.

Science is Powerful, But Limited

By using the scientific method, we can secure important answers about ourselves and our world that help us all lead a better life. But science falls short in one very important way. While advancements in science let us study the brain and human behavior, the field of psychology cant tell you how to lead an emotionally healthy and happy life. (At least not in its current stage of development.) This is because science steers clear of Lifes Big Questions that you need answers to in order to lead a fulfilling and meaningful life.

How Science Falls Short

Here are some of Lifes Big Questions that science wont answer for you: What is the meaning of my life? What should I do with my life? How can I make the best of my life? How can I lead a happy life? How can I be emotionally healthy? What do my emotions mean? Why do I have certain emotions (that dont feel good)? Are my emotions good for me or bad for me? How can I make the best of all of my emotions?

These are really important questions. How you answer them and that you answer them at all directly impacts your future.

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(1)

In this report, Ill show you five specific reasons why science falls short in answering Lifes Big Questions. Youll see how important it is for you to take matters into your own hands. Ill explain these five reasons in a way thats easy to understand. And in the last section Ill suggest how to start finding your own answers to Lifes Big Questions today.

What Youll Get in This Report

Science isnt equipped to provide us with all the answers to life. Heres how the authors of Introducing Evolutionary Psychology describe it:

The quality of human life has improved since the birth of the scientific method, but we still struggle as a species to lead happy and healthy lives. (Especially when science and technology create more problems than they solve.)

Why Science Doesnt Have All the Answers

The sciencesrestrict themselves to making factual claims, and leave the business of value-judgments to ethics. Ethical questions cannot be settled by science. Perhaps this is the key to human freedom. Dylan Evans & Oscar Zarate

Questions about ethics are part of Lifes Big Questions. Science cant tell you whats right or wrong behavior, or how you should live your life. It can only make factual claims that you can then choose to use or discard when deciding upon these things for yourself. Therefore, its your job alone to answer these questions. How you answer them and that you answer them at all directly impacts your emotional well-being.

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(2)

5 Reasons Why Science Wont Give You All the Answers to Life
According to Evans & Zarate, science can only make factual claims. Lets deconstruct this: Science can only observe how the physical universe operates. Rightness and wrongness are human constructs, not physical things. Likewise, how you should live your life is not a physical thing; science cant figure it out. To be more specific, science can only observe how the physical universe operates from the limited perspective of the human mind. Because humans conduct science, and they perceive through their minds. To be even more specific, the limited perspective of the human mind isnt objective at all meaning the factual claims created by science arent even all that factual in the way that we understand the term. Dont worry if this seems complicated right now. By the end of this report youll have a better understanding. It took my entire undergraduate study of cognitive science to really see this bigger picture of science. Ive broken up what I learned from four years into this 23-page report. In the next sections, well explore these five reasons why science cant answer Lifes Big Questions let alone give you all the answers to life. Heres an outline:

Reason #1: Reason #2: Reasons #3: Reasons #4: Reason #5:

Science is a Cultural Practice (p. 4) The Scientific Method is Subjective (p. 9) Science Minimizes Your Subjective Experience (p.11) Science is Often Disconnected from the Real World (p. 15) Science Cant Show You the Bigger Picture (p. 18)

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(3)

We think of science as something dry and clean. An unemotional, logical, calculated, pristine process. In other words, we think of science as being objective. Meaning that its nobler than our individual notions of the world which are highly subjective, and thus, less accurate. Science is supposed to be sterilized, but its not. Its a tool, yes. A powerful tool at times. But like any tool, its how its used that matters. Science is only as dry, clean, unemotional, logical, calculated, or pristine as are the human scientists using it. And as we know human behavior isnt very dry, clean, unemotional, logical, calculated, or pristine. Were messy, emotional, full of assumptions and expectations, easily pricked, often cliquey, vulnerable to groupthink, and most definitely susceptible to dysfunctional beliefs and behaviors. And were the ones steering science. Because science is conducted by people. Its a cultural practice

Reason #1: Science is a Cultural Practice

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(4)

Heres How the Culture of the Scientific Community Operates:

1) Funding Funding is an integral part of research, because no money = no research. Sources of funding influence how research gets done. Organizations wont fund research they dont believe in or see a need for. And when large corporations allocate scientific funding to ultimately increase their profits, that research isnt objective, but based on agenda. Think Big Pharma. 2) Motivations for Research Researchers need funding and approval to conduct their research. But they are the ones who determine how and why that research is being done. They invest in topics they want to investigate, based on personal opinions and preferences. Look closely at researchers, youll find they come in all colors. Within cognitive science, theres definitely variation. Some researchers conduct studies to disprove God by pointing to a God-spot in the brain. Others do so to prove that spiritual experiences are not hallucinations. Both camps have their minds mostly made up before they design and conduct experiments. Researchers are motivated to conduct experiments based on their preexisting subjective worldviews. Subjective worldviews arent bad or good; they just are. They color the way we perceive the world. And the way researchers do their research. 3) Interpreting Data After researchers gather their data, they look at it closely and use complex statistical procedures (math invented by other human minds).

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(5)

So that they can make meaning out of numbers and find patterns. To then make important conclusions which they can report to other organizations, and maybe even the public. It may seem like statistics is rock-solid because its math. But consider a recent debate within cognitive science. One of my former UC San Diego professors, along with three colleagues, published a paper accusing lots of social neuroscientists of misusing statistical methods to make their brain data essentially look pretty. These social neuroscientists did this so to make sensational claims from largely inconclusive data. The paper, Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition, was originally titled, Voodoo Correlations in Social Neuroscience. The take-away point is this: Its tempting for researchers to interpret brain data in the ways they want to see it. So that the results can reinforce their assumptions, beliefs, affiliations, agendas, and subjective worldviews. This goes for other fields as well, especially the softer sciences like psychology. 4) Publication If researchers are lucky, their work gets published in well-known scientific journals. But only if it gains the approval of those in charge of a particular publication. The process is called peer-review; your research is evaluated by your peers. Because your peers are people, they dont necessarily base their judgments on purely objective and fair standards. In other words, your wonderful study may not get published if youre not in the club. The club has many rules about subjects and theories that are not currently in fashion. Intelligent design isnt in fashion. The existence of supernatural forces isnt in fashion. The result of negative side effects from many vaccinations isnt in fashion. And studying the effects of mind control isnt in fashion because the American Psychological Association wont look into it. Yet hop on over to another major institution like the CIA and youll find that its been avidly researching mind

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(6)

control for decades. Remember, every institution is a cultural practice. Its not culturally acceptable yet for U.S. mainstream mental health to explore the topic of mind control. (And the reasons are way too complex for the scope of this report.) Publication is the backbone of academia, and academia is the backbone of scientific research. So publication, the backbone of scientific research, is guided by human judgment peer review panels, editors, and in some cases, censorship. 5) Application Once a study is published and taken seriously enough by the scientific community at large, its findings may then be translated into some new application, drug, or other product or service that can reach the public. So the research enters the social space of governments, nonprofits, small businesses, and corporations. This means that the research gets even more entangled with politics. In 2009, Uncle Sam created the swine flu scare by over-hyping the disease as part of pro-vaccination propaganda. In a perfect world, the U.S. medical system has Americas health at heart but in reality its heavily influenced by politics, and will push drugs and applications when so instructed by a government that doesnt always look out for your best interests. Heres a quick reference to a website that investigates Big Brothers big hand in shaping science and many other major institutions (like the medical system) that are founded upon science: WantToKnow.info. Its not essential that you study this website to follow the rest of this report, but it can certainly help. Mindful Construct pulls back the veils that co-construct human experience. WantToKnow pulls back the veils that mass media puts in place so youll trust your government and other authoritative institutions to always have your back.

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(7)

Science is a Cultural Enterprise

As you can see, the scientific community is governed by several cultural practices: Research is inseparable from funding, and organizations only invest in research they deem worthwhile. Researchers only conduct research they are personally invested in, which shapes the way they do and report the research. Especially when it comes to the soft sciences like psychology, theres gray area in interpreting data. Data analysis isnt black and white. The backbone of science, publication, is driven by human editing and peer review. When governments, nonprofits, small businesses, and corporations decide to apply scientific research in new products or services politics no doubt enters the picture. So scientific research is not as objective as people typically think it is. Its actually pretty messy and subjective. Likewise, the scientific method is not as detached from human messiness and subjectivity as we think it ought to be

Because the people who run science arent always interested or even able to answer your Big Life Questions.

Science is a cultural enterprise, meaning its governed by people.

Recap of Reason #1:

Science wont give you all the answers to life

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(8)

Reason #2: The Scientific Method is Subjective

method before continuing with this section.)

The scientific method is guided by faith, colored by assumption, and driven by the constraints of human perception. (You may want to review the six steps of the scientific

Facts Arent Discovered; Theyre Made

In his 1935 monograph, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Polish medical doctor and researcher Ludwik Fleck challenged the notion that facts are discovered out there in the world. Instead, he argued, facts are created by man culturally construed. His argument refers to the act of conducting a scientific experiment, and three things that happen: 1) Insertion of Faith/Intuition The researcher must create a hypothesis before designing an experiment. A hypothesis is an intuition, based on faith in all previous scientific knowledge. So the very act of science is seeded by an inkling of feeling. Einstein said: All great achievements of science must start from intuitive knowledge. 2) Presence of Assumptions/ Limitations of Human Perception The researcher must view collected data in a stylized way that comes as a result of their previous professional training. An astronomer sees the night sky much differently than you do, because he looks for constellations instead of stars. This stylized vision shapes the way a researcher view the world. Furthermore, the researcher can only see what a human can see, and we cant perceive everything that exists out there because weve only got five senses.

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(9)

3) Fitting Data to Preexisting Scientific Theory The researchers interpretation of their data must fit in with the thought styles, or theoretical frameworks, that are currently in fashion among the scientific community at large. Galileos theory that the sun was the center of the solar system didnt bode well with the geocentric consensus of his time. Because the grip of the church convinced the masses that the humans Gods ultimate creation were figuratively and literally at the center of the universe. And while were onto theory, heres another important point about the scientific method: 4) Dependence on Limited Scientific Theory Scientific theories are elaborate claims about how physical phenomena operate. A claim is an argument. Arguments cant be proven right or wrong; they can only be supported by evidence. Likewise, scientific theories cant be proven right; they can only be supported by evidence. And then they can be supported by more and better evidence over time. Or, they can be discarded or at least weakened in the presence of contradictory evidence. Scientific knowledge is never complete. Were constantly exploring and searching for better explanations and models for how our physical universe works.

Being Mindful of Science

Ludwick Fleck was clearly ahead of his time. Consider his statement below:

Observation without assumption, which psychologically is nonsense and logically a game, can therefore be dismissed.
(10)

http://mindfulconstruct.com

Its only in recent decades that this statement can be clarified by actual brain research. Cognitive science has taught us that any act of human observation is constrained by personal constructs about how the world operates. The mind is primed to make assumptions and predictions about the world to enhance your ability to adapt to your environment and survive. In his monograph, Fleck deconstructs the sanctity of science in showing that objectivity cant be separated from subjectivity. Most scientists today are either unaware of this insight, or arent mindful of it. Because they are notorious for using science as a way to beat down subjectivity, or the power of personal experience

Because scientific facts arent always objective, but rather part of a larger cultural and historical context. That greater context may or may not help you answer your Big Life Questions.

The scientific method isnt completely objective because its conducted by the human mind.

Recap of Reason #2:

Science wont give you all the answers to life

Reason #3: Science Minimizes Your Subjective Experience

Ive had a few college professors who really look down on the layman. I cant stand that term by the way. They view laypersons as ignorant, misguided, and charmed by folk psychology. If you havent heard the term before, chances are those professors look down on you too in

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(11)

secret of course. Or at least only in their labs or when amongst colleagues and loyal students. Folk psychology is a loose term for any model that people use to understand the world that the scientific community doesnt approve of. Anger gets stored in the body is a folk psychological model, since its not been supported by the bulk of mental health professionals.

The Gap between the Scientific Community and the Laypersons

Some researchers get easily irritated when laypersons live their lives based on their own folk psychological models. But instead of promoting science literacy, these researchers just stay in their labs, talking amongst their own tribes, essentially living in their own little worlds. So the gap remains. The gap is really painful to society. It prevents a more direct and productive dialogue between the public and the researchers. Science is supposed to help us all lead a better life, not just be a past-time for Club Academia. Because of the gap between what the scientific community thinks is important to study, and what the public thinks is important, we get clashes. Like Jenny McCarthy versus the medical community, regarding the autism debate.

Jenny McCarthys Son is Her Science

When former actress Jenny McCarthys son developed autism after scheduled vaccinations, she knew something was wrong. But the medical community shunned her suspicions. Instead of sitting back and letting the existing studies on autism call the shots, McCarthy took action. She responded to her situation. No matter how stupid or uneducated it made her look. She sought alternative treatment, with the help of some black sheep physicians, and recovered her son. McCarthy is the spokesperson for Generation Rescue, a parent-founded and parent-led organization with the mission of recovering children with autism using biomedical

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(12)

intervention. The Generation website states that its efforts have mitigated the symptoms and recovered thousands of children across the globe. Of course, this publicity doesnt sit well with the scientific community. Even though the origins of autism are still little understood, researchers discredit that outside forces like vaccinations could cause the onset of symptoms (to which McCarthy attributes her sons autism development). In other words, most of the scientific community sees McCarthy as spreading lies, false hope, and seriously misguiding thousands of other parents at the expense of all that scientific progress stands for. During her 2007 appearance on Oprah, Jenny McCarthy explained her defiance in the face of sciences large body of evidence disproving her claims:

Jenny McCarthys Response Ability

My science is Evan. Hes at home. Thats my science.

As Generation Rescue continues to grow, McCarthy knows that the debate isnt just a battle of studies but a thing of politics, as we explored in Reasons #1 and 2. Its not yet socially acceptable to question vaccinations or the cover-ups surrounding their deleterious ingredients. (Check out WantToKnow.info to learn more.) But McCarthy didnt blindly follow the general consensus when she had to answer some of Lifes Big Questions, such as: Why did this my son develop autism? Is there anything I can do to help? Can he recover? How?

Instead, she decided that science didnt have all her answers. So she took the response ability to find them on her own.

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(13)

Jenny McCarthy turned her back on the mainstream of doctors, researchers, and medical professionals. It didnt matter to her whether all MDs and PhDs respected her opinion. Her response ability to her sons condition is what mattered most. There will come a time, if it hasnt already, that youll need to take response ability to find your own answers. Without the support of a mainstream institution. Even if that means facing ridicule, losing respect, or alienating others.

The Scientific Community Doesnt Have to Care About Your Quality of Life
In order for the scientific community to investigate Lifes Big Questions thoroughly, it needs to become entrenched with daily, subjective, highly personal experience. Its not meant to dabble in that arena its supposed to stick to factual claims. As a natural by-product, scientists may judge, condemn, or ridicule you when you make decisions based on daily, subjective, highly personal experience. Just as McCarthy did. But you are entrenched with daily, subjective, highly personal experience because youre the one living your life! Which means you are the only person qualified to make those important life decisions that direct your future!

Because it often antagonizes your ability to answer Lifes Big Questions on your own.

Scientists look down upon anecdotal evidence and personal experience. But you need to pay attention to personal experience because that is your life.

Recap of Reason #3:

Science wont give you all the answers to life

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(14)

Reason #4: Science is Often Disconnected from the Real World

When it comes to psychology, theres a common trend for universities to conduct studies on undergraduate students. And then extrapolate that data to reflect the population at large. This isnt an ideal way to understand all of human behavior. Psychology is also concerned with identifying behavioral norms, and then comparing individuals to those norms. This isnt an ideal way to understand individual human behavior. On top of this is the fact that most research is conducted within a laboratory. So students perform specialized tasks like looking at pictures of faces on a computer screen and pressing a red or blue button during three ten-minute sessions after watching a neutral nature film with no sound. This isnt an ideal way to understand human behavior as it occurs in its natural environment: everyday life.

Most Psychological Research is Conducted in the Lab

Many psychology studies lack whats called ecological validity. This is when a studys results can translate into something that you can directly apply to your daily life. Ecological validity is really important when it comes to psychology because we need to understand how humans behave in real life not under laboratory conditions. (And we need to understand this if we are to learn how to cooperate globally, and promote the well-being of the planet.) Additionally, Club Academia is set up in such a way that researchers can live in their own labs and academic departments, cushioned by tenure. Meaning they dont have to get their hands dirty and see how messed up the world really is outside the walls of their

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(15)

university. So research can dabble on surface-level topics. (Remember how the APA wont go near mind control?) Or focus on the treating symptoms rather finding solutions to problems.

Science Needs to Get Out into the Real World

Researchers dont like to get messy with the down and dirty details of real life. Thats why parents are given an 18-year grace period. Whatever they do in the home thats dysfunctional for the life of their child(ren) doesnt really matter. Because science will try to explain psychological problems that develop later on in a heap of other ways. That usually finish off with some type of drug prescription. Mental health is notorious for subscribing quick-fixes to symptoms, rather than looking for long-lasting solutions to the original problems. Or preventing the problems in the first place. If we were to videotape the first 18 or so years of a persons life, wed notice clear patterns in how they are conditioned by: Those providing them care Their environment Their cultural programming Any dysfunctional beliefs that they inherit

Besides that being an immense undertaking and not to mention an unethical invasion of privacy, the scientific community will have nothing of it. Because the conclusions would mean a complete overhaul of how we as a society raise our children and relate to one another as adults. And this would require complete overhaul of how mental health operates. If we all learned emotional intelligence skills at an early age, we wouldnt need nearly as many therapists or bottles of Prozac Big Pharma and Big Brother wouldnt really like that.

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(16)

But even so, the grace period is slowly waning. Because attachment studies increasingly show how relationships between a caregiver and infant greatly affect the childs development and adult relationships later on in life.

Science is Growing, but Slowly

At present, mainstream science is content with explaining human problems through genes, unbalanced brain chemicals (the origins of which are still mystified), and theories about our tree-dwelling ancestors (known as evolutionary psychology). With time, the new field of epigenetics will filter more into the mainstream, and science will depend less on the dogma of genetic determinism and more on the principles of neuroplasticity, or how the brain-body changes and adapts over time. For now, well just have to wait it out. Which means, youll have to start thinking critically about whether youll settle for what science says about your human potential. (Which comes with answering some of Lifes Big Questions.)

Science can only make limited claims, based on data mostly derived from the lab.

Recap of Reason #4:

Because in order to answer many of Lifes Big Questions, you need to be able to make bold claims whether or not verifiable data is available. Bold claims come from real life experience, not from the lab.

Science wont give you all the answers to life

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(17)

#5: Science Cant Show You the Bigger Picture

Enter the Matrix of Reality
The Matrix wasnt just a sci-fi action thriller that broke cinematic ground in 1999 and developed a cult following (of which Im included). Its very relevant today. We could all be plugged into a matrix, or a computer-simulated dream world, without ever knowing it. This is actually what Buddhism holds that reality is an illusion. Reality is an illusion in that everything in your reality is co-constructed by the brain. So reality is created from within you, rather than outside of you. Science cant disprove that we are all hooked up to a matrix. Just like it cant disprove life after death, or the existence of a soul. Or God, or some other supernatural, omnipotent force. All science can show is how the physical universe operates, based on the limited human perspective. And its important to note that we have primate brains, which perceive the world in specific ways. And our brains are bundled up in a heck of a lot of human culture, which complicates things.

Science Has a Lot to Explain

There are still a lot of things we dont know. Like why or how the Big Bang happened. Or what happened before it. What the universe really is. Or what consciousness is. And how the two are related. Or how an electron can be in two places at once and what that means about the physicality of our world that we take for granted.

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(18)

Science cant explain why on the morning of September 11th, 2001, certain people were delayed from making it to work when others werent. Or why cancer goes through spontaneous remission in some patients, yet takes the lives of others. When it comes to these existential questions, science falls short. (Of course, this could change.) The scientifically-minded may say, Well those are irrelevant questions. Manufactured by a mind seeking answers to the unanswerable. And yes, its quite a possibility. But people need answers to Lifes Big Questions to go on as effectively as they can. People need meaning to order their lives; its what the brain was designed to do. When science doesnt answer Lifes Big Questions, people settle for what something that gets them through even if only temporarily.

Be Mindful of the Limitations of Science

Its vital that you remember this anytime Psychology Today or Scientific American or The New York Times rattles a study that will supposedly revolutionize the way you lead your life. Its vital to keep the broader perspective in mind. To remember that for Lifes Big Questions, right now science delivers only so much. At the end of the day, science is done by people. And this bears repeating we experience reality through our primate brains. Just like dolphins experience reality through their cetacean brains. And just like ants experience reality through their insectillian brains.

There are a lot of questions about your life and its meaning that science isnt prepared to investigate. Its only equipped to investigate physical things in the universe.

Recap of Reason #5:

Because your Big Life Questions dont always involve physical things.

Science wont give you all the answers to life

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(19)

Science is Limited, But Powerful

This report has shown you how science is more limited than people typically imagine it to be. Hopefully, you can see how important it is to find your own answers to Lifes Big Questions when science doesnt (yet) have them. Science wont give you all the answers to life, but its still very good at investigating. And its powerful in our world. I encourage you to pay attention to science, especially as its pitched by the media. I encourage you to be as scientifically literate as you can, and think critically about the studies you read. It will drastically help you sharpen your discernment. Which will help you tremendously in answering those Big Life Questions.

How You Can Start Answering Lifes Big Questions Today

What is the meaning of my life?

Now that you understand why you cant rely on science to answer all of your Big Life Questions, here are some helpful ways you can start finding your own answers today:

Youre the only one who can answer this question, because the answer doesnt exist out there. Its an answer that you create for yourself. So remember that the meaning of life is what you make it, and embrace your inner existentialist.

What should I do with my life?

Again, your life is what you make of it. So theres nothing that you should do because what you do is your decision alone.

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(20)

To do what you really believe in, it helps to be mindful of how you are currently constructing your life, and then focus on building your life as a mindful construct.

How can I make the best of my life?

To get the most out of life is to be as successful as you can at creating your life as a mindful construct. In order to be successful, you need to be in tune with all of your emotions because they help you figure out whats important to you and why. You also need to be able to work with any negative emotions that serve as roadblocks to your success.

How can I lead a happy life?

Happiness is the natural by-product of you taking care of yourself and in so doing building your life as a mindful construct. Self-care comes from: solitude, getting comfortable experiencing and working with all of your emotions, and accepting rather than rejecting yourself which includes your aspect of ego.

How can I be emotionally healthy?

Emotional health means being able to mindfully respond to life experience, because thats what emotions evolved for. Emotional health means having response ability. You cant mindfully respond to life experience when your emotions cloud how you perceive a certain situation. Thats another reason

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(21)

why you need to work with all of your emotions to help clear up your vision. Your vision is shaped by your cognitive networks of thoughts, beliefs, assumptions, and expectations about the world all of which your emotions reflect. So follow your emotions back to the those cognitive networks, and in so doing youll start to uncover your subconscious mind.

What do my emotions mean?

Your emotions mean many different things, given the situation. Ultimately, they tell you how a particular person or thing affects your life, and your place in it. The only way to know what your emotions mean is to continue working with them and finding out for yourself. The more you practice, the easier it gets.

Why do I have certain emotions (that dont feel good)?

Sometimes there are people or things in your life that are potentially harmful to you and your negative emotions alert you of that danger. If your emotions dont feel god, its because theyre reflecting something in your environment, or some thought that you have thats potentially harmful to you. Remember, the emotion is just the messenger.

Are my emotions good for me or bad for me?

Evolutionarily speaking, your emotions are key to your survival. They provide you with vital information about your environment, and your place in it, so that you can survive.

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(22)

Now, because humans evolved culture, oftentimes you can inherit dysfunctional cultural beliefs about your environment or what you need to survive. When this is the case, your emotions still reflect those cognitive networks, even if they are dysfunctional. So its important to remember that when your emotions appear bad for you they can be traced back to the cognitive networks that gave cause for them in the first place. Its those cognitive networks that need to be repaired, not the emotions. In this sense, your bad emotions are actually good for you, because in addition to alarming of danger in your environment they alarm of any dangerous cognitive networks you might have.

How can I make the best of all my emotions?

Because you are human, your emotions are big part of who you are. Theyre biologically wired to get your attention. To make the most of all of your emotions, you need to learn how to work with them. You need to learn how to use them constructively to continue building your life as a mindful construct. When you do this, you naturally increase your emotional resilience too. Emotional resilience increases response ability, which enhances your ability to make the best of your life. And continue finding answers to your Big Life Questions

http://mindfulconstruct.com

(23)

If you enjoyed this report, you can leave a comment at: http://mindfulconstruct.com/?page_id=5063.

Thanks for reading, and remember, Your Life is Your Construct.

Copyright 2010 Mindful Construct.