You are on page 1of 31

Creating Shared Value: Strategy in the Post-Crisis Era

Professor Michael E P t P f Mi h l E. Porter Harvard Business School Madrid ExpoManagement June 16, 2010
This presentation draws on ideas from Professor Porters books and articles, in particular, Competitive Strategy (The Free Press, 1980); Competitive Advantage (Th F Ad t (The Free P Press, 198 ) Wh i S 1985); What is Strategy? (H ? (Harvard B i d Business R i Review, N /D 1996) S Nov/Dec 1996); Strategy and the I d h Internet (H (Harvard B i d Business Review, March 2001) and On Competition (Harvard Business Review, 2008). No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any meanselectronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwisewithout the permission of Michael E. Porter. Additional information may be found at the website of the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, www.isc.hbs.edu. Version: June 15, 2010
20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Thinking Strategically

COMPETING TO BE THE BEST

COMPETING TO BE UNIQUE

The worst error in strategy is to compete with rivals on the same dimensions

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Setting the Right Financial Goals

Strategic thinking starts with setting proper financial goals for the company

The fundamental goal of a company is superior long-term return on investment Growth is good only if superiority in ROIC is achieved and sustained
ROIC threshold

Setting unrealistic profitability or growth targets can undermine strategy gy

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Economic Performance versus Shareholder Value

Economic Performance

Shareholder Value

Sustained ROIC Sustainable Revenue Growth

Stock Price EPS Multiple EPS Growth

Shareholder value is the result of creating real economic value Pleasing todays shareholders is not the goal today s

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Determinants of Superior Performance

Differentiation (Higher Price)

Competitive C titi Advantage

Lower Cost

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Competitive Advantage and the Value Chain


Firm Infrastructure
(e.g. Financing, Planning, Investor Relations)

Human Resource Management


Support Activities (e.g. Recruiting, Training, Compensation System)

Technology Development
(e.g. Product Design, Testing, Process Design, Material Research, Market Research)

M a r g

Value What buyers are willing to pay

Procurement
(e.g. Components, Machinery, Advertising, Services)

Inbound Logistics
(e.g. Incoming Material Storage, Data g , Collection, Service, Customer Access)

Operations
(e.g. Assembly, Component Fabrication, Branch Operations)

Outbound Logistics
(e.g. Order Processing, Warehousing, g, Report Preparation)

Marketing & Sales


(e.g. Sales Force, Promotion, , Advertising, Proposal Writing, Web site)

After Sales After-Sales Service


(e.g. Installation, Customer Support, pp , Complaint Resolution, Repair)

i n

Primary Activities

All competitive advantage resides in the value chain. Strategy is p g gy manifested in how activities in the value chain are configured and linked together
20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Achieving Superior Performance


Operational Effectiveness is Not Strategy

Operational Effectiveness

Strategic Positioning

Assimilating, attaining, and extending best practices

Creating a unique and sustainable competitive position

Do the same thing better

Do things differently to achieve a different purpose

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Five Tests of a Strategy

A unique value proposition compared t other organizations d to th i ti A different, tailored value chain Clear tradeoffs, and choosing what not to do Activities in the value chain that fit g together and reinforce each other Strategic continuity with continual improvement in realization

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Strategic Positioning
IKEA, Sweden
Value Proposition

Distinctive Activities
Modular, ready-to-assemble, easy to package designs In-house design of all products Wide range of styles displayed in huge warehouse stores with large on site inventories on-site Self-selection Extensive customer information in the form of catalogs, explanatory ticketing, do-it-yourself videos, and y assembly instructions Ikea designer names attached to related products to inform coordinated purchases Long hours of operation Suburban locations with large parking lots On-site, low-cost, restaurants Child care provided in the store Self-delivery by most customers

Young, first time, or price-sensitive buyers Stylish, space efficient and scalable furniture and accessories at very low price points.

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Defining the Value Proposition

What Wh t Customers?

Which Needs?

What end users? What channels?


What Relative Price?

Which products? Which features? Which services?

Premium? Discount?

A novel value proposition often expands the market

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

10

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Strategic Positioning
Nespresso
Value Proposition Distinctive Activities

Uniquely high quality, easy to prepare espresso coffee at a premium price Demanding convenience-sensitive, Demanding, con enience sensiti e affluent consumers and offices

Extra-high quality ground coffee in 16+


varieties Individually proportioned capsules for freshness and ease of use Tailored espresso machines manufactured to specifications by highend machine vendors Capsules sold only online or through about 200 coffee boutique shops in major cities, cities not in mass market food channels Uses the Nespresso Club to achieve high levels of communication with customers Focused image-oriented media image oriented advertising

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

11

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Five Tests of a Strategy

A unique value proposition compared t other organizations d to th i ti A different, tailored value chain Clear tradeoffs, and choosing what not to do Activities in the value chain that fit g together and reinforce each other Strategic continuity with continual improvement in realization

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

12

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Strategic Tradeoffs
IKEA, Sweden
IKEA
Product Low-priced, modular, ready-to-assemble designs No custom options Furniture design driven by cost, manufacturing g y , g simplicity, and style Value Chain Centralized, in-house design of all p , g products All styles on display in huge warehouse stores Large on-site inventories g Limited sales help, but extensive customer information Long hours of operation

Typical Furniture Retailer


Product Higher priced, fully assembled products Customization of fabrics, colors, finishes, and sizes Design driven by image, materials, varieties

Value Chain Source some or all lines from outside suppliers Medium sized showrooms with limited portion of available models on display Limited inventories / order with lead time Extensive sales assistance Traditional retail hours

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

13

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Mutually Reinforcing Activities


Ikea
Suburban locations with ample parking Instructions and support for customer assembly High traffic store layout Explanatory catalogs, informative displays and labels More impulse buying

Self delivery and assembly by most customers t


Increased likelihood of follow-on purchase

Limited Sales Staffing

Selfselection by customer

Ample inventory on site

Ease of transport and t t d assembly

Complete line of p furniture and accessories to furnish home

Designer identification of compatible lines Year-round Year round stocking to even out production

Modular, scalable furniture designs


Knock-down kit packaging

In-house design focused on cost of manufacturing

Low manufacturing cost


100 percent sourcing from long-term long term suppliers

High variety, but ease of manufacturing

Fit is leveraging what is different to be more different


20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

14

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Strategic Continuity
Continuity of strategy is fundamental to sustainable competitive advantage
e.g., allows the organization to understand the strategy build truly unique skills and assets related to the strategy establish a clear identity with customers, channels, and other outside entities strengthen fit across the value chain

Reinvention and frequent shifts in direction are costly and confuse the customer, the industry, and the organization

M i t i continuity i th value proposition Maintain ti it in the l iti Continuously improve ways to realize the value proposition
St t i continuity and continuous change should occur simultaneously. Th are not Strategic ti it d ti h h ld i lt l They t inconsistent

Continuity of strategy allows learning and change to be faster and more effective

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

15

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Growing Social Challenges


External pressures for corporate social responsibility continue to grow Many companies are engaged in an unprecedented range of CSR activities While the legitimacy of business continues to erode Most companies treat CSR and community issues as separate from their core business agenda Company practice in CSR leaves much room for improvement
Unfocused Reactive PR-driven Limited impact Hard to sustain

Yet concern with social issues will be a defining characteristic of the post-crisis era

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

16

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

The Boundaries of Capitalism

Company C Profitability and Growth

Social d S i l and Economic Development

Narrow cost minimization Ease of outsourcing, relocating, and globalizing Shortening time horizons Tradeoff mindset

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

17

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Sources of Competitive Advantage: New Learning


Employee Education and Skills

Poverty in aC Companys Community

Worker Safety

Environmental Impact

Company Productivity P d ti it

Gender Equity

Energy Use

Employee Health Water Use

Social deficits create economic cost External conditions shape company productivity
20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

18

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

The Concept of Shared Value


Shared Value: Corporate policies and practices that enhance the competitiveness of the company while simultaneously advancing economic and social conditions in the communities in which it operates

Fi d and expand th congruence b t Find d d the between economic and societal objectives, i d i t l bj ti rather than assume tradeoffs or the need for redistribution
Driven by value creation thinking

Shared value arises from a deeper understanding of the drivers of competitiveness and competitive advantage
The opportunities are growing

Achieving shared value requires new operating practices, new technologies, technologies and new approaches to competing

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

19

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Shared Value vs. CSR

CSR

CSV

Values: doing good Philanthropy Selfless Discretionary Agenda externally determined Separate from profit maximization Limited (CSR) budget

Value: economic and social benefits relative to cost Joint value creation Mutual benefits for the company p y Integral to competing Company specific / internally generated Integral to profit maximization Total budget

Example Fair trade

Example Transforming procurement to increase quality and yield

In either case, compliance with regulations and good corporate practice is assumed.
20
Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

Levels of Shared Value

Reconfigure the value chain using shared value to drive productivity

Create products that meet social needs

Build clusters and a supportive local external context to enhance pp productivity and create self-reinforcing economic development

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

21

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Reconstructing the Value Chain


Enhanced procurement to support vendor quality, efficiency, and price y, p realization Sourcing locally Local and small vendor development Purchasing transparency
Firm Infrastructure
(e.g. Financing, Planning, Investor Relations)

Human Resource Management


(e.g. Recruiting, Training, Compensation System)

Technology Development
(e.g. Product Design, Testing, Process Design, Material Research, Market Research)

M a r g

Procurement
(e.g. Components, Machinery, Advertising, Services)

Inbound g Logistics
(e.g. Incoming Material Storage, Data Collection, Service, Customer Access)

Operations
(e.g. Assembly, Component Fabrication, Branch Operations)

Outbound g Logistics

Marketing & Sales

After-Sales Service
(e.g. Installation, Customer Support, Complaint Resolution, Repair)

i n

Recruiting from diverse and disadvantaged communities Employee education and job training Enhancing employee health Modifying compensation and benefit practices for lower income workers Enhancing retention Process transformation

(e.g. Order (e.g. Sales Force, Processing, Promotion, Warehousing, Advertising, Report Proposal Preparation) Writing, Web site)

Limiting logistical intensity g g y and impacts

Recycling and reuse of products Remote services Packaging use and disposal Limiting logistical intensity Local channel development Marketing nutrition, safety, and low environmental impact Pricing models for lower income customers Sustainable credit policies

Local processing Limiting emissions and waste Minimizing use of hazardous materials Better energy and water use Worker safety Upskilling

The greatest opportunities for shared value are in activities most salient to a companys particular business Some opportunities will be generic to many companies, and become new best practices company s Some opportunities to create shared value will create competitive advantage and reinforce a companys strategy

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

22

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

The Social Dimension of Products


Most products and services address not just economic but social needs, such as:
Environmental impact Safety Health and nutrition Savings / sound financing Inclusion Education

There is new awareness of underserved needs in disadvantaged and developing markets


Bottom of the Pyramid Reverse product innovation

Markets are rapidly growing for social products


A new generation of social entrepreneurs are embracing market principles Corporations have largely sat on the sidelines p g y

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

23

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Creating a HealthyLocal Clusters Building Business Environment


Improving Deficits in the Business Environment
Availability of qualified human resources Access to appropriate education and training programs relevant to the business Availability of efficient logistical infrastructure Availability of credit for local organizations Local research on products and processes addressing l dd i local needs l d Local market organization and price transparency Fair local competition (e.g., the absence of trade barriers and market distortions) Regulatory structure (e.g., land use, resource use)

Context for Firm Strategy Strateg and Rivalry

Factor (Input) Conditions

Demand Conditions

Availability of capable local suppliers and support services Cooperates and business groups to enable collaboration

Related and Supporting Industries

Product standards meeting the needs of local customers Availability of local distribution channels Quality certification organizations

Deficits in the business environment create internal costs A strong local cluster enables productivity
Source: Michael Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, 1990
20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

24

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Creating Shared Value


Nestl

Nutrition

Water

Rural Development

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

25

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Adding a Social Dimension to Strategy


Customers and business partners value social performance, not just economic performance Companies can have the greatest societal impact in areas tightly connected to their business
This is where societal performance and economic p p performance intersect most closely

Societal improvements create shared value that drive the competitiveness of the business

Companies should incorporate a social dimension to their value proposition Shared value can reinforce the companys unique strategic positioning This social dimension of strategy can be more sustainable than conventional cost and quality advantages

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

26

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Shared Value and Strategic Positioning


Whole Foods Markets
Value Proposition
Natural, fresh, organic, and prepared foods and health items with excellent service at premium prices Cater to specialized nutritional requirements (gluten allergies, vegan, etc.) Educated, middle class, and affluent customers who are passionate about food and a healthy lifestyle

Distinctive Activities

Well-lit, inviting supermarket store formats with appealing displays and extensive prepared foods sections Produce section as theater Caf-style seating areas with wireless internet for meetings and meals Each store carries local produce and has the authority to contract with the local farmers. Company provides low-interest loans if needed. Microcredit in supplier communities Information and education provided to shoppers along with products High touch in-store customer service via knowledgeable, flexible, and highly motivated personnel Flat compensation structure Own seafood procurement and processing facilities to control q quality ( y (and p price) from the boat to the counter ) Heavy emphasis on environmental sustainability. Each store has green projects, directed by employees to improve environmental performance All in-store materials are biodegradable no plastic bags available and customers given discounts for reusable bags Emphasis on supporting community development

Successful future strategies will include social dimensions


20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

27

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

The Purpose of Business


There is an opportunity to transform thinking and practice about the role of the corporation in society, using the concept of shared value Shared value arises from a deeper understanding of doing business that transcends narrower conceptions of economic efficiency that have guided company operations Shared value thinking will provide new catalysts for global economic growth and the next wave of innovation and productivity in the global economy Businesses acting as businesses, not as charitable givers are arguably the businesses givers, most powerful force for addressing many pressing issues facing our society A transformation of business practice around shared value will give purpose t f ti fb i ti d h d l ill i to the corporation and to capitalism itself, and represents our best chance to legitimize business again

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

28

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Strategy in Economic Downturns


Create a positive agenda Refocus on strategy Return to economic fundamentals Downsize to a strategy, not across the board Do not overreact to distressed industry conditions Use the downturn to get things done that would be more difficult in normal times Position for long term economic performance, not near term stock price S i opportunities f di Seize t iti for discontinuities which are more lik l t emerge ti iti hi h likely to

Strategy is more important in downturns, not less


20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

29

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Backup

20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

30

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

Mutually Reinforcing Activities


Ikea
Ample inventory on site Suburban or high-access locations High traffic store layout
Large stores with ample parking Self delivery by most customers

Limited instore sales help Year round Year-round stocking to even out production
Self-selection by y the customer In-house design of product families

Designer identification of compatible lines

100 percent sourcing from long-term long term suppliers

Low manufacturing costs

Modular, design approach with attractive styles and materials

High variety, but ease of manufacturing

Fit is leveraging what is different to be more different


20100616 MadridExpomanagement.ppt

31

Copyright 2010 Professor Michael E. Porter

You might also like