Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Contents
1. Worldwide Nuclear Power Development 2. Nuclear Power Development in Malaysia & TNB 3. Malaysia Nuclear Power Roadmap 4. Introduction to Nuclear Energy 5. References
104
100
80
60
59
55 27 20 19
40
20
18
17
15
11
10
USA
France
Japan
Russia
Korea
EPR
ST-LAURENT
58 PWR units
CHINON CIVAUX
LE BLAYAIS GOLFECH
Connection to the grid : Unit 1 (Fessenheim 1) : April 1977 Unit 58 (Civaux 2) : December 1999
May 2006 : EDF announced the decision to build a first EPR in France (Flamanville)
Ulchin 8 units
In operation
20 units
(17,716 MW)
Wolsong 6 units
Kori 8 units
Seoul
Under planning
(15,400 MW)
Yong-gwang 6 units
10 units
Muria Site
Source: Country Report Indonesia (B. Suprawoto, Q. Romandhi, M. Hasan), KNPEI, Busan, RoK, 2005.
Source : EGAT, 2009 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP09)
10
11
1 4 5 7 8 10 17 19 59
1 1 2 6 11 17 20 55
1 1 2 5 6 3 2
2 2 2 18 104
1 2 1 2 4 5 6 15 31
439
7 2
35
319
12
Fuel Methane, CH4 Propane, C3H8 Octane, C8H18 Ethanol, C2H5OH Glucose, C6H12O6 Coal, C96H135O9NS Hydrogen, H2 (for combustion) Uranium-235
Specific Energy, kJ/g. 50.7 46.0 41.2 27.8 15.6 ~30 249 90,000,000
Source: IAEA
Full production chain from uranium mining to waste disposal (cradle to grave) for nuclear power only produced 1-6 gram of carbon per kilowatt-hour
13
Type of Power Plant Coal Fuel Oil Natural Gas (Combined Cycle) Nuclear (fission) Thermonuclear (fusion) Solar
Fuel for 1,000 MWe for 1 year 2 x 106 tonnes of coal 1.96 x 109 of gallons oil 87.6 x 109 scf of gas 30 tonnes of uranium 0.6 tonnes of tritium/hydrogen 100 km2 area 3,000 x 1 MWe wind turbine 30,000 km2 of plantation area 16,100 km2 of corn 800 x 106 chicken
Source: IAEA
14
15
Resource basis for 1000 MWe 100 km2 @10% efficiency 3,000 wind turbines @ 1 MW each with 33% capacity factor 6,200 km2 of sugar beets 7,400 km2 of potatoes 16,000 km2 of corn 272,000 km2 of wheat 24,000 km2 of rapeseed 30,000 km2 of wood < 1 km2
16
0.4
0.001
0.0002
About 2.4 mSv/year (world average) of natural radiation exposure >> 0.05 mSv/year of targeted radiation level around NPP
17
Capacity Factor
(%) 100 80 60
40 20
93.3
``
KOREA
USA
France
1.5
KOREA
USA
France
Japan
18
71.1 Sales Price in KOREA (US/kWh), KPX in 2007 10.4 10.7 11.7
3.9
Nuclear
4.1
6.5
9.4
Hydro
LNG
Wind
Oil
Solar
178% rise
150
50
19
Cost Analysis
(NT$/KWH) 2008 2.25 3.60 5 1 0 1 0 . . . . . 0 8 6 3 5 6 7 2 4 9 2007 1.79 3.32 3 1 0 1 0 . . . . . 7 1 6 2 6 2 8 3 8 6
NT$ / KWH
Kuosheng (Taiwan NPP) has maintained a low generation cost (around 2 US cents / kWh)
20
21
8,000 6,000
8,019
4,000
2,000 0
Australia Taiwan Japan Singapore South Korea
Malaysia
Romania
China
Source: Key World Energy Statistics, 2008 and The World Fact Book, 2009
22
23
24
25
29 April 2008: TNB Board approved the setting-up of 3 teams/committees: 1. Nuclear Energy Taskforce 2. Nuclear Interest Group 3. External Nuclear Advisory Panel 29 August 2008: TNB Board agreed to rename 1. Nuclear Energy Taskforce Nuclear Energy Unit 2. Nuclear Interest Group Nuclear Pre-Project Team, and 3. RM2 million budget in FY2008/09 was also approved to carry out a list of proposed planning and preparatory activities. 09 September 2008: TNB gave approval to engage CRA International for a White Paper on Nuclear Roadmap for Malaysia. This 2nd White Paper complements the 1st White Paper on Long Term Energy Security (Options) prepared by Planning Division.
26
Legal & Regulatory Fwork Licensing Communication/ Public Acceptance Siting Emergency Planning EIA/RIA
Technology Assessment
Safety, Security & Safeguard (3S) Issues Engineering Quality Assurance Pre-operation Tests Grid Connection
27
Siting Study
GAD
Stakeholder Mgt. & Communication Strategy
TNBR
Economic & System Analyses
System Planning
Legal Dept.
Legal & Regulatory Framework (Act 304) Legal related matters
Finance Dept.
Funding and Financial Analysis
HRM Dept.
Manpower Development Subject Matter Experts Safety (OSHA) Training
UNITEN
Nuclear education
Nuclear Energy Unit Collaboration With Other TNB Departments (Nuclear Pre-Project Team)
Nuclear Energy Unit also acts as a one-stop centre to coordinate with TNB internal Departments and collaborate with external parties on nuclear matters
28
REGIONAL
Asia Nuclear Safety Network (ANSN) HAPUA HR WG8 (Nuclear Power) Forum for Nuclear Cooperation in Asia (FNCA)
Nuclear Energy Unit also acts as a one-stop Centre to coordinate with TNB internal Departments and collaborate with external parties on nuclear matters
INTERNATIONAL
IAEA
KEPCO/TEPCO
29
2008: TNB Management gave approval to engage CRA International for a White Paper on Nuclear Roadmap for Malaysia. This 2nd White Paper complements the 1st White Paper prepared by Planning Division with assistance of CRA. TNB Research commenced NPP Site Survey (desktop study) to develop NPP Siting Methodology and its application to identify potential NPP sites in Peninsular Malaysia in December 2008. The study has completed in July 2009. Next plan: appointment of a reputable foreign consultant for site selection and qualification and choose the preferred NPP site(s). 2009: TNB Management gave approval to collaborate with KEPCO to undertake a Nuclear Preliminary Feasibility Study. TNB has MOU with KEPCO and nuclear power development is one of agreed areas of cooperation. Agreement between TNB and KEPCO was signed in June 2009. The 12-month Pre-FS collaboration is expected to end in June 2010.
30
44,000 MW
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
27,000 MW
15,000
10,000
5,000
14,000 MW
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2007 Adopted Forecast 2008 TNB E-Council LOW 2008 Government 2008 TNB E-Council MOD 2008 Published Sources 2008 TNB E-Council HIGH
31
35% 18,000
30% 16,000 25% 14,000 12,000 10,000 2009 2011 2013 2014 Capacity with Bakun (MW) Peak Demand (MW) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 Capacity without Bakun (MW) Reserve Margin (%) 20% 15% 10%
32
Year
Accumulated Peak Installed Demand Capacity (MW) (MW) 14,291 19,380 24,023 10,673 13,809 16,132
33
The pattern/shape of the demand has a significant impact on the technology selection Different technologies have different technical and economic characteristics and operational capabilities
14 12
14 12
Served by high-cost generators (e.g., gas turbines), also hydro
8 6 4 2 0 Jan
Sort highest to lowest
10
10 8 6 4 2 0
0 1460 2920 4380 5840 7300 8760
Served by medium-cost flexible generators (e.g., coal, combined cycles) Served by low-cost base load generators (e.g. nuclear)
34
BASE LOAD
DEMAND
35
* Preliminary figures
36
200000
Post 2020
HISTORICAL PROJECTION
Nuclear Sarawak Import Bakun
150000
100000
Coal
50000
Natural Gas
Oil
Peninsular Hydro
19 7 19 6 7 19 8 8 19 0 8 19 2 8 19 4 8 19 6 8 19 8 9 19 0 9 19 2 9 19 4 9 19 6 9 20 8 0 20 0 0 20 2 0 20 4 0 20 6 0 20 8 1 20 0 1 20 2 1 20 4 1 20 6 1 20 8 2 20 0 2 20 2 2 20 4 2 20 6 2 20 8 30
37
Coal 29%
Hydro/RE 30%
Coal 30%
2015 to 2020:
Bakun 800/1000MW in 2015 and second 800/1000MW in 2017. Another 1000MW import from Sarawak in 2019 Gas to the power sector to be maintained at 1,350 mmscfd for the entire period No new coal plants, annual coal import contained at 20 million tonnes Remaining Peninsula hydro to be developed
38
Possible Solutions
Further gas resource development from marginal fields and import of gas from Indonesia, JDA, etc. Reconsideration of benefits & costs of future piped gas export to Singapore More sustainable basis for allocating gas for power & non-power sectors Leverage on LNG terminals being built by Thailand and Singapore Development of LNG regas terminal in Pen. Malaysia Remove subsidy gradually
Source : PETRONAS
38
Source: NEB 2007
39
Possible Solutions
Continuous strategic coal procurement Diversification to other sources of generation Strategic investment in coal mines Use of advanced technology e.g. CCS, IGCC in the longer term Coal Market Prices
2007 2008
NEWC
Coal
RB
210.00 200.00 190.00 180.00 170.00 160.00 150.00 140.00 130.00 120.00 110.00 100.00 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00
2006
JPU
K1 (5900 GAR)
K2 (5000 GAR)
6/1/2006
7/1/2006
8/1/2006
9/1/2006
1/1/2007
2/1/2007
3/1/2007
4/1/2007
5/1/2007
6/1/2007
7/1/2007
8/1/2007
9/1/2007
1/1/2008
2/1/2008
3/1/2008
4/1/2008
5/1/2008
6/1/2008
7/1/2008
8/1/2008
9/1/2008
1/1/2009
10/1/2006
11/1/2006
12/1/2006
10/1/2007
11/1/2007
12/1/2007
10/1/2008
11/1/2008
Date
12/1/2008
2/1/2009
40
Possible Solutions
Developing Hulu Terengganu (250 MW) and Ulu Jelai (372 MW) to commission in 2013/2014 To develop multi purpose scheme of Lebir and Nenggiri for flood mitigation, power, etc. To systematically develop the remainder hydros
41
Possible Solutions
Systematic promotion with proper policy and incentives for viability Focus on developing mini-hydro, solar, biomass and biogas Need feed-in tariff Landfill
Approx. RM 1.50/kWh
42
REGULATORY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION WORKING COMMITTEE Atomic Energy Licensing Board (AELB) & Energy Commission (EC)
Source: Nuclear Malaysia - TNBR Report, 2009
43
44
No. (i)
(ii)
Comprehensive Feasibility Study: Feasibility Public Acceptance National Industry Preparedness Technology Development Plan National Human Capital Readiness Determination of Nuclear Power Plant Location(s) Dissemination of Public Information
(ii)
IAEA MILESTONE
Nuclear power option Included within the national Energy strategy MILESTONE 1 Ready to make a knowledgeable commitment To a nuclear programme MILESTONE 2 Ready to invite bids for the first NPP MILESTONE 3 Ready to commission and Operate the first NPP
45
PHASE 3 PHASE 2 Activities to implement a first NPP PHASE 1 Preparatory work for the Construction of NPP after A policy decision has been taken
Pre-project
Construction
Operation/decommissioning Commissioning
?10-15 years
Source : IAEA TECDOC 1555 Managing the First Nuclear Power Plant Project.
46
MILESTONE 1
Ready to make commitment to a nuclear
MILESTONE 2
Ready to invite bids for the first NPP
MILESTONE 3
Ready to commission and operate first NPP
PHASE 0
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
Preparatory work for construction of a NPP after a policy decision has been taken
Pre-policy
Pre-project
Project definition
Construction
Ops
Policy decision
Procurement process
Commissioning
2009
2013
Investment analyses
2016
2018
2025
46